HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicant Checklist ResponseCoü^, ry
BLRE-05-23-81 19 - Dag & Anwyl-Davies ADU is UNDER
REVIEW
Courtesy Message to Property Owners at 848 CR 106 Carbondale:
Stefan, I am now reviewing your overall plans and proposed work scope for an
Accessory Dwelling Unit at 848 CR 106.
To make the building permit and public file record more cleal please verify and
confirm the following are TRUE or otherwise provide a written response so that
we all have an accurate understanding of the current building project:
1 . Please confirm, the proposed ADU is to be placed on subject parcel with
address of 848 CR 106 and a corresponding tax parcel number of
23932843001? True? /Ë3 A...l.k Q0¿fo3+
2. Please confirm, the proposed ADU is to be placed within the building
structure previously submitted under historic building permit #11260,
completed circa year 2009 under description of 'detached garage with
storage above it? True? Ye= C O. 2 o/ 2-
3. Please confirm, the current buildi
existing storage space above the
no;s
interior residential stairwell, one-bedroom, one
common kitchen living space? True? y4
4. Please confirm, submitted detaú2 /A-101 Upp
4/¿
e
is to convert the
S ft ADU with an
two clos et,
er Level Floor Plan should
be REVISED to more accurately be labeled as "proposed closet"2O3,
"proposed closed204, "proposed bath"202, and no upper level spaces are
intended as "future" or "unfinished" under the current permit request?
True? YAS
5. Please confirm, the current work scope will not alter the existing building
height nor increase any of the existing horizontal r.oof projections from the
circa 2009 erected building structure? True? YpS
6. Please express, specifically, lF any proposed additions, alterations,
remodeling or other architectural or strUctu.ral changes proposed to be
made to the existing main level? /VtNF
7. Where finish work of the upper level plumbing, mechanical, electrical work
should cause demolition of the existing garage fire separation, please
confirm owner builder will comply and maintain required garage / house
occupancy separation pursuant to the currently adopted 2015 IRC Table
R302.6. Corräct? Y+
8. Where finish work of the upper level living finish should cause demolition/
cutting / notch¡ng I boring into existing structural framing members,
0
owner agrees to retain the professional services of a Colorado licensed
Engineer to provide deferred submittal observation report and stamp{_
framing details for any as-built framing modifìcations? Correct? Y-S
lnasmuch as the original upper floor system was designed under an
earlier adopted building code, and inasmuch as more than 14 years has
passed since building final inspections for the detached garage. We
suggest the property owner reach out to Robert Oddo, Oddo Engineers,
PE, license 28085, to have them evaluate the existing framed design 2800-
39 (S1 .0 and 51.1) 9-18-2008 and REVISIONS, and prepare a recent
structural engineers memo attesting the existing framed structure and
floor system is structurally sound to support the proposed habitable
dwelling use and existing framing complies with Garfield County's
currently adopted 201 5 ¡RC. 74
Colleen W¡rth
Building Plans Examiner
Garfield County Community Development
108 Bth Street, Suite 401
(970) 945-1377 ext 1610
erutrlh@ g a rfì e I d-c o u nty.cam
ø 2 7