The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCompaction Testingffi CTL ITHOMPSON Compaction Testingffi Report#:sNc-ooooo4 0813012021 Report D ate: 09 I O7 I 2021 Test Method: ASTM D 6938 Form 44 Construction Management, LLC P.O. Box 10147 Aspen, CO 81612 Client:Project: Gl€nwood Sprlngs 234 Center Orlve Glsnwæd Sprlngs, co 81601 Phone: 970-94ı-2809 GS06546.000F-345 491 High Aspen Drive 491 High Aspen Drive Lot 31, High Aspen Ranch Garfield County, CO Test Results Min Comp. Remark ln Place Dry Deneity Wet Density Probe Depth Percent(pcD Maximum Dry ln Place MoistureSoil Classification Optimum Molsture Test Date Procto¡ lD MethodTest # Rêtest of 100 A't27.9 138.0 12128.0 7.9698CCohesiveI't2 o$t30121 Curve No.2 9B A126.4 137.0.0 128.0Cohesive1Curve No. Test lnformation Field Technician Gauge / Model / SN CalibratedElevationTest #Location MatthewTROXLER / 341 10.0cornerPoolBuild TROXLERl3411l13040/13 NW cornerBuild CommentsRemarks "Backscatt€f'. Gauge calibration data on 13: Afternoon site visit made as requested for density testing in pool storage building subgrade. The approximate 2O'foot x 20-foot area previıusly prepared by removing/replacing 2-foot thickness of structuraifill. Stockpiled onsite soil obtained from previous tennis court excâvation reused as structural fill. Compactive effort using a walk-behind vibratory sheepsfoot roller, Density tests performed with results (20%+3/4" rock corrsction). Finishing Touch as with the testing agency. satisfactory arê "Direct Transmission"unless probe d6pth isA: Tsst results specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets þroject specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work' Page I of I ffi CTL I THOM PSON Compaction Testingffi Report#:sNG-ooooo3 0812612021 RepoÉ Datet 0910712021 Test Method: ASTM D 6938 Form 44 Construction Management, LLC P.O. Box 10147 Aspen, CO 81612 Client:Project: Gl6nwood SprlngB 234 Center Ðrlvs Glsnwood Sprlhgs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 GS06546.000F-345 491 High Aspen Drive 491 High Aspen Drive Lot 31, High Aspen Ranch Garfield County, CO Test Results Remark ln Place Wet Density Probe Depth Percent Min Comp. Maximum Dry ity (pcO ln Place Moisture ln Place Dry Density Method Soil Claesification Optimum Moisture Teet # Retest of Test Date ID 98 D26.5 135.0 I 99128.0 6.7698cCohesive9.0708t26121Curve No. 2 D29.3 136.6 I128.0CurveCohesiveI08t26121 98 D127.1 134.59.0 128.0Curve No. 2 698CI 8 99 9815.5 127.09.01Curve No. 2 98 D,4 136.5 I 10017.1CohesiveI1108t26121Curve No Test lnformation Gauge Make / Model I SN / Galibrated TechnicianElevationReferenceTest #Locat¡on below XPLORER I 3500 / 1995 / 04/10.07Fill: club house lines below 3500 / 1995 I 04116120200.08lines 6/Ehouse XPLORER / 35OO 1 Sandon0,0 belowIStructural Fill: club house lines 5/D XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 /Sandon0.0 below10Structural Fill: club house lines .5 below XPLORER / 3500 / 1955 I 04116120201club house lines 1/C.5 CommentsRemarks unlêss probe depth is noted as with the têst¡ng agency. mostly complete satisfactory. The theât oftime our{f¡ilStructural wasplacement contentmoisture tstestareresults timeconsideredtheduetoacceptable elapsed âre "Dirêct Transmission" Gauge calibration data onconsidered acceptable with no moistureD: Têst r€quirêmont. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown âbove. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets þroject specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page I of 1 ffi CTL ITHOMPSON ComPaction Testing @ Report#:SNG-00000S 09t0212021 Report D ate 09 I 07 I 2021 Test Method: ASTM D 6938 Form 44 Construction Management, LLC P.O. Box 10147 Aspen, CO 81612 Client:Project: Glonwood sprlngs 234 Csntor Drlve Glenwood Sprlngs, CO 81601 Phonê: 970-945-2809 GS06546.000F-345 491 High Aspen Drive 49'l High Aspen Drive Lot 31, High Aspen Ranch Garfield County, CO Test Results Min Comp. Remark ln Place Wet Dens¡ty Probe Depth Percent ln Place Moisture ln Place Dry DensitySoil Classification Optimum Moisture Maximum Dry Density (pcfl Proctor lDTest # Retost of Date 98 A136.0 10 9818.2 't25.79.0Curve No. 214 A.8 137.0 101,0 7.2CohesiveCurve No. 2't5 A9998126.8 136.0128.0Cohesive16oslo2l21Curve No. A112102987.9 130.79.0 28.02698C1709102121 98 A137.0 b19.4698C9.0Curve No.2't8 Test lnformation Gauge Make / Model / SN /Field TechnicianElevationReferenceTest #Test Subgrade cPN/MC-1/MD40201885 041161202014Grade Beam gridlinesGrade Beam Barto, Matthewi MD40201885 / 612020 0.015Beam Subgrade: West gridlines D/0.0 Barto, Matthew1885 / 0411612020 cPN / MC-10.0 Subg168.715.5East Grade Beam Barto, MatthewSubgradecPN / MC-1 / MD40201885 / 0411612020 0.0Grade Beam gridlinesBeam Subgrade:5'17 Barto, Matthew1885 / o4l1 0.0gridlines 8.9/6.5Subgrade: East CommentsRemarks âsnotedareTestsA)(Method ondetâ file thow¡th"Backscatter"calibration agency.testingGâuge I1 visitSite asmade removal/replacement effortCompactive Earthworkconections.+314 rockand30%using testofinformedOlsenBuilders site visitsnotifiedwhenfurther comply with specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above' Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets 'projàct spécifìcations. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compact¡on effort and moisture to comply with project specifications' Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1