HomeMy WebLinkAboutEngineer's Framing Letter 10.03.2023October 3,2023
Attn:Jay Spry
Lot 6, Four Mile Ranch, Red Cliff Cir
Garfield County, CO
970-230-0501
j a,v (íl.acc * $ton top s.c om
Regarding:Spry Residence
Building Inspector structural comm€nts i
Dear Mr. Spry,
As per your request, I have verified the structural discrepancy items noted by the building inspector as
follows:
1. Mßsing beam at the interior master bath bay window bumpout and small roofframing. Sheet 54
along GL "9" bets'veen GL "C.B & D".
a. It is acceptable to not install the noted (2) 9 Y, beam or small loof framing due to the PE
engineered truss is bearing on the exterior wall along GL 9 and creating the header and
end wall condition. It is acceptable as cunently installed with no additional action
required.
2. Header change at entry door. Sheet 54 along GL "8.7" between GL "6 & 8".
a. Acceptable to use the installed (3) 2x6 header with a double top plate bearing on the (2)
trimmer studs and (3) king studs on each side. It is acceptable as currently installed with
no additional action required.
3. Change of entryfloorframing on sheet S3 between Grids "4 & 7" and "D & 8".
a. Acceptable to use the alternate option of a double (2) II 718" TII|210 @ 16" oc in lieu a
single ( 1) 1 1 7 /8" TI7|2I0 @ 12" oc" It is acceptable as cumently installed with no
additional action required.
Please contact me if you have questions pertaining to this letter or if I may be of further selice regarding
this matter.
Sincerely,
By:
Paul Stoffel, PE 10/slã3