The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3.0 Correspondence & MinutesGARFIELD COUNTY REGULATORY OFFICES AND PERSONNEL January 19, 1993 Mr. John Thulson Delaney and Balcomb, P.C. P.O. Box 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 RE: ZINI(O SUBDIVISION Dear John: On January 4, 1993, the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners conditionally approved your client's application for a subdivision exemption. The conditions approved by the Board are as follows: I . All representations of the applicant shall be considered conditions of approval unless otherwise stated by the applicant. 2. The applicant shall have 120 days to complete the required conditions of approval. Extensions of 120 days may be granted by the Board for a period of up to one (1) year. 3. A Final Exemption Plat will be submitted, indicating the legal description of the property, dimension and area of all proposed lots or separate interests to be created, access to a public right-of-way, and any proposed easements for drainage, irrigation, access or utilities. 4. That the exemption plat include the following plat notes: A. Specific building locations may be subject to slope and soil hazards. All structures shall require the submittal of an engineering report addressing geologic conditions, foundation design and drainage prepared by a Colorado Registered Engineer. 1098TH STREET, SUTTE 303 . 945-8212t625-5571t285-7972 . GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Mr. John Thulson January 19, 1993 Page2 B. All lots may be subject to the requirement of engineered wastewater systems. At the time of building Pennit Application, proof will be required by a licensed Colorado Engineer regarding specific wastewater system needs on each lot. 5. The applicant shall submit $200.00 in School Impact Fees prior the signing of an exemption plat. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Dave Michaelson Planner DHM/dhm L 1 2 3 4 5 5 7I 9 10 11 comments and recommendations. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion;carried. RIFLE ECONO LODGE-TREASURER'S DEEDAfter discussion regarding the request for a Treasurer,s Deed for theRifle Econo Lodge, the Commissioners stated that they did not have aninterest in redeeming their interest. RELEASE T'ORM KAISER.SEIVER DITCH CLAIIITAfter discussion with Don regarding the Kaiser-Seiver Ditch claim,Commissioner Arbaney made a motion that the Chairman be authorized toexecute the form of release for a claim in the amount of $51400.00.Commissioner Smith seconded the motionl carried. t-CL_eZ PUBLTC MEETTNG FoR AN ExEMPrroN FRoM rHE DEFrnrrr'frIJn/irr"orvrsroN; LOCATED ON SOUTH SrDE OF MTDLAND AVENUE, ADJACENT TO GLENWOOD SPRTNGS.APPLTCANT: OTTO AND CATHERINE zINKo Commissioner Arbaney declared a conflict of interest as his propertyborders this property on the South side. Chairman Mackley eicuiedCommissioner Arbaney due to his conflict of interest and -Commissioner Arbaney left the room. Don DeFord questioned Allen Thulson, Attorneyfor Otto and Catherine Zinko, regarding the posting certification.Allen stated that the posting was visible fr6m Midiand Avenue. Donstated that with the certification of mailing and ihe certification ofposting was adequate the meeting could proceed. Dave Iulichaelson reguested that the following exhibits be entered intothe record: Exhibit rrAr - Proof of Publication, Exhibit xB,, - ReturnReceipts, Exhibit "c" - staff Report and Exhibii, ,Du - Apprication.Chairman Mackley entered Exhibits rrAtr through ,'D" into the record. Dave stated that,the property is located on the South side of MidlandAvenue adjacent to the City of Glenwood Springs. This is a 7 .25 acretract that is _served by central water from the City of Glenwood Springswith an ISDS for sewage disposal for the existing iesidence with icce=sdirectly off Midland Avenue. The existing zonin[ is R/L/SD which isResidential Limited Suburban Density. Th; appli6ant is proposing tosplit the 7.25 acre tract into two parcels ot- I .626 acres each. BothIots would meet the minimum lot size requirements. The required.setbacks are 25 feet front and back with 10 feet, on the sides. The 9ity of Glenwood Springs has indicated that they are willing to providedomestic water to the additional parcel. sewag6 is proposed to Lehandled by_rSDS. Staff suggests tne following plat irote be a conditionof approval: "A11 lots maf Ue subject to the-rlquirement of engineeredwastewater systems. At the time of Building eermit Application] proofwiII be required by a licensed Colorado nngineer reg.i-airrg specificwastewater system needs on each lot.', The city of Glenwo5a SpringsGeological Hazard Mapning indicates that the pioperty is in area ofknown hazards. Staff recommends that the fotiowing Sondition ofapproval be placed g. the project: "Specific buildlng locations may besubject to slope and soil hazirds. A11 structures shall require t'hesubmittal of an engineering report addressing geologic conditions,foundation design and drainage prepared by a-c5lorado negisteredEngineer. " The applicant has submitted d6cumentation fr5m the GlenwoodSprings -Department of Emergency Services regarding the abitity of theGlenwood Springs Rural Fir6 protection Distiict t5 serve the |roject. Dave stated that staff was recommending approval subject to thefollowing conditions:1. A11 representations of the applicant shall be consideredconditions of approval unless oth6rwise stated by the appticant.2. The applicant shaIl have 120 days to complet6 tne riiuiredconditions_of approval. Extensions of LzO diys may be gianted bythe Board for a period gf rp to one (1) year.3. A Fina1 Eremption PLat wif f Ue sriUiritt"d, indicating the legaldescription of thg property, dimension and area of all !ropo"-a-lots or separate interests to be created, access to a p.ruricright-of-rayt - ?ng any proposed easements for drainage,- irrigation,access or utilities.4. That the exemption r-rlat include the f ollowing plat notes:A. Specific building locations may be subj6ct to slope andsoil hazards. All structures shalL requir6 the submittal ofan engineering report addressing geologicat conditions, L2 1_3 l-4 L5 15 L7 18 19 20 2t 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 4L 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 55 57 58 59 60 51 62 63 64 6s 66 67 Page 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 foundation design and drainage prepared by a cororadoRegistered Engineer.B. AIl lots may be subject to the requirement of engineeredwastewater systems. At the time of building permit Application, proof will be required by a licensed ColoradoEngineer regarding specific wastewater system needs on eachlot.5. The applicant shall submit $200.00 in School Impact Fees priorto the signing of an exemption plat. After further discussion, Dave said that there should be an additionalcondition of approval stating that a driveway permit needed to beobtained from the County. Allen stated that they might use a commondriveway. Dave stated that if a conrmon driveway was-used, theeasements would need to be indicated on the final exemption plat. Commissioner Smith made a motion that an exemption from the definitionof a subdivision be granted to Otto and Catheiine Zinko for a tract of 7 .25 acres of land located on the South side of lv1idland Avenue with allthe issues, concerns and recommendations of Staff being a part of thatapproval. Chairman Mackley stepped down as Chairman and s6conded themotion; carcied. PAYABLE CLAIMS AND PAYROLL EXPENDITURESAfter discussion with Chuck regarding the bi]Is for the month ofDecember, L992 and the December payroll expenditures, CommissionerSmith made a motion that the payable claiml against ihe County for thefirst run of Dgcember t L992 and the payroll eipend.itures for Lhe monthof December, 1992.be-approved and ttre Ctrairman authorized to sign theresolution. Commissioner Arbaney seconded the motion; carrigd,_- C.NTINUED PUBLI. HEARTNG FoR A SPECTAL USE PERI,IIT FoR ,-"I;*;JJMATERIAI HANDLING OF NATURAT RESOURCES AT BLUE PIT; LOCATED ON NORTHSIDE OF STATE HTGIIWAY 82 APPROXIMATELY TwO AND ONE-HALF ( 2-t/2) MrLESEAST OF CARBONDALE. APPLICANT: CASEY coNcRETEDon DeFord stated that previously the noticing of hearing was adeguateand the exhibits need to be accepted into the record. chairman Mackley s\dore in everyone wishing to testify. r.0 11 L2 13 L4 15 16 L7 18 19 20 2L 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 4L 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 50 51 62 63 64 65 66 67 Dave asked thatExhibit rrArr Exhibit 'BuExhibit "C,Exhibit ilD'!, Exhibit ,,8,, Exhibit trF,, Exhibit rrGrr Exhibit rrHrr Exhibit 'I'Exhibit rrJrr Exhibit 'K* Exhibit,Lrt Exhibit trMrr Exhibit rrNrr Exhibit'O' the following Exhibits be entered into the record:- Proof of Publication - Return ReceiptsStaff Report - Application Adjacent Land Use Map Access Route, taken from original application whenthe BIue Pit was permitted in 1981Petition with 25 signatures stating ,,W€, theundersigned, request the Casey Concrete Special UsePermit to arLow the instal-lation of a concrete batchplant at the Blue pit off County Road 104 not beapproved for the forlowing reasons: 1. The currenttraffic volume created by the pit operations is notcompatible with the approximate 20, width of CO RD103, is not compatible with the school bus stop atthe intersection of CO RD 103 and CO RD 104. 2. Anyincrease in traffic wourd make the present dang"rorrs'situation even worse. 3. A long-term sorutioi needsto be developed to eliminate the current traffichazards. This would be either widening 103 orrouting truck traffic directry to Highway g2 via theaccess road South of the pit. "L2/L/92 letter of opposition from Michaer RomanusL2/7 /92 letter of opposition from John ColtonL2/9/92 letter of opposition from Stace LuffL2/9/92 letter of opposition from John and MarthaHenderson L2/L3/92 letter of opposition from Thomas NeeIL2/L4/92 letter of opposition from Gordon GreinerL2/2L/92 letter from king LloydL2/L7/92 letter of opposition-from James and BarbaraRansford Page 8