Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4927GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303) 945-8212 County Road 313, Silt, CO N: 04927 JobAddress ----------------------------------'--------- Nature of Work __ _,B""u"'i"'l"'-d,,_i=-n=.....:;.P:;ec::r.::m:::i:.ot:__ _____________________________ _ Use of Building __ _,S::.:l.::e. n:!!g2.:10.'.e:;___'.F:;:a~m:;i:::l:,>Y'._'.:Dw~e::'.1::'.l::'.i:'.:n:§g~U.'.'.n::'.:i..'.:t_:'..w!.../::::S~i.n~g:'.:_l'.:'.e_G~a:r~a:g~e:_ ______________ _ Owner -----~E~d•~·~ar~d~E~·-~~~_,s~l~1i~r~l~e~y"._'.J~.'......-'.S~m~i~t~h'------------------------ An.aunt of Permit: $ ----'!:9-"1;_7_._.,,,o"-9-=~=--­ Permit: 555.81 White-Treas. Canary -Office Pink-Applicant Gold -Duplicate IJlan ~ 361.28 Date: October 12, 1993 S. Archuleta Clerk ; ~ :.::->.i' ~-... ' GARFIELD COUNTY APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PEHMIT PERMIT NUMBER #27 DATE /tJ-/;?-73 p.Iease print or type • • "' 0 ... u ;;i ~ z 0 u TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT Nl!ME _ __,0:.LJ-W"'-"!f'L,8"'-~r"c· ------·-------- ADD.RESS rITY _______ _ ]PHONE LICENSE # CLASS OF WOPJ( NEf~ -~Y,._ __ ALTERATION --·--ADDITION ___ _ DEl<JOLISH ____ REPAIR !40VE MOBILE HO/IE (make/model) S .P. OF BUILDING n2..:? O ¥ S .F. OF (;Jf Ul'Ct-C-S" # OF FLOORS HEIGHT # OF FAMILY UNITS # OF BE . S -~3'~-- Il/TEllDED USE OF BUILDING 0aoa; /"4-. GARAGE: SING LEX;. DBL_ CARPORT: sni6£E_ DBL FLREPLACE _ti . .<2.<'::J.'----------------- DOCUMENTS ATTACHED WATER SUPPLY -~b~l~ec...LILI ____________ _ DRIFEflAY PERMIT _,awt~fi.u.a.""-'C!;,.,hruc:Jd:2__ ________ _ SITE PLAN tJ., Tfa. ,; I, 1:.d BUILDING PLANS -"a,~tfu_aa.,-,_h.,,_,1c.ef2L---------­ SAll ITARY SEWER CLEARANCE ON SI2'E SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT ®t;(.3<.,,/. .../ ___ _ OTHER DOCUMENTS (specify) PLOT PLAN 1VOTE: Show easements, _property line dimensions, all other structures, specify north, and street name. F'or odd shaped lots, or i.f space is too smal_l ,.-_provide separate plot plan. # OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL -~()"'------­ USE OF' BUII,DINGS NOvi ON PARCEL FRONT PROPERTY LINE • I hereby ac.knowledge that I have read this application and the above is correct and I agree to comp.Iy with all county ordinances and state lar1rs regulating building construction ~, '/.., f/~,, ;:!£, s;t2 'f/9,? SIGN~- FOH OFFICE USE ONLY Vl!LU;1TION 'iii! foz -;;;.:;; PERMIT FEE $ ss!J: &-!PLAN CHECK FEE $ 3i:;;. 2-S- TOTAL FEE $ 71z,or SCHOOL INPACT FEE$ ;?M.00 DATE PERMIT ISSUED ___ _ ZOl1fI1'lG DISTRICT --------- TYPE OF OCCUPANCY _,f2'-"-_-~J<---------­ TYPE OF CONSTRUCT.WI/ JZ:-/V. S .F. OF BUILDING ,2"-/'f"t:° S .F. OF LOT MAX. HEIGHT SC""9<'."«.>@2"1'' ROAD CLASS. ___ _ SETB11CKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: FRONT :5 / 0 0 ' ,_ REAR l/ /0 Cl , r RIGHT£ J! C!O' 7_ LEFT W ,2. L_. OFF STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED APPROT,lED: /0-/0'f.J DATE FWOD HAZARD CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVATION ----------- SPECIAL CONDITIONS PROBLEMS f'7ITH PERMIT ADDITIO~AL INFORMATION NEEDED --------- CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURFEYOR OR ENGINEER ·----~· PLANNING DEPARTMENT j'if ;:: I ;~Zifun t-1.'J, . IDJanuary 30, 1994 ; ;~.11.i:i<: ,. ~ Ed and Shirley Smith -..nnrkLD COUNTY #65 Hideaway Circle Road Evergreen, CO 80439 ---{ 303) 674-5331 Garfield County Building Department Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Gentlemen: Enclosed are two copies of thee Soils analysis for the building permit requirement. Enclosed are two copies of the SP2W for the basement wall with clarification on drainage of the footer and wall. These items were reviewed with Daniel E. Hardin,P.E. who did the soils analysis and he agreed with what we are doing. Enclosed are two copies of SPBASMNT that shows the drain line and increase in the center post pads. The 3000 psf rating of the soil is sufficient for the pads, but the smaller pads had a higher loading and could potentially have a different increment of settling than the walls. This was reviewed by Daniel E. Hardin,P.E. who did the soils analysis and he agreed with what we are doing. / y .. o .. ;i.E.§ ;.-t71 ~· .... "" ... A/ . -x?2 1;17c~ .. "'"/ ·Edward E. Smith SPRUCE GULCH SOLAR CABIN East Divide Creek, Silt, CO EDWARD E. and SHIRLEY J. SMITH #65 Hideaway Circle Road ·Evergreen, CO 80439 phone (303) 674-5331 * APPROVED SUB.JECT .-. -··: .-;·;co llCEPnm:~:: ,, : ' .cCTION~ GARF>' i ' ' 'urrrY '.BUIL~:Jr;:, -... --.--.··-~-'.\TM' ' Date 10:,~0,~Yj _· _ . __ ,,Jl f ,,_.,, .. .' ' '-'· I NO INSP~Cliv 1; WITHOllf' . THESE PLANS ON SITf r.ce_..:::::-oir::== X-cof//?!_FI0!-'/9C :-' r'O!J 0(JTl9//"/rC 11 so'tt-> f1F'/L-f5"15' l'f/./_,:l ClT/hVt fl4tJ f(/C-vr:CI() 1"011-cf· ' HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. November 2, 1993 Ed and Shirley Smith #65 Hideaway Circle Road Evergreen, Colorado 80439 7B40 Highway 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 303 945-8454 Phone 303 945-7988 Job No. 193 239 Subject: · Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, 5 Miles up County Road 313 (Divide Road), Silt, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smith: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on October 21, 1993 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The fmdings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you, dated October 20, 1993. The proposed 2200 square foot residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a basement level. The foundation will consist of wood foundation walls on concrete footings. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level from 1 to 8 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The materials exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of weathered claystone/siltstone bedrock. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on Fig. 1, indicate the claystone has low compressibility under light loading and a minor expansion potential when wetted .. The claystone was moderately compressible under increased loading after wetting. No free water was observed in the excavation. The weathered bedrock was slightly moist to moist. Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural weathered bedrock designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf should be adequate for support of the proposed residence. There may be sorrie potential for heave if the bearing materials become wetted. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed bedrock encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footings extended down to the undisturbed natural subgrade. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Three feet of cover is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site well-broken bedrock backfill. A lower lateral pressure based on 35 pcf equivalent fluid unit can be used for free- draining screened rock wall backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided Ed and Shirley Smith November 2, 1993 Page 2 to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the walls and prevent wetting of the lower level. The floor slab should be constructed independent of the remaining structure to allow for some heave due to wetting of the subgrade. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the materials exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that materials beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. DEH/ro Attachment H-P GEOTECH " ... ' c 0 V) c "' 0. >< w c 0 .~ 1 VJ VJ (j) '-~ 2 0 u 3 4 0. 1 i 93 239 . Moisture Content -10 percent Dry Unit Weight • .121 pct sample oi: .weathered c 1 aystone . bedrock From: Footing grade southwest buildinq corner ' ~ ~]' ""' ~ '" " J 11 p \_ Expansion Upon l~ett i og I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -kst HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1 GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, !NC. November 2, 1993 Ed and Shirley Smith #65 Hideaway Circle Road Evergreen, Colorado 80439 7840 Highway 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 303 945-8454 Phone 303 945-7988 Job No. 193 239 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, 5 Miles up County Road 313 (Divide Road), Silt, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smith: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on October 21, 1993 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you, dated October 20, 1993. The proposed 2200 square foot residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a basement level. The foundation will consist of wood foundation walls on concrete footings. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level from 1 to 8 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The materials exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of weathered claystone/siltstone bedrock. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on Fig. 1, indicate the claystone has low compressibility under light loading and a minor expansion potential when wetted. The claystone was moderately compressible under increased loading after wetting. No free water was observed in the excavation. The weathered bedrock was slightly moist to moist. Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural weathered bedrock designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf should be adequate for support of the proposed residence. There may be some potential for heave if the bearing materials become wetted. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed bedrock encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footings extended down to the undisturbed natural sub grade. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Three feet of cover is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site well-broken bedrock backfill. A lower lateral pressure based on 35 pcf equivalent fluid unit can be used for free- draining screened rock wall backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided Ed and Shirley Smith November 2, 1993 Page 2 to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the walls and prevent wetting of the lower level. The floor slab should be constructed independent of the remaining structure to allow for some heave due to wetting of the subgrade. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the materials exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that materials beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us kuow. Sincerely, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. DEH/ro Attachment H-P GEOTECH -------------------------. Moisture Content = 10 percent Dry Unit Weight= _121 pc! Sample oi: weathered claystone ' bedrock c:: From: Footing grade southwest 0 huildina corner ·-V1 c:: "' c. >< lJ.J 0 ..., --ri~ c:: 0 1 ·- ""' ~' V1 V1 QJ '-c. 2 ) ' E l\p 0 ~ u -I -I ' 3 ...._ Expansion Upon _ \fott i og 4 I I I I I I I I 11 I 11 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. i 193 239 GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. • • • PROTECTIVE E'OAK.J OR FL,"SHih\: ./ GR."VEL ALONG 1H.".LL FOR DRAINAGE 1/2' AtKHOR SOL TD E' 4' OC !-II-JC COATED TREATED SILL FLA-:-S '1" PE.~i'"ORA TED DRAH,FJ:::>.:: 2X5 12 CCl~TF::CL A.IKHOI< 1/2" ;/AFER BOARD i PN2TIC.".L BOARD ~=='==~3§/~'=··=T~<~G5'P~LYWOOD :u:::~f<TJI Z.J" OC i.~ "· ~XB or·J 12" CEIHERS u1,··~ERGROUt<D Tl<EATED WO'J') 1/2" PLY\>IOOD Ul..JDERGROUt·IDI TREA-:-r·E:'}IT ALL CUTS TO B<:: TRE~.TED \.IU:TH FRESERVATI\/E ~JAil_S .".PPROVED F"OR H'EATIL' LUl-'ISER Ir..JSTALLATIOl·I LE,\VE 1/6" GAP -"LL EC:·GES SEAL W 5ILICOl'·IE I1%Lll_ATION EEThlEEI'·! STUDS Vi:E55URE-TRt:,". TED WOOD FRAl-IE FOUi"DATION WALL :!_/2" WATER RESISTANT 5HEETROO:: -~1/2" X 4" PRESSURE TP.EAl]EC• PLYWOOD ~·I" SLAB WITH l<ELDED WIRE i·IESH V."POR f?ETA .. '2DER. ..l ,~ ----------~-FILL DIRT THIS M2E." --......._2" D~ilIN HOLES ON B FT, SPACir·~G FOOTER 9 ., ~: 16" ED E SHIRLEY SMITH #65 HIDEAWAY CR RD SCALE 1" 1'6" EVERG~EEN, CO 80439 • • • MINIMUM CLEARANCE-,i.r L._l\'ri::~3 1 4 CDA 9 1/2 -~HORIZONTAL! FACE uRAlt~ SLOPE GROl.J'NO AWAY FROM WALL --......_ -\ CLOSURE SETl<!::=.N .JOISTS '..., SEE T .JI rlM<UAL FOR ADDITI NAL INFO " J./2" ANCHOR SOLTD ~ 4•· OC Zit.JC COATED TREATED SILL PLATE 4 ·• PERFORATED D~AINPIPE ~ COLJRSE GRAVEL ii I \·DOUBLE 2X8 HEAC1ER ~XB ON .12" CENTERS UNGERG'20UND TREATED WOOD E MIL POL YETMYLEl"IE MEMBR ME --..__...__~1/2" PLYWOOD UNDERGROUND TREATMEIH ALL CUTS TO BE TRE:A TED W TH PRE SERVA T!VE NllILS llPPROVED FOR TREAT 0 LUMSER INSTALLATIOI~ LEA'/E 1/8" GAP ALL EDGES SEAL W SILICONE ltJSULA TION EET>JEEN STUDS PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD FRAC1E FOUNDATION IJALL .!./2 h'ATEJ< RESISTANT SHE~ROC~ ........----112 x "'i PRESSLJRE TREA D PLYWOOD _,,_ SLAB WITH WELDED WI MESH VAPOR RETARDER FILL DIRT THIS. ARE-' 2·· DRAIN HOLES ON 8 FT. S?,ICHIG FOOTER !3" X lE" 5P21Ai SCALE 1" 1'6" ED E SHIRLEY SMITH #65 HIDEAWAY CR RD EVERGREEN, CO 80439 • /LEAVE ENO TO OPEN FOP. INSPECTION \ ' COVER ENJ WITH SCREEN TO KEEP OUT VERMINE <E;--SlCPE DOWN 1/8" PER 12" USE Gl<'AVEL ALO'-IG WALL A1'D DRAIN Fa<: WATER DRAINAG£ UP STAIRS l THIS DRAWING HAS INCREASE IN SIZE OF CENTER FOOTER PADS AND AT FIREPLACE TO MAKE A MORE EVEN LOAD DISTRIBUTION ON SOIL AS SUGGESTEED BY DANIEL HARDIN P.E. • . WHO DID SOIL ANYALSIS. REST OF BASEMENT PLAN HE VERBALY OKAYED. w __________ .;<_ • SPalCE GULCH SOLAR CABIN EAST DIVIDE CR. SILT, CD SPBASMNT ED < SHIJ<LEY SMITH BASEt'ENT FL~ SCALE 1" =6' •6~ HIDEAWAY CT! la) E:VERG12EEN, co_ 80439 (303) 674-5331 • . / IS ~RECTION RECORD '~;, Zoning Roof Covering _; :·-I)'#, Footing -:> .. : ;f,'. ·!#'I' '1.k'f!!,'e.A ·.~ ;i'~'l-os Plumbing-Undergrotind/p'f-.ft . r' · . ~AJ1-· .. • '·e4o Foundation ' . :J ! i ,-· . ' . ' ,_' " ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE,NS,J,:cr.io ANi)~PROVED BEFORt'covERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EX1ER!Oll., UNDEROOOUND OR ABOVE GR.OUND . . "' "· -'" ··:· . ' Certificate of Occupancy No. 4571 Building Department Garfield County, Colorado No cllange in the character of occupancy of a building shall be made without a Certificate of Occupancy-(UBC Sec. 109.1) This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 109 .3 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance, this structure was in compliance with the various codes adopted by the County regulating building construction or use for the following: Use Classification S"ingJe family w/ garage Building Pennit No. __ 4~9~2~7 ________ _ Type of Construction_~v_-_N _____ Zone District Owner of Building Edward & Shi.rley Smith Address 5232 County Road 313 Silt, Co. Building Address 5232 eountv Road 313 Silt, Co. Locality (East Divide Creek) Address_same~aa;ss...<a"''~""'e"'r'----------- Date January 16, 2003 Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy shall not be construed as an appro,•al of a violation of the provisio11s of this code or of other resolutions of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other resolutions of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. (UBC Sec.109.1).