The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCabin Permit FileOP �� rncednity Development Department % pJ X018 8th Street, Suite 401 \ 4pC' tia�Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 OC-�•;1A• (970) 945-8212 Go�tk www,�;arfieid•county.com t SCA Garfield County TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ❑ Commercial/Multi-Family _ ❑ Manufactured Home (Single or Multi -Level) Ei Residential (5F. Duplex or ivwnhorne) INVOLVED PARTIES BUILDING PERM APPLICATION' Re,u:c Property Owner: /14.14064-• syll1iet144/+ 7 Phone: Mailing Address: 7J/5 Comet / X a 4071 J/2 111;g4,— Email /f;wEmail Address: 1401/'f/jyel' f 1 e7 joist/. Cate/ Contractor: AZomPOw."tE://4rnae , i,' Phone:�_� Mailing Address: Email Address: Architect: ..goene _ Phone: i ) Mailing Address: . Email Address: Engineer: L 4/2104 /0/70 ,e6k9A Pttone: (77') 98* o32 ' Mailing Address: 823 L ,d r%`e Email Address: Manufactured Home Installer: /V4 Phone: ( Mailing Address. Email Address: PROJECT DETAILS �f �J / Describe Work: NC t.44 Gv4.3��itC/'/ t�! ��'7et/'GpTr�q � Cl�+6ir1 Ga�+9rflP,16-,/ 4I, 2o/f i., "-4 .0,004/.0,004/l' /0/e " w ' /I ikG° / G9Ar'ftelJ/ pienR'y Job Address: 7.5/...-CC•.4 /12 44.,.. .94Y,p2 PeSelvfe Assessor's Parcel Number: 2/e3.322 aoopi/ Sub. Lot — Block Owner's Valuation of Work: &SD,' 84,‘" Property Size (Sq. Ft. or Acres): _ 2 92 _ Sq. Ft. of Building: 2"4-O Height: 22M # of Floors: Class of Work: El New El Alteration 0 Addition ❑ Repair ❑ Move/Relocation Garage: (Attached ❑ Detached PROJECT DETAILS CONTINUED Septi Type of Heat: Driveway Permit: vris ElNatural Gas Exempt 0 Community ® Propane n Electric Other ❑ Permit #: NOTICE Authority. This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Division. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (1) State Electrical Permit, (2) County OWTS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if :In work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and it work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Division accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Division. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, OWTS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulatton(s)). 1 acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Division to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. 1 further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: (1) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Division do not constitute an arrnmanre of respnnsihility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, engineer and/ or builder. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and understand the Notice and Certlflcatlon above, as well as, have proiIded the required information whirls is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. A". Property Owner Print and Sign Date OFFICIAL USE ONLY Special Conditions: 15,4 5lc_ lottidvift list 0 COK014111,149 Plan Check Fee: irmit Fee: 4.0,1 4 geir.75 A`ugstel)d 1414.73:1) Total Fees: :i 451143 1.7°1 63 'x r R=25) 9=10 bo Manu home Fee: Fees Paid: gN2 •fid Balance Due: toq • 26? OCC Group: 1 MC -. BP No: BU2. -05 Const Type: G Ravi trri l; stufh d i cifric4) Misc Fee DINTS No: % ‘-114 BUILDING / PLANNING DIVISION : 44449M - Zoning: n W2111,16 Gcrrfiwlri Counyy Buildin / Zonin Plan Review Checklist Permit Number: Building 26-63-1Q- 5115 P( .(,1/ 9. P. PGS 14444 CL Engineered Foundation Driveway Permit X Surveyed Site Plan Septic Permit and Setbacks t Grade/ Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List Subdivision Plat Notes Fire Department Review Valuation Determination/ Fees Red Line Plans/ Stamps/ Sticker Attach Conditions WA N/A Application Signed Plan Reviewer to Sign Application Parcel/ Schedule No. N/A 40# Snowload Letter— Manu. Homes Soils Report FoetA too, ch Pac = ` 416Co.(9944 t*tric+ 00 Planning/ Zoning Property Line Setbacks WA 30 ft. Stream Setbacks N�A Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -Off Road Impact Fees Grade/ Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat General Comments: IVtaisn 1-w t ujoprur (Aix( ?of�� PCgk v cc Cv& l *au, Covw. P Nalfon AT% x 4374- ko x neo- av 110 x 41‘g.00 5243 40, I10 =Q6q)aao. 'Jego. (AA -L -€A /.2t/2) CONDITIONS OF PERMIT B LR E-03-18-5115 Matthew & Sylvia Ringer Conversion of "Recreational Cabin" to S.F. Residence 7315 County Road 312, New Castle 1. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (I.R.C.), 2009 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE (I.E.C.C.)AND MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. 2. IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS CONTAINED IN THE ATTACHED "GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS". NUMBERED REFERENCES AS NOTED ON PLANS REFER TO SPECIFIC ITEMS ON THIS LIST. 3. THE EXISTING AND PREVIOUSLY UN -PERMITTED "RECREATIONAL CABIN" STRUCTURE IS APPROVED FOR USE AS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, BUT THIS STRUCTURE MAY NOT BE USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. ANY SUBSEQUENT CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BUILDING PERMITS AND/OR LAND USE CHANGE PERMITS. THE OWNER'S USE OF THIS STRUCTURE MUST COMPLY WITH "RURAL" ZONE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS PER GARFIELD COUNTY'S LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. THE ADJACENT "AGRICULTURAL BARN" AND ITS PROPOSED USE AS AN "EVENT CENTER" OR OTHER NON-AGRICULTURAL USES IS SPECIFICALLY NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS BUILDING PERMIT, AND IT REQUIRES A SEPARATE LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT PRIOR TO ANY SUCH USAGE. 5. PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM LIMITED TO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING USE ONLY (SEE SEPTIC PERMIT # SEPT -05-17-4708). 6. PROVIDE ENGINEER'S REPORT VERIFYING STRUCTURAL FITNESS OF FOOTIINGS AND FOUNDATION PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION & CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 7. REFER TO ATTACHED STRUCTURAL FRAME ASSESSMENT REPORT FROM ANDERSON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. (DATED JUNE 13, 2018) ATTESTING TO THE STRUCTURAL FITNESS AND BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE OF AS -BUILT WOOD FRAMING. 8. VERIFY INSTALLATION OF THERMAL BARRIER AT INSIDE FACE OF I.C.F. FOUNDATION WITHIN CRAWL SPACE PER I.R.C., SECTION R316.4 9. ELECTRICAL PERMITTING AND INSPECTIONS BY COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD. ELECTRICAL FINAL APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL INSPECTION & CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. R 7-5-2o/8 CONDITIONS OF PERMIT BLRE-03-18-5115 Matthew & Sylvia Ringer Conversion of "Recreational Cabin" to S.F. Residence 7315 County Road 312, New Castle 1. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (I.R.C.), 2009 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE (I.E.C.C.)AND MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. 2. IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS CONTAINED IN THE ATTACHED "GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS". NUMBERED REFERENCES AS NOTED ON PLANS REFER TO SPECIFIC ITEMS ON THIS LIST. 3. THE EXISTING AND PREVIOUSLY UN -PERMITTED "RECREATIONAL CABIN" STRUCTURE IS APPROVED FOR USE AS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, BUT THIS STRUCTURE MAY NOT BE USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. ANY SUBSEQUENT CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BUILDING PERMITS AND/OR LAND USE CHANGE PERMITS. THE OWNER'S USE OF THIS STRUCTURE MUST COMPLY WITH "RURAL" ZONE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS PER GARFIELD COUNTY'S LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM LIMITED TO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING AND ACCESSORY AG BARN USE ONLY (SEE SEPTIC PERMIT # SEPT -05-17-4708). 5. PROVIDE ENGINEER'S REPORT VERIFYING STRUCTURAL FITNESS OF FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATION PRIOR TO FINAL INSPFCTIQN RI CFRTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 6. REFER TO ATTACHED STRUCTURAL FRAME ASSESSMENT REPORT FROM ANDERSON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. (DATED JUNE 13, 2018) ATTESTING TO THE STRUCTURAL FITNESS AND BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE OF AS -BUILT WOOD FRAMING. 7. VERIFY INSTALLATION OF THERMAL BARRIER AT INSIDE FACE OF I.C.F. FOUNDATION WITHIN CRAWL SPACE PER I.R.C., SECTION R316.4 8. ELECTRICAL PERMITTING AND INSPECTIONS BY COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD. ELECTRICAL FINAL APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL INSPECTION & CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Dave Arg o From: Dave Argo Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 5:10 PM To: 'Matthew Ringer' Cc: Andy Schwaller (aschwaller@garfield-county.com) Subject: Ringer Cabin - Permit #BLRE-03-18-5115 Attachments: Existing Structure Permit.pdf; GarCo Bldg Reqts-2016.pdf; GarCo Plan Attachments.pdf; Ringer Plan Redlines.pdf Matthew: We have reviewed the plans & other information you have submitted for a building permit at the "recreational cabin" which you would like to convert into your primary residence at 7315 County Road 312. Unfortunately, we cannot issue a building permit for this residence until we receive a letter from an Engineer or Design Professional certifying that this building complies with Garfield County's Building Requirements — including structural, insulation and plumbing, etc. — items which are all now concealed from view and cannot be verified by our Building Inspectors. As a result, we must rely on a report issued by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer or Architect to certify that your building meets our minimum requirements. Please refer to the attached one-page description of "Obtaining a Building Permit for an Existing Structure" for more information. For your edification, I have also attached a copy of Garfield County's Building Requirements, as well as the redlines on your floor plans with numerical references to the attached "Residential Plan Review List". Between these documents and the items redlined on your plans, you can get a good idea about the items your Engineer and/or Architect should address in their report. From a Structural Engineering perspective, the report should address compliance with the Engineered plans you have submitted to our office by Anderson Structural Engineering. Since we do not review photographs for the purpose of providing "ex post facto" building inspections, you are welcome to come pick up from our office the pictures you submitted along with your plans. These would perhaps be more suitable for you to present to an Engineer or Architect who can then provide us with the certification report as described above. Also please note that our review & pending issuance of a building permit for this application only centers on the recreational cabin and its conversion into your primary residence. Any forthcoming approval for this project in no way should be interpreted as approval of either a Land Use Change Permit or Building Permit for the existing barn structure. Until we receive the follow-up documentation described above we will place your project file in our "pending permits" file. Thank you for your assistance in completing your application. Dave Argo Plans Examiner C. Garfield Count/ Community Development Department 108 80 Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 1 Garfield County BUILDING DEPARTMENT 108 Eighth Street, Suite 40!, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Te!: (970) 945-8212 Obtaining a Building Permit for an Existing Structure Because an existing building's structural and architectural elements were not inspected during the initial construction, the following steps are required to obtain a building permit and subsequent Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the structure already built, or otherwise for an existing structure being moved into Garfield County from another location: 1) Depending on the type and use of the building, a specific permit packet (application and checklist) must be obtained from the building department. Please call the building department to determine which packet applies. Building permit application packets are also available online by visiting: https://www. garfield-co unty. com/community-development/building-permit-applications. aspx 2) A Colorado licensed design professional (Architect or Engineer) must perform a site visit and inspection to verify the structure meets the requirements for structural and non-structural provisions of the adopted codes. As part of the building permit application process, the design professional must certify with a sealed letter that the building meets adopted codes. This letter must accompany the building permit application. Depending on the complexity of the structure, building plans may also need to be drawn and submitted with the application. 3) Upon approval of the application, a permit will be issued and the final permit fees will be collected. Typically there are one or two inspections performed by the county to finalize the process and issue a CO if applicable. 4) Additional permits for septic, electrical or driveways may be required and must be submitted and finalized prior to issuance of a CO if applicable. Please contact the Community Development department with any questions or concerns. Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 11:10 AM To: 'Matthew Ringer' Cc: Andy Schwaller; Sylvia Ringer; Glenn Hartmann Subject: RE: Ringer Cabin - Permit #BLRE-03-18-5115 Matthew: It's good to hear that your Structural Engineer was present during construction to view structural elements of the cabin as it was being built. That should make it easier for them to certify that it complies with Garfield County's minimum building requirements. The purpose of taking photos during construction is to provide a record of construction progress for a consulting Professional Engineer hired directly by you so that they can view key structural & plumbing elements of that become concealed during the construction process. Our office can only review & inspect work as it's being completed, which is why it's best to pull a building permit before construction begins. After looking at your building permit application for the barn, I know that we are still awaiting Structural Engineering certification of this existing steel building before we can go any further in issuing an "after the fact" building permit. The barn is still being held in our "pending projects" file and I believe that Andy Schwaller contacted you recently about whether or not you wanted to have us continue to hold the file or close it out. I have also asked Glenn Hartmann to reach out to you for a status update and to assist you with any pending land use change issues on your property. Dave Argo Plans Examiner C!\, 1 . Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com CONFJDNT!ALITYNOTICE: This email communication and any files transmitted along with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by email and delete it from your files. From: Matthew Ringer [mailto:mmringer2l@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 4:54 PM To: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Cc: Andy Schwaller <aschwaller@garfield-county.com>; Sylvia Ringer <sringer21@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Ringer Cabin - Permit #BLRE-03-18-5115 Dave, I will get my engineer to certify the building was built with Garfield County Building requirements. Landon Anderson (my engineer) conducted a site visit during the construction phase when all structural components were visible. I will also pass on the photos to him for further review if needed. The only reason 1 submitted photos with my application to your office is because I was specifically told about a year ago at a meeting with you present to "take lots of photos" concerning the "ex post facto" cabin topic. I guess 1 mis-understood what 1 that meant? Did policy change on this? Nevertheless, I can provide my engineer with whatever he needs to complete his report. Also, I am well aware that the permitting of the cabin as a primary residence has no bearing on the permitting or land use change for the agricultural barn that is also on the property. I have been waiting for many weeks for a pre -conference summary or follow up meeting concerning that topic from the community development office. 1 have taken steps to meet several of the requirements for permitting of the barn such as meeting with the Fire Marshall (Orrin Moon) at the location, meeting with Road and Bridge representative at the location, providing an engineer report for the structure, as well as having a water pump performance test conducted. At this point we are not sure how to get additional movement on the process as we have left several messages trying to schedule a follow up meeting to discuss the Pre -conference summary progress. I assume your office is busy. Thank you for the attached supplemental information for the permitting process. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 1:10 PM Dave Argo dargo(cigarfield-county.com> wrote: Matthew: We have reviewed the plans & other information you have submitted for a building permit at the "recreational cabin" which you would like to convert into your primary residence at 7315 County Road 312. Unfortunately, we cannot issue a building permit for this residence until we receive a letter from an Engineer or Design Professional certifying that this building complies with Garfield County's Building Requirements — including structural, insulation and plumbing, etc. — items which are all now concealed from view and cannot be verified by our Building Inspectors. As a result, we must rely on a report issued by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer or Architect to certify that your building meets our minimum requirements. Please refer to the attached one-page description of "Obtaining a Building Permit for an Existing Structure" for more information. For your edification, I have also attached a copy of Garfield County's Building Requirements, as well as the redlines on your floor plans with numerical references to the attached "Residential Plan Review List". Between these documents and the items redlined on your plans, you can get a good idea about the items your Engineer and/or Architect should address in their report. From a Structural Engineering perspective, the report should address compliance with the Engineered plans you have submitted to our office by Anderson Structural Engineering. Since we do not review photographs for the purpose of providing "ex post facto" building inspections, you are welcome to come pick up from our office the pictures you submitted along with your plans. These would perhaps be more suitable for you to present to an Engineer or Architect who can then provide us with the certification report as described above. Also please note that our review & pending issuance of a building permit for this application only centers on the recreational cabin and its conversion into your primary residence. Any forthcoming approval for this project in no way should be interpreted as approval of either a Land Use Change Permit or Building Permit for the existing barn structure. Until we receive the follow-up documentation described above we will place your project file in our "pending permits" file. Thank you for your assistance in completing your application. 2 Dave Argo Plans Examiner CGarfield County Community Development Department 108 8'h Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: damofrlr_gmfield-cr►ttntv.com Web: gaifiehLcantov,cant CONPIDEN7MLITY NO 1('l : This email communication and any files transmitted along with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it isrxldrexwd. Om have received this email in error, please immediately notes the sender by email and delete it from your files. 3 Dave Argo From: Matthew Ringer <mmringer21@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 10:16 PM To: Dave Argo Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: Re: Ringer Cabin - Permit #BLRE-03-18-5115 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dave and Andy, Please see the attached engineer report and "redlines" response for the recreation cabin conversion to primary residence. I have also contacted the County Road and Bridge to verify the driveway exemption. This occurred at least a month ago and it was my understanding that they would contact you directly to confirm this. Please let me know if you need anything else to issue the final inspection. Ringer Cabin "red lines" response PDF Ringer ADU Letter.pdf David Argo From: David Argo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:34 PM To: 'Matthew Ringer' Subject: RE: shed blue prints Matthew: Thanks for sending over this information. Unfortunately, I believe that you have been somewhat misled by this manufacturer. Although their General Notes say that the structure has been designed to meet IRC and IBC building code requirements, note #4 says rather directly: "Structures ... should not be used for human habitation." Clearly we can't accept a building like this for residential purposes. As we discussed the other day, any pre -built residential structures will be required to have the insignia of Colorado Dept. of Housing (or CDOH) affixed to them as follows: (a) inside the structure indicating that design & construction are in compliance, and (b) on the outside of the structure indicating that installation is in compliance with CDOH standards and requirements. CDOH compliance is really one of the most important questions you need to ask of potential manufacturers of modular structures for your home. The good news is that there certainly aren't a lack of manufacturers out there who build pre -fab, modular and/or manufactured housing units which comply with CDOH requirements. In fact, with the popularity of the "Tiny Homes" movement, there are many options available. Maybe a good place to start is by taking a look at CDOH's website per the following web -link: www.colorado.gov/pacificldola/factory-built-structures Hopes this information helps in your pursuit of finding an acceptable manufacturer, and please feel free to contact me if you have any other questions. Dave Argo Plans Examiner CGarfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any files transmitted along with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. /f you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by email and delete it from your files. From: Matthew Ringer [mailto:mmringer2l@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:52 AM To: David Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Subject: Fwd: shed blue prints Dave, 1 Hi, this is Matthew Ringer. My wife, Sylvia and I met with you and Glenn earlier this week to discuss our house permit. We were able to get general engineered plans sent to us by the manufacturer, which are attached, but I wanted to run them by you before we commit to this building. The structure is designed and built using 2015 IRC and 2015 IBC, but the plans do note that they are classified as storage (Cat. 1). Is this because the interior is not finished out? Would this cabin be compliant for our residence if we build the rest of the interior out according to 2015 1RC and it was secured to a compliant stem wall? Also, our design would be 16x32 with a bedroom, kitchen, bathroom with shower, two storage lofts and a living room. Thank you for your time. Forwarded message From: Sylvia Ringer <sringer21 @gmail.com> Date: Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 20:47 Subject: Fwd: shed blue prints To: <mmringer21 @gmail.com> Forwarded message From: Daniel Plank <dmwoodwork2@a.gmai1.com> Date: Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:29 PM Subject: shed blue prints To: sringer21@gmail.com Virus -free. www.avg.com Matthew Ringer 970-618-5993 2 GENERAL. NOTES: 1. SVI%LJC:T•3RE 1,156 BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2012 W rERNATION.AL RESIDENTIAL CODE AND 1 HE 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. 2. ALL MATERIALS .AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE CODES AT TFIE TIME OE MANUFACTURE. 3. DRAWINGS SHALL NOT ESE SCALED FOR DIMENSIONS 4 STRUCTURES ARE GLASSIF TED AS "MINOR STORAGE FACILITES" {RISK CATEGORY li AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR HUMAN HABITAT ION. 5. SIDING FASTENERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN PANEL SIDING GROOVES N THE FELT OF TI1E PANELOR WHEN THE SIDING GROOVES OCCUR AT CUT EDGES OF THE SIDING PANE! 5. STRUCTURES ARE DESIGNED FOR LOCATIONS THAT ARE NOT IN FLOOD HAZARD AREAS. STRUCTURES SHOULD NOT BE USED 1N OTHER LOCATIONS_ 7. STRUCTURES ARE DESIGNED FOR LOCATIONS THAT I-IAVE A MAXIMUM GROUND SNOW LOAD OF 1081 ESE AND A PART TALLY EXPOSED TERRAIN CATEGORY, STRUCTURES SHOULD NOT BE USED IN SHELTERED TERRAIN LOCATIONS WHERE I'HE STRUCTURE I5 TIGHT IN AMONG CONIFER TREES. B. STRUCTURES SHOULD HAVE ASPHALT SHINGLES CONFORMING TO ASTM D3161 (CLASS F) OR ASTM 07158 (CLASS H; OR 29 GA METAL ROOF PANELS OVER WOOD SHEATF I ING. 9. 'WOOD FRAMING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE.ANSI:AWC -NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION 1NDS) FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION" 2215. CUMBERLAND BUILDINGS 10- ALL ROOF DECKING L5 TO BE 7/1," O.S.B. 11. ALL SIDING IS TO BE WATER SEALED 6. 71-11 PLYWOOD. 12. ALL FLOOR JOISTS ARE TO BE PRESSURE 1 R E.A1 EO SYP 52, OR BETTER, 13. ALL UN-FREATEO WOOD FRAMING IS TO BE TO BE SPF 52 OR BETTER_ UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 14, ALL EXTERIOR NAILS ARE TO BE ZING COATED. 15- .ALL FLOOR DECKING 15 TO SE % OR YL" PLYWOOD. :6 ALL SKIDS ARE TO BE 4,6 PRESSURE TREATED, RATED FOR GROUND CONTACT. 7, REFER TO THE SUPPLIED FASTENING SCHEDULE FOR FASTENING BASED ON CONNECTION AND LOCATION OF MEMBERS AS PER THE 2r15 IBC TABLE 2344,9.1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ITEMS 13Y f.1THERS: THE FCLIXIWING ITEMS ARE TO BE SUPPLIED AM) INSTALLED BY OTHERS. THESE ITEMS MAY B7 SUBJECT TO LOCAL JURISDICTION APPROVAL. CUMBERLAND BUILDINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE ITEMS. 1. THE COMPLETE FOUNDATION AND TIE -DOWN SYSTEM 2. RAMPS, STAIRS, AND GENERA ACCESS 3. ELECTRICAL SERVICE HCOISUP 18R5{IF REQI,AIRED1: 1. PIENS 4RE NOT REQUIRED AAHEN THE SKIDS GAN BE SUPPORTED ON FIRM, LEVEL GROUND. 2. PIERS SHALL TYPICALLY BE 16"x15' CONCRETE BLOCKS, DRY STACKED 70 A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3 FEET. TIE BLOCKS BY ALTERNATING THE DIRECTION OF BLOCKS ON EACH ROW. TREATED LUMBER WITH A MINIMUM BEARING AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 255 SQUARE INCHES MAY EE USED FOR PIERS LESS THAN 12" HIGH. 9. CUMBERLAND BUILD! S 15 NO' RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRtRARATION OF THE PROPOSED STTE[1R DETERNINAT WIN DF 7,12 SITE'S SI.ULTABUT Y TO SUPPOHTTHE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. IT IS THE PROPERTI OWNER'S RESPONSIB L_ITY TO DETERMINE IF SITE CONDITIONS ARE SUITABLE TO SUPPORT THE STRUCTURE. 4. PIERS SHOWN ON SHEET S-1 ARE CONCEPTUAL AND MAY NOT REFLECT ACTUAI. CONDITIONS. THE PIER LAYOUT MAY BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS PROVIDED THAT THE 'MAXIMUM SPACING SHOWN IS NOT EXCEEDED, DESIGN CRITERIA: 1 DESIGN LOADS ARE IN ACCORDAN4E WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING C005.2015 RISK CATEGORY I 2. LIVE LOADS: FLOOR: 40 PSF LOFT: 5 FSF ROOF_ 20 PSF 3. DEAD LOADS: FLOOR: 4 PSF ROOF: 7 PSF STALL: 3 PSF 4. SNOW LOADS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING. GROUND SNOW LOAD. PQ = ICO PSF MIN. ROOF SNOW LOAD. P1= G7 PSF EXPOSURE FACTOR, Ce= 1.0 IMPORTANCE FACTOR. t= 0.5 THERMAL FACTOR. Cl = 1.2 5. WIND LOADS ARE BASED OV THE FOLLOWING: ISLTIMATE DESIGN WINE SPEED: VOL= 175 MPH NOMINAL DESIGN WIND SPEED: Vasd = 135 MPH RISK CATEGORY I EXPOSURE CATEGORY C INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT: GCPL = 3-0./B COMPONENTS 8 CLADCING: ROOF -ZONE 1 = 23.0, -36.7 PS -7 ROOF -ZONE 2 = 23.0. -63.8 P57 RODF-20NE 3 = 23.0, -994.4 P55 WALL -ZOITE 4 =461.0, -43.4 PSF WALL -ZONE 5 = 410, -53.6 PSF NOTE: CAC 'WIND pRFSSURES SHORAN ARE FOR A 10 SQUARE FOOT EFFECTIVE AREA (AeIAND MAY BE REDUCED FOR LARGER AREAS A5 ALLOWED BY CODE. 0, SEISMIC LOADS ARE BASED CN THE FOLLOWNG: RISK CATEGORY I SITE CLASS D DESIGN CATEGORY C 00 .,Tf y�.. ,ya., Ir► r u:w <;\0 Is n f_ iC• i • 44 I, T -S-16 COPIED BARN-COLORADO-SNOW=100PSF-WIND=175MPH t2,UIBt1LANB BUILDINGS HOJECI NC ATE' 05-0&2016 EJrtAWN BY: KLN CHECKED 6Y: KLN r uISio SHEET NUMBER SIB SCALE: David Argo From: Matthew Ringer <mmringer21@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:18 PM To: David Argo Subject: Re: shed blue prints Dave, This is certainly disappointing, but I understand. I hoped that the CDOH certification was only for "completed" manufactured/pre-fab homes as opposed to just the finished shells which we would finish using the IRC code. We will be looking into other options from the CDOH list or I guess a GC to build. Thank you for your time. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 13:33 David Argo <dargo a�7,garfield-county.com> wrote: Matthew: Thanks for sending over this information. Unfortunately, I believe that you have been somewhat misled by this manufacturer. Although their General Notes say that the structure has been designed to meet IRC and IBC building code requirements, note #4 says rather directly: "Structures ... should not be used for human habitation." Clearly we can't accept a building like this for residential purposes. As we discussed the other day, any pre -built residential structures will be required to have the insignia of Colorado Dept. of Housing (or CDOH) affixed to them as follows: (a) inside the structure indicating that design & construction are in compliance, and (b) on the outside of the structure indicating that installation is in compliance with CDOH standards and requirements. CDOH compliance is really one of the most important questions you need to ask of potential manufacturers of modular structures for your home. The good news is that there certainly aren't a lack of manufacturers out there who build pre -fab, modular and/or manufactured housing units which comply with CDOH requirements. In fact, with the popularity of the "Tiny Homes" movement, there are many options available. Maybe a good place to start is by taking a look at CDOH's website per the following web -link: www.colorado.gov/pacific/doia/factory-built-structures Hopes this information helps in your pursuit of finding an acceptable manufacturer, and please feel free to contact me if you have any other questions. Dave Argo