HomeMy WebLinkAbout4927GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8th Street Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(303) 945-8212
County Road 313, Silt, CO
N: 04927
JobAddress ----------------------------------'---------
Nature of Work __ _,B""u"'i"'l"'-d,,_i=-n=.....:;.P:;ec::r.::m:::i:.ot:__ _____________________________ _
Use of Building __ _,S::.:l.::e. n:!!g2.:10.'.e:;___'.F:;:a~m:;i:::l:,>Y'._'.:Dw~e::'.1::'.l::'.i:'.:n:§g~U.'.'.n::'.:i..'.:t_:'..w!.../::::S~i.n~g:'.:_l'.:'.e_G~a:r~a:g~e:_ ______________ _
Owner -----~E~d•~·~ar~d~E~·-~~~_,s~l~1i~r~l~e~y"._'.J~.'......-'.S~m~i~t~h'------------------------
An.aunt of Permit: $ ----'!:9-"1;_7_._.,,,o"-9-=~=--
Permit: 555.81
White-Treas.
Canary -Office
Pink-Applicant
Gold -Duplicate
IJlan ~ 361.28
Date: October 12, 1993
S. Archuleta
Clerk
; ~
:.::->.i'
~-... ' GARFIELD COUNTY
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PEHMIT
PERMIT NUMBER #27
DATE /tJ-/;?-73 p.Iease print or type
• •
"' 0 ... u
;;i
~ z
0 u
TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT
Nl!ME _ __,0:.LJ-W"'-"!f'L,8"'-~r"c· ------·--------
ADD.RESS
rITY _______ _
]PHONE LICENSE #
CLASS OF WOPJ(
NEf~ -~Y,._ __ ALTERATION --·--ADDITION ___ _
DEl<JOLISH ____ REPAIR !40VE
MOBILE HO/IE (make/model)
S .P. OF BUILDING n2..:? O ¥ S .F. OF (;Jf Ul'Ct-C-S"
# OF FLOORS HEIGHT
# OF FAMILY UNITS # OF BE . S -~3'~--
Il/TEllDED USE OF BUILDING 0aoa; /"4-.
GARAGE: SING LEX;. DBL_ CARPORT: sni6£E_ DBL
FLREPLACE _ti . .<2.<'::J.'-----------------
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
WATER SUPPLY -~b~l~ec...LILI ____________ _
DRIFEflAY PERMIT _,awt~fi.u.a.""-'C!;,.,hruc:Jd:2__ ________ _
SITE PLAN tJ., Tfa. ,; I, 1:.d
BUILDING PLANS -"a,~tfu_aa.,-,_h.,,_,1c.ef2L---------
SAll ITARY SEWER CLEARANCE
ON SI2'E SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT ®t;(.3<.,,/. .../ ___ _
OTHER DOCUMENTS (specify)
PLOT PLAN
1VOTE: Show easements, _property line dimensions,
all other structures, specify north, and street
name. F'or odd shaped lots, or i.f space is
too smal_l ,.-_provide separate plot plan.
# OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL -~()"'------
USE OF' BUII,DINGS NOvi ON PARCEL
FRONT PROPERTY LINE •
I hereby ac.knowledge that I have read this
application and the above is correct and I
agree to comp.Iy with all county ordinances
and state lar1rs regulating building construction
~, '/.., f/~,, ;:!£, s;t2 'f/9,? SIGN~-
FOH OFFICE USE ONLY
Vl!LU;1TION 'iii! foz -;;;.:;;
PERMIT FEE $ ss!J: &-!PLAN CHECK FEE $ 3i:;;. 2-S-
TOTAL FEE $ 71z,or SCHOOL INPACT FEE$ ;?M.00
DATE PERMIT ISSUED ___ _
ZOl1fI1'lG DISTRICT ---------
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY _,f2'-"-_-~J<---------
TYPE OF CONSTRUCT.WI/ JZ:-/V.
S .F. OF BUILDING ,2"-/'f"t:° S .F. OF LOT
MAX. HEIGHT SC""9<'."«.>@2"1'' ROAD CLASS. ___ _
SETB11CKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: FRONT :5 / 0 0 ' ,_
REAR l/ /0 Cl , r RIGHT£ J! C!O' 7_ LEFT W ,2. L_.
OFF STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
APPROT,lED: /0-/0'f.J
DATE
FWOD HAZARD
CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVATION -----------
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
PROBLEMS f'7ITH PERMIT
ADDITIO~AL INFORMATION NEEDED ---------
CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURFEYOR
OR ENGINEER ·----~·
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
j'if ;:: I ;~Zifun
t-1.'J, . IDJanuary 30, 1994
; ;~.11.i:i<: ,. ~ Ed and Shirley Smith
-..nnrkLD COUNTY #65 Hideaway Circle Road
Evergreen, CO 80439
---{ 303) 674-5331
Garfield County Building Department
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Gentlemen:
Enclosed are two copies of thee Soils analysis for the building
permit requirement.
Enclosed are two copies of the SP2W for the basement wall with
clarification on drainage of the footer and wall. These items were
reviewed with Daniel E. Hardin,P.E. who did the soils analysis and he
agreed with what we are doing.
Enclosed are two copies of SPBASMNT that shows the drain line and
increase in the center post pads. The 3000 psf rating of the soil is
sufficient for the pads, but the smaller pads had a higher loading
and could potentially have a different increment of settling than the
walls. This was reviewed by Daniel E. Hardin,P.E. who did the soils
analysis and he agreed with what we are doing.
/
y .. o .. ;i.E.§ ;.-t71 ~· .... "" ... A/ . -x?2 1;17c~ .. "'"/
·Edward E. Smith
SPRUCE GULCH SOLAR CABIN
East Divide Creek, Silt, CO
EDWARD E. and SHIRLEY J. SMITH
#65 Hideaway Circle Road
·Evergreen, CO 80439
phone (303) 674-5331 * APPROVED
SUB.JECT .-. -··: .-;·;co
llCEPnm:~:: ,, : ' .cCTION~
GARF>' i ' ' 'urrrY
'.BUIL~:Jr;:, -... --.--.··-~-'.\TM' ' Date 10:,~0,~Yj _· _ . __ ,,Jl
f ,,_.,, .. .' ' '-'· I NO INSP~Cliv 1; WITHOllf'
. THESE PLANS ON SITf r.ce_..:::::-oir::==
X-cof//?!_FI0!-'/9C :-' r'O!J 0(JTl9//"/rC
11 so'tt-> f1F'/L-f5"15' l'f/./_,:l ClT/hVt
fl4tJ f(/C-vr:CI() 1"011-cf·
'
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
November 2, 1993
Ed and Shirley Smith
#65 Hideaway Circle Road
Evergreen, Colorado 80439
7B40 Highway 82
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax 303 945-8454
Phone 303 945-7988
Job No. 193 239
Subject: · Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, 5 Miles
up County Road 313 (Divide Road), Silt, Colorado.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smith:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the
subject site on October 21, 1993 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support.
The fmdings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are
presented in this report. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for
geotechnical engineering services to you, dated October 20, 1993.
The proposed 2200 square foot residence will be a two story wood frame structure
over a basement level. The foundation will consist of wood foundation walls on
concrete footings.
At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level
from 1 to 8 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The materials exposed in the
bottom of the excavation consisted of weathered claystone/siltstone bedrock. Results
of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on
Fig. 1, indicate the claystone has low compressibility under light loading and a minor
expansion potential when wetted .. The claystone was moderately compressible under
increased loading after wetting. No free water was observed in the excavation. The
weathered bedrock was slightly moist to moist.
Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed
construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural weathered bedrock
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf should be adequate for
support of the proposed residence. There may be sorrie potential for heave if the
bearing materials become wetted. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches
for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed bedrock
encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed
and the footings extended down to the undisturbed natural subgrade. Exterior footings
should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost
protection. Three feet of cover is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation
walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by
assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as
retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an
equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site well-broken bedrock backfill.
A lower lateral pressure based on 35 pcf equivalent fluid unit can be used for free-
draining screened rock wall backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided
Ed and Shirley Smith
November 2, 1993
Page 2
to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the walls and prevent
wetting of the lower level. The floor slab should be constructed independent of the
remaining structure to allow for some heave due to wetting of the subgrade. Backfill
placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent
ponding within at least 10 feet of the building.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the
materials exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface
exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation
influence. This study is based on the assumption that materials beneath the footings
have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement
may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the
subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the
subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible
the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations
contained in this letter.
If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
DEH/ro
Attachment
H-P GEOTECH
" ...
'
c
0
V)
c
"' 0. >< w
c
0
.~ 1
VJ
VJ
(j)
'-~ 2
0 u
3
4
0. 1
i 93 239
.
Moisture Content -10 percent
Dry Unit Weight • .121 pct
sample oi: .weathered c 1 aystone
. bedrock
From: Footing grade southwest
buildinq corner
' ~ ~]'
""' ~ '" " J 11 p \_
Expansion
Upon l~ett i og
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I I
1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -kst
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1 GEOTECHNICAL, Inc.
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, !NC.
November 2, 1993
Ed and Shirley Smith
#65 Hideaway Circle Road
Evergreen, Colorado 80439
7840 Highway 82
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax 303 945-8454
Phone 303 945-7988
Job No. 193 239
Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, 5 Miles
up County Road 313 (Divide Road), Silt, Colorado.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smith:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the
subject site on October 21, 1993 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support.
The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are
presented in this report. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for
geotechnical engineering services to you, dated October 20, 1993.
The proposed 2200 square foot residence will be a two story wood frame structure
over a basement level. The foundation will consist of wood foundation walls on
concrete footings.
At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level
from 1 to 8 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The materials exposed in the
bottom of the excavation consisted of weathered claystone/siltstone bedrock. Results
of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on
Fig. 1, indicate the claystone has low compressibility under light loading and a minor
expansion potential when wetted. The claystone was moderately compressible under
increased loading after wetting. No free water was observed in the excavation. The
weathered bedrock was slightly moist to moist.
Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed
construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural weathered bedrock
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf should be adequate for
support of the proposed residence. There may be some potential for heave if the
bearing materials become wetted. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches
for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed bedrock
encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed
and the footings extended down to the undisturbed natural sub grade. Exterior footings
should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost
protection. Three feet of cover is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation
walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by
assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as
retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an
equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site well-broken bedrock backfill.
A lower lateral pressure based on 35 pcf equivalent fluid unit can be used for free-
draining screened rock wall backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided
Ed and Shirley Smith
November 2, 1993
Page 2
to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the walls and prevent
wetting of the lower level. The floor slab should be constructed independent of the
remaining structure to allow for some heave due to wetting of the subgrade. Backfill
placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent
ponding within at least 10 feet of the building.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the
materials exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface
exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation
influence. This study is based on the assumption that materials beneath the footings
have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement
may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the
subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the
subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible
the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations
contained in this letter.
If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us kuow.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
DEH/ro
Attachment
H-P GEOTECH
-------------------------.
Moisture Content = 10 percent
Dry Unit Weight= _121 pc!
Sample oi: weathered claystone
' bedrock c:: From: Footing grade southwest 0
huildina corner ·-V1
c::
"' c. ><
lJ.J
0 ..., --ri~ c::
0 1 ·-
""' ~' V1
V1
QJ
'-c. 2 ) ' E
l\p
0
~ u
-I -I ' 3 ...._
Expansion
Upon _ \fott i og
4
I
I
I
I
I I
I I 11 I 11
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. i 193 239 GEOTECHNICAL, Inc.
•
•
•
PROTECTIVE E'OAK.J OR FL,"SHih\:
./
GR."VEL ALONG 1H.".LL FOR DRAINAGE
1/2' AtKHOR SOL TD E' 4' OC
!-II-JC COATED
TREATED SILL FLA-:-S
'1" PE.~i'"ORA TED DRAH,FJ:::>.::
2X5 12 CCl~TF::CL A.IKHOI<
1/2" ;/AFER BOARD i PN2TIC.".L BOARD
~=='==~3§/~'=··=T~<~G5'P~LYWOOD :u:::~f<TJI Z.J" OC
i.~
"·
~XB or·J 12" CEIHERS
u1,··~ERGROUt<D Tl<EATED WO'J')
1/2" PLY\>IOOD Ul..JDERGROUt·IDI TREA-:-r·E:'}IT
ALL CUTS TO B<:: TRE~.TED \.IU:TH FRESERVATI\/E
~JAil_S .".PPROVED F"OR H'EATIL' LUl-'ISER Ir..JSTALLATIOl·I
LE,\VE 1/6" GAP -"LL EC:·GES SEAL W 5ILICOl'·IE
I1%Lll_ATION EEThlEEI'·! STUDS
Vi:E55URE-TRt:,". TED WOOD
FRAl-IE FOUi"DATION WALL
:!_/2" WATER RESISTANT 5HEETROO::
-~1/2" X 4" PRESSURE TP.EAl]EC• PLYWOOD
~·I" SLAB WITH l<ELDED WIRE i·IESH
V."POR f?ETA .. '2DER. ..l
,~
----------~-FILL DIRT THIS M2E."
--......._2" D~ilIN HOLES ON B FT, SPACir·~G
FOOTER 9 ., ~: 16"
ED E SHIRLEY SMITH
#65 HIDEAWAY CR RD
SCALE 1" 1'6" EVERG~EEN, CO 80439
•
•
•
MINIMUM CLEARANCE-,i.r L._l\'ri::~3 1 4 CDA 9 1/2 -~HORIZONTAL! FACE uRAlt~
SLOPE GROl.J'NO AWAY FROM WALL --......_ -\ CLOSURE SETl<!::=.N .JOISTS
'..., SEE T .JI rlM<UAL FOR ADDITI NAL INFO "
J./2" ANCHOR SOLTD ~ 4•· OC
Zit.JC COATED
TREATED SILL PLATE
4 ·• PERFORATED D~AINPIPE ~
COLJRSE GRAVEL
ii
I
\·DOUBLE 2X8 HEAC1ER
~XB ON .12" CENTERS
UNGERG'20UND TREATED WOOD
E MIL POL YETMYLEl"IE MEMBR ME
--..__...__~1/2" PLYWOOD UNDERGROUND TREATMEIH
ALL CUTS TO BE TRE:A TED W TH PRE SERVA T!VE
NllILS llPPROVED FOR TREAT 0 LUMSER INSTALLATIOI~
LEA'/E 1/8" GAP ALL EDGES SEAL W SILICONE
ltJSULA TION EET>JEEN STUDS
PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD
FRAC1E FOUNDATION IJALL
.!./2 h'ATEJ< RESISTANT SHE~ROC~
........----112 x "'i PRESSLJRE TREA D PLYWOOD
_,,_ SLAB WITH WELDED WI MESH
VAPOR RETARDER
FILL DIRT THIS. ARE-'
2·· DRAIN HOLES ON 8 FT. S?,ICHIG
FOOTER !3" X lE"
5P21Ai
SCALE 1" 1'6"
ED E SHIRLEY SMITH
#65 HIDEAWAY CR RD
EVERGREEN, CO 80439
•
/LEAVE ENO TO OPEN FOP. INSPECTION
\ ' COVER ENJ WITH SCREEN TO KEEP OUT VERMINE
<E;--SlCPE DOWN 1/8" PER 12"
USE Gl<'AVEL ALO'-IG
WALL A1'D DRAIN
Fa<: WATER DRAINAG£
UP STAIRS
l
THIS DRAWING HAS INCREASE IN SIZE OF
CENTER FOOTER PADS AND AT FIREPLACE
TO MAKE A MORE EVEN LOAD DISTRIBUTION
ON SOIL AS SUGGESTEED BY DANIEL HARDIN P.E.
•
.
WHO DID SOIL ANYALSIS. REST OF BASEMENT PLAN HE VERBALY OKAYED.
w
__________ .;<_
•
SPalCE GULCH SOLAR CABIN
EAST DIVIDE CR. SILT, CD
SPBASMNT ED < SHIJ<LEY SMITH
BASEt'ENT FL~
SCALE 1" =6'
•6~ HIDEAWAY CT! la)
E:VERG12EEN, co_ 80439
(303) 674-5331
•
. /
IS
~RECTION RECORD '~;,
Zoning Roof Covering _; :·-I)'#,
Footing -:> .. : ;f,'.
·!#'I' '1.k'f!!,'e.A ·.~ ;i'~'l-os
Plumbing-Undergrotind/p'f-.ft . r' · . ~AJ1-· .. • '·e4o
Foundation
' . :J
! i
,-· . ' . ' ,_' "
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE,NS,J,:cr.io ANi)~PROVED BEFORt'covERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EX1ER!Oll., UNDEROOOUND OR ABOVE GR.OUND . . "' "· -'" ··:· . '
Certificate of Occupancy
No. 4571
Building Department
Garfield County, Colorado
No cllange in the character of occupancy of a
building shall be made without a Certificate
of Occupancy-(UBC Sec. 109.1)
This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 109 .3 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance, this
structure was in compliance with the various codes adopted by the County regulating building construction or use for the following:
Use Classification S"ingJe family w/ garage Building Pennit No. __ 4~9~2~7 ________ _
Type of Construction_~v_-_N _____ Zone District
Owner of Building Edward & Shi.rley Smith Address 5232 County Road 313 Silt, Co.
Building Address 5232 eountv Road 313 Silt, Co. Locality (East Divide Creek)
Address_same~aa;ss...<a"''~""'e"'r'-----------
Date January 16, 2003
Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy shall not be construed as an appro,•al of a violation of the provisio11s of this code or of other
resolutions of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other resolutions
of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. (UBC Sec.109.1).