Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1.0 Application
The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Application September 19, 2016 Revised 10.17.16 Gerd Zeller, Owner Whitsitt & Gross, P.C., Representative TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FINAL PLAT FOR SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO APPLICANT AND OWNER: GERD ZELLER TAB # DESCRIPTION PAGE # 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. General Application Materials 1 Introductory Letter 2 BOCC Resolution 2011-54 3 Statement of Compliance with BOCC Reso 2011-54 12 Warranty Deed to Gerd Zeller 16 Application Form for The Sages at Aspen Glen 19 Authorization Letter for Representative 21 Agreement to Pay Fees 22 Title Commitment for Property 23 Pre -Application Form 34 Vicinity Map 37 Final Plan Map 38 Final Plat — paper 40 Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Exhibits 42 Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements of The Sages at Aspen Glen 69 Engineering Plans for Subdivision 124 Roads, Trail, Walkway & Bikeways Mitigation of Geological Hazard Sewage Collection and Water Supply/Distribution System Soil Suitability Groundwater Drainage Final Cost of Estimates for Public Improvements Final Construction Plans for Sages at Aspen Glen 229 Site Specific Geotechnical & Foundation Report 239 10. Appraisal of Subject Property for Calculation of Fee in-lieu of School Land Dedication 245 11. Weed Vegetation and Management Map and Treatment Methods for The Sages at Aspen Glen 252 12. Agreement for Vacation of Golf Course Easement 273 The Sages at Aspen Glen General Application Materials Introductory Letter BOCC Resolution 2011-54 Approving Preliminary Plan Statement of Compliance with BOCC Resolution 2011-54 Warranty Deed to Gerd Zeller Application Form for The Sages at Aspen Glen Authorization Letter for Representative Agreement to Pay Fees Title Commitment for Property Pre -Application Form The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0001 WHITSITT F3 GROSS, P.C. TIMOTHY E. WHITSITT nitsitt@roaringforklaw.com Ms. Kathy Eastley Garfield County Planning Dept. 108 8th Street, Suite 401 - Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 LAWYERS 320 MAIN STREET, SUITE 200 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 TELEPHONE: (970) 963-6363 FACSIMILE: (970) 963-6667 September 19, 2016 RE: The Sages at Aspen Glen — Final Plat Approval Application Dear Ms. Eastley, ERIC J. GROSS* ejg@roaringforklaw.com Mho admitted in Massachusetts The office of Whitsitt & Gross, P.C. represents Gerd Zeller, the owner and applicant of the real property knowns as The Sages at Aspen Glen. Please accept our application for the Final Plat of the Subdivision. Pursuant to the Garfield County Land Use Code, enclosed please find 3 copies of the application. The application in electronic format is included as well on the enclosed computer disc. Also enclosed is the planning review fee in the amount of $200.00. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require additional information or have questions or concerns. Thank you for your consideration. TEW/jh Enclosures Yours Truly, WHITSITT & GROSS, P.C. By: Timothy E. Whitsitt The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0002 fiCi°rd+lrAVA IN 11111 ReceptionU: 808880 10/04/2011 03:24:25 PM Jean Aiberloo 1 o(9 Rea Fee:50.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) At aregular meeting of the Board of County ConuniSsioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse, in Glenwood Springs on, Monday, the 19th day of September A.D. 2011, there were present: John Martin , Commissioner Chairman Mike Samson , Commissioner Tom Jankovsky , Commissioner Drew Gorget , County Attorney Carey Gagnon , Assistant County Attorney Jean Alherico , Clerk of the Board Ed Green (absent) , County Manager - when thefollowing proceedings, among others were.had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. cOon — 54/ A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN SUBDIVISION LOCATED WITHIN THE ASPEN GLEN PUD CLUB VILLAS ZONE DISTRICT ON 4.243 -ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY GERD ZELLER IN SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6m P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL NO# 2395-134-00-405 Recitals A. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, received a request for a Subdivision Preliminary Plan to allow for the subdivision of ad 4.243 -acre parcel into ten (10) lots which include seven (7) single family tots and three (3) duplex lots. B. The ±4.243 -acre parcel is located within the Aspen Glen PUD in Sections 13, Township 7 South, Range 89 West ofthe 6th P.M. and more fully described in a General Warranty Deed recorded at Reception Number 665694 in the office of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder. C. The subject property is contained withinthe Club Villas zone district, Aspen Glen Planned Unit Development located in unincorporated Garfield County. D. The Board is authorized to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0003 1111 11,%11:11M111ii MINf,liTreeI rAliiiiR14 MI III Receptiontt: 808880 10/04/2011 03:24:26 P11 Jean Rlberioo 2 of 9 Reo Fee;$0,00 Doo Fee:0,00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO Subdivision Preliminary Plan pursuant to Article V, Section 5-303 of the Unified Land use Resolutions of 2008, as amended. E. The Planning Commission opened a public hearing on December 8, 2010 at which time the Commission voted to recommend approval with conditions to the Board of County Commissioners. F. The Board of County Commissioners opened a'public hearing on the 19th day of September, 2011 upon the question of whether the Subdivision Preliminary Plan should be granted or denied, during which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the plan. G. The Board of County Commissioners closed the public hearing on the 19th day of September, 2011 to make a decision. H. The Board'on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following determinations of fact: 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted or could be submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the request for a subdivision Preliminary Plan to create seven (7) single family lots and three (3) duplex lots on a 4.243 -acre parcel maybe in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of GarfieldCounty upon compliance with conditions of approval recommended by the Board of County Commissioners. 4. That, upon compliance with conditions of approval, the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield County' Comprehensive plan of 2000, as amended. 5.. That, Upon compliance with conditions of approval, the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield' County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that: 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0004 III'f���1ri�Ii�1l�R1ll�«r�� �I III Reception#: 808880 19104/2011 08:24:26 PN Jean Alherlon 3 of 9 Rao Fee;$0,00 Doo Fee:0,00 GARFIELD COUNTY GO A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution. B. The Sages at Aspen Glen Subdivision Preliminary Plan located withinthe Aspen Glen PUD, Garfield County is hereby approved subject to compliance with the Prelinunaly Plan, attached as Exhibit A, and the following conditions: 1. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application and at the public hearing shall be considered conditions of approval. 2. • Preliminary Plan approval shall be valid for a period of one (1) year froth the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 3. The Applicant shall comply with the final plat requirements in addition to those requirements contained within the Garfield County Unified Land use Resolution of 2008, as amended (ULUR): a. The Final Plat shall contain the following notes: i.' Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner. ii. No open hearth solid fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within the subdivision. One (1) new solid -fuel burning stove as defined by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et.seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All 'dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances. iii. All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and that all exterior lighting shall be directed inward and downward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be made to allow for safety Lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries. iv. Colorado is. a "RIGHT -TO -FARM" state pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-11, Et. Seq. Landowners, residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sights, sounds and smells of Garfield County's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a county with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. Those withal), urban sensitivity may perceive such activities, sights, sound, and smells only as inconvenience, eyesore, noise and odor. However, state law and county policy provide that ranching, farming and other agricultural activities and operations within Garfield County shall not be considered to be nuisances so long as operated in conformance with the law and in a non -negligent manner. Therefore, all must be prepared to encounter noises, odor, lights, mud, dust, smoke, chemicals, machinery on public roads, livestock on . The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0005 NIIIPAt1 Ii1 1 li K.reII n1r+le:nom kik Reaeptionq; 808880 10/04/2011 03:24:26 PN Jean Alberioa 4 of 9 Reo Fee:$0.00 Doo Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO public roads, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by • spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendment, herbicide, and pesticides, any one or more of which may naturally occur as part of legal and non -negligent agricultural operations. v. All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under state law and county regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditches, controlling weeds, keeping livestock and , pets under control, using property in accordance with zoning, and other aspects of using and maintaining property. Residents and landowners are encouraged to learn about these rights and responsibilities an act as good neighbors and citizens of the county. 'A good introductory source for such information is "A Guide to Rural Living & Small Scale Agriculture" putout by the Colorado State University Extension Office in Garfield County; Fencing on the property shall comply with the Division of Wildlife .specifications for wildlife -friendly fencing; vii. The mineral rights associated with this property have been partially or wholly severed and are not fully intact or transferred with the surface estate therefore allowing the potential for natural resource extraction on the property by the mineral estate owner(s) or lessee(s). b. The Final Plat shall contain the following certificates as contained within the Plat Certificate Appendix of the ULUR: i. Certificate of Dedication and Ownership; ii. Lienholder Consent and Subordination Certificate, if applicable; iii. Board of County Commissioners Certificate; iv. Title Or Attorney Certificate; v. Treasurer Certificate 'of Taxes Paid; vi. County Surveyor Certificate; vii. Clerk and Recorder Certificate; viii. Surveyor Certificate. 4. The Applicant shall delineate and legally describe all easements on the final plat and convey all easements to the responsible entity. This dedication shall be in a form acceptable to the County Attorney's Office and transfer shall occur at the time of recording of the final plat. These easements shall include, but are not limited to all easements of record, utility - easements, drainage easements, water system easements, stormwater drainage easements, open space and any internal roads required as a part of this development. 5. The vacation/relocation ofthe golf cart path must be clearly documented at final plat 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0006 ®III rivnivact m Ng larivosal.kiu NI M Receptionq. 808880 10104/2011 03:24:25 PM Jean Ailerioo 5 of 9 Reo Fee:$0,00 Doo Iee:0,00 GRRF15LD COUNTY CO including a letter of acceptance for the vacation of the easement from the Homeowner's Association or Club representative; 6. The Applicant shall provide a map and inventory for the property for Garfield County listed noxious weeds. If noxious weeds are present the Applicant shall provide a weed management plan and address the weed management of the site, including common areas, within the covenants. This information shall be submitted for review and acceptance by the Vegetation Manager of Garfield County prior to submittal of the final plat' application; 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final plat the Applicant shall be required to comply with Resolution 2008-05, and submit the required $730.00 per unit residential impact fee for the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. 8. . The Applicant shall subtnit an ururnproved property appraisal for the site at final plat. This appraisal is necessary to calculate the Fee in -lieu of School Land Dedication which shall be due and payable prior to approval and recordation of the final plat. 9. A site specific geotechnical and foundation report shall be required at final plat. 10. The Board of County Commissioners recommends that the Applicant work with the Aspen Glen Design Review Committee. 4d Dated Ibis o� day of 61-a-►ic.t- , A.D. 20 11 , ATTEST: � lJ rk of the Board pnlern GARFIELD "SUNTY. BOARD OF COMMIS SI , GARFIELD COUNTY, ,OLORAD Upon motion duly made and seconded the fo going ' ,lotion was a. , pted . by the following vote: COMMISSIONER CHAIR JOHN F. MARTIN COMMISSIONER MIKE SAMSON COMMISSIONER TOM JANKOVSKY , Aye , Aye , Aye 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0007 VIII PPilli'0,,1114.NI IF IN'I llnlii Hi NI III Receptionll. A08680 10/04/2011 03;24:25 PM Jean Rlberloo 6 of ,9 Reo Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee;0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY co STATE OF COLORADO )ss County of Garfield I, • , County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certifythat the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of , A.D. 20 County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 6 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0008 L 1 Z aEd uogooilddy 6.reuLUU101d uaj9 uadsy w s9a0s (\-6 MIII PIA P1r11i'IQILI J I (PSCIr+IDE1141011110i NIM 11111 Recep4ion4: 808880 710o0 f492 Rec1 Fee:$0.00 DM oo,Fee:0,00rGARFIELD COUNTY CO 1 1 7f if tip 4 1 pxag� li �t t ; tFl! ➢ $ #gge: III I 7s A t' E r s y Oh 't Fte.saill!' aha3 t ➢#1 a : 31 "3 1e ;x lai �. �� � ill; 1, t t tart ap °B 8 '9 ii #�� `�' °3; 'i r; ¢ s' aiagz 3sPf�1 �1t i iii r y b 'O is $F 1 azill!i #' � t t;± � oil 3 vile S 4•ta➢ °t; j a t jii d tit p &1 41$Plir,, Iga Is i �E1 � l# ilit :1,1g;,; I {� It_ ibi` :I *19 ! ,t IA 1 3 1` j �t3 #1 a E 1 tii. a ga a!t x t !° Ei t 3i.1 t� 3� t$a� �a _ ! 4 ay! t 3#t gt 'n g$ 1 �➢1 • 'g 'A t t! 1 ili tY 11 s4 • Hill Ifilib� 14 ➢! • g.@f sill �1 !a. 11 1' 1 0 g 1 1ti ,�� 1 14 €a !IiiI!fitJ 4• i1 �� 1 @a F ° tII � E ami �t� • it➢ 1 [j$p I �JFa�h'!, ' ltf 56fr : • t . {=ta tF a: i a ii 13th 11,f4 1§ 1 ,�t� °at ?11!lt !tit Cpl E i41 0 ill ail 4 4 W Ct ,Aw tl a .w�w.�• e.t 4•.'n w.,-x�i ar uii +�14r.-w-.aN�t^§a F.cVn:v IT. It 13 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0009 8IZ aBtd uogeoTlddy ,CleuLunlaid ua D uadsy 10 sots 1111 hYr411:1W.MI1.4ki fitill WIRVMI4Jr14 IN��11 IN Reception#: 808880 rico 8 10/04/2011 0f49 Rec F e:$0.00PDoc Jean 00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO `SSI': s $ IIt 171 �rls X 1D C ;a oa ti E 9ye_ood Rt (01 t11�1� Tl 01 Is >r rN.41i 1HNw Hi�+IwJ�te-�.IN:�. raaVc�le The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0010 61Z aged uogsorvIdy,Ltemm p.1d uam tradable saes N111P�, Frdi? 'if I ,iikiT IONCYfrIM. M1111 Receptiont#: 808880 10Q4$PM an 0R9 o9 Roc Fee:000ocee:0.0GRFIELD COUNTY CO 4,:i i $ I' 1 ' "1 > d1�� j ` I List C aV 1i�1`i•Cii`w ivi { I tI' 1- 4 '11 � b `1.1�© CIZ rtzl ctS ;1 4:1 CZ •/541 t1 EE£.•kA acEE ..,. F` i •F;,. 4 '11 � b `1.1�© CIZ rtzl ctS ;1 4:1 CZ •/541 t1 EE£.•kA acEE li U. 141190111"1111 1ii'i1;11j13,311i11 1111111=.111111111111111 i,1Cif_ciE`i681 liiii -Wail tfi is ii 9 is it — 1111111'1,1111 111111 11€1'112.1.9111 11.111= 1111.111 111119 1� Will it 11#4 [i111 1 ca zozbag iligg 111 1111x1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0011 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN Final Subdivision Plat Application Statement of Compliance with BOCC Resolution 2011-54 The applicant, Gerd Zeller received preliminary plan approval from the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners for The Sages at Aspen Glen on September 19, 2011. BOCC Resolution 2011-54 ("Resolution 11-54") outlined several conditions of approval which are to be addressed on the final plat application. Those conditions and an explanation of compliance for each condition are set forth below: 1. All representations made by Zeller in the application and the Public Hearing concerning the application shall be considered conditions of approval At the public hearing concerning the application for The Sages at Aspen Glen, held on September 11, 2011, the primary discussions and concerns were related to the design guidelines established by the Aspen Glen Design Review Committee ("DRC") and the Homeowner's Association at Aspen Glen ("HOA"). Zeller represented that any improvements within The Sages at Aspen Glen will comply with the Design Review Committee guidelines and further confirmed that his subdivision is subject to the design standards established by the HOA as well as the DRC. Zeller pledged to comply 100% with the design standards set forth by the DRC. Zeller's representations with respect to design guidelines complies with conditions 1 and 10 of Resolution 11-54. 2. Preliminary Plan approval shall be valid for a period of 1 year from the date of approval by the BOCC. The Preliminary Plan was set to expire on September 19, 2012, however the BOCC granted an extension to September 19, 2014. A second extension was granted by Resolution 2014-38, extending the final plat deadline to September 19, 2016. The current application was submitted on September 19, 2016. 3. The Applicant shall comply with the final plat requirements in addition to those requirements contained within the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and shall contain the following notes: a. The final plat shall contain the following notes: 1. Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0012 ii. No open hearth solid -fuel burning stoves will be allowed in dwelling unit. ill. All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and shall be directed inward d and downward towards the interior of the subdivision. iv. Colorado is a RIGHT TO FARM state pursuant to C.R.S.§35--3--11 et. seq. v. All owners of land have obligations under state law and county regulations with regard to the maintenance offences and irrigation ditches, controlling weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control. vi. Fencing on the property shall comply with the Division of Wildlife specifications for wildlife -friendly fencing. The Mineral rights associated with this property have been partially or wholly severed and are not fully intact or transferred with the surface estate thereby allowing the potential for natural resource extraction .no the property by the mineral estate owners or lessees. The final plat for The Sages at Aspen Glen contains each of these notes on page 1, under note items 15--21. b. The Final Plat shall contain the following certificates as contained with the Plat Certificate Appendix of the ULUR: 1. Certificate of Dedication and Ownership. ii. Lienholder Consent. iii. Board of County Commissioners Certificate. iv. Title or Attorney Certificate. v. Treasurer Certificate of Taxes Paid. vi. County Surveyor Certificate. Clerk and Recorder Certificate. viii. Surveyor Certificate. The final plat for The Sages at Aspen Glen contains each of the certificates listed above. 4. The Applicant shall delineate and legally describe all easements on the final plat and convey all easements to the responsible entity. Page 1 of the final plat describes easements for open space, maintenance and utilities, easements for Right of Ways and building setback, in the plat notes items 12, 13 and 23. Page The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0013 2 of the final plat describes the golf course, drainage, raw water, utility and maintenance easements. 5. The vacation/relocation of the golf cart path must be clearly documented at final plat, including a letter of acceptance for the vacation of easement from the Homeowner's Association or Club representative. Page 2 of the final plat for The Sages at Aspen Glen depicts the vacation of the existing golf cart path and the description contained in the Agreement for Vacation of Golf Course Corridor Easement documents the relocation of the golf cart path easement. The parties continue to review the draft agreement and a final letter of acceptance will be submitted for recording prior to the recording of the final plat. 6. The Applicant shall provide a map and inventory for the property for Garfield County listed noxious weed and shall provide a weed management plan for review and acceptance by the Vegetation Manager of Garfield County. Tab 11 of the Final Plat Application for The Sages at Aspen Glen, located at page 252, contains maps and a list of likely noxious weeds which have been found in the Aspen Glen subdivision. This information is collected from the Garfield County Vegetation Management department and the Colorado Department of Agriculture website. Additionally Zeller's representatives have contacted the Community Manager for the HOA at Aspen Glen in order to determine the HOA's position on the matter of weed management. Section 3.1 and Section 3.9 of the Amended Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen Glen require the owners to maintain their properties in a weed free manner. Further Section 8.5 of the Declaration of Covenants for The Sages at Aspen Glen requires property owners to identify, manage and control noxious weeds and to utilize the Garfield County Vegetation Management resources to control noxious weeds. Exhibit C to the Covenants contains a list of noxious weeds located in the subdivision. 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final plat the Applicant shall be required to comply with Resolution 2008-05, and submit the required $730.00 per unit residential impact fee for Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. Payment in the amount of $9,490.00 will be submitted to the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District prior to the recordation of the final plat and Zeller will provide the The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0014 Community Development department with a receipt, showing the payment has been made in full. 8. The Applicant shall submit an unimproved property appraisal for the site at final plat, which appraisal will be used to calculate the Fee -in -lieu of School Land Dedication, which shall be paid prior to approval and recordation of the final plat. Peak Appraisal Service, Inc., has issued an opinion of value for this parcel of property in its unimproved state. That opinion of value will be confirmed with a full appraisal which is being conducted. The opinion of value for the parcel, based upon comparable sales is $1,050,000.00. Pursuant to Section 7-404 (B) (2)(a) (1) of the Garfield County Land Use Code, the calculation for the Fee -in -Lieu is $248,227.00 (unimproved per acre per Appraisal) X .020 (Land Dedication Standard) = $4,964.00 X 13 units = $64,532.00. The full Appraisal will determine the specific amount to be paid for the Fee -in -Lieu and Zeller will submit payment prior to the recordation of the final plat. 9. A site specific geotechnical and foundation report shall be required at final plat. Chen Northern, Inc. conducted a study of the proposed subdivision and made recommendations based upon the location of silty sand clay located above coarse gravel terrace deposits. The report recommended raft foundation with bearing level near the existing grade in order to reduce vulnerability of buildings to differential subsidence damage. More recently, HP Kumar examined the soils and the preliminary report recommends supporting residences on a deep foundation which extends down to the dense river gravel alluvium in order to reduce settlement potential. HP Kumar will follow up with a full report and further recommendations prior to final plat recordation. 10. The BOCC recommends that the Applicant work with the Aspen Glen Design Review Committee. This item was addressed in number 1 above. Zeller is committed to working with both the DRC and the HOA's design guidelines. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0015 1111111 11111 1111111 MUM 1111 MERI11 i111I 11111111 665694 12/21/2004 01:59P 81649 P904 M ALSDORF 1 of 3 R 16.00 D 85.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO GENERAL WARRANTY DEED ASPEN GLEN GOLF COMPANY, a Colorado limited partnership, Grantor, whose address is 9929 State Highway 82, Carbondale, Colorado, 81623, for the consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to GERD ZELLER and/or assigns, Grantee, whose address is P.O. Box 37, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, the following real property in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado: A tract of land situate in Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly right of way line of County Road 109 and the west line of 2nd Amended Plat of Golf Course Parcel 9, Aspen Glen, Filing No. 1, County of Garfield, State of Colorado whence the W '/, corner of Section 20, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian bears S 57Degrees23'01" E 5194.26 feet; thence along the west line of said Golf Course Parcel 9 the following courses: N 79 Degrees 46'03" E, 87.38 feet; thence, S 29 Degrees 23'03" E, 308.37 feet; thence, S 74 Degrees 11'52" E, 10.61 feet; thence, S 29 Degrees 23'03" E, 440.20 feet; thence, S 53 Degrees 16'43" E, 36.29 feet; thence, S 14 Degrees 34'35" E, 84.79 feet; feet to the north right of way line of Golden Bear Drive as shown on plat of Aspen Glen, Filing No. 6, County of Garfield, State of Colorado; thence along said north right of way line the following courses: thence 45.51 feet along the arc of a 814.50 feet radius non tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 3 Degrees 12'05" and subtending a chord bearing S 75 Degrees 32'33" W 45.50 feet; thence 29.03 feet along the arc of a 199.75 feet radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 8 Degrees 19'39" and subtending a chord bearing S 78 Degrees 06'20" W 29.01 feet; thence, S 82 Degrees 16'09" W, 45.30 feet; thence 61.73 feet along the arc of a 200.25 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 17 Degrees 39'47" and subtending a chord bearing S 73 Degrees 26'16" W 61.49 feet; thence 55.09 feet along the arc of a 833.67 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 3 Degrees 47'11" and subtending a chord bearing S 62 Degrees 42'47" W 55.08 feet; thence 38.40 feet along the arc of a 47.50 feet radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 46 Degrees 19'29" and subtending a chord bearing S 83 Degrees 58'56" W 37.37 feet to the east right of way line of County Road 109; thence along said east right of way line the following courses: thence, N 29 Degrees 02'45" W, 166.98 feet; thence, N 20 Degrees 41'20" W, 11.95 feet; thence 545.79 feet along the arc of a 1635.67 feet radius non tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 19 Degrees 07'06" and subtending a chord bearing N 16 Degrees 06'57" W 543.26 feet; thence, N 06 Degrees 33'24" W, 135.34 feet; to the point of beginning, containing 184,848 sq.ft. or 4.243 acres more or less. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO with all its appurtenances, and warrants the title to the same except for real property taxes for 2004 and subsequent years, riot yet due and payable, and subject to all matters on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed the within Deed this 17th day of December, 2004. ASPEN GLEN GOLF COMPANY a Colorado limited partnership By: Management Com,150 • Aspen G n, Inc., a Colorado �; Gen Partner STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF GARFIELD By: Its: onald L. P�•�_7 The above and foreFRing document was subscribed and sworn before me this 17`s day of December, 2004, by Donald L. Parris, as \11ULestoteAAA of Management Company for Aspen Glen, Inc., a Colorado corporation, General Partner of Aspen Glen Golf Company, a Colorado limited partnership. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: SI Ol My address is: 1-1-1 e1 JESSICA REED NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My Commission Expires Attg. 2.2007 SVP., f-itevunlOOt Sp5S., Co st.6oi ,:.)�--- Notary blic Relict . ,n y U-I,e ci" _5;0S S CO </r; O� The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0016 11111111111111111111111111111111(11111111111111 11111111 665694 12/21/2004 01:59P B1049 P905 M RLSDORF 2 of 3 R 16.00 D 85.00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A Our Order No. GW243466-3 RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 24, 1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 332. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 24, 1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 332. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTIONS BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, CONCERNING THE ASPEN GLEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER MATTERS, AS SET FORTH AS FOLLOWS: A. RESOLUTION NO. 92-056 RECORDED JUNE 29, 1992 IN BOOK 835 AT PAGE 305. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 93-121 RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 1993 IN BOOK 887 AT PAGE 824. C. RESOLUTION NO. 94-008 RECORDED FEBRUARY 2, 1994 IN BOOK 89I AT PAGE 620. D. RESOLUTION NO. 94-089 RECORDED AUGUST 9, 1994 IN BOOK 911 AT PAGE 791. E. RESOLUTION NO. 94-139 RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 1994 IN BOOK 925 AT PAGE 345. F. RESOLUTION NO. 95-004 RECORDED JANUARY 17, 1995 IN BOOK 929 AT PAGE 64 G. RESOLUTION NO. 96-06 RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1996 IN BOOK 966 AT PAGE 682. H. RESOLUTION NO. 96-07 RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1996 IN BOOK 966 AT PAGE 686. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 96-26 RECORDED MAY 9, 1996 IN BOOK 977 AT PAGE 399. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN AGREEMENTS RECORDED APRIL 12, 1992 IN BOOK 827 AT PAGE 636 AND RECORDED JUNE 29, 1993 IN BOOK 835 AT PAGE 364. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, AS CONTAINED IN MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR ASPEN GLEN RECORDED APRIL 06, 1995, IN BOOK 936 AT PAGE 350, FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED JULY 15, 1997 IN BOOK 1026 AT PAGE 161, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1997 IN BOOK 1043 AT PAGE 850, THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 10, 1998 IN BOOK 1053 AT PAGE 8, FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 10, 1998 IN BOOK 1053 AT PAGE 30, FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED MAY 1, 1998 IN BOOK 1065 AT PAGE 800, SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED MAY 22, 1998 IN BOOK 1069 AT PAGE 58, SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1998 IN BOOK 1084 AT PAGE 943, EIGHTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 1998 IN BOOK 1094 AT PAGE 517, NINTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1999 IN The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0017 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 665694 12/21/2004 01:5SP 61649 P906 M RLSOORF 3 of 3 R 16.00 0 85.00 Gf1RFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A Our Order No. GW243466-3 BOOK 1145 AT PAGE 680, TENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 19, 1999 IN BOOK 1161 AT PAGE 293, ELEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 IN BOOK 1151 AT PAGE 877 AND TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 1999 IN BOOK 1164 AT PAGE 755 AND THIRTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED JULY 17, 2000 IN BOOK 1197 AT PAGE 740 AND FOURTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED MAY 8, 2003 IN BOOK 1467 AT PAGE 910, AND FIFTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED Tl�10 r UNDER /h RECEPTION NO. ti 7� TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 06, 1995, IN BOOK 936 AT PAGE 444, AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 IN BOOK 1151 AT PAGE 866. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, OBLIGATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS CONTAINED IN IN DECLARATION OF GOLF FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL EASEMENT RECORDED APRIL 6, 1995 IN BOOK 936 AT PAGE 314. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO. 1 RECORDED APRIL 6, 1995 AS RECEPTION NO. 476330. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION OF GOLF CORRIDOR EASEMENT RECORDED jje.,tALa,YfUNDER RECEPTION NO. 6, 65. ENCROACHMENT OF TREES ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON DRAWING PREPARED BY SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. DATED JANUARY 2004. EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE PIPELINE AS SHOWN ON DRAWING PREPARED BY SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. DATED JANUARY 2004. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0018 Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-countv.com DIVISIONS OF LAND APPLICATION FORM 40 TYPE OF SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION Owner/Applicant Name: Gerd Zeller Phone: ( 970 ) 963-7487 ■ Minor Subdivision 0 Preliminary Plan Amendment Major Subdivision 0 Final Plat Amendment • Sketch ■ Preliminary MI Final 0 Common Interest Community Subdivision Conservation Subdivision 0 Public/County Road Split Exemption • Yield 0 Sketch 0 Preliminary 0 Final 0 Rural Land Development Exemption ❑ Time Extension Aspen Glen PUD INVOLVED PARTIES Owner/Applicant Name: Gerd Zeller Phone: ( 970 ) 963-7487 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 37 City: Aspen State: CO Zip Code: 81612 E-mail: gmz52@aol.com Representative (Authorization Required) Name: Timothy E. Whitsitt Phone: ( 970 ) 963-6363 Mailing Address: 320 Main Street, Ste. 200 City: Carbondale State: CO Zip Code: 81623 E-mail: whitsitt@roaringforldaw.com PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION Project Name: The Sages at Aspen Glen Assessor's Parcel Number: 2 3 9 5- 1 3 4- 0 0- 4 0 5 Physical/Street Address:TBD Golden Bear Drive/Aspen Glen PUD - immediately off C.R. 109 at back gate Legal Description: Sections 13 & 24; Township 7S; Range 89W, more particularly described on the attached legal description. Zone District:Club Villas Zone District/ Property Size (acres): 4.24 acres Aspen Glen PUD The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0019 ® a @�'as ��res-,. ,. �- '�`a ��°'�,c."�.a ��.„��'�a 3,.._e � ' r. `�-a .. o. — Existing Use: Vacant Land located within the Aspen Glen PUD Proposed Use (From Use Description of Project: Table 3-403): Residential Dwelling Single & 2 Unit Dwelling. Subdivision of parcel of land within the Aspen Glen PUD to allow for creation of 7 Single Family Dwelling lots and 3 Residential Duplex lots for a total of 10 lots and 13 residential units. Pr ® a os , e o • ptAea Land Use Type # of Lots # of Units Acreage Parking Single Family 7 7 1.91 Off Street- 4 min x 7 =28 spaces Duplex 3 6 1.32 Off Street -4 minx 6 =24 spaces Multi -Family Commercial Industrial Open Space .41 OtherPublic/Quasi-Pubic .60 Total 10 13 4.24 52 spaces Submission Requirements ❑ The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4-202. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: Waiver of Standards ❑ The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4-118. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: I haverear est. E is above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and :` culat • e best of my knowledge. Signature of P clpert Owner Date File Number: _ ___-_--- Fee Paid:$ The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0020 Gerd Zeller Post Office Box 37 Aspen, CO 81612 September 19, 2016 Ms. Kathy Eastley Garfield County Community Development 108 8' Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: The Sages atAspen Glen - Final Plat Subdivision Application Dear Ms. Eastley, I, Gerd Zeller, the owner and applicant of the real property known as The Sages at Aspen Glen, hereby give my permission and authority to Whitsitt & Gross, P.C. to act on my behalf with respect to the above referenced application for Final Plat Approval pursuant to the Garfield County Land Use Code. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require additional information or have any questions or concerns. Thank you for your attention in this matter. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0021 Garfield County PAYMENT AGREEMENT FORM GARFIELD COUNTY ("COUNTY") and Property Owner ("APPLICANT") Gerd Zeller agree as follows: 1. The Applicant has submitted to the County an application for the following Project: Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat 2. The Applicant understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 2014-60, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type application, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. The Applicant and the County agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. The Applicant agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the Project, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to the Applicant. The Applicant agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the County, when they are necessary, as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, the Applicant shall pay additional billings to the County to reimburse the County for the processing of the Project. The Applicant acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the County of any Land Use Change or Division of Land. I hereby agree to pay all fees related to this application: Billing Contact Person: Gerd Zeller Phone: ( 970) 963-7487 Billing Contact Address: Post Office Box 37 City: Aspen Billing Contact Email: gmz52@aol.com Printed Name of State: CO Zip Code: 81612 to Sign: Gerd Zeller igna re) (Date) The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0022 Stewart title View your transaction progress 24/7 via Stewart Online Ask us about your login today! Date: July 27, 2016 File Number: 01330-84010 Property: 171 Wildflower Lane, Carbondale, CO 81623 Please direct all Closing inquiries to: Phone: Fax: Email Address: Stewart Title - Aspen 620 East Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 SELLER: BUYER: Gerd Zeller to be determined Delivery Method: Emailed Delivery Method: Emailed ATTORNEY: Whitsitt and Gross, PC 320 Main St Ste 200 Carbondale, CO 81623 Attn: Timothy E Whitsitt Phone: (970) 963-6363 Fax: (970) 963-6667 Email Address: whitsitt@roaringforklaw.com Delivery Method: Emailed WIRED FUNDS ARE REQUIRED ON ALL CASH PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS. THE WIRING INSTRUCTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS TITLE COMMITMENT OR FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE ESCROW OFFICE AS NOTED ON THIS PAGE. We Appreciate Your Business and Look Forward to Serving You in the Future. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0023 ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Countersigned by: Search Report Only Stewart Title - Aspen 620 East Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-3577 stewart title guaranty company Matt Morris President and CEO Denise C . rraux Secretary Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-84010 004 -UN ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) AMERICAN [AND TITLE AS{iillAif �l4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0024 CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at< hitn://www.alta.org/>. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-84010 004 -UN ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) > AMERICAN LAND TITLE 11176C17613Ti The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0025 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A File No.: 01330-84010 1. Effective Date: July 21, 2016, at 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy Proposed Insured: to be determined (b) ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: 2006 (Extended) Amount of Insurance T.B.D. 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee Simple 4. Title to the said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: Gerd Zeller 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Attached Legal Description Purported Address: 171 Wildflower Lane Carbondale, CO 81623 STATEMENT OF CHARGES These charges are due and payable before a policy can be issued Search Report: Search Fee: $150.00 Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. l The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use, Va>EuceN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. i�Ko v'ritl File No. 01330-84010 Page 1 of 2 STEWART TITLE sra a x CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch A STO GUARANTY COMPANY The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0026 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situate in Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly right of way line of County Road 109 and the west line of 2nd Amended Plat of Golf Course Parcel 9, Aspen Glen, Filing No. 1, County of Garfield, State of Colorado whence the W1/4 corner of Section 20, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian bears S 57°23'01" E 5194.26 feet; thence along the west line of said Golf Course Parcel 9 the following courses: N 79°46'03" E, 87.38 feet; thence, S 29°23'03" E, 308.37 feet; thence, S 74°11'52" E, 10.61 feet; thence, S 29°23'03" E, 440.20 feet; thence, S 53°16'43" E, 36.29 feet; thence, S 14°34'35" E, 84.79 feet; feet to,the north right of way line of Golden Bear Drive as shown on plat of Aspen Glen, Filing No. 6, County of Garfield, State of Colorado; thence along said north right of way line the following courses: thence 45.51 feet along the arc of a 814.50 feet radius non tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 3°12'05" and subtending a chord bearing S 75°32'33" W 45.50 feet; thence 29.03 feet along the arc of a 199.75 feet radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 8°19'39" and subtending a chord bearing S 78°06'20" W 29.01 feet; thence S 82°16'09" W, 45.30 feet; thence 61.73 feet along the arc of a 200.25 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 17°39'47" and subtending a chord bearing S 73°26'16" W 61.49 feet; thence 55.09 feet along the arc of a 833.67 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 3°47'11" and subtending a chord bearing S 62°42'47" W 55.08 feet; thence 38.40 feet along the arc of a 47.50 feet radius curve to the fight, having a central angle of 46°19'29" and subtending a chord bearing S 83°58'56" W 37.37 feet to the east right of way line of County Road 109; thence, along said east right of way line the following courses: thence, N 29°02'45" W, 166.98 feet; thence, N 20°41'20" W, 11.95 feet; thence 545.79 feet along the arc of a 1635.67 feet radius non tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 19° 07'06" and subtending a chord bearing N 16°06'57" W 543.26 feet; thence, N 06°33'24" W, 135.34 feet; to the point of beginning. County of Garfield, State of Colorado Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form Is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-84010 CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch A STO Page 2 of 2 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0027 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART I File No.: 01330-84010 The following are the requirements to be complied with: 1. Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. 3. Evidence satisfactory to Stewart Title Guaranty Company of payment of all outstanding taxes and assessments as certified by the County Treasurer. 4. Execution of Affidavit as to Debts and Liens and its return to Stewart Title Guaranty Company. NOTE: If work has been performed on, or in connection with, the subject property (architectural drawings, soils testing, foundation work, installation of materials), please notify the Company's escrow officer within 10 days of receipt of this title commitment. 5. Payment of any and all Homeowners assessments and expenses which may be assessed to the property. 6. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENT IS FOR DELETION OF SURVEY EXCEPTIONS 2 AND 3 OF THE OWNERS POLICY: A SURVEY, meeting the minimum detail standards of the ALTA/ACSM, Survey OR IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE, prepared by a registered Colorado surveyor, within the last TWO MONTHS, must be presented to Stewart Title Guaranty Company, for its approval prior to the deletion of any survey exceptions from the OWNERS POLICY. Stewart Title Guaranty reserves the right to take exception to any adverse matters as shown on said survey, or make further inquiry or requirements relative thereto. Said Survey, must be certified to Stewart Title of Colorado and/or Stewart Title Guaranty Company. 7. NOTE: This is a Search Report Only NOTE: The vesting deed is shown as follows: Warranty Deed recorded December 21, 2004 in Book 1649 at Page 904 as Reception No. 665694. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-84010 CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch B I Page 1 of 1 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0028 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART H File No.: 01330-84010 Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the Effective Date but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. 7. Water rights, claims or title to water. 8. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed tax sales. 9. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation or other district or inclusion in any water service or street improvement area. 10. Reservations or exceptions contained in U.S. Patents, or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, recorded July 25, 1894 in Book 12 at Page 332 as Reception No. 17522. reserving 1) Rights of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom and 2) rights of way for ditches and canals constructed under the authority of the United States. 11. Resolutions by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, as follows: 12. A. Resolution No. 92-056 recorded June 29, 1992 in Book 835 at Page 305 as Reception No. 436262. B. Resolution No. 93-121 recorded December 28, 1993 in Book 887 at Page 824 as Reception No. 457154. C. Resolution No. 94-008 recorded February 2, 1994 in Book 891 at Page 620 as Reception No. 458796. D. Resolution No. 94-089 recorded August 9, 1994 in Book 911 at Page 791 as Reception No. 466955. E. Resolution No. 94-139 recorded December 13, 1994 in Book 925 at Page 345 as Reception No. 472058. F. Resolution No. 95-004 recorded January 17, 1995 in Book 929 at Page 64 as Reception No. 473462. G. Resolution No. 96-26 recorded May 9, 1996 in Book 977 at Page 399 as Reception No. 492765. H. Resolution No. 96-06 recorded February 9, 1996 in Book 966 at Page 682 as Reception No. 488797. I. Resolution No. 96-07 recorded February 9, 1996 in Book 966 at Page 686 as Reception No. 488798. J. Resolution No. 2006-79 recorded March 19, 2007 in Book 1903 at Page 967 as Reception No. 719257. 13. Agreements recorded April 12, 1992 in Book 827 at Page 636 as Reception No. 433216 and recorded June 29, 1993 in Book 835 at Page 364 as Reception No. 436263. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in goad standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-84010 CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch B II STO Page 1 of 3 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0029 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART II 14. Master Declaration recorded April 6, 1995 in Book 936 at Page 350 as Reception No. 476328, First Supplemental Declaration recorded July 15, 1997 in Book 1026 at Page 161 as Reception No. 510976, Second Supplemental Declaration recorded November 26, 1997 in Book 1043 at Page 850 as Reception No. 516966, Third Supplemental Declaration recorded February 10, 1998 in Book 1053 at Page 8 as Reception No. 520203, Fourth Supplemental Declaration recorded February 10, 1998 in Book 1053 at Page 30 as Reception No. 520209, Fifth Supplemental Declaration recorded May 1, 1998 in Book 1065 at Page 800 as Reception No. 524479, Sixth Supplemental Declaration recorded May 22, 1998 in Book 1069 at Page 58 as Reception No. 525647, Seventh Supplemental Declaration recorded August 24, 1998 in Book 1084 at Page 943 as Reception No. 531005, Eighth Supplemental Declaration recorded October 26, 1998 in Book 1094 at Page 517 as Reception No. 534299, Ninth Supplemental Declaration recorded August 17, 1999 in Book 1145 at Page 680 as Reception No. 550617, Tenth Supplemental Declaration recorded November 19, 1999 in Book 1161 at Page 293 as Reception No. 555596, Eleventh Supplemental Declaration recorded September 23, 1999 in Book 1151 at Page 877 as Reception No. 552597, Twelfth Supplemental Declaration recorded December 14, 1999 in Book 1164 at Page 755 as Reception No. 556668, Thirteenth Supplemental Declaration recorded July 17, 2000 in Book 1197 at Page 740 as Reception No. 566379, Fourteenth Supplemental Declaration recorded May 8, 2003 in Book 1467 at Page 910 as Reception No. 626952, First Amendment to the Master Declaration recorded October 30, 2003 in Book1533 at Page 735 as Reception No. 639707 and Fifteenth Supplemental Declaration recorded December 21, 2004 in Book 1649 at Page 891 as Reception No. 665692, Amended Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen Glen recorded March 23, 2007 in Book 1905 at Page 523 as Reception No. 719512. 15. Declaration of Golf Facilities Development, Construction and Operational Easement, recorded April 6, 1995 in Book 936 at Page 314 as Reception No. 476327. 16. Subdivider's Agreement as contained in Instrument recorded April 6, 1995 in Book 936 at Page 444 as Reception No. 476329. 17. Plat of Aspen Glen Planned Unit Development recorded April 6, 1995 as Reception No. 476330. 18. Special Warranty Deed and Grant of Easement, recorded December 31, 1996 in Book 1005 at Page 228 as Reception No. 503024. 19. Declaration of Golf Course Easement, recorded December 21, 2004 in Book 1649 at Page 899 as Reception No. 665693. 20. Deed of Easement for Untreated Water Irrigation Line, recorded December 21, 2004 in Book 1649 at Page 907 as Reception No. 665695. 21. Transfer of Declarant Rights, recorded December 21, 2004 in Book 1649 at Page 912 as Reception No. 665696. 22. Amended Bylaws of the Homeowners Association at Aspen Glen recorded March 23, 2007 in Book 1905 at Page 577 as Reception No. 719513. 23. Land Use Change Permit recorded January 7, 2011 as Reception No. 796954. 24. Resolution No. 2011-54 recorded October 4, 2011 as Reception No. 808880. 25. Resolution No. 2014-38 recorded July 22, 2014 as Reception No. 851644. NOTE: This product is for informational purposes only. It is not a title insurance product and does not provide any form of coverage. This product is not a guarantee or assurance and does not warrant, or otherwise insure any condition, fact or circumstance. This product does not obligate this Company to issue any policies of title insurance for any subsequent transaction based on the information provided or involving the described herein. This Company's sole liability for any Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members In good standing as of Ole date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-84010 CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch B II STO u Page 2 of 3 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0030 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART II error(s) relating to this product is limited to the amount this was paid for this product. NOTE: Exceptions 1 and 4 may be deleted from the policies, provided the seller and buyer execute the Company's affidavits, as required herein, and the Company approves such deletions. If work has been performed on, or in connection with, the subject property (architectural drawings, soils testing, foundation work, installation of materials), and the Company has not reviewed and approved lien waivers and indemnitor financials, Standard Exception 4 (mechanic lien exception) will not be deleted and no mechanic lien coverage will be furnished. Exceptions 2 and 3 may be deleted from the policies, provided the Company receives and approves the survey or survey affidavit if required herein. Exception 5 will not appear on the policies, provided the Company, or its authorized agent, conducts the closing of the proposed transaction and is responsible for the recordation of the documents. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form Is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-84010 CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch B II STO Page 3 of 3 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0031 DISCLOSURES File No.: 01330-84010 Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A. THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; B. A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT; C. INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Subparagraph (7) (E) requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed." Provided that Stewart Title - Aspen conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lender's Title Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative Mechanic's Lien Protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception No. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfiled Mechanic's and Materialmen's Liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased, within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and/or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium; fully executed Indemnity agreements satisfactory to the company; and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company makes the following disclosure: a. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and b. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. NOTE: THIS DISCLOSURE APPLIES ONLY IF SCHEDULE B, SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT HEREIN INCLUDES AN EXCEPTION FOR SEVERED MINERALS. NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE ANY OF THE COVERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN, UNLESS THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE FULLY SATISFIED. File No.: 01330-84010 CO Commitment Disclosure The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0032 STG Privacy Notice Stewart Title Companies WHAT DO THE STEWART TITLE COMPANIES DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal and applicable state law regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand how we use your personal information. This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of the Stewart Title Guaranty Company and its title affiliates (the Stewart Title Companies), pursuant to Title V of the Gramm -Leach -Bliley Act (GLBA). The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have sought through us. This information can include social security numbers and driver's license number. All financial companies, such as the Stewart Title Companies, need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business—to process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section below, we list the reasons that we can share customers' personal information; the reasons that we choose to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. Reasons we can share your personal information. Do we share Can you limit this sharing? For our everyday business purposes— to process your transactions and maintain your account. This may include running the business and managing customer accounts, such as processing transactions, mailing, and auditing services, and responding to court orders and legal investigations. Yes No For our marketing purposes— to offer our products and services to you. Yes No For joint marketing with other financial companies No We don't share SHARING Contact 1980 For our affiliates' everyday business purposes— information about your transactions and experiences. Affiliates are companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and non-financial companies. Our affiliates may include companies with a Stewart name; financial companies, such as Stewart Title Company Yes No For our affiliates' everyday business purposes— information about your creditworthiness. No We don't share For our affiliates to market to you — For your convenience, Stewart has developed a means for you to opt out from its affiliates marketing even though such mechanism is not legally required. Yes Yes, send your first and last name, the email address used in your transaction, your Stewart file number and the Stewart office location that is handling your transaction by email to optout@stewart.com or fax to 1-800-335-9591. For non -affiliates to market to you. Non -affiliates are companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and non-financial companies. No We don't share We may disclose your personal information to our affiliates or to non -affiliates as permitted by law. If you request a transaction with a non -affiliate, such as a third party insurance company, we will disclose your personal information to that non -affiliate. [We do not control their subsequent use of information, and suggest you refer to their privacy notices.] PRACTICES How often do the Stewart Title Companies notify me about their practices? We must notify you about our sharing practices when you request a transaction. How do the Stewart Title Companies protect my personal information? To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer, file, and building safeguards. How do the Stewart Title Companies collect my personal information? We collect your personal information, for example, when you • request insurance -related services ■ provide such information to us We also collect your personal information from others, such as the real estate agent or lender involved in your transaction, credit reporting agencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right to limit sharing (e.g., opt out) in certain instances, we do not share your personal information in those instances. us: If you have any questions about this privacy notice, please contact us at: Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Post Oak Blvd., Privacy Officer, Houston, Texas 77056 File No.: 01330-84010 Page 1 Revised 11-19-2013 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0033 Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfeld-countv.com PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2395-134-00-405 PROJECT: Sages at Aspen Glen OWNER: Gerd Zeller REPRESENTATIVE: Tim Whitsitt PRACTICAL LOCATION: Aspen Glen PUD — immediately off CR 109 at back gate TYPE OF APPLICATION: Final Plat DATE: July 7, 2016 I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Gerd Zeller is the owner of a 4.243 -acre parcel located within the Aspen Glen PUD in the Club Villa Zone District. Mr. Zeller received Preliminary Pian approval in 2011 to create seven (7) single family lots and three (3) duplex lots for a total of 13 units on the site. The Preliminary Plan was set to expire on September 19, 2012 however the BOCC granted an extension to the time period to September 19, 2014. A second extension was granted in 2014 for a two year extension, Resolution 2014-38 (attached) so that the applicant could submit a technically complete final plat prior to September 19, 2016. The Final Plat must be consistent with the approved Preliminary Plan in addition to satisfying conditions of approval in Resolution 2011-54 and compliant with the 2013 Land Use and Development Code, as amended, process for Final Plat. Conditions required at final plat include: 1. A list of required plat notes; 2. Required certificates on the plat; 3. Inclusion of all easements and dedication of those easements to the responsible entity (be it HOA, utilities, Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District, etc); 4. Vacation/relocation of the golf cart path including a letter of acceptance from the HOA or Club representative; 5. Map and inventory for the property for any listed noxious weeds and, if present, a management plan for the site; The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0034 6. Site specific geotechnical and foundation report. 11. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT 1S REQUIRED TO ADDRESS Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended (LUDC) - Sections: 4-102 Common Review Procedures 5-302 D. Final Plan/Final Plat Review 5-401 Submittal Requirements 5-402 Description of Submittal Requirements III. REVIEW PROCESS The process to accommodate this request shall require Subdivision — Final Plan/Plat review process pursuant to the LUDC. A. Pre -application Conference. B. Application Submittal — three paper copies, one electronic copy C. Determination of Completeness D. Request for review sent to referral agencies E. Evaluation by Director/Staff resulting in a Staff Report regarding finalization of the mylar F. Applicant obtains signatures on the mylar and Subdivision Improvements / Development Agreement vyhich are presented to the BOCC for signature. Security may be required for any public improvements. G. Plat and documentation are recorded. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NOTICE No Public Notice required for a Final Plat. Referral will be sent to the following agencies: Garfield County reviewing engineer ➢ County Road & Bridge ➢ County Surveyor ➢ Aspen Glen HOA ➢ Vegetation Management ➢ RFWSD ➢ Utility companies V. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. General Application Materials a. Deed to demonstrate ownership b. Application form and fee c. Agreement to Pay Form d. Title Commitment e. Authorization letter for representative to act on behalf of owner f. Pre -application Summary Form B. Vicinity Map — typically on the plat C. Final Plan Map — see description in 5-402 E. (24" x 36" paper copy) The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0035 D. Final Plat — see description in 5-402 F. E. Subdivision Improvements Agreement F. CCR's G. Engineering Plans a. Roads, trails, walkways and bikeways; b. Mitigation of Geological Hazard; c. Sewage Collection and Water Supply/Distribution System; d. Soil suitability; e. Groundwater drainage; f. Final cost estimates for public improvements. VI. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES This application will be subject to the following fees and deposit requirements: Planning Review Fees: $ 200.00 + additional Staff time at staff hourly rate of $40.50 Referral Agency Fees: $ reviewing engineer and county surveyor County Surveyor: $ hourly rate Recordation: $ TBD Total Deposit: $ 200.00 General Application Processing Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to referral agencies for comments. Case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site visit. Staff reviews application to determine if it meets standards of review. Case planner makes a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the appropriate hearing body. Disclaimer The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is basad on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre -application Summary Prepared bv: Kathy Eastley, AICP Date The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0036 70 Q1BNrf OD SPR/NGS VICINITY MAP The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0037 Lrd .619 NWP 120 45,13,11. .71 aro 4666 1013-14361. fOrtraSla 111 limerrie 16.7 21. 133..17 41. 174..111.7 125 1106 47,40 170 11, .07 146 .151 1507 12 61. .61 41. 6.r 41.31,11, ,uz;; rrrrywr Preliminary Plat The Sages at Aspen Glen Existing Conditions Garfield County, Colorado S74'1152'E 70.61' AAO dye°6�0ti9 j,l p3 • 6,< /29.0 L... se.a. .divisio o As. -6 4 1 ac. + — Zeller '.rce W.rronf D ece.tion No. 00 Loo•! µOpp S0 p N0, 109 COUNTY ROA V _ice SICBHW S676 SER GORDON 200MEYER GtvM•cOo SPEINOS. Comm.° 81601 <9701945-1004 FAX 1970) 945-5946 ASPEN. 52605/00 C9701925-6727 CR/0Seu BOri, CO 19701349-5355 oroosuwrOwouor. The Sages at Aspen Glen Existing Conditions 17117 or �4n GRAPHIC SCALE (1N)SO A coat- ruic ReIJCIS LEWIN raSG&? ro arra 9675 0.2 MOOS 69.0.7 14.34 29.01 6,49 11606321 57J66,6W sown - 7:19v) C.3 61267 55.03 1156 33.0.9 6▪ 14117W 34>'11' 4).30 .7640 20 JI 31.56 N6r36501 61530 1351 11.76 43.50 ▪ S3)'S3l✓ 16..67 545)9 175.45 3.1.26 91606571 Preliminary Plat Jo nu 2008-361.002 DCO, 2-19-02 2 or 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0038 CERBFICATE OF DEOICAHON AND OWNERSHIP KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Gerd Zeller, whose address is Post Office Box 3Z Aspen Colorado, being sole owner in fee simple of a// !hot .real properly described or .4 tract of land situate in Section 13 Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian being more particularly descdbed os follows: Beginning at point an the easterly right of way ,ire of County Rood 109 and the west line of 2nd Amended Plot of Golf Course Parcel 9, Aspen Glen, Filing No. 1, County of Corfield, State of Colorado whence the 61/4 Comer of Section 20, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Pnocfpol Meridian beam 557'2301'£ a distance of 519426 feet; !hence along the west bhe of said Golf Course Parcel 9 the following s& (6) courses: N79'4603'6 o distance of 87.38 feet; thence 529'3031" o distance of 308.37 feet' thence S74'11'52'E a distance of 10.61 feet thence, 52923031- o distance of 440.20 feet; thence 553'16'43'( o distance of 36.29 feet; thence, 51434'35'£ o dstonce of 84.79 feet to the north right of way toe of Golden Bear Ddve os shown on the Plot of Aspen Glen, Filing No. 6 as recorded at Reception No. 531004, County of Garfield, Stole of Colorado; thence along sold north right of way bee the following six (6) courses: 45.51 feet along the ore of o 814.50 feet radius non tangent curve to the left having o central ong/e of 3'12'05" and subtending o chord bearing S75'3233'1Y a distance of 4550 feet (hence 29.03 feet along the oro of o 199.75 feet mus curve to the right, having o centra/ angle of 8'1939' and subtending o chord boodng S78'06201Y a distance of 29.01 feet; thence, 582'16091Y o distance of 4530 feet; thence 61.73 feet along the orc of o 200.25 feet radius curve to the left, having o centro/ angle of 17'39'47' and sub(endrg o chord beodng 573'26'16'W o distance of 61.49 feet; thence 5509 feet along the arc of a 833.67 feet radius curve to the left, hosing o centra/ angle of 347'11" and subtending a chord bearing S62'42'47'W a distance of 55.08 feet; thence 38.40 fee( along the ors of o 4Z50 feet radius curve to the right, having a centra/ angle of 46'19'17' and subtending o chord bearing 583'58'501V a distance of 37.36 feel to the east right of way line of county rood 109; thence along sold east right of way line the following lour (4) courses N29'02'451Y o distance of 166.98 feet; thence N2041'201'/ o distance of 11.95 feet; thence 54579 feet along the arc of a 1635.67 feet radius non tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 19'0706' and subtending o chord bearing 616'0657W o dstonce of 84.126 feet thence, N0633241,1 o distance of 135.34 feet to the point of beginning, sold tract contains 184,848 sq.R. or 4244 acres more or less. Hove by (hese presents /aid out plotted, and subdivided the some into lots as shown hereon and designate the same as 17/£ S4GE5 AT ASPEN GLEN in the County o/ Garfield, State of Colorado. .4// streets, roods and Open Space parte/s os depicted on the accompanying plot ore hereby ded/coted orid set apart to the Homeowners Association of Aspen Glen. Inc. a Colorado not -Mr -profit corporation, for the use of the members and guests thereof The Public Utales and those portions of said real property which ore labeled as utility easements on (I/O accompanying plot as perpetual easements far the instol/otion and maintenance o/ u0l't/es. irrigation and drainage focllties, Including but not limited to electric lines, gas lines, telephone lines; together with the right to trim interfering trees and bash; wth perpetual right of Ingress and egress for installation and mointenonce of such hires. Such easements and rights shall be utilized in o reasonable olid prudent manner. 114 WITNESS WN£R£OF said owner hos caused his name to be hereunto subscribed this day of _, AD., 2010. Gerd Zeller, owner Dote State of Colorado ) ss County o/ -- ) ' The foregoing dedication was acknowledged before me this__ day of by Gerd Zeller as Owner WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL Preliminary Plat The Sages at Aspen Glen Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 89 West, 6th Principal Meridian Garfield County, Colorado Notes: ® - indicates monument /5 rebor and Red Plastic Cap- LS. 15710. - Basis of Bearings: Bearings ore relative to the bearings as shown for the 2nd Amended Plot of Golf Course Parcel 2, Aspen Glen, Filing No. 1 -Reception No. 664580, shoeing o bearing along the westerly /Me of said of 829230310 os shown. - Survey Dote: Existing Conditions Mapping -October 14 2002. - The Soges of Aspen Glen, is o port of Aspen Glen P.U.D. approved June 29, 1992 by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County. The terms and conditions applicable to the Aspen Glen P.U.D. ore set forth in the resolution of the County Commissioners recorded on June 29, 1992 as Reception No. 436262 in Book 835 at Page 305 of the records of the Corfield County Clerk and Recorder. - The reel properly depicted and described on the will. Fina/ Plot, The Sages at Aspen 0/en, is subject to all terms and conditions of (0 the Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen Glen recorded In the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on Kori 6, 1995 as Reception No. 476324 and (b) the Fifteenth Supplemental Dec/oration to the Master Declaration of Covenants Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen C/en recorded in the records of Code/d County Clerk and Recorder on December 21, 2004, in Book 1649 of Page 897. - The within,Fine/ Plot constitutes a Supplemental Plat as that term is defined in the Master Oeclorotion of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen Glen. By virtue of the within fiino/ Plot and the fifteenth Supplemental Declaration to the Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen Glen, the real property depleted and described on the within Final Plat is annexed to and made a port of the Aspen Glen C munity Ansa. - The set backs shown hereon reflect the development standards of the Club Villa Residential Zone District as outlined in Book 835 of Page 305 and as Amended B)' Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, Recorded ori____ as Reception Na - This survey 00ES NOT represent a Mk search by this surveyor to determine ownership or to discover easements or other encumbrances of record. A1/ information pertaining to ownership, easements and other encumbrances of record hos been token from Land Title Guarantee Company, Owner's Policy L/1112 4 3 4 6 6. Pertaining to sold policy Schedule B• - Lots S8 through S10 ore duplex lots and may be further subdivided of o future dole. - Colorado iso "Right -to -Form' Store pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-101, et seq. Landowners, residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities sights, sounds and smells of Garfield County's ogdculfu / operations as o normal and necessary aspect of /rang fn o County with strong oral choroc(er and healthy ranching sector. A/l must be prepared to encounter noises odor. lights, mud, dust _A.D., 2010. smoke, chemicals, machinery on pubic roods, livestock on public roods, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides, and pesticides, any one or more of which may naturally occur as o port o/ legal and non -negligent agricultural operations. - All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under State low and County regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditches, contro/lng weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control, using property In oceadonce with zoning, and other aspects of using and mointoining property. Residents and landowners ore encouraged to /earn about these rights and responsibilities and act as good neighbors arid citizens of the County. A good introductory source for such information is "f Guide to Rural Living & Small Scale Agriculture' put out by the Colorado Stole University Extension Office in Garfield County. - 4/! exterior light/ng w7/ be the minimum amount necessary and o// exterior lighting will be directed inward, towards the 101060, of the subdiviskm, except that provisions moy be mode to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property bounden'. if approver/ expressly by the Aspen Glen Design Review Committee,. Notary My commission pias: Aspen Glen Minerals William Wolter Gentry AKA 191110m Gentry Al/ reserved in deed recorded 5/8/50 in Book 250 of Page 271. Effects Lots 2 and 5, Section 13; township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6(0 Pdncpo/ Mean. EASEU1741 STATEMENT:. 1. There shall be on easement for utilities, drainage, irrigation and pedestdon access for sidewalks along the font lot lines of o/1 lots. These easements will be 11.5 feet wide on streets with 27 foot R -0-1Y width and 15.5 feet wide on streets with 29 foot R -O -W width. 2. Emergency vehicular occess is allowed to all (Memel roods. 3. A// infernal roads con be used as utility easements. 4. There shall be for utility, d o/nage, and irrigation purposes a 15 foot wide easement, 7.5 feet on each side o/ all side and rear /ot lines 5. All internal and entry roods ore subject to o permanent access easement for use and benefit of the owner of the Aspen Glen Club and the club's members and employees. Title Certificate / on attorney licensed to practice low in the State of Colorado, or agent authorized by a title Insurance company, do hereby certify that / hove examined the Title to o// lands shown upon this Plot and that Title to such lords is vested in free and clear of oil Bens and encumbrances (including mortgages, deeds of trust judgments easements, contracts and agreements of record affecting the real property he this Plot), except as follows: DATED this _-__ day of A0 2010. Title Company Agent Surveyor's Certificate for Prel)ninory Plot /, Stephen L. Ehlers, do hereby certiy that / ora o Profession/ Land Surveyor licensed under the /ow o/ the Stole of Colorado, that this preliminary plot shown hereon wos mode from an accurate survey of said property by me, or under my svperv/slan and correctly shows the location and dimensions of the boundary, existing easements and existing conditions to the best of my knowledge. /N 6115(155 WHEREOF / hoe set my hand and seal this day of _ -- , AD., 2010. Stephen L. Biters, Profession! Lond Surveyor /20133 Neb'er .4.10,0189to Cob,ado Lae, you mese any regal oaten based upon any in defect this survey ansa three years eller you (051 dseoee1' such defect In no event moy ony action based upon any defect m this y be commenced more /hon ten years r the dote of the cedelkot/on shown neeedn. - Certain building locations may.. subject to geologic and hydraulic hazards. Al/ structures shall require the submittal of on engeedng report addressing soils and geology conditions, foundation design and drainage prepared by a registered profession/ engineer Al/ site development, /nc/ud0g building construction, shall be conducted in accordance with engineer's stipulations. - No open hearth so/Id-fuel being fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within Aspen Glen. A/1 dwelling units m71 be of/owed on unrestr/cted number of natural gos burning fireplaces or appliances. A// dwelling units l// be allowed no more than one new wood burn/ng stove as defined by CR.S. 25-7-401, et seq. and the regulations promulgated (hereunder. - - Only one (1) dog Is allowed for each residential unit. - The mineral rights associated w'ih this property hove been portio//y or wholly severed and ore not fu//y intact or transferred with the surface estate therefore allowing the potential for natural resource extraction on the properly by the mineral estate owner(s) or lessn(s). ' - Aging to F£/A9 the subject parcel is situated in o Zone C (Areo of minima/ flooding). See FIRM mop 1465, Community Pone/ number 080205 14655 - Open Space Parcels 1 thio 5 shall be dedicated to the Home Owners Association of Aspen Glen, said dedication is to include the use of these areas os reosonoby necessary for the into/lotion, maintenance, repo/r and replacement of utilities. including water, sewer, irrigation, electrical, telephone, gos, cablevision, pedestrian trail, facilities and installations for wafer drainage and the control of water flow, os wen as for any reasonable necessary retaining walls, cut/fail slopes and related facilities and roods. -Together with the use of the open space parcels os outlined oboe a 20' wide drainage grading, maintenance and utility easement is provided along the northeasterly limits of the CR 109 right-of-way to insure the existing top of berm and propned top of wall ore maintained for aesthetics and there is peer function of drainage features for CR 709. County Surveyors Certificate Approved for content and form only and not the accuracy of surveys, aolcu/oh0ns or drafting, pursuant to C.R.S. S 38-51-101 and 702, et seq. DATED this _-._ day of A0 2010. Garfield County Surveyor VICINITY MAP Scale 1 "=4, 000' Development Area Residential Units Size (Acres) Off Street Parking Provided Totol Areo of Subdivision 0.60 4.24 (4) Open Space/Common Area Total Areo of Developed Buildings 0.41 Total Non -Residential Floor Space - - - Single -Family (Detached) Lots 1-7 7 1.91 4 MIN. = 28 Duplex (Attached) Lots 8 -10 6 1.32 4 MIN. = 24 Total 13 3.23 52 Density 4.02 Unite/Acre Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitki, Counties (C0655) Map Unit Symbol Mop Unit Nome Acres in A01 Percent of Aol 6 Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes 15.5 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) 15.5 100.0% Board of County Commissionary' Certificate: Dis Plat, approved by the Board of County Commissioners of\"Godeld County Colorado, this _ day of A0. 2010, for filing with the C/erk and Recorder o/ Garfield County and for conveyance to the County of the public dedicof"/.ns shown hereon; subject to the provision that approval in no way obligates Corfield 00oo,1t.(or t1ie f/noncing or constructing of improvements on /ands, public highways, or easements ded/caled)'to the public except os specifically agreed to by the Boon/ of County Commissioners and fOrfhar-that sold approval sholl In no toy obligate Garfield County for the construct/on, repair or mojo /conn enol public highways. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2 N%.... . . r�. OF CAMEL!) COUNTY, COLORADO t �., �\` \; i � d Chairman s "s ).' ,%v.\ \Z, Mims. my hand and sea/ o/ the Cod* of Gorfie/d "'�� \4 Attest: ,.�•.j .1 )i �,, County Cleric w� J \ Clerk and RecardeFs�Cert�cate: i:'• This p/a(,was 1,7 /os record /n the e of the Clerk and Recorder of Gore/d County, Colorado, at �1c)ack �M., this _-..,,,7_,,,,,,f,,,.______ _ oo�;, of__,_ 2070, in Book , of Poge Reception (�40: _____....4",,,.,6,,.../.;\‘\)...,,,)' _ �, ��\ 4 yL Clerk & Recorder /5 /( ,J C \• Deputy `:`✓ ' - \11 • SCHMUESER I GORDON 1 MEYER ENGINEERS 4000VeYORe SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 The Sages at Aspen Glen REV15/ON • DATE Revised Certificates 4' Layout 61/11/11 BY RJ Revise Development Area Table mow SE Preliminary Plat Job Ab. 2008-361.002 Drown by. SB Dole: 13apri/2010 1 Approved The: Soles PP -pat OF 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0039 Floor Areas (sq.ft.) Size (Acres) Parking Provided (4) Public/Quasi-Public Open R.O.Y. 0.60 (4) Open Space/Common Area Open Space 0.41 Total 1.01 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitki, Counties (C0655) Map Unit Symbol Mop Unit Nome Acres in A01 Percent of Aol 6 Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes 15.5 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) 15.5 100.0% Board of County Commissionary' Certificate: Dis Plat, approved by the Board of County Commissioners of\"Godeld County Colorado, this _ day of A0. 2010, for filing with the C/erk and Recorder o/ Garfield County and for conveyance to the County of the public dedicof"/.ns shown hereon; subject to the provision that approval in no way obligates Corfield 00oo,1t.(or t1ie f/noncing or constructing of improvements on /ands, public highways, or easements ded/caled)'to the public except os specifically agreed to by the Boon/ of County Commissioners and fOrfhar-that sold approval sholl In no toy obligate Garfield County for the construct/on, repair or mojo /conn enol public highways. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2 N%.... . . r�. OF CAMEL!) COUNTY, COLORADO t �., �\` \; i � d Chairman s "s ).' ,%v.\ \Z, Mims. my hand and sea/ o/ the Cod* of Gorfie/d "'�� \4 Attest: ,.�•.j .1 )i �,, County Cleric w� J \ Clerk and RecardeFs�Cert�cate: i:'• This p/a(,was 1,7 /os record /n the e of the Clerk and Recorder of Gore/d County, Colorado, at �1c)ack �M., this _-..,,,7_,,,,,,f,,,.______ _ oo�;, of__,_ 2070, in Book , of Poge Reception (�40: _____....4",,,.,6,,.../.;\‘\)...,,,)' _ �, ��\ 4 yL Clerk & Recorder /5 /( ,J C \• Deputy `:`✓ ' - \11 • SCHMUESER I GORDON 1 MEYER ENGINEERS 4000VeYORe SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 The Sages at Aspen Glen REV15/ON • DATE Revised Certificates 4' Layout 61/11/11 BY RJ Revise Development Area Table mow SE Preliminary Plat Job Ab. 2008-361.002 Drown by. SB Dole: 13apri/2010 1 Approved The: Soles PP -pat OF 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0039 s, whose address Is Post Office Box 37, Aspen Colorado, being sole owner n fee simple of all that red bath, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridiem, Canty of Serried, State of Colorado, and being more ne of County Rood 109 and the westerly One al 2nd Amended Plat of Golf Course Parcel 9, Aspen Glen, thence the WI/4 Corner of Section 20. Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 61h Principal Meridian ce along the west fine of said Golf Cance Parcel 9 the tailoring six (6) courses 1179'46'03'E a dalance 16.37 feet; thence S74'11'521 a distance of 10.61 feet thence, 5097303'E a distance of 440.20 feel; e, 514'34'35'E o diston,e of 84.79 feet to the north right of way line of Golden Boor Done as shown on Reception No. 531004, County of Gorfidd, State of Colorado; thence ding said north right of way fine c of a 814.50 feet radius nm -tangent curve to the left, hang a control angle of 312'05' and of 45.50 feet thence 29.03 feet along the arc of o 199.75 feet rod'us am to the right hong a eating S7856'20'W a distance of 29.01 feel; thence, 56216'09'W a distance of 45.30 feet; thence 61.73 1 the left, honing a central ongle of 17'39'47' and subtending a chord beating S7326'16'W a distance of 133.67 feet radius ane to the left, hosing a central angle of 31711' and subtending o dmrd bearng 1 feel olong the ore of a 47.5D kel radius wrve to the right, hang a central angle of 461917' ond of 37.36 feet to the east fight of way line of county road 109; thence along said east right of woy line ice of 166.96 feet' thence N20'41'20'W a d0tance of 11.95 feet; thence 545.79 feet long the arc of a , honing a centrol angle of 1957'06' and subtending a chord bearing N1656'57'W a distance of 543.26 t to the pont of beginning, said tract contains 184,848 sq.9. or 4.244 acres more or lens. hided the some into lots as shown hereon and designate the some os DIE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN. In the led on the accompanying plot are hereby dedicated and set apart to the Haneo,ners Assodation at fon, fee the use of the members and guests thereof properly which ore labeled as utility easements on the accempany99 plot as perpetual easements for the Ind drainage fac6ties. including but not limited to electric Ines gos fins, telephone Ines, together with oerpetud right of Ingress and egress for nstallation one maintenance of such Ines. Such easements one manner. me to be hereunto ,bsmbed de ne this_ day of_A.1) 2016, by Gerd Zeller os Neu at Page 271. IL Range 8B West of the 618, Principal livid! Final Plat The Sages at Aspen Glen Section 13, T.7 S., R.89 W. of the 6th P.M. Garfield County, Colorado gvtc5 1. Basis of Bearings Bearings are retake to the bearings as shown for the 2nd Amended Pial of Golf Course Pard 9, Aspen pen, Frog No. 1 -Reception No. 664560. showing a beating along the westerly fine of said of 529'23'03'E os shown. 2. Surrey Date: Existing Conditions Mapping -October 14, 2002. 4. Units of linear measurancnts ore displayed n US Survey Feet. 5. 5068 w11 not be respmeble far any changes mode to this document after N leaves our possession. My copy. facsenie, etc, of this daament must be compared to the original signed, sealed and dated document to insure the accuracy of the information shown on any swath copy, and to insure that no such changes have been made. ed to practice law in the State of Calomdo, or agent outhorized by a gine insurance company, all lands shorn upon this Hal and that Title to nide lands Is vested n and incumbrances (including mortgages, deeds of trust, judgments, easements, contracts and this Hat), except as follows: 016. of Trust granted by the Owner upon the red property platted end divided os shown s that the undersigned hos reviewed the Subdivision Plot Amendment and by this . Amendment and to the recording 8Aereaf. Beneficiary bather consents to said ale of Oedialian and Ownership.-atoted by the Owner hereon, and hereby subordinates property subject to such dee," a the enttty(ies) or the generd public to which 2016. 6. The Sages el Aspen pen, is o part of Aspen pen P.U.D. approved .one 29, 1992 by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County. The terms and conditions applicable to the Aspen pen P.U.O. ore set forth In the resdotlonn of the Canty Commissioners recorded on dune 29, 1992 as Reception No. 436262 in Book 835 at Page 305 of the records of the Gadd County Clerk and Recorder. 7. The red property depicted and described on the with Find Hat, The Sages et Aspen pen, n subject to all terms and conditions of (I) the Laster Dedamtim of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen pen recorded in the records of the Garfi8d Canty perk and Records on Apr9 6, 1995 as Reception No. 476328; and (0) the fifteenth Supplemental Declaration 10 the baster Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions fa Aspen pen recorded In the records of Garfield County Clerk one Recorder on December 21, 2004, n Book 1649 at Page 891. & The within fad Plot constitutes a Supplementd Hol as that tens is defied b the Laster Declaration of Cements, Conditions and Restrictions fa Aspen pen. By virtue of the within Fid Hal and the Fifteenth Supplemental Declaration to the Laster Dedaro9m of Cownonts, Conditions one Restrictions for Aspen pen, the red properly depleted and desmbe4 on the whthn Fid Plot is annexed to and mode a pat of the Aspen pen Canmunity Mea. 9. The set bods shown hereon reflect the development standards of the pub Vila Residen4d Zone District as outlined n Book 83.5 at Page 305 and os Amended By Resolution of the Bead of Canty Commissioners, Recorded on as Reception No. 10. Only one (1) dog Is 4lowed for earth residential unit. 11. According to FDA the subject parcel is situated in a Zone C (Mea of minced flooding). See 110L mop 1465, Community Pond number 080205 14658 12. Open Space Parcels 1 than 5 shall be dedicated to the Horne Owners Association of Aspen pen, sold 4,4800160 is to include the use of these areas as reasonably necessary for the installation, mantenonce, repair and replacement of unities, 'during water, sewer, rogation, deetrkal, telephone, gas. able television, pedestrian hon, toddies and Installations for water drainage and the control of water flow, as won as for ony reasonable necessary retaining wags, cut/fit dopes and seated fealties ad roads. 13. Together with the use of the open space parcels as outlined above o 20' wide konage, grading, maintenance and utility easement is prodded along the northeasterly limits of the CR 109 right-of-way to insure the existing top of berm and proposed lop of waft are maintained far aesthetics and there Is proper function of draooge fealures for CR 109. 14. Certain budding locations may be abject to gedogle end hydraulic hazards. All structures shell require the submittal of on engineering report addressing sons and geology candilims, foundation design and drainage prepared by a registered professional engineer. A8 site development, ndud'g beading construction, shall be conducted in accordance with engineer's stipulations. 15. Control of norious weeds is the rmponsbifty of the property owner. 16. No open hearth solid -fed burning fireplaces all be allowed y1her6 walla the subdivision. One (1) new safid-fuel burning stone as defied by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et.seq., and the regulations premulAR 4o,9r,gutnits be be allowed an er, nil be unrestricted in any of natural g ani gas burning fireplaces or appliances. 17. All exterior fightingHI be the minimum amount necessary and m celeriac righting wbe deeded inward, towards the interior of the subdmviskm except that provisions may be made to mow for safety 1'ghi9g that goes beyond the property bandories 0 opprosed expressly by the Aspen pen Design Review Committee. 18. Cdwado is a 'Right -to -Fane State pursuant to 0.R.5. 35-3-101, et seq. Landowners, residents and visitors must he prepared to accept the ac0dties, sights, sounds orad ands of Garfield Cantyes agricultural operations os a nomad and necessary aspect of Ih4g in e county with strong turd character and a healthy ronchhg sector. Those with on urban sensiRdty may perceive suds activities, sights, sound, and smells only as an inconvenience, eyesore, noise and odor. However, stale law and county policy provide that rending, fanning and the other agricultural activities and operations wiU6 Garfield County shall not be considered to be nuisances so long as operated n formmce with the law and in a non -negligent manner. Therefore, a9 must be prepared to encounter noises, oda, fights, mud, dust smoke, chemicals, modmnery on public roods, livestock 00pud io roods, slaage ed dispose of mmare, ore the antenotlon . herbicide. er othaes i of shany one ortras, 006 maydnent herbicide, and pesticides, nal one a more of With may mural o er ar w pat of lege and nm -negligent agricultural operations. 19. All emus of land, whether ranch 0r residence, have obligations under Stale law and Canty regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and krig,tion ditches, centring weeds, keeping 6,6.90 d< one pets under control, using property in accordance with zing. one other aspects of using and mointaining property. Residents and landowners are encouraged to learn about these rights and responsb8i8es and act os good neighbors and citizens of the Canty. A good introductory source for such information is 'A Guide to Rural Lung de Srnoll Scale Agriculture put at by the Colorado Stole University Extena6n Office In Gores.' Canty. 20. Fencing on the property shall comply with the 0ivdon of Waif, aped8calioes for wldlife-fnendy fencing. 21. the mnerd rights associated with this property have been parti0ly or wholly severed and are not fully 6lact or transferted with the striae estate therefore allowing the potential for natural resource extraction on the property by the mineral owner(s) or lessee(,). 22. Lots 58 through 510 ore duplex lois and maybe further subdndded at a future date 23. The property shown hereon Is subject to all easements, rights-of-way, 0008. items may o19,09 this setbacks other This a aches not repraenl 0 title search by this surveyor to determne ownership or to discover easements cur other encumbrances of record. All information pertaining is omership, easement and other encumbrances of record has been token from the title insurance commitment issued by Stewart Tdie Guaronty Company, Fie No. 01330-84010. hang on effective dote of duly 21, 2016. Pohwhpaent Arco Residential Units Site (Acres) ON Street Parking Provided Wed Area of Shtdnxtia, 4.24 Toto/ Arm 07 0001 Reed I ,08,00 f Non-Redden8al Thor Space - - f - 5ngle-F 7s, (Detached) Late S7-57 7 091 4 IOM - 28 Duplex (A(4oNwd) Cob 5W - S70 6 7.132 f NOL = 24 Certificate of Taxes Paid I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes and assessments due and payable as of VICINITY MAP F a11F14T STATEMENT. 1. There shall be on easement for unities, drainage, irrigation and pedestrian occess for sidewalks along the front lot Ilnes of all 1 to. These easements di be 11.5 feel wide on streets with 27 foot R-0-14 width and 15.5 feet wide on streets with 29 loot R-0-14 width. 2. Emergency sehiculor access is allowed to oil Meme roods. 3. AO internal roads con be used as unity easements. 4. There shall be, for ut9Ry, drainage, and 9rigalion purposes, 0 15 fool wide easement, 7.5 feet on each side of dl side lot Eines. 5. AO Meme and entry roods are subject to a permanent access easement for use end benefit of the owner of the Aspen pen Club and the dub's members and employees $gfveSer's Certified. t Robert E Brondeberry, do hereby certify thol I am a Profeoiad Land Surwyar licensed under the laws of the Stale of Colorado, that this Plat is a true, correct and complete Plat of The Sages at Aspen fit& as laid out, plotted, dedicated and shown hereon, that such Plot was mode from an eaurate survey of sold property by me, or under my supervision, and correctly shows the location ad dimensions of the lots. easements and streets of said abdvsim as the some are slaked upon the ground in compliance with opplioabie regdo6ons govan0g the subdidsion of land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have set my hind and sed this _ day of LA0 2016. 1h16w1 E &mate y Cola &8 t 36388 F0,ad minted alai. COON 5urvwwrs Certificate Approved for content and form only and not the accuracy of surveys, 040.10tians or drafting. pursuant to C.R.S. § 36-51-101 and 102, et seq. DATED this _ day of A.D. 2016. Garfield Canty Surveyor Weld of Carate Canmtsstmer's CaBBata Based upon the review and recommendation of Garfield County Director of Community Development, the Board of the County Commissioners of Garfield Canty, Colorado, hereby approves this Amended Find Hal this _ day of AO 2016, for filing with the Clerk ond Retarder of Garfield County, abject to the provisions that appoval in no way obligates Gorged Canty for the financing or construction of improvements on lends, public reads, highways or easements dedicated the public, except as specifically agreed to by the Boal of County Commissioners by seperote resolution. This approve anon in no way obligate Garfield Canty for the construction, repel or maintenance of streets, public roads, highways, or any other public dedications shown hereon. Choeman, Board of County Commissioners Garfield County, 'da -ado 1511ness my hand and seal of the County of Garfield. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0040 90 5011 1110 940 '265 5711 575 115 .565 '705 '995 7611 56? 171- 8410 1755410 445 775 540. 3.5 795 9251 1111 555 0E114 4619"7- 747"1- 1719'47' 019'19' 71255' 190106' 44000' 8851')5' !0701'47' 565650' 6812,34- 2711C' 71217 221'1/' 663141' 661741' 255851' .79.2478- 667741' 74050' 17246'12' 22657 44259' 55741' • \ Final Plat The Sages at Aspen Glen Section 13, T.7 S., R.89 W. of the 6th P.M. Garfield County, Colorado D� C0165 941665 006570 6467E 1005651 TARE MOO 01 DELIA C24 165167 7807 .79.01 7606 57418783. 24455' 325 6150 7264 4088 6675 56269735 6572'41' 026 64.50 7669 4.115 7241 4100'4465411 7317'41' C27 81450 2558 1279 2559 514.50'7011 1.4739- C28 19975 7.141 671 1142 68820413. 75031. C29 114.50 24.46 1258 2481 600215011 121026' C30 81450 1897 996 1993 519'263211 17456' 337 19915 1161 7.81 1.161 417610513. 72601' 032 83167 3.100 1650 3100 564287911 71656' 333 83.761 2209 1165 22.09 361745411 1'3155. C35 6633 4425 2200 4.043 110421583. .769273' 0.36 10.00 1481 020 7.154 027593811 861251' 0.36 22125 07.90 34.22 01.65 57520',611 139.41. 0.30 85167 24.19 1210 24.19 567474051 93755' C40 2600 .0099 97.63 2095 63646511, 60/7'41' co 163567 39.70 1569 31.79 .0706'485 156'47 342 761.167 26176 11117 26.540 51719205 77823" CO 12100 1390 696 1390 10,5317011 07376' C44 2100 2660 1608 27.07 632792311 6732'41' 347 81450 3260 1610 32.60 578717119 71173' 546 779.75 LISS 651 9.706 409.24733. 23554' C49 2476 4140 3229 3950 02552J85 7050216' Golf Course Corridor Easement Reception No. 665693 (To Be Vacated by this find Plat) Proposed Utility Easement (Ta be recorded with separate document prier to this And plat) 514'34:35Z Coif Course Corridor Easement Reception No. 965693 (To Be Vacated by this Fined Plat) 84.79' 51 I' 2669 %651:1' 42:16C"u g636 147 (Easement) 800 Pew 1/00C1 Masa Cap LS 15710 Rad Amended Plat aJ 60(1 305257 Parcel 9, Aapm Gan 10779 No 1 7850907080 Na 664560 86 .011 Coif Course Corridor Easement Reception No. 665693 (To Be Vacated by this Final Rat) 0481818 80.0040098 0008 Spe08 I 607188 8/- 1.0 fiord E • 6 6''f 26wter. a 529." 670 611 3 63 N tl3 02 10. 4 "rg,`o. 797/4 Com 385760 20 Lot 57 0289 63 I/- 4 Lot S6 0211 AC 2/- 4 Lot 38 .�wwppm� 0866 AC / 41 , u, ocrAlty Ota 3 SL ViA6' G o� BE $ 410 100 g0 t8 -p69 30 i-gut-Ot 60 604 9 4324'✓= 613 .1.3.04._ t -m 6621 1'R 52.51 d �.y5 •201 \ �1d 988 edf Open Spe00 S 6148 AG \cl° 4s 041 7 LIVE LIRE 5615 1LN61N eraepec 11 625 NLS4J9711 L1 79.97 41070'1919 IJ 1666 4151'7695? 54 4668 1447007211 73 22.61 41170173? 16 1010 579'74'519 17 11.72 /0,265411 68 )210 522700519 19 4666 142701'3511 LL0 1650 99189759? 011 '466 015395919 LIZ 2191 x17423411 013 1605 134570919 114 1660 NO 5319 L15 1803 641:75'50? 016 32.99 147477417 117 1600 113629]611 LI9 23.58 x79.46515 L19 30037 4792305 120 L21 127 125 1067 514'11325 4191 82973575 7604 15.93 x.34497119 649:7240? 324 2505 x39511511 LAT TABLE LAT LIMN 84100 L40 1.604 524795919 142 1691 517305511 647 17.66 5,1725711 144 17.09 51541535 145 1603 53632405 144 40.58 54351515 L47 1819 51506725, 161 1067 174775111 657 11.95 51171505 159 27.01 56824'4911 060 1167 51613375 16l 2662 60421'165 162 1415 58504165, 163 3113 565011619 164 4149 6$50476? 165 631 1/74I737V L66 619 N14175119 166 2119 416139455 169 1515' 527514819 111 2446 5841441 171 1675 S12J11I11 L72 24.41 50423577 177 2441 515377611 674 2507 58230515 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0041 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT THIS SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT ("SIA") is made and entered into this day of September, 2016, by and between GERD ZELLER ("Owner") and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, ("BOCC") acting for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, as a body politic and corporate, directly or through its authorized representatives and agents. Recitals Owner is the owner and developer of the Sages at Aspen Glen Subdivision (the "Subdivision"), which property is depicted on the Final Plat of The Sages at Aspen Glen Subdivision ("Final Plat" or "Final Plat of the Subdivision"). The real property subject to this SIA is described in that Final Plat, recorded on at Reception Number of the real property records of Garfield County, Colorado and incorporated by this reference. On October 3, 2011, the BOCC, by Resolution No. 2011-54, recorded at Reception Number 808880 of the real property records of Garfield County, Colorado and incorporated by this reference, approved a preliminary plan for the Subdivision which, among other things, would create seven (7) single-family residential lots, three (3) duplex residential lots, and four open space/common area parcels ("Preliminary Plan Approval"). As a condition precedent to the approval of the Final Plat submitted to the BOCC as required by the laws of the State of Colorado and by the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended ("LUDC"), Owner wishes to enter into this SIA with the BOCC. Owner has agreed to execute and deliver a letter of credit or other security in a form satisfactory to the BOCC to secure and guarantee Owner's performance under this Agreement and has agreed to certain restrictions and conditions regarding the sale of properties and issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy within the subdivision, all as more fully set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the BOCC and Owner ("Parties") agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. The BOCC hereby accepts and approves the Final Plat of the Subdivision, on the date set forth above, subject to the terms and conditions of this SIA, the Preliminary Plan Approval, and the requirements of the LUDC and any other governmental or quasi -governmental regulations applicable to the Subdivision ("Final Plat Approval"). Recording of the Final Plat in the real property records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder shall be in accordance with this SIA and at the time prescribed herein. 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0042 2. OWNERS PERFORMANCE AS TO SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS. a. Completion Date/Substantial Compliance. Owner shall cause to be constructed and installed the subdivision improvements, identified in the Exhibits defined in subparagraph 2 (a)(i), below ("Subdivision Improvements") at Owner's expense, including payment of fees required by Garfield County and/or other governmental and quasi -governmental entities with regulatory jurisdiction over the Subdivision. The Subdivision Improvements shall be completed on or before the end of the first full year following execution of this SIA ("Completion Date"), in substantial compliance with the following: Plans marked Approved for Construction for all Subdivision Improvements prepared by SGM ("Owner's Engineer") and submitted to the BOCC on September , 2016, such plans being summarized in the list of drawings attached to and made a part of this SIA by reference as Exhibit A; the estimate of cost of completion, certified by and bearing the stamp of Owner's professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado ("Owner's Engineer"), attached to and made a part of this SIA by reference as Exhibit B, which estimate shall include an additional 10% percent of the total for contingencies; and all other documentation required to be submitted along with the Final Plat under pertinent sections of the LUDC ("Final Plat Documents") ii. All requirements of the Preliminary Plan Approval. iii. All laws, regulations, orders, resolutions and requirements of Garfield County and all special districts and any other governmental entity or quasi -governmental authorities with jurisdiction. iv. The provisions of this SIA. b. Satisfaction of Subdivision Improvements Provisions. The BOCC agrees that if all Subdivision Improvements are constructed and installed in accordance with this paragraph 2; the record drawings have been submitted upon completion of the Subdivision Improvements, as detailed in paragraph 3(c), below; and all other requirements of this SIA have been met, then the Owner shall be deemed to have satisfied all terms and conditions of the Preliminary Plan Approval, the Final Plat Documents and the LUDC, with respect to the installation of Subdivision Improvements. 3. SECURITY FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS (EXCEPT RE -VEGETATION). a. Subdivision Improvements Letter of Credit and Substitute Collateral. As security 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0043 for Owner's obligation to complete the Subdivision Improvements, other than revegetation, Owner shall deliver to the BOCC, on or before the date of recording of the Final Plat of the Subdivision, a Letter of Credit in the form agreed to be acceptable to the BOCC, attached to and incorporated in this SIA by reference as Exhibit C ("LOC") or in a form consistent with the Uniform Commercial Code, C.R.S. § 4-1-101, et seq. and approved by the BOCC. The LOC shall be in the amount of One Million, Twenty-seven Thousand, Fifty-one and 50/100 Dollars ($1,027,051.50), representing the full estimated cost of completing the Subdivision Improvements, with a sufficient contingency to cover cost changes, unforeseen costs and other variables (not less than 10% of the estimated cost and as approved by the BOCC), as set forth and certified by Owner's Engineer on Exhibit B, to guarantee completion of the Subdivision Improvements. The LOC shall be valid for a minimum of six (6) months beyond the Completion Date for the Subdivision Improvements set forth in Paragraph 2(a), above. The BOCC, at its sole option, may permit the Owner to substitute collateral other than a Letter of Credit, in a form acceptable to the BOCC, for the purpose of securing the completion of the Subdivision Improvements subject of this Paragraph 3(a). b. LOC Requirements and Plat Recording. The LOC required by this SIA shall be issued by a state or national banking institution acceptable to the BOCC. If the institution issuing the LOC is not licensed in the State of Colorado and transacting business within the State of Colorado, the LOC shall be confirmed within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial Code, Letters of Credit, 4-5-101, et seq., C.R.S., as amended, by a bank that is licensed to do business in the State of Colorado, doing business in Colorado, and acceptable to the BOCC. The LOC shall state that presentation of drafts drawn under the LOC shall be at an office of the issuer or confirmer located in the State of Colorado. The Final Plat of the Subdivision shall not be recorded until the security, described in this paragraph 3 has been received and approved by the BOCC. c. Extension of LOC Expiration Date. If the Completion Date, identified in paragraph 2 (a) above, is extended by a written amendment to this SIA, the time period for the validity of the LOC shall be similarly extended by the Owner. For each six (6) month extension, at the sole option of the BOCC, the face amount of the LOC shall be subject to re -certification by Owner's Engineer of the cost of completion and review by the BOCC. d. Unenforceable LOC. Should the LOC expire or become void or unenforceable for any reason, including bankruptcy of the Owner or the financial institution issuing or confirming the LOC, prior to the BOCC's approval of Owner's Engineer's 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0044 certification of completion of the Subdivision Improvements, this SIA shall become void and of no force and effect and the Final Plat shall be vacated pursuant to the terms of this SIA. e. Partial Releases of Security. Owner may request partial releases of the LOC, and shall do so by means of submission to the Garfield County Building and Planning Department of a "Written Request for Partial Release of LOC", in the form attached to and incorporated by this reference as Exhibit D, accompanied by the Owner's Engineer's stamped certificate of partial completion of improvements. The Owner's Engineer's seal shall certify that the Subdivision Improvements have been constructed in accordance with the requirements of this SIA, including all Final Plat Documents and the Preliminary Plan Approval. Owner may also request release for a portion of the security upon proof that: 1) Owner has a valid contract with a public utility company regulated by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission obligating such company to install certain utility lines; and 2) Owner has paid to the utility company the cost of installation as required by the contract. The BOCC shall authorize successive releases of portions of the face amount of the LOC as portions of the Subdivision Improvements, dealt with in this Paragraph 3, are certified as complete to the BOCC by the Owner's Engineer and said certification is approved by the BOCC. f. BOCC's Investigation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon submission of the Owner's Written Request for Partial Release of LOC, along with Owner's Engineer's certificate of partial completion of improvements, the BOCC may review the certification and may inspect and review the Subdivision Improvements certified as complete to determine whether or not they have been constructed in compliance with relevant specifications, as follows: i. If no letter of potential deficiency is furnished to Owner by the BOCC within fifteen (15) business days of submission of Owner's Written Request for Partial Release of LOC, accompanied by Owner's Engineer's certificate of partial completion of improvements, all Subdivision Improvements certified as complete shall be deemed approved by the BOCC, and the BOCC shall authorize release of the appropriate amount of security. ii. Improvements certified as complete are not in compliance with the relevant specifications, the BOCC shall furnish a letter of potential deficiency to the Owner, within fifteen (15) business days of submission of Owner's Written Request for Partial Release of LOC, accompanied by Owner's Engineer's certificate of partial completion of improvement. 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0045 g. iii. If a letter of potential deficiency is issued identifying a portion of the certified Subdivision Improvements as potentially deficient, then all Subdivision Improvements not identified as potentially deficient shall be deemed approved by the BOCC, and the BOCC shall authorize release of the amount of security related to the Subdivision Improvements certified as complete and not identified as potentially deficient. iv. With respect to Subdivision Improvements identified as potentially deficient in a letter of potential deficiency, the BOCC shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the letter to complete the initial investigation, begun under subparagraph 3 (f)(ii) above, and provide written confirmation of the deficiencies to the Owner. v. If the BOCC finds that the Subdivision Improvements are complete, in compliance with the relevant specifications, then the appropriate amount of security shall be authorized for release within ten (10) business days after completion of such investigation. BOCC Completion of Improvements and Other Remedies. If the BOCC finds, within the thirty (30) day period of time, defined in subparagraph 3(f)(iv) above, that the Subdivision Improvements are not complete, or if the BOCC determines that the Owner will not or cannot construct any or all of the Subdivision Improvements, whether or not Owner has submitted a written request for release of LOC, the BOCC may withdraw and employ from the LOC such funds as may be necessary to construct the Subdivision Improvements in accordance with the specifications, up to the face amount or remaining face amount of the LOC. In such event, the BOCC shall make a written finding regarding Owner's failure to comply with this SIA prior to requesting payment from the LOC, in accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the LUDC. In lieu of or in addition to drawing on the LOC, the BOCC may bring an action for injunctive relief or damages for the Owner's failure to adhere to the provisions of this SIA regarding Subdivision Improvements. The BOCC shall provide the Owner a reasonable time to cure any identified deficiencies prior to requesting payment from the LOC or filing a civil action. h. Final Release of Security. Upon completion of all Subdivision Improvements, Owner shall submit to the BOCC, through the Community Development Department: 1) record drawings bearing the stamp of Owner's Engineer certifying that all Subdivision Improvements have been constructed in accordance with the requirements of this SIA, including all Final Plat Documents and the Preliminary Plan Approval, in hard copy and digital format acceptable to the BOCC; 2) copies of instruments conveying real property and other interests which Owner is 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0046 obligated to convey to the Homeowner's Association of the Subdivision [or any statutory special district or other entity] at the time of Final Plat Approval; and 3) a Written Request for Final Release of LOC, in the form attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibit E, along with Owner's Engineer's stamp and certificate of final completion of improvements. The BOCC shall authorize a final release of the LOC after the Subdivision Improvements are certified as final to the BOCC by the Owner's Engineer and said final certification is approved by the BOCC. If the BOCC finds that the Subdivision Improvements are complete, in accordance with the relevant specifications, the BOCC shall authorize release of the final amount of security, within ten (10) business days following submission of the Owner's Written Request for Final Release of LOC accompanied by the other documents required by this paragraph 3(h). ii. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon Owner's Written Request for Final Release of LOC, accompanied by Owner's Engineer's certificate of final completion of improvements, the BOCC may inspect and review the Subdivision Improvements certified as complete. If the BOCC does so review and inspect, the process contained in paragraph 3.f., above, shall be followed. iii. If the BOCC finds that the Subdivision Improvements are complete, in accordance with the relevant specifications, the BOCC shall authorize final release of security within ten (10) days after completion of such investigation. iv. If the BOCC finds that the Subdivision Improvements are not complete, in accordance with the relevant specifications, the BOCC may complete remaining Subdivision Improvements, or institute court action in accordance with the process outlined in paragraph 3.g., above. 4. SECURITY FOR REVEGETATION (If Required). The application for Final Plat for The Sages at Aspen Glen does not require security ro revegetation. 5. WATER SUPPLY [AND WASTEWATER COLLECTION]. As stated in paragraph 13, below, prior to issuance by the BOCC of any certificates of occupancy for any residences or other habitable structures constructed within the Subdivision, Owner shall install, connect and make operable a water supply and distribution system for potable water, fire protection, 6 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0047 non -potable irrigation water, and a wastewater/sewer collection system in accordance with approved plans and specifications. All easements and rights-of-way necessary for installation, operation, service and maintenance of such water supply and distribution systems and wastewater collection system shall be as shown on the Final Plat. Owner shall deposit with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder executed originals of the instruments of conveyance for easements appurtenant to the water and wastewater systems, for recordation following recording of the Final Plat and this SIA. All facilities and equipment contained within the water supply and wastewater collection systems shall be transferred by Owner to the Homeowner's Association of the Subdivision or Special Districts by bill of sale. If a third party water or sewer service entity requires warranty of the systems, Owner shall provide proof to the BOCC that such warranty is in effect and, if necessary, has been assigned. 6. PUBLIC ROADS. All roads within the Subdivision shall be dedicated by the Owner to the public as public rights-of-way and shall be accepted by the BOCC, on behalf of the public, on the face of the Final Plat. The Homeowner's Association of the Subdivision shall be solely responsible for the maintenance, repair and upkeep of said rights-of-way, including the traveled surface of the roadways and portions of the rights-of-way outside of the traveled surface. The BOCC shall not be obligated to maintain any road rights-of-way within the Subdivision. 7. PUBLIC UTILITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY. Whether or not utility easements exist elsewhere in the Subdivision, all road rights-of-way within the Subdivision shall contain rights-of-way for installation and maintenance of utilities. Public utility easements shall be dedicated by the Owner to the public utilities on the face of the Final Plat, subject to the Garfield County Road and Right -of -Way Use Regulations, recorded as Reception No. 643477, in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder, as amended. The Homeowner's Association of the Subdivision shall be solely responsible for the maintenance, repair and upkeep of said public utility easements, unless otherwise agreed to with the public utility companies. The BOCC shall not be obligated for the maintenance, repair and upkeep of any utility easement within the Subdivision. In the event a utility company, whether publicly or privately owned, requires conveyance of the easements dedicated on the face of the Final Plat by separate document, Owner shall execute and record the required conveyance documents. 8. CONVEYANCE OF OPEN SPACE. The common open space parcel identified on the Final Plat of the Subdivision shall be conveyed by Owner to the Homeowner's Association at the time of Final Plat Approval. Owner shall deposit with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder executed original of the instrument of conveyance for recordation following recording of the Final Plat and this SIA. 9. INDEMNITY. The Owner shall indemnify and hold the BOCC harmless and defend the BOCC from all claims which may arise as a result of the Owner's installation of the Subdivision Improvements (including off-site improvements and revegetation) and any other agreement or obligation of Owner, related to development of the Subdivision, required pursuant to this SIA. The Owner, however, does not indemnify the BOCC for claims made asserting that the standards imposed by the BOCC are improper or the cause of the injury asserted, or from claims which 7 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0048 other agreement or obligation of Owner, related to development of the Subdivision, required pursuant to this SIA. The Owner, however, does not indemnify the BOCC for claims made asserting that the standards imposed by the BOCC are improper or the cause of the injury asserted, or from claims which may arise from the negligent acts or omissions of the BOCC or its employees. The BOCC shall notify the Owner of receipt by the BOCC of a notice of claim or a notice of intent to sue, and the BOCC shall afford the Owner the option of defending any such claim or action. Failure to notify and provide such written option to the Owner shall extinguish the BOCC's rights under this paragraph. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to constitute a waiver of governmental immunity granted to the BOCC by Colorado statutes and case law. 10. ROAD IMPACT FEE. NO ROAD IMPACT FEE IS DUE 11. FEES IN LIEU OF DEDICATION OF SCHOOL LAND. Owner shall make a cash deposit in lieu of dedicating land to the Roaring Fork School District, calculated in accordance with the LUDC and the requirements of state law. The Owner and the BOCC acknowledge and agree that the cash in lieu payment for the Subdivision is calculated as follows: for the RE -1 School District: Note: Final Appraisal shall be submitted prior to recording of Final Plat and fees in lieu of dedication of school land will be paid. Currently, Owner is submitting an Opinion of Value. Unimproved per acre market value of land, based upon an appraisal submitted to the BOCC by Owner, i.e. $ ; and Land dedication standard: Seven (7) single-family dwelling units x 4.24 acres; Six (6) multi- family dwelling units x 4.24 acres equals Fifty-five and 12/100 (55.12) acres. The Owner, therefore, shall pay to the Garfield County Treasurer, at or prior to the time of recording of the Final Plat, ($ ) as a payment in lieu of dedication of land to the Roaring Fork School District. Said fee shall be transferred by the BOCC to the school district in accordance with the provisions of 30-28-133, C.R.S., as amended, and the LUDC. The Owner agrees that it is obligated to pay the above -stated fee, accepts such obligations, and waives any claim that Owner is not required to pay the cash in lieu of land dedication fee. The Owner agrees that Owner will not claim, nor is Owner entitled to claim, subsequent to recording of the Final Plat of the Subdivision, a reimbursement of the fee in lieu of land dedication to the Roaring Fork School District. 12. SALE OF LOTS. No lots, tracts, or parcels within the Subdivision may be separately conveyed prior to recording of the Final Plat in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. 8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0049 13. BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. As one remedy for breach of this SIA, the BOCC may withhold issuance of building permits for any residence or other habitable structure to be constructed within the Subdivision. Further, no building permit shall be issued unless the Owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District ("District"), if the Fire District has so required, that there is adequate water available to the construction site for the District's purposes (and all applicable District fees have been paid to the District). No certificates of occupancy shall issue for any habitable building or structure, including residences, within the Subdivision until all Subdivision Improvements have been completed and are operational as required by this SIA. 14. CONSENT TO VACATE PLAT. In the event the Owner fails to comply with the terms of this SIA, the BOCC shall have the ability to vacate the Final Plat as it pertains to any lots for which building permits have not been issued. As to lots for which building permits have been issued, the Plat shall not be vacated and shall remain valid. In such event, the Owner shall provide the BOCC a plat, suitable for recording, showing the location by surveyed legal description of any portion of the Final Plat so vacated by action of the BOCC. If such a Plat is not signed by the BOCC and recorded, or if such Plat is not provided by the Owner, the BOCC may vacate the Final Plat, or portions thereof, by resolution. (It is specifically agreed that this paragraph 14 applies to the Subdivision as a multi - phased project and, therefore, in the event the BOCC vacates the Final Plat as to the Subdivision, subject of this SIA, the BOCC may also withhold approval of a proposed final plat for a future phase, if Subdivision Improvements covered by this SIA are not completely installed and operable). 15. ENFORCEMENT. In addition to any rights provided by Colorado statute, the withholding of building permits and certificates of occupancy, provided for in paragraph 13, above, the provisions for release of security, detailed in paragraph 3, above, and the provisions for plat vacation, detailed in paragraph 14, above, it is mutually agreed by the BOCC and the Owner, that the BOCC, without making an. election of remedies, and any purchaser of any lot within the Subdivision shall have the authority to bring an action in the Garfield County District Court to compel enforcement of this SIA. Nothing in this SIA, however, shall be interpreted to require the BOCC to bring an action for enforcement or to withhold permits or certificates or to withdraw unused security or to vacate the Final Plat or a portion thereof, nor shall this paragraph or any other provision of this SIA be interpreted to permit the purchaser of a lot to file an action against the BOCC. 9 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0050 16. NOTICE BY RECORDATION. This SIA shall be recorded in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and shall be a covenant running with title to all lots, tracts and parcels within the Subdivision. Such recording shall constitute notice to prospective purchasers and other interested persons as to the terms and provisions of this SIA. 17. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The obligations and rights contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Owner and the BOCC. 18. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND NOTICE PROVISIONS. The representatives of the Owner and the BOCC, identified below, are authorized as contract administrators and notice recipients. Notices required or permitted by this SIA shall be in writing and shall be effective upon the date of delivery, or attempted delivery if delivery is refused. Delivery shall be made in person, by certified return receipt requested U.S. Mail, receipted delivery service, or facsimile transmission, addressed to the authorized representatives of the BOCC and the Owner at the address or facsimile number set forth below: Owner: BOCC: Gerd Zeller P.O. Box 37 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Phone:970-963-7487 With copy to: Whitsitt & Gross, P.C. 320 Main Street, Suite 200 Carbondale, CO 81623 Phone: 970-963-6363 Fax: 970-963-6667 Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado c/o Community Development Director 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-8212 Fax: (970) 384-3470 19. AMENDMENT AND SUBSTITUTION OF SECURITY. This SIA may be modified, 10 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0051 but only in writing signed by the parties hereto, as their interests then appear. Any such amendment, including, by way of example, extension of the Completion Date, substitution of the form of security, or approval of a change in the identity of the security provider/issuer, shall be considered by the BOCC at a scheduled public meeting. If such an amendment includes a change in the identity of the provider/issuer of security, due to a conveyance of the Subdivision by the Owner to a successor in interest, Owner shall provide a copy of the recorded assignment document(s) to the BOCC, along with the original security instrument. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties may change the identification of notice recipients and contract administrators and the contact information provided in paragraph 18, above, in accordance with the provisions of that paragraph and without formal amendment of this SIA and without consideration at a BOCC meeting. 20. COUNTERPARTS. This SIA may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed one and the same instrument. 21. VENUE AND JURISDICTION. Venue and jurisdiction for any cause arising out of or related to this SIA shall lie with the District Court of Garfield County, Colorado, and this SIA shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Colorado. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this SIA to be effective upon the date of Final Plat Approval for the Subdivision. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: By: Clerk to the Board Chairman Date: OWNER: By: Gerd Zeller Date: 11 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0052 STATE OF COLORADO )ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD Subscribed and sworn to before me by Gerd Zeller, as Owner of the Sages at Aspen Glen Subdivision, this day of , 2016. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 12 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0053 The Sa::es at Aspen Glen FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHEET INDEX . �� o ` �/-...... ))4� A� s., ,� ` : ��. o - COVER SHEET Cl GRAD/NG AND DRAINAGE PLAN C2 ROAD PLAN AND PROfILE C3 ROAD PLANDETAILS C4 WARER AND SEWER PLAN AND PROf7LEn¢ C5 MAS7ER SHALLOW U7Kl7Y PLAN118 C6 U7/LITY DETAILS C7 EROS/ON CONTROL C8 RETAINING WALL DETAILS GEYER4 1ARR/SEMER /MIS SSGM5?, 1 18 West Sixth Street, Suite 200; Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com - /l a .. Ly;� \ ``,e: _ .Sfa/.F. / "=-/nn' ... �11 , o �♦•° ,F 6 ,�� \ 1 •,` �� \�, ;, 1 " = `•• 1ji 1 �`\� � ________.A_I ,tea _o�;?',,'7 \� �:� 1V t.`1 \10 �, 7 j`. I`L `•1 4 �10110T„�,' .Y \ \ -V / �� 2'\) �' '� (()., ,, ••' {i i ° ._ \'•� �II � ':. ,y.F"`rt..4'6A 'I)1\�t1 :l 555111)77L7�� _ a ” 1 `�1 1 )'1 ` � 01 \ j�. �� \Y -, \.il. I, ,'* \ ',Ir. ��� / (1 > "• i1.V )) �164�� 1 �`.. � 1 )� i�)��� �'" /��1tnn22 '' .• •.•'�,. �.. Ti,d,``1\��Je 'r' •�: 145 7,, / .�_* _ S`9.�1 / ••••'� . ii `1•I )O '' '` S 4 '4'J:I "SOX` c J• d'h\J_\}\ I "�.�.•-/ T.IS,:_ 1,v IJ 1� /z. } 4Z -11,L � 11)H C' 1Z: 111 \ ° �� If i toli ,� _ nk . el 1) THE APPROANW7ELOCATION Of ACL KNOW MINES OWES SEIZED CS Project Engineer PHONE EIECI M CABLE ETC ARE SWAN ON 742 LRAMOCS WE CONRACRR STAU. CONTACT AIL U/ILITY OWMRS M VERIFY BOTH LOCATION AND.1.12'\)L-v-,,_-_,-At DEPM AFW M& BEFAREANYWORK CONTRACDN SHV[ BEAR DIE RLS ON98HBY FOR ITS PRDTECTKN OF MMES. WINO CONSMUcnom IM ADOMONAL PAWN M U BE WOE FAN MIRES LOGDD BUT NOT SWAN W 2) KORSIDIDS 1Ml/6 SH4L BE (WSW IDN A RYE AN0 LWE-INF (3Jn 8707 MOW Of P/N GOO /f HALL BEIffT AfM E ATZS E -HALF• (a ODFLR OBA2 FOOT N PROPOSED COV APR GRADE 04N BE YARIEO PROVIDED THE 5 I/2 FOOT WNW WON OF COVER /S IL4MANEA 3) ACL MECA4ACAL ON RINGS REWNRED FOR THE DE-R/S M DIE E FIND AUII/E LA OF 11£ (HESE IN PD'1NOED AS ARE FMO CONTRACTOR RECURS) BY ME OTNMACMR AS PART OF ]IE -B1 M WINO 5)STFA/ R'B HELL.;•, 4) ALL RETEfun.,WRIST /6ENOS CK INSLA ED by CC IIP AND HES% ID T&DCHRD A TT ^EIDE MDONN DET µF17 SAPACE KE AU TST gBLOW WY NOT /ME OW SNOW ON THE PLN NEW DRAW= NEC-A-UASS MAY BE 5UBSDRRED FAN WIC THRUST BLGK'/( 114019 WNW APPRO/71 5) MUM ALL COW (COLORADO DEPAR/MENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH @ FNNRCWMIN) RE0LU1101/5 FOR WART NM WO? LNC GAMING% L BE RESPAYSIBIE 10R REMC ANY DD'MRBED AREAS R/ 6) ME CONTRACTOR MDSRM ACCORDA SE 1177H SPamcAnO/IS T) ALL RENOYID WATER LINE AP OR7DA5CES ID BE 5000155 70 DINER 8) THEPWOW ER W[BE LOCATION SHOWN WW2ES JCM DEDECMN (A APC Of 9) WE 5400 040111 SHOWN 91 PLV/ NEW 0/00476 THE LOCA7KN OF 77/E STEPS MM/P1 74/6 WHOLE AND APACE MA/ [WOOD BY A BLICNENED GAOL THIS SU BE THE MOW 1004110.9140 EACH LNM/IXE SHOW David M. Kotz, P.E. 29961 Owner: { '1 VICINITY J N IT) MAP /0) CONDUCTOR M P30Y THE OWE 06 AIL 8.1'51190 SEDER LUNE BEFORE ANY PPE M DWI wrmr DLNN.ONS CONTACT EIGNEER MIM ANY LYTFERWES N ELEYATIONS SO THAT CRAW CAN BE AM STER 11) COMPACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL 113CEUNIEDUS [MUNE TNT MNL. CROS OR PARALLEL RIE LME PRIOR M DISTALLY/0 NEW [DIE P GRADE /00701075 OGCUR.. CONTACT WINES? 50 DEET CRUDES CAN BE AMUSTER 12) PLV/ NEW DISTANCE BEMED/ WHOLES LS C7'MERLR/E TO 00/ERLNE OF MEW MCUT � APNIKK•ES (CL TO 2 E NEWEY WHOLES IS � I/2 /NSME IXWDEH 0f EACH WHOLE). SJ) ALL MOWN SDRICE MHA]/ TIE /NM THE &STMC AWN ARE SHOW. .40 504405 MMLY/ 6 907 SHOW BUT 1105 11//0 MAY/ SHALL 8E SEPIA= NA TIED INTO NEW AWN. 14) REPLACE ALL WORD& ASPHALT MIM J //07 WC ASPHALT AND B- CL 6 &LW LOUSE PE ALL ASPHALT WANK STALL BE AMMO), MTH A LOVOMN RIE 15) 0! Gerd Zeller Po Box 37 /, Aspen, Co 81 61 2 (970 ) 948-1221 0A¢ er ALL EATON SERVICE ARE 70 7' 00MEMS 16) Al CONS/RUCIK1/ i0 BE N CONFORMANCE WNW R/Wk50 STANDARDS 1 ! E XII B IT y 11 .. ,m., Ir..uamuLM (.u,m3-anZ 7 77501 L 6/24/11 Ulc, ` IA The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0054 GRAPHIC SCALE j \`1 ▪ 1 ✓ 1 V 1 i 1 1 \ I 1 1 1 1 1 nU 1 • 1 I nin 11 ���" �`�� 1 LMT— Ravi 17 0YF GR%YAID YAkav OR AWG 1 D i OM OP TMV 1 ~ n 1 leak 8NO )n 1 E nstn I 1 l i SPEN GLEN GOLF COURSE R000A7ED AUINA/ERT 8' CMG CMT PAIN COMARE AYE 57401017 O DOMESDAY ON OXF COURSE COMM OF CONOPOE 'T PARR AuIM) ERSIR/G /E ELEYAI08 77 47 DOSE OOYCREIE GOLF CART PAIN TPMINN ENO RELOGIOI OF GGYFCMT PAI. NA EASIWP ��— \,RP [Y COHERE EI1EINIION MEL/ 8005 RELLGR40 u1, 0 YCNVE GOLF CMT PAIN MARYI 005IW 70M OF CYWCREM ELE0111M /- �. ENO RELEVANCY., o' CONCRETE GOLF GRT PAIN. RATON EDON D TOP O' 20707(IE ELEVATION CBOT EASgT. CO PER- latiE CMT PAIN O REMAIN GOO RUM- GOLF CART TOnE NO EMSL IORt PAM PER ASPELI L fAPPROxPPROX tmEcneN OO4000OT GOLF GRT CROSSM'O ACR ASPEN IXENG CDE LIC NE NEW GRT PAM NOM�TeN OERRU/, PROMOS 000 NEW GRT PAM NA70GVO H 0-• nd ,$787 Danwnen7 � Cp frvMed LNc SlS]!0 fAvii Tad nap umameat ..060756' Tp dg Red Ras* COP 7 IAIdL5I5710 FL MERE WNL SG8E PUNS 80/73' 57TH WALL O PROTECT P7los DEBRIS FLOW PTR OEOTEON REPORT W 8005.470510/047704001 ID IIIE SLOW LINE(ESS SPECMD OTMRIITSC EARTHWORKS: CUT = 3,166 C.Y. FILL = 4,679 C.Y. (FILL)4,679 x 1.15 (SHRINKAGE FACTOR 157e) _ FILL = 6,266 C.Y. NET BALANCE = 2,100 C.Y. FILL (BASEMENTS NOT INCLUDED) P1C U1Vrr W 1 •' era. Y om _ M. NAM 117 �MA� Z�iY�.�'��_�•-6055 Ma ...NW' J J� yT r Ei -4- ROAD No 109 w � W 6s MEW ONYX SEE IAADSGPE PLANS _— _ FIST NV 007AB ) LEGEND 5870 --5B70— X X PROPOSED CLW/IXARS IMSMNO CONTOURS PROPERTY BOIONARY L07WEE R0A0 COMMUNE B1RLONG SETBACK UTILITY NO LWANAOE EAg10TT MOM EAEEUENT PROPOSED FETAT ENEMNG MICE PROPOSED CAG EASING CAC —778'W- -E9W- - E7CG- -NB'S - - EB"5 - - S5- -W5— PROPERTY FLORAE E 52/00 /LORVIYE EASING E7ECIR/0 UNE PROPOSED B. WATER UNE PROPOSED B' RALEY UNE PROPOSED 0ECI750 R9EPN00 GB10 AND GAS PROPOSED B' SANITARY SERER UNE EASING B' SANITARY SEW? UNE PROPOSED SANITARY SERER SERVILE'' PROPOSED WATER SERVICE EASING 5705.E SEVER PROP05ED STOW SEVER N F 51 0 tis 03SnN0 ELTCIRIC 6/A7IOOPNER PROMISED PAIR VALVE DRSING WAIER MULE PROPOSED SANITARY BENDY MAMMA' 0951/50 SANITARY SERER MARROWS .SIGN LIGHT POLE 004719' CYYRRO'. POINT PRIMO 1 RRE NORANT DOSING STOW/ NLET r® MIRAGE 001700 RY ®l �) INN NAG7 AREAS N07ES 1. A TEMPORARY 01.ERALL NAST GRADING SCHEME /5 SNOW. ACTUAL LOT GRADING PALL BE PHASED LOT BY LOT. 2. TEMPORARY SLOPE OF 61 ON LOTS 7-7 UNTIL BUILDING 00551Rucnom THEN .k1 SLEW( 7O BE CONSTRUCTED. S OWNER NAY CHOOSE 70 CONSTRUCT .01 SLOPES OR FLATTER PER ROAD SECTION SHEET GT. A SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR CUL PERT AND MET GRADES SCNMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER L e..e,Pee73 I au er crena SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 18 W. 6-rx STREET. SLATE 200 GL NWOOD SPRINGS. COLona0o 81801 (070) 945.1004 FAX 1970) 945-5948 ASPEN. COLORADO 7970) 925-6727 CRESTED Burr, C01970) 349-5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN 4717 �R RAMON 1104. PLAT DAM q?I /9 6Y GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN MA nn. 2440-361.001 8047 q: COW Y }7107/06/09 Cl Rae S774.a C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0055 SE6 mar 0/ FM4 649T �AIIN 66.68(10! 1 m1 ME AIL KW( 10 RE (5/67600 AILD W. ASPEN 6101705 \` • ••••"".6E811 LFIX-&017 BALD EA/XE WAY STA 8014.52 (zl7L 10 69-2 'Mew fic §/1''�OsLc 1100 \ i 6050 24620' 718 7 60.0000 Di 2 09 $64'- 1168.73 P14 EIEY. 602237 A0. - 276 1= 2896 75' ,C RO. St ti 4 'RTem�i v ice• pf 0.1 SAW LW AND AEV01E 8p1 LP. 6191820 010 O 0,1710? 92.5118067 ASPHALT REPAVE AV/ALT sew TO L RD AI/GNN01T 4' WILEY PAN CREATE 186N POINT PROM 1/0 TO VALLEY PAN 70 IEE; 51/0 EA61E WAY 6RAVIA7E FLOW EROS DOM. 7[05633 ROAD BEGIN 09� 10 X - OPE TBA(OI 0410 01614E WAY 31A 8+01.65 12./76 077721 AIL ELEVATIONS /N RDIOWAY ARE NE4STALD TO 111E FLOW LINE UNLESS SPEOFI/0 011160175E LOW'POHIT 801'4 606987 LOW PONT STA - 346405 LAN STA - 3461.67 P,4 AIV"= 668971 60 = 222 K = 1962 44• w 71 x 10 1781 PON7 EIEY - 607105 /301 1161247 STA - 5+2561 98 STA 1. 5441.86 PM 6011= 607135 AD + -160 K 21.43 75' IC LOW POINT E/EV - 606867 LOW P0/17 STA - 617415 PN5TA-6499.18 211 DIV - 6057.42 .124.--1.50 e'-2000 50'16 1801 *0077 BEV + 6071.66 /601 PONT SIA - 6+/869 PIO574-801017 PN BEV r 607297 10 r. n I-871 40' IC 6090 • 6060 -71VSIO57.1) 15•_AP =--1------� • 16'WP INV 606555 EX .7O• L71P MV 606562 7/- WARY 70 CONSiRLICROW 6571E TABLE • CURIE RADIUS (EN0IN TANGENT 0/090 BEARING DELTA 01 750.00 1122 8/1 12.21; 521.4511.E 41407161" C2 3263 9200 519.65 655.; ST078YBT 77214671• 13 75000 1131 876 35817. NJ1'4b2W 4,4129' C9 :1.150 7264 4086 6875; 5624,5232/ 65:0$'41• GS :64.50 7486 4,125 7241: N6014:NW 667x11• 075(540 LEN7ERIMEE1EYA70N ,_7162980 081166[11 E 0111901) C6 11450 7.4.66 12.38 246?: 0.202750 W 722(828' • LINE TAME UNE . (ENGIN 6EA81N0 LI • 3450 • 55550 49'W • •5019876111 • 1.7 2269 N14r73777 50' 16817/ h oq 0.g o0. 0. g� ? ''''.1 gQ s O g `4� �o ♦. b g n`E 47 g �$ 1` . $ -_ �o r '„ ...,., I'?s "S " l' 0..m 0.$t 12 R{n0 H gb Li �� gg 7+20 rye. g0. �n 0.g 7+80 8+40 0700 0460 20 6 SCHMUESER I GORDON 1 MEYER cxaixccRs 1 1+80 2440 34 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 1 7 B W. 679 STREET. Su11E 200 GLEIIWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 1970) 945.1004 FAX 1970)945-594B ASPEN. COLORADO 1070) 025-6727 CRESTED Burse, CO 19701 340-5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN 0) BY FINAL RAT 5/24/,4 ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE 2' STRIP LF AS'HALT FOR 4410670 NEW VALLEY PN/ 6070 8060 .N! A. 2008-361.007 Awn 0(45 0//06/69 C2 566 .ce.a-r>-aenv CU The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0056 50' 0034/ h 40155 6444449.4 1110. Il' J vrA4/uer MO CARER, 5045 00,0303. 00,1ECRbff 7' CAS 740047 RR OD/1Y 601 / 00844 2Y 074742 004405)YOASALLBGIE C 'L..S 460,4047E 0/6062'0AS 6 A0%GR =PAC= �4IOb Pr 6A R TYPICAL 27' ROAD R. a W. CROSS SECTION MOT m BGIE Nom NA AR RAMAN MO A.uvaM v66nsxax44wAw(AS swam Wl rssTImES AAD MO WARM 83 'MOM° 17450017110. MO WU=WTI SOME WOW, AMERAIF m74Y 10RAmwTv 0AS rAMMAR-Aurow. EMMEN MO 301iO`)K7467A6AU 1�Yaaa1 S6VCARA SM. MO Pe MAMMY Ee FAbE MGM MIR WS RPWit ON106 MC lOGA 6 COMM" SDK Miff or LANarcwr MAW: 60• J.J.T G ACCESS Va.", u• a . 250' 6.70 SW' 31 4.e: -b Cti.Try A5`74R AP 6 561 3571 Abmittr D 0556 D_ AV 7 06578646 4 4 BALD EAGLE WAY CROSS SECTION NOT r0. .1[E, /rel MF JF_E 5757 27" MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 5000 1 rj11 1 _4 s- zd 0102' Ara 4'_'00..5 0452/ENT ;.4`14144 2142 EXISANG GROUND `GRASSED __ 11'MIN./ 31 ROUND (TYP) I 4 _O•. 1 MAX. (VAR/£S) TYPE A SWALE SCALE 1/2". - 1,0 72' 3F FADED SPC77ONS ARF FOR REFERENCE ONLY 'RO 1• aASs c z431 50.4050- I2' Ross 3 5/772 9455-/ COUNTY ROAD #709 TYP/CAL ROAD SECT/ON 7014 arm -4,x 007 MmxN 31' 0..0 0.060611110? 08 VALLEY PAN HOSE ASP/IALT 3.PeeMWbw. 4004£ ALL 10/07£70 roofs PROW arm 5000177745/5500 EDGE OF 47076405 TYP. ASPHALT/CONCRETE CONNECTION SOW 1' - 1-0 AF -as %V/ Fi 325' m .425. 22.87' 7Y.'11' ✓ Com= 025' a2s• 44:.05^7.71' 4514 •ii -vre2.1 Y i i1171r_rshi is s .��i /7r�e/� 75'054557 Ae a'0.455 467.x50. m!cALR SRO. t 40004200 s:74seA�c BALD EAGLE WAY W/MEDIAN CROSS SECTION NOT 70 SCSI 700 011011211 0,5.7 zr .4,4T 6 A6i-3E..e1LJre. WS,t R202.0.4•2-' 4' cow 6 40706017E 4' VALLEY PAN DETAIL scan. LW- 7 0' 4• GAS 6 4035748034E 3' VALLEY PAN DETAIL Sdf6 AD SLY, TOP 0.6160 rt0 AN/)T04RME 6655070 AT 50349700E 0r O&IE A5 ARMY ON PLANS Nam I)46 f area MET m 3445 BE 0454AG 2) PRAM 2 4347E SPIE BE 4416427' PART -BOWED NY 6vnrA644RR¢ .1) ;WSW ALUSIIIENT RI:sdr Q PRE EV. WAI MAW w�tt1WmM.rt TLP 0• also 50,4055 OVATE 0281' 501, LVE RR AS SECTION A—A DRAIN INLET NTS SECTION 8—B 1/2'503/ LONG HOLT PG, NUT TO .WUNT SS Avow 70 SAME (TTP. OA 4) 74/4'7,1• STAIIOESC STEEL 10007.E .4740/01 8055, (51/0x0100000 747 86'4010 S/B•A1-1/(' S0T /0 Amu) (745 or 4) AVAIL A NEOPRE1E C 0000 DRAW NRET TOPMW4TE? 9A461.1 T9 BE A HALF 5007487 OF PIC PIPE OR APPROVED E00AL..Sg PER TABLE PLAN FRONT STORMWATER 20' 02:02 AND -11, -- ACCESS EASEYENr 16061,4 ox•LNb BA a" TL/RRm 0I 01PE DRAW ALE7 7473'7(/I' STANGE:557804 87470 3•E 808IXN T BOLT ANGIE m SON PE PRE & 00403 WALL. (3177 0E4) Ii:. 00TH MOE10BMOM BOTTOM 01 84£7008 SIDE QUALITY INLET DETAIL Nor '° SLITS RIPRAP OUTLET SWALE 1107 TO SCALE 6 SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER caa4.acas isaa.6.osa SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER I/O W. E 744 57REe, 5072 200 GLENW00D SPRINGS. COLORADO 61501 (970) 945-1004 18.457670>945-59474 ASPEN, COLOMU4 (9 70) 905-8727 CRESTED Burre. CO (970) 349-5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN RNA - 047E WT 771AL PUT 6/24/16 ROAD DETAILS AW ah 2008-361.001 Drawn Er AR OWN 07/06/09 C3 o IFC' JM 01" 119M'6J-+00055 GF C8 .4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0057 NOM LOTS 1-7 Glu REOIRRE GRWOER PUMPS 104 8A5f3/ENs SEDER i li 1 1 L EOSINS as• X10 ALL NOW 70 8E MD 00OT8/87719 NTH ASPEN [SEN TO f5319'/ A, 8'x22)5' 4)13, BEND Tosykopma GRASSED PROPOSEDMYER ALNT fro EC' OBTAINED P J "010.14 - 8' 86 4'79 0X !MANHOLE 1 WI 6069.97 1 WV W60152.02 EX Bev WT 6061.71 (/,E,o 1ER177 NO 3788) ET9 411.604 *61197 900) luso 2.8 7277 es IA 374 014707 8/236871/0 0/S 232401 /109 0/ IECROV OF ARMOSsfgfr Lr .BR*g.7 n; D,9.lax N RWPLeARr FIRE N •:. CDVRECINNS --172.49007 '.'. 80507E STA 842339 0/5 61.300 6E(Yl 0E0ECIIOV Pr WAR? ONE 7000(01 EX CAP, /NSTALL 90' BEND 490) 0,90057 TO EX 8' W.1/ER 000 HERR FOP EXACT LOCATION 756 0E2 607939 STA 8.2 1.32 0/5 79.778 FNOM :vary CIC LOCANM PRIM 772 C0VSTMM77/V 30/0 6/LN7AM' 5' SEPAPA9001 R` 2 "--GRAPHI SEAL& \76� - .- COUNTY ROAD NO .109 PV. 584'2.T:0673 PH REV . 607237 A.B. = 978 75' K' 68581,2 7. LOP_PO4T c EV'= 604287 1.017:P0211 STA = 3404.05 L•N STA = 3951.07 PV,' 9''27.. 4050.76 4d = 131 • K�28. 48 8 CAP 8 PLOD */1170 mower TOP 004 PPE- 607379 72400'102- 407250 0' 041E VAL/ TLP Cr PIPE- 607289 80249 8EA0 70P LK PPE- 007235 qfm 6060 DIWW LOEV 605400 /NSLU)E -WADER LIVE EX 30' CMP WV 604362 ./- 48087 PRIOR 70 80167RUC8M 204 11WF 610402 NO. P0A'I 6782 = 5071.45 (9130 701/77 274 = 542881 70 ST4 ;= 5447.86 5K .91.71,- 6071.35 -366 =• 27.41 75'W [RAVE 8595 Baro Y(P 0,555.7= 606301 LOW75 /T ELEV. 806667 7510017 5T4 - 6,74 73 PK 974 - 6,19 ID PKE787= 005087 .42.1 .60 2905 50. a -- R --3 8' PIC TCN PONT £ EV - 657266 Ijioi( n0'NI .7:7A - 6478.85 PK STA . 6,7917 P4' ELV a 6072.97 .. - - XA377 40' P* 400' 18'CNP4 6. _ INV 606555 81 LIVE WAS IE • 85225.6a:0 ILP OF PPE- 600401 8122. t 1).25' 60/0 TOP OF PPE- 605272. - 6090 6080 716 INTO EXISNNOTNNNIXE STA 8/0.97 O/5 44242 0/6 6069.97 907 W 606202 fSNOW OUT OF 800171010 2' 5789' Or ASPHALT FOR LG7E1I06 NEW VALLEY PAN NOPZ IEiPE COSMO CE717DIPAYE.ELEVAIKW FAWNED 197410808E 6111,01818: 0/00 0.60 6 SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 METER ...,....6 1 .,...caw s 1480 2,40 00 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 118 W. 09: STREET. Sum 200 GLENw000 SPRINGS, COL08480 81 501 82707945-1004 FAX f9703945-5948 ASPEN. COI -08090 (970) 925-8727 CRESTED Bone. CO (970) 349-5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN RflmM 84 FINAL PIAT UTILITY PLAN AND PROFILE 6070 6060 2008-361.001 awn 41 3E 0//06/09 C4 IXI IIc• .i 75/ 8,..-2442...2 C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0058 f1 ,+1, n' w hg m= m b, " h • , 1`o M� a 'r �e ��. li n . h. d b 1 r e'< a kg a na $ s em $; gg1-2, &; m __ .--- -.._ .... .rte., -- 7480 8+40 0/00 0.60 6 SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 METER ...,....6 1 .,...caw s 1480 2,40 00 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 118 W. 09: STREET. Sum 200 GLENw000 SPRINGS, COL08480 81 501 82707945-1004 FAX f9703945-5948 ASPEN. COI -08090 (970) 925-8727 CRESTED Bone. CO (970) 349-5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN RflmM 84 FINAL PIAT UTILITY PLAN AND PROFILE 6070 6060 2008-361.001 awn 41 3E 0//06/09 C4 IXI IIc• .i 75/ 8,..-2442...2 C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0058 GRAPHIC SCALE m; 11 1 - 1 al / rn I 1 1 ) 1 , hal10 A XI)L SPUN GLEN GOLF COURSE CD COWING Z5 14 0, 10 11 8 1 EAYY£NT SAIKY/T NEH01EA89IEf 405 W'WDC SCOPG 09S9I0 A9'NA1rf04 PLAC[1/T11T av urrnGAn 510F -ice 11 f .^., OFPM 1 I • 4 7,747 6r\ 71 / 1957;41- 1-6 MIT*6/ J ENO ALLISON e A1.101191 319 RD aiss 1P 1110 E.114R10 EI£0 muaw010 CABLE AND 019 1£4PY &WON WIN s .7(005DM? . •v. / a� V a\\ '041? 10,9 -9- ro ro__�ro ro �ro _-------0{''� IRRICAIION DESIGN SCHEMATIC. OWNER MAY USE POTABLE WATER FOR IRRIGATION. 6 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER c.a.ncrns Isunrccons SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 1 1 B W. 6150 STREET. SURE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO B 1601 (970) 945-1004 FAX 1970) 945.5948 ASPEN. COLORA00 1970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE. C01970) 349.5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN MY- Bflt )PUL PLAT 011E NzA/Ie 2Y MASTER SHALLOW UTILITY PLAN .bb Mc 2000-361.001 Drone by JX Dom 01/06/09 4a IPF JY C5 lin' 050-05-+s0.s OF r 8 I The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0059 N N A A J AV A WO WHINE RRL=SSE 2) 915E mon- 2007401247 MILL MEET MIAS 7MOM59 NM AE 011001= 48NMUMS A?Vf. 917E 0410 COURSE - 52. 4457 3) /TNRC /1'4:04119AlL LFE7'010740 MOON. IND 05 MON INF FWORAG IOWA. 1 TORSOS 2) 5000571'11172014 AS 7011420, 1MOAN Siff a TRENCH CROSS SECT/ON 4' OF POLYSIYR0NE BESOUTTON ON TOP OALONC F MIS' AND SWM 4/4: /'-0' LI T 3 6 `�,HR [ IOC OMR N„M CLAMOR /I: NEW 404507 NAW anew E0S2 507407 4441 Ort OR UM GOKRETE NOM.. W 0130030 CLASS 6 PER 'TRENCH CROSS SECTION' WATERLINE INSULATION SECTION TRIONCh K SPOOFED N0 5041E Ma, far Aaa PNFROIF IV WA DV MO GLUM OEW INCONEN 0 SECTION pre cm TEE 90; 45; 22.5, OR 11.25' ELBOW, HORIZONTAL OR 8017011 OF VER17CAL 920 ELBOWS TEES d (4575$).90. n.) (Sri 17) (55 24/) a5 fa227) 6 4.0 120 0 28 70 111.7 40 SO 1O 28 04 P11 i16 00 a0 f TABLE OF BEAR/NG AREAS IN SQ. FT. TYP. CONCRETE RE4CT/ON BLOCK DETAILS CENTER ITAL JOTS O_ 418 9ON277017 /T.• WW WATER ARAN LESS OLIN 7t.42049 0454/ 5El4ER MON OSIDERA.019 OE NI Or ONV5111.111 OF , OR -III FOIE NNW. 0552050.20 1� MI FORTIONIAL summon. arms lo: WATER / SEWER CROSSING TYP. WATER SERVICE DETAIL I -a- AS 8452 TRANIC RANCE ELEA _U� 5511001E 1...j a• ISO BOSS 1.COAGIBIE • CONTRACTORLf 05151MINE REEANDTE °`ASD RWM OM OF • S MRERS W BE INAEATID AT A4 awWACE PPE C'RaSSO05 LM MOM COM i• S LESS BM 5'-6' AS SKOV a4/ IM 1111111' OEM MEET. LOW." IETFRNLY ARE NOT PLICA. ON Tiff HWS S 0500641E FRE NIAR4NTA50 4ALK LIYA7RW MON OTHER INSCOLVTIONT MIST. A 5N�i11W AAD IRIIFR 4[45120 PUN'FOR 0100 54045't A.h posh 40 n v mve:ry/�..a�an R Rmn n m.4 mamsn n Sr' 1st ht.IstR • mvatsNvl�*Ns"'wa m ••e g .w av e. s.e4.M. y.4eis r f ) t Ohs A St INNS en *IN or konan or s Pw a k. las mese • N. ern oPeff tterm®nw eww: tmI q,q+n f se..a.1 Sw J' 6v 4 ass. taro stem.= Os II 1st par et et metalOm 4 nst Sit b mea SECTION 8 - 8 A e• 040 h 111.0 OrNONIF Oh. Ihr AMC NIN111 SAL eloWS,unTB,""' SECTION ELEVATION SECTION A - A STANDARD MANHOLE DETAIL GUT MSC OR S40 L 7EE 6441fL PROLVE MO 41' GUM NE ROOS 119' ETE OYES SEE CONCRETE REACTION &CON 6844 ATOST11 DETAIL MILS IJ awls M INN 70 /MOM SOWS 957 44400W AEDf4W 40 RINSED MAIM 1) 0004WT. YA457 AIM ANT515 IT BE 250 RSA RATES J) POVEDT DIE MNP BOLL 00407 OLP. ASSB 845' fhri6 MOW BASE TD WONT .11 4) ALL /BORN) LEAD HVW 10 BE a4/. J) 79442197$1004 PLASM 5' N 914:1 OF COM OR AS M OROI BY 0715£794 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION DETAIL NES 20900345E FASPHALT STORM OWN WATERLINE WSNURON FOR 54475170470' (SEE ANSLRA11041 SECTION BELOW) ELEVATION WATERLINE/CUL VERT CROSSING NO SCALE CONCRETE TRENCH DETAIL .50(L2-11/2'- 1'7' WYE SDO/6 IWE 001110 OR EMMERT AS BEND TYPICAL GATE VALVE NTS I. ET t>, OMNI NY�� NNS E ,D@ $LSLCTMW LOE,ROAC SIM. ON MUG. 417w INS OEM MT . TIRO ITE 4VMSErMEMIS,� W OF RE ANEA:mmLY 10' STEEL FENCE HOST W/ fC450%O LW APPROVED ALIERNMO'E • PLACE TRACER 744E 0'470 57000 FENCE POST ABOVE ANO LOOP ORM ENO OF PIPE BELOW. PLI0 OR 1) 2) ) 4) 574954055 STEEL PROFILE � (2 EACH PI -LINE WYE FOR NEW CO.NSTRNCTRN1. WTE SADDLE FOR 077477 5112110E5 044107LL LANDER LYE T0 BE 5CR9ND ROCK OR CLASS 6 4576200011E 95X CONPACTTON DENSITY 947 ASa/ 0-695 MINNOW COYER - 5 FELT. STANDARD SEWER SERVICE CONNECT/ON DETAIL N.T.S 6 SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER CnP,n CCPel Pvn.CTOPE SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER I 1 6 W. 679 SIREET. 5uRE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 61 601 1970) 945-1004 FAX 1970) 945-5946 ASPEN, COLORADO 1970) 925-6727 CRESTED MIRE. CO 59701 349-5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN ROSTON OTTE AWL RAT 524/18 UTILITY DETAILS .5406 2009-J51.001 awn ge JA oda 01/05/09 C6 070 Ler Skv-0140 '9' The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0060 GRAPHIC SCALE SPEN GLEN GOLF COURSE DIMS YAMS "V, STRAW WATRLS PYaCte AMINO O A1YA(AE N4E7�� IkV =AREAS WITH GREATER THAN 1:5 SLOPE 'CO s 109 fR045-GRTION 04 EROSION BALE PLACEMENT IN CHANNELIZED DITCH SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER c,1PEaccaA 1 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 78 W. 664 STREET. 5uRE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORA00 01601 (970) 945.1004 FAX 1970) 945.5948 ASPEN, COLORA00 (970) 925.6727 C1(25760 8177(1e, CO (070) 349-5355 - _ sae gar MICE —i- re SUGGESTED SCHEDULE OF OPERATIONS PHASE I CLEARING AND GRUBBING I A. INSTALL SET FED10E NO STRAW BALES PM PERMETFR SEDIMENT PROTECINW MONO 10,14!46 AND 2RUBBINC NOR4 fl INSTALL 1-6' ROOK ;RAMC PAD (30:r502. 2 AFTER EARMINI0 (IXGYABON & EMBANKMENT) /S COMPLETED /INSTALL SILT fEVCE AND SWAN BATES ON NAT 901 GP ROAR 1 CONSTRUCT 719.4P081117.SEDIM0/T TRAPS AS NFEBED. ( INSTALL HAY BALES N SWALES AT 50. INTERVALS S mama 114540 500/05 W/N1501 ON OISOIRBEB SLOES I:S)'206 OT 51E47E5 .15 9(01X/ ABOM N HE 9/AOfO AREAS 6 CLEW 1M SITE 811/0)0 5110 WASTE ANO DISPOSE 0' 0/OE,G1L SAILS 014/1DU7115 7. 5741(0 STREETS AS NEEDED. M7Nf 4.0VAPACTOV /5 RESPOV5PLE FO4 OBTAINING A SIO1NWA7ER PERMIT FROM 771E WPM' PRIOR TO C0VSIRUCl/OV THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN 1 FINN. RAT 4/16 PHASE PHASE II UNITIES 1. INSPECT AND REPAM EDSING 505 009011 CONTROLS FROM PHASE L S 'WALL �ADY��4ANO M71111117E5 REMADE Ors ROSECRON54700MGT iR 4 1EAN .u: NEXT TRAPS 5 WATER SEEDED AREAS AS NEEDED 70 MATNTA/N OLEO CROWN A RE110(£ NEEDS 6 CLEAN UP 971 RENOAE 5O10 WASTE ANO (091004 OF CHEMICAL MALLS POMOLAla1 7. 01574)101740,0,0 WALES (WASP/ OUT CONCRETE WOOS N WA91 P17) fl 51f1EP STREETS A5 NEEDED. PHASE III PANNG 1. NSPEC7 AND REPAIR 0157730 50L ERO3LY/ CONTROLS PROM PHASE 12 2 PUCE AC54ECA7E BASE CONCRETE CURB AND OH7IIL )PAS/ OUT CONCRETE 7RUCT5 N 619H PIT) 1 RENOIL MICR PALL 145TALL ASPHALT 5ANORN1 4. REINSTALL NWT POTPRS 5 INSTALL OMB MEWS S DEIN SEDIMENT TRAPS Z. WATER SEEDED AREAS AS NEEDED B COMPLETE BW(LWIG PADS AHA 1ONd0ATI145 (WASH OUT CONCRETE TRICKS 11 WASH PHP). 9 N5TAEL ACC4EDA75F1410N)EWAY.401090 10 OCEAN 15 SITE 80101£ 5050 WASTE AND DISPOSE 07 0411650 SPATS ND1DL17ELY. 71. SHEEP STREETS AS NEEL0A PHASE IV FINAL STABIL/ZA77ON INSPECT Aho REPAIR EN571110 SM ER090W 0ON7ROS FROM PRAM- 4 E ARO SL 2 REMO1E TEMPORARY SWAIfNT ER090I CONTROLS AF713? PERMANENT SEEDING G 4IA07N5 HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED (SIE LW5CAPE PIANS) .1 INMATE MNEADOR SYSTEM (5 OPERA7NG CORSEGR7 AND AOAHST THE PHAQES 1444 ZONES 4. SORDID= SITE INSPECTION FOR RANTING A P[RIUNENT SOL MOON CONTROLS 5 (RAN9TR 51f144 PERMIT040£,1 0410J/SVT OI ACTUAL CCIVSTROCITC11 O RNMENS EROSION CONTROL MAP Aa na 2003-361.001 l / 6.11er , . 07/06/09 aac C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0061 it 297471 65.88 WVW 605749 `. \ 5Z[ 071152555261 4 TW 59 - � BW 6071 "3/0>A•41.54 525 119 60655 BW 60]S59 • 874 022024 4" *069250760 D Whet"8024 dr BW 607009 ",' y.TA 743972 '1/ I 61O5721505� 7 BW 607269 -, q\•cam ` \ � (0166[) _ro5 '75.212 6073v WW 607111:117237-61 1X- 606209 73 7263 HP: �0 + .601R59� �� 6D7Ls9 69 11155 �-iT)=♦9603 )5255 ---7X'6870. ,126A--_. 77.59 BW 607/59 109 712291 061 BW 6857F.YL�� 5E1 1 TW 608539 RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ARE REDI-ROCK 41" BLOCK SERIES NON -REINFORCED SOIL WALLS WITH 41" WIDE BLOCKS 0100 0+60 1+20 TURN AROUND 1960 50& 0959.42 LIE+ 606209 7159 0001500 5295017559 152519 • STA: 0151.72 FLEX. 609019 71091 0007934 510.017034 1515:9 1I/291 AROUND 0966/55 69610( AT FACE [Y WNL • WALL 570 1+2672 E7E11 606209 50/1 AROUND S71,+2291 15255 WNL STA 1+3642 ELEY 609259 T71RN 4WWN0 STA.I47EI7 7525» 57A 0+4402 ELE+ 6079.09 R/Rl/ AR01690 STA=0+6509 /5255 511: 0+4077 77091 6077.59 7082) AROUND 574=0+624215255 6600. • STA 0+31.47 E0E+. 607509 TURN 4615069 s7. 0095699 15868 6019 •....... 5TA 033247 ELE1L 6071.59 loci 11111liiaiili 1111111111111111111111 E111111111111111111111111111 511111111111111111111111111 Q li1111111nn1 un11111111111i<; . . Him •■en11111111 1111 111111Iiiii S7A'016097' Elf* 607309 x1(00 5TA I+4RI1 a6+ 6079.09 bL6N AROLWD 5TA=/53344 15255 WNL STA 1+429711E0 6077.59 • 61E11 AROUND 57.521+3606 11155 • WALL 5TA 7+51.62 CIE+ 007009 5691 0605510 5/167+3E69 152519 L 57A 1+5152 55.E15 607059 NAN AROUND 5796114194 15255 5TA 0+4717 TTA 0+4167 ELER 607109 'ELM. 6073.09 589 1159.52 .QE+. 0077.59 576: 0947.87 ELM 6071.59 DAILY 05(7 606000 1 • • 30'St MAI F•r-s' IiSr. 01755710 CO ERLINE LLE)91109 0900 0960 1+20 FACE OF RETAINING WALL 5E5B658=725' -- 147..PorNpYmwon 26' Top Bock Load Con5fio. paeeaa.p4-No snwrcal Ground Len Wel He phl Exposed wag FINISH TO MATCH ASPEN GLEN STANDARDS Ground., LevM M;-K,ll=sl=llyli Leveling •71121=11 .:� 'WATT 7�-u1�u rtu-R�'is�+�' Pedplaled 004, DDrain1=II=7f-71=7F11=ll�lf=1._4= -r As Specified b Engineer) Crushed Leveling Pad 0 VW - 93 X11=1� 'LB� �1f=719-I1� Move Blocks Forward Dung Inslal1on to Engage Shear Knobs (Typical) 47•15/441e Block Free Draining Badd01 to Extend al Least 12' BeNrd wag Non-W000n Geotex69 Fabric (If Specified) 41• Bolton Bock Typical Gravity Wall with 41" Blocks No Scats 41" Middle Block Calculations for SRWaII PROSPOSED GRADE • 16 SECTION A -A No SUN SCHEMATIC WALL DESIGNS SHOWN RETAINING 90751180 -W' 655.49E [ l J' VALLEY PAN DRIVEWAY 11X .5' Amy 61/RY 1^ 10' -1-10' 599117 SECTION B -B EDGE DF DRIVEWAY 6 SCHMUESER ( GORDON 1 METER cw9.wccws Isu.v crews SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 118 W. 8507 STREET, SUDS 200 GLENWOOD 5PRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945.1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN. COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED 760419, CO 19707 349-5355 THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN 011£ 97748 PUT 611403 RETAINING WALL DETAILS .No Na 2008-361.001 0990 6l• .L9. 0116 0!/06/09 C8 oc7, IR. 111 fi 97u -Td -r 15 OF (�(j C El The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0062 SGM SAGE OF ASPEN GLEN ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT August 25, 2016 SGM JOB NO: 2008-361.001 ITEM 1 QUANTITY! UNIT COST 1 COST Grading and Earthwork.1.1111111111111 Earthwork - Embankment ......................................................................................................................... Clearing & Grubbing Topsoil Striping,Stockpile and Placement (Ass Drill seed / Hydromulch Retaining Walls....................................._........_........_................... Erosion Control 2,1001 C.Y.: 512.00, $25,200.00 3.30! Acres $2,000.00; $6,600.00 umed 6" depth) 2,643! C.V. 1 510.00! $26,430.00 3'.30: Acre ............... .52,800.00: $9,240.00 1...2,840 ... SF....................................$60.001..........._$170,400.00 1 L.S. I $7,500.00: $7,500.00 ISUB TOTAL . $245,370.00 Road Construction 11111111111111111111 3 1/2" Asphalt 440! TON 1$95.001 $41,800.00 8" Class 6 Base Course 1,000! TON i $25.001 525,000.00 16" Class 1 Base Course € 2,000! TON 1 $22.50 $45,000.00 48" Pitrun : 6,000! TON I $18.00 $108,000.00 27" Mountable Curb & Gutter 1,805! L.F. 1 $22.50 $40,612.50 6" Concrete Flatwork (Valley Pan & Fillets) 1851 S.Y 1 $70.00 $12,950.00 € !SUB TOTAL $260,412.50 Cart Path Relocation 8' Concrete Cart Path in Golf Course (6" thick) Domestic Water 667 S.Y. 1 $75.00 SUB TOTAL ---price includes trenching and fittings --- 8" C900 water main 844 L.F. 8" Gate Valve 1' Each Fire Hydrant Assembly ................21.. Each Water Service w/ Curb Stop t 131 Each $2,000.00 Water/Sewer/Storm Sewer Crossings 3! Each 1 $1,500.00 Connectto Existing Water Main .........................................................................................................................k.....................Each..p.....................$2:000.00, $2,000.00 .................lSUB TOTAL $50,025.00 $50,025.00 $37.50! $31,650.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $26,000.00 ................ 54,500.00 $74,650.00 ---price includes trenching and fittings--- s s i 8" SDR -35 Sewer Pipe7741 L.F. t $42.501 $32,895.00 4' Dia. Manhole 4! Each! $3,500.001 $14,000.00 Connect to Existin& Sewer Manhole 13 Each! $3,500.00 $3,500.00 4" Sewer Service 131 Each $2,000.001 $26,000.00 ISUB TOTAL 1 $76,395.00 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 1 B SIAm The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0063 SAGE OF ASPEN GLEN ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT August 25, 2016 SGM JOB NO: 2008-361.001 ITEM ; QUANTITY 1 UNIT COST ; COST Raw Water Irrigation ---price includes trenching and fittings 4 C900 DRI8 Irrigation Main (Shallow Construction) • i 1,61011 L F 1 $15.001 $24,150.00 :SUB TOTAL, $24,150.00 Storm Sewer System ---price includes trenching and fittings--- 15" CMP , 125: L.F.: $60.00; $7,500.00 18"CMP 421 L.F. 1 $75.00; $3,150.00 24" CMP 290; L.F. ' $85.001 $24,650.00 15" CMP Flared End Section 11 Each' $250.001 $250.00 CMP Flared End Section L.18" 2 Each I $350.001 $700.00 24" CMP Flared End Section 1 Each 1 $450.001 $450.00 Drain Inlet 1 2i Each 1 $3,000.001 $6,000.00 Drain Inlet w/Quality Control t 21. Each( $3,500.001 $7,000.00 1- L......_.._ i i r :SUB TOTAL I 549,700,00 Shallow Utilities' `" »z price includes trenching, conduit installation and vault placement-- 11. Shared Shallow Utility Trench 1,070=-- L.F. ; $12.00: $12,840.00 ;SUB TOTAL 512,840.00 Miscellaneous = Traffic Control j.Each.......................$5,000.00; i. $,000.00 Landscape and Entry Monumentaion (SEC) 11 LS 1 $70,000.00i $70,000.00 1 1 SUB TOTAL i $75,000.00 1 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL; 5868,542.50 3».._. Construction QA/QC 7.5"/"`:. $65,140.69 I 1 1 PROJECT TOTAL. $933,683.19 1. Unit prices used in developing this EOPC were based on cost estimate data from SGM's database of recent western slope similar projects. 2. Unit prices and total costs are based on Present Value dollars. Adjustments should be made for years beyond the present year if actual construction occurs in a future year. 3. This EOPC was prepared on the basis of SGM's experience and qualifications and represents SGM's judgment as a professional generally familiar with the industry. However, since SGM has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, over contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, SGM cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from SGM's EOPC. 2 of 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0064 PARTIAL RELEASE OF IRREVOCABLE LE 1"1'ER OF CREDIT This Partial Release of Irrevocable Letter of Credit (the "Release") is hereby presented by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado to Gerd Zeller, (the "Principal"), and (Name of Bank) , (the "Surety Company") as of this day of , 20 WHEREAS, Principal and Surety Company have posted an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, Letter of Credit No , in favor of the Board of County Commissioners of Galli County, Colorado as surety for the improvements, installations and lot improvements gthe "Subdivision Improvements") required by the Garfield County Planning and Zol • Department in connection with the approval for The Sages at Aspen Glen subdi (the "Subdivision"); and, ision } WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield Co #y, C. tg • do has received an Letter of Compliance from the responsible design profes al repiesenting that all Improvements have been constructed and installed in compliance.:with aequirements, standards and specifications of the Subdivision Approval and other ap9lidable Ordinances of Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado. (Cheek all items to be covered by this Release): WHEREAS, the Board of County Commijsio a Completion Letter indicating that Garfielddcottnt above indicated Improvements. �irf�/fir Garfield County, Colorado has issued anning and Zoning has accepted the NOW, THEREFORE, the items iec k completed for the Irrevocable Letter of Credit issued for the below indicated Subnti provements is hereby released. [ ] Earthwork — Embankm rw $25,200.00 [ ] Clearing and Gij Bing '55' $6,600.00 [ ] Topsoil StripinSttclpile & Placement $26,430.00 [ 1 Drill seed/ ro aifit6h $9,240.00 [ 1 Retaini `Via ,, ' �Y $ �' $170,400.00 [ 1 Erosi9n Control $7,500.00 [ 1 Road OwtiVction $260,412.50 [ 1 42301f,Orfrath Relocation $50,025.00 [ 1 r,,, Ins llafion of Domestic Water $74,650.00 [ 1 ‘,," tc $fation of Sewer System $76,395.00 •.Raw Water Irrigation $24,150.00 [ r` 1'a`"? 'fTnstallation of Storm Sewer System $49,700.00 [ 1 ' Construction of Shared Shallow Utility Trench $12,840.00 [ ] Installation of Traffic Control $5,000.00 [ ] Installation of Landscape and Entry Monumentation $70,000.00 PROJECT TOTAL $933,683.19 EXHIBIT 1slA 0 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0065 1 [BANK STATIONARY WITH BANK NAME AND ADDRESS] IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT Date of Issue: Expiration Date: Beneficiary: Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado 109 8th Street, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 r7*.x Re: Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. .� On Account of: Gerd Zeller f Address: Post Office Box 37 /ty f .. Aspen, CO 81611,;;,:/ f /.. k f In the Amount of: $1,129,756.65 Subject Property: The Sages at Aspep Glen TBD Allison Road. Glenwood S Ds, 8 1601 • Subject Property Legal: Atta,hed- E ''bit A To Whom It May C n: 63 We hereby issue our Irre'�ecb'' atandby Letter of Credit in your favor available by draft or drafts at sight wj1 on thi <b at the address shown above for any sum or sums not exceeding � ` >rs for the account of the account of the entity stated above. the total sum st ed { Thisletter sof credi is issued for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of Subdivision ImprQ�vi�,n troperty described herein pursuant to the Subdivision Improvements Agreement Drafts must accompanied by the following: A written notification from the Planning Director of Garfield County stating that the owner of the Subject Property has failed to perform the Subdivision Improvements and obligations for the Subject Property as contained in the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado. EXHIBIT E 51A G The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0066 Partial draws are permitted. Each draft must bear on its face the clause "Drawn under Letter of Credit Number , dated , of the [Name of Bank]. Except so far as otherwise expressly stated herein, this Letter of Credit is subject to the "Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits 1983 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce Brochure Number 400" and the provision of 4-5-101-C.R.S. et seq. This bank represents and warrants to the Board of County Commissioners of Garfi ld County that it has the full authority and power to issue this Letter of Credit to Garfield CC y „ in the total amount and for the period of time stated herein; said authority being purs tint to the laws of the United States, or the State or Territory which governs the establishment an•egulation if this bank, this bank's charter, by-laws and other applicable rules and regulad purist nt thereto. Should it be necessary for the Board of County Commission fs of e .e y to file suit in an effort to enforce this Irrevocable Letter of Credit, this bink hereb aives all venue rights and submits to the jurisdiction of the District Court in and for tr. County .._ Garfield, State of Colorado. We hereby agree that drafts drawn under and in compliance wt he term of the Letter of Credit will be honored if presented to our office located at herein. Sincerely, [Name of Bank] By: ame and Title] on or before the cl�e ofbusiness on e expiration date set forth 2 fr The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0067 PARTIAL RELEASE OF IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT This Partial Release of Irrevocable Letter of Credit (the "Release") is hereby presented by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado to Gerd Zeller, (the "Principal"), and (Name of Bank) , (the "Surety Company") as of this day of , 20 WHEREAS, Principal and Surety Company have posted an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, Letter of Credit No , in favor of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado as surety for the improvements, installations and lot improvements (the "Subdivision Improvements7,2 required by the Garfield County Planning and Zoning Department in connection with the approval for Th ages at Aspen Glen subdivision. (the "Subdivision"); and, f4,...N.,-,-41 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado has rbeive a Letter of Compliance from the responsible design professional representing that all Improvem4ts ha 'heen constructed and installed in compliance with all requirements, standards and specifications of. the Oka tsion Approval and other applicable Ordinances of Board of County Commissioners of Garfield Cot} ty, Colorado. •fir, WHEREAS, the Board of County Conunissioners of Garfield Count, C`lYkxa /has issued a Completion Letter indicating that Garfield County Planning and Zoning has accepted the able indicated Improvements. 9Y NOW, THEREFORE, the items checked as completed for thOi':itevocable Letter of Credit issued for the below indicated Subdivision Improvements is hereby released. i'';`,„ (Check all items to be covered by this Release): ,,rrr, [ 1 Earthwork — Embankment „`''• 0' $25,200.00 [ 1 Clearing and Grubbing A' J ` $6,600.00 [ 1 Topsoil Striping, Stockpile & Placement ` `' 4./ ;V $26,430.00 [ 1 Drill seed/Hydromulch . ; _ F $9,240.00 [ 1 Retaining Walls/ ''• % $170,400.00 [ 1 Erosion Control ` �„, .. ?'' $7,500.00 [ ] Road Construction / '/ ' $260,412.50 [ ] Golf Cart Path Relocation `'4� r{ f�, $50,025.00 [ ] Installation of Domesti,crWater V $74,650.00 [ ] Installation of Sewer.5y.$tpm,' $76,395.00 [ ] Raw Water Irriga ion '. ) '%f $24,150.00 [ ] Installation of $toriM, Se\e'r'System $49,700.00 [ ] Construction& iaie .•hallow Utility Trench $12,840.00 [ ] Installatic of`'I';gffic Control $5,000.00 [ ] Installatio 'rte I{dscape and Entry Monumentation $70,000.00 PROJT $933,683.19 fel{fes �. /Exec ed fits day of Board of oll tty Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado: By: ATTEST: Clerk to the Board ,20 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0068 J E C Lid AAV ON of COVENA ?S, CON LIONS, RES"RICTIONS AND EASEMENTS of T SAGES AT A A PHI The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0069 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS OF THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN TABLE OF CONTENTS RECITALS 7 ARTICLE 1 7 1.1 Declaration 7 1.2 Master Declaration 7 ARTICLE 2 8 DEFINITIONS 8 2.1 Allocated Interest 8 2.2 Annual Assessment 8 2.3 Articles 8 2.4 Assessments 8 2.5 Association 8 2.6 Association Documents 8 2.7 Board of Directors 8 2.8 Bylaws 9 2.9 Common Expenses 9 2.10 Declarant 9 2.11 Declaration 9 2.12 Default Assessment 9 2.13 Duplex Unit 9 2.14 First Mortgage 9 2.15 First Mortgagee 9 2.16 Common Area 9 2.17 Duplex Lot 10 2.18 Lot 10 2.19 Manager 10 2.20 Master Association 10 2.21 Master Declaration 10 2.22 Member 10 The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0070 2.23 Mortgage 10 2.24 Mortgagee 10 2.25 Owner 10 2.26 Plat 11 2.27 Property 11 2.28 Residential Unit 11 2.29 Sharing Ratio 11 2.30 Special Assessment 11 2.31 Successor Declarant 11 2.32 The Sages at Aspen Glen 11 ARTICLE 3 12 NAME, DIVISION INTO RESIDENTIAL UNITS 12 3.1 Name 12 3.2 Association 12 3.3 Number of Lots and Residential Units 12 3.4 Identification of Lots 12 3.5 Division of Property into Lots & Allocation of Interests 12 3.6 Ownership of Common Area 13 3.7 Non-Partitionability of General Common Area 13 3.8 Use of Common Area 13 3.9 Description of Lots 13 ARTICLE 4 14 MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS; ASSOCIATION OPERATIONS 14 4.1 The Association 14 4.2 Transfer of Membership 14 4.3 Membership 15 4.4 Declarant Control 15 4.5 Compliance with Association Documents 15 4.6 Books and Records 16 4.7 Manager 16 4.8 Implied Rights and Obligations 16 ARTICLE 5 16 POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0071 OF THE ASSOCIATION 16 5.1 Power to Adopt Rules and Regulations 16 5.2 Power to Enforce Declaration and Rules and Regulations 17 5.3 Power to Engage Employees, Agents, and Consultants 18 5.4 General Corporate Powers 18 5.5 Power to Employ Managers 18 5.6 Powers Provided by Law 19 ARTICLE 6 19 MECHANIC'S LIENS 19 ARTICLE 7 19 PROPERTY RIGHTS OF OWNERS AND RESERVATIONS BY DECLARANT 19 7.1 Recorded Easements 19 7.2 Other Easements 19 7.3 General Maintenance Easement 20 7.4 Association as Attorney -in -Face 20 7.5 Emergency Access Easement 21 7.6 Model Unit Reservation 21 ARTICLE 8 21 MAINTENANCE, LANDSCAPING AND SPECIAL EASEMENT 21 8.1 Maintenance 21 8.2 Special Easement 21 8.3 Maintenance Contract 22 8.4 Maintenance Responsibilities of Owners 22 8.5 Maintenance Related to Noxious Weeds 22 8.6 Additions, Alterations and Improvements 22 8.7 Owner's Failure to Maintain or Repair 23 8.8 Right of Master Association to Maintain or Repair 23 ARTICLE 9 24 INSURANCE AND FIDELITY BONDS 24 9.1 General Insurance Provisions 24 The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0072 9.2 Cancellation 24 9.3 Policy Provisions 24 9.4 Insurance Proceeds 25 9.5 Association Policies 25 9.6 Insurer Obligation 25 9.7 Common Expenses 25 9.8 Fidelity Insurance 25 9.9 Workers' Compensation Insurance 26 9.10 Other Insurance 26 9.11 Insurance Obtained by Owners 26 ARTICLE 10 26 ASSESSEMENTS 26 10.1 Obligation 26 10.2 Purpose of Assessments 27 10.3 Budget 27 10.4 Annual Assessments 27 10.5 Apportionment of Annual Assessments 28 10.6 Special Assessments 28 10.7 Default Assessments 29 10.8 Effect of Nonpayment; Assessment Lien 29 10.9 Collections 30 10.10 Personal Obligation 30 10.11 Successor's Liability for Assessments; Subordination of Lien 30 10.12 Payment by Mortgagee 31 10.13 Statement of Status of Assessment Payment 31 10.14 Capitalization of the Association 31 ARTICLE 11 31 ASSOCIATION AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT 31 ARTICLE 12 32 DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION 32 12.1 Role of the Board of Directors 32 12.2 Estimate of Damages or Destruction 32 12.3 Repair and Reconstruction 32 12.4 Funds for Repair and Reconstruction 32 The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0073 12.5 Disbursement of Funds for Repair and Reconstruction 33 ARTICLE 13 33 DESIGN REVIEW 33 13.1 Approval Required by Association 33 ARTICLE 14 34 DURATION OF COVENANTS AND AMENDMENT 34 14.1 Term 34 14.2 Amendment by Declarant 34 14.3 Amendment of Declaration by Members 34 ARTICLE 15 35 COVENANTS RELATING TO THE MASTER DECLARATION 35 15.1 Master Declaration Matters 35 15.2 Enforcement of Master Declaration 35 ARTICLE 16 36 GENERAL PROVISIONS 36 16.1 Restriction on Declarant Powers 36 16.2 Enforcement 36 16.3 Special Rights of First Mortgagees 36 16.4 Severability 36 16.5 Conflicts Between Documents 37 EXHIBITS 38 Exhibit A - Legal Description 38 Exhibit B — Allocation of Assessments 39 Exhibit C — Garfield County Noxious Weed Management Plan 43 The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 6 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0074 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS OF THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN This DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS of The Sages at Aspen Glen (the "Declaration") is made as of this day of , 2016, by Gerd Zeller (the "Declarant"). RECITALS A. Declarant is owner of that certain real property located in Garfield County, Colorado, more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"). B. Declarant desires to create on the Property a project pursuant to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act as set forth in Colorado Revised Statute 38-33.3-101, et. seq. (the "Act"), the name of which is The Sages at Aspen Glen. ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION AND SUBMISSION 1.1 Declaration. Declarant hereby declares that the Property shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of the Property, and which shall run with the land and be binding on all parties and heirs, successors, and assigns of parties having any right, title, or interest in all or any part of the Property. Additionally, Declarant hereby submits the Property to the provisions of the Act. 1.2 Master Declaration. The Property is subject to the Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen Glen recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado on April 6, 1995, in Book 936 at Page 350, as amended (the "Master Declaration"). The The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 7 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0075 association (hereafter defined) shall constitute a Sub -association as defined in the Master Declaration. ARTICLE 2 DEFINITIONS The following words when used in this Declaration or any Supplemental Declaration, unless inconsistent with the context of this Declaration, shall have the following meanings: 2.1 "Allocated Interests" means the undivided interests in the Common Area, the Common Expenses, and the votes in the Association. The Allocated Interests for each Lot or Duplex Unit have been allocated so that each Lot's or Duplex Unit's share shall be computed with the numerator being one (1) and the denominator being the total number of Residential Lots created and existing at any one time. 2.2 "Annual Assessment" means the Assessment levied annually. 2.3 "Articles" mean the Articles of Incorporation for The Sages at Aspen Glen Homeowners Association, as amended from time to time. 2.4 "Assessments" mean the Annual, Special, and Default Assessments levied pursuant to Article 10 below. Assessments are also referred to as a Common Expense Liability as defined under the Act. 2.5 "Association" means The Sages at Aspen Glen Homeowners Association, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, and its successors and assigns 2.6 "Association Documents" means this Declaration, the Articles of Incorporation, and the Bylaws of the Association, and any procedures, rules, regulations, or policies adopted under such documents by the Association. 2.7 "Board of Directors" means the governing body of the Association elected to perform the obligations of the Association relative to the operation, maintenance, and management of the Property and all improvements on the Property. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0076 2.8 "Bylaws" mean the Bylaws adopted by the Association, as amended from time to time. 2.9 "Common Expenses" means (i) all expenses expressly declared to be common expenses by this Declaration or the Bylaws of the Association, (ii) insurance premiums for the insurance carried under Article 9, and (iii) all expenses lawfully determined to be common expenses by the Board of Directors of the Association. 2.10 "Declarant" means Gerd Zeller, and his successors and assigns. 2.11 "Declaration" means and refers to this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements of The Sages at Aspen Glen. 2.12 "Default Assessment" means the Assessments levied by the Association pursuant to Article 10.7 below. 2.13 "Duplex Unit" means any one of the two duplex residential units, together with all improvements thereon, which may be created by further subdivision on Duplex Lots S8, S9 and S10, including the individual duplex structure, together with an undivided percentage interest in the Common Area appurtenant to such Lot and all other rights and burdens hereunder. 2.14 "First Mortgage" means any Mortgage which is not junior to any lien or encumbrance except liens for taxes or other liens which are given priority by statute and liens for assessments pursuant to the Master Declaration. 2.15 "First Mortgagee" means any person named as a mortgagee or beneficiary in any First Mortgage, or any successor to the interest of any such person under such First Mortgage. 2.16 or "General Common Area" shall mean those Common Areas reserved for use by all the Owners by virtue of not being Lots. The General Common Area shall include all tangible physical properties of this Property including, but not limited to, the land described in Exhibit A. Unless the context otherwise clearly requires, Common Area shall include "Association Property," which shall mean all real and personal property, other than a Residential The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0077 Lot or Duplex Lot, owned or leased by the Association for the use, enjoyment or benefit of the Owners or other occupants of the Property or any part hereof; 2.17 "Duplex Lot" those Lots identified as Lots S8, S9 and S10 on the Plat which may be further subdivided in two Duplex Lots each. 2.18 "Lot" means any plot of land labeled as any one of Lots S1 through S10 or Duplex Lot created by further subdivision of the Duplex Lots subject to this Declaration and designated as a "Lot" on any subdivision plat of the Property recorded by Declarant in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. 2.19 "Manager" shall mean a person or entity engaged by the Association to perform certain duties, powers, or functions of the Association, as the Board of Directors may authorize from time to time. 2.20 "Master Association" means The Homeowners Association at Aspen Glen, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, and its successors and assigns. 2.21 "Master Declaration" means the Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Aspen Glen recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado on April 6, 1995, in Book 936 at Page 350 as it may be amended from time to time. 2.22 "Member" shall mean every person or entity that holds membership in the Association for The Sages at Aspen Glen. 2.23 "Mortgage" shall mean any mortgage, deed of trust, or other document pledging any Lot or interest therein as security for payment of a debt or obligation. 2.24 "Mortgagee" means any person named as a mortgagee or beneficiary in any Mortgage, or any successor to the interest of any such person under such Mortgage. 2.25 "Owner" means the owner of record, whether one or more persons or entities, of fee simple title to any Lot or Duplex Unit, and "Owner" also includes the purchaser under a contract for deed covering a Lot or Duplex Unit The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 10 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0078 with a current right of possession and interest in the Residential Unit, but excludes those having such interest in a Lot merely as security for the performance of an obligation, including a Mortgagee, unless and until such person has acquired fee simple title to the Lot or Duplex Unit pursuant to foreclosure or other proceedings. 2.26 "Plat" means the subdivision plat of The Sages at Aspen Glen recorded , 2016, as Reception No. in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado and all supplements and amendments thereto. 2.27 "Property" means and refers to that certain real property described on Exhibit A attached to this Declaration. 2.28 "Sharing Ratio" means the percentage allocation of Assessments to which an Owner's Lot or Duplex Unit is subject as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2.29 "Special Assessment" means an assessment levied pursuant to Section 10.6 below on an irregular basis. 2.30 "Successor Declarant" means any party or entity to whom Declarant assigns any or all of its rights, obligations, or interest as Declarant, as evidenced by an assignment or deed of record executed by both Declarant and the transferee or assignee and recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, designating such party as a Successor Declarant. Upon such recording, Declarant's rights and obligations under this Declaration shall cease and terminate to the extent provided in such document. 2.31 "The Sages at Aspen Glen" shall mean the residential development project created by this Declaration, consisting of the Property, the Lots and Residential Units, and any other improvements constructed on the Property and as shown on the Plat. Each capitalized term not otherwise defined in this Declaration or in the Plat shall have the same meanings specified or used in the Act. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 11 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0079 ARTICLE 3 NAME, DIVISION INTO RESIDENTIAL UNITS 3.1 Name. The name of the residential project is The Sages at Aspen Glen. The Project is a Planned Community pursuant to the Act. 3.2 Association. The name of the Association is The Association of The Sages at Aspen Glen. Declarant has caused to be incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado the Association as a nonprofit corporation with the purpose of exercising the functions as herein set forth. 3.3 Number of Lots and Residential Units. The number of Lots is 10 and the number of Residential Units of the project is thirteen (13). 3.4 Identification of Lots. The identification number of each Lot shall be shown on the separate Final Plat as filed in the real property records of Garfield County, Colorado. 3.5 Division of Property into Lots and Allocation of Interests. The Property shall, upon the filing of the Final Plat indicating individual Single Family Lots and Duplex Units, be divided into fee simple estates, each such estate consisting of the separately designated Residential Units as shown on the Plat, as may be supplemented or amended from time to time. The Allocated Interest in and to the General Common Area appurtenant to each Unit and in the Common Expenses shall be a fractional interest with the numerator being one (1) and the denominator being the total number of Residential Units depicted on the Plat and all supplements and amendments thereto. Each Lot shall be allocated one (1) vote in the Association. In the event any Lot or Property is added to the Project, pursuant to reserved Declarant development rights, the resulting Allocated Interest of the Residential Unit(s) in the Common Areas, Common Expenses, and votes in the Association shall be adjusted so that each Lot has an identical fractional interest with the numerator being one and the denominator being the total number of Units created and shown on the Plat as may be supplemented and amended from time to time. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 12 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0080 3.6. Ownership of Common Area. Such undivided fee interests shall not be amended without the prior written consent of all Owners having a fee ownership in the Common Area. 3.7 Non-Partitionability of General Common Area. The General Common Area shall be owned in common by all of the Owners of the Residential Units and shall remain undivided, and no Owner shall bring any action for partition or division of the General Common Area . 3.8 The Use of Common Area. Each Owner may use the Common Area in accordance with the purpose for which it is intended, without hindering or encroaching upon the lawful rights of the other Owners, subject to such reasonable rules and regulations as may, from time to time, be established pursuant to the Bylaws of the Association. 3.9 Description of Lots. (a) Each Lot or Duplex Unit, and its appurtenant undivided interest in the General Common Area, shall together comprise one (1) Lot, shall be inseparable and may be leased, devised or encumbered only as a Lot. (b) Title to a Lot or Duplex Unit may be held individually or in any form of concurrent ownership recognized in Colorado. In case of any such concurrent ownership, each co-owner shall be jointly and severally liable for performance and observance of all the duties and responsibilities of an Owner with respect to the Lot in which he owns an interest. For all purposes herein, there shall be deemed to be only one (1) Owner for each Lot or Duplex Unit. The parties, if more than one, having the ownership of a Lot shall agree among themselves how to share the rights and obligations of such ownership, but all such parties shall be jointly and severally liable for performance and observance of all of the duties and obligations of an Owner hereunder with respect to the Lot in which they own an interest. (c) Any contract of sale, deed, lease, Mortgage, will or other instrument affecting a Lot may describe it by its Lot number, The Sages at Aspen Glen, County of Garfield, State of Colorado, according to the Plat thereof recorded , 2016 as Reception No. , and any recorded amendment and supplement thereto, and this Declaration, which will be recorded The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 13 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0081 in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, and any recorded amendment and supplement hereto. (d) Each Lot or Duplex Unit and the undivided interest in the General Common Area appurtenant thereto shall be considered a separate parcel of real property and shall be separately assessed and taxed. (e) Each Lot and Duplex Unit shall be used and occupied solely for dwelling or lodging purposes. All of the above stated uses and occupancies shall be only as permitted by and subject to the appropriate and applicable governmental zoning and use ordinances, rules and regulations from time to time in effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Declarant, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby retains a right to maintain any Lot or Units as sales offices, management offices or model residences so long as Declarant, or its successor or assigns, continues to be an Owner of a Residential Unit. The use by Declarant of any Lot as a model residence, office or other use shall not affect the Lot's designation on the Plat as a separate Lot. (f) An Owner shall have the right to lease his Lot upon such terms and conditions as the Owner may deem advisable; provided, however, that (i) any such lease shall be in writing and shall provide that the lease is subject to the terms of this Declaration, (ii) a Lot may be leased only for the uses provided hereinabove, and (iii) any failure of a lessee to comply with the terms of this Declaration, Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws or rules of the Association shall be a default under the lease enforceable by the Association. ARTICLE 4 MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS; ASSOCIATION OPERATIONS 4.1 The Association. Every Owner of a Lot or Duplex Unit shall be a Member of the Association. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of any Residential Unit. 4.2 Transfer of Membership. An Owner shall not transfer, pledge, or alienate his membership in the Association in any way, except upon the sale or encumbrance of his Lot or Duplex Unit and then only to the purchaser or Mortgagee of his Lot. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 14 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0082 4.3 Membership. The Association shall have one (1) class of membership consisting of all Owners including the Declarant so long as Declarant continues to own an interest in any Residential Unit. Except as otherwise provided for in this Declaration, each Member shall be entitled to vote in Association matters pursuant to this Declaration on the basis of one (1) vote for each Lot or Duplex Unit owned. When more than one (1) person holds an interest in any Residential Unit, all such persons shall be Members. The vote for such Lot shall be exercised by one (1) person or an alternative person (who may be a tenant of the Owners) appointed by proxy in accordance with the Bylaws. In the absence of a proxy, the vote allocated to the Lot shall be suspended in the event more than one (1) person or entity seeks to exercise the right to vote on any one (1) matter. Any Owner of a Lot or Duplex Unit which is leased may assign his voting right to the tenant, provided that a copy of a proxy appointing the tenant is furnished to the Secretary of the Association prior to any meeting in which the tenant exercises the voting right. In no event shall more than one (1) vote be cast with respect to any one (1) Lot. 4.4 Declarant Control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided for herein or in the Bylaws, Declarant shall be entitled to appoint and remove the members of the Association's Board of Directors and officers of the Association to the fullest extent permitted under the Act. The specific restrictions and procedures governing the exercise of Declarant's right to so appoint and remove Directors and officers shall be set out in the Bylaws of the Association. Declarant may voluntarily relinquish such power evidenced by a notice executed by Declarant and recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder for Garfield County, Colorado, but in such event, Declarant may at its option require that specified actions of the Association or the Board of Directors as described in the recorded notice, during the period Declarant would otherwise be entitled to appoint and remove directors and officers, be approved by Declarant before they become effective. 4.5 Compliance with Association Documents. Each Owner shall abide by and benefit from each provision, covenant, condition, restriction and easement contained in the Association Documents. The obligations, burdens, and benefits of membership in the Association concern the land and shall be covenants running with each Owner's Lot or Duplex Unit for the benefit of all other Residential Units and for the benefit of Declarant's adjacent properties. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 15 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0083 4.6 Books and Records. The Association shall make available to Owners and to Mortgagees for inspection, upon request, during normal business hours or under other reasonable circumstances, current copies of the Association Documents and the books, records, and financial statements of the Association prepared pursuant to the Bylaws. The Association may charge a reasonable fee for copying such materials. The Association shall maintain such books and records as may be required under the Act. 4.7 Manager. The Association may employ or contract for the services of a Manager to whom the Board of Directors may delegate certain powers, functions, or duties of the Association, as provided in the Bylaws of the Association. The Manager shall not have the authority to make expenditures except upon prior approval and direction by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall not be liable for any omission or improper exercise by a Manager of any duty, power, or function so delegated by written instrument executed by or on behalf of the Board of Directors. Any such Manager employed by or contracted with by the Board of Directors shall be licensed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado which govern licensing of managers for community associations. 4.8 Implied Rights and Obligations. The Association may exercise any right or privilege expressly granted to the Association in the Association Documents, and every other right or privilege reasonably implied from the existence of any right or privilege given to the Association under the Association Documents or reasonably necessary to effect any such right or privilege. The Association shall perform all of the duties and obligations expressly imposed upon it by the Association Documents, and every other duty or obligation implied by the express provisions of the Association Documents or necessary to reasonably satisfy any such duty or obligation. ARTICLE 5 POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ASSOCIATION 5.1 Power to Adopt Rules and Regulations. The Association may adopt, amend, repeal, and enforce Rules and Regulations as may be deemed necessary or desirable with respect to the interpretation and implementation of this Declaration, the operation of the Association, the use and enjoyment of Association Properties, and the use of any other property within the Community The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 16 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0084 Area, including Lots. Any such Rules and Regulations shall be effective only upon adoption by resolution of the Board of Directors. Notice of the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any Rule or Regulation shall be given in writing to each Member at the address for notices to Members as elsewhere provided in this Declaration or the Bylaws, and copies of the currently effective Rules and Regulations shall be made available to each Member upon request and payment of the reasonable expense of copying the same. Each Member shall comply with such Rules and Regulations. Such Rules and Regulations shall have the same force and effect as if they were set forth in and were part of this Declaration. In the event of conflict between the Rules and Regulations and the provisions of this Declaration, the provisions of this Declaration shall prevail. 5.2 Power to Enforce Declaration and Rules and Regulations. The Association shall have the power to enforce the provisions of this Declaration and the Rules and Regulations and shall take such action as the Board of Directors deems necessary or desirable to cause such compliance by each Member. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Association shall have the power to enforce the provisions of this Declaration and the Rules and Regulations by any one or more of the following means: (a) by entry upon any property within the Community Area after Notice and Hearing (unless a bona fide emergency exists), without liability to the Owner thereof or the Association, for the purpose of enforcement or causing compliance with this Declaration or the Rules and Regulations; (b) by commencing and maintaining actions and suits to restrain and enjoin any breach or threatened breach of the provisions of this Declaration or the Rules and Regulations, by mandatory injunction or otherwise; (c) by commencing and maintaining actions and suits to recover damages for breach of any of the provisions of this Declaration or the Rules and Regulations; (d) by suspension, after Notice and Hearing, of the voting rights of a Member during and for up to ten (10) days following any breach by such Member or a Related User of such Member of this Declaration or the Rules and Regulations; unless the breach is a continuing breach in which case such suspension shall continue for so long as such breach continues; (e) by levying and collecting, after Notice and Hearing, a Reimbursement Assessment against any Member for breach of this Declaration or the Rules and Regulations by such Member or Related User of such Member; and (f) uniformly applied fines and penalties, established in advance in the Rules and Regulations of the Association, from any Member or Related User for breach of The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 17 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0085 this Declaration or the Rules and Regulations by such Member or Related User of such Member. In the event that the Association fails to enforce the provisions of this Declaration as provided for herein, each Member shall, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Association, have the power (a) to enforce the provisions hereof by commencing and maintaining actions and suits to restrain and enjoin any breach or threatened breach of the provisions of this Declaration, by mandatory injunction or otherwise; or (b) to commence or maintain actions and suits to recover damages for breach of any of the provisions of this Declaration. 5.3 Power to Engage Employees, Agents, and Consultants. The Association shall have the power to hire and discharge employees and agents and to retain and pay for management, (e.g., management company), legal and accounting services as may be necessary or desirable in connection with the performance of any duties or the exercise of any powers of the Association under this Declaration. 5.4 General Corporate Powers. The Association shall have all of the ordinary powers and rights of a Colorado corporation formed under the Colorado Nonprofit Corporation Act, including, without limitation, entering into partnership and other agreements, subject only to such limitations upon such powers as may be set forth in this Declaration or in the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws. The Association shall also have the power to do any and all lawful things which may be authorized, required, or permitted to be done under this Declaration or the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws and to do and perform any and all acts which may be necessary or desirable for, or incidental to, the exercise of any of the express powers or rights of the Association under this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws. 5.5 Power to Employ Managers. The Association shall have the power to retain and pay for the services of a Manager or Managers, which may be an affiliate of Declarant, to undertake any of the management or Administrative Functions, Recreation Functions, or Public Functions for which the Association has responsibility under this Declaration to the extent deemed advisable by the Association, and may delegate any of its duties, powers, or functions to any such Manager. Notwithstanding any delegation to a Manager of any duties, powers, or functions of the Association, the Association and its Board of Directors shall remain ultimately responsible for the performance and exercise of such duties, powers, and functions. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 18 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0086 5.6 Powers Provided by Law. In addition to the above -referenced powers, the Association shall have full power to take and perform any and all actions which may be lawfully taken by the Association under the Colorado Nonprofit Corporation Act and the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act. ARTICLE 6 MECHANIC'S LIENS If any Owner shall cause any material to be furnished to his Lot or Duplex Unit or any labor to be performed therein or thereon, no Owner of any other Lot shall under any circumstances be liable for the payment of any expense incurred or for the value of any work done or material furnished. All such work shall be at the expense of the Owner causing it to be done, and such Owner shall be solely responsible to contractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons furnishing labor or materials to his Lot or Duplex Unit. ARTICLE 7 PROPERTY RIGHTS OF OWNERS AND RESERVATIONS BY DECLARANT 7.1 Recorded Easements. The Property shall be subject to all easements as shown on any recorded plat affecting the Property and to any other easements and licenses of record or of use as of the date of recordation of this Declaration. In addition, the Property is subject to those easements set forth in this Article 7. 7.2 Other Easements. (a) Easement for Benefit of Owners. All of the Owners of Lots shall have a nonexclusive right in common with all of the other Owners to use of sidewalks, pathways, roads and streets located within the entire Property, if any. This easement is subject to the following rights of the Association: (i) the right to reasonably limit the number of guests (not including lessees or members of the Owner's or lessee's family residing on a Lot). The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 19 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0087 (ii) the right to establish uniform rules as to the use of any facilities on the Property, including without limitation the right to establish and enforce parking restrictions; (iii) the right to suspend the right of an Owner, his lessees and their families or guests to the benefit or use of any facilities on the Property for any period of time during which any assessment against a Lot remains unpaid and delinquent and also for a period of time not exceeding thirty (30) days for any single infraction of the rules of the Association. (b) The Declarant under the Master Declaration and the officers, agents, employees and independent contractors of the Master Association shall have a nonexclusive easement to enter upon the Property for the purpose of performing or satisfying their respective obligations as set forth in the Master Declaration, Master Association bylaws and rules and regulations. 7.3 General Maintenance Easement. An easement is hereby reserved to Declarant, and granted to the Association, and any member of the Board of Directors or the Manager, and their respective officers, agents, employees, and assigns, upon, across, over, in, and under the Property and a right to make such use of the Property as may be necessary or appropriate to make emergency repairs, to perform the duties and functions which the Association is obligated or permitted to perform pursuant to the Association Documents, or to exercise its rights under Article 8 below, including the right to enter upon any Lot for the purpose of performing maintenance, including but not limited to work involving drainage, irrigation and other water features, as set forth in Article 8 below. 7.4 Association as Attorney -in -Fact. Each Owner, by his acceptance of a deed or other conveyance vesting in him an interest in a Residential Unit, does irrevocably constitute and appoint the Association and/or Declarant with full power of substitution as the Owner's name, place and stead to deal with Owner's interest in order to effectuate the rights reserved by Declarant or granted to the Association, as applicable, with full power, right and authorization to execute and deliver any instrument affecting the interest of the Owner and to take any other action which the Association or Declarant may consider necessary or advisable to give effect to the provision of this Section and this Declaration generally. If requested to do so by the Association or Declarant, each Owner shall execute and deliver a written, acknowledged instrument confirming such appointment. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 20 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0088 7.5 Emergency Access Easement. A general easement is hereby granted to all police, sheriff, fire protection, ambulance, and other similar emergency agencies or persons to enter upon the Property in the proper performance of their duties. 7.6 Model Unit Reservation. Declarant reserves for itself and for any Successor Declarant or assign the right to construct and maintain a model home or duplex unit for the purpose of sales efforts upon any Lot in the Project. ARTICLE 8 MAINTENANCE, LANDSCAPING AND SPECIAL EASEMENT 8.1 Maintenance. In order to maintain a uniform appearance and a high standard of maintenance within The Sages at Aspen Glen, the Association shall maintain: (a) General Common Area. The Association shall have the sole discretion to determine the time and manner in which maintenance shall be performed. (b) Roadways, Landscaping, Drainage, Irrigation and Other Water Features contained within the Property and General Common Area; provided, however, that the Association's obligation of maintenance of the Roads and right to the use of the water and water rights contained in any such drainage, irrigation or other Water Features shall be subject to the Aspen Glen P.U.D. approvals, the Master Declaration and/or agreement between the Declarant and the Master Association. (c) Association's Right to Create Rules Regarding Owner's Maintenance of Lot. The Association shall have the right to promulgate reasonable rules and regulations regarding the maintenance by the Owner of the landscaping and lawn care of each Lot. 8.2 Special Easement. The Association and the Board of Directors and their respective representatives are hereby granted a nonexclusive easement to enter the Lots as may be necessary or appropriate to perform the duties and functions which they may be obligated or permitted to perform pursuant to this Article 8. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 21 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0089 8.3 Maintenance Contract. The Association or Board of Directors may employ or contract for the services of an individual or maintenance company to perform certain delegated powers, functions, or duties of the Association to maintain the Common Area. The employed individual or maintenance company shall have the authority to make expenditures upon prior approval and direction of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall not be liable for any omission or improper exercise by the employed individual or management company of any duty, power, or function so delegated by written instrument executed by or on behalf of the Board of Directors. 8.4 Maintenance Responsibilities of Owners. Each Owner is responsible for providing all maintenance upon their Lot at their own expense. Such responsibility shall include, without limitation, maintenance of the entire buildings on a Lot and the Lot. The Association shall have the right and power to prohibit storage or other activities deemed unsafe, unsightly, unreasonably noisy or otherwise offensive to the senses and perceptible from another Lot. 8.5 Maintenance Related to Noxious Weeds. Each Owner is responsible for the identification, control and management of noxious weeds which may grow on their Lot. Owners shall utilize the resources contained in the Garfield County Vegetation Management Plan for the identification, management and treatment of any of the noxious weeds contained listed in Section 2.04 of the Noxious Weed List created by the Garfield County Vegetation Management Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein. Owners are encouraged to utilize the resources available through the Garfield County Vegetation Management Department. 8.6 Additions, Alterations, and Improvements. Subject to the reservation of rights of Declarant hereof, no improvement to the Property (other than for maintenance) which results in a Common Expense shall be constructed except with the prior approval of the members of the Association having at least sixty-seven percent (67%) of the total number of votes outstanding and entitled to be cast at a membership meeting as provided in the Bylaws. Dissenting Owners shall not be relieved of their obligation to pay their proportionate share of any Common Expenses. An individual Owner shall do no alterations, additions, or improvements (for his individual benefit or for the benefit of his Lot) to the General Common Area or the Limited Common Area without prior written The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 22 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0090 approval of the Board of Directors. No Owner shall decorate or fence any of the Lot area without the prior written approval of the Board of Directors. Utilities shall not be disturbed or relocated by an Owner without the written consent and approval of the Board. All repairs, alterations or remodels are coupled with the obligation to replace materials removed with similar or better quality materials. An Owner shall do no act nor any work that will or may impair any easement without the written consent of the Board of Directors, after first proving to the satisfaction of the Executive Board that such structural soundness or integrity will be maintained during and after any such act or work shall be done or performed. Any expense to the Board of Directors for investigation under this paragraph shall be borne by the Owner. Further, any augmentation or increase in the landscaping of the landscaped garden areas shall include a plan for the maintenance thereof. Such approved additional landscaping shall be maintained at the sole cost and expense of the Owner whose Lot is affected in accordance with the approved plan of maintenance. 8.7 Owner's Failure to Maintain or Repair. In the event that landscaping upon any Lot is not maintained properly, then the Association, after notice to the Owner and with the approval of the Board of Directors, shall have the right to enter upon the Lot to perform such work as is reasonably required to restore the landscaping thereon to a condition of good order. All costs incurred by the Association in connection with the restoration shall be reimbursed to the Association by the Owner of the Lot upon demand. All unreimbursed costs shall be a lien upon the Lot until reimbursement is made. The lien may be enforced in the same manner as a lien for an unpaid Assessment levied in accordance with Article 10 of this Declaration. 8.8 Right of Master Association to Maintain or Repair. In the event that any property, whether pertaining to a Lot (as described in Paragraph 8.6 hereof) or to Common Area located anywhere within the Sages at Aspen Glen are not properly maintained or are damaged or destroyed by an event of casualty and neither the Owner thereof or the Association takes reasonable measures to diligently pursue the repair and reconstruction of the damage or destruction, then the Master Association, after notice to the Owner, if applicable, and to the Association, shall have the right to enter the affected property and perform such work as is reasonably required to restore the property and any improvement thereon to a condition of good order and repair. All costs incurred by the Master Association in connection with the restoration shall be reimbursed to the Master The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 23 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0091 Association by the Owners of the affected Lot, or by the Association upon demand. All unreimbursed costs shall be a lien upon the affected Lot or Units and the property of the Association until reimbursement is made. This lien may be enforced in the same manner as a lien for an unpaid Assessment levied in accordance with Article 10 of this Declaration. ARTICLE 9 INSURANCE AND FIDELITY BONDS 9.1 General Insurance Provisions. The Association shall maintain, to the extent reasonably available, such insurance as the Board of Directors considers appropriate, including insurance on Common Areas. 9.2 Cancellation. If the insurance described in Article 9.1 is not reasonably available, or if any policy of such insurance is canceled or not renewed without a replacement policy therefor having been obtained, the Association promptly shall cause notice of that fact to be hand delivered or sent prepaid by United States mail to all Owners. 9.3 Policy Provisions. Insurance policies carried pursuant to Article 9.1 must provide that: (a) Each Owner is an insured person under the policy with respect to liability arising out of such Owner's membership in the Association; (b) The insurer waives its rights to subrogation under the policy against any Owner or member of his household; (c) No act or omission by any Owner, unless acting within the scope of such Owner's authority on behalf of the Association, will void the policy or be a condition to recovery under the policy; and (d) If, at the time of a loss under the policy, there is other insurance in the name of an Owner covering the same risk covered by the policy, the Association's policy shall provide primary insurance. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 24 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0092 9.4 Insurance Proceeds. Any loss covered by the property insurance policy described in Article 9.1 must be adjusted with the Association, but the insurance proceeds for that loss shall be payable to any insurance trustee designated for that purpose, or otherwise to the Association, and not to any holder of a security interest. The insurance trustee or the Association shall hold any insurance proceeds in trust for the Owners and Mortgagees as their interests may appear. The proceeds must be disbursed first for the repair or restoration of the damaged property, and the Association. Owners and Mortgagees are not entitled to receive payment of any portion of the proceeds unless there is a surplus of proceeds after the damaged property has been completely repaired or restored or the regime created by this Declaration is terminated. 9.5 Association Policies. The Association may adopt and establish written nondiscriminatory policies and procedures relating to the submittal of claims, responsibility for deductibles, and any other matters of claims adjustment. To the extent the Association settles claims for damages to real property, it shall have the authority to assess negligent Owners causing such loss or benefiting from such repair or restoration of all or an equitable portion of the deductible paid by the Association. 9.6 Insurer Obligation. An insurer that has issued an insurance policy for the insurance described in Article 9.1 shall issue certificates or memoranda of insurance to the Association and, upon request, to any Owner or Mortgagee. Unless otherwise provided by statute, the insurer issuing the policy may not cancel or refuse to renew it until thirty (30) days after notice of the proposed cancellation or nonrenewal has been mailed to the Association and to each Owner and Mortgagee to whom a certificate or memorandum of insurance has been issued at their respective last -known addresses. 9.7 Common Expenses. Premiums for insurance that the Association acquires and other expenses connected with acquiring such insurance policy as , described in Article 9.1, are Common Expenses. 9.8 Fidelity Insurance. To the extent reasonably available, fidelity bonds may be maintained by the Association to protect against dishonest acts on the part of its officers, directors, trustees, and employees and on the part of all others who handle or are responsible for handling the funds belonging to or administered by the Association in an amount not less than two (2) months' current The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 25 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0093 Assessments plus reserves as calculated from the current budget of the Association. In addition, if responsibility for handling funds is delegated to a Manager, such bond may be obtained for the Manager and its officers, employees, and agents, as applicable. Any such fidelity coverage shall name the Association as an obligee and such bonds shall contain waivers by the issuers of all defenses based upon the exclusion of persons serving without compensation form the definition of "employees," or similar terms or expressions. 9.9 Workers' Compensation Insurance. The Board of Directors shall obtain workers' compensation or similar insurance with respect to its employees, if applicable, in the amounts and forms as may now or hereafter be required by law. 9.10 Other Insurance. The Association shall also maintain insurance to the extent reasonably available and in such amounts as the Board of Directors may deem appropriate on behalf of Directors against any liability asserted against a Director or incurred by him in his capacity of or arising out of his status as a Director. The Board of Directors may obtain insurance against such other risks of a similar or dissimilar nature as it shall deem appropriate with respect to the Association's responsibilities and duties. 9.11 Insurance Obtained by Owners. Each Owner shall obtain and at all times maintain physical damage and liability insurance for such Owner's benefits at such Owner's expense, covering the full replacement value of the Owner's Lot improvements. All Owners are required to maintain on file copies of all such current policies with the Association to evidence their obligations hereunder and to facilitate recovery of all appropriate rewards or proceeds by the Association. ARTICLE 10 ASSESSMENTS 10.1 Obligation. Each Owner, including Declarant, by accepting a deed for a Lot, is deemed to covenant to pay to the Association (i) the Annual Assessments imposed by the Board of Directors as necessary and pursuant to the Budget adopted annually by the Association, for common expenses associated with the maintenance, repair or replacement of common elements and expenses necessary to perform the functions of the Association, (ii) Special Assessments for capital improvements and other purposes as stated in this Declaration, if permitted under the Act, and (iii) Default Assessments which may be assessed against a Lot The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 26 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0094 for the Owner's failure to perform an obligation under the Association Documents or because the Association has incurred an expense on behalf of the Owner under the Association Documents. 10.2 Purpose of Assessments. The Assessments shall be used exclusively to promote the health, safety and welfare of the Owners and occupants of The Sages at Aspen Glen, and for the improvement and maintenance of the Property, the Common Area, and other areas of Association responsibility referred to herein, as more fully set for the in this Article below. 10.3 Budget. Within thirty (30) days after the adoption of any proposed budget for the Association, the Board of Directors shall mail, by ordinary first- class mail, or otherwise deliver a summary of the budget to all the Owners and shall set a date for a meeting of the Owners to consider ratification of the budget not less than fourteen (14) nor more than sixty (60) days after mailing or other delivery of the summary. Unless at that meeting a majority of all Owners reject the budget, the budget is ratified, whether or not a quorum is present. In the event the proposed budged is rejected, the periodic budget last ratified by the Owners must be continued until such time as the Owners ratify a subsequent budget proposed by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall adopt a budget and submit the budget to a vote of the Owners as provided herein no less frequently than annually. The Board of Directors shall levy and assess the Annual Assessments in accordance with the annual budget. 10.4 Annual Assessments. Annual Assessments made shall be based upon the estimated cash requirements as the Board of Directors shall determine by the Annual Budget to be paid by all of the Owners, subject to Article 10.3 above. Estimated Common Expenses shall include, but shall not be limited to, the cost of routine maintenance and operation of the Property and the Common Area; expenses of management; insurance premiums for insurance coverage as deemed desirable or necessary by the Association; landscaping of the Property; care of grounds within the Common Area; routine repairs and renovations within the Common Area, including wages; common water and utility charges for the Common Area; legal and accounting fees; management fees; expenses and liabilities incurred by the Association under or by reason of this Declaration; payment of any default remaining from a previous assessment period; and the creation of a reasonable contingency or other reserve or surplus fund for general, The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 27 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0095 routine maintenance, repairs, and replacement of improvements within the Common Area on a periodic basis, as needed. Annual Assessments shall be payable in quarterly installments on a prorated basis in advance and shall be due on the first day of each quarter. The omission or failure of the Association to fix the Annual Assessments for any assessment period shall not be deemed a waiver, modification, or release of the Owners from their obligation to pay the same. The Association shall have the right, but not the obligation, to make prorated refunds of any Annual Assessments in excess of the actual expenses incurred in any fiscal year. 10.5 Apportionment of Annual Assessments. Each Owner shall be responsible for that Owner's share of the Common Expenses, which shall be divided among the Residential Units on the basis of the Sharing Ratio in effect on the date of assessment, subject to the following provisions: Expenses (including, but not limited to, costs of maintenance, repair, and replacement) relating to fewer than all of the Residential Units, to the extent not covered by insurance, may, in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors, be assessed only to Owners of the affected Residential Units; provided, however, that assessments for maintenance of the Limited Common Area shall be shared equally on the basis of the Sharing Ratio. 10.6 Special Assessments. In addition to the Annual Assessments authorized by this Article 10, the Association, if permitted under the Act, may levy in any fiscal year one or more Special Assessments, payable over such a period as the Association may determine, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any unexpected repair or replacement of improvements on the Property or the Common Area or for such other expense incurred or to be incurred as provided in this Declaration. This Section 10.6 shall not be construed as an independent source of authority of the Association to incur expense, but shall be construed to prescribe the manner of assessing expenses authorized by other sections of this Declaration. Any amounts assessed pursuant to this Section shall be assessed to Owners in the same proportion as provided for Annual Assessments in Section 10.4, subject to the requirement that any extraordinary insurance costs incurred as a result of the value of a particular Owner's residence or the actions of a particular Owner (or his agents, servants, guests, tenants, or invitees) shall be borne by that Owner, and subject to Section 10.5 above. Notice in writing in the amount of such Special Assessments and the time for payment of the Special The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 28 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0096 Assessments shall be given promptly to the Owners, and no payment shall be due less than thirty (30) days after such notice shall have been given. 10.7 Default Assessments. All monetary fines assessed against an Owner pursuant to the Association Documents, or any expense of the Association which is the obligation of an Owner or which is incurred by the Association on behalf of the Owner pursuant to the Association Documents, shall be a Default Assessment and shall become a lien against such Owner's Lot which may be foreclosed or otherwise collected as provided in this Declaration. Notice of the amount and due date of such Default Assessment shall be sent to the Owner subject to such Assessment at least thirty (30) days prior to the due date. 10.8 Effect of Nonpayment; Assessment Lien. Any Assessment installment, whether pertaining to any Annual, Special, or Default Assessment, which is not paid on or before its due date shall be delinquent. If an Assessment installment becomes delinquent, the Association, in its sole discretion, may take any or all of the following actions: (a) assess a late charge for each delinquency in such amount as the Association deems appropriate; (b) assess an interest charge from the date of delinquency at the yearly rate of two (2) points above the prime rate charged by the Association's bank, or such other rate as the Board of Directors may establish, not to exceed twenty-one percent (21 %) per annum; (c) suspend the voting rights of the Owner during any period of delinquency; (d) accelerate all remaining Assessment installments so that unpaid Assessments for the remainder of the fiscal year shall be due and payable at once; (e) bring an action at law against any Owner personally obligated to pay the delinquent Assessments however a lien for unpaid assessments is extinguished unless proceedings to enforce said lien are instituted within six (6) years after the full amount of assessments become due; and (f) proceed with foreclosure as set forth in more detail below. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 29 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0097 Assessments chargeable to any Lot or Duplex Lot shall constitute a lien on such Residential Unit. The Association may institute foreclosure proceedings against the defaulting Owner's Lot in the manner for foreclosing a mortgage on real property under the laws of the State of Colorado, however no such institution of a foreclosure shall commence against any delinquent owner until the balance due equals or exceeds six (6) months of assessment fees. Additionally, prior to instituting any foreclosure action, the Board of Directors must formally resolve, by a recorded vote, to authorize the filing of legal action against the owner of the Residential Unit on an individual basis. In the event of any such foreclosure, the Owner shall be liable for the amount of unpaid Assessments, any penalties and interest thereon, the cost and expenses of such proceedings, the cost and expenses for filing the notice of the claim and lien, and all reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with the enforcement of the lien. The Association shall have the power to bid on a Lot at foreclosure sale and to acquire and hold, lease, mortgage, and convey the same. 10.9 Collections. In order to collect past due assessments and other delinquent payments under this Article 10, the Board of Directors shall adopt and comply with a collection policy that meets the requirements set forth in C.R.S. §38-33.3-205.5 (5) and shall further make a good faith effort to coordinate with the Residential Unit owner to set up a one-time payment plan established in writing and signed by the delinquent owner. This one time opportunity to enter into a payment plan does not extend to any owner who does not occupy the Residential Unit and who has acquired the property as a result of a default on a mortgage (i.e. Public Trustee foreclosure) or a foreclosure of the Association's lien. 10.10 Personal Obligation. The amount of any Assessment chargeable against any Lot shall be a personal and individual debt of the Owner of same. No Owner may exempt himself from liability for the Assessment by abandonment of his Residential Unit. Suit to recover a money judgment for unpaid Assessments, any penalties and interest thereon, the costs and expenses of such proceedings, and all reasonable attorneys' fees in connection therewith shall be maintainable without foreclosing or waiving the Assessment lien provided in this Declaration. 10.11 Successor's Liability for Assessments; Subordination of Lien. The provisions of the Act shall govern and control (i) the obligations of successors to The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 30 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0098 the fee simple title of a Lot on which Assessments are delinquent, and (ii) the subordination by the lien of the Assessments provided for in this Declaration 10.12 Payment by Mortgagee. Any Mortgagee holding a lien on a Lot may pay any unpaid Assessment payable with respect to such Lot, together with any and all costs and expense incurred with respect to the lien, and upon such payment that Mortgagee shall have a lien on the Lot for the amounts paid with the same priority as the lien of the Mortgage. 10.13 Statement of Status of Assessment Payment. Upon payment of a reasonable fee set from time to time by the Board of Directors and upon fourteen (14) days' written request to the Manager or the Association's registered agent, any Owner, Mortgagee, prospective Mortgagee, or prospective purchaser of a Lot shall be furnished with a written statement setting forth the amount of the unpaid Assessments, if any, with respect to such Residential Unit. Unless such statement shall be issued by personal delivery or by certified mail, first class postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the inquiring party (in which even the date of posting shall be deemed the date of delivery) within fourteen (14) days, the Association shall have no right to assert a lien upon the Lot over the inquiring party's interest for unpaid Assessments which were due as of the date of the request. 10.14 Capitalization of the Association. Upon acquisition of record title to a Lot from Declarant or any seller after Declarant, each Owner shall contribute to the working capital and reserves of the Association an amount equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Annual Assessment determined by the Board of Directors for that Lot for the year in which the Owner acquired title. Such payments shall not be considered advance payments of Annual Assessments. The unused portion of the working capital deposit shall be returned to each Owner upon the sale of his Residential Unit, provided that the new purchaser of the Lot has deposited the required working capital deposit with the Association. ARTICLE 11 ASSOCIATION AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Each Owner hereby irrevocably appoints the Association as the Owner's true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the purposes of dealing with any improvements covered by insurance written in the name of the Association pursuant to Article 9 upon their damage or destruction as provided in Article 12. Acceptance by a The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 31 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0099 grantee of a deed or other instrument of conveyance or any other instrument conveying any portion of the Property shall constitute appointment of the Association as the grantee's attorney-in-fact, and the Association shall have full authorization, right, and power to make, execute, and deliver any contract, assignment, deed, waiver, or other instrument with respect to the interest of any Owner which may be necessary to exercise the powers granted to the Association as attorney-in-fact. ARTICLE 12 DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION 12.1 Role of the Board of Directors. In the event of damage or destruction to any property covered by insurance written in the name of the Association, the Board of Directors shall arrange for and supervise the prompt repair and restoration of the damaged property insured by the Association. 12.2 Estimate of Damages or Destruction. As soon as practicable after an event causing damage to or destruction of any part of the Association -Insured Property, the Board of Directors shall, unless such damage or destruction shall be minor, obtain an estimate or estimates that it deems reliable and complete of the costs of repair and reconstruction. "Repair and reconstruction" as used in Article 12 shall mean restoring the damaged or destroyed improvements to substantially the same condition in which they existed prior to the damage or destruction. Such costs may also include professional fees and premiums for such bonds as the Board of Directors or the Insurance Trustee, if any, determines to be necessary. 12.3 Repair and Reconstruction. As soon as practical after the damage occurs and any required estimates have been obtained, the Association shall diligently pursue to completion the repair and reconstruction of the damaged or destroyed Association -Insured Property. As attorney-in-fact for the Owners, the Association may take any and all necessary or appropriate actions to effect repair and reconstruction of any damage to the Association -Insured Property, and no consent or other action by any Owner shall be necessary. Assessments of the Association shall not be abated during the period of insurance adjustments and repair and reconstruction. 12.4 Funds for Repair and Reconstruction. The proceeds received by the Association from any hazard insurance carried by the Association shall be used The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 32 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0100 for the purpose of repair, replacement, and reconstruction of the Association - Insured Property. If the proceeds of the Association's insurance are insufficient to pay the estimated or actual cost of such repair, replacement, or reconstruction, or if upon completion of such work the insurance proceeds for the payment of such work are insufficient, the Association may, pursuant to Section 10.6, if permitted under the Act, levy, assess, and collect in advance from the Owners, without the necessity of a special vote of the Owners, a Special Assessment sufficient to provide funds to pay such estimated or actual costs of repair and reconstruction. Further levies may be made in like manner if the amounts collected prove insufficient to complete the repair, replacement, or reconstruction. 12.5 Disbursement of Funds for Repair and Reconstruction. The insurance proceeds held by the Association and the amounts received from the Special Assessments provided for above constitute a fund for the payment of the costs of repair and reconstruction after casualty. It shall be deemed that the first money disbursed in payment for the costs of repair and reconstruction shall be made from insurance proceeds, and the balance from the Special Assessments. If there is a balance remaining after payment of all costs of such repair and reconstruction, such balance shall be distributed to the Owners in proportion to the contributions each Owner made as Special Assessments, then in equal shares per Residential Unit, first to the Mortgagees and then to the Owners, as their interests appear. ARTICLE 13 DESIGN REVIEW 13.1 Approval Required by Association. No initial improvement or alteration of the exterior of a Lot or other structure located on a Lot, including repainting of the structure, shall be made unless first approved in writing by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall exercise its best judgment to ensure that all modifications to structures and on land within the Property conform to and harmonize with existing surroundings and structures. The Board of Directors has the absolute right to deny any requested changes which the Board of Directors reasonably determines do not conform to and harmonize with existing surroundings and structures. The provisions for architectural control contained in this Declaration shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the architectural control The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 33 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0101 provisions contained in the Master Declaration. The granting of approval for proposed work hereunder shall not dispense with the requirement to also comply with the approval procedures set forth in the Master Declaration. All proposed construction, modifications, alterations and improvements shall be approved pursuant to this Declaration before being submitted for approval pursuant to the Master Declaration. ARTICLE 14 DURATION OF COVENANTS AND AMENDMENT 14.1 Term. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the land in perpetuity, subject to the termination provisions of the Act. 14.2 Amendment by Declarant. Until the first Lot subject to this Declaration has been conveyed by Declarant by a recorded deed, any of the provisions, covenants, conditions, restrictions and equitable servitudes contained in this Declaration may be amended or terminated by Declarant by the recordation of a written instrument executed by Declarant setting forth such amendment or termination. 14.3 Amendment of Declaration by Members. Except as otherwise provided in this Declaration, any provision, covenant, condition, restriction or equitable servitude contained in this Declaration may be amended or repealed at any time and from time to time, upon approval of the amendment or repeal by members of the Association holding at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the votes of members. The approval of any such amendment or repeal shall be evidenced by the certification by the members to the Board of Directors of the Association of the votes of members. The amendment or repeal shall be effective upon the recording in the real property records of Garfield County, of a certificate executed by the president or a vice-president and the secretary or an assistant secretary of the Association setting forth the amendment or repeal in full and certifying that the amendment or repeal has been approved by the members. Any amendment to the Declaration made hereunder shall be effective only when recorded in the real property records of Garfield County. All amendments hereto shall be indexed in the grantee's index in the name of Declarant and the Association and in the grantor's index in the name of each person executing the amendment. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 34 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0102 ARTICLE 15 COVENANTS RELATING TO THE MASTER DECLARATION 15.1 Master Declaration Matters. Each Owner, by accepting a deed to a Residential Unit, recognizes that (i) the Property is subject to the Master Declaration and (ii) by virtue of his ownership, he has become a member of The Homeowners' Association at Aspen Glen. Each Owner, by accepting a deed to a Lot or Residential Unit, acknowledges that he has received a copy of the Master Declaration. The Owner agrees to perform all of his obligations as a member of the Homeowners Association at Aspen Glen as they may from time to time exist, including, but not limited to, the obligation to pay assessments as required under the Master Declaration and other governing documents of The Homeowners Association at Aspen Glen. 15.2 Enforcement of Master Declaration. (a) The Association shall have the power, subject to the primary power of the Board of Directors of the Master Association, to enforce the covenants and restrictions contained in the Master Declaration, but only if said covenants and restrictions relate to the Property, and to collect assessments on behalf of the Master Association. (b) This Declaration is intended to supplement the Master Declaration as it applies to the Property. In addition to all of the obligations which are conferred or imposed upon the Association pursuant to this Declaration, the Bylaws or the Articles of Incorporation, the Association shall be subject to all of the obligations imposed upon it pursuant to the Master Declaration and the Bylaws of the Master Association. The Association and all committees thereof shall also be subject to all superior rights and powers which have been conferred upon the Master Association pursuant to the Master Declaration and the Bylaws of the Master Association. The Association shall take no action in derogation of the rights of, or contrary to the interests of, the Master Association. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 35 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0103 ARTICLE 16 GENERAL PROVISIONS 16.1 Restriction on Declarant Powers. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no rights or powers reserved to Declarant hereunder shall exceed the time limitations or permissible extent of such rights or powers as restricted under the Act. Any provision in this Declaration in conflict with the requirements of the Act shall not be deemed to invalidate such provision as a whole but shall be adjusted as is necessary to comply with the Act. 16.2 Enforcement. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Declaration, the Board of Directors, Declarant, or any Owner shall have the right to enforce, by a proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens, and charges now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of this Declaration. Failure by the Board of Directors of the Association, Declarant, or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction contained in this Declaration shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. (b) The Master Association shall be entitled to enforce the provisions of this Declaration to the same extent as the Association or any Owner. The failure of the Master Association to enforce any of the limitations, restrictions, conditions or covenants contained herein shall not constitute a waiver of the right to enforce the same thereafter. No liability shall be imposed on, or incurred by, the Master Association as a result of such failure. The prevailing party in any action at law or in equity instituted by the Master Association or the Association to enforce or interpret said limitations, restrictions, conditions or covenants, shall be entitled to all costs incurred in connection therewith, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees. 16.3 Special Rights of First Mortgagees. First Mortgagees shall have all rights granted to First Mortgagees under the Master Declaration, specifically Sections 11.6, 11.7, 11.8 and 11.9. 16.4 Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provision which shall remain in full force and effect. The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants 36 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0104 16.5 Conflicts Between Documents. (a) In case of conflict between this Declaration and the Articles and the Bylaws of the Association, this Declaration shall control. In case of conflict between the Articles and the Bylaws, the Articles shall control. (b) The covenants, restrictions and provisions of this Declaration shall be cumulative with those of the Master Declaration; provided, however, in the event of conflict between or among the provisions of this Declaration, the Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation or rules and regulations pursuant thereto and the Master Declaration, its bylaws, articles of incorporation or rules and regulations, those of the Master Association shall be superior to those of the Association. The foregoing priorities shall not prevent enforcement by the Association of provisions or rules which are stricter than those of the Master Association. Executed this DECLARANT: day of ,2016. Gerd Zeller STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) )ss. ) The above and foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by the Declarant, Gerd Zeller. Witness my hand and seal. My commission expires: The Sages at Aspen Glen Declaration of Covenants Notary Public 37 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0105 EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRCITIONS AND EASEMENTS THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0106 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situate in Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly right of way line of County Road 109 and the west line of 2nd Amended Plat of Golf Course Parcel 9, Aspen Glen, Filing No. 1, County of Garfield, State of Colorado whence the W1/4 corner of Section 20, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian bears S 57°23'01" E 5194.26 feet; thence along the west line of said Golf Course Parcel 9 the following courses: N 79°46'03" E, 87.38 feet; thence, S 29°23'03" E, 308.37 feet; thence, S 74°11'52" E, 10.61 feet; thence, S 29°23'03" E, 440.20 feet; thence, S 53°16'43" E, 36.29 feet; thence, S 14°34'35" E, 84.79 feet; feet to the north right of way line of Golden Bear Drive as shown on plat of Aspen Glen, Filing No. 6, County of Garfield, State of Colorado; thence along said north right of way line the following courses: thence 45.51 feet along the arc of a 814.50 feet radius non tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 3°12'05" and subtending a chord bearing S 75°32'33" W 45.50 feet; thence 29.03 feet along the arc of a 199.75 feet radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 8°19'39" and subtending a chord bearing S 78°06'20" W 29.01 feet; thence S 82°16'09" W, 45.30 feet; thence 61.73 feet along the arc of a 200.25 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 17°39'47" and subtending a chord bearing S 73°26'16" W 61.49 feet; thence 55.09 feet along the arc of a 833.67 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 3°47'11" and subtending a chord bearing S 62°42'47" W 55.08 feet; thence 38.40 feet along the arc of a 47.50 feet radius curve to the fight, having a central angle of 46°19'29" and subtending a chord bearing S 83°58'56" W 37.37 feet to the east right of way line of County Road 109; thence, along said east right of way line the following courses: thence, N 29°02'45" W, 166.98 feet; thence, N 20°41'20" W, 11.95 feet; thence 545.79 feet along the arc of a 1635.67 feet radius non tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 19° 07'06" and subtending a chord bearing N 16°06'57" W 543.26 feet; thence, N 06°33'24" W, 135.34 feet; to the point of beginning. County of Garfield, State of Colorado Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land The Association. File No. 01330-84010 CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch A STO Blumberg No. 5118 EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 2 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0107 EXHIBIT B SHARING RATIOS AND ALLOCATED INTERESTS ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO. 1; ROARING FORK MESA AT ASPEN GLEN; ROARING FORK MESA AT ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO. 2; ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 2; ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 3; THE PEAKS AT ASPEN GLEN; THE PEAKS AT ASPEN GLEN, PHASE NO. 2; THE PEAKS AT ASPEN GLEN, PHASE NO. 3; . ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO. 5; ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO. 6; THE FAIRWAYS AT ASPEN GLEN; CLUBLODGE LOT 1, CLUBLODGE LOT 2, CLUBLODGE LOT 3, CLUBLODGE LOT 4 AND CLUBLODGB LOT 5; ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 7; ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 8; ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO. 4; AND THE SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN Lots ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. Lots Al - A23, inclusive Lots B1 - B10, inclusive Lots C1 - C11, inclusive Lots D1 - D39, inclusive Lots D40A and D4OB Lots D42 - D45, inclusive Lots El - E56, inclusive Lots•F1 - F27, inclusive Lots G1 - G5, inclusive Sub -Total Master Association Master Assoeiation Common Expense Vote Liability Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot; 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lit: One Vote • Bach Lot: 1/469 Bach Lot: One Vote 178 Lots EXHIBIT BE � m The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0108 ROARING FORK MESA AT ASPEN GLEN Lots 1 - 24, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot; One Vote Sub -Total 24 Lots ROARING .FORK MESA AT ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 2 Lots 24A, 25 - 54, inclusive Each Lot: 11469 Sub -Total 31 Lots ASPEN GLEN FILING NO -2 Lots GV1 - GV13, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Lots 1S1 -1523, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Sub -Total 36 Lots ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO', 3 Lots L1, L2, and Lots L16 - L21, Each Lot: 1/469 inclusive Lots WP1 - WP16, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Sub -Total THE PEAKS AT ASPEN GLEN Lots 1-15 24 Lots Each Lot: 1/469 Sub Total 15 Lots THE PEAKS AT ASPEN GLEN, PHASE NO. 2 Lots 16-30 Sub -Total THF PEAKS AT ASPEN GLEN, PHASE NO. 3 Lots 31-42, inclusive Sub -Total ASPEN GLEN, FILING Na 5 Lots 1-11 Each Lot: 1/469 15 Lots Each Lot: 1/469 12 Lots Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0109 Sub -Total 11 Lots ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO. 6 Lots L22 -L25, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Lots WPI7-WP20, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Lots 111-N10, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote and Lots H35 -H42, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Sub -Total 26 Lots THE FAIRWAYS AT ASPEN GLEN Lots I-25, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Sub -Total 25 Lots CLUBLOD GE LOT 1, CLUBLODGE LOT 2, CLUBLODGE LOT 3, CLUBLODGE LOTS 4A AND 4B CLUBLODGE LOTS SA AND 5R Lots 1 - 3, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote Lots 4A, 4B, 5A and 5B Each Lot: 1/469 Sub -Total 7 Lots ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 7 Lots Hi l -1134, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Sub -Total 24 Lots ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 8 Lots 51 - S16, inclusive Each Lot: 1/469 Sub -Total 16 Lots Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote Each Lot: One Vote The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0110 ASPEN GLEN, FILING NO: 4 Lots SD -1 - SD -24, inclusive Sub -Total Tut i' SAGES AT ASPEN GLEN Lot 1 Sub -Total Total Lots: 469 • Each Lot: 1/469 Each Lot: One Vote 24 Lots Bach Lot: 1/469 1 Lot Each Lot: One Vote Total Master Association Expense Liabilities =•469/469 Total Votes: 469 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0111 GARFIEID COUNTY WEED MANAGEM]E NOXIOUS Adopted by the Board of County Commissioners May 1, 2000 Revegetation Guidelines and Reclamation Standards Amended May 7, 2001 Resolution #2002-94 October 21, 2002 Prepared by Garfield County Vegetation Management and the Garfield County Weed Advisory Board EXHIBIT The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0112 2.04 Integrated Weed Management — Treatment Methods: Management techniques include cultural, mechanical, biological and chemical strategies. The optimum method or methods for weed management will vary depending on a number of site specific variables. Factors to be considered should include soil type and stability, grade, associated vegetation, existing and proposed land use, proximity to water, availability of irrigation water, weed type and stage of growth, and severity of infestation. The management method selected should be the least environmentally damaging, yet practical and reasonable in achieving the desired results. When considering weed management on a property, work on the areas that may transport weed seeds. These areas include ditches, streams, roadsides, driveways, trails, livestock concentrated areas, and equipment storage sites. The following recommendations are intended to be a reference for weed management in Garfield County. The information is not intended to be a complete guide to weed management. Before using any chemical, you should thoroughly read the label. Any use of a herbicide inconsistent with the label is neither legal nor recommended. Changes in herbicide registrations occur constantly. The herbicide label is the legal document on herbicide use. Read and follow all directions carefully. The use of a pesticide in a manner not consistent with the label can lead to injury of crops, humans, animals, and the environment. Specific chemical recommendations are available from the Garfield County Vegetation Management Department and/or licensed applicators and are not listed in the Plan. CANADA THISTLE Description: Perennial. Reproduces from vegetative buds in root system and from seed. Comments: Canada thistle is best managed through an integrated management system that emphasizes competitive, desirable plants. Biological control: Three insects currently available. It is best to release a complex of insects (different insects that will stress different parts of the plant.) Ceutorhyncus litura — a weevil that stresses the crown of the plant. Urophora carduii — a stem and shoot gall fly. Cassidia rubiginosa — leaf beetle. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Maintain soil fertility and moisture at optimum levels to favor grass growth. Mechanical control: Research indicates that mowing of Canada thistle may be effective when done repeatedly at two week intervals over a period of 11 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0113 CHICORY Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: several years. Pulling and digging up Canada thistle is ineffective as the plant has such an extensive root system. Simple perennial. Chicory is well established in western Garfield County (Parachute) and is spreading rapidly in other parts of the County. Close grazing by sheep will control the chicory in pastures. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Re -seed disturbed areas adjacent to chicory infestations with appropriate perennial grasses. None available. COMMON BURDOCK Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: Biennial. Prolific seed producer. Burs may become entangled in the hair of livestock, wildlife, or pets allowing seed to be distributed to new areas. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Minimize soil disturbances, encourage desirable plant growth. Top growth removal through mowing or cutting is effective as is pulling or digging out the plant at flowering or early seed formation. DALMATIAN TOADFLAX Description: Comments: Biological control: Aggressive perennial, escaped ornamental. Widespread in Glenwood Springs. The defoliating moth, Calophasia lunula, has been released on Dalmatian and yellow toadflax. It may defoliate up to 20% of the leaves of the plant. 12 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0114 Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: Education: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Re -seed disturbed areas adjacent to toadflax infestations with appropriate perennial grasses. Repeated mowing 2-3 times per year will slow spread and reduce seed production. The key to Dalmatian toadflax management is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that Dalmatian toadflax is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large-scale landscape projects. DIFFUSE KNAPWEED Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: HOARY CRESS Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Biennial, reproduces by seed. Increasingly common in Garfield County. The largest infestation is at the Glenwood Springs Airport. Two seed head flies, Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata, are available. They reduce seed production. A root -boring moth, Agapeta zoegana, causes considerable damage to roots. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Reseeding of disturbed sites with fast growing grasses helps prevent diffuse knapweed establishment. Handpulling has been effective, if done persistently over time. A very competitive, deep-rooted perennial that reproduces by root segments and by seed. Cominon in Garfield County. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Mowing or cultivation effectiveness will be increased if other plants like perennial native grasses or alfalfa are seeded in the hoary cress stand as competitors. Maintain range and pasture in 13 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0115 Mechanical control: HOUNDSTONGUE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: LEAFY SPURGE Description: Comments: Biological control: good condition. Promote healthy grass growth through proper irrigation and fertilization. Do not overgraze. Removal of top growth is somewhat effective. Repeated treatments may reduce seed production and spread. Biennial. Prolific seed producer. Seed nutlets break apart at maturity and cling to clothing or animals. Widespread throughout Garfield County. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Re -seed disturbed sites with fast growing native grasses. Maintain range and pasture in good condition. Promote healthy grass growth through proper irrigation and fertilization. Do not overgraze. Houndstongue is a prolific seed producer, and the seeds are readily spread by their ability to stick to wildlife and domestic animals. Physical removal of the plant at flowering or in early seed formation, by pulling or digging, will break the cycle of the plant. A perennial up to three feet tall that reproduces by vigorous root stalks and seed. Leafy spurge is primarily found in Wallace Creek in western Garfield County. An extremely difficult -to -control perennial weed that will require re -treatments to achieve adequate control. Development of a management plan is helpful to manage large areas of leafy spurge. Sheep or goats will graze leafy spurge. If livestock graze leafy spurge after seed formation, hold animals in a corral for at least seven days before moving them to an uninfested area to avoid seed spread. Several flea beetles (Apthona spp). are available from the Colorado Department of Agriculture Insectary in Palisade. These insects are available upon request at no charge to the public. The larvae bore into leafy spurge roots and the adults feed on the leaves. Also available from the Insectary are Oberea erythrocephala, a stem 14 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0116 Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: MUSK THISTLE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: and root crown mining long -horned beetle, and Spurgia esulae, a shoot tip gall midge. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Any activity that encourages vigorous grass growth is very important. Overgrazing stresses grasses and makes them less competitive to leafy spurge. Mowing leafy spurge at 14 to 21 day intervals may cause higher susceptibility to fall applied herbicides. Musk thistle is a biennial and the key to its successful management is to prevent seed formation. Scattered throughout the County, heaviest in the Crystal River Valley. The musk thistle seed head weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, is wide- spread in Colorado. Larvae of this insect destroy developing seeds but are not 100 percent effective by themselves. The weevil normally impacts seed production by about 50 percent. Herbicides can be combined with weevils if the insects are allowed to complete their life cycles. Another weevil, Trichosirocalus horridus, attacks the crown area of musk thistle rosettes and weakens the plant before it bolts. This weevil has reduced stand density in areas where it has become well established. A leaf feeding beetle, Cassidia rubiiginosa, causes considerable damage by skeletonizing leaves. It is recommended to release more than one type of insect on a weed since each type may work on different parts of the plant. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Musk thistle, like other biennial thistles, thrives on disturbance. The best management is to minimize disturbance. If it does occur be certain to revegetate with competitive perennial grasses. Mechanical control: The most effective type of mechanical control is to hand pull this plant prior to flowering. This can be unrealistic on large acreage or when the ground is very dry. Another option is to use a shovel to cut the root below the surface of the soil, taking care not to disturb the soil more than necessary. If this is done prior to flowering the plant can be left in place after it is cut. If it has 15 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0117 already flowered the plant should be removed and placed in a bag and disposed of. Mowing is not effective on this species unless repeated numerous times throughout the growing season since musk thistle will flower and produce seed even after one or two mowings. OXEYE DAISY Description: A rhizomatous perennial, escaped ornamental. Comments: A rapidly spreading weed in Garfield County. Biological control: None currently available. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: None available. Mechanical control: No information available. Education: The key to oxeye daisy management is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that oxeye is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large-scale landscape projects. PLUMELESS THISTLE Description: A biennial, prolific seed producer. Comments: Common in southern Garfield County, rapidly spreading south of Battlement Mesa. Biological control: The same seed head weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, that attacks musk thistle also feeds on plumeless thistle seeds. Another musk thistle weevil, Trichosirocalus horridus, has been released on plumeless thistle in Garfield County. This weevil appears to be ineffective on plumeless. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Plumeless thistle, like other biennial thistles, thrives on disturbance. The best management is to mimimize disturbance and revegetate with competitive perennial species Mechanical control: Mowing is generally not effective on plumeless due to the plant's capacity for rapid re -growth. Hand cutting is not effective unless 16 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0118 there are repeated follow-up treatments. Hand cutting should only be conducted if there is a commitment to follow-up efforts. Plumeless tends to branch out where it is cut and then it re -flowers. Pulling plumeless can be very effective, especially if done after a light rain. Hand pulling, with a good set of gloves, is preferable to shoveling. Shoveling disturbs the ground thus creating a potential seedbed for future infestations. PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE Description: An introduced perennial. This escaped ornamental is also a prolific seed producer, able to produce over 10,000 seeds per square yard. Comments: The US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Colorado Division of Wildlife are extremely alarmed about the proliferation of purple loosestrife in wetland and riparian habitats. Biological control: Biological control may eventually bring weed populations under control, but it will not eliminate or prevent the spread of noxious weeds. A survey of Ioosestrife populations in Europe has resulted in the selection of five insects which may have potential as biocontrols. Three of these species have completed initial screening tests conducted by the International Institute of Biological Control, in Switzerland and one, Hylobius transverovittatus, a root mining weevil which attacks the vascular tissue of the plant, was subsequently released in New York in 1991. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Not available. Mechanical control: Mechanical methods include hand pulling, mowing, and flooding. Hand pulling is effective when infestations are detected early. The root system must be completely removed, since the root sections can sprout and form new plants. For this reason hand pulling is only effective on small plants. Education: The key to purple Ioosestrife management and other escaped ornamentals is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that purple Ioosestrife is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large- scale landscape projects. 17 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0119 RUSSIAN KNAPWEED Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical controls: RUSSIAN OLIVE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: A perennial with an extensive underground root system. This weed is very common in Garfield County. Like other creeping perennials, the key to Russian knapweed control is to stress the weed and cause it to expend nutrient stores in its root system. An integrated management plan should be developed that places continual stress on the weed. Currently, the best management plan includes cultural control combined with mechanical and/or chemical control techniques. A single control strategy, such as mowing or a herbicide, usually is not sufficient. The plant is toxic to horses, however they must consume it over a period of time before poisoning will occur. Once poisoning occurs horses are unable to chew and advance food to the back of their mouths, swallowing is impaired and horses can drink only if they immerse their head in water far enough to get water to the back of their mouths. Poisoning is irreversible and death by starvation will occur. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Russian knapweed tends to form monocultures by eliminating other plants. Therefore, sowing desirable plant species is necessary after the weed is controlled. Research indicates that the native grasses, streambank wheatgrass and thickspike wheatgrass will establish in an area after Russian knapweed is suppressed with herbicides. If the Russian knapweed stand is not too old and grasses are still present, stimulating grass growth by irrigation (where possible) should increase grass competition with knapweed and keep it under continual stress. Repeated mowing combined with herbicide applications will gradually stress the plant. A tree that may reach heights from 10 to 25 feet. Very common along the Colorado River and other drainages in western Garfield County. None available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. 18 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0120 Cultural control: Mechanical control: SALT CEDAR Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Plant native trees or less aggressive introduced trees. In riparian areas establish native riparian vegetation. Small trees may be controlled mechanically by using an appropriate tool or shovel. Shrub or small tree. Widespread throughout Garfield County. There are experimental projects being conducted in a few areas in the West involving the release of mealybugs and leafbeetles. These are not cleared for general release. The recent listing of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (a native species that nests in saltcedar) under the Endangered Species Act has challenged efforts to move forward with release of insects for biocontrol. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Establish native riparian vegetation. Mechanical control: Historical saltcedar management projects have included root plowing and raking, dozing, mowing, and prescribed burning. These methods provide only short-term benefits and are labor intensive. SCOTCH THISTLE Description: A biennial. Comments: Common in Garfield County, the worst infestations are located between Glenwood Springs and New Castle. Biological control: None currently available. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Mechanical control: Reseed disturbed sites with appropriate perennial grasses. Digging the plant at the rosette stage is effective. 19 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0121 SPOTTED KNAPWEED Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: A short-lived, non -creeping perennial that reproduces from seed and forms a new shoot each year from a taproot. One of the most invasive, aggressive weeds to plague the western United States. Small infestation located in the Battlements. The seedhead flies, Urophora affinis and Urophora quadrifasciata, have been released in many Front Range counties. These insects cause plants to produce fewer viable seeds and abort terminal or lateral flowers. Root feeding insects may have more of a detrimental effect on knapweed populations than seed feeding insects. Larvae of the yellow winged knapweed moth feed in the roots of both knapweed species. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. If desirable grass competition is evident in spotted knapweed stands, judicious herbicide application that does not injure grasses may release them to compete effectively with the weeds. Irrigation may help stimulate grass competition in these cases. Seeding suitable perennial grasses is necessary to prevent weed re -invasion. None available. YELLOW STARTHISTLE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: Annual, prolific seed producer. In California alone, this plant has infested more than 20 million acres. There are no known infestations in Garfield County; however there have been reports in the past of single -plant infestations. A seed -feeding beetle, Bangasterus orientalis, has been released in California and Idaho. Seed weevils and seed flies have also been released. In Garfield County, we hope to detect and eradicate any infestations of starthistle before biocontrols are necessary. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Vigorous competitive grass is essential to maintain a plant community's resistance to starthistle invasion. Mowing or cutting starthistle is rarely effective. 20 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0122 YELLOW TOADFLAX Description: Comment: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Education: Mechanical control: An escaped ornamental perennial reproducing by seed and rootstalk. Prevalent in the Flattops. One insect species Calophasia lunula a defoliating moth has been released on yellow toadflax. It may defoliate up to 20 percent of the leaves. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Attempt to maintain competitive communities of desirable species. Re -seed any open ground with perennial grasses to prevent invasion by other weed species. The key to management of yellow toadflax and other escaped ornamentals is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that yellow toadflax is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large- scale landscape projects. Digging and pulling where feasible, can provide effective control of toadflax if conducted annually for 10 to 15 years. 21 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0123 The Sages at Aspen Glen Engineering Plans Roads, Trail, Walkway & Bikeways Mitigation of Geological Hazard Sewage Collection and Water Supply/Distribution System Soil Suitability Groundwater Drainage Final Cost of Estimates for Public Improvements The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0124 THE SAGES at ASPEN GLEN GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PRELIMINARY PLAN ENGINEERING REPORT APRIL 2010 Prepared by David M. Kotz, P.E. Sckmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. 118 West 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 April 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0125 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Sages at Aspen Glen —consists of a 4.24 -acre parcel within the Aspen Glen PUD. This parcel is zoned Club Villa Zone District, and is subject to the development standards within that district. The Sages parcel is located in the northern portion of the Planned Unit Development near the back entrance off County Road 109. It is bordered by County Road 109 on the west, Bald Eagle Drive on the south and Aspen Glen Hole 3 on the east. The 1993 Aspen Glen Preliminary Plan Submittal included survey and engineering design for 6 single-family lots. A maximum of fifteen (15) units could be built under the current Club Villas zoning. This plan includes only seven (7) single-family Tots arranged on the east side of Allison Road and three (3) duplexes on the west for a total of thirteen (13) dwelling units. This revised Preliminary Plan submittal provides survey and near construction -level engineering design for the 13 unit configuration. Development of this parcel has always been a consideration in the overall master planning and engineering of Aspen Glen. Connections for all utilities are located immediately adjacent to the parcel. Existing water and sewer mains and downstream drainage infrastructure are more than sufficient to serve the Sages lots. The Sages will be constructed under the same standards, details and specifications used elsewhere in Aspen Glen. To minimize impacts on the golfing community, the public infrastructure will be installed in one phase. Residential construction and associated over -lot grading will proceed in a phased fashion based on market conditions. ke STREETS The Sages is located east of County Road 109 just north of the Bald Eagle Way intersection. Improvements to County Road 109 were completed by Garfield County and the Aspen Glen PUD, per the approval resolution. Bald Eagle Way is the main collector street within the Aspen Glen PUD. It also provides the primary access to Colorado Highway 82 by way of an Access Permit granted by the Colorado Department of Transportation. 1:2008-361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0126 The interior road is tentatively named Allison Road. The roadway cross section matches the standard Aspen Glen residential template and includes two 11 -foot asphalt driving lanes with 27 -inch wide curb and gutter on each side. An intermediate eyebrow is provided to act as a turnaround. Radii exceed the minimums necessary for emergency vehicles and the design has been developed in compliance with criteria from the Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District. Like the other internal access roads within Aspen Glen, these roads will be privately owned and maintained by the homeowners' association. Aspen Glen has constructed a bike trail on the west side of CR 109 thru The Reserve" parcel. No separate trails, walkways or bikeways are contemplated within The Sages. Traffic impacts for the original PUD zoning of Aspen Glen were contemplated in the attached "Traffic Impact Study" by Mathew J. Delich, P.E. (Appendix A). Note that the original PUD zoning contemplated a larger number of dwelling units than can possibly be built with existing development and current zoning on the few undeveloped parcels. Thus, overall traffic impacts will be Tess than considered in the previous 1993 Preliminary Plan Approval. Trip Generation Rate calculations for The Sages using the most current Institute of Traffic Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, to establish an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) follow. Estimated Traffic Generation Aspen Glen — The Sages Land Use # of UNITS DAILY RATE AM RATE / % IN, % OUT PM RATE / % IN, % OUT DAILY TRIPS AM IN AM OUT PM IN PM OUT Single -Family Detached Housing 1 7 9.57 0.75 / 25% Enter 75% Exit 1,01 / 63% Enter 37% Exit 67 1 4 4 3 Recreational Homes 2 6 3.16 0.16 / 67% Enter 33% Exit 0.26 / 41% Enter 59% Exit 19 1 0 1 1 Total Traffic Generation: 13 UNITS 86 2 4 5 4 —ITE Land Use Code #210 — Single -Family Detached Housing, trip rate based on number of dwelling units 2 — ITE Land Use Code #260 — Recreational Homes, trip rate based on number of dwelling units Notes: The rates are taken directly from Trip Generation, 7r" Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2003). No reduction has been applied to any rates to account for possible transit, ride -share, bicycle, pedestrian, or trips made by another mode of travel, Peak hour calculated trips were rounded up to provide a more conservative forecast of peak hour traffic generation. 1:2008-361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 4 i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0127 Trip Generation defines single-family detached housing as, "all single-family detached homes on individual lots. A typical site surveyed is a suburban subdivision." Also of note, "Single- family detached units had the highest trip generation rate per dwelling unit of all residential uses because they were the largest units in size and had more residents and more vehicles per unit than other residential land uses; they were generally located farther away from shopping centers, employment areas and other trip attractors than other residential land uses; and they generally had fewer alternate modes of transportation available, because they were typically not as concentrated as other residential land uses. The peak hour of the generator typically coincided with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic." Trip Generation defines recreational homes as, "usually located in a resort containing local services and complete recreational facilities. These dwellings are often second homes used by the owner periodically or rented on a seasonal basis," Also of note, "A large number of internal trips were made for recreational purposes in resort communities containing recreational homes." For a worst-case, or a conservatively high, estimate of trip generation the above analysis assumes all seven of the single-family residences are primary residences and the duplex units are counted as recreational homes, If the duplexes were analyzed as Townhome/Condo use in Trip Generation, this would add approximately 3 more trips per unit (18 total additional). The approximate 50% assumption of recreational units is consistent with current ratios in Aspen Glen. Applying the recreational percentage to the duplex units produces higher trip generation estimates than if the single-family detached units were considered recreational. DRAINAGE The drainage plan and design for The Sages conforms to that envisioned in the 1993 Master Aspen Glen Drainage and Water Quality Report. All downstream Aspen Glen drainage infrastructure was previously designed and installed to provide water quality treatment and flood protection for post -development conditions. With a total parcel area of only 4.24 acres, the site runoff pales in comparison to the drainage from over 300 acres west of County Road 109 and the rest of the project, County Road 109 was re -constructed with drainage improvements (roadside ditches and cross culverts) that accommodate the offsite flows and those from post - development conditions on The Reserve parcel. In the vicinity of The Sages, large ditches 1:2008-361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0128 along County Road 109 capture all flows and convey them to one cross culvert, Runoff is conveyed through The Sages by the 30" CMP located between lots 5 and 6. Site drainage from the Sages will flow to the natural depression at the rear of lots 2 and 3. The previous plan routed this flow over land between golf tees to a small inlet on the right side of the course in front of the tees. Aspen Glen Golf opposed this plan due to concerns over excessive wetting of the course and unknowns associated with their drainage system (The outlet for their area drain is unknown.) The drainage plan has been revised to alleviate the concerns of Golf, A 15" pipe will now divert these flows away from the tees and into the 30" CMP at the rear of Lots 5 and 6. The 30" travels on to collect flows from Homestead Road. After changing to a 36" pipe, it outlets to the golf course stream on Hole 6. Flow continues on thru the stream and created wetlands and into the lake network. For on-site drainage, the primary concern is that proper residential site grading conveys runoff around and past the structures. Runoff from the western Tots (8, 9 & 10) will then be intercepted by the proposed roadway. The fronts of lots 1 — 6 will also drain to the roadway and be piped eastward. The remainder of this section discusses the methodology, procedures and results of the drainage analysis conducted by SGM. Complete calculations are included in Appendix B. Sheet C1 serves as the drainage area map Methodology The NRCS TR -55 method was used for estimating the amount of runoff that will occur as a result of a particular precipitation event, This method calculates runoff from individual basins based on the basin area, SCS curve number, precipitation and the time of concentration. Drainage Basin Area No off-site basins are tributary to The Sages. The overall project area was divided into five sub -areas that range in size from 0.15 acres to 1.58 acres. AH basins drain to the east to grassed swales on the golf course. Basins are delineated on sheet C1. 1:2008-361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 6 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0129 SCS Curve Number A SCS curve number is assigned to each basin. The curve number provides the relationship between the amount of precipitation and the amount of subsequent runoff, The curve number is a function of soil type, vegetative -cover, land use, and antecedent moisture conditions. The SCS soil map and descriptive table are also included in Appendix B. An area -weighted average curve number is assigned to each sub -area due to the variation in soil types, impervious and vegetative cover. Precipitation Large runoff events in this region of Western Colorado are caused by cloudburst type storms that are characterized by short durations of high intensity rainfall. The SCS Type II 24-hour distribution best represents these types of storms and was used for this analysis, Rainfall depths were taken from the NOAA Atlas 2, Precipitation -Frequency Atlas of the Western United States, Volume III- Colorado. Values for the 2-, 10-, 25- and 100 -year are 1.30, 1.60, 2.00 and 2.40 inches, respectively. Time of Concentrafion/Travel Time Time of concentration (TC) is an important parameter in runoff modeling. It is defined as the time it would take for a drop of water falling on the most hydraulically remote point in the watershed to reach the outfall. TR -55 uses a segmented approach consisting of three components; sheet flow, overland flow, and channel flow, to estimate (TC). The length of flow, surface roughness, slope and channel geometry all factor in. Flow velocities are estimated using Manning's kinematic flow equation. Shorter TC's produce more rapid runoff and comparatively higher peaks. As sub -areas on The Sages are relatively small, a minimum TC of 0.1 hour was applied in the calculations, Analysis & Results The following table summarizes the drainage characteristics of The Sages sub -areas and presents results of the 2-, 10-, 25- and 100 -year analysis. Complete computer output is include in Appendix B. 1:2008-361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 7 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0130 TR -55 Parameters & Results BASIN AREA CN TO 02 Q10 Qts Q1o0 [ac] [hr] [cfs] [cfs] [cfs] [cfs] A 0.906 76 0.1 0.10 0.38 0.51 0.82 B 0.932 82 0.1 0.30 0.70 0.89 1.30 C 0.500 80 0.1 0.12 0.31 0.41 0.61 D 1.575 79 0.1 0.33 0.89 1.17 1.80 E 0.152 84 0.1 0.06 0.13 0.17 0.23 Total 4.065 0.91 2.38 3.13 4.77 Stormwater Quality There is little risk of temporary or permanent water quality impacts resulting from the construction of The Sages, Sediment discharged downstream during construction would be the primary concern. The golf course and HOA simply won't tolerate that. To minimize sediment transport, appropriate best management practices (BMP's) will be utilized. Straw bale check darns, culvert inlet protection and silt fence will prevent sediment from traveling downstream. Refer to sheet C7 for the Erosion Control Plan. The contractor will need to obtain a "Stormwater Permit for Construction Activities over 1 Acre" from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and follow all requirements. Runoff that does leave The Sages will receive substantial treatment on Aspen Glen prior to ever possibly reaching the wetlands adjacent to the Roaring Fork River. That treatment includes the baffled inlets, dilution of the golf course stream flow, flow thru created wetlands and sedimentation afforded by three lakes in series. WATER Water Supply and Treatment The Sages will be served by the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District (RFWSD), Refer to the "will serve" letter contained elsewhere in this application. The RFWSD water supply system has been approved and accepted by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment and has more than enough capacity to serve the 13 units in The Sages in addition to the previously platted lots. A copy of the RFWSD Water System Master Plan, June 2008 is on file with Garfield County. Water for the District is supplied through an augmentation plan, Case No. 93CW192, which was approved on October 31, 1995. Under this plan, water is supplied via wells on the Aspen 1:2008-361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0131 Glen property, which are augmented through contracts with both the West Divide Water Conservancy District and the Basalt Water Conservancy District. The infrastructure completed as part of the previous phases of Aspen Glen includes a 700,000 gallon water storage tank east of Highway No. 82, a 300,000 gallon tank west of County Road 109, three wells and a chlorination well house. The RFWSD system also includes two separate 10" connections to Coryell Ranch where a 400 gpm well pumps thru a chlorination facility to a 200,000 gallon tank. A 12" transmission main also extends northward to Iron Bridge where a 300,000+ gallon tank is located, All these facilities are interconnected and provide redundant storage and connections to The Sages. A conservatively, high estimate for Sages average water demands would be 13 units x 3.5 persons/unit x 100 gallons/person/day = 4550 gallons/day. Water Distribution Water service will be delivered to The Sages by the 10" transmission main between tanks and the 8" main located in Bald Eagle Way. The new 8" main in Allison Road will be stubbed to the property boundary and available for connection when The Reserve parcel located west of County Road 109 is developed. This will further strengthen the district system. Waterlines and services will be built to the standards of the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District. Upon completion and acceptance, the lines will be dedicated to the District. WaterCad water system computer modeling has shown that The Sages area will have normal water system pressures of around 70 psi, which is about optimal. The model predicts fire flows of about 2,000 gpm at the minimum residual pressure of 20 psi. Base conditions for the model considered all district tanks at the %/2 full elevation of 6216' and system -wide maximum day demands. Available fire flows will increase once the additional loops are completed across The Reserve. SEWER Wastewater Treatment Wastewater treatment will be through the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District (RFWSD). 1:2008.361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 9 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0132 The District has completed Phase I of the wastewater treatment facility, and it is operating under Discharge Permit No. CO -0044750 issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, At the present time, a limited number of residences are built and tied into the wastewater treatment facility. Total flow to the facility is well below capacity. Refer to the "will serve" letter provided by the RFWSD contained elsewhere in this application. A conservatively, high estimate for Sages average -day wastewater flow would be 13 units x 3.5 persons/unit x 70 gallons/person/day = 3185 gallons/day. Wastewater Collection System The Sages is included within the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District wastewater service area, and the interceptor sewer and wastewater treatment facility were all sized to include The Sages wastewater contribution. Service to this parcel is consistent with the Water & Wastewater Master Plan previously approved for Aspen Glen. The internal 8" gravity collection sewer lines will be built to the standards of the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District, and then dedicated to the District upon completion and acceptance by the District. These lines will connect to the existing manhole and line in Bald Eagle Way. Wastewater will flow entirely by gravity from the collection lines to the interceptor sewer line that flows to the wastewater plant. SOILS A map and description of soil types and their boundaries based on the National Cooperative Soil Survey are included in Appendix C. These were taken from the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 1.1. Appendix C also includes the original "Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado" by Chen Northern, Inc., dated May 28, 1993. After Preliminary Plan approval from Garfield County, SGM recommends that The Sages obtain a detailed, site-specific geotechnical and foundation report for use in preparing the Final Plans. 1:2008.361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Plan Engineering Report 10 f I The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0133 MISCELLANEOUS UTILITIES All affected utility companies have been notified of this application and have copies of the project layout so they may complete their respective designs. Electricity Power for the west side of Aspen Glen, or the west side of the Roaring Fork River, is provided by Xcel Energy. As part of the master planning and development of the Aspen Glen PUD an electric system sufficient to serve the entire development has been designed. Xcel Energy will service The Sages via the existing underground power lines extended to the project area below the proposed roads. Gas Gas Service will also be provided by Source Gas. The gas main, which previously crossed the Aspen Glen property on the west side of the Roaring Fork River, has been relocated along County Road 109. The main was sized at the time of installation to provide service to the Aspen Glen PUD. New gas lines will be simply be extended through The Sages. Telephone Qwest provides telephone service to Aspen Glen through a land development agreement dated December 5, 1991. Telephone lines, which previously cross the Aspen Glen property west of the Roaring Fork River, have been rerouted along The Sages parcel and below the roads. A fiber optic line is located between the existing bike path and County Road 109 on the Reserve parcel. 1:2008-361.001-01 Sages Preliminary Pian Engineering Report 11 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0134 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC REPORT The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0135 9 THE ASPEN GLEN CLUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO APRIL 1992 Prepared for: The Aspen Glen Club 555 East Durant, Suite 4-A Aspen, Colorado 81611 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 Banyan Avenue Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 303-669-2061 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0136 I. INTRODUCTION Aspen Glen Club PUD is a residential community with a private golf course and clubhouse. The location of Aspen Glen Club 13 shown in Figure 1. The residential portion of Aspen Glen Club will consist of primarily single family detached and duplex dwelling units, with some condominium type dwelling units. A detailed description of the Aspen Glen Club is contained in the submission for "Planned Unit Development and Sketch Plan for the Aspen Glen Club," February 21, 1992. This study was performed to evaluate the traffic operation using the existing traffic, traffic generated during major construction phases, and at build out of Aspen Glen Club PUD. During the course of this study frequent contact was made with the Aspen Glen Club staff and consultants, the Garfield County planning and engineering staff, and the Colorado Department of Transportation. This traffic study generally conforms with typical traffic impact study guidelines. It involved the following steps: - Evaluate existing traffic and road conditions; Trip generation; - Trip distribution; - Trip assignment; - Operational analyses; - Geometric analyses. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS In order to evaluate the impacts of a development such as the Aspen Glen Club, it is important that a thorough understanding of the existing road system be presented.. The existing conditions present a base to which the future conditions can be compared. Roads The Aspen Glen Club is proposed .to be located along the Roaring Fork River between State .Highway 82 (SH82) and Garfieid County Road 109 (CR109). These are the roads which will be primarily impacted. SH82 is a northwest --southeast road, connecting Glenwood Springs and Granite. The resort community of Aspen is situated approximately at the midpoint. Independence Pass is located southeast of Aspen. It is closed for a number of months during the winter. Adjacent to the Aspen Glen Club, SH82 has a four lane rural cross section. It has a grass median 16-18 feet wide. Shoulders are 8-10 feet. The posted speed limit is 55 mph. 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0137 • mu •�iii�. �� �:��\��. /lllY/iltle`� •.. ••-? R. ifil� k I(C/•a..i ,'�y� �A, �Va� No Scale SITE LOCATION Figure 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0138 t • CR109 is administered by Garfield County, At the north end, CR109 begins at CR154 at a bridge over the Roaring Fork River. It continues in a southeast direction on the west side of the Roaring Fork River to an intersection with CR108 near Carbondale. The road is approximately 6.1 miles long. The northern 1.7 miles has asphalt pavement. It is approximately 26+ feet wide. The posted speed from West Bank to the end of the pavement is 40 mph. The gravel portion of CR109 is approximately 4.0 miles long. The width of the travelled way varies from 16-24 feet. The determination of the travelled way was 'based upon observed wheel tracks on the gravel surface. According to Garfield County staff, the right-of- way available was uncertain. The gravel segment is posted at 25ij mph. A chip and seal paved surface exists for 0.4 miles north of CR108. This pavement is approximately 20 feet wide. This segment is posted at 25 mph. Approximately 1.4 miles of the gravel portion of CR109 is bordered on both sides by the Aspen Glen Club PUD. Another 0.8+ miles of CR109 is "loosely" adjacent to the Aspen Glen Club PUD The remaining 2.2+ miles of CRIO9 cannot be considered to be adjacent to the Aspen Glen Club PUD property. The condition of CR109, particularly the gravel portion, bears some comment. The portion of CR109 that is bordered by Aspen Glen Club on both sides has some mild vertical and horizontal curves. These do not cause operational constraints. Sight distance could be improved on some curves by keeping the roadside vegetation trimmed. There is a vertical curve. approximately 200 feet north of Sievers Corner with limited sight distance. This is complicated by an especially narrow roadway width. If the sight distance cannot be improved through this vertical curve, the roadway should be widened. The horizontal curve at Sievers Corner could present some hazard. It is recommended that Garfield County investigate improvement of this combination of vertical and horizontal curves. Based upon observation, it appears that the utility poles are well to the west of the horizontal curve. Therefore, there may be right-of-way available to smooth the horizontal curve without acquisition of additional right-of-way. Just south of Sievers Corner, there is a 2000 foot long segment of CR109 that drops off severely on the east side. Tire tracks indicate that vehicles do not get very close to the edge. On the west side of the road, the terrain rises severely. There is an irrigation ditch running parallel to CR109 on a "bench" above the road. This ditch may limit widening of CR109 to the west. Widening to the east appears to be unfeasible. There is an intersection with limited sight distance approximately 0.9 miles north of the beginning of the chip and seal pavement. Dust is a problem on the gravel segment of CR109. Beside the nuisance problem of dost for motorists and adjacent land owners, dust can create visibility concerns. Based upon casual 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0139 • observation, it took 2-5 seconds for adequate visibility to return after a vehicle passed. Traffic Traffic counts on SH82 were obtained from the Colorado Department of Transportation. In the segment between Spring Valley. Road and Sti133, the 1990 average daily traffic (ADT) was 10,900. The design hour volume' (DHV) was 11 percent and there were 6 percent trucks. The 20 year projection factor was 1.7. Garfield County Engineering Department obtained traffic counts in September 1990 on CR109 at three locations: 1. At the Roaring Fork River Bridge - 3476 vehicles; 2. Just south of West Bank access - 700 vehicles; 3. At the CR108 intersection - 631 vehicles. Applying factors for existing land uses and activities along CR109 between count locations 2 and 3, indicates that through traffic on the road ranges between 400 and 600 vehicles a day. Garfield County Engineering indicated that additional counts would be obtained in April 1992 to corroborate the 1990 traffic counts. During data collection conducted on March 31, 1992, the following observations of traffic were made: - From 10:00-10:30 AM, one passenger vehicle was observed on the gravel portion of the road. There were two gravel trucks exiting and one truck entering the gravel pit near the north end of the Aspen Glen Club property. The three trucks were to/from the north. From 2:30-3:15 PM, seven passenger vehicles were observed on the gravel portion of the road. Based upon judgment, no two vehicles were on the gravel portion at the same time. No gravel trucks were observed. Operation SH82 and CR109 were evaluated based upon methodologies contained in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (1985 HCM). Since gravel roads with a narrower than 18 foot width are not specifically addressed in the 1985 HCM, adjustments to the service flow rates and V/C ratios were made to obtain the threshold volumes for the level of service categories. The segment of SH82 adjacent to the proposed Aspen Glen • Club is operating at level of service A. For rural highways, the Colorado Department of Transportation defines acceptable as level of service C or better. This analysis was performed using the 1990 DHV as reported earlier. 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0140 • • The gravel portion of CR109 is operating at level of service B, considering an average ADT of 500 vehicles and a DMV factor of 11 percent. From an operational perspective, CR109 would appear to be adequate as it currently exists. However, consideration must also be given to the general condition of the road. The minimum effective width of any road is established at 20 feet, based upon American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials criteria, Garfield County should strive to attain this minimum for all roads with an ADT greater than 60 vehicles. Based upon criteria in the Federal Clean Air Act, the Surface of any road with an ADT of >200 should be paved. Based upon these criteria, it is recommended that Garfield County both pave and widen CR109 to meet minimum design standards. This recommendation is made whether or not the Aspen Glen Club develops in this location. In consideration .of availability of funds to accomplish this improvement, Garfield County should place this road on an improvement plan, detailing when the improvement will be made. Land Uses Land uses both on, the site and surrounding the site are agricultural or open. Land uses north and south of the site are in active agricultural use, focusing on hay production and livestock pasturing. There is a gravel extractionoperation immediately north of the proposed Aspen Glen Club. East and west of the site is rugged terrain with limited agricultural use., The community of Carbondale lies three miles to the south. The 1990 population was reported at 3,004. Glenwood Springs is 7.5 miles to the north. The 1990 population was reported at 6,561. Both communities offer basic retail services, but Glenwood Springs has more retail stores and likely offers a wider variety of goods and services. Recreational activities exist throughout this area of Colorado. However, the most attractive recreational activities are in Glenwood Springs and Aspen. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Aspen Glen Club is a residential golf community located in the Roaring Fork River Valley approximately 7.5 miles south of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The development will include 643 dwelling units, most of which are single family detached homes. A clubhouse with tennis and swimming activities will be at the center of the development. A site plan is shown in Figure 2. More detailed site plans, showing specific uses and activity Locations, are provided in other planned unit development and sketch planning documents submitted to Garfield County. 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0141 i r Access to River Park o Controlled Access to County Road 109 4 x w 4 1 - No Scal Primary ‘s) Aspen Glen CI Access / siTE PLAN Flgure The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0142 • • Primary access to Aspen Glen Club will occur at a security controlled road to SH82. There will be an emergency only access located approximately 3600 feet to the south of the primary access.. An access is also proposed to CR109, located approximately 3500 feet north of Sievers Corner. This will be a limited use access, primarily used by the residents of the 31 dweIling units located west of CR109. It is proposed that this access be controlled by a card activated gate with full access allowed for the 31 dwelling units west of CR109. Egress will be allowed at this location for all Aspen Glen Club residents. Other than the 31 dwelling units west of CR1O9, this access is expected to have limited use. The existing access to/through the gravel pit operation at the north end of Aspen Glen Club will continue. This road will provide vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access to the public river park. Other accesses along CR109 are .for emergency 'vehicles only to access long cul-de-sacs. These accesses will not have day-to-day use. As part of this development, the Aspen Glen Club is proposing to participate in paving CR109 from the end of the existing pavement, a distance of 9,000 feet to the golf course maintenance area. Aspen Glen Club will also participate in applying a chip and seal surface another 4000 ± feet to the south. This chip and seal surface will extend through most/all of the narrow segment with the steep side slopes. Trip Generation The number of trips generated by a use such as this will have a direct impact on the area road system. Garfield County expressed an interest in knowing the amount of construction traffic that will be generated and the traffic generated by the residents of the Aspen Glen Club. Prior to construction of any dwelling units, certain infrastructure items and the golf course will be completed or near completion. In accordance with the proposed schedule, the construction access activity contained in Table 1 will' likely occur. The estimate of trips contained in Table 1 are based upon information supplied by the Aspen Glen Club, research for similar construction activities, and a contingency factor of 20 percent. It is assumed that Phases A, B, and C will not overlap. Phase A assumes that all construction vehicles and workers will be required to access via the primary access to SH82. During Phase B, it is assumed that the bridge would not be completed. Therefore, a significant number of workers will be required to access the area west of the river via CR109 through the gravel pit entrance road. By Phase C, the bridge is expected to be completed and as such, all construction trips will be required to access via SHB2. Timing of construction of any home will be under the control of each Aspen Glen Club resident. The expected development will occur over a 10- 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0143 1 Table 1 Construction Trip Generation Access Location Analysis Phases SH82 CR109 A. Golf Course back nine Infrastructure east of Roaring Fork River Bridge construction 220 vpd B. Golf Course — front nine Infrastructure west'of Roaring Fork River Bridge Bridge construction Waste Water Plant C. Clubhouse Miscellaneous homes D. Miscellaneous homes (vpd = vehicles per day) 55 vpd 380 vpd 320 vpd 220 vpd The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0144 12 year period. The construction traffic, related to miscellaneous home construction, assumes that 10 percent of the single family and duplex homes will be at various stages of construction per year. The townhouse units (Club Villas) will be built by the Aspen Glen Club developer as the last phase of construction (Phase XI). Phase D accounts only for miscellaneous home construction. During each of the remaining years to the expected build out of Aspen Glen Club, there will also be resident related travel activity, Trip Generation prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers is customarily used to determine the vehicle trips that will be generated by development proposals. This reference lists recreational homes as a land use code. The daily trip rate is listed as 3.162 per dwelling. In consideration of sources used to develop this rate and following conversations with Garfield County staff, this rate was. factored by 1.5 times, giving a daily rate of 4.74 trips per dwelling unit. Maid and lawn service trips were factored into the trip generation. It was assumed that these services would be required once a week and would occur over a six day period (Monday through Saturday). It was also assumed that a given service could handle three dwelling units per day. During the summer months, Aspen Glen Club employees are expected to number 100 (golf course, clubhouse, etc.). Not all would be on-site during the entire day, nor arriving and departing at the same time periods. It was assumed that Aspen Glen Club employees would make one trip in and one trip out during a typical day. In the winter, the number of employees would be significantly lower than in the summer. Since the Aspen Glen Club is expected to be largely' a second home community, not all residents are expected to be on site at a given time. For analysis purposes, 85 percent occupancy was assumed. This is considered to be a conservatively high estimate. It might occur over a one to two week period in July or August. Trip Distribution Trip distribution was estimated by developing a series of gravity models for each of the travel activities. Population and/or recreational activities in the area were determined to be the variables used in each model. Each of the various routes to potential destinations was also considered. For example, there are two routes to Glenwood Springs and two routes to Carbondale. Each route was evaluated with respect to travel time from areas within the Aspen Glen Club. It was concluded that for much of the Aspen Glen Club residents, use of the main access on SH82 would be the fastest route. to either of these communities. For construction workers, maid/lawn service, and Aspen Glen Club employees, population was used as the gravity model variable. 6 i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0145 1 • The trip distribution was assumed to be 70 percent to/from the north and 30 percent to/from the south. Access for construction workers is shown in Table 1. Access for maid/lawn service and Aspen Glen Club would be confined, by policy, to the SH82 primary access. Aspen Glen Club resident trips were divided into two categories: shopping trips and other trips. It was assumed that two shopping (grocery, etc.) trips per dwelling unit would occur per week. These trips would be randomly distributed throughout the week. The other trips are defined as recreational trips to/from activities outside of Aspen Glen Club. Both of these types of trips were distributed to the ST182 and C12109 accesses based upon the relative location of the dwelling unit within Aspen Glen Club, the travel time to/from the activity, and the'policy regarding CR109 access. Background Traffic Background traffic is defined as the traffic that is on the area road system that is not related to the development proposal (Aspen Glen Club). Traffic projections for SH82 are provided,by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Based upon a factor of 1.7, provided by CDOT, the year 2010 ADT on SH82 adjacent to Aspen Glen Club will be 18,530. This assumes an annual rate of increase of slightly less than 3 percent per year. It is reasonable to assume that adjacent roadway development will cause some of that increase over the next 20 years. Some of the Aspen Glen Club traffic is assumed to be part of that increase. Background traffic on CR109 is expected to grow less than that on the state highway system and be related more toward adjacent development. It was assumed that traffic on CR109 would increase a the rate of 1 percent per year. The twenty year factor is 1.22. It was also assumed that the 21 single family lots at the Teller Springs development would be built and occupied. Traffic Assignment • Traffic assignment is the resultant of the trip generation and trip distribution process. Traffic assignments were conducted at various levels of Aspen Glen Club construction, and build out and occupancy of Aspen Glen Club as a residential community. Figures 3, 4, and 5 show the daily traffic assignment of the construction traffic at Phases A, B, and C, respectively as described in Table 1, Background traffic on SH82 and CR109 are included in these figures. Phases A, B., and C correspond to 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively. A Phase D assignment is not presented. A Phase D assignment will likely be less than a Phase 7 fi The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0146 0 515 County Road 109 0 515 • • 0 State Highway 82 LEGEND: Construction Traffic Total Traffic 150 12,190 70 12,110 PHASE A CONSTRUCTION & TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC (1393) Figure 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0147 f 150 670 70 590 County Road 109 • 220 220 State Highway 82 LEGEND: Construction Traffic Total Traffic 40 12,470 15 12,445 I-- PHASE B CONSTRUCTION & TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC (1994) Figure 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0148 0 525 0 1 A 0 525 i • • 0 0 State Highway 82 LEGEND: Construction Traffic Total Traffic N� 270 13,080 110 12,920 PHASE C CONSTRUCTION & TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC (1995) Figure 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0149 • • C assignment in the short range future and less than full build out in the long range future. Figure 6 shows the daily traffic assignment at full build out of Aspen Glen Club. This assignment includes background traffic and considers the occupancy assumptions presented under "Trip Generation." IV. IMPACTS Traffic impacts were determined at each of the traffic assignment futures shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. Operational analyses were conducted on roadway segments similar to that described under "Existing Conditions — Operation." The analysis of SH82 assumes the existing four lane cross section. The analysis of CR109 assumed the existing gravel road and an improved paved road as recommended in Chapter II of this 'report. Construction Traffic Impacts Construction traffic will have varying degrees of impact on the area roads. Phase A impacts will be confined to SH82. SH82 will continue to operate acceptably as a four lane road. The primary access to Aspen Glen Club will be built• with all the necessary auxiliary turn lanes. The geometry at this access will be discussed later in this report. Due to the nature of construction traffic, impacts will be highest at the beginning and end of the work day. Once heavy equipment is on site, it will remain there until no longer needed. Supply/material trucks will access the site throughout the day. However, this activity will not be at a concentrated time period. Their impact will be minimal. Phase B impacts will be higher on CR109 and less on SH82. It is expected that the SH82 •traffic will be confined to bridge construction activity. Operation on SH82 will continue to be acceptable. Since the bridge will not be completed, all traffic related to the front nine, infrastructure, and waste water plant construction will be required to use CR109. It is expected that this construction traffic will comprise 12 percent of the daily traffic on CR109 south of Sievers Corner during this period. • The bridge is expected to require one year to build. Since it was started under Phase A, the impact shown on CR109 under Phase B is expected to last only about six months. With the existing gravel road, operation will be at level of service B. Even if CR109 were paved, operation will also be at level'of service B. 8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0150 120 850 130 130 100 100 County Road 109 70 750 State Highway 82 LEGEND: Aspen Glen Club Traffic Total Traffic 1200 19►100 1300 19,200 FULL BUILDOUT OF ASPEN GLEN CLUB & TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC (2010) Figure 6 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0151 Once the bridge is completed, all construction traffic can be redirected to SH82. During Phase C, no traffic will be allowed to access the Aspen Glen Club property via CR109, This will confine the construction traffic to SH82. The access will be constructed to handle this traffic activity. SH82 will continue to operate acceptably. The traffic on CR109 will return to background traffic only. Build Out Impacts Using the traffic shown in Figure 6, the operation on SH82, both north and south of the primary Aspen Glen Club access, will. operate at level of service D with the existing four lane cross section. The operation of these segments will be at level of service D with background traffic only. The Aspen Glen Club traffic will cause a slight deterioration in operation within the level of service D category, but it is the background traffic that causes the operation to fall into level of service D. Operation at .the stop sign controlled intersection will be acceptable, except for left—turn exits from the site. These left turns will operate at level of service F, based upon the 1985 HCM technique. However, new research regarding stop sign controlled intersections indicates that based upon vehicle delay, this operation is more appropriately defined as level of service D. Since these impacts are likely to occur for a relatively short period during the year, it is recommended that they be accepted. Good design of the intersections will provide adequate storage for turning vehicles. CR109 will operate at level of service B to the north of the Aspen Glen Club access. In this segment, the Aspen Glen Club traffic will comprise approximately 14 percent of the total traffic on CR109. In the segment to the south of Aspen Glen Club, approximately 9 percent of the daily traffic will be attributable to Aspen Glen Club generated trips. CR109 will operate at level of service C as a gravel road and at level of service B as an improved paved road. Additional restrictions at the CR109 access to the Aspen Glen Club, beyond those proposed and stated earlier in this report, are not required. Further limitations on access would have little bearing on the operation of CRi09. In Carbondale, it is expected that 100-150 vehicles a day will be added to the Main Street/SH133 intersection due to Aspen Glen Club generated traffic. These vehicles will be via both the CR109 and SH82 accesses to Aspen Glen Club. Current traffic volumes are not available on the east and west legs of Main Street. However, the ADT on 5H133 was 9,000 between 5H82 and Main Street in Carbondale in 1990. This count was obtained prior to the opening of a number recent developments in Carbondale. Town staff indicated that volumes are much higher in 1992. The additional 9 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0152 traffic added to this intersection by the Aspen Glen Club will' be small. State Highway 82 Access Geometry The access to SH82 must be designed in accordance with the State Highway Access Coda. Design hour volumes, developed using the full build out analysis, were applied to criteria in the State Highway Access Code. There are railroad tracks which cross this primary access to Aspen Glen Club. While no trains currently operate on these tracks, there is a possibility that as many as three coal trains per week could operate here in the future. It was assumed that a coal train would be a unit train (1 mile long). A conservative 30 mph train speed was assumed. This would cause blockage of this access for just over two minutes. This was considered in the recommended auxiliary turn lanes shown below: Southbound right turn deceleration/storage lane - 555 feet plus 22.5:1 taper; - Southbound right -turn acceleration lane - 960 feet plus 22.5:1 taper; Northbound left -turn deceleration/storage lane - 555 feet plus 22.5:1 taper. Other Issues Garfield County expressed concern about access to the Roaring Fork River Park at the north end of the Aspen Glen Club. This park will be open to the public. It will be accessed by vehicles, bicycles, or pedestrians via the road which is currently used by the gravel extraction operation. Parking for this river park will be provided near the park itself, not near the CR1O9 access. A second access to 5H82 is proposed approximately 3600 feet south of the primary access to Aspen Glen Club. This access will is not a public access, but may be used by emergency vehicles only. It is recommended that it not be subject to access criteria in the State Highway Access Code. An equestrian facility is proposed on the east side of SH82. It is expected that approximately 30 horses will be boarded at this facility. Typically, horses are not visited by owners on a daily basis. The vehicle traffic generated by this use will be minimal. Aspen Glen Club has proposed, in their submittal, that a shuttle service be provided from this development to popular common destinations (i.e. hot springs pool in Glenwood Springs, Aspen for skiing, etc.). This shuttle is intended to be a dial--a-ride service for residents. The preceding analyses regarding traffic impacts did not consider this service. Therefore, the previously described impacts could be reduced with this shuttle service. 10 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0153 APPENDIX B DRAINAGE CALCS The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0154 WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: DMK Date: 9/9/2009 Project: Aspen Glen - The Sages Units: English SubTitle: Areal Units: Acres State: Colorado County: Garfield Filename: I:\2008\2008-361 Sages\AspenGlenSages.w55 Name --- Sub -Area Data --- Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc Sub -area A Outlet 0.91 76 0.100 Sub -area B Outlet 0.93 82 0.100 Sub -area C Outlet 0.5 80 0.100 Sub -area D Outlet 1.58 79 0.100 Sub -area E Outlet 0.15 84 0.100 Total area: 4.07 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2 -Yr 5 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr 50 -Yr 100 -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.2 Storm Data Source: User -provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> 2.4 .0 WinTR-55, Version 1.00,08 Page 1 9/9/2009 2:53:48 PM 1 i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0155 DMK Aspen Glen - The Sages Garfield County, Colorado Watershed Peak Table Sub -Area Peak now by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr 100 -Yr Identifier (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) SUBAREAS Sub -area A 0.10 0.38 0.51 0.82 Sub -area II 0.30 0.70 0.89 1.30 Sub -area C 0.12 0.31 0.41 0.61 Sub -area D 0.33 0.89 1.17 1.80 Sub -area E 0.06 0.13 0.17 0.23 REACHES OUTLET 0.91 2.38 3.13 4.77 WinTR-55, version 1.00.08 Page 1 9/9/2009 2:53:49 PM The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0156 OMC( Aspen Glen - The Sages Garfield County, Colorado Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub -Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr 100 -Yr Identifier (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (hr) (hr) (hr) (hr) SUBAREAS Sub -area A 0.10 0.38 0.51 0.82 12.03 12.01 12.01 11.95 Sub -area B 0.30 0.70 0.89 1.30 12.01 11.95 11.94 11.94 Sub -area C 0.12 0.31 0.41 0.61 12.02 11.95 11.95 11.94 Sub -area 0 0.33 0.89 1.17 1.80 12.02 11.96 11.95 11.94 Sub -area E 0.06 0.13 0.17 0.23 11.96 11.94 11.94 11.94 REACHES OUTLET 0.91 2.38 3.13 4.77 WinTR-55, Version 1,00.08 Page 1 9/9/2009 2:53:49 PM 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0157 DMK Sub -Area Identifier Aspen Glen - The Sages Garfield County, Colorado Sub -Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Land Use Hydrologic Sub -Area Curve Soil Area Number Group (ac) Sub -area Aspen space; grass cover > 75% (good) 8 .542 61 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways 8 .274 98 Paved; curbs and storm sewers B .09 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .91 76 Sub -area BOpen space; grass cover > 75% (good) B .408 61 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways B .279 98 Paved; curbs and storm sewers B .245 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .93 82 Sub -area COpen space; grass cover > 75% (good) B .25 61 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways B .069 98 Paved; curbs and storm sewers B .181 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .5 80 Sub -area DOpen space; grass cover > 75% (good) B .829 61 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways B .746 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 1.58 79 Sub -area Copen space; grass cover > 75% (good) B .056 61 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways B .006 98 Paved; curbs and storm sewers B .09 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .15 84 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.08 Page 1 9/9/2009 2:53:49 PM The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0158 WinTR-SS OutputHydroiraph Project: Aspen Glen -The Sages Oa.(2000 Subareas: (Sub area A, Sub -area 8, Sub -area C, Sub -area 0, Sub -area E, Outlet) Storni: 100 -Yr 1:1200812008-361 SegestAspenOlenSeges.w5S 4.5 4.0 3.5 v 3.0 3 u 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 .5 .0 Trial #1, Sub -area A -- — •••- Trial #1, Sub -area I3 Trial #1, Sub -area C !'riul r 1, iulr•nr8,) I — •• - --- - - Trial #1, Sub -area L Trial #1, OUTLET J 2, 4. 8. 8. 10, T1ME(hts) r. 12. 14. 18. 1 I I 1 l 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0159 APPENDIX C SOILS REPORTS 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0160 USDA United States Department of Agriculture 4 \CS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties Aspen Glen - The Sages September 9, 2009 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0161 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locatorlapp? agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://soils.usda.gov/contact/ state_offices/), Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Soil Data Mart Web site or the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The Soil Data Mart is the data storage site for the official soil survey information, The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0162 for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD), USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0163 Contents Preface 2 Soil Map 5 Soil Map 6 Legend 7 Map Unit Legend 8 Map Unit Descriptions 8 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties 10 6 --Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes 10 Soil Information for All Uses 11 Soil Properties and Qualities 11 Soil Qualities and Features 11 Hydrologic Soil Group (Aspen Glen - The Sages) 11 Soil Reports 16 Soil Physical Properties 16 Engineering Properties (Aspen Glen - The Sages) 16 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0164 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0165 29" I 39' 26'18" 0 W 0 0 N W O W P O O 0 0 b 10 H O (0 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map ZO Map Scale: 1:1,720 it printed on A size (8.5" 8 11") Sheet. 0 15 30 60 0 50 100 200 M ters 90 Feet 300 to 0 39' 28' 36' 39' 26' 16" The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0166 Custom Soil Resource Report MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND Map Scale: 1:1,720 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. Very Stony Spot v. M / k e\ 0 \ a 2 a 2 , / ( 2m ,2 ƒ R \ $ / \ §6 / ] � . { 70 \ \ + 0.e ®2 a. ] \ / Closed Depre Streams and Canals \ Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Local Roads Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry / a } 3 3 '3 - \ # a. \ e °a ® . •0 . : 0. k 0. ,§ o c >. e 2 _ ) ± «) ) k \ \ \ \ k 8 X® X< B k 4«$ s>+ 2$ o A% m o The Sages at AsG!: Final Plat Subdiv: Application 9.19.16 Gem Application A�7 m Page 0167 1 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties (C0655) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of A01 6 Totals for Area of Interest Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes Map Unit Descriptions 15.0 15.0 The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes, Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data, The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into iandforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. 8 100.0% 100.0% The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0168 Custom Soil Resource Report An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha - Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 9 i 1 l The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0169 Custom Soil Resource Report Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties 6—Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 6,000 to 7,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 14 inches Mean annual air temperature: 42 to 46 degrees F Frost -free period: 85 to 105 days Map Unit Composition Almy and similar soils: 80 percent Description of Almy Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, hills Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from calcareous sandstone and/or alluvium derived from calcareous shale Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 12 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage c/ass: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2,00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8,6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability (nonirrigated): 4e Ecological site: Rolling Loam (R048AY298C0) Other vegetative classification: ROLLING LOAM (null 20) Typical profile 0 to 8 inches: Loam 8 to 26 inches: Fine sandy loam 26 to 60 inches: Sandy clay loam 10 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0170 Soil Information for All Uses Soil Properties and Qualities The Soil Properties and Qualities section includes various soil properties and qualities displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in the selected area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated by aggregating the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This aggregation process is defined for each property or quality. Soil Qualities and Features Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly measured, but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil properties, Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil features are attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features include slope and depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the use and management of the soil. Hydrologic Soil Group (Aspen Glen - The Sages) Hydrologic sail groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long - duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and CID). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. 11 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0171 Custom Soil Resource Report Group C, Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of wafer or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a sail is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/t ), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. 12 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0172 39' 28 29' 0 0 0 (s1 0 39' 26' 18" '0 r. 0 304480 Custom Soil Resource Report Map—Hydrologic Soil Group (Aspen Glen - The Sages) 304520 304560 304600 309640 304680 304720 0 39' 28 30" 0 0 0 5 .4! a 1010 11 1 304480 A 304520 304560 Map Scale; 1:1,720 if piffled on A size (8,5" x 11") sheet. 15 30 60 0 50 100 200 304600 Meters 90 Feet 300 304640 304680 304 20 0 0 a 01 39'26'18" The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0173 q U L MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND Map Scale: 1:1,720 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. o co ca \ \ • / 2 ] - ® �o § Th. § } ] ) ca 0. ° L. E 7 \ O. * } \g § o / ] 222 § 3 CO 0 3 a. \)z / ( Z s \ §]e • E § o o \ } / \ / \ k tn- - E0. ] '5 ja /\) ; o ]$ _a] o as ] 7).. 27 #J /{ \/ .•I) 2 as c • �C ®k4 �] \\§ • •' �G$ 1 tq@ fp e\ ®0c 2 qs\ \ e J®5 2 m,e / ) co E \\\ E01 - )\\ 0 1-4 <0 7 \ k}< 2 co I0 0 o / ; \ g El$ q 0 2 0 4 Not rated or not available a \ Date(s) aerial images were photographed: ) g 7 \\ .2 cwt §k( f// -0) C g 0< ®% ca \.o " ƒQ. =®m 0)0 0 \a] \/) \kk\ a)EFoE -(a« ater Features co J Streams and Canals The Sages at AsG!: Final Plat Subdiv: Application 9.19.16 Gem Application A�7 m Page 0174 Custom Soil Resource Report Table—Hydrologic Soil Group (Aspen Glen - The Sages) Hydrologic Soil Group --Summary by Map Unit Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in A01 Percent of A01 6 Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest B 15.0 15.0 Rating Options—Hydrologic Soil Group (Aspen Glen - The Sages) Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower 15 100.0% 100.0% i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0175 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Reports The Soil Reports section includes various formatted tabular and narrative reports (tables) containing data for each selected soil map unit and each component of each unit, No aggregation of data has occurred as is done in reports in the Soil Properties and Qualities and Sultabilities and Limitations sections. The reports contain soil interpretive information as well as basic soil properties and qualities. A description of each report (table) is included. Soil Physical Properties This folder contains a collection of tabular reports that present soil physical properties. The reports (tables) include all selected map units and components for each map unit. Soil physical properties are measured or inferred from direct observations in the field or laboratory. Examples of soil physical properties include percent clay, organic matter, saturated hydraulic conductivity, available water capacity, and bulk density. Engineering Properties (Aspen Glen - The Sages) This table gives the engineering classifications and the range of engineering properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam," for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly," Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification system (ASTM, 2005) and the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 2004). The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are classified according to particle -size distribution of the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW, GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL -ML. The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of particle -size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection. 16 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0176 Custom Soil Resource Report If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A -1-a, A -1-b, A-24, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7-5, or A-7-6. Asan additional refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry -weight basis. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the Feld to weight percentage. Percentage (of soil particles) passing designated sieves is the percentage of the soil fraction Tess than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0,420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination, References: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing, 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. 17 li The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0177 61 0 a) 0 a) X a) N Q. a) 43) .0 a) o. a) Y Lt co U 42 (0 a1 t 41) N rn E O a 3 as -o a) fE Y a> CO C cti0) Y a) o c 'S 0 o1y. 0 U _C1 X Q Engineering Properties– Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties Plasticity index ; o Lc% M N o IA M 6 N tr) in toco th N a ,E Percentage passing sieve number— 0 cv h o to to crn h h o 6 to O> 9 to : cn 0 co th (C1 0 o_ 6 C)) 0 La 0) tti j LI) . el to f� r 6 0) 0 t 0) 0 0 .4.0 Fragments 08 A .0 0 0 0 >10 inches Classification AASHTO Q a 4.) • a U 0. V V) •a) to Q d S c? _j4UU)(1) 0 a USDA texture • In .6—Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes Almy 0-8 .*Loam 8-26 *Fine sandy loam 26-60 `Sandy clay loam Depth Map unit symbol and soil name The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0178 Chen0Northern, Inc. May 28, 1993 Conat1ling EnoIneets 0!!d ScIenllals 5080 Road 154 Glenwood Springs. Ccdorsdo 81601 303 9457458 303 945.2383 Facsimile Aspen Glen Company Attn: Terri Hart 555 East Durant, Suite 4A Aspen Co 81611-1815 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado Job No. 4 112 92 Dear Ms. Hart: As requested, we have conducted a supplemental geotechnical engineering study at the subject site for the preliminary plat design. The study included additional subsurface exploration, field reconnaissance and geologic hazard assessments for planning and preliminary design purposes. The scope of the study included subsidence risk of sinkhole and ground depression areas; debris flow hazard impacts and mitigation; foundation considerations for the bridge across the Roaring Fork River and the waste water treatment plant; suitability of the two water tank sites for construction;, setback of residential building lots next to steep slopes; surface and subsurface drainage considerations; and pavement subgrade conditions. The findings of the supplemental geotechnical study are presented in this report. Interim findings have been provided to the client so that planning and preliminary design could proceed concurrently with our work. Based on the findings of our additional study, the project remains feasible based on geotechnical considerations with the conditions and recommendations as presented in this report. The report which follows describes our investigations, summarizes our findings and presents our recommendations for planning and preliminary design purposes. It is important that we provide consultation through final plat design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. Site specific subsurface explorations are recommended for final design of individual structures proposed as part of the site development. We will be available for continued consultation and additional investigations as needed. If you A member or lha liYl group of companies 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0179 have any questions regarding the information provided in this report or if we can be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, E ► -NORTHERN, IN. 4)...‘).0e4ck Steven L. Pawlak, 1'. E. Rev. By: RGM SLP/lr cc: Pittman Poe & Associates - Attn: Tim Terra! The Land Design Partnership - Attn: Ron Liston v--Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. - Attn: Louis Meyer Chen Northern, Inc. Consutlxrg Engineers and Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0180 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PREVIOUS STUDIES 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SITE CONDITIONS 3 FIELD EXPLORATION 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 SINKHOLE AND SURFACE DEPRESSION AREAS 4 BRIDGE ABUTMENTS 4 WASTE WATER TREATMENT SITE 5 LABORATORY TESTING. 5 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 6 SINKHOLES AND SURFACE DEPRESSION AREAS 6 Hazard Evaluation 6 Development in Sinkhole Areas ... 7 Development in Surface Depression Areas 8 DEBRIS FLOW RISK AND MITIGATION 11 Hazard Evaluation 11 Hazard Mitigation Concepts 13 BRIDGE ACROSS THE ROARING FORK RIVER 15 WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 16 WATER TANK SITES 17 STEEP SLOPE SETBACK 17 DRYWELL DRAINAGE 18 PAVEMENT SUBGRADE 19 LIMITATIONS 19 TABLES AND FIGURES FIGURE 1 & 1A - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS & GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREAS FIGURE 2 - EXPLANATION OF GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREAS FOR FIGS. 1 & IA FIGURE 3 & 4 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 5 - BRIDGE ABUTMENTS LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 6 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS - WASTE WATER TREATMENT SITE FIGURE 7 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 8 - PIEZOMETER CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY FIGURE 9 - BUILDING AND UTILITY SETBACK FROM SINKHOLES FIGURE 10 - TYPICAL DRY WELL CONSTRUCTION TABLE I - SUMMARY OF WATER LEVEL READINGS TABLE II -WEST SIDE ALLUVIAL AND DEBRIS FANS APPENDIX A - CORE LOGS APPENDIX B - LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ChenNorthern, Inc Consulting Engineers annScientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0181 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a supplemental geotechnical engineering study for the preliminary plat design of the Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado. The site development area is presented in Figs. 1 and 1A. The study was conducted to obtain additional subsurface and geologic information needed for planning and preliminary design purposes. The work was conducted in accordance with our proposal to the Aspen Glen Company, dated March 2, 1992. Our work was coordinated with the various project designers and consultants to obtain the appropriate geotechnical information for their planning and preliminary designs. The field exploration program consisted of geologic reconnaissance and exploratory borings to obtain information on the subsurface conditions and for geologic hazard mitigation. Samples obtained during the subsurface exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine engineering characteristics of the on-site soils and bedrock. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were evaluated for subsidence risk of the sinkhole and ground depression areas; debris flow impacts and mitigation; foundation considerations for the bridge across the Roaring Fork River and the waste water, treatment plant; suitability of the two water tank sites for construction; setback of residential building Lots next to steep slopes; surface and subsurface drainage considerations; and pavement subgrade conditions. Results of the field exploration and laboratory testing are presented in this report. This report has been prepared to summarize the additional data obtained during the study and to present our conclusions and recommendations based on the current proposed construction, the additional geologic assessments and the subsurface conditions encountered. Additional design parameters and discussions regarding the subsurface and geologic conditions impacting Chen Northern,Inc C,orisuiing Enpveersand Scientsls The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0182 2 the proposed Aspen Glen Development are included in the report. PREVIOUS STUDIES Chen -Northern, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Aspen .Glen Development and presented their findings in a report dated December 20, 1991, Job No. 4 112 92. The study included geologic mapping and potential geologic hazard impact evaluations, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing and analysis for planning and preliminary design purposes. Based on the sinkholes and depression areas identified during the study, trenching and additional reconnaissance was conducted to better delineate the sinkholes and broad surface depression areas. The findings of this additional work were presented in a report to you dated April 28, 1992, Job No. 4 112 92. The current geotechnical engineering study was performed as a supplement to these two initial studies. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The current proposed development plans for the property are similar to those described in our previous studies and as submitted to the Garfield County Commissioners. We refer to the land planning drawing prepared by Pittman Poe and Associates for details of the development plan. The drawings were in progress at the time of our additional work. We should review the drawings and provide additional consultation as needed for continued implementation of our recommendations. Chen Northern,Inc. Consulting Engineers and Scientists i !_ I The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0183 3 SITE CONDITIONS The property boundaries and proposed development areas are essentially the same as that described in our previous reports. The location of a waste water treatment plant at the north end of the property has also been identified. The additional study work is generally located west of Highway 82 except for a water storage tank site located near the top of a drainage basin fan in the southeast part of the property. A more complete description of the property site conditions can be found in our December 20, 1991 report. FIELD EXPLORATION 14 Thirteen exploratory borings were drilled at the approximate locations shown on Figs. t and 1A, in addition to the fifteen previous borings, also shown of Figs. 1 and IA. Two other borings, RE -1-93 and RE -2-93 were also drilled at the request of Resource Engineering for water supply purposes. Six exploratory borings were drilled in the sinkhole and surface depression areas and two borings were drilled at the bridge abutments to evaluate the overburden depth and quality of the underlying bedrock. These borings (13-1-93 through 8-8-93) and Borings RE -1-93 and RE -2-93 were advanced through the overburden soils by Becker Drills which utilizes a percussion driven casing advancement method. The underlying bedrock at selected borings was drilled using an NX size core drilling method which obtains a continuous sample. Borings B-9-93 through B-13-93 were drilled at the waste water treatment site with fl- inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a truck -mounted CME -55 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Chen -Northern, Inc. Chen eNorthern, Inc. Consulting Engineers.and Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0184 4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphical logs of the subsurface profiles encountered at the exploratory borings drilled for the current study are presented on Figs. 3 through 6. An explanation of the symbols and notes regarding the drilling and other procedures are presented on Fig. 7. The core logs of Borings B-1-93, B -2-93,.B-5.93 and B-6-93 are presented in Appendix A. A summary of the piezometers installed in the borings is presented in Fig. 8. SINKHOLE ANIS SURFACE DEPRESSION AREAS The subsoils encountered in the borings consisted mainly of 1 to 27 feet of silty sandy clay above the coarse gravel terrace deposits. The Eagle Valley Evaporite was encountered below the gravel deposits between depths of 23 and 98 feet. At Boring B-4-93, bedrock was not encountered to the depth drilled of 109 feet. At Boring RE -1-93, sandstone bedrock of the Maroon Formation was encountered. Additional discussion of the subsurface conditions relating to the subsidence risk is presented below in the "Development in Sinkhole Areas" and "Development in Surface Depression Areas" sections. Groundwater was encountered between about 35 and 47 feet below the ground surface at the time of the field work. Subsequently, water levels have risen to depths of about 31 to 37 feet. A summary of the water level measurements made during the study are presented in Table I. BRIDGE ABUTMENTS The subsoils encountered in the proposed abutment areas consist of about 2 to 5 feet of topsoil Chen Northern, Inc. Consuituv Engineers ana Scienhsls L it The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0185 5 and silt above dense coarse gravel terrace deposits. The Eagle Valley Evaporite was encountered at depths of 23 to 33 feet. The bedrock appeared soft and weathered at the west abutment (Boring B-8-93). WASTE WATER TREATMENT SITE Five exploratory borings, B-9-93 through B-13-93, were drilled in the waste water treatment plant site as requested by Westwater Engineers. The borings encountered a small amount of topsoil and up to about 1 1/2 feet of sandy silt above the coarse gravel terrace soils. The gravels are dense to very dense and refusal to auger drilling equipment was encountered in the deposit. Shale/siltstone bedrock of the Eagle Valley Evaporite was encountered below the gravel terrace soils at depths of 11 and 14 feet which extended to the maximum depth investigated, 30 feet. Groundwater was encountered in two of the borings between 2 1/2 and 14 feet below ground surface but caving of the gravel soils in the borings prevented continued groundwater, level monitoring. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained during the field exploration included in-situ moisture content, grain size analysis and liquid and plastic limits. The results of gradation analyses preformed on samples of the gravelly soils (minus 1 1/2 and 3 inch fraction) are presented on Figs. 8-1 through 8-3. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table B-1. Chen ONorthern, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Scienlisis The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0186 6 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The findings of the additional field reconnaissance and subsurface exploration performed for the current study are generally consistent with those of our previous studies. The following recommendations are made for planning and preliminary design of the various conditions and facilities included in the current study. SINKHOLES AND SURFACE DEPRESSION AREAS Hazard Evaluation: Six exploratory borings (B-1-93 through B-6-93) were drilled in the area of concern to evaluate the overburden depth and quality of the underlying bedrock. Casing was advanced through the overburden soils by Becker Drills and the underlying bedrock was drilled by using NX size core drilling. The subsoils encountered in the borings consisted of between t to 27 feet of silty sandy clay above the coarse gravel terrace deposits. Two of the borings were drilled next to sinkholes, one was drilled within a sinkhole and the other three borings were drilled in the broad depression areas, well away from specific sinkholes (see Fig. 1). Groundwater was encountered between about 35 to 47 feet below ground surface at the time of drilling. Large cavities which would indicate a potential for collapse and additional sinkhole development in areas outside of the existing sinkholes were not encountered in the borings. The rock quality was found to be variable and localized zones of clay breccia and voids were encountered. ChenNorthern, Ino Consulling Engineers and 8cien1isis The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0187 7 Develmment in Sinkhole Areas: Residential lot development is proposed in the area of the existing sinkholes. These features should be considered potentially unstable. Our recommended approach to the land planning is to avoid the sinkhole areas by making them open non -buildable space. The sinkhole areas could be avoided by including them as golf course fairways, parks or other non building areas. Potential ground settlement.,outside of building limits within residential lot boundaries. should also be considered. Where development of residences and roadways are proposed next to sinkholes, two approaches can be considered: 1) avoid .the sinkhole footprint including a minimum setback distance from the edge of the sinkhole and 2) mitigate the future settlement risk of the sinkholes. The required setback distance from the edge of the individual sinkholes was evaluated based on the subsurface profile, depth to bedrock and size/configuration of the sinkholes. The calculated minimum setback distance from the sinkhole is presented in Fig. 9, attached. The minimum recommended setback distance for each sinkhole is graphically shown on the topographic map, Figs. 1 and 1A, attached. In general, the setback distances from the top rim of the sinkhole vary between about 15 to 30 feet. The actual sinkhole limits and setback distances should be field verified at the time of the lot line and building envelope staking. Mitigation of future settlement risk of the sinkholes may be possible by various methods of ground stabilization and by designing the structures adjacent to the sinkholes to withstand potential gross distortion. The stabilization may consist of: 1) subexcavating the loose material within the sinkhole and replacing it with a relatively high quality and high density material and 2) grouting the natural dense soils along the perimeter of the sinkhole to reduce the potential for future widening of the sinkhole. The subexcavation and replacement procedures do not appear Chen Northern,Inc. Consullina Engineers and Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0188 8 practical due to the depth of the sinkholes. The grouting procedure should help reduce the settlement risk but not totally eliminate it. Therefore, we believe that avoiding the sinkholes by building setback is the lower risk and the more appropriate approach that should be taken. Development in Mace Depression Areas: Based on our findings, development within the ground surface depression areas (shown on Fig. 1) should be feasible provided appropriate mitigative designs are implemented for the residential buildings, utilities and roadways as described below. The appropriate level of the mitigative designs depend on the potential ground deformation, the building type, location and configuration and level of tolerable maintenance (mainly for roadways and utilities). Building design considerations include use of a relatively rigid foundation, (such as a stiffened slab or raft) and a simply shaped building footprint to reduce potential damage in the event of differential movement. These design concepts would be included in the engineered foundations for residences located in the depression areas. Utilities should be designed and constructed to be relatively flexible and allow for differential movement without rupturing. Where possible, settlement sensitive main utility lines should be routed outside of the ground surface depression areas. Roadways can be conventionally designed and constructed with provisions for maintenance if subsidence related distress is experienced. There are several geotechnical design concepts which can be used to mitigate potential subsidence damage to residential buildings and underground utilities. Special mitigative designs for a specific lot should be developed by the owner's architect and structural engineer and should be based on the type of building proposed and the site specific foundation conditions. The following design concepts are presented to assist in evaluating design options prior to site Chen Northern, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0189 9 specific investigations for an individual building site. The concept for underground utilities should be incorporated into the utility design by the developer. Building Configurations: The extent of damage to a building subjected to the surface effects of subsidence may be reduced by implementing several architectural measures in the building design. These 'measures would include the following: * Relatively flexible structural systems such as wood frame construction, flexible exterior siding, and dry wall interior partitions are preferable to less flexible masonry structural system and exterior sidings. * Interior non-bearing partitions resting on the floor slab should be provided with slip joints so that slab movements are not transmitted to the upper structure. • The building should be a low structure preferably limited to one or two stories. • The building should have relatively small plan dimensions of 60 feet or less. If this is not practical then the building should be divided into independent modules. * The building configuration should be a simple rectangular configuration with straight foundation walls and a minimum of side projections from the main building, * The ground floor should be on a single level rather than using a split level design. * Basements are particularly susceptible to subsidence damage and are not recommended unless the entire foundation is at basement level and designed for lateral earth loading. Chen @ Northern, Inc. ConWang Engineers and Scionfisis The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0190 10 Building Foundations: A raft foundation with a bearing level near the exterior grade appears to be an appropriate foundation system for reducing the vulnerability of buildings to differential subsidence damage. Typical shallow spread footings would be a relatively flexible system and a rigid system is preferable for the larger magnitude deformations. Foundation system considerations are outlined below: * A raft foundation system is the preferable system and should be designed according to the site specific soil bearing conditions. • The bottom surface of the raft should be smooth and free of vertical projections. * The raft should be separated from the bearing soils by placing the raft on a minimum 4 -inch thick compacted, clean sand. A polyethylene sheet should be placed between the raft and the sand layer. The use of deep foundation walls should be minimized to the extent practical. The soil pressure equal to at least twice the "at rest" earth pressure (on the order of 80 to 100 pcf equivalent fluid unit weight) should be assumed to act on all vertical surfaces in contact with the foundation soils. • The bearing elevation of the raft should be placed below frost depth or sufficient soil cover should be provided for frost protection. Underground Utilities; Underground utilities are susceptible to the affects of area subsidence, As outlined below there are several mitigative design concepts which can be used to reduce the potential for damage. In our opinion the mitigation measures should be used where underground utilities are located in the ground surface depression areas shown on Fig L Chentallorthem,Inc. Consulting Engineers and Scientists I 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0191 11 • Flexible joints should be used between adjacent pipe segments for both gravity and pressure lines. * Positive restraints should be provided in pressure lines to prevent pipe separation. • A flexible joint should be provided as close as practical to any building, manhole, or other rigid structural connection. * A soil cushion in the immediate vicinity of the pipe should be provided by not over -compacting the backfill soils close to the pipe. * Check valves should be placed at appropriate locations on all gas and water mains to permit interruption of flow in case of subsidence distress. DEBRIS FLOW RISK AND MITTIGATION Hazard Evaluation: This study shows that thealluvial and debris fans along the western side of the development are potential sites of water flooding and debris flows. The area evaluated is shown on the attached Fig IA. A summary of the basins and fans evaluated is presented on the attached Table II. The calculated flow depths and volumes are based on hydrological data provided by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. Potential water floods, with high sediment concentrations, should be considered for all of the basins upslope of the fans. Appropriate surface water hydrologic methods should be used to evaluate the flood hazards on all fans. Fans I and 2 in the southern part of the area are not subject to debris flows, but debris flows should be considered on Fans 3 through 25 and the area to the north (see Fig. IA). Based on numerical debris flow modeling, we have designated three potential haiard Chen0Northern, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Sciemisls The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0192 12 zones on the debris fans. The "high hazard zones" are Located near the fan heads where flow velocities and impact pressures are expected to be relatively high. Impact pressures in the "high hazard zone" could be greater than 200 psf. The "moderate hazard zones" are luted in the middle parts of the debris fans where intermediate flow velocities and impact pressures are expected. Impact pressures in the "moderate harard zones" are expected to be in the range of 60 to 200 psf. The "low hazard zones" are located in the lower parts of the fans where relatively low flow velocities and impact pressures are expected, Impact pressures in the "low hazard zones" are expected to be less than 60 psf. The recommended design debris flow parameters presented on Table II are expected to be associated with relatively infrequent debris flow events. Recurrence probabilities for the design debris flows are expected to be greater than 100 years. The design debris flows are expected to have peak discharges in the range of 830 to 37 cfs in the confined channels near the fan heads. Flow depths in the confined channels are expected to be from 13.9 to 5.6 feet. On the fans below the confining channels the flow will spread laterally and begin to deposit. Because of the potential for blockage of, the shallow fan channels it is not possible to predict the exact path that a flow will take as it travels down the fan, therefore, the entire fan surface should be considered in the potential hazard area. The design debris flows on the fan surfaces are expected to have widths of 30 to 50 feet. Average flow depths of the design debris flows are expected to very from 2.4 to 1.0 feet. Total design debris flow volumes are expected to be in the range of 685 to 15 cubic yards. In our opinion, debris flow hazard mitigations should be considered for all occupied structures located in the three potential hazard zones shown on Fig. IA. The debris flow Chen Northern, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Soiernisls 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0193 13 mitigations should be coordinated with the overall surface water runoff 'management plan. A discussion of possible hazard mitigation concepts follows. Hazard Mitigation Concepts: There are several planning and engineering methods which can be used to mitigate debris flow hazards. The appropriate method for a particular project will depend on several factorswhich include the location and type of construction proposed and the degree of risk the developer and prospective home owners are willing to accept. To eliminate the risk, the hazard areas could be avoided or mitigation methods could be used to protect the property. Possible debris flow hazard mitigations which have been used to mitigate potential debris flow hazards include: (1) debris retention basins, (2) deflection structures, and (3) direct flood proofing of the exposed structure. Debris Retention Basins: When terrain is suitable, debris collection basins can be constructed near the fan head to collect and store potential debris flows, but to pass potential water flood runoff. This method of mitigation will provide protection of the entire downslope fan area. The collection basins typically consist of an earth, soil -cement, or concrete dam and excavated or natural storage basin. There are several factors at the Aspen Glen site which will make construction and maintenance of effective debris retention basins difficult, There are over 25 individual drainage basins and debris fans in the project area which would require a large number of collection basins. The fan heads and upslope channels are very steep. Based on these topographic Chen0Northern,Inc. COnsuIIing Eng+neets and ScieniS(s The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0194 14 constraints, we expect that use of debris retention basins will not be a practical mitigation method. Deflection Structures: Deflection structures can consist of earth berms or reinforced concrete walls similar to retaining walls. The purpose of the deflection structure is to direct flood waters and debris flows away from individual structures or group of structures. The effectiveness of the deflection structure, and a reduction in design loads and berm heights can be achieved by angling the deflection structure to the flow direction. Properly Dated deflection structures can be used to completely divert debris flows away from the area to be protected. It should be feasible to use deflection structures at the Aspen Glen project to protect individual structures or groups of structures. The protection of large areas will require relatively extensive berms or walls. Care should be taken to avoid directing debris into adjacent structures or properties. The redirected debris flood should be considered in the surface drainage designs of the residential building sites along the downhill side of County Road 109. Direct Flood Proofing: Direct flood proofing of individual structures can be an effective method of protecting a structure but will not prevent some property damage as the result of deposition of mud and debris. Flood proofing consists of developing architectural and structural designs that will: (1) allow the structure to directly withstand the impact pressures and debris depositional pressures, usually by the use of reinforced concrete building walls which extend above the height of the design debris flow, (2) locating doors, windows, and other structurally weak wall areas above design debris flow depths, and (3) designing the building and site grading Chen ONorthern,Inc. Consuhr Eng,neersand Scianiisis 11. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0195 15 to eliminate topographic or building wall obstructions which would prevent the free flow of flood waters and debris around the building. Direct flood proofing should be feasible in all haiard zones except in the "high hazard zone" near the fan heads. However, the developer and potential home owners should be aware that if this method is used exclusively, that some property damage can be expected as a result of the deposition of mud and debris adjacent to the structure. The data and design concepts presented above are suitable for conceptual planning purposes. When the preliminary mitigation designs and lot layout have been determined, we should review the information and preform additional analysis as needed to develop the final mitigation plan. BRIDGE ACROSS THE ROARING FORK RIVER Borings 8-7-93 and B-8-93 were drilled at the approximate proposed bridge abutments to evaluate the subsurface conditions for foundation design. Access to the center pier supports with the truck -mounted drill rig was not possible because of the irregular terrain. The subsurface conditions encountered at the borings consist of about 23 and 33 feet of relatively dense coarse gravel terrace deposits above relatively soft to hard shale/siltstone bedrock of the Eagle Valley Evaporite. The coarse granular soils are generally considered suitable for spread footing foundations but considering possible excavation depth required at each abutment, structural loadings of several hundred kips at each support location, and the variable quality of the underlying bedrock, spread footings may not be acceptable. The footing sizes required to support the structural loading and the differential settlement potential could both be excessive. Chen eNorthern, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0196 16 A deep foundation such as drilled piers or driven piles appear more appropriate for support of the structure. Drilled piers would likely be cased through the overburden soils and weathered bedrock and socketed into competent bedrock. We expect that pier diameters would be at least 3 feet and extend at least 10 feet into the underlying competent bedrock. Design bearing pressures for that portion of pier in the competent bedrock is expected to be on the order of 20,000 psf maximum allowable end bearing and 2000 psf allowable skin friction. A driven pile would probably consist of and H section with a reinforced tip capable of being driven through the coarse gravel terrace deposits. The pile should derive its capacity through end bearing and peripheral shear and when driven to virtual refusal should develop its structural capacity, typically taken as a working stress of 9 ksi. Additional geotechnical investigation should be conducted at the individual bridge abutment and pier locations to determine site specific subsurface conditions and geotechnical design recommendations for the structuraldesign.of the bridge. WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT Five exploratory borings were drilled between depths of about 5 to 30 feet within the general proposed waste water treatment plant site. Graphical logs of the subsurface profiles encountered in the borings are presented on Fig. 6. The subsoils consist mainly of dense gravel terrace deposit which should be suitable for support of moderately loaded spread footings. The topsoil and silt soil should be removed from beneath the structures to expose the dense gravels. Below grade construction could require temporary excavation dewatering and designing the structures to withstand hydrostatic forces. When the waste water treatment facilities have been ChenetNorthern,Ine Consulting gngineets anti Sciontiisls i i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0197 17 better identified, we should review the information and perform additional analysis and . subsurface exploration for final design of the facilities. WATER TANK SITES Two storage tanks for domestic water supply are proposed, one near the southeast corner of the property and the other near the northwest corner at the locations shown on Figs. 1 and 1 A. A reconnaissance of the tentative tank sites was conducted with the project engineer and planner to assess the feasibility of the sites based on geotechnical considerations. Based on the reconnaissance, construction of the water storage tanks at both sites should be feasible based on geotechnical considerations. The southeast site consists of steep hillside with bedrock outcrop of the Maroon Formation. The cut slope for this site will need to be engineered based on the rock quality conditions. For preliminary design purposes the cut grade can be assumed as 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical. The northwest tank site is on a strongly sloping ridge which should not be impacted by steep slopes and debris flows. When more detailed information has been developed regarding the tank construction and grading plans, we should review the information and perform subsurface exploration and analysis for the structural design of the tanks. STEEP SLOPE SETBACK Numerous terrace escarpments are located on the property and building envelopes are proposed near the top of some of these escarpments. In general, under current site conditions most of these escarpments are relatively stable but some of these escarpments are over steepened and show signs of ravelling and minor erosion. Repairs and maintenance of the Glenwood Ditch Chen@Northern, Inc. ConsuNing Engineers and Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0198 . 18 appear to have also created localized over -steepened fill embankment sections. Buildings located next to steep slopes which could continue to erode or fail are normally setback a specified distance so that if continued slope movement occurs, the buildings will not be affected. A slope setback criteria suitable for the coarse gravel terrace deposits consists of an imaginary line extended up from the toe of the slope at a grade of 11/2 horizontal to 1 vertical. The approximate limit of this setback slope projected from the toe of the escarpment to the ground surface in the affected areas is shown on Fig. 1. Buildings should be located no closer to the top of the escarpment than this setback line without further investigation and analysis. The actual setback should be established in the field during the lot layout staking. DRYWELL DRAINAGE We understand that the surface drainage design will incorporate detention areas with controlled surface release and subsurface percolation depending on the site specific conditions. Where clay soils are predominant, percolation from surface ponding should be relatively slow. Drywells which extend into the gravel terrace soils could be used to enhance the surface water disposal for low flow conditions. The coarse gravel terrace soils would have relatively good infiltration characteristics compared to the fine-grained overlying soils. A typical detail of a drywell suitable for surface water disposal is shown on Fig. 10. We can assist in sizing the drywells once their location and disposal capacities have been better determined. The design should include subsurface profile and percolation information. Dry wells should not be located within the sinkhole limits shown on pig 1 and IA. We should review the dry wells in the surface depression areas for possible subsidence affects. Chen @Northern, Inc. Consulting Engneersand Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0199 19 PAVEMENT SUBGRADE The subgrade soils encountered across the property are variable and range from silty clays to dense gravels. We expect the majority of subgrade will consist of the fine-grained silty and clayey soils. We understand that for preliminary design purposes, the pavement section consisting of three inches of asphalt above 8 inches of aggregate basecourse has been assumed. Typically for the types of roadway use proposed on the project site (excluding Highway 82) this section is expected to be adequate. In low traffic areas and where gravelly subgrade soils are present, thinner pavement sections may be possible. Where roadways cross sinkholes, a thick Layer (a few feet or more) of compacted gravel subbase should be provided. We recommend that a pavement subgrade study be conducted to determine design level pavement sections once the roadway alignments, grading and traffic conditions have been determined. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no other warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figs. 1 and 1 A, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is Chert Northern,Inc Consulling Eng neorsand Scl mists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0200 20 performed, If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our exploratory information which has not been described or documented in this report. As the project evolves, we should 'provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications of the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. Sincerely, CHEN-NORTHERN, IN :.1.1.3:1 p W 3E'$'4c,.T 9 15222 , * 47 By Steven L. Pawlak, `'; L4. g�g�,t.•` And By: f 5J C0-° a* )7:-A_ I 1 Ralph G. Mock Engineering Geologist ChenNorthem,Inc. Confuting Engineers and Scientists The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0201 0. a Y =• ((�� Q Ili N d N� l ICI 44 0 ro ,r'" 0. i2'� "0 .8pa0 a0 iT(a . 3a 0J .A, „v.2 HA � -b L N 8 y p .... + N i+ f'-'12 44 a N Y L 4. T d w Y A 444)0). 2 ,3;:?. 4.' g il • C C H` NN , 7 iV .q V . -T N d O ti IT d ▪ T' -' Y Y.-.1 4.• ^+ 2 • ) N.7 61~ q4 b▪ .N°:o roti �4) C O 0 N N N b 44 N N o at; d wa 3 0a asydC 4 4. 4+ pa _Oy14- Ii4)N g.N .v I- }dqOA A N r• t s + 34d a 0 Ns q• L a_NL4G1'4 roaa4).) N 44�▪ 14 O y N N 7- L 4-) d 4 f,* b V) VI VI •e• ad p N 44 L u.D At N0 f RNA 4) ' d T " L 9 e4)iu -4u A �yQQ/ 14 ^ N L -+N N Y 3 } C d 4. {1 oGi .? G N Y O 4) C 4. 4 C4 -' N F A 4C Y � C 4 yW, 44u. N • tyi0 „. ca}L1145 • W OLdq "' 9 C�•Ci `w' q4L pf,-. A td.. 'pti L h 643 N 0 C dN N b 1p 9> .4070 V) 14) a .0 .0 Q 4 la - q ) 4) 77CC 0bpyL N0CA M., C •+0 c 4) 00 y4 04I HO 4.4 G • to 4)4)i v• r L LL01 7 ' J.. N d ▪ '$3 gu L ' L 5:1 So A 0 yi O 7Q NN3 SoVI 3€ a.- 33 4.3 N L N Y O a�3 0 off, v(y�ro ,i3 N C L L 5 -7;Sb v N a c - 4-r ai 04 a.N5 . 4) c w � 7 N 0 N 0 0 N G LO 4)44 o ~e V A N 4) . N N .. a •0 a C 4 - L A O A A 14 '.ll L. q 4) W 04 q N A 0 d O q w b N 4N7 aC d d C 0, 441 ro 0 N _ .C4- L L.9 L. 74 0120 g o N 4042 3 8 N 40 d NNI 04 O C ' L 3 o s N 9 d NG NO 4.L13 5, CU 0 4- 0.r a! 0 A ma „a V 3 34 4 d aI'4o4)'i '- 0 442 O.N N DEBRIS FLOW HAZARD EVALUATION: N L 50.1g 0 42. 0. `8E N 421 u0- 30r, 0N Vg'- ti o aF44. 4) N•-. 04 G C 41 P -a G N w tO+ g$2 Y N 6'h ./ N T N a. S. aA q"a 2 caq 7 44 .0 N q 0 A N d N 1' - • 4) A C 441 ' C..b L N4 d 4M 4.4 ••••• N 070 J -. 4 A q 4- e O 41 'a -r N4+ Q tti N.U. 71 4 di Y O q • GI WL 14. .4 L C Y SAL c ▪ , ▪ A 0. vro Y > P 0•14 o a e p1. Aid 4) 0c Y 4) 4) u N8 u u • N 0 0 L.4 0' C " A 21 4�.+ L 4. a p8 L "Al,O LI a al (11 ✓ 0 a.19 Y 01a 70 I • L w01 s• uu O N d TN k > O --C 4. q Y L a .41 a4C pp L �▪ 'a1 9• 5._ w Lo 46 Z. qv. 0V o a O2b CCQs+ 0 O NO X 44 0 4.40 4i 461 r0 04 0 W 8 av N 5 N W N qG N .4 c 0 ppb .z..13 w j A N '" a LL 0 3• �K Y O UJ 8N N La 4) 41 Y s o. 1.o N aLu 4 44v, TN q L 04. • ,a bQ-541 d M ti 66// pu0 a a g d o Q1 JO G �G b 0 5 v. ar app 'CL CLI 1. ••+ 0 1A 11 N.."4b .41 dL * Y Mom ' a 440 0 L. 71 db 0 Y N �G c. a/ O 00 N d L .o2 O V a L = b U N U 4 "5 z eN4) 0 N .M C 4- 4q4 y N O O v 6 d • 44 12 0 44 CC 440= 0 `u� W 7-048 .gom v▪ d O O 9 0 • zvu 01 ▪ V 03 71 C .04 344 I13 B44c d 94, 44 0-8, Ett N• OOp W O Itt Oo�tl .D �a 5 Gpp N oL Vt ,1"g b 4.1 4� N N g i aA"8iro Y 4- b 14 NI 0 T Y } 4 A aC% L W a C b O a7 N N 14) d Y N L u 7 4.4 411 L LL SdSd Q 7 Y AVW 7..C. o O Y b IL NNL 0y a L "Ne G Lw u 34 CI 0 Aspen Glen Development The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0202 0 10 • Boring B-1-93 0 a 5 9 20 17 8 7 30 6 45 mss- 7 40 1 6 2 5D 6- 60 6 6 5 70 13 00 90 00 10 20 30 Boring 8-2-93 NC■26 0 .1-200.89 .. L1•31 a Pt.12 0 ..0 0 0 43 -3 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 3 5 3 2 se 73 13 20 16 5 0,30 Boring B-3-93 54 6 144.71 5 :4004115 26 rti .;r 45 -200.99 LL•41 P1.18 Boring Boring 8-4-93 0-5-93 0 12 9 11 12 21 1 +4.69 -200.6 Note: Explanation of syribols presented on fig, 7. Core Logs of Borings B-1, 2 A 5 show on Figs. A-1, through A-1, Appendix A. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 130 90 100 110 120 130 LL N 0 a di The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0203 m W 0 0 • -- 10 r- 20 Boring 8-6-93 0 8 16 7 11 12 '26 30 8 SO 40 — 50 60 70 — 80 • 40 100 -- 110 — 120 �-- 130 7 1t'"e- 40 29 29 29 20 14 74 22. 23 23 64 Boring RE 1 4 6 24 41 16 ,59 25 25 16 9 0,2 12 10 16 16 9 12 33 64 1 Boring RE 2 19 55 39 17 -44 16 11 16 8 10 7 6 10 9 Mote; Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 7. Core Log of Boring 8-6-93 shown on Figs. A-8, A-9 and A -l0, Appendix A. 0 —^ 10 20 30 — 40 50 — 60 �. LL 70 • 80 — 90 -- 100 --- -- 110 —` 110 — 120 -- 130 Development The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0204 - 10 - 15 - 20 m a a 25 - 30 - 35 - a0 Boring B-7-93 0 13 15 36 15 15 �. WC=10 200=70 LL=24 .' PI=3 Boring B-8-93 fl 9 13 14 9 6 3 6 3 fl 10 15 ' 20 4,6101.1.0 25- 30-1 5 30-1 35 40 45 45 Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 7. Depth - Feet 4 112 92 Chen ONorthern, Inc Bridge Abutments Logs of Exploratory Borings Fig. 5 i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0205 Depth - Feet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -] LC11 C7 lf) O L) r N N Cr) .-4 LO N II CO O r,.rO•-•N N M7 I -J CL UD C5 11 Kt NNCCV Kt H C7 11 II Cr1 N J C I • -a L. O 1 CSI . `4K�wttg O O N CD M C71 01 1 •.. o OCO CO Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. r-1 aVek • 1111i :IW s 1 O tf) O If) .- O LC N N O Depth - Feet 4 112 92 CheneNorthern, Inc. Logs of Exploratory Borings Waste Water Treatment Site Fig. 6 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0206 a a • 4. C•.C.ACmC] d L 3 1+0c -o a )�••L.ACna p A al 0iL ~ Nq NV1�- a a) -8441 r. aA • 2'-°' w ' g L 4 e 0 G O. 1O k V7 1.F.NC h 2'801 ■U 1a. * 4 L' .4 +4 O , LN. .' U L.a.GAu ••+ ro .* 21..1). 4 MOq wo40�0 a e� g c`�'ay.9 oLAC rol-,y N4yQ11 0. L i+oC a C d 1p- .D as VOi L a 101 4 ro m .....5 O p �v tel O Qn. 2 ..5,N8XG 0 .SON X�. QL1� 5 OC Qb1 O..VI 0 �W 2 4. C a 0 a 44 411141 g .....4) 5 ro 0)Q1. -p. N C 5 mo i. O r dl a 11 -E2Ar SL a roi 8c4)q C 71a mtlNU? NC C Oma+ 7 i YN N N Su E a L v �f ON •••••rn �i-D $ . U*A N 7 01'1 sr Nr O Oo NH ^7. N N.+''51.: q • �� O�y N N2LL V C$ u (Ly �i3UL. � OL.N NV 01 4) V, N 1.1 . tOG6,.4. -. Ma N CQ Nq 01 v olid L' {X� •p }' C' � L L�❑+ 010.1 L.". S L aQ+ -(a. N�4. Cpp NN NLOo C� GO K i .81.2 pays C Q1Y' afa+6NWG ( (v,J =tl w 7 O� *L0.7 H� N V � fai u A,C gCw1a O L R 0-- NUa. 4%L �.qa+ aN Y�Lyy� L�F+ .O+^O 4)44 - C N Oro .0+~ 4ry) 0 00.+ LU.0.. 41 C•a ro • .00L 044 • N 4pp C• .+4144 L Nr CC 4. 1d X44+ . X M roy0. wJd 04 q 4.. i.+0 roC a -O L..+ C. uUU G) a rot+ }.1 ), L C!p O w 11 (} a a LI L L 01 g .O ,a•. pL 4144, a 6 i+ Rpp 2 f7 _ N W O T)"*":: aro J 4. W L F. 0 F. RI 'J .. .1 �t 1 4 J 0. a Np 2 w N ni a 1A tD Topsoil; silty clay. organic, dark brown. 49 El) ES3 MI 1131 Silt (HL); sandy. medium dense. slightly moist, brown. L. .. .0 .+ y U O .^ L Cu .1 C �' NaN+4dR 4144 IA 4aX mo me d ro� ug ca �$/ Mo N 470 P 2 O C 0d N 0g (0- N c m1v , N .a+ L L 4) N m O C] J N N 2 kC r N .4.4 0 L . .Cu C. N - a$ - u C L r .O ... C N )•)as o� m vs r. N 4 4• !+ • ^ 7 ap ro • 01 1J N 0 N c Ca .(7,1"N W u1 V •-• N O A Q y-. 4.. L W NV. }y+ NA, 0 C LW N a a C 0. C N N L C 01 i a a C 0) 2•. ,+a uc u° ° Nm 1+ v`v A L P O a O 8 4 i GI W I t 7 0) E 1 a Vo 1%1,x. T. L .0 Nd 0 v a Ni OL OXY u .a N tis a i cto .64 8.u± p a.+ LLea a L N 0. 41 y L. ......... .. o P N QM w o r CO 41 sa i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0207 L 1 0 of mom w N .i1 0 — 0 . — 0 .r 0 at 0 -, 0 0 N N CASING AND MATERIAL DIMENSIONS (FT.? M f-1 Ni m N m m f/1 a a,1 o 0 1b c N y 0 1n 0 Q1., M PIp m .O en "� 1-.N v N Q. 0 d• N Q1 M +r CO Q1j sn na 1.0a 1!f QQ Q ^ O- t-..1.0 v SO 10 Oh1 tr. • 1 OAR4 1 g .a W W o W •aCO M 01 WI r1 00 m 01 rn 1 rn 1 CO a 1 CO rn m NPsi; Aspen Glen Developweat 11. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0208 125 z 1- 4 100 MINIMUM SETBACK FROM EDGE OF SINKHOLE * OVERBURDEN 75 50 0 (0 20 SETBACK DISTANCE ( f t ) 30 * ASSUMES GRAVEL IS AT GROUND SURFACE. INCREASE SETBACK BY 1/3 THE CLAY SOIL DEPTH. 4 112 92 Chen ONorthem,I nc BUILDING AND UTILITY SETBACK FROM SINKHOLES Fig. 9 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0209 Clay Soil Gravel Alluvium urface Grate Finish Grade Compacted Backfill 3' Typ. 3/4" - 1 112' Screened Rock �, Varies 4-6' typ. DRY WELL SCHEMATIC Solid Concrete Pipe 6" Diameter Solid Standpipe with Trash Screen at Top Perforated Below Filter Fabric Perforated Concrete Pipe 4' Minimum Penetration into Gravel Alluvium NOT TO SCALE 4 112 92 Chen ONorthern, Inc. Typical Dry Well Construction Mg. 10 PI The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0210 Boring No. Tip Depth (R.) TABLE SUMMARY OF WATER I.KVEL READINGS 3-18-93 Job No. 4 112 92 [oath to Weld %Bvol (Ft.) Below Ground Surfacq 3-20-93 34243 B-1-93 97.0 8.2-93 127.5 B-3-93 62.0 41.2 8.4-93 109.0 45.0 8-5-93 1003 8.6-93 100.5 R1 -t-93 79.0 45.0 45.1 RE -2-93 54.0 10.7 4-4-93 5.17-93 ii 47.0 36.2 31.7 40.7 31.4 44.7 37.0 34.8 33.5 37.2 35.2 33.7 8.7 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0211 JobNo.411292 I t 1r4 10 IP V1 .N-. ..i V.'1 IM • N N a N « ... 00 WI -- O 6 00 Oa M 0 0 N O bit e.1 •.. T M N ('� el ea M IIn M M g N tom` i� F h� 00 • a6?No®a 4 4 d N M(� n a w NN...►+ti N M M h 6i N V1 41 W M N �O N V'G' OD O°N 4; � V 1• .�-iy iF oaoti W V1 F Oe NO 01 41. 41 • aamaa� 1.. 6.....6 N N .6 N '~'� 6 0 C00000 a 0: 01 01 — 0 0 0 0 N 1.2 v1 lea 00 .4w..4 to — ta 112 w F F N O a N N A N ri 64 N N* F ms Ch Chch r, o °OF rN4 0. 40 ▪ .+PlNNNeY • 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 aav as g 0 ▪ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 60 60 41 .+ 11! 014° NNavi6oa o'3 0 cei enemy N NNfv �C 164 O eRry l 1, ci 101 F V1 br F V1 ^...4 M t M ..4 iJ 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 vv1 tel 7F1 11 00000d 414:410141-1°I o e -: o V' Iri 01 0 7 kr) 0 �...NN N �. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0212 APPENDIX A CORE LOGS • The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0213 GOMM LOG Jog NO. 4 112 92 SHEET 1 PRO. cT Aspen Glen LDGATION See F19. 1 BORING N0. B-1-93 TOTAL DEPTH 103.5' OVERBURDEN ANGLE FROM BEARING OF DEPTH OF HHORIZONTAL90o ANGLE B0R1NG WATER TABLE DATE 4-1-93 BEWN: 52' FINISHED: 4-2.93 GEDLOC8C LOG 0.0 to 1.0 ft. TOP SOIL: Silty Clay, moderately organic, dark brown GRAPHIC LOG DIS.CON1 JITY LOG TEST RESULTS DEPTH — FEET rue 0 1.0 to 9.0 ft. SANDY CLAY: Radium to stiff, low plasticity, moist to wet, red -brown 10- 9.0 0- 9.0 to 75.0 ft. GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS: Sandy, slightly silty to Clean, dense to very dense, moist to wet. gray - brown. River Terrace Alluvium. 15 — 20 25 45 — 10 15 25 45 Fig. A-1 BORING 11-1-93 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0214 Let JO® N0. 4 112 92 @OR1N0N0. • 8 1-93 OEOti:OG40 L00 (AFHic LOG S}tkci 2 OF 2 DISCONTINUITY 1.00 !TROD/ R RECOVERY TEST RESULTS 9.0 to 75.0 ft. GRAVEL, COBBLES AND 6RLDERS: • Sandy, slightly silty to clean, dense to very"dense, moist to wet, gray -brow Rivet Terrace Alluvium. SS- 5 - 80 - 80- 83 85 — 70- 75,0 0- DEPTH — FIET 75,0 to 90.5 ft. SILTSTONE: Cnicarlous, with thin gypsum and calclte stringers, small vuggs, hard, well cemented, gray and tan. Eagle Valley Evaporate. 80 — 85 — 90.5 to 94,5 ft. VOID: our oo g void in rock, little resistance to drilling 15.0 to 90.5• ft. SILTSTONE: 95 — Calcareous, with,thi,n gypsum and calcite stringers, smell vuggs, hard, well cemented, gray and tan. Eagle Valley Evaporate. 94.5 to 103.5 ft. CLAY: Red clay cavity tilling. 100 — 85 DRILL WATER CIRCULATION 98.5 to 99.0 ft. Poor 99.0 to 103.5 ft. Lost 70 50 95 100 CORING STARTED AT 81.0 ft. Run 1 Rec•. 1% ROD = 0% Run 2 Rec s 16% ROD = O% Run 3 Rec a 82% ROO = 45% 0 60 1O0 L 0! • 61 0 a 103 105 Total Depth 103,5 ft. 11111'1111) 0 50 100 Fig. A-2 BORING 8-1.93 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0215 DOIWA LOS jog NO. 4 112 92 PRO,CT Aspen Glen SHEET 1 Of 3 LOCATION See Fig. I BORING, NO. 8-2-93 nON �TH 127.5' ANGLE FROM MARINO OF HORIZONTAi. ANGLE BoRINO DEPTH OF 43' WATER TAIL D62111 Of OVERBURDEN DATE 9EG0N: 4-1-93 FueSl 4-4-43 0.0 to 10.0 ft. CLAY ANO GRAVEL: Nita scree cobbies, elediue* to Stiff low plasticity, moist to wet, red 0 Drown. Sinkhole Infilling. 5 10 10.0 to 27,0 ft. SANDY CLAY: Nlcn soft gravel, +Aadttrf to stiff, low plasticity. moist to wet, red - browe.S1hk11ol'e Infilling, TEST TS 13- 20 5- 20 - 25 - 27.0 to 98.0 ft. SILTY GRAVEL: wan some Conies, medium dense, moist to wet, brown. Sinkhole Infilling. 30 35 - 40 45 - DEPTH - FEET 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 SO 100 Fig, A-3 BORING 0-2-93 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0216 IRMO LO JOB NO 4 112 92 • 001001491i. 8-2-93 ..001N1itiUED SWEET 2 OF3 GEOLOGIC L00 GRAPHIC LOG DIRTY LOO % ROD/ R REC01r1;AY s0 TEST RESULTS 27.0 to 98.0 ft. SILTY GRAVEL: Nith sole.cobbles, medium dQnse, moist to wat, brown, Sinkhola 1nf1l ing. 55 -- 70- 73 .80 — 83- 90- 9S — 90.0 to 127.5 ft. SHALE: Carbonaceous with gypsum partings fissile, small vuggs, non- 300 cemented, black. 105 DEPTH — FEET s0 50 Or111 Water Circulation 90 10'1.0 to IGI.S rC. eid 109 Coring started at 102.0 ft. Run 1 Rec • 60% RQO • 50% 90 100 Fig. A-4 BORING 0-2-93 1 i The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0217 JC6N0. 4 112 92 ANG tiO. B•2-93 CONTINUED aas SHEET 3 CF 3 OEOLOO1C LOG GRAPHIC L00 DISCONTINUITY 1.00 X ROD/ X RECOVERY 98.0 to 127.5 ft. SHALE: u4rbbn4eeiOS wltn gypstm partingst5 ' fissile, wall vug9S, non- canAnted, black_ 110 TEST RESULTS 115 .. 120 125 — DEPTH — FET 105 110 115 120 125 Run 1 Ret • 60% RQD • 50% Run 2 Rec • 64% . RQD • 50% Run 3 Rec • 100% RQD ■ 100% Run 4 Rec • 100% RQD • 100% Run 5 Ree • 100% RIO .• 100% 130 — 135 — 140 — 145 L. 150 — 155 — 160 130 — 135 . — 140 —145 — 150 —155 160 Total Depth 127.5 ft. )1111J1111] O 50 104 Fig. A-5 BORING 3-2-93 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0218 -a COMM 1,00 JOS NO. 4 112 92 SHEET I OF PROJECT Aspen Bien LOCATION See Fig. 1 GROW.* TOTAL,106.5' DgPTN OF BORING N0, 0-5-93 ELEVATION DEPTH OVERBURDEN DATE ANGLE fn041 BEARING OF D PTN OF , BEGUN• 4 - HORIZONTAL. 90° ANGLE BORING WATER TABLE 40 FifilSf GEOLOgC LOG 0.0 to 2.0 ft. SANDY CLAY: Medium to stiff, low plasticity, moist to wet, red -brown. AND B0UCOE147- Sandy, slightly Silty to clean, dense to very dense, moist to wet, gray.brown. River Terrace Alluvia*, Fig. A-6 BORING B_5-93 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0219 1i09 NO. 4 112 92 90R1N3 NO. 8-5-93 CONTINUED ROMS 1.130 SHEET 2 Of 2 GWLOOIC LOC GRAPHIC 100 f DISCONTINUITY 1.00 TEST R TS 2.0 to 62.0 ft. GRAVEL, COBBLES AID BOuLUtha: sandy, slightly silty to clean, dense to vary douse, moist to wet, gray -brown. River Terrace Alluviums. 55 — 60- 62.0 to 70,0 ft. SHALE: Carbonaceous with gypsum partings, fissile, small vuggs, non-cementeg black. Eagle Valley Evaporlte. 70.0 to 88.0 ft. CLAY BRECCIA: Pine fb Medium Sized angular shale and slltstone fracgtyents in a clay matrix, non-cemented moderate plasticity. gypsum seams. gray to black. Cavity infilling, 7S.. go -- 85 85 — 86.0 to 100,5 ft. GYPSUM: Frissive, cbnvaiutea banding, gray to dark gray. Eagle Valley Evaporlte, 00 — 95 — 100 105 DEPTH — FET 50 OS 70 75' 45 104 105 Drill Water Circulation,. bb.0 to ILLS rt. hood Coring started at 85.0 ft. Run 1 Rec . 45% ROD 0% Run 2 Rec • BOX ROD • OT. Run 3 Rec + 100% RQO . 35% Run 4 Ren, : 50% RQO . 13% Run 5 Rec . 100% ROD . 86% Run 6 Rec > 83% RQO = 83% Run 7 Ree • 58% RQO , 58% % RQO/ —4 X RES:CARY 0 50 1 1.111 1 11111 Total Depth 106.5 ft. 0 '50 100 fig. A-7 BORING 8-5-93 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0220 RONDO 1.04 J08 NO. 4 112 92 PRO'ECT Aspen Glen SHEET' 1 OF 3. LOCATION Sae Fig, 1 GROUND TOTAL DEPTH Of 1308110 NO. 8-6-93 ELEVATION OEPTH 130.0' OVER09JRoi]a ' DATE ANOLE FROM OF DEPTH OF 39.5' BEGUN: 3-I9-93 HOI4iZONMONO 90° ANGLE d NO . WATER TAB F245341, 340_43 CEOLOCIC LOG GRAPHIC LOO DISCONTINUITY 100 Si ROO/ % RECOVERY 0.0 to 1.0 ft. TOPSOIL: siltynCr y, mod ratoty organic dark brown. 1.0 to Z.0 ft. SANDY CLAY: Hedium to stiff, tow plasticity, moist to wet. red -brown. to TEST RESULTS 2.0 to 86.0 ft. GRAVEL. COBBLES 15 .Nir BOULDERS; Sandy, siightly silty to clean, dense t0 Very dense, moist to wet, gray -brown. River Terrace Alluvitm. 20 — 30 — 35 — 40 45 Fig. A-8 80ON® 0.6-93 I The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0221 xe NA 4I1292 00040 MX 8.8.93 Cqy V3 SHEET 2 pr 3 GEOLOGIC L00 2.0 to 06.0 ft. GRAVEL COOBLES, sandy. slightly silty to clean. dense to very dense, mist to bet, gray -bran. River Terrace Alluvium. 6b 05 70 75 86.0 to 93.0 ft. WEATHERED SHA E: With angular gravel, co.. :s and boulders. very stiff, we brown. Colluvium. GRAPHIC 1.00 'RST RESULTS DISC0l1TINLISTf L00 DEPT - FEET 90 X RCO/ X RECOVERY SO es 70 75 93.0 to 100.0 ft, SHALE: `—Carbonaceous W111 gypsua partings, ftsstle, small vugg non -Cemented, black. Eagle Valley Evaporate. 100.0 to 102.0 ft. SELTSTOUE: Calcareous. wan thin gypsum and calcite stringers, small vuggs, hard, well cemented, gray and tan. Eagle Valley Evaporate, Drill Water Circulation 1OO.0 to 130.0 ft. Goad 90 9S 102.0 to 109,0 ft. CLAY BRECCIA: rine to medium slaw angu►ee shale and slltstone fragments . 100 Ina clay matrix, non-cemented, moderate plasticity, gypsum seams. gray to black. Cavity infl111ng, 105 Coring started at 106.0 ft. 100 Run 1 Rec • 100% ROD • 41% Run 2 Rec • 100% RQD • 01 103 Fig, A-9 BORING 0.6-93 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0222 6 • 1O 00,9 No, 4 112 92 B N0. 8-6-93 COPCiRrt1ID SHEET 3 or 3 OEM= C L0O GPAPH1C LOO 105 102.0 to 109.0 ft. CLAY BRECCIA: rine. to medlurtl sized angular shale and slltstone fragments'In a clay matrix, non cemented, moderate plasticity, gypsum seams, gray to black. Cavity Infilling. /110 OISCON11HUUTY LOO 0 X CO TEST RESULTS 109.0 to 112.5 ft. StLTSTONE; • t,alcareaus. with thin gypsum and calcite stringers, smell vuggs, hard, well cemented, gray and 115 — tan. Eagle Valley Evaporite. / 120 112.5 to 118.5 ft. SHALE: carDenaceou$ with gypsum partings fissile, small vuggs, non -cement , black. Eagle Valley Evaporate. 118.5 to 121,0 ft. SILTSTORE: caltar/out. with thin gypsum and calcite stringers. small vuggs, hard, well Cemented, gray and tan. Eagle Valley Evaporite. 121.0 to 130,0 ft. CLAY BRECCIA: Fine to median% sized angular shale and slltstone fragments to a clay matrix, non-cemented, moderate plasticity, gypsum seams gray black. Cavity 140 -- lnfliling. 125 143 150 — 155 160 OEPTI4 — F T 109 110 115 120 125 13o — 115 — 140 145 — 135 160 Run 3 Rec . 4111 RQD . 16% Run 4 Rec : 67% RQD 23% Run 5 Rec . 100% RQ0.60% Run 6 Rec . 100% RQD . 17% Run 7' Rec . 58% RQD . 0% Total Depth 130.0 ft. 0 90 100 Fig. A -In ANO 8-6-93 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0223 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0224 HYGROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS SIEVE ANALYSIS 24 NR 1471 45 MIN l4MIN, 80 MIN 19MIN.4MIN , 'MIN 100 70 11 U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR S ORAE 0 EN 4 0 00 '50 '40'30 '18 '0 '4 W' Y.• Ph" 3" 5"8" 8' 0 �s���■it�■■t�s�s��sa■tr=ss�rtraa■�i■a minkpappolamm•I■imm 111111r r 17 y 1 n OOS 0 ,1 i Lr1 f .019 .037 .074 .44' .247.12590 4.79 2 2,98 4.70 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS [ 1 1 [.1... 1 'LIII' 1 1 1 11 CLAY TO SILT SANO 2 FINE 1 MEOtUM IcoAREE GRAVEL %1 % LIQUID LIMIT SAND 18 °/, SILT AND CLAY PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF clayey sandy gravel HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 24 NR. YHA 148 MINUS MIN. 50 MIN. 19 M114.4 MIN. 1 MIN, 90 80 70 FROM U.5. STANDARD SERIES 19.4 38.1 . 78.2 727 52 GRAVEL FINE COARSE 1 11 % COBBLES 10 30 eoz 40 toSoz w Boring B-2-93 at 53' thru 62' SIEVE ANALYSIS CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS '100 'SD '40'90 '18 ca '4 4i' I',1' L 1 r 1 80 4' 70 43 4- 4. L IA, 20 10 -4 J - t L f Y L 1 4 1 1 r [ .DOS .009 .019 .027 .074 .149 .2971 590 1.19 f2 30 4.78 9,52 .42 2.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS 1 .001 .002 _1)1 1 9 1 I 11 1 114 F CLAY TO SILT SAND 1 [ 10 1 1142 1 1 [39.1 19.1 38,1 76.2 127 O;RAVEL FINE 1 MEDIUM 'COARSE GRAVEL 33 % LIQUID LIMIT SAND 65 5b SILT AND CLAY We SAMPLE OF gravelly sand 4 112 92 PLASTICITY INDEX FROM Chen Northern, Inc. FINE 1 COARSE IO 20 30 w b1 506 6a 5 70 60 90 100- 200 152 C088LES % Boring 3-4-93 at 108' thru 109' GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. B-1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0225 241 HR. 7 HR. 45 MIN 15 MIN 100 HYGROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 70 2 w 41 U 40 30 TIME A6ADINGS 60 MIN. 19 MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. SYANDARD SERIES '100 '50 •40'30 •16 •1p, l CLEAR SAUARE 141- 3` 5.8,. 6' 0 - .=•Iaa•a•M•r1Ma.a•�aao.. MiliMilli rMmnsul Wm •MI•. ••1 NIMMONS ••••PrMIwwaw m 1/w.migr•4 wwEA 010,00110•1Y0=MIInrrlltea. __•••I•••aaa•11•••IM. aMIIa•. ,iiimmo,.•a.r•aa..a.a•.... .rte arM.MI M.••r,wlaMI•IO•1111 minium. mmiUm MM••••••••w••••11rr.wM111 AIM/Mr mo•••• =MOM Mm•Mwl`A wwrmk iw a•I�I,IMOMI•O• gra w••••••M••Irw••••.•ar1•••M -M �•aa••w•Irr1.--•IM=I-MN= •••Ir•11••••r• MOM= -MItwr•rwr a�•a•••1111A•�••1��•r�� •I••••I1�.M•4•w••rr. ••w.•NI1••w•/1.- r aa�..�•.�Ma•••.a. ...1.111.10111111 01....1=1.11.• ..1=1••••=00. ••••1•1 pm. r+.••aw.w •Ia•M. •••rte. r•M••1••-M•••••.-inimoMM wrlr.rrw er•r•`wlw•r•Mrrer me Allnl IllYMwwirli1•I•.IM..a•..-�Mr-.Ma_I••MOMMOO ra•r •rwrrr•MMw.•a.MMIONIONNIO amon••Mrwr-•mm_ - - of NO r+r0•11•••0MO111111111.__••••M MIMawr••M_ r• • III0IMINI_r aa••.•a•1.r1MIN 111 aaMrIEM•111 •.•M•� a IOMml ,r.M .a r.0 raMa•r••11•.srllii M•rI.•�r:.aE ��••r•••rr M••�•rcirc r•iw +n. =MIN... a.•MM.•Mrrr•.•M• aaIM•a•Iar/a •••. mow •.I morrmmimrm,ra..a._MMrrr.ar 1.11101••�•�MrrMMONO=� arM••••••a w aM•�1•�'rami Mra•o• aMrrl�1•rMw --•I� ooaMI,0MMIMMI•M••Iiiiii1M/h•14•111•1•11NOMM•• MOM.••al11.11111••••alww a•i.��rr�MM•aMMS MMa•Mraaamoil•M••.m•,, aa•m.1 ••irmowMaala.arM�rMr.+ aaa� aaM.r ww•••I,�wa••tri�� �••r r1= •MMIMN•=OEM1 1.1111,4 ••••••1111111PM moill•••••1111111111111••1111•1••••••mm.MoMimo. mom anel•Ill101111MM•0401111 BMW mi oolol•Oleill no •�.•M��1� �•t••IMM rw••rrrrmilo r•NIiafall ••••w Ma�••.•��I�aMMr•M•ra� mi.•Sar•r_.. •ai __aaMr_r mg... MM __ 1111111,1.•.••MIaM,.�•.•••.•r-1111•11.1.01 rar•Mr•••MM_aonS•MMONo MIMEO. /M•u•!•ION..MOM= •r•••MMrM••o•rM••r _•i•rs__�a•r•M1 •.•rte_ Mr�.M�__ •r•Mrw�r���I_•r•�a.rrMraa••.I•rr11.MMMT r�'Marw.�_ 4MF Ma ri.•�NNIMI r.�-�. r••.M•1•M.a•,r•MrM•w .,M=••• M•�rMr�MrMA mm•m•MIIr.••IMII a•wla.r••....a•r..•wa-.fi. wooer. aa•r.MINa•awaa ••rMMw•Ira1..•• M•sl aMinnswM MMINIMI11011001111111~..ONIMMI••• =MINIM ftIMIM.• =Mime IIMMIIIIMINI MONO in aMIYy a•rr• r•rM•rw•,I. Mwma•a MEM. •• MrMr. m■mME.ma.•1••M.•••...••M.• ar•I� •11•M„ =MOM MOIMw..•nr.Iw.►. r.• •MMr ONNIM• r w rMMM�MrraMaa omorim __ a••=sen . ra�M••rwawr� 1.1111110 .•••.�- •r1.�II`•M►i-aM��--a••Y•�Mrsa,r.a �..�ow.-.wrlw. • arm. MMONMA =moos, r.M.M.a�a•M• a..a a MOM. OS aaa..rr.r�� >� •1•1•11Y•I•••Il fie. •M ■ I I.. •••a••••a• Y• ••.• M 1•••1.•• MS c. M• •i1 Mii• MMI.• •1 a.•um.= •wwl. ,a1.111•1111111 II 019 .037 .074 .14• •291 .590 119 2.3.9 4.76 +2 2.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS 19.1 31.1 , 702 127i62 CLAY TO SILT GRAVEL 69 % LIQUID LIMIT FINE SAND I MEDIUM !COARSE GRAVEL FINE I COARSE COBBLES SAND 25 % SILT AND CLAY SAMPLE OF sandy gravel PLASTICITY INDziX 6 % FROM . Boring B-5-93 at 7' HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 24 HR, 7 HR. 49 MIN.1S MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN 100 SIEVE ANALYSIS U.S. STANDARD SERIES '200 '100 150 '40'30 •f6 •�'8 •k' 4* ttt' 3" . S'6" CLEAR SOUAR$ OPENINGS 10 20 30 O 40Z SDS 60w 70 00 0 90 00 4 10 70 i c. U� 30 1 1 t 4 �3a J t_ 20 J i L L r r k- 60 10 001 .002 A..11li 1 1 1 1 A 1' 1 „ .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .211 .590 1.19 12.35 4.76 9.52 .t2 2.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SANG FINE I MEDIUM !COARSE CLAY TO SILT 4 1I2 92 GRAVEL 57 % LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE OF sandy gravel SAND 34 % Chen Northern, I nc. GRAVEL 7 ! 711 LI 1 35.1 16,2 127 200 90 100 SILT ANO CLAY PLASTICITY INDEX FROM FINE I COARSE COBBLES 9 % Boring 8-9-93 at 2.5' GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig, 8-2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0226 24 HR, 1 HR. HYDROMETER ANALYSIS jj SIEVE ANALYSIS TIME READINGS U.S_ STANDARD SERIES CLEAR S'OUARE iiOENtNGS 45 MIN 15 MIN. 00 MIN. 14 MINI MIN 1 MIN. -200 '100 'S0'40'30 '16 11.8 h' Y:' I'1" 3" 5'6" 0' 100,' - - •z _ i c 10 r0 00 CL so 2 41 (Ci 40 a 30 10 r Lr 10 1 _ f' 20 t I , { 7 r i— i 1 1 F a 1 r' 602 4- 1 J6 4 L t- .002 93 4- • 8 .005 .009 „DID ,037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.38 ' 4.76 982 19.1 36.1 , .42 2.0 76.2 127152 29P DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO 514.7 GRAVEL 58 LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE OF FINE SAND I MEDIUM jCOARSE ORAVEL FINE I COARSE C0S8LES SAND 33 4S SILT ANO CLAY °b PLASTICITY INDL•X 91 sandy gravel FROM Boring B-12-93 at 44 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 24 HP. 7 HP. 15 MIN./5 MIN, 80 MIN. 19 5074.4 MIN 100 1 MIN. '200 SIEVE ANALYSIS U.S. STANDARD SERIES '400 '50 '40'30 '10 ioe 7 1 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS '4 fi' 11' 1'h" 3" • 5,6, 0 t0 20 7 90 L 80 70 13 3 o40 30 20 10 Q01 .002 .005 t J - 4 4j- 1- , r .009 r r 1 1 1 7 11 I l _ I i 11, k _1 r. 111117 019 .037 974 .149 .291 090 1,19 12.38 4.78 ,42 2.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS 952 15.1 30,1 76.2 127 152 60 40 100 200 CLAY TO SILT SANG GRAVEL FINE J MEDIUM COARSE FINE 1 COARSE GRAVEL % SAND % SILT AND CLAY LIDUIO LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF FROM Nr .ly C088LES 4 112 92 Chen Northern,[ne. GRADATION TEST RESULTS 1 Fig. B-3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0227 Chen-)" .hern, Inc. 1- 1— >- 1 Ina - 1— Ib CC as 4'c Cc 03 A g 61 - 61 M us I e • in u (Ar r a ft (weathered siltstone I 1111 1 liEor .e yyip� 11! II CO LIO 25 34 1 33 d K .-. Cr) CT t•••• CO igli w.. i N 1 01 m o N N •--• w d Mrm t► 4 - 7 1 N ILO kr) t17 al O .-. CD LID o $ r O ® 01 I r- I CO OM1 1 N t CO in Cr) I M I CO in cot t d 1 CO in CT 1 IIT 1 OC• in t f-. 1 CO 01 i 01 I CO M 01 r I CO M Oi CV v -- 1 CO The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0228 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Construction Plans Note on Tab # 8 — Final Construction Plans for The Sages at Aspen Glen are submitted in full size with this application. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0229 The Sages at Aspen Glen FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHEET INDEX C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 COVER SHEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE ROAD DETAILS WA TER AND SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE MASTER SHALLOW UTILITY PLAN UTILITY DETA/LS EROS/ON CONTROL RETAINING WALL DETAILS GENERAL WA TER/SEWER NOTES: 1) THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ALL KNOWN UTILITIES (WATER, SEWER, GAS, PHONE, ELECTRIC, CABLE, ETC.) ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITY OWNERS TO VERIFY BOTH LOCATION AND DEPTH OF UTILITIES BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROTECTION OF UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR UTILITIES LOCATED BUT NOT SHOWN IN DRAWINGS. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A FIVE AND ONE—HALF (5X) FOOT MINIMUM DEPTH COVER. /F GRADE CONFLICTS OCCUR WITH EXISTING UTILITIES OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS, THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN GRADE CAN BE VARIED PROVIDED THE 5 1/2 FOOT MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER IS MAINTAINED. ALL MECHANICAL COUPLINGS REQUIRED FOR THE 77E—INS TO THE EXISTING WATERLINES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THESE SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS PART OF TIE—/N TO EXISTING SYSTEM BID ITEM. 4) ALL FITTINGS (BENDS, CROSSED, PLUGS, VALVES AND TEES) TO HAVE A CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE THRUST BLOCK TABLE SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET FOR CLARITY'S SAKE, ALL THRUST BLOCKS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON THE PLAN VIEW DRAWINGS. MEG—A —LUGS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR CONC. THRUST BLOCK UPON ENGINEER APPROVAL. 5) FOLLOW ALL CDPHE (COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT) REGULATIONS FOR WATER AND SEWER LINE CROSSINGS. 6) THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING ANY DISTURBED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 7) ALL REMOVED WATER LINE APPURTENANCES TO BE SUPPLIED TO OWNER. 8) THE WATER LINE LOCATION SHOWN UTILIZES JOINT DEFLECTION. (A MAX OF 3° PER JOINT) 9) THE SEWER MANHOLES SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE STEPS WITHIN THE MANHOLE AND MANHOLE RIM LOCATION BY A BLACKENED CIRCLE. THIS WILL BE THE REQUIRED LOCATION FOR EACH MANHOLE SHOWN. 10) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE GRADE OF ALL EXISTING SEWER LINES BEFORE INSTALLING ANY PIPE TO VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS. CONTACT ENGINEER WITH ANY DIFFERENCES IN ELEVATIONS SO THAT GRADES CAN BE ADJUSTED. 11) CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL MISCELLANEOUS UTILITIES THAT WILL CROSS OR PARALLEL THE LINE PRIOR TO INSTALLING NEW LINE. /F GRADE CONFLICTS OCCUR, CONTACT ENGINEER SO THAT GRADES CAN BE ADJUSTED. 12) PLAN VIEW DISTANCE BETWEEN MANHOLES /S CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE OF MANHOLES. PROFILE DISTANCE AND SLOPE BETWEEN MANHOLES /S FROM INVERT OUT TO INVERT IN OF MANHOLES (CL. TO CL. MANHOLE DISTANCE MINUS 1/2 INSIDE DIAMETER OF EACH MANHOLE). ALL KNOWN SERVICES WHICH TIE INTO THE EXISTING MAIN ARE SHOWN. ANY SERVICE WHICH /S NOT SHOWN BUT TIES INTO MAIN SHALL BE REPLACED AND TIED INTO NEW MAIN. 14) REPLACE ALL DISTURBED ASPHALT WITH 3 1/2" ASPHALT AND 8" CL. 6 BASE COURSE. ALL ASPHALT WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED WITH A LAYDOWN MACHINE. 15) ALL WATER SERVICE ARE TO BE 1 " DIAMETER. 16) ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH RFW&SD STANDARDS. SGM 118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Project Engineer David M. Kotz, P.E. 29961 Owner: Gerd Zeller Po Box 37 Aspen, Co 81612 (970) 948-1221 NUM— BER REVISION JOB NU 2008-361 Final Plat 8/24/16 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0230 -C1-GP.dwg 3/4/2009 2008\2008-36 30 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. 120 ASPEN LEN LF C BEGIN REL OCA TION OF CONCRETE GOLF CART PATH. MATCH EXISTING TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVA TION N 8729.28 E 2732. 72 REL OCA TED ALIGNMENT 8' CONC CART PATH 70.7 78.00... THEME FENCE SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS IN ROADWAY ARE MEASURED TO THE FLOW LINE UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. / EARTHWORKS: / 7650 - • E END R GOLF C TOP OF 0 VERFL OW TO DEPRESSION ON GOLF COURSE L OCA TION OF CONCRETE RT PATH. MATCH EXISTING ONCRETE ELEVA TION N 7770.47 E 2963.48 CONCRETE TRENC DRAIN OR INVERT PIPE S DIRECTED BY /OLF COURSE CONCRETE GOLF CART PATH TO REMAIN .76 i RETAINING WALL SEE SECTION SHEET 8 END REL OCA TION OF CONCRETE GOLF CART PATH. MATCH EXISTING TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVATION N 7454.63 E 3140.07 END REL OCA TION OF CONCRETE GOLF CART PATH. MATCH EXISTING TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVA TION N 7509.63 E 3105.29 BEGIN REL OCA TION OF CONCRETE GOLF CART PATH. MATCH EXISTING TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVA TION N 7666. 78 E 3018.98 EXIST. CONCRETE GOLF CART PATH TO REMAIN CUT = 3,166 C.Y. FILL = 4,579 C.Y. (FILL)4,579 x 1.15 (SHRINKAGE FACTOR 15%) = FILL = 5,266 C.Y. NET BALANCE = 2,100 C.Y. FILL (BASEMENTS NOT INCLUDED) RETAINING WALL SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 FO 70.-90.-.. 1: 1 ."TEMP .. SLOPE 69:12 r;RADE.JSL.ANr? ' ER LANSCAPE LANS 72.83 H.P. 3 �__ ���g moniammtpmprx_82.07 :4, ... X4.78 79.7.4 " . X ... ®. ... .... FO FO FO ........ ......... � x� 109 FO FO ..................:::::: 101!rour . FO CLF CART TO TIE ONSTRUCT EXIST G�O F ART PATH PER ASPEN GLEN GOLF COURSE DIRECTION. (APPROX. 40 L.F..±) CONSTRUCT GOLF CART CROSSING ACROSAY PER AS BALD EN GLEN AGOLF GLE WCOURSE 77E NEW CART PATH INTO PROPOSED CURB RETURN, PROVIDE CURB CUT TO MATCH NEW CART PATH MATCHING FLOWLINE N 7329.17 E 3202.43 APH,SP EDS' (2.4R2-2) 7266 05 .-• EMO VE/EXIST. CONCRETE GOLF. CART P STALL STO. 3........... -.. ...................... ..84 76T B a "aft ..... ........... • .............. ININ •8598 T.B. 6085. ........ ........ X 83.70 LEGEND 5810 PROPOSED CONTOURS 5810 EXISTING CONTOURS PROPERTY BOUNDARY LOTLINE ROAD CENTERLINE BUILDING SETBACK UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT X X PROPOSED FENCE x x EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED C&G EXISTING C&G 0 N8"W E8"W ETCG N8"S E8"S SS WS PROPERTY FLOWLINE EXISTING FLOWLINE EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE PROPOSED 8" WATER LINE PROPOSED 8" WATER LINE PROPOSED ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, CABLE, AND GAS PROPOSED 8" SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER LINE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER ET XXXSF EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER PROPOSED WATER VALVE EXISTING WATER VALVE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SIGN LIGHT POLE SURVEY CONTROL POINT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING STORM INLET DRAINAGE BOUNDARY DRAINAGE AREAS SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER ENGINEERS1 SURVEYORS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 18 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 THEME FENCE SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS 1 ..... 0-I I SII 72. 72 s / / lFnd. Survey Monument Red Plastic Cap Stamped LS75710 / N 7318.67 E 3163.17 ELEV 6072.99 Fnd. Survey Monument TB.M=6073.6' Top of Red Plastic Cap I Stamped LS75710 N 7315.10 E 3150.94 ELEV 6073.60 SUBDIVISION THEME WALL SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PROVIDE 3' STEM WALL TO PROTECT FROM DEBRIS FLOW PER GEO TECH REPORT EXIST INV 6079.6 NOTES: 7. A TEMPORARY OVERALL MASS GRADING SCHEME IS SHOWN. ACTUAL LOT GRADING WILL BE PHASED LOT BY LOT 2. TEMPORARY SLOPE OF 7: 7 ON LOTS 7-7 UN TIL BUILDING CONS TRUC TION. THEN 3: 7 SLOPE TO BE CONS TRUC TED. J. OWNER MAY CHOOSE TO CONSTRUCT 3: 7 SLOPES OR FLATTER PER ROAD SECTION SHEET C3. 4. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR CUL VERT AND INLET GRADES. THE GES AT ASPEN GLEN NUM- BER 1 REVISION DATE BY FINAL PLAT 8/24/16 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN Job No. 2008-361.001 Drawn by: JJL Date: 01/06/09 cl QC:RM KW IPE: File: Sages -C1 -GP. dwg JM OF C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0231 NUM- BER REVISION DATE BY 1 FINAL PLAT B/24/16 a N h 1 cN -361 Sages\Dw SEE SHEET C1 FOR CART 7 PATH RELOCATION rrl II PROPER TY L ;NE NOTE ALL WORK TO BE FIELD COORDINATED WITH ASPEN GLEN CLUB 0 co d'�O - -l`+KT PATy BEGIN LEFT X -SL OPE TRANSITION TO MATCH BALD EAGLE WAY STA 8+14.52 12.17L O SZ:/ 8s?S III X27" CURB & cR co fr) LOco Q c•/ / v 70.7 78.00 I• ' • ... -•. •7.8.501 �= . A. ,... ' S L.._ Q1-.... ••77;57.- ••••• :.3'. ... :VALLEi•.;• 6065 ................•....'• N ......•• (0 -•... ................................. Z o . 6065 -� `" p •. Z N ' ..... II N '`K (f) I 11 ..................... ...... .5' UTILITY 65.42 • •� 65.88 65.49 EASEMENT 65.78 65.67 - .. BE (.OPET •-.71.20 ALL -ROA- ALIO NT •.:_ N 7898,49,•. 16.7.0.. 4' VALLEY PAN ALL/SON ROAD EXIS7/ING CURB AND II GUTTER 30 RE A NG WALL \ S CTION SET 8 atA-PUsIC fiCALE 15 30 60 120 ( IN 1 inch EET ) = 30 ft. ,c)/y% A:'W / TURN AROUND P \SEE DETA G WALL SEE DETAIL SHEEN 71.35 / Qom,c>TYP. BLD. EN VELD E x��� ............................ o ?,fig -..... • 4 STA: 45 8 � i FSET. 43.5 ciptims- X71.06 ............................... � O> ........................ ::.:::::::.::::::::....... ........-608 / 'SA N CUT AND REMOVE 1 8 11. 31 L.F. EXISTING CURB d ck GUTTER & 2' STRIP OF ASPHALT REPAVE ASPHALT SACK TO NEW CONC. PAN / '\END ALL/SON RD A N 7283.19LIGNMEN T E 3183.27 4' VALLEY PAN CREATE HIGH POINT FROM C/G TO VALLEY PAN TO KEEP BALD EAGLE WAY DRAINAGE FLOW FROM ENTERING ALLISON ROAD BEGIN RIGHT X -SL OPE TRANSITION TO MATCH BALD EAGLE WAY STA 8+01.65 12.178 NOTE.' ALL ELEVATIONS IN ►� ROADWAY ARE MEASURED TO THE FLOW LINE UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. 1.71.86 3 ......................... ---•6Oa_ ............... ............. . 85 98 T. B. - ........ 085• 83.70 6090 6080 / 6060: DATUM ELEV 6050.00 O N PVl STA = 1+66.73 PVI ELEV = 6072.37 A.D. = 2.78 K = 26.98- : 75' VC N• .\ EVCS: 2+04,23 ..VCE: .6071:92 • FIN/SHED GRADE h W W Z -1.22% LOWPOINTELEV = 6069.87 LOW- POINT STA = 3+84.05 PV/ STA = 3+81.87 BVCS 3+59.87 PV/ ELEV = 6069.75 A.D. = 2..22 K = 19.82 44' VC co v m EVCS: 4+03.87 EVCE: 6069.97 B VCS: 5+ 04.38 1.00% -2502 HIGH POINT ELEV = 6071.08 HIGH POINT STA = 5+2581 PVI STA = 5+41.88 PV/ ELEV = 6071.35 A.D. _ -3.50 K = 21.43 75' VC B VCE. 6070.97. LOW POINT ELEV = 6068.67 LOW POINT STA = 6+74.13 PV/ STA = 6+99.13 PV/ ELEV = 606742 A.D. = 7.50 K = 20.00 150' VC HIGH POINT ELEV = 6072.68 HIGH POINT STA = 8+18.68 PV/ STA = 8+10.11 PV/ ELEV = 6072.97 A.D. =i -700 EVCE: 6070.41 B VGE.• • .6069.29. . EVCS: 7+74.13 . N K = 5.71 40' VC B VCE.• 6071:97 ENCS: 8+30.11 -2.Oiq / 15" CMP _ INV 6067.11- EXISTING GRADE 18" CMF' \__.- INV 6065.55 EX. 30" CMP - INV 606562 +/- • VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION . EXISTING. CENTERLINE ELEVATION FINISHED CENTERLINE ELEVATION . CURVE TABLE • . CURVE .RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD. BEARING DELTA 01 150.00 12.22 6.1:1 12.21: 531'45'11"E 4'401'00" C2 :32.83 99.00 519.65 6553 . S30°28'181- 172°46'12" 03 150.00 12.31 6.16 368.17 N31 214'07"W 4'4209" C4 :63.50 7264 40.88 68.751 S62 09 23 E 65'32'41" C5 .64.50 ............................................... 76.88 43.75 72.41. N60.46 '54 "W 687 7'41 " C6 114.50 2.4.66 12.38 24.61. N20 27'50 "W 12°20'26" • LINE TABLE • LINE : LENGTH 1 BEARING L1 34.50 - S55 54 '49 "W L2 38.59. . . - . .S6308 36"W - L3 22.69 1 N1477'37"W • SCALE: -30' HORZ = 5, VERT 6082.5 CO 6076.64 6075.4 6075.44 6072.3 60 74. 24 6070. 1 6073.12 6069.2 6072.32 6069.5 6071.85 6069.3 6071.48 6068.5 6071.11 6067.8 6070. 75 6067.4 6070.38 6067.6 6070.02 6067.4 606 9. 88 6067.5 6070.13 6068.1 6070.43 6068.7 6070.73 6068.7 6071.02 606 9. 1 6071.03 6069.3 0 O Co N �� 00 COcoCO � O COCo 6069.15 6067.5 6068.72 6066. 1 ed O "7 N CO 6069.19 6 06 9. 3 6070.11 6071.2 60 71. 46 6070.5 6072.61 0+00 0+60 1 +20 SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS 1+80 2+40 3+00 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 18 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 3+60 4+20 4+80 TIIR SIGES AT ASPEN GLEN 5+40 6+00 6+60 7+20 7+80 8+40 ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE 6090 6080 2' STRIP OF ASPHALT FOR MATCHING NEW VALLEY PAN 6070 6060 Job No. 2008-361.001 Drawn by: JJL Date: 01/06/09 C2 OC: Kw PE: JM File: Sages -C2 -RP. dwg OF C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0232 :28 PM MST 0 I:\2008\2008-361 Sages Dwg O 1—Pre/iminary Sages—C3—RD. dwg i 50' UTILITY & ACCESS EASEMENT 11.50' 2.50' 11' 11' 2.50' 2.50' 6.00' W ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND CABLE TV EASEMENT 3.00' _ GAS lRRIG Tht TYPICAL 27" CURB & GUTTER ON MIN. 2" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE �O OO OO 29 3 1/2" ASPHALT 2% iiiiiiiiiiii/II/AMMAIMIAiiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii /. 16" CLASS 1 AGGREGATE COMPACTED SUBGRADE SEE ASPHAk T / CONCRETE CONNECTION DETAIL ON THIS SHEET 0000,(3/,'2P 0000 8" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE EASEMENT GAS (DEPTHS PER UTILITY CO.) 3V TYPICAL 27" CURB & GUTTER ON MIN. 2" CLASS' 6 AGGREGATE TYPICAL 27' ROAD R.O. W. CROSS SECTION 15.50' NOT TO SCALE NOTES: ALL FILL MATERIAL AND A MINIMUM OF 6 FEET OF SUBEXCA VA TION (AS IDENTIFIED ON TEST HOLES AND FIELD VERIFIED BY GEOTECH) MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH SUITABLE IMPORTED AGGREGATE MATERIAL (PI TRUN) PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CLASS 1 AGGREGATE MATERIAL. ENG/NEER AND SOILS ENGINEER SHALL VER/FY FINAL STRUCTURAL SECTION AND THE COMPACTION OF SUBGRADE PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF CLASS 1 AGGREGATE. REFER TO PLAN SHEETS FOR EXACT HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF GAS" ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, CABLE AND IRRIGATION LINES. SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE TYPICAL LOCATIONS. COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY OR LANDSCAPE COMPANY 2.50' ov ciiiui I cL LA. LMLIVI 2.50' 3'-6' 3.5' 6.0 3.00' / 2% IRR/G 3 1/2" ASPHALT 2% riEMMEEMOMMiiiiiir W - ••:o 0; "••• OoOo:••:•• - 00 00000°0 ,0 00 7 0 00 .0 O� O� C ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND CABLE TV GAS (DEPTHS PER UTILITY CO.) TYPICAL 27" CURB & GUTTER ON MIN. 2" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE r\//\/4\ 16" CLASS 1 AGGREGA TE COMPACTED SUBGRADE .600b 01 .• o.. 0 — o •o So So �'• o O�O�O�O0 8" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BALD BCL WAY CROSS SL CIION 27" MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 1/8'R 2" MIN. CLASS 6 AGGREGATE LEVELING COURSE SCALE: 1 1/2"= 1'-0" NOT TO SCALE, FOR REFERENCE ONLY EASEMENT 20' UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENT 10'-20' TYPICAL 27" CURB & GUTTER ON MIN. 2" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE EXISTING GROUND ROUND (TYP.) GRASSED 7' MIN. 4'-0" TYPE A SWALE _7 s.3 MAX. (VARIES) 3' 3' 4' SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0 EASEMENT FADED SECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONL Y 34' R. 0. TYP 27" C&G 8.25' 8.25' TYP 27" C&G - v U�ov �,O..O�o °� - °00 u- 4"" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE 4' VALLEY PAN DETAIL 1'-6" SCALE: 1?2"= 1'—O" 1'-6" 0(00 000'0 s, r 0 ,090 000o ODoOO O� /. NDN% 4" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE 3' VALLEY PAN DETAIL SCALE: NO SCALE 0000 Orf),, G NN/ /\ 4Z -6X 2Z 2% GRA V. SHDR. 2' 2% 12' 4' 4' f4" ASPHALT 2% GRA V. SHDR. 3z OWiWiWeWiWiM WS 'a Va ratali ilatiiffiV r n ra WiWSWIRWig W.WO'WiW CLASS 6 BASE COURSE 12" CLASS 3 SUB BAS 2- 1 CURB/GUTTER OR VALLEY PAN ilRAISE ASPHALT 3/8" MINIMUM ABOVE ALL CONCRETE EDGES, PROVIDE CLEAN, SMOOTH FINISHED EDGE OF ASPHALT. TYP. ASPHALT/CONCRETE CONNECTION COON l Y ROAD /709 I YPICA l ROAD SI- C 110N SCALE: 1" = 5' FOR REFERENCE ONLY MEDIAN 34' R.O.W. SCALE: 1" = 1'-0 24.83' LANDSCAPE AREA TYP 27" C&G 8.25' 8.25' TYP 27" C&G \ \ :r ii��.'�'!i�Zr�!e,Zi- ��Z.r-7.. `.i.�i_;Y!�;Zi_g7�7f;7��!i��!.-Y!rZ.e=7.'.Y�s:.7���i+•�!. �r$r=7�_7�;�r�_.i+��-tip... .w�.w�w�w w• w w w w w w• w w w .,r��w�w�_w.�w.�w�w�w.rw,�w .w w w w w w w w w w w• w�w�.w�w �'��y.a'i-Xi-yi-=r�rY- .,Y x -Y _:r_ 1 r -•r_ �._r _y y- . Yr-Y.-�.yi-=rXi-�'-'y�':�'�'- •e�e�e�e�e���eQef��l��e�e�e�e�e�e���e�e��c a a a a a a a a a a a a a o a a a 8" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE SLOPE CONCRETE 1/2" TO MATCH ELEVATION OF GRATE �B 16" CLASS 1 AGGREGATE DIAGONALLY SLOTTED GRATE SEE NOTE /2 (DOUBLE INLET ONLY) TOP OF CURB FLOWLINE B PLAN TOP OF CURB LIP OF GUTTER R/M/FLOWLINE ELEVA TION AT CENTERLINE OF GRATE AS SHOWN ON PLANS 6" MIN. 8/8 WELDED WIRE MESH 4" \ COMPACTED SUBGRADE 2% 2% • ,,,,,,,, ,.,i i i i i,_i i i i i i i_,i i i w,i,_i i,i`_•:•.•;••;•:•;•;•.•;•;,, �,�,,, 'PTiFIWPOW/OVIip Wrap 8/1 D 1-11G1 I- V1/wI Y Val - DI N CROSS Cl- C / ION NOT TO SCALE, FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOTES: 1) FRAME, GRATE & CURB INLET TO BE CASTINGS INC. 1FG32460DOCl. 2) FRAME & GRATE SHALL BE ASPHALT PAINT—DIPPED BY MANUFACTURER. 3) PRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS (/3 REQUIRED) SHALL BE GROUTED IN PLACE. 4) PIPE ENDS ARE TO BE TRIMMED FLUSH WITH THE INTERIOR WALLS. END SECTION (WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS) DEPRESS GRATE 1/2" BELOW FLOW LINE PRECAST CONC. BASIN TOP OF CURB 0 R/M/FLOWLINE ELEVATION AS SHOWN ON PLANS TOP OF BOX 1' ROUT PIPE IN PLA BOTTOM OF BOX AS SHOWN ON PLANS SECTION A A DRAIN INLET N.T.S. 4" �—a 24" 2'-8" 4„ PIPE SIZES, LOCATION & INVERT ELEVATION AS SHOWN ON PLANS SECTION B -B 1/2"10x3" LONG BOLT W/ NUT TO MOUNT S.S. ANGLE TO BAFFLE (TYP. OF 4) INSTALL A NEOPRENE GASKET BETWEEN BAFFL & CONC. WALL DRAIN INLET STORMWATER BAFFLE TO BE A HALF SECTION OF PVC PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL, SIZE PER TABLE PLAN 16" CLASS 1 AGGREGATE COMPACTED SUBGRADE FRONT 20' UTILITY AND ��- ACCESS EASEMENT 8" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE 1/2 "`x3" STAINLESS STEEL WEDGE ANCHOR BOL T, (SHOWN HIDDEN TO REVEAL 5/8"x1-3/4" SLOT IN ANGLE) (TYP. OF 4) HEIGHT OF BAFFLE - EQUALS "D" + 4" CENTERED ON PIPE DRAIN INLET 3 "x3 "x 1/4 " S TA /NL ESS STEEL ANGLE, 3" LONG W/ SLOT CUT INTO ANGLE FOR MOUNTING, BOLT ANGLE TO BOTH P.E. PIPE & CONC. WALL. (TYP. OF 4) EA SEMEN T PIPE DIA. = 0" SIDE STORMWATER QUALITY INLET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE W GEOTEXTILE OR IMPERVIOUS LINER D50 AS SPECIFIED n 1.5x050 H 1 RIPRAP OUTLET SWALE NOT TO SCALE 10" MIN. DEPTH FROM BOTTOM OF BAFFLE TO BOTTOM OF INLET BOX SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 18 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 THE SA GFS AT ASPEN GLEN NUM— BER REVISION DATE BY 1 F/NAL PLAT 8/24/16 ROAD DETAILS Job No. 2008-361.001 Drawn by: JJL Dote: 01/06/09 C3 QC.'RM KW PE: JM File.: Sages—C3—RD. dwg `F C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0233 t/E INTO EX. /MANHOLE / RIM 6069.97 / INV /N 6062.02 EX. INV OUT 6061.72 / (FIELD VERIFY I NO STUB) END ALLISON RD ro ALIGNMENT 7283. 1 8"x90° BEND E N 3183.279 STA 8+2245 0/5 7.38'R 15.89 L.F. STA 8+23.68 0/5 23.24'R END DEFLECTION OF WATER LINE FSTA 8+30.95 RE oD. ASSEMBLY .17? L.F. 8"x6" TEE STA 8+25.15 0/5 46.75'R STA 8+25.39 0/5 64.34'R BEGIN DEFLECT/ON OF WATER LINE REMOVE EX. CAP, INSTALL 90° BEND, AND CONNECT TO EX 8" WATER. FIELD VERIFY FOR EXACT L OCA TION TOP ELEV 6070.39 STA 8+24.32 0/5 79.77R N 7310.29 E 3094.04 NOTE: VERIFY ETC LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAIN 5' SEPARATION NOTE LOTS 1- 7 WILL REQUIRE GRINDER PUMPS FOR BASEMENT SEWER 6080•..... ".. .:... ---FIRE HYD. ASSEMBLY STA••0+92.46 0/S._ 19.351 8"x6"• -TEE +9245 0/S 4.97'R • EGIN ALL -ROAD .. ALIG NT •.:: N 7898,49,-.. . E 2716.79, � /NS L TEMPORARY FIRE HYDR ACT FOR FU . ' CONNECTIONS 'TO, ASPEN RESERVE \0+59.3 30 0 15 S 5.48'L / GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING 25' fDAIAJArE `Ac AA7NIT PROPERTY LINE ZNOTE..° ALL WORK TO BE FIELD COORDINATED WITH ASPEN GLEN C lB VERFLOW TO D ON r COURSE 6T ANHOLE UN- III EX 30" CMP RIM 6064.30± I I 30" WV -W-60:59 .....• "'....."•'-••'.. 1 15' INV IN 6059.80 I F/ELD VER/FY 30" PR/OR III TO CONSTRUCTI�tY-........ 1 11 MH #2 00.33 0/S 7.68'L ........ --•403 L.F. 15" CMP 2.3Z W/.END SECTION DRA/N""/NLET #2 W/ QUAL/TY CONTROL"--- RIM 6069.62 INV /N 6067.00 /Nt&••0Ef7 5 ?5.3 81 ............. STA 3+83.79 O/S 13.252 RESSION '7 E --'A " GRASSED RIP RAP D5o=8" D=12" STA 3+83.79 0/S 115.91'L INV OUT 6061.45 2 PROVIDE 1' .0E - COVER E.R. 0 V.. DRAIN PIPE 8" GATE VALVE STA 4+66.33 O/5.6:03`R • INV OUT 60 STA V+ 8'x2 .5' &11.25. BEND TA 6+92.�� /S 4. 46 R 11JJ� 4 STA 6+92.57 0/5 FES INL.Er#4 W/ QUALITY CONTRO460 /NV 6065:44 STA 6+74.21 0/5 12.927.....••••.., 5.17 L.F. 18" 0MP•- ® 1.10% 8'x45 ° BEND i STA 5+56.64 0/S 5.97R MH #3 STA 15+54.59 0/S 5.571 SS INV. 66.47 STA:••2:¢83.01 TA.2+09.201. _ 0/S 2325 25.001 - - - - -- - -A'-NikeitAmix 30 60 •-. I MH --#1 • ... 0159.3Q 0%5••5.48'1-•..•.• 8'x45° BEND STA 0+50.81 0/S 5.66R 120 1 1 h = 30 \9\ eQvo \9\ /A 511 • .....::.... •......... WA TER L!NE... :... :::'-.::::::::::" ::: - ......... 6:080.:::::::: :: \9\ • WS STA 2+99.09. ........ SS INV""65.98..S•TA.--3+74.7' 0/ 25.00 L 2/S 23.25'L • SS lNV. 65.89 STA. 3+92.79 0/S 23.25'L WS STA.4+02.79 0/S 25.00'L S STA. 4+93.01 25.00'L WS STA. 4+4.9:12 OO�S.2500R li WS STA.3+26.31 ."" .. ••• " S INV. 6573 STA. 4159.18 0/S 27.89 R 0 .. - ....." • .................. DRA/N ............................. ..R/M •'6'06`9.62 /NSULA • T F 15" CMP /NV 6067.23........... • c�1":0q •"'•STA3t83:79 0/S 132 45 8 •608 "� r .... EIRE HYD. ASSEMBLY STA 4+69,320/5..19:48'R i 8'x6" --•TEE.... ' .". ........ ,.....•••STA".4+69.32 0/S 5;98 R• 9 WS STA. 4+73.82 1S 25.00 R PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (TO BE OBTAINED BY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) 8"x22.5* BEND -I 070/S5.53c O] '-..166. X58" CMP 6u' 6� livtlV 1����4����FES l',� 6� 1'" �0 DRAIN /N T #3 • RIM 6e•8.32 CNV 6065.66 A 6+74.00 0/S 13.25'R 22 L.F. CMP ns 1.0z I .• (ADD WA TER & SEWER SERV/CE • ".f /F REQUIRED FOR TRIPLEX) y.. -ETRE- 6085- ........... 085............. . ............. LJ «DI .-I (n :s W W w LU w e CO 6090 6080 • 8 CAP & PLUG w/TEMP HYDRANT TOP OF PIPE- 6073.00 FLANGE: EL - •607 .50 • 8" GATE VALVE TOP OF PIPE- 6072.89 8'x4.5' BEND TOP OF PIPE- 6072.35 6060: 9ATUM ELEV 6050.00 0 INSULATE WATER LINE EX. 30" CMP INV 6065.62 +/- • VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION . rn co 1113 • PV/ STA = 1+66.73 PVI.. ELEV = 6072.37 A.D. = 2.78 K = 26.98• : 75' VC : SVCS: 2+ 04 23 co FINISHED GRADE O v CI Z P29" LOW "POINT ELEV 6069.87 LOW. POINT STA = 3+84.05 • PV/ STA = 3+81.87 B PV/ ELEV = 6069.75 A.D. = 2.22 • K = 19.82 44' VC: B INV 6067 11 E 0 Cc) B VCS.• 5+04. 38 EXISTING GRADE HIGH POINT ELEV = 6071."08 HIGH POINT STA = 5+25.81 PV/ STA = 5+41.88 : PV/ ELEV.= 6071.35 • =3.50 K 21.43 75•' VC BVCE:. 607.0.97. S 5+ 79.38 W EVCE: 6070.47 v 1' LOW PO/NT ELEV = 6068.67 LOW POINT STA = 6+74.13 PV/ STA = 6+99.13 PVI ELEV = 6067.4.2 AD.= .7.50 K = 20.00 150' VC HiGH POINT ELEV = 6072.68 PVI ELEV := 6072.97 CO INV 6065. 55 • E.VCS• 7+74.13 EVCE; .6.071. 17 . . BVCS: 7+90.11 N 0 00 Cri EVCE: 6072.57 CO o Li 7 8 "x90° BEND TOP OF PIPE- 6067 19 CO INSULATE WATER LINE 8" GATE -VALVE TOP OF PIPE- 6064.02 8"x45° BEND TOP OF. PIPE 6063:51 8" PVC WA TER LINE TOP OF PIPE- 6064.06 BALD EAGLE 6090 INSULATE WATER LINE TOP OF PIPE- 6062 74 . EXISTING: CENTERLINE ELEVATION FINISHED CENTERLINE ELEVATION 77E INTO EXISTING MANHOLE STA 8+41.97 0/5 44.24Z RIM 6069.97 INV IN 6062.02 (SHOWN OUT OF ROTATION) 2' STRIP OF ASPHALT FOR MATCHING NEW VALLEY PAN 6070 1 6060 6082.5 ^ 0 O (0 6076.64 6 075. 4 N O r') N O (0 6074.24 6070.1 6073. 12 6069.2 50- 32 6069.5 ,� N o �p I) of c0 O (0 ;C 6 6068.5 6071.11 60678 - Nb N (0 O (0 6070.38 6067.6 UU/U.UL 6067.4 606 9. 88 6067.5 6068.1 6070.43 6068.7 N. IN� O 00 (0 O� (0 �, co ^ of 0 0 co 6077.03 6069.3 0 Cc, N 0 0 c 6069.90 6068.7 c 0 h N 0 0o �0 0(0 CO ^� ( Oo fr.) N cd 0 00 O (0C� in of O (0 6070.11 6071.2 6071.46 6070.5 c� r c- , 0+00 0+60 1+20 1+80 2+40 ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER I 18 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BU-EFE, CO (970) 349-5355 3+60 4+20 5+40 6+00 6+60 7+20 7+80 8+40 THE ES AT ASPEN GLEN NUM- BER REVISION BY 1 FINAL PLAT 13/24/16 UTILITY PLAN AND PROFILE Job No. 2008-361.001 Drawn by: 01/06/09 C4 RM KW PE. File: Sages -C4- UP. dwg JM OF C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0234 NUM— BER 1 REVISION DATE BY FINAL PLAT 5/24/16 8:20 AM MST 2008\200 30 0 15 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 60 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. I PEN LEN cG LF C SA WCU T, REMOVE AND REPLACE 5' WIDE STRIP OF EXISTING ASPHALT FOR PLACEMENT OF IRRIGATION SLEEVE 1-8" SLEEVE 5OLF SCHEDULE 40 PVC 30" DEPTH EXISTING 7.5' IRRIGATION EASEMENT co TA 7-/-36.•:52- q' LL ;—c 0 2EEVE 30LF SCHEDU/ _40-1P VC •... 30' DEPTH II II II II II I I •1........ 4 6065 ................... .� 5 6065 6080. 2 -. PROPOSE2 7 0AD ..... STA 4+9 INSTALL SLEE AS REQUI P.ER-I U•T t 1 - STA 5+01..7.1••••••••••• . / INSTALL 1-6" SLEEVE' - 71 ES ED 1.:. ES f END ALL/SON RD ALIGNMENT N 7283.19 E 3183.27 TIE INTO EX/STING ELEC, TELEPHONE, CABLE AND GAS. VER/FY DES/GN WITH UTILITY COMPANIES STA 8+28.14 O/S 15.57'R / U /TY EAS'MENT 77•;•;: ALL -'ROAD ALIO' •.iyT••.. N 7898.49..._ ''••._ 16.70.1 1 / • :......STA•..2+ 04O 27 35. r�?.::: - ..:INSTALL 1-6 SC IIE' / \9\ \9\ \g\ \g\ 4/ w \• \9\ 0 -9- e -9 FO -g e_ -g FO —9 —9 Fp —9 Fo --9 _-9 e .......0 09 —9— FO zz U —9 e —g Fp —y_ —9_ FO -9-- 9 -9- -y_ FO FO -9-- 9_ -9-- -9 FO FO -g .......................6085................................. .....................................................•• / ___- - ——• 0) w — e • ............................. •ai U oo X Lu FO a) FO SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS I CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER I 18 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 THP,7 E7 AT ASPEN GLEN FO FO FO -g _g - -9- g -g- - -9 IRRIGATION DESIGN SCHEMATIC. OWNER MAY USE POTABLE WATER FOR IRRIGATION. FO W cn Lu FO J) MASTER SHALLOW UTILITY PLAN co W FO / FO FO Job No. 2008-361.001 Drawn by: JJL Date: 01/06/09 C5 QC.•RM KW PE.• JM File: Sages—C5—MS. dwg OF C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0235 6.•57.•04 PM MST I:\2008\2008-361 Sages 1 Dwg 101—Preliminary \Sages—C6—UD. dwg EXISTING DIRT OR TOPSOIL AREA VARIES EXIST. ASPHALT TO BE SAW CUT TYP. //,\/&//`, DEPTHS AS SHOWN Ou` 4" MIN. r EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE SLOPE TRENCH WALLS FOR SAFETY PER CURRENT OSHA & COSH. REQUIREMENTS COMPACTED CLASS 6 AGGREGATE COMPACTION DENSITY OF 95% PER ASTM D698 CLASS 6 AGGREGATE COMPACTION TO 959 PER ASTM 0698 1) PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SHALL MEET EXISTING THICKNESS AND KIND WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUMS: ASPHALT SURFACING = 3" MIN., AGGREGATE BASE COURSE = 8" MIN. 2) BASE COURSE REPLACEMENT SHALL MEET EXISTING THICKNESS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUMS.: AGGREGATE BASE COURSE = 12" MIN. 3) D/RT / TOPSOIL PLACEMENT SHALL MEET EX/STING TH/CKNESS AND KIND WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUMS: 4" TOPSOIL. 4) SELECT MATERIAL AS FOLLOWS: 6" MAXIMUM SIZE IN TOP 12" OF BACKFILL 12" MAXIMUM SIZE IN REMAINDER OF BACKFILL TRENCH CROSS SECTION 4" OF POLYSTYRENE INSULATION (LOCATED ALONG SIDES AND ON TOP OF PIPE) SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-0' CONCRETE ENCASEMENT CENTER 1 FULL JOINT f WATER G SEWER 10' 10' Q COMPACTED NATIVE MATERIAL CONDITION /1: NEW WATER MAIN BELOW EXIST. SEWER MAIN HEAVILY COMPACTED IMPORTED OR NAT/VE MT'L OR LEAN CONCRETE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT IF EXPOSED OR DAMAGED CLASS 6 PER "TRENCH CROSS SECTION" INSULATION SECTION TRENCH WIDTH AS SPECIFIED NO SCALE SEE TABLE FOR AREA OF CONCRETE TO BEAR ON UNDISTURBED EARTH SECTION Q� MINIMUM THICKNESS EQUAL TO PIPE O.D. TEE 1/4" PLYWOOD OVER FACE OF PIPE DEAD END 90°, 45, 22.5, OR 17.25° ELBOW, HORIZONTAL OR BOTTOM OF VERTICAL SIZE (INCHES) ELBOWS TEES & ENDSED 90° (SQ. FT.) 45° (SQ. FT) 22.5° (SQ. FT.) 11.25° (SQ. FT.) 4 1.8 1.0 0.5 0 1.3 6 4.0 2.2 1.1 0 2.8 8 7.1 3.8 2.0 1.0 5.0 10 11.1 6.0 3.0 1.5 78 12 16.0 8.6 4.4 2.2 11.3 14 21.7 11.8 6.0 3.0 15.4 TABLE OF BEARING AREAS IN SQ. FT. TYP. CONCRETE REACTION BLOCK DETAILS SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS CENTER 1 FULL JOINT WATER �1 418" CONDITION /2: NEW WATER MAIN LESS THAN 18" ABOVE EXIST. SEWER MAIN 1) SEWER/WATER LINE TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE JOINT (18' MIN/MUM) OF C-900 PVC, DR -18 PIPE, CENTERED ON SEWER/WATER LINE FOR PERPENDICULAR CROSSING. FOR SKEW CROSSING'S, USE C-900 PIPE UNTIL HORIZONTAL SEPARATION EXCEEDS 10'. WATER / SEWER CROSSING WATER MAIN CORPORATION STOP & COUPLING 10' C❑ SERV/CE SADDLE W/ MINIMUM OF 2 STRAPS l''0 TYPE !C" COPPER SERVICE LINE (CONTINUOUS) 1 1/2" TELESCOPIC CURB BOX TYP. WATER SERVICE DETAIL CURB STOP & COUPLING TIE SERVICE TO BUILDING CONCRETE BLOCK TRAFFIC FLANGE FIN. GRADE ELEV. AS REQ'D PUMPER NOZZLE SHALL FACE ACCESS THREE PIECE ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX CONNECT AL VE TO TEL - EXTENSION(S) AS NECESSARY 6" FLxFL NON - RISING STEM GATE VALVE Z W Q BRICKS CONCRETE REACTION BLOCK ONC. BLOCKS PROVIDE TWO 3/4" GAL V. TIE RODS W/ EYE BOLTS 1/2 CU. YD. OF 1/2" COURSE GRAVEL DRAIN MATERIAL 7,. i SECTION B - B A WATERLINE GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE VAL VES AND BOXES ARE LOCATED OUT OF CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, FILLETS AND VALLEY PANS. 2. WATERLINE TO BE INSULATED AT ALL DRAINAGE PIPE CROSSINGS OR WHERE COVER IS LESS THAN 5'-6" AS SHOWN ON THE 'UTILITY DETAIL SHEET': LOCATIONS GENERALLY ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 3. COORDINATE FIRE HYDRANT AND VALVE LOCATION WITH OTHER MISCELLANEOUS UTILITIES 4. REFER TO 'SEWER AND WATER MASTER PLAN" FOR WATER SERVICE LOCATIONS. NOTES: 1. All bases shall be cast in place or precast concrete; use /4 rebar on 12" c -c both ways in poured bases. 2. Joint to be located on each side of all manholes, maximum of 24" from inside face. 3. Where available from pipe manufacturer, use expandable water stop or special sleeve as per manufacturer's specifications. 4. Steps to be located on side of bench or over upstream pipe. 5. Use Rub-R-Nek preformed gasket (2 layers) or grout in place between al/ bottom section, barrel sections, concrete grade rings, and top castings. 6. BackfilI within 24" of manhole: Class 6 aggregate or native materials with less than 3" size. 7 Precast rings or metal riser ring course shall be utilized where required with 2 courses minimum and 12 courses maximum (2 minimum, 12" maximum height). 8. Grade adjustment as follows: Greater than, or equal to, 1 foot, concrete barrel sections; less than 1 foot, concrete or metal grade rings. 9. Finish grade as follows: With asphalt or concrete pavements flush; with base course surface or dirt/topsoil -5" below grade. PRECAST ECCENTRIC CONE, 3' HIGH PRECAST MANHOLE BARREL PIPE LENGTH AS REQUIRED RUBBER 0 -RING OR FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SEAL. GROUT SEAL NOT ALLOWED. SECTION ELEVATION CONCRETE BASE CAST IN PLACE C.I. RING & COVER VERTICAL SIDE GROUT IN FIELD REINFORCED CONCRETE GRADE RINGS FOR FINE GRADING AS REQUIRED (6" WALL) 2/3 D SECTION A - A STANDARD MANHOLE DETAIL N.TS ROADBASE ASPHAL T ................................................. STORM DRAIN 4' MINI -4 ' MIN: %/�//moi, NEW WATERLINE NOTE: IF SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM DRAIN AND WATER LINE IS LESS THAN 4' USE INSULATION. INSULATION FOR WATERLINE (SEE INSULATION SECTION BELOW) ELEVA T/ON W,4 TERLINE/CUL VERT CROSSING MJxFL TEE OR SWIVEL TEE SEE CONCRETE REACTION BLOCK DETAIL NOTES: 1) ALL JOINTS FROM MAIN TO HYDRANT SHALL BE HARNESSED MECHANICAL JOINTS OR FLANGED JOINTS. 2) HYDRANT, VALVE AND FITTINGS TO BE 250 P.S.I. RATED. 3) POLYETHYENE WRAP SHALL COVER D.I.P. ASSEMBLY FROM HYDRANT BASE TO WATER MAIN. 4) ALL HYDRANT LEAD PIPING TO BE D.1. P. HYDRANTS TO BE PLACED 5' IN BACK OF CURB OR AS ORDERED BY ENGINEER. 5) FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION DETAIL SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 18 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 4" NO SCALE 20" 6" / / / 6" r o� " V won0°Oo° 4" 18" ® GRADE AT GUTTER LIP '-90 0�o ° c 0 00°0° 09°bnv9-;0, '-,o°) r ` 6" 4" 4" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE CONCRETE TRENCH DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2"= 1 '-0" WYE SADDLE, WYE FITTING OR EQUIVALENT 4" THICK CONC PAD AROUND BOX WHEN LOCATED IN GRASS OR DIRT DEBRIS CAP FINISHED GRADE DEPTH OF COVER 7 A 9i 4 ..V 4 4 47_ 1' THREE PIECE ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX 2" SQUARE NUT 4 4f G 4. .0 4 .4 1' GATE VALVE' 160 WIDE OVAL BASE BRICK TYPICAL GATE VALVE WATER MAIN N.T.S. NOTES: 1. IN LINE VALVES TO BE M✓ x MJ. DESIGN LOCATIONS OF VALVES ARE OUTSIDE OF CONCRETE, CURB/GUTTER AND VALLEY PANS. 2. INSTALLED VALVES WHICH CONFLICT WITH CONCRETE AREAS SHALL BE RELOCATED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3. THIS DETAIL DOES NOT APPLY TO HYDRANT ASSEMBLY VALVES. 4. OPERATING NUT EXTENSION SHALL BE PROVIDED PER DISTRICT REQUIRERMENTS AS PART OF THE VALVE ASSEMBLY 1) 2) 3) 4) 10' STEEL FENCE POST W/ FLAGGING OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE PLACE TRACER WIRE ONTO STEEL FENCE POST ABOVE AND LOOP ONTO END OF PIPE BELOW.E PLUG OR CAP 4" DIA. 2% MIN. STAINLESS STEEL PROFILE STRAPS (2 EACH SADDLE) IN-LINE WYE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. WYE SADDLE FOR OTHER SERVICES. BACKFILL UNDER WYE TO BE SCREENED ROCK OR CLASS 6 AGGREGATE, 95% COMPACTION DENSITY PER ASTM D-698. MINIMUM COVER - 5 FEET STANDARD SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL N. r.s. THF SA GES AT ASPEN GLEN NUM- BER REVISION DATE BY 1 F/N4L PLAT 8/24/16 UTILITY DETAILS Job No. 2008-361.001 Drawn by: JJL Date: 01/06/09 C6 QC.'RM KW PE: JM File: Sages -C6 -UD V` CB J The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0236 NUM- BER REVISION DATE BY 1 FINAL PLAT 3/24/16 :27 AM MST dwg 3/5/20 30 GRAPHIC SCALE 15 30 60 120 • -60j5.. ....... y..•. FEET ) inch = 30 ft. rrA LEN G LF -962' SIL T FEN 1 ' OFF OF Cc`J,UP STONE AND WIRE WATTLES "LACED AROUND DRAINAGE INLETS 's /0 • STONE AND W/RE WATTLE AROUND DRAINAGE.. -INLETS '6080•....: : `': A BALE CH !I K DAMS AC DA® 50' / RIVALS •; _ 6080•-:... ...... ....525' SILT FENCE / SILT FABRIC STAPLED TO POSTS / / STRAW WATTLES PLACED AROUND DRAINAGE INLET F =AREAS WITH GREATER THAN 1:5 SLOPE 24" MIN .x 6REx C6 SILT FENCE FABRIC ANCHORED IN TRENCH AND ATTACHED FIRMLY TO POST COMPACTED-) BACKFILL SILT FENCE SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS 42 f 24" MIN -POST (2" X 2" NOMINAL) SILT FENCE FABRIC ANCHORED IN TRENCH AND FIRMLY ATTACHED TO POST 6" x 6" i TRENCH 11 `�. 11=11=11 I11 1 1= 1E1 11- �I IIIIIII�,II 11 MEW- co 11=111 c Fo Fo Ro 4/ Fo ... .............fi - -- .....................:. .. ......608 109 FO - -n 11=111=1 11-11 I=1 CROSS-SECTION AA EROSION BALE PLACEMENT IN CHANNELIZED DITCH EROSION BALE DISTANCE SUCH THAT POINTS C AND D ARE OF EQUAL ELEVATION SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 18 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 -ISI-ISI I iiii=iii=111= *REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WHEN IT REACHES ONE HALF OF EXPOSED BALE HEIGHT I I I-1 I'-' I I1 PROFILE PO FO X :::::lam_ 61d8..... :: .. ■ ................... ....... . 6085........ • L J 342' SILT FENCE a, SUGGESTED SCHEDULE OF OPERATIONS PHASE / CLEARING AND GRUBB/NG 1 A. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND STRAW BALES FOR PER/METER SEDIMENT PROTECTION DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING WORK B. INSTALL 3"- 6" ROCK TRACK/NG PAD (30x50). 2. AFTER EARTHWORK (EXCA VA TION & EMBANKMENT) IS COMPLETED INSTALL SILT FENCE AND STRAW BALES ON WEST S/DE OF ROAD. 3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS AS NEEDED. 4. INSTALL HAY BALES IN SWALES AT 50' INTERVALS 5. INSTALL HYDRO SEEDING W/ MULCH ON DISTURBED SLOPES 1: 5(20Z) OR GREATER, AS SHOWN ABOVE IN THE SHADED AREAS. 6. CLEAN UP SITE. REMOVE SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSE OF CHEM/CAL SP/LLS IMMEDIA TEL Y. 7. SWEEP STREETS AS NEEDED. *THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONS/BLE FOR OBTAINING A STORMWA TER PERMIT FROM THE CDPHE PR/OR TO CONSTRUCTION FLOW EROSION BALES VFLOW P LAN THJE l._/L-7_ A /S AT ASPEN GLEN POINT A MUST BE HIGHER THAN POINT B U X w 00 w 00 e - e / / / PHASE 11 UT/Ll TIES 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR EXISTING SOIL EROSION CONTROLS FROM PHASE 1. 2. INSTALL UNDERGROUND UTILI TIES: SEWER, WA TER, IRRIGATION, STORM DRAIN AND DRY UTILITIES. 3. REGRADE DISTURBED ROAD SECTION AND INSTALL STORM WATER INLET FILTERS. 4. CLEAN SEDIMEN T TRAPS. 5. WATER SEEDED AREAS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN SEED GROWTH & REMOVE WEEDS. 6. CLEAN UP S/ TE. REMOVE SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSE OF CHEMICAL SPILLS IMMEDIA TEL Y. 7 INSTALL RETAINING WALLS (WASH OUT CONCRETE TRUCKS IN WASH PIT) 8. SWEEP STREETS AS NEEDED. PHASE III PAVING 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR EXISTING SOIL EROSION CONTROLS FROM PHASE l & 11. 2. PLACE A GGREGA TE BASE, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, (WASH OUT CONCRETE TRUCKS IN WASH P1 T). 3. REMOVE TRACK PAD, INSTALL ASPHALT PA VEMEN T. 4. REINSTALL INLET FILTERS. 5. INSTALL CURB CHECKS. 6. CLEAN SEDIMENT TRAPS. 7 WATER SEEDED AREAS AS NEEDED. 8. COMPLETE BUILDING PADS AND FOUNDATIONS (WASH OUT CONCRETE TRUCKS IN WASH P/T). 9. INSTALL A GGREGA TE FOR DRI VEWA Y ACCESS. 10. CLEAN UP SI TE. REMOVE SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSE OF CHEMICAL SPILLS IMMEDIA TEL Y. 11. SWEEP STREETS AS NEEDED. PHASE IV FINAL STABILIZATION 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR EXISTING SOIL EROSION CONTROLS FROM PHASE 1, ll, AND Ill. 2. REMOVE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT EROSION CON TROL S AFTER PERMA NEN T SEEDING & MULCHING HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED (SEE LANSCAPE PLANS). 3. INSURE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATING CORRECTLY AND ADJUST 7711/16 PHASES FOR ZONES. 4. SCHEDULE SITE INSPECTION FOR PLAN TING & PERMANENT SOIL EROSION CON TROL S. 5. TRANSFER SWWP PERMIT TO OWNER. *DEPENDEN T ON ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OPERA TIONS. EROSION CONTROL MAP I Job No. Drawn by: 2008-367.007 Date: QC. KW File: Sages -C7 -EC. dwg JIL 01/06/09 PE.: JM C7 OF C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0237 NUM- BER REVISION 1 ANAL PLAT BY 1:56.22 PM MST I:\2008\2008-561 Sages Dwg 01—PreliminarySages—C8—WD. dwg O0% II II II I •I. II 64.69 6065 DRAIN PIPE ON -PERFORATED) 65.42 5. 78 65.88 65.6 7 •..••0,4•Yb`Of•T..4 " DRAIN PIPE IN TC' 1NL•ET ••'"•' INV IN 606750 49 TW i�981.59 BW. -607 . 1\1-7989.86 E 2693.15 STA 0+52.81 4 0/S 15.25'R TW 6081.59 BW 6075.59 STA 0+85.59 0/S 15.25'R TW 6081.59 BW 6075.59 4" PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE 20 0 10 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 80 6090 6080 6070 DATUM ELEV 6065.00 oci 0 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. A '1+00.99 0/S.-1525'8- . T.W 6080.09 c -6074.09 STA 1+20.24 0/S 15.25'R TW 6078.59 BW 6074.09 STA ..1+51:38. ... 0S1525'R... TW 607559.., BW 6072.59 STA b+5.6: 99 15 86'8 71w•.6076.09 BW 6071:59.:....... STA 0.+62:421525'R • 680 •..... ..QW6077:59.....:: STA. 0+65.08 15.25'R TW 6079.09 w.. B.W 6071.59. STA -0+70.34 15:25,.. TW '6.080.59" B -W 607,3.09 STA 0+.7;559 1525.' TW BW 6073.09 TA 0+93.12 15.25 6082.09 STA 1+31.79 0/S 15.25'R TW 607709 BW 6072.59 BW_. 4 1+22.91 '7525'R W_ _ 6082 09... - BW 6 STA 1+3 STA 1+28.17 15.25'R TW 6080.59 .. 74 TW 6079.09 BW 6071.59 STA 1+36.06 15.25'R TW 607759 W 6071.59 6071.59 . • ..... STA 1+43.94 + 43.94 15.258...... . -TW.6074.59 8W 6071.59 .. ........... STA 1+38.69 15.25'8 608 _V BW 6071.59 1 RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ARE REDI-ROCK 41" BLOCK SERIES NON -REINFORCED SOIL WALLS WITH 41" WIDE BLOCKS HIGH POINT ELEV = 6072.77 N- 0 3.20*, / HIGH POINT STA = 0+93.12 PV/ STA . = 0+92.11 PV/ELEV = 6073.15 A.D. = -6.15 K - 8.12 50' VC EXISTING GRADE 2959 1 " _ - 30' .HORZ. SCALE' . . . . . \ 7 - 5 VERT. EXISTING CENTERLINE ELEVATION FINISHED CENTERLINE ELEVATION 0 FINISHED GRADE h co 0 o IN I\ 0 o 6072.13 6081.4 6072.76 6078.8 6072.33 6070.7 6071.45 6068.9 6070.56 6 06 71 o co 0 o 0+00 0+60 1+20 TURN AROUND ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS 1+80 6090 STA: 0+59.42 ELEV.. 6052.09 TURN AROUND STA -0+75.59 15:25'R STA: 0+51.72 ELEV.- 6080.59 TURN AROUND STA=0+70.34 75.25.' STA: 0+44.02 ELEV.- 6079.09. TURN AROUND STA =0+65.08 15.25'R. STA: 0+40.17 ELEV.. 6077.59 • TURN AROUND STA=0+62.42 75.25R 6080. STA: 0+32.47 ELEV.- 6076.09 TURN AROUND STA=0+56.99 15.86'R SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 1 8 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BurrE, CO (970) 349-5355 6070: TURN AROUND FINISHED GRADE AT FACE OF WALL STA: 0+4787 ELEV.. 6073.09 STA: 0+32.47 ELEV.. 6071.59 )- WALL STA: 1+28.72 ELEV.. 6082.09 TURN AROUND STA =7+22.97 15.25'R WALL STA: 7+36.42 ELEV.. 6080.59 TURN AROUND STA= 7+28.77 15.25'R STA: 0+4787 -'STA: 0+4787 . ELEV.- 6073.09 .ELEV: 6073.09 WALL STA: 7+44.12 ELEV.- 6079.09 TURN AROUND STA=1 +33.44 15.25'R WALL STA: 7+47.97 ELEV: 607759 TURN AROUND STA= 7+36.06 15.25'R WALL STA: 7+57.82 ELEV. 6076.09 TURN AROUND STA= 7+38.69 15.25R WALL STA: 7+59.52 ELEV.- 6074.59 TURN AROUND STA=7+45.94 75.25' STA: 7+59.52 -ELEV.. 6077.59 STA: 0+4787 . ELEV.. 6077.59 • DATUM ELEV 6060.00 0 0 SCALE.' 1 " = 30' HORZ 1 = 5, VERT. EXISTING CENTERLINE ELEVATION 6073.8 0) oo 0 0 6080.8 6082.2 6075.8 6 070. 4 0+00 0+60 1+20 FACE OF RETAINING WALL THE S GES AT ASPEN GLEN i Wall Height SETBACK = 1.25" (4.0° Batter Angle on Wall) Exposed Wall FINISH TO MATCH ASPEN GLEN STANDARDS 40.75" Ground Level 28" Top Block Note: Load Condition A Shown (No Backslope - No Surcharge) Ground Level I I -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -I I_I I -III -III -III -III -III -1 _I 1, 11111111111-1 I I1111111 I I1111111111111111 I 111 111 I I -1-1�1-III-1�1-1�1-1�1-1�1-1�I-1�1-1�1 1111111111111111 111 1 1-1111 11I= I I S III -III -III -III -I I I_I I I -III- � 1' 11-111=111=111=111 111-1 1- 11-I I -I I" Tui -' Blocks Forward During Installtion to Engage Shear Knobs (Typical) 1 I -1I1-1 III -III 1-111=1 111 11-1 1 111=111=I 1 I 11111111=1111 I =111=1 1=1-I I 1 I 1=11_ I_I I_I -11,;111 111 �1111111111i1111;IT- 1 - -II-II-1- 11 I- l 11-111-111 Crushed Stone Leveling Pad Typical Gravity Wall with 41" Blocks 36.00" 5.00" 5.00" 36.00" No Scale Y 41" Middle Block Free Draining Backfill to Extend at Least 12" Behind Wall Non -Woven Geotextile Fabric (If Specified) 41" Bottom Block Perforated Sock Drain (As Specified by Engineer) P 41" Middle Block Calculations for SRWaII PROSPOSED GRADE J .5' MIN BURY DEPTH PROSPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE RETAINING WALL 2' 27" 11' • TURN AROUND SECTION A -A No Scale SCHEMATIC WALL DESIGNS SI-1OWN RETAINING WALL DRIVEWAY _12V EXISTING GRADE 3' VALLEY PAN .5' MIN BURYLN, DEPTH SECTION B -B 70' No Scale EDGE OF DRIVEWAY f1/24/16 DATE RETAINING WALL DETAILS Job No. 2008-361.001 Drawn by: JJL Date: 01/06/09 RM ' KW PE: JM File: Sages-CS-WD.c/wg C8 OF C8 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0238 H-P�KUMAR Geotechnical Engineering i Engineering Geology Materials Testing I Environmental 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com September 16, 2016 Zeller Construction Attn: Gerd Zeller P.O. Box 37 Aspen, Colorado 81612 gmz52@aol.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthome, Colorado Project No. 16-7-432 Subject: Interim Findings of Lot Specific Subsoil Study, Proposed Residences, The Sages at Aspen Glen, Bald Eagle Way and County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, we have conducted subsurface exploration as part of the lot specific subsoil study for foundation design of the proposed residences at the subject site. The interim findings of our study and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical (now H-P/Kumar) previously conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subdivision development design and presented our findings in a report dated December 21, 2010, Job No. 110 406A. The proposed subdivision development plan is essentially the same as described in our previous report and will include 10 single family residences. Due to the settlement potential of the natural alluvial fan soils and risk of building distress, it is tentatively planned to support the residences on a deep foundation which extends down to the dense, river gravel alluvium. A total of 10 exploratory borings were drilled near the center of each lot (8 for the current study and 2 from the previous study) to evaluate the subsurface conditions for foundation support. The subsurface profile encountered on the lots Located immediately below County Road 109 (Lots 6 through 10) consisted of about 23 to 261/2 feet of alluvial fan soils above dense river gravel alluvium. The subsurface profile encountered on the lots located below the proposed access road (Lots 1 through 5) consisted of about 161 to 21 feet of alluvial fan soils above dense river gravel alluvium. The soils were typically stiff to very stiff and slightly moist to moist with depth. These subsurface conditions are consistent with those encountered in our previous subsoil study. The subsurface profiles encountered in the exploratory borings drilled on each lot are similar and a deep foundation such as micro -piles, drilled/helical piers or driven piles which extends down into the dense river gravel alluvium are recommended for the building foundation support. Other lot specific recommendations will be presented in our forthcoming project report. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, H -P%- KUMAR Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. SLP/ksw cc: Whitsitt and Gro itt@roarinaforklaw.com) The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0239 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL December 3, 2010 Zeller Construction Attn: Gerd Zeller P.O. Box 37 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 110 406A Subject: Response to Colorado Geological Survey Review and Geologic Hazard Summary for Preliminary Plan, The Sages at Aspen Glen, Bald Eagle Way and County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Zeller: As requested, we are providing response to the Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) review dated November 24, 2010 of the proposed development. A representative of Hepworth Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the subject site on December 2, 2010. Our response to the CGS comments and recommendations for the preliminary plan design are presented in this report and were conducted according to our agreement for professional services with Zeller Construction dated December 2, 2010. Previous Studies: The Sages at Aspen Glen development site is located within the area originally evaluated as part of the Aspen Glen Development by Chen -Northern (1991 and 1993) and Huntingdon (1993). The findings of those studies have been incorporated into our findings. Site Development: Ten lots, 7 single family and 3 duplex, and an access street are proposed. Grading for the infrastructure construction will typically be minor. Retaining walls up to about 9 feet high will be built in the northern part to the west of Lots 4 through 7. The existing earthen berm along County Road 109 will not be disturbed in the County right-of-way but will be excavated on the project site for the retaining walls and potentially the individual buildings. Off site drainage from uphill of County Road 109 currently flows onto the south end of the project. site. Geologic Concerns: The primary geologic conditions that could potentially impact the project site consist of 1) sinkholes related to Eagle Valley Evaporite, 2) water sensitive soils that could cause settlement related distress of structures, and 3) debris flows or floods caused by thunderstorm runoff from the nearby valley side. These concerns were addressed by CGS as 9 comments in their review report. Our findings and recommendations to address these comments are presented below. Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0240 Zeller Construction. December 3, 2010 Page 2 Findings and Recommendations: Our findings are presented to address CGS comments in the order given by them. We are currently in the process of conducting a geotechnical engineering study including subsurface exploration for groundwater conditions, retaining wall design, pavement sections and preliminary foundation design that will be appropriate for the final plan design. 1) In our opinion, the proposed land use and grading plans are in conformance with the recommendations by Chen -Northern (1991 and 1993). 2) The piezometersinstalled by Chen -Northern (1993) for groundwater level monitoring were located in areas close to the Roaring Fork River and the project site is not known to be impacted by shallow groundwater. 3) The project site is not known to be impacted by sinkholes or depressed areas but is underlain by Eagle Valley Evaporite that is known to be associated with sinkhole development. In our opinion, the risk of future sinkhole development at the project site throughout the service life of the facilities is low and mitigation is not warranted, but the homeowners should be made aware ofthe risk. The project site is impacted by potential debris flows or floods that are described in the following item 4. 4) The existing earthen berm along County Road 109 is an effective debris flow mitigation structure for most of the development. The berm terminates next to Bald Eagle Way and the south end of the development is exposed to debris flows and floods. The berm should be extended around the comer and down along Bald Eagle Way to the east end of building envelope on Lot 10 with a minimum height of 3 feet. As an alternative, a debris flow or flood impact wall could be built. The berm along County Road 109 should maintain a minimum height of 4 feet measured from the roadside ditch invert. 5) The retaining walls along the west side ofthe project site will mainly support the earthen berm and their construction is not expected to undermine the road right- of-way. The site specific conditions ofthe bearing soils and excavation cut face should be determined by the geotechnical engineer at the time of construction. 6) Groundwater is not expected to be shallow in this area and should not adversely impact buried utilities but seasonal perched water could developed. Below grade structures such as retaining walls and basements should be protected from seasonal groundwater by underdrains typical of this type of construction. 7) Alluvial fan soils cover the project site and are typically known to be moisture sensitive. Positive surface grading around the buildings, proper backfill compaction and limited irrigation are recommended to reduce potential surface water infiltration. 8) A geotechnical study should be conducted at the individual lots for site-specific design recommendations for foundation, grading and drainage designs. The Job No. 110 406A Gtech The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0241 Zeller Construction December 3, 2010 Page 3 geotechnical study currently being performed will provided general subsurface conditions and preliminary design recommendations to be included in the final plan design. 9) The findings of our review and the forthcoming geotechnical study report should be provided to the prospective homebuyers. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPW, OORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. .to -set A• ti 04. •°s�F A• ° Rev. by: Ei c' 24443 5 o i ,Thk SLP/kswgr % •em cc: . Schmuet a1pkaoet/Ieyer — Attn: David M. Kotz, PE Attachment CGS Review Letter dated November 24, 2001 References: Chen -Northern, 1991, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development along the Roaring Fork River between Glenwood Springs and Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado, dated December 20, 1991, Job No. 4 112 92. Chen -Northern, 1993, Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado, dated May 28, 1993, Job No. 4 112 92. Huntingdon, 1993, Debris Flow Hazard Mitigation Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado, dated August 16, 1993, Job No. 4 112 92. Job No. 110 406A GecPtech The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0242 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY— serving the people of Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 715 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 866-2611 Fax: (303) 866-2461 November 24, 2010 Ms, Kathy Eastley Garfield County Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 COLORADO ow"gtr Legal: S13 of T7S, R89W DEPARTMENT OF NATCJRA L RESOURCES Re: Sages at Aspen Glen Subdivision — Preliminary Plan CGS Review No. GA -11-0003 Dear Ms. Eastley; Bill Ritter, Jr. Governor Mike King Executive Director Vincent Matthews Division Director and State Geologist In response to your request and in accordance with Senate Bill 35 (1972), CGS has performed a technical review concerning geologic hazards for the above-mentioned proposed development. The site consists of approximately 4.2 acres and is being divided to include 10 residential lots (7 SF and 6 duplexes). The lots will be provided service by the Roaring Fork Sanitation District. The review package included the project application packet, preliminary engineering report (4110) by David Kotz, preliminary construction plans (3/4/09) by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, preliminary plat (4/13/10) by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, and geotechnical engineering study (5/28/93) by Chen Northern. The geotechnical report was done as a supplement to two initial studies for the Aspen Glen area, which were not submitted as part of the referral. The site is located north of Carbondale and east of County Road 109, west of the Roaring Fork River. A number of ponds and irrigation ditches are present in the area. Groundwater levels were encountered around 31 feet below ground surface after drilling in 1993. Groundwater may be shallow in areas where ponds are located, or form perched water tables seasonally on clayey lenses in the subsurface soils. Surficial deposits are predominantly alluvial terrace sands, gravels, clays and cobbles. The Eagle Valley Evaporite was encountered between 23 and 33 feet below ground surface. Low density soils may be present at depth in this area, and may consolidate/collapse under a load. The area has been mapped as having possibly hydrocompactive soils. The geotechnical report did not include any boring location maps, site geologic maps, or hazard area identification maps. Primary geologic concerns for the development of this property include water -sensitive soils, potential sinkholes, shallow groundwater, potentially water -sensitive soils, and potential debris flows. CGS offers the following comments for County consideration: The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0243 1. The current site plans should be submitted to Chen Northern for comment pertaining to the geologic conditions at the site and current proposed land use and grading plans to ensure they are in conformance with the geotechnical recommendations and current understanding of the site conditions. 2. The Chen Northern report indicates piezometers were installed during the 1993 investigation. It would be useful to review that data as it pertains to groundwater conditions and impacts to the site. 3. The Chen Northern report indicates there are areas of sinkholes, depressed areas, and debris flows within the site. These areas should be clearly identified on the plat, and specific mitigation measures should be detailed in plat notes, 4. Locations and design details of the debris deflection structures should be provided for review. 5. A retaining wall is proposed along the westem edge of the property, adjacent to CR 109. A slope stability analysis should be considered to ensure that the wall is adequately designed and proposed grading along the toe of the slope will not create unstable conditions to the adjacent county road. 6. Seasonally shallow groundwater may be present in areas of this site. Appropriate subsurface drainage should be established for utility lines and subsurface construction expected within 5 feet of the seasonally high groundwater table. 7. The soils are likely sensitive to moisture. Surface grading should work to prevent water from infiltrating soils around structures and prevent areas of standing water. Low-water usage landscaping should be used around structures. 8. Design -level subsurface geotechnical investigations should be conducted prior to building. Foundation designs may require additional mitigation based on the findings of this investigation. Large rocks may be encountered at depth which could impact foundation design. 9. Disclosure should be provided to potential homeowners regarding the geologic conditions at the site. Based on the material included in the referral, CGS does not have enough information to provide adequate evaluation of the proposed development. If you have further questions about this site, please contact me at (303) 866-2611. Sincerely, TWait Engineering Geologist Cc: file The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0244 The Sages at Aspen Glen Appraisal of Property for Fee in Lieu of School Land Dedication Note on Tab #10: This is an Opinion of Value of the Property and not a full Appraisal. The completed Appraisal will be submitted as soon as it is completed. It is anticipated that the full Appraisal will be of equal value to the Opinion of Value. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0245 PEAK APPRAISAL SERVICE, IINC. 09/16/2016 Timothy Whitsitt 320Main St, Suite 200 Carbondale, CO 81623 SUSAN F. EBERT"STONE, SRA Colorado Certified Residential HENRY J. STONE Colorado Certified Residential RE: RESTRICTED REPORT Executive Summary of Restricted Report including summary of Market Conditions, Comparables and Indicated Value Subject Property: Section 13, Township 7, Range 89, known as: The Sages at Aspen Glen. Carbondale, Colorado Dear Mr. Whitsitt, In accordance with your request, I have studied current market statistics and data for the Carbondale area, in order to form an opinion of value for the subject property. I have researched comparable data and performed an analysis on the sales and/or listings that may be pertinent to the subject property. The restricted report summarizes and states the data that is analyzed, and concludes to an opinion of current value for the subject property. The effective date of this report is September 16, 2016, and is the date of value. My opinion of value is contingent upon completion of the appraisal, and that more thorough analysis could have an effect on my conclusions. The Intended Use of this appraisal is for Final Subdivision Plat Application for the subject property. The Intended User of this Executive Summary and the Restricted Appraisal and Report is Mr. Gerd Zeller (current owner of the subject property), and his counsel, Timothy Whitsitt, for the purpose as stated. No additional intended users or uses are included for purposes of this appraisal, and it should be noted that the appraiser's opinions and conclusions set forth in this restricted report may not be understood properly without additional information in the Restricted Appraisal, and retained in the appraiser's work file. The opinion of Market Value is as defined in the certification section of this report. The scope of work included research and analysis of the general Carbondale market, research and analysis of sales and listings of undivided vacant land sales and listings (if they exist) in the Basalt, Carbondale, Glenwood Springs, and New Castle markets that would have competing properties (comparables), and conclusion of this information to form an opinion of the current value for the subject property in Fee Simple Estate. This appraisal is based on the Hypothetical Condition that the Highest and Best Use of the subject property is "as is." The subject is currently configured as one undivided vacant parcel. This Hypothetical Zeller Restricted Report Executive Report Summary Page 1 of 2 P1 -i: 970.945.4003 • 298 MEADOW LANE, GLENWOOD SPR/NGS, CO 81601 • FX: 970.945.2255 peakappraisalservice@comcastnet The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0246 PEAK APPRAQS " L SERVliCE, 09/16/2016 Timothy Whitsitt 320Main St, Suite 200 Carbondale, CO 81623 SUSAN F. EBERT-STONE., SRA Colorado Certified Residential HENRY J. STONE Colorado Certified Residential RE: RESTRICTED REPORT Executive Summary of Restricted Report including summary of Market Conditions, Comparables and Indicated Value Subject Property: Section 13, Township 7, Range 89, known as: The Sages at Aspen Glen. Carbondale, Colorado Dear Mr. Whitsitt, In accordance with your request, I have studied current market statistics and data for the Carbondale area, in order to form an opinion of value for the subject property. I have researched comparable data and performed an analysis on the sales and/or listings that may be pertinent to the subject property. The restricted report summarizes and states the data that is analyzed, and concludes to an opinion of current value for the subject property. The effective date of this report is September 16, 2016, and is the date of value. My opinion of value is contingent upon completion of the appraisal, and that more thorough analysis could have an effect on my conclusions. The Intended Use of this appraisal is for Final Subdivision Plat Application for the subject property. The Intended User of this Executive Summary and the Restricted Appraisal and Report is Mr. Gerd Zeller (current owner of the subject property), and his counsel, Timothy Whitsitt, for the purpose as stated. No additional intended users or uses are included for purposes of this appraisal, and it should be noted that the appraiser's opinions and conclusions set forth in this restricted report may not be understood properly without additional information in the Restricted Appraisal, and retained in the appraiser's work file. The opinion of Market Value is as defined in the certification section of this report. The scope of work included research and analysis of the general Carbondale market, research and analysis of sales and listings of undivided vacant land sales and listings (if they exist) in the Basalt, Carbondale, Glenwood Springs, and New Castle markets that would have competing properties (comparables), and conclusion of this information to form an opinion of the current value for the subject property in Fee Simple Estate. This appraisal is based on the Hypothetical Condition that the Highest and Best Use of the subject property is "as is." The subject is currently configured as one undivided vacant parcel. This Hypothetical Zeller Restricted Report Executive Report Summary Page 1 of 2 PH: 970.945.4003 - 298 MEADOW LANE, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 • Ex: 970.945.2255 peakappraisalservice@comcast.net The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0247 Condition is needed in order for Garfield County to determine the Fee in -lieu of School Land Dedication. The ultimate Highest and Best Use of the subject is likely subdivision for single family/multi-family home sites, which is not addressed in this report. The only method of valuation that is employed for purposes of this restricted report is the market sales comparison approach. The cost approach is not an applicable methodology for vacant (or minimally improved) land, and the income approach is not applicable to this type of property. The subject property has not sold in the three years prior to the effective date of value, and is not currently listed for sale. Note that disclosure of this history is required by USPAP. The subject of this appraisal is a 4.243 acre parcel located on the west side of Aspen Glen, a private, gated golf community northwest of the town of Carbondale. The parcel is mostly level, and is along County Road 109 and the west entry into Aspen Glen. The northern part of this parcel is also along a tee box of the golf course. Currently, the golf cart path is along the east border of the property. There are no other known improvements on the property. Statistically, the single family market in Carbondale has remained steady thus far in 2016, after steadily through 2015. Prices are currently flat, and have remained in a +-2% range this year. Median prices have increased at a greater pace than average prices, as the lower priced properties on the market have been absorbed. Vacant land prices are also flat this year, following the trend of the single family home data. It is typical for the real estate market in this area to slow in the fall and winter months, especially for vacant land, as well as Presidential election years (due to the uncertainty of the direction of the country. My market analysis found three sales that have occurred this year (two are non -golf), four sales in 2015 (two are non -golf), five sales in 2014 (two are non -golf), five sales in 2013 (one is non -golf). There were no similar sales in 2012. There is only one active comparable property. Not all of the data was used, and is detailed in the report to follow. In summary, the sales ranged in sale prices from $83,500 to $3,000,000; my brief analysis of these comps resulted in their indicated values for the subject ranging from $750,000 to $2,400,000. I considered nine of the 10 golf properties, and one non -golf sale from the Roaring Fork River valley. These sales ranged in prices from $350,000 to $3,000,000. Based on this summary of information, data detailed in the report, and retained in my workfile, it is my opinion that the current market value for the subject property, as of September 16, 2016 is: $1,050,000 The estimate of Reasonable Exposure Time is approximately eight to 12 months, based on information from the sold comparables and current statistics, and considering the subject's current condition/ultimate use. Current Realtor broker fees for land are typically 2.5% - 3% for each broker in a transaction, in this market. Zeller Restricted Report Executive Report Summary Page 1 of 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0248 Condition is needed in order for Garfield County to determine the Fee in -lieu of School Land Dedication. The ultimate Highest and Best Use of the subject is likely subdivision for single family/multi-family home sites, which is not addressed in this report. The only method of valuation that is employed for purposes of this restricted report is the market sales comparison approach. The cost approach is not an applicable methodology for vacant (or minimally improved) land, and the income approach is not applicable to this type of property. The subject property has not sold in the three years prior to the effective date of value, and is not currently listed for sale. Note that disclosure of this history is required by USPAP. The subject of this appraisal is a 4.243 acre parcel located on the west side of Aspen Glen, a private, gated golf community northwest of the town of Carbondale. The parcel is mostly level, and is along County Road 109 and the west entry into Aspen Glen. The northern part of this parcel is also along a tee box of the golf course. Currently, the golf cart path is along the east border of the property. There are no other known improvements on the property. Statistically, the single family market in Carbondale has remained steady thus far in 2016, after steadily through 2015. Prices are currently flat, and have remained in a +-2% range this year. Median prices have increased at a greater pace than average prices, as the lower priced properties on the market have been absorbed. Vacant land prices are also flat this year, following the trend of the single family home data. It is typical for the real estate market in this area to slow in the fall and winter months, especially for vacant land, as well as Presidential election years (due to the uncertainty of the direction of the country. My market analysis found three sales that have occurred this year (two are non -golf), four sales in 2015 (two are non -golf), five sales in 2014 (two are non -golf), five sales in 2013 (one is non -golf). There were no similar sales in 2012. There is only one active comparable property. Not all of the data was used, and is detailed in the report to follow. In summary, the sales ranged in sale prices from $83,500 to $3,000,000; my brief analysis of these comps resulted in their indicated values for the subject ranging from $750,000 to $2,400,000. I considered nine of the 10 golf properties, and one non -golf sale from the Roaring Fork River valley. These sales ranged in prices from $350,000 to $3,000,000. Based on this summary of information, data detailed in the report, and retained in my workfile, it is my opinion that the current market value for the subject property, as of September 16, 2016 is: $1,050,000 The estimate of Reasonable Exposure Time is approximately eight to 12 months, based on information from the sold comparables and current statistics, and considering the subject's current condition/ultimate use. Current Realtor broker fees for land are typically 2.5% - 3% for each broker in a transaction, in this market. Zeller Restricted Report Executive Report Summary Page 1 of 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0249 This opinion of value is subject to the definition of market value, statement of limiting conditions, and the certification(s) as contained in the Restricted Report to follow. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Respectfully Submitted, Henry J. Stone, SRA CO Cert.Res. 100004019 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0250 This opinion of value is subject to the definition of market value, statement of limiting conditions, and the certification(s) as contained in the Restricted Report to follow. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Respectfully Submitted, Henry J. Stone, SRA CO Cert.Res. 100004019 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0251 Weed Vegeta t'on and Management Maps and Treatment Methods for The Sages at Aspen G en The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0252 Sages® Vegetation Plan 3ypasG 8 S�fl/&4gR OORDON Y6YSR INC. idi• Vip�haad q •Mb Na •.90ClS�d001 Lbt. 09/IJ/10 q- rod f fa coop4 fUoa v10 JOIN L T.41/722? * ASSOCIATES The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0253 2.04 Integrated Weed Management — Treatment Methods: Management techniques include cultural, mechanical, biological and chemical strategies. The optimum method or methods for weed management will vary depending on a number of site specific variables. Factors to be considered should include soil type and stability, grade, associated vegetation, existing and proposed land use, proximity to water, availability of irrigation water, weed type and stage of growth, and severity of infestation. The management method selected should be the least environmentally damaging, yet practical and reasonable in achieving the desired results. When considering weed management on a property, work on the areas that may transport weed seeds. These areas include ditches, streams, roadsides, driveways, trails, livestock concentrated areas, and equipment storage sites. The following recommendations are intended to be a reference for weed management in Garfield County. The information is not intended to be a complete guide to weed management. Before using any chemical, you should thoroughly read the label. Any use of a herbicide inconsistent with the label is neither legal nor recommended. Changes in herbicide registrations occur constantly. The herbicide label is the legal document on herbicide use. Read and follow all directions carefully. The use of a pesticide in a manner not consistent with the label can lead to injury of crops, humans, animals, and the environment. Specific chemical recommendations are available from the Garfield County Vegetation Management Department and/or licensed applicators and are not listed in the Plan. CANADA THISTLE Description: Perennial. Reproduces from vegetative buds in root system and from seed. Comments: Canada thistle is best managed through an integrated management system that emphasizes competitive, desirable plants. Biological control: Three insects currently available. It is best to release a complex of insects (different insects that will stress different parts of the plant.) Ceutorhyncus litura — a weevil that stresses the crown of the plant. Urophora carduii — a stem and shoot gall fly. Cassidia rubiginosa — leaf beetle. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Maintain soil fertility and moisture at optimum levels to favor grass growth. Mechanical control: Research indicates that mowing of Canada thistle may be effective when done repeatedly at two week intervals over a period of 11 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0254 CHICORY Description: Comments: several years. Pulling and digging up Canada thistle is ineffective as the plant has such an extensive root system. Simple perennial. Chicory is well established in western Garfield County (Parachute) and is spreading rapidly in other parts of the County. Biological control: Close grazing by sheep will control the chicory in pastures. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Re -seed disturbed areas adjacent to chicory infestations with appropriate perennial grasses. Mechanical control: None available. COMMON BURDOCK Description: Biennial. Prolific seed producer. Comments: Burs may become entangled in the hair of livestock, wildlife, or pets allowing seed to be distributed to new areas. Biological control: None currently available. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Minimize soil disturbances, encourage desirable plant growth. Mechanical control: Top growth removal through mowing or cutting is effective as is pulling or digging out the plant at flowering or early seed formation. DALMATIAN TOADFLAX Description: Aggressive perennial, escaped ornamental. Comments: Widespread in Glenwood Springs. Biological control: The defoliating moth, Calophasia lunula, has been released on Dalmatian and yellow toadflax. It may defoliate up to 20% of the leaves of the plant. 12 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0255 Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: Education: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Re -seed disturbed areas adjacent to toadflax infestations with appropriate perennial grasses. Repeated mowing 2-3 times per year will slow spread and reduce seed production. The key to Dalmatian toadflax management is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that Dalmatian toadflax is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large-scale landscape projects. DIFFUSE KNAPWEED Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: HOARY CRESS Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Biennial, reproduces by seed. Increasingly common in Garfield County. The largest infestation is at the Glenwood Springs Airport. Two seed head flies, Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata, are available. They reduce seed production. A root -boring moth, Agapeta zoegana, causes considerable damage to roots. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Reseeding of disturbed sites with fast growing grasses helps prevent diffuse knapweed establishment. Handpulling has been effective, if done persistently over time. A very competitive, deep-rooted perennial that reproduces by root segments and by seed. Common in Garfield County. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Mowing or cultivation effectiveness will be increased if other plants like perennial native grasses or alfalfa are seeded in the hoary cress stand as competitors. Maintain range and pasture in 13 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0256 Mechanical control: HOUNDSTONGUE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: LEAFY SPURGE Description: Comments: Biological control: good condition. Promote healthy grass growth through proper irrigation and fertilization. Do not overgraze. Removal of top growth is somewhat effective. Repeated treatments may reduce seed production and spread. Biennial. Prolific seed producer. Seed nutlets break apart at maturity and cling to clothing or animals. Widespread throughout Garfield County. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Re -seed disturbed sites with fast growing native grasses. Maintain range and pasture in good condition. Promote healthy grass growth through proper irrigation and fertilization. Do not overgraze. Houndstongue is a prolific seed producer, and the seeds are readily spread by their ability to stick to wildlife and domestic animals. Physical removal of the plant at flowering or in early seed formation, by pulling or digging, will break the cycle of the plant. A perennial up to three feet tall that reproduces by vigorous root stalks and seed. Leafy spurge is primarily found in Wallace Creek in western Garfield County. An extremely difficult -to -control perennial weed that will require re -treatments to achieve adequate control. Development of a management plan is helpful to manage large areas of leafy spurge. Sheep or goats will graze leafy spurge. If livestock graze leafy spurge after seed formation, hold animals in a corral for at least seven days before moving them to an uninfested area to avoid seed spread. Several flea beetles (Apthona spp). are available from the Colorado Department of Agriculture Insectary in Palisade. These insects are available upon request at no charge to the public. The larvae bore into leafy spurge roots and the adults feed on the leaves. Also available from the Insectary are Oberea eiythrocephala, a stem 14 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0257 Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: MUSK THISTLE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: and root crown mining long -horned beetle, and Spurgia esulae, a shoot tip gall midge. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Any activity that encourages vigorous grass growth is very important. Overgrazing stresses grasses and makes them less competitive to leafy spurge. Mowing leafy spurge at 14 to 21 day intervals may cause higher susceptibility to fall applied herbicides. Musk thistle is a biennial and the key to its successful management is to prevent seed formation. Scattered throughout the County, heaviest in the Crystal River Valley. The musk thistle seed head weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, is wide- spread in Colorado. Larvae of this insect destroy developing seeds but are not 100 percent effective by themselves. The weevil normally impacts seed production by about 50 percent. Herbicides can be combined with weevils if the insects are allowed to complete their life cycles. Another weevil, Trichosirocalus horridus, attacks the crown area of musk thistle rosettes and weakens the plant before it bolts. This weevil has reduced stand density in areas where it has become well established. A leaf feeding beetle, Cassidia rubiiginosa, causes considerable damage by skeletonizing leaves. It is recommended to release more than one type of insect on a weed since each type may work on different parts of the plant. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Musk thistle, like other biennial thistles, thrives on disturbance. The best management is to minimize disturbance. If it does occur be certain to revegetate with competitive perennial grasses. Mechanical control: The most effective type of mechanical control is to hand pull this plant prior to flowering. This can be unrealistic on large acreage or when the ground is very dry. Another option is to use a shovel to cut the root below the surface of the soil, taking care not to disturb the soil more than necessary. If this is done prior to flowering the plant can be left in place after it is cut. If it has 15 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0258 OXEYE DAISY Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: Education: already flowered the plant should be removed and placed in a bag and disposed of. Mowing is not effective on this species unless repeated numerous times throughout the growing season since musk thistle will flower and produce seed even after one or two mowings. A rhizomatous perennial, escaped ornamental. A rapidly spreading weed in Garfield County. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management applicator for specific recommendations. None available. No information available. or a licensed The key to oxeye daisy management is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that oxeye is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large-scale landscape projects. PLUMELESS THISTLE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: A biennial, prolific seed producer. Common in southern Garfield County, rapidly spreading south of Battlement Mesa. The same seed head weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, that attacks musk thistle also feeds on plumeless thistle seeds. Another musk thistle weevil, Trichosirocalus horridus, has been released on plumeless thistle in Garfield County. This weevil appears to be ineffective on plumeless. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Plumeless thistle, like other biennial thistles, thrives on disturbance. The best management is to mimimize disturbance and revegetate with competitive perennial species Mowing is generally not effective on plumeless due to the plant's capacity for rapid re -growth. Hand cutting is not effective unless 16 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0259 there are repeated follow-up treatments. Hand cutting should only be conducted if there is a commitment to follow-up efforts. Plumeless tends to branch out where it is cut and then it re -flowers. Pulling plumeless can be very effective, especially if done after a light rain. Hand pulling, with a good set of gloves, is preferable to shoveling. Shoveling disturbs the ground thus creating a potential seedbed for future infestations. PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE Description: An introduced perennial. This escaped ornamental is also a prolific seed producer, able to produce over 10,000 seeds per square yard. Comments: The US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Colorado Division of Wildlife are extremely alarmed about the proliferation of purple loosestrife in wetland and riparian habitats. Biological control: Biological control may eventually bring weed populations under control, but it will not eliminate or prevent the spread of noxious weeds. A survey of loosestrife populations in Europe has resulted in the selection of five insects which may have potential as biocontrols. Three of these species have completed initial screening tests conducted by the International Institute of Biological Control, in Switzerland and one, Hylobius transverovittatus, a root mining weevil which attacks the vascular tissue of the plant, was subsequently released in New York in 1991. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Not available. Mechanical control: Mechanical methods include hand pulling, mowing, and flooding. Hand pulling is effective when infestations are detected early. The root system must be completely removed, since the root sections can sprout and form new plants. For this reason hand pulling is only effective on small plants. Education: The key to purple loosestrife management and other escaped ornamentals is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that purple loosestrife is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large- scale landscape projects. 17 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0260 RUSSIAN KNAPWEED Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical controls: RUSSIAN OLIVE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: A perennial with an extensive underground root system. This weed is very common in Garfield County. Like other creeping perennials, the key to Russian knapweed control is to stress the weed and cause it to expend nutrient stores in its root system. An integrated management plan should be developed that places continual stress on the weed. Currently, the best management plan includes cultural control combined with mechanical and/or chemical control techniques. A single control strategy, such as mowing or a herbicide, usually is not sufficient. The plant is toxic to horses, however they must consume it over a period of time before poisoning will occur. Once poisoning occurs horses are unable to chew and advance food to the back of their mouths, swallowing is impaired and horses can drink only if they immerse their head in water far enough to get water to the back of their mouths. Poisoning is irreversible and death by starvation will occur. None currently available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Russian knapweed tends to form monocultures by eliminating other plants. Therefore, sowing desirable plant species is necessary after the weed is controlled. Research indicates that the native grasses, streambank wheatgrass and thickspike wheatgrass will establish in an area after Russian knapweed is suppressed with herbicides. If the Russian knapweed stand is not too old and grasses are still present, stimulating grass growth by irrigation (where possible) should increase grass competition with knapweed and keep it under continual stress. Repeated mowing combined with herbicide applications will gradually stress the plant. A tree that may reach heights from 10 to 25 feet. Very common along the Colorado River and other drainages in western Garfield County. None available. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. 18 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0261 Cultural control: Mechanical control: SALT CEDAR Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Plant native trees or less aggressive introduced trees. In riparian areas establish native riparian vegetation. Small trees may be controlled mechanically by using an appropriate tool or shovel. Shrub or small tree. Widespread throughout Garfield County. There are experimental projects being conducted in a few areas in the West involving the release of mealybugs and leafbeetles. These are not cleared for general release. The recent listing of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (a native species that nests in saltcedar) under the Endangered Species Act has challenged efforts to move forward with release of insects for biocontrol. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Establish native riparian vegetation. Mechanical control: Historical saltcedar management projects have included root plowing and raking, dozing, mowing, and prescribed burning. These methods provide only short-term benefits and are labor intensive. SCOTCH THISTLE Description: A biennial. Comments: Common in Garfield County, the worst infestations are located between Glenwood Springs and New Castle. Biological control: None currently available. Chemical control: Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Cultural control: Mechanical control: Reseed disturbed sites with appropriate perennial grasses. Digging the plant at the rosette stage is effective. 19 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0262 SPOTTED KNAPWEED Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: A short -Lived, non -creeping perennial that reproduces from seed and forms a new shoot each year from a taproot. One of the most invasive, aggressive weeds to plague the western United States. Small infestation located in the Battlements. The seedhead flies, Urophora afnis and Urophora quadrifasciata, have been released in many Front Range counties. These insects cause plants to produce fewer viable seeds and abort terminal or lateral flowers. Root feeding insects may have more of a detrimental effect on knapweed populations than seed feeding insects. Larvae of the yellow winged knapweed moth feed in the roots of both knapweed species. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. If desirable grass competition is evident in spotted knapweed stands, judicious herbicide application that does not injure grasses may release them to compete effectively with the weeds. Irrigation may help stimulate grass competition in these cases. Seeding suitable perennial grasses is necessary to prevent weed re -invasion. None available. YELLOW STARTHISTLE Description: Comments: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Mechanical control: Annual, prolific seed producer. In California alone, this plant has infested more than 20 million acres. There are no known infestations in Garfield County; however there have been reports in the past of single -plant infestations. A seed -feeding beetle, Bangasterus orientalis, has been released in California and Idaho. Seed weevils and seed flies have also been released. In Garfield County, we hope to detect and eradicate any infestations of starthistle before biocontrols are necessary. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Vigorous competitive grass is essential to maintain a plant community's resistance to starthistle invasion. Mowing or cutting starthistle is rarely effective. 20 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0263 YELLOW TOADFLAX Description: Comment: Biological control: Chemical control: Cultural control: Education: Mechanical control: An escaped ornamental perennial reproducing by seed and rootstalk. Prevalent in the Flattops. One insect species Calophasia lunula a defoliating moth has been released on yellow toadflax. It may defoliate up to 20 percent of the leaves. Contact Garfield County Vegetation Management or a licensed applicator for specific recommendations. Attempt to maintain competitive communities of desirable species. Re -seed any open ground with perennial grasses to prevent invasion by other weed species. The key to management of yellow toadflax and other escaped ornamentals is to create an awareness among homeowners, nurseries, landscapers, and landscape architects that yellow toadflax is a noxious weed and therefore should not be specified in plantings, sold in nurseries or planted in home gardens or large- scale landscape projects. Digging and pulling where feasible, can provide effective control of toadflax if conducted annually for 10 to 15 years. 21 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0264 CD CD CD • m a) c z N .0 co (n (D 0131i2IVO D liepunog Aiuno3 easy uogeuiwp3 1 Absinth Wormwood Containment 1 . wKc-- if 0 xl N 3 m °c . r 0 0 N (l a on a W W rn G) m 0 N 3 OONV-18 0121 cri O 0i N O N C' 0) c z The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0265 Common Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) Figure 27.02 Garfield County VLH J 3.0 .901....l,0 Y F- c d U) W nW 1-74..: V Capes rca 63ac O. ' c „69 .I.Z s y L O cV C C7 I 1. � Le n 1 `' O MZn w O et e � m to moo s 0-R, E E c d d U epnuo, 1lB ~~ Pf m tY G J W LL Ct a ZG� Legend interstates Major Roads Rivers Aka Creek — County Boundary Common Tansy Containment E iminat,on Area The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0266 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0267 Oxeye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare) Garfield County The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0268 IL eaJV uogewwg3 Plumeless Thistle Containment • c cs O. o N ooi1 n 3 A c w m o m (n a A 7 C. O3NVls OI2i 0 0 •� 0 D 1 f4uno3 plapeO 3 0 N N rh CD 0) z z n) n 0) z O cp 2. The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0269 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0270 Pikik OXIO katAmlG WelcomeL'to the about that bi sideof the f ee 5: , i n nto? . Now what are you going to do atch of Russian knapweed on your It is not uncommon for new rural landowners to the county to receive such a greeting upon moving into a new home with a piece of ground. The greeting may come from a neighbor or perhaps a county weed manager. The weed in question may be Russian knapweed or Whitetop or Canada thistle or common burdock. Or any of the approximately 85 weeds on Colorado's noxious weed list. Ma folks are surprised upon moving in to learn that there ar certain plants that they are required by law to manage. ese are plants that are classified as "noxious" and are regulated by the Colorado Noxious Weed Act and local county weed management plans. Noxious weeds are not native to Colorado. They are aggressive and out -compete desirable plants and rob them of moisture, sunlight, and nutrients. So what is the first step to managing these weeds? It's all about getting started and staying focused. Learn what is growing on your property. You may have a mix of desirable plants with a few noxious weeds scattered around the property. Or you may have the opposite - a monoculture of a noxious weed with very few desirable plants. Either way it will take some effort but it is doable. Ask your neighbors about the local noxious weeds. Contact the county weed program, extension agent, or conservation districts. They'll be happy to come out for a site visit. That is the best way to learn - have © Todd Patrick Garfield County, Colorado Kural Living Landbook 27 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0271 someone who knows the plants walk your property with you. Pocket identification books are also helpful and are generally available from most county weed programs. Once you learn what weeds you have, you'll learn the best methods to manage the different species that may be on your property. There isn't a silver bullet, one -size -fits -all approach to the weed problem. Distinct species may require varying treatments at different times of the year. Once you have started, get focused and stay the course. Set a budget and prioritize by taking on areas that may facilitate the spread of the weeds. Ditches, driveways, areas where animals concentrate, spots where equipment is stored - work on these sites first. All too often we work on the big patch that may be many acres in size and we ignore the satellite, isolated areas that are very winnable battles. There are Four Golden Rules of Weed Management: • Know what you want to do with your property. Is it grazing livestock? Is it to provide wildlife habitat? Knowing the desired end result will be the motivating factor in how you manage your weeds. • Promote healthy vegetation. If your desirable plants are not healthy, determine what the problem may be and correct the situation. • Implement good land use practices. Ultimately if the situation that created the weed problem is not remedied the weeds will be back. Limiting disturbances will enable the desirable vegetation to compete with the noxious weeds. • No single weed management method works alone. Mowing at the proper time or pulling may be effective on small patches. Herbicides used responsibly are a valuable tool. There are many weeds that have effective biological controls that work on them. Reseeding of disturbed areas may be the single most important tool of all. It is the combination of all these strategies that will lead to weed management success. Keep these rules in mind. Contact local resources for help and schedule a site visit. Inventory the weeds you have, develop appropriate strategies, and implement a plan. Don't feel that you have to solve your weed problems in one year. Taking those first, small steps, and keeping with it are the keys to success. 28 Aguide to rural living in northwest Colorado The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0272 AGREEMENT FOR VACATION OF GOLF COURSE CORRIDOR EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR VACATION OF GOLF COURSE CORRIDOR EASEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of September , 2016, between, Gerd Zeller, whose address is P.O. Box 37, Aspen, Colorado 81612 ("Zeller") and Aspen Glen Golf Club Management Company, a Colorado corporation, whose address is 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75234 ("Golf Club"), wherein Zeller and Golf Club may sometimes be referred to jointly as "the Parties" hereto. RECITALS A. Zeller is the owner of that certain real prot4f in Garfield County, Colorado, as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached her:;® ' ae a; z es at Aspen Glen Property"). B. Golf Club is the owner of that cep o . eal property :a ,, arfield County, Colorado adjacent to the Sages at Aspen Glen Propel which the 18-hvl eolf course and related facilities known as the "Aspen Glen Club" are .. ted, as more particul escribed in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Country Club Prope Col ely, the at Aspen Glen Property and the Country Club Prop will be refe ```� e "Parcels." C. Pursuant to that certai of Covenants, Conditions, and Restr recorded on December 21,, 004 at Rece Clerk and Recorder, t = r_ : ;a Aspen Aspen Glen Golf C Supplem spen G Declaration to Master Declaration ated December 17, 2004 and cords of the Garfield County tl to and made a part of the D. Pursuan,et!'that December 17y- 0 4 and re 1 :o - of the ea a t y Ease the Sage: uA certain • 0'`- -laration of * g Y dated Apr , k:*1995and recg1 476327 (the e . Facilities of Golf Course Corridor Easement dated 04 at Reception No. 665693 of the records "Declaration of Golf Course Corridor subject to the terms and conditions of that {p 4 E. Pur• s Facilities Easement, : $ Golf Course Conidor Ea en Prope Development, Construction and Operational Easement fl 6, 1995 in Book 936 at Page 314 as Reception No. laration of Golf Course Corridor Easement and the Golf ns of the Sages at Aspen Glen Property are subject to certain F. Golf Club has agreed that it will vacate the Golf Course Corridor Easements burdening the Sages at Aspen Glen Property, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0273 1. Vacation of Easement. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, upon completion of construction of the new cart path, removal of the portions of the existing cart path to be abandoned, and completion of all required restoration, to Golf Club's satisfaction, Golf Club agrees that the Golf Course Corridor Easements burdening those certain portions of the Sages at Aspen Glen Property, which are identified in the Declaration of Golf Course Corridor Easement as Golf Course Corridor Easement 1 — Sages, Golf Course Corridor Easement 2 — Sages, and Golf Course Corridor Easement 3 — Sages (collectively, the "Golf Course Corridor Easements") shall be released and vacated pursuant to the filing of the Notice of Completion in accordance with Section 4 hereof. 2. Construction of Improvements. Zeller shall cost and expense to construct a new cart path on the Coun at Aspen Glen Parcel, according the schedule, location Club. Zeller agrees to make all improvements on a s advance by the Golf Club so as to minimize inter cart access through the construction area at a and requirements of the relocated path to Zell of Zeller's intent to commence relocation impr expense, to have the plans and specifications for all applicable approvals. All imp constructed in accordance with the PUD and Garfield County. Upon co same by Golf Club, Zeller shall be req e with go s. Golf Club a thin thirty (30) days ents. Zellet is responsi art .of tlocation pr the obligation at its own sole ib Property adjacent to the Sages irements established by the Golf ifically approved in writing in activities and maintain golf to provide the location itten notice by Zeller at its sole cost and ents upon ent laws, the new ' gve the abandoned and restore ..:l. existing immediatel include, but not lim way, cart paths, iiriga such as tee boxes, bunker Any damae' ;y1s ;;. eas grass Golf for the fu after invoi expeditious an cted po e constr r, restor signage, reens, d, and to obtain Country Club ' •operty shall be and regulations of the Aspen Glen ath by Zeller and acceptance of ns of the old cart path being Property to the condition ler's obligation to restore shall d/or re:: ement of grade, roads, rights of ties, fences, gates, golf course improvements and cover, trees, shrubs and other plantings. repaired using sod of the same type as the ake suc% a { vithin five (5) days of written notice from s without her notice to Zeller and Zeller will be liable uch amount to be paid by Zeller within thirty (30) days work, a eluding restoration, must be performed by Zeller in an rice the same is initiated, and must be completed within thirty ountry ged. It Golf Club mtofsuchwo c•'lo Golf Club. ent manna fails ake (30) days of comi s 3. General ` ' ar ent Path. The cart path shall be realigned after the green of the second hole of the golf co ► . The cart path crossing of Golden Bear Drive may be relocated, subject to safety considerations and all applicable laws. The cart path shall remain on the same side of the third hole of the golf course as currently located, but those segments of the cart path currently located within the Golf Course Corridor Easements shall be moved to the Country Club Property. After relocation, no portions of the cart path shall be located on the Sages at Aspen Glen Parcel. The re -located path shall not cross between or in front of any tee boxes. The precise location of the re -located path shall be subject to the direction and approval of the Golf Club. The final location shall be flagged and agreed to by the Parties after the Sages at Aspen Glen Parcel boundary is surveyed and staked. Even after the location has been agreed to, up until construction of the new cart commences, the actual location may be adjusted by the Golf 2 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0274 Club. 4. Notice of Completion. Schmueser, Gordon and Meyer, Engineers shall have the responsibility to submit for recording a written Notice of Completion, certifying that Zeller has completed all of the work necessary for the relocation of the golf cart path along the third hole of play, including removal of the portions of the existing cart path to be abandoned and all restoration work, all in accordance with the direction and approval of the Golf Club. At the time of the recording of said Notice of Completion, the Golf Course Corridor Easements granted pursuant to the Declaration of Golf Course Corridor Easement shall be released and vacated. As a condition precedent to recording the Notice of Completion, G._ don and Meyer, Engineers shall obtain the acknowledgment of Golf Club, as evidenced by 430ature of a corporate officer of Golf Club, that all work related to the cart path relo ` a including restoration has been completed to Golf Club's satisfaction. 5. Insurance. Zeller agrees that itc,y of its ag construction and restoration work under this ;.cement shall be r omissions and will be required to maintain a *t Imes during which on request to provide evidence of, insurance co �`` e which eets or ex surance requirements (unless higher limits are re:`r_ d b . r?. in which ca shall be required): a. Commercial = :;., 'ability ins :fie with a minimum policy limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence an. s 10€ 8 90 'n the agar _te for bodily injury and property d contractors performing sible for their acts and s perfoiined, and up - the following in - he higher limit damage; and b. the use or o behalf of Zel property damage 1 automo`� liab;l ce'� e`vering liability arising from vehicle ise operated or used by or on um polic it of $1,00,000 combined bodily injury and ccident; a 4 -'_ ed by Colorado law, and employers' lia- po �� .3AB *4of $500,000 per accident for bodily injury bility coverage of at least $2,000,000 each occurrence and Golf Club shall b ers' compensation. ditional insured on all liability policies save and except work - 6. Indemnific. Zeller hereby agrees that it shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Golf Club and Golf Club's officers, directors, members, managers, partners, sharehold- ers, employees, agents, tenants, contractors and any affiliates or subsidiaries of the foregoing (each individually a "Golf Club Party" and collectively referred to as, "Golf Club Parties") from and against any and all expenses, suits, actions, judgments or claims brought or made on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons or property, arising out of, occasioned by or in connection with the design and construction of the relocated cart path. In addition to and not in limitation of the immediately preceding sentence, Zeller, for and on be- half of Zeller and Zeller's successors and assigns, does hereby irrevocably release, acquit, and forever discharge Golf Club and the Golf Club Parties of and from any and all liabilities, claims, 3 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0275 demands, damages, causes of action, expenses, costs, attorneys' fees and compensations of what- soever kind resulting from the flight of golf balls. 7. No Liens. If any lien is filed or otherwise imposed on any part of the Country Club Property in connection with or arising out of Zeller's work pursuant to this Agreement, Zeller shall (i) use its best efforts to cause such lien to be released, discharged or otherwise set- tled so as not to encumber any portion of the Country Club Property within ten (10) days after filing; (ii) cooperate with Golf Club in any action to remove such lien; and (iii) indemnify, de- fend and hold Golf Club harmless from any such lien. 8. Notice. Any notices or other communicatio shall be sufficiently given if in writing and (i) hand deli nized overnight delivery service, or (iii) sent by certif prepaid, addressed as shown below, or to such other tute by written notice to the other. All notices 'r's0y. date of delivery. All notices forwarded by o deemed received on a date three days (exclusW the date of deposit with such overnight deliver the delivery receipt indicating the date upon whichq idence that such notice was receiveo.; e date indic quired or permitted hereunder or (ii) sent by nationally recog- eturn receipt requested, postage e party concerned may substi- elivered si be deemed received on the t delivery servi . r certified mail shall be Sundays and holida'' 'A ediately following ice or i he U.S. ma .rovided, however, received shall, prima facie ev- se ® f e delivery recei6t If to Golf Club: Aspen Glen Golf Club 0545 B al '4.4..f Way f ' Carbo _c_ eE �' 04 0 8162 AttenW Genera' . ager e it :, haco."if.`• •v. -..p. c len d...V -,, 523; 54.. 1 Ge P.O.:-6 Aspen, `eta 4yo`F1612 The addresses and addressees may be changed by giving notice of such change in the manner provided herein for giving notice. Unless and until such written notice is received, the last ad- dress and addressee given shall be deemed to continue in effect for all purposes. No notice to either party hereto shall be deemed given or received unless the entity noted "With a copy to" is simultaneously delivered notice in the same manner as any notice given to either party hereto. pany 9. Enforcement. This Agreement may be enforced by any proceedings at law or in equity against any person or entity violating or attempting to violate any part of the Agreement either to restrain or enjoin violations or to recover damages. Damages shall not be deemed ade- quate compensation for any breach or violation of any provision hereof, and the enforcing party 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0276 shall be entitled to relief by way of injunction as well as any other remedy either at law or in eq- uity. The rights, powers and remedies provided herein shall be cumulative and not restrictive of other remedies at law or in equity, and the exercise of any particular right, power or remedy shall not be deemed an election of remedies or to preclude resort to other rights, powers or remedies. No delay or failure to invoke any available right, power or remedy in respect to a breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of (or estop a party from asserting) any right, power or remedy available upon the recurrence or continuance of said breach or the occurrence of a differ- ent breach. The obligations of Zeller set forth herein shall survive any termination of this Agreement and/or the Golf Course Corridor Easements. 10. Attorney's Fees. In the event that any ac between the parties upon a claim arising out of or relati where any provision of this Agreement is validly asse such action or proceeding shall be entitled to an a reasonable attorney's fees, costs and disburs-'so' +ts incurr limitation, the fees, costs and disbursements o iated wit 0. proceeding, in addition to any other availabi%4 edy. Such of the action or proceeding, without the necessitsf any p therefor. 11. Full Force and Effec the Declaration of Golf Course Co recording of the Notice of Completion acknowledge and agreee Declara { olf Course gkidor Easements granted pursuant to ent shag - released and vacated upon the with Se`dn. 4 hereof; however, the Parties or Easement, and all other re am in full force and effect on. In` : a'tion, the Sages at Aspen Glen •estrictions and encumbrances created by the o, the Golf Course Play Easement burdening ountry Club Property and the Club Users Section 9 thereof. or proceeding is commenced he terms of this Agreement, or defense, the prevailing party in e non -prevailing party of its erein, including, without . " eal of such action or amounts be awarded as costs y making a4:m or counterclaim easements, restrictio even after the reco Property remains sub Golf Facilities Easement, the Sages pursu ions corn ice of easemerl of limi its agreeme set out, or tha er joins in the execution of this Agreement to evidence restrictions, conditions and provisions hereinabove n Zelle', its successor and assigns. 13. Rec. ell.� County Clerk and Rec;�, :eement shall be recorded in the records of the Garfield 14. Entire Agre ` ent. This Agreement, including the exhibits attached hereto, contains the entire agreement relating to the subject matter hereof between the Parties hereto. Oral representations or modifications concerning the subject matter of this Agreement shall be of no force and effect. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by the Parties. 15. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. (Remainder of the Page Intentionally Left Blank) 5 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0277 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. Gerd Zeller Aspen Glen Golf Club Management Company, a Colorado corpora. • By: Print;4, ame: 6 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0278 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Gerd Zeller, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpoes and consideration therein ex- pressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF 2016. STATE OF TEXAS this the day of September, la otary P lic, State oorado ission Expires: COUNTY OF DAL Colora foregoin consideratio capacity the f A 2016. rporation, a A ument and a ein express reit ed. , on this day personally appeared en Glen Golf Club Management Company, a e the per on and officer whose name is subscribed to the me that (s)he executed the same for the purposes and the a ,ond deed of said limited liability company, and in the GIVEN UNDE AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of September, 7 Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires: The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0279 EXHIBIT A Sages at Aspen Glen Property Description 8 A 4 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0280 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Golf Club Property 9 The Sages at Aspen Glen Final Plat Subdivision Application 9.19.16 Revised Application 10.17.16 Page 0281