HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Correspondence•
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building and Planning
July 10, 1995
Mr. Jeff Deatherage
Water Resources Engineer
Office of the State Engineer
1313 Sherman Street, Room 818
Denver, CO 80203
RE: Simmons Subdivision Exemption (Sec. 24 T5S R9OW)
Sahula Subdivsion Exemption (Sec. 30 T6S R94W & Sec. 25 T6S R95W)
Parrington Subdivision Exemption (Sec. 6 T6S R92W)
Dear Jeff:
Please find enclosed applications for subdivision exemption from F. Peter Simmons, Peter
Sahula and John & Nila Parrington. The applicants are proposing to split their parent parcels
into smaller parcels through our exemption process. Your office has taken the position that
because the County uses the authority provided in C.R.S 30-28-101 (10)(d) as the basis for the
process, that any lot approved through the process is an exempt well. The process is set up by
the County to require the applicant to prove that they are eligible for a well permit without
County approval being in place first. If the proposed applications could be approved without
using the previously noted statutory authority by means of having adequate augmentation
water or falling under another exempt well criteria, the Board will accept the source of domestic
water as being a legal source. Please review the applications as if they were a "minor
subdivision".
109 8th Street, Suite 303
945-8212/625-5571/285-7972 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
The public meetings before the Board of County Commissioners will on August 8th for
Simmons and Parrington, and on August 14th for Sahula. I have included a copy of a sketch
plan of the proposed exemption parcels and water documentation for your reference.
If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
Mark L. Bean, Director
Building & Planning Department
Enclosures
• •
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building and Planning
November 3, 1995
Tamara Cunningham
Colorado State Engineers Office
Division of Water Resources
1313 Sherman Suite 818
Denver, Colorado 80203
Re: Peter Sahula Exemption
Resolution No. 82-21
Dear Tamara;
This faxed letter is in response to a question your office had regarding the County's recognition of
the change in legal descriptions for a 10 ac. tract of land created by exemption and approved by
Resolution No. 82-21. Garfield County does not require any formal recording of documents for
lots approved by exemption, but never recorded by deed. In other words, the person owning the
property that contains the property described in the resolution. may file a deed that describes the
property in a different configuration, without going through any formal procedure.
By this letter, I am saying that the proposed reconfiguration of the 10 acre parcel described in
Resolution No. 82-21, by Peter Sahula, is legal under the County's regulations and requires no
additional action on the part of Garfield County.
If you have any additional concerns, I will try to address them as quickly as possible.
Si cerely,
Mar L. Bea
Director
Building & Planning Department
xc: Sahula Exemption file
Post -it® Fax Note��11 7671
Date f,//� p# oges/
/
To%o. M 7 C 'GetY iro /?/ v.. ,From
{�
/.. , 06,eoci
Co./ J 't. k ow/
/ -4,6
Co. (4,"
Phone #/pp /_ 35.Q7
Phone# T c _ 2/2._
Fax#
Fax#