HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 CorrespondenceDavid Pesnichak
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Casey Lawrence
Thursday, March 02,20L7 3:16 PM
Kelly Cave
David Pesnichak
FW: 2463-034-00-025 Holgate Parcel Research
From: Casey Lawrence Ima i lto :cd law970@gma il.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 02,2017 2:50 PM
To: Casey Lawrence <clawrence@garfield-county.com>
Subject: Holgate Parcel Research
Parcel Research 2463-034-00-025
Account Number: R090045
Situs Address: 24 County Road 111
Carbondale, CO 81623
Owner: HolgaterBttaL
Deed Research
Reception Number: 170919
. Grantor: Thompson, Lewis R (Personal Rep. for Hattie Holland)
. Grantee: Holgate, Fred K & Dorothy J
. This conveyed the area in question in addition to more land in the area.
Following this deed Fred & Dorothy Hol gate began deeding off chunks
of the larger parcel they were conveyed.
Reception l{umber 176330
Grantee: Cerise, Frank J & Marguerite
Dated: 6-13-1951
Acreage: 14.83 Ac. +l-
Reception Number 192008
Grantee: Holgate, Robert &, Blanche
Dated: 10-ll-1955
1
Acreage: .23 Ac. +/-
Reception Number 205226
Grantee: Colorado Dept. of Highways (Highway 133 R.O.V/.)
Dated: 3-23-1959
Acreage: .586 Ac. +l- &, .426 Ac. +l'
Reception Number 206169
Grantee: Holgate, Robert &, Blanche
Dated: 7 -21-1959
Acreage: .15 Ac. +l-
Reception Number 210646
Grantee: Arbamey, Frank E
Dated: 6-2-1960
Acreage: .41 Ac. +l-
Reception Number 226588
Grantee: Turnbull, V/illiam
Dated: 8-12-1964
Acreage: Conveyed all remaining portions of "original parcel", except2 tracts
of land, containing 10.08 Ac. +l- and .85 Ac. *l-, which were retained by Fred
& Dorothy. The 10.06 Ac. +/- parcel contains the parcel in question as well as
its eastern bordering parcel. The other except created parcel number 2463-112-
00-020.
This deed was later corrected via o uitclaim l)eed recention
number 303709,which amended the description of "Tract
Att in Warrantv Deed recep tion numb er 226588. so that it
would reflect that of the desc rintion o f ttTract Ar? as Der
ttoriginal deedtt rece I)tion number 170919. the deed in
which t he Holsates acouired title to the entire area rn
uestion.
2
Reception Number 241067
Grantee: Holgate, Charles R. &.EttaL.
Dated: 6-3-1968
Acreage: .2I Ac. +l-
**********This is the first portion of parcel Number 2463-034-00-025
conveyed to Charles & EttaHolgate.
Reception Number 263933
Grantee: Holgate, Owen & Jean A
Dated: 7 -12-197 4
Acreage: 5.22 Ac. +l'
This deed is what created illesal parcel 2463 -034-00-033.and broke out the
4.62 Ac. +/-nortion of 2463-034-00-025 that would later be co nveved to
Charles & Etta Ho lsate via Ou itclaim deed receotion number 269704.
Reception Number 269958
Grantee: Hackbarth, Charles D. 8. Sandra J.
Dated: 10-27 -197 5
Acreage:.85
. This deed is being included because it was the last portion of the parcel
described in "original deed" reception number 170919 owned by Fred &
Dorothy Holgate, and confirms the conveyance of all of the property
conveyed to the 2 via "original deed" reception Number 1709L9.
Reception Number 770113
Grantee : Holgat e, Etta L
Dated: 3-21-2009
Recorde d: 6-25-2009
Acreage: 4.83
. This is a supplemental affidavit fioint tenancy) in which the Death
Certificate of Charles R. Holgate is recorded as page 3, and this removed
Charles as owner, thus resulting in the parcel as it sits today in terms of
legal description, acreage, and ownership.
3
F Io
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONTRS OF
GARFITLD COUNTY, COLORADO
PTTITION FOR EXEMPTION
Pursuant to C.R.S. (.l973) Section 30-28-l0i (10)(a) - (d) as amended,
and the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, Colorado, adopted
September 1, 1972 and arnended Apriì 14, 1975, Sections .l.02.17(d) and
3.02.0'1, the undersigne ¿,
respectfully petitions the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield
County, Colorado, to exenpt by resolution the division of a five
acre tract of land inÈo*two tracls of approli!åt€-ly_ sqgê¿_3grgêse
more fully hereinafter described, from the definjtions of "subdivision"
and "subdjvision land" as the terms are used and defined in C.R.S. (1973)
Section 30-28-l0l(a) - (¿) and the GarfÍe'ld County Subdivision Reguìations,
for the reasons stated below:
Exhibi.t "À"
SubmÍtted at G'lenwood Springs, Co'lorado, this day
of l9
'ì
o o
EXHTBI'F *À'
I own a five acre tract of land south of Carbondale'
I am petitioning for this exemption to allow the Land to be
divided into two separate tracts so that my wife and I may
build a house on one parcel of and the other may be conveyed
to my daughter and son-in-law to buitd a house. vle have already
drilled a well on the property which is sufficient to supply
the domestic uses of two houses. I believe the engineering
tests and report wilL show that the property is sufficient
to provide for an adequate septic system for both houses'
Electricity will be provided by undergrountl lines and is now
a short distance from the builtlinq sites. Access to the property
is by way of a private road on the property. Thís road has
been roughed in and is usatrle, but is not yet fínished. Granting
the request of exemption will have líttle impaet Ôn the srrrrounding
landowners since buildings erected on the proposed sites would
not be visibl_e to ôur neighbors. Adrlitionally, many parcels
of l_and surrounding our property or sltuate nearby are t$¡o
and one-half acres or smaller in size. The buí1ding sites
which we have selected are far enough apart to provide each
with privacy. Ilo$¡ever, both houses witl be served by the same
access road, power supply, l^tater and septic systems. In sum,
the requested exemptÍon allows our family to utilize the subject
property in the best possible way both economical-ly and estheti.cally,
with minimal inpact on the surrounding landowners.
f-'---:rr^+;o,l() ì.illl-.",,l. ': ..'.. î. t/- ¡.\/{IìOIÒ,tlitOI11r¡ìq13urpìrr lt_,1Ji.rilIi,Dllì90lc)-l(o. ì1, Ji.r¡f .Ji r¡ iì'')!jlt'lllj{tl,l;g'-t(!'!q:.;rF,'!i.Ya,e¡Ijii,riroI:'t¡ i],,,¡. ),.itllitr I ill {IIIIIII1fl!;!!tÌ¡ çpî87 €î/ü
a a
o o
COLLINS DRILL¡NG, INC.
P. O. BOX 375
CARBONDALE. COLORADO A T 623
To ..llron Tl, î:,,e.r Coneer¡l:
Co1lj.ns Ðr.i-llinq, Tncorrorated. <Jril-l.ed a ve11 ¡6¡ {,l..rcn ¡lol.ate on_ 3erter¡ber t7rt75t
Colora¿ìo oer4it n.rr¡ber-?8/.11, Oarlield Cornt'¡, 1:.o a t,o"a1 clepi'n of il¡{ ft. cased'orith
steel casi.:rq-?!to:¡lsi.de diar¡Át,er. ilhe bal.jnz rate of t¡j.s'.+el-l ¡'¡as 1{: 1al-1ons per rnln.
ThiS Ís norc tran slffj.ent aioo,rnt o.f r:ater ]'oilihe ':se oI'Li.¡o lro',rsehokJ.s.
iìoverrber I':,11976
üoll j¡s Dri.llinq, Ïne.
l.ii ¿, .. t tt L,. ,. '
o
RESOLU'IION
WHEREAS, Fred K, Holgate, Dorothy J. Holgate, owen llolgate and Jean A.
ttlgate have petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Ga¡field County,
lr)rado, for an exemption from the subciivision regulations of Carfield County
r:l the State of Colorado, pursuant to C. R. S. 19ó3, IA6-2-33 (3) (d), as amended,
' : Section 3.02'07 of the subdivision resolution of Garfield County, Colorado, for
r."r'tain tract of land, which is locared in Garfield county, colorado, and more
rcularly described as set out in Exhibit ilArr, attached hereto and by t¡,,is refcrence
: a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, petitioners have presented evidence to tÌ¡e Board cìemonstrating
' reasonable cer:tãinty that road access exists to the properfy; that the diwision
operty as contemplated presents no problems reÌateC to the jntensive use of
i or provision of utilities and services; and the proposed use of t̡e land is in
-",.rnony with adjacent property and with the Garfield county ceneral plan; and
. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is convinced that under t̡e
rircumstances the proPosed division of the lands requested to be exempteci from
ther regulation under t]¡e subdivision reguìations of fhe State of Coloradò, and
tlounty of Garfield is appropriate;
NOW, THEREFORE, upon motion of Commissioner
y Ccmmissioner )J---;Ærd unanimously carried
property described in Exhibit rArr hereof is hereby exempted from all fu¡ti¡er
regulation under the subdivision resolution of Garfield county, colorado. A
.'"oy of the tÌ¡e instrument of conveyance shall bê recorded together witÌ¡ this
'rtíon.
Dated this,/
TiTE BO.A.RD OF COUNTY COtr{T{ISSIONERS
OF GAR.FIELD COUNÎY , COLOR.ADO
o
seconded
, the sale
r974
ATTEST:
By
95, E Eîw fHL,67*H. fV,la
t/o
.,ÉÞ
7"4 ø",E
35s. ao'
læ t(**=--_
,lr*tfu.tI:" òz;z.iqz'J'
t.i.^ lt L
o"3Ç.¿6'l;'.19''tc.
ilte
o4;l
I"
4 l2 3
3O ¡7 ç3I
\
oI (o'
2
.ø I'
-,1,'il
-2
'og."t'l
91
.ñ'¡lo
e. s-o¿ ;Ë!¿"I
99
1,"Í,
6@z
¡/z t "2b
¡0
¿oT(src.
¿D tl¿ti
5.22,4c./
2
!y'es - eç3.8â'ì
/z ,;î¿;'"?:'r 5t¿
z. -7/ 7
" r¿,
"t^/
a "fJ8l:rill"
¿0o'q'
.qí5
5irÅñRCi'l A:'¡D i'J,trL.rÊR llr:
R:r:.er-i L. i';¿;,s le'/
Re:istered Lancj SurveYcr
27/
, Lr?'T,/,
scnLí ./ /NCH' /oo fIETGAF.F!ELD
"run
¡lzr?åi.
COLORADC
A parcel of lanc situaied in Lof 18 of s¿clÎon J and Lof I of sectionll0, all in
iolnsnip g South,nano.å ea l{est oí ti':e Sixfh Principal l.ieridian,.. lying Sc'utheriy
end t,,esierly of ã feice as conslructed and in plece and.Eastarly of *he Easiariy
line of a Diich as cc.nstrucied anC in place, said parcel of l¿ncj is iescribeC as
fol lo¡s:
Seginn¡ng aÌ a polnt vihence a Stone C:rner fcund in place and orocerlv m¿rked
for -ihe Section C"r""r"ãäiã"ã it-ô..iiont Z,l,10, anð'll in saìd iovrnéhip and
.u"ge luu,-, z 5.39o391 2a;-r. 7g3.O4 feei; thence S.04o l3t33r E' ll7'9-l feet al:ng
said íence; thence i-li"¿i;tll g. gg.Ê5 feet alcng said íence; thence s-¡4':91
4i,, i-- 31g_,=l reet eiã.g saic fence; lhence s.22"14 ' ¡4" !l . 155.7 I feet alcng
said ícnce; ihence i.oz;¿lt4a't Ir. iå'31 feet along said í"!:?-i:? t P?inJ-(rÎ il't
i.zsterly line ot saìd ditch;-thence.elcng said-gi1:'l..li.'.12"-Oiti9'r lt' 6'i'55 feei;
trion." í¡ .65o:4r}t" fl. ìg4.56 teei; ther,cã l¡ .52!49100" 11. 6l .93 íeet; f\cnce
t:-4io?7tcj.rr ,j;.. ,19.55 Íeet: thence ¡:i.7i"74t?t" l',l, 246.S1 feet; thence N.5l'26rÚJ!'
t:. 22-g4 ieet: thence l.l .lC'22tlit ii. 53-99 feet; thence t'¡ .0'l'50rl4r' l'i. 47.ô¿ feêÌ;
.ihenc.r l.l- ¡foûtr25,t €.. g?.33 fect; thence ü.7È3261?1',t .li- 25.67 feet to a pcini cn
seirj fence; thence t!.37o46r1Otr E. 155.ô0 feet along said fencc tc ihe point of bcg-
irraing. _.^_^ _- , -__Il¡eôùovêc¿scribedpa;.celoflanijC.nîains5.22êcre5,¡:preorIess.
t/
I
i.ìarr:h i5, 197.,:
aKL;'L^/ A
o GARFIELD COUNTY .
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH &
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
2Oì4 BLAKL AVENUÊ GLENII'OOD SPRINGS, COLOBADO Bl60I PHONE 945 7255
Noventber 78, 7976
6arf ieJd Cauntg Commjssjor¡e¡s
GARFTELD COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8t-607
Letter of Feasjbility for Sevrage Disposal for the folTowlng propettg
beTonging to Mt. Cnien Hoigate of CarbondaJe, Colorado: Iþt L8, Section
3, and Lot 7 of Section 70, a7J in T, I 5., R. 88 W.' of the 6th P.M-
Gentl-emen:
Based on the information received by this office and past experÌence with
sev/age dìsposal facijitÍes in the inrmediate area of the proposed exemption, jt
has úeen dätermined by thÍs office on-lot sev/age dìsposal facilitjes are both
feasìble and practical, contmensurate with both County and State regulations,
provjded proper permits are obtained prjor to construction.
It should be further noted that due to the known conditions, only the follow-
ing types of on-lot sewage d'isposal systems wou'ld be acceptable:
x Approved septic tank and absorption area
x Approved sept'ic tank and dry well
x Approved aerated treatment unit and absorption area
---- Approved aerated treatment unjt and sea'led sub-surface
-
evapotranspiration system
Vault
PTease be advised I would suggest each patceJ have
x 0ther as specified;individuaf di if the
gr:an
If 1ae can be of any further assistancer please do not hesitate to contact this
office.
S i ncereìy,
TNVlRONI4TNTAL HTALTH DTPARTMTNT
Re
-,y'¡'--4V/rl
,oí^ro'r. ;l
Depattment Head
ELF/t7s
o o
GARFIELD COUNTY DFPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood SPrings, Colorado 81b01
This does rìot coìstilr¡le
a bLrildinq ot use Pe!tn;1.
tNDtvtDUAL sEWAGE DtsposAL PtnMlr ld'l 34 B
,Y,r. ,ç /1.!-s. ?lv.n -tíoTqate
Owner
Djn::le ;,r.¡íe .Roåd
Syslem Location
olfil¡:¡
Licensed Contractor
' Conditional Conslrucl¡on approval is herebv grantecJ lor a -/*âQQ--gallon
X Septic Tank or
--Aerated
treatment un¡1'
Absorption area (or diapersal area) compuled as follows:
perc rare of one inch ¡n..*é. '-- minlrtes requires a minimum of ,-/*45iÃ. f l. of absorption area per betlroom.
ïherefore rhe no. of bedrooms --:j.- -
x ./-.¿{iq. rt. m¡nimum requiremenr = a rotal of .ãZ'5 f t. of absorpt¡on area.
May we suggest ÒeÉ*77¿é.7,/ ¿"4 3Ò / .<-c>'vë /1-^//Oz_ €VC# .<_/.1/ë-,/-?-2VA e. * a)/D€.ê/ aæ
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM:
No system shall be cleemed 10 be ¡n compl¡ance w¡th the Sewage Disposal Laws until tlre assembled system is approved prior 1o cover-
ing any parl.
septic Tank cleanout to within 12" of Íinal grade or aerated access pofts above grade.
Proper materials ancl assemblY.
TrarJe name ol sepl¡c lank or aeraled treatment un¡l.
Adequate absorption (o¡ dispersalì area.
Adequate compliance w¡th permif requirements.
Adequate compliance with County ancl State regulalions/requirements.
Olher
I nspector
RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
-CONDITIONS:
1. All install¿tion must comply with all requiremenls of the County lndiviclual Sewage D¡sposal Regulations, adopled pursuanl lo au'
thoriry granted in 66'44-4, CRS 1963, amended 66'3-14, CRS 1S63'
Z. This perm¡l ¡S valid Only lor connection ro strur.:ture5 which l¡ave f ully complied w¡th County Zoning and bui¡d¡ng requ¡remtnts.
Connect¡on to or use with any dwelling or struclures not approved by the bu¡lc]¡ng and Zoning office shall äulomat¡cally be a viola-
tion of ¿ requiremenl ol the permit ancl cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit.
3. Section lll, 3.24 requ¡res any person who constructs, alters, or ;0stalls dn ir¡dividu¿l sewage disposal systenì in a mðnner which in'
volves a knowing and material variation lrom the terms or specilicat¡ons conta¡ned ¡n lhe applicat¡on of perm¡t commits a Class l,
Petty Offense (5500 00 line -- 6 nronths in jail or both'
Builcling OfTicial - Permit White Copy Applicanl - Green Copy Dept. - Pink Copy
D
Q^- y- [=ttrl{-,2.ë"/^¿tLkal Et aFOe-tlL-el,ttG2Q4'+4€Lr¿ tú ép*âdLÊo¿'t6<- ,,.3 Þ{-Y\^-e})'&A-AJflÞt>È=t e €
,Ë;',*äl'il.*Çnr nttY
üurbon¡i¡rlcr Colo. ¡;¡6¿.,
I :,rlillEbüf arl9?6
¡rr.öo8 ?¿I
C{rbo¡{t*lo, tolo.6¡t;¿3
Dl¡ l¡rr l&¡¡næ,
t¡ rcg¡rdr to our tülo¡rhqr oorrrrsrtlq ol Drs. 2, Lll6, ooetmlng
¡urr ollont ltro ücn Ilolgltr¡ ¡ roulrl llkc ûe ruH,t thr follerå,n31
0n or aboilt No'r 22, 1fl6 *t r norün¡ of yorr ollcat¡ tho eou¡t¡rod,rtlø.r¡ srd ¡tt.ü4.¿ by lôr. loÞort ttlùltorrll¡ tht oouaþ plruol¡
ny ¡¡na r¡r &mtr.@.ô rg o¡¡e rùo obJocted to Sc dlv¡rto! of r gl,oot of
FüopçfûJr oacl by lúrrr äclçtrf f,or üh. ¡mtpo¡. ef, ¡üt¡üf¡S tro hd.r
ln¡le¡ô of utr
b lfoü. 29th¡ onc Ír..L nftðr &. ¡ter. 2¡C núoùl¡Ð¡, I ra¡ ¿nfe¡ltré sf
tha Doo¡tüt , ttt gurporr ¡nd of ù¡. rort¡,e of q1'aeiac ar u obJtôtorr
¡ do ¡rqt Áoi ¡¡o! dld I ðt3! obJsot to ôA} dLvlalon or bul^ldlnt of ¡
ho,¡n or hqse! oû llk ilolgrtero proprrþro
ÀpFrf.¡rtly tlrlle hw bero a dsu¡¡durct¡¡¡dlag rc to ry ¡trûd on 1¡lü,rn¿ttrr rld hopr thlr hùtrr l¡¡¡ ¡11 hc¡rlry t¡ô ooaJüotura tc ratt.
I t¡ún¡ ¡.ou for gqt ¡trto¡¡tlot 1¡ thl,r nrttrr, ald ronr:In¡
lìerprotfully
---'---'¡t-/--cU'/.ÀYaF
Job¡ ilt ltLne ll /
oo¡ ilo¡rd of üouoty Coul¡¡¡oa¡r¡
.:¡
t
bir c I ig7Ë
fr 1q16 0ARËtILD eiì¡Jì,{TY C0lÌil.
ROUTING SLIP
Hi!t
C¡l'lr¡
¡Ì-. : il1:*ì, ¡ . ,
$tt
V¿'Y
LJ
Return to -----------""'
o Robert D. Emerson
Lowyer
o
303 Main Streel
P.O. Box 948
C¿rborìd¿lè, Colo¡¿tio 8l 623
(303) 963,3700
fieceml¡er 2, L976
guestions concerning this, please contact me
ence.
CA¡ii.il i i. ; ,, r. ¡¡, f :,
l{c!il ii{ü :r-l:l
Lli!lt ¡,.1
a'--. ì.: ...L..¡
1,.: . .. .'t
tvt:-!*
LI
fìctr:l¡r in -,"-.--.--""-'--Mr. Flaven Cerise
ChairmanGarfield County Board of County CommissionersGarfield County Courthouse
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8L601
re: Owen Holgate Senate Bil-I 35 Exemption
Dear Mr. Cerise:
I received â telephone call today from John fripp concerningthe above referenced matter. Mr. Tripp indicated to me tha!he had been advised that his name had been mentioned at thehearing held before the Commissioners in this matter and r"¡antedto advise me of his position.
Mr. Tripp indicated to me that he wished it to be made clearthat he in no way objected to the requested Senate Bill 35 Exemption,the proposed property division, or the erection of any buildingsby the Holgates. I advised him that I would pass thiã informaiionalong to you so that you and the other board members couldconsider it in rendering your decision. Mr. Tripp, of course,is one of the property or^¡ners in the vacinity of lhe Holgateproperty.
If you have anyat your conveni r---)siycereTþ .,/
--ß,Ék*RBE/pIt
o oRobert B. Emerson
Lowyer
303 M¿¡n Slreet
P.O. Box 948
Carbondale, Color¿do 8l 623
(303) 963-3700
l\lovember 23, I976
Êtul':¡it :l-!P
i l!l!
t:r¡ l:e
t'I i
Mr. Flaven Cerise
Chairman of the Board
Garfield County Commissioners
Garfleld County courthouse
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
re:Petition for Senate BilL 35 trxemption of
Owen Holgate
Dear Mr. Cerise:
I appreciate having had the oPportunity to present the evidence
to the Board of County Commissioners which supports the Petition
by Owen Holgate for a senate Bill 35 Exemption to divide his
property.
As I understand Ít, the Board has rlecided to view the property
involved before making a final decj-sion.
Mr. I¡?itkowski has argued that the exemption should be denied
sÍnce the access and topography do not support the requested
exemption and that the general policy has been to deny second
exemptions. Wê are happy to have an opportunity Èo have the
Board members personal-ly view the property, since we feel that
this wíll dispelL any question that the physical setting of
the property may not be appropriate for two residential building
sites. I think that you will find when you view the premises
thât thê area involved is a rather flat piece of ground on
lhe lop of a smalL hill and that it is ideally suited for the
proposed division and building of two homes, without a negative
impact on the surrounding land ov¡ners and wj-thout creatj-ng a
property divislon inconsistent with the legislative intentions
behind senate BiLl 35.
I would appreciate it if you would contact me when you have
selected a date to view the premises. It is my hope that both
Mr. Holgate and rnyseLf can accompany the commissioners to the
property and ansr,rer any guestions which you might have.
If I may be
convenience.
of further'assistance, please contact me at your
Robert B. Smerson
RBa/p1t
o a oL
L2-L3-76
The regular meeting of the Board.of County Commíssioners was held
il;""rbå; L3, 1976,'uåã:-""i"g at 10:00 A'M" there being present-
commission"r" c"rírãl'¡lãllltt and Hill, commissioners Elect Jolley
and Velasquez, and Adm. AssistanÈ Esther Piper
Bob l¡fitkowski, County Planner, and-Doyle Li'kely presented a petition
for sB 35 exempri;;-É.;-;;tiã'r,*"ry ior a split ot 2.7 acres in
Chelyn Acres. ne iequesteã a p.rcel" .7 acreè for use by his father
so that he would ¡ã tìà"t him. Mr. Witkowski recommended denial on
the basis tnat zoãinö-iãquire" a,rninjmum size of t$/o acres' Access
and $¡aÈer r.r" ,ro"f,tåurãå.--cr.arlotte Zi1m, closest neighbor' stated.
that they had no objection. ¡rr. ¡¿ãtlivi suggested an on site inspection'
Tabled for insPection.
Mr. Vlitkowski presented a petition for SB 35 exemption for John
Dwire for a three-ı"V-"piii of. 22 acres near Si1l. .All three parcels
Ë;;-"ãı""tã u"iräiíg "iu""' waùer is from a spring and access is
no problem. Mr'. v'¡itkówski reconunendecl approval' subject to the
warer being fited';;;;l-'¡at.-¡l"ttivi movãã that the sB 35 exemption
for John Dwire n. ðiã"ie¿ iubject to ùhe r¡tater from the spring being
filed upon. seconããJ-U'-ti. úiff. Motion carried unanimously' Fee
S5?.00 paid.
Àdjourned to make t\^7o on site inspections: Doyle Likely and owen
Holgate.
Adjourned for lunch. Reconvened at 1:30 P'M'
Municipalities in Garfield county r,¡ere invited to submit requesLs
for ímprovement,s t,o State Hlghways in their area' This will be
insluded with the-ðon.rt'y preãentãtion a¿ the public hearing in
Grand Junction on January 20 ' T977 '
Mark Bean, Planner for Carbondale, reguested:
L. ChanneLile-ã"4-"iã""1ize íntðrsection of Highway 133. and
snowmass órive (tíuck bypass), and Highway 133 and the
entrance to the high school at Carbondale'
2. Bã;i" pr^""i"ı, ãniineerins-ald rj-ght-of-wav st'udies-to
four-ranãl ;iËh a ñedian, Éishway 133 from Hishwav 82 to
Main Street in Carbondale'
3. Continue working on a four lane of Highway 82 to Aspen'
itohn West, Glenwood Springs City Manager'.requestêd:
1. Replacement wittr-Uetter signál lights ?!.8:h and 9th Sts"
andGrandAve.Wouldrecoñmendoneswithleftturncycle.2. Ñew traflic lights a¿ loth or 11th st' and Grand Ave'
3. rncorporãlio" ór accelldeceleration lanes at 14th street
and Grand-Ave. with median to control turning movements'
4. Continueã ãt"ay of a Highway 82 By-Pass thru Glenwood'
5. Considerãtiã" åf tearin! up and repaving Highway 82 from
6th street to 23rd sgreet ivitr, r"-ãoing of curbing and
striPing.
Other town and cóunty requèsts to be as listed in letter of Sept' 3'
L976, to Club 20.
L2-L3-7 6
Pagè 2
o O
public hearing continued from Decernber 7th was held for the zone chanqe
to PUD for Ríverbend Subdivision and for preliminary plat approval.
This is a joint public hearing with the Planning and ZonÍng Commission
and tha County Commissioners. Hamilton Duncanr Devel"oper, and Bob
Wa¡nsley, Engineer, Present.
Bob Witkowski, Count,y Planner, submitted proof of publication of pubLic
hearing notice, and proof of notification to adjacent landowners. fhere
are thiee private landowners and lhe BLM and Forest Service. Both
Forest Service and BLM have given v¡aivers of notice. Mr. Witkowski
reviewed the project. He discussed the fact that the subdivision is
located in two school districts and he recommended that it all be in
one for pracÈical purposes. Donation of land for the school site
was discussed. foi final plat approval the change in school boundaries
wiLl be required. Any site selection musL be contingent upon the
ability to purchase additional land to a11ow for a iarger site. The
State bept. of lvater Resources had no objection. USGS had some objections
to Phase V and they witl be worked out at t.he. time of preliminary plat
approval for Phase V.
Hamil-lo¡r Duncan stated that they have drj-lled five r¡tater \^¡e11s which
have been pumped and tesfed. Phase V is the only part that is currently
agricultural Land to be developed, except for the school site. Mr.
Duncan asked about, prolection againsù down zoning. He was informed
that that is always a right the CÕunty keeps. Mr. trrlitkowski presented
his conditi-ons for approval by the Planning Commission. He added
that ¿he Planning Commlssion must find this project to be in cotlformance
r+ith the 1968 General Pl-an. Mr. Duncar¡ questioned why the convenience
store r4ras delayed to Phase V. After discussion as to why limit it, at,
all but 1et that be governed by need, it was agreed that the condilion
be changed to read "when need demonstrated to the Planning Cornmission. "
Dal-e Albertson, Vice Chairman Planning Commission, appointed Ed Chelewski
as a voiting member in place of Dr. Jackson who was absent. Dick Mart.in
moved that the request for a zone change to Planned Unit DeveLopment
be granted with the following condit,ions:
(Type conditions)
Seconded by Arnold Mackley. Motion carried unanimously.
Dick Martin moved approval of the preliminary pLat v¡ith the following
conditions:(Type conditions)
Seconded by DoÈtie Pretti. Motion carried unanimously.
Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, and subjecl to the
conditions Listed in the recommendation, Mr. Mattivi moved that the
reguest for a zone change to PUD be granted and that the County Planner
be-instructed to write a Resolution. Seconded by Mr. Hil1. Motion
carried unanimously. Mr. Mattivi rnoved approval of the preliminary
plat for Riverbend Subdivision, subject to the conditions listed in
the recommendation by the Planning Cornmission. Seconded by Mr. Hill.
Àlotion cgrried unanimously.
Mr. Mattivi moved approval of the minutes of. the meeting of Nov. 29.
seconded by ¡4r. Hi1l. Motion carried. Mr. cerise abstained. as he was
not present aÈ the meeting.
o o
L2-L3-76
Page 3
Mr. Mattivirmoved approval.of the minutes of the rneeting of December 6'
Seconded by Mr. Hiii: Motion carried unanimously'
Mr.Mattivimovedapproval.oftheminutesofthemeetingofDece{nber7.-s-"å""ã"a by Mr- Hiii: Motion carried unanimously'
Carpetbidsdiscussed.Ifit'isachoiceofcarpetfortheCommissioners|
room or improvemeã;;-;" lfre proUte*-ãe-'oi=e in ihe Adm' Assist'antsr
office, Mr. vetasä"ãr'ã"i'l-t[ã-""i""-ptã¡l"*- should have priority'
tvtr. Maftivi *o.r"a=liåt-irrã il;iã of'$2016'00 from lralts CusUom carpet
service be accepreãl--sããó"aed by-¡lil ¡r:-ir. Motlon carried unanimouslv'
Mr. Smallwood was fn=tiu"te¿ to ãnãcf -n improvements for sound in the
Adm. Assietantrs office'
Mrs.PiperinformedCommissionersofarequest.tosalvageatthelan¿Ifill . The Commissioners *"rr orr.rrGottt tót safeLy reasons in denying
this request.
Mr.HillmovedadoptionofResolutionNo.T1-TTvoiclingoutstanding
warrant No. 21574 for Dept. of Sociai Services. Seconáed by Mr' Mattivi'
Itotion carried unanimouslY'
Mr.MattivimovedthattheBoardofCountyCommissionersendorselheyamcoro proiec¿ ;"-ä; vã*p" Riv9l in Gariield countv adjacent to
Routt counÈy. s"ä""äãa-[v'ùr. girr. Motion carried unanj-mously.
DiscussionofsB35exempÈionreguestsfromDoylel,ikelyando\"'en
Holgate t/as held. From it*ir ""-'"iiã inspection,. Commissioners felt
approval_ trom rnå B;;;ä o! Áãjortm¿nt shouid have been obtained bv Mr'
Likely prior t'o ás-ãs-"xemptión t"ı4"¿' - Mr: y:tlivi moved that the
recommendation oi-tùã plutîl.t U" iðifãw.d anil the sB 35 exemption requests
fron Ðoyle Likely and owen Ho1gat'e be denied' Seconded by Mr' Hill'
Motion ðarried unanimously'
Mr.Hillco¡ment,eclonpayûenùs-in-1ieu.It\nrasthestandofthelnter-state Lanil group-of thä il V,Iestern-"t"i""-tftat this money should be used
in lieu of taxes ana ã¡roura go for general government purposes'
Mr. Velasquez asked about the transilion meeting' He would like the
opportuniry to -"äã-thã àctions t" -uã taken that date prior to the
meeting to stuoyf- ùi' J"ir"v asked for them two $¡eeks in advance'
Mrs. Piper to prepare the iniormation for them'
Liquor r-icense renev¡ar for BpoE r,odge No. 2286.at-Grenwood springs
;ä:-;;";;iäã"råi"ãppi""år. Mr. Haírert. counrv_Attornev' presenf'
He stated that all things were in àrder.' ¡ar. ¡lilt moved lhat the
renehTal te approvãa.-- sáconaed by t¿i. ¡latt:-vi. Motion carried unanimously'
Mr. Hartert reported that he hand carried-the.Urige to the Colorado
Supreme Court on-tñã ràfusaL of Garfielél County Assessor to change the
ã"ãããããa valuationã-in accordance r¿ith thesùate order'
Mrs.PiperreportedontheU.S.ForestservicerequestbyJarnesl,.Mongan
that the county enforce the right of the public to access to pubtic lands'
a
L2-L3-76
Page 4
Map showing locked gate on canyon creek discussed. Mr. lto].J.ey
státed tha¿ this decision was made by the Supreme Court severaL
years ago. Mr. Hartert to check further and inform the Forest
Service.
Meeting continued unÈ,il 1;30 P.M. Dece¡uber L4, 1976.
The regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners continued
from December 13, was held beginning a¿ 1:30 P.M. Decenber L4, L976.
there being present Commissioners Cerise, Hill and Mattivi, Commåssioners
Elect .folley and Vei-asquez and Adr¡. Assistant Esther Piper.
AJ.so presenÈrwere Dariel Clark, Nick Massaro, Bud Meisner, Lynn Behrns
Dan Depper Ron Bausch, Roger Hocking, Mark Bean, John I^Iest, Owen
HoJ.gater and Steve Schmitz
Pulpose of the meeting vras to present requests to be included with
Garfield County's reguest for funding from the Oil Shale Trust Fund.
l'1r. Ðariel Cl-ark, RE 2 School District, requested $126r000 to cover
the cost of over-runs at the New Castle school.
Mr. Massaro, RE I School Dist,rict, requested $49'891 to cover loss
of state equalization due to increased enrollment and for additional
welding class.
Bud Meisner presented the request from the To\,tn of Rifle:
1. Expansion of the sewage treatment plant. Phase I, $4381000
if the EPA grant is not approved. If the grant is approveil
they request the city share of $109,687.
2. Sewer lift station st the Colorado River, $66,825.
3. Relocation of J.ibrary. Town has $19'000 now, would need
additional ç31.000.4. Continued funding of Planning efforts, $10'000.
John Vfest, City Manager of Glenwood Springs, spoke in support of
the Library request for relocation. They need the space occupied
by the Library in the municipal building. He qri1l make some proposals
to Co¡nrnissioners in January.
Ron Bausch, Library Director, presented a reguest for new facilities
in Rifle, Carbondale and Glen\¡rood Springs in the amount of $8201000.
There would be 10,500 sq. ft. in Glenwood, and 5'000 sq. ft. each in
Rifle and Carbondale, He also requested $94,000 for materials an,l
books.
Owen Holgate presented the request for lhe Town of Carbondale:
I. Expansion of the sewer plant, $479'0002. Municipal buiLding¡ could include ùhe LibrarYr $15010003. Paving, curb and gutters, 5450'0004. Recreation program and facilities, $38r000
Mrs. Piper presented the ¡equest by the County for replacement of
the Grand Valley bri<lge. The structure is estimated to be 500 feet
long x 35 feet wide and cost $3I per sq. foot. Plus approachest
chañnel improvements, removal of existing structures, utifities,
o
o a
L2-L3-7 6
Page 5
engineeringr and contingencies would bring the total to $709'500.
Al.so requested by the County is $25.000 for land acguisition at thêAirport and $251000 to construct a ne\^¡ access road on the East sideof ttre runway at the aÍrport.
Steve Schmitz, Director COG, informed Co¡nmissioners that at the last
COG meeting the Board approved a regional request for 9100,000 toqontinue the Technlcal Assistanee program for which funding wilL run
out.
Setting of priorities was tabled until December 2Oth.
Mr. Mattivi moved that the Chairman be authorized to sign the amendedreport of certification of levies. Amended report incLudes certificationof mill levies for the Rifle Fire Prot,ection District of 3 mills,
Sil-t-New Castle Fire Prot.ectj-on DisÈrict 3 mil1s, and the nill levyfor Èhe Eagle School Ðj-strict 50-J. Seconded by Mr. Hil1. Motioncarried unanimously.
Mr. Mattivj. moved that the request of Kay ,fohnson for an assigned sal-ary
voucher be approved. Miss Johnson is going on vacation the l-7th of
Dec. and will return Jan. 5th. Seconded by Mr. Hi11. Motion carried
unanimously.
Mrs. Piper was instructed to set up a meeting with Commissioners ofelected officials to discuss salaries for proposed legislaÈion nextyear. Meeting wil-I be Dec. 20th.
Holidays for Christmas and Ne\^t years was discussed. Conrnissioners agreedthat the Road Dept. wilL be given Dec. 24th off as a holiday. Mrs. Piperto inform them. It \r¡as suggested that, the courthouse be kept open with
each department using their discretion as Lo the nu¡nber of employees
and their work schedul-e.
Meeting ad.journed 4:00 P.M.
i(.f\ao
Proctcdings of thc Bourd of Cotttrty Cu¡lnlissioncrs, Uarlicltl Counl¡r, (:o1o.,..........................NOVIìilÎlìR llr..7-(r...-..
Mr. ¡tîttivi noved tlìrt tltc nill Icvies for thc slìeci¡l rlistricts h¡ cerf¡fied is srhnitte(l to lhcrn.
s('cordcd by ìh'. lli I l. ¡k)t ion cilr'ricd tD¡l,timor¡sly.
¡tr. f{lttivi rnu",l ih"t ,lcrry lhttcrt h,.r¡rpointcJ t(ì ralìrfsent.,lim l}rinkhousr} in 1lìÈ îr:tion rc¡¡itrrlin¡l
asscsscd vrlùrtions in tlìc' Cotnìty. tlct(nìdod by l.lr. l¡ill. lilotion c¡rrie'd unanimousl¡"
Mr. ftl¡tlivi novcd thôt thc liquor liccnsc ¡c¡cwal for the lìed Stceî lnc. be a¡provcrl, all thinSs lrL'rtrÈ in
or<ler. Scconded by lilr, lllll, ¡lotion c¡rricd unün¡nrous¡y.
lrtr, Hill noved that thc liquor licensc r!.ncwals for Robert L. ll¡siûs, L¡ llacienda Restaurant, and for the
BPOI Lodgc No, 2195 at Riflc, bc a¡prove'd. Seconrlcd by I'lr. Ì.l¡¡ttivi. I'lotion carricd unanimously.
Torn Yourg of thc fiour I'lile (:orl Conrpany tx¡rlaincd thrt hc lìos rro platrs at this tima to cxPand the coal
ninc. llc ltid ask pcrmission to buil.l i¡ ncw tiplc. llc ltlirns to hùvc thrcc ncn at thc mìne and thcy ìiill
ertra(:t illloìrt ì00 tons rrf coìrl pcr r¡ay. 'lherc should bc no inpnct on the road,
Leo SwurtzeÌd¡uher ashcd ¿bout the ^ntlers
orchard Subdivision tnd riEltt of way on the roads, llc wis in-
structed to have ¡ surt,cy madc nnd thcn req$cst the County to voc¿tc 3ll ovcr 25' from eithcr sidc of tltc
ccnterline of thc roåds in qucstion.
A presentation wÀs nadc to Bcrcnicc t'lcDonald, County TÌcasu¡er, for 40 ycars of se¡vice to Gsrficld County
25 of which she has been Couìty T¡easurcr.
At Mûßgard p¡esented estinates on the cost to move the tr¡nsmitter at Sünli8.ht ¿nd the antennas to the
trlountain ViðN Buit<ling. llc requestcd authoriration to spend the moncy in the rnount of $982.50. iur.
Iqattivi noved thrt ¡.1r. ¡l¡ggaÌd be authorized to start the nove. Sccon,.led by Mr. llill. I'lotion carricLl
unaninouslY.
Mr, Mattivi inforned tlre Conmissione¡s ¡¡nd Com¡nissioners-elect of a joint meeting of ûll Comnissioners in
Region XI to be held in Grand Junction at the Mesa County Comissionersi office on Fridåy, Novenbe¡ 19th,
at 7;30 p.m.
Meeting adjoumed at 4:30 p.m.
B¡ta ÞfePne.ns, urerr Flaven J. Cerise, Chairman
EONDAY ,NOVEilBER 22, 7976
11¡e regù1ar neeting of the Board of County Contissioners was held November 22,1976, beginning
there being prcsena Chai¡nan Flaven J. CerÌse, Connissioners Pete I'lattivi and Lynn flill, Conmi
elect Dick Jolley and Larry Velasquez, ¿nd Administrativê Assistant Esther Piper.
at l0:00 a
ss i onets -
Al !.{âggard opÈned rhe ônly bid received, from Àlotorola,on the new radio systen. The totat bid was $38,552.yhich-included: Dispatclr consolos - $17,086; Rêpeate¡ ¿nd nain bosê station - $4,684; Têlophone Pctch
systen - $2,130; 2-uay radio - $1,665; Conversion of radios - $f3,026.10; instatlation of console - $741
lnstallation of ¡epeater and transnitter - $885. Also birl was status map, opti.onal - $ó,6f0. Detayed
for four Heeks was the voting systen. No bid was made otr Auto Tx ID S)'stem. Al l.laggard is to ¿nalyze the
bid and review it with the Cónnunications Board for recomnendation to the Commissioneri on Novenber 29th'
90t of the total cost wili be fMded by the federal governnent'
D¡riel Clark, Lynn Behrns, Mr. Blackno¡e, and Àlrs. Roberts presented ¡ rêquést fo¡ a wide¡ road to ths
high schooÌ at Riflc. It is onìy 30 fect widc now and with the nerr junior hiSh schoot going in, this riill
crãate a problem in trðffic. Currently, right of way is needed for a øater Line so that the Pavcne¡t lvill
not havc io be cut. 'nte distance is betNeen 1/2 à\d 3/4 niles, and an additional i0 fect wot¡ld be needed.
Also discusscd was the vacation of a small strip of county road which is no longer used due to correcting
tn intersection. N¡. Cl¿rk asked what w¿s fair - should tlìc cour)ty or the school p¡y for thc nccess.¡ry
york to be done to obtrin no¡e right-of-wây. ßob Sc.lrow, Cor¡nty Surveyor, and Jcm)'t¡arte¡t, Count)'
Attorney, also preseñt. Afte¡ rcvierc of the problems, ¡Ur. tlartc¡t strted thât if the road was to be a
public road, thä couty should bc the entity to do the pro-icct. It rvas tulncd over to l'tr' lla¡tert ¡¡d
itr. S"r¡row to contact thc property omer to see if he will give right of way and to see first what the
county road ¡ight-of-Nry curretrtly is. The Conmissioners agreed they would ab¿ìndon the smalI striP of
county ¡oad noa used sincc thc co¡rcction of the intelsection ¡eâ¡ the northwest cit)' ¡imÍts of Rifle as
Iong as the property owne¡ l¡ås access.
County Sanitarian lìd Feld repo¡ted on sùggcstions fór the panel for the CCI Progran- lle âlso discussed
probl;ms ìn his deprrtntcnt an,l a reqlrest fron the State to do uo¡k for then on insPections. If hc agrees
io do public acconmodations, it will require 3n additional enployec and is a Program that the statc is
suppos;d to do. lle was a¡lvised to co¡rtact the State to see if they wcre willing to pay a fee for serviccs
he does for them.
The fotlowing liquor liccnse renewa¡s were p¡eserted: The Apple tnn at Sunti8lìt, Fralkts Fileside Inn lnd
the Gold l.¡rnte¡n prclirß¿ store in $lcst Clenwood, anrl r chtngr: fron restaurant to tave¡n licensc fo¡ litcllâ
Woolley at the Oui Ucst llar û Cr¡fe in Rifle, All werc fouid to be ir order. Mr, I'lüttivi moved that they
be approve<1. Secondcd by lir. ]lil1. I'lotion carrìed un¡ninousl]'.
Mr. ilflrte¡t explained thc condennation case and ¿sked to have the Chüi¡nûn sign an interrogatory stîting
that tho Co¡miisioncrs had not ltivcn advice to thc Statc tlighoay oepart¡rcnt in regrrd to loc¿tion of
gravcl pits. '[hc chuirman uas ¿uthorized to siSn the stttemcnt.
^djourned
for lunch. Rcconvcncd tt l:30 P.m.
ii
-¿
sriol
proeccrlings of thc Uourd of County Conrmissioncrs, ctrfiekl County, Colo.,.'..........,.. .....,....,.....'.'..,..I9Ylilllll:lÌ..'..'..ts..19...
A discr¡ssion srs hcl<l conccrning issuing vorrchcls to |t)'I'or rc8l$trrtlon, clc. Lll atlvrncc uf nrurLill!Ìs'
Thc milttci wts t¡rl¡lcd.
A SB-SS crcml)tion for ìtillirn C. tì Vio!¡ il. ¡k)0rc wils l)rcsciltcrl lry lkrlt l'J¡thowski, Counry I'lirltrrcr. 'llrcy
h¡ve 4t) lcrcs ¡n¡ witnt t0 st)tit it into two tr¡lcts of 35 and 5 ilcrcs, Loc{t('d (tl¡ ll(}tllcs lk'sN. 'lllcro ¡r0
no problcm:¡ snd l,lr. Nitkow¡ii roconrnrsn(lc,.l ¡rl)l)¡'(,vrl- l'lr. flrtiivi nr¡vsl tlt¡t tlìc Sll-¡5 r'x('ntptíon for l{i¡li
C. anrl Violl lil. Ilt)orc lrc grüntcd. Sccuìdcd ir¡',rlr. llill. l.lotion clrric,J unattimously. ll7()-71. ljce S55 l)¿
A SB-3S excnption wfls presentc{t b}'^trn llobiÁson for 82 acrcs on Rifle C'rcck' Shc w¡rnts to rplit approxi-
fl¡tely ¡Z ¿c'res off, .Âftcr discussion it úûs rcconncnrlc.tl by ¡lr. tfitkowski to lpprovc. Shc strted that it
could be more thal thc 12 acrcs. 1,1r, llitl novcd th{t thc 58-35 cxcnption fot Ann Robinson be approved,
Seconded by iilr. I'httivi. l,lotion crrricd tuìû,rimously. lice of $6:.0{l p¡id. n76-'12'
^
SB-3S exemption for Sylmar Vctcrina¡y I'ledical Clinic, tnc. Robcrt Cotlctt, was p¡esented l)y Bob lllitkossli
Thcre is no ihi..l pürty owncrshif. It i$ on oxchangc of onc tcrc fron tt¡ ¡d.i¡cent l¡ndow¡c¡. ¡lr. l{it\owsk
recomcnderl "pp"uuil. l,tr. llill noved thût tl¡c 5B-:ì5 cxcnption for sylnrar Vctclinilry iledicrl clinic, lnc.
be app¡ovcd. -becon.lcd by l'tr, Àl¡¡tivi. l.lotion ca¡ried unanimqusl/. I"e-c of $S1.00 paill. ä7{r-70.
Betty woollef, R¡flc area County llealth Nurse, who hfls rcsigned, stoPped by to say goodbye'
An' exenption from SB.3: for Owcn llolgatc was presented by I'lr. l{itkowski and try Bob Èncrson, attorney for
nh. Holgate. 'Ihey requcstcd r sptit of 5 acrcs into two ?arcels of 2-l/2 acres cach on the Diiltlc L¿le
Road near Carbondrtc. l.h. witkowski c¡plained thc problems: this is the product of a prior exenption;
acccss is qucstionablc; uscrblc ac¡e¿gc is mr¡ch lcss th¿n the 2-l/2 a¿tcs, ¡lc ¡econmcndcd dcnial. ¡lr.
Emerson prcsented copies of lettcrs fÍom Co!¡nty Sanitari¡n Ed feld stirting th¿t therc uere no physical
problcns on water xnd scwer; and a lctte¡ from Coliins llritlin! st¿tin[ thtrt thcrc is wttcr suffì.cient fo¡
iwo dwetlings, ¡,tr. llolgate stütcd rlìat this palcel of land existed before 58-35 or county zoning regula-
tions. ¡lr,*Cerise statı,1 he had had severat crlls objecting to thc -sPlit, and he st¡88cstcd an on-sitc
inspection. ¡"1r. tyitkowski stated that the land is¡ì't sr¡itrblc for two lÌomes and that it is too hi8h
density for thc topography of the lanrl. lt was tabled fo¡ an on-sitc inspcction. Fce of $52.00 Paid'
Attorney Bob Chaffin presented a SB-.15 exenption.equest for Ciiffo¡¡l T. ðnd llazel I'1. Ba¡ksdale, for a
division of 35 âcres into two parcels of l0 acres and 25 acres on Cüttlc Creck. There tlere no ptoblcms
8nd l.{r. NitkoBski reconnendcd ipp¡ovat. I'lr. l.lattivi moved that the Slt-35 exenption for Cl.ifford T. and
Hazet ¡{. B¡rksdale be granted. 3econded by Mr. Hill. ¡qotion carricd uûaninousÌy. Fee of $60'00 Paid. ir
A request for exenption fron SB-35 was pÌesented for John S. and Josephine L. Turk ¡nd Steven L. and
6lo¡ja Strouse. Tiri" "cquest is for a split of I4-l/2 acres o¡ West El.k Creek i.nto two Parceìs of 7.3
acres each. There uere no problens and Mr. Witkowski recomnended aPproval. l'lr. Hill moved that SB-35
exenption be granted fo¡ John S. and Josephine L. Turk and Steven L. and Gl.o¡ia St¡ouse. Seconded by I'l¡.
l,lattivi, I'lot.ion car.icd unauimously. Fee of $57.00 paid. ï76-74'
A letter.cas read f¡on Ìlhite fr Sons Construction requestìng that the concrete decking on the Catherine
BriCge be delayed until spring. üpon reconmenclation of Êd Hãnsen, resident engineer of the State tli8hway
Depaitncnt, and Mr. Cc¡isc in whose district thc bridge is located, it uas agrecd to grant thc dclay.
The policy on vouchers was again discussed. It was agreed that the policy will be not to Pây in advance
for ãttcndance at neetings without aPproval of the Conimissioners.
Robert Richardson presented â SB-35 exemption request oî 16-1/2 acres in Rifle for a thÌee-way split.
Thère were no probiens a¡rd i\tr. l{itkolski ¡ecomnendetl approval. M!. Hiil noved that thc exenption from
SB-3S fot Robeit J, cnd:\brjorie Richa¡dson be grantcd. Seconded by ¡lr. l'l¡ttivi. itlotion carried unani.
mus¡y. Fee of $57.00 Paid. correction of legal descriPtion of property to be mde. l+76-i5.
Berenice I'fcDonatd informed the Conmissioners of a notice to appàar in a bankruPtcy suit and asked for
Êdvice. She sås referreû to the Cowty Attorney.
I,l¡. Hill moved that thc ninutes of the neetings of November l, 3 and 8 be aPProved. Seconded by I'h.
lbttivi. I'lotion carried uaninously,
Bilt Dodds-Scott introduced Jerry vandervette' new owner of Scott Rubbish Renoval Mr- Vãndervelte dis-
lan{tfilI. ¡'h. Cctisecussed leasing of the dunps. t'lr. llill reviewed a p¡oposal for sal vagc at the Rifle
informed ¡lr, Vandcrvelte that l.lr. Scott has not ng for usc of the Rifle landfill and that thc
Comissioners ui¡ I have to rcconsider this. I'l¡
been payi
Itlat t ivi explaincd thrt lsaring of the Rifle lanCfill mi
not be possible as it is leascd to us fron the BLI'I. Àlr. Vanderveltc askcd the feeting of thc Board. l'he
Board oi Comissioners felt this would t¡ke a lot more irrfo¡mation i¡nd study before they could conment,
but they uoutd likc to hâve it off thcir hands if possible. l*lr, Ce¡isc stated we stil¡ hsve ¿n obli8ation
to thc cities of Rifle and o¡cnwood Springs and theÌe are still a lot of areas to consider.
l,þeting adjoumed at 4:30 P.m'
ts¡¡a ùfePnens, L¡er(Ëlaven J Cerise uhalrman
id
73
rì
")
a
a
,January 24, 1977
l4r. Robdrt B. Emerson
Attorney at Law
303 Maln
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Re: Senate Bllt 35 Exemption - Owen Holgate
Slncerely,
RA}Ukay
I
Dear !lr.; Ercrson:
Enclosed ls a copy of the minutes of the County Cor¡nissloners,
meting of DecerÈer 13, 1976 at, which the nntfon todeny 0wen
Hoìgaters subdlvlslon exemption. request was approved. itre actlonis listed on Page 3 of the mlnutes. Accordlng !o the Cormlsslonerc'
Decnetary, the mlnutes have been approved by the Board and are inthe process,of belng incorporated lnto the Cp¡mlssioners,. Book.I am sorry for the oversight in notlflcation whlch caused thisdelay. ;
I have spoken wlth Mr. Gerald Hartert concernlng the statusof appeal that could be nnde ln thls matter. It was hls opinlonthat slnce the exerytlon authorlty ls part of Senate Bl'll 35 and the
County Subdlvlslon Ordinance, that any appea'l of the actlon by the
Board of, County Conrnlssfoners would àbve to go through the cotrt
system.
The appeal pnocess as outlined in the Zonlng 0rdlnance of the
County whlch sets the Board of AdJustment up as the revleur.lngauthority pertalns-only to matters concernlng the Zoning 0rdlnance.Actions whlch lnvolve permits, lnterpretatloñs of the Zòning
0rdinance or requested artendrîents of that ordinance, are coveredby the appeal process, not actlons whfch are taken under the
subdlvlsion authorlty of the County.
- ¡f you have any further quest,ions, Gerry suggested that yougive hlm a call
Robert A. t'lltkowskl
Dl rector
Encl os ure