HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application• •
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PETITION FOR EXEMPTION
Pursuant to C.R.S. (1973) Section 30-28-101 (10) (a) - (d) as amended,
and the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, Colorado, adopted
April 23, 1984 Section 2:20.49, the undersigned Sandra Smith respectfully
petitions the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, to
exempt by Resolution the division of one 120.7 acre tract of land into 2
tracts of approximately 102.56 and 18.14 acres more or less, from the
definitions of "subdivision" and "subdivided land" as the terms are used and
defined in C.R.S. (1973) Section 30-28-101 (10) (a) - (d) and the Garfield
County Subdivision Regulations for the reasons stated below:
These tracts have historically been separate. My plan is to subdivide
the larger tract at a later date. The smaller tract will remain as a separate
parcel.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
An application which satisfies the review criteria must be submitted with all
the following information:
A. Sketch map at a minimum scale of 1"=200' showing the legal
description of the property, dimension and area of all lots or
separate interests to be created, access to a public right-of-way,
and any proposed easements for drainage, irrigaiton, access or
utilities;
B. Vicinity map at a minimum scale of 1"=2000' showing the general
topographic and geographic relation of the proposed exemption to the
U.S.G.S. quadrangle map may be used.
C. Copy of the deed showing ownership by the applicant, or a letter
from the property owner(s) if other than the applicant; and
D. Names and addresses of owners of record of land immediately
adjoining and within 200 feet of the proposed exemption, mineral
owners and lessees of mineral owners of record of the property to be
exempted, and tenants of any struture proposed for conversion; and
E. Evidence of the soil types and characteristics of each type; and
F. Proof of legal and adequate source of domestic water for each lot
created, method of sewage disposal, and letter of approval of fire
protection plan from appropriate fire district; and
G. If connection to a community or municipal water or sewer system is
proposed, a letter from the governing body stating a willingness to
serve; and
H. Narrative explaining why exemption is being requested; and
I. It shall be demonstrated that the parcel existed as described on
January 1, 1973 or the paracel as it exists presently is one of not
more than three parcels created from a larger parcel as it existed
on January 1, 1973.
J. A $100.00 fee must be submitted with the applicaiton.
Sandra Smith, Petitioner
3059 103 Road
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(303) 963-3507
• •
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
John Clark
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
or
3523 103 Road, Carbondale, CO 81623
(303) 963-2025
Gailen Smith
5062 County Road 113
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(303) 945-4917 (disconnected)
Pauli Reitz
P.O. Box 2721
Aspen, CO 81612
(303) 963-0730
Karl Larson
201 North Mill St.
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-5030
• •
NOTICE
Take Notice that Sandra Smith has applied to the Board of County
Commissioners, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to grant an Exemption
from the definition of subdivision in connection with the following
described property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado;
to -wit;
Legal Description: See attached
Practical Description: (location with respect to highway, County roads and
residences): Located approximately 4 miles north of Carbondale, off
County Road 103.
Said Exemption is to allow the Petitioner to divide a 120.70 acre
parcel into two tracts of approximately 18.14 acres, and 102.56 acres
on the above described property.
All persons affected by the proposed Exemption are invited to appear and
state their views, protest or objections. If you cannot appear personally
at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter,
particularly if you have objections to such Exemption request, as the
Board of County Commissioners will give consideration to the comments of
surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to
grant or deny the request for the Exemption. This Exemption application
may be reviewed at the office of the Planning Department located at
Garfield County Courthouse, 109 8th Street, Suite 303, Glenwood Springs,
Colorado between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through
Friday.
That public meeting on the application for the above Exemption has been
set for the 6th day of March, 1989, at the hour of 2:00 P.M., at the
Garfield County Courthouse, Commissioner's Hearing Room, Suite 301, 109
8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
Planning Department
Garfield County, Colorado
tXH1B1T A
TO SPECIAL WAR
DATED MAY Oe;' 1981
BETWEEN N. LEE LACY
AND SANDRA SMITH
PARCEL A:
A parcel of land situated in the SW1 of Section 12 and the N1 of Section 13,
Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Prinicpal Meridian, described as
follows:
Beginning at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 12 and 13 in said Township
and Range, thence S. 84°16'22" E. along the Section line between said Sections
12 and 13, 210.00 feet to a point in the center of the Park Ditch; thence along
the centerline of said ditch S. 16°07'31" E. 40.35 feet; thence S. 26°17'50" E.
76.58 feet; thence S. 34°58'50" W. 179.02 feet; thence S. 21°25'52" W. 97.27
feet; thence S. 09°41'43" E. 57.78 feet; thence S. 14°07'35" E. 322.35 feet;
thence S. 12°03'17" E. 139.33 feet; thence S. 73°54'25" W. 138.94 feet; thence
S. 01°31'14" E. 294.00 feet; thence S. 05°28'32" E. 109.40 feet; thence S.
21°16'33" E. 67.58 feet; thence S. 64°12'36" E. 116.10 feet; thence S. 52°13'39"
E. 95.46 feet; thence S. 10°49'10" E. 116.53 feet; thence S. 26°39'52" E. 157.36
feet; thence S. 18°20'39" E. 70.39 feet; thence S. 27°01'44" E. 142.09 feet;
thence S. 39°23'09" E. 143.24 feet; thence S. 02°53'08" W. 96.14 feet to a point
on the Northerly right-of-way line of County Road No. 103; thence along said
right-of-way line, 59.31 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a
radius of 1044.57 feet, the chord of which bears S. 81°47'25" W. 59.30 feet;
thence S. 83°25'00" W. 115.08 feet; thence 116.32 feet along the arc of a curve
to the left, having a radius of 741.22 feet, the chord of which. bears S. 78°55'16"
W. 116.20 feet; thence 230.70 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having
a radius of 423.13 feet, the chord of which bears S. 58°48'21" W. 227.86 feet;
thence 90.93 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of
408.67 feet, the chord of which bears S. 36°48'42" W. 90.75 feet; thence leaving
said right-of-way line N. 89°16'38" W. 32.34 feet; thence S. 01°06'40" W. 492.34
feet to a point in the center of said Park Ditch; thence S. 79°54'59" W. 105.66
feet along the center of said ditch; thence N. 06°38'19_" W. 240.30 feet; thence
N. 73°01'11" W. 409.45 feet; thence N. 54°06'22" W. 675.91 feet; thence N.
10°48'08" W. 313.56 feet; thence N. 12°35'49" W. 1436.10 feet; thence N. 18°16'24"
W. 529.17 feet; thence N. 00°19'40" E. 456.51 feet; thence N. 88°12'04" W.
174.20 feet; thence N. 10°24'04" W. 591.49 feet; thence S. 77°29.'14" E. 737.75
feet; thence S. 27°08'04" E. 412.25 feet; thence S. 01"18'01" E. 122.39 feet;
thence S. 03°51'39" E. 233.82 feet; thence S. 45°01'08" E, 273.91 feet; thence
S. 03°42'58" W. 76.44 feet; thence N. 87°58'57" E. 762.34 feet more or less to
the Quarter Corner common to Section 12 and 13 in said Township and Range, the
point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion of said parcel lying in Lot 7 of Section
13, said Township and Range.
PARCEL B:
A parcel of land situated in Lot 8 of Section 12, Township 7 South, Range 88
West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, described as follows:
Beginning at the Quarter Corner between Sections 12 and 13 in said township and
range; thence S. 87°58'57" W. 762.34 feet along a fence; thence N. 03°42'58" E.
76.44 feet; thence N. 45°01'08" W. 273.91 feet; thence N. 03°51'39" W. 233.82
feet; thence N. 01°18'01" W. 122.39 feet; thence N. 27°08'04" W. 412.25 feet;
thence S. 77°29'14" E. 1166.80 feet to a point on the North-South Centerline of
said Section 12, thence S. 01°27'21" E. along the North-South Centerline of said
Section 12, 713.02 feet to the point of beginning.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
• •
LAW OFFICES
ROBERT B. EMERSON, P.C.
86 SOUTH THIRD STREET
CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623
(303) 963-3700
ROBERT B. EMERSON
February 13, 1989
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
Garfield County Courthouse
109 8th Street, Suite 306
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
HAND DELIVERED
Re: Sandra Smith - subdivision exemption application
Dear Mark:
I am writing on behalf of Sandra Smith. I am enclosing with this letter her
Petition for Subdivision Exemption. I believe that this letter together with
the documents enclosed will satisfy all of the submission requirements. If
not, please let me know immediately.
Enclosed is a copy of the deed by which Sandra Smith took title to her
property. As you can see, she was deeded the property in two parcels, the
larger parcel is approximately 102.56 acres and the smaller parcel 18.14
acres. You have advised me that Garfield County takes the position that these
parcels have been merged into one tract. The purpose of this subdivision
exemption is to create a legal division of the property back into two separate
tracts as the property was originally conveyed to her.
I have enclosed a map as a sketch map of the property. The property
boundaries are highlighted in yellow. Although this map has a scale of 1 inch
equals 300 feet and not all of the legal description of both parcels is
included on the sketch map, given the other information submitted, you have
indicated that this sketch map is satisfactory for the purposes of presenting
this matter to the commissioners. A subdivision exemption plat will be
submitted if the exemption request is approved by the commissioners. This
Plat will be in the proper scale and will meet other filing requirements. I
am also enclosing a vicinity map, a copy of the deed showing ownership, a copy
of a soils test prepared by Lincoln-DeVore showing the soil types and
characteristics. The property meets the requirement that the parcel existed
as described on January 1, 1973. I am also enclosing the $100.00 application
fee.
The names and addresses of the adjoining property owners of record and within
200 feet of the property proposed for exemption are attached.
. •
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
February 13, 1989
Page 2
Each of the two parcels has a domestic water well and septic system
installed. The water wells were drilled in 1974 and 1981 respectively
pursuant to well permits issued by the Department of Water Resources. Access
to the property is from County Road 103.
If you need any additional information please let me know. I would like to
get back copies of the documents submitted, if possible.
Sincerely,
ROBERT B. EMERSON, P.C.
By: 714
Robert B. Emerson
RBE/rjj
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Sandy Smith
��i
Z
Q
LL
E- 2
LOC]
W [,]
S Lti
0 L
• Z
Q
l3' CE
O J
J U]
O Z
Recorded at
Reception No.
41
o,clock
.5Ot
BOOK 572 PAGE 540
2-191
THIS DEED, Made this _I' day of May
1981 ,between N. Lee Lacy
California
of the County of Los Angeles and State of acYDA
kfitc of the first part, and Sandra Smith
whose legal address is P . 0. Box 853
Aspen, Colorado 81612
of the
County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, of the second
part;
WITNESSETH, That the said party
of Ten Dollars and other good and
ecorder.
RECORDER'S STAMP
MAY 221981
Sin Rnf'T 'rTo!T FFF
f3
of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum
valuable consideration
ikA1(
to the said part y of the first part, in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the
receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and con-
veyed, and by these presents do es grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the said
part y of the second part, her heirs and assigns forever, all the following described
ltutxxmt parcel s of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Garfield
and State of Colorado, to wit:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
See also Addendum A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
alecoknucsmasmisnakaxabirauamberx
Together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in
anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents,
issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever,
of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained
premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said
premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto Sandra Smith
the said party of the second part, her
heirs and assigns forever.
And the said N . Lee Lacy
part y of the first part, for himsel f , his heirs, executors and
administrators, do es covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the said part y of the
second part, her heirs and assigns, the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable
possession of said part y of the second part, her heirs and assigns, against all and every
person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, by, through or
under the said part y of the first part to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said part Y of the first part has hereunto set his
hand and seal the day and year first above written.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of �j
Ze �� 4 !� '� % [SEAL]
. Lee Lacy /
�/ [SEAL]
/'!.'n //1/1//"/ a'' -.
I SEAL]
Ai d'I.-7-1.17 -1--- .r72 -774-
S I AI F. OF CAI,II Ofl\!A
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)''.
On this 14th clay of ----. -- May 1981 , before me, the unrl, r,it n(d.
a Notary Public in and for said County and .State, personally appeared
William A. Halama
l;no\cn (o me to be the person \\ hose none 1S subscribed to the \vithin instrument,
N. Lee Lacy
as the Attorney - --.--,__-__in fact of
and acknox\'led)Ce(1 to me that __----he_ _----_subscribed the name_
of-N'—Lee Lacy_
(hetet() as principal . _and. _- -_ his own name
R'ITNL:SS my hand and official seal.
Sitonattrre
Pamela S. Welton
_ as Attorneyin fart.
OFFICIAL
PAMELA S WELTON
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My comm. expires OCT 7, 1984
No. 16 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED. —Bradford Publishing Co., 1824-46 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado (573-5011) 12-77
, Public.
4:JJ4
BOOK 572 PAGE 540A
• •
ADDENDUM A
To Special Warranty Deed
Between N. Lee Lacy and
Sandra Smith dated May ar, 1981
The party of the second part hereby acknowledges
that title to the subject property is encumbered by the
following:
(1) Deed of Trust for the use of Norman E.
Sherwood and Mary N. Sherwood recorded
in Book 487 at page 853 and assigned to
the Bank of Glenwood by instrument re-
corded in Book 513 at page 62 of the
Garfield County records; and
(2) Deed of Trust recorded in Book ,W,7 at
page, of the Garfield County records
securing the party of the first part's
non-recourse promissory note to Joe L.
McClung and Judith J. McClung for the
principal sum of $174,128.00.
The party of the second part hereby assumes and
agrees to pay said obligations referred to in numbered
paragraphs 1 and 2, above and further agrees to become
personally responsible for and liable on the promissory
note referred to in numbered paragraph 2, above.
00108
BOOK "72 PAGE 540B
• •
EXHIBIT A
TO SPECIAL WARRANTY
DATED MAY ;11'; 1981
BETWEEN N. LEE LACY
AND SANDRA SMITH
PARCEL A:
A parcel of land situated in the SWZ of Section 12 and the N1 of Section 13,
Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Prinicpal Meridian, described as
follows:
Beginning at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 12 and 13 in said Township
and Range, thence S. 84°16'22" E. along the Section line between said Sections
12 and 13, 210.00 feet to a point in the center of the Park Ditch; thence along
the centerline of said ditch S. 16°07'31" E. 40.35 feet; thence S. 26°17'50" E.
76.58 feet; thence S. 34°58'50" W. 179.02 feet; thence S. 21°25'52" W. 97.27
feet; thence S. 09°41'43" E. 57.78 feet; thence S. 14°07'35" E. 322.35 feet;
thence S. 12°03'17" E. 139.33 feet; thence S. 73°54'25" W. 138.94 feet; thence
S. 01°31'14" E. 294.00 feet; thence S. 05°28'32" E. 109.40 feet; thence S.
21°16'33" E. 67.58 feet; thence S. 64°12'36" E. 116.10 feet; thence S. 52°13'39"
E. 95.46 feet; thence S. 10°49'10" E. 116.53 feet; thence S. 26°39'52" E. 157.36
feet; thence S. 18°20'39" E. 70.39 feet; thence S. 27°01'44" E. 142.09 feet;
thence S. 39°23'09" E. 143.24 feet; thence S. 02°53'08" W. 96.14 feet to a point
on the Northerly right-of-way line of County Road No. 103; thence along said
right-of-way line, 59.31 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a
radius of 1044.57 feet, the chord of which bears S. 81°47'25" W. 59.30 feet;
thence S. 83°25'00" W. 115.08 feet; thence 116.32 feet along the arc of a curve
to the left, having a radius of 741.22 feet, the chord of which bears S. 78°55'16"
W. 116.20 feet; thence 230.70 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having
a radius of 423.13 feet, the chord of which bears S. 58°48'21" W. 227.86 feet;
thence 90.93 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of
408.67 feet, the chord of which bears S. 36°48'42" W. 90.75 feet; thence leaving
said right-of-way line N. 89°16'38" W. 32.34 feet; thence S. 01°06'40" W. 492.34
feet to a point in the center of said Park Ditch; thence S. 79°54'59" W. 105.66
feet along the center of said ditch; thence N. 06°38'19" W. 240.30 feet; thence
N. 73°01'11" W. 409.45 feet; thence N. 54°06'22" W. 675.91 feet; thence N.
10°48'08" W. 313.56 feet; thence N. 12°35'49" W. 1436.10 feet; thence N. 18°16'24"
W. 529.17 feet; thence N. 00°19'40" E. 456.51 feet; thence N. 88°12'04" W.
174.20 feet; thence N. 10°24'04" W. 591.49 feet; thence S. 77°29.'14" E. 737.75
feet; thence S. 27°08'04" E. 412.25 feet; thence S. 01°18'01" E. 122.39 feet;
thence S. 03°51'39" E. 233.82 feet; thence S. 45°01'08" E. 273.91 feet; thence
S. 03°42'58" W. 76.44 feet; thence N. 87°58'57" E. 762.34 feet more or less to
the Quarter Corner common to Section 12 and 13 in said Township and Range, the
point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion of said parcel lying in Lot 7 of Section
13, said Township and Range.
PARCEL B:
A parcel of land situated in Lot 8 of Section 12, Township 7 South, Range 88
West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, described as follows:
Beginning at .the Quarter Corner between Sections 12 and 13 in said township and
range; thence S. 87°58'57" W. 762.34 feet along a fence; thence N. 03°42'58" E.
76.44 feet; thence N. 45°01'08" W. 273.91 feet; thence N. 03°51'39" W. 233.82
feet; thence N. 01°18'01" W. 122.39 feet; thence N. 27°08'04" W. 412.25 feet;
thence S. 77°29'14" E. 1166.80 feet to a point on the North-South Centerline of
said Section 12, thence S. 01°27'21" E. along the North-South Centerline of said
Section 12, 713.02 feet to the point of beginning.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
Together with any and all water rights appurtenant to the lands, including but
not limited to 7.5 shares of stock of Park Ditch and Reservoir Company, a Colorado
corporation, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that said water rights are conveyed herewith
without warranties of title.
001699 /f1' 4�
/7 7
ROBERT B. EMERSON, P.C.
WILLIAM V. HODGES III
• CLAIRE H. GREEN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
86 SOUTH THIRD STREET
CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623
(303) 963-3700 OR (303) 963-3777
TO:
•
Mr. Mark Bean, Planning Dept.
109 Eighth Street, Suit -P 30
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
DATE:
March 9, 1989
IAM
X
THES
X
ii
MAR 1 u 1989 ;1 .
c.L .L
GARI6LLDCLi• I'd1Y,
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
REGARDING:
Subdivision Exemption Application -Sandra
Smith
Copy of letter from
Agreement
Check for
Court Pleadings
Copy of well permit application and Log and History of Well
For your information.
For your review and comment.
For your approval, endorsement and return to me.
For filing in your office. with the Sandy Smith subdivision exemption application.
REMARKS:
SIGNED
P-). lY\ Q-%"-
� \t—.
Form tRev.
9'- 62. 1 i1 M
Applicant
APPLICATION
I10 AiRti tc.tr14:
P.O. Address k''
Quantity applied for io gpm or
AF Storage
STATE OF COLORADO u U LS lvJlS U U L5
A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER JUN 4 . 19( 4
A PERMIT TO CONSTR.A WELL RUND WATER SECT.
LO PION OF WELLCOLORADO
County i) F, i' STATE ENG:NEFF
Used for
on/at
Purposes
(legal description of land site)
Total acreage irrigated and other rts.
ESTIM& ED DATA OF WELL
Hole size: I /' in. to2--1 o ft.
in. to ft.
Casing Plain from D to /6
in. from to ft.
Open or Perf �%in. from—Tao 2.. c' ft..
in. from to ft. ,
PL' MP Outlet I�
DATA: Type . HP .Size
Use initiation date �� 19 S .
(Use Supplemental pages for additional data)
THIS APPLICATION APPROVED
PERMIT NO. 20095
ISSUED: JUN -4 1964
DATE 19
0JLev' -- ofN C ,'? of Sect., Twp. r%So ,
Rge.___.
C^ P. M. OR
Street Address or Lot & Block No.
W
Town or Subdivision
N
s
$25.00 fee required for uses other
than Domestic or Livestock. T
E
Locate
well in
40 acre
(small)
square
as near
as possible.
Large square
is one section.
Applicant
Agent or
Drill
Address , Lt
1.17r-r--(>
No.No.1
4r/41/p C C`4` .
NOTE — SATISFACTORY COMPLETION REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF AP'LICATION
2 304
`
Rev.) Jiii+ 2 w - 1965
j-62'
Index No / 6:41
IDWD
Use rt,t-r—'''- - c
Registered.
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
GROUND WATER SECTION
Driile
Owner
Strectt_
Tenant
LOG AND HISTORY OF WELL
PERMIT ryNaO r a
0
Lic Nod J
r�R Me
Use of Water
On or By
Date Started
Date Completed
2)rimpslec
rS� /e
No.
Acres
(description
�/
f site or land)
Y,6
0
Yield GPM or CFS
WELL DESCRIPTION:
Depth to Water
Hole
Diameter
TEST DATA:
from
from
from
/S5 -
ft Total
(measured from
0 ft to_€
1-0
ft to
ft to
de mig ess° '\
How Tested Pump or Bailed
Date Tested 1/ 6 , 19 ‘,1 Length hrs.
Rate GPM Drawn Down ft,
PUMP DATA:
Pump Type Outlet Size in
Driven by HP
CASING RECORD:
Depth Z� ft
ground surface)
ft , in
eft, cc, in
ft , in
Plain Casing
Size 7 , Kind 02.3 from 0 ft to \30 ft
Size 57�, Kind Ifrom o5 ft to
Size , Kind from
Size 5 , Kind
/t ft
ft to ft
Perforated Casing
/9 from 160 ft to ____--° ° ft.
Size , Kind from
Size , Kind from
ft to ft
ft to ft.
FOR V
,
1.964
CO11)6440
fiVirgM
WELL LOCATION
e1/
Nw '/a of A/ '/a of Sect /3
23
County
Twp. 7-SJ , Rge. FeVw (a PM
West
North
I
--NwF+/c-------Nel'A----
TT—
I iI
'
I
'
1
I
I
I
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
South
East
ABOVE DIAGRAM REPRESENTS ONE FULL SEC-
TION. LOCATE WELL ACCURATELY IN SMALL
SQUARE REPRESENTING 40 ACRES.
or
If the above is not applicable fill in:
No. Street
City or Town
or
Lot , Block
Subdivision
(include filing or number)
TO BE MADE OUT IN QUADRUPLICATE:
Original Blue and Duplicate Green Copy
must be filed with the State Engineer within
30-d-ajrs`after -well is completed. White
copy is for the Owner and Yellow copy for
the Driller.
USE REVERSE SIDE
Ground Elevation
•
WELL LOG
(if known)
r
How Drilled
FROM
FEET
TO
FEET
TYPE OF MATERIAL
REMARKS
(such as Cementing,
Packing, Shut off, etc.)•
(if mon space is required use additional sheat) '
WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT
This well was drilled under my supervision and the above information
knowledge and belief.
Dated
Signed
and correct to the best of my
By
.r!' J r: )r
2 -
Application must
h: complete where
')pheable. Type or
int in BLACK
JI;. Nu overstrikes
or erasures unless
initialed:
'
CC)L(.)f(Ar)C) Div I ;ION OF wA rL f{(_r'Ut(C;Et JC r
b1Uadu Olcnnial lildg., 1313:;hcrnu,i, Si,, Uci,rrr ( 1 J rn�
t. )�U;i
PERMIT AP�'LIC;! I ION rot:rn I yew, RECEIVED
1 ) A PE ((mil 10 U`;i1 GHOtJNI v,/,,1 E►t fi
TSG A PERMIT 10 C0NST1 UC1 A WELL
FOR ( ) A PERMIT 10 INSTALL A PUMP
(1) APPLICANT - mailing address
rJAraE 0E. L. Me C L
BEET o_ph SG? /
crry_A SP Et -3
fSiarc, ----------( Z.p)---
9S- (filo
---
) REPLACLMENT OF -1 NO. -----____--
01 HER ________
t1'A1 E11 COUR1 CASE NC)..
1 (.)(; 01 1 1(.( (!l;; ;INI.1'. t)(� NO1 WRIT( IN THIS COLUMN
111 LPHONE NO.
(2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL
County
AR.f)Et p
_ SW V of the S �� 'h Section I i
S Rng. __-3.5i'�/ � TN
F .rJ
ira.SI
Ie.N'.
' ) WATER USE AND WELL DATA
posed maximum pumping rate (ypm) IS
Average annual amount oI )round water
10 be appropriated (acre•Icet):—
a
(Dumber of acres to be irrigated: iN 0 E
Hoposed total depth (Beet):
70 Fr(EST)
A tuiler ground water is to be obtained Irorn:
-13_4\S A LT
well designation
;ROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR:
1 HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY • no irrigation (0)
DOMESTIC (1)
' LIVESTOCK (2)
!COMMERCIAL (41
( ) INDUSTRIAL (5)
( ) 113111G/11 ION (G)
( ) MUNICIPAL (li)
) OTHER (9) Ft�E1)1?OTL-C-TJDNI
()PAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11)
1) DRILLER
Ic._
ieph(ine No. --_
Lic. No
MAY 2 1 1979
L' ATLR fti3'1)URCEy
Ise IF ttiGIM-LR
UZI
Receipt N(,
Itr��,o
Dist.
CONDITIONS -OF APPROVAL
.1 )ins well ;hall he used in such a way 2s to cause
no mat et i;:I injury to existing water rights. The
issuance of the permit dors not assure the applicant
that rio injury will occur m another vested water
right or PrecluOe another owner of a vested water
right iron) seeking relief in a civil court action.
APPROVED PURSUANT TO CRS 1973, 37-92-602
(3) (ti) (I I) AS THE ONLY )YELL ON A TRACT
OF 33 ACRES OR MORE DESICIIATI':I) AS 4
ACRES Iii J (.t S:/ 5; e‹.) '/y . SFr ,7
APPROVED FOR DOMESTIC USE, INCLUDING THE
IRRIGATION OF NOT OVER ONE ACRE OF HOME
CA1fl1EhS AND LAWNS.
APPROVED PURSUANT TO CRS 1973, 37-92-602
FOR THE WATERING OF LIVESTOCK ON A FARM
OR RANCII.
�..,,.!•
r f-. ,1,t
1.yt
(.4_,:z
L
(.-t_ r.t 1 (z, J /
l L)
APP1).( TION APPROV :.D rl
PERMIT NUMBER- p 070:1GDA1 E ISSULD - UN_U 4 19 1g —
[um 10N IL)ATE -.. ..,a JUN (i4. 198i
I t /.3 t F rr li
1 r1.
1 ,
!/11.G
i.,) THE.LOCA 1 ION UI• 1111: I'IWI'(.) LL) VVI.: I_L nut Ilii: III.:.l t u
' winch the wa1Ct will most be Ir,;1,Uilerl un Ile di;u,lrain below
Usc the CL NTE 11 SE 1 :.cci,u,'1U :,cies.) lot the well luc.,l,u„
s S
al 0
I 1
I NORTH SECTION LINE Ni)lill T--111
_!_—I_ —
1
�\
-a-
I
---• •1'AIL EL7tloFEET
}
_+
J
0
1
1
-.--- -. -- -- 111
, I1.
I -4
In
$00111 SECTION LINE
I'n
"Inv scale of the dianram is ? inches = 1 mile
1 _ - _Each sma!t suuore rcp0_+crescntt �lc_
+'il ' )UIV •`LENT' 1Abt.E lI o,nutcu Fnl,. -1
Rn aCrt 100, ...•e,: 1 ane land 1 loot deep
1 tuo.c lout Ile' second Ws) ... 449 gallons per minute Ig{,rnl
A 1ar,ly of , .viii Il'rluile n0010nu1•14%CIV 1 acre•Ionl 01 v.;ttcr Ill', year.
1 JO e•1001 . 43.5(0 cult'- Icer . , 375.900 97inuns
1,000 grim ut.nutted Continuously lor one /Jay ptorluceS 4 4? •cre•Ieet.
10) LAND .0N 1�'HICIi G_Fi(011ND l'VA_i ERWI(__1_._(3F__USF-O:
0' t— . 1-k G C- E- t) b.3 No. of acres:._._
( U..1 - I' 8 p F n -t a C. -114-114
os S EST. t z T 1 1�... - - - --
) (>E 1 AU f= D. DESC1 IP-I_IU—N ul the use of ground water: Household use and domestic wells must indicate type of dispose
stern
lo be uset.i.
IUGI< __7r l -
1, ) 1 1 . Vl 1 1 1 03 1 UL L'.JL !\ 1 L• U
l Jc.t;uucs I 'ton Unci.
r
iron' So U T►{_
(') (101111 01 SUVIh3 o
%1 ES-)- sec. li•
Zeas! or west)
S VJ 1/4- S W (/¢ o f S E.cT . t Z. T t'
LOT_ BLOCK _ _ f ILING a .__
R 13 B W Of 'TUEG Tie }. IN
C19 CI_ I1. bunt
st:t.
(7) TRON WHICH WELL WILL BE
LQCAACTI E(DJ tltrnt.r _�o_ :_H1c cLu►�G.%
No. u1 acre' ---! U ._--------- • will this be
the only well or, this tract) _—(ES ___
(8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM
Plain Casing
CO
�^ It. to 11
�-U-_-_ in. burn
in. from
Purim wed citsiny
tri. front
_—_._It. to
50 ,1.10. '7 0
11
It
in. horn ___ 11. 10 tt
. (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS give distance
and dr.ection frurn old well and plans lor pluygrny
it:
4-0
1 „') C, li(_(i-_1'!!>,I I,.11 I110 -1_I$ used nn this lend, u,clucltr3 wells Give 11c91sU:lllon and Water Court Case Numbers.
Usec( 101 (itti ase) Descrll/tion of land on which used
1 Y1, 1• Of t iyh! -
r) - c� 121zrc,r,Tlo►J 5�'/4 Ste. tz _�1�� _ 13
EG
t_tzk: U(rc}t..-..}.�--FS .-_..- -- -- ----- --- G Ott ___
St1A1`r- r`lo(r.►T 3 TwP 9 s_1_---5--
. o
Ci 1 HE APPLICANT (S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFOIiMA-1 ION SET FORTH HEREON IS
1 RUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE.
--- --1- -f- All_ __-__c_ ____X -Lw-.. _.:)
.A7UPPF 01 API !CAN 11...)
List atldt1IU IJl sheets ets 01
1 If m011' SpdCf' Is required.
Lincoln DeVore
1000 West Fillmore St.
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907
(303) 632-3593
Home Office
Sandy Smith
3059 Road 103
Carbondale, CO 81623
May 7, 1981
Re: SUBSURFACE SOILS INVESTIGATION
INDOOR RIDING ARENA
CEDARIDGE RIDING ACADEMY
CARBONDALE, COLORADO
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is the report concerning a subsurface
soils investigation for a proposed indoor riding arena for
the Cedaridge Riding Academy near Carbondale, Colorado.
Respectfully submitted,
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY, INC.
Written by: Gary M.
Grand
rzisnik,
nction `af. Nj
Reviewed by G
GMK/heh
LD Job No. 39037 -GS
cc: LD - Grand Junction
LD - Glenwood Springs
East 8th Street
)lo, Colo 81001
} 546-1150
P.O. Box 1427
Glenwood Springs, Colo 81601
(303) 945-6020
86 Rosemont Plaza
Montrose, Colo 81401
(303) 249-7838
P.O. Box 1882
Grand Junction, colo 81501
(303) 242-8968
P.O. Box 1643
Rock Springs, Wyo 82901
(307) 382-2649
•
ABSTRACT:
The contents of this report are a
subsurface soils investigation and foundation recommendations for
the proposed indoor riding arena for the Cedaridge Riding
Academy located north of Carbondale, Colorado.
Topographically, the site is approxi-
mately level with a gentle slope (0 to 5 degrees) downward to the
northwest. Some grasses were noted on the site which is in a
stable, low erosion potential area.
Site soils consisted of fine grained
silts and clays and of weathered basaltic rock as a sandy gravel
stratum. Bedrock consists of basalt believed to overlie deeper
rock strata of the Eagle Valley and Maroon Formations.
bearing pressures of 3000 and 5000 psf are recommended
dations on the fine grained soils and the sandy gravel
Maximum
for foun-
or rock,
respectively. On the fine grained soils, minimum pressures of
1500 psf may be necessary due to the varying swell pressures of
these materials.
All foundations must be well
balanced and heavily reinforced to minimize differential
movement.
All floor slabs on grade must be
constructed to act independently of other structural portions of
the buildings.
Adequate drainage must be provided
at all times. Water should never be allowed to stand or pond
above the foundation materials. A subsurface peripheral drain
shall be placed around the exterior of the structure at the
•
foundation level, connected to the bottom of floor slabs or sur-
face of the ground with a gravel -vertical drain on the exterior
of the wall.
A Type II Cement would be recom-
mended in all concrete in contact with the soil on this site.
More detailed recommendations can be
found within the body of this report. All recommendations will
be subject to the limitations set forth herein.
GENERAL:
This laboratory has been informed
that the soils information developed in this report is to be used
for the design and construction of an indoor riding arena. The
information may or may not be valid for other purposes. If the
proposed use is changed or types of construction proposed other
than noted herein, the laboratory must be contacted to determine
if the information in this report can be used for the new
construction without further investigation being required.
The site is located in the southwest
quarter of Section 12, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, north of
Carbondale in Garfield County, Colorado. As we understand it,
the proposed construction at this location will consist of a pole
type structure of steel framing and metal sheathed walls. Planned
foundation support typically consists of an auger -drilled pier
extending at least 4 feet below grade. No stem walls or grade
beams are planned since wall coverings will be suspended on the
purlins and columns. Maximum column loads will be on the order of
• !
20 kips. Floor slabs on grade will be used in 6000 square feet
of the 150 by 200 foot building, with no slabs in most areas, or
about 24,000 square feet of earth floor.
The site topography is approximately
level, with a gentle slope to the northwest. The site is located
within an area of fair to good surface drainage. This is,
roughly, the lower portion of a small valley that carried runoff
and snowmelt water into Cattle Creek and eventually into the
Roaring Fork River. No significant stability problems are anti-
cipated in the site which is level and well away from any land-
slide or potential slide areas. We understand, from the building
contractor, that cuts and fills at extreme ends of the building
could be on the order of 6 feet or slightly more. At the time of
this report, we were informed that site prepartion was in pro-
gress using push fill without engineering control in the filled
areas.
The site soils are predominantly
colluvial silt and clays, cemented as caliche in some locations
overlying colluvial, sandy gravel. Formational material, encoun-
tered at depths of 6 to 15 feet at the time of drilling, was a
Basalt of Tertiary Age. Basalt rock is an igneous formation,
sometimes intrusions and often igneous flows in this region. It
is generally hard and stable and, at this site, exhibits rela-
tively little weathering. This Basalt flow is of unknown thick-
ness and overlies the Eagle Valley and Maroon Formations in the
general area. Basalt usually weathers to a clay.
BORINGS, LABORATORY TESTS AND RESULTS:
Three test borings were drilled
across the building site and are located approximately as shown
on the attached Test Boring Location Diagram. The test borings
were placed in such a manner as to obtain a reasonably good pro-
file of the subsurface soils. All test borings were drilled with
a power -driven, continuous auger drill. Samples were taken with
a standard split -spoon sampler, and by bulk methods.
The soils profile is generally a
3 -layer system consisting of a surface layer of moderate density,
fine grained soils (Soil Types No. 1, 2 and 4) overlying a high
density layer of sandy gravel with some sandy, silty clay (Soil
Type No. 3). The third layer is the hard Basalt formational
rock.
The precise gradational and plasti-
city characteristics associated with the soils encountered during
drilling can be found on the attached summary sheets. The repre-
sentative number for each soil group is indicated in a small
circle immediately below the sampling point on the Drilling Logs.
The following discussion of the soil groups will be general in
nature.
Soil Type No. 1 classified as a
silty clay of very fine grain size. The similar Soil Type No. 2
is also silty clay with more fine sands and of moderate density.
These soils have a varying tendency to expand upon the addition
of moisture with swell pressures on the order of 700 to 1340 psf
being considered typical. While this magnitude of expansion
should not be sufficient to affect the heavy structural members
of the building, it can cause some movement beneath light struc-
tural members and floor slabs on grade. These soils will have a
slight tendency to long-term consolidate under applied foundation
pressures. However, if the allowable bearing values given
not exceeded, we feel that differential movement
tolerable. This soil group was found to have an
bearing value on the order of 3000 psf maximum.
would be
allowable
Because of
are
variations in swell pressures, a minimum design pressure of 1500
psf is recommended.
with some silt and clay.
Soil Type No. 3 was sandy gravel
The material was of relatively high
density with very low or no expansive potential. A maximum
bearing pressure of 5000 psf is feasible on this material, with
no minimum load required.
Soil Type No. 4 was sandy, clayey
silt of moderate density and plasticity. This material was
cemented with caliche, a calcium carbonate compound that can
leach out of the soil when very wet and result in subsidence of
the soil mass. Some swell potential, typically 645 psf, was also
determined. A maximum bearing pressure of 3000 psf was recom-
mended for this material, with a minimum of 750 psf. Soil
moisture control at and below footings is also very important,
particularly because subsurface drainage appears to be poor.
No free water was encountered during
drilling on this site. True free water should be fairly deep in
this area, and hence, should not affect construction assuming
that surface drainage is properly controlled.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Since the exact magnitude and nature
of the foundation loads are not precisely known at the present
time, the following recommendations must be somewhat general in
nature. Any special loads or unusual design conditions should be
reported to Lincoln-DeVore so that changes in these recommen-
dations may be made, if necessary. However, based upon our ana-
lysis of the soil conditions and project characteristics pre-
viously outlined, the following recommendations are made.
Most of the native soils encountered
at the site are suitable to support shallow foundations at a
maximum bearing pressure of 3000 psf and a minimum pressure of
1500 psf to resist the potential swell (under a structure in
place) of the fine grained soils. The proposed short drilled
pier foundation should be constructible at this site, designed
for these recommended pressures. Foundations should extend
through any fill materials to bear on native soils of all types.
The short piers should rest on the granular soils of Soil Type
No. 3.
We will not present any alternative
shallow foundations that are also feasible. We understand that
arrangements have already been made with a caisson drilling con-
tractor, pending final drilled pier designs based on the soils
information in this report.
The bottoms of all piers should be
thoroughly cleaned prior to the placement of. concrete. The
amount of reinforcing required in each pier will depend upon the
magnitude and nature of loads involved. However, as a rule of
• •
thumb, reinforcement equal to approximately .07 of the gross
cross-sectional concrete areas should be utilized. Additional
reinforcing should be used if structural consideration is so
warranted. Reinforcement over the entire shaft length would be
recommended.
The horizontal thrust normally
generated at the foundation line by rigid frame buildings should
not be resisted by "hairpins" embedded into the floor slabs where
slabs on grade are used. This horizontal force should be resisted
by either threaded tie rods or reinforcing bars extending from
pier to opposite pier below the finished floor slab line. All
fasteners should be either encased in concrete or covered with a
heavy coat of bituminous paint to ensure long-term stability.
The bottom of all foundation com-
ponents should rest a minimum of 4 feet below finished grade or
as required by the local building codes. Foundation components
must not be placed on frozen soils.
Where floor slabs are used, they may
be placed directly on grade or over a compacted gravel blanket of
4 to 6 inches in thickness. Under no circumstances should this
gravel pad be allowed to act as a water trap beneath the floor
slab. A vapor barrier is recommended beneath any and all floor
slabs on grade which will lie below the finished exterior ground
surface. All fill placed beneath the interior floor slabs must
be compacted to at least 90% of its maximum Proctor dry density,
ASTM -D-698.
All floor slabs on grade must be
constructed to act independently of the other structural portions
•
of the building. These floor slabs should contain deep construc-
tion or contraction joints to facilitate even breakage and to
help minimize any unsightly cracking which could result from dif-
ferential movement. Floor slabs on grade should be placed in
sections no greater than 25 feet on a side. Prior to
constructing slabs on grade, all existing topsoil and organics
must be removed from the building interior. Likewise, all foun-
dations must penetrate the topsoil layer.
Any interior, non -load bearing par-
titions which will be constructed to rest on the floor slab
should be constructed with a minimum space of 2 inches at either
the top or bottom of the wall. The bottom of the wall would be
the preferred location for this space. This space will allow for
any future potential expansion of the subgrade soils and will
prevent damage to the wall and/or roof section above which could
be caused by this movement. There will probably be no non-
bearing partitions extending from floor to ceiling.
Adequate drainage must be provided
in the foundation area both during and after construction to pre-
vent the ponding of water. The ground surface around the
building should be graded so that surface water will be carried EI
quickly away from the structure. The minimum gradient within 10
feet of the building will depend upon surface landscaping. Bare
or paved areas should maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, while
landscaped areas should maintain a minimum gradient of 5%. Roof
drains must be carried across all backfilled. areas and discharged
well away from the structure. This surface drainage is par-
ticularly important to prevent both swelling of foundation soils
• •
and leaching of the caliche from soils similar to Soil Type No. 4
that can occur with saturation of subgrade materials.
To give the building extra lateral
stability and to aid in the rapidity of runoff, all backfill
around the building and in utility trenches in the vicinity of
the structure should be compacted to at least 90% of its maximum
Proctor dry density, ASTM D-698. The native sandy gravel encoun-
tered on this site may be used for backfilling purposes, if so
desired. All backfill must be compacted to the required density
by mechanical means. No waterflooding techniques of any type
should be used in the placement of fill on this site or borrow
materials similar to Soil Type No. 3.
Although cuts of up to 6 feet have
been mentioned at the uphill portion of the building, no retain-
ing walls appear to be planned at this time that would be over 5
feet in height. For such walls under 5 feet, normal stem wall
proportions and reinforcing would probably be adequate for the
relatively stable soils. Such a stem wall would typically be
extended into foundation soils and designed as a "no footing" or
stem wall on grade type foundation within the limitations set
forth above for foundation design.
Because a subsurface water trap
would form behind (uphill of) such a wall in the backfill, a sub-
surface peripheral drain, including an adequate gravel collector,
sand filter and perforated drain pipe, should be constructed out-
side the building perimeter at the bottom o.f the wall. The
discharge pipe should be given free gravity outlet to "daylight"
or ground surface.
Excavation into the surficial, fine
grained soils should not be difficult, but drilling into Soil
Type No. 3 will present a moderate degree of difficulty due to
the high density and possible cobble sized rocks that could
occur. If Basalt is reached in some locations, extreme dif-
ficulty is likely for drilling in the weathered portion, with no
progress likely in the hard, unweathered Basalt.
The soils on this site were found to
contain sulfates in detrimental quantities. Therefore, a Type II
Cement would be recommended in all concrete in contact with the
soil. Under no circumstances should calcium chloride ever be
added to a Type II Cement. In the event that Type II Cement is
difficult to obtain, a Type I Cement may be used, but only if it
is protected from the soils by an impermeable membrane.
The open foundation excavation must
be inspected prior to the pouring of concrete to establish that
adequate design bearing materials have been reached and that no
debris, soft spots or areas of unusually low density are located
within the foundation region.
It is believed that all pertinent
points concerning the subsurface soils on this site have been
covered in this report. If soil types and conditions other than
those outlined herein are noted during construction on the site,
these should be reported to Lincoln-DeVore so that changes in
recommendations can be made, if necessary. If questions arise or
further information is required, please feel. free to contact
Lincoln-DeVore at any time.
f titI. -
Grr /
••\�- i�`� 6ya
yyp0 frlJ' �� o�'.�� S »•i?ry �� ..
rr
370
940 ._ it !ii
Q.
7,440
/
s 77 c' ) •
...._, --, __v.._ ,,,,_,,
i
L_,., F�•
000
24 •
�.. •
reek
rg
Springy
G�E�AG S,7 Lex47-74).v G.eAM
CZ14.e/c>6 LiOiA/ y- La, CO
q
LINCOLN
DeVORE
ENGINEERS•
GEOLOGISTS
5C.44 -E -L.
//I 2,000'
COLORADO: COLORADO SPRINGS,~'
PUEBLO, GLENWOOD SPRINGS ,
GRAND JUNCTION , MONTROSE ,
WYOMING: ROCK SPRINGS
• SOILS DESCRIPTIONS:
SYMBOL USCS DESCR/PT/ON
ROCK DESCRIPTIONS;
SYMBOL DESCR/PT/ON
SYMBOLS 81 NOTES: T
„SYMBOL DESCRIPT/ON
:o;:04
SEDIMENTARY ROCKS
Free
water
9/12 Standard penetration drive
Numbers indicate 9 blows to drive
the spoon 12" into ground.
ST 2- V2" Shelby thin wall sample
Wo Natural Moisture Content
u)x Weathered Material
Free water table
,,
Topsoil
:,i;��
CONGLOMERATE
Man-made Fill
SANDSTONE
0.00.0.
0:0.0:0:
0:0:0:0;
o:o•oo
GW Well -graded Gravel
_ -
:..77:_._-:.:
SILTSTONE
0000
0000
0 00
0000
GP Poorly -graded Gravel
____
====
=___
SHALE
0 o
0
0
0
GM Silty Gravelx
x x x
x x
CLAYSTONE
%0
'oo0/
GC Clayey Gravel
I r
COAL
SW WeII-graded
Sand
I I
LIMESTONE
15' Wx
Ya Natural dry density
T.B.—Disturbed Bulk Sample
0 Soil type related to samples
in report
Top of formation
(/
SP Poorly -graded Sand
i
DOLOMITE
I
I
III
III
i
i
SM Silty Sand
MARLSTONE
��
,��
SC Clayey Sand
/Mit,,
GYPSUM
ML Low -plasticity Silt
Other Sedimentary Rocks
/,`/ I,
JONEOUS ROCKS
CL Low -plasticity Clay
, i� ��
GRANITIC ROCKS
orm.
I—�1—+
Standard
by driving
sampler
laolb.
des. D-1586.
Samples
spoon
thin wall
samples.
The boring
at the
not warranted
of subsurface
and times.
Test Boring Location
Test Pit Location
Seismic or Resistivity Station,.
Lineation indicates approx,
length a orientation of spread
(S =Seismic , R=Resistivity )
Penetration Drives are mode
a standard 1.4" split spoon
into the ground by dropping a
weight 30". ASTM test
may be bulk , standard split
(both disturbed) or 2-I/2" I.D.
("undisturbed") Shelby tube
See log for type.
logs show subsurface condition;
dates and locations shown ,and it is
that they are representative
conditions at other locations
OL Low -plasticity Organic
+
* +
DIORITIC ROCKS
I
:
Silt and Clay
MH High -plasticity Silt
)i.!/i. u:
p`•� •
'ix ...-.0:.•!,
GABBRO
/
CH High -plasticity Clay
�-
RHYOLITE
Z
—
----Z,/
—
OH High -plasticity
Organic Clay
""'7,,t,,,-
ANDESITE
....4.4...44,
a.,«.
pt Peat=
111
BASALT.111,441-
0
J
0�'
I GW/GM Well- graded Gravel,
Silty
is
`"
'moo Qo
TUFF a ASH FLOWS
2/0
00
0
GW/GC WeII-graded Gravel,
Clayey
.„,..;
:io°vo
BRECCIA & Other Volconiks
000
°Op o
'
GP/GM Poorly- graded Gravel,
Silty
rt� A
Other Igneot4 RochS
0
7p
0000
o
°
0
GP/GC Poorly -graded Gravel,
Clayey
,�ff ,/
11,---�/
METAMORPHIC ROCKS
GNEISS
a
0
, GM/GC Silty Gravel,
Clayey
.IX
f�
�f��
�!i/
SCHIST
//
o
GC/GM Clayey Gravel,
Silty
v
21411
`�
PHYLLITE
`
a
SW/SM Well - graded Sand,
Silty
:�:��
•s!
SLATE
SW/SC Well- graded Sand,
Clayey:!:
j.N:
METAQUARTZIT E
�l�
O 9 O
1h
SP/SM Poorly -graded Sand,
ooQ
MARBLE
i>
,
Silty
o�
'�
SP/SC Poorly- graded Sand,
Clayey
��'d
v r�
HORNFELS
I I
SM/SC Silty Sand, Clayey
yc�!
fA 1'
SERPENTINE
SC/SM Clayey Sand, Silty
Other Metamorphic Rocks
CL/ML Silty Clay
0 LINCOLN
DeVORE
TESTING
COLORADO. Colorado Springs, Pueblo,
GlenwoodSWlnMontrose, ¢unnison,
EXPLANATION OF BOREHOLE LOGS
AND LOCATION DIAGRAMS
LABORATORY
Grand Junction.-: WY° -Rock Springs
TEST HOLE No.
TOP ELEVATION
—10
_ Cc..,ci_Ay,s,47y,
"./sA,vo gt r"..iic
(.ia4vti, v-STIF;Z
Mors3 Sada FAT4F1
/,-1; sikA/DY
Goitvii, Si, TY,
V. 7:4/4512;--
13414-11aol.,M,
23.4.54 LT
LeiFids..4,- 0.1
—34saLr
Ar /0')
—20 —
—25 —
I, 4 1_, ccAy-su 77,
.s.4,40y; (cA,../w)--
soc•r; Mo/br,
t../POTIF,TaW
SAMbyQ
d...,r; v. _p
p‘r,vs aix-sam
V.
175%,
X-47TN'ggl,
6,0_4vgt It+.6--i4
9
0
a
CZ, ci-AY,
v.144/Zo,liSRAi,
5LAITAWD
.45.4s.7 Lem sgs
0,./
A/440 el4.5.14-y-
AT /5')
,a:ve-7.414 ZoGs 4A.it) 6 /
6 4c-Lf/4 V- 6--4E.50 A/2)4 L.cf;
.3.1 '1.
40/4
7. /
LINCOLN
DeVORE
ENGINEERS•
GEOLOGISTS
,44L,
CcALic.v.fr
zazkars /Ai CY
zypi 4 /-4.41,-/r/x� ca
SA L
• G.
''.=/ 00 '
c.
10
15
20
25
3 9e. 3 7 S
COLORADO: COLORADO SPRINGS,
PUEBLO , GLENWOOD SPRINGS ,
GRAND JUNCTION , MONTROSE ,
WYOMING: ROCK SPRINGS
SUMMARY SHEET
Soil Sample CL Test No. 39037 GS
Location Cep4,etQ4t - 304/A44_E CO Date
Boring No. Depth ¢ 3 o B
Sample No. Test by sa
Natural Water Content (w)
Specific Gravity (Gs) In Place Density fro) pcf
SIEVE ANALYSIS:
Sieve No. % Passing
1 1/2"
111
3/All
1/2.1
4 loo. v
10 99.44
20 99.5
40 991C
100 q� 9
200 96-.9'
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS:
Grain size (mm)
s9.
o.00S 43. 7
Plastic Limit P.L. /2.6 %
Liquid Limit L. L. 3a .0
Plasticity Index P.I. zs.a- %
Shrinkage Limit
Flow Index
Shrinkage Ratio
Volumetric Change
Lineal Shrinkage %
MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD
Optimum Moisture Content - wo
Maximum Dry Density -ad pcf
California Bearing Ratio (av) %
Swell- f)ays
Swell against /340 psf Wo
BEARING:
Housel Penetrometer (av) psf
Unconfined Compression (qu) psf
Plate Bearing• psf
Inches Settlement
Consolidation % under psf
PERMEABILITY:
K (at 20°C)
Void Ratio
Sulfates ppm,
LDV -09
SOIL ANALYSIS
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY
COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
1
SUMMARY SHEET
Soil Sample eL Test No. 390.37 as
Location ��dAaiO4E �o,v� ,x%.64-"IY- 6.74a64,,.+DAcal,CO Date 4 30 B/
Boring No. Depth
Sample No. z Test by sD
Natural Water Content (w) %
Specific Gravity (Gs) In Place Density (To) pcf
SIEVE ANALYSIS:
Sieve No. % Passing
1 0"
1"
3/4"
1/21i
4 foo.o
10 ioo.o
20 9B. 3
40 95.6
100 yz.
200 B7/
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS:
Grain size (mm)
Ok
Plastic Limit P L /4 .6" %
Liquid Limit L. L. 4e, 3 %
Plasticity Index P.I. 25.8 %
Shrinkage Limit %
Flow Index
Shrinkage Ratio ok
Volumetric Change %
Lineal Shrinkage %
MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD
Optimum Moisture Content - w°
Maximum Dry Density -Td pcf
California Bearing Ratio (av)
Swell. Dar
Swell against 7"° psf Wo gain �0.a °o
BEARING:
House) Penetrometer (av) psf
Unconfined Compression (qu) psf
Plate Bearing• psf
Inches Settlement
Consolidation % under psf
PERMEABILITY:
K (at 20°C)
Void Ratio
Sulfates ppm,
LDll
VO
SOIL ANALYSIS
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY
COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
Soil Sample G�'1
Project CIaq,¢ipla .Cio,✓; 4cAatiwY
Sample Location C/oe,a...uoaLA-; CD ('S.rd)
10
9
8
7
6
5
40
30
20
10
0
Test No. 3937-S
Date
Test by
S D
' " #4 4t10 #20 4M0 #100 *200- Sieve No.
Sample No. 3
Specific Gravity
Moisture Content
Effective Size .0o6.2
Cu >5oo
Cc o. 93
Fineness Modulus
L.L. ° P.I.__,
BEARING
psf
Sieve Size
1
% Passing
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
1 1/2"
1"
3/4"
498.4
82. S
1/2"
72.o
3/8"
4
68./
58.5
10 47.5
20 393
40 3s i
100 29.9
200
26.
.0200 /5.4
.005o
Sulfates Ppm
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY
COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
tI
I'
GRAVEL
SAND
SILT TO CLAY
Coarse
1 Fine
Co.
Medium
1 Fine
Nonplastic to Plastic
01111I
.........._
....,_.,
...........
,____
100
,1t...
I
_ 1)
I
,0
Q.,
Diameter- (rr�m1 I
•
, ,0
' " #4 4t10 #20 4M0 #100 *200- Sieve No.
Sample No. 3
Specific Gravity
Moisture Content
Effective Size .0o6.2
Cu >5oo
Cc o. 93
Fineness Modulus
L.L. ° P.I.__,
BEARING
psf
Sieve Size
1
% Passing
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
1 1/2"
1"
3/4"
498.4
82. S
1/2"
72.o
3/8"
4
68./
58.5
10 47.5
20 393
40 3s i
100 29.9
200
26.
.0200 /5.4
.005o
Sulfates Ppm
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY
COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
tI
I'
Soil Sample /'1L�C,4uc,yE)
SUMMARY SHEET •
Test No. 39037 Gs
Locatione,o"E 2o..,4 4,4b. -..--,r- L A,eB0,v2A4E-(-0 Date 4.30 -8 /
Boring No. Depth
Test by SI)
Sample No 4
Natural Water Content (w)
%
In
Place Density (To) pcf
Specific Gravity (Gs)
SIEVE ANALYSIS:
Sieve No. % Passing
1 1/2"
Plastic Limit P L 23.0
4/ 4 %.4
Plasticity i 3ity Index P.I.
1"
Shrinkage Limit %
3/4"
Flow Index
1/211 foo . o
Shrinkage Ratio %
49.9
Volumetric Change %
10 96. 7
Lineal Shrinkage %
20 90.8
MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD
Optimum Moisture Content - w° °Io
40 ,,;.5--../
100 74.5
200 G4,¢
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS:
Grain size (mm) %
Maximum Dry Density -rd pcf
California Bearing Ratio (av) %
Swell- Days %
Swell against A45 psf Wo gain �• '$ °o
BEARING:
House I Penetrometer (av) psf
0.02. 5,2.0
o . ooS" 40.8
Unconfined Compression (qu)
psf
Plate Bearing: psf
Inches Settlement
Consolidation % under psf
PERMEABILITY:
K (at 20°C)
Void Ratio
Sulfates ppm.
SOIL ANALYSIS
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY
COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
LDV -09
RONALD GARFIELD*
ANDREW V. HECHT**
ROBERT E. KENDIG
MICHAEL J. HERRON***
JANE ELLEN HAMILTON
CATHERINE H. McMAHON****
*also admitted to
New York Bar
**also admitted to
District of Columbia Bar
***also admitted to
Florida Bar
****also admitted to
Illinois Bar
•1110
GAR11EI D & H ECHT, -3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING
601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
February 22, 1991
Mark Bean
Planning Director
Garfield County
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Amended Smith Exemption Plat
Dear Mark:
TELEPHONE
(303) 925-1936
TELECOPIER
�-- (303) 925-3008
F -L-1:1-1217_ _..
G' FEB 25 1991 iY.
ARFIELD COUNTY
As you and I have discussed on the telephone, during the
course of the purchase of Parcel B of the Smith Exemption, located
in Garfield County, by our client, the 1982 FBO Richard Honig
Trust, it was discovered that the Plat of record for the
subdivision contained certain discrepancies in the calls of the
legal description of the property. The legal description in the
Plat has now been changed to reflect the actual description of the
property and such changes are reflected in the First Amendment to
the Smith Exemption, two "blue lines" and the mylar of which are
enclosed under cover of this letter. Also enclosed are original
executed Consents from our client, as the owner of Parcel B, and
from Sandra Smith, who is the owner of Parcel A. In addition, we
have included two checks in the amount of $50.00 payable to the
Garfield County Treasurer for processing the Plat amendment and a
check in the amount of $10.00 payable to the Garfield County Clerk
and Recorder for recording costs.
The owners both request approval from the Garfield County
Commissioners to this amendment to the Plat as expeditiously as
• .
GAR IIELD & HECHT, P.C.
Mark Bean
February 22, 1991
Page 2
possible. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C.
JEH/bc
Enclosure
cc: Richard Honing (w/o enc.)
Ellen Hamilton
1
• •
CONSENT
The undersigned, Sandra Smith, owner of Parcel A, Smith
Exemption, does hereby consent to the submission by Garfield &
Hecht, P.C. of a request to amend the Smith Exemption Plat to
correct certain discrepancies in the legal descriptions of the
property contained in such plat. I hereby request that the Board
of County Commissioners of Garfield County approve this request.
Sandra Smith
LAW OFFICES
ROBERT B. EMERSON, P.C.
86 SOUTH THIRD STREET
CARBONDALE. COLORADO 81623
(970) 963-3700
ROBERT B. EMERSON
August 26, 1998
Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Sandra Smith Subdivision Exemption
Dear Mark:
FAX (970) 963-0985
AUG 2.8 t998
•r
Pursuant to the conditions of approval of this subdivision exemption, I am enclosing with
this letter copies of documents and correspondence regarding the wells on the subject
property. Once we receive the final well permits, I will provide copies to you.
The approval of this subdivision exemption was granted on May 18, 1998. The terms of
approval required that a plat be presented within 120 days, or by September 18, 1998.
The Board may grant extensions of up to 1 year from the date of approval for finalizing
the subdivision exemption.
Given the fact that the well permits have not been finalized, I would request on behalf of
Sandy an extension of time to May 17, 1999, to finalize the exemption. Hopefully, we
will be able to finalize this at an earlier date, but the full year extension seems to
make sense so we don't have to keep coming back. Please present this to the Board of
Commissioners for consideration and advise me in writing of the Board's approval.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
ti
Robert B. Emerson
RBE/jc
Enclosures
cc: Fitzhugh Scott, III
Sandra Smith
FITZHUGH SCOTT I I I
ATTORNEY AT LAW
1555 SILVER ZING DRIVE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE/FAX (970) 925-1216
July 5, 1998
Sandie Johnson
Office of State Engineer
1313 Sherman St., Room 818
Denver, CO 80203
Re: Sandra Smith - Cedar Ridge Farm Well Nos. 6 & 7 (#s 37201-F and 28918-F)
Dear Sandie:
Enclosed are: Petition for Reinstatement for #28918-F (which I discussed with Craig Liss
last May), together with a Late Filed SBU (plus copies of Shelton Drilling's Well Completion and
Pump Installation Reports of 5/81 and Sandra Smith's previous SBU/Amendment of Existing
Record of 5/27/81) and the associated $30 filing fee, and; for both wells, Applications to Change
Existing Location and Water Court applications to make the water rights for the wells absolute.
Would you update us on the reinstatement for Sandra's well (#37201-F), which, which we
were working on in May? Sandra just mentioned that she has not received anything final from the
CSEO on that item.
Thanks for your help in handling these items.
Very truly yours,
Fitzhugh Scott III
encls.
cc: Sandra Smith
sscsco.Ar
Gt M C.
GWS -42
07/93
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman SC, Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
PRIOR TO COMPLETING FORM, SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE
1. APPLICATION FOR WELL LOCATION AMENDMENT
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 28918—F
2. WELL OWNER.
NAME(S) SANDRA SMITH
Mailing Address 3.9.5.9
City, St. Zip
CARBONDALE CO
81623
Phone ( 970 ) 963-3057
For OUGcc Use only
3. ACTUAL WELL LOCATION: COUNTY OWNER'S WCL DESIGNATN ...CE
WELL NO.7 (PREVIOUSLY REFERRED TO AS SMITH,
3059 10 3.....ROAD CARBONDALE CO
(Address at well location) (City)
DAR....RIDGE...FARM
.WELL NO -I ")
'81$.23
(Zp)
NE 1/4 of the NW
1/4, Sec. .J, 3 Twp. 7 S
(North or South)
(State)
, Range 8.8 W
(East or West)
Distances from Section Lines
48 Ft. from N Section Line, 1740 Ft. from W ' Section Line.
(North or South) (East or West)
SANDRA SMITH EXEMPTION "FATHERING PARCEL" 92.507 ACRES, APPROVED BY
Subdivision GARFIELD COUNTY COMMISSION S 05/98 Block Filing (Unit)
4. The location of the existing well needs to be amended for the following reason(s): (Attach appropriate documentation as necessary)
ALL PREVIOUS DESCRIPTIONS ON ORIGINAL PERMIT NO. 107036, REPLACEMENT
PERMIT NO_ 28918—F AND IN APPLICANT .'S.AUGMENTATION PLAN, (81CW497) WERE
INACCURATE: SUBJECT WELL_ItECEN LY RE—SURVEYED BY SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC
OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS. AMENDMENT MADE PER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NO.3 ON
PERMIT NO. 28918-F.
5. I (we), the above listed owner(s) own the well described herein. I (we) have read the statements made herein,
know the contents thereof, and state that they are true to my (our) knowledge. [Pursuant to Section 24-4-104 (13)(a) C.R.S.,
the making of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the second degree and is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor.]
Name\Title (Please type or print) . Signature Date
SANDRA SMITH
's) 8
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
State Engineer By
Court Case No, Div. Co. WD
Date
Basin MD
FO6M NO.
GWS -10
03/92•
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER•
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
For Office use only
FOR INSTRUCTIONS, SEE REVERSE SIDE
STATEMENT OF BENEFICIAL USE
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 28918-F
1.
WELL OWNER
NAME(S) SANDRA SMITH
Mailing Address 3059 10 3 ROAD
City, St. Zip CARBONDALE CO 81623
Phone ( 970) 963-3057-
2.
WELL LOCATION: COUNTY GARFIELD OWNER'S WELL. DESIGNATION CEDAR RIDGE
3059 103 ROAD CARBONDALE CO 81623 FARM WELL NO. 7
(Address)
NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Sec. 13 Twp. 7 Li N o-
X
(City) (State) (Zip)
S., Range 88 17 E. or n W. 6 P.M.
Distances from Section Lines 48 Ft. from
X
N. or.I
S. Line, 1740 Ft. from
I 1
E. or Cl W. Line.
3.
The well is being used for the following purpose(s): IN HOUSE DOMESTIC, NON-COMM,ERCIAI, LAWN
AND GARDEN IRRIGATIONr STOCK WATERING AND STANFRY 'F ,EE_'PROTECTIQN AS PER
4.
Water from the well was first used beneficially AUGMENTATION DECRE 8 CW4 9 7
under this permit number, for.the above described purposes on OR ABOUT JUNE 1 19 81 .
(Do not report a date which is before the issued date of this permit)
5.
The pumping rate claimed is 30 gallons per minute. .
6.
•
The average annualamount of water diverted is 2 acre feet.
7.
The land area irrigated' (watered) by water from this well is: 2000
—
Acres or
.X_.
Square feet,
(Number)
described as: SANDRA SMITH EXE1 TTQN -APPROVED MAY_ 1988 ••
(Legal escription)
or as FATHERING PARCEL Subdivision Lot(s) Block Filing/Unit
8.
Well drilled by: SHELTON DRILLING Lic. No: 387•
Pump installed by: • SHELTON DRILLING Lic. No: 387 .
9.
Meter Mfg. by OWNER‘. IE •C.RRENTLerial No.: Date installed:
at 41'4111 ` :METER
I (we) have read the statements made herein, know the contents thereof, and.state.that they are true to my (our)
knowledge. [Pursuant to Section 24-4-104 (13)(a) C.R.S., the making of false statements herein constitutes perjury
in the second degree and,isrpunishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor.]
10_
Name/Title (Please type or print)
SANDRA SMITH,
Signature
--L2_
.���C --,fir
Date
-)r--'1 13 )C
. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY •
State Engineer By Date
Court Case No. Div. Co. WD Basin MD Use
**
On
PETITION FOR REIN§TATEMENT
(C.R.S. 37-90-137(3)(c)]
AUGUST 22
19 85
, the Colorado State Engineer issued well
permit No. 28918—F (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS NO.10 7 0 3 6 AND NOW KNOWN AS
CEDAR RIDGE FARM`WELL NO. 7)
I(We) failed to submit evidence of beneficial use [ifpermit issued per 37-90-137(2)] or notice of well
completion [ifpermit issued per [37-90-137(4)] prior to the expiration date of the well permit due to the following
reasons:
PLEASE NOTE THAT I PREVIOUSLY FILED A SBU AND AMENDMENT OF EXISTING
RECORD WITH CSEO IN 5/81 (COPY ATTACHED). WELL WAS COMPLETED AND PUMP
INSTALLED IN 4/81 (SEE ATTACHED WELL COMPLETION & PUMP INSTALLATION
REPORT, FILED WITH CSEO ON 6/22/81) SUBSEQUENTLY, I FILED AN
APPLICATION FOR PLAN OF AUGMENTATION IN 81CW497 IN WATER COURT, DIV
NO.5IN CONNECTION WITH WHICH THE CSEO ISSUED PERMIT NO. 28918—F FOR
THE "EXPANDED USES" AND YIELD (30 G.P.M.) SPECIFIED IN THE
AUGMENTATION PLAN. THEREFORE, MY REASON FOR NOT FILING AN ADDITIONAL
SBU WAS THAT IT DID NOT SEEM TO BE A NECESSITY. FURTHER TO THE REQUEST
THE CSEO, I AM SUBMITTING A CURRENT, SUPPLEMENTAL SBU, TOGETHER WITH
APPLICATION FOR WELL LOCATION AMENDMENT (BOTH ENCLOSED HEREWITH ALONG*
I(We) hereby petition the State Engineer to find that the above reasons constitute excusable neglect,
inadvertence or mistake and accept the evidence attached hereto in accordance with applicable Colorado Revised
Statutes.
Further, I(we) say that I(we) have read the statements made herein and that the same are true of my(our)
own imowledge.
WITII LATE FILED SBU FEE OF $30-00
c
Signature Date
Signature Date
Suhmu oribinal plus 3 Copia COPY
Origi • aI
1S/
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 5 , COLORADO
Cast No. 98 CW j
APPLICATION: 0 FOR FINDING OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE
11 TO MAKE ABSOLUTE A CONDITIONAL WATER RIGHT
Cleric
By
Deputy
•
CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS 01.:
SANDRA SMITH
GARFIELD
' In County.
1. Name, address, telephone number(s) (residence and busincss) of applicant(s)
SANDRA SMITH PHONE NUMBER 970 963-3057
3059 103 ROAD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
2. Name of structure: (well, spring, ditch, reservoir) CEDAR RIDGE FARM WELL NOS. 6 & 7
3. Describe conditional water right (as to each structure) giving the following from the Referee's Ruling and Judgment and
Decree:
A. Date of Original Decree: 12/04/84 81 CW4 9 7 DISTRICT/WATER
Case No. Court DIV NO . 5
B. Location:
C. Source:
GLENWOOD SPRINGS
CATTLE CREEK ALLUVIUM
WELL NO. 6 FOR 15 G.P.N.,
D. Appropriation Date: DECEMBER 4 , 19 81 Amount: WELL NO . 7 FOR 3 0 G . P.M.
E. Use:WELL N0. 6 IN HOUSE.. USE DOMESTIC & 20001" SQ. FT. OF LAWN & GARDEN IRRIGATI
WELL NO. 7 IN HOUSE DOMESTIC & 2000 SQ FT OF LAWN AND GARDEN IRRIGATION, STO
AND STANDBY FIRE PROTECTION
E Depth: (if well) 150± FOR EACH FELL
4. Provide a detailed outline of what has been done toward completion or for completion of the appropriation and application
of water to a beneficial use as conditionally decreed, including expenditures: (add additional sheets if necessary)
No. JDk 300W. Rey. 8-90. APPuCAT10N: 0 FOR FINDING OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE
0 TO MAKE ABSOLUTE A CONDITIONAL WATER RICHT
Bradford Publislzinr,1743 Wazcc Dam CO 80202 — (303) 292.2500 — 9-95
(C1
5 If claim to make absolute —
Water applied to beneficial use:
A. Datc• WELL NO. 6 09/26/90 Amount: 15 G.P.M.
WF.T.T. NO. 7 06/01 /81 FOR 30 G.P.M. /WELL NO
B. Description of place of use where water is applied to beneficial
1) WELL NO. 6 IS USED FOR IN—HOUSE
DOMESTIC & 2000± SQ FT OF LAWN AND
GARDEN IRRIGATION
2) WELL NO. 7 IS USED FOR EMPLOYEE HOUSE
(IN HOUSE DOMESTIC) AND HORSE BARN
(STOCK WATERING) AND 2000± SQ FT OF
LAWN AND GARDEN IRRIGATION.
Use: SAME AS STATE:t) @ PARA 3E HEREOF
. 7 ACTUALLY PUT TO USE PRIOR TO FILING
use: OF SUBJECT AUGMENTATION PLAN—SEE
ORIGINAL PERMIT NO. 107036 AND
REPLACEMENT PERMIT NO. 28918—F
ALSO SEE WELL & PUMP COMPLETION/IN—
STALLATION REPORTS AND SBU'S ON BOTH
WELLS ATTACHED HERETO.
*"PLEASE NOTE: The owner of any conditional water right shall notify the clerk of the court that decreed the conditional
water right of any change in mailing address.
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
1, SANDRA SMITH
verify its content.
{
SS.
FITZHUGH SCOTT, III
1555 SILVER RING ASPEN CO 81611
A44 I of Applk M lef A omc71
TckPn«<r+o. 970 925-1216
Alwnpr Ncc;>uwtws NN)
Subscribed under oath before me on
My commission expires:
91 .0 /
OAK
002596
state under oath that I have read this application and
SANDRA SMITH
TrITAI P 917