The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3.0 Signed Referral FormColorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division Engineering Section 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, 82 Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 CDPHE.WQEngReview@state.co.us 303-692-6298 Regulation 22 Application Form Section 22.5 of Regulation 22: Increasing or Decreasing the Design Capacity f E . f W t t T t t F Tt o an XIS mg as ewa er rea men ac1 1:y A. Project and Svstem Information System Name Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Project Title Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion County Garfield County Date Fee Paid or payment Invoice Number and Check WUSA171030897 (Site attached May 16, 2017 Number Location App.) CK No. 9973 Design Company Name SGM, Inc. Design Engineer Brandyn Bair CO License Number 42640 Address 118 W. 6th St, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Email brandynb@sgm-inc.com Phone 970.384.9024 Fax 970.945.5948 Applicant I Entity Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Representative NamefTitle Tonya Uren, District Manager Address 3790 County Road 109 Carbondale, CO 81623 Email info@rfwsd.com Phone 970.945.2144 Fax B. Project Information Location (existing or proposed site) Proposed Project Capacitv Maximum Month Average Brief location description Carbondale, CO Hydraulic Capacity in million 0 .214 MGD i:iallons oer day (MGD) NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of S13, T7S, R89W and part of the SW Peak Hour Hydraulic Capacity in Legal Description 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of S18, T7S, 0 .535 MGD (e.a. Township , Range) R88W million gallons per day (MGD) County Garfield Latitude 39.45200N Organic Capacity (lbs. BOD&day) -450 lbs . BODslday Lonaitude 107.26879W Treatment Facilih Only Funding Will a State or Federal grant or loan be sought to IZI D If yes, please list finance any portion of the project (e.g., State No Yes Process Revolving Fund)? project number Project Schedule and Cost Estimate Estimated Bid Ooenina Date January 2018 Estimated Comoletion Date Sorino 2019 Estimated Project Cost $2.5M Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 1 of 6 Project and System Information Proiect Title Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion System Name Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District County Garfield County COPS Permit No. C00044750 COPS Permit December 31, 2020 Expiration Date Original site location approval number and #4133, 1994 date Treatment Facility Information 1. Existing Facility Process Overview a) Please describe the exist ing wastewater treatment facil ity process(es) The existing WWTF is an activated sludge facility with secondary clarification, tertiary filtration, chlorine disinfection, and aerobic digestion of biosolids. Influent passes through the existing pretreatment facility, which consists of flow measurement and screenings and grit removal equipment. Effluent is discharged to the wetlands adjacent to the Roaring Fork River. b) Existing Facility Approved Capacities Existing Hydraulic Capacity : Maximum Month Average : 0.214 million gallons per day (MGD) Peak Hour: NIA million gallons per day (MGD) Existing Organic Capacity : Maximum Month Average 225 lbs of BODs/day c) Existing Facility -Current Flow and Loading Current Flows: Maximum Month Average : 0.060-0.088 million gallons per day (MGD) Percent of Existing Capacity: 57% -82% Peak Hour: NIA million gallons per day (MGD) Percent of Existing Capacity : NIA Current Organic Load : Maximum Month Average: 127 lbs of BODs/day Percent of Existing Capacity : 57% 2. Proposed Facility Process Overview a) Please describe the proposed wastewater treatment fac ility process(es) and any existing treatment process(es) or equipment being retained . The expansion of the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District (RFWSD) Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) will include the following: 1. addition of one 107,000 gallon-per-day (gpd) aeration basin; 2. addition of an anoxic process, including pumps and piping necessary for recycling mixed liquor from the aeration basin to the anoxic basin; 3 . design of a treatment plant, necessary footprint, and piping for future enhanced biological nutrient removal (EBNRJ for phosphorus removal; 4 . addition of another secondary clarifier to meet the CDPHE design criteria requirements for redundancy; 5 . an analysis of influent flows to determine the need for flow equalization or pump system modifications to keep pretreatment facilities and clarifiers from exceeding their design capacity. A ddWo nal blower capacity and digester capacity will be considered, including an improved decant system and thickening capabilities. Site Information 3. Vicinity maps of facility location which includes the following: a) 5 mile radius map : all wastewater treatment facilities , lift stations and domestic water supply intakes b) 1 mile radius map : habitable buildings , location of public and private potable water wells, an approximate indication of the toooaraohv . and neiahborina land uses 4. Site Location Zoning a) Present zoning of the site location? Revised December 2013 Section 22 .5: Application Form Page 2 of6 PUD b) Zoning within a one (1) mile radius of the site? PUD, Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density, Agricultural/Industrial, Commercial General, Commercial Limited 5. Floodplain or Natural Hazard Area a) Is the facility located in a 1 DO-year floodplain or other natural hazard area? If so, what precautions are being taken? No. No precautions necessary. b) Has the floodplain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources or other aaencv? If so, olease list aaencv name and the desianation. FEMA. Plant site is above the floodway and flood plain; designation is not applicable . 6. Land Ownership a) Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? Please attach copies of the document(s) creating authority for the applicant to construct the proposed facility at this site. RFWSD 7 . Nearby Facilities a) Please list all municipalities and water and/or sanitation districts within 5-miles downstream of the proposed wastewater treatment facil ity site. No munic ipal or District WWTFs are located within 5-miles downstream. The following are privately owned systems: H-Lazy-F Mobile Home Park, Mountain Meadows MHP, El Rocco MHP. Treatment Facility Effluent Information 8. Effluent disposal method (please check all that apply) ~ Surface Discharge to watercourse (enter watercourse name below) D Groundwater Discharge D Land application D Treated Effluent Reuse (Regulation 84) D Evaporation D Other (describe below) Natural wetlands tributary to Roaring Fork River, stream segment COUCRF03a. 9. Preliminarv Effluent Limits (Dlease attach a coov in Enaineerina ReDortJ a) Preliminarv Effluent Limits date : August 31, 2016 bl Preliminary Effluent Limits exoiration date: December 31, 2020 10. Downstream Distances a) Downstream distance from the discharge point to the nearest domestic water supply intake? Name of supply? Address of suooly? Distance: 9 miles Name of Supply: City of Glenwood Springs Address of Supply: 806 Cooper, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 b) Downstream Distance from the discharge point to the nearest other point of diversion? Name of user? Address of user? Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 3 of6 Distance: 17 miles Name of User: Town of New Castle Address of User: P. 0. Box 90, New Castle, CO 8164 7 Project lnfonnation 11. a) What entity is financially responsible for the construction of the facility? RFWSD 12. a) What entity has the financially responsibility for owning and long term operating expense of the proposed facility? RFWSD 13. a) What entity has the responsibility for managing and operating the proposed facility after construction? RFWSD Additional Factors 14. Please identify any additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Division make an informed decision on your site location aoolication . An existing WWTF already exists at this site and is functioning well within its discharge permit. The original service plan and site application contemplated this expansion, and a pre-inclusion agreement with the parties involved in the Expanded Service Area has accounted for additional utility service needs achievable within the proposed capacity. Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 4 of 6 • Water Quality Control Division 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, 82 Engineering Section Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 . CDPHE.WQEngReview<@state.co.us Colorado Department of Public Health 303-692-6298 and Environment Applicant Certification and Review Agencies Recommendation Section 22.5 of Regulation 22: Increasing or Decreasing the Design Capacity of an Existina Wastewater Treatment Facility A. Proiect and System lnfonnation System Name Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Proiect Title Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion County Garfield County 1. Acclicant Certification I certify that I am familiar with the requirement of Regulation 22 -Site Location and Design Approval Regulations for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works, and have posted the site in accordance with the Regulations . An engineering report , as described bv the reaulations, has been oreoared and is enclosed. Applicant Legal Representative (e.g., Public Works Director) Date Typed Name I Si grwture "Bo A ,c..t> ~'CS It> floJT 6"j1c-l11 L1 ~.ro'\' \-\u tJ 1SM.~ .11Ac#C The system legal representative is the legally responsible agent and decision-making authority (e.g . mayor/president of a board, public works director, owner). The Consulting Engineer is not the legal representative and cannot sign this form . 2. Recommendation of Review Agencies As required in Section 22.5(4) and referencing the procedure in Section 22 .4(2), the application and the engineering report must be submitted to all appropriate local governments, 208 planning agencies and State agencies for review and comment prior to submittal to the Division . By signing below, the entity or agency: 1) acknowledges receipt of the proposed site location application, 2) has reviewed the proposed site location application and may elect to provide comments, and 3) has provided a recommendation concerning the application to the Division. The recommendation should be based on the factors outlined in Section 22.4(2); for example, on the consistency of the proposed site location application with the local comprehensive plan(s) as they relate to water quality and any adopted water quality management plans(s). Please note : Review agencies are encouraged to provide project comments; however. if a review agency does not recommend approval then the agency must attached a letter describing the reason for their decision or comment on the next page. Signature of Management Agency if different from other entities listed below I Role Date Tvoed Name ./').aency Signature ~ ------/ " Recomme11 d Accroval ? Yes I I I No I 0 S i gnature of County, if pro i)OSed facility is located in unincorporated arns of a coufl t1 I Role Date Typed Name I Agency "' I s {gnature ~ I ()V\.tf-.\ ( ~,,_ ~f~/11 ~~h"' ""°'"'" "~"'" ~./"If //1 &a-< ,·a.ld (-<) v-"' t~ f3 0 Cl. ..-\I v .. I 71---. . ...,.R <c o nUn end Apltrctval? Yes I.II 1'/io I I I Signature of City or Town, if site is located within three miles o~l t97'1 own ~undary (if multi sheets as needed) "-... ple.,ttach additiona\ Role Date Tvced Nalhe I ~ency I $j am tu re J Carbondale, CO ~ ~ / / Glenwood Springs, CO Recommen6 Appk>val? \Yes 0/1 No I 0 Signature of Local Health Authority " I I '--"""' Role Date Typed Name I Aaency ' I Slanature Board of County ,,~/11 <! D ~"'-ft" \-1 ""-{ ~~ / lMI 1 ~ Commisioners of Garfield ~(.fi tlc ~"fl~{~oMG -..t ... • ___. I , County Rec on rme -~oval? Yes Ii ~ I.II N/o I I I v ) ' Revised December 2013 Section 22 .5: Application Form P;,ge 5 of 6 t ~ I Slanature of 208 Plannlna Aaencv Role Date Tvned Name I Aaencv Slanature Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Recommend Annroval? I Yes I D I Nol D Signature of Other State or Federal Agencies, if facility Is located on or adjacent to a site that Is owned or managed by a federal or state aaencv. Role Date Tvned Name I Aaencv Sia nature --- Recommend Annroval? I Yes I D I Nol D Signature of Other Basin Water Quality Authority, Watershed Association, Watershed Authority, etc., if facility is located In a Water Qualltv Control Commission Watershed Protection Control Area. Role Date Typed Name I Aaencv Signature --- Recommend Annroval? I Yes I D I No I 0 Review Agencv Comments: Revised December 2013 Section 22.5: Application Form Page 6 of 6