HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.0 Correspondence & Conditions of ApprovalGlenn Hartmann
From: Michael Prehm
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 5:58 AM
To: Glenn Hartmann
Cc: rbeshelman@gmail.com
Subject: Driveway 7378 CR 100
Glenn,
Conditions for driveway permit issued to 7378 County Road 100 have been met. Road & bridge have no other concerns.
Thanks
Mike Prehm
Garfield County Road & Bridge
Foreman/Glenwood District
(970) 945-1223 Office
(970) 945-1318 Fax.
(970) 618-7109 Cell
1
CIVIL
August 14, 2013
Glenn Hartmann
Garfield County Building and Planning
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
An Employee -Owned Company
Re: Pioneer Point Subdivision — Subdivision Improvements
Dear Glenn,
LAND SURVEYING
RECEIvEP
AUG 1 4 7013
GARFIELD COUNTY
)MM4MUNfTY DEVELOPMENT
Roger Eshelman has completed all the subdivision improvements related to the property as of
August 14, 2014. This includes the waterline extension to Lot 1 across Lot 2, the asphalt apron
and vegetation removal at the Lot 1 Pioneer Point/Hogan driveway entrance that was completed,
and the asphalt apron for the Lot 2/3 driveway.
The location of the Lot 1 waterline extension across Lot 2 is within the "Access, Utility, and
Construction Easement" described in Tab G of the final plat application package. The water
service is reflected on the Utility Plan within the Construction Drawings of the Final Plat
application package.
The Lot 1 driveway is an extension of a12 -ft wide driveway onto Lot 1 of Pioneer Point
Subdivision. The road was built according to the standards depicted in the Construction
Drawing set in the Final Plat application package.
We are asking that the requirement of a Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA) and related
plat notes be waived since the required infrastructure improvements are now in place.
Sincerely,
Daniel Denniso P.E.
High Country Engineering,
1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Telephone (970) 945-8676
Fax (970) 945-2555
41r
X
ORAPHC BCAiE
.a ar oases wei Nos soma, a • was. Woos ••••••
ati WS, Its as Val
sAW
SWIMS COMM sex-
[IRMA *Tay
WOWED SM.
!ROO* ORM Rai
Slie Rai
tr Mt R-13
AO MIRO AO
mons., pc
AP. 23.00401126 art 0-mam
DOOn MOOT 00.41at
R Ne. V11.1.-.1003� MS
IMAM
woof
laRior IC
.w rA
JOT 1 MIMED DRIVEWAY PWI VIEW
^t ��nu= t
1
i
1
aver z =y
IS
1
stSler
t
OMEN, •Rtrer.ML
LOC 1 SHARED DRIVEWAY PEWEE VIEW
STATIONING H LEFT TO MOOT
1
`z
z1;
at at w° i
k z
:q 0t a
E `x z
¢l bIN l
Qzg
MGM. NO.
aM1asILW
SOF5
•
roon•oE Xt AA Moss
DMA *ON POWAY Wr.
•WEPT* 10E
• WIRAIXO P11001
WI flop POW
•
0610Y¢ NO NE
A. 4,i
11.011 IO.30•• ,o rmeRca .
110. AA d. WA 00710110) • ?\
MVO. lirtelOr
mama. ow. 110101.20.11
NAMES �1 ENR ow
00220
E15E1
2AD 100
57625
MBY191� \
MAWY 11111.1J 'e L
E.
PN�F..MOW* 1 1 1
1
POPS
m
EU•1•N Muom M1O.PE
axa - -1
. MORE mama I
▪ M 1 O.MM..
N O SOO.
MI
I
OM
000E r.M. I
�.112.01010
LIEU
*111.1
211
MM2
WAN. 00 OF R0 We AR 1
.11.11,11.
•E 7* WE
�{ot SYS. NisP[N MIAOW
• SOL MtMm1%M0. a .
PO
::
1x0 0 -r
t SW
AAA WAS. I
GAP AT
ri
1
Miff sass'
UMW 11.
-VA..am\ \ {-
SIIIMMIMPI ni ,NE \ \ L
111. TRADE 1
n*oM E
��omME\
K�AX501l ` -1
I
`Mry "s E\1\ `‘"7. xmna\
E
mNa‘N
l a RE
LELLI
�m �; ;5711 \ i sf Ma
\ \ I
\ 1 \
\ \\ NEE P. /Er,,P Or .P .,MCA 111 MOW
sm I
\ ‘,,,,,,016,...r.
./.101121
DOM. MO OA
601Al
A C W
21.2 AG
0410- E rift
s�
et AP1 29101:0(051
1RDEM1 a lA•D
MANAGELIOC
58629 HOMO 6 t N
4810001 1
CR0100
O 60
MOTO* 6 A MFM
MP GME
Mssw MOT
IMO.
1
5.106 TO MEW
We INT 111 2 MN Ow
FORE TROT MC
miM.: w
•mRHEPOEAM 101 1
2)1 239115100016
NEMC A. O m•161 1. 10..6E0
1102 CBN1Y ROAD OM
CA19PB1.LE- CO 0623
115 AC
1116010 N %O.
-1
\"1"02ZA
'
M1 23!11:
\ LAMING STOCK20OLP
it
JO CORM NOM 102
GMBOONE. CO 61625
1A.K
0
1N a
MOM(
ENDOW
6.0105
OF M 9iMm.
NPm1f
12 °�imiss !
O D•POMO MN
memo 11.0. S. wcm
(90,16 MOP WW1.
1111. SWAM Ul.
Lexpo
SEM
•
a
RIPOTO WO MOON.
NTO[f OgAE6r
C• M
11111.
OF. SOrod
ry r Rasa sown -
610C 50M1 us
ERMA TWO
9RIE*1111.21JOfOQ
FA (x al
02* EaOE9Na -.s ao11MM57A 1065O.R0
100 251.1.. 02 +E0 - FPO w
•110 tt 0813 PM AWAS -. L O2LA1E0 S SEM&
MET
01 rd .110.a �Ea.210 4401.E 0MMO6.m WO
v a ..r
06E1am1 NMOm0 Or MR 10.1 01.111N.6.
2) M OLIRD Yie cME.1`57`0091•�R00.001 20
SI �011.40200.88P100..'An 1110 1a00'OOwR 2M1
9 2002 0 oris 1157 w wM lwca w1u aN Ow
r • r M.E .. mEsa tan 10. 0 *Mit C.
C MOM
. AT x P: .10.7110.1.00 Emma
vomem am. mu R. aomama ammo • mom.
tam MIMEO DX 111.1. nastrx .ra r senor
7* 401 NPM1M OW. OW M E AEC. 0.104
.816.0
_.®MR®Ef0WPC,��*0¢�
21 1011
SOME u N*AVM ON *AVM *0. ®AW MAD
2
H WT. Mel* TM. OM E EMU. W
ME *AWN oEEM. na0[mNueP.M M WR.*
laig AND Va.. NMA lrE 11..6 OA NODEOO1 EOM 1E,
*UMRf1.s„ ,O RE E* E6,E.�s�f �EPO. MA
A ME x18 02 011 Oki S11MSE Al 11E ME 6 sE SECS 00)
fel LIR 1
O6 r. �R a Oe comma ml u . MM. 11111. NEITOEC 111E w�OUE
10.1
M WM 1N of f.OMN w0 02211 Al MMO P ssWOOAMOR. Sr®1
Bae Nat. OROS T Y@R POW lert
ORs
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
S2EQ OF OMR
9O6LD 19A
•01.017 OF NASA
11 OP.m
9EEE5
06 0FO0D 111E a SOME DISPOSAL
M OW S15Td
MOW
OSHA 50.5 COHRMAl10M SERVICE
SOLS MESPMOBMS
MANE -TRICOT
COMER 12 TO 506
AM116D a 1•RSOURCE E1EC160TY
EXISTING RRY LF095
EL6fG O, CR
9 EE
aMTW&RM SOMME OR RAe9f6 CES
O01YE® MOM
AM1*0000 SOURCE a 190901¢maw.*
0162.10 ORESr
REMORA.
A2RMP•Ra D SOO. CORE 1E1EM901
SAlEl11f
swum 9ERY1¢
O 0
r• e
1O •Z
4 ' 3
ye
jaT
munj
89 WE
E. m
Z
O 0
PROTECT W
20]10!0
4 OF 5
•
...001•I•it ,940I
,. .
ae..
—
_
.� w
/
�11
J!!.
it
ite='
14
a o
•
�i
boo
>\_�- `�
//y,/��
MVP 501:00 .
Pa,':Ma ODIrI
Rn W PATROL FENCE
�MATIYA11ON rONTNQ
.1 MO 0.00®is PK VP OC NM 0001 0 at.4.s
HAY 01E0( DAY
sc
Ossa a �v�ssn .urs
tp..�.w......4
.,..,
MO 111400 060106 NM MI �IOW .a...w.,..o
a•.ws•.ma n.w.
z
0
Ios
Y waa5
z .s! 4
V ill
Z
8
m
0 1
S
0
0
0
s
�.
hi
=s9Opa
rE YO
a Y
z
_O
S
ra
r a�I
- i1,4R41,R4Wi'Y 'fia`L"lCiaiS�eHJ.1I
.gra= ss uw w,,,,,,.....= c.,.
t 0.. ACC..". OQC
5j�v5was oat os xnw...0n... w_ t arra=.a, a,0.omm......5RAN
00 000 0 a... 0.00.a10.0005 ...am.00u .. 000
SOFS
PIONEER POINT SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT
THIS PIONEER POINT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT ("SIA") is
made and entered into this day of , 2013, by and between ROGER AND
AMELIA ESHELMAN ("Owner") and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, acting for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, as a
body politic and corporate, directly or through its authorized representatives and agents ("BOCC")
(collectively, the "Parties").
Recitals
A. Owner is the owner and developer of the Pioneer Point Subdivision (the
"Subdivision"), which property is depicted on the Final Plat of Pioneer Point Subdivision ("Final
Plat"). The real property subject to this SIA is described in that Final Plat recorded at Reception
Number of the real estate records of Garfield County, Colorado and incorporated by
this reference.
B. On January 21, 2013, by Resolution No. 2013-10, recorded at Reception Number
830406 of the real estate records of Garfield County, Colorado and incorporated by this reference,
the BOCC,approved a preliminary plan for the Subdivision which, among other things, would create
three (3) single-family residential lots ("Preliminary Plan Approval").
C. As a condition precedent to the approval of the Final Plat submitted to the BOCC as
required by the laws of the State of Colorado and by the Garfield County Unified Land Use
Resolution of 2008 ("ULUR"), Owner wishes to enter into this SIA with the BOCC.
D. Owner has agreed to execute and deliver security in a form satisfactory to the BOCC
to secure and guarantee Owner performance under this SIA and under the Preliminary Plan
Approval and has agreed to certain restrictions and conditions regarding the sale of properties and
issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy within the Subdivision, all as more fully
set forth below.
E. Owner represents that at the time of recording this SIA all taxes and assessments upon
all parcels of real estate described in this SIA are paid in full.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and
promises contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:
Asreement
1. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. The BOCC hereby accepts and approves the Final Plat
of the Subdivision, on the date set forth above, subject to the terms and conditions of this SIA, the
Preliminary Plan Approval, and the requirements ofthe ULUR, and any other governmental or quasi -
governmental regulations applicable to the Subdivision ("Final Plat Approval"). Recording of the
Final Plat in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder shall be in accordance with this
SIA and at the time prescribed herein.
1
2. OWNERwS PERFORMANCE AS TO SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS.
a. Required Improvements. The Owner agrees to cause to be constructed and
installed access improvements, as shown on the Final Plat and described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Infrastructure Improvements").
b. Approval of Plans. Such Infrastructure Improvements must be installed in
accordance with plans and specifications prepared by licensed engineers and professionals
and approved by Garfield County. The Owner shall submit plans to the Community
Development Department for engineering approval prior to commencing any work on the
Infrastructure Improvements. The Owner will be responsible for any fees associated with a
County engineer's review of the plans. The Owner shall comply with all laws, re&ulations,
orders, resolutions and requirements of the State of Colorado, Garfield County, all special
districts, and any other governmental or quasi-govemmental authority with jurisdiction, and
this SIA in the construction and installation of the Infrastructure Improvements.
c. Completion Date/Satisfaction of Improvements Agreement. The BOCC
agrees that if all Infrastructure Improvements are installed in accordance with this SIA, the
approval resolution, and the ULUR, then the Owner shall be deemed to have satisfied all
terms and conditions of this SIA with respect to the installation of improvements. There is
no provision in this SIA which requires the Owner to construct any Infrastructure
Improvements within a set period of time. Potential purchasers are hereby put on notice that
Garfield County makes no representations, assurances or guarantees concerning when, if
ever, such Infrastructure Improvements will be constructed.
3. SECURITY FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS.
a. Plat Restriction. As security for the Owner's obligation to complete the
Infrastructure Improvements, the Owner shall include the following plat restriction ("Plat
Restriction") as a plat note on the first page of the Final Plat to guarantee completion of the
Infrastructure Improvements prior to sale or conveyance of lots:
RESTRICTION ON SALE OR TRANSFER: Lot 1 as shown on this plat
may not be sold, conveyed or transferred, nor building permits issued, until
public improvements to serve Lot 1 are completed as required in the
Subdivision Improvements Agreement between Roger and Amelia Eshelman
and Garfield County, Colorado.
b. Release of Plat Restriction. Upon completion of all Infrastructure
Improvements, the BOCC shall authorize a "Release of Plat Restriction." The Owner may
request release of the Plat Restriction by means of submission to the Community
Development Department of a "Written Request for Release," in the form attached hereto
and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. Such submission shall be accompanied by the
Owner's Engineer's stamped certificate of completion of the Infrastructure Improvements.
Before any release is considered, Owner shall certify that all taxes and assessments on the
real property subject to the release are paid in full.
Comment Nil: Glenn — Is this necessary, or will
the plans required by COA # 8 provide the necessary
engineer approval such that no additional review will
be necessary?
c. BOCC's Investigation. Upon submission of the Owner's Written Request for
Release along with the Owner's Engineer's certificate of completion of improvements, the
BOCC may review the certification and may inspect and review the Infrastructure
Improvements certified as complete to determine whether or not said Infrastructure
Improvements have been constructed in compliance with relevant specifications, as follows:
i. If the BOCC chooses to inspect and determines that all or a portion of
the Infrastructure Improvements certified as complete are not in compliance with the
relevant specifications or that the requirements of the Preliminary Plan Approval
have not been met, the BOCC shall furnish a letter of potential deficiency to the
Owner within fifteen (15) days of submission of the Owner's Written Request for
Partial Release.
ii. If no letter of potential deficiency is furnished to the Owner by the
BOCC within fifteen (15) days of submission of the Owner's Written Request for
Release, all Infrastructure Improvements certified as complete shall be deemed
complete by the BOCC, and the BOCC shall authorize execution of a Release of Plat
Restriction in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C,
provided that all requirements of the Preliminary Plan Approval have been satisfied.
The Owner may thereafter record the Release of Plat Restriction in the office of the
Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. Upon recording, the Plat Restriction shall have
no further force and effect with respect to and shall no longer restrict the sale, transfer
or conveyance of Lot 1.
iii. If a letter of potential deficiency is issued identifying a portion of the
certified Infrastructure Improvements as potentially deficient and there are no
outstanding requirements of the Preliminary Plan Approval, then all Infrastructure
Improvements not identified as potentially deficient in such letter shall be deemed
complete.
iv. With respect to Infrastructure Improvements identified as potentially
deficient in a letter of potential deficiency, or if the requirements of the Preliminary
Plan Approval have not been met, the BOCC shall have thirty (30) days from the date
of the letter to complete the initial investigation, begun under subparagraph i above,
and provide written confirmation of the deficiency(ies) to the Owner. The Owner
may correct such deficiency(ies) and resubmit a Written Request for Release, after
which the procedures of this subparagraph 3.c. shall be followed.
v. If within the thirty (30) day inspection period the BOCC finds that the
Infrastructure Improvements are complete and that all requirements of the
Preliminary Plan Approval have been met, or if the BOCC does not provide written
confirmation of the deficiency(ies), all Infrastructure Improvements certified as
complete shall be deemed complete by the BOCC, and the BOCC shall authorize
execution of a Release of Plat Restriction. Owner may thereafter record the Release
of Plat Restriction and the Plat Restriction shall have no further force and effect with
respect to and shall no longer restrict the sale, transfer or conveyance of Lot 1.
3
vi. Within ten (10) days of recording of a Release of Plat Restriction, the
Owner shall submit to the BOCC, through the Community Development Department,
record drawings bearing the stamp of an engineer certifying that all Infrastructure
Improvements have been constructed in accordance with the requirements of this
SIA, in hard copy and a digital format acceptable to the BOCC.
d. Amended Final Plat. Nothing herein shall be construed to mean the Owner is
prohibited from amending the Final Plat to adjust lot lines, or eliminate lots.
e. Substitution of Security to Satisfy Plat Restriction. The BOCC, in its sole
discretion, may permit the Owner to substitute another security instrument, such as a cash
deposit under a treasurer's deposit agreement or a letter of credit, as collateral in the place of
the Plat Restriction for the purpose of securing the completion of the Infrastructure
Improvements, should the Owner so request.
f. Recording of Final Plat. The Final Plat shall not be recorded until the Plat
Restriction has been received and approved by the BOCC and the Plat Restriction appears on
the first sheet of the Final Plat.
4. INDEMNITY. The Owner shall indemnify and hold the BOCC harmless and defend
the BOCC from all claims which may arise as a result of the Owners installation of the Subdivision
Improvements and any other agreement or obligation of Owner, related to development of the
Subdivision, required pursuant to this SIA. The Owner, however, does not indemnify the BOCC for
claims made asserting that the standards imposed by the BOCC are improper or are the cause of the
injury asserted, or from claims which may arise from the negligent acts or omissions of the BOCC or
its employees. The BOCC shall notify the Owner of receipt by the BOCC of a notice of claim or a
notice of intent to sue, and the BOCC shall afford the Owner the option of defending any such claim
or action. Failure to notify and provide such written option to the Owner shall extinguish the
BOCCas rights under this paragraph. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to constitute a
waiver of governmental immunity granted to the BOCC by Colorado statutes and case law.
5. FEES IN LIEU OF DEDICATION OF SCHOOL LAND.L Owner shall make a
cash deposit in lieu of dedicating land to the RE -1 School District, calculated in accordance with the
ULUR and the requirements of state law. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the cash in lieu
payment for the Subdivision is calculated as follows:
a. Unimproved per acre market value of land, based upon an appraisal submitted
to the BOCC by Owner, i.e. $ ; and
b. Land dedication standard: single-family dwelling
units x acres equals acres.
c. The Owner, therefore, shall pay to the Garfield County Treasurer, at or prior
to the time of recording of the Final Plat, ($ ) as a payment
in lieu of dedication of land to the RE -1 School District. Said fee shall be transferred by the
BOCC to the RE -1 School District in accordance with the provisions of.30-28-133, C.R.S.,
4
COmmatt [CA: Glenn — Have you received the
necessary information yet to fill in this section?
as amended, and the ULUR.
d. The Owner agrees that it is obligated to pay the above -stated fee, accepts such
obligations, and waives any claim that Owner is not required to pay the cash in lieu of land
dedication fee. The Owner agrees that Owner will not claim, nor is Owner entitled to claim,
subsequent to recording of the Final Plat of the Subdivision, a reimbursement of the fee in
lieu of land dedication to the RE -1 School District.
6. SALE OF LOTS. No lots, tracts, or parcels within the Subdivision may be
separately conveyed prior to recording of the Final Plat in the records of the Garfield County Clerk
and Recorder.
7. BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. As one
remedy for breach of this SIA, including failure to satisfy requirements of the Preliminary Plan
Approval, the BOCC may withhold issuance of building permits for any residence or other habitable
structure to be constructed within the Subdivision. Further, no building permit shall be issued unless
the Owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District
("District"), if the District has so required, that there is adequate water available to the construction
site for the Districts purposes, and all applicable District fees have been paid to the District.
8. CONSENT TO VACATE PLAT. In the event the Owner fails to comply with the
terms of this SIA, the BOCC shall have the ability to vacate the Final Plat as it pertains to any lots
for which building permits have not been issued. As to lots for which building permits have been
issued, the Plat shall not be vacated and shall remain valid. In such event, the Owner shall provide
the BOCC a plat, suitable for recording, showing the location by surveyed legal description of any
portion of the Final Plat so vacated by action of the BOCC. If such a Plat is not signed by the BOCC
and recorded, or if such Plat is not provided by the Owner, the BOCC may vacate the Final Plat, or
portions thereof, by resolution.
9. ENFORCEMENT. In addition to any rights provided by Colorado statute, the
withholding of building permits and certificates of occupancy, provided for in paragraph 7, above,
the provisions for release of the Plat Restriction, detailed in paragraph 3, above, and the provisions
for plat vacation, detailed in paragraph 8, above, it is mutually agreed by the BOCC and the Owner,
that the BOCC, without making an election of remedies, shall have the authority to bring an action in
the Garfield County District Court to compel enforcement of this SIA. Nothing in this SIA,
however, shall be interpreted to require the BOCC to bring an action for enforcement or to withhold
permits or certificates or to vacate the Final Plat or a portion thereof, nor shall this paragraph or any
other provision of this SIA be interpreted to permit the purchaser of a lot to file an action against the
BOCC. In addition, the BOCC may, but shall not be required to, pursue any of its enforcement
remedies as applicable, pursuant to Article 12 of the ULUR.
10. NOTICE BY RECORDATION. This SIA shall be recorded in the Office of the
Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and shall be a covenant running with title to all lots, tracts and
parcels within the Subdivision. Such recording shall constitute notice to prospective purchasers and
other interested persons as to the terms and provisions of this SIA.
5
11. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The obligations and rights contained herein shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Owner and the BOCC.
12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND NOTICE PROVISIONS. The
representatives of the Owner and the BOCC, identified below, are authorized as contract
administrators and notice recipients. Notices required or permitted by this SIA shall be in writing
and shall be effective upon the date of delivery, or attempted delivery if delivery is refused. Delivery
shall be made in person, by certified return receipt requested U.S. Mail, receipted delivery service, or
facsimile transmission, addressed to the authorized representatives of the BOCC and the Owner at
the address or facsimile number set forth below:
Owner: Roger and Amelia Eshelman
7378 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
w/copy to,
BOCC: Board of County Commissioners
of Garfield County, Colorado
c/o Community Development Department Director
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-8212
Fax: (970) 384-3470
13. AMENDMENT. This SIA may be modified, but only in writing signed by the
Parties hereto.
14. COUNTERPARTS. This SIA may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed one and the same
instrument.
15. VENUE AND JURISDICTION. Venue and jurisdiction for any cause arising out of
or related to this SIA shall lie with the District Court of Garfield County, Colorado, and this SIA
shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Colorado.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this SIA to be effective upon the date of
Final Plat Approval for the Subdivision.
6
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
By:
Clerk to the Board Chairman
Date:
OWNER
By:
(Name and Title)
Date:
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD )
Subscribed and swom to before me by , an authorized
representative of , Owner of the Subdivision, this day of
, 20
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
7
GARFIELD COUNTY TREASURER
Certificate of Taxes Due
Account Number R011396
Parcel 239118100027
Assessed To
ESHELMAN, ROGER B & AMELIA S
7378 COUNTY ROAD 100
CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8816
Certificate Number 2013-01790
Acres 6.702
Order Number
Vendor ID
Roger B Eshelman
7378 COUNTY ROAD 100 CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8816
Legal Description
Section: 18 Township: 7 Range: 87 TR IN LOT 12, ALSO A TR OF LAND CONT 3.001 AC+/- AS
DESC IN BNDY LINE ADJ BK 1528/609 AND PLAT 638443, A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN
THE W1/2NEI/4
Situs Address
007378 100 COUNTY RD,7378
CATHERINE STORE RD
Year
Tax Charge
Tax
Interest
Fees
Payments Balance
2012
Total Tax Charge
$3,818.76
$152.75
$0.00 ($3,971.51)
$0.00
$0.00
Grand Total Due as of 08/16/2013
$0.00
Tax Billed at 2012 Rates for Tax Area Ol 1 - 1R -MF - 011
Authority
GARFIELD COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY - ROAD & B
GARFIELD COUNTY - SOCIAL SE
CARBONDALE & RURAL FIRE
BASALT WATER CONSER
COLO RIVER WATER CONS
SCHOOL DISTRICT RE -1
COLORADO MTN COLLEGE
GARFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBR
Taxes Billed 2012
* Credit Levy
Mill Levy
10.3410000
2.5500000
0.7640000
9.9650000
0.0440000
0.2420000*
38.3880000
3.9970000
1.0000000
Amount Values
$586.85
$144.71
$43.36
$565.51
$2.50
$13.73
$2,178.52
$226.83
$56.75
67.2910000 $3,818.76
SINGLE FAM.RES.-
LAND
SINGLE FAM.RES-
IMPROVEMTS
Total
Actual Assessed
$245,000 $19,500
$467,940 $37,250
$712,940 $56,750
AH Tax Lien Sale amounts are subject to change due to endorsement of current taxes by the lienholder or to advertising and distraint
warrant fees. Changes may occur and the Treasurer's Office will need to be contacted prior to remittance after the following dates:
Personal Property and Mobile Homes - September 1, 2013, Real Property - September 1, 2013. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION
AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIERS CHECK.
Special taxing districts and the boundaries of such districts may be on file with the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk, or
the County Assessor.
This certificate does not include land or improvements assessed under a separate account number, personal property taxes, transfer tax
or misc. tax collected on behalf of other entities, special or local improvement district assessments or mobile homes, unless specifically
mentioned.
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcels of real property and all
outstanding sales for unpaid taxes as shown by the records in my office from which the same may still be redeemed with the amount
required for redemption are as noted herein. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
TREASURER, GARFIELD COUNTY
GEORGIA CHAMBERLAIN
/fr-e-a4f4g---d.a,iu44eAeo:-t-*)
109 8th Street. Suite 204
Glenwood Springs CO. 81601
Aug 16, 2013 11:44:07 AM Page 1 of 1
Garfield County Treasurer
Receipt of Tax Payment
Account
R011396
Parcel Number
239118100027
ESHELMAN, ROGER B & AMELIA S
7378 COUNTY ROAD 100
CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8816
Receipt Date
Aug 16, 2013
Receipt Number
2013 -08 -16 -CB -8552
Situs Address Payor
007378 100 COUNTY RD,7378 CATHERINE STORE RD ESHELMAN, ROGER B & AMELIA S
7378 COUNTY ROAD 100
CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8816
Legal Description
Section: 18 Township: 7 Range: 87 TR IN LOT 12, ALSO A TR OF LAND CONT 3.001 AC+/- AS DESC IN BNDY
LINE ADJ BK 1528/609 AND PLAT 638443, A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE W1/2NE1/4
Property Code Actual Assessed Year Area Mill Levy
SINGLE FAM.RES.-LAND - 1112 245,000 19,500 2012 011 67.291
SINGLE FAM.RES-IMPROVEMTS - 1212 467,940 37,250 2012 011 67.291
Payments Received
Cash $4,000.00
Payor Roger Eshelman
Cash ($28.49)
Payments Applied
Year Charges Billed Prior Payments New Payments Balance
2012 Interest $152.75 $0.00 $152.75 $0.00
2012 Tax $3,818.76 $0.00 $3,818.76 $0.00
$3,971.51 $0.00
Balance Due as of Aug 16, 2013 $0.00
ALL CHECKS ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL COLLECTION.
Thank you for your payment!
Garfield County Treasurer
109 8th Street, Suite 204
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
970-945-6382
www.garfield-county.com
Receipt2013-08-16-CB-8553
Product
2
Certificate of Taxes Due
CERT REVENUE
WORKING FUND DUE TO FUNDS
Total
Tender (Cash)
Payor
Roger Eshelman
Fri Aug 1611:44:07 MDT 2013 cbaker
Name
Certificate of Taxes Due R011396
Garfield County Treasurer
109 8th Street
Suite 204
Glenwood Springs CO 81601
PH: (970) 945-6382
Extended
$10.00
Account #:R011396
Effective Date: 8/16/13
Certificate Number: 2013-01790
Item ID: R011396/
($10.00)
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
Thank You 1
scW
NLy
To: Frank Harrington - High Country Engineering
From: Scott Aibner — Garfield County Surveyor
Subject: Plat Review — Pioneer Point Subdivision
Date: 08/13/2013
Garfield County
SURVEYOR
SCOTT AIBNER, P.L.S
Frank,
Upon review of the Pioneer Point Subdivision Plat, I have no comments or corrections to be made prior to
approval for survey content and form.
Once all final comments from Community Development have been completed, the Mylar may be prepared for
recording. The Mylar shall be delivered to the Community Development office with all private party signatures
no later than Monday the week prior to the next commissioner meeting day in order to make that meeting.
Sincerely,
Scott Aibner
Garfield County Surveyor
cc Glenn Hartmann — Community Development Department
109 8 th Street ,Suite 100B • Glenwood Springs, C081601 • (970)945-1377 • Fax: (970)384-3460 • e-mail: saibner@garfield-countycom
Glenn Hartmann
From: Roger B. Eshelman [rbeshelman@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 7:01 PM
To: Glenn Hartmann
Cc: Dan Dennison
Subject: Eshelman driveway apron
Hi Glenn,
Elam construction who is making my asphalt and promised it to me for Tuesday bailed
on me and now they're not making it until Wednesday morning. No big deal. Dan is still going
to supply you with the letter that saying that Everything is complete. And he can simply
Inspect it on Wednesday when it's finished, (He already inspected the preparation for it )But
he can supply you with the letter ahead of time, if you wish? I emailed Mike Prehm To let him
know what's going on so he can also look at it on Wednesday afternoon sometime if he feels
like it. Thank you, Roger Eshelman
Sent from my iPhone
1
August 8, 2013
Glenn Hartmann
Garfield County Building and Planning
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Pioneer Point Subdivision — Subdivision Improvements
Dear Glenn,
Roger Eshelman has completed the extension across the Hogan property along the "Access,
Utility, and Construction Easement" described in Tab G of the final plat application package.
The extension is a12 -ft wide driveway that extends onto Lot 1 of Pioneer Point Subdivision. The
road was built according to the standards depicted in the Construction Drawing set in the Final
Plat application package. The construction of the driveway across the Hogan property was the
only item that remained in our list of subdivision improvements. We are asking that the
requirement of a Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA) and related plat notes be waived
since the required infrastructure improvements are now in place.
Sincerely,
i
Daniel Dennison, P.E.
High Country Engineering, Inc.
, Garfield County
MEMORANDUM
Community Development
108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Office: 970-945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470
TO: Becky Wheelersberg, Administration
Community Development Department
FROM: Glenn Hartmann, Senior Planner
DATE: July 26, 2013
SUBJECT: Pioneer Point Subdivision School Impact Fees
Attached is a check provided by Roger and Amelia Eshelman in satisfaction of their
school impact fees associated with the Pioneer Point Subdivision Final Plat. Details are
summarized below:
• The School Impact Fees are for the RE- 1 School District
• The Fees have been calculated in accordance with the ULUR in effect at the time
of submittal and the Preliminary Plat Approvals.
• The Fees are in the amount of $931.18.
Please contact me if you need anything further. Thanks.
•
•
•
Cultutamd
better water. pure and simple.
Pinnacle Water Inc., 1107 Hendrick Drive, Carbondale CO 81623 P: 970-963-2273 F: 970-963-0131
Aspen: 970-925-1010 Vail: 970-476-2008 Steamboat Springs: 970-879-8292
Telluride: 970-243-0628 Grand Junction: 970-243-0628
Date: 7-24-13
Glenn Hartmann
Garfield County, CO
Community Development Department
Glenn Hartmann,
Re: Water analysis by ACZ Laboratories, Inc, Project ID: L11434 / Eshelman
Bacterial sample by Mesa County Health Department -Eshelman
All of the parameters tested for are below the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment (CDPHE) and the US EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCL's).
The water is safe for human consumption and domestic water use.
http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/index.cfm
Regards,
Robert D. Donnelly / Pres.
Pinnacle Water Inc.
•
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Report to:
Robert Donnelly
Pinnacle Water Inc.
1107 Hendrick Dr
Carbondale, CO 81623
Project ID:
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Robert Donnelly:
Bill to:
Robert Donnelly
Pinnacle Water Inc.
1107 Hendrick Dr
Carbondale, CO 81623
Revised Analytical
Report
June 21, 2013
Enclosed are revised analytical results for sample(s) submitted to ACZ Laboratories, Inc. (ACZ) on April 04,
2013 and originally reported on April 22, 2013. Refer to the case narrative for an explanation of the changes.
This project was assigned to ACZ's project number, L11434. Please reference this number in all future
inquiries.
All analyses were performed according to ACZ's Quality Assurance Plan. The enclosed results relate only to
the samples received under L11434. Each section of this report has been reviewed and approved by the
appropriate Laboratory Supervisor, or a qualified substitute.
Except as noted, the test results for the methods and parameters listed on ACZ's current NELAC certificate
letter (#ACZ) meet all requirements of NELAC.
This report shall be used or copied only in its entirety. ACZ is not responsible for the consequences arising
from the use of a partial report.
All samples and sub -samples associated with this project will be disposed of after May 22, 2013. If the
samples are determined to be hazardous, additional charges apply for disposal (typically less than
$10/sample). If you would like the samples to be held longer than ACZ's stated policy or to be returned, please
contact your Project Manager or Customer Service Representative for further details and associated costs.
ACZ retains analytical reports for five years.
If you have any questions or other needs, please contact your Project Manager.
Sue Webber has reviewed and
approved this report.
�w$ ACCoR0
47
CF
REPAD.01.06.05.02
Page 1 of 17
•
•
•
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Project ID:
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Case
Narrative
June 21, 2013
Sample Receipt
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. (ACZ) received 1 ground water sample from Pinnacle Water Inc. on April 4, 2013. The sample was
received in good condition. Upon receipt, the sample custodian removed the sample from the cooler, inspected the
contents, and logged the sample into ACZ's computerized Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). The sample
was assigned ACZ LIMS project number L11434. The custodian verified the sample information entered into the computer
against the chain of custody (COC) forms and sample bottle labels.
Holding Times
All analyses were performed within EPA recommended holding times.
Sample Analysis
This sample was analyzed for inorganic, radiochemistry parameters. The individual methods are referenced on both, the
ACZ invoice and the analytical reports.
This report was revised on 06/21/13 to include the following statement:
This report reflects the parameters inlcuded in the "CDPHE?s Deluxe Colorado Package", excluding coliform bacteria.
REPAD.03.06.05.01
Page 2 of 17
• 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
ADZ Laboratories, Inc.
•
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Project ID:
Sample ID: ESHELMAN
Inorganic Analytical
Results
ACZ Sample ID:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Sample Matrix:
L11434-01
04/02/13 10:35
04/04/13
Ground Water
Field Data
Parameter
EPA Method
Result Qual XQ Units MDL POL
Date Analyst
pH (Field)
Temperature (Field)
Inorganic Prep
Parameter
Total Recoverable
Digestion
Total Recoverable
Digestion
Metals Analysis
Field Measurement
Field Measurement
EPA Method
M200.2 ICP
M200.2 ICP -MS
7.7
14.4
units
C
Result Qual XQ Units MDL PQL
04/02/13 10:35
04/02/13 10:35
rd
rd
Date Analyst
04/12/13 10:17
aeb
04/08/13 16:24 las
Parameter
EPA Method
Result Qual XQ Units MDL PQL
Date Analyst
Arsenic, total
recoverable
Cadmium, total
recoverable
Calcium, dissolved
Copper, total
recoverable
Iron, total recoverable
Lead, total recoverable
Magnesium, dissolved
Manganese, total
recoverable
Sodium, dissolved
Uranium, total
recoverable
Zinc, total recoverable
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
M200.7 ICP
M200.7 ICP
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
M200.7 ICP
M200.7 ICP
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
0.0016
34.9
0.01
0.0006
27.3
19.2
0.0076
0.02
U
B
U
U
B
mg/L
0.0002 0.001
04/10/13 5:05
pmc
mg/L 0.0001 0.0005 04/10/13 5:05 pmc
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.2 1 04/15/13 14:46 aeb
0.01 0.05 04/15/13 18:02 aeb
0.02
0.0001
0.2
0.005
0.05
0.0005
1
0.03
04/15/13 18:02
04/10/13 5:05
04/15/13 14:46
04/15/13 18:02
aeb
pmc
aeb
aeb
0.3 2 04/15/13 23:31 jjc
0.0001 0.0005 04/10/13 5:05 pmc
mg/L 0.01 0.05 04/15/13 18:02 aeb
REP IN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details.
Page 3 of 17
0 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
•
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Project ID:
Sample ID: ESHELMAN
Inorganic Analytical
Results
ACZ Sample ID:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Sample Matrix:
L11434-01
04/02/13 10:35
04/04/13
Ground Water
Wet Chemistry
Parameter
EPA thud
Result Quad XQ Units MDL POL
Date Analyst
Alkalinity as CaCO3
Bicarbonate as
CaCO3
Carbonate as CaCO3
Hydroxide as CaCO3
Total Alkalinity
Chloride
Conductivity @25C
Corrosivity (calc.)
Fluoride
Hardness as CaCO3
Lab Filtration (0.45um)
& Acidification
Lab Filtration (glass
fiber filter)
Nitrate/Nitrite as N
pH (lab)
pH
pH measured at
Residue, Filterable
(TDS) @180C
Sodium Adsorption
Ratio in Water
Sulfate
SM2320B - Titration
SM4500CI-E
SM2510B
SM 2330 - CaCO3 SI
SM4500F-C
SM2340B - Calculation
M200.7/200.8
SOPWC050
M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved
SM4500H+ B
SM2540C
USGS - 11738-78
D516-02 - Turbidimetric
191 mg/L 2 20 04/10/13 0:00 Ijr
7 B mg/L
U mg/L
199 mg/L
7 mg/L
448 umhos/cm
-0.1 SI Unit
0.7 mg/L
199 mg/L
2 20 04/10/13 0:00
2 20 04/10/13 0:00
2 20 04/10/13 0:00
1 5 04/18/13 9:43
1 10 04/10/13 20:37
04/22/13 12:23
0.1 0.5 04/17/13 12:50
1 7 04/22/13 12:23
04/12/13 16:30
0.86 mg/L 0.02 0.1
8.4
20.0
270
0.6
29
H
units 0.1 0.1
C 0.1 0.1
mg/L 10 20
0.03 0.15
mg/L 1 5
04/05/13 14:37
Ijr
Ijr
Ijr
bsu
Ijr
calc
Ijr
calc
las
las
04/18/13 23:22 pjb
04/10/13 0:00
04/10/13 0:00
04/05/13 16:53
Ijr
Ijr
Ijr
04/22/13 12:23 calc
04/17/13 12:41 Ihb
REPIN.02.06.05.01 "Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details.
Page 4 of 17
ADZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
•
•
Inorganic
Reference
Report Header Explanations
Batch
Found
Limit
Lower
MDL
PCN/SCN
PQL
QC
Rec
RPD
Upper
Sample
A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time
Value of the QC Type of interest
Upper limit for RPD, in %.
Lower Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg)
Method Detection Limit. Same as Minimum Reporting Limit. Allows for instrument and annual fluctuations.
A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis
Practical Quantitation Limit, typically 5 times the MDL.
True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike
Recovered amount of the true value or spike added, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg)
Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types
Upper Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg)
Value of the Sample of interest
QC Sample Types
AS
ASD
CCB
CCV
DUP
ICB
ICV
ICSAB
LCSS
LCSSD
LCSW
Analytical Spike (Post Digestion)
Analytical Spike (Post Digestion) Duplicate
Continuing Calibration Blank
Continuing Calibration Verification standard
Sample Duplicate
Initial Calibration Blank
Initial Calibration Verification standard
Inter -element Correction Standard - A plus B solutions
Laboratory Control Sample - Soil
Laboratory Control Sample - Soil Duplicate
Laboratory Control Sample - Water
LCSWD
LFB
LFM
LFMD
LRB
MS
MSD
PBS
PBW
PQV
SDL
Laboratory Control Sample - Water Duplicate
Laboratory Fortified Blank
Laboratory Fortified Matrix
Laboratory Fortified Matrix Duplicate
Laboratory Reagent Blank
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Prep Blank - Soil
Prep Blank - Water
Practical Quantitation Verification standard
Serial Dilution
QC Sample Type Explanations
Blanks
Control Samples
Duplicates
Spikes/Fortified Matrix
Standard
Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method or calibration procedure.
Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure.
Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method.
Determines sample matrix interferences, if any.
Verifies the validity of the calibration.
ACZ Qualifiers (Qual)
B Analyte concentration detected at a value between MDL and POL. The associated value is an estimated quantity.
H Analysis exceeded method hold time. pH is a field test with an immediate hold time.
L Target analyte response was below the laboratory defined negative threshold.
U The material was analyzed for, but was not detected above the level of the associated value.
The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit.
Method References
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Comments
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
EPA 600/4-83-020. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1983.
EPA 600/R-93-100. Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, August 1993.
EPA 600/R-94-111. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples - Supplement I, May 1994.
EPA SW -846. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.
QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations.
Soil, Sludge, and Plant matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on a dry weight basis.
Animal matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on an "as received" basis.
An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier
associated with the result.
If the MDL equals the PQL or the MDL column is omitted, the PQL is the reporting limit.
For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: http://www.acz.com/public/extquallist.pdf
REP001.09.12.01
Page 5 of 17
AcZ Its TY
ACZ ID
•
•
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Inorganic QC
Summary
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Alkalinity as CaCO3
SM2320B - Titration
Found Mills Rec', Lower Upper RPD Limft Qual
WG341864
WG341864PBW1 PBW 04/10/13 17:53 U mg/L -20 20
WG341864LCSW2 LCSW 04/10/13 18:07 WC130328-1 820 750.7 mg/L 91.5 90 110
L11446-04DUP DUP 04/10/1321:15 194 206.9 mg/L
WG341864LCSW5 LCSW 04/10/1321:28 WC130328-1 820 767.2 mg/L 93.6 90 110
WG341864PBW2 PBW 04/10/1321:36 U mg/L -20 20
WG341864LCSW8 LCSW 04/11/130:26 WC130328-1 820 770.4 mg/L 94 90 110
WG341864PBW3 PBW 04/11/130:35 2.1 mg/L -20 20
WG341864LCSW11 LCSW 04/11/133:56 WC130328-1 820 785.3 mg/L 95.8 90 110
WG341864PBW4 PBW 04/11/134:05 U mg/L -20 20
WG341864LCSW14 LCSW 04/11/137:25 WC130328-1 820 797.5 mg/L 97.3 90 110
6.4 20
Arsenic, total recoverable
M200.8 ICP -MS
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCNISCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qua!
WG341808
WG3418081CV ICV 04/10/13 3:40 MS130402-2 .05 .05127 mg/L 102.5 90 110
WG3418081CB ICB 04/10/13 3:43 U mg/L -0.0006 0.0006
WG341684LRB LRB 04/10/13 3:46 U mg/L -0.00044 0.00044
WG341684LFB LFB 04/10/133:49 MS130329-1 .05005 .05025 mg/L 100.4 85 115
L11430-03LFM LFM 04/10/13 4:50 MS130329-1 .05005 U .05219 mg/L 104.3 70 130
L11430-03LFMD LFMD 04/10/13 4:59 MS130329-1 .05005 U .05223 mg/L 104.4 70 130 0.08 20
Cadmium, total recoverable
M200.8 ICP -MS
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Quai
WG341808
W03418081CV ICV 04/10/133:40 MS130402-2 .05 .04979 mg/L 99.6 90 110
WG3418081CB ICB 04/10/13 3:43 U mg/L -0.0003 0.0003
WG341684LRB LRB 04/10/133:46 U mg/L -0.00022 0.00022
WG341684LFB LFB 04/10/133:49 MS130329-1 .0501 .04821 mg/L 96.2 85 115
L11430-03LFM LFM 04/10/13 4:50 MS130329-1 .0501 .0003 .0449 mg/L 89 70 130
L11430-03LFMD LFMD 04/10/13 4:59 MS130329-1 .0501 .0003 .04523 mg/L 89.7 70 130 0.73 20
Calcium, dissolved
M200.7 ICP
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Quaff
WG342036
WG3420361CV ICV 04/15/13 14:23 11130114-3 100 98.55 mg/L 98.6 95 105
WG3420361CB ICB 04/15/13 14:27 U mg/L -0.6 0.6
WG342036LFB LFB 04/15/13 14:39 11130326-2 67.95918 70.84 mg/L 104.2 85 115
L11434-01 AS AS 04/15/13 14:49 11130326-2 67.95918 34.9 105.34 mg/L 103.7 85 115
L11434-01 ASD ASD 04/15/13 14:52 11130326-2 67.95918 34.9 107.67 mg/L 107.1 85 115 2.19 20
REPIN.01.06.05.01
Page 6 of 17
ACZ ID
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
0 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Inorganic QC
Summary
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Chloride
SM4500CI-E
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG342245
WG3422451CB ICB 04/18/139:15 U mg/L -3 3
WG3422451CV ICV 04/18/13 9:15 W1130131-1 54.945 58.8 mg/L 107 90 110
WG342245LFB1 LFB 04/18/139:43 W1130201-8 30 31.9 mg/L 106.3 90 110
L11434-01 AS AS 04/18/13 9:43 W 1130201-8 30 7 39 mg/L 106.7 90 110
L11452-01 DUP DUP 04/18/13 9:43 450 450 mg/L
WG342245LFB2 LFB 04/18/13 10:01 W1130201-8 30 31.8 mg/L 106 90 110
0 20
Conductivity @25C
SM2510B
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG341864
WG341864LCSW1 LCSW 04/10/13 17:56 PCN41036 1408.8
L11446-04DUP DUP 04/10/1321:15
WG341864LCSW4 LCSW 04/10/1321:17 PCN41036 1408.8
WG341864LCSW7 LCSW 04/11/130:15 PCN41036 1408.8
WG341864LCSW10 LCSW 04/11/133:44 PCN41036 1408.8
WG341864LCSW13 LCSW 04/11/137:13 PCN41036 1408.8
1421.1 mhos/cm 100.9 90 110
1620 1614 mhos/cm
1413 imhos/crr 100.3 90 110
1402.8 imhos/crr 99.6 90 110
1394.7 imhos/crr 99 90 110
1386.6 mhos/cm 98.4 90 110
0.4 20
Copper, total recoverable
0
•
M200.7 ICP
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG342018
WG3420181CV ICV 04/15/13 17:34 11130114-3 2 1.966 mg/L 98.3 95 105
WG3420181CB ICB 04/15/13 17:40 U mg/L -0.03 0.03
WG341947LRB LRB 04/15/13 17:56 U mg/L -0.022 0.022
WG341947LFB LFB 04/15/13 17:59 11130326-2 .5 .492 mg/L 98.4 85 115
L11458-01 LFM LFM 04/15/13 18:11 11130326-2 .5 U .492 mg/L 98.4 70 130
L11458-01 LFMD LFMD 04/15/13 18:14 11130326-2 .5 U .49 mg/L 98 70 130 0.41 20
Fluoride
SM4500F-C
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG342163
WG3421631CV ICV 04/17/13 12:33 WC130417-1 2.002 1.96 mg/L 97.9 95 105
WG3421631CB ICB 04/17/13 12:40 U mg/L -0.3 0.3
WG342163LFB1 LFB 04/17/13 12:47 WC130313-8 5.005 4.85 mg/L 96.9 90 110
L11434-01AS AS 04/17/13 12:53 WC130313-8 5.005 .7 5.65 mg/L 98.9 90 110
L11434-01 DUP DUP 04/17/13 12:56 .7 .62 mg/L
12.1 20
RA
Iron, total recoverable
M200.7 ICP
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG342018
WG3420181CV ICV 04/15/13 17:34 11130114-3 2 1.991 mg/L 99.6 95 105
WG3420181CB ICB 04/15/13 17:40 U mg/L -0.06 0.06
WG341947LRB LRB 04/15/13 17:56 U mg/L -0.044 0.044
WG341947LFB LFB 04/15/13 17:59 11130326-2 1 .995 mg/L 99.5 85 115
L11458-01 LFM LFM 04/15/13 18:11 11130326-2 1 U .995 mg/L 99.5 70 130
L11458-01 LFMD LFMD 04/15/13 18:14 11130326-2 1 U .996 mg/L 99.6 70 130 0.1 20
REPIN.01.06.05.01
Page 7 of 17
ACZ ID
ACZ ID Type Analyzed PCWSCN QC Sample Found Units Rec, Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
ACZ ID
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
0 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
•
•
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Inorganic QC
Summary
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Lead, total recoverable
M200.8 ICP -MS
Type PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Quad
WG341808
WG3418081CV ICV 04/10/13 3:40 MS130402-2 .05 .05343 mg/L 106.9 90 110
WG3418081CB ICB 04/10/133:43 U mg/L -0.0003 0.0003
WG341684LRB LRB 04/10/133:46 U mg/L -0.00022 0.00022
WG341684LFB LFB 04/10/133:49 MS130329-1 .05005 .05075 mg/L 101.4 85 115
L11430-03LFM LFM 04/10/13 4:50 MS130329-1 .05005 .0014 .05075 mg/L 98.6 70 130
L11430-03LFMD LFMD 04/10/13 4:59 MS130329-1 .05005 .0014 .05042 mg/L 97.9 70 130 0.65 20
Magnesium, dissolved
M200.7 ICP
ACZ ID Type Analyzed PCNfSCN QC Sample Found Units Rec' Lower Upper RPD Limit Quad
WG342036
WG3420361CV ICV 04/15/13 14:23 11130114-3 100 101.14 mg/L 101.1 95 105
WG3420361CB ICB 04/15/13 14:27 U mg/L -0.6 0.6
WG342036LFB LFB 04/15/13 14:39 11130326-2 49.99941 51.53 mg/L 103.1 85 115
L11434-01AS AS 04/15/13 14:49 11130326-2 49.99941 27.3 80.18 mg/L 105.8 85 115
L11434-01ASD ASD 04/15/13 14:52 11130326-2 49.99941 27.3 82.13 mg/L 109.7 85 115 2.4 20
Manganese, total recoverable
M200.7 ICP
WG342018
WG3420181CV ICV 04/15/13 17:34 11130114-3 2
WG3420181CB ICB 04/15/13 17:40
WG341947LRB LRB 04/15/13 17:56
WG341947LFB LFB 04/15/13 17:59 11130326-2 .5
L11458-01 LFM LFM 04/15/13 18:11 11130326-2 .5
L11458-01 LFMD LFMD 04/15/13 18:14 11130326-2 .5
1.925 mg/L 96.3 95 105
U mg/L -0.015 0.015
U mg/L -0.011 0.011
.4864 mg/L 97.3 85 115
U .4834 mg/L 96.7 70 130
U .4827 mg/L 96.5 70 130 0.14 20
Nitrate/Nitrite as N
M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG342294
WG3422941CV ICV 04/18/13 18:26 WI130411-3 2.416
WG3422941CB ICB 04/18/13 18:27
WG342299
2.302 mg/L 95.3 90 110
U mg/L
-0.06 0.06
WG342299LFB LFB 04/18/1323:21 WI130215-3 2 1.938 mg/L 96.9 90 110
L11434-01 AS AS 04/18/13 23:23 W 1130215-3 2 .86 2.878 mg/L 100.9 90 110
L11545-01 DUP DUP 04/18/13 23:26 .26 .261 mg/L
0.4 20
pH (lab)
SM4500H+ B
Type Analyzed PCWSCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Quad
WG341864
WG341864LCSW3 LCSW 04/10/13 18:11 PCN40853
L11446-04DUP DUP 04/10/1321:15
WG341864LCSW6 LCSW 04/10/1321:31 PCN40853
WG341864LCSW9 LCSW 04/11/130:29 PCN40853
WG341864LCSW12 LCSW 04/11/134:00 PCN40853
WG341864LCSW15 LCSW 04/11/137:28 PCN40853
6 6.01 units 100.2 98 102
8.2 8.19 units
6 6.02 units 100.3 98 102
6 6.01 units 100.2 98 102
6 6.01 units 100.2 98 102
6 6.02 units 100.3 98 102
0.1 20
REPIN.01.06.05.01
Page 8 of 17
Inorganic QC
Summary III
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
0 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
•
•
Pinnacle Water Inc.
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C
SM2540C
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG341646
WG341646PBW PBW 04/05/13 16:40 U mg/L
WG341646LCSW LCSW 04/05/13 16:40 PCN40254 260 242 mg/L 93.1 80 120
L11462-03DUP DUP 04/05/13 16:59 3150 3190 mg/L
-20 20
1.3 20
Sodium, dissolved
M200.7 ICP
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qua!
WG342065
WG3420651CV ICV 04/15/1323:06 11130114-3 100 100.08 mg/L 100.1 95 105
WG3420651CB ICB 04/15/13 23:12 U mg/L -0.9 0.9
WG342065LFB LFB 04/15/1323:25 11130326-2 100.0416 100.9 mg/L 100.9 85 115
L11434-01AS AS 04/15/1323:34 11130326-2 100.0416 19.2 122.1 mg/L 102.9 85 115
L11434-01ASD ASD 04/15/1323:37 11130326-2 100.0416 19.2 126 mg/L 106.8 85 115 3.14 20
Sulfate
ACZ ID
WG342188
W G3421881CB
W G3421881CV
WG342188LFB
L11434-01 DUP
L11518-01 AS
D516-02 - Turbidimetric
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
ICB 04/17/13 9:27 U mg/L -3 3
ICV 04/17/13 9:27 W1130416-2 20 21.1 mg/L 105.5 90 110
LFB 04/17/13 12:41 W1130416-3 9.99 10.3 mg/L 103.1 90 110
DUP 04/17/13 12:42 29 28.2 mg/L
AS 04/17/13 13:41 SO4TURB20 10 330 349 mg/L 190 90 110
2.8 20
M3
Uranium, total recoverable
M200.8 ICP -MS
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG341808
WG3418081CV ICV 04/10/133:40 MS130402-2 .05 .05185 mg/L 103.7 90 110
WG3418081CB ICB 04/10/133:43 U mg/L -0.0003 0.0003
WG341684LRB LRB 04/10/133:46 U mg/L -0.00022 0.00022
WG341684LFB LFB 04/10/133:49 MS130329-1 .05 .04954 mg/L 99.1 85 115
L11430-03LFM LFM 04/10/13 4:50 MS130329-1 .05 .0051 .05414 mg/L 98.1 70 130
L11430-03LFMD LFMD 04/10/13 4:59 MS130329-1 .05 .0051 .05399 mg/L 97.8 70 130 0.28 20
Zinc, total recoverable
M200.7 ICP
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Found Units Rec Lower Upper RPD Limit Qual
WG342018
WG3420181CV ICV 04/15/13 17:34 11130114-3 2 1.961 mg/L 98.1 95 105
WG3420181CB ICB 04/15/13 17:40 U mg/L -0.03 0.03
WG341947LRB LRB 04/15/13 17:56 U mg/L -0.022 0.022
WG341947LFB LFB 04/15/13 17:59 11130326-2 .5 .487 mg/L 97.4 85 115
L11458-01 LFM LFM 04/15/13 18:11 11130326-2 .5 U .479 mg/L 95.8 70 130
L11458-01 LFMD LFMD 04/15/13 18:14 11130326-2 .5 U .481 mg/L 96.2 70 130 0.42 20
REPIN.01.06.05.01
Page 9 of 17
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
0 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Inorganic Extended
Qualifier Report
ACZ Project ID: L11434
•
•
ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER
METHOD QUAL DESCRIPTION
L11434-01 WG342163 Fluoride
WG342188 Sulfate
SM4500F-C
D516-02 - Turbidimetric
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte
concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike
level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS
or LFB) was acceptable.
REPAD.15.06.05.01
Page 10 of 17
•
•
ADZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Project ID:
Sample ID: ESHELMAN
Locator:
RadioChemistry
Analytical Results
ACZ Sample ID:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Sample Matrix:
L11434-01
04/02/13 10:35
04/04/13
Ground Water
Gross Alpha & Beta, total
M900.0
Prep Method:
Parameter
Measure Date
Prep Date
Result Error(+/-) LLD
Units XQ Analyst
Gross Alpha
Gross Beta
04/12/13 10:34
04/12/13 10:34
9.6
3.3
1.8
10 3.6 4.3
pCi/L
pCi/L
mla
mla
REPRC.02.06.05.01
* Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details.
Page 11 of 17
Method Pre Reference
• ADZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
•
•
Radiochemistry
Reference
Report Header Explanations
Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time
Error(+/-) Calculated sample specific uncertainty
Found Value of the QC Type of interest
Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %.
LCL Lower Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg)
LLD Calculated sample specific Lower Limit of Detection
PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike
Rec Amount of the true value or spike added recovered, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg)
RER Relative Error Ratio, calculation used for Dup. QC taking into account the error factor.
RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types
UCL Upper Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg)
Sample Value of the Sample of interest
QC Sample Types
DUP
LCSS
LCSW
Sample Duplicate
Laboratory Control Sample - Soil
Laboratory Control Sample - Water
MS/MSD
PBS
PBW
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
Prep Blank - Soil
Prep Blank - Water
QC Sample Type Explanations
Blanks
Control Samples
Duplicates
Matrix Spikes
Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method procedure.
Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure.
Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method.
Determines sample matrix interferences, if any.
ACZ Qualifiers (Qua!)
H Analysis exceeded method hold time.
M
SM
D
RP
ESM
EPA methodology, including those under SDWA, CWA, and RCRA
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.
ASTM
DOE
DOE/ESM
Comments
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Solid matrices are reported on a dry weight basis.
Preparation method: "Method" indicates preparation defined in analytical method.
QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations.
An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification
qualifier associated with the result.
For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: http://www.acz.Com/public/extquallist.pdf
REP003.09.12.01
Page 12 of 17
•
A Z Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Radiochemistry QC
Summary
Pinnacle Water Inc.
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Alpha
M900.0
Units: pCi/L
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Error LLD Found Error LLD Rec Lower Upper RPD/RER Limit Qual
WG342032
WG341742PBW PBW 04/12/13 .55 0.91 0.87 1.74
WG341742LCSW LCSW 04/12/13 RC121002-2 81.06 84 7.6 1.3 103.6 83 133
L11331-01DUP DUP-RER 04/12/13 -0.27 1.4 1.7 .53 1.6 1.7
L11443-05DUP DUP-RER 04/12/13 2.7 1.7 1.2 3.4 1.9 1.3 0.27 2
L11334-01MS MS 04/12/13 RC121002-2 81.06 8.5 3.4 2 48 7.2 2 48.7 83 133
0.38 2
M2
Beta
M900.0
Units: pCi/L
ACZ ID
Type Analyzed PCN/SCN QC Sample Error LLD Found Error LLD Rec Lower Upper RPD/RER Limit Qual
WG342032
WG341742PBW PBW 04/12/13 .16 1.9 2.8
WG341742LCSW LCSW 04/12/13 PCN40553 100 100 6.8 4.1 100 70 129
L11331-01DUP DUP-RER 04/12/13 1.7 3 4.3 7.9 3.4 4.3
L11443-05DUP DUP-RER 04/12/13 2.9 2.2 2.9 5.6 2.3 2.9
L11444-01 MS MS 04/12/13 PCN40553 66.67 1.7 2.1 2.9 70 4.7 2.9 102.5 70 129
5.6
1.37 2
0.85 2
REPRC.01.06.05.01
Page 13 of 17
1
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
*2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
•
•
Pinnacle Water Inc.
RadChem Extended
Qualifier Report
ACZ Project ID: L11434
ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER
METHOD QUAL DESCRIPTION
L11434-01 WG342032 Gross Alpha
M900.0 M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the
associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable.
REPAD.15.06.05.01
Page 14 of 17
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
1112773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Certification
Qualifiers
ACZ Project ID: L11434
No certification qualifiers associated with this analysis
•
•
REPAD.05.06.05.01
Page 15 of 17
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
0 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
•
•
Pinnacle Water Inc.
Sample
Receipt
ACZ Project ID: L11434
Date Received: 04/04/2013 10:31
Received By:
Date Printed:
4/4/2013
Receipt Verification
1) Is a foreign soil permit included for applicable samples?
2) Is the Chain of Custody or other directive shipping papers present?
3) Does this project require special handling procedures such as CLP protocol?
4) Are any samples NRC licensable material?
5) If samples are received past hold time, proceed with requested short hold time analyses?
6) Is the Chain of Custody complete and accurate?
The date/time was entered on the COC per the information
present on the sample containers for sample(s) one.
7) Were any changes made to the Chain of Custody prior to ACZ receiving the samples?
YES
NO
NA
X
X
X
X
X
8) Are all containers intact and with no leaks?
9) Are all labels on containers and are they intact and legible?
10) Do the sample labels and Chain of Custody match for Sample ID, Date, and Time?
11) For preserved bottle types, was the pH checked and within limits?
12) Is there sufficient sample volume to perform all requested work?
13) Is the custody seal intact on all containers?
14) Are samples that require zero headspace acceptable?
15) Are all sample containers appropriate for analytical requirements?
16) Is there an Hg -1631 trip blank present?
17) Is there a VOA trip blank present?
18) Were all samples received within hold time?
YES NO NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Chain of Custody Related Remarks
Client Contact Remarks
Shipping Containers
Cooler Id
3880
Temp (°C)
2.3
Rad (uR/Hr)
11
Custody Seal Intact?
Yes
Client must contact an ACZ Project Manager if analysis should not proceed for samples received
outside of their thermal preservation acceptance criteria.
REPAD LPII 2012-03
Page 16 of 17
•
•
•
70112 Laboratories, Inc,
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493
Name: R3 6,EX b U� Nt.t..1 E lly
L--
//9 3� i i
Address: 1k0-1 % 1e.
mi) ..r� QR.
Pi Company: t' i ►�t.1 A 4 Y-3 ATER.ltAC.Gt
" N1 k.?!. --i LL7 e-)+ 3
E-mail: RDOIJ Ka"( *v P►taNAc\1'F. wN• , (,OM
,
Telephone: `i -t0 -,.N(03 - 1
Name:
E-mail:
Company:
Telephone:
I
Name: Rp�'j ?:i- 1D�1�1E. \ %.1
Address: flC J 1AEURcK D€
Company:1>t*><i.S1AGAa \IkTER ta( .
GAR. CItiDi -i C ri +1tv43
E-mail: RCION NI jj CPI NNA,.:AE wq'Z€s; -C.c
-v
,;
Telephone: C"(G - ` 1W J._) - c;. a 1 3
If sample(s) received past. holding time (HT), or if insufficient
HT remains to complete YES
analysis before expiration, shall ACZ proceed with requested
short HT analyses? NO
If N.Y'then ACZ will contact client roc further Instruction. If neither "-'ES" nor "Nn'
Is Ini ItCaled. ACZ will proceed wnh the requested analyses, even If HT s expired. and data will be
quoWien
Are samples for SDWA Compliance Monitoring?
Yes No L�
If yes, please include state forms. Results will be reported to
PQL for Colorado.
Sampler's Name:Raa@Rr 11,0NY 0 Sampler's site Information
State
(�
Zip c
de
:; ...,.,
Time Zone
MpT
' I i
Quote #: E.s4-gL pd.,),
tn
Project/PO #: ,11E_ cp, .'BO ) js.-1C
iv
fn
Reporting state for compliance testing: G0
o
Check box if samples include NRC licensed
i 1 •1 ii 1
material?
0
rr``
•Sik
Matrix
F \ e -k t
Ft e \
SW (Surface Water) • GW (Ground Water)
t - LAr R . f�
D -7, 7
Please refer to ACZ's
bot e.\\y
• WW (Waste Water) - DW
terms & conditions located
q -(21.3 li:1)-
(Drinking Wate) SL (Sludge) SO (Soil) OL (01)
on the reverse side of this COC.
ze 4-/ /
• Othe (Specify)
/6 3 /
FRMAD050.02.11.11
White - Return with sample. Yellow - Retain for your records.
Page 17 of 17
•
•
•
MESA COUNTY
HATH DEPARTMENT
ifferkhig Together for a Heathy Controunfty
Customer
Pinnacle Water (Culligan)
1107 Hendricks Dr
Carbondale, CO 81623
Mesa County Health Depc
510 29.5 Rd, Grand Junctic
US Mail: PO Box 20,000, +
(970) 248-6999 fax (97C
http://health.mesacounty.
Sample
Invoice # 20-13 Date
Collected 1/2/2013
System Eshelman Received 1/3/2013
7378 CR 100 Matrix DrinI ing Watei
Carbondale CO Purpose Personal Info
Location Comments
Test Name Result
MPN E. coli <1.0 E. coli/ 100 mL
D14 AD LE 1�Ir
4z...
Re°sro �y
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE RECEIPT
Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District
300 Meadowood Drive • Carbondale, CO 81623
Phone - (970) 963-2491
Fax - (970) 963-0569
Received Roger & Amelia Eshelman
From:
DATE: June 13, 2013
PAYMENT METHOD
CHECK NO.
NAME OF DEVELOPMENT
Check
Pioneer Point Subdivision
QTY
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
1.00
Single Family Units
$ 730.00
$
730.00
Multi Family Units
730.00
$
-
Commercial/Industrial
730.00
$
-
Hotel/Motel
1,825.00
$
-
Total Amount Due:
$
730.00
Received By
//3 /07,3
Date
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into between Carbondale and
Rural Fire Protection District (Fire District) and Roger & Amelia
Eshelman (Developer), to become effective June 13, 2013, regardless
of the actual date of execution by the parties:
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1993, the Fire District, approved
Resolution No. 93-7, Series of 1993, providing for collection of a
base development impact fee of $200.00 per residential lot, multi-
family residential unit, or for each 10,000 square feet of
commercial or industrial buildings to be paid by all developers of
property subdivided within the district; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-2, Series of 1994, the amount of
said development impact fee was increased to $235.00 per
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or for each 10,000
square feet of commercial or industrial buildings; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 97-2, Series of 1997, the amount of
said development impact fee was increased to $339.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $339.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 99-6, Series of 1999, the amount of
said development impact fee was increased to $417.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $417.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof, or $1,042.50 for each 1,900 square feet
of hotel/motel buildings in size with an additional fee of
$1,042.50 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2004-4, Series of 2004, the amount
of said development impact fee was increased to $437.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $437.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof, or $1,092.50 for each 1,900 square feet
of hotel/motel buildings in size with an additionalfee of
$1,092.50 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2008-5, Series of 2008, the amount
of said development impact fee was increased to $730.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $730.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof, or $1,825.00 for each 1,900 square feet
of hotel/motel buildings in size with an additional fee of
-1-
$1,825.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is seeking subdivision approval for
Pioneer Point Subdivision from Garfield County, which property is
located within the Fire District boundaries and is subject to the
terms and conditions of said Resolutions; and
WHEREAS, the Fire District has requested that as a condition
of approval of such subdivision by the Pioneer Point Subdivision
that the Developer pay the Fire District a development impact fee
of $730.00 for each residential lot, multi -family residential unit,
or for each commercial or industrial building up to 1,900 square
feet in size with an additional fee of $730.00 for each additional
1,900 square feet of size or fraction thereof, or $1,825.00 for
each 1,900 square feet of hotel/motel buildings in size with an
additional fee of $1,825.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet
of size or fraction thereof on or before the date of recording the
final plat of such subdivision or such other date as the Developer
and the Fire District may agree to in writing; and
WHEREAS, there are 1 single family residential lots, 0 multi-
family residential units, or 0 commercial lots or 0 hotel/motel
lots that could be created in Pioneer Point Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement regarding the
amount, time of payment, and other matters agreed to by the
parties, and the parties wish to set forth their agreement in
writing.
For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Prior to the recording of the final subdivision plat for
Pioneer Point Subdivision, Subdivision, the Developer shall pay the
Fire District $ 730.00. This sum represents payment of a
development impact fee in the amount of $730.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family units, or commercial or industrial
building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an additional fee of
$730.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof or $1,825.00 for each 1,900 square feet of hotel/motel
buildings in size with an additional fee of $1,825.00 for each
additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction thereof; and
2. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the
contemplated development in Pioneer Point Subdivision, will cause
certain fiscal impacts on the Fire District and will create the
need for additional Fire District facilities and services. The
Developer further acknowledges that this development should share
proportionately in the cost of providing these additional
facilities and services. The Developer further acknowledges and
agrees that the development impact fee to be collected according to
-2-
the above -referenced resolutions and the terms of this agreement is
based on a rational nexus between the impact of this development
and the amount of said fees and that said fee is reasonable and
necessary to offset the additional costs that will be incurred by
the Fire District for capital improvements, facilities, equipment,
personnel, and services as a result of this development. Finally,
the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the impact fee is lawful
and valid and that the terms and conditions of said Resolutions are
binding on and enforceable against the Developer.
3. The Developer hereby irrevocably waives and releases and
agrees to indemnify the Fire District from any and all claims of
any kind that might be asserted against the Fire District arising
out of or in connection with the development impact fee, the
collection or use thereof by the Fire District, or the terms of
this agreement; provided, however, that this waiver shall not
preclude the Developer from enforcing the terms of this agreement
relating to reimbursement of excess fees as set forth more fully
below.
4. Both parties have participated in the negotiation and
drafting of this agreement, and it shall therefore be interpreted
or construed in favor or against either party by virtue thereof.
5. This agreement shall be governed by, construed, and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. The
venue for any litigation arising out of this agreement shall be the
District Court of Garfield County, Colorado. In the event of any
such litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award
of reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by the prevailing
party.
6. This agreement shall constitute the entire agreement
between the parties and any prior understanding or representation
of any kind preceding the date of this agreement shall not be
binding upon either party except to the extent incorporated in this
agreement.
7. Any modification of this agreement or additional
obligation assumed by either party in connection with this
agreement shall be binding only if evidenced in writing signed by
each party or an authorized representative of each party.
8. The failure of either party to this agreement to insist
upon the performance of any of the terms and conditions of this
agreement, or the waiver of any breach of any of the terms and
conditions of this agreement, shall not be construed as thereafter
waiving any such terms and conditions, but the same shall continue
and remain in full force and effect as if no such forbearance or
waiver had occurred.
-3-
9. The invalidity of any portion of this agreement will not
and shall not be deemed to affect the validity of any other
provision. In the event that any provision of this agreement is
held to be invalid, the parties agree that the remaining provisions
shall be deemed to be in full force and effect as if they had been
executed by both parties subsequent to the expungement of the
invalid provision.
10. This agreement shall be executed by the parties in
duplicate, each copy of which shall have the same force and effect
as an original.
11. Upon execution, this agreement shall be binding upon the
parties, their successors and assigns.
ATTEST:
CARBONDALE AND RURAL FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
By:
President
Pioneer Point Subdivision
2
By:
By:
-4-
orizecf signer)
(Authorized signer)
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into between Carbondale and
Rural Fire Protection District (Fire District) and Roger & Amelia
Eshelman (Developer), to become effective June 13, 2013, regardless
of the actual date of execution by the parties:
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1993, the Fire District, approved
Resolution No. 93-7, Series of 1993, providing for collection of a
base development impact fee of $200.00 per residential lot, multi-
family residential unit, or for each 10,000 square feet of
commercial or industrial buildings to be paid by all developers of
property subdivided within the district; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-2, Series of 1994, the amount of
said development impact fee was increased to $235.00 per
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or for each 10,000
square feet of commercial or industrial buildings; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 97-2, Series of 1997, the amount of
said development impact fee was increased to $339.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $339.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 99-6, Series of 1999, the amount of
said development impact fee was increased to $417.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $417.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof, or $1,042.50 for each 1,900 square feet
of hotel/motel buildings in size with an additional fee of
$1,042.50 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2004-4, Series of 2004, the amount
of said development impact fee was increased to $437.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $437.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof, or $1,092.50 for each 1,900 square feet
of hotel/motel buildings in size with an additional fee of
$1,092.50 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2008-5, Series of 2008, the amount
of said development impact fee was increased to $730.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family residential unit, or each commercial
or industrial building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an
additional fee of $730.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of
size or fraction thereof, or $1,825.00 for each 1,900 square feet
of hotel/motel buildings in size with an additional fee of
-1-
$1,825.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is seeking subdivision approval for
Pioneer Point Subdivision from Garfield County, which property is
located within the Fire District boundaries and is subject to the
terms and conditions of said Resolutions; and
WHEREAS, the Fire District has requested that as a condition
of approval of such subdivision by the Pioneer Point Subdivision
that the Developer pay the Fire District a development impact fee
of $730.00 for each residential lot, multi -family residential unit,
or for each commercial or industrial building up to 1,900 square
feet in size with an additional fee of $730.00 for each additional
1,900 square feet of size or fraction thereof, or $1,825.00 for
each 1,900 square feet of hotel/motel buildings in size with an
additional fee of $1,825.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet
of size or fraction thereof on or before the date of recording the
final plat of such subdivision or such other date as the Developer
and the Fire District may agree to in writing; and
WHEREAS, there are 1 single family residential lots, 0 multi-
family residential units, or 0 commercial lots or 0 hotel/motel
lots that could be created in Pioneer Point Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement regarding the
amount, time of payment, and other matters agreed to by the
parties, and the parties wish to set forth their agreement in
writing.
For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Prior to the recording of the final subdivision plat for
Pioneer Point Subdivision, Subdivision, the Developer shall pay the
Fire District $ 730.00. This sum represents payment of a
development impact fee in the amount of $730.00 for each
residential lot, multi -family units, or commercial or industrial
building up to 1,900 square feet in size with an additional fee of
$730.00 for each additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction
thereof or $1,825.00 for each 1,900 square feet of hotel/motel
buildings in size with an additional fee of $1,825.00 for each
additional 1,900 square feet of size or fraction thereof; and
2. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the
contemplated development in Pioneer Point Subdivision, will cause
certain fiscal impacts on the Fire District and will create the
need for additional Fire District facilities and services. The
Developer further acknowledges that this development should share
proportionately in the cost of providing these additional
facilities and services. The Developer further acknowledges and
agrees that the development impact fee to be collected according to
2
the above -referenced resolutions and the terms of this agreement is
based on a rational nexus between the impact of this development
and the amount of said fees and that said fee is reasonable and
necessary to offset the additional costs that will be incurred by
the Fire District for capital improvements, facilities, equipment,
personnel, and services as a result of this development. Finally,
the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the impact fee is lawful
and valid and that the terms and conditions of said Resolutions are
binding on and enforceable against the Developer.
3. The Developer hereby irrevocably waives and releases and
agrees to indemnify the Fire District from any and all claims of
any kind that might be asserted against the Fire District arising
out of or in connection with the development impact fee, the
collection or use thereof by the Fire District, or the terms of
this agreement; provided, however, that this waiver shall not
preclude the Developer from enforcing the terms of this agreement
relating to reimbursement of excess fees as set forth more fully
below.
4. Both parties have participated in the negotiation and
drafting of this agreement, and it shall therefore be interpreted
or construed in favor or against either party by virtue thereof.
5. This agreement shall be governed by, construed, and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. The
venue for any litigation arising out of this agreement shall be the
District Court of Garfield County, Colorado. In the event of any
such litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award
of reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by the prevailing
party.
6. This agreement shall constitute the entire agreement
between the parties and any prior understanding or representation
of any kind preceding the date of this agreement shall not be
binding upon either party except to the extent incorporated in this
agreement.
7. Any modification of this agreement or additional
obligation assumed by either party in connection with this
agreement shall be binding only if evidenced in writing signed by
each party or an authorized representative of each party.
8. The failure of either party to this agreement to insist
upon the performance of any of the terms and conditions of this
agreement, or the waiver of any breach of any of the terms and
conditions of this agreement, shall not be construed as thereafter
waiving any such terms and conditions, but the same shall continue
and remain in full force and effect as if no such forbearance or
waiver had occurred.
3
9. The invalidity of any portion of this agreement will not
and shall not. be deemed to affect the validity of any other
provision. In the event that any provision of this agreement is
held to be invalid, the parties agree that the remaining provisions
shall be deemed to be in full force and effect as if they had been
executed by both parties subsequent to the expungement of the
invalid provision.
10. This agreement shall be executed by the parties in
duplicate, each copy of which shall have the same force and effect
as an original.
11. Upon execution, this agreement shall be binding upon the
parties, their successors and assigns.
ATTEST:
Secretary
CARBONDALE AND RURAL FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
By:
President
Pioneer Point Subdivision
By:
By:
-4
(Authorized signer)
(Authorized signer)
July 24, 2013
Roger and Amelia Eshelman
7378 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
Dan Dennison
High Country Engineering Inc.
1517 Blake Ave. Suite 101
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
GarfieldCounty
Community Development
108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Office: 970-945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470
RE: Pioneer Point Final Plat (SFPA-7614)
Dear Roger and Dan:
This letter is in regard to your recent submittal for Final Plat approvals for the Pioneer
Point Subdivision. The site is located at 7378 County Road 100, approximately 6 miles
northeast of the Town of Carbondale and is also known by Assessor's Parcel No. 2391-
181-00-027. Your submittals have been reviewed by the Community Development
Department and County Attorney's Office and while they are thorough and well
documented the following items need to be addressed prior to approval and execution
of the Plat by the Board of County Commissioners.
1. The Final Plat document needs to be updated with the Plat Notes contained in
Exhibit "C" to the Preliminary Plat Resolution of Approval. A copy is attached for
your convenience.
2. Pursuant to the Conditions of Approval in Resolution 2013-10 the following
additional plat notes needed to be added to the plat.
"The Owners shall maintain compliance with the Division of Water Resources
Well Permit and related Water Court Decrees and any conditions contained
therein".
"Compliance with the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District
recommendations contained in their referral comments set forth in Exhibit "A" of
the Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 2013-10 recorded at Reception No. 830406."
3. The following minor edits to the Final Plat Certificates need to be completed:
a. The plat note currently labeled a:; Note #6 (shown as Note #7 on the
Preliminary Plat) which begins with "No Further Subdivision of a Recorded
Subdivision Shall be allowed....." needs to be deleted.
b. In the Certificate of Ownership and Dedication the access easement across
Lot 3 needs to be dedicated for the use of Lot 2. The fourth paragraph in that
Certificate should be amended to include the following additional dedication:
"[...] The owner(s) do hereby dedicate to and set apart the access easement as
shown on Lot 3 of the accompanying Plat to the use of Lot 2 forever, and
hereby dedicate to the Public Utilities...."
c. Also in the Certificate of Ownership and Dedication the last sentence is
missing and needs to be added at the end of the existing text. The additional
text should read as follows:
"All expenses for street paving or improvements shall be furnished by the
seller or purchaser, not by the County of Garfield"
4. Your application needs to include a copy of the Final Road Sharing Agreement
between Lots 2 and 3. This agreement will be included with other legal
documents to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
5. Your Application needs to establish that all required improvements have been
completed through an Engineer's Certification/Statement. If they have not been
completed then your Application needs to include the draft Subdivision
Improvements Agreement developed as part of the Preliminary Plat review and
the related plat note addressing limitation on conveyances until such time as all
the improvements have been completed will also need to be included on the
Final Plat. Please advise us as soon as possible as to your intentions on how
you will address this subdivision improvements issue.
The County has received a technical letter including finding of compliance with
the CDPHE Water Quality standards pursuant to the test results from AZC Labs.
Thank you for dealing with this issue and no additional water quality information
is required.
Once all the above items have been addressed please provide an updated submittal
and review copy of the Final Plat. Subsequent to final review and approval by the
County a mylar copy of the plat will be prepared for circulation for signatures. Once all
owners, surveyor, title company, County Treasurer, and related signatures have been
obtained you will present the plat to the County. At that time the County will coordinate
obtaining the Board of County Commissioner's signatures on the plat, typically handled
as a consent agenda item on the next available agenda.
Plats need to be presented to the County with all required signatures a minimum of one
week prior to the Board's meeting for which it will be scheduled. Staff will coordinate
with you and your representatives (i.e. Attorney) recording order for the plat and related
documents along with required recording fees.
Please contact this office if you have any further questions or if we can be of any
assistance.
Sincerely,
Glenn Hartmann
Senior Planner
XC: Carey Gagnon, Assistant County Attorney
1111IVIANOlinirfriiiMi 11111
Reception#: 830406
01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Rlberico
12 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Exhibit C - Plat Notes
1. Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner in compliance with
the Garfield County Weed Management Plan and the Colorado Noxious Weed Act.
2. No new open hearth solid -fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within the
subdivision. One (1) new solid -fuel burning stove as defined by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et.seq., and
the regulations promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units
will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances.
3. All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and all exterior lighting
shall be directed inward and downward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that
provisions may be made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries.
4. Colorado is a "RIGHT -TO -FARM" state pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-11, Et. Seq.
Landowners, residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sights, sounds and
smells of Garfield County's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in
a county with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. Those with an urban
sensitivity may perceive such activities, sights, sound, and smells only as inconvenience,
eyesore, noise and odor. However, state law and county policy provide that ranching, farming
and other agricultural activities and operations within Garfield County shall not be considered to
be nuisances so long as operated in conformance with the law and in a non -negligent manner.
Therefore, all must be prepared to encounter noises, odor, lights, mud, dust, smoke, chemicals,
machinery on public roads, livestock on public roads, storage and disposal of manure, and the
application by spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendment, herbicide, and
pesticides, any one or more of which may naturally occur as part of legal and non -negligent
agricultural operations.
5. All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under state law and
county regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditches, controlling
weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control, using property in accordance with zoning, and
other aspects of using and maintaining property. Residents and landowners are encouraged to
learn about these rights and responsibilities an act as good neighbors and citizens of the county.
A good introductory source for such information is "A Guide to Rural Living & Small Scale
Agriculture" put out by the Colorado State University Extension Office in Garfield County.
6. The mineral rights associated with this property may not be transferred with the surface
estate therefore allowing the potential for natural resource extraction on the property by the
mineral estate owner(s) or lessee(s).
7. Dogs kept on the property shall be in a fenced yard, kennel or on a leash to prevent
harassment of wildlife. Any outside storage of trash shall be in a bear proof container. Feeding
of wildlife shall be prohibited with the exception of songbirds. Fencing on the property shall
12
1111r� K111f��il �+L I 'r �4 f�l�lslt 1114/1111
Reception#: 830406
013 of DocPM aFee:0.00cGARFIELD COUNTY CO
comply with the Division of Wildlife specifications for wildlife -friendly fencing contained in
their 11/13/12 referral letter.
8. Engineer -designed foundations are required within this subdivision, along with
compliance with requirements for supplemental geo-technical and soils analysis and
recommendations of the Yeh and Associates Geotechnical Report (dated August 28, 2009) and
the Colorado Geological Survey Referral Comments (dated November 14, 2012) for
improvements including road construction.
9. Garfield County Traffic Impact fees shall be paid for development of Lot 1 at the time of
filing a building permit application for Lot 1.
10. Subdivision Improvement Plat Note to be prepared by the County Attorney's Office.
13