HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence-Builders Clarification, Work Scope & Basement DesignColleen Wirth 6u,Harç ãa¡rþa**
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Thanks Colleen
See below here, attached, and in red in your email.
For square footages, I used the table below from sheet A-1
Luke Gosda <luke.gosda@sunriseco. com, Q lr7 /U¿fkgAAP4 ?
Wednesday, July 19, 2023 3:40 PM t t / -l - - I -
coileen wirth ÞaSetnZ-ttf, 'ã€9,'4 h
RE: BLRE-06-23-8182 - BEACH residence is UNDER REVIEW J
buildi ng -permit-fees-worksheet.xlsx
MAIN LEVEL LIVIN6 AREA: z,OqO 5F *
BASEMENT LEVEL LIVIN6 AREA: 1,321 9F
TOTAL LIVING ARFA: 3,411 3F
TOTAL AREA lNglDE THE THERMAL ENV: ?,145 9F *
áARAOE AREA: b10 5F
COVER;ED PATIOI?ORCH AREA: 102 9F
UNCOVEREP ?ATtOI?ORCH AREA: 311 9F
TOTAL NON-LIVING ARFA: 1,02q 9F
TOTAL AREA OF HOMF: 4,446 9F **
HOTES: ALL LINE ITEM FOOTAhE ROUNDED U? TO THE NEARE5T åF THEN LINE lTEl
ADDED TO çREATE TOTAL9.. FOR SCUARE FOOTAgEMETHODOLOÛY CONTACT EI.J
"TOTAL DOEí NAl INCLUDE THE 4? 3F PORTION OF THE 9TAIRI^IELL OH TI.IE T"{AIN LE'
19 OPEN TO F.ELOW.
*.TOTAL INCLUPE9 LIVIH6 AREA5, NAN-LIVIN6 AREA5, ANP UNFINISHEO BÊ\ãEMEH'
1
Luke
From: Colleen Wirth <cwirth @ga rfield-cou nty.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July L9,2023 3:26 PM
To: Luke Gosda <luke.gosda @sunriseco.com>
Subject: BLRE-06-23-8182 - BEACH residence is UNDER REVIEW
IEXTERNAL EMAILI Do NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
RE: BLRE-06-23-8L82- BEACH res¡dence, L62 Blue Heron Dr, Lot 37
Hello Luke,
Hope your summer is going well.
l'm finishing up the review for Heather & Gary Beach in lronbridge and have just a couple of items:
REQU ESTED CLARIFICATION:
1. I see a detail for "optional insulation" in the attached garage ceiling? Willthe garage be heated
conditioned space? Or unheated space outside the proposed building thermal envelope? The garage
is not heated conditioned space. We just provide the option to our customers, but they have not
elected to take this option.
2. To be sure the plan check / building fees are accurate, what figures do you show for square ft: See
above referencetl table frt¡nr Sheet A-]-.
2.a. Permit Application form states sq. ft. of building = 3,145. ls that 3,L45 overall gross total building
area (including the attoched gorogel? No, does not include the garage.
2.b. Or is 3,145 sq ft intended to reflect "finished living spaces only" -- excluding garoge area? Correct.
2.c. Based upon the architectural and structural dimensional references I am showing a rough
calculation for covered porch / deck = 96.22 sq ft. Does that sound correct? 102SF per Table on Sheet
A-1
2.d. Based upon the architectural and structural dimensional references I am showing a rough
calculation for uncovered porch or deck = 316.50 sq ft. Does that sound correct? 317SF per Table on
Sheet A-1
2.e. Based upon architectural and structural dimensional references I show a crawl space calculation of
725 sq ft. Does that sound correct? This isnt referenced in the table, but I calculate 696 SF. I have
attached the excel spreadsheet with my valuation calculation.
2.f. Based upon architectural and structural dimensions I show garage area at roughly 590 sq ft. Does
that sound correct? 610SF per Table on Sheet A-1
2.f. Please confirm your calculation for total finished residential living space at
See rny attached excel spreadsheet.
sq.ft.
ACTION NEEDED: Responses for items 1 and 2.a-2.1may be responded to me directly via email
cwirth@gedi,{d:çggly.cgm (no resubmitted plan sheets are required nor requested at this time)
COURTESY HEADS UP ON CONTACTING THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD:
2
3. When reading the Kumar & Associates report 2I-7-434 prepared back in June2O2L, James Parsons P.E.
indicates the "future house plans for the site were not available, and it was assumed the home design
would be for a one- or two- story home setting on a crowl spoce with garage slab. Given lronbridge
phase lll recorded PLAT NOTE #2 specifies "basements shall be allowed only where safe, as
determined by a qualified geotechnical engineer". lf the Geotechnical Engineer of Record is not
already made abreast of IRONBRIDGE PLAT NOTE #2 and of the BEACH RESIDENTIAL basement layout --
then please do notify Kumar & Associates at your earliest convenience and make clear to them the
forthcoming "OPEN HOLE SOILS REPORT" will need to include written acknowledgement by the
Geotechnical Engineer of Record of the BEACH BASEMENT design and have them attest it is safe to
build a basement at this lot location'
ACTION NEEDED: Nothing further needed for plans examiner review and forthcoming release of the
permit. However, acknowledgement of the basement design by Geotechnical Engineer is still needed in
geotech's OPEN HOLE SOILS REPORT. I have discussed this with Kumar and they will address this in the
Open Hole Soils Report. Courtesy copy of plat attached for your referral.
Thanks for your efforts, I look forward to seeing this one move forward,
Colleen W¡rth
Building Plans Examiner
Garfield County Community Development
108 8th Street, Suite 401
(970) 945-1377 extL6LO
cwirth @ga rfield-countv.com
3