HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.00 ConditionsRiver Frontage Storage
Mike and Tami Kaimon 1/15/18
Landscaping and Screening Plan for Storage Facility
Parcel NO# 2179-091-00-041
We have a variety of 9 mature existing trees on the site along with an existing 6' privacy
fence. ( See attached plan for height and location of trees and fence.)
We plan to add on the east side 8 willow type shrubs - a hardy disease resistant and can
withstand extreme weather conditions. Tall and upright growing. Will reach 35' to 45' tall with
lateral branches from the ground. Will reach 14' to 20' in first year of growth. Life span is
estimated to be 70 years. Will make a great screen, as well as a dust and sound barrier. On the
south side we would like to plant an orchard type of screening with a variety of Fruit Trees. We
will put in 16 trees that at maturity will reach 10' to 15' tall. ( See attached plan for locations we
plan to plant.)
We feel that this plan will be an appropriate and pleasing to look at for our storage facility.
Thank you,
Mike and Tami Kaimon
• FOUND RE—BI2 ac. CAP
LS #1350:
lkaa.
)
1;%ITALL Ire BY
MINIM IMOD
36: CULVERT I
i
i :: ' : 1 i-__L.4illiolims..v.71.7
i!____J ! • — -,--_--.... ,
,.., dr .
-.)- t ,,
X \ \
• .. ,,.. ,
/-• ., •••% •,.. 1, \
Fi
,tA
4,
tz, itx ._ -..,.. ..,, ' . .
1 '.. -S* - •••.„.. ,• --- 6' 'C..IRITY
k s
-.A.
••e• -:•••...,
\'" \
• ‘... -G I
C I •
.—'-....----1 1 3O -7
i. . , . , t'',PI .., j„.....-713.. ..___:‘ FLOODPLAIN
. .51_..4 .• • BOUNDARY
:43: --it 1:........iSES1 NOTE 3
4.--"--- 25.5' X $I.2' •
•
, •
IODEN 9 -IM 13.3' 21 4' —
WELL O(SE
2;91
(40_1
1.014?
1?-) V.'1
ONE STORY
WOOD F
<1' 4
SITE & GRADING PLAN
MIN. 50* RAC.
CONSTRUCT 20'
*IDE DRIVE
6
10
278_3'
EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED
& REPLACED ALONG PROPERTY
UNE SECURITY FENCE 2.5
g.m55110
013
/
LA)11101A)
.3
1 zt
36)
,042e),
11E04
—ro+M?
PROPCSEC GRAVEL
RV AND BOAT SIDRA:3E
AC.
FOUND 'MT. CCR
—LS 4CLEDGABLE
1•1111M AMINE, AMEND
•
.R196110.'4 •„„f.)1TC14X /-
2 'I* te;
F RI VE. 5BAKK
- )0, /1 /5 fu i'
5.002 ACRES
4-1
IN, 4 s
COLORADO RIVER
WM/ 4•1101,
1
1
(„ •
_ feet(
- Us\ CrAl
— 54-i cc) 1 tic9
4 r -c 3 Cc+P„.-1
—
f Ea5-11--)
• i I1 „,” -
11 CV) I I )1-4:
1
1 tj
,-thS
/
lel
,...=.,:_ -.' c' '-1; ''' ' — - '
1-)
•
, t
• 1--•,.F"f•'.;'- .•
4 t.i) lt
6
Glenn Hartmann
From: mike kalmon <wsparkinglotservices@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 4:55 PM
To: Glenn Hartmann
Subject: Kalmon Storage letter of how we will take care of extra top soil from storage project
Parcel NO# 2179-091-00-041
We will not store top soil on our property from our storage project after completion of the storage project.
This should not be a problem, The area was used as storage by previous owner and he had it graveled.
Thank you,
Mike and Tami Kalmon
1
Glenn Hartmann
From: mike kalmon <wsparkinglotservices@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 2:16 PM
To: Glenn Hartmann
Subject: Irrigation plan for River Front Storage
Attachments: storage irrigation plan.pdf
Hi,Glenn,
Here is our plan for the irrigation.
Thanks,
Tami
"1.7'.7114
FOUND RE-aztR & CAP
LS #1350:
AMOII -i;'k •
/
BY ,"
3E' CULVERT i
SITE & GRADING PLAN
WIN. 50 RAC.
EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED
& REPLACED ALONG PRCPERTY
U E W/ SECURITY FENCE
- CONSTRUCT 20.
AIDE DRIVE
10
i t6T - ,--.:6 •... `N.
55- 4', Y I •,.. -s. - • --,
-
-1, \ la
.„.Z ''-3
k ---": ‘ .... C ''• 'Tz
..' * .r! i s-19, ''• lc'
is- ONE STORY ---1 }...4. \ - - -n
7
—.1\
t.,.
WOOD FRAMEr-A-r••Z._—_—.—L__-11 \ 1, .i.•
I • 1 -1, V;
I 5: lisa.' I I ‘ c•
278. 3
PROPCSEC GRAVEL
RV AND DAT STORAGE
±1.7.A AC.
I; 51 OOCPLAIN
- • 2.1;: - - BOUNDARY
-717-----11' 3°- 7. ----,-----L.-;:::..----.J.---- SEE NOT' 5
434.-._,,,c4D:r-K--. Or5E---ro1
' -----/-7'.---/-
6 f
."•—•• 25_5 x 3/.2'
, - l• s
1 WOODEN 9 -IM 13.3' X 21 4' --2
L/
_ aL HptsE f
FOUND ..NIT. COR
-LS #ILLEDGABLE
IMMINO 01111 ONNIINO
•
ONNIII• III/1/Mr
5.002 ACRES
'C'JRITY
FENCE
1 e
tH
: 1 7
F VER :BA
FdNK
. t
COLORADO RpiER
=IOW MINIM
1
1
1 rvic-ft.i.oi ch
y v)kr c)ca'
(A •oid
E6s1 5.1(1 - rivid
(A) I
(.4 d • •I -I {in
C)ct !Myr
- • :
-axxi-h 5i ‘c 0A7
ill( —I- )':-(11'S
Th
4
cyA,4
oot
Uric - S4cois
fit
Glenn Hartmann
From: Jared Walter <JWalter@za-engineering.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:54 PM
To: Glenn Hartmann
Cc: Mike Kalmon; Jim Kalmon
Subject: Kalmon RV Park and Boat Storage
Attachments: Kalmon_Drainage_Plan.pdf; Kalmon_Drainage_Report.pdf; Kalmon_Rd.pdf
Hello Glen,
Please find the attached materials related to the subject proposed development, LIPA-02-17-8519.
Thanks you,
Jared Walter, P.E.
Office: 970.945.5700 I Direct: 970.456.4723 I Fax: 970.945.1253 I Cell: 970.618.0605
JWalter(a�za-engineerinq.com
Zancanella & Associates Inc. 1 Engineering Consultants
1011 Grand Avenue 1 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential, privileged or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
1
DRAINAGE PLAN
FOR
KALMON RV PARK AND BOAT STORAGE
FACILITY
Prepared For:
Garfield County Community Development Department
P.O. Box 1908
1011 Grand Avenue
Glenwood Springs,
CO 81602
Prepared By:
t" Z4NC4M LL4 anp 4sso04re5. enc.
EnatEEmnc ConsuLT4MTS
Jared Walter, P.E.
November 1, 2017
(970) 945-5700
(970) 945-1253 Fax
Kalmon RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Introduction 1
Drainage Basins 1
Hydrology 1
Drainage Plan 2
List of Figures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
List of Tables
Table 1 Summary of Peak Flows.
List of Attachments
Appendix A — NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Precipitation Depths
Appendix B - WinTR-55 Runoff Calculations
Appendix C - USDA NRCS Soil Survey Report
Drainage Plan (3 Sheets)
.2
z:\2017 jobs\17616 kalmon\kalmon_drainage.doc\\11/1/17
Kalmon RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Introduction
The subject parcel is located along the northern bank of the Colorado River south of Silt
as shown in Figure 1 (attached). The parcel address is 32956 River Frontage Road,
Silt, Colorado and the Garfield County Parcel No. is 2179-091-00-041. The parcel is
five acres in size and the portion within the parcel proposed for development is one
acre. The proposed development will construct a 20 foot wide entrance drive, perimeter
security fence and, gravel cover to accommodate RV and Boat storage.
The site is comprised of flat to gently sloping topography draining to the Colorado River.
Existing site drainage patterns do not influence off site areas and the proposed
development will not alter these patterns. A slight increase in runoff from storm events
will occur with the change of cover associated with the gravel. However, these
increases will be mitigated with simple BMPs at the site.
Drainage Basins
There are no major basins other than the Colorado River influencing the one acre
portion of the site proposed for development. The Colorado River is located adjacent to
the subject parcel. The area of proposed development is outside of the 100 -year
floodplain boundary. The relatively flat topography at the site and in the vicinity does
not contribute enough runoff to define drainage paths in the area and most runoff
eventually infiltrates into the ground.
Hydrology
The hydrologic methods for estimating runoff in this study are as outlined in the United
States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service publication
"Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds" Technical Release 55 (TR -FF). Peak flows
will be rainfall derived due to the elevation of the site. Therefore, the storm drainage
system will be more than adequate to handle spring snowmelt runoff, as it typically has
much lower peaks, even though of longer duration. Pre and post development
conditions were considered. Precipitation amounts were gathered from NOAA Atlas 14,
Volume 8, Version 2 and are included as Appendix A. Runoff calculations were
performed using WinTR-55 Versions 1.0010 and are included in Appendix B.
The hydrologic soil characteristics were based on information gathered from the USDA
NRCS Web Soil Survey website. The soil report indicated soils at the site to be of
Hydrologic Soil Group was "A". The soil report is attached as Appendix C. Runoff
curve numbers and time of concentration for the pre and post development conditions
were developed in accordance with TR -55 methodology. A summary of peak pre and
post runoff rates is provided as Table 1.
ENS411.1.4 4t500411.%
z:\2017 jobs \17616 kalmon\kalmon_drainage.doc
1
Kalmon RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Increase In Runoff
Table 1
Summary of Peak Flows
(All values presented in cfs)
1 -yr 2 -yr 5-ry 10 -yr 25 -yr 50 -yr 100 -yr
0.09 0.19 0.30 0.36 0.43
The runoff estimates presented in Table 1 suggest no increase, or negligible increase
associated with 1 -yr to 5 -yr 24-hour storms. Larger storms will result in larger
increases. However, the increase in runoff from even the 100 -year storm estimated to
be 0.43 cfs can be mitigated with a basic berm/ditch surrounding the perimeter of the
proposed development.
Drainage Plan
Detention is not proposed for this development because the site location and drainage
patterns do not pose a risk to on site or offsite features. In addition, the low, diffuse
flows combined with relatively flat topography would make routing of flow to detention
areas difficult and the construction of channels and ponds would disturb more area and
cause more erosion than warranted by any benefit gained.
The proposed drainage plan is attached. Notable features include an 18 -inch diameter,
36 foot long culvert and perimeter drainage channel, both sized to accommodate the
increase in runoff estimated to occur as a result of the proposed development. The
installation of gravel is an appropriate BMP for erosion control and will also promote
more natural infiltration during precipitation events as opposed to other hardscape
alternatives.
7' s..«..I...o 411.1, 14
z:\2017 jobs\1 7616 kalmon\kalmon_drainage.doc 2
Z:\2017 Jobs \17616 Kalmon\Kalmon_Vicinity.mxd
Legend
[II Kalmon Parcel
nGRNOE
q�
•
r77-
1,000 2,000'• 4,000;e
Feet?
1 inch = 2,000 feet
5397r-._ /*-•
o, TCF
SAN
1• 2Q
• 5°.
y
}mr�.• + - c..
l'?,;:.) s7C5:pyLilh2'O 2013' National Geogi-aphie�Society..i=cube
Vicinity Map
DATE: DRAWN BY
Nov. 1, 2017 JAW
CHKD BY:
TPB
APPD BY:
AWZ
CLIENT:
KALMON
ZANCANELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
POST OFFFICE BOX 1908 - 1011 GRAND AVENUE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700
FIGURE No:
1
PROJECT: 1
7616
APPENDIX A
NOAA ATLAS 14, VOLUME 8, VERSION 2 PRECIPITATION DEPTHS
PO. Boa MO
16110 clA
CaleoWOOQ 6PN^B•,
CO 61602
Urua+aw a+o 4srociares. WIC.
Enonmanc COMUt WIT
,670946.6766
OM) 94,1263 F.
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Page 1 of 4
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2
Location name: Silt, Colorado, USA*
Latitude: 39.5428', Longitude: -107.6646°
Elevation: 5404.66 ft**
• source: ESRI Maps
" source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale
Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular 1 PF graphical 1 Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
Duration
1
2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000
5 -min
0.115
(0.090-0.146)
0.147
(0.115-0.186)
0.202
(0.157-0.257)
0.251
(0.195-0.322)
0.325
(0.245-0.441)
0.386
(0.284-0.531)
0.451
(0.320-0.638)
0.520
(0.353-0.761)
0.618
(0.403-0.934)
0.697
(0.441-1.07)
10 -min
0.169
(0.132-0.214)
0.215
(0.168-0.272)
0.295
(0.231-0.376)
0.368
(0.285-0.471)
0.476
(0.359-0.645)
0.565
(0.415-0.777)
0.660
(0.468-0.935)
0.762
(0.517-1.12)
0.905
(0.590-1.37)
1.02
(0.646-1.56)
15 -min
0.206
(0.161-0.261)
0.262
(0.205-0.332)
0.360
(0.281-0.459)
0.449
(0.348-0.575)
0.580
(0.438-0.787)
0.689
(0.506-0.947)
0.805
(0.571-1.14)
0.929
(0.631-1.36)
1.10
(0.720-1.67)
1.24
(0.787-1.90)
30 -min
0.263
(0.206-0.334)
0.342
(0.268-0.434)
0.477
(0.372-0.607)
0.594
(0.461-0.762)
0.765
(0.576-1.03)
0.903
(0.662-1.24)
1.05
(0.741-1.48)
1.20
(0.813-1.75)
1.41
(0.918-2.13)
1.58
(0.997-2.41)
60 -min
0.341
(0.268-0.433)
0.427
(0.334-0.542)
0.573
(0.447-0.730)
0.701
(0.544-0.898)
0.886
(0.667-1.19)
1.04
(0.760-1.42)
1.19
(0.845-1.68)
1.36
(0.922-1.98)
1.59
(1.03-2.40)
1.77
(1.12-2.71)
2 -hr
0.419
(0.332-0.527)
0.511
(0.404-0.644)
0.669
(0.527-0.845)
0.807
(0.632-1.02)
1.01
(0.765-1.34)
1.17
(0.867-1.58)
1.34
(0.958-1.87)
1.52
(1.04-2.19)
1.77
(1.16-2.63)
1.97
(1.26-2.96)
3 -hr
0.487
(0.387-0.609)
0.572
(0.454-0.716)
0.721
(0.571-0.906)
0.853
(0.671-1.08)
1.05
(0.801-1.39)
1.21
(0.899-1.62)
1.38
(0.989-1.90)
1.55
(1.07-2.22)
1.81
(1.20-2.66)
2.01
(1.29-3.00)
6 -hr
0.606
(0.485-0.750)
0.698
(0.559-0.866)
0.867
(0.684-1.07)
0.995
(0.789-1.24)
1.19
(0.919-1.56)
1.36
(1.02-1.79)
1.62
(1.10-2.07)
1.70
(1.18-2.38)
1.94
(1.30-2.81)
2.13
(1.39-3.13)
12 -hr
0.740
(0.598-0.909)
0.855
(0.690-1.05)
1.05
(0.844-1.29)
1.21
(0.971-1.50)
1.45
(1.12-1.87)
1.64
(1.24-2.14)
1.83
(1.34-2.46)
2.03
(1.43-2.81)
2.31
(1.56-3.29)
2.52
(1.66-3.65)
24 -hr
0.889
(0.725-1.08)
1.02
(0.834-1.25)
1.26
(1.02-1.53)
1.46
(1.17-1.78)
1.73
(1.35-2.20)
1.96
(1.49-2.52)
2.19
(1.62-2.90)
2.43
(1.72-3.31)
2.76
(1.88-3.87)
3.02
(2.00-4.30)
2 -day
1.04
(0.855-1.25)
1.19
(0.978-1.44)
1.45
(1.18-1.75)
1.67
(1.36-2.03)
1.99
(1.57-2.50)
2.24
(1.73-2.87)
2.51
(1.87-3.29)
2.79
(2.00-3.75)
3.17
(2.19-4.39)
3.48
(2.33-4.88)
3 -day
1.12
(0.924-1.34)
1.29
(1.07-1.55)
1.58
(1.30-1.91)
1.83
(1.50-2.22)
2.19
(1.74-2.73)
2.47
(1.91-3.12)
2.75
(2.07-3.57)
3.05
(2.20-4.07)
3.46
(2.40-4.74)
3.78
(2.55-5.24)
4 -day
1.19
(0.984-1.42)
1.38
(1.14-1.64)
1.69
(1.40-2.03)
1.96
(1.61-2.36)
2.33
(1.86-2.90)
2.63
(2.04-3.31)
2.92
(2.20-3.77)
3.23
(2.34-4.28)
3.65
(2.54-4.96)
3.97
(2.69-5.48)
7 -day
1.39
(1.16-1.65)
1.59
(1.33-1.88)
1.91
(1.59-2.28)
2.19
(1.81-2.62)
2.58
(2.07-3.17)
2.88
(2.26-3.59)
3.19
(2.42-4.06)
3.50
(2.56-4.58)
3.93
(2.76-5.27)
4.26
(2.92-5.80)
10 -day
1.57
(1.32-1.86)
1.77
(1.49-2.09)
2.10
(1.76-2.49)
2.38
(1.98-2.83)
2.77
(2.23-3.38)
3.07
(2.42-3.80)
3.38
(2.58-4.28)
3.70
(2.72-4.81)
4.14
(2.92-5.50)
4.47
(3.08-6.03)
20 -day
2.06
(1.75-2.41)
2.29
(1.94-2.68)
2.66
(2.25-3.12)
2.97
(2.50-3.50)
3.40
(2.77-4.10)
3.74
(2.98-4.56)
4.07
(3.14-5.07)
4.41
(3.27-5.63)
4.86
(3.47-6.35)
5.20
(3.63-6.90)
30 -day
2.46
(2.10-2.86)
2.73
(2.33-3.17)
3.17
(2.69-3.69)
3.53
(2.98-4.12)
4.01
(3.28-4.80)
4.39
(3.51-5.30)
4.75
(3.68-5.86)
5.12
(3.81-6.46)
5.60
(4.02-7.23)
5.95
(4.17-7.81)
45 -day
2.95
(2.53-3.41)
3.30
(2.82-3.81)
3.84
(3.28-4.45)
4.28
(3.63-4.97)
4.86
(3.99-5.75)
5.29
(4.25-6.34)
5.71
(4.45-6.98)
6.12
(4.58-7.64)
6.64
(4.79-8.48)
7.01
(4.95-9.12)
60 -day
3.38
(2.90-3.88)
3.79
(3.26-4.36)
4.44
(3.80-5.12)
4.95
(4.22-5.73)
5.63
(4.63-6.62)
6.12
(4.94-7.29)
6.59
(5.15-8.00)
7.04
(5.29-8.73)
7.60
(5.51-9.63)
8.00
(5.67-10.3)
1 Precipitation frequency PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates
(for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds
are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=39.5428&lon=-107.6646&d... 10/26/2017
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Precipitation depth (in)
Precipitation depth (in)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
c
vi
PF graphical
PDS -based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves
Latitude: 39-5428°, Longitude: -107.6646°
4
3
2
c c
E E
o
c
E
L L
Duration
? o m
13 vv
r r
01 3 m o o.3
v v a 1:3 vvp
8
5 10 25 50 100 200
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2
Average recurrence interval (years)
500 1000
Created (GMT): Thu Oct 26 19:29.33 2017
Back to Top
Page 2 of 4
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
— 1
2
— 5
— 10
— 25
— 50
— 100
— 200
— 500
— 1000
Duration
5 -min
— 10-mn
15 -min
— 30 -inn
— 60 -min
— 2-11r
— 3 -hr
— 6 -hr
— 12 -hr
— 24 -hr
2 -day
3 -day
4 -day
7 -day
10 -day
20 -day
30 -day
45 -day
60 -day
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds jrintpage.html?lat=39.5428&lon=-107.6646&d... 10/26/2017
Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page 3 of 4
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
C
v '4 LILY
rs
Etas
.,NL
JR7
Silt
—
imin • mi.
1
3km
g • r; 401** 40
Large scale terrain
tY r
4 -dreg
Longs Peak
434m.»
Bouh
Grand Junction
400km
Ait,pp.--dp
jOrni
Elbert
" 439'9 m
WE 5T ELK
MOUNTAIN
Large scale map
-Eo
:4
orac
Fc
tta key, a!
rr
si
100km
60mi
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.htm1?lat=39.5428&lon---107.66468zd... 10/26/2017
Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page 4 of 4
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: HDSC.Questionst noaa.aov
Disclaimer
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds printpage.html?tat=39.5428&lon=-107.6646&d... 10/26/2017
APPENDIX B
WINTR-55 RUNOFF CALCULATIONS
PO Box 1006
1011 G a A
GlAnwoo<1 9f.IM1,
CO 91902
ZANC44 .L4 4f 4ssocwiss, r.
Enicanevar4G Consixuwa
(910)644-6700
(8,0) 416-1263 74
JAW
Kalmon
RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
Storm Data
Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period
2 -Yr 5 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr 50 -Yr 100 -Yr 1 -Yr
(in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in)
1.02
1.25 1.45
1.73 1.95
Storm Data Source: User -provided custom storm data
Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II
Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard>
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10
2.19 .89
Page 1 11/1/2017 9:37:57 AM
JAW
Kalmon
RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
Watershed Peak Table
Sub -Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period
or Reach 2 -Yr 5 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr 50 -Yr 100 -Yr 1 -Yr
Identifier (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
SUBAREAS
Pre .00 .00 .00 0.07 0.16 0.28 .00
Post
REACHES
OUTLET
.00 0.09 0.19 0.37 0.52 0.71 .00
.00 0.09 0.19 0.42 0.67 0.98 .00
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10
Page 1 11/1/2017 9:37:57 AM
JAW
Kalmon
RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table
Sub -Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period
or Reach 2 -Yr 5 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr 50 -Yr 100 -Yr 1 -Yr
Identifier (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
(hr) (hr) (hr) (hr) (hr) (hr) (hr)
SUBAREAS
Pre .00 .00 .00 0.07 0.16 0.28 .00
n/a n/a n/a 12.05 12.04 12.03 n/a
Post
REACHES
OUTLET
.00 0.09 0.19 0.37 0.52 0.71 .00
n/a 12.03 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.95 n/a
.00 0.09 0.19 0.42 0.67 0.98 .00
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10
Page 1 11/1/2017 9:37:57 AM
JAW
Kalmon
RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
Sub -Area Time of Concentration Details
Sub -Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel
Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time
(ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)
Pre
SHEET
SHALLOW
20 0.0150 0.150
267 0.0150 0.050
0.090
0.038
Time of Concentration .128
Post
SHEET 100 0.0150 0.011 0.040
SHALLOW 187 0.0150 0.050 0.026
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10
Time of Concentration 0.1
Page 1 11/1/2017 9:37:57 AM
JAW
Sub -Area
Identifier
Kalmon
RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Garfield County, Colorado
Sub -Area Land Use and Curve Number Details
Land Use
Hydrologic Sub -Area Curve
Soil Area Number
Group (ac)
Pre
Pasture, grassland or range (poor) A 1 68
Total Area / Weighted Curve Number
Post Gravel (w/ right-of-way)
Total Area / Weighted Curve Number
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10
A
1 68
1 76
1 76
Page 1 11/1/2017 9:37:57 AM
APPENDIX C
USDA NRCS SOIL SURVEY REPORT
PD. Sox lao
101 G
Sido
on od Sp1ng
co RISCO
r^<\
ZANC4N13.44 410 4SSOCld1ES. IMC.
EtIMEHLMG [MU/UNITS
(WO) 53 F
(OM) .5-126.1253 FFA
USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
\RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Rifle Area, Colorado,
Parts of Garfield and
Mesa Counties
Kalmon RV Park and Boat
Storage Facility
October 25, 2017
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 12
Map Unit Descriptions 12
Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties 14
40—Kim loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes 14
65—Torrifluvents, nearly level 14
73—Water 16
Soil Information for All Uses 17
Soil Properties and Qualities 17
Soil Qualities and Features 17
Hydrologic Soil Group 17
References 23
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
39° 32' 36" N
39° 32' 31" N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
3
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
270890 271010 271030 271050 271070 271000 271110 271130 271150 271170 271190 271210
N
Map Scale: 1:1,090 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
0 15 30 60 90
Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: t1TM Zone 13N WGS84
9
3
6
39° 32' 36" N
39° 32' 31" N
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
ry Soil Map Unit Lines
■ Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
V Blowout
Borrow Pit
j( Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
• Landfill
Lava Flow
iib Marsh or swamp
,t Mine or Quarry
• Miscellaneous Water
O Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
• Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
• Sodic Spot
•
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
▪ Rails
,M Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
10
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and
Mesa Counties
Survey Area Data: Version 9, Sep 22, 2015
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 11, 2011—Mar 2,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
12
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
40
Kim loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes
3.3
65.5%
65
Torrifluvents, nearly level
0.1
2.4%
73
Water
1.6
32.1%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.0
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties
40—Kim loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: jny7
Elevation: 5,000 to 6,000 feet
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Kim and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kim
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans, benches
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Linear, convex
Parent material: Alluvium derived from sandstone and shale
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 17 inches: loam
H2 - 17 to 60 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 3 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.60 to 6.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: Rolling Loam (R048AY298C0)
Hydric soil rating: No
65—Torrifluvents, nearly level
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: jnz3
Elevation: 5,000 to 7,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 15 inches
14
Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 48 degrees F
Frost -free period: 90 to 120 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Torrifluvents and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Torrifluvents
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, rivers, distributaries
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 36 inches: loam
H2 - 36 to 60 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: Occasional
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent
Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent
Salinity, maximum in profile: Very slightly saline to moderately saline (2.0 to 8.0
mmhos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Wann
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Fluvaquents
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Marshes
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
73—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
16
Soil Information for All Uses
Soil Properties and Qualities
The Soil Properties and Qualities section includes various soil properties and
qualities displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in
the selected area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated
by aggregating the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This
aggregation process is defined for each property or quality.
Soil Qualities and Features
Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly
measured, but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil
properties. Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil
features are attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features
include slope and depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the
use and management of the soil.
Hydrologic Soil Group
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
17
Custom Soil Resource Report
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at
or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
18
39° 32' 36" N
39° 32' 31" N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map—Hydrologic Soil Group
s
F8;
271010
271110
271150
N`X B[M l..rm l cMYY(Y(l� I I rrji k5
I I I I 1
271010 271030 271010 271070 271080
Meters
0 15 30 60 90
Feet
0 50 100 200 3W
Map projedion: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84
Map Scale: 1:1,090 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
19
271110
271153
271170
271190
39° 32' 31" N
271210
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
A
ND
0 B
0 B/D
0 C
0 C/D
0 D
Q Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
A
. r A/D
•— ▪ B
B/D
• c
<„r C/D
••••r
. • Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
• A
O A/D
■ B
▪ B/D
o C
® C/D
• D
▪ Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
4--14 Rails
,.fir Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
20
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and
Mesa Counties
Survey Area Data: Version 9, Sep 22, 2015
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 11, 2011—Mar 2,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
Table—Hydrologic Soil Group
Rating Options—Hydrologic Soil Group
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
22
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
40
Kim loam, 3 to 6 percent
slopes
A
3.3
65.5%
65
Torrifluvents, nearly level
C
0.1
2.4%
73
Water
1.6
32.1%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.0
100.0%
Rating Options—Hydrologic Soil Group
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
22
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb 1043084
23
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=n res142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_052290.pdf
24
PO Bd. Igroa
G11 Grand Pp.,*
0...wood Springs.
COSMO,
DRAINAGE PLAN
(3 SHEETS)
Z4t4411111i,4 4t10 45SIXI4TES. pm'
Enortararic CONSULI4t4 TS
WO) 94,4700
Isro) 84,1x. For
P.O. Box 1908
1011 Grand Avenue
Glenwood Springs,
CO 81602
Z4NC4NELL4 4N0 /,ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEEPING CONSULTANTS
November 1, 2017
Glenn Hartmann
108 80h Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Kalmon RV Park and Boat Storage Facility
Mr. Hartmann:
(970) 945-5700
(970) 945-1253 Fax
I have reviewed the proposed road design for the subject development. Upon my review,
it is my opinion that the proposed road and right of way is sufficient for the intended use
and meets the County's criteria for Roadway Standards as set forth in Table 7-107 of the
Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) for the category
Primitive/Driveway.
Sincerely,
Zancanella and Assocjat-s, Inc.
Attachments
Zancanella & Associates, Inc.
November 1, 2017
Page 1
z:12017 jobs\17616 kalmon\kalmon_rd.docx
Z: \25000\25304 Reserve at Elk Meadows\dwg\Diversion_Dam.dwg
v.
5400
4
t<...
-�:-/CSTtc
RIVERS`-`
SITE LOCATION
PARCEL No. 2179-091-00-041
ter.
VICINITY MAP
\RP SW
a_, c I1L Ir �Y
/`<\
Z4nC4nEt.L4 4n0 01S50c11.4tEY, WIC.
EN®nEEntnc Consm nrs
I hereby declare that these plans for the Project were prepared under my
direct supervision.
RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER:
SHEET INDEX:
Colo. PE No. 44506
COVER SHEET & VICINITY MAP 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
DRAINAGE PLAN 3
Z&A Project No. 17616
SHEET: 1 OF 3
Z: \25000\25304 Reserve at Elk Meadows\dwg\Diversion.am.dwg
ONE—STORY
FRAME
25.5' X 37.2'
WOODEN SHED
x r—
sN
x
EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED &
REPLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINE W/
SECURITY FENCE
100—YR FLOODPLAIN
NN,4
EX. IRRIGATN DITCH
WASTE WAY 'sN
•707//
i
LEGEND
BOUNDARY
x x x FENCE
DITCH
MAJOR CONTOUR
MINOR CONTOUR
13.3' X 21.4'
WELL HOUSE
COLORADO RIVER
PLAN VIEW - EXISTING CONDITIONS
1"=60'
REV. DATE REVISION
N0.
0 10/26/17 DRAINAGE PLAN PER COUNTY
MADE CHKD APPD
BY BY BY
JAW TPB TAZ
EXISTING CONDITIONS KALMON
ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A7ES, /NC.
ENG/NEER/NG CONSULTANTS
SCALE: DATE SHEET:
1" = 60' OCT. 25, 2017 2 OF 3
DRAWN BY: CHKD BY: APPD BY: DRAWING:
JAW AWZ AWZ See Left Border
POST OFFICE BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81802 (970) 945-5700
FIGURE NO.
PROJECT: 17616
Z:\25000\25304 Reserve at Elk Meadows\dwg\Diversionj)am.dwg
MIN. 50' RAD.
INSTALL 18"gs by
36' CULVEr
i
+ , `,,
\ / T--,
\CONSTRUCT 20'
WIDE DRIVE
N
X
s17
PROPOSED GRAVEL
RV AND BOAT STO
±1.01 AC.
X
EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED &
REPLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINE W/
SECURITY FENCE
x
`s
x X X =X --X
CONSTRUCT
6' SECURITY FENCE
\ 100—YR FLOODPLAIN
ss
EX. IRRIGATI6•1 DITCH
WASTE WAY
i
25.5' X 37.2'
WOODEN SHED
LEGEND
x x x
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE
CHANNEL
(SEE DETAIL)
p
13.3' X 21.4'
WELL HOUSE
BOUNDARY
FENCE
DITCH
MAJOR CONTOUR
MINOR CONTOUR
COLORADO RIVER
—► SURFACE DRAINAGE GRADIENT
PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL
PLAN VIEW - DRAINAGE PLAN
1" = 60'
24" MIN.
11 8" MIN.
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
NOT TO SCALE
REV. DATE REVISION
N0.
0 10/26/17 DRAINAGE PLAN PER COUNTY
MADE CHKD APPD
BY BY BY
JAW TPB TAZ
DRAINAGE PLAN
SCALE: DATE
1 = 60' OCT. 26, 2017
SHEET:
3 OF 3
DRAWN BY: CHKD BY: APPD BY:
JAW AWZ AWZ
DRAWING:
See Left Border
KALMON
ZANCANELLA AND ASSOLYATES, /NC.
ENG/NEER/NO CONSUL TANTS
POST OFFICE BOX 190E — 1005 COOPER AVENUE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700
FIGURE NO.
PROJECT: 17616
Glenn Hartmann
From: mike kalmon <wsparkinglotservices@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 4:55 PM
To: Glenn Hartmann
Subject: Kalmon Storage letter of how we will take care of extra top soil from storage project
Parcel NO# 2179-091-00-041
We will not store top soil on our property from our storage project after completion of the storage project.
This should not be a problem, The area was used as storage by previous owner and he had it graveled.
Thank you,
Mike and Tami Kalmon
1