HomeMy WebLinkAbout4223,··~·::·~·~~., ... ..,.'.""1': ..... f:'~ ~: ..1.---'"-•
,,J .. (•
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 Ith st'"t SUlte 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801
(303) 945-8212
04223
· 013 ~ c.R. '~25 Rifle JobAddress ....:=<..L..=..::.. _ _;_ _________________________________ _
Nature of Work Buildin 1 Pe?'mit
Useo!Bulldlng __ ....i;s.ii.11.11.&&.1.l~e_F.t·l!:!!wi!!!;!,.l.1,.yi::.....R~e!l.s!!.i""di!Je!(Jn!!JC;;JeL. ______________________ ;....._
Owner -----~M1i~c~ha[l!!!e~l~ILJSllp~y~cilha!i!.Jl~at-__________________________ _
Contractor ____ o"""""'--------------'---------------------
Amount of Permit: $ _9,.,0u:6n.J. 6w8,_ ______ _
White-T~as.
Canary -Office
Pink -Applicant
Gold -Duplicate
Permit $549.50
Plan $357. ts
Date: May 24. I 99 I
B. Hennett
CJ erk
•
GARFIELD COUNTY
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
p.7ease pr.int or type
TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT PLOT PLAN
-.--ADDRESS _ _..C~a~v"--"~~,.-'--""'---'-'~""'--_,,___"'--,,__·---~ NOTH: Show easements, property line dimensions,
SU8DIVI5'ION __ .J""'"-'-!.-l'-"'..K....;:_.;:>t~"-tlLBl..S.~'¢.~.t:'.!"'lr-I a1 l other structures, specify north, and street
FI.LING # LOT # na.me. For odcl shaped lots~ o.r if spacn is
TAX SC!IEDULE # too smal.1,,. proVide sepa.ratc .Plot plan.
LEGAL {SEC/TWN/RNG)" ff OP IlUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL
i'l "' ';:] ~
"' 0 .... u
~ z
0 u
NAME
ADDRt/SS
NAME
ADDRESS
CTTY
I -IP HONE
CITY
LICENSE #
CLASS OF WOHK
Nt/W _L ALTERATION ADDITION ----
DEMOLISH REPAIR MOVE _____ ,. --··----MOBILE 110/IE {make/model)
S .P. OF BUILDING ~-(! __ ,,_ ~' OF LOT _3.'fB l\~5
# OF FLOORS o..,E.. HEH/HT <) "lE. 7-r"oe.t __
# OF FAMILY UNlTS . # OF BEDROOMS -3~--
INTENDED uSE OF llUILDlNGf"A"''hV lb G.
GARAGE' STNGLE DIJL CARPORT' SINGLE
FIREPLACE __!:!J;,;;:-i .. u••To1t.. Ce, sir)
WATER SUPPLY
DRIVEWAY PERMIT
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
DBL
SITE PLAN ----------------
BUILDING PLANS
SAN.l"TARY SEWER CL£'ARANCE
ON Sl TE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERM.TT
01'1/ER DOCUMENTS (specify)
,
tt/2£q /JAi ~ ...
USE OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL --------
FR01'!T PROPERTY LINE
STREET NA/IE/ROAD NUMBER
Cl/ECK IF CORNER LOT
DESCRIPTION OF r<IORK PLANNED
I hereby acknowledge that I havo read this
application and the above is corroct and I
agree to comply with all county ord.inances
i~n.d state laws regula.ting building construe-ti on.·
S.TGNATTJRE
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
VALUATION 7 CJ tJ , o<l
PERMIT FEE f.!;f<J,'!;'oPLAN CHECK FEE $3 5'.~~=--,~
T01'AL FDE $ ffP(; da $ SCIWOL Il1PACT FEE $
JJATE PERMIT TSSUED
ZONING DISTRICT ~-.A/,,;? /;kD
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY "rf<-3
TYPP, OF CONSTRuCTTON 11'-tJ-----~--
S.F. OF BUTLD.TNG /'J.z__B S.F. OF LOT 3 f:a_c_,
MAX. l/FTG//T .-..-.. M 'ROllD CLl!SS. -. t
SETBACKS FROM PROPERTV LrNE' FRONT~
REAR RLGH7' LEPT
on· STREET PARKlNG SPACES REQUIRED
FWOD HAZARD---·--------------
CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVAT.WN -----------SPECIAL CONDITIONS --------------
PROBLEMS •TIT/I PERMIT -------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED
CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
OR E:NGINEER
APPROVE?~ , ' 6t!f. PLANN~~ -·~
---~·--~---- - -,,
,
~!I
!I ';;
}i\P!J_(Cl;IAEt S'PYCHAt.~ -+/10/9-I
.:! -. /(;, b £.l-2 l.> 4,
1
:,r/N "'ic/(~+) +11-1{>,.) --=-;r;;;_t."'
1
«-= 7'1'; or.J-&.0 ~
11
_,, ·-------·--. -
3PYC:HALA EXEMPTION PLAT
···==~··~-~=~·~-~···=--======~
:l 2 AND 3, SECTION
OUNTY OB~ GARFIELD,
7, T.6
STATE
S.,
OF
R.92 W. OF
COLORADO
THE 6TH P.M.
9'08'46" E
19.66
N 00"51"41" W
30.05
TION PARCEL. BOOK 657, PAGE 345
CQ d>"'1
1•.id;1
l ~ Hl.5" W.C. SRASS CAP TO N.W. CORNER,
LOT 22. 1/4 CORNER COMMON TO SECTION
6 AND 7, T&S, R92W, 6th P.M,
\ r OVERHEAD
~ N.W. CORNER, LOT 2. 1/4 CORNER PO\.VER l...INES
COMMON TO SECllON 6 AND 7,
...... I T6S. R92W, 6th P.W. \ \J ~-~--~~-~,._-=_4 ___ =-----o="'-,-=------------
1 ' .. ' --·~-
---
------------POWER ~ ---POl...I,:; ,...,...--_...,.
J:::X:EMP'.ril'..lN _£~.~T.If....!.f..~TE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------
THIS PLAT APPHOV8D BY RESOLUTION Of 'J'II~ 001\RD Of' COUNTY
N B9"
----
-----
COMMISSIONER$ A'r GARF'lRJ,D COUHTY, COLORADO 'l'ftIS DAY
OF ' l\..D. t 19 IN PILING WI'rtt-ruf:cLERK /\ND f
RECOhO.b'.:R OF CiARFrE~n COUNTY, sucff APPROVAL 1N NO WAY IMPLlES 'l'HAT:
'l'lH:: INFORMATION SHOWN llEJ:H\:IN IS TRUE AND ACCURA'l'.E, flU'l' lJOl::S 1
INDICATE THA'I' TllIS PL1\T rr. F.Xl::liPT PROM TINO NOT SUBaECT '1'0
REGULATION UNDE:ll GAR~'IELD COUN'T'Y SlH~DIVISIO.N REGULA'l'IONS A'I' 'fl!!:!
'l'lMf:: OF l•rs .~'I LING.
' .
· '*ChenONorthern,Inc
"
SUBSOIL S'lUDY
FOR FCl.JNDi\TIOO DESIGN
PI<Oro5ED RESIDENCE
0141 CI.JUNl'll R.)AD 225
GARFIElD CI.JUNl'll, CDIDRAOO
4 357 90
JUNE 12, 1990
IBEPARED FOR
MIKE AND VAinUE SP'iCHAIA
0141 CI.JUNl'll R.)AD 225
RIFLE CD 81650-8718
\
\
'\
:;;oao Road 154
Glenwood Spfir"IQS, Colorado 81601
\
30394G-7458
303 945-23133 Facsimile
'!be prqiosed residenoe should be foon:ied with spread foot~
bearin;i on the natural soils an:! designed for an allowable soil
bearin;i pressure . of . 1000 psf. other design am. construction
ct!~iti-reia:t:ffifto"~ aspects of the proposed residence
are presented in the body of the report.
'lhis report presents the :results of a subsoil study for a proposed
residence to be locate::l at 0141 a:iunty Read 225, Garfield County, Cblorado. '.the
project site is shoWn on Fig. 1. 'Ihe prq:iose of the study was to develop
l.'ElOOllllel'Xtions for the foun:lation design ard to detetmine septic field
percolation :rates. 'lhe study was corducted in aCCOJ:danoe with our agreement for
geotechnica.l en;Jineerin;i services t.o Mike am Valerie Spyehala, date::! May 1,
1990.
A field exploration p:i:op:am consisting of explorat.ory bor~ was
con:lUcted t.o d:Jta1n information on subsurface coOO.itions. sanples obta:inal
durin;J the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to detennine their
'Ihe results of the field exploration and
laoorato:ry t:esting were analyzed to delfelop recamren::lations for foun:lation
types, depths arxi all~le prESSUl'.eS for the prqiosed b.lildllq foun:lation. '.the
results of the field exploration ru'li laboratory test.iu] are present.eel in the
report.
'Ihi.s report has been prepared to sumnarize the data obtained dUring this
study an:l. to present our conclusions ard reoamrerrlations based on the proposed
constl'.llction am the subsoil corill.tion.s encountered. Design paraneters and a
disrnssion of geotedmical en;rineering considerations related to construction
of the prcposed residence are included in the report.
Chen t..'l Northern, Inc.
'·: ··,· -f' .. •·
-2-
'Ihe proposed residenoe will be a sin;Jle stocy log structure with crawl
spaoe. Gradin;J f= the structure is expected to be relatively minor with cut
depths betWeen about J to 4 feet. We assonne relatively light foun::lation
loadin;Js, typical of the prq:iosed type construction.
If buildin;J loadinJg, location = gradin;J plans dlan;Je significantly from
those des=ibed above, we should be notified to reevaluate the reccamendations
contained in this report.
SI'l'E CXH>ITICJNS
'Ihe proposed construction site is urxlistw::bed and relatively flat pasture
land between U.S. Highway 6 & 24 and O:.iunty Road 225. Vegetation consists
mostly of native grasses although the prq;iert:y has a relatively sparse growth
tcw.ird the northwest. A very slight natural~ to the southeast and only
about 1 to 2 feet in elevation difference exists across the site. several
irrigation ditches cross the general area. One of these ditches borders the
west edge of the lot, 'Ihe ditches contained water at the t.ime of our field work
and the irrigation season had reportedly just begun.
'Ihe field exploration for the project was con:ructed on May 4, 1990. Two
exploratory borin;Js were drilled at the locations shewn on Fig. 1 to evaluate
the subsurface corrlitions. 'lhe borin;Js were advanced with 4-inch diaJneter
('hen~ Northern. Inc.
-3-
continuous flight augers powered by a truck-nount.ed C>IE-55 drill rig. '!he
borin;Js were logged by a representative of Cllen--Northern, Inc.
Sarrples of the subsoils were taken with a 2-:inc:h I.D. spoon sanQ.Jler. '!he
sanQ.Jler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blc::MS from a
140~ hammer fallin;J 30 in:hes. 'lhis test is similar to the standard
penetration test descril:ied by AS'IM Method 0-1586. '!he penetration resistance
values are an indication of the relative aenSity or consist.ency Of the subsoils.
Depths at which the sanples were taken arxi the penetration resistance values are
sh= on the Logs of Exploratory Borin;Js, Fig. 2. '!he sanples were returned to
our laboratory for review by the project en;Jineer arxi testin;J.
'!he subsoil conditions encamtered at the site are shCMTI graphically on
Fig. 2. '!he subsoils consist of up to 1/2 foot of topsoil overlying a shall(1.ll
depth of na.iium stiff, na.iium plastic clays. '!he clays overlie loose silty to
clayey san:'ls at depths of 1 to 4 1/2 feet. 'lhe san:'ls exten:l to 16 1/2 feet in
Borin;J 1 where clays arxi silts were encamtered which exterxied to 21 feet depth.
At Borin;J 2, the san:'ls existed to the full depth explored, 11 feet.
laboratory testin;J pertonood on sanples ootainOO from the borin;Js included
standard properties arxi swell-consolidation potential. Results of swell-
oonsolidation tests, shC1im on Fig. 4, indicate that the natural soils have a
IOOderately high settlement potential uroer light to m:xierate load a00. wetting.
'!he laboratory testin;J is summarized in Table I,
Free water was encamtered in Boring 1 at the tillle of drillin;J.
subsoil;-were sligh~-roist ~-:;-;:;·;;,::~;;·-~;··f~t~"-'"''~·· "" ... "'"' ·_,)
\ ? ,.,. , .. <' ,:,1 : ~ ' • ('· ,
. ' _) '
Chen~Northern.lnc.
I
I
I
I
1,
I
• I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
!
-4-
Considerilq the subsoil conditions erniuntered in the exploratory borirqs
an::J. the nature of the proposed construction, we reccnunend the buildilq be
founded with spread footin;Js bearin;J on the natural subsoils. '.lbere is sane
after wettilq. To reduce the risk, positive surface drainage l'.'eC011'1llletions
"'~''' • ..• ,,_,,, ..... ,,~. ,,, •.,-/:,To',•"''~''·""·'',,,
as discussed later in this report should be follCIWE'd.
'.Ille design an::J. construction'' critE!J::'ifi-~t.ed l:>aj,~ should be observed
~ ............... ,.,~.,.-... '"'"""'·~··· .. ·····"'•·-·•·, ... .. .•..... , .... ~... ' .. •,•. ' .. ·,
for a spread footilq foun::lation system. '.Ille construction criteria should be
considered when preparilq project documents.
1) Footin;Js placed on the un::list:urt>ed natural subsoils should be designed for
an allowable soil bearilq pressure of 1000 p;f. Based on experience, we
expect settlement of footilqs designed an::J. const.:ructed as discussed in
~--·+. ... , .•.. ··-\
this section will be about 1 inch or less. If the bearilq soils were to
·~ .. ,_,.,.. '. ,, '' '' '•''"'""' ,,,,.,\\','~~' ',Y;o )W
bec.ane wetted, additional settlement of about 1 inch or more could oocur.
-""""'
'.Ille magnitude of settlement will be related to the depth of wettin;J and
could oocur aver a long time period.
2) All existin;J fill, topsoil and any loose or disblrbed soils should be
removed and the footin;J bearilq level extexx:led down to finn natural
subsoils. 'lhe footilq subgrade should be moistened an::J. caupactEd to at
. ·--·~, ... ~·-·~-·-··'"' .... ,~, .•. ,.,,..,_,.,.,, .. ~ .,.,.., ......... , .. , .. ,., ..
least 95% of the maximum~ Proctor ~ity.
3) '.lb:_~;;~-~~ howe a ~ wi~~ o~(:~-~;>fo~ C0!1t~uous ~11:;
~,.~."~~~-<fal:" iso~~~.~·
\. ,,,.,,
4) ~for footilqs an::J. footin;Js beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearilq elevation for frost
Chen tl Northern, Inc
I
,!
' '
' I
I
I
5)
6)
--------~----·---'"'·~--....
-s-
protection. Placement of faumations at least 36 inches below exterior
~-.~~-... ---~·''"'""'"'•·'. ,,,, .... .,,,... -·· .·~· ., ·· ...
grade is typically used in this area.
• ...........,.llW_•_,, ... ...... . ''~··
Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced t.op and bottom to span --·--····-·· ..... ,.... .. .•...... . .. ' , .. ,. .,
an unsupported lenJtll of at least 12 feet. Continuous heavily reinforced
wall foundations rather than isolated pads will help limit the effects of
sane differential setUen-ent. Foun:lation walls acting as retaining
structures should also be designa:l to resist a lateral earth pressure
cotTeSpOn:ling to an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf.
A representative of the soil en;Jineer shollld observe all footing
excavations prior to COirnte plaoenent to evaluate bearing con:litions.
'.!.'he natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. 'Ib reduce the effects of some
differential m:l\TE!ll'el1t, floor slabs shoold be separated from all bearing walls
and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical rrovement.
Floor slab =trol joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage
craoldn:J. 'lhe requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be
established by the designer based on experience and the :intended slab use. A
thin layer of fine gravel may be placed beneath slabs to facilitate construc-
tion. '!his material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with less than 50%
passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 12% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at
least 95% of maximum stan:iard Proctor density at a iroisture content near
optimum. Required fill should consist of the on-site sarrls devoid of vegeta-
tion and topsoil.
Chcn~Northcrn_ Inc.
I
I
I
I
-6-
Percolation tests were performed at the locations designated by the prefix
"P" on Fig. 1. '!he approxi111a:te septic systern area was located by the client.
___ ...... , ....... M"O°'•'''' ,.,,., ..... ,, ..•. ., ... _.,•L,.,, •. ,.:,, .. ,,,, ·,''•• '''''""'·"'','~",°'\",'I•:·•:••,•",''
'lhe subsoil profiles encountered in the percolation holes were s1Jnilar to those
of the nearby exploratory borirqs. No free water was encountered in the
percolation holes or Boring 2 to the I!laXinum depth drilled of 11 feet. '!he
results of the percolation tests are preserrt:ed in Table II and indicate
percolation rates between about 10 to 27 minutes per inch. Based on the ........... , ...... ,, .,
subsurface profiles encountered at the site and the percolation test results,
the site appears acceptable for a conventional infiltration system. '!he septic
;( '"'"""''.'')""""','• ' •, • ' " ','', ''•,' ' '' ,;,·,.··'"'• "1,,• ,,••,1, •. ; .. ' ... M\u-.,,, .• , . ..;, .. , '~
disposal system should be designed by a civil engineer or persons acceptable to . '' . ·~.· . ' ,. '"
the =unty. and include additional percolation tests perfonned at the design
-·~,,..·'"'·~··'"'"'''''"''•''""',
system location and elevation as needed .
...... ~., .... ,~,,,, ....... ~.,.. -· '• ··'
'!he following drainage precautions should be observed during construction
and 111aintained at all times after the residenoo has been canpleted:
1) Inundation of the fouooation excavations and underslab areas should be
.'·(·•o.\,•'·>•' ,,
avoided during construction.
~f"~!!
. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near opt:!nnnn 1110isture and
canpacted to at least 95% of the ll1alCi.num standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the ll1alC:innnn standard ....... ~·-' .............. --
Proctor density in landscape areas.
Chen() :'\orthcrn. Inc.
-7-
J) ~ grc:und surface surroomirq the exterior of the Wildin;" should be
slq:ied to drain &1ay :fran the foondation in all directions. we reoc:.nmm:i
..... -........ ~ ..... ,,+··"' ........ · .. :'"'· . ''·' ;·: .... ,:, .~,.~ •.• , ... ,.,, .. .
a rninilllum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a
·'·''!-•'•", .. · ... ,.
rninimJm slope of J inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
4) Roof dC1.lll1SpOOts and drains should discharge well beyorxi the limits of all
""'........,,._,,.,, . ..,,.,, .......... ,,~ -··-·~·"'·-' .... '\,.-' ' ~ ,, .... , .... '
backfill.
;.-..... ~ ........... """".:.I;,.··
'!his rep:>rt has been prepared in a=rdanc.e with generally accepted soil
and f0lll1dation erqineer.in;J practices in this area for use by the client for
design purposes. 'Ihe conclusions and rec:amnen::lations subnitted in this rep:>rt
are based upon the data obtained fran the eiq:iloratocy borin:Js drilled at the
locations in:licated on Fig. 1 and the proposed type of construction. 'Ihe nature
and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not beoane evident until
excavation is performed. If during construction, fill, soil, rock or water -corrlitions appear to be different :fran those des=ilied herein, this office
,:-;1,,..,1 .,
should be advised at once so reevaluation of the recamnendations may be made.
We recanmen::l on-site obseivation of excavations and fo.nxlation bearing strata
' . ,_ , ~.-... ,. ,
and testing of structural fill by a repI: :ntative of the soil erqineer.
Sincerely,
OlEN-NORIHERN, me.
Reviewed By
David A1
SLP/ec
('hen e Northern, Inc.
•
I
• • •
.•
APPROXIMATE SCALE
I " = 100'
PROPERTY
BOUNDARIES
\
\
N I
I
·_,_ EXISTING
RESIDENCE
G
.. -··~
l/ J (~-~~ __o/
BORING I •
I~ €~BORING 2
I I
: 1 I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
EXISTING /
FENCE \....-~-ir.--~~--'-..L-~~~1 I _________ ,,,. / ---_,,,, -------------1---------
BENCHMARK:
TOP OF GARAGE
CONCRETE SLAB·
ELEVATION= 100.b'
ASSUMED
COUNTY ROAD
225
4 357 90 -ChenONorthem,Inc. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS a
PERGOLA TION TEST HOLES Fig.
, .•. ,, , :.,; "'""~ . -~--~, .. ···""'· ·:r·· -''. --.... , ..• ,.,,_,,.,_ .. ,.,,,,,,,~
. ---~----....... , _______ _...,.. _____ ~------
LEGEND:
~Topsoil; organic sandy clay, porous, slightly moist, brown.
0 Clay (CL); sandy, medium stiff, slightly moist, porous, light brown, medium loose,
plasticity.
[71 Clay and Silt (CL-ML); sandy with occasional sand layers, medium stiff to
Ldwet, low plasticity, brown.
~Sand (SM-SC); silty to c. layey, occasional clean sand and pebble layers, loose, ~moist, porous, brown, occasional clay layers.
~Sand (SM); silty, loose to medium dense, moist, brown.
~ Relatively undisturbed drive sample, 2-inch I.D. California liner sample.
6/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 6 blows of a 140-pound hammer falling
30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on May 4, 1990 with a 4-inch diameter
continuous flight power auger.
2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from
features shown on the site plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer
to the Bench Mark on Fig. 1.
4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate
only to the degree implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the borings at time of drilling or when checked
three days following drilling.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content (%)
DD = Dry Density
4 357 90 ChenONorthern,Inc.
LL = Liquid Limit (%)
PI = Plasticity Index (%)
Legend and Notes Fig. 3
•
oou: oou: llEPIH
NO. (In.)
P-1 45
P-2 44
P-3 43
l.ENGIH
OF
INl'ERVAI.
(Min.)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
. 20
'l1Ul!E II
PERCOIATION TEST RESUI1l'S
DEPIH 'IO
WATER AT
STARl' OF
INTERVAL
(Inches)
24 1/2
23
22 1/2
21 1/2
25
20
17
14
22
20
18
16 1/2
.. ''','r"'''' -,··~··· ••
DEPlH 'IO
WATER AT
END OF
INTERVAL
(Inches)
23
22 1/2
21
21
20
17
14
12
20
18
1/2
16 1/2
15 1/2
/ ! ··.,..J
OOOP IN
WAXER
iEVEL
(Indles)
1
1
5
3
3
2
2
2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1 1/2
4 357 90
May 17, 1990
AVERllGE
PERCOI.ATION
RATE
(Min. ,/In:tJ.)
27
10
20
\ •.. (/
c
0 -"' "' Q) ....
~ u
""
c
0 ·-"' "' Q) ....
Q.
E
0 u
. .
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.1
4 357 90
. 1 "7~
Moisture Content i::: 11 percent
Ory Unit Weigh! = 95 pcf
Sample of: clayey sand --..... r-...._ From: Boring 1 at 5 feet
r--.._
"' '~
~ -b
(-
\ -f.--. ...... .... _ itiona irn \ COi pr •ss , __ ---•"-,n -
\ IJ~ to we .tin
\
'
\
LO 10 1
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
Moisture Content 1:: 11 percent
Ory Unit Weight 'II 94 pc!
Sample of: silty sand
From: Soring 2 at 5 feet
-.... ....... ~
I>
1---1--..
.....
\. )
(
~
"\ r--.... '-
I'\.
,__ ,_ itiona COi pr1 SS oh , __ -.,n ,+,--' ---.
II to we .tin
\
'
1~ 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
Chen-Northern, Inc. SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4
,,, . '·' , ...... , ""'''!'''·",l'"'"'·)••'\• ··-··~...,,..~--~·~1"'.~~··· , ··-···.,~~·
Chen-Northern, Inc.
TABLE
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SNlllPLE l.OCATICIK GFW>oJ10K "'°"""""' ... Tl.OW. MOTUIW. PEACE,,,. "1TE&:AG lNTS
"""511./RE ORY "'5SING OOMPAESSM!
IOltlMI
.,..,... CONTENT .,........
GRNEI. SN«J 00200 LICU:J Pl.ASTIClf'I STRENGTH
<""'I f'o) [pell N j"'J ..... ,..,.,. .. ., .. (""'
N "''
1 2 15 29 15
5 11 95
10 11 106
2 5 11 94
•
'
4 357 90
SOit"" BEDROCIC TVPE
sandy clay
clayey sand
si ltY sand
si ltv sand
'
·j
' . {
. I
!
j
l
I
i
' 1
!
)
;
l . r
' ' t
r· ...
' . •
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUlRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date lssue;;?,~_QlH_~q(.zoned Area ................................. Permit No .... ':J..J...~ . .J..
AGREEM};NT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with
all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the
proposed >tructure for which this permit is granted, and_ further agrees that if the abo'C
said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and
construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice
fro e County B ' 'ng lns11ec or an\1-l ED IA TEL Y BECOME NULL AND VOID,
u.. "'-'-'_.__,_~__,__,,_'E'__,,._,,,,...__.~· ::-:!.\;J;;--'--'7:e....,,.s.~' ...... ""::::l;...Jl:-"T''-f'TT _____ _
Address or L~gal Description
Owne~~dc:A\a..,~1o\vie! Tcuntractor own er
Setbacks froot Side Side Rear
Thi• Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From the Street Until Final InspectioJL
INSPECTION RECORD
Zonin~ Roof Covering s ~ :u--r J.. q:;.,,,._,
Elettric·rinal (hy STATE inspector)
Footing /-/ '.~ .-•C,/'! '---~~-~-ll-fi,6S77 )ii_, f.. <."K
Foundation
Plumbing-Underground
Gas Piping 16 -!;-'7 J,,
__ , .. _
Heating Ventilation v~t-; 0 _, _,, r<!). ' '
Frame .) ~-1. )-.:..;1 j..... ·:f:::·:::.'1-t_.1 Insulation 711_. __ ,,. d-.a ~ /i,J ""
Plumbing-Rough ' -~::._:;_ .. /.:.!.... ·;:;i::-_,,,..~·-,_ Drywall L 0 "'-J-+ 7/<-,/' u
Electric-Rough ~-; -I .· ., ·~
(by STATE inspector) Final 1-1r~rr " \
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING ·-
WltETHER INTERIOR 0'!;.EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR.'ABO'lfE GROUND., , -· .. -
, .""THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
J'hone 945-8212 I 0 .9 8th Street, County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs, Colo.
APP ROVED D() NOT DESTi10Y Tffi3 C-;.RD
Data5-;ti·9( ev~f8
. .•. ,., ........ ,.. ,-.,~, .• ,.,-, ,.,. .. ,·rr-.:.J r~l f.' 1, TJ Pf \.;;:.T1(·
::.:~
()p -
1992 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
·issued Without Fee
--~r.,,, .. 1p .. 1.,1a.,.r'"';;..' _!,__'_,_i ____ 19 :i3
Permission is hereby granted to --'l_li"-"=1><:::''="=1--=1'_,.--=S:..p .. y_,c,_,h,,,a-,,il"'a,_ ________________ _
Building Permit No. ------""~.:.;1.:,:3 ____________ Zone Dislrlct_..._A,./_.ll,,/_,M=--------
situated al --~Ual~.'1~5~r::~01"'1~n~t~v~),~·o~ac~· ~1 ~"~-2~-~"'-'-' _T,,t*i~f~J..-e _______ Lot __ Blk. __ Addilion, _____ _
for the following purpose __ _,f'-';,.,,,· '"'"'"'' l"-e"'---.,_l',,am:=i""l""y.ill\i;;1~e~lt.1lt.:i':ln~p'J:.,,rltln'l¥.;i1'-t,___~----------------'---(stiii Nifilrw or Uiij
Contractor_---"0_,,'1_,,n,,,c"'r"-/-",T"'e"r-'r""''-' -"',,ie"'l"'""'n"'d"------------'------------------------
TAKll "OTiCE
No 0111119 -be modo In
the ... dlhlo building·-
prior notice and c.rttflclile
"""' !he Bulding Olltolol.
White: Owner
Green: Lending J\ge11cy
Gola: Conuactot
Yellow: 6ulldlng Dep11rtment
Pink;: Assessor
GARFl.EU> COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT