HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 Staff Report BOCC 07.09.90BOCC 7/9/90
PROJECT INFOR]'IATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
REOUEST:
APPLICANT:
LOCATTONc
SITE DATA:
WATER:
SEWER:
ACCESS:
EXTSTING AI.ID ADJACENT ZONING:
Exemption from the Defini-tion of
Subdivision
Peter Stacey
A tract of land known as the W
L/2 sE 1/4 NE L/4 of Section 29,
T7S, R87W of the 5th P.M;
located approximately 1.5 miles
northeast of Catherine's Storeoff C.R. LO2 (I'lissouri Heights-El Jebe1 Road).
The site consists of a 2O acre
parcel.
Proposed wells
Individual
Systems
Sewage Disposal
Existing access drive off C.R.
L02.
A/R/RD
I. RELATTONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The subject property is located in District B, RuralServiceable Areas/I,linor Environmental Constraints, as
designated on the Comprehensive PIan Management Districts'
map.
rI. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
A. Site Description: The site is located in a residentialportion of Ivlissouri Heights. The property is just
southwest of and across C.R. L02 from the King's Rowsubdivision. (See page il ) The property is moderatelysloped and partially treed with pinon/juniper typevegetation. The property is currently vacant.
B. Project Description: The applicant proposes to dividethe 20 acre parcel into two parcels of ten (10) acreseach. If approved, the applicant is proposing to seII
one of the two parcels.
C. History: The subject property was originally created by
an exemption approved in 1973 splitting a forty (40) acreparcel. The applicant's parents obtained approval tocreate two twenty (20) acre parcels. These parcels wereeventually given to the applicant and his brother wholater sold the eastern 20 acres. This 20 acres was thensplit by approved exemption in L982 by Leonard Riggs.
The original parcel now consists of a twenty (20) and twoten (10) acre pieces.
This matter was originally scheduled for a public hearingin June but due to noticing problems, was not heard and
was rescheduled.
-/-
III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
L. Soil survey information indicates that there are no majorlimitation to homesite development. Some shrink-swelIclays may be found in the area. In addition, occasionalbasalt outcrops and/or shallow layering may be found.This may restrict development of some portions of the
proposed parcels.
2. Slopes on the property are moderate, ranging from L0 to
15 percent. No problems related to topography areanticipated.
3. Access to the property is obtained via access easements
from C.R. L02. The easement is partially improved as itserves a residence two parcels to the east of thesubject property. From that point, the easement istraversed by an old farm road which extends onto thesubject property.
4. Fire protection will be provided by the Carbondale Fire
Department.
5. No water, either domestic or irrigation, is currentlyavailable on the property. In L984, the applicantapplied for and was granted a weII permit for domestic
use only on the subject property. No well was everconstructed causing the permit to lapse. A new permit
would be required. Since previous exemptions haveoccurred, the issuance of multiple well permits may berestricted. In all likelihood, the applicant will bereguired to augment water through the Basalt Water
Conservancy District or some other source.
rV. SUGGESTED FTNDINGS
L. That proper posting and public notice was provided asrequired by law for the meeting before the Board of
County Commissioners.
2. That the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners
was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts,matters and issues were submitted, and that allinterested parties were heard at that meeting.
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed
exemption is in the best interest of the health, safety,morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of thecitizens of Garfield County.
V. RECOI,IMENDATTON
APPROVAL, with the following conditions:
1. That the following notes shall be included on the
Exemption Plat.
A. No further exemptions shall be allowed on eitherparcel.
B. Foundations and/or individual sewage disposal
systems may require design by a registered engineer.
2- That the appricant shaLl submit evidence of a domesticwater source for both of the proposed parcers consistingof well permits prior to any formar resolution creatingthe tracts.
3. That the applicant sharr submit $400 in schoor rmpact
Fees.
*,5:-
4.
5.
That all conditions of approval shall be satisfied and an
Exemption PIat filed within 120 days. An extension maybe reguested prior to the expiration date but in no
case will an extension be approved for a time period
extending beyond one (1) year from the date of
conditj.onal approval.
That aII representations of the applicant, either in theapplication or in the public meeting, shall be considered
conditions of approval.
L uJr\.i.{ ri'I"
-(-
@-D
@
(@
@
@
L
?
f\ t''.
\'
\o-orv o
@o
:
i
';;!
I
;9
?e
@2e
Fo
i
t
\\
+2a
ilorE:
I Wattbonh RoDch Sob-Otr (pot, ol)2. lcc lttnor Stb.-Oiy, Ruel Rdgc pUO. (po.t ot)4 lron ,lourldro Coaclo,
Adiornin0 2195
-\e
\
),.
2!9t 'r 2 2. OO-O6 7
'. (:)Z)\ /'/',/.-\@\', ./^'v."
@
@
@
I
;
I
I.t
I
\
,f
\
\
\-\ 6rho\
1\
2591- rt2.OO-tO2
l7-86)
?395-Ot
T. 7 S.-R.89 W. S EC. I