HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubsoil StudyLI(P Engineering, fnc.
qVII./GEOTECHNICAL
SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
F'OR A
MAIN RESIDENCE AND BARNiADU
4C RANCH
GARFTELD CREEK ROAD, CR #312
NE\il CASTLE
PIN 218334300058
GARFTELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO. 22-3661
MAY 31,2022
REVISED AUGUST 8,2022
PREPARED FOR:
BRENT SCOTT
P.O. BOX 55s9
EAGLE, CO 81631
Br,ent. S cott@moun@inbevera ge. com
P.O. Box 724,Eagle, CO 81631 Tel. (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEneineering.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........
SCOPE OF STUDY
SITE DESCRIPTION.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
FIELD INVESTIGATION
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION S
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
CRA\ML SPACE
RETAINING TVALLS
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM...
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
LAWN IRruGATION.,.........
LIMITATrON................
FIGURES
LOCATION SKETCH .....
AREA MAP.
2
2
2
3
3
J
4
5
6
6
6
7
7
I
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS.
...DRAWING NO. 1
..DRAWINGNO.2
.FIGURE NO's 1-3
.FIGURE NO. 4GRAIN.SIZE DISTzuBUTION.
PERIMETER DRAIN DETAIL.
STRUCTURAL FILL WITH GEOGRID
,..FIGURE NO. 5
.....FIGURENO.6
OVEREXCAVATION AND COMPACTION...-,... ."..........FIGUR8 NO. 7
P.O. Box 7Z4,Eagle,CO 81631 Tel (970) 390-0307 www.lkpengineering.com
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed bamlresidence should be supported with
conventionel type spread footings, designed for an allowable soil
bearing pressure of 1500 psf. They should constf,uct the footings
on the undisturbed silty to sandy clay to silty-clayey sand with
cobbles and boulders or on geogrid improved structural fill. See
Foundation Recommendations.
SCOPE OF'STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsurface Soil and Foundation Investigation for a
proposed single-family residence and a barn with an apartment at4C Ranch, New Castle,
County Road 312, PIN 218334300058, Garfield County, Colorado. The purpose of the
subswface soil and foundation investigation was to determine the engineering characteristics of
the foundation soil and to provide recommendations for the foundation design, grading, and
drainage. Geologic hazard studíes are outside of our scope oJ'services.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The 4C Ranch is 1163.959 acres property, south of New Castle, Garfìeld County,
Colorado. The proposed building sites are located in the northwest portion of Section 3, as
shown on the area map, drawing 2 and on the Location Sketch, Drawing L The building sites tÌrr
the proposed barn/residence are on meadows. Vegetation within the proposed building site
LKP Engineering,Inc,
4J
consisted of grass. The topography within the selected building areas (where the test pits were
excavated) is relatively flat.Drainage is to the north and northwest. Garfield Creek and Garfield
Creek Road are to the north of the proposed building sitc for the main residence. The area was
surrounded by mountains.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
W'e understand that the proposed main residence will be fwo story, wood frame
construction without a basement, on a concrete foundation, and the bam building will also be
two story wood frame construction with an apartment above on one side, and a large barn on the
other. We anticipate loads to be light, typical of residential construction.
If the finalized plans differ significantly from the above understanding, they should
noti$r us to reevaluate the recoûlmendations of this report.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field investigation, conducted on May 25,2022, consisted of logging and sampling
three test pits. Approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Drawing No. l- We show the
soil profile of the test pits on the Subsurf¿ce Exploration Logs, Figure No's 1 through 3. Soil
samples for laboratory soil anaþsis and observation were taken at selected intervals. We
understand that your excavator dug the test pits prior to our site visit.
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GRCIUNDTVATER CONDITION
The soil profiles encountered in the three test pits were fairþ uniform, consisting of 2 to
5 feet of topsoil over brown to light brown, silty-sandy clay to silty-clayey sand, gravelly with
cobbles and varying amounts of boulders. Moishue content was high (15 to 17%) but free
P.O. Box 724,Eagle, CO 81631 Tel. (970) 390-0307 wwlv.LKPEngineering.com
4
ground water or bedrock were not encountered in any of the test pits. We sampled the soil in the
test pits at random intervals. The samples were tested for natural moisture content and grain-size
distribution. The test results are shown on Figure numbcr 4.
FOUNDATION REC OMMENDATIONS
The proposed main residence and the barn with an additional dwelling unit, should be
supported with conventional type spread footings, designed for an allowable soil bearing
pressure of 1500 psf. They should construct the footings on the undisturbed silty to sandy clay to
silty-clayey sand, gravelly with cobbles and some boulders.
If unsuitable soils (thick layers of topsoil) are encountered within the foundation
excavation, the proposed residence and the additional dwelling unit should be supported with
conventional fype spread footings constructed on ø structuralfll, designed for a maximum
allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf. The footings will be placed on overexcavated aryd
corwcted,.stqucturql..fr-ll improvedwith three (3,) la:¡ers of Tensør, Triaxial-Geogrid, as shown
on the attached detail, Structural Fill with Geogrid, Figure No. 7. Minus 3-inch road base or
other approved, imported structural material, free from topsoil, organics and volcanic ash, can be
used as a structural filI. A minimum of four feet of the unsuitable subgrade material (topsoil or
other soft or wet soils) should be overexcavated uncler the entire foundation. The width of the
overexcavation should be according to the attached overexcavation and compaction detail with a
minimum of five feet on the outside perimeter of the excavation.
The completedfoundation excavation should be observed and/or tested by the
wtdersi.gned engineer to verify that the soil conditions encountered durtng construction are ds
anticipated ín this report.
We recommend a minimum width of 16 inches for the continuous footings and? feet for
the isolated footing pads. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to
span an unsupporfed length of at least 10 feet.
The proposed fbundation should be set at a minimum depth of four feet below the
fînished grade or at the minimum depth required by the local building code. The foundation
P.O. Box 724,Eagle, CO 81631 Tel. (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineerins.com
5
excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing water. 'We
recommend prooÈrolling of the foundation excavation. Soft spots detected during the proof-
rolling, should be removed by overexcavation. Any overexcavation within the proposed
foundation should be backfilled, in I inches loose level lifts and compacted to 100% of the
maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the optimum moisfure content as determined in a
laboratory from a Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698). A structural fill, placed under footings
shoulcl be tested by a qualified professional,
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable to support lightly
loaded slab-on-grade construction. In the event that the thick topsoil layer is also encountered
under the proposed slab on grade areas, the unsuitable soil should be overexcavated and replaced
with a non-swelling, structprqlfrll, reiryforced with lat¡ers of Tensør .Geogrid, as described above
in the foundation recommendations section. The subgrade for the slab-on-grade construction
should be proof compacted to detect and remove soft spots. They should backfill overexcavated
soft spots and other underslab fill with the on'site soil, free from topsoil and organics, or other
suitable material, compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum standardProctor
density (ASTM D-698). Suitable material should be free from topsoil, organics and rock
fragments greater than 3 inches.
The concrete slab should be constructed over a 4-inch layer of clean gravel consisting of
-314-inch gravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the
No.200 sieve.
They should reinforce the concrete slab-on-grade and score controljoints according to
the Arnerican Concrete Institute requirements and per the reçornmendations of the designer to
reduce damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation
walls and columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing
damage.
P.O. Box 724,Eagle, CO 81631 Tel. (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineerine.com
6
CRAWL SPACE
If topsoil is encountered in the crawl space al€as, it should be overexcavated and
replaced with non-organic soil. Thc organic matter contained in the topsoil will decompose with
time releasing odors (like row sewage) that might not be acceptable by the homeowner. Crawl
spaces should be vented according to the building code.
RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported
should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid densify of 60 pcf for an "at-rest" condition.
Laterally unrestrained structures, retaining the on-site earth, should be designed to resist an
equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active" case.
The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal
backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent stnrcftues, weight of temporary stored
construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to
undrained backfill should be incorporated in the desigu. They should try to prevent the buildup
of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall.
Passive earth pressure of360 psfcan be used for the lateral pressure against the sides of
the footings. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footings can be calculated based on a
coefficient of friction of 0.5. Undisturbed soil or a structural fill compacted to 100 percent of the
maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content will be used to
resist lateral loads at the sides of the footings.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTAM
To reduce the risk of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoil, we recommend
installation of a fbundation perimeter drain (see Figure No. 5). The foundatíon perimeter drain
should consist of a 4-inch diameter, perforated pipe, sloped to a suitable gravity outlet, at a 114
P.O. Box 724,Eagle, CO 81631 Tel. (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineering.com
7
inch per foot for flexible or at a 1/8 of an inch for rigid pipe. The bottom of the trench adjacent
to the footing should be lined with a polyetþlene moisture barrier glued to the foundation wall.
The drain pipe should be covered with a minimum of 6 inches af -3/4-inch free-draining
granular material. Geotextile (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be used to cover the free-
draining gravel to prevent siltation and clogging of the drain. The backfill above the drain should
be granular material to within 2 feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic
pfessure.
STTE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The following recommendations are general, Exterior backfill should be compacted at or
near the optimum moisture content to at least 957o of the maximum standard Proctor density
under pavement, sidewalk and patio areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor
density under landscaped areas. They should use mechanical methods of compaction. Do not
puddle the foundation excavation.
The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all
directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas, and
three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill should
be covered with a minimum of I foot of relativeiy impervious fill to reduce the potential of
surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils.
Surface water natrually draining toward the proposed building site should be diverted
around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof
drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill.
LAWN IRRIGATION
It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing
sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should ensure that
the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs.
P.O. Box 724,Eagle, CO 81631 Tel. (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineering.com
I
Lawn inigation mustbe controlled.
LIMITATION
This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical
Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. The type of
soil testing was selected by the ovrner as the preferred method for the soil and foundation
investigation over a soil and foundation investigation with a drill ng. There is no other warranty
either expressed or irnplied.
The findings and recoürmendations of this report are based on field exploration,
laboratory testing of samples obtained at the specific locations shown on the Location Sketch,
Drawing No.1 and on assumptions stated in the report. Soil.conditions at other locatigns may
vary. which m4y,Oot begome evident until 1þ-e,.fouqdation excqvation is coryplqtgd. If soil or
water conditions seem different trom those described in this report, we should be contacted
immediately to reevaluate the recofirmsndations of this report. '!V'e are not responsible for
technical interpretation by others of the data presented in this report.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Brent Scott, for the specific
application to the proposed Main Residence and Bam with an ADU at 4C Ranch, New Castle,
County Road 312, PIN 218334300058, Garfield County, Colorado.
Sincerely,
LKP ENGINEERING,INC.
t''\
i¡ìjj.ìi!,1i
LuizaPetrovska, PE
J :\_WP X4-LKPV022U2 -3 60 6CLAY-PITS. DOCX
P.O. Box 724,Easle, CO 81631 Tel. (970) 390-0307 wyvw.LKPE¡rgine.-e_ring.cogr
NOTE: THE LOCATION OF THE TEST PITS lS
APPROXIMATE. IT IS NOT BASED ON A SURVEY
crvrL/GEolEcHNrcAL
Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 724, Eogle, CO 81631
Tel (97O) 390*0307 www.LKPEngíneering.com
LKP
LOCATION SKETCH
4C RANCH
CR 312, NEW CASTLE
PIN: 218 334 3000 58
GARFIELD COUNry, COLORAÐO
PROJECT NO.:
22-3619
SCALEi
DMWNGNO.:
1
+TS5
#:)i3!3
f'{: ql
ffi$å.:5T¡J
'l"t ç
IT8$UTI
$rr
{i
ftfti
'Jj'
'i:¿:
i rll,r:l'rl.
TdiÊ
Fì$'i q,ï
Tes
åtsr']ifuÌ
'li.¡i'
Ël{}!lJ'i¡
,-,1 t i.|.\;
,:}P
{:
Ë.L/-r.
iti¡'l'r¡d
rr-ì,7t
å"t'iäi't'{d
r ! o.à
lf5
fì613W
i ¡t¡rllilrlþ_, af .--¿
i::,jr r i '
T¡]i
tìf 'li{J
.t-fj$
Êl'x!!3
'l'$;'i
R$*1tr
l¡¡¡..¡ç=::::F ={J 1 2ntì
NOTE: THE LOCATION OF THE TEST PITS lS
APPROXIMATE, IT IS NOT BASED ON A SURVEY
cMrlçEoTECIINICAI
Engineering, Imc.
P.O. Box 724, Eogle, CO 81631
Tel (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineer¡ng.com
LKP
AREA MAP
4C RANCH
CR 312, NEW CASTLE
PIN: 218 334 3000 58
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO,:22-3619
scALE: -1"=Bo'
DRAWING NQ.:.2
DATE OBSER\ED: Moy 25,2022
ELEVATION:
Test PÍt-t/ProtÍhe Hole-t
ItaÍn frouse
DEPTH
FEET
.s
Y
M
B
o
L
s
A
M
P
L
E
DESCRFNON OF MATERIAL
AND SAIIPLE LOCANON
UBORATORY
TãST RE.'U¿rs
REMARKS
5
_10
_f5
t0
Topsoil, thickness varies from 2
to 5 feet
Brown, cla¡ælrgrovelly sond
wîth cobbles ond boulders
MC=í5.1i
Light brown, sandy clay motrix
with cobbles ond boulders
-2OO=J5.61
Bottom of Test Pit @ 7.ı feet No Ground Woter
Encountered
I,EGEND:
tr
T
DD
MC
- Z-lnch O.D. Callfomia Lînar Sample- Eulk Samplc
- Noturql Dry Denslty (pcf)
- Natural Molsture Content (x)
S/eæ-2O0 - Perccnt Passlng No. 200LL - Llquld LlmitPl - Plostlclty lndexOW - Qround votçr
IJ(P ENGINEERING, INC.SUBSUNFACE EXPI,ORATION LOG
Ffrüæf Iø!22-J619
IfløÆflq,,
DAIE OBSER\ED: Moy 26,2A22
ELEVATOT'I:
Teet, Plt-?Ifain Ilouse
DEPIH
FEET
s
Y
M
B
o
L
s
A
M
P
L
E
DESCRIPNON OF MA'IERIAL
AND SAMPLE LOCANAN
LABORATORY
TEST RESULïS
REMARKS
5
-lo
-1ü
_20
Å
Topsoil, thicknees varies from 2
to 4 feet
LÍght brown,
motrÍx wlth
boulders
silty-sondy clay
cobbles and large
Bottom of Test P¡t @ 6.5 feet No Ground Water
Encountered
I.EGEND:
t]t
DD
MC
-200u
PI
GW
- 2-lnch O.D. Callfomla Llner Sample
- Bulk Sample
- Naturql Dry Denslty (pcf)
- Natural Molsture Content (fr)
- Pereant Paeslng No, 200 Slaw
- Uqufd Llmlt
- Plastîcìty lndex
- Ground watar
I,KP ENGINEEMNG, INC.SUBST'BFACE HTPTORA1TON IOG
mqãçt tfr t 22-3619
2FIølæ NO.:
DATE OBSER\ED: Moy 25,2022
ELEVATON:
Test PÍt-fl
Barn-AIIU
DEPTH
FEET
s
Y
M
B
o
L
.9
A
M
P
L
E
DESCHPNON OF NATERIAL
AND SATIPLE LOCANON
LABORATORY
EST RESU¿TS
RETIARKS
5
_10
-
t5,
_20
I Topsoil, thickness vor¡es from 2
to 4 feet
Light brown,
motrix with
boulders
silty-sandy cldy
cobbles and large
Bottom of Test P¡t AÐ 7 feet No Ground Water
Encountered
I.EGEND¡
t]I
DD
MC
-200
LL
PI
êw
- 2-Ínch O.D. Callfornla Llner Sampla
- Bulk Sample
- Naturql Dry Ðenslty (pcf)
- Natural Moleture Contant (E)
- Parcent Paaslng No. 20O Slave
- Llquld Llmît* Plaetlcîty lndax* Ground watdr
IJ(P NNGINEDRING, INC.SUBSURFACD E¡(PTORATION TOG
Fnøñf
'dlr:22-36t9
FtcÆNo,t J
ì$Bo$sIs)$IaNeU,)dUqIo=àFROt'l: Test PÍt I at 5 feetU.S' SrrrûDtnD trrf æE¡mrc rrv fìlC#S US STÁI,IDARD gEtf ,!üldæçS6 43 zttê I *t tûÐ J I 6 8lO tl ,6 ã, &r¿Xr5070|OO14O2O0H'ffiÆER090'to203AIo40È50Ëðq60 .b\"ì7098090EO70Iä60I350q€roñS¡onro,ao10a5CIOrco 50105'î 0.50,'t o.o5o.ao50.o01Sand: 35.6tFfines: 35.62\\ìI\\Sllt or ClaySondfînemedíumcoars€GrovdfrnecoctrseCobblesMolsture Content: 15.48Craval: 28.7ßDescrìptlon: Brown, sÍlt¡-clayey, gravelly eend
.t.
A
Þ
!!
S
ð
R=-(
:JÕl.-
Þ
Þ
Þ
À
Þ'
Þ
AWAY FROM BUILDING
BACKFILL WITH A MINIMUM
OF ONE FOOT OF RELATIVELY
IMPERVIOUS SOIL
FABRIC (MIRAFI
140N OR EQUTVALENT)
3/4.INCH DIAMETËR, COARSE,
CLEAN CRUSH ROCK
30 MIL MINIMUM THICKNESS,DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE SLOPED TOPLASTIC LINER, GLUED TO A DAYLIGHT LOCATION AWAY FROM THE
FOUNDATION AT 1/4INCH PER FOOT FOR
FLEXIBLE AND 1/8-INCH MINIMUM FOR RIGID PIPE
FOUNÐATION WALL
cryIL/cEoTEcHNrCÀI,
Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 724, Eoglo, CO 81631
Tel (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngìneering.com
LKP
PERIMETER DRAIN
4C RANCH
CR 312, NEW CASTLE
PIN:218 334 3000 58
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.:22-3619
scALL: N.T.s.
5
FIGURE NOi
î
2
FROsT
DEPTH
COTIPACTED
FILL
FOOnN6
I
2
FOR
C,QN,nNUOUS FQOnNq
d : DEPTH TO ADEOUATE BEARING MA|ERALd:2xþ
tüilcHEWR /S ¿Ê'SS
SOUAE€ FQONNG
d : DEPTH TO ADEQUATF BEARINê MÅTER|ALd*l-1/2xb
tl,tilCHEWR /.S ¿ßS
NOTî: Source of ìnformatÌon from Foundations and Eorth Structures, Design Manual 7.2
Deportment of the Nauy, Novol Focilitìes Engneering Commond
LKP
cnm,/cnomcENIca¡.
Engineering, lnc.
P.o. Box 724, Eqglo, CO 81631
Td (97O) 390-0307 wwv.LKPEnglncoring,com
OVEREXCAVATION & RECOMPACTION
4C RANCH
CR 312, NEW CASTLE
PIN:218 334 3000 58
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
22-3619
/vrs
6
FOOTING
,|
1
I
¡"
.j '.;....
Þ't:b
À
JÞ
,
Tv¡
Þ.
I
.: , .:.r
i'. r
.) "'.
É
l¡.1È
J-Þô-
u¡o
t--U'o
É.IL
ulff,o
C)J
(JoJ
5'min
6" max.
6" min.
SOFT (or Uneuitable) BEARING SO
TENSAR TRIAXIAL GEOGRID
MINUS 3.INCH ROAD
FOR STRUCTURAL FILL PLACEMENT OVEREXCAVATE
4 FEET BELOW THE FOOTINGS AND
3 FEET BELOWTHE SLAB ON GRADE
cIVII,/GEorlcÍMcå¡,
Engineering, fnc.
P,O. Box 724, Ëagle, CO 81631
Tel (970) 39G0307 www.LKPEngln€er¡ng.æm
LKP
GEOGRID REINFONCW¡ STRUCTURAL FTTI.
4C RANCH
CR 312, NEW CASTLE
PIN:2f I 334 3000 58
GARFIELÐ COUNTY, COLORADO
22-3619
scALE: N.T.s.
7
L'RAwlNt; NU.: