Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of Excavation 7.14.2022'(+AKamer &Associates, Inc.® Geotechnical and Materials Engineers 5020 County Road 154 and Environmental Scientists Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax: (970) 945-8454 email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com An Employee Owned Compony www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado July 14, 2022 Russell Cartwright 35 Willowview Way Parachute, Colorado 81635 russecart@gmail.com Project No. 22-7-176.01 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot 13, Block 7, Willow Creek Section 1, 48 Ridge View Place, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Russell: As requested, a representative of Kumar & Associates observed the excavation at the subject site on July 5, 2022 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations are presented in this report. The services are supplemental to our agreement for professional services to you dated February 10, 2022. We previously prepared a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated April 7, 2022, Project No. 22-7-176. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our previous report. Spread footings sized for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf were recommended for foundation support with some risk of settlement. At the time of our site visit, the foundation excavation which was essentially complete had been cut in one level from about 1 to 4 feet below the adjacent ground surface. There was minor cut in the garage floor slab area. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of stiff, slightly sandy occasionally clayey silt. The excavation subgrade had been moistened and compacted. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on samples taken from the site, shown on Figure 1, indicate the soils are moderately compressible under conditions of loading and wetting with a low hydro -compression potential. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 1,200 psf. The risk of settlement is primarily if the bearing soils were to become wetted with depth and precautions should be taken to prevent wetting. Prior to the footing construction, any loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils and the subgrade re -compacted as needed. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation Russell Cartwright July 14, 21722 Page 2 movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, Kumar & Assoeia4es. Inc. o 6216 David A. Young, P. • DAY/kac Gam••• SSS.....4 attachment Figure Test Results Kumar & Associates, Inc. ' Project No. 22-7-176.01 SAMPLE OF: Slightly Sandy Silt FROM: Bottom of Excavation WC = 6.0 %, DD = 95 pcf 1 ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING .. 0 X J J —1 IBJ N —2 Z O H Q o — 3 J O 1n Z O —4 —5 0 —6 I N — ` These test results apply only to the samples tested. The testing report i shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Kumar and Associates, Inc. Swell Consolidation testing performed in — accordance with ASTM D-4546. .1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF 10 100 z 0 o °s s N N 4 22-7-176.01 Kumar & Associates SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1