The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondenceDave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 7:24 AM To: Darren Gallegos Cc: Lindsay Krol; Andy Schwaller Subject: RE: Ranch at Roaring Fork, Lot 11 Attachments: Ranch Creek PUD Final Plat.pdf Darren: I appreciate your follow-up emails on the subject of building envelopes. I have attached a copy of the Final Plat for what was originally called "Ranch Creek PUD" now commonly known as Ranch at Roaring Fork. On page 1 (middle bottom of sheet) you will see the Plat Notes which were included in my prior email to you. Sheet 2 shows the portion of the PUD included for this plat. There have been additional plats filed as this subdivision has grown over the years, but this is the one that includes Lot 11. From the Building Department's perspective, with the development of any lots located within platted subdivisions the Final Plat + Plat Notes included therein are the basic legal requirements to which all such lots must adhere. HOA covenants or design regulations are not enforced by Garfield County, but the Final Plat is what we must pay attention to when reviewing permits for development. Plat Note #6 very specifically states that "all structural elements of a house...shall be contained within the [building] envelope" and roofs obviously fit within the definition of "structural elements". This language also aligns with the definition of "building envelope" contained in our Land Use & Development Code. As a practical matter, the difference between setbacks and building envelopes is that setbacks allow for encroachment of up to 18" for roof overhangs and decks, whereas a building envelope does not allow for these encroachments outside its boundaries. We oftentimes describe a building envelope as a 3-dimensional glass box that doesn't allow encroachments out past the glass box. Although I recall reviewing another home in this PUD where the roof encroachments described in the HOA regulations was allowed, that doesn't appear to apply to this filing, because of the specific language included on the final plat. Dave Argo Plans Examiner E. Garfield Cou,itti' i Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county. corn From: Darren Gallegos <darrengallegos@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 3:45 PM To: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Cc: Lindsay Krol <Ikrol@garfield-county.com>; Andy Schwaller <aschwaller@garfield-county.com> Subject: [External] Re: Ranch at Roaring Fork, Lot 11 Dave, 1 Please see attached. I found this interesting. If you look at the Architectural -Guidelines on page 9 and io - 9 . General b. it says "Eaves, steps and open porches, patios and decks shall not be considered part of the building in computing compliance with building envelopes and setbacks". Please let me know if this changes anything. Thanks, Darren Gallegos From: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-countv.com> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 1:40 PM To: Darren Gallegos <darrengallegos@hotmail.com> Cc: Lindsay Krol <IkrolPgarfield-countv.com>; Andy Schwaller <aschwaller@garfield-countv.com> Subject: Ranch at Roaring Fork, Lot 11 Darren: I am currently reviewing plans for a new S.F. residence located at Ranch at Roaring Fork, Lot 11. However, it appears that the building footprint just barely fits within the platted Building Envelope and this doesn't yet account for roof overhangs and the trellis structure on the back patio — both of which must also must fit within the Building Envelope. Before we can finalize our plan review & issue a building permit, we need to receive from you a Site Plan prepared by a Colorado licensed Professional Land Surveyor which clearly illustrates and demonstrates compliance with limitations of the Building Envelope. For your information and so that you can forward along to your Surveyor, I have attached to this email the specific language of the Plat Note #6 stating this requirement and redlined areas on your building footprint plan which do not appear to comply. We will await receipt of a surveyed site plan from you before we can proceed with permit issuance. In addition to this new site plan, you will also be required to provide us with an improvement location survey that matches up with the surveyed site plan at time of your initial concrete inspection. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Dave Argo Plans Examiner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 2 0.14.163f tlItgebeZZECACki RANCH CREEK PLANNE OF PARCELS A & B, RESUBDIVISION OF RANCH AT ROARING FORK FINAL PLAT & "D" UNITS, ROARING 4::Ch9MerPT:•::: :I:9:9g "7 - °: "!' 7" ," 77 . 1: .. . . 1: r.., 1 "*"*'1""'"* ..7;,,..:. k7ge_. STATEOF DM ‘277L TY ZY.NOF Ma12.2.OoI ' ;7 ' "7 rrsoped o7 "T'' "T.9:"ty '' mho 40.11 ' " ' ."-171 T., =Val- rt-Lrarq, '' -7 My ceeeiss.on eap.ret: e Ws ime DAMP ..ND SEAL I4•, . LINES IN SPACE LAND SURVEYS FINAL PLAT D UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION PARCEL 2, PHASE II, TOWN CENTER, AND "D" UNITS OF . AND PARCEL 1, FINAL PLAT, PHASE II, TOWN CENTER FORK RANCH, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. T9Td T99' rrar:t9': 1:T7hoTs9c:92:: ' ::"th:9•:%9•17:1"9' T" 99" 99'99.9 9' ""T'9.99 T" '9' PMLLI" M"PE. dole 1:hert !sciole sr,IneieIscM .. •t':,::. lessollo, 'en ••• ..... M•a•cse al • ...orrery Ir•is••lon oed ...... Taco tr•inege . . .. 1.1 ghe la nr,a .rerfer, loe. a. I...h.,. a pop -greed ::1 :14:9rU::::ders4WMT•9;l7ti:g '''K =EV •••• Net ...sod =AV • t. I ' MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT MO DEDICATION ' !::194Pre:e94:":c:rs9:1:: h on pia, osol de gain . 110 dodleal o horm.n ir.2.40:1.• I.. • PLAT MOTES: I Control of nom.. mem. . Th. rorpoospbilpry of she properly ..... 2 All consirool.n shall he conrillosi oish USFS Wildfire P ...... ion Goidelknes. and iho pro..igoor thorowndor she% ;ill 'he no reo;rscI.n9en o. nImber of calsirol gas burning fireplacos or applIonces inclurrnd 'Fe pralocIl. coven ..... 4. All wslorier 1,0ring sill be dsr.scsod d ...... d ond in•ard. sa p ...... glar• on 5 :::11'99949T'9" 999'999' '9 . : . ***"“ SURVE,OR•S CERTI ....... ' ''' 1 9" "" • 119, 6/1,4/4••• .1 2: r.:.111 " • .•.. • • • f -11.11.6.• iird`r 11; Zoog NMI * 0.1.$31.0411 rl .. ..7.412L 4; :PE'Cr7OV. '1111:.44::UI; MIt I .1, ...I Chop' ••• ••1 ....... - J. ..14:Tiqi.Tol ...... !:(1%.:14.,. • '114 til:T44,711:124 1111:::feLW: ..... std. "EZ4:1!!:1'.' .3,7•I:a;:‘ • SF -;1 4.1. 41.1 wr 6••• . r 44.44M.OW091.01WW1.1401 4.11mki:92'le:\ .19'44":6"ii.F., A D L wry • cr 5=4 Mr'icf.a" LIES IV SPACE SPDAEY tAct-TAE- (LS /41/1) • ...1.4414_(ait S:44..ca .rr #le/44 • ma. -rm. ram FINAL PLAT RANCH CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS A & B, RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 2, PHASE II, TOWN CENTER, AND "D" UNITS OF RANCH AT ROARING FORK FINAL PLAT, AND PARCEL 1, FINAL PLAT. PHASE II, TOWN CENTER & "D" UNITS, ROARING FORK RANCH, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. CURVE & LIN& 17,70 71,0 TABLES l+bi�r! �6.grr� c C°Z 0R`923,0 STA re 070 ge3-261.1 h'f0Xw1P N0, coos.. Derainddi OF 82 a4ww1w •.R 8.11 IO,. wirr 14,41" 0,3 Ikf v' YJ 4711' IWO OP VICINITY MAP tar LINES IN SPACE OWNERS NOL:, .00..1700. • W. OYIw,N, 70415 e wwrc. w.m.00"1Xp f0" w1rL [ CANT a .L ENGINEER a�xw an m ,�eoi SURVEYOR LOT J5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE BREAKDOWN ?4 - • ,. w. • r e MONAD o x�r • SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE ��1 air �� ^ix,�ir•. � '�.�w�. � TyiF r� •••114M, ti EGiRD AND NOTES - ---.. i ��.o��,rrf� w .roi7,15.,x0 .ix /1771 VW. +E esesimcal err 60 fa 70 SCALE: 15:4O' LIVE IV 'ACE $rDIEr L?X SE 4,C S 1d 1111 eu,S.b,;. ca• .� 4.'i.Wq' V 3 -RL 4, 5 w, a c NOP [External] Re: Ranch at Roaring Fork, Lot 11 Darren Gallegos <darrengallegos@hotmail,cornT To Dave Argo Cc Lindsay Krol; Andy Schwaller U You replied to this message an 4/3/2020 10:33 AM. LOT 11 RRF Roof overhangs inside -Floor Plan Imagepdf 919 KB Dave, (--) Reply « Reply All -4 Forward Fri 4/3/2320 9:4t AM I just redrew the plan to account for roof overhangs and also took off the trellis. This would give us a room for a 3.6" overhang with 2" to spare everywhere except the back gable bump out. There we would have a 14' overhang with 2" to spare. How do you feel about this before I send it to Mic for updated architectural's and structural's? Darren -- r Dave Argo From: Darren Gallegos <darrengallegos@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 1:27 PM To: Dave Argo Subject: [External] Re: Amended Plans Form Attachments: Scan 2020-4-13 13.13.57.pdf; Darren Lot 11 RRF ARCHITECTURAL Layout Plans_rev a.pdf; Darren Lot 11 RRF STRUCTURAL Layout Plans_.pdf; document.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Dave, Please see attached updated plans and the Amended plans form. I also attached a Point map from High Country Engineering so you can see that I am working with them to make absolutely sure that this completely fits in the building envelope as required. Shown are the changes that we have made to get it to fit. HCE has confirmed that Mic's site plan is accurate and it does fit as he has shown. Thanks, Darren Gallegos 970-948-7383 From: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 12:15 PM To: Darren Gallegos <darrengallegos@hotmail.com> Subject: Amended Plans Form Darren: Here's the Amended Plans form that you can include along with Mic's updated drawings. Thanks & stay safe out there. Dave Argo Plans Examiner evGarfield Courtly Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfleld-county.com 1 Garfield County COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-8212, Fax: (970) 384-3470 BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTAL Information Requested by Plans Examiner ❑ Information Requested by Inspector Revisions to Approved Plans BUILDING PERMIT #: LR - n 3 - `a O - � i Description of work, including changes to approved plans: -11k 00A IlAUe. cPvi c s0 \- A- Vt eft \\NI \Dv i\c10‘..5 ‘./,A fe,_ Cnntant Information: Contact Name: Q HIr<er‘ O-o,.i1L9 S Job Address: T 1`) Loi I fre j 54 Cor dd, (0 Phone: ` Q - Li v- -7 31:Z1 CeII: E-mail: 061 y(19, ose1lok-fvkai COi`'1 Plan Review Fee: ($5o.o0per hour)