Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04312C' 11, f° GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Coloradof 81601 Phone (970) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT/ -7"(Arf!�e-, I aV,C Web/el ._:-4,1401 Present Address t7?4 15-1 PC) Gam. Gw s PROPERTY Owner's Name �/�� ' P 6 System Location`//76i l9 WA `7 ,yon otter. 0.361 -o6 -c 3 Permit 4312 sessor's Parcel No. Y)s12,3-61-00 This does not constitute a building or use permit. Phone 9'6 7,003 Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No a SYSTEM DESIGN Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) Required Absorption Area - See Attached Special Setback Requirements: Date Inspector FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer �� n Septic Tank Capacity c"._.. )(_-eS l Lc 34 +.05+ Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Absorption Area Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements Other DateYf 7-b `'C 7 Inspector }tutu Ru.�-C.aVQ411_ P2 RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE *CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning off ice shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs,alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine —6 months in jail or both). White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION OWNER 1A r• -ftkv-rLE ADDRESS 39 PHONE (31A-- 100g CONTRACTOR Neva Caearioc,) Fr. cNvat - cpn1 Ruiz_ gLIs-8226 ADDRESS B 'is() Si&r co. I4'SPHONE g1ys/ X2260 PERMIT REQUEST FOR (i< NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4). LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: / Near what City of Town (M,,An Ceeet- t1' "Y(c Size of Lot 4i. S 46o_c"s Seer. 7w/d e'NV 36 -S -HO be -L re of LANA NE sec 36 p o¢ 1 --no . Af-o 172. 6ANe4 tieSc Legal Description or Address Be. »'i»VI Pe z6y. &xcepe Te. 46,cx.- etc. iit Pe zeS ALSO 14Asll .o% Re 1N 6c 1211 Pe s2 WASTES TYPE: (i`) DWELLING ( ) TRANSIENT USE ( ) COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ( ) NON-DOMESTIC WASTES ( ) OTHER—DESCRIBE BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE. S (ZaraL UuIrs Number of Bedrooms / 0 Number of Persons Ig BIZ. ( ) Garbage Grinder (Automatic Washer ( ) Dishwasher SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: WELL ( ) SPRING ( ) STREAM OR CREEK If supplied by Community Water, give name of supplier: DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: Co ml &CS Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? tJ o A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the following -MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well: 100 feet Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet Septic System (septic tank & disposal field) to Property Lines: 10 feet YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN. GROUND CONDITIONS: Depth to first Ground Water Table eigeHreg- +h4N g Percent Ground Slope ?/ !o 4 2 TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANT ( ) VAULT ( ) VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, POTABLE USE ( ) PIT PRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, OTHER USE ( ) CHEMICAL TOILET( ) OTHER -DESCRIBE FINAL DISPOSAL BY: (x) ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ( ) UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER ( ) ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND ( ) OTHER -DESCRIBE WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? A, PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes 6 0 per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes 36 per inch in hole No. 3 Minutes yS per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes °la per inch in hole No. N Name, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests: 970 'vf ogee SoaoY pAAm SJrJ - I1ep IUCrh PMu1Fe_ euc • 5020 /51 gO. G Name, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system: I Au_ 2k4Iese basip EJ7 i,JEEt - SopejS ENOiA)Ereilu ��%O '04 -0311 I 30 my i„ St 4* A3 / LPa_koN€wte Co slaz3 Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in le al action for perjury as provided by law. Signed I�1) �Date ti 1V ©1 PLEASE DRAW AN A CURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY!! Designate North Arro / 2 2 4 a \0 \ .0 \ $5 /@ { 0 oct< \�ƒce\ {cidao ®`. > .2 00 4 .w \ ƒ ] ° ± /\\ $%9 /t : 04/24/2007 08:50 970-704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING PAGE 01 FAX Transmittal To: Company: Fax #: Date: Total Pages: SE Mint No. From: Message: Andy Schwall.er Garfield County Building Department 384 3470 4-24-07 2 26241.01 Paul Rutledge Attached is the, 46419 Highway 6 & 24, OWS supplemental information letter for the David Turtle property, submitted in support of his replacement OWS permit application. If youhave any questions please call me. Cc: David Turtle 945 7008 0 Original notto follow 0 Original to follow by mall 0 Original to be delivered by messenger 0 Original to be picked up APR 2 4 2007 3UULDuiG ,"OUNry NAANG 502 main street • suite A3 • carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • fax (970) 704-0313 SUMS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants 04/24/2007 08:50 970-704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING PAGE 02 April 24, 2007 Andy Schwaller 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Design Considerations, Proposed On-site Wastewater System for David Turtle Property at 46419 Highway 6 & 24, Garfield County Colorado SE Job No. 23136.01 Dear Andy: Pursuant to your request, this letter summarizes our findings and design considerations in regard to increased setback distances due to the design flow value greater than 1000 gallons per day. The replacement OWS proposed will achieve a higher level of effluent treatment as compared to a conventional system. The existing conditions soil conditions and design treatment enhancements have been considered to mitigate the need for increased setback distances. The soils encountered at the absorption/treatment field location consist of relatively tight very silty sand with an average percolation rate of 65 minutes per inch. The permeability of the soils is low and the transport of microbial contaminants is limited. The field is slighty Dow gradient of the existing well and the overall vicinity ground water gradient is assumed to be south toward the river further down gradient from the field. We would not expect the absorptive plume of influence to intersect the well's cone of depression. The actual slope distance from the absorptive surface in the field to the static water level in the well probably exceeds 175 feet. The OWS design incorporates an effective single pass sand filter treatment enhancement in the treatment beds. The effluent is distributed along the entire length of the beds through perforated distribution pipes over a minimum 6 - inch layer of filter sand. Enhanced treatment of the effluent will occur through the sand prior to absorption into the native soils. Therefore based on our evaluation of geological/geo technical conditions and treatment design enhancements, with respect to evaluating the risk of contamination of ground water , it is not necessary to add 8 feet additional setback distance for each 100 gallon of wastewater per day of design flow over 1000 gallon per day as specified in the regulations. The 135 -foot nearest horizontal separation between the proposed absorption/treatment area and the exiting well is adequate to prevent potential contamination. We will attempt to install the field further east as practical however the adjustment is limited due to natural grade breaks and the existing orchard. If you have any question or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENG[NEERING, LLC Paul E.Rut redge Design Engineer Cc: David Turtle 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311• Fax (070) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • C civiI consultants r/3 j: 'vs bssAJ our- of {-owit) C0 e., 3 w s-�s so os fkE 12e Aso fo a the r£eLn y � N ye ,,u7 +ks eEpo f uu1-0 you,. �qq ' ti5 $Gtr / i2 Sarkis Cela i k 4'%E co pZjoiel,ov a % 441E S b(A��� ON sill GUASFE wATER SYs4-67ro /oc:-Ate A i 1164ief llw i % 6.x.5, 1 F you I)Avs ques ho/kiS plense_ �w rn s 1 GALL, . U �J�ls-000r July 6, 2007 David Turtle 726 County Road 137 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: As -Built -On-site Wastewater System (OWS) —Turtle Property -46419 HivipaQvrorrt LIVED Garfield County, CO jj�ai�L �� , jj�,AA IIS�L SE Job No. 23136.01 AUG 0 3 2007 Dear David: GAR.FIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING Pursuant to County requirements, this letter provides documentation that the new Onsite Wastewater System (OWS) recently installed at the above referenced site is in general compliance with the permitted design. Sopris Engineering inspected the excavations and the installation of system components at various times during construction prior to final backfill. The replacement system installed on site was designed and built to serve the needs of the 5 existing small residential housing units on-site. We understand that the total population within the 5 units is controlled at a maximum of approximately 12 people. The maximum number of rooms to be utilized as bedrooms in the 5 units is 11 however we do not anticipate a peak population in the units at any time. The system is designed based on a peak equivalent population of 22 people with a design flow rate of 2475 gpd. The existing ISDS system was abandoned in place. Sopris Engineering performed visits to inspect and document the as built conditions of the constructed system. We have coordinated our efforts with the system installer. The as built conditions and installation of the new OWS components is in compliance with the permitted design specifications for the system. The System was installed in accordance with Garfield County Regulations; the design presented in the Sopris Engineering design drawing and report, dated October 6, 2006 and a supplemental information letter dated April 24, 2007. A 3000 -gallon primary and a 2000 -gallon dual compartment concrete septic tanks were installed in series with appropriate sanitary tees and an effluent filter in the outlet tee of the second tank. The effluent gravity discharges effluent to a 2395 square foot soil absorption bed system utilizing leaching chambers. The soil absorption system is located down gradient of the existing residential units installed in natural soils with a 3 to 6 inch course of filter sand. The multiple absorption bed system consist 2 beds 102 feet long containing 4 chamber rows and a bed 102 feet long containing 2 chamber rows. Each row contains (25) 4 -foot long infiltrator Quick -4 leaching chambers units and end caps. Each bed was slightly over excavated to provide additional horizontal and vertical infiltrative surface area. Additional sand was placed as backfill around the perimeter and between the chamber rows up to the top of the chamber louvers. The beds maintain a 6' separation distance between the sidewalls. A total excavated horizontal infiltrative surface area of 3300 SF is provided. Effluent is equally distributed from the distribution box through individual distribution pipes to each pair of rows in the individual beds. The distribution pipes incorporate snap in flow equalizers in the distribution box pipe outlets to insure equal distribution into each discharge pipe. The discharge pipes are connected to a tee at the head of each chamber row pair and split the flow through a header pipe for discharge into the head of each chamber. A perforated distribution pipe is installed running the length of the individual rows with the perforations oriented downward. Inspection ports are installed on the top mid - 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants David Turtle SE Job No. 23136.01 July 6, 2007 Page 2 point cut out on the corner end chambers in each bed and on alternate ends in the middle rows. This will allow for checking the performance of the system over time. The beds are backfilled with suitable excavated soil (3" minus material) to the finished grade. The top of the field is graded slightly above the finished grade to allow positive drainage away from the field surface. A low deflection mound was graded on the up gradient side of the field to deflect potential surface water away from the field. The system was installed in consistent soils across the field. No ground water was encountered to a depth of 12 feet. The construction was completed utilizing specified materials installed according to design. The soils encountered at the absorption/treatment field location consist of relatively tight very silty sand with an average percolation rate of 65 minutes per inch. The permeabilityof the soils is low and the transport of microbial contaminants is limited. The field is slightly down gradient of the existing well and the overall vicinity ground water gradient is assumed to be south toward the river further down gradient from the field. We would not expect the absorptive plume of influence to intersect the well's cone of depression. The actual slope distance from the absorptive surface in the field to the static water level in the well probably exceeds 175 feet. The OWS design incorporates an effective single pass sand filter treatment enhancement in the treatment beds. The effluent is distributed along the entire length of the beds through perforated distribution pipes over a minimum 6 —inch layer of filter sand. Enhanced treatment of the effluent will occur through the sand prior to absorption into the native soils. Therefore based on our evaluation of geological/geo technical conditions and treatment design enhancements, with respect to evaluating the risk of contamination of ground water , it was not necessary to add 8 feet additional setback distance for each 100 gallon of wastewater per day of design flow over 1000 gallon per day as specified in the regulations for conventional systems. The 130 -foot nearest horizontal separation between the proposed absorption/treatment area and the exiting well is adequate to prevent potential contamination. The beds are backfilled with suitable excavated soil (3" minus material) to the finished grade. The top of the field is graded slightly above the finishedgrade to allow positive drainage away from the field surface. A low deflection mound was graded on the up gradient side of the field to deflect potential surface water away from the field. The system was installed in consistent soils across the field. No ground water was encountered to a depth of 12 feet. The construction was completed utilizing specified materials installed according to design. OWS Operation and Maintenance All components of the engineered OWS shall be inspected on a regular basis and be properly maintained. The re establishment of vegetative cover over the field and responsibility for inspection and maintenance of the system will remain with the Property Owner. The owner shall periodically inspect the OWS and to perform all maintenance and repairs as necessary to ensure that the system is in good operating condition and performing as designed. David Turtle SE Job No. 23136.01 July 6, 2007 Page 3 The OWS should require minimal maintenance. Several factors influencing the need for maintenance include: actual wastewater flows versus design flows, the volume of kitchen/domestic waste (excluding human waste and toilet paper), excessive household chemicals and other toxic liquids. The tank, sanitary tees and effluent filter should be visually inspected bi-annually for clogging debris, damage, leaks, or other potential problems. In general, for a properly utilized system, septic tanks should be pumped and inspected every 3 - 7 years. The effluent filter should be cleaned every six months and at the time of pumping. Absorption fields should be maintained with suitable vegetative cover and kept free of root invasive plants. Positive surface drainage away from the absorption field should be maintained. If you have any question or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Property Search 1 Assessor Subset Quem 1 Assessor Sales Search Clerk &...Recorder Reception. Search Parcel Detail Basic Building Characteristics 1 Tax Information Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail 1 Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number Mill Levy 004 R040221 ............._ 212336100023 63.379 Owner Name and Mailing Address TUR E, DAVID J. 726 COUNTY ROAD 137 GLENWOOD SPGS, CO 81601-9707 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:36-5-90 DESC: TR OF LAND IN NE OF SEC. 36 LYING N. OF I-70. ALSO A TR OF LAND AS DESC IN BK 1179 PG 269. EXCEPT A TR OF LAND AS DESC IN BK 1179 PG268. ALSO ATR OF LAND CONT. .076 AC AS DESC IN BK 1211 PG 52 BLA. BK:0368 PG:0330 BK:1753 PG:693 RECPT:688076 BK:1179 PG:276 RECPT:561376 BK:1179 PG:270 RECPT:561375 BK:1179 PG:269 RECPT:561374 BK:1179 PG:268 RECPT:561373 BK:1179 PG:263 RECPT:561372 BK:0788 PG:0548 Location li 11 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R040221 4/25/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3 Physical Address: 046419 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 NEW CASTLE Subdivision: Assessed Value Land Acres: 4.256 Land Sq Ft: 0 151,820 Section Township Range 36 5 90 Property Tax Valuation Information Sale Date: Sale Price: 3/31/2000 285,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 2 0 Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 302,250 24,060 Improvements: 151,820 12,090 Total: 454,070 36,150 Sale Date: Sale Price: 3/31/2000 285,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 2 0 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R040221 4/25/2007 Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics TOTAL HEATED AREA: 1,672 ABSTRACT CODE: SINGLE FAM.RES- IMPROVEMTS ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: 1 -STORY EXTERIOR WALL: AVERAGE ROOF COVER: COMP SHNGL ROOF STRUCTURE: GABLE INTERIOR WALL: DRYWALL FLOOR: CARPET FLOOR: SHT VINYL HEATING FUEL: GAS HEATING TYPE: HOT WATER STORIES: STORIFFS 1.0 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R040221 4/25/2007 Parcel Detail Page 3 of 3 BATHS: I 1 ROOMS: 6 UNITS: 1 BEDROOMS: 4 YEAR BUILT: 1955 Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Type Amount 2006 Tax Amount $2,291.16 2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,292.02) 2005 Tax Amount $2,292.02 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,284.56) 2004 Tax Amount $2,284.56 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,012.58) 2003 Tax Amount $2,012.58 2002 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,967.72) 2002 Tax Amount $1,967.72 2001 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,980.38) 2001 Tax Amount $1,980.38 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,054.04) 2000 Tax Amount $2,054.04 1999 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,893.90) 1999 Tax Amount $1,893.90 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options j Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garfield. Counjy Home Page The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 - 2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R040221 4/25/2007