HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubsoil StudyLKP Bngineering, Inc.
CTVIL/GEOTECHNICAL RECEIVED
jlJi- I t4 'llÅ:ì?
GARFIELD COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SOIL AI\D F'OI]IIDATION IIYVESTIGATION
FORA
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 38, CERTSE RANCH SUBDryrSrON, PHASE 2
27 LARTGPUR DRTVE, CARBONDALE
GARFTELD COUNTY, CO
PROJECT NO. 20.3473
DECEMBER 9,2020
PREPARED tr'OR:
SEAN & CHRISTINA DUFFY
5 ELEMENTS ELECTRIC INC.
2OO UTE TRAIL
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
P.O. Box 724,Eagle, CO 81631 Tel (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineering.com
SCOPE OF STUDY
SITE DESCRIPTION.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION.....
FIELD INTVESTIGATION
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS .......
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
RETAINING WALLS
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
LAWN IRruGATION...........
LIMITATION............
FIGURES
LOCATION SKETCH
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
.DRAWINGNO. 1
. FIGURE NO's 1-2SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS.
GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION
PERIMETER DRAIN DETAIL.
. . . .FIGURE No's. 3-6
. . . .FIGURE NO. 7
LKP Engineering,Inc.
2
EXECUTTVE SUMMARY
The proposed residence should be supported with
conventional type spread footings, designed for an allowable soil
bearing pressure of 1500 psf. They should construct the footings
on the undisturbed silty-gravelly sand with some cobbles. See
Foundation Recommendations.
SCOPE OF'STT]DY
This report presents the results of a subsurface Soil and Foundation Investigation for a
proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 38, Cerise Ranch Subdivision, Phase 2,27 Lnkspur
Drive, Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado. The purpose of the subsurface soil and
foundation investigation'$ras to determine the engineering characteristics of the foundation soil
and to provide recoÍrmendations for the foundation design, grading, and drainage. Geologic
hazard studies are outside ofour scope ofservices.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Lot 38 is a 4.152-acre lot on the north side of Larkspur Drive, about 850 feet west from
the roundabout and the intersection with Bluestem Court, at27 Larkspur Drive in the Cerise
Ranch Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. The lot variable moderate topography with a
steep bank up from the road then moderate slope for the next 200 to 300 feet (or to the north
LKP Engineering,Inc.
3
edge of the building envelope) and then steep slope again. The vegetation on the lot consisted of
wild grass, cacti, shrubbery, cottonwood trees along the old irrigation ditch, and juniper trees on
the upper, steep slopes. Drainage is to the south and southwest. Along the south side of the lot is
Larkspur Drive. To the east and west are existing residences, and to the north arevacant lots of
the White Cloud Subdivision. Lot 38 is also vacant.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand that the proposed residence will be a one story, wood frame construction
on a concrete foundation, without a basement. \ile anticipate loads to be light, typical of
residential construction.
If the finalized.plans differ significantþ from the above understanding, they should
notiff us to reevaluate the recommendations of this report.
FIELD IIIVESTIGATION
The field investigation, conducted on December 3,2020, consisted of excavating,
logging and sampling two test pits. The excavation of the test pits was done with a John Deere
3lOSK, rubber tire bacftfioe. The test pits' locations are shown on Drawing No. 1. We show the
soil profïle of the test pits on the Subsurface Exploration Logs, Figure No's I and2. Soil samples
for laboratory soil anaþsis and observation were taken at selected intervals. Geologic hazard
studies are outside of our scope of services.
SUBSURFACE SOIL A¡ID GROUNDWATER CONDITION
The soil profïles encountered in the two test pits were similar. Test Pit No. t had about
one foot of topsoil over light brown, silty-clayey, sandy gravel with basalt and sandstone cobbles
LKP Engineering,Inc.
4
and boulders over siþ-clayey, gravelly sand, calcareous with cobbles and few boulders, to the
maximum depth explored of 8 feet. The soil was less gravelly in the last couple of feet. Test Pit
No. 2 had about 1.5 feet of topsoil over of blocþ clay, over silty-gravelly sand, calcareous,
gypsiferous with some, to the maximum depth explored of 8feet. Ground water was not
encountered in either test pit.
'We sampled the soil in the test pits at random intervals. The soil samples were tested in
our laboratory for natural moisture content and grain size distribution. The test results are shown
on Figure No's 3 to 6.
FOT]NDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings,
designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf. The entire foundation
should be constructed on the undisturbed siþ-gravelly sand with some cobbles.
'We recommend a minimum width of 16 inches for the continuous footings and2 feet for
the isolated footing pads. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to
span an unsupported length ofat least 10 feet.
'We recommend a minimum of 48 inches of backfill cover for frost protection of the
footing subsoils. Thefoundation excavation should be observed by the undersigned engineer to
verify that the soil conditíons encountered during constructíon are as antícípated in this report.
The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing
water. 'We recommend proof-rolling of the foundation excavation. Soft spots detected during the
proof-rolling, should be removed by overexcavation. Any overexcavation within the proposed
foundation should be backfilled, in 8 inches loose level lifts and compacted to l00o/o of the
maximum dry density and within 2percent of the optimum moisture content as determined in a
laboratory from a Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698). A structural fill, placed under footings
should be tested by a qualified professional on regular basis.
LKP Engineering,Inc.
5
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable to support lightþ
loaded slab-on-grade construction. The subgrade for the slab-on-grade construction should be
proof compacted to detect and remove soft spots. They should backfill overexcavated soft spots
and other underslab fill with the on-site soil, free from topsoil and organics, or other suitable
malenal, compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density
(ASTM D-698). Suitable material should be free from topsoil, organics and rock fragments
greater than 3 inches.
The concrete slab should be constructed over a4-inch layer of clean gravel consisting of
-3|4-inchgravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the
No.200 sieve.
They should reinforce the concrete slab-on-grade and score control joints according to
the American Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to
reduce damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation
walls and columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing
damage.
RETAINING \ryALLS
Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that arelaterally supported
should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 55pcf for an "at-rest" condition.
Laterally unrestrained structures, retaining the on-site earth, should be designed to resist an
equivalent fluid density of 35pcf for the "active" case.
The above design recoÍrmendations assume drained backfill conditions and ahonzotttal
LKP Engineering,Inc.
6
backfitl surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored
construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to
undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should try to prevent the buildup
of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall.
Passive earth pressure of 400pcf can be used for the lateral pressure against the sides of
the footings. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footings can be calculated based on a
coefficient of friction of 0.6. Undisturbed soil or a structural fill compacted to 100 percent of the
maximum dry density and within 2percent of the optimum moisture content will be used to
resist lateral loads at the sides of the footings.
I]NDERDRAIN SYSTEM
To reduce the risk of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoil, we recommend
installation of a foundation perimeter drain (see Figure No. 7). The foundation perimeter drain
should consist of a 4-inch diameter, perforated pipe, sloped to a suitable gravity outlet, or to a
sump pump location, at a ll4 inch per foot for flexible or at a 1/8 of an inch for rigid pipe. The
bottom of the trench adjacent to the footing should be lined with filter fabric. The drain pipe
should be covered with a minimum of 6 inches of -3l4-inch free-draining granular material.
Geotextile (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be used to cover the free-draining gravel to
prevent siltation and clogging of the drain. The backfill above the drain should be granular
material to within 2 feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic pressure.
SITE GRADING A}[D DRAINAGE
The following recommendations are general. Exterior backfill should be compacted at or
near the optimum moisture content to at least 95Yo of the maximum standard Proctor density
under pavement, sidewalk and patio areas and to at least 90o/o of the ma¡rirnum standard Proctor
LKP Engineering,Inc
7
density under landscaped areas. They should use mechanical methods of compaction. Do not
puddle the foundation excavation.
The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all
directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recoÍrmended in unpaved areas, and
three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill should
be covered with a minimum of I foot of relatively impervious fillto reduce the potential of
surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils.
Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site should be diverted
around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof
drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill.
LAWN IRRIGATION
It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing
sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should ensure that
the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs.
Lawn irrigation must be controlled.
LIMITATION
This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical
Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. The option
to test the soil with a backhoe pits verses with test borings drilled with a drill rig, was selected by
you. There is no other warranty either expressed or implied.
The findings and recoÍtmendations of this report are limited to the depth of the test pits
investigated due to the type of equipment selected by the owner for the soils and foundation
investigation. The above recoÍrmendations and based on field exploration, laboratory testing of
LKP Engineering,Inc
8
samples obtained at the specific locations shown on the Location Sketch, Drawing No.l and on
assumptions stated in the report. Soil conditions at other locations may vary, which may not
become evident until the foundation excavation is completed. If soil or water conditions seem
different from those described in this report, we should be contacted immediately to reevaluate
the recommendations of this report.
We are not responsible for technical interpretation by others of the data presented in this
report.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Sean and Christina Dufff, for their
proposed residence, to be constructed on Lot 38, Cerise Ranch Subdivision,Phase 2,27
Larkspur Drive, Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado.
Sincerely,
LKP ENGINEERING,INC.
\¿¿fr-;Ø*"h7-ù?
LuizaPetrovska, PE
J:\ WP X4-LKP\ 2020\20-34T3GRAVSNDPITS.DOCX
LKP Engineering,Inc
-tt\\
r-!
u
(ê
'#-'c
)
\
\l
I
t'
I
T ST
\
g
\B
I
I\{
I 6
l'-
I
I
¡
I
I--.r
I
I
I
rÈsi
¡r
;;l;'lI
It
I'{
I
i
J-
I
I\
I
i
¡
I
I
N
I
i
È '---
\'t\'a '-.
PIT.
Irl
f,t-.l
ts
è.qsa
h:kìl\rg\mg \
ìl þ \
à\*t \
\ \_n\H\
\ l{''\l':lt, \"ìtr$
qêå
Lì
Ë
u %j þð.r '
¡
..1
'1
I
Ì
t-
L*
(
'.- \ '?â>¡r
I-l 197 t45.Ot
-- -t--_--:--\*'-f------.-'\-l
,orle
I
I
I
I
I
.l
I
¡
I
ll
o¿¡à
I
Ir..
l
ì,
I
\
j
I
,O/rg
¡
B
f,o
s\
s
f)
:+
è
\
Lo
ð.
ß,
È
IR
ññ
ı¡r
sl
*"¡l
'3u"t
I
!
ü
lt{lt
.s (o
E
l!
ñ{
NoTE: THE LOCATION OF THE TÊST PITS lS
APPROXIMATE. IT IS NOT BASED ON A SURVEY
LOCATION SKETCH
NÕ-:20-3473
-1"=50'
NO.:
1
LOT 38, CERISE RANCH, PHASE 2
27 LARKSPUR DRIVE
CARBONDALE
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
CIV¡L,/GEOTECITNICAL
Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 724' Eogle, CO 81631
LKP
Tel 590-0307
DATE OBSERVED: DECEMBER 3, 2020
ELEVAÏON:
Test Pit f 1
DEPTH
FEET
s
Y
M
B
o
L
s
A
M
P
L
E
DESCRPNON OF MATERIAL
AND SAMPLE LOCANON
LABORATORY
TEST RESULIS
REMARKS
5
_10
_15
_20
2V
I
I
Topsoll, forest lltter ond heovy roots
LÍght brown, sÌltycloyey, sandy grovel
wlth cobbles and boulders, basolt ond
sandstone over
Sllt¡rclap¡1, gravelly sond, colcareous
wlth cobbles and few boulders
MC:4.1%
-200=138
MC:5.52
-200:20.6%
less grovelly neor
the bottom
Bottom of Test Pít at I feet No Ground l¡tlater
Encountered
I,EGEND:
tr
T
DD
MC
- 2-ìnch O.D. CdlÍfomia LÍner Somple
200
- Bulk Sample
- Notural Dry Density (pcf)
- Noturdl MoÍsture Content
- Percent Possìng No. 200
- LÍquld Llmit
- PlastÍcíty lndex
- Ground wdter
(%)
Sìeve
LL
PI
GW
IJ(P ENGINEERING, INC.SUBSURFACE EXPIORATION tOG
PROECI lla.:20-3473
1
F'êUÊ No.'
DATE OBSERVED: DECEMBER 5, 2020
ELEVAÏON:
Test Pit ff 2
DEPTH
FEET
s
Y
M
B
o
L
s
A
M
P
L
E
DESCRPNON OF MATERIAL
AND SAMPLE LOCANON
LABORATORY
TEST RESULTS
REMARKS
5
_10
-15
_20
^'
I
I
Topsoil, dnd roots over blocky clay
Tan, sllt¡rgravally sand,
colcareous-glpslferous wlth some
cobbles MC:5.3%
-200:17.9%
MC--5.22
-2OO=18.4%
Bottom of Test Pìt of I feet No Around llater
Encountered
IEGEND:
tr - 2-Ínch O.D. CalìfornÍo Llner SampleI - Bulk SampleDD - Natural Dry Densíty (pcf)
MC - Notural Moisture Content (Z)
-200 - Percent Passíng No. 200 SieveLL - Llquld LimitPl - PlastÍcíty lndexeW - Oround water
tKP ENGINEERING, INC.SUBSURFACE EXPTORATION TOG
PffiGCf NO.:20-3473
FIdJRE NO:2
ì$|aso$sIIsL=IaNÞøìùeoI(r¡FROM: Test Test PÍt 1 at 4 feetU.S. SIAIIDAH) STEUE æENN6 IN INC']æ U.S STAilDAH) SEVE MI'ÆRS6 1 3 2lrÈ I û ta t 3 I 6 ItO t1 ,6 Zt æA 50 70 ,(n tutO 2(nH'tÐRd,lFfEt1o102030ìonÈso$q60qFzog908070IS60G¡$uooI€+oFS .to20to8090îooo500100 50105I 0.5o.'t o.05o u)5o.æ1Sand: 5OZFînes: î3.0%\\\\\\-ll\\Sílt or ClaySondfìnemedîumcoarscGravelflnecootseCobblesMoìsture Content: 4.18Grovel: 372Descrìptîon: Sìtltyclo¡iey, grarelly Sand
r$rosogsIf)ï=IaNÞfi)IaqìJPNoI(¡àdàFROM: Test Pít No. 1 ot 7 feetU.S SîAI,ITùM) SIEVE æÐüIE N NC'ß U.S STANDAN' SEVE NU,Æ€nS;6 13 2l,a I s ,ãû 3 1 6 ErO ,1 ,8 20 g'loæ 70rærØ2OOHVNüINERtooo90102030I,nåc)508ao609F709goı908070I$aoo*s50oI€+oFS .¡o2010otoo500IOO 50105't 05at o.o5o.oo5o.oolSond: 65.22\\\\\I\\\\\Sílt or ClaySandfrnemedlumcoarseGrovdfìnecoarsteCobblesMoisture Content: 5.58Grawl: 14.2ßDescrÍption: SÍltyclo¡oy, gravelly SandFînes: 20.62
o102030I40ä50i60qF709goı90100o.oo',o.oo5FROïI: Test Pít No. 2 ot 5 feetHVDRÆlRo.1 0.05u.s sTAì.tDM) gEtÆ rvul¿8Ens6 1t 2M I * ,aú J 1 6 8rO Ul6 n 5O,lO50 mlær,l0Z)Oî 0.5Sand: 64.8210sU.S SIATü,AH) S/ÆVE æøIINê IN INCI,ßtoo 50500't00908070I$60s$u,o€+oFS .ro2010o\\\\\\\\\\Sllt or CloySandfìnemedîumcoaftßGrovelflnecoarseCobblesFìnes: 1792DescrîptÍon: Sllty, gravelly SandGravd: 17.4ßMoÍsture Content: 5.32ì$roìogsspr=IñÞ(n*qIP(l
o102030*&gsogìo60qF70s8090tu)o.oolo.oo5FROM: Iesf lest Pit 2 ot I feetHVNúßERaî o.o5U.S STA¡IDARD SEVE NUUffi6 1J 2ttÀ I * ûs. J 1 6 EIO ,1 l8 20 JOIOSO 70t(nr,r0Zn1 0.5105Sond: 58.42U.S STATIT'Afu SIEVE OPøINê N NCTIßtoo 50500908070IS60o¡$u,q€¡oFS .ro2010o\\\\\\\\\\Sîlt or CloySandfìnemedîumcoorsreGrovdfÍnecoarseCobbleeFines: 18.4O2DescrþtÍon: Sílty, gravelly SandGrovel: 23.22Moisture Content: 5.2ßì$|asogsII$IaNÞø*eIo=-EnFlsÈ"l*
'Á
Þ
ÞÞ
Þ.
Þ
À Þ''
!
S
È
R=
È
U\_
AWAY FROM BUILDING
BACKFILL WITH A MINIMUM
OF ONE FOOT OF RELATIVELY
IMPERVIOUS SOIL
FABRTC (MtRAFr
140N OR EQUTVALENT)
3/4-INCH DIAMETER, COARSE,
CLEAN CRUSH ROCK
30 MIL MINIMUM ÏHICKNESS,DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE SLOPED TOPLASTIC LINER, GLUED TO A DAYLIGHT LOCAÏION AWAY FROM THE
FOUNDATION AT 1/4-INCH PER FOOT FOR
FLEXIBLE AND 1/8.INCH MINIMUM FOR RIGID PIPE
FOUNDATION WALL
cryrLlGEOTEcHNIcÂL
Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 724, Eogle, CO 81631
Tel (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineering.com
LKP
PERIMETER DRAIN
LOT 38, CERISE RANCH, PHASE 2
27 LARKSPUR DRIVE
CARBONDALE
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PRoJEcr No.:
2O_g4Zg
scALE: N,T.s,
7
|IçURL NO.: