HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 Resolution 90-015RECORDED AT /0 —
REC. a 409740
STATE OF COLORADO
)ss
County of Garfield
O'CLOCK A .M. FEB 8 1990
MILDRED AL'SDORF, COUNTY CLERK
GARFIELD COUNTY, C!?L0RAD0
BOOK 772 PAGE 443
At a regular meeting of the Board of County
Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held at the
Commissioners' Meeting Room at the Garfield -County Courthouse in
Glenwood Springs on the 5th day of February A.D.1990 ,
there were present:
Marian 1. Smith , Commissioner Chairman
Arnold L. Mackley , Commissioner
Elmer (Buckey) Arbaney , Commissioner
Don DeFord , County Attorney
Mildred Alsdorf , Clerk of the Board
Chuck Deschenes , County Administrator
when the following proceedings,
to -wit:
among others were had and done,
RESOLUTION NO. 90-015
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION OF RAY
R. FENDER FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONE DISTRICT TEXT FOR THE RED
HILL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.
WHEREAS, Ray R. Fender has filed a petition with the Board of
County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, for approval of
an amendment to the zone district text for the Red Hill Planned
Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by this Board on November
20, 1990.
WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, study of
the master plan for the unincorporated area of the County, comments
from the Garfield County Planning Department and the Garfield
County Planning Commission and comments from all interested
parties, this Board finds as follows:
1. That proper publication and public notice was provided as
required by law for the hearing before the Board;
2. That the hearing before the Board was extensive and
complete, that all pertinent facts, matters, and issues were
submitted and that all interested parties were heard at the
hearing;
3. That th2 Garfield County Planning Commission has
recommended to this Board that the requested PUD zone district text
amendment be granted;
4. That the proposed zoning is in general conformity with the
purposes set ' forth in Section 4.0 of the Garfield County Zoning
Resolution of 1978, as amended, and will meet the requirements set
forth therein;
5. That the proposed land use will be generally compatible
with the existing land uses in the nearby area provided proper
mitigation is performed to mitigate impacts;
6. That other than the foregoing, the requested PUD zone
district text amendment, is in general conformity with the
Comprehensive Plan for Garfield County, Colorado and is in the best
interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order,
prosperity and welfare of the citizens.of Garfield County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that the petition for
BOOK 77? ? pecE444
a text amendment for the Red Hill Planned Unit Development be
approved for the following described property in the unincorporated
area of Garfield County as follows:
A. Approval of the Planned Unit Development expressly
conditioned upon the following conditions:
1. A letter be submitted to the Planning Department,
with the building permit application, stating that
the State Highway department has reviewed the
proposed development plan and any requirements of
the Department have been, or will be, met.
2. The building permit application include a soils
study performed by a qualified engineering geologist
that addresses soils compaction, drainage, slope
stability and any recommended structural
requirements for the building and/or site.
3. That prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
the landscaping as proposed shall be completed or a
bond in an amount acceps:able to the County
Commissioners shall be placed with the County to
guarantee completion within the next year.
B. That the text of the master plan for the Planned Unit
Development shall be as follows:
See attached Exhibit "B"
Dated this 5th, day of February , A.D. 1990
ATTEST: GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
�.r
lerk of the Board
Chairman
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution
was adopted by the following vote:
Marian I. Smith
Arnold L. Mackley
Elmer (Bucker) ArbaneV
Aye
Aye
Aye
STATE.OF COLORADO
County of Garfield
County Clerk and ex -
officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the
County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and
foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the
Proceedings of the Board of County Commissionersfor said Garfield
County, now in my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of
A.D. 19
County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
of the Board of County Commissioners.
RED HILL PUD
ZONE REGULATIONS
1. General Provisions
MK 772 e c 44 5
A. Effect of Garfield County Zoning Resolution (adopted
January 2, 1979) .
The provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
and the successors thereof, as not in effect and here-
after amended, are by this reference incorporated herein
as if set forth in full, to the extent not divergent from
the provisions of the Red Hill Planned Unit Development°
Zone Regulations.
B. Conflict.
The provisions of the Red Hill PUD Zone Regulations shall
prevail and govern the development of the Red Hill PUD
provided, however, where the provisions of the Red Hill
PUD Zone Regulations do not clearly address a specific
subject, the provisions of the Garfield County Zoning
Resolution, or any other ordinances, resolutions or
regulations of Garfield County shall prevail.
C. To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield
County Zone Resolutions, Garfield County, Colorado and,
particularly -Section 4.00 of that title, as amended, the
Red Hill Planned Unit Development Zone District is
further divided into the following Zone District
classifications:
Highway Commercial
Common Open Space
D. The boundaries of these districts shall be located as
shown on the Red Hill PUD Plan and shall be governed in
conformity with the hereinafter contained regulations.
2. HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL
A. Uses, by right: Park, hotel, motel
One residential dwelling and accessory uses for a
caretaker.
Office for conduct of business or profession, studio for
conduct of arts and crafts provided all activity is con-
ducted within a building.
mo 77Z pdci 446
Commercial and manufacturing, fabrication, service and
repair operations are conducted within a building;
1. All manufacturing, fabrication, service and repair
operations are conducted within a building.
N
2. All storage of materials or equipment shall be
within a building;
3. All loading and unloading of vehicles is conducted on
private property;
4. No dust, noise, glare or vibration is projected
beyond the lot;
j
5. Proof of adequate provisions for the use and handling
of any environmental pollutants shall be provided to
the County. The County Commissioners shall have the
final determination of the adequacy of the provisions
and their acceptability foruse on the site.
Wholesale and retail establishment, including sale of
food and beverages, automotive and vehicular fuel and
new parts.
General service establishment, including restaurant
(standard fast food or drive-in), bar in association
with a restaurant, recreation, storage, repair and
service of automotive and vehicular equipment,
vehicular rental.
Manufacturing and fabrication facilities.
B. Minimum Lot Area: 7500 square feet.
C. Maximum Lot Coverage: 50 percent
D. Minimum Setback
1. Front yard: 25 feet from front lot line. The
"front" lot line is along County Road 107.
2. Any development will minimize negative visual
impacts through the use of architecture and
landscaping that is compatible with the environ-
mental constraints of the site. A developmental
plan noting the size, configuration and color
scheme of all structures, parking and access plans
along with the location and type of landscaping
will -be submitted to Garfield County prior to
building permit application. The development plan
will be referred to the Carbondale Planning and
Zoning Commission for review and comment within 30
WA 772 P?cE 44';'
days of submittal. At the next regular County Plan-
ning Commission meeting, the development plan will
be either approved or disapproved subject to modi-
fication. Modifications noted must be made prior
to and incorporated into any building permit issued.
If there is disagreement on the proposed changes,
the Board of County Commissioners has the final
determination.
3. No additional excavation of the hillside will be.
allowed unless approved during the development plan
review.
4. More than one principal use is allowed on a lot, if
approved as a part of a development plan.
5. Any change in use or expansionof the existing
facilities shall be subject to development plan
review described in F.(2).
C. COMMON OPEN SPACE
1. Use by Right: Park, open space, agriculture.