The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondenceDave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 9:48 AM To: Brad Larson (brad.LDA@comcast.net) Cc: 'Mike Thele' Subject: Warnecke Residence - Permit #BLRE-03-18-5122 Brad: I am currently reviewing plans for Curt Warnecke's new residence located at 68 Midland Point Road in Carbondale. But before we can finalize our plan review & issue a building permit, we need for you to provide us with the following items: A. Reference Building Codes — Garfield County's currently adopted building codes for S.F. residences include 2015 IRC and 2009 IECC. Please confirm that design meets the 2015 IRC (not 2009 IRC as noted on Sheet A000). Note: Structural Drawings include correct reference code. B. Soils Report — Please provide our office with a digital copy of the soils report as referenced on the Structural Drawings/Specs. C. Floor Elevation Datum Reference — Please provide us with an actual elevation height above sea level for the 100'-0" main floor elevation. Thank you for your assistance with these items. Dave Argo Plans Examiner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any files transmitted along with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by email and delete it from your files. 1 Dave Argo From: Curt Warnecke <curt@gfwoods.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 11:13 AM To: Dave Argo Cc: brad.lda@comcast.net Subject: Midland Point Lot 12 Attachments: LOT M-12 4-3-18 TOPO.PDF; MP SOILS TEST.pdf Hi Dave, Attached is a revised topo relative to sea level for my house location. For some reason, the original topo produced last October had erroneous elevation. Hired gun did a GPS correction yesterday. Based on the placement of my house on the lot, main floor elevation of 100'-0" is equal to 6101.6 (20" above consistent existing grade). Also attached is my soils report produced by HP Geotech. Brad will respond to item A on your message from Monday as soon as he can. Hopefully this will allow you to continue review of my permit application. Please let me know if there are any other outstanding issues. I appreciate your immediate attention to this. Thank you! Curt Curt Warnecke 1 Superintendent F. WOODS CONSTRUCTION general contracting + construction management 430 E. Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 C. 970.379.6758 O. 970.544.1833 www.gfwoods.com 1 �( / '\ !_ c2 0 / / , f TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 70.0' , LOT M-12, MIDLAND POINT SUBDIVISION ,300' 25.0 c� ,0\.? N \ \ \ ib f3 6 ?.1 10,0' RECEIVED APR 0 4 2018 GARFIELD COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M®tih Piacr = 1Le abov4 wtt/roto L, v�. NA-4\ra I Grev c f oe). o 4 tih Lag( Rot- &o I o1 ( ,w 4/416 gat•ti ( fiem h of ) T 0 5 10 eo lo' BASIS OF BEARING = A BEARING OF N60°58'43"E BETWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND CAP LOCATED AT THE N.W. PROPERTY CORNER AND A NO. 5 REBAR LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY PROP UNE AS A 45.0' WC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT M-12 ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JANUARY 18, 2000 AS RECEPTION NUMBER 558144 COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO Legend O INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED Notes NO TITLE INSURANCE POLICY WAS FURNISHED FOR THIS SURVEY PLAT. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RIGHTS OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING,CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE "I, STEVEN A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE AS LAID OUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS PLAT WAS MADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON NOVEMBER 10, 2017, THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REAL PROPERTY ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. 038-51-102(9). " 33646 STEVEN A. YELTON PLS 33645 �} I wu .a*C lwqr DATE: 4-3-18 ; AL WO •r NOTICE; ACCuldln5 Lu CalSTado low you must Commence any lu9Al action based upon any dven suivoy nl=�Ypn ae0. 04140. Inoemayany actio51004oany de[Crlrf. AO,U[n this eurv6y btemmenemcl more Own len years from 180 dale of the cortIEcoUen shown !lemon HIRED GUN SURVEYING P.O. BOX 1336 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 (970)964-6105 DATE SURVEYED: 9-20-17 DATE DRAFTED: 10-6-2017 DATE UPDATED: 4-3-18 DATA FILE NAME: 1709137 DRAWN BY: SY Dave Argo From: Curt Warnecke <curt@gfwoods.com> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 3:34 PM To: Dave Argo Cc: brad.Ida@comcast,net Subject: Permit BLRE 03 18 5122 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Dave, Thanks for doing my plan check for my building permit. There are a couple of your reference notes that need clarification. A) Regarding the mechanical slab in the crawlspace, your ref note #58 states "All habitable rooms shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 68 degrees...". Why is this area considered a "habitable room" when most of the area is open to the crawlspace and used for mechanical purposes only? Egress is not required. Does the entire 200 sq ft slab area need to be enclosed, drywalled and heated? B) My intention is to only enclose and drywall the area with the gas-fired furnace and water heater. I understand that I will need to apply "fire protection" on the inner surface of the ICF foundation walls. However, I did not think I needed to fire -protect the underside of all flooring, outside of the enclosed mechanical equipment area. Could you please help define this? C) Also number #7 states the requirement of crawlspace access. There is clearly a compliant stairwell leading down onto the mechanical slab from the garage. Doesn't this qualify? These issues are inter -related somewhat, but I could use more definition before I complete the crawlspace finishes. I appreciate your help. Thanks! Curt Warnecke 1 Superintendent G.F. -31 WOjipS CONSTRUCTIO general contracting + construction management 430 E. Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 C. 970.379.6758 0. 970.544.1833 www.gfwoods.com 1 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 5:18 PM To: 'Curl Warnecke' Subject: RE: Permit BLRE 03 18 5122 Curt: Thanks for your email & sorry it's taken me a few days to get back to you with clarifications. Please review my responses in red text below. Should you need further clarification on these or other items related to our plan review comments, you can either send me another email, or it may be easier to discuss some items in the field with our Building Inspector as he begins making inspections of your project. Dave Argo Plans Examiner C\.. Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any files transmitted along with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by email and delete it from your files. From: Curt Warnecke [mailto:curt@gfwoods.com] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 3:34 PM To: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Cc: brad.lda@comcast.net Subject: Permit BLRE 03 18 5122 Hi Dave, Thanks for doing my plan check for my building permit. There are a couple of your reference notes that need clarification. A) Regarding the mechanical slab in the crawlspace, your ref note #58 states "All habitable rooms shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 68 degrees...". Why is this area considered a "habitable room" when most of the area is open to the crawlspace and used for mechanical purposes only? Egress is not required. Does the entire 200 sq ft slab area need to be enclosed, drywalled and heated? The intent of this note is not to heat the mechanical room itself, but to insure that the mechanical system is sized properly to provide enough heat for all habitable portions of the building. B) My intention is to only enclose and drywall the area with the gas-fired furnace and water heater. I understand that I will need to apply "fire protection" on the inner surface of the ICF foundation walls. However, I did not think I needed to fire -protect the underside of all flooring, outside of the enclosed mechanical equipment area. Could you please help define this? According to IRC, Section R302.13 wood -framed floor assemblies with Hoists are to be protected on the underside of joists with %2" drywall (see attachment with description of this code requirement). However, you should visit with your building inspector — probably Matt Provost — because I believe that in some cases where mechanical rooms are located in the crawl space, they have allowed homeowners to install a one-hour wall and floor assembly 1 surrounding the mechanical room itself and leaving the remainder of the crawl space unprotected as described above. • Please leave Matt a message on the Inspection Line phone number you were provided when you picked up your building permit and he will call you back to discuss further. C) Also number #7 states the requirement of crawlspace access. There is clearly a compliant stairwell leading down onto the mechanical slab from the garage. Doesn't this qualify? All portions of the crawl space need to have access provided to them. Please verify that all areas are accessible. These issues are inter -related somewhat, but I could use more definition before I complete the crawlspace finishes. I appreciate your help. Thanks! Curt Warnecke 1 Superintendent general contracting + construction management 430 E. Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 C. 970.379.6758 0. 970.544.1833 www.gfwoods.com 2 BUILDING PLANNING -.JOISTS DRAFTSTOPPING SUSPENDED CEILING SECTION A -A JOISTS Figure 302.12(1) DRAFTSTOPPING OF CEILING SUSPENDED UNDER FLOOR FRAMING TRUSSES Figure 302.12(2) DRAFTSTOPPING OF TRUSS -TYPE FLOOR FRAMING R302.13 Fire protection of floors. Floor assemblies that are not required elsewhere in this code to be fire -resistance rated, shall be provided with a `12 -inch (12.7 min) gypsum wall- board membrane, 218 -inch (16 nun) wood structural panel membrane, or equivalent on the underside of the floor fram- ing member. Penetrations or openings for ducts, vents, elec- trical outlets, lighting, devices, luminaires, wires, speakers, (Iniinage, piping and similar openings or penetrations shall be permitted. Exceptions: 1. Floor assemblies located directly over a space pro- tected by an automatic sprinkler system in accor- dance with Section P2904, NFPA 13D, or other approved equivalent sprinkler system. 2. Floor assemblies located directly over a crawl space not intended for storage or fuel -fired appliances. 3. Portions of floor assemblies shall be permitted to be unprotected where complying with the following: 3.1. The aggregate area of the unprotected portions does not exceed 80 square feet (7.4 m2) per story 3.2. Fireblocking in accordance with Section R302.11.1 is installed along the perimeter of the unprotected portion to separate the unprotected 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE® COMMENTARY 3-63 BUILDING PLANNING portion from the remainder of the floor assem- bly. 4. Wood floor assemblies using dimension lumber or structural composite lumber equal to or greater than 2 -inch by 10 -inch (50.8 mm by 254 mm) nominal dimension, or other approved floor assemblies dem- onstrating equivalent fire performance. 4. During a fire unprotected floor assemblies of light- weight construction have a short time gap between untenable conditions and the structural collapse of the floor assembly. Section R302.1.3 requires protection to floors of light -weight construction that will provide the occupants additional time for self -evacuation and safety for fire fighters performing search and rescue. This section requires all floor assemblies, not fire rated, to be protected on the underside with 1/2 -inch gypsum board, s/einch wood structural panels or equivalent. This will apply mainly to floor assemblies located over nonsprinklered areas such as unfinished basements and crawl spaces for storage or containing fuel -fired appliances. There are four exceptions pro- vided that specify where the protection is not required. Exception 1 permits floor assemblies above any space protected by an automatic sprinkler system to be exempt from the application of the protective mem- brane to the underside of the floor -framing members. Section R313 requires an automatic residential fire sprinkler system (ARFSS) for new construction and the floor assemblies at each story will have the space below protected; therefore, Section R302.1.3 is not required. For crawl spaces used for storage or contain- ing fuel -fired appliances and alterations or additions to existing buildings that are not provided with an ARFSS, existing buildings that are not provided with an AFRSS, this exception will permit deletion of the protective membrane if the space is protected by an AFRSS in accordance with Section P2904, NFPA 13 D or other approved methods. Exception 2 exempts floor assemblies over crawl spaces, unless the crawl space contains fuel -fired appliances or is intended for storage. However, Excep- tion 1 may be used for crawl spaces intended for stor- age or containing fuel -fired appliances. Exception 3 prescribes an allowable area where the protective membrane may be omitted. Exception 4 permits floor framing of sawn lumber or structural composite lumber equal to or greater than 2 x 10 nominal dimension to be exempt from the appli- cation of the protective membrane to the underside of the floor -framing members. The basis for this excep- tion is that tests conducted of floor framing constructed of 2 x 10 lumber and loaded to 50 percent of full design Toad showed that the assemblies provided adequate time for occupants to self -evacuate and safety for fire fighters performing search and reuse. R302.14 Combustible insulation clearance. Combustible insulation shall be separated not less than 3 inches (76 mm) from recessed luminaires, fan motors and other heat -produc- ing devices. Exception: Where heat -producing devices are listed for lesser clearances, combustible insulation complying with the listing requirements shall be separated in accordance with the conditions stipulated in the listing. Recessed luminaires installed in the building thermal envelope shall meet the requirements of Section N1102.4.5 of this code. • The minimum clearance required between combusti- ble insulation and light fixtures, fan motors, etc., mini- mizes the chance of accidental ignition of the insulation. If a heat -producing device is listed for less than the minimum clearance specified in this section and all conditions of the listing are satisfied, the reduced clearance would apply. SECTION R303 LIGHT, VENTILATION AND HEATING R303.1 Habitable rooms. Habitable rooms shall have an aggregate glazing area of not less than 8 percent of the floor area of such rooms. Natural ventilation shall be through win- dows, skylights, doors, louvers or other approved openings to the outdoor air. Such openings shall be provided with ready access or shall otherwise be readily controllable by the build- ing occupants. The openable area to the outdoors shall be not less than 4 percent of the floor area being ventilated. Exceptions: 1. The glazed areas need not be openable where the opening is not required by Section R310 and a whole -house mechanical ventilation system is installed in accordance with Section M1507. 2. The glazed areas need not be installed in rooms where Exception 1 is satisfied and artificial Light is provided that is capable of producing an average illumination of 6 footcandles (65 lux) over the area of the room at a height of 30 inches (762 mm) above the floor level. 3. Use of sunroom and patio covers, as defined in Sec- tion R202, shall be permitted for natural ventilation if in excess of 40 percent of the exterior sunroom walls are open, or are enclosed only by insect screening. + All habitable rooms are to be constructed with an aggregate glazing area of not Tess than 8 percent of the floor area. The code does not require the glazed area to be openable. This section also provides the stan- dard of natural ventilation for all habitable rooms. Openings to the outdoor air, such as doors, windows and louvers, provide natural ventilation. The openable area must be not less than 4 percent of the floor area being ventilated. This section does not, however, state 3-64 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE' COMMENTARY Dave Argo From: Curt Warnecke <curt@gfwoods.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 11:06 AM To: Dave Argo Cc: Curl Warnecke Subject: Warnecke foundation alternate detail - Permit# BLRE-03-18-5122 Attachments: Warnecke foundation alternate.pdf Hi Dave, Hope you're doing well. I had originally submitted my structural plans for permit reflecting a standard formed foundation because I could not find a local contractor with experience using preferred ICF foam block forms. However afterward, I did discover a contractor from Gypsum that installs ICF frequently. So I am now using ICF forms and have a stamped engineered set of plans. It is virtually the same 6" concrete walls and same footing size & rebar schedule. I can resubmit structurals if necessary. Attached is a foundation detail that shows a condition where final grade is above foundation wall, but is against 6" masonry rock veneer. My engineer says this is acceptable if I place waterproofing behind the masonry. Could you please take a moment to weigh in on this? I am close to ordering the ICF block package and this affects the order. Thank you! Curt Warnecke 1 Superintendent general contracting + construction management 430 E. Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 C. 970.379.6758 O. 970.544.1833 www.gfwoods.com 1 60"R`� 7i(ocK veoee,2 (itv\,06,50,--)A4) 4-, T. WALL SEE PLAN 0T. FTG. SEE PLAN FDN.DRAIN PER ARGH'L zz/ZCONT. 2X TREATED PLATE W/ 1/2" DIA. ANCH. BOLTS ® 48" OG TYPICAL CONT W.P. LINER A5 REQ'D T. PLY SEE PLAN FLOOR FRAMING, SEE PLAN IGF FDN WALL, SEE PLAN #4 VERT @ 16" OC - *4 HORIZ @ IS" OC *4 DOWEL X If' ® I6 OG 6" 2- #5 CONT @ FTG. ////.`'(( SEE PLAN ALTERNATE DETAIL for STONE SUPPORT - 3/4" = 1"-0" WARNECKE RESIDENCE LOT M-12 Midland Point Road Garfield County, CO 4/25/201E5 MIKE THELE, PE Structural Engineering Services, Inc. 0296 Seven Oaks Road Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 963-3181 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 4:24 PM To: 'Curt Warnecke' Subject: RE: Warnecke foundation alternate detail - Permit# BLRE-03-18-5122 Curt: Since your Structural Engineer is approving and assuming liability for this detail, the Building Dept. will accept it. However, we need to have a wet seal/stamp submitted on this detail for our records/file. Placement of wood frame construction below finish grade is not the ideal scenario, as long-term durability of the structure is dependent and if you can lower finish grade below the wood floor framing that typically is a better detail. We also have concerns about the detail as shown, including verification of frost depth and waterproofing of the ICF foundation. Since you have revised from conventional cast in place concrete to ICFs, you will need to submit amended foundation plans to our office for review/approval. Please provide (2) full-size copies of any affected drawing sheets and/or supplemental drawings to our office. Review time on amended plans is usually between 3 — 5 business days. I will be out of the office the remainder of this week, but back on Monday. Thanks for contacting us about these changes. Dave Argo Plans Examiner C. Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any files transmitted along with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by email and delete it from your files. From: Curt Warnecke [mailto:curt@gfwoods.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 11:06 AM To: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Cc: Curt Warnecke <curt@gfwoods.com> Subject: Warnecke foundation alternate detail - Permit# BLRE-03-18-5122 Hi Dave, Hope you're doing well. I had originally submitted my structural plans for permit reflecting a standard formed foundation because I could not find a local contractor with experience using preferred ICF foam block forms. However afterward, I did discover a contractor from Gypsum that installs ICF frequently. So I am now using ICF forms and have a stamped engineered set of plans. It is virtually the same 6" concrete walls and same footing size & rebar schedule. I can resubmit structurals if necessary. 1 Attached is a foundation detail that shows a condition where final grade is above foundation wall, but is against 6" masonry rock veneer. My engineer says this is acceptable if I place waterproofing behind the masonry. Could you please take a moment to weigh in on this? I am close to ordering the ICF block package and this affects the order. Thank you! Curt Warnecke 1 Superintendent WOODS CONSTRUCTION general contracting + construction management 430 E. Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 C. 970.379.6758 0. 970.544.1833 www.gfwoods.com 2 Dave Argo From: Curt Warnecke <curt@gfwoods.com> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 7:46 AM To: Dave Argo Subject: RE: Warnecke foundation alternate detail - Permit# BLRE-03-18-5122 Dave, I appreciate you considering my option for the foundation change, and your suggested concerns. Even tho as a builder I feel comfortable with the 6" of framing below grade detail, I am considering your concern. I will be stopping by today to re -submit structurals. Thanks much! Curt Warnecke 1 Superintendent general contracting + construction management 430 E. Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 C. 970.379.6758 0. 970.544.1833 www.gfwoods.com From: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 4:24 PM To: Curt Warnecke <curt@gfwoods.com> Subject: RE: Warnecke foundation alternate detail - Permit# BLRE-03-18-5122 Curt: Since your Structural Engineer is approving and assuming liability for this detail, the Building Dept. will accept it. However, we need to have a wet seal/stamp submitted on this detail for our records/file. Placement of wood frame construction below finish grade is not the ideal scenario, as long-term durability of the structure is dependent and if you can lower finish grade below the wood floor framing that typically is a better detail. We also have concerns about the detail as shown, including verification of frost depth and waterproofing of the ICF foundation. Since you have revised from conventional cast in place concrete to ICFs, you will need to submit amended foundation plans to our office for review/approval. Please provide (2) full-size copies of any affected drawing sheets and/or supplemental drawings to our office. Review time on amended plans is usually between 3 — 5 business days. I will be out of the office the remainder of this week, but back on Monday. Thanks for contacting us about these changes. Dave Argo Plans Examiner 1 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 8:10 AM To: 'Curt Warnecke' Cc: Lindsay Krol; Tracy Pihl Subject: RE: Stolen permit/plans Curt: I have copied Lindsay & Tracy at our front desk with this reply, and they can help facilitate the best method of getting you digital copies of your approved plans & a new permit card so that you can have one of the local print shops provide you with a copy to replenish the missing information at the job site. [ Building Permit #BLRE-03-18-5122 ] Dave Argo Plans Examiner E. Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any files transmitted along with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by email and delete it from your files. From: Curt Warnecke [mailto:curt@gfwoods.com] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 10:59 AM To: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Cc: Curt Warnecke <curt@gfwoods.com> Subject: Stolen permit/plans Hi Dave, It looks as if my permit site plans and permit card have been stolen from my jobsite. The container has been cleaned out sometime between wall steel inspection and Saturday 6/9. This is most unusual and I have never heard of this happening in my 35 years of construction. What do I need to do to have the permit set from the building department copied and a new permit card issued? Obviously, they will stay with me until I can secure them on site, or deliver them for an upcoming inspection. I will call the building dept 1st thing Monday. I just thought I should notify someone as soon as I discovered this. Thanks Curt Warnecke Superintendent 1