The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2.0 Staff Report & Exhibits BOCC & BOH 09.05.17Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District -Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion -Exhibits Applicant is Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District September 5, 2017 Exhibit Exhibit Description Number 1 Garfield County Land Use and Development Code of 2013, as Amended 2 Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2030, as amended 3 Application 4 Staff Report 5 Referral Comments from Morgan Hill, Garfield County Public Health, Dated August 11, 2017 6 Regulation 22 Application Form, CDPHE, for BOCC and Board of Health Signature 7 Location and Extent Approval for the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District's Wastewater Treatment Facility and Proposed Expansion, August 9, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 EXHIBIT .1 4 ----- Site Approval BOCC & BOH September 5, 2017 PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS REQUEST APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER ENGINEERS LOCATION CDPHE Referral to the County regarding Site Approval for the Expansion of an Existing Wastewater Treatment Facility Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Aspen Glen Water & Sanitation District Brandyn Bair, P.E., SGM Engineering, Inc West of SH 82 and the Roaring Fork River, approximately 3.36 miles northwest of the Town of Carbondale. Also known by Garfield County Assessor Parcel No. 239513102065. I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility 0/VWfF) and Expansion has been referred to the Board of County Commissioners and the Board of Health for comments and recommendation. The Colorado Revised Statutes and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) State Regulations call for Amendments of an Existing Site Location Approval to be forwarded to the County and Local Health Authority for review and comments. The proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion will expand the capacity of the current WWTF from 0.107 million gallons per day to 0.214 million gallons per day. The Applicant has represented that the current WWTF is experiencing flows in the range 60% to 80% of capacity and with the recent addition of the RE-1 Elementary School, those flows will increase closer to the 80% capacity trigger which requires further planning and permitting to begin. Additionally, the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation 85, calls for the control of nutrients from domestic wastewater treatment effluent and requires that discharges meet a total inorganic nitrogen and phosphorous limit. Although the current facility is exempt from compliance because the facility is below 2.0 million gallons per day, the exemption may sunset in 2022. The existing WWTF is located on an approximately 6 acre parcel. The proposed expansion would occur on the already developed parcel. On August 9, 2017, the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District received a Location and Extent approval from the Garfield County Planning Commission for both the existing WWTF and the proposed expansion. llPage Figure 1 : Vicinity Map Site Approval Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion 21Page Site Approval Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion Figure 2: Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation Distr ict Boundaries 3IPage Figure 3: Proposed Site Plan Site Approval Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion 41Page II. REVIEW AND STAFF ANALYSIS Site Approval Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion 1. The CDPHE and State regulations call for Wastewater Treatment Facility expansions to be forwarded to the County in which the facility is to be located for review and comments. The local authorities are requested to comment on the relationship of the lift station to its local comprehensive plan and/or utility plans for the community as it affects water quality. An example of the referral form is available for review as Exhibit 6. 2 . The Board of County Commissioners will also convene as the Board of Health for the purpose of reviewing the referral. 3. The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030, as amended contains goals and policies in Section 7 -Water and Sewer Services relevant to the request. Key elements from Section 7 that support the Application and a finding of consistency with the plan are provided in the following excerpts: Section 7-Vision: High water quality has been preserved and enhanced through stringent regulation of waste water treatment and disposal as well as regulation of detrimental surface uses. Section 7 -Goals: 1. Ensure the provision of legal, adequate, dependable, cost-effective and environmentally sound sewer and water service for new development. Section 7 -Policies: 1. Development located adjacent to municipalities or sanitation districts with available capacity in their central water/sewer systems will be encouraged to tie into these systems . 2. County will strongly discourage the proliferation of private central water/sewer systems[. ... ] 5. Higher density development [. ... ] should be located in areas where central sewage treatment facilities are either currently available, or feasible in the future. The location of the Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map as Residential Medium High. It is staff's opinion that the application is generally consistent with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan . SI Page Industrial •Mixed Use • Commercial Res H (1 /3 TO <2 Ac/Du)' Res MH (2 TO < 6 Ac/Du)" Res M (6TO<1 0 Ac /Du) Res L (10 + Ac /Du) Resource Production/r\Jatural Ill. REFERRAL COMMENTS Site Approval Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion The Application was referred to Garfield County Environmental Health Department. Morgan Hill from Environmental Health noted in her comments (Exhibit 5): There were no identified issues with the proposed wastewater expansion facility . Public Health is supportive of new developments between Glenwood Springs and Carbondale being connected to a public wastewater treatment facility. Recommendation that a spill response plan is in place in the event of failure. Staff spoke to the applicant and they stated that they have an emergency response plan in place, as required by Colorado Department of Environmental Health. This emergency response plan will address spills. IV. RECOMMENDATION Formalize a motion acting as both the Board of County Commissioners and the Garfield County Board of Health recommending to the CDPHE approval of the Roaring Fork 6 I f.l' g ,,, Site Approval Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion Water and Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion and authorizing the Chairman to sign the CDPHE Review Agencies Recommendation form as the Board of County Commissioners and the Board of Health. 71Page Garfield County 195 W . 14th Street Rifle, CO 81650 (970) 625-5200 Garfield County Community Development 1 08 81h Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Patrick Waller August 8, 2017 Hello Patrick, Public Health E XHIBIT I 5 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs , CO 81601 (970) 945-6614 I have reviewed the Site Application Report for Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation and did not identify any issues with the proposed wastewater expansion facility. Public Health is supportive of new developments between Glenwood Springs and Carbondale being connected to a public wastewater treatment facility. We recommend that a spill response plan is in place in the event of failure, which can happen even with the best practices in place. The operator of the lift station should have the contact information for the City of Glenwood Springs water treatment plant, which intakes off of the Roaring Fork River. The City has developed a Source Water Protection Plan for this water source and the site of the lift station is within their source water protection area. Please contact Brad Zachman at (970) 989-4358 or Warren Hays at (970) 384-6348 in the event of a spill. The City's wastewater treatment plant has also developed a spill response plan which I've attached for reference. Please feel free to contact me with questions. Thank you, {/~Ii ;/i f/11£ Morgan Hill Environmental Health Specialist Ill Garfield County Public Health 195 W. 141h Street Rifle, CO 81650 (970) 665-6383 Garfield County Public Health Department -working to promote health and prevent disease EXHIBIT Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division Engineering Section 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, 82 Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 CDPHE.WQEnqRevlew@state.co.us 303-692-6298 Regulation 22 Application Form Section 22.5 of Regulation 22: Increasing or Decreasing the Design Capacity f E . f W t t T t t F Tt o an XIS mg as ewa er rea men ac1 l~Y A. Project and Svstem lnfonnatlon System Name Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Project Title Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion County Garfield County Date Fee Paid or payment Invoice Number and Check WUSA171030897 (Site attached May 16, 2017 Number Location App.) CK No. 9973 Design Company Name SGM, Inc. Design Engineer Brandyn Bair CO License Number 42640 Address 118 W. 6th St, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Email brandynb@sgm-inc.com Phone 970.384.9024 Fax 970.945 .5948 Applicant I Entity Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Representative Name/Title Tonya Uren, District Manager Address 3790 County Road 109 Carbondale, CO 81623 Email info@rfwsd.com Phone 970 .945.2144 Fax B. Project lnfonnatlon Location (existing or orooosed site) Proposed Project Capacitv Maximum Month Average Brief location description Carbondale, CO Hydraulic Capacity in million 0.214 MGD aallons per dav (MGD) NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of S13, T7S, R89W and part of the SW Peak Hour Hydraulic Capacity in Legal Description 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of S18, T7S, million gallons per day (MGD) 0.535 MGD {e .a. Townshio, Ranae) R88W Countv Garfield Latitude 39.45200N Organic Capacity (lbs. BODslday) -450 lbs. BODs/day Lonaitude 107.26879W Treatment Facilih Onlv Funding Will a State or Federal grant or loan be sought to igi D If yes, please list Process finance any portion of the project (e.g., State No Yes project number Revolving Fund)? Project Schedule and Cost Estimate Estimated Bid Qpenino Date January 2018 Estimated Comoletion Date SprinQ 2019 Estimated Project Cost $2.5M Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 1 of 6 Project and System lnfonnatlon Proiect Title Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion System Name Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Countv Garfield County COPS Pennit No. C00044750 COPS Pennit December 31, 2020 Expiration Date Original site location approval number and #4133, 1994 date Treatment Facilltv Information 1 . Existing Facility Process Overview a) Please describe the existing wastewater treatment facility process(es) The existing WWTF is an activated sludge facility with secondary clarification, tertiary filtration, chlorine disinfection, and aerobic digestion of bioso/ids. Influent passes through the existing pretreatment facility, which consists of flow measurement and screenings and grit removal equipment. Effluent is discharged to the wetlands adjacent to the Roaring Fork River. b) Existing Facility Approved Capacities Existing Hydraulic Capacity : Maximum Month Average : 0.214 million gallons per day (MGD) Peak Hour: NIA million gallons per day (MGD) Existing Organic Capacity: Maximum Month Average 225 lbs of BODs/day c) Existing Facility -Current Flow and Loading Current Flows : Maximum Month Average : 0.060 -0.088 million gallons per day (MGD) Percent of Existing Capacity: 57% -82% Peak Hour: NIA million gallons per day (MGD) Percent of Existing Capacity : NIA Current Organic Load : Maximum Month Average : 127 lbs of BOD5'day Percent of Existing Capacity : 57% 2. Proposed Facility Process Overview a) Please describe the proposed wastewater treatment facility process( es) and any existing treatment process( es) or equipment being retained. The expans ion of the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District (RFWSD) Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) will include the following: 1. addition of one 107,000 gallon-per-day (gpd) aeration basin; 2. addition of an anoxic process, including pumps and piping necessary for recycling mixed liquor from the aeration basin to the anoxic basin; 3. design of a treatment plant, necessary footprint, and piping for future enhanced biological nutrient removal (EBNR) for phosphorus removal; 4. addition of another secondary clarifier to meet the CDPHE design criteria requirements for redundancy; 5. an analysis of influent flows to determine the need for flow equalization or pump system modifications to keep pretreatment fa cilities and clarifiers from exceeding their design capacity. Additional blower capacity and digester capacity will be considered, including an improved decant system and thickeninq capabilities. Site lnfonnation 3. Vicinity maps of facility location which includes the following: a) 5 mile radius map : all wastewater treatment facilities, lift stations and domestic water supply intakes b) 1 mile radius map : habitable buildings, location of public and private potable water wells, an approximate indication of the tooooraohv, and neiohborino land uses 4 . Site Location Zoning a) Present zoning of the site location? ~ Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Fonn Page 2 of 6 PUD b) Zoning within a one (1) mile radius of the site? PUD, Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density, Agricultural/Industrial, Commercial General, Commercial Limited 5. Floodplain or Natural Hazard Area a) Is the facility located in a 1 OD-year floodplain or other natural hazard area? If so , what precautions are being taken? No. No precautions necessary. b) Has the floodplain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board , Department of Natural Resources or other ai::iencv? If so, please list aaencv name and the desig nation. FEMA. Plant site is above the floodway and flood plain; designation is not applicable . 6. Land Ownership a) Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? Please attach copies of the document(s) creating authority for the applicant to construct the proposed facil ity at this site. RFWSD 7 . Nearby Facilities a) Please list all municipalities and water and/or sanitation districts within 5-miles downstream of the proposed wastewater treatment faci lity site. No municipal or District WWTFs are loca ted within 5-miles downstream. The following are privately o wned systems: H-Lazy-F Mobile Home Park, Mountain Meadows MHP, El Rocco MHP. Treatment Facilitv Effluent lnfonnation 8. Effluent disposal method (please check all that apply) ~ Surface Discharge to watercourse (enter watercourse name below) D Groundwater Discharge D Land application D Treated Effluent Reuse (Regulation 84) D Evaporation D Other (describe below) Natural wetlands tributary to Roaring Fork River, stream segment COUCRF03a. 9 . Preliminary Effluent Limits (please attach a copy in Engineering Report) a) Preliminary Effluent Limits date : August 31, 2016 b) Preliminary Effluent Limits exoiration date : December 31 , 2020 10. Downstream Distances a) Downstream distance from the discharge point to the nearest domestic water supply intake? Name of supply? Address of suoolv? Distance : 9 miles Name of Supply: City of Glenwood Springs Address of Supply: 806 Cooper, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 b) Downstream Distance from the discharge point to the nearest other point of diversion? Name of user? Address of user? Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 3 of 6 Distance: 17 miles Name of User: Town of New Castle Address of User: P.O. Box 90, New Castle, C081647 Project lnfonnation 11. a) What entity is financially responsible for the construction of the facility? RFWSD 12. a) What entity has the financially responsibility for owning and long tenn operating expense of the proposed facility? RFWSD 13. a) What entity has the responsibility for managing and operating the proposed facility after construction? RFWSD Additional Factors 14. Please identify any additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Division make an infonned decision on your site location aoolication . An existing WWTF already exists at this site and is functioning well within its discharge permit. The original service plan and site application contemplated this expansion, and a pre-inclusion agreement with the parties involved in the Expanded Service Area has accounted for additional utility service needs achievable within the proposed capacity. Revised December 2013 Section 22 .5: Application Fonn Page 4 of 6 • Colorado Dt:part1m:nt of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division Engineering Section 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, 82 Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 CDPHE.WQEngRevi ew@state.co.us 303-692-6298 Applicant Certification and Review Agencies Recommendation Section 22.5 of Regulation 22: Increasing or Decreasing the Design Capacity of an Existina Wastewater Treatment Facilitv A. Project and System Information Svstem Name RoarinQ Fork Water & Sanitation District Proiect Title Roarino Fork Water & Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facilitv Expansion Countv Garfield County 1. A licant Certification I certify that I am familiar with the requirement of Regulation 22 -Site Location and Design Approval Regulations for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works, and have posted the site in accordance with the Regulations . An engineering report, as described b the re ulations, has been re ared and is enclosed. Applicant Legal Representative (e.g., Public Works Director Date T ed Name The system legal representative is the legally responsible agent and decision-making authority (e .g mayor, president of a board, public works director, owner). The Consulting Engineer is not the legal representative and~ sign this form . 2. Recommendation of Review Agencies As required in Section 22.5(4) and referencing the procedure in Section 22.4(2), the application and the engineering report must be submitted to all appropriate local governments, 208 planning agencies and State agencies for review and comment prior to submittal to the Division . By signing below, the entity or agency: 1) acknowledges receipt of the proposed site location application, 2) has reviewed the proposed site location application and may elect to provide comments, and 3) has provided a recommendation concerning the application to the Division . The recommendation should be based on the factors outlined in Section 22.4(2); for example, on the consistency of the proposed site location application with the local comprehensive plan(s) as they relate to water quality and any adopted water quality management plans(s). Please note: Review agencies are encouraged to provide project comments; however, if a review agency does not recommend approval then the agency must attached a letter describing the reason for their decision or comment on the next page. Signature of Manaaement Aaencv, if different from other entities listed below I Role Date Tvced Name I Aaencv Sia nature ------ Recommend Annroval? l Yes l D I No I 1 1 Signature of County, if proposed facilitv is located in unincoroorated areas of a countv Role Date Typed Name I Aaencv Sia nature ------ Recommend Aocroval? I Yes 1 D I No I D Signature of City or Town, if site is located within three miles of the CltyfTown boundary (if multiple, attach additional sheets as needed) Role Date Tvced Name I Aaencv Sianature Carbondale, CO Glenwood Springs, CO Recommend Aooroval? I Yes I 0 I No I 0 Signature of Local Hea lth Authority Role Date Tvoed Name I Aaencv Sia nature Board of County Commisioners of Garfield County Recommend Annroval? I Yes l I I J No I 0 Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 5 of6 Shmature of 208 Plannlna Aaencv Role Date TvDed Name I Aaencv Sia nature Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Recommend Aooroval? I Yes I D I No I I I Signature of Other State or Federal Agencies, if facility Is located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a federal or state aaencv. Role Date Tvoed Name I Aaencv Sia nature --- Recommend Aooroval? I Yes I D I No l D Signature of Other Basin Water Quality Authority, Watershed Association, Watershed Authority, etc., if facility is located in a Water Quality Control Commission Watershed Protection Control Area. Role Date TvDed Name I Agency Sianature --- Recommend Aooroval? I Yes I I I I No I D Review Aaencv Comments : Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 6 of 6 1111 WJ~ .. K''lll ·~f.,~Ni!.r.ff\i ~~l'r/ ~'"'~"-""'~~~ i ·.i 11111 Reception#: 896187 08/16/2017 12 :39 :09 PM Jean Rlberico 1 of 5 Rec Fee:$0 .00 Doc Fee:0 .00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) ) SS. ) EXHIBIT 1_1-_ At a regular meeting of the Planning Commission for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room at the Garfield County Plaza Building, 108 gth Street, in Glenwood Springs, Colorado, on Wednesday, the 9th day of August, 2017, there were present: ... B=ob.._._F=ul=le=rt=o=n.__ ______ ., Commissioner, Chairman =K=ei=th==-=L=amm==ey.!-. ______ ,, Commissioner, Vice Chair .::E=ri=c ..::.;R=u=dd"'---------' Commissioner ..:::G=re:::.cg;i..::M=cK==enru=·s~-----• Commissioner =K=a=se ..... y_.N'-'-1=· s~pe=l ______ _,, Commissioner oMfoheel 8tt1Hveft , Commissio11e1 "-'=-==~===.-..=------- "'-S =t e'-'-v e~K,.._y =le:...._ _______ ., Associate Commi ss ioner =M=a=tt:..:L=an=gh=o=r=st.__ _____ , Associate Commissioner =L=cc::...=D=at=n=t1=tl·.=--------' Asseeiate Ce .1nmis:siw1e1 - =K=e=U.,,_y.....;;:C=a'-'-ve~ ______ _,, Assistant County Attorney =B-=ec=k"""y._W-'-'-'-'h=e e=l=er=s-=-b ur~g.__ ___ , Clerk to the Commission when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to wit: RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-01 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH A LOCATION AND EXTENT APPLICATION FOR THE ROARING FORK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT FOR A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY LOCATED ON THE PARCEL AS DEPICTED ON THE FINAL PLAT OF ASPEN GLEN FILING NO. 1, RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER ON APRIL 6, 1995, AS RECEPTION N0.476330. (FILE NO. LAEA-06-17-8557) Recitals A. Garfield County is a legal and political subdivision of the State of Colorado for which the Board of County Commissioners is authorized to act. B. Pursuant to law, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County has appointed the Garfield County Planning Commission (the Commission) to act on its behalf. C. The Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District (the Applicant) applied to the Commission pursuant to File No. LAEA-06-17-8557 for a Location and Extent Review for a wastewater treatment facility. 1 1111 WJP.r~'r'llrMr~'l11 M M• 119''1'k' Mr&\Jllli"1~\19'i W 11111 Reception#: 896187 08/16/2017 12:39 :09 PM Jean Rlberlco 2 of 5 Rec Fee:$0 .00 Doc Fee:0 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO D. The proposed facility will be .located on the property as depicted on the Final Plat of Aspen Glen Filing No. 1, recorded in the records of the Garfield county Clerk and Recorder on April 6, 1995, as Reception No. 476330. E. Pursuant to Section 4-111 (C) of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended, and C.R.S. § 30-28-1 lO(l)(a), the District is required to submit an application to the planning commission that has jurisdiction over the territory in which the improvements are proposed to be located for review and comment. Comments shall be provided regarding whether the proposed improvements are in general conformance with the County's Comprehensive Plan of 2030, as amended (the Comprehensive Plan). Pursuant to C.R.S. § 30-28-110, whenever any county planning commfssion has adopted a master plan of the county, no public utilities, whether publicly or privately owned, shall be constructed or authorized in the unincorporated territory of the county until and unless the proposed location and extent thereof has been submitted to and approved by such county. F. In accordance with state law, the Commission has adopted a Master Plan. The Master Plan applicable to this review is the Comprehensive Plan. G. The Commission opened a public hearing on August 9, 2017, upon the question of whether the proposal i s in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. H. The Commission closed the public hearing on August 9, 2017, to make a decision on the request. I. The Commission, on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following determinations of fact: I. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Planning Commission. 2. That the hearing before the Planning Commission was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted or could be submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that hearing. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons, approval of the Location & Extent request by the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District for a wastewater treatment facility and the proposed expansion is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. 4. That the Location and Extent request has been determined to be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That the Location and Extent request is in conformance with the Review Criteria contained in Section 4-111, Location and Extent of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended. 2 6. The determination of General Conformance is based on the Applicant's representations in their Application submittal and at the public hearing before the Planning Commission. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of Garfield Cowity, as follows: A. The foregoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution. B. Exhibit A describes the location of the proposed infrastructure improvements. C. The Location and Extent request for expansion of Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation's Wastewater Treatment Facility is hereby approved subject to the following conditions of approval: I. That all representations made by the Applicant in the Application shall be conditions of approval unless specifically altered by the conditions of approval contained herein. 2. That the District shall obtain all required federal, state and local permits required for installation of the infrastructure. 3. The Applicant shall map the property for county listed noxious weeds and manage any weeds that they may find. Cowity Vegetation Management requests that the Applicant provide its office with treatment records by September 30 2017 if any noxious weeds are located. 4. To help avoid and minimize disturbances to the adjacent heronry, the applicant shall postpone initial construction witil May I st, 2018. To the extent possible, traffic associated wit h the del ivery of supplies and equipment should be minimized and conducted during the last two weeks of April. Additional construction needed to complete the proposed upgrade during subsequent heron nesting seasons shall consist of interior construction work. DATED this 9th day of August, 2017 ATTEST: PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 3 1111 Jii~.,~~~liV~~~~,._.,~ /~~.1~n ~ 'rAl"'~~·riWi 11111 Reception#: 896187 08/16/2017 12:39 :09 PM Jean Alberico 4 of 5 Rec Fee :$0.00 Doc Fee :0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO c ~ Garfield CoWlty Planning Commission Garfield CoWlty Planning Commission Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote: Commission Chairman Bob Fullerton Commissioner Keith Lamme Commissioner Eric Rudd Associate Commissioner Steve K Associate Commissioner Matt Lan horst A:sseeiate Connuisstoner Lee Damuth 4 11111Jr.1~.'L'illl.~~:.:1l'I .M\ 1: \~~:.,~m,w-~w 11111 Reeeption#: 896187 08!16/2017 12 :39 :09 PM Jean Al ber lco 5 of 5 Rec Fee :$0 .0tll Doc Fee :0.00 GA RF IELD COUNTY CO . "II I I l' I . " ~ ,. I ~~ ~· ~ tJ (j) 0 ~ Exhibit A ' \ \ \ \ \ 5