HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubsoil Study for Foundation Design 01.28.19tGn ftunr&&tochtot,hD.
geotechnical and Materials Enginêers
and EnvironmenÞl Scientisß
kumarusa.com
5020 CountY Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
phone: (S70) 945-7988
fax: (970) 945-8454
email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com
un¡ru¡ k¡ rñârr ¡qâ l1ñm
-
ACEC
MEIVIBER
Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs and Surnmit Coun$, Colorado
January 28,2019 RECEIVED
D.M. Neuman Construction
Attn: Jason Neuman
P.O. Box 2317
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
i asqtßìdqlnçsme!. ca!û
Project No.18-7-692
Subject:Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, TBD Four Mile Road
(County Road 117), Near Bottom of Bershenyi Dip, Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Jason:
As requested, Kumar & Associates, Inc. observed two pits for a subsoil study for design of
foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for
geotechnical engineering services to D.M. Neuman Construction dated November 13, 2018. The
data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface
conditions encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be 1,800 square feet, one story wood
frame over a crawlspace, located on the site as shown on Figure 1. The attached garage will
have a slab-on-grade floor. Cut depths for the crawlspace are expected to range between about 2
to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and
typical of the proposed type of construction.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report.
Site Conditions: The proposed building area had been stripped of vegetation. The building area
slopes down to the north at about 5Yo grade. There is a steep slope (hillside) to the east of the
site. The building area appears to have been filled and may have had an old pond on it in the
past.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two
exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Figure l. The logs of the pits are
presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered in Pit I, east of the building area, consist of
ûeT t $ ?fil$
;ARFIELD COUNTY
: IIMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
-2-
9 feet of loose to medium dense, silty to very silty gravelly sand overlying relatively dense, silty
sandy gravel. The subsoils encountered in Pit 2, north of the building area, consist of \Yz feet of
stiff clayey sandy gravel fill. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a relatively
undisturbed sample of silty sand from Pit 1, presented on Figure 3, indicate low compressibility
under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a low to moderate collapse potential
(settlement under constant load) when wetted. Results of gradation analyses performed on a
sample of gravelly, sandy clayey silt (minus 5-inch fraction) obtained from Pit 1 and the fill soils
obtained from Pit 2 are presented on Figure 4. The laboratory testing is summarized on Table 1.
No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist
to moist. A third pit was excavated in the proposed garage area of the house (between Pits I and
2) and reportedly encountered fill down to a depth of 3 or 4 feet where the pit was terminated.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings
placecl on the undisturbed natural silty sand soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure
of 1,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. We recommend that the house not be placed
on the fill encountered in Pit 2. The natural silty sand soils tend to compress after wetting and
there could be post-construction foundation settlement of around 1 to 2 inches depending on the
depth and extent of wetting. Footings should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the
foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level
extended down to the undisturbed natural soils." Exterior footings should be provided with
adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least
36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls
should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an
unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be
dcsigncd to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50
pcf for the on-site soil as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of existing fill and topsoil, can he support for
lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction with a risk of settlement. To reduce the effects of some
differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with
Kumar & Associates, lnc.Project No. 18-7-692
-J-
expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should
be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and
slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended
slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath slabs to
provide support and act as a leveling course. This material should consist of minus 2 inch
aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than2o/o passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least95o/o of maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the
onsite, silty sand soils or imported granular soils such as %-inch road base devoid of vegetation,
topsoil and oversized rock.
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has
been our experience in this area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of
heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a
perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and
crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain
system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above
the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of
excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum lo/oto
a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should
contain less than 2o/o passingthe No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a
maximum sizeof?inches. Thedraingravelbackfillshouldbeatleast lYzfeetdeep. An
impervious membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough
shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction
and maintained at all times after the residence has been.completed:
1) Inundation ofthe foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided
during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to
at least 95o/o of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas
Kumar & Associates, lnc.Project No, 18-7-692
4
3)
and to at leost 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas.
Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer
graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to
drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum
slope of 12 inches in the first l0 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3
inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas.
Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
Landscaping which requires regular heavy inigation should be located at least 10
feet from the building. Consideration should be given to the use of xeriscape to
limit potential wetting of soils below the foundation caused by irrigation.
4)
Límitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based
upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure 1
and to the de,pths shown on Figure 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in
the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold
or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concemed
about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our
findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the
exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until
excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from
those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the
recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not
responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we
should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and
monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations
have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis
or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation
s)
Kumar & Associales, lnc.Project No. 18-7.692
-5-
of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of skuctural fill by a representative of
the geotechnical engineer.
If you have any questions or if we maybe of frrther assistanceo please let us know.
Respectfully Submitted,
I-I*P+KUMAR
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E.
Reviewed by:
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
DEH/kac
attachments Figure 1 - Location of Exploratory Pits
Figure 2 * Logs of Exploratory Pits
Figure 3 - Swell-Consolidation Test Results
Figure 4 - Gradation Test Results
Table 1 - Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Kumar & Associates, lnc.Project No. 18-7-692
!rI
F
ó
@_
6
Fin. Floor Elev
= 100'(6156)
6160 6159
6156 615a
6152 orSO
12
.útlô't?at 2 t Parcel # 2 185-343-00-023
1,869 SF Single Family
Residence on crawl space
with Garage
0)
.É
GËo-
4 Mile Road (CR 117)
test
deak.t
PIT I
APPROXIMATE SCALE-FEET
18-7-692 H-PVKU]VIAR LOCATION OF EXPLORAÏORY PITS Fig. 1
::
I
I
I
Ê
PIT 1 Ptf 2
F
UJulL.
I-Fo-
LJÕ
o
5
r WC=6.5
' +4=18
-2OO=54
WC=9.5
DD=95
WC=7.5
+4=54
-200=33
0
5
10
i-l¡Jl¡¡l!
IT¡-fL
l.Jô
10
LEGEND
FILLr SANDY SILTY CLAY, GRAVELLY, SCATTERED COBBLES, STIFF' MOIST' MOTTLED DARK
BROWN AND BLACK.
I,Zto*o (SM): SrLTy To vERy srLTy, cRAvELLy, scATTERED coBBLEs, toosE To MEDTuM
( :)otvsr, SLIGHTLY Molsr, REÐDlsH BRowN.
GRAVEL (OP-CU): SANDy, SLTGHTLY S|LTY, WITH COBBLES, DENSE, SLIGHTLY MO¡ST, BRoWN
HAND DRIVEN 2-INCH DIAMETER LINER SAMPLE.
DISTURBED BULK SAMPLE
NOTES
1, THE EXPLORAIORY PITS WERE EXCAVATED WITH A MINI_EXCAVATOR ON NOVEMBER 15,2016,
2, THE EXPLORATORY PITS WERE LOCATEÐ BY THE CLIENT.
5. THE ELEVATIONS OF THE EXPLORATORY PITS WERE NOT MEASURED AND THE LOGS OT THE
EXPLORATORY PITS ARE PLOTTED TO ÐEPTH.
4, THE EXPLORATORY PIT LOCATIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE ONLY TO THE DEGREE
IMPLIED BY THE METHOD USED.
5, THE LINES BETWEEN MATERIALS SHOWN ON THE EXPLORATORY PIT LOGS REPRESENT THE
APPROXIMATE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN MATERIAL TYPES ÀND THE TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
6. GROUNDWATER WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED IN THE PITS AT THE TIME OF DIGGING. PITS WERE
BACKFILLTD SUBSEQUENT TO SAMPLING.
7. TABORATORY TEST RESULTS:
WC = WATER CONTENT (%) (ASTM Ð 2216);
DD = DRY DENSITY (pct) (ASTU D 2216);
+4 = PERCENTAGE RETAINEÐ ON NO. 4 SIEVE (ASTM D A22);
-200 = PERCENTAGE PASSING NO. 2OO SIEVE (ASTM D 1 140)'
F
-l
I
I
-t
b'
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fi1. 218-7 -692 H.PryKUMAR
SAMPLE OF: Silty Sond
FROM:Plt1@4.5'
WC = 9.5 %, Ð0 = 95 pcl
.<
ln
ln
ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION
UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE
DUE TO WETTING
2
0
JJ
l,¡t
=tn
I
zo
F-
ô
Jovtz.o()
2
-4
-6
-8
1 0
-12
-14
-16
18-7 -692 H-PryKUMAR SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3
I
E
¡
ä
a
Ë
100
90
t0
,o
ð0
30
ao
¡o
20
to
o
0
lo
20
30
6
to
ô0
70
BO
90
tæ
Ë
E
E
E
DIAMETER OF
2.O
IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT COSBLES
GRAVEL 18 '( SAND 28
'(
LIQU¡D LIMIT PLASTICITY INOEX
SAMPLE OF! Grovelly Sondy Cloyey Slll
SILT AND CIAY 54 X
FROM:Pll 1O2.5'-3'
2
ø
E
I
Ë
too
90
to
,o
60
30
&
lo
20
to
o
0
t0
20
JO
40
50
60
,o
¡o
to
!o0
a
I
E
E
H
OF IN
CLAY TO SILT COBBLES
GRAVEL 54 % SAND
LIQUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OFr Cloyey Sondy Groy€l (Flll)
15 X SILT AND CLAY
PTASTICIIY INDEX
FROM: PltZC2,5''3'
35X
lhæ. l.!l r.lulls qppl!, only lo lh.
romphr rhlch rcrc l¡¡lcd, th¡l!¡llñg nport lboll nol b! npt"ducrd,rxclpl ln full, vlthoul lh! *tltlcn
opprcvol ol Kumor ù A¡¡oclolo¡. lnc,
Slcva onolyrlr lt¡llñg h prlod.d ln
occordoncr rlth ASÍM D¡122. ASIII Cl56
ond/or ASTH 0ll/t0.
SIEVÍ ANALYSIS
c8¡ soumE oPÊl{}losu.s.
i
HYDiOT,IETEi ANALYSIS
8ns 7 HRS
l
¡
I
,
t
I
I
,
I
¡
I
I
¡
l
I
I
1
¡
I
¡
I
GRAVELSAND
COARSEFINEMEDTUM ICOARSE F¡NE
SIEVE ANALYSISHYDNOMETgR ANALYSIS cuR sou^RE oPa{ncs
t/t r¡1. t 1tt.¡tôô
u.s. sra¡D nD sÉ¡lEs
¿5ô aaô ¡!o aia alo ¡ata ltRs 7 HRS tY[t tt
ft)l€ REA9TNCS
mq¡ t ¡llt fflN
a
1
/
I
I
I
¡l
l
I/
l
I
t
I
I
I
I
l
I
l
¡
I
i: r ¡ l¡l
I
1
It
GRAVELSAND
MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSEFINE
18-7 -692 H-PryKUMAR GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fis. 4
H-PIKUMARTABLE 1SUIUMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTSProfect No. 18-7-692SOILTYPEGravelly Sandy Clayey SiltSiþ SandClayey Sandy Gravel (Fill)UNCONFINEDcofitPREs{¡lvESTRÊNGTH(osf)54ATTERBERG LITITSPTASTICINDEX(o/olUCN'llDLITIT(YolPERCËNTPASTTINGNO.200SIEVE33GRADATIONSAND(w28l3GRAVEL(lolI854NATURALDRYDENSITYfocfl95NATURALtrOISTURECONTENT(olol6.59.57.5-ocATtot{DEPTHrfrt2Yr-34Yz2t4-3SÀ¡fPLEPITI)
Dave Arqo
lo:
Cc:
Sent:
Subject:
From:Dave Argo
Tuesday, October 29,2019 7:41 AM
Rich Carter
'Jason Neuman'
RE: Cappo Garage - Permit #BLRE-09-19-5980
Rich:
Thanks for your email. For some reason, our database wasn't showing the building permit for the S.F. Residence on this
property, so I appreciate you enlightening me on that. You are right that most of the items included in my prior email
are essentially moot because of the previous permit. However, we still need to receive a digital copy of the soíls report
as referenced on Bob Oddo's structural documents, since none was provided for either the garage or the residence and
there is a specific plat note that requires submission of a soils report as a condition of building permit approval.
As I have mentioned on more than one occasion to you and Jason - on all projects, if you have a soils report you should
always submit it to our office at time of permit application as it will always speed up approvals from our end of things.
We'll look forward to receiving the soils report on this project and as soon as we review it, we should be able to issue
this building permit.
Dave Argo
Plans Examiner
Garfield County Building DePt.
Community Development Department
L08 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Tel : 970-945-82L2 Ext. 1.610
Email: da rgo@garfield-county.com
Web: garfield-county.com
Thanks,
----Original Message---
From: Rich Carter <rich@dmneuman.com>
Sent: Friday, October 25,2079 9:46 AM
To: Dave Argo <da rgo@garfield-county.com>
Cc:'Jason Neuman' <jmn@dmneuman.com>
Subject: IExternal] Cappo Garage - Permit #BLRE-09-19-5980
Good morning Dave -
ln regards to the permitting for this garage, the county has already issued us a building permit for a single family
residence on this property (earlier this year), plus with the approved final plat (from when the property was split in two
earlier this year), this piece of property has also been granted water and sewer taps (which has been paid).
This piece of property is zoned as Rural, and allows for residential/garage use (by right)... we feel that the already
permitted residence and this garage are the best fit for this property.
1
We believe that the majority of item you listed below are a moot point do to the fact that we have already completed
these initial steps, and would request that we be put back in the cue for permit review on this project.
Please let me know if you have any further questions or comments Thanks Dave Rich
Richard Carter, Project Architect
D.M. Neuman Const. Co. & Design Group
ESTABLISHED 1982
310 19th STREET GWS CO 81601
l970l945-7s02 OFFICE
(970)618-7230 DTRECT
Scamped LS lta. 15710
4'Ahoue ûrounà Fou¡
3-1/,
Statryput¿
s 88"53'29't E
76.64
Føund #6 Rebar a¡d
Fov¡td *6 Rebor and 3-I/' Alvmlnum Cap
Sla*çød LS No, 15710 .,4#'#'
#r*
3-1/4" AÍumìnum C,etp
e;;4.dLSJ,I;. iiäo- /
¿F /,/
Warratúg De*d.
Boak 1934, Pdge 948
PL,4,T.NOTES
A" NOXTAUS WEEDS.
CONT&AL OF NAXOUS ü1ÐEDS fS THÊ RESPANSTBILTTY OF THE PROPS,RîY ÔWNî'Ê
B. OPEN IIEAftTE SAilO.FUËL þ-IREPT'AC.ÊS,
NT APE,X HEAET'' SÕ.gTD.F-IJEL fiAgf¿ECÐS WILL B& ALLOWEÞ ANYWH*:RE WTTHW'THE ST,'BÐIVß|r].$. ANE NEW SAUÐ.¡f.'T,L
ÐUR!ilNç SîOUE dS DEFIIí&D BY C.R.S. 2ç7-4A1, ET.SEQ., AllÞ TI{E REe{nAflANS PPaM{JLGATED THÊP$Í,î$DER, 'ltlm ÐË
ALLûWßD îIr Afi.IY PWÊLLING UNIT..ALL ÐWELLII'ÍG UNIT.$ WILL BE ALLûWEÐ 'tN UHRESTRICTfrÐ NU*IB&R OF WAnræ¿L GAS
BURã{TNG SW)WS AT{D APPUANCÊS.
C. &XTERTAR LTGHIING.
ALL EXTERIÖR,LIçHrTNG STII'LL BE TIIE T4TN'*IUM Ã,ÅOUi{T NECESSARY ANÐ TTUT ALL ÐçTE&TAR UçTITTIIG STULL AE
ÐIRþC:T&Ð TNWARÐ.AIIþ DOWîIWARD, TOWAKDT; THE IìiTÉ;IilÖR ÚÍ" TTLE SUBDWTS/É'¡Í, aNC&TVT rfjl/.T PRAVISIANS MAY BE
M.ADø rc ALLOW FOR $AFÞTY UIiÍTTIII<} THAT çOES BEYONÐ îHE PROPERTY BÖUNDARTES.
D. KTGH'I'T$ ËA,RM
CAU)RAT}a ß A .RÍGHT.rc.FARM, STI'TE PURS.TANT TÛ C.R.S. 35-3.1.1, ßT. SEQ. LANÐAWNSRS, RES]ÐE$TS ANÐ WSTTORS
MUST B& aREPARED TA .4CCßì?T THE ACT'M'IES,sYc¡l?b-, ÁYl{'lVOS,4flÐ SMEL¿,S OF G¿BfiALD COUNTY'S AGRICÍíLTURAL
OPERATIA$S,fLS A NORùÚAL AÀ.Ð ¡æCSSSÁRY ASIIECT tF LìWNC' IN A COUÌ{TY WTH d.S?l?oivG RL,/PAL CHARACTER ANÐ A
HEALTTîY RANCHÍNÇ SECTt}R. THOSE WTTH AN ARBAN SEïSTfiVTTY MAY PER<:ETW SIJCÍI ÃCTTWTTÊg, SJC¡'TS, SOUjÉID, ANÐ
SMg¿¿,S ONLY AS N'T&JNVENíÊNCÊ, EYÊSARE, NOTSE ANÞ ODOR. HAWEWR, STATE LAW AXÐ ffiAIITY POTJCY PRAWÐE TÍíAT
&AIICHIÌ,ÍG, îARTITI!rc ANÐ OTHËR AL}RTCÜLTUK4L ACTTVTNES AND OPERATTONS,WTTTIN GARFIELIS COUNîY SHALL NAT BE
CO¡{S¡ÐßP6Ð TA ÉE TflNSANCE,S SO ¿OJV(i ¿S OPERA'TED W CA!(N}RÛI,ÀNCÊ WTTH TT]E T,AW ÃNT} N A NOTT-NEGLTGÊNT
MAI{NER. TTIEREFaßa, ALL MUST BE PREPAREÐ TO ENCOUNTÐ&, JYO'SÃ.S, OÐ(''R, LIG,ITS, IIîJD, ÐUST, SMAKE, CHDfuITCALS,
${,â,CHINÊRY ON PLIELTC ROADS. UWSTOCE AN PUßLTC ROADS, STORAQE AND hTSTSAL OF MANURE AIIÐ THÊ APPUCATION
BY SPRAYINLS ttg ûTHERWISE OF CHEhtlCAl. FEI¿'I'(UZERS, SOTL AMENDMEI'¡t, HERBICIÐg, AIIÐ PßSTICIÞES, ANY OI'rg OR
tttlJRÞ, ÕF wHIcII MAy NATIJRALLY OCCtjR AS PART OF LEAAL ANÐ NON-NEGLIGENT AGRICTTLTURAL O.PEEATÍONS.
g. MAINTEI,NANCE OF FEITCES, RURAL UVTNG, Ê'TC"
ALL T'WI{AÊ$ AF LdNÍ1, WHNTFTER PAN(:g NR RN$NENT:.E,
'TAVE
ABLTGA?'JOIVS UJVnl?Ë STA'T& TÁW ANÐ CAUNTY
ÊÐçIJLATIONS WTTII REçARD TO îHE
'{ATTÍTENANCE
ÖF TnNCES AI{D IRR/:GATTOfi T}ITCHES, CONTRÛLU''¡(} tr¿EED"C, KEEPTN(i
LrvESrÕcK AND pETe ÍtNOF.g CÚ,Nî'RÕL, ttstl(t ÍTRaPERTY Iî{ ACCARDANCE WTri æ$rNG, âND ATEER ASP&CrS OF u$tMt}
AND VATNîATNT$G PRAPERTY. RÍj.s¡ÍÞEÍTS AîíT] I,ANDÕW$ERS ARE EÌ{COURAGED îO LEARN ABOVT ftIESß RÍT}HTS ANÐ
RESFO¡TS'ÊT¿JT¡ES AN A{T AS GOOD N&îC,$BARS ANÐ CMT.EI'TS ÖP TT4Ê CAUî'TTY, A 600Þ INTRC)DLÍCTORY SOURCE FOR SUCH
Tñ{FORU¿TTA$ ÍS 'A AUTÞE TT} RURAL LTîITNT & S¡4TAT'L SCALE AGRTÖULTURE, PI'T OUT BY TTIE COLARAÐO STATE LINTYøRSTTY
ÐxÎðJV,SrO¡{ 0F¡'JCã IN cARFtpLO CAUNTY.
H. DAMESII:CÞOGS,
ÐOGS KøM ON TITE FRaPERTI, SHALL ßE TN A PENCED YARÐ OR I}TI A T'EASH,I\., FREVENT HAPASSTIIEI(I T}î WTLNUFE.
PARCEL BETNç SWÐ'WÐEN fi&REAN PRBWAT.ISLY ÐÊSCRIBED AN:
d, 2ND ÃTIENDED N.qî AF S¡-NLTGTIT VTEW SI]BÐIUI$OIÍ. RECÊPTTI}N NO. 3099A6
b. FINAL PLAT TF SUN*TI}¡IT PARßWAY - RÐÇEF?ION NO. 477',55
C. lST AMENÐED PLAT OF SUNT¡I}H? PARKWAV " RþCEPTTCIN NÛ. 5Ti6968
d. SaCOIVÍ) A'LENÐED MáSÎEÈ PLAT îOR TÍIE PRESERVE AT FNøHU æAXC¿I . RECEPTTÛN
'TO.
6:ì8654
e. 2ND AMÊNÐEÐ PTAT AF SUT,TLTAHT PARKWAY AS SEWAQE îÊEATM&NT AREA. RECEPTTAN NT. 8561'17
CISUNTY CAM'
THß PtA! IS jûtr'--
CÛNV&YÀNÇE
APPRAVAL IÈ(
Í,ANDS, HtgUt
THE BOARD O.
I}áRFÍE,LN CAI
PUELICDEDTC
CH^IRMÃN, g.
{\AR}-IELÐ CAt
WTTNESS MY h
ATTEST:-
COÜNTY CLER,
C&RITI,-TCA'IS (
f, T}IEUTIDÊRÍ,
PAYARLP AS O
PAIÐ W FUI¡.
ÐATEI7 r¡fls_
fl?ËÁsúRs]?i)l
,2Reærd
C8
N1E--.--s 89"O3',56"
t dvÍ
K. FAI.,NÐATIONS.
ENQTNÊER-DESILINED þ'VUNÐA'üo.|VS ÁitE ßEQltREÐ WITHIN THIS SíIBDMSION.
4 -solf,S RËPôPT trÐÞßESs¡Iî,tG HAZARDÕ|S SüLS, CONTAMINATEÐ so,]¿'S, SLO.PßS' AEÛ-I'IAZARDS.'i¡IÐ F.oR
RECAMMENÐ{| fc[v.c FOR rgÊ FtStl¡IDATIoN DESIGN SHALL B& REQWRED PÊIOP ¡o ISS¿¿{¡\'CË.
awNER r{&ß¿ar-4sstcJys Two WAT&RAND TWO SEWEI{ TAPS TQ EACH PARCEL (1 AND 2) AS SHAW:N H&REÖN.
Dave Argo
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subiect:
Attachments:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Rich Carter < rich@dmneuman.com >
Friday, October 25,2019 9:46 AM
Dave Argo
'Jason Neuman'
lExternall Cappo Garage - Permit #BLRE-09-19-5980
17 087 -01 Reviw Plat 6.12.19.pdf
Follow up
Flagged
Good morning Dave -
ln regards to the permitting for this garage, the county has already issued us a building permit for a single family
residence on this property (earlier this year), plus with the approved final plat (from when the property was split in two
earlier this year), this piece of property has also been granted water and sewer taps (which has been paid).
This piece of property is zoned as Rural, and allows for residential/garage use (by right)... we feel that the already
permitted residence and this garage are the best fit for this property.
We believe that the majority of item you listed below are a moot point do to the fact that we have already completed
these initial steps, and would request that we be put back in the cue for permit review on this project.
Please let me know if you have any further questions or comments Thanks Dave Rich
Richard Carter, Project Architect
D.M. Neuman Const. Co. & Design Group
ESTABLISHED 1982
310 19th STREET GWS CO 81601
(9701945-7s02 OFFTCE
(97016t8-7230 DTRECT
----Original Message-----
From: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 24,2OL9 L:44 PM
To: Jason Neuman (jason@dmneuman.com) <jason@dm neuman.com>; Rich Carter
(rich@dmneuman.com) <rich@dmneuman.com>
Cc: Glenn Hartmann <ghartmann@garfield-county.com>; Brooke Winschell<bwinschell@garfield-county.com>; Lindsay
Krol <lkrol@garfield-county.com>
Subject: Cappo Garage - Permit #BLRE-09-19-5980
Jason:
We have reviewed the building permit application for the above referenced project, but before we can finalize our
review & issue a building permit there are a few items that must first be addressed:
L. Property Boundary Survey - Provide us with a copy of a Survey as
prepared by a licensed Colorado Surveyor (or, alternatively, an Amended Final Plat or Boundary Line Adjustment)clearly
illustrating the property boundary lines and topographic features of this property. As shown on the architectural Site
Plan, the property boundaries do not align with information in our database records.
1
2. Land Use Change Permit - Has there been a Land Use Change Permit or
Subdivision completed for this property? Our records indicate that this lot has been designated for use at the sewage
treatment plant for Sunlight View subdivision. I am going to visit with Glenn Hartmann about whether or not your
garage is an allowed use, but Glenn is out of the office until Monday.
. . so I thought I would ask you this question.
3. Residential Garage - The size/configuration of this building is
somewhat incongruous with "residential" use and, in part, that is why I asked the question about a Land Use Permit. lf
your intent is for this building to serve as a "residential accessory building" then we need for you to complete the
attached Garage Agreement stating that this structure will only be used for residential accessory purposes. ln addition,
this Affidavit requires for you to build a residence on the property within twelve (12) months.
4. Soils Report - Provide us with a digital copy of the Engineer's
soils report.
5. Septic Permit - The inclusion of a powder bath in the garage
requires that you apply for a Septic Permit, as well as the Building Permit.
Please provide us with a Septic Permit application along with the associated fees, and you can coordinate this with
either Brooke or Lindsay.
6. Driveway Permit - Provide copy of driveway permit or exemption
letter from Road & Bridge Dept.
7. Setbacks - As a clarification to your Site Plan, the frontage along
Four Mile Road is the "Front Yard" and the minimum setback is 25 feet. I don't believe this poses a problem in terms of
siting the building since it's shown at a 35-foot distance from that property line, but I wanted to let you know about this
setback requirements. Also, the property line opposite the "Front Yard" is defined as the "Rear Yard" and a 25-foot
setback also applies.
lf you can follow-up with this requested information at your earliest opportun¡ty, we'd greatly appreciate it. ln the
meantime, we will place this project in our "Pending" file.
Thanks for your assistance on this matter
Dave Argo
Plans Examiner
IGa rfield-Cou nty-officia l-logo-signature]
Community Development Department
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 8160L
2
Dave Argo
From:
Sent:
lo:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dave Argo
Thursday, October 24,2019 1:44 PM
Jason Neuman fi ason@dmneuman.com); Rich Carter (rich@dmneuman.com)
Glenn Hartmann; bwinschell@garfield-county.com; lkrol@garfield-county.com
Cappo Garage - Permit #BLRE-09-19-5980
Garage Agreement.pdf
Jason:
We have reviewed the building permit application for the above referenced project, but before we can finalize our
review & issue a building permit there are a few items that must first be addressed:
t à Propertv Boundarv Survev - Provide us with a copy of a Survey as prepared by a licensed Colorado Surveyor (or,v rlt"r".t''*lìt an Amended Final Plat or Boundary Line Adjustment) clearly illustrating the property boundary
lines and topographic features of this property. As shown on the architectural Site Plan, the property boundaries
",
do not align with information in our database records.
VlI Land Use Change Permit - Has there been a Land Use Change Permit or Subdivision completed for this
property? Our records indicate that this lot has been designated for use at the sewage treatment plant for
Sunlight View subdivision. I am going to visit with Glenn Hartmann about whether or not your garage is an
allowed use, but Glenn is out of the office until Monday. . . so lthought lwould ask you this question.
Vf . Residential Garage - The size/configuration of this building is somewhat incongruous with "residential" use and,
in part, that is why I asked the question about a Land Use Permit. lf your intent is for this building to serve as a
"residential accessory building" then we need for you to complete the attached Garage Agreement stating that
this structure will only be used for residential accessory purposes. ln addition, this Affidavit requires for you to
build a residence on the property within twelve (12) months.
4, Soils Report - Provide us with a digital copy of the Engineer's soils report.
ú Septic Permit - The inclusion of a powder bath in the garage requires that you apply for a Septic Permit, as well
as the Building Permit. Please provide us with a Septic Permit application along with the associated fees, and
/' you can coordinate this with either Brooke or Lindsay'
y'A. Drivewav Permit - Provide copy of driveway permit or exemption letter from Road & Bridge Dept.
t,l. Setbacks - As a clarification to your Site Plan, the frontage along Four Mile Road is the "Front Yard" and the
' minimum setback is 25 feet. I don't believe this poses a problem in terms of siting the building since it's shown
at a 35-foot distance from that property line, but I wanted to let you know about this setback requirements.
Also, the property line opposite the "Front Yard" is defined as the "Rear Yard" and a 25-foot setback also
applies.
lf you can follow-up with this requested information at your earliest opportunity, we'd greatly appreciate it. ln the
meantime, we will place this project in our "Pending" file.
Thanks for your assistance on this matter.
Dave Argo
Plans Examiner
Garfieltl Connt¡'
Community Development Department
708 gth Street, Suite 407
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610
Emo i I : do rg o @ g a rfield-cou nty. com
Web : go rfi e ld-cou nty. com
1