HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceQ Reply lP{ ReplyÂll ft, Forward
h,lan &?5/2S19 I1:33 ÅH
Dave Argo
Building Ht. Solutions - Permit #BLRE-0I-19-5623
To'fÕresb¡Èt¡s@yðhot,ccm'
Forest:
Thanks for sending over these 2 options for redesign of rosfs to comply with Garfield Countly's 2$foot height limitation. Please let me
know which of these is your preference, and provide us wth updated plans illustrating that revÍsed desþn meets the height
rëqu¡rements.
Approval of your bu;iding permit will be conditioned upon you providíng us with a Surveyo/s lmprovement Certif¡cete that demonstrates
compliance of the as-built roofs with this 2Ffoot building heþht limit, More specifically, this language will read as follows:
CONDITION OF PERMIT:
AN EIEVATION SURVET SEALEÛ BY A COLORAÐO PROFESSIONAL LICENs:Ð
SURVEYOR, IS REQUÊREÐ AT FRAME INSPECTION TT VERIFY THAT AS-BU¡LT ROOFS
COMPLY W¡TH GARF¡EID CTUNTY's 2}FOOT BUILСNG HEIGHT LIMËT AS ÛEFINE'}
¡N THE LANÐ USE ÐEVELOFMENT COÐE.
We suggest that when you have your Surveyor come out to stake the foundation that they also shoot existing natural grade elevations at
the corners of the buiiding footprint so that they can use this as the basis for the impravement survey they witl need to provide to our
Building lnspector pr¡or to completion of framing.
please update/amend your permÍt ptan set with the approprlate drawíng rev¡s¡ons and once $te receÍve updated drawings we should be
able to finalize our review and issue a building permit for your project rather quickly.
Thanks for your asssistance -
Ðay€Argo
Pl¡ns Ex¿miner
l@ø*ueuu:
Com muniry Derrelspmem Depdrtment
I08 8jà Strs€t, Suite 4OI
6tenwood Springs, C0 81601
Tpt: 970-945-8272 Ext. t 610
Em a¡ t : dsrgp.g gd rf¡ E l *tÐunty.com
W e E g:a tfr r t d< nírûr. corn
DECOR/\TIVE €.AB¿LE PETAI L&Æt12'=l'gMATIS RESIOENCÉ1G CREEKSIDE OR.RtFLE, CO 8160THESE PÉNSARE NOTFOR USE ONANY OTHEFOR LOCAÍIONTM VA\+ASSOCIATIPjÍ,tr@Ð51EP5TOéæEt*Pr.GRâÍêì€/!Éot{t-Y,sfitt{€LEsbII\)È0zIoù_tts0ÀIC)Az=ofá'¿óRt€RBOARD c|TP.)tndFA6óIA CYPJor9t{[{6t_E9tsrùIIùU0u0(Trp)9{[{6LE5tsIÞr0IAIoAz?oô6reBR¡¿KETfiYP)IônnÉ. A TÆERED ¿¿LJMN ONtÒtxtÒt cflPtæ.w 9-lia18VÊI{ÈER TO 3ó' ASøVE FFL'2'1TAECN ÎtP)FRONT ELEVATIONætv4-l'4'LAllI¿ECn?J
uÉrr()t<t\t tYE (gt\ÞLE vEl l\lL%Ætln'=l'4'onflTM VAVRA+ ASSOCTATES, P.C.tx4 PT.IÂTTICEoJùgLÀzNivAIoôz?oôø3f{t{éLEgts0T0Jù:f!ozooof'jFtDIoIoÀz=o:irtro otlJI{FAS¿IA fffPJl2+{lN€t_Èg(t-lP)9r.{tt¡€t_E6r<bFoI:HıEIRA¿KET@)Iå' 3d. TAFEREP ¿4-t'MN ONtô'xl6' ôw PIER w 9fot€\ÆI{EER TO 3ó' AEOVE FFL'2. 5TolË. Oñ i'tP)FRONT ELEVATIONPT.l'þæ3TEP9 TOéRÆETTPJ
LI\ VLLUTf\TorLFCEÕô\D EEDRFSTRICTEDADtrA/1t \ L/-1\\A\.ì\D,/lIIE20' EXtFTtN G WATERSYSTE\,I U TlLl TYn,n, ,L t¡t ^ \'-o-\o(^vls,ÉáLv GTNTRY\\\\tKLN/É2_\n n ./n ¡lr.ztiirL \-/ BLDC tNV.TIt P CIN T(L7e)\\\LOTr-t¡N)10+,620r+RECEIVEÐFEB 2 5 201$*...,'-? "+01 Ac.(GARFIELD COUNTYCOi,lMUNITY DEVELOPMEI{Ti¡a'ìì(lJ-lcr-)CÐ(')-)BUILDINGTNV[LOPt(ì/\ìrN)\155N 87'o'28718 o?lr\EO
Dave Argo
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dave Argo
Wednesday, February 20,2019 9:53 AM
'forestmatis@yahoo.com'
Matis Residence - Permit #BLRE-01-19-5623
Matis Bldg Ht Problem.pdf; Bldg Ht Calculation.pdf
Forest
We have reviewed plans submitted for a new single-family residence as referenced above, but there is an issue that
must be addressed before we can finalize our plan review & issue a building permit. Based on our review of submitted
plans, building height exceeds the 25-foot height limit by approximately 4'-3" (total height =29'-3"1. Please refer to the
attached redline drawing of the front elevation which illustrates this problem.
Per Garfield County's Land Use & Development Code, building height is defined as follows: "The distance, measured
vertically, from the average undisturbed or natural ground grade horizontal plane of a structure footprint to the top of a
flat roof or mansard roof or to the mid-point between the eave line and the peak of a gable, hip, shed, or similar pitched
toof ."
ln order to resolve this problem we will require the following information to be submitted to our office:
L. Revised Exterior Elevations & Roof Plan - Provide a design solution that complies with the "Rural" zone
district's 25-foot height limitation and in accordance with the above definition of building height.
2. Topoeraphic Survev of Buildins Site - Prepared by a Colorado Professional Licensed Surveyor and including
calculation of "average natural grade" below the building footprint. For additional information please reference
"Building Height Definition and Calculation Procedure" as attached.
ln addition to these corrections, we also understand that we are still awaiting the following:
3. Drivewav Permit (or exemption letter)from Garfield County's Road & Bridge Dept.
4. Engineered Septic Svstem design report as per Creek Side Estates plat note requirements.
Please submit this requested information at your earliest opportunity, and thank you for your assistance and prompt
attention to this matter.
Dave Argo
Plans Examiner
Gurfield Coanty
Community Development Department
708 8th Street, Suite 407
Glenwood Springs, CO 87601
Tel: 970-945-8272 Ext. 1610
Ema il : d a rgo @ go rfi eld-cou nty, com
Web : g a rfield-cou nty. com
1
\\\
J(
5
ñáCALÊ' l/2' - l'-O'
}LE I)ETAIL
5H]N6LE5
F
(Dï
oñz
sHIN6LE5
txb(P)
\
cf\
-¡
N $*
I
{s
ñ
-l ^il¿ -L)
ÕORNER
(TYP.)
o
_t
I
amûx
4
ON
6 CYU l"STONE
36
T
f FFL4
(TYP.)froví Åc
BRICK
to
2
L
ER
FRONT ELEVATION
;Ëgrrsfr
ËFËË[n[
O|.n\o
t-,{
ooc
O
trlJ
tr.il=l
ú nv)FriÈon<ZrrìF
rÐ 7i rÊâHR
#Hq
THESE PLANS ARE NOT LICENSED
PRE.EN
HAVE
AT
OR LOCATION.
+
RdOF
N:3s
À
+
.s
-t
ñ\\r
EERING FOR IN$PECTOR
INEERED RF TRUS$E
IME OF FRAME INSPECTION
'-4u
ftobt¿ølllWlvt¡".-:
DECK DÊTAIL,
\
l*
s
a$
f-
-tv
_t-
N
MtÞ-PflN
.THI5 gHEET
*
-[
!È
T
lc'
N'
(P )
2XIO P.T. LEDêERj FASTEN
10 P.T. BAND K.I/ I/2' LAO
SCR:E'{5.@ l4'O.C.¿I
v(wà
N^fuvt\qhu+ 1.2
v
âwvtr4t/s ro?o
tû Þ¿fttntt'tc Ar4
4tr,út @ ptropw
5'TAOEERÊD