HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff ReportPROJECT REQUEST:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
WATER:
SEWER:
PROPOSED ROADS:
ADJACENT ZON]NG:
RELATIONSH]P TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The 51.06 acre tract is l-ocated in District
(subdivisions/nural serviceable aneas, % to
constnaints ) .
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Subdivision Sketch Plan and request fo::
exemption from funther subdivision neview.
Elaine and Allen Sundmacher
3 miles southeast of Sift off County Road 335.
The 8 acne tnact with the existing nesidence
is served by a welt dug in the 1900rs and no
negistnation exists on that wel-l. The
applicant proposes to supply the 43 acr:e
tract with a new well.
The tr"acts will be senved by individual
septic systems. The 8 acne tnact and house
are currently senved by an existing
individual septic system.
The B acre tract will be senved by an
existing 25r access fnom County Road 335.
The 43 aclre tnact would be senved by a new
access from County Road 335.
North A/I
South: A/R/RD
East: A/I
West: A/l
B of the County Compnehensive Plan
1 mile radius, minor. environmental-
The applicant proposed to split a 51.06 acne tract into 2 pareels of 8 and
43.06 acres each. The eight acre tract curlrently has a house, a bunkhouse, and
sevelral outbuildings on it. The r:emaining acreage is vacant land.
MAJOR CONCERNS AND ]SSUES:
The Silt B::idge is schedul-ed for replacement l-ater this year. THe applicant should
be::equi:red to pay arrpen lotrrassessment toward the cost of the bnidgers neplacement.
REVIEW]NG AGENCIES:
Town of Sil-t: No problems with the proposal.
Division of Water Resou::ces: No response at the time the agendas wer:e mailed.
Sil-t/New Castle Fine Pnotection Distnict: recommends use of an inrigation pump
and waten from Col-onado Rj-ver for fine protection purposes on 51 acres.
ar:fiel-d County'school- District RE-2: Adequate bus stops exist at this site.
rfiefd County Road Supervisor"-will wor:k with applicant on l-ocation of access cut
the remaining 43 acre tract; would prefer that the existing access serve both
'.efs, if possible.
' q.
rl-ication,has been filed in comptiance with the county zoning negulations,
.nty subdivision regulations, and the county Compr:ehensive Plan'
NDAT] ON:
2 2, 1982, the Gai:fiel-d County Planning Conmission lrecommended appr-oval- of
etch plan and request for exemption fuom further subdivision review with the
ring conditions:
he applicant shall submit a $1OOO.00 fee to the Planning Department as a con-
:ribution to the construction of the SiIt Bridge prior: to issuance of the
--)i -., 3xemption resolution.
{,9s01!-tUe applicant shall- submit a $ZoO.00 school assessment fee to the Planning
4epartment prio:r to -issuance of the exemption nesolution.
i mL ,applicant shalt submit a copy of the well permit fon the remaining 43 acre
Page 4
parcel to the Planning Depa:rtment
( tn" Iega] descniption for the
-4f the Col-or-ado Riven.
5. The applicant shall wo::k with
fon the 43 acre acne pancel,
altennative.
prior to issuance of the exemption nesolution.
B acre pancel shall extend to the centerline
the County Road Supenvisor. to l-ocate the access
and that a shaned access is the pr"efenr ed
G-? -tjz f]-r. ,-dll Ct-:tt)-\c.61{-- c--*lgr-rs\ai> o t\
tz c: d (.q.- -\.r \< n:- -\ I <-ti.-1al -r, -[- T-=:..b\c- €xk-ffr\o-r\ -] \z C
do1'r I
^i >,-
AFPuat >€:c> C' 5 (t:-t-td i-tr 5^s
Page 5