HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitI
Garfield County
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office:970-945·8212 Fax: 970-384-3470
Inspection Line: 970·384-5003
Building Permit No.
Parcel No:
Locality:
Job Address: 0306 Blue Heron GWS --------------·----~----~----~~-~-------··------·--
Owner:
Contractor: Hansen Construction ------·-··-----·---···--··------··----------····
Fees: Plan Check: 838.86 Septic:
----·-·~-
Bldg Permit: $ 1,290.55_ RFTA: 750.00
~··---··
Total Fees: ___ $ ---2,879.41._
Clerk: ~:an __ Date: .J~B~OO._ I
2
3
5
6
7
8 Use of Building:
9 Describe Work:
10 Class of Work:
o Addition II Garage: Septic: o!SDS Communit'
12 Driveway Permit: Owners valuation of Work: $
OTICE
Authority. This application for a Building Penni[ must be signed by the Owner of the property. described above, or an atllhorized ngem. I fthc signature below is not that oft he Owner. a scpamte
letter of authority. signed by the Owner. must be provided with this Application.
1 Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the prope11y for purposes of inspections by the Building Department.
Other Pcnnits. Multiple scpamte pennits may be required: ( 1) State Elcct!ical Penn it, (2) County ISDS Permit. (:');mother penn it required for usc on the propeny identi lied above. e.g. Stmc 01
County Highway/ Road Access or a State \Vaste\'>'ater Disclllllli.e Permit.
•II Void J>ermit. /\ Buildi11g Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or ab~ndoned for n period of lfW
, d~ys after commencement.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that! have rend this Application and that the information contained above is true and cOt1·ect. I understand that the Building Department accepts the r\j)plicatiOI!, nlong with the plans
~nd specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behnlf(submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy.
Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application. a Building Permit wi!! be issued granting permission to me. as Owner. to construct the strucwre(s) and facilities detailed on 1 lhe submittals reviewed by the Building Department.
ln considcra!ion of!he issuance of the Building Permit.! a, nd my <~gents will comply with provisions ofnny !Cdcral, state or local law regulating the work nnd the Garfield County Building
Code. !SDS regulations and applicable land use regu ons (County R >ulation(s)), I acknowledge that the Building Penni! may be suspended or revoked. upon notice ll'om the County. if the location.
construction or use of the structure(s) and fadli ·es), described above, re not in compliance with County Regu!ntion(s) or any other applicable law.
I het·eby grant rx:m1ission to the Building Dep ·tment to entet· the prope '· described above. to inspect the work. 1 fut1her acknowledge that the issuance oft he Building Permit does not prevent the
Building Official fi·om: ( l requiring the cor ction of errors in the subn ttals. if any. discovered after issuance: or (2) stopping construction Ol' use of the structure(s) or facility(ics) if such is h! 1·iolmion
of County Regul~tion(S)p any other app!ic ble law.
Review of this Applicar;'m . including subm !als. and inspections oft I work by the Building Dcp~r!ment do not constitute an acceptanc\": ofrcsponsihi!i!y or liability by the County of errors. omissions
or discrepancies. A· I1C wncr.! acknowlc ~c that responsibility fi compliance with federal. ~tate and local laws and County Reg1ilations rest with me and my authMizcd agents, including wirhout
!imit(llion my arcb· de igne1. engineer and or builder.
I ::::"I~S.SI:~,,::~ HAY, oAD ,\NO . DE::~''D 11:~-:~:~&-C~RTI:~s~~ov~5-~ ~-~--
STAFF USE ONLY
ID-7-D8
DATI:
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection:
I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector.
2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the
structure and where readily visible from access road.
3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows
installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all
necessary plumbing.
4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running
water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door.
5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks
over 30" high must be constructed to alllBC and IRC requirements including guardrails.
6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building;
7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of
Occupancy may be issued conditionally.
8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED.
OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN
ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES
UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit.
.w
OWNERS I NATURE DATE
Bapplicaliondccc! cr2007
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant
Address
Date
.;Kn:::.:;:u;ts::;:o:::n-=---::-::--------Subdivision
o306 Blue He11JOn Vista Lot/Block -~1:-:;0:.:;. 7;=:.0;..:;8;::-:==:._:,.;='--------Contractor
Finished (Livable Area):
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
Total
Basement:
Unfinished
Square Feet
Valuation
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Total Valuation
Garage:
Carport:
Total Valuation
Crawl Space
Total Valuation
Decks/ Patios
Total
Covered
Open
Valuation
Type of Construction:
Occupancy:
Valuation
Total Valuation
977 sq.ft
905 sq.ft
sq.ft
sq.ft X $74.68
1882 sq.lt
sq.ft X $41.00
sq.ft X $33.68
556 sq.ft X $18.00
sq.ft X $12.00
sq.ft X $9.00
sq.ft X $24.00
127 sq.ft X $12.00
Commercial
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
Iron Bridge P 1A \) e (,. ()..,.
286
140,547.76
0.00
10,008.00
0.00
1,524.00
0.00
152,079.76
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and
it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the
delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall
be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line
for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been
provided to the Building Department.
TWO (2) SETS O:F CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE
SUBMITTED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project
and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design
professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your
project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a
Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing
and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during
design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at
time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn
to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks,
balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and
original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed,
wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your
plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to
the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of
30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the
placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously
surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor
and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be
built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a
copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes')(
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility
easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the
property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do
applyv
Yes~--
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal
System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent
propertie , streams or water courses?
Yes._~~-
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the
pro pert)(?
Yes '-f-Y.--
2
5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof
of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your
right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept.
of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any
combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 I. See phone book for
other a~cies
Y es _ _,P-=='-----
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel
in acc01~e with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes __ (r>""---
7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the
clearan~quired between wood and earth?
Yes ~ No ____ _
8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and
soffits\!
Yes ~ No _____ _
9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of
40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind
loads?'{
Y es __ j-+-'-----
1 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
~oe~structf
II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists,
roof rafte s r joists or trusses?
Yes ___ +-"------
12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all
columns an beams?
Yes _ _,P>-----
13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top
of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes JC
14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make
and mo~d Colorado Phase I certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes~ No ____ ~~---
3
15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply
with the IRC?
Yes. ___________ No ____ ~~~------
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from
sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes t-
17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and
ventilatiy:_n for all habitable rooms?
Yes ---+-"-'---
18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing
immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking
surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specifY safety
glazing or these areas?
Yes No ____________ __
19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on
the plan?
Yes ~·
20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the
subdivi! process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?
Y es ___ P"I--'"-----
21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting
an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without
it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in
revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans
have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either
revocation or substantial modification of the plans.
Yes f
22. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes '(:.. No lfno-Explain: ___________ __
23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes 'f-
24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long?
Yes f
4
25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code
requirements?
Yes '{-
26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties
zone dis~if?
Yes_---'7--'kr----
27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection
by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes f
28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are reqUJred pnor to the
applica~ of these changes?
Yes __ ~t-=---
29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the
time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any
"Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?
Yes )C
30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the
requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be
made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in
to 384-~0fl3.
Yes ~ No __________ __
31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a
$50.00 r~-jilspection fee?
Y es ___ "b_-'-"-------
32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including
approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the
building?V
Yes. __ -1"'-P'----
33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being
given fcyn Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC?
Yes. ___ -1"--F'------
5
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and
Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the
work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of
applicable izypection.
Yes ___ _,..,.-F'~----
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the
Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a
building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes f
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety
. ? 1ssues. "{
Yes ---JT-""------(please check with the building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the prope1ty prior
to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit?
Yes 'f.·
38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees
have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy?
Yes 'f.
I hereby acknowl
my ability.
derstand and answered these questions to the best of
Date
Phone97D-3'6£.t-·~ff\~(days); (evenings)
ProjectName: Le:-T ~~lo :Cranbri~>PUD Ph.~
Project Address:~ B\U< , \-\ €.ri::;)Q \)\ ~ bt.J'3
6
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant i<l'lv«S0/11. Date /&-7-0/3
/uilding
_A_ng gi neered Foundation
JL/snriveway Permit
Aurveyed Site Plan
[{~Permit and Setbacks
__ Grade/Topography 30%
~;rumtiol Plru> ""';~ u,.
__ Minimum Application Questionnaire
~vision Plat Notes
JJA. Fire Department Review
_Lvaluation Determination/Fees
~d Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~ch Conditions
~ication Signed
~Reviewer To Sign Applicatio
~chedule No.
40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms.
~ilsReport
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
__ Property Line Setbacks-~ '141· tF-'iS(
A ~ Mf--/;l:()iJIA.'/tJJf'1\-> ~30ft Stream Setbacks
f( fi Flood Plain
!lA Building Height
~ing Sign-off
~ad Impact Fees
HHOAIDRC Approval
-~opography 40%
~anning.Issues
11178 No. ______________ _ Assessor's Parcel No. 2395-014-29-286
Date ____ 1_11_14_1_20_0_8...;__
BUILDING PERMIT CARD
Job Address __ ..:..03.:..:0.:..:6....::B.:..:I..:..ue.::.....:...;H..:..e.:..:ro....::n....::V.:...:i..:..st....::a.o_, G..:..W....::....::S....::....::Ir..:.o_nb....::r....::id__,g,_e_P....::U.:..:D...:.,_L.:..:o..:..t _28_6 _____________ _
Owner _____ K_n_u_ts_o_n_,_B~ru_c_e_&_M_a.....:ry'----Address 104 Williams Way, Aspen Phone# ______ _
Contractor Hansen Construction Address 410 lronbridge Dr, GWS Phone #970-394-3990
Setbacks: Front _____ Rear _____ RH ______ LH _____ Zoning _____ _
s/f on foundation WI att. Garage INSPECTIONS
Weatherproofing ___________ _
Mechanicai _____ -:------------
Eiectrical Rough (State) &-Z'Z-" DCj
Electrical Final State) _______ --::,---
Final 'B'·A. -/Check••"+ f"ompleted?. ~
Certificate Occupancy # .,.(a:":-'?;3'""'-..?"1+-l-.-=,..-----
Date .lSSU£ () I . I • 09 ·
Septic System #<.! .... D_...)MiJi~==·Ln'-'-'-1 M.L.~L...~------
Date _____ :::1=-------
Final ___________ _
Other _______________ _
NOTES
(continue on back)
B\\.:~LDING PERMIT
'·"' GARFIELD COl:JNTY, COLORADO
DNSI'IE<Cl!l()l\! WDI.L NOT B~ Mlllll>IE ilDNUSS
THUS CA!'!Dl> 1:5 i'O:SnDl> ON THIE JOil
LA+
a~
Date Issued --\J\IL·_._)L\.J_··OQ~;..L...-------Permit No. _ _,\_,_\l=-/,_b"""'---------
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations
related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is
granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location,
erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the
County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. ,;
:::1!'"!.~~. Gws owner!mU.{S()l,~~~ contractor t\ruten ~St ... ·
Building Permit Type 'l2ec tdam~f1,_...( _____________________ _
This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Stre.e~Until Final Inspection
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing .. j Driveway
Foundation I Grouting Insulation 7-1-o't ~~
Underground Plumbing Drywall 7 0 CJ "l' 4CU,
h -/~o'Z:' ~-~ ·-
Rough Plumbing !Electric Finan (by State nraspector)
'· 6' --'6 -/7'? .-,.., {Prior to F'inal)
Rough Mechanical Septic Final
GasPiping G·&-cf?-~ FINAL '6-s<G-c;c; ~~
IEiectwic Rough (by State irBspedow) (You Must Call For Final Inspection) \i . 7-'1-·tf\ .. Notes {Prior to Framing)
Framing 1., ~ t,. ~0.. r--\J {h._t-,.
' !
Division of Registrations
... ., • ._.,...,. The Official State Web I'M!al Dora Division of Registrations
Department of Regi,ila_tory Agencies
View Permit 670251
Requestor
Site
Inspections
Inspected Date
08/19/2009
08/03/2009
06/22/2009
Electrical and Plumbing Permits Online
Company Name: MD ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC
First Name: MIKE
Last Name:-SEEMAN
Address: 947 HICKORY DR
City: RIFLE
State: CO
Zipcode: 816500000
Phone: (970) 930-5559
Fax: ()-
Email Address: ttelinde1 @juno.com
License Number: 7536
Property Type: PRIVATE
Property Owner: IRON BRIDGE
Job Site Address: 306 BLUE HERON VISTA
City: GLENWOOD SPRINGS
State: co
Zipcode:
County: GARFIELD
Power: XCEL-CARBONDALE
Building Type: RESIDENTIAL
Construction Type: NEW
Mise Construction: RESIDENTIAL NEW
Square Feet: 1500
Trim: N
Type
FINAL ACCEPTED
FINAL ACCEPTED PARTIAL
ROUGH IN ACCEPTED
Status
Page 1 of2
https:/ /www.dora.state.co.us/pls/real/ep _web _permit_gui.show _page?p _user_ type=ELEC... 8/24/2009
Division of Registrations
Status/Actions
Permit Number: 670251
Type: ELECTRICAL
Status: CLOSED
Opened: 06/12/2009
Expiration Date: 06/12/2010
Closed: 08/20/2009
Replaces: NONE
Replaced By: NONE
Questions? Check out the Definitions Page or Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).
Please take our Survey to tell us about your experience with the online permits site.
Page 2 of2
Generated: 08/24/2009 04:52 p,m.
Privacy Statement 1 Disclaimer
Federal Home Page II State Home Page II Department Home Page
Top of Page
Technical Assistance:
E¥mail Information Technology Section E-Mail the Division of Registrations
1560 Broadway, Suite 1500
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 894~2985-Phone
(303) 894-2310-Fax
Relay Colorado
(TTY (English & Spanish), Voice, VCO, ASCI!, STS Assistance Numbers)
https:/ /www.dora.state.co. us/pls/real/ep _web _permit_gui.show _page?p _user _type=ELEC... 8/24/2009
February 5, 2009
Iron bridge Golf Club & Sporting Community
410 Iron bridge Drive
Glen wood Springs, CO 8160 I
Attn: Mike Woelke
RE: Tendon Stressing Observation
0306 Blue Heron Vista
Lot 286-
Ironbridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
1205 S. PLATTE RrvER DRIVE, SUITE 200
DENVER, COLORADO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
Per your request, we visited the subject site on February 4, 2009 to observe the tendon stressing operations for
post-tensioned slab-on-grade design.
The stressing of the tendons were conducted within acceptable tolerances and appeared to be in general
conformance with the construction. At this time, tendon tails may be cut off and the anchor cavities grouted with
a high strength, non-shrink grout. This concludes the construction of the post-tensioned foundation system.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
Jtf;J;-L
Jeffrey R. Goben, PTI # 9160622
Reviewed by:
JRG:jma
attachments
file
--~~ l FUHRMANN
IIENGINEERJING §ERVJIICE§, LlLC
February 5, 2009
Iron bridge Golf Club & Sp01ting Community
410 Iron bridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
ATTN: Mike Woelke
RE: Post Tensioned Slab-on-Grade Certification
0306 Blue Heron Vista
Lot 286
Ironbridge Community
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear: Mike
1205 S. PIAITE RivER DRIVE, SUITE 200
DENVER. CoLORADO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
As of February 4, 2009 all required construction observations for the Post Tensioned Slab-on-Grade Foundation
System at the subject site have been completed by this office.
From our observations, we have concluded that this foundation has been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction documents and guidelines set forth by the Post Tensioning Institute. All required
observations and their subsequent letters by this office for the Post Tensioned Slab-on-Grade Foundation System
which includes the Trench Beam and Steel Observation including Ufer Rod, Tendon Placement (pre-pour)
Observation, and Tendon Stressing Observation have been approved by this office. We also note that the
required insulation has been installed per our structural details and the Jntemational Residential Code, 2003
Edition. No further observations are required.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
f//i JV
Jeffrey R. Goben, PTI # 9160622
Reviewed by:
JRG:jma
cc: file
December I 0, 2008
Iron bridge Golf Club & Sporting Community
410 Iron bridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attn: Mike Woelke
RE:
ron bridge Subdivision
Garfield Connty, Colorado
Dear Mike:
i205 S. PLATTE RivER DRIVE, SurrE 200
DENVER, COLORADO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
Per your request, we visited the subject site on December 9, 2008 to observe the construction of the trench
beams of the post-tensioned slab-on-grade. The dimensions, geometry, and required options have not been
verified at this time. The contractor assumes responsibility for the accuracy of all building dimensions, locations
on lot, foundation elevations, and the slab step layout
The trench beam depth, width, and required steel placement appeared to be in general conformance with
approved construction documents. Also, we observed the required l-inch polystyrene foam (extruded) insulation
was placed in the trenches at the exterior of the building footprint per plan and is temporarily to the trench wall.
We also observed that an Ufer rod was placed at the time of the wall steel installation. No other items were
observed at this time.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann ;r_eering Services, LLC
J~h R~oOOo, PTI #9160622 1 .. ~-~
Reviewed by: /;/
Nathaniel P. Graf, P.E.
JRG:jma
attachments
tile
December I 0, 2008
Ironbridge Golf Club & Sporting Community
410 Iron bridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attn: Mike Woelke
RE: Tendon Placement (pre-pour) Inspection
0306 Blue Heron Vista
Lot286
Iron bridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
1205 S. PIATT£ RivER DRIVE, Surtt 200
DENVER, CoLORADo 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
Per your request, we visited the subject site on December 9, 2008 to observe the tendon placement and interior
trench beams of the post-tensioned slab-on-grade. The dimensions, geometry, and required options have not
been verified at this time. The contractor assumes responsibility for the accuracy of all building dimensions,
locations on lot, foundation elevations, and the slab step layout.
The installation of the tendons and interior stiffened beams appeared to be in general conformance with the
construction plans. We observed the top of grade appeared to be at the correct elevation to maintain the slab
thickness per plan. It is the responsibility of the contractor to verity slab thickness and tendon layout remain as
observed during concrete placement. No other items were observed at this time.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
. ~11 .JL.
Jeffrey R. Goben, PTI # 9160622
Reviewed by:
Nathaniel P. Graf, P.E.
JRG:jma
attachments
cc: file
I
.FuHRMANN -----Col
]ENGINJEJERIING §JERVIICJE§, LLC
June 24, 2009
Iron bridge Golf Club & Sporting Community
410 Ironbridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attn: Mike Woelke
RE: LVL Bearing, Hole, Truss Bearing
0306 Blue Heron Vista
Lot286
lronbridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
1205 S. PLArrn RivER D~ Sum~ 200
DENVER, CoLORADO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715·9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
Per your email dated 23 June 2009, we understand that the (2) LVL above the Great Rm!Dining Rm
only has approximately one inch of bearing on one ply and full bearing on the second ply. We have
reviewed this condition and it is not a structural concern.
Further more we understand that a quarter inch hole has been put at an angle into the L VL
approximately 6ft from bearing. We have reviewed this condition and it is not a structural concern.
We understand that the bearing wall at the laundry has been moved. We have reviewed this condition
and recommend providing a 2-2x8 HF #2 or better dropped beam at the original bearing location.
May I, 2009
Ironbridge Golf Club & Sporting Community
410 Iron bridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 I
Attn: Mike Woelke
RE: Weathered Trusses
0306 Blue Heron Vista
Lot286
Iron bridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
1205 S. PLATTE RivER DRIVE, SuiTE 200
DENVER. CoLoRADo 80223
OFfiCE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
Per your request, we visited the subject site to observe the roof trusses for this house that have been left
exposed to the elements for several months. We recommend that any truss that is split at the end bearing or
within 1 '-6" of the end bearing be replaced or approved by the engineer representing the truss manufacturer.
Trusses that have a split at greater than 1 '-6" from the end bearing may have a 2x Doug Fir #2 or better sistered
to it with 2 rows of 1 Od nails ea side @4" 0. C. staggered. The sistered member is to be 3 times the length of
the split, minimum of 3ft, and is to be centered on the split. The depth of the sistered member needs to match
the depth of the member being repaired.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
.-? ~ fi~·' ~ "~ ..;P~
Jeremiah Willis
Reviewed by:
JW
file
! 0
'-JH'l6f.;-t~>t1
i'
;. nl'ir
" "
: I~ ' .
/
I
I
' '
/
/
,>,
/
--/0;<"'"'-/ ,o
0""'" I yO__ /
/
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
j-R ENGINf\'ERING
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
i!
'I I I
i
I
~
··<:~£tech
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL,
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone' 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
email: hpgeo®hpgeotech.com
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
PROPOSED IRONBRIDGE VILLAS
IRONBRIDGE DRIVE
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
A~ CO> tle.e.-116uJ
'Sci I Hep&v-4--
JoB NO. 105115-6
SEPTEMBER 14, 2005
PREPARED FOR:
L.B. ROSE RANCH, LLC
ATTN: AARON BEVINGTON
410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................ -1 -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... -1 -
SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... -2 -
FfELD EXPLORATION ...................................................................... : ......... : ................ -2-
SUBSURFACE COJ-..'DITIONS ................................................................................ ; ..... -3-
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... -4 -
DESIGN RECO!viMENDATIONS ................................................................................. -5-
FOUNDATIONS ........................... : ............................................................................. -5 -
FOUNDATION .AND RETAlNING WALLS ............................................................ -6-
FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... -8 -
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .................................... : ..................................................... -8-
SITE GRADING ......................................................................................................... -9-
SURFACE DRAINAGE ................................................................. ~ ................ , ........ -10-
PAVEMENT SECTION ........................................................................................... -ll -
LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................ , ............ -11 -
FIGURES 1 AND 2-LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURES 3 TIIROUGH 8-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
. FIGURE 9-LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURES 10 THROUGH 16-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURES 17 AND 18-GRADATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical study for fue proposed
Ironbridge Villas to be located along Ironbridge Drive, Garfield County, Colorado. The
project site is shown on Figures 1 and2. The purpose offue study was to develop
recommendations for the foundation and grading designs. The study was conducted in
accordance wifu our agreement for professional engineering services to L.B. Rose Ranch,
LLC dated June30, 2005. We previously conducted geotechnical studies for planning and
. preliminary design of fue Rose Ranch Development (now known as !ronbridge) and
presented our frndings in reports dated October 29, 1997 and September 10, 1998, Job
No. 197 327.
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain
infonnation on the subsurface conditions within the depth of expected foundation loading.
The potential for future ground subsidence due to deeper geologic conditions was to be
evaluated by others. Samples of fue subsoils obtained during the field exploration were
tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering
characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed
to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the
proposed building foundation and for fue subdivision grading. This report summarizes
the data obtained during this study and presents our couclusions, design reco=endations
and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on tbe proposed construction and
fue subsurface conditiollS encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed Villas development is located in the central pert of !ronbridge near the main
·club and oilier common facilities and i'Yill consist of tightly spaced, single family
residences in two development areas as shown on Figures 1 and 2. The access roads and
drives will connect to fue existing and proposed lronbridge Drive. The residences will be
2 story, wood frame structures constructed typically 8 to 10 feet apart Ground floors will
Job No. 105 IlS-6
-2-
be structural above crawlspace in the residences and slab-on-grade in the garages. The
entire development area will be elevated typically up to about 15 feet. The fill sections
will grade into the existing Ironbfidge Drive, the golf course 18th Hole and the Robertson
Ditch. The fill material will be obtained on the project site, likely from <:he Phase 2
development. The Robertson Ditch will remain open but be improved by lining to reduce
leakage. After the subdivision grading, the excavation for the individual residences will
be relatively minor. We assume the residences wili be relatively lightly loaded, typical of
the proposed type of construction.
If·building loadings, location or development plans change significantly from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evall18.te the reco=endations contained in
this report
SITE CONDffiONS
The Villas development is located downhill to the east and south of the existing pro shop
and other co=ons area, see Figures 1 and 2. The north Villas site was mainly vacant and
covered with field grass and weeds. The south Villas site is partly disturbed and covered
with grass and weeds with miscellaneous fill piles. The ground surface slope is about 5 to
7% with 20 feet of elevation difference across the north Villas site, and about 6 to 8%
with 30 feet of elevation difference across the south Villas site. The entire project site is
covered with debris fan deposits that generally increase in depth with increase in ground
surface elevation to the west Bedrock of the Eagle Valley Evaporite outcrops to the west
of County Road 109 in the golf course fairway and the steep valley side.
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted between Juiy 6 and 8, 2005. Twenty~
five exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figures 1 and 2 to
evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter
continuous flight auger powered by a truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig. The borings were
logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc ..
lob No. 105 115-6
-3-
Samples of the subsoils were tal(en with a 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The
samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound
hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by
ASTM Method D-1 586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the
relative density or consistency of the subsoils and hardness of the bedrock. Depths at
which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are s..J,own on the
Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figures 3 through 8. The samples were returned to our
laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figures 3
through 8. The subsoils, below a thin topsoil root zone, consist of a variable depth of
stratified silt, sand and gravel debris fan deposits overlying dense, river gravel alluvium.
About 3 to 4 feet of exi~g fill was encountered above the mrtural soils in Borings 5, 6, 7
and 15, located just east of the Robartson Ditch. The debris fan soils were typically
encountered between depths of 7 to 19 feet in the north parcel and between depths of 16
to 32 feet in the south parcel. In Borings 6 through 9 and 15 at the north parcel, the debris
fan soils were deeper than the adjacent area to the north, with depths of22 to 38 feet
before the gravel alluvium was encountered. Siltstone and gypsum bedrock offue Eagle
Valley Evaporite was encountered below the gravel alluvium at a depth of 42 feet in
Boring 6. The bedrock quality appeared poor to fair and included gypsum, but did not
appear to be a void or cavity. Drilling in the dense gravel alluvium with auger equipment
was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and practical drilling refusal was typically
encountered in the deposit.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural
moisture content and density, liquid and plastic limits and gradation analyses. Results of
swell-consolidation testing, presented on Figures 10 through 16, indicate the debris fan
soils are typically hydrocompressive and moderately to highly compressible under load
after wetting. Some of the clay soils showed a low expansion potential when wetted but
JobNo.l05115·6.
-4-
the resulting heave potential is not expected to be significant compared to the collapse
potential. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples
(minus 1\12 inch :fraction) of the debris fan soils are shown on Figures 17 and 18. The
laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1.
Free water was typically not encountered in the borings and the subsoils -were relatively
dry. In Borings 6 through 9 and 15, the subsoils became moist with depth and free water
was encountered at depths between 26 and 3 6 feet in Borings 6 and 15.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
Development of the Villas project as proposed should be feasible based on geotechnical
conditions. The upper 7 to 38 feet of soils e;ncountered in the borings consist of debris fan
deposits that tend to collapse (settle under constant load) when wetted. The amount of
settlement will depend on the depth of the compressible soils and the -wetted depth below
the foundation. The settlement potential and risk of excessive building distress can be
reduced by compaction of the soils til a certain depth below the foundation bearing level
and by heavily reinforcing the foundation to resist differential settlements. The
compaction should also extend to below driveway and utility areas. The soil compaction
can consist of the structural fill proposed to elevate the project site but relatively deep
structural fills will also have some potential fur long term settlement. Proper grading and
compaction as presented below in Site Grading will help reduce the settlement risks. In
areas underlain by less than 10 to 15 feet of debris fan soils, malnly the northern part of
the north parcel, additional compaction below the building foundation should not be
needed. A heavily reinforced mat foundation designed for large differential settlements or
a deep foundation that extends down to the underlying, dense river gravel alluvium could
also be used to reduce the settlement risk.
Eagle Valley Evaporite that underlies the project area is known to be associated with ·
sinkholes and localized ground subsidence in the Roaring Fork River valley. A sinkhole
opened in the parking lot of the Pro Shop to the northwest of the project site in January
2005 and other inegular bedrock conditions have been identified in the affordable
Job No. 105 115-6
-5-
housing site to the west of the Villas north parcel. Indications of ground subsidence were
not observed in the Villas development area that could indicate a risk of future ground
subsidence but the variable depth of debris fan soils in Borings 6 through 9 and 15 in the
north parcel could be the result of past subsidence. In our opinion, the risk of future
ground subsidence in the Villas project area is low and similar to other areas of the
Roaring Fork River valley where there have not been indications of ground subsidence.
We understand that the potential for future ground subsidence in the project area is being
evaluated by others. The southern part of the northern parcel should be further evaluated
for potential sinkhole development considering the variable subsurface profile
encountered in that area.
Recommendations for preliminsry design of the proposed development are presented
below. When the building plans have been developed, we should review the information
for compliance with our recommendations.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the
nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the buildings be founded with spread
footings bearing on at least 5 feet of compacted on-site debris fan soils or compacted
structural fill. The feasibility of footings placed on the natural soils in the north parcel
where the debris fan soils are less than about 10 to 15 feet deep should be evaluated prior
to construction. If a mat foundation or deep foUiidation system is considered for building
support, we should be contacted for additional recommendations.
The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation system.
1) Footings placed on at least 5 feet of compacted fill in deeper debris fan
areas or on natural soils where there is less than 10 to 15 feet of the natural
debris fan soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of
Job No. 1051!5-6
-6-
1,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings
designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch
or less. Additional differential settlement between about 1 to 2 inches
could occur in deeper nil areas or if the undisturbed debris fan soils are
wetted.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of20 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil c.over above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
4) The f01mdation should be constructed in a "box-like" configuration rather
fuan with isolated footings. The foundation walls should be heavily
reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an
unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining
structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as
discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report.
5) The topsoil, existing undocumented fill and any loose or disturbed soils
should be removed. The soils should be subexcavated as needed to provide
at least 5 feet of structural fill below the footing bearing level compacted
to at least 98% of the maximum standard Proctor density within 2
percentage points of optimum moisture content. Where footings are placed
on tbe natural soils, the exposed soils in footing area should be moistened
and compacted.
6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should evaluate the
compaction of the fill materials and observe all footing excavations prior
to concrete placement for bearing conditions.
FOUNDATION AND RETAJNlNG WALLS
Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be
expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral
lob No. 105 115-6
-7-
earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf
for backfill consisting of the on-site fme-grained soils. Cantilevered retaining structures
which are separate from the buildings and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to
mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth
pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcffor
backfill consisting of the on-site fme-grained soils.
All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and
surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and
equipment. The pressures reconunended above assume drained conditions behind the
walls and a horizontal back:fi.ll surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward
sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or
retaining structure. An under drain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure
buildup behind walls. Site walls with a maximum backslope of2 horizontal to 1 vertical
should be designed for an active earth pressure of at least 60 pcf equivalent fluid unit
weight.
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Back:fi.ll in pavement and
walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the back:fill or use large equipment
near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some
settlement of deep foundation wall back:fill should be expected, even if the material is
placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill.
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted
backfill against the sides ofthe footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the
Job No. !05115-6
-8-
design to limit the strain which \\dll occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads
should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a
moisture content near optimum.
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, and compacted structural fill can be used to
support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. The natural soils are compressible
when wetted and there could be some post-construction settlement. To reduce the effects
of some differential movement, nonstructural floor slabs should be separated from all
bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical
movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage
cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be
established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A min:imum 4
inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to
facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least
50% retained on the No.4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs above footing bearing level should be
compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content
near Dptimuru. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil
and oversized rock.
UNDERDRAJN SYSTEM
Although free water was typically not encountered during our exploration, it has been our
experience in the area thet local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy
precipitation or seasonal runoff Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched
condition. We recommend below-grade. construction, such as retaining walls and
basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an
Job No. 105 115-6
-9-
underdrain system. An underdrain should not be provided around crawlspace and slab-on-
grade areas.
If installed, the drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free-drailling granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent fmish
grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravit"j outlet. Free-draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Yz feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as a
20 mil PVC liner, should be placedbeneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and
attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils.
SITE GRADING
Extensive grading of the Villas area is proposed as part of the development plan. 1n
addition, removal and replacement of the debris fan soils compacted is recommended in
shallow fill areas to reduce the risk of excessive differential settlements and building
distress. The structural fill should extend to at least 8 feet below design surface grade and
to at least 2 feet below the water and sewer pipe invert levels. 1n addition, the water and
sewer pipe joints should be mechanically restrained to reduce the-risk of joint separation
in the event of excessive settlement. Excavation and compaction below footing bearing
level may not be needed where the debris fan soils are Jess than 10 to 15 feet thick. The
structural f!ll materials below footing bearing level should be compacted to at least 98%
of the maximum standard Proctor density within 2 percentage points of optimum moisture
content Prior to fill placement, the sub grade should be carefully prepared by removing
the existing fill, all vegetation and topsoil and compacting tc at least 95% of the
maximum standard Procter density at near optimum moisture content. The flil should be
benched into slopes that exceed 20% grade. Based on our experience with the Phase 1
development, shrinkage of the debris fan soils due to compaction is expected to be about
15%to 20%.
Job No. 105115-6
-10-
Permanent unretained cut and flll slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. This office should
review site grading plans for the project prior to construction.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Precautions to prevent wetting of the bearing soils such as proper backfill construction,
positive backfill slopes, restricting landscape irrigation and use of roof gutters need to be
taken to help limit settlement and building distress. The following drainage precautions
should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after each residences
have been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away :from the foundation in a1l directions. The slope
should be at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet in unpaved areas and at least 3
inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Drain gravel of retaining walls
should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on-site soils to reduce surface
water infiltration.
4) Roof gutters should be provided with downspouts that discharge beyond
the limits of the foundation wa11 backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should
be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be
given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below
the building caused by irrigation.
Job No. !05115-6
-11 -
PAVEMENT SECTION
The upper soils encountered at the site consist oflow plasticity sand, silt and clay that are
considered a poor support of pavement sections. A Hveem stabilometer 'R' value of 15
was assumed for the native soils and required imported soils. The traffic loadings for the
Villas development have not been provided but are assumed to be relatively light for the
service traffic loading condition, after the construction phase. Based on these conditions,
a preliminary pavement section consisting of 3 inches of asphalt on 8 inches of CDOT
Class 6 base course for the main drives and 3 inches of asphalt on 6 inches of CDOT
Class 6 base course for automobile only parking is recommended. We can review the
pavement section design when the roadway subgrade has been graded and the traffic
loadings have been determined.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical . . -.
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations
indicated on Figures l and 2, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the
area. Our services do not include detennining the presence, prevention or possibility of
mold or other biological contaminants (M:OBC) developing in the future. If the client is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation oftbe subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
Job No. !05 115-6
(
-12-
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our reconunendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the reconunendations
presented herein. We reconunend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural flll on a regular basis by a representative of the
geotechnical engineer.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
R.eviewedby:
Daniel E. Hardin, P .E. .
SLP/ksw
cc: High Country Engineering-Attn: Scott Gregory
S.K. Peightal Engineers-Attn: Jack Albright
Job No. 105115·6 ~tech
/~
APPROXIMATE SCALE:
tn .= 80'
"105115-6
\
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
VILLAS NORTH PARCEL
\~
\\ \
Figure 1
105115-6 Figure 2
0
5
10
$ ,u..
i' /.r:::.
15.
OJ
0 15
20
25
105115-6
BORING 1
ELEV.= 5952'
20/12
WC=4.5
00=106
20/6,30/4
BORING2
ELEV.= 5950'
20/12
WC=6.2
00=93
·200=85
25/4,10/0
BORING3
ELEV.= 5944'
24/12
WC=5.1
00=94
Note: Explanation o! symbols is shown on Figure 9.
BORING4
ELEV. = 5946'
25/12
WC=7.1
00=104
·200=83
LL=28
Pl=11
20/6,40/6
T
~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
He worlh-Pawlak Geotoohnlcal
0
5
10
1il
OJ
1.1..
' -'= 15.
15 '" 0
20
25
Figure 3
5
0
.= 5950'
11/12
5
16/12
WC=9.3
10 DD=100
-200=54
17112
15
105115-6
I 6
ELEV.= 5953'
15/12
12/12
WC=10.3
-200=50
10/12
.WC=18.2
DD=108
-200=73
I
ELEV. = 5954'
7/12
14/12
WC=16.3
DD=108
-200=62
32/12
7/12
WC=17.7
DD=107
-200=74
I 8
ELEV.= 5946'
29/12
WC=4.0
00=107
30/12
7/12
WC=6.6
DD=117
-200=44
12/12
50/2 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 9.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 4
0
5
10
1ii
"' u.
)~ ,_
a.
Q)
0 15
20
25
105115-6
BORING9
ELEV. = 5942'
24/12
18/12
28/12
10/12
WC=11.4
DD=104
BORING10
ELEV.= 5938'
18/12
WC=4.0
DD=96
10/12
60/12
BORING 11
ELEV. = 5943'
9/12
11/12
wc~15.5
DD=109
-200=76
7/12
3/6,15/6
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 9.
BORING 12
ELEV. = 5938'
33/12
WC=6.1
DD~117
43/12
14/12
c~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
He worth-Powlok Geotechnleol
0
5
10
l
' E a.
15 "' 0
20
25
Figure 5
0
5
10
15
1i)
if. 20
'
25
30
35
40
105115-6
BORING 13
ELEV. = 5944'
22/12
T
BORING 14
ELEV.= 5937'
28/12
WC=8.5
DD=109
-200=91
LL=31
P1=13
20/6,30/3
BORING 15
ELEV.= 5950'
15/12
WC=14.3
DD=112
9/12
WC=14.5
-200=71
10/12
WC=14.4
DD=112
+4=17
-200=58
24/12
32/12
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 9.
BORING 16
ELEV. = 5968'
15/6,35/5
47/12
33/12
WC=3.2
+4=34
-200=42
18/12
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
5
1i)
20 (J)
1.1..
' .c -"-(J)
0
25
Figure 6
0
5
10
15
1i5
"' L.L
20
25
30
35
105115-6
BORING 17
ELEV.= 5963'
52112
34/12
WC=5.9
DD=115
23/12
50/3
BORING 18
ELEV. = 5968'
38112
40/12
WC=3.6
DD=104
-200=58
42112
WC=3.6
DD=109
45/12
BORING 19
ELEV.= 5962'
13/12
30/12
WC=1.7
DD=120
+4=38
-200=26
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 9.
BORING20
ELEV. = 5967'
18/6,25/3
WC=1.9
DD=103
-200=36
55112
~, LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
He worth-Powlok Geoteehnlool
5
15
1i5
"' u..
' £
0.
"' 20 0
Figure 7
BORING21 BORING 22 BORING23 BORING24 BORING25
:: ELEV. = 5976' ELEV. = 5957' ELEV. = 5985' ELEV.= 5985' ELEV.= 5990'
0 0 ]
52/12 21!12 52/12 39/12 20/6,30/3
5 WC=3.3 WC=1.3 5
+4=38 -200=27
-200=23
15/12 30/6,25/3 57/12 20/12 27/12
10 WC=2.6 WC=4.6 10
-200=46 00=105
-200=62
43/12 28/12 30/12
15 WC=3.3 WC=4.1 15
~ 00=108 00=112 'ID
-200=64 (j)
l1.
' '
£ ..c
)5} 0..
·o (j)
15/12 40/12 50/6,10/0 0
20 WC=3.4 20
00=109
25 25
30 30
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 9.
105115-6 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 8
LEGEND:
39/12
0,2
T
NOTES:
FILL; silty sandy gravel, loose to medium dense. slightly moist, brown.
TOPSOIL; root zone, sandy silt, slightly moist, brown.
SILT AND CLAY (ML-CL); slightly sandy to sandy, scattered gravel, some sandy clay, stiff to very stiff, slightly
moist, very moist with depth at Borings 6, 7 and 15. mixed brown, slightly calcareous and porous, low plasticity.
SAND AND SILT (SM-ML); scattered gravel to gravelly, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, light brown.
SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM); silty, some sandy silt layers, medium dense, brown, subangular to rounded rock.
GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM-GP); slightly silty, dense, typically moist, wet at Borings 4 and 15,
brown, rounded rock.
SILTSTONE AND GYPSUM; medium hard to hard, moist, gray and white. Eagle Valley Evaporite.
Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample.
Drive sample; standard penetration test (SP1), 1 3/8 inch I. D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586.
Drive sample blow count; indicates that 39 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were
required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches.
Free water level in boring and number of days following drilling measurement was taken.
Depth at which boring had caved when checked on July 8 , 2005.
Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of Jog, indicates that multiple attempts were
made to advance the boring.
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on July 6, 7 and 8, 2005 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger.
2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan
provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided.
4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the
method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between
material types and transitions rnay be gradual.
6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in
water level may occur with time. Groundwater was only encountered in Borings 6 and 15.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content (%)
DD = Dry Density (pel)
+4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve
105115-6 He£; -Getectl HePWorl:h-Powlak Geotechnical
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid Limit (%)
PI = Plasticity Index (%)
LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 9
' Moisture Content ~ 4.5 perc ent
Dry Density = 106 pel
Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay
From: Boring 1 at 4 Feet
0
* --c 1
·~ ....... ~ Compression
"' upon
~ "" wetting a. 2 E '\ 0
0
3
!
. 0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE· ksf
105115·6 ~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 10
HeDWorth-Pow!ok Geotechnlcal
Moisture Content ~ 5.1 perc ent
0
Dry Density = 94 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt --r--r-From: Boring 3 at 4 Feet
1
2
3 ~ Compression
upon
4
wetting
5
*-6
\ c
·f& 7 (h
~ \ .
E
0 8 (.)
9
10 1\
11 \
\
(
12
13
\
14 !\
15
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE· ksf
105115-6 ~ He;worth Powlak Geotechnical
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 11
I \ Moisture Content = 4.0 perc ent
'
0
Dry Density = 107 pel
Sample ol: Very Silty Sand .._ r--r-. t'--t-..
From: Boring 8 at 4 Feet
1
2 Compression
'if
[\_
upon
c 3
wetting
-~ ~ (/) a
E 4
0 \ 0
5 \
6 \
7
0.1 1.0
APPLIED PRESSURE • ksl
10 100
' Moisture Content = 11.4 perc ent
Dry Density = 104 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt
From: Boring 9 at 19 Feet
0 --...... ,....
'0"-1 Compression
c ~ 0 upon
'(); wetting
"' 2 a ~ E ~ 0
0 3 '\
4
0.1 1.0
APPLIED PRESSURE · ksf
10 100
105115-6 ~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 12
HeDWorth PowloK Ge~>t~hnteol
0
._ -Moisture Content ~ 4.0 perce nt
t----r-. Dry Density ; 96 pel
1 Sample of: Sandy Slit
From: Boring 10 at 4 Feet
2
r---1--r--.
??-3 Compression
r:
.Q "' upon
({) wetting
({) 4 ~ '\ E
8 5 \
6 \
7 1\
8
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksl
}
Moisture Content ~ 6.1 peree nt
Dry Density ; 117 pel
*
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
c From: Boring 12 at 4 Feet
l 1 --r-..,.,
' 0
c: "" ......,
"-..... -~
"' 1 1\ 1£
0. Expans on
E
0 upon
0 wetting 2
0.1 1.0
APPLIED PRESSURE-ksl
10 100
105115-6 ~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 13
HepWorth Pawlak Geote!;:hnlco\
Moisture Content = 8.5 perce nt
Dry Density = 1 09 pcf
Sample of: Slightly Sandy Silty Clay
From: Boring 14 at 4 Feet
2
'* c: ·~ 1 P--......
c:
<1) ~ &' ~ ' ' 0
c: ~ " -~ "' "' 1 " 1!:
Cl. Ex pans• r E
0 upon
() wetting 2
0.1 1.0
APPLIED PRESSURE • ksf
10 100
Moisture Content = 5. 9 perce nt
Dry Density = 115 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
From: Boring 17 at 9 Feet
0
1fl.
c:
0 1 "fi!
"' ~>---......, .fr ~ 0 >--..
' c: Expansion 0
-~ upon f',
~ 1 wetting
E
8
2
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE • ksf
105115-6 ~&tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 14
HEPWOfmt<PAWLAK GEOTE:CHNlCAL.
\ Moisture Content= 3.6 percent
Dry Density = 109 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay
From: Boring 18 at 14 Feet
0
* '-...._ <"
_.;;
1
c: ~ :-No movement
0 ·u; "' upon
ro ~ 2
wetting
E
0
0
3
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
:
j
Moisture Content = 3.3 percent
Dry Density = 108 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay
From: Boring 21 at 14 Feet
0 Compression -~ upon
* -v 1-<.vetting
1 /
c: ~ 0 ·u;
"' ~ 2
E "t I'-0
0 " 3
•
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -kst
105115-6 ~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 15
HePWorth-Pawlak Geotecholoo!
Moisture Content = 3.4 percent
Dry Density = 109 pet
Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay
From: Boring 22 at 19 Feet
?f. 0
c: ---... t--
·~ ~ 1--.
en 1
~ "' No movement
c.
E upon
0 2 wetting
(.)
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
i Moisture Content = 4.6 perc ent
Dry Density = 105 pet
Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay
From: Boring 25 at 9 Feet
?f. 0
c: '\---0 ·;; ' ~ 1 ~ ('..
E I', 0
(.) 2
No' movement
upon
wetting
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf
105115-6 ~ H~WOJm+f'AWLAK Gt:!OTECHNlCAL
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 16
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS I
"[ TIME READINGS I U,S. STANDARD SEAlES I CLEAR SCUARE OPENINGS I
24HR. 7HA
45 MIN.15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4' 1 1/Z' 3" 5"8" 8"
0 ""
10 "'
0 20 "' w <!J z 30 " z
~ 1i5
40 00 ~ a:
~ 1-
50 "'m w
0 0 a: 60 "' 0:
w w
CL CL
70 "
80 "'
80 "
100 ' '" ·'"' ·"'" ·"" .0\9 ·'"' '" ·'"' "" ·"" 1,18 = 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 $7.5 76.2 "' ..
"' DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
ct.AYTOSilT I """' ICOAASE I "" I MEOW FINt
~RAVEb
I COARSE I COBBLES
GRAVEL 17% SAND 25 % SILT AND CLAY 58 %
LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAMPLE OF: Sandy Gravelly Silt FROM: Boring 15 at 14 Feet
} I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I
2i k~· 7 HR TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS ~. 45MIN.15 MIN.60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8' 3/4" 11/2' 3" 5'6'
0 100
10 90
0 20 80
w (!)
z 30 70 z
ffi 1i5
(f)
0: 40 60 '&
1-1-z 50 50 aJ w
0 0 a: 60 40 ffi w
CL CL
70 30
80 20
90 10
100 0
.001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 s.s,2.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 12lp2 203
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
ClAI'T0$U """' GAA 1. '""'""' '"" MEOil.IM 00-FINE COM~
GRAVEL 34% SAND 24 % SILT AND CLAY 42 %
LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX %
" SAMPLE OF: Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Borio.q 16 at 14 Feet
105115-6 o$'£tech GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 17
HE:PW01l'l1+-PA.Wl.AK GEO'TECHNICAJ..
I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SiEVE ANALYSIS
u( TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS _1,
24H1't 7HA
\ 45 M!N. 15 MIN. 60M!Nl9M!N.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/6" 3/4" 1 112: 3' s· 6" 8"
0 '"'
10 "
0 20 " uJ 0 z 30 " z
~ i'i5
40 "' ~ 0: ,.... ,....
m 50 " z uJ
if ()
60 "" 0::
uJ uJ
Q_ Q_
70 so
80 "'
90 "
100 ' ·"'' "" .oos .009 .QIS ., .074 ·'"' "" ·""' 1.18 2.$6 4.75 S,$12.5 19.0 37.5 16:2 "' "" "' DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
CtAvtOS!LT SMD GAA"' COB9l.£S ""' MEDIUM COAA" FINE CO>RSE
GRAVEL 38% SAND 36 % SILT AND CLAY 26%
LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAMPLE OF: Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Boring 19 at 9 Feet
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I
i ~. 7 HR TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS ~· ~ I . 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #3{) #16 #8 #4 318" 3/4' 1 1}2' 3" 5"6"
0 100
10 90
0 20 80
uJ 0 z 30 70 z
~ i'i5 en
0: 40 60 ct ,.... ,....
z 50 50 m uJ
() 0
0:: 60 40 ffi w
Q_ Q_
70 30
80 20
90 10
100 0
.001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.512.519.0 37.5 76.2 12}52 203
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
CLAYTOS!.T "" GAAVEl COllBI..ES FIN;: MEOW COMS€ FINE COARSE
GRAVEL 38% SAND 39 % SILT AND CLAY 23 %
LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAfvPLE OF: Si ~and Gravel FROM: Borina 22 at 4 Feet
105115-6 r -L I GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 18
·,._ ..
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1 Job No. 105 115·6
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
age 0 p 1 f 3
SAMPlE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED
MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORJNGS DEPTH CONTENT DENS!iY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE
(It) 1%) (ocfl (%) ("!•) (PSF)
1 4 4.5 106 Sandy silty and clay
2 4 6.2 93 85 Sandy clayey silt
3 4 5.1 94 Sandy silt
4 4 7.1 104 83 28 11 Sandy silty clay
5 81h 9.3 100 54 Silt and sand with gravel
6 14 10.3. 50 Very silty sand and gravel
24 18.2 106 73 Sandy silt
7 9 16.3 108 62 Sandy silt
24 17.7 107 74 Sandy silt
8 4 4.0 107 Very silty sand
14 6.6 117 44 Very silty sand
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1 Job No. 105 115-6
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
~e 0 p 2 f 3
SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED
MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORINGS DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE
(ttl (%) (pcf) (o/o) (•(o) (PSF)
9 19 11.4 104 Sandy silt
10 4 4.0 96 Sandy silt
11 9 15.5 109 76 Sandy clayey silt
12 4 6.1 117 Sandy silty clay
14 4 8.5 109 91 31 13 Slightly sandy silty clay
.
15 4 14.3 112 Sandy silty clay
10 . 14.5 71 Sandy silty clay
14 14.4 112 17 25 58 Sandy gravelly silt
16 14 3.2 34 24 42 Silty sand and gravel
17 9 5.9 115 Sandy silty clay
._J
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1 Job No. 105 115·6
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
age 0 Pa 3 f3
SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTER8ERG UMITS UNCONFINED
MOISTURE DRY . GRAVEL SAND PASSING UQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORINGS DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY N0.200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE
(ft) {%) Jpg)_ (%) (%) (PSF)
18 9 3.6 104 58 Sandy silt with gravel
14 3.6 109 Sandy silty and clay
19 9 1.7 120 38 36 . 26 Silty sand and gravel
20 4 1.9 103 36 Silty sand and gravel
21 14 3.3 108 Sandy silt and clay
22 4 3.3 38 39 23 Silty sand and gravel
19 3.4 109 Sandy silt and clay
Silty sand and gravel
23 4 1.3 27 Silty sand and gravel
24 9 2.6 46 Very silty sand with gravel
25 9 4.6 105 62 Sandy silt and clay
14 4.1 112 64 Sandy silty and clay
EXHIBIT A
THE ASPEN COLLECI'ION
FREEDOMPROM§ONSTRU9JON CONTRACT
L I .200{S._
THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ("Contract") is made and entered into between ffiONBRIDGE ASPEN
·· ooaECTioNtu:;·a·colc>riKio limited ·lliilillilfoompany·(~').·· wli.Ose3ddi'ess .. i84fo-:rr.;nt;ii(lge. R:<.IUCO:i;;;.;~;.;t
Springs, Colomdo 81601, whose telOJ(hone number is (970) 945-4300, and whose facsimile nwnber is (970) 928-8865, and
fOtrBJ lf8Pitfi f9lM:3f>AJ ("Owner''), \Wloae address is
ID'{/J.U/.J(tfl(.? $~.0 G. tjtbl{ ,whosete!~honenmnberis'?Glf:tJZ...endwhose
facsimile number is IT £.'~s Contmet is entered into this l s.rday of ;JIJL. '1 , 200 g_ (''Effective
. Date,) .. This Contract is entered into in connection with and pursuant to Contractor and Owner's Freedom Program Prncbase and
Sale Agreement dated ::f rJ/.'1 ( . , 200,8.. Terms defined in the Freedom Program Purehase and Sales Agreement
and ·nsed in this Contract shall hold the same definition in this Contract. The. construction of the Residence on the Lot, eaeh as
defined in the Freedom Program Purchase and Sale Agreement shall be referred to berein as (the ''House~).
I. Confactor's Scope of Work Contractor's scope of work shall consist of construction services for the House as set forth
O
below, wbieh collectively shall be referred to herein as the "Work."
lans
Contractor has prepared the following drawings, consistent with other homes in the Project, as defined in the
F~m 1Jft{'/J;"hase and Sale Agreement, and constructed by Contractor: ~: 2,Z.o2]) .-rdl~fY
iii (collectively, the~'). i'
3. Construction Services
a. Contractor shall procure and pay for aU pennits,licenses, approvals and inspections reqnired for the House.
b. Contractor shall provide or cause to be provided all labor, materials, equipment and services to conslruct the House in
a workmanlike manner, consistent with homebuilding indUS!Iy s!andards in Garfield Connty, pursuant to the Plans.
Contractor shall not be mspo!ndble for furnishing or constructing any improvements or performing any worl<: unless
the same are specifieaUy set forth in the Plans or in this Contract.
4. Owner's Responsibilities
a. Owner shall cooperate with Contractor in securing any permits, licenses, approvals and inspections for the House.
b. Upon Contractor's request, Owner shall provide all "Reqnested Information" to Contractor in a timely manner, and
shall be available to meet with Contractor to approve plans and review the prowss of the Work. Requested
lnfonnation shall inclnde, but not necessarily be limited to:
i. proof of financing
ii. Design and Architectural Option selections by the associated design selection dates
iii. change order requests
iv. proof of necessary insurance
c. Owner specifieally agrees snd acknowledges thet finllllcing for the House is the sole and exclusive obligation of
Owner, and Owner's ability to obfain financing is not a condition precedent to Owner's obligations set forth in this
Contract Owner represents thet Owner is quslified to obfllin sueh fmancing and/or has available funds in the amount
necessary to complete the House. Owner agrees to promptly seek and obfain any and an required financing for the
House. Owner agrees to provide Contractra with proof, satisfactory to Contractor, that Owner's financing for the
House has been fi.!'.elized> a.tld ag,:--ees that Contractor is not obligated io pr.Q~ with construction on the House until
such proof is delivered to Contr-actor and the Closing of the Lathes oc¢.k~~·
Fonn Datt: 6.'16108
150F23
d. Owner agrees not to let or enter into any other contracts in connection with the House or the Lot without the prior
written approval of Contractor. Owner acknowledges and agrees that entering into any contract or permitting any
other contractor onto the Lot may impede the Contractor's ahili!y to manage the cost of the House and timely
complete performance of the Work as contemplated herein. Violation of this provision, shall, in addition to any other
remedies set forth herein, permit Contractor to exercise its termination rights as specified herein.
e. Within three (3) days after substantial completion of the Work, Owner shall notifY all utili!y suppliers that Owner is
responsible for utili!y expenses from and after the date of substantial completion. -··-,.,__~,_, __ .
5. Time
a. Without limiting the foregoing, Owner agrees to provide all Requested Information to Contractor to start construction
within three (3) months of the date on which the Closing of the Lot occurs. Should Owner delay commencement
construction beyond said three (3) months, Owner shall pay Contractor the sum of Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000.00) per month, allocated for fractional portions of months ("Extension Fee"). The parties hereby agree that
Contractor's actual damages for such Owner delay cannot be calculated now with certainty, and that Liquidated
Damages are a re.Soriahle estimate thereof. ·
b. Provided that Owner has complied with all of its obligations hereunder, including but not limited to timely payment
of all sums due to Contractor~ and Ownei bas secured financing for the House and delivered satisfactory proof
thereof to Contractor, and Closing of the Lot has occurred, Contractor shall commence construction at the House Site
within six!y (60) days after the issuance of a building permit in the Owner's name, as evidenced by accurate
installation of the fo~ndation forms (the ~'Commencement Date").
c. Substantial Completion of the House shall occur within ten (10) months after the Commencement Date (the
"Completion Date"). The Completion Date may be extended on account of:
i. labor disputes;
ii. fire or other damage to the House, including interior damage;
iii. material or labor shortages;
iv. transportation delays;
v. governmental action;
vi. unusual weather conditions;
vii. change orders or delays caused by Owner;
viii. the failure of Owner to provide information and/or approvals in a timely manner; or
ix. any other causes which are beyond Contractor's control or which may otherwise justifY the delay; and
x. Force M(\jeure events.
d. Without limiting !be foregoing, Owner agrees to provide all required information to Contractor to substantially
complete construction by the Completion Date. Should either party delay Substantial Completion of the House
beyond the Completion Date, the delaying party shall pay the other party the sum of Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000.00) per month, allocated for fractional portions of months as an Extension Fee. The parties hereby agree that
actual damages for such delays cannot be calculated now with certainty, and that these Liquidated Damages are a
reasonable estimate thereof.
6. Ownership ofPlans. Owner agrees and acknowledges that the Plans, and any amendments or revisions thereto, are and
shttUEemain the sole and exclusive.property of Contractor~ and Owner agrees not to seU, transfer~ assign, use, copy or
shafe the same with any person or entity without tile prior and express written consent of Contractor, which may be
withheld in Contractor~s sole discretion.
7. Contract Price.
,.--..--_....
a. Q1!JI'<'r shaV..11.ay Cotllractor the sum of~ l/t l -
1 lt.JfJ!r-0~ --=:......,., Dollars($ ,Qli.OO) ("Contract Price") for performance of
the Work; which amount shaH be paid in accordance with the paymefiiPrd'visions set forth in this Contract.
b. Owner acknowledges that upon the execution of any change orders during the course of construction, the Contract
Price may increase~ and in such event 0-YVner shaH pay to Contractor such increase upon execution of the change
order~ and prior to Contractor's performance of any work in connection with the change order.
8. Payment Procedure.
a. Owner shaH mflke. or cause Ov:ner's lender to make. progress payme.r1ts fo:r the V\lork in accordance with the
schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 ("Draw Schedule") or at any intermediate point based on the percentage of
completion. of work at that time identified by inspection. Progress payments shaH be delivered to Contractor within
Fonn Dat1:!: 6/IG!OS
I60F 23
9.
five (5) days after Owner's receipt of Contractor's request for payment, which reques1s for payment shall include a
blanket lien waiver statement relating to all parties who provided labor and/or materials applicable to the previous
request for payment.
b. In the event thatatauy time the amount of Owner's loan available for distribution is less than the amount of the
Contract Price remaining to be paid, Owner shall deposit the difference into a construction control account and
execute a customary construction control agreement with respect to the holding and distribution of said sum prior to
Contractor's obligation to commence or continue construction at the House Site. Owner shall b"re~()ll,<ii:>l~fQl:the
~·payment-ohnyfees-in connection·wltll !lie "cofisfiii¢fi6n control. . -.. ·~ . .. .. ~ . . . .
c. Within ten (10) days after substantial completion of the Work, Owner shall pay all remaining amounts due under this
Contract.
d. All monies not paid when due as provided herein shall bear interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum.
e. In the event any insta1Jment is not paid when due, Contractor may exercise any remedy set forth in this Contract or
exercise any other legal andi'or equita'bie rights which may be necessary or appropriate to enfoiCe this Contract.
Changes in the Work
a. Buyer understands, acknowledges and agrees that the Contract Price includes only the items set forth in the document
a..ttached hereto as Exhibit B ("Features List"). These are referred to herein as (''Standard Selections").
b. Additions, upgrades, and/or optional items which are made available to Owner shall be selected, contracted and paid
for in a separate contract with Contractor or by Change Order.
c. Contractor may offer pre-designed and priced options for each Residence to Owner.
i. Options which change the architectural design ofthe Residence, such as an additional garage bay, are
referred to as architectural options ("Architectural Options").
ii. Options which change the materials and colors of the Residence, such as carpet type and/or color, are
referred to as design opti(}ns ("Design Options").
m. Together these are often referred to as ("Options').
d. Changes to the Work that are not a pre-designed and priced Architectural Option or Design Options are referred to as
change orders ("Change Orders").
i. All change orders shall specifY the following:
I. the change in the Work, ·
2. the adjustment to the Contract Price, if applicable, and
3. the adjustment to the Completion Date, if applicable.
e. Changes in the Work can only occur by purchasing au Architectural Option, purchasing a Design Option or by
written Change Order prepared and approved by Contractor.
f. Options will be offered to the Owner, provided the following conditions have been adhered to:
i. Options mnst be selected in a timely manner. Each Option is assigned one of three dates which are referred
to as Design Selection I ("DSI "),Design Selection 2 ("DS2") and Design Selection 3 ("DS3"}. DSl is
seven (7) days after closing, DS2 is forty five ( 45) days after DS I is executed by Owner and Contractor and
DS3 is forty five ( 45) days after DS2 is executed by Owner and Contractor.
ii. Should Owner fail to select Options on or before the applicable design selection date, Seller shall have the
right to either stop work, install the standard selection or deny the Option.
iii. Options and Change Orders shall be selected subsequent to the execution of this Agreement. Payment in the
amount of!OO% of the price of each Option or Change Order shall be due when each Option or Change
Order is ordered.
g. ALL PAYMENTS FOR OPTIONS AND CHANGE ORDERS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE TO OWNER
h. All Option purchases and Change Orders shall be executed by both the Owner and the Contractor and paid for by
Owner, prior to the commencement of the work set forth therein.
i. In the event that any increase in the cost of construction arises because of a change in applicable governmental
regulations taking effect after the date of this Contract, such revision or condition shall be the basis for a Change
Order and Contractor shall receive appropriate compensation for making such change.
10. Possession and Use of the Lot. Upon the Closing of the Lot, Owner is deemed to have conveyed to Contractor an
absolute and exclusive right to possess and use the Lot. Owner shall not enter the Lot unless accompallied by an
authorized representative of Contractor. Owner shall not instruct, direct or otherwise contact Contractor's laborers,
sub~ontractors or consultants. Contractor shall permit access to the Lot by inspectors of Owner's lender. Contractor shall
return possession of the Lot to Owner at the time that all payments and obligations required of the Owner have been fully
paid a.'!d performed b;• the O;vner. If possession of the House and Lot is taken by the Owner before Owner 1s obligations
set forth in this Contract are fully performed and without the prior -v';:rittcn consent of Contl-actor, Owner shaH be deemed
to have accepted the Work as compiete and satisfactory, in compliance of all of Contractor's obligations hereunder.
Form Date: 61!6/08
17 OF 23
11. Walk Through.
a. Upon notice from Contractor to Owner, Owner and Contractor shall schedule a walk-through of Owner's home and
shall compile a list of any items which are materially not in accordance with approved plans and specifications, or do
not materially conform to Garfield County standards. Contractor shall repair, replace or otherwise remedy the items
within a reasonable time after Substantial Completion .
. •· . --· . --·-·-· . . b; .. Notwithstanding·the·facrthaniadi!ionalwoi'R maYlie required iiicoiiecfthe ilems:IfilieHousehas reached ...
Substantial Completion, then no funds shall be withheld from Contractor for these items.
c. After Substantial Completion, the Limited Seller's Warranty included in the Freedom Program Purchase and Sale
Agreement shall apply.
12. No Assignment. This Contract shali not be assigned by Owner or Contractor to any other party except after the prior
written consent of Owner or Contractor, which consent may be reserved in Owner's or Contractor's sole discretion. If
Owner or Contractor assigns any ofOwner~s or Contractor~s rig4ts unf{er this Contract to any other party in violation of
this provision, said assignment shall be void and ofi10 effect, and Owner shall be in default hereunder. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, Contractor consents to a collateral assignment of this Contract to Owner~s lender pursuant to Owner's
agreement with its ]ender.
13. Insurance.
a. Owner shall procure and maintain during the term of this Contract the following policies ofinsurance:
L Course of Construction insurance in the amount of the Contract Price;
ii. Homeowner's insurance, and a fire and extended risk insurance policy, covering the House and Lot, in an
amount not less than the Purchase Price, together with insurance covering loss or damage to Owner's
personal property, and Owner's personal liability for injuries which may be sustained within the Property;
and
m. Comprehensive General Liability insurance in the amount of$1 ,000,000.
b. Contractor shall maintain during the term of this Contract:
i. Workers compensation insurance, as required by Jaw.
14. Termination of the Contract upon Termination of the Preedom Plan Purchase and Sale Agreement. This Contract shall
be deemed terminated upon the termination of the Freedom Plan Purchase and Sale Agreement for any reason. In such
even~ unless the cause of such termination is the default of Contractor as seller under the Freedom Plan Purchase and
Sale Agreement, Contractor shall be entitled to retain all other .arnount(s) previously paid to Contractor or otherwise due
to Contractor under this Contract.
15. Contractor's Right to Stop Work and Terminate Contract. In addition to all other remedies set forth in this Contract, in
the event that any payment is not made in full within five (5) days after such payment is due, or Owner tails to perfurm
any of its duties under this Contract within ten (10) days after written notice from Contractor, Contractor may stop the
Work until payment is made or Owner fulfills its duties. Should the Work be stopped fora period of fifteen (15) days or
~~r~ lJPQD Owner's failure to make a progress payment or as a result of any other act, omission or neglect of the Owner,
then _Contractor may, upon providing written notice to Owner~ tenninate this Contract. Upon such termination, the
Contractor may recover from the Owner payment for all work completed and for any loss sustained by the Contractor for
materialst equipment, tools, or machinery to the extent of actual loss thereon, plus an amount equal to the Contractor's
anticipated profit under this Contract, plus interest on the foregoing amounts at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per
annum.
16. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Owner and Contractor agree to be bound by the alternative dispute resolution procedures
set forth in the Declaration. Any and aU claims, disputes and controversies arising between Owner and Contractor1
whether before or after Closing, relating to this Contract or its subject matter, including, but not limited to, any alleged
construction defect, shaH be submitted to final and binding arbitration.
17. Notices. All notices required by this Contract shall be in writing and shall be given by any of the following means to the
below listed addresses or fax numbers:
3. certified or registered mai~ pos:t.age p.rt:paid, return receipt requested, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered
three (3) business days a.f!er t~e postmark date;
b. recognized commerciai overnight courier, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered one (1) business day after
Form Date: 6/16/08
18 OF 23
receipt for delivel)' by the courier;
c. electronic mail llansmission with confirmed receipt,
d. telecopy llansmittal ("fax"), in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon fax confrrmation of transmission to
the intended party; or
e. personal delivel)', in which case the notice shall be effective when received.
f. Notice shall be given to Contractor M
410 lronbridge Dr.
··--·---· ·-·· ·-·---·--·-·Glenwood-springs; CO""Sl6Qt· · ···
g. Notice shall e given to Owner to:
h. Notice of change of address shall be delivered by written notice in the manner described in this section. Rejection or
other refusal to accept a notice or the inability to deliver a notice because of changed addres!l of which no notice was
given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the noiice sent.
18. Contractor~s Limited Warranty. Contractor shaH provide a one-year iimited warranty on the house as provided· for in
the Freedom Program Purchase and Sales Agreement.
19. Contractor's Disclaimers. Contractor makes no representation or warranty) and shall in no event be responsible for the
following:
a. Hazardous materials (as defined by applicable law) in the House or on the Lot;
b. Homeowner's association assessments and/or property taxes applicable to the Lot;
c. Owner's financing of the Work;
d. Any work or materials not supplied or installed by Contractor pursuant to this Contract; or
e. All of the mailers described in the disclosures and disclaimers set forth in the Freedom Plan Purchase and Sale
Agreement, which disclosures and disclaimers are fully incorporated herein by this reference.
20. General Provisions.
a. This Contract shall be governed by 1he laws of the State of Colorado. Jurisdiction and venue for any action
concerning this Contract shall be in Garfield County, Colorado.
b. In the event of any litigation or other proceedings between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to the payment by the nonprevailing party of all of its reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, and
litigation expenses.
c. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and any prior understandings, ngreements or
representations of any kind whatsoever preceding the date of this Contract shall not be binding upon either party
except to the extent that they are specifically incorporated into this Contract.
d. This Contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs,
representatives, successors and permitted assignees. This Contract is intended for the exclusive benefit of Owner and
Contractor and is not intended and shall not be interpreted as conferring any benefit on any third party.
e. This Contract and any amendments to this Contract may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original and all taken together shall constitute one and the .same agreement. Fax copies of this
Contract and any amendments to this Contract and fax signatures thereon shall have the same force, effect, and legal
status of originals.
f. If any provision of this Contract is or shall become invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions ofthis
Contract shall not be affected.
g. Time is of the essence in each and every term and provision of this Contract. All references to days herein shall be
deemed to refer to calendar days unless otherwise specified. In the event that the final date for performance of any
act required by this Contract falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, such act may be performed on the next day
which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
h. The waiver of a breach of any provision in this Contract shall not be construed as a waiver of any other breach of the
same or other provision of this Contract, including the time of performance of any provision.
i. Owner understands that this Contract is a legally binding contract. Owner represents and warrants that Owner has
read the terms a."l.d conditions ofthls Contmct, aud has had a fuH and fair opportunity to consuit with legal counsel of
Owner's own choosing concerning this Contract.
F<mn Dete: 6/i6/0S
l90F23
EXECUTED to be effective as of the date oftbe date first written above.
CONTRACTOR: OWNER:
IRONBRIDGE ASPEN COLLECTION LLC,
" " ""~ ~"-A.C<>IoradoJimited.liability.company-.. ~-·-·-""
By:--------------------~-
Managing Member
Fonn Date: 61J~/OS
200F23
Form Da1e: 6/16/08
EXHIBITA-1
(Draw Schedule insert)
21 OF 23
EXHIBIT A-1
DRAW SCHEDULE
-----------~----lronbridgeAspen-eollection;-tLe····· ·--------·-··---···· ·--~----··---·-····--·--···
February 14, 2008
Plan No: 22020
Foundation: Post Tension Slab on Grade ·
Descri2tion % Cost
Permits, Engineering, Survey 5% $ 11,251
Sitework 4% $ 9,001
Foundation 7% $ 15,751
Framing 20% $ 45;004
Roofing 5% $ 11,251
Plumbing 5% $ 11,251
Electrical 3% $ 6,751
HVAC 4% $ 9,001
Windows, Doors, Trim 7% $ 15,751
Insulation 1% $ 2,250
Exterior Finishes 5% $ 11,251
Painting 6% $ 13,501
Drywall 4% $ 9,001
Flooring 3% $ 6,751
Tile 2% $ 4,500
Cabinets 2% $ 4,500
Appliances 1% $ 2,250
Landscaping (if applicable), Driveways, Sitework 7% $ 15,751
General Conditions 2% $ 4,500
Total Cost 93% $ 209,269
Contractor Fee 7% $ 15,751
Total Contractor Cost and Fee 100% $ 225,021
Fonn Date: G/16/0S
EXHIBITB
(Features List insert)
220F 23
I:R.ON:S:R.Jt.»Gtm
GOLF CLUB AND MOUNTAIN COMMIJNll"Y
--~------"'-""·--·~-----··· -~---·--·-·--~---~
1RONBRIDGEASPEN COLLECTION LLC
February 7, 2008
ENERGY PERFORMANCE FEATURES
• Fully-engineered .Air and Water Jnfdlration
Paokage
o . Double-paned Low-E Glass
o Air Infi!tmtion-protected Electrical
~el>l ..
o Fuli:r·wr•pped and S<o;lled Wir\dow . Openings
o W<>athi:r Sllipping <>n ExteriDr Doors
o Air Barrier Weather Sllipping at
Foundation
o Under-slab Vapor Barriers
• High-efl'ieiency Furnace
• High-efficiency 4& Gallon Hot Water Heater
• Insulated Exterior Doors and Garage Door
• Outside Fresh Air Exchanger
ROOFING
• 40-year Asphalt Shingles
• Pre-finished Gutters and Downspouts
WINDOWS & DOORS
• Lifetime Warranty Energy Star-rated
Wmdows
• Double-paned Low-E Glass
• Thennalnt Fiberglass Insulated Entry Door
ELECTRICAL
• Phone/DataffV Ports in Kilchen, Great Room
and Master Bedroom
• Photo Cell Automatic Exterior Sconces
• Decorative Fixtures at Kilchen, Dining,
Bathrooms, Walk-in Closets
• Switched Outlets in Great Room and
Bedrooms
• Recessed Can Lights in Kitchen & Hallways
1 of2
HEATING & VE,.''TILATION
• .. EJ<hapsl Fans: Energy Star-mted Whisper
Fans, Vented to Exterior
• Powet'VentedAetive Radon Mitigation
System
~ Heated Ga..-age
GARAGE DOORS
• Insulated Door
• Pre-wired Gamge Door Opener Ontlet
APPLIANCES
o GE Gas Range
• Range Exhaust Hoed
• Built-inGEDishwasher
INTERIOR FINlS.HESAND FLOORING
• Hand-textured Painted Walls
• Square Dl:ywaU Comers
• 9-ft. Ceilings
• 10-ft. Coffered Ceiling in Master Bedroom
• Vinyl Flooring at Kitohens, Bathrooms and
Mudrooms
• Crupeting in all Bedrooms and Great Room
• Ceramic Tile Tub Deck in Master Bath
• Full-height Fiberglass Shower and Tub
Enclosures
GOLt:: CLUB AND 1V10UNTAJN CQ1\II},.{UNITY
·············--···-·--· ·········· · · · ·· ···· ntbNIJRIDGE ASi>ltN-co:LtEtnoNLic· .....
February 7, 2008
INTERIOR DOORS, TRIM & CABINETS
• Interior. Doors: .Sante.FeScy!e Hollow Core
• Closets: Stained Rods and Painted Shelves
• Pajnred Basebollrd!; and Door Casings
• .J>ainied Exfeoded.Win<Jow Sills and Aprons • Laminate COwltertOps . .
• Cabinets: Hickory
o 30" Uppers at Kitehen
o Raised Panel Style Doors
o 36" High Vanities
o Alljuslable Shelves
0 Raised Bar Counrertop
PLUMBING FIXTURES & SHOWER
ENCLOSURES
• Soaker Tub in Master Bath
• Pedestal Sink in Powder Rooms
• Icemaker-llne to Refrigerator
• Mirror over all Vanicy Cabinets
EXTERIOR
• Asphai!Driveway with Concrete Walk alld
Covered Front Porches
• L'l-ground Drainage System
• Landscaping, lirigafion and Dreinage
• Stucco, Stone & Rough-Sawn Wood Finishes
THE TOTAL NUMBER, DESIGN, LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF LOTS, LANDSCAPING, LAKES,
RES!DENCESANDUN!TMJXANDTHBLOCATION,DESIGNANDLAYOUTOF
RECREATIONALFACIL!TIESMAYBECHANGEDDUETOANUMBEROFCIRCUMSTANCES,
INCLUDING GOVERNMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, MARKET DEMAND AND COST
CONSTRAINTS. THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND
FAClLITIES DESCRIBED WILL BE CONSTRUCTIID. DIMENSIONS AND RESIDENCE SIZEA.llli
APPROXIMATEINNATUREANDARENOTINTENDEDFORFINALREFERENCEASPLANS
ARE NOT TO SCALE. LEROSE RANCH LLC,IRONBRIDGEHOMES LLC,IRONBR!DGE
MOUNTAINCO'JTAQESLLCAND.IRONBRIDGEASPENCOLLECTIONLLCRESERVE.THE
R!GIDTOMAKEMODIFICATIONSINLOTANDRES!DENCEPR!CESANDMAKE
Iv[QI)IFICATION!IIN M/l.TERIALS AND SPECIFICATIONS AT ANY TIME WITHOUT PRIOR
NOTICE .. OWNERSHIP OF A RESIDENCE OR LOT OOESNOTINCLUDECLUB MEMBERSHIP
OR !UG!ITS IN THB COUNTRY CLtJB FAC!LITIES'.
2of2
EXIDBIT B-1
PROJECT DOCUMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Purchaser, as witnessed by the signature(s) below, acknowledges that as specified in the Purchase and Sale Agreement,
Paragraph 5(A), Title Policy, will receive all recorded documents that relate to the Property from the Title Company within ten
days from mutua~~ecujiJm~qL!hJLQ>ntr.act. .Sl!iJLds;cuments.ar.e.seferred.to ... as-'>ll.Schedule.B-2.exception.documents·as··listed·in····· · ··········
···· ········~-the Commitment to Provide a Title Insurance Policy.
Said Documents are provided on a computer disc, however the Buyer may request from the Title Company printed copies of any
or all documents provided on the disc.
As referenced in Paragraph 5(E) and 5(F), "Project Documents" and "The Aspen Collection Association", oflhe Purchase and Sale
Agreement, there are additional documents relating to the Property which are considered to be unrecorded documents that relate to
the Title of the Property. These documents are provided by the Seller and the IPOA/T A CA through thewebsite of the community
which is accessible at www;ironbridgeclub;com by logging irito the site under member's login by using the password 234.S:sy
signing below, the Purchaser acknowledges the ability to review and the receipt of said documents through the website listed
above during the Title Review Period. Purchaser may request printed copies of said documents in the event that they are unable to
access the documents through the website.
Purchaser Date
Purchaser Date
January 1, 2008
Fonn Date: 6!16/08
23 OF 23
Parcel Detail Page I of 4
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Treasurer Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor
Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Reception Search
Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information
Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial
Improvement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs I Mill Levy Revenues Detail
~ Account Parcel 2007 Mill
Number Number Levy a
I 090 II R043502 1123950142928611 64.976
Owner N arne and Mailing Address
!KNUTSON, BRUCE C. & MARYS.
II 04 WILLIAMS wAy
!ASPEN, CO 81611
Assessor's Parcel Description
(Not to be used as a legal description)
!SECT,TWN,RNG: 1-7-89 SUB:IRONBRIDGE
IPUD, PHASE II, FILING 1, 2 & 3
ILOT:286 PRE:R041509 BK:1596 PG:871
IBK: 1565 PG:600 BK: 1560 PG:438
IBK:1560 PG:431 BK:l057 PG:0745
IBK:l028 PG:768 BK:l028 PG:597
http: l/www. garcoact. com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=23 9 50 14 2 9286
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9/8/2008
Parcel Detail Page 2 of4
[BK:l006 PG:743 RECPT:755001 I
[RECPT:755000 BK: 1822 PG:287 I
[RECPT:702424 BK: 1822 PG:283 I
[RECPT:702422 BK: 1822 PG:250 I
[RECPT:702421 BK: 1782 PG:269 I
[RECPT:694479 BK:1782 PG:264 I
jRECPT:694478 BK:l747 PG:1 I
JRECPT:686745 BK:1218 PG:738 I
[RECPT:572583 BK:1218 PG:715 I
IRECPT:572582 BK:l217 PG:266 I
[RECPT:572131 BK:1206 PG:852 I
IRECPT:569200 BK: 1206 PG:780 I
[RECPT:569199 BK:l206 PG:768 I
[RECPT:569197 BK:l206 PG:734 I
[RECPT:569195 BK:l206 PG:662 I
IRECPT:569194 BK:l206 PG:637 I
[RECPT:569192 BK:1206 PG:629 I
IRECPT:569191 BK:l206 PG:574 I
[RECPT:569190 BK:l063 PG:0578 I
[BK:l063 PG:0571 I
Location
Physical 1306 BLUE HERON VISTA GLENWOOD SPRINGS~ Address:
[subdivision: IIIRONBRIDGE PUD, PHASE II, FILING 1, 2 & I
[Land Acres: [ 0
[Land Sq Ft: I 3,378
I Section II Township II Range I
I 1 II 7 II 89 I
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelN umber=23 950 14 29286 9/8/2008
Parcel Detail Page 3 of 4
2008 Property Tax Valuation Information
II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: II 82,51011 23,9301
\Improvements: \\ oil ol
I Total: II 82,51 oil 23,9301
Additional Value Detail
Most Recent Sale
Sale Date: \\8129/2008
Sale Price: \\254,000
Additional Sales Detail
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential jo I Buildings:
Number ofComm/lnd jo I Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I
I 2007 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($640.66)\
I 2007 II Tax Payment: First Half 11 ($640.66)\
I 2007 II Tax Amount II $1,281.321
I 2006 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($38.32)1
I 2006 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($38.32)\
I 2006 II Tax Amount II $76.6411
http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelN umber=23950 1429286 9/8/2008
June 24, 2009
Ironbridge Golf Club & Sporting Community
410 Ironbridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attn: Mike Woelke
RE: LVL Bearing, Hole, Truss Bearing
0306 Blue Heron Vista
Lot 286
Ironbridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
Per your email dated 23 June 2009, we understand that the (2) LVL above the Great Rm/Dining Rm
only has approximately one inch of bearing on one ply and full bearing on the second ply. We have
reviewed this condition and it is not a structural concern.
Further more we understand that a quarter inch hole has been put at an angle into the LVL
approximately 6ft from bearing. We have reviewed this condition and it is not a structural concern.
We understand that the bearing wall at the laundry has been moved. We have reviewed this condition
with the provided profile for truss f1c and it is not a structural concern.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
Jeremiah Willis
Reviewed by:
Nathaniel P. Graf, P.E.
JW
file