The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRC Approval LetterRECEIVËÞ GARF¡ËLD COUNTY COM M UNITY f]EVELCIPMENT MEMORANDUM ASPEN GLEN DESIGN RBVIE\X/ COMMITTEE DATE: TO: FROM: RE: July 19,2021 L-24 Swank FINAL APPROVAL FILB Lisa Vogele, DRC Administrator Aspen GIen Lot L-24'349 Miclland Loop Df{.C Final Approval Package This Memorandum to File has been created to ensure continuity when reviewing this project during the periodic and final inspections required by the Aspen Glen Design Guidelines. The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the docurnents included in the final approval package for the L-24 project Swank Residence as reviewed at the July 9,2021 dnC meéting. Any changes to this package must be submitted as a change order and will be reviewed by the DRC administratively or before the Committee depending on the scope ofthe change. The foltowing items were included in the approved DRC final paclcage: . Revised sheet L-1.2 to show p per DRC letter Lisa Vogele, Administrator Design Review Comrnittee 970-963-3362 #RECEIVËÞ ,t ,, ;,, : G.ARFIELD COUNTY COMMUNIIY DEVELOPMENT Horneowners Association et Aspen Glenu lrtc. July 19,2021 Todd and Michelle Swank via email" rtswank@slqtbeam'com 16223 Deer Mountain Drive Littleton, Colorado 80 127 Re: Summary of Final Review LotL-24,349 Midland Loop Carbondale, CO 81623 'l-el: (970) 963-3362 Emu il : dpr i nc e@us ¡tengl e n h oct. c ont Dear Mr. and Mrs. Swank: The Design Review committee (DRC) completecl linal revier,v of your surbmitted plan set for lof L-24 Midland toop at their regurlar rnàeting hetd iuly g,2021. Thank you flol havir-rg your architect on hand to answer questions. Receipt of the $20,000 builder's completion deposit, $4,000 SAF nnd $5,000 CRAF is hereby acknowledged. As stated in the preliminary approval letter, the DRC fee of $7,500 was paid at the preliminar¡Trneeting. please be åware that this basic fee covers preliniinary application processing, neighbor notification, preliminary review, final application processing, final review, the pre- construction meeting, à.y-in inspection, grading inspection, final i¡spectio6, project oversight, and project closeout. This basic fee does not covertime to review incomplete submittals. design elements not in compliance with the Design Guidelines, change order requests, any violation o1'the Construction Rules arrd Regulatiorrs, ãncl re-inspections uãd/or meeting time clue to non-compliance with the fìnal DRC approved plans set. Any DRC time spent oLrtside the basic fee scope olrvorl< shall be charged at the following rates: DRC Meeting time - S625lhr. DRC Administrator - $125lhr' DRC Architect - $250/hr. DRC Landscape Architect - $25O/hr' The DRC approved the fîrTal set of plans baserj upon the following: l. Varia¡ce request #1: Section 6.9 rninirnum Tree & Shrub tequirements, granted Z. Variancerequest#2: Section5.5roofconfigurationandclesignitem#l primaryroof,grantecl 3. Variance request #3: Section 5.4 walt configuration and desigrl item #4, grantecl 4. Variance request #4: Section 4.1 1.c.1 hot tub outside olbrrildirrg envelope, granted 5. I-lot tub recessed; 18" above grouncl 0080 Bald Eagle ltraY 6. Put irrigation pump on plan, add detail, and follow-r'rp with 'lake Falke [completed' received' included in final approved package] 7. Metal clad garage dbor should have appropriate size hardware g. Site Materials Mock-up - A materials åolór mock-up wall must be built on site within 30 days of the start of construction and installed on the outside of the construction fence. The DRC will make a final decision on color and materials at this time. N{}TE: It is uderstaocl by the I}RC that all prajects gaing.forwarti ü?'e úwûYc oÍ'tlrc inleerent ri'chç {}sststiatedwith coustrucriín r:ost,s and mute¡,ial'ilrto.yl æ iír¡,u ¡¡utr. !f'wst't thÕs¿t t,> wtove.fìtrwar¿!witit constructitln, the Ðllc) wi!í. ywt grant *) v*ri¿¡n¿:e x, tir, Ii-w¡¡t¡tfh e¿¡rtsffi'tc{íor¡ t{eadline iÍue tr't e,sealating project costs. Con,stlucüon t)cla.ys u,iíl <¡v¡!.\: be cop¡sidet'etl. ii ¡he ttpp!ícant {ûil prove tlwt ¿s ptarticulir'maier¡at(i) is unavailable.. ?'hß wauld reqz,tire applying to the llRC.fcr a varictnce reqilesl' -|"lte variance request sh*ll incluate the.follawing" * Filling or.tt a Vsriance Rer¡trest.fttrm (www.ts,t¡t'cngle r¡ftç't'*:n':,i t Providing a lefkr.from fÍrc rn*nufisctt¿t'{'1r 'strtifng ilral * ¡:tzt'iidtìlúi t?títi(?r¡¡¡i is r¡¡rf cvt'tiiahle *v¡'i whert the.y a rtÍ ic i¡;cte ava i la b i I i ty' ø A statement deciarirry thrtt ¿z.substitute materíal(s) wa's cttn'rirl"ereç!' c .4n updated consiruclion schedule reflecting the acliusted crsnpletion daie' Variance yeEue.,cts shall be. ernaited to tlrc dtt(: ,4drninistrator in acl'vçrtce af any proiect detays' The ,*.ior", request will be placed an the next availaltle ÐRC Agendaþr ret'iew' The DRC requires a building height verification survey to be completed prior to the ror"rgh fraÍring inspection (dry-in) insfectio"n anã performed by a colorado professional land surveyor and sl-rall include a statement Ui ft. .rru"yo, stating whettrer the builcling is ot is not in-co-mplianee with Garfield County building height rules. Tñe owner or owner's representative shall submit a completed height verifrcation ,uro.î to íhe Aspen Glen DRC. The standard form that shall be used is attached' Prior to closing the file and returning the builder's completion deposit, copies 9ltlt certifìcate of occupancy and an il;;";"nt Loãation Certifi,cate must be provided to the DRC. The DRC may elect to withhold u portion of the Builder's completion Deposit to ensure that final landscaping is completed, and growth is assured. Fi'ally, the HoA has adopted a schedule of Violations & Fines' A copy of the schedule is attached to this letter and will be provided at the pre-construction rneeting. Please familiarize yourself and your contractor with this dåcument, then sígn, date, and emailto the DRC Administrator' The Pre- construction meeting will not be helcl untilthe signed document is received' please keep in mind that a copy of your approvecl plans will be lcept on file for periodic review by the Design Review Committee to assure .orþiiun.. with yor-rr approved plarrs. Any anticipated changes fr"om your upprou.d fiunr t"uu be submiited to, reviewecl by, antl receive approval frorn the Design Review Cominittee prior to making any changes' 0080 Batd Eagte way ,*0,#:l;,;1,,::g:,r,,:åt: (e70)o%3-3362 2 Sincerely, Lisa Vogele Aspen Glen DRC Adrninistrator Cc: Frank Malek, architect DRC Carbondale,CO 81623 Tel: (970)963-3362 Email : dprÌnc e@as pe ngl enh o a' c o¡n aJ 0080 Bald Eagle WaY úfl H H !l iä*c'rt; 'ir-* June 28ln,2021 Aspen Glen DRC Boord B0 Bold Eogle WoY Corbondole. CO Bló23 RE:Proposed Swcrnk Residence LoT tNP-24, Midlond Loop, Corbondole, CO Deor Members of the Aspen Glen DRC Boord: On beholf of lhe oppliconts Mr. Todd & Mrs. Michelle Swonk ond pursuont to the Summory of the preliminory Reviewdofed June 16l",2021for the obove referenced project pleose occept this conespondence os the Formol Request for Vorionces from the following requirements of the Aspen Glen Moster Design Guidelines: Vqrionce Requesi # l: Voriqnce from Seclion 6.9 Minimum Tree & Shrub Requiremenls Due to extenuoting circumstonces specific lo this property vorionce from the obove referenced section is kindly requested os follows: A 12,-6,,Droinoge & lnigotion Eosemenl is locoled olong the enlire side north side of this properly ond on oddition ol 6,681SF ıroinoge & lrrîgoiion Eosemenf in the form of o pond occupies'lhe reor (Eosf) side of the proper.ty. Since irees ore nol ollowed to be plont wifhin these eosements lhe ocÌuol plonioble ór"o on this properly is sevedy reduced to opproximotely 0.352 ocres moking it difficult to meei the minimum tree ond shrub plonting requirements. Vorionce is kindly requested to crllow the plonting of Z Evergreens Trees, B Deciduous Trees (2 are existing) ond 53 Shrubs (12 of which ore ävergrãen¡ os indicoted on the ottoched Londscope Plon L- I .l prepored by Elife Lond Design, LLC ond lost revised on 6-1g-21. pleose note ihol os o considerolion for this vcrionce request ihe size of eleven of the proposed trees hos been increosed in size' Voriqnce Requesl # 2: Vqrionce from Seclion 5.5 Roof Configurolion cnd Design ltem # 1 Primory Roof seciion 5.5 (l ) of lhe Moster Design Guidelines stoies: "The main roofs of fhe residence musf not exceed 40,-0;'in tength before oéhongein slope or elevotion heighl. ChÌmneys con be used os the chonge ín etevoiloíhowever the ridgeline beyond the chÌmney cannot exceed 20 feet. Roof e/ernents used to breok up lhe maxtmum ridge line must tronsverse bolh sides of the ridge and be of opproprioternoss ond sco/e, see diogrom 5.5 o. Ihls con o/so be occomp/ished by o roof e/enrenf lronsverse fo lhe long elemenf, see dragrom 5.5 b'" As indicoted on lhe fuesi Elevoiion of sheet A2Ol the proposed primory roof of the residence is opproximotely 50'-Z', in length exceeding the 40'-0" requirements, however the mojority of the leng'th of this roof is intenupled by-severol eleménis including o lower goble ond shed roof elenlents with six windows thot substontiolly breokup Ihe moss of lhe moin roof in o similor moner os illustroted in diogrom 5.Sb of the requírements. Bosed on lhe obove we believe thot the intent of Section 5.5 (l) of ihe Moster Design Guidelines is substontiolly met in this design qnd kindly requesl thot this vorionce be gronted. Vqriqnce Requesf # 3: Vorionce from Seclion 5.4 Wqll Configurolion ond Design, ltem A per seclion 5.4, lfem A, the Goroge woll length must be o moximum running length of 25'-0" (twenty- five feet). The proposed front woll of the Goroge os indicoted on lhe South Elevotion meets lhese requirements however of the reor woll of the gorqge shown on the North Elevotion is opproximotely 3o'-l 1,, exceeding the moximum running woll length of 25'-0" by opproximoiely 5'-1 1". ln view of the 8400 Ë. CrescenÌ t)çrkwoy, Suile I ó0. Greenwooci Viì¡oa,jè, r:C tiOl I 1 '" lJ0ll-l-t08-ti.Îi¿4 Page 2 of 2 Variance Requests Letter - Swank Residence 06-18-2021 ilenlur* foct thot this reor goroge woll includes o door, lwo windows ond hip roof ond the North Elevotion of the Residence includes numerous orticulotions in tlre wolls ond the roof lines we kindly requesi o vorionce from Section 5.4, ltem A to ollow fhe reor woll of the goroge to remoin os indicofed' We oppreciote your time ond consideroiíon in lhe review of these vorionce requests. Sincerely, l0lArchitecture LLC 1 ,rr# Fronk A. M Monoging AIA, NCARB pol