HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence-Clairification on Scope of Work-
Carres/aa/øæ
c/anh;caha¿ an
Colleen Wirth
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Justin Scott <justin@tpigj.com>
Friday, October 20,2023 3:54 PM
Colleen Wirth
RE: BLRE-09-23-8310 - Closs Detached Garage permit is now UNDER REVIEW
REVISED CLOSS FN D-COMMENTS 1 0- 1 9-23-S1 -FOU N DAT|ON.pdf
Good afternoon Colleen,
Please see the response to comments below as well as the revised foundation drawing with comments. Please
let me know if there is any more information that you need.
Thank you
RE: Engineer's Structural Design Criteria / SNOWLOAD
1. Please confirm the building site location is less than 7,000 ft elevation and the proposed building roof
design will be a minimum 40 PSF Roof Snowload (Pf = at roof, not Pg = at ground)? The building site
location is at 6,900 ft, The roof snow load for the building is located on the front page of the structural
B&C drawing and has been designed to meet a 60 PSF roof snow load.
B&C Steel and Building Loads / Description stomped by Richord Smith denote Roof Snow Load at 60
PSF; CCt Engineer Foundotíon Plon sheet 51- stomped by Thomas Cronk list Load Design Criterio for Roof \
30 Snow? See attached revised foundation drawings by CrCl , /d-ZhZV t t , Ã-
RE: Geotechnicalinformation and foundation design 0Ø 0/P fV/OfF VøfZpdügy rcffi ^ $-2. ls there an existing geotechnical report to reference in the desigrl of this structuré? ¡,lo l9 tþ/H \3. ls there an assumed soil bearing capacity for the foundation design? Please see revised CCI d¡frwinB
^.4. Will a compaction report for structural fill be prepared for this site? No ìa5. lf less than 36 inch frost depth is anticipated, do you have frost protected insulation details for the I >
shallow foundation design? Where applicable, include proposed insulation detail. Please see revised \.
CCI drawing
Notes on CCt Engineer Foundotion Plon sheet 57 stomped by Thomos Cronk state "subgrode to be .S
prepored in accordonce with geotechnical investigation prepared by others". Sheet 5L Section L, 2, 3 -ìñ
further list "structuralfill typ." N
RE: Building use and scope
6. From the application form and SITE PLAN, I interpret this to be a residential, detached garage structure
for the property owner's private, personal use with no building heating and no plumbing connections,
correct? Yes that is correct
5.A. And NOT a building structure proposed for use as a commercial building operation, nor place of
employment and visits or services to the general public, correct? Yes that is correct, this is NOT for
commercial use.
RE: Building Shape & Size details
7. The building application form lists a structure with t,224 sq ft and overall height of 20 feet. The B&C
Steel plans, sheet E1, while no scale furnished, appears based on dimensions given, suggest a more
modest building of some L4-L5 ft measured from finished grade to roof ridge peak. B&C Steel AL and
CCI 5L shows building enclosed space at roughly 915 sq ft of garage area enclosed by walls. B&C Steel
E4 roof plan appears to show a 6 ft extended roof eave running the 36 ft length of the building. You are
correct. The building foot print 915 sqft enclosed with a 6' overhang on the front of the building. The
maximum roof peak height is l-5'.
1
s
\
7.a. Please confirm, the plans received are the correct plan set and dimensions for the steel building
being delivered to the site for installation? Plan set is correct, building application was wrong.
7.b, W¡llthere be a 21"6 sq ft covered patio or roof extension as noted on E4 roof plan? There ls an
overhang on the front of the building that covers 216 sqft.
7.c. ls there a foundation and framing plan for the 216 sq ft roof extension (as noted on E4 roof plan)?
There are no columns for the overhang, it is an overhang only.
7.d. f s a storage loft / mezzanine within the garage anticipated to be constructed to bring the structure
area up Ìo 1,224 sq ft? Or is the 1,224 sq ft an errata and n/a to current scope? There is no mezzanine
or loft.
7.e. Please confirm the estimated height of the structure from grade to ridge peak? 15'
Justin Scott
TPI lndustrial lnc.
2471 Riverside Parkway Unit A
Grand Junction, CO 81505
970-243-4642
www.tpigi.com
From: Colleen Wi rth <cwirth @ga rfield-cou nty.com>
Sent: Monday, October 9,202310:29 AM
To: d hcloss@gmail.com; Justin Scott <justin @tpigj.com>
Subject: BLRE-09-23-8310 - Closs Detached Garage permit is now UNDER REVIEW
BLRE-09-23-8310 - Closs Detached Garage perm¡t is now UNDER REVIEW
Courtesy Message for Daric Closs and Justin w/ TPI lndustrial
This morning, I finished the plan review for the proposed detached garage at 5005 Grass Mesa Road, Lot 49, and have a
few questions.
I would like to stamp the FIELD COPY correctly - obtaining further clarification or confirmation will be most helpful.
UESTIONS:
RE: Engineer's Structural Design Criteria / SNOWLOAD
1., Please confirm the building site location is less than 7,000 ft elevation and the proposed building roof
design will be a minimum 40 PSF Roof Snowload (Pf = at roof, not Pg = at ground)?
B&C Steel ond Building Loods / Descriptíon stamped by Richord Smith denote Roof Snow Loød at 60
PSF; CCI Engineer Foundotion Plan sheet 5L stomped by Thomas Cronk list Load Design Criteria for Roof
30 Snow?
RE: Geotechnical information and foundation design
?. ls there an existing geotechnical report to reference in the design of this structure?
3. ls there an assumed soil bearing capacity for the foundation design?
4. Will a compaction report for structural fill be prepared for this site?
2
5. lf Iess than 36 inch frost depth is anticipated, do you have frost protected insulation details forthe
shallow foundation design? Where applicable, include proposed insulation detail'
Notes on CCt Engineer Foundøtion Plan sheet 57 stamped by Thomos Cronk state "subgrode to be
prepored in occordonce with geotechnical investigation prepared by others". Sheet 57 Section 7,2, 3
further list "structurol fill tYP."
RE: Building use and scoPe
6. From the application form and SITE PLAN, I interpret this to be a residential, detached garage structure
for the property owner's private, personal use with no building heating and no plumbing connections,
correct?
5.A, And NOT a building structure proposed for use as a commercial building operation, nor place of
employment and visits or services to the general public, correct?
RE: Building Shape & Size details
7. The building application form lists a structure with t,224 sq ft and overall height of 20 feet. The B&C
Steel plans, sheet EL, while no scale furnished, appears based on dimensions given, suggest a more
modest building of some I4-LS ft measured from finished grade to roof ridge peak. B&C Steel AL and
CCI 51 shows building enclosed space at roughly 915 sq ft of garage area enclosed by walls. B&C Steel
E4 roof plan appears to show a 6 ft extended roof eave running the 36 ft length of the building.
7.a. please confirm, the plans received are the correct plan set and dimensions for the steel building
being delivered to the site for installation?
7.b. W¡ll there be a2L6 sq ft covered patio or roof extension as noted on E4 roof plan?
7.c. ls there a foundation and framing plan for the 216 sq ft roof extension (as noted on E4 roof plan)?
7.d. ls a storage bft | mezzanine within the garage anticipated to be constructed to bring the structure
area up to L,224 sq ft? Or is the L,224 sq ft an errata and n/a to current scope?
7.e. please confirm the estimated height of the structure from grade to ridge peak?
please respond to questions 1-7.e at your convenience, Please share or send this emailto Richard Smith and
Thomas Cronk however needed (their email contact information was not found in the application packet).
Email responses can be forwarded directly to me, Colleen Wirth, Plans Examiner, Garfield County
cwirth @ga rfi eld-cou ntv.com.
I look forward to receiving more information and helping your project move forward,
Kind regards,
Colleen W¡rth
Building Plans Examiner
Garfield County Community Development
108 8th Street, Suite 401
(970) 945-1377 ext 1610
cwirth @ga rfield-cou ntv'com
3