HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff ReportPROJECT NAME:
APPL ICAII:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
ZON ING:
QUALIFICATION:
ACCESS:,
IIAIEB'
SEWER:
Senate Bill 35 Exemption
K. R. Weatherly
4 miles north of New Castle on County
Owned 5+ years; applicant indicates thatthe parcels were also separately identifiedprior to September, 1973.
Existing access from County Road 241
Spring and storage tank
Individual sept'ic
COMPREHEI{SIVE PLAN:
District E (Rura1 Areas/Moderate-Severe Environmental Constraints)
STAFF COIWENTS:
The_applicant purchased the above-referenced parcels as separate tracts
1: 1311-:r!,1?\1. .9::1r:: ?l the^court of Apfeal: Rrlina !n ili. yulUrvren
Road 241.
To split a 6.66of 1.73 and 4.93
A/R/RD
acre tract into 2 parcels
each.
created contiguous
vs. Board.of Adjustment of Adams county case,'it is the 6pinion of-ThEcounty at individually created contiguouproperties by a single individual creates, once again, d single laige tract.Because the applicant has owned the property for 6ver-5 yeari, he would stillqualify for a Senate Bill 35 Exemption requ6st. However-, Resolution No. 80-65regard'ing Senate Bill 35 Exemptions specif ically ind'icates that ,'...all newparcels created must meet all'requirements of t"lre appf icable ione district...,,The A/R/RD zone d'istrict, wilihjn'whjch this project'ites, .uqrires a two acreminimum. The Comprehensive Plan would recommeni 5 acres-in irrts managementdistrict.
RECOMMENDAT IONi_--
I Den"ia1, lu.applfred for, both parcels would not meet all requirements of the A/R/RDI zone utstrrct.
OR
Approval with the followlng conditions:
1. Both parcels should meet the two acre zone djstnict minimum.2. An access easement for both_parcels should be included in the 1ega1 descriptions.3.. The legal-descriptions should conta'in a dedication of the equivaTent of 5 gpmwater supply for each parcel, at a minimum.
),.^ -rrrr.*rc.n {}. te,-n',al ba'*) r>r\ /- )Ac 5iZe
Larrtt ^ nc>let ar^,C
{-L-l+C rI r.-+€f>h,Cnlrnl., C)r-\,. Ittler;tror-r) \f\
Page 5
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFE COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION
PURPOSE:
ZONING:
QUALTFTCAETON:
ACCESS:
WATER:
SEWER:
Senate BiIl 35 Exemption
K. R. Weatherly
4 miles north of New Castle on
County Road 241
To split a 6.66 acre tract inlo 2parcels of 2.00 and 4.66 each
A/R/RD
Owned 5+ yearsi applicant indicatesthat the parcels were also
separately identified prior to
September, L973
Existing access from County Road
24t
Spring and storage tank
Individual septic
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
District E (Rural Areas/Moderate-Severe Environmental Constraints)
STAFF' COMMENTS:
This application was originally denied due to one of the lots being lessthan 2 acres in size. It was noted that it could be approved if thefollowing conditions were met:
1. Both parcels should meet bhe two acre zone district minimum.2. An access easement for both parcels should be included in the
lega1 descriptions.3. The legal descriptions should contain a dedication of theequivalent of 5 gpm water supply for each parcelr dt a minimum.
The resubmitted informabion meets these requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Appr oval