HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.07 N23-697 Pipeline IVNWMP
CAERUS OIL AND GAS
N23-697 PIPELINE
INTEGRATED VEGETATION AND NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN
GARFIELD COUNTY LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT CODE 2013
Cover photo: View of the proposed pipeline alignment.
Prepared for:
Caerus Oil and Gas
143 Diamond Ave.
Parachute, CO 81635
Prepared by:
WestWater Engineering, Inc.
2516 Foresight Cr. #1
Grand Junction, CO 81505
Amie Wilsey, Environmental Scientist/Project Manager
May 2018
WestWater Engineering Page 1 of 13 May 2018
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
At the request of Caerus Oil and Gas (Caerus), WestWater Engineering (WestWater) has prepared this
Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan for the proposed N23-697 pipeline that
would be located on privately owned lands in Garfield County, Colorado. This document reports the
results and analysis of the findings that are pertinent to Section 9-102-K of the Garfield County Land Use
and Development Code (as amended) as it applies to this project.
The project would be located in Section 23, Township 6 South, and Range 97 West (Figure 1). Access to
the project area is available via Garfield County Road 215 and private access roads. The current land uses
include rangeland, agriculture, wildlife habitat, and oil and gas development.
1.2 General Survey Information
Pedestrian surveys of the project area were conducted by WestWater biologists on May 9, 2018. Surveys
were conducted within the growing season for noxious weeds. Identification of plant species was aided by
using pertinent published field guides (Ackerfield 2015, Kershaw et al. 1998, Whitson et al. 2001,
CWMA 2007, Weber and Wittmann 2012). Noxious weed locations were recorded with the aid of
handheld global positioning system (GPS) receivers using NAD83 map datum, with all coordinate
locations based on the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system in Zone 12. Mapped soil
types, as published by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), were reviewed to determine the soil types and vegetation characteristics at the
project site (NRCS 2018).
2.0 Landscape Setting
2.1 Terrain
The proposed pipeline would be located on top of the Roan Plateau along gently rolling ridges at an
elevation of approximately 8,500 feet (Figure 1). The area surrounding the project is composed of rolling
ridges divided by draws. The proposed project would parallel an existing pipeline alignment. There are
numerous access roads and oil and gas infrastructure in the project vicinity.
2.2 Vegetation
Vegetation communities around the project area have been disturbed by natural gas development
including access roads, pipeline rights-of-way (ROWs), and well pads. Vegetation communities present
in the survey area consist of a mixture of reclaimed areas re-seeded with native and non-native grasses
and forbs, scattered oakbrush shrublands, and mountain shrublands. The mountain shrublands are
composed primarily of Saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) intermixed with mountain
snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii), and mountain big sagebrush
(Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana). The oakbrush shrublands are dominated by Gambel oak with an
understory of forbs and grasses. A list of common plants observed and/or known to occur in the survey
area are described in Table 1.
VEGETATION
WestWater Engineering Page 2 of 13 May 2018
Table 1. Common plant species observed and/or known to occur in the survey area.
Common Name Scientific Name Abundance* Habitat Type
Grasses
Bluebunch
wheatgrass Pseudoroegneria spicata xx
Oakbrush shrublands,
Mountain shrublands,
Reclaimed areas
Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis xx Reclaimed areas, Mountain
shrublands
Intermediate
wheatgrass Thinopyrum intermedium xx Reclaimed areas
Slender Wheatgrass Elymus trachycaulus xxx Reclaimed areas
Smooth brome Bromus inermis xx Reclaimed areas
Western wheatgrass Pascopyrum smithii xx
Reclaimed areas, Mountain
shrublands, Oakbrush
shrublands
Forbs
Common dandelion Taraxacum officinale xx Reclaimed areas, Mountain
shrublands
Lewis flax Linum lewisii xx Reclaimed areas, Mountain
shrublands
Prickly lettuce Lactuca serriola x Reclaimed areas
Russian thistle Salsola tragus x Reclaimed areas
Sharpleaf twinpod Physaria acutifolia x Mountain shrublands,
Oakbrush shrublands
Stickseed Lappula spp. x Reclaimed areas
Tumblemustard Descurainia sophia x Reclaimed areas
Wavyleaf thistle Cirsium undulatum xx Reclaimed areas, Oakbrush
shrublands
Western yarrow Achillea millefolium xx Mountain shrublands,
Reclaimed areas
Yellow sweetclover Melilotus altissimus xx Reclaimed areas
Shrubs/Trees
Broom snakeweed Gutierrezia sarothrae xxx Reclaimed areas,
Mountain shrublands
Gambel oak Quercus gambelii xxx
Oakbrush shrublands,
Mountain shrublands
Rubber rabbitbrush Ericameria nauseosa xx Reclaimed areas
Saskatoon
serviceberry Amelanchier alnifolia xx Mountain shrublands
Wood’s rose Rosa woodsii xx Mountain shrublands,
oakbrush shrublands
Wyoming big
sagebrush
Artemisia tridentata
wyomingensis xx Mountain shrublands,
Oakbrush shrublands
WestWater Engineering Page 3 of 13 May 2018
Table 1. Common plant species observed and/or known to occur in the survey area.
Common Name Scientific Name Abundance* Habitat Type
Yellow rabbitbrush Chrysothamnus
viscidiflorus x
Oakbrush shrublands,
Mountain shrublands
*Abundance:
xxx= High frequency; with uniform distribution across project area.
xx= Moderate frequency; occurrence scattered throughout project area.
x= Infrequent; only a small number of individuals noted within project area.
3.0 NOXIOUS WEEDS
3.1 Introduction to Noxious Weeds
Most noxious weed species in Colorado were introduced, mostly from Eurasia, either unintentionally or
as ornamentals that established wild populations. These plants compete aggressively with native
vegetation and tend to spread quickly because the environmental factors that normally control them are
absent. Disturbed soils, altered native vegetation communities, and areas with increased soil moisture
often create prime conditions for weed infestations. The primary vectors that spread noxious weeds
include humans, animals, water, and wind.
The Colorado Noxious Weed Act (State of Colorado 2005) requires local governing bodies to develop
noxious weed management plans. Both the State of Colorado and Garfield County maintain a list of
plants that are considered to be noxious weeds. The State of Colorado noxious weed list segregates
noxious weed species based by priority for control:
1. List A species must be eradicated whenever detected.
2. List B species spread should be halted; may be designated for eradication in some counties.
3. List C species are widespread and the State will assist local jurisdictions which choose to manage
those weeds.
The Garfield County Weed Advisory Board has compiled a list of 21 plants from the State list considered
to be noxious weeds within the county (Appendix A). The Garfield County Weed Advisory Board has
duties to:
1. Develop a noxious weed list;
2. Develop a weed management plan for designated noxious weeds; and,
3. Recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that identified landowners submit an
integrated weed management plan for their properties (Garfield County 2002).
3.2 Observations
Weed species listed by the State of Colorado (2005) detected in the project area include bull thistle
(Cirsium vulgare), houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale), and musk thistle (Carduus nutans) (Figure 1).
Houndstongue and musk thistle are listed weeds in Garfield County (Garfield County 2018). Detailed
noxious weed infestation information, general control techniques, and revegetation recommendations are
included in this Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan.
In areas where soil disturbances have created growing conditions that favor non-native vegetation, several
unlisted nuisance weed species are present. These plants can negate revegetation efforts and cause
financial losses due to decreased seeding success and associated costs of replanting. The presence of
these plants creates increased competition for resources and can negatively affect desirable native plant
WestWater Engineering Page 4 of 13 May 2018
species. Plants in this category observed or known to exist in the project area include Russian thistle
(Salsola ssp.) and tall tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimum).
3.3 Integrated Weed Management
Control of invasive species is a difficult task and requires intensive on-going control measures. Care
must be taken to avoid negatively impacting desirable plant communities and inviting infestation by other
pioneer invaders. Weed management is best achieved by employing varied methods over several growing
seasons, including inventory (surveys), direct treatments, prevention through best management practices,
monitoring of treatment efficacy, and subsequent detection efforts. Weed management is often limited to
controlling existing infestations and prevention of further infestations, rather than eradication, but through
effective weed management practices eradication can be possible in small to medium sized weed
populations.
Assessment of the existence and extent of noxious weeds in an area is essential for the development of an
integrated weed management plan. This report provides an initial assessment of the occurrence of
noxious weeds for the project area. In order to continue effective management of noxious weeds, further
inventory and analysis is necessary to 1) determine the effectiveness of the past treatment strategies; 2)
modify the treatment plan, if necessary; and 3) detect new infestations early, which would result in more
economical and effective treatments.
3.4 Prevention of Noxious Weed Infestations
Weed management can be costly, and heavy infestations may exceed the economic threshold for practical
treatment. Prevention is an especially valuable and economical strategy for noxious weed management.
Several simple practices should be employed to prevent weed infestations. The following practices will
prevent infestation and thereby reduce costs associated with noxious weed control:
• Prior to delivery to the site, all equipment and vehicles, including maintenance vehicles, should
be thoroughly cleaned of soils from previous sites which may be contaminated with noxious
weeds.
• If working in sites with weed-seed contaminated soil, equipment should be cleaned of potentially
seed-bearing soils and vegetative debris at the infested area prior to moving to uncontaminated
terrain.
• Avoid driving vehicles through areas where weed infestations exist.
• Use of weed-seed-free reclamation materials such as mulch and seed.
3.5 Treatment and Control of Noxious Weed Infestations
The treatment method and timing will be determined by the project proponent and their contracted
licensed pesticide applicators. The recommendations provided in this report will be considered when
developing annual treatment plans. General control methods for the species detected in the project area
are provided for reference in Table 2.
Table 2. General noxious weed control methods for species in the project area.
Common Name
Scientific Name
USDA Symbol
Type Control Methods
Bull thistle
Cirsium vulgare
CIVU
Biennial
Severing the tap root at least 2 inches below the soil line before
flowering is very effective. Herbicides can be used in the rosette
to early bolting stage. Flowering plants should be chopped and
bagged to prevent spread of seeds.
WestWater Engineering Page 5 of 13 May 2018
Table 2. General noxious weed control methods for species in the project area.
Common Name
Scientific Name
USDA Symbol
Type Control Methods
Houndstongue
Cynoglossum officinale
CYOF
Biennial
Early Spring tillage before weed emergence in the existing
corridor to a depth of 2 to 4 inches. Herbicide application in
Spring while plants are small and it the late fall, bagging the
seed heads.
Musk thistle
Carduus nutans
CANU4
Biennial
Tillage or hand grubbing in the rosette stage, mowing at bolting
or early flowering, seed head & rosette weevils, leaf feeding
beetles, herbicides in rosette stage.
Bold = Garfield County List
3.6 Recommended Treatment Strategies
The following treatment strategies are presented for reference. It is important to know whether the weed
species being managed is an annual, biennial, or perennial to select strategies that effectively control and
eliminate the target. Treatment strategies vary depending on plant type, which are summarized in Tables
3 and 4. Herbicides should not always be the first treatment of choice when other methods can be
effectively employed.
Table 3. Treatment Strategies for Annual and Biennial Noxious Weeds
Target: Prevent Seed Production
1. Hand grub (pull), hoe, till, cultivate in rosette stage and before flowering or seed maturity. If flowers
or seeds develop, cut and bag seed heads.
2. Cut roots with a spade 2”-3” below soil level.
3. Treat with herbicide in seedling, rosette or bolting stage, before flowering.
4. Mow biennials after bolting stage but before seed set. Mowing annuals will not prevent flowering but
can reduce total seed production.
(Sirota 2004)
Table 4. Treatment Strategies for Perennials
Target: Deplete nutrient reserves in root system, prevent seed production
1. Allow plants to expend as much energy from root system as possible. Do not treat when first
emerging in spring but allow growth to bud/bloom stage. If seeds develop cut and bag if possible.
2. Herbicide treatment at bud to bloom stage or in the fall (recommended after August 15 when natural
precipitation is present). In the fall plants draw nutrients into the roots for winter storage. Herbicides
will be drawn down to the roots more efficiently at this time due to translocation of nutrients to roots
rather than leaves. If the weed patch has been present for a long period of time another season of seed
production is not as important as getting the herbicide into the root system. Spraying in fall (after
middle August) will kill the following year’s shoots, which are being formed on the roots at this time.
3. Mowing usually is not recommended because the plants will flower anyway, rather, seed production
should be reduced. Many studies have shown that mowing perennials and spraying the regrowth is
not as effective as spraying without mowing. Effect of mowing is species dependent therefore it is
imperative to know the species and its basic biology. Timing of application must be done when
biologically appropriate, which is not necessarily convenient.
WestWater Engineering Page 6 of 13 May 2018
Table 4. Treatment Strategies for Perennials
Target: Deplete nutrient reserves in root system, prevent seed production
4. Tillage may or may not be effective or practical. Most perennial roots can sprout from pieces only 0.5
inch – 1.0 inch long. Clean machinery thoroughly before leaving the weed patch.
5. Hand pulling is generally not recommended for perennial species unless you know the plants are
seedlings and not established plants. Hand pulling can be effective on small patches but is very labor
intensive because it must be done repeatedly.
(Sirota 2004)
Some weeds, particularly annuals and biennials, can develop resistance to herbicides. The ability to
quickly develop immunity to herbicides, especially when they are used incorrectly, makes it imperative to
use the proper chemicals at the correct time in the specified concentration according to the product label.
Excessive application, either in frequency or concentration, can result in top kill without significantly
affecting the root system. Repeated excessive applications may result in resistant phenotypes.
3.7 Noxious Weed Management – Best Management Practices
Construction: The following practices should be adopted for any construction project to reduce the costs
of noxious weed control and aid in prevention efforts. The practices include:
• Prior to delivery to the site, equipment should be cleaned of soils remaining from previous
construction sites which may be contaminated with noxious weeds.
• Equipment and material handling should be done on established sites to reduce the area and
extent of soil compaction.
• In all cases, temporary disturbance should be kept to an absolute minimum.
• Top soil, where present, should be segregated from deeper soils and replaced as top soil on the
final grade, a process known as live topsoil handling.
• If stored longer than one growing season, topsoil stockpiles should be seeded with non-invasive
sterile hybrid grasses.
• Wetland vegetation, if encountered, should be live handled like sod, temporarily watered if
necessary, and placed over excavated sub-soil relative to the position from which the wetland sod
was removed.
• Cut-off collars should be placed on all wetland and stream crossings to prevent back washing
(seed vector) and to ensure that soil moisture conditions are not impacted after construction so
that native plants can re-establish from the existing seed bank.
• If working in weed infested sites, equipment should be cleaned of potentially seed-bearing soils
and vegetative debris prior to moving to uncontaminated terrain.
• After construction, disturbed areas outside the footprint of the development should be
immediately reseeded with an appropriate seed mix.
Herbicides: Many of the listed noxious weed species in Colorado can be controlled with commercially
available herbicides. Annual and biennial weeds are best controlled at the pre-bud stage after germination
or in the spring of the second year. Selective herbicides are recommended to minimize damage to
desirable grass species.
It is important that applicators adhere to concentrations specified on herbicide containers. Herbicides
generally do not work better at higher concentrations. Herbicide failures are frequently related to high
concentrations that result in top kill before the active ingredient can be transported to the roots through
WestWater Engineering Page 7 of 13 May 2018
the nutrient translocation process. If directed on the herbicide label, a surfactant or other adjuvant should
be added to the tank.
Grazing: In the event grazing is allowed in the project area, it should be deferred in reclaimed areas until
revegetation of desirable species has been successfully established and seeded plants have had
opportunity to reproduce.
Monitoring: Areas where noxious weed infestations are identified and treated should be inspected over
time to ensure that control methods are working to reduce and suppress the identified infestation. The
sites should be monitored until the infestations are eliminated. These inspections can then be used to
prioritize future weed control efforts.
3.8 Commercial Applicator Recommendations
A certified commercial pesticide applicator licensed in rangeland and/or right-of-way/industrial weed
control (depending on site characteristics) is a necessary choice for herbicide control efforts. An
applicator has the full range of knowledge, skills, equipment, and experience desired when dealing with
tough noxious weeds. In addition, the purchase and use of restricted use herbicides requires a Colorado
pesticide applicator license.
4.0 REVEGETATION – RECLAMATION
Successful reclamation of the project area is dependent upon soil type and texture, slope gradient and
aspect, proper weed control, available water, and revegetation with suitable plant species. Site-specific
reclamation plans utilizing native species should be developed with a qualified reclamation contractor.
Reclamation services using multiple seed bin range drills and specialized equipment are available and
should be used for reclamation seeding projects.
Soil Preparation
Compaction can reduce water infiltration and also hinder the penetration of the sprouting seed. Practices
that will reduce compaction and prepare the seedbed include: scarification, tillage, or harrowing
(Colorado Natural Areas Program et al. 1998).
In areas with slope greater than three percent or where laminar flows from runoff could affect reseeding
success, imprinting of the seed bed is recommended. Imprinting can be in the form of dozer tracks or
furrows perpendicular to the direction of slope. When utilizing hydro-seeding followed by mulching,
imprinting should be done prior to seeding unless the mulch is to be crimped into the soil surface. If
broadcast seeding and harrowing, imprinting should be done as part of the harrowing. Furrowing can be
done by several methods, the most simple of which is to drill seed perpendicular to the direction of slope
in a prepared bed. Other simple imprinting methods include deep hand raking and harrowing, always
perpendicular to the direction of slope.
Soil Amendments
The addition of soil amendments in rangeland reclamation projects can create more optimal growing
conditions for non-native or invasive plant species, with which native plants compete poorly. There is
potential that the use of soil amendments (fertilizer) containing nitrogen will disproportionately benefit
undesirable annual plants (Perry et al. 2010). If the company determines the use of soil amendments to be
beneficial, the type and rate should be based on results from lab analysis of soil samples collected at the
site.
A potentially beneficial alternative method to enhance reclamation success, particularly where there is
poor or destroyed topsoil, is the application of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). These
fungi, mostly of the genus Glomus, are symbiotic with about 80 percent of all vegetation. Endo-
mycorrhizal fungi are associated mostly with grasses and forbs and could be helpful in reclamation. In
WestWater Engineering Page 8 of 13 May 2018
symbiosis, the fungi can increase water and nutrient transfer capacity of the host root system (Barrow and
McCaslin 1995). Over-the-counter commercial products are available, and the best products should
contain more than one fungus species.
Compacted soils respond well to fossilized humic substances and by-products called humates. These
humates, including humic and fulvic acids and humin were formed from pre-historic plant and animal
deposits and can benefit reclamation efforts on compacted soils when applied as directed.
Seed Mixture
The recommended seed mix (Table 5) is adapted from the Bureau of Land Management’s Colorado River
Valley Field Office seed menu recommendations (BLM 2013). This seed mix is well suited for mountain
shrublands and oakbrush shrublands. The mix includes perennial native grasses and forbs that should
establish well, protect topsoil, and provide a basis for rehabilitation of the site upon reclamation. Since
the project area is privately owned, the landowners may request a different seed mixture.
Table 5. Recommended seed menu for mixed mountain shrubland, including oakbrush.
Common Name Scientific Name Variety Season Form
PLS
lbs/acre*
Plant Both of the Following (20% Each, 40% Total)
Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymus elymoides, Sitanion
hystrix VNS Cool Bunch 2.7
Bluebunch Wheatgrass
Pseudoroegneria spicata,
Agropyron spicatum
Secar, P-7,
Anatone,
Goldar
Cool Bunch 3.7
and Two of the Following (15% Each, 30% Total)
Thickspike Wheatgrass
Elymus lanceolatus ssp.
lanceolatus, Agropyron
dasystachyum
Critana,
Bannock,
Schwendimar
Cool Sod-
forming 2.5
Slender Wheatgrass Elymus trachycaulus,
Agropyron trachycaulum San Luis Cool Bunch 2.5
Western Wheatgrass Pascopyrum [Agropyron]
smithii
Arriba,
Rosana Cool Sod-
forming 3.6
and One of the Following (10% Total)
Big Bluegrass Poa ampla Sherman Cool Bunch 0.3
Canby Bluegrass Poa canbyi, P. secunda Canbar Cool Bunch 0.3
Muttongrass Poa fendleriana VNS Cool Bunch 0.3
WestWater Engineering Page 9 of 13 May 2018
Table 5. Recommended seed menu for mixed mountain shrubland, including oakbrush.
and One of the Following (10% Total)
Letterman Needlegrass Achnatherum [Stipa]
lettermanii VNS Cool Bunch 1.7
Columbia Needlegrass Achnatherum [Stipa]
nelsonii, Stipa columbiana VNS Cool Bunch 1.7
Green Needlegrass Nassella [Stipa] viridula Lodorm,
Cucharas Cool Bunch 1.4
and One of the Following (10% Total)
Indian Ricegrass
Achnatherum [Oryzopsis]
hymenoides
Nezpar,
Paloma,
Rimrock
Cool Bunch 1.9
Junegrass
Koeleria macrantha, K.
cristata
VNS (North
American
origin)
Cool Bunch 0.1
OPTIONAL: Any combination from the following species may be substituted for up to 10% of the
above grasses.
Silvery Lupine Lupinus argenteus VNS
Arrowleaf Balsamroot Balsamorhize sagittata VNS
Sulfur Flower Eriogonum umbellatum VNS
Yarrow Achillea millifolium VNS
Utah Sweetvetch Hedysarum boreale VNS
Rocky Mountain
Beeplant
Cleome serrulata VNS
Utah Serviceberry Amelanchior utahensis VNS
Mountain Snowberry Symphoricarpus oreophilus VNS
Wood’s Rose Rosa woodsii VNS
White Sage Artemisia ludoviciana VNS
*Based on 60 pure live seeds (PLS) per square foot, drill-seeded. Double this rate (120 PLS per
square foot) if broadcast or hydroseeded
WestWater Engineering Page 10 of 13 May 2018
For best results and success, reseeding should be done in late autumn. The seed application rate should be
doubled for broadcast applications such as hydroseeding or hand broadcasting of seed (CNHP 1998).
Seeding Methods
The preferred seeding method would be with a multiple seed bin range drill with no soil preparation other
than simple grading to slope and imprinting and water bars where applicable. This method would likely
also be the most economical method. Hydroseeding or hand-broadcast seeding at twice the recommended
drill seed rate is recommended for steep slopes or for smaller areas where drill seeding would be
impractical or dangerous.
Alternative seeding methods include, but are not limited to:
• harrow with just enough soil moisture to create a rough surface, broadcast seed and re-harrow,
preferably at a 90 degree angle to the first harrow;
• hydroseeding; and
• hand raking and broadcast followed by re-raking at a 90 degree angle to the first raking.
These are not the only means of replanting the site. However, these methods have been observed to be
effective in similar landscapes. After desired grasses are established and control of target weed species is
successful, then shrubs, forbs, and trees can be planted without concern for herbicide damage. Few native
forb seeds are available commercially as cultivars. Most are collected from natural populations. Native
shrubs and forbs often do not establish well from seed, particularly when mixed with grasses. Past
experience has shown that stabilizing the soil with grasses, accomplishing weed control, and then coming
back to plant live, containerized woody species in copses has been the most cost effective method for
establishing the woody species component of the plant community.
For sites where soil disturbance will be temporary, grasses should be drilled after construction activities
cease and the equipment is removed from the site. After two years of controlling weeds (with herbicides)
and allowing the grasses to become established, forbs and woody species should be inter-seeded or hand-
planted to increase the diversity and value of the reclamation plantings.
Mulching
Crimped straw mulch would be the most cost effective and practical method of mulching areas prone to
erosion after drill seeding this site. No mulching is recommended for areas that are hydroseeded. Potential
detrimental effects of mulching include the introduction of weed species and the establishment of non-
native cereal grains. Use of a certified weed-free sterile wheat hybrid straw mulch would limit these
effects.
BMPs
Excelsior wattles or straw bales at the toe of steep slopes and water discharge points are appropriate to
help control water velocity flowing off the alignment during storms and spring runoff. Terracing slopes
near or exceeding 3:1 will reduce erosion, benefitting topsoil and seed retention and thereby improving
revegetation success.
5.0 REFERENCES
Ackerfield, J. 2015. Flora of Colorado. Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth, Texas.
Barrow, J. R., and Bobby D. McCaslin. 1995. Role of microbes in resource management in arid
ecosystems. In: Barrow, J. R., E. D. McArthur, R. E. Sosebee, and Tausch, R. J., comps. 1996.
Proceedings: shrubland ecosystem dynamics in a changing environment. General Technical
WestWater Engineering Page 11 of 13 May 2018
Report, INT-GTR-338, Ogden, Utah: U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service,
Intermountain Resource Station, 275 pp.
BLM. 2013. Revised Revegetation Seed Mix Menus, CRVFO Energy Team. U.S. Bureau of Land
Management, Colorado River Valley Field Office. Silt, Colorado.
Colorado Natural Areas Program, Colorado State Parks, Colorado Department of Natural Resources.
1998. Native Plant Revegetation Guide for Colorado. Available online:
http://www.parks.state.co.us/SiteCollectionImages/parks/Programs/CNAP/CNAPPublications/Re
vegetationGuide/revegetation.pdf.
CNHP. 1998. Native Plant Re-vegetation Guide for Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage
Program, Caring for the Land Series, Vol. III, State of Colorado, Division of Parks and
Outdoor Recreation, Department of Natural Resources, Denver, 258 pp.
CWMA. 2007. S. Anthony, T. D’Amato, A. Doran, S. Elzinga, J. Powell, I. Schonle, K. Uhing. Noxious
Weeds of Colorado, Ninth Edition. Colorado Weed Management Association, Centennial.
Garfield County. 2002. Garfield County Vegetation Management and Garfield County Weed Advisory
Board. Garfield County Noxious Weed Management Plan, Resolution #2002-94, October 21.
Garfield County. 2018. Vegetation Management Section – Noxious Weed List. Available online:
http://www.garfield-county.com/vegetation-management/noxious-weed-list.aspx. Rifle.
Kershaw, L., A. MacKinnon, and J. Pojar. 1998. Plants of the Rocky Mountains. Lone Pine Publishing,
Auburn, Washington.
NRCS. 2018. Web Soil Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service,
URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Perry, L.G., D.M. Blumenthal, T.A. Monaco, M.W. Paschke, and E.F. Redente. 2010. Immobilizing
nitrogen to control plan invasion. Oecologia: 163:12-24.
Sirota, Judith M. 2004. Best management practices for noxious weeds of Mesa County. Colorado State
University, Cooperative Extension Tri River Area, Grand Junction, Colorado. URL:
http://www.coopext.colostate.edu/TRA/Weeds/weedmgmt.html
State of Colorado. 2005. Rules pertaining to the administration and enforcement of the Colorado Noxious
Weed Act, 35-5-1-119, C.R.S. 2003. Department of Agriculture, Plant Industry Division,
Denver, 78 pp.
Weber, William A., and Ronald C. Wittmann. 2012. Colorado Flora, Western Slope. Fourth Edition,
University Press of Colorado, Boulder.
Whitson, T. D. (editor), L. C. Burrill, S. A. Dewey, D. W. Cudney, B. E. Nelson, R. D. Lee and R.
Parker. 2001. Weeds of the West – 9th edition. Western Society of Weed Science in cooperation
with Cooperative Extension Services, University of Wyoming, Laramie.
WestWater Engineering Page 12 of 12
WestWater Engineering Page 13 of 12
WestWater Engineering Appendix A-1 May 2018
Appendix A
Garfield County Noxious Weed List
Species Common name
Species
Code Growth Form Life History
State
Listing
Acroptilon repens Russian
knapweed ACRE3 Forb Perennial B
Aegilops
cylindrica Jointed goatgrass AECY Grass Annual B
Arctium minus Common (Lesser)
burdock ARMI2 Forb Biennial C
Cardaria draba Hoary cress,
Whitetop CADR Forb Perennial B
Carduus
acanthoides
Spiny plumeless
thistle CAAC Forb Biennial / Winter Annual B
Carduus nutans Musk (Nodding
plumeless) thistle CANU4 Forb Biennial B
Centaurea diffusa Diffuse knapweed CEDI3 Forb Perennial B
Centaurea
maculosa
Spotted
knapweed CEMA4 Forb Perennial B
Centaurea
solstitialis Yellow starthistle CESO3 Forb Annual A
Chrysanthemum
leucanthemum Oxeye daisy CHLE80 Forb Perennial B
Cichorium intybus Chicory CIIN Forb Perennial C
Cirsium arvense Canada thistle CIAR4 Forb Perennial B
Cynoglossum
officinale
Houndstongue,
Gypsyflower CYOF Forb Biennial B
Elaeagnus
angustifolia Russian olive ELAN Tree Perennial B
Euphorbia esula Leafy spurge EUES Forb Perennial B
Linaria dalmatica
Dalmatian
toadflax, broad-
leaved
LIDA Forb Perennial B
Linaria vulgaris Yellow toadflax LIVU2 Forb Perennial B
Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife LYSA2 Forb Perennial A
Onopordum
acanthium Scotch thistle ONAC Forb Biennial B
Tamarix
parviflora
Smallflower
tamarisk TAPA4 Tree Perennial B
Tamarix
ramosissima
Salt cedar,
Tamarisk TARA Tree Perennial B