Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report BOCC 06.11.90BOCC 6/LL/90 PROJECT INTOR]VIATION AND STAFF COMMENTS REOUEST: APPLTCANT: LOCATTON: SITE DATA: WATER: SEWER: ACCESS: EXISTING AND ADJACENT ZONING: Exemption from the Definition of Subdivision Peter Stacey A tract of land known as the W L/2 SE 1/4 NE L/4 of Section 29,T7S, R87W of the 6th P.M; Iocated approximately 1.5 miles northeast of Catherine's Storeoff C.R. L02 (Missouri Heights-EI Jebel Road). The site consists of a 20 acre parcel. Proposed weIls Individual Sewage Systems Disposal Existing access drive off C.R. L02. A/R/RD I. REI,ATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject property is located in District B, RuralServiceable Areas/Minor Environmental Constraints, asdesignated on the Comprehensive PIan Management Districts' map. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL A. Site Description: The site is located in a residentialportion of lvlissouri Heights. The property is just southwest of and across C.R. L02 from the King,s Rowsubdivision. (See page 7 ) The property is moderatelysloped and partially treed with pinon/juniper typevegetation. The property is currently vacant. B. Proiect Description: The applicant proposes to dividethe 20 acre parcel into two parcels of ten (10) acreseach. ff approved, the applicant is proposing to sellone of the two parcels. C. History: The subject property was originally created byan exemption approved in 1973 splitting a forty (40) acreparcel. The applicant,s parents obtained approval tocreate two twenty (20) acre parcers. These parcers wereeventually given to the appricant and his brother whorater sord the eastern 20 acres. This 20 acres was thensplit by approved exemption in L9B2 by Leonard Riggs.The original parcel now consists of a twenty (20) and-iwoten (10) acre pieces. -t- III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS 1. SoiI survey information indicates that there are no major limitation to homesite development. Some shrink-swell clays may be found in the area. In addition, occasionalbasalt outcrops and/or shallow layering may be found.This may restrict development of some portions of the proposed parcels. 2. Slopes on the property are moderate, ranging from 10 to 15 percent. No problems related to topography areanticipated. 3. Access to the property is obtained via access easements from C.R. 102. The easement is partially improved as itserves a residence two parcels to the east of thesubject property. From that point, the easernent istraversed by an old farm road which extends onto thesubject property. 4. Fire protection will be provided by the Carbondale Fire Department. 5. No water, either domestic or irrigation, is currentlyavailable on the property. In 1984, the applicantapplied for and was granted a weII permit for domestic use only on the subject property. No well was everconstructed causing the permit to lapse. A new permit would be reguired. Since previous exemptions haveoccurred, the issuance of multiple well permits may berestricted. In all likelihood, the applicant will berequired to obtain additional water through the Basalt Water Conservancy District. No formal response from the Department of Water Resources has been received. IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. That proper posting and public notice was provided asrequired by law for the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. That the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts,matters and issues were submitted, and that aIIinterested parties hrere heard at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption is in the best interest of the health, safety,morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of thecitizens of Garfield County. V. RECOMI{ENDATION APPROVAI, with the following conditions: 1. That the following notes shall be included on the Exemption PIat. A. No further exemptions shall be allowed on eitherparcel. B. Foundations and/or individual sewage disposal systems may require design by a registered engineer. 2. That the apprj-cant shalr submit evidence of a domesticwater source for both of the proposed parcers consistingof werr permits prior to any formal resorution creatingthe tracts. 3. That the appricant shalr submit $400 in schoor rmpactFees. _ ?_ 4. 5. That, all conditions of approval shall be satisfied and an Exemption Plat, filed within 120 days. An extension maybe requested prior to the expiration date but in nocase will an extension be approved for a time period extending beyond one (1) year from the date ofconditional approval. That all representations of the applicant, either in theapplication or in the public meeting, shalI be consideredconditions of approval. - J- deNwooo 6pF;,r-/{a3, Avtp,otJoLLe VICINI-IY MAP NO 5CALts. [388ff'"2- IFZlo PROPERTVlu tr M \D KN65 RON tZ $SUBJECT OLSL5 o r5 1,8,, ,o{{ 239t- 2a6t-oI!-oo-oa3 5ol.:.req \ at @ I al rrJ'to' NO. I 239t-30 rit rr- o* i" J L SEE 259t ++ !lI ll Lr MAP NO. KS&t NO.239t-33 - 7"