Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of Excavation 02.01.2010Gtech HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL February 1, 2010 Andrew Beuter County Road 109 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 110 020A Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot C, Beulah Wilson Exemption, 6195 County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Beuter: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on January 29, 2009 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to you, dated February 1, 2010. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated May 24, 2001, Job No. 101 338C. The proposed residence will be one and two story wood frame construction above a partial basement and partial crawlspace with an attached garage. Basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. A spread footing foundation imposing a maximum soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf and a minimum continuous footing width of 18 inches was used for design based on our previous report. At the time of our visit to the site, the footings were in place and the foundation excavation had been cut in three levels from 3%2 to 9 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soil conditions were variable. The soils exposed in the bottom of the lowest level of the excavation consisted of silty sandy gravel with cobbles. The soils exposed in shallower cut areas consisted of silty sandy clay. The clay layer appeared to be 1 to 3 feet thick below the footings. The footings were being protected from frost with insulated blankets. Some snow and ice was observed in the excavation bases and the client was advised to remove the snow and ice and continue to protect the excavation bases from frost. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf should be adequate for support of the proposed residence. The upper silty sandy clay soils tend to compress when wetted and there could be some post -construction settlement of the foundation if the bearing soils become wet. The settlement would be differential between footings bearing on the clay and footings bearing on the gravel soils. Loose and disturbed soils in footing areas should R I1v' r 303-841-7119 ® Coloralo `;}rings 719-633--5562 0 Hilv'ortl1(,rn1 97;' Andrew Beuter February 1, 2010 Page 2 be removed and the bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The bearing soils should be protected against frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforccd top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site soil as backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the basement walls and prevent wetting of the lower level. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. Landscaping that requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, and sprinkler heads should not be located within 10 feet of the foundation. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. ■ Louis E. Eller Reviewed by: �11i11i11l11f1�� 0:1 REerffp,t, Aq n0 u .' :Q g 44•J• o z Daniel E. Fiardi P.lid LEE/kac ' ll -/(f 66 45, 44> n9 ir• DC- o ••N\•64•• k�7•��x' S O k C '4114 ft ii110L�4 Job No. 110 020A GeHgtech