Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of Excavation 10.17.2022 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax: (970) 945-8454 email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado October 17, 2022 Eric and Denee Berhalter 4062 County Road 331 Silt, Colorado 81652 bird@awd.com Project No. 22-7-278.01 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Steel Building, Lot 27, Grass Mesa, 209 Cedar Breaks Road, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Eric and Denee: As requested, a representative of Kumar & Associates observed the excavation at the subject site on August 23 and September 30, 2022 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations are presented in this report. The services are supplemental to our agreement for professional services to you dated April 6, 2022. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated August 11, 2022, Project No. 22-7-278. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our previous report. The building was originally designed to be supported on a thickened slab foundation then redesigned for a spread footing foundation using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf, as recommended, with a slab-on-grade floor. On August 23 the excavation had been dug for a shallow thickened slab foundation with cut depths from about 1 to 2½ feet below adjacent ground surface, and stiff sandy clay exposed at subgrade. At this time, we recommended the clay soil be removed to bear on the underlying calcareous soils. The building was then designed for a conventional spread footing foundation. At the time of our September 30 site visit, the foundation excavation had been cut in two levels from 3½ to 4 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of generally medium dense, basalt gravel and cobbles in a sandy silty clay matrix. The soils were highly calcareous. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on samples taken from the site, shown on Figure 1, indicate the soils are slightly to moderately compressible under conditions of loading and wetting. The sample was likely partly disturbed due to the sampling process. No groundwater was encountered in the excavation and the soils were generally moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are generally consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils, and the subgrade compacted. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. Kumar & Associates