Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.00 General Application Materials Hogback View Estates Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Garfield County, Colorado Parcel #212335200186 Land Use Change Application Submitted October 30, 2024, revised December 13, 2024 by The Land Studio, Inc. for: Canyon Creek Partners, LLC 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden, Colorado 80401 canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 2 Table of Contents 4-203. General Submittal Requirements ................................................................................................. 5 Pre-Application Conference Summary ..................................................................................................... 5 Application Form ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Fee Agreement ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Letters of Authorization ........................................................................................................................... 12 4-203.C - Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................................. 14 Site Plan/Landscape Plan ........................................................................................................................ 15 Grading and Drainage Plan ..................................................................................................................... 15 Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Traffic Study ............................................................................................................................................. 17 4-203.L ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 .............................. 17 Water Supply and Distribution Plan ....................................................................................................... 18 Wastewater Management and System Plan ........................................................................................... 18 Article 7, Divisions Standards ................................................................................................................. 18 7-101. Zone District Use Regulations .................................................................................................... 18 7-102. Comprehensive Plan & Intergovernmental Agreements ............................................................. 18 7-103. Compatibility ............................................................................................................................... 19 7-104. Source of Water ......................................................................................................................... 19 7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems ................................................................ 19 7-106. Public Utilities ............................................................................................................................. 19 7-107. Access and Roadways ............................................................................................................... 20 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards .................................................................................... 20 7-109. Fire Protection ............................................................................................................................ 20 Division 2 General Resource Protection Standards ............................................................................. 21 7-201. Agricultural Lands ....................................................................................................................... 21 7-202. Wildlife Habitat Areas ................................................................................................................. 21 7-203. Protection of Waterbodies .......................................................................................................... 21 7-204. Drainage and Erosion ................................................................................................................ 21 7-205. Environmental Quality ................................................................................................................ 21 7-206. Wildfire Hazards ......................................................................................................................... 21 7-207. Natural and Geologic Hazards ................................................................................................... 21 7-208. Reclamation ............................................................................................................................... 21 The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • Tel 970 927 3690 • landstudio2@comcast.net August 30, 2024 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Land Use Change Permit Application for Parcel 2123-352-00-186 Owners: Canyon Creek Partners Dear Garfield County, The Applicant for Parcel 2123-352-00-186, would like to request a waiver from requirements of Section 4-203.L, Traffic Study. Waiver Request of Section 4-203.L, Traffic Study. The Applicant requests this waiver due to the very small increase in traffic associated with the Land Use Change from an existing residential garage use to an Industrial-Fabrication Metal working shop use resulting in minimal increase in traffic to the access Road. We believe that requiring a Traffic Study is not necessary given the rural nature and low traffic volumes of the area. 4-202. Waiver Of Submission Requirements A waiver request shall be considered based on the following criteria: 1. The Applicant shows good cause for the requested waiver; 2. The project size, complexity, anticipated impacts, or other factors support a waiver; 3. The waiver does not compromise a proper and complete review; and 4. The information is not material to describing the proposal or demonstrating compliance with approval criteria. The applicant feels a waiver from the submission requirement to provide a traffic study is appropriate because the project size is very minimal, consisting of only an existing use to an existing building. A full traffic study will not provide significant information beyond the CDOT access permit No. 303120 attached to the Engineering Report from Sopris Engineering. SE reviewed the CDOT State Highway Access Permit for the existing access at County Road 138 and it is SE’s opinion a traffic study is not required for this application. The exclusion of a traffic study will in no way compromise a complete review of the proposed Land Use Change Permit Application. Please call to discuss as necessary and thank you for your attention to this request. Sincerely, THE LAND STUDIO, INC By: _____________________________ Douglas J. Pratte Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 3 7-301. Compatible Design ..................................................................................................................... 22 7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards ................................................................................ 22 7-303. Landscape Standards ................................................................................................................ 22 7-304. Lighting Standards ..................................................................................................................... 22 7-305. Snow Storage Standards ........................................................................................................... 22 7-306. Trail and Walkway Standards .................................................................................................... 22 7-1001. Industrial Use ........................................................................................................................... 22 Exhibits ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 Exhibit A - Title Commitment Exhibit B - Engineering Report & Plans Exhibit C - Legal Water Supply Letter Exhibit D - Mineral Owner Research Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 4 Application Team Landowners: Charles Hoge & Michael and Laura Resch 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden, Colorado 80401 canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com Applicant: Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Contact: Michael Resch 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden, Colorado 80401 canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com Civil Engineering/Survey: Sopris Engineering Contact: Kyle Sanderson, PE 502 Main Street, Suite A-3 Carbondale, CO 81623 970.704.0311 ksanderson@sopriseng.com Land Planning: The Land Studio, Inc. Contact: Doug Pratte 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 970.927.3690 Landstudio2@comcast.net Water Attorney: Balcomb & Green Contact: Sara M. Dunn 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 970.945.6546 sarad@balcombgreen.com Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 5 4-203. General Submittal Requirements Pre-Application Conference Summary 1 Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 212335200186 DATE: April 2, 2024 PROJECT: Canyon Creek Partners/Hogback View Estates Metal Shop OWNERS/APPLICANT: Hodge, Charles and Resh, Michael and Laura REPRESENTATIVE: The Land Studio Inc., Doug Pratte PRACTICAL LOCATION: Lot 2, Gabossi Subdivision Exemption According to the Plat Recorded February 11,2003 at Reception #620584 ZONING: Rural TYPE OF APPLICATION: Administrative Review, Directors Decision COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Res MH (2 to 6 Ac/Du), New Castle Area of Influence I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting to legalize an existing metal fabrication shop located on the subject parcel that will also be undergoing a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Review. The shop is an existing use that was not formally permitted. The applicant should supply an operating plan explaining the use and hours of operation. Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 6 2 Subject Parcel II. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS The following Sections of the Garfield Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) as amended apply to the proposed Application: • Section 4-103 Administrative Review • Table 4-102 Common Review Procedures and Required Notice • Section 4-101 Common Review Procedures • Table 4-201 Application Submittal Requirements • Section 4-203 Description of Submittal Requirements • Article 7, Divisions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10 as applicable, and including 7-1001 Industrial Use. III. PROCESS The Application may be “Called-Up” for review by the Director and the Board of County Commissioners. In addition, the Applicant and any affected Adjacent Property Owner can request a Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 7 3 Call-Up for review by the Board in accordance with the procedures and review process contained in Section 4-112. Staff will review the application for completeness prior to requesting referral agencies to provide additional technical review. Staff will prepare a report based on received comments and their review of the application. VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS As a convenience outlined below is a list of information typically required for this type of application. The following list can function as a checklist for your submittal. Submit three paper copies and one digital of all application materials. Additional copies will be requested upon determination of completeness. See the land use code for additional information on submittal requirements. General Application Materials o Signed Application Form o Signed Payment Agreement Form and application fees o Proof of ownership (copy of deed, title work) and information on any lien holders. o A narrative describing the request and related information o Names and mailing addresses of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. o Mineral rights ownership for the subject property (demonstrated through a search of Clerk and Recorders database and/or Assessor database, memo attached). o If the owner is an entity or trust, a recorded Statement of Authority, authorizing a person to encumber the property. o If the applicant is a representative of the owner, a letter of authorization to represent is needed. o A copy of the Pre-application Summary needs to be submitted with the Application. Vicinity Map including areas within approximately 3 miles. Site Plan including topography, existing improvements, infrastructure, irrigation ditches, and significant features. The site plan should include improvement location information adequate to confirm that no nonconforming conditions will result from the proposed subdivision. See Section 4- 201.D Water Supply Plans needs to include details on legal water (well permit and/or draft contracts with Water Conservation District), well production tests, and water quality tests. Information as applicable to demonstrate compliance with provisions of Article 7 Standards, Divisions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10. Requests for waivers that fulfill the requirements of Section 4-118 Waivers of Standards or Section 4-202 Submittal Waivers as appropriate. Submit three paper copies and one digital copy of the application. Additional copies will be requested upon determination of completeness, if necessary. See the land use code for additional information on submittal requirements. Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 8 4 IV. APPLICATION REVIEW a. Review by: Staff for completeness recommendation and referral agencies for additional technical review b. Public Hearing: _X__None (Director’s Decision) __Planning Commission __ Board of County Commissioners __ Board of Adjustment c. Referral Agencies: May include Garfield County Road and Bridge, Fire Protection District, Town of New Castle, Garfield County Vegetation Management, and Garfield County Designated Engineer. V. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES a. Planning Review Fees: $ 250.00 Preliminary Plan ($325 Sketch Plan) b. Referral Agency Fees: $ N/A c. Total Deposit: $ 250.00 (additional hours are billed at $40.50 /hour) Disclaimer The pre-application meeting summary is only valid for six (6) months from the date of the written summary. The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre-application Summary Prepared by: April 2, 2024 ___________________________________________ _____________ John Leybourne, Planner III Date Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 9 Application Form Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970)945-8212 www.garfield-county.com LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICATION Administrative Review Development in 100-Year Floodplain Limited Impact Review Development in 100-Year Floodplain Variance Major Impact Review Code Text Amendment Amendments to an Approved LUCP LIR MIR SUP Rezoning Zone District PUD PUD Amendment Minor Temporary Housing Facility Administrative Interpretation Vacation of a County Road/Public ROW Appeal of Administrative Interpretation Location and Extent Review Areas and Activities of State Interest Comprehensive Plan Amendment Accommodation Pursuant to Fair Housing Act Pipeline Development Variance Time Extension (also check type of original application) INVOLVED PARTIES Owner/Applicant Name: ________________________________________________ Phone: (______)_________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________________________ State: _______ Zip Code: ____________________ E-mail:_______________________________________________________________________________ Representative (Authorization Required) Name: ________________________________________________ Phone: (______)_________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________________________ State: _______ Zip Code: ____________________ E-mail:_______________________________________________________________________________ PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION Project Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Assessor’s Parcel Number: ___ ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ Physical/Street Address: ______________________________________ Legal Description: ______________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Zone District: ___________________________________ Property Size (acres): __________________ Charles Hoge & Michael and Laura Resch 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden CO 80401 canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com The Land Studio, Inc. Douglas Pratte 970 927-3690 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs CO 81601 landstudio2@comcast.net Hogback View Estates Metal Shop Pa___rce___l I___D# ___21___23__3___52_00____18_6 Lot 2, Gabossi Subdivision Exemption Rural 34.7 Acres ✔ Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 10 Existing Use: The garage building has an existing metal fabrication shop that was not formally permitted. Proposed Use (From Use Table 3-403): same use ---------------------- Des c rip ti on of Project: requesting to legalize an existing use located on the parcel For Appeal of Administrative Interpretation please include: 1. The Decision you are appealing. 2. The date the Decision was sent as specified in the notice (date mailed). 3. The nature of the decision and the specified ground for appeal. Please cite specific code sections and/or relevant documentation to support your request. 4. The appropriate appeal fee of $250.00. 5. Please note a completed Appeal Application and fees must be received within 30 calendar days of the date of the final written Administrative Inter retation. Submission Requirements □The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4-202. list: Section: ____________ Section: ______________ Section: ____________ Section: ______________ Waiver of Standards □The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4-118. List: Section: _____________ _ Section 4-203.L Traffic Study_________ Section: Section: _____________ _ I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Date File Number: ____ -____ Fee Paid:$ ___________ _ Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 11 Fee Agreement Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 12 Letters of Authorization Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 13 4-203.B.2 - Ownership Information A Title Commitment is provided as an Exhibit to this Application 4-203.B.3 - Adjacent Property Owners Within 200 Feet 4-203.B.5 - Project Description This Application is for a Land Use change Permit to change the existing residential garage use to an Industrial-Fabrication Metal working use. The existing 34.7 acre lot is currently zoned Rural and requires a land use change for the proposed use. No other construction or disturbance is proposed at the time of this Application. Garfield County Land Explorer Parcel Physical Address Owner Account Num Mailing Address 212326200955 Not available NEW CASTLE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT R040354 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT, CO 81652 212335100118 Not available NEW CASTLE MACY, JACQUELINE S REVOCABLE TRUST R040326 PO BOX 886 SILVERTHORNE, CO 80498 212335100120 319 138 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE GLASSIER, TEMPLE & PALARDY, DYLAN & MORGAN PALARDY, ANNA R040328 319 COUNTY ROAD 138 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 212335100127 406-000408 138 COUNTY RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS HANSEN, NORMAN RAY R040338 406 COUNTY ROAD 138 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 212335200059 Not available NEW CASTLE TIBBETTS HPW LLC R040237 225 N 5TH STREET GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 212335200186 24 138 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE HOGE, CHARLES & RESCH, MICHAEL & LAURA R040429 901 COTTONWOOD CIR GOLDEN, CO 80401 212335200187 18 138 COUNTY RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS CANYON CREEK SELF STORAGE LLC R040430 PO BOX 2518 MEEKER, CO 81641 212335200188 22 138 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE CANYON CREEK SELF STORAGE LLC R040431 PO BOX 2518 MEEKER, CO 81641 212335201001 44523 6 & 24 HWY GLENWOOD SPRINGS GABOSSI, ROCKY A & MARY A R082828 44523 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ROW Not available null 10/21/24, 2:18 PM Garfield County Land Explorer about:blank 1/1 Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 14 4-203.C - Vicinity Map &RS\ULJKW‹ 1D WLRQ DO* HRJ UDS KLF6R FLHW\LFXEHG N EW C AST LE 0.7 MIL ES GL EN W O O D SPR ING S - 5 M ILE S A PPRO XIM ATE SU B J EC T B O UND A R Y §¨¦70 9LFLQL W\ £¤6 §¨¦70 &$1<21&5((.5' 6&$1<21 & 5 ( (.5' T H R E E M IL E R A D I U S &$1< 21&5( (. 3$ 57 1(56 //& 7+5((0,/(5$',869,&,1,7<0$3         )H HW $ 3$ 5&(/,1)250$7,21*$5),( /'&2 817<*,6   %$6(0$386 $72320$36 ( 65, 7+,6 0$ 3,6 ,17(1'(' )25*(1( 5$/3 /$11,1*385326(621/< VFD OH     # [ PDS  MEO 62 35,6( 1*, 1(( 5, 1*±// && ,9 , /& 2 168 /7$ 176  0$ ,16 75(( 7 68, 7 ( $ &$ 5%2 1 '$ /( & 2 /2 5$'2        68 %-(&7 3$5 & (/ '(7$ ,/6  & 5   1 (: & $ 67/ (&2 3$5 & (/ 1 R         /2 7 * $%2 66 ,6 8%' ,9,6,2 1 (;( 03 7,2 1 6(352 -(& 7 1 R    ' $7(       Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 15 Site Plan/Landscape Plan 4-203.D/F A Site Plan has been included with the Engineering Report and drawings, see pages C-1.0 and C-2.0. The only proposed landscaping will be the reclamation of disturbed areas for road improvements as described in the Engineering Report Section 7-208. Grading and Drainage Plan 4-203.E There are grading and drainage improvements proposed for the access to the metal fabrication shop. The driveway site plan and profile are attached as an Exhibit. No grading and drainage disturbance is planned for the metal fabrication shop at the time of this submittal. A Building Permit was issued on 10/4/2010 when a grading plan would have been reviewed as part of Building Plan Review. Impact Analysis 4-203.G 1. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1,500-foot radius. The building is located in an area of rural residential and agricultural uses. - 12-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the west - 59-acre Rural agricultural parcel with a single family home to the northwest - Two parcels with warehouse / self-storage / RV storage to the south - 28-acre Rural vacant land parcel to the northeast - 14-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the east - BLM land to the north See attached map for Adjacent Landowners. 2. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the evaluation of the proposed development. The building is located in an area that does not have significant site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water, steep topography, and vegetative cover. It is located within an existing gravel area to be utilized for shop vehicular circulation and parking. 2. Soil Characteristics. A description of soil characteristics of the site that have a significant influence on the proposed use of the land. Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 16 The Engineering Report that is attached as an Exhibit references the soil characteristics of the site especially related to the Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) for the shop building. See this Exhibit for additional information. 4. Geology and Hazard. A description of geologic characteristics of the area including any potential natural or manmade hazards, and a determination of what effect such factors would have on the proposed use of the land. No known natural or manmade geologic hazards exist in the location of the existing building and driveway. 5. Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Area. Evaluation of the relationship of the subject parcel to Floodplains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal, the Slope of the land, the effect of sewage effluents, and the pollution of surface Runoff, stream flow, and groundwater. The Engineering Report that is attached as an Exhibit identifies that the subject parcel is not in a floodplain. Sopris Engineering performed site investigation of the existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) for the shop building and has prepared a separate report that details the findings and recommendations for the OWTS system. This report is an Exhibit to their Engineering Report. 6. Environmental impacts. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be developed and the effects of development on those conditions. A Building Permit was issued on 10/4/2010 for the existing structure. No additional construction or building development is proposed with this Application that will affect the environment. All metal fabrication uses will occur within the existing structure. 7. Nuisance. Impacts on adjacent land from generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration or other emanations. The proposed land use change would have no substantial temporary or long-term adverse effect on noise, odors, or waste-generation. The building is at least 500 yards or 1500 ft. from the nearest building that is not occupied full time (the new creation church). It is approximately 800 yards or more from the nearest occupied dwelling. 8. Hours of Operation. The Applicant shall submit information on the hours of operation of the proposed use. The proposed hours of operation are 8 am to 6 pm. Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 17 Traffic Study 4-203.L The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • Tel 970 927 3690 • landstudio2@comcast.net August 30, 2024 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Land Use Change Permit Application for Parcel 2123-352-00-186 Owners: Canyon Creek Partners Dear Garfield County, The Applicant for Parcel 2123-352-00-186, would like to request a waiver from requirements of Section 4-203.L, Traffic Study. Waiver Request of Section 4-203.L, Traffic Study. The Applicant requests this waiver due to the very small increase in traffic associated with the Land Use Change from an existing residential garage use to an Industrial-Fabrication Metal working shop use resulting in minimal increase in traffic to the access Road. We believe that requiring a Traffic Study is not necessary given the rural nature and low traffic volumes of the area. 4-202. Waiver Of Submission Requirements A waiver request shall be considered based on the following criteria: 1. The Applicant shows good cause for the requested waiver; 2. The project size, complexity, anticipated impacts, or other factors support a waiver; 3. The waiver does not compromise a proper and complete review; and 4. The information is not material to describing the proposal or demonstrating compliance with approval criteria. The applicant feels a waiver from the submission requirement to provide a traffic study is appropriate because the project size is very minimal, consisting of only an existing use to an existing building. A full traffic study will not provide significant information beyond the CDOT access permit No. 303120 attached to the Engineering Report from Sopris Engineering. SE reviewed the CDOT State Highway Access Permit for the existing access at County Road 138 and it is SE’s opinion a traffic study is not required for this application. The exclusion of a traffic study will in no way compromise a complete review of the proposed Land Use Change Permit Application. Please call to discuss as necessary and thank you for your attention to this request. Sincerely, THE LAND STUDIO, INC By: _____________________________ Douglas J. Pratte Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 18 Water Supply and Distribution Plan 4-203.M The existing building is served by an existing well. See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. Also attached is a legal water supply letter from Sara Dunn at Balcomb & Green. Wastewater Management and System Plan 4-203.N See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. Article 7, Divisions Standards Division 1. General Approval Standards 7-101. Zone District Use Regulations Zoning for this parcel is Rural and the minimum lot area for the Rural Zone District is 2-acres. This Land Use Change Application proposes to allow a Metal Fabrication shop which is an allowed use requiring an Administrative Land Use Change permit in the Rural Zone district. 7-102. Comprehensive Plan & Intergovernmental Agreements The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan shows the Canyon Creek Partners parcel in the Res MH (2-6 Ac/Du) future land use designation. Residential Medium High is defined as small farms, estates, residences, and clustered residential subdivisions. The proposed Land Use change of the existing garage building to a metal fabrication workshop will not change the density of the neighborhood. Section 4: Economics, Employment and Tourism, Policy 4 of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan states “Strengthen Garfield County’s economic resiliency for employment and income generation by continuing to diversify the economy”. The use of an existing building to generate jobs and income reflects the ideals of this policy with minimal costs and impact for new development. This parcel also resides within the New Castle Area of Influence and at the edge of the New Castle Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use designated for this parcel is Rural Low Density. The type of use for this designation is large lot single-family, working ranches/farms, ranchettes, and Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 19 open pastures with rural qualities. The existing garage building blends in with other working farms and outbuildings. 7-103. Compatibility The building is located in an area of rural residential and agricultural uses. The adjacent land uses consist of the following: - 12-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the west - 59-acre Rural agricultural parcel with a single family home to the northwest - Two parcels with warehouse / self-storage / RV storage to the south - 28-acre Rural vacant land parcel to the northeast - 14-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the east - BLM land to the north 7-104. Source of Water The existing building is served by an existing domestic well, Permit No. 335230. This commercial exempt well permit allows the well to be used for drinking and sanitary facilities in a commercial business where (1) pumping is limited to 15 g.p.m.; (2) uses are limited to drinking and sanitary facilities inside a single commercial business; and the demand will be less than. 1/3 of an acre foot per year. A copy of the well permit is included in the Civil Engineering Report from Sopris Engineering. A legal water supply letter has been provided by Sara Dunn of Balcomb & Green and has been included as an Exhibit to this Application. 7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems The existing building is served by an existing well. See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. Wastewater Systems – See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. 7-106. Public Utilities Xcel Energy (Public Service Co), Electric Utility Service - An existing overhead service line provided service to the existing building. See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 20 7-107. Access and Roadways See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit, for information related to the Highway 6 and County Road 138, as well as the driveway to the Metal Shop Building. 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards This Application does not propose development within any natural or geologic hazard areas. 7-109. Fire Protection See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit, for information related to their coordination with the Glenwood Springs Fire Department regarding access and fire suppression. Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 21 Division 2 General Resource Protection Standards 7-201. Agricultural Lands The existing building will have no adverse effect on surrounding Agricultural Operations. 7-202. Wildlife Habitat Areas Because the building exists there will be no additional disturbance to wildlife habitat with the proposed land use change. 7-203. Protection of Waterbodies No natural water bodies are in the location of the metal fabrication shop. 7-204. Drainage and Erosion There are grading and drainage improvements proposed for the access to the metal fabrication shop. The driveway site plan and profile are attached as an Exhibit. No grading and drainage disturbance is planned for the metal fabrication shop at the time of this submittal. A Building Permit was issued on 10/4/2010 when a grading plan would have been reviewed as part of Building Plan Review. 7-205. Environmental Quality The proposed land use change would have no substantial temporary or long- term adverse effect on noise, odors, or waste-generation. All metal fabrication will occur within the metal fabrication shop. 7-206. Wildfire Hazards The existing building is in an area designated as Low Burn Probability on the Wildlife Risk Assessment map. 7-207. Natural and Geologic Hazards No natural or manmade geologic hazards exist in the location of the existing building. No additional development is proposed with this Application. See the Engineering Report included as an Exhibit. 7-208. Reclamation Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 22 The owner proposes no additional development with this Application other than road improvements to the Metal Shop. The only proposed landscaping will be the reclamation of disturbed areas for road improvements as described in the Engineering Report Section 7-208. 7-301. Compatible Design The existing building is typical of rural out-buildings, garages, or shops of rural Garfield County and other western communities. 7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards A gravel parking and loading area exists at the building site. See the Engineering Report included as an Exhibit. 7-303. Landscape Standards The owner proposes no additional development with this Application other than road improvements to the Metal Shop. The only proposed landscaping will be the reclamation of disturbed areas for road improvements as described in the Engineering Report Section 7-208. 7-304. Lighting Standards One existing overhead light is on the exterior of the building and is on during dark hours for safety and security. 7-305. Snow Storage Standards Adequate snow storage space is available around the building site. See the Engineering Report included as an Exhibit. 7-306. Trail and Walkway Standards No trails or walkways are proposed with this Land Use Change Application 7-1001. Industrial Use A. Residential Subdivisions The Metal Shop occupies Lot 2 of the Gabossi Exemption and is not a part of a platted residential subdivision. B. Setback Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 23 The nearest property line to the east is 245’ from the existing Metal Shop building, and 237’ to the south of the existing building. C. Concealing and Screening All metal fabrication will occur within the Metal Fabrication Shop. D. Storing All materials will continue to be stored within the Metal Fabrication Shop. E. Industrial Wastes The Applicant agrees that any industrial waste shall be disposed of in a manner consistent with Federal and State statutes and requirements of CDPHE. Any flammable or explosive solids or gases and other hazardous materials shall be stored according to the manufacturer’s standards and shall comply with the national, State, and local fire codes and written recommendations from the appropriate local fire protection district. F. Noise The Applicant agrees that noise shall not exceed State noise standards pursuant to C.R.S., Article 12, Title 25. G. Ground Vibration The Applicant agrees that the use shall not create ground vibration that is perceptible without instruments at any point of any boundary line of the property. H. Hours of Operation. The proposed hours of operation are 8 am to 6 pm. I. Interference, Nuisance, or Hazard. The proposed land use change would have no substantial temporary or long- term adverse effect on noise, odors, heat, glare, radiation or waste- generation. The building is at least 500 yards or 1500 ft. from the nearest building that is not occupied full time (the new creation church). It is approximately 800 yards or more from the nearest occupied dwelling. Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Land Use Change Application Garfield County, Colorado 24 Exhibits Exhibit A - Title Commitment Exhibit B - Engineering Report & Plans Exhibit C - Legal Water Supply Letter Exhibit D - Mineral Owner Research Customer Distribution Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will never change. Order Number: GW63019439-4 Date: 06/24/2024 Property Address: 24 COUNTY ROAD 138, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Garfield County Title Team 901 GRAND AVENUE #202 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (970) 945-2610 (Work) (970) 945-4784 (Work Fax) glenwoodresponse@ltgc.com Seller/Owner CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH 901 COTTONWOOD CIR GOLDEN, CO 80401 fresch99@yahoo.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: GW63019439-4 Date: 06/24/2024 Property Address: 24 COUNTY ROAD 138, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Seller(s): CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH Buyer(s): A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about Land Title. Estimate of Title Insurance Fees "TBD" Commitment $265.00 TBD - TBD Income $-265.00 TOTAL $0.00 Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and be aware of the implications of the documents on your property. Chain of Title Documents: Garfield county recorded 02/14/2022 under reception no. 970898 Garfield county recorded 03/05/2003 under reception no. 622235 Plat Map(s): Garfield county recorded 02/11/2003 under reception no. 620584 Property Address: 24 COUNTY ROAD 138, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 1.Effective Date: 05/31/2024 at 5:00 P.M. 2.Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED $0.00 3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4.Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH 5.The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 90 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID TRACT OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE N1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35, SAID POINT BEING AN IRON PIPE WITH AN ALUMINUM CAP, PLS NO. 15710; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NW1/4 S 07°03'10" E 1870.02 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE N 90°00'00" W 84.81 FEET; THENCE S 00°40'50" W 80.42 FEET; THENCE S 10°10'24" E 123.46 FEET; THENCE S 79°49'36" W 85.70 FEET; THENCE N 58°20'18" W 80.34 FEET; THENCE 19.34 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°39'42" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 74°10'09" W 19.10 FEET; THENCE N 90°00'00" W 38.18 FEET; THENCE 88.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 515.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°47'59" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 85°06'01" W 87.98 FEET; THENCE N 80°12'01" W 56.76 FEET; THENCE 110.42 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 65.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 97°20'08" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 31°31'57" W 97.62 FEET; THENCE N 84°8' 51" W 119.80 FEET; THENCE S 84°18'28" W 105.41 FEET; THENCE N 74°56'17" W 210.39 FEET; THENCE N 68°43'16" W 110.56 FEET; THENCE S 72°59'26" W 101.15 FEET; THENCE N 80°11'51" W 128.20 FEET; THENCE N 02°38'42" E 142.25 FEET; THENCE N 28°03'51" W 69.80 FEET; THENCE N 34°01'36" E 250.32 FEET; THENCE N 23°42'17" E 160.96 FEET; THENCE N 40°24'52" E 63.16 FEET; THENCE N 04°15' 08" W 209.64 FEET; THENCE N 22°37'14" E 167.65 FEET; THENCE N 49°48'42" E 68.45 FEET; THENCE N 37°28'23" E 80.15 FEET; THENCE N 11°39'34" E 51.69 FEET; THENCE N 26°11'52" E 62.99 FEET; THENCE N 26°31'06" W 55.72 FEET; THENCE N 45°21'31" E 855.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALSO KNOWN AS: LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 620584. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:GW63019439-4 Copyright 2006-2024 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:GW63019439-4 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: GW63019439-4 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1.Any facts, rights, intere sts, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate a nd complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prio r to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices o f such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8.DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2022, FROM CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO FOR THE USE OF BAY EQUITY LLC TO SECURE THE SUM OF $856,000.00 RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 2022, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 970901. 9.DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2022, FROM CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $288,000.00 RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 2022, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 970902. NOTE: THE ABOVE DEED OF TRUST SECURES A LINE OF CREDIT. 10.RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 1967, IN BOOK 388 AT PAGE 311. 11.RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 1967, IN BOOK 388 AT PAGE 311. 12.ENCROACHMENT OF ROADWAY ONTO SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON FIRST AMENDED SENOR MESA PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 1998 AS RECEPTION NO. 533649 PURPORTEDLY GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 13, 1943 IN BOOK 201 AT PAGE 502. 13.UTILITY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1999, IN BOOK 1154 AT PAGE 989. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: GW63019439-4 14.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO 2002-84 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 IN BOOK 1387 AT PAGE 114. 15.EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 7, 2002 IN BOOK 1376 AT PAGE 135. 16.EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL MATTERS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 610839 AND AMENDED PLAT RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 620584. 17.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 639228, AND APPLICATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 2013 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 831818. 18.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 791617. 19.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF WATER AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 791618 AND AMENDMENT RECORDED MARCH 28, 2011 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 800548 20.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 2022 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 970897. 21.MATTERS DISCLOSED ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY BOOKCLIFF SURVEY SERVICES INC., CERTIFIED NOVEMBER 29, 2021, JOB NO. 21161-01, OUR ESI 40147305. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: GW63019439-4 Land Title Guarantee Company Disclosure Statements Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to t he time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title P olicy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or a greed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (B) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. (C) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (A) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (B) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. (C) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Ind emnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. (E) This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of I nsurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any document. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (A) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. (B) Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of Land Title Guarantee Company Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Per sonal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information wh en you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. . COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and t he name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: 4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (b) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (d) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (g) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h) the Notice;(a) the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b) the Commitment Conditions;(c) Schedule A;(d) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (a) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (b) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (c) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (d) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (f) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (c) 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the P roposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (d) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f) Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change Engineering Report October 24, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 1 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Canyon Creek Partners LLC c/o Julie and Doug Pratte – The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Email: juliepratte@thelandstudio.com, dougpratte@thelandstudio.com RE: Land Use Change Engineering Report – Canyon Creek Partners LLC (SE Job #32000.01) Dear Julie and Doug, Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) has prepared the following report in support of a Land Use Change (LUC) Permit for the existing metal shop building at Lot 2 of the Gabossi Exemption. The site is generally located between Canyon Creek and New Castle off Highway 6 and County Road 138 in Garfield County. This report generally outlines applicable civil design scope, civil related deliverables, and civil related responses to the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code for the existing shop building. SE assumes that the text in this report and the associated attachments will be combined into a single report document by The Land Studio that encompasses all design criteria necessary for the Garfield County LUC documents and requirements.  Executive Summary  Improvement Survey Plat attached (Bookcliff Survey, 11/29/21)  Vicinity Map is attached as Figure 1 (Section 4-203.C)  General Site Map is attached as Figure 2 (Section 4-203.D)  Driveway Site Plan & Profile, Sections Drawings are attached (Section 4-203.D, 4-203.E, 7-107)  The subject property falls within the Rural Zone District. The existing shop building is ±2,450-sf.  SE reviewed the CDOT State Highway Access Permit for the existing access at County Road 138. It is SE’s opinion a traffic study is not required for this application. The shop has been in existence since before the latest access permit was prepared in 2003, thus current traffic is treated as background traffic. In other words, SE does not believe any further highway improvements or access permit review is required. (Section 4-203.L)  Water currently serves the shop building from Bowles Well No. 3. The state issued a new commercial exempt well permit for the current shop building which legalizes the water supply (attached). The well was bacteria tested in June of 2024, with help from Aspen Waterwise, per County standards, with no bacteria. A pump test was also performed in June of 2024, with help from High Country Pump, to verify the production of the well, with suitable production for the shop. Wright Water Engineers prepared a summary report describing the suitability of the existing wells onsite which has been attached for reference. (Section 4-203.M, 7-104, 7-105) Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change Engineering Report October 24, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 2 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311  SE performed site investigation of the existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) for the shop building. The shop has a single ½-bathroom with a toilet and sink. A single compartment, 750-gal concrete septic tank exists south of the building with evidence of a soil treatment area (STA) consisting of absorption trenches or similar south of the tank. SE believes that the OWTS is fully functional for the ½-bath and that no improvements are immediately required for functionality. SE has prepared a separate report that details the findings and recommendations for the OWTS system. The report is attached. (Section 4-203.N)  The existing shop building is not located in a floodplain. (Section 4-203.O)  An overhead electric main line runs through the southern portion of the property and includes a 20-ft utility easement that was granted in 1999 for access for operation, repair, and maintenance to Xcel Energy (Public Service Co). Structures are not permitted within this easement (Book 1154 at Page 989, See Exception 11 of Title Commitment). It appears that a service line comes off this main line to serve the existing shop building. Gas lines exist within the Highway 6 right of way but are not extended to the property currently. No other public utilities exist on the property. (Section 7-106)  Grading and road improvements will be required for the access roads to the shop building to bring them to the current County and Fire Department standards. A Semi-Primitive Access is required for the existing shop use. Some portions of the driveway will need to be widened, grading to reduce the longitudinal grade will need to be completed, proper cross slope of the driveway will need to be added, and a borrow ditch meeting the road standards will need to be improved and/or added in certain areas. Other grading and drainage improvements include fixing and/or adding culverts. (Section 7-107)  General Existing Site Conditions and Structures The subject property is approximately 34.685 acres. The property is generally wooded with shorter scrub oak and cedar trees throughout. There is a large ±6.0-acre field that has been used for crop production in the past on the lower, west side of the property. There is one single family home located towards the north side of the property with a circle gravel driveway and some small outbuildings and sheds. There is one metal shop located towards the southeast side of the property with a large parking and storage area outside of the building. There are generally single lane gravel driveways to the home and the metal shop with other two track gravel drives around the site for ditch access and property access. The east 2/3 of the property generally slopes from north to south with the west 1/3 of the property generally sloping steeply from east to west. See attached Figure 2 for a General Site Map. Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change Engineering Report October 24, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 3 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311  Division 1. General Approval Standards The following section of this report shows general responses for Civil Engineering related scope found in the Land Use Code, Article 7, Division 1 Standards.  Section 7-104. Source of Water – The Gabossi Exemption (Existing Lots 1 through 4), has 6 wells known as Bowles Well Nos. 1 through 6 that may be used for in-house, domestic water use (no irrigation or outdoor use). The 6 wells may be used for up to 22 single family dwellings. Bowles Well No. 2 is to be used for 7 of the dwellings where the remaining Bowles Well Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 may serve a combined total of up to 15 singe family dwellings. Bowles Well No. 3 has been developed (Permit No. 56102-F) and is located on Existing Lot 2 (Decreed location is 1500-ft from the north section line and 2200-ft from the west section line). Currently the well has a conditional water right for 25 gpm. This well appears to be the well serving the shop building on the south east part of the property within Proposed Lot 7. The state issued a new commercial exempt well permit for the current shop building which legalizes the water supply (attached). The well was bacteria tested in June of 2024, with help from Aspen Waterwise, per County standards, with no bacteria. A pump test was also performed in June of 2024, with help from High Country Pump, to verify the production of the well, with suitable production for the shop. Wright Water Engineers prepared a summary report describing the suitability of the existing wells onsite which has been attached for reference. The maximum total diversions from Bowles Well Nos. 1 through 6 combined is limited to 8.65 ac-ft per year for in- house domestic use only. No irrigation or outdoor use is allowed. Water from the wells may serve a combined maximum of 22 single family dwellings located on the Gabossi Subdivision Exemption and Old Orchard Subdivision. The Bowles Pond, First Enlargement and the Bowles Diversion which fills the pond are located on existing Lot 1. 2.4 ac-ft is absolute for augmentation for Bowles Well No. 2. 0.1 ac-ft is conditional for augmentation for Bowels Well No. 2. 2.5 ac-ft is conditional for augmentation of the remaining Bowles Wells Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Note that the conditional water rights are subject to an Application for Finding of Reasonable Diligence in the same month six years from the date of the water judge’s order (November 25, 2020) in Case No. 2019CW3096.  Section 7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems – A. Water Distribution Systems – See above for the description of the well that serves the shop building. B. Wastewater Systems – As stated above, SE performed site investigation of the existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) for the shop building. The shop has a single ½-bathroom with a toilet and sink. A single compartment, 750-gal concrete septic tank exists south of the building with evidence of a soil treatment area (STA) consisting of absorption trenches or similar south of the tank. SE believes that the OWTS is fully functional for the ½-bath and that no improvements are immediately required for functionality. SE has prepared a separate report that details the findings and recommendations for the OWTS system. The report is attached. Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change Engineering Report October 24, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 4 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311  Section 7-106. Public Utilities – Xcel Energy (Public Service Co), Electric Utility Service – There is an overhead electric line that runs through the southern portion of the property and includes a 20-ft utility easement that was granted in 1999 for access for operation, repair, and maintenance. Structures are not permitted within this easement (Book 1154 at Page 989, See Exception 11 of Title Commitment). It appears that a service line comes off this main line to serve the existing shop building. Gas lines exist within the Highway 6 right of way but are not extended to the property currently. No other public utilities exist on the property. (Section 7-106)  Section 7-107. Access and Roadways – Existing Roads & Vehicle Access Access Easement through existing Lot 4 Property – There is a 30-ft wide ingress, egress, and utility easement (Reception No. 620584, Exception 14 of Title Commitment) into the subject property from County Road No. 138 from the south as shown on attached Figure 2. This easement crosses existing Lot 4 of the Gabossi Subdivision. The existing gravel drive within the easement has some portions that will need to be re-graded for longitudinal slope, the cross slope will need to be improved, and the borrow ditch on the inside of the road will need to be improved. Driveway to Metal Shop Building – The gravel drive that provides vehicle access to the metal shop building is shown on attached Figure 2. The drive from the wye to the building is approximately 14% grade with a minimum width of about 18-ft in some sections. The road will need to be widened in some areas, the cross slope will need to be improved, the grade will need to be improved, and the borrow ditch will need to be improved. Glenwood Springs Fire Department Standards – SE reached out to the Glenwood Springs Fire Department to confirm minimum road width and grade that they will accept for their fire apparatus. They stated that they use the 2015 International Fire Code (IFC) for fire apparatus access roads. The 2015 IFC, Appendix D states fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10% grade unless approved by the fire chief and dead-end roads shall be minimum 20-ft wide. Garfield County Road Standards – A Semi Primitive Access per County Standards is the requirement for the shop building. The Roadway Standards for a Semi Primitive Access off a public right of way in the Garfield County Land Use Code, Article 7, Section 7-107.F, Table 7-107 states the following: Design Standards Primitive/Driveway Access Design Capacity (ADT) 21 to 100 Min ROW Width (ft) 40 Lane Width (ft) Two Lane – 8 each, 16 total Shoulder Width (ft) 2 Ditch Width (ft) 4 Cross Slope 2% Chip/Seal, 3% gravel Min Radius (ft) 50 Max % Grade 12% Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change Engineering Report October 24, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 5 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Site Plan & Profile drawings along with section drawings have been attached showing where improvements need to be made to the driveway and access roads for the shop building. This also includes drainage improvements such as fixing and/or adding culverts as shown. Highway 6 and County Road 138 CDOT State Highway Access Permit and Traffic Generation If a development is accessed from a state highway, the State Highway Access Permit at the intersection is to be studied for increased traffic generation due to the development. If a development increases the permitted traffic at a highway access by 20% or more, a revised Access Permit is required. The access to the subject lot is at the intersection of Highway 6 and County Road 138. CDOT Permit No. 303120 (Attached) exists for this intersection and was permitted in 2003. The access is to provide service to the County Road and is permitted for 40 DHV (Peak Hour Trips). The 40 trips were calculated based on traffic due to the New Creation Church and Daycare in both the short term (2002) and long term (2022). However, other developments outside of the church and daycare were not included in the site generated traffic. SE reviewed the CDOT State Highway Access Permit for the existing access at County Road 138. It is SE’s opinion a traffic study is not required for this application. The shop has been in existence since before the latest access permit was prepared in 2003, thus current traffic is treated as background traffic. In other words, SE does not believe any further highway improvements or access permit review is required.  Section 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards – The shop building does not appear to be within any natural or geologic hazard areas.  Section 7-109. Fire Protection – SE reached out to the Glenwood Springs Fire Department to confirm minimum road width and grade that they will accept for their fire apparatus. They stated that they use the 2015 International Fire Code (IFC) for fire apparatus access roads. The 2015 IFC, Appendix D states that fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10% grade unless approved by the fire chief and dead-end roads shall be minimum 20-ft wide.  Division 2. General Resource Protection Standards The following section of this report shows general responses for Civil Engineering related scope found in the Land Use Code, Article 7, Division 2 Standards.  Section 7-203. Protection of Waterbodies – There are no waterbodies located on the subject property. Irrigation ditches run through the property but will be protected and accounted for early in the design phases of the project. If ditches are to be crossed with proposed road improvements, necessary culvert design will be provided. Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change Engineering Report October 24, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 6 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311  Section 7-204. Drainage and Erosion – Grading and drainage design will be provided at future design phases of the project. SE does not anticipate issues with meeting the Garfield County detention requirements (2-year and 25-year, 24-hour precipitation events) or safely passing the 100-year storm event through the site. SE will provide sediment, erosion control, and stormwater management recommendations in the design phases of the project (design drawings, drainage reports, etc).  Section 7-205. Environmental Quality – Current construction standards provide parameters for mitigation of drainage and soil erosion activities relative to site development. Recommendations for appropriate best management practices (BMP’s) will be made throughout the design phases of this project. These BMP’s are primarily grouped for the construction phase and the post development phase of the project, with the main emphasis on soil erosion and sediment transport controls.  Section 7-206. Wildfire Hazards – The County restricts development in areas designated as severe wildfire hazard areas (Slopes greater than 30% or within a fire chimney as identified by the Colorado State Forest Service). The subject property will be reviewed for wildfire hazard restrictions at the design phase of the project but does not appear to be in a severe wildfire area.  Section 7-207.F. Slope Analysis – The County allows development of property on slopes up to 30%. Development on slopes from 20% to 30% requires special engineering study to “establish the feasibility of development for the site” as stated in the land use code, Article 7. Section 7-207.F. SE has prepared a slope analysis for the sketch plan phase of this project. The existing shop building was not constructed on slopes over 20%.  Section 7-208. Reclamation – Recommendations for reclamation of disturbed areas will be made throughout the design phases of this project. In general, any disturbed areas are to be re-seeded with County approved seed mixes. Reclamation of disturbed areas will be outlined in more detail within sediment, erosion control, and stormwater management design. Permanent Erosion Control BMPs shall consist of a complete landscaping and ground covering task to permanently re-vegetate and cover bear grounds that will remain open space to avoid long-term soil erosion. This effort will reduce the risk of unnecessary degradation and failure of the drainage system. Temporary erosion control structures installed during construction shall be left in place as necessary and maintained until new vegetation has been reestablished at a 70% level. Upon reaching a satisfactory level of soil stabilization from the new vegetation, all erosion control structures shall be removed; with the exception of the proposed sediment/retention basins. These should remain in place until they become a conflict with future improvements. Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change Engineering Report October 24, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 7 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311  Division 3. Site Planning and Development Standards The following section of this report shows general responses for Civil Engineering related scope found in the Land Use Code, Article 7, Division 3 Standards.  Section 7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards – The existing shop building has adequate parking areas for the use as well as a full loop drive around the building for emergency vehicle access and large vehicle turnarounds.  Section 7-305. Snow Storage Standards – There is adequate snow storage around the existing shop building. Sopris Engineering has studied the subject property and specifically the existing shop building area. SE believes that the shop building, water system, OWTS, driveway access, and other civil related infrastructure can be brought up to current standards for the proposed land use change to legalize the shop building use. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call (970) 704-0311. Sincerely, Kyle Sanderson, PE Project Manager Attachments:  1 – Improvement Survey Plat  2 – Figure 1 – Vicinity Map  3 – Figure 2 – General Site Map  4 –HVE SITE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS  5 – Commercial Exempt Well Permit  6 – Well Pump and Bacteria Test Report  7 – SE OWTS Report  8 – CDOT Access Permit No 303120 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 G:\2022\32000\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\DE\32000-SITE.DWG - Oct 24, 2024 - 11:58am NO R T H FIGURE 1 GENERAL VICINITY MAP CANYON CREEK PARTNERS, LLC (BACKGROUND: GOOGLE EARTH AERIAL) CANYON CREEK PARTNERS LLC PROPERTY BOUNDARY (LOT 2 - GABOSSI EXEMPTION) SCALE: 1" = 1 mile COLORADO RIVER ±3-MILE RADIUS AROUND PROPERTY BOUNDARY LAKOTA LINKS GOLF COURSE CHACRA/ CANYON CREEK EXIT 109 CANYON CREEK NEW CASTLE EXIT 105 ALKALI CREEK TO GLENWOOD SPRINGS SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 G:\2022\32000\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\DE\32000-SITE.DWG - Oct 24, 2024 - 11:59am NO R T H FIGURE 2 GENERAL SITE MAP CANYON CREEK PARTNERS, LLC (BACKGROUND: GOOGLE EARTH AERIAL) CANYON CREEK PARTNERS LLC PROPERTY BOUNDARY (LOT 2 - GABOSSI EXEMPTION) HIGH W AY 6 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 3 8 NEW CREATION CHURCH EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EXISTING METAL SHOP BUILDING 30FT INGRESS, EGRESS, & UTILITY EASEMENT 20FT PUBLIC SERVICE CO EASEMENT LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 1 SCALE: 1" = 250' EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO SHOP BUILDING OFF MAIN DRIVE, MAX 14% GRADE HIGH W AY 6 x x x x x x x O E O E O E O E O E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0+0 0 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+ 5 0 5 + 0 0 5 + 5 0 6+ 0 0 EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, DETERMINE IF CULVERT CAN BE RESTORED. IF NOT, CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE & REPLACE WITH MIN 12-IN DIA ADS N-12 OR APPROVED EQUAL. 30.0' INGRESS, EGRESS, AND UTILITY EASEMENT RECEPTION NO. 620584 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION 5 6 2 4 5622 5624 563 0 56 4 0 56 5 0 56 6 0 5650 5654 5660 5666 5660 5 6 3 4 5 6 4 0 5 6 4 4 5 6 5 0 5 6 5 4 5 6 6 0 5664 5 6 7 0 56 6 6 5 6 6 8 5676 5 6 8 0 5 6 8 4 5 6 8 8 5 6 9 0 56 9 4 56 9 0 5 6 8 0 568 4 568 0 5 6 7 0 LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTION RECEPTION NO. 620584 Design Standards for Primitive Driveway Access Design Capacity (ADT) - 21 to 100 Min ROW Width - 40-ft Lane Width - Two Lanes - 8-ft each, 16-ft total Shoulder Width - 2-ft Ditch Width - 4-ft Cross Slope - 3% gravel Min Radius - 50-ft Max % Grade - 12% LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.685-ACRES P R I V A T E D R I V E T O S T O R A G E F A C I L I T Y H I G H W A Y 6 COUNTY ROAD 13 8 -1. 0 : 1 EX CULVERT 18" HDPE INV IN: ±5621.21 EX CULVERT 18" HDPE INV OUT: ±5620.38 EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP, BEGIN EDGE OF DITCH MIN 24" FROM EX FENCE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER EX CULVERT 18" CMP INV OUT: ±5621.60 EX CULVERT 18" CMP INV OUT: ±5621.50 CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR EXISTING 18" CMP CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, VERIFY POSITIVE DRAINAGE 5624 5 6 2 6 56 3 0 56 3 4 56 4 0 56 4 6 56 5 0 56 5 4 56 5 8 5 6 6 2 CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADE LOWER ROAD SECTION (±STA: 0+00 TO STA 3+75), 16FT WIDTH AT 3% CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE, 2FT SHOULDERS AT MAX 5% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE PROPOSED 12" DIA. ADS N-12 CULVERT (OR APPVD EQUAL), MIN 12" COVER, ±60-LF AT ±10% SLOPE (2% MIN SLOPE) EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP 3. 0 % 3 . 0 % 3. 0 % 3 . 0 % 2.0 % 11.4% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12 . 0 % 3. 0 % 56 8 4 5620 5630 5640 5650 5660 5670 5680 5690 5700 5710 5720 0+00 56 2 3 . 4 56 2 4 . 0 1 56 2 3 . 6 56 2 4 . 5 1 0+50 56 2 4 . 2 56 2 5 . 0 1 56 2 6 . 1 56 2 7 . 0 1 1+00 56 2 9 . 2 56 3 0 . 0 1 56 3 2 . 4 56 3 3 . 0 1 1+50 56 3 5 . 6 56 3 6 . 0 1 56 3 9 . 0 56 3 9 . 0 1 2+00 56 4 2 . 6 56 4 2 . 0 1 56 4 5 . 8 56 4 5 . 0 1 2+50 56 4 8 . 6 56 4 8 . 0 1 56 5 1 . 5 56 5 1 . 0 1 3+00 56 5 4 . 2 56 5 4 . 0 1 56 5 7 . 1 56 5 7 . 0 1 3+50 56 6 0 . 1 56 6 0 . 0 1 56 6 3 . 0 56 6 3 . 0 1 4+00 56 6 6 . 1 56 6 6 . 0 1 56 6 8 . 9 56 6 9 . 0 1 4+50 56 7 2 . 0 56 7 2 . 0 1 56 7 5 . 1 56 7 5 . 0 1 5+00 56 7 7 . 0 56 7 7 . 0 1 56 7 7 . 8 56 7 7 . 7 6 5+50 56 7 8 . 5 56 7 8 . 5 1 56 7 9 . 6 56 7 9 . 2 6 6+00 56 8 1 . 0 56 8 0 . 8 8 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE MAX 3% GRADE FOR FIRST 30-FT OF DRIVEWAY (MATCH EXISTING) EXISTING GRADE MAX 12% GRADE 2.00% 12.00% 8.00% 6.50% 3.00% GRADE BREAK STA = 0+00.00 ELEV = 5624.01 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 4 + 7 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 5 . 0 1 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 5 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 7 . 0 1 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 5 + 7 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 9 . 2 6 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 6 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 8 0 . 8 8 PVI STA: 0+60.00 PVI ELEV: 5625.21 K: 2.00 LVC: 20.00 BV C S : 0 + 5 0 . 0 0 BV C E : 5 6 2 5 . 0 1 EV C S : 0 + 7 0 . 0 0 EV C E : 5 6 2 6 . 4 1 Design Standards for Primitive Driveway Access Design Capacity (ADT) - 21 to 100 Min ROW Width - 40-ft Lane Width - Two Lanes - 8-ft each, 16-ft total Shoulder Width - 2-ft Ditch Width - 4-ft Cross Slope - 3% gravel Min Radius - 50-ft Max % Grade - 12% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE MATCH EXISTING (±STA: 3+75) DATE REVISION C-1.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ D E \ 3 2 0 0 0 - D E . D W G - O c t 2 4 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m NO R T H DRIVEWAY SITE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 0+00 - 6+00 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 020 20 40 20 8010 32000.01JOB NO. DATE:10-24-24 DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O LA N D U S E C H A N G E P E R M I T SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE DRIVEWAY PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 20' NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N KTS O E O E O E O E O E O E S O E O E O E O E O E O E O E W W W W W W SS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 13+05 6+ 0 0 6+ 5 0 7+ 0 0 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11 + 5 0 12+00 12+50 13+00 56 9 0 5680 LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.685-ACRES Design Standards for Primitive Driveway Access Design Capacity (ADT) - 21 to 100 Min ROW Width - 40-ft Lane Width - Two Lanes - 8-ft each, 16-ft total Shoulder Width - 2-ft Ditch Width - 4-ft Cross Slope - 3% gravel Min Radius - 50-ft Max % Grade - 12%20.0' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY EASEMENT EXISTING BOWELS WELL NO. 3 EXISTING SEWER SERVICE EXISTING SEPTIC TANK EXISTING METAL SHOP BUILDING 56 9 0 56 9 0 57 0 0 56 9 6 5 7 0 4 5 7 1 0 5710 5700 5690 5 7 0 0 5710 573 8 5740 5736 5730 5724 572 0 571 6 5 7 2 0 5728 5734 5736 57 4 0 5720 5710 5716 5730 5720 5706 57 2 0 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 8 57 4 0 5740 5742 5748 5750 5750 5744 - 2 . 0 : 1 - 2 . 2 : 1 - 2 . 1 : 1 -1 . 0 : 1 -1.0:1 -3.0:1 -1.0:1 CONTRACTOR TO CUT HILLSIDE AT MAX 1:1 SLOPE, ADD BOULDERS AT TOE OF SLOPE FROM STA: ±6+25 TO ±7+75 STA:12+94.77 STA:11+88.29 -1.0:1 8.7 % EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADE UPPER ROAD SECTION (STA: ±8+00 TO ±11+90), 16FT WIDTH AT 3% CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE, 2FT SHOULDERS AT MAX 5% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO WIDEN ROAD, CUT HILLSIDE AT MAX 1:1 SLOPE, CUT IN DITCH AT MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP -1 . 0 : 1 - 1 . 9 : 1 5738 CONTRACTOR TO CUT HILLSIDE AT MAX 1:1 SLOPE, CUT IN DITCH AT MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP 56 8 4 56 9 0 56 9 2 56 9 6 570 0 570 6 5700 5 6 9 8 5 7 0 0 5 7 0 2 57 0 4 570 6 57 1 0 5710 5716 5720 5724 57 1 4 57 1 8 57 2 0 57 2 4 573 0 573 2 573 6 57 3 0 57 3 2 57 3 6 5738 5740 57 4 0 12.0% 12.0% 12 . 0 % ALIGNMENT - DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE - LOWER PROFILE 6+00 56 8 1 . 0 56 8 0 . 8 8 56 8 2 . 9 56 8 3 . 0 7 6+50 56 8 5 . 1 56 8 5 . 2 6 56 8 7 . 4 56 8 7 . 4 5 7+00 56 8 9 . 7 56 8 9 . 6 3 56 9 1 . 7 56 9 1 . 8 2 7+50 56 9 3 . 1 56 9 3 . 3 2 56 9 4 . 4 56 9 4 . 8 2 8+00 56 9 6 . 3 56 9 6 . 3 2 56 9 8 . 5 56 9 9 . 0 7 8+50 57 0 0 . 7 57 0 1 . 8 2 57 0 3 . 1 57 0 4 . 8 2 9+00 57 0 6 . 2 57 0 7 . 8 2 57 1 0 . 2 57 1 0 . 8 2 9+50 57 1 3 . 7 57 1 3 . 8 2 57 1 7 . 2 57 1 6 . 8 2 10+00 57 2 0 . 6 57 1 9 . 8 2 57 2 4 . 0 57 2 2 . 8 2 10+50 57 2 7 . 5 57 2 5 . 8 2 57 3 0 . 8 57 2 8 . 8 2 11+00 57 3 4 . 5 57 3 1 . 8 2 57 3 8 . 0 57 3 4 . 8 2 11+50 57 3 9 . 9 57 3 6 . 9 9 57 4 0 . 0 57 3 9 . 1 5 12+00 57 4 0 . 3 2.1' 3.9' MATCH EXISTINGEXISTING GRADE ±2-FT FILL TO FLATTEN GRADE TO MAX 12% ±3.9-FT CUT TO FLATTEN GRADE TO MAX 12% MAX 12% GRADE, MIN 20-FT WIDE ROAD (INCLUDING SHOULDERS) WITH MIN 4-FT WIDE BORROW DITCH PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE 6.50% 8.75% 6.00% 8.65% 11.00% 12.00% GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 6 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 8 0 . 8 8 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 7 + 2 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 9 1 . 8 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 9 6 . 3 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 5 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 7 0 1 . 8 2 GRADE BREAK STA = 11+25.00 ELEV = 5734.82 GRADE BREAK STA = 11+88.28 ELEV = 5740.30 MATCH EXISTING Design Standards for Primitive Driveway Access Design Capacity (ADT) - 21 to 100 Min ROW Width - 40-ft Lane Width - Two Lanes - 8-ft each, 16-ft total Shoulder Width - 2-ft Ditch Width - 4-ft Cross Slope - 3% gravel Min Radius - 50-ft Max % Grade - 12% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE MATCH EXISTING (±STA: 8+00) EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE MATCH EXISTING (±STA: 11+90) DATE REVISION C-2.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ D E \ 3 2 0 0 0 - D E . D W G - O c t 2 4 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m NORTH DRIVEWAY SITE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 6+00 - 12+00 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 020 20 40 20 8010 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE DRIVEWAY PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 20' NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 10-24-24 LA N D U S E C H A N G E P E R M I T KTS SECTION AT STA: 0+00.0 5618 5620 5622 5624 5626 5628 5618 5620 5624 5628 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 0+25.0 5618 5620 5622 5624 5626 5628 5630 5618 5620 5624 5628 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 0+50.0 5618 5620 5622 5624 5626 5628 5630 5618 5620 5624 5628 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 0+75.0 5616 5618 5620 5622 5624 5626 5628 5630 5632 5616 5620 5624 5628 5632 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 1+00.0 5622 5624 5626 5628 5630 5632 5634 5636 5622 5624 5628 5632 5636 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 1+25.0 5624 5626 5628 5630 5632 5634 5636 5638 5624 5628 5632 5636 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 1+50.0 5628 5630 5632 5634 5636 5638 5640 5642 5628 5632 5636 5640 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 1+75.0 5632 5634 5636 5638 5640 5642 5644 5632 5636 5640 5644 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 2+00.0 5634 5636 5638 5640 5642 5644 5646 5648 5650 5652 5634 5636 5640 5644 5648 5652 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 2+25.0 5638 5640 5642 5644 5646 5648 5650 5652 5654 5656 5638 5640 5644 5648 5652 5656 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 2+50.0 5642 5644 5646 5648 5650 5652 5654 5656 5658 5642 5644 5648 5652 5656 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 2+75.0 5646 5648 5650 5652 5654 5656 5658 5660 5646 5648 5652 5656 5660 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 3+00.0 5648 5650 5652 5654 5656 5658 5660 5662 5664 5648 5652 5656 5660 5664 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 3+25.0 5652 5654 5656 5658 5660 5662 5664 5666 5652 5656 5660 5664 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 3+50.0 5654 5656 5658 5660 5662 5664 5666 5668 5670 5654 5656 5660 5664 5668 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 3+75.0 5658 5660 5662 5664 5666 5668 5670 5658 5660 5664 5668 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 4+00.0 5660 5662 5664 5666 5668 5670 5672 5660 5664 5668 5672 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 4+25.0 5662 5664 5666 5668 5670 5672 5674 5662 5664 5668 5672 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 4+50.0 5664 5666 5668 5670 5672 5674 5676 5678 5680 5664 5668 5672 5676 5680 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 4+75.0 5664 5666 5668 5670 5672 5674 5676 5678 5680 5682 5684 5664 5668 5672 5676 5680 5684 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 5+00.0 5666 5668 5670 5672 5674 5676 5678 5680 5682 5684 5686 5666 5668 5672 5676 5680 5684 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 5+25.0 5668 5670 5672 5674 5676 5678 5680 5682 5684 5686 5688 5668 5672 5676 5680 5684 5688 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 5+50.0 5672 5674 5676 5678 5680 5682 5684 5686 5688 5690 5692 5672 5676 5680 5684 5688 5692 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 5+75.0 5674 5676 5678 5680 5682 5684 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5674 5676 5680 5684 5688 5692 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 6+00.0 5674 5676 5678 5680 5682 5684 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5674 5676 5680 5684 5688 5692 5696 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 6+25.0 5676 5678 5680 5682 5684 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5676 5680 5684 5688 5692 5696 5700 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 6+50.0 5678 5680 5682 5684 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5678 5680 5684 5688 5692 5696 5700 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 6+75.0 5680 5682 5684 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5680 5684 5688 5692 5696 5700 5704 5708 0 10 200-10-20 PROPOSED GRADE (TYP) EXISTING GRADE (TYP) -3.0% PROPOSED GRADE (TYP) EXISTING GRADE (TYP) -3.0% PROPOSED DITCH (TYP) PROPOSED DITCH (TYP) PROPOSED DITCH (TYP) PROPOSED BOULDERS (TYP) DATE REVISION C-3.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ D E \ 3 2 0 0 0 - D E . D W G - O c t 2 4 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m DRIVEWAY SECTIONS STA: 0+00 - 6+75 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 10-24-24 LA N D U S E C H A N G E P E R M I T KTS SECTIONS HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 10' SECTION AT STA: 7+00.0 5684 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5712 5684 5688 5692 5696 5700 5704 5708 5712 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 7+25.0 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5712 5714 5686 5688 5692 5696 5700 5704 5708 5712 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 7+50.0 5686 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5686 5688 5692 5696 5700 5704 5708 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 7+75.0 5688 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5688 5692 5696 5700 5704 5708 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 8+00.0 5690 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5690 5692 5696 5700 5704 5708 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 8+25.0 5692 5694 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5692 5696 5700 5704 5708 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 8+50.0 5696 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5712 5696 5700 5704 5708 5712 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 8+75.0 5698 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5712 5714 5716 5698 5700 5704 5708 5712 5716 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 9+00.0 5700 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5712 5714 5716 5718 5720 5700 5704 5708 5712 5716 5720 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 9+25.0 5702 5704 5706 5708 5710 5712 5714 5716 5718 5720 5722 5724 5702 5704 5708 5712 5716 5720 5724 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 9+50.0 5704 5706 5708 5710 5712 5714 5716 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 5728 5704 5708 5712 5716 5720 5724 5728 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 9+75.0 5706 5708 5710 5712 5714 5716 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 5728 5730 5706 5708 5712 5716 5720 5724 5728 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 10+00.0 5712 5714 5716 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 5728 5730 5732 5734 5712 5716 5720 5724 5728 5732 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 10+25.0 5716 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 5728 5730 5732 5734 5736 5738 5716 5720 5724 5728 5732 5736 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 10+50.0 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 5728 5730 5732 5734 5736 5738 5718 5720 5724 5728 5732 5736 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 10+75.0 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 5728 5730 5732 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5718 5720 5724 5728 5732 5736 5740 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 11+00.0 5722 5724 5726 5728 5730 5732 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5722 5724 5728 5732 5736 5740 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 11+25.0 5728 5730 5732 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5728 5732 5736 5740 5744 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 11+50.0 5728 5730 5732 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5746 5728 5732 5736 5740 5744 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 11+75.0 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5746 5748 5750 5734 5736 5740 5744 5748 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 12+00.0 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5746 5748 5734 5736 5740 5744 5748 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 12+25.0 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5746 5736 5740 5744 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 12+50.0 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5734 5736 5740 5744 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 12+75.0 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5746 5734 5736 5740 5744 0 10 200-10-20 SECTION AT STA: 13+00.0 5734 5736 5738 5740 5742 5744 5746 5734 5736 5740 5744 0 10 200-10-20 PROPOSED DITCH (TYP) PROPOSED BOULDERS (TYP) PROPOSED GRADE (TYP) EXISTING GRADE (TYP) -3.0% PROPOSED DITCH (TYP) PROPOSED GRADE (TYP) EXISTING GRADE (TYP) -3.0% PROPOSED DITCH (TYP) EXISTING GRADE (TYP) DATE REVISION C-4.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ D E \ 3 2 0 0 0 - D E . D W G - O c t 2 4 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 : 5 6 a m DRIVEWAY SECTIONS STA: 7+00 - 13+00 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 10-24-24 LA N D U S E C H A N G E P E R M I T KTS SECTIONS HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 10' Wright Water Engineers, Inc., 818 Colorado Ave., Ste. 307, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel. (970) 945-7755; Fax. (970) 945-9210, e-mail:jkelly@wrightwater.com MEMORANDUM To: Michael Resch and Charles Hoge Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Via Email <canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com> From: Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Jonathan Kelly, P.E. and Brianna Trotter, E.I. Date: August 2, 2024 Re: Report on Suitability of the Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 for Proposed Uses PURPOSE Wright Water Engineers, Inc. (WWE) has prepared this memorandum to describe the suitability of the Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 in serving their proposed uses in the future land use application to Garfield County. Bowles Well No. 3 is currently operating under Well Permit No. 335230, but a new well permit will be obtained to accommodate the proposed uses. Bowles Well No. 4 operates under Well Permit No. 56103-F, which allows for use in one single-family dwelling unit only, with no irrigation or other uses. This memorandum describes the proposed uses for both wells and the results from the well pumping test and water quality sampling that took place on June 26, 2024. BOWLES WELL NO.3 Proposed Uses The proposed uses for the Bowles Well No. 3 include drinking and sanitary uses in a small metal fabrication shop, including use in one bathroom with a sink and one additional utility sink, and vehicle washing for one vehicle twice per month. Additionally, a single-family home may be added to the well in the future. WWE used the Garfield County Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Rules and Regulations Table 6-2 to estimate the wastewater flow for a bathroom with a sink and an additional utility sink. WWE then calculated the projected daily demands per person based on an assumed consumptive use of 15%. WWE used estimates for a water closet in Table 6-2 as estimates for toilet use of 24.8 gallons of wastewater flow per day per person and estimates from the lavatory sink in Table 6-2 as estimates for a bathroom sink use of 8.4 gallons of wastewater flow per day per person for handwashing. A kitchen sink with garbage grinder in Table 6-2 was used to estimate the potential wastewater flow in gallons per day per person for the additional sink. It was assumed that four employees would be using the facilities each day. Based on these assumptions, the total estimated water use of the shop is 0.017 acre-feet (AF) per month. Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 2 WWE assumed the single-family home would use a total of 350 gallons of water per day per standard engineering assumptions. The total monthly demand for domestic in-house uses is calculated to be up to 0.033 AF per month. For vehicle washing use, it is assumed that one car will be washed twice per month based on estimates from the client. The Western Carwash Association suggests that vehicle washing can use anywhere from 20 to 100 gallons of water per vehicle. Therefore, to maintain a conservative approach, WWE assumed that vehicle washing from the Bowles Well No. 3 would require 100 gallons of water per wash. The total amount of water used for vehicle washing per month was calculated to be 0.001 AF per month. These projected water demands are shown in Table 1. Based on these assumptions, the total water demand from the Bowles Well No. 3 is calculated to be 0.05 AF per month, or approximately 16,740 gallons per month. This equates to about 540 gallons of water per day in demand from the Bowles Well No. 3. Well Pumping Test and Results WWE coordinated the well pumping test with the pump contractor High Country Pump Services, LLC (High Country Pump). High Country Pump performed the well pumping test on June 26, 2024 with WWE on site to take measurements and notes. A Level Troll 700, rated at 100 pounds per square inch (psig), pressure transducer was secured within the well to log water-level readings every minute during the pumping test and recovery period. The pressure transducer was set at approximately 200 feet below the top of the well casing. The total well depth is 223 feet, with the pump set at a depth of 209 feet according to the pump installation report. Per the well construction and pump installation reports, the well casing diameter is 7 inches of steel material from 0 to 40 feet and 5.5 inches of PVC material from 38 to 140 feet, with the remaining well depth being perforated PVC casing at a diameter of 5.5 inches. The static water level in the well prior to the well pumping test was 151 feet from the top of the well casing. The Bowles Well No. 3 well pumping test began at 12:22 pm and lasted for four hours, with the pump being shut off at 4:22pm. The pumping rate used varied slightly throughout the well pumping test. High Country Pump set the pumping rate at about 10.7 gallons per minute (gpm) at the start of the test, but the water level in the well was drawing down relatively quickly at that rate, so High Country Pump reduced the pumping rate to about 8.75 gpm starting about 11 minutes after the beginning of the test. The drawdown began to slow, but did not appear to slow enough, so after ten minutes at the rate of 8.75 gpm, the rate was lowered again to about 7.89 gpm. The drawdown of the water level appeared to continue at a controlled rate at a pumping rate of 7.89 gpm, so the pumping rate was left at 7.89 gpm for the remainder of the test. With about an hour left of the test, the water quality samples needed to be collected, but the water being pumped out of the well was a dark red color from the sediment load in the pumped water. High Country Pump opined that this was likely due to the fact that the well is not often pumped for so long per day due to the small demand on the well in a typical day, so the extended pumping during the test was likely disturbing the sediment at the bottom of the well. In an attempt to get a clearer sample for the water quality testing, High Country Pump decreased the pumping rate slightly to 7.5 gpm starting at 3:08pm. After lowering the pumping rate slightly, the water color of the pumped water began to clear significantly, so WWE collected the water quality samples at approximately 3:30 pm. Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 3 During the four-hour well pumping test for Bowles Well No. 3, the maximum pumping rate was 10.7 gpm, and a more stable pumping rate at which point the drawdown was more gradual was approximately 7.89 gpm. The total drawdown was 25 feet. A total of 1,900 gallons were pumped during the well pumping test. The well recovered to 90% of the static water level within 20 minutes. WWE analyzed the recovery data and projected the recovery data out to 100 percent recovery to determine how long the well would need to rest to recover fully. WWE estimated that the well would recover fully within 32.4 minutes, or in just over half an hour. Water Quality Test Results WWE collected water quality samples from the Bowles Well No. 3 within the last hour of the well pumping test to ensure that a sufficient volume of water had been purged from the well and that the water being sampled was from the aquifer rather than stagnant water within the well. The water quality samples were analyzed by ACZ Laboratories, Inc. in Steamboat Springs, CO. As mentioned previously, the water being pumped from the well during the pumping test was dark red in color, indicating that there was suspended sediment in the water. The pump contractor opined that this could be due to the fact that the well is not often pumped for so long or at such a high rate, so sediment in the bottom of the well may have been disturbed during pumping, causing discoloration. The well is drilled in the Maroon Formation, which is a pliable sandstone bedrock that can easily break away. It is also possible that the well casing slot sizes are too big and allow too much sediment to break away from the Maroon Formation and pollute the well. When the water quality samples were collected, the pumping rate was decreased in an attempt to clear up the water color. The water quality results were received from ACZ Labs on July 22, 2024. Most of the parameters were within the expected range of values. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has standard maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), which are the maximum levels allowed of a contaminant in water which is delivered to any user of a public water system. None of the EPA’s MCL values were exceeded for the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County. However, the levels of total recoverable iron were elevated above the Secondary MCL (SMCL) value of 0.3. This is indicative of sediment in the water, as evidenced by the total suspended solids (TSS) value of 223 mg/L. Additionally, the hardness as CaCO3 was considered to be hard water at 279 mg/L. Hardness as CaCO3 values above 200 mg/L are considered to be very hard and softening is recommended to reduce scaling and mineral deposits. However, neither of these elevated parameters has an EPA MCL value, and neither parameter requires immediate treatment. Table 1, attached, shows the water quality results with their associated MCL values. The full water quality report from ACZ Labs is attached as Attachment A. BOWLES WELL NO. 4 Proposed Uses The Bowles Well No. 4 is proposed to be used for Lot 1 of the proposed subdivision. Per the Well Permit No. 56103-F, the well may only be used for water use in one single-family dwelling and may Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 4 not be used for irrigation or other uses. This is to be the proposed use for the well, also, in future Lot 1. Therefore, WWE assumed that the total water demand from the well will be 350 gallons per day, as is a standard engineering assumption of demand for a single-family home. This is equal to approximately 10,850 gallons per month of demand from the Bowles Well No. 4. Well Pumping Test and Results WWE coordinated the well pumping test with High Country Pump. High Country Pump performed the well pumping test on June 26, 2024 with WWE on site to take measurements and notes. A Level Troll 700, rated at 300 psig, pressure transducer was secured within the well to log water level readings every minute during the pumping test and recovery period. The pressure transducer was set near the well’s pump at approximately 344 feet below the top of the well casing. The total well depth is 348 feet. Per the well construction and pump installation reports, the well casing diameter is 7 inches of steel material from 0 to 106 feet and 5.5 inches of PVC material from 85 to 195 feet, with the remaining well depth being perforated PVC casing at a diameter of 5.5 inches. The static water level in the well prior to the well pumping test was 231.6 feet from the top of the well casing. Therefore, the transducer was set about 112 feet below the static water level. The Bowles Well No. 4 well pumping test began at 10:02 am and lasted for four hours, with the pump being shut off at 2:02 pm. The pumping rate used was a constant rate at 14.28 gpm. The water level maintained a steady and slow rate of drawdown, so the pumping rate was left at 14.28 gpm for the entirety of the test. With about an hour left of the test, the water quality samples needed to be collected. The water being pumped from the well was clear for the entirety of the test. WWE collected the water quality samples at approximately 1:28 pm. The total drawdown was 69 feet. A total of 3,430 gallons were pumped from the well during the four- hour pumping test. The well recovered to 94 percent within 16 hours and 13 minutes. WWE analyzed the recovery data and projected the recovery data out to 100 percent recovery to determine how long the well would need to rest to recover fully. WWE estimated that the well would recover fully within 1,390 minutes, or 23.2 hours. Water Quality Test Results WWE collected water quality samples from the Bowles Well No. 4 within the last hour of the well pumping test to ensure that a sufficient volume of water had been purged from the well and that the water being sampled was from the aquifer rather than stagnant water within the well. The water quality samples were analyzed by ACZ Laboratories, Inc. in Steamboat Springs, CO. The water quality results were received from ACZ Labs on July 22, 2024. All of the parameters were within the expected range of values. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has standard maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), which are the maximum levels allowed of a contaminant in water which is delivered to any user of a public water system. None of the EPA’s MCL values were exceeded for the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County. However, the hardness as CaCO3 was considered to be elevated at 246 mg/L. This is considered to be very hard Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 5 water but can be addressed easily with an in-home water softener to reduce scaling and mineral deposits. This parameter does not require immediate treatment. Table 2, attached, shows the water quality results with their associated MCL values. The full water quality report from ACZ Labs is attached as Attachment B. CONCLUSIONS Bowles Well No. 3 The total estimated demands for Bowles Well No. 3 are expected to be 540 gallons per day. During the well pumping test on June 26, 2024, a total of 1,900 gallons were pumped in four hours. The well recovered to 94 percent of the static water level within about 20 minutes after pumping stopped. WWE found that the well could fully recover in just over 30 minutes. This suggests that the daily yield of the well is in excess of 1,000 gallons and that the well can be expected to recover fully in under an hour. In our professional opinion, this shows that the long-term yield of the well is sufficient to supply the 540 gallons of water per day that is expected to be used for the proposed uses of the metal fabrication shop, vehicle washing, and the single-family home. The water quality test results show that none of the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County exceed the EPA MCL limits. The total recoverable iron is elevated, likely due to sediment in the well, but can be addressed with additional well development or an in-home filtration system to remove sediment from the water. The hardness as CaCO3 is considered to be elevated and shows that the water is very hard. This can be addressed with an in-home water softener. However, neither of these parameters has an EPA MCL limit, and neither requires immediate treatment. Bowles Well No. 4 The total estimated demand for Bowles Well No. 4 is expected to be 350 gallons per day. During the well pumping test on June 26, 2024, a total of 3,430 gallons were pumped in four hours. The well recovered to 90 percent of the static water level within about 16 hours after pumping stopped. This suggests that the daily yield of the well is in excess of 1,000 gallons and that the well can be expected to recover to 90 percent of its starting water level within 16 hours. WWE found that the well could fully recover in just over 23 hours. This shows that the long-term yield of the well is sufficient to supply the 350 gallons of water per day that is expected to be used for the proposed uses of the Lot 1 single-family home. The water quality test results show that none of the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County exceed the EPA MCL limits. The hardness as CaCO3 was considered to be elevated at 246 mg/L, which is considered to be very hard water. This can cause scaling and mineral deposits. However, this can be easily addressed by implementing an in-home water softener. Please reach out with any questions. Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 6 Attachment(s)/Enclosure(s) Table 1: Water Demands – Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 Table 2: Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Analysis Results Table 3: Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Analysis Results Attachment A: Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Report from ACZ Labs Attachment B: Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Report from ACZ Labs cc: Andie Hall, Esq. Sara Dunn, Esq. G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Report\Memo - Well Pumping Tests -Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4.docx Shop Domestic In- House Use Vehicle Washing Total Domestic In- House Use Total (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) Jan 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Feb 0.016 0.031 0.001 0.047 0.031 0.031 Mar 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Apr 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 May 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Jun 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 Jul 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Aug 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Sep 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 Oct 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Nov 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 Dec 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Total 0.206 0.392 0.007 0.606 0.392 0.392 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Table 1 Equals Column (5) Total water demands for one single family home at 350 gpd/EQR Equals Column (1) + (2) + (3) Assumes 100 gallons per wash and 2 vehicle washes per month. Total water demands for one single family home at 350 gpd/EQR Total water demands for one bathroom (lavatory and water clsoet) and one sink (kitchen sink with garbage grinder) for four employees in a metal fabrication shop, based on the Garfield County OWTS Rules and Regulations Table 6-2 and assuming 15% consumptive use. Month Bowles Well #3 Bowles Well #4 Water Demands - Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Water Demands\ Water Demands.xlsx Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 7/25/24 Prpd by: BBT Chckd by: JMK ANALYTE UNITS Method Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Results MCL1 SMCL2 Temperature °F YSI DSS Pro 62 -- pH (WWE Field Measurement)-YSI DSS Pro 7.59 -- pH units SM 4500-H+ B-2011 7.9 -- Temperature at which pH was measured C SM 4500-H+ B-2011 21.3 Total Alkalinity mg/L SM 2320 B-2011 277 -- Chloride mg/L SM 4500-Cl E-2011 2.09 -250 Fluoride mg/L SM 4500-F C-2011 <2.25 4 - Nitrate - Nitrogen mg/L Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.155 10 - Nitrate/Nitrite as N mg/L EPA 353.2 0.155 Nitrite - Nitrogen mg/L EPA 353.2 <0.01 1 - Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C mg/L SM 2540 C-2011 364 Total Dissolved Solids (calculated)mg/L Calculation 363 -500 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C mg/L SM 2540 D-2011/2015 223 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water -USGS - I1738-78 0.48 Sulfate mg/L ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 38.4 -250 Conductivity @25C umhos/cm SM 2510 B-2011 433 Corrosivity (calc.)SI Unit Calculation (SM 2330)0.7 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved)mg/L Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)279 Total Coliform -SM 9223 Absent -- E-Coli -SM 9223 Absent -- Iron mg/L EPA 200.7 6.91 -0.3 Arsenic mg/L EPA 200.8 0.00108 0.01 - Cadmium mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.008 0.005 - Copper mg/L EPA 200.7 0.013 1.3 1.0 Lead mg/L EPA 200.8 0.00215 0.015 - Manganese mg/L EPA 200.7 0.063 -0.05 Uranium mg/L EPA 200.8 0.0123 0.03 - Zinc mg/L EPA 200.7 0.029 -5 Calcium mg/L EPA 200.7 70.4 -- Magnesium mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.02 -- Sodium mg/L EPA 200.7 18.4 -- Exceeds Recomended Concentration 2 Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) or National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR) are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor, or color) in drinking water. EPA recommends secondary standards to water systems but does not require water systems to comply. WWE recommended concentrations are based upon the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), MCL, SMCL, and MCLG, or professional judgment when EPA standards have not been established. Coliform Total Metals Dissolved Metals Notes 1 Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. MCLs are enforceable standards for Public Water Supplies. Inorganics TABLE 2 Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Analysis Results Field Parameters G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Water Quality\From ACZ Labs\Water Quality Results\ Tables - Water Quality Results - Bowles 3 and 4.xlsx Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 7/25/24 Prpd by: BBT Chckd by: JMK ANALYTE UNITS Method Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Results MCL1 SMCL2 Temperature °F YSI DSS Pro 59 -- pH (WWE Field Measurement)-YSI DSS Pro 7.72 -- pH units SM 4500-H+ B-2011 6.7 -- Temperature at which pH was measured C SM 4500-H+ B-2011 21.5 Total Alkalinity mg/L SM 2320 B-2011 265 -- Chloride mg/L SM 4500-Cl E-2011 4.46 -250 Fluoride mg/L SM 4500-F C-2011 0.43 4 - Nitrate - Nitrogen mg/L Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.278 10 - Nitrate/Nitrite as N mg/L EPA 353.2 0.289 Nitrite - Nitrogen mg/L EPA 353.2 0.011 1 - Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C mg/L SM 2540 C-2011 322 Total Dissolved Solids (calculated)mg/L Calculation 362 -500 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C mg/L SM 2540 D-2011/2015 <5 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water -USGS - I1738-78 0.42 Sulfate mg/L ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 62.2 -250 Conductivity @25C umhos/cm SM 2510 B-2011 438 Corrosivity (calc.)SI Unit Calculation (SM 2330)0.0 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved)mg/L Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)246 Total Coliform -SM 9223 Absent -- E-Coli -SM 9223 Absent -- Iron mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.06 -0.3 Arsenic mg/L EPA 200.8 0.00077 0.01 - Cadmium mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.008 0.005 - Copper mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.01 1.3 1.0 Lead mg/L EPA 200.8 <0.0001 0.015 - Manganese mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.01 -0.05 Uranium mg/L EPA 200.8 0.0258 0.03 - Zinc mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.02 -5 Calcium mg/L EPA 200.7 70.6 -- Magnesium mg/L EPA 200.7 17.0 -- Sodium mg/L EPA 200.7 14.8 -- Exceeds Recomended Concentration 2 Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) or National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR) are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor, or color) in drinking water. EPA recommends secondary standards to water systems but does not require water systems to comply. WWE recommended concentrations are based upon the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), MCL, SMCL, and MCLG, or professional judgment when EPA standards have not been established. Coliform Total Metals Dissolved Metals Notes 1 Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. MCLs are enforceable standards for Public Water Supplies. Inorganics TABLE 3 Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Analysis Results Field Parameters G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Water Quality\From ACZ Labs\Water Quality Results\ Tables - Water Quality Results - Bowles 3 and 4.xlsx Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 7/25/24 Prpd by: BBT Chckd by: JMK ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Analytical Report Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ACZ Project ID: L88577 Brianna Trotter July 22, 2024 Project ID: Report to: Suite 307 Brianna Trotter: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) submitted to ACZ Laboratories, Inc. (ACZ) on June 26, 2024. This project has been assigned to ACZ's project number, L88577. Please reference this number in all future inquiries. All analyses were performed according to ACZ's Quality Assurance Plan. The enclosed results relate only to the samples received under L88577. Each section of this report has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate Laboratory Supervisor, or a qualified substitute. Except as noted, the test results for the methods and parameters listed on ACZ's current NELAC certificate letter (#ACZ) meet all requirements of NELAC. This report shall be used or copied only in its entirety. ACZ is not responsible for the consequences arising from the use of a partial report. All samples and sub-samples associated with this project will be disposed of after August 21, 2024. If the samples are determined to be hazardous, additional charges apply for disposal (typically $11/sample). If you would like the samples to be held longer than ACZ's stated policy or to be returned, please contact your Project Manager or Customer Service Representative for further details and associated costs. ACZ retains analytical raw data reports for ten years. If you have any questions or other needs, please contact your Project Manager. Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Brianna Trotter Bill to: Suite 307 Page 1 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Inorganic Prep XQDilution Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 jqr07/05/24 9:10 Lab Filtration (0.45um) & Acidification EPA 200.7/200.8 Filter aps07/01/24 15:40 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 lbt*07/01/24 10:24 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP EPA 200.2 aeb/ae h 07/02/24 12:55 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP-MS EPA 200.2 jrj*07/09/24 20:34 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 2 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Metals Analysis XQDilution Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 6.85 mg/L 0.25 msp0.07 07/16/24 14:481 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0004 mg/L 0.002U jrj0.0004 07/03/24 15:151 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00108 mg/L 0.002B jrj0.0005 07/03/24 15:151 Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.0822 mg/L 0.035 aeb/ms p 0.009*07/12/24 13:081 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.000712 mg/L 0.0005 aps0.0002*07/10/24 18:112 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.008 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:081 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 70.4 mg/L 0.5 msp0.1 07/13/24 13:581 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 <0.02 mg/L 0.05U msp0.02*07/13/24 13:581 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.013 mg/L 0.05B msp0.01*07/16/24 14:481 Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 6.91 mg/L 0.15 aeb/ms p 0.06 07/12/24 13:081 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00215 mg/L 0.0005 jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:151 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 25.1 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/13/24 13:581 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.063 mg/L 0.05 msp0.01 07/16/24 14:481 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 <0.0002 mg/L 0.001U aeh0.0002 07/03/24 16:241 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.0120 mg/L 0.04B aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:081 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 2.26 mg/L 1 msp0.5*07/13/24 13:581 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.002 mg/L 0.01U gjl0.002 07/10/24 14:152 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 29.7 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/13/24 13:581 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.01*07/12/24 13:081 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 18.4 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/13/24 13:581 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00022 mg/L 0.0005B jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:151 Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.0123 mg/L 0.0005 jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:151 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.029 mg/L 0.05B aeb/ms p 0.02 07/12/24 13:081 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 3 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Wet Chemistry XQDilution Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM 2320 B-2011 Bicarbonate as CaCO3 277 mg/L 20H rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Carbonate as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Hydroxide as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Total Alkalinity 277 mg/L 20H rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Cation-Anion Balance Calculation Cation-Anion Balance 0.8 %calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Anions 6.4 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Cations 6.5 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 2.09 mg/L 2 jqr1*06/28/24 11:101 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 433 umhos/cm 10 asn1*07/09/24 19:441 Corrosivity (calc.)Calculation (SM 2330)0.7 SI Unit calc*07/22/24 0:00 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 <0.003 mg/L 0.01U ems0.003*07/08/24 11:450.5 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 <2.25 mg/L 5.25U emk2.25*07/18/24 15:2015 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved) Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)279 mg/L 5 calc0.2 07/22/24 0:00 Lab Filtration (0.45um filter) SOPWC050 cdp06/27/24 15:461 Nitrate as N Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.155 mg/L 0.1 calc0.02 07/22/24 0:00 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 0.155 mg/L 0.1 pjb0.02*06/26/24 23:591 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U pjb0.01*06/26/24 23:591 pH (lab)SM 4500-H+ B-2011 pH 7.9 units 0.1H asn0.1*07/10/24 0:001 pH measured at 21.3 C 0.1 asn0.1*07/10/24 0:001 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 0.077 mg/L 0.25B mrd0.05*07/05/24 10:495 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 364 mg/L 40 ptw20*06/27/24 13:371 Residue, Non- Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 223 mg/L 20 cdp5*06/26/24 13:271 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water USGS - I1738-78 0.48 calc07/22/24 0:00 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 38.4 mg/L 25 mrd5*06/28/24 12:105 TDS (calculated)Calculation 363 mg/L calc07/22/24 0:00 TDS (ratio - measured/calculated) Calculation 1.00 calc07/22/24 0:00 Turbidity EPA 180.1 198 NTU 0.5 trt0.1*06/26/24 11:411 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 4 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. Lower Lower Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) MDL Method Detection Limit. Same as Minimum Reporting Limit unless omitted or equal to the PQL (see comment #5). Allows for instrument and annual fluctuations. PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit. Synonymous with the EPA term "minimum level". QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Recovered amount of the true value or spike added, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types Upper Upper Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types AS Analytical Spike (Post Digestion)LCSWD Laboratory Control Sample - Water Duplicate ASD Analytical Spike (Post Digestion) Duplicate LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank CCB Continuing Calibration Blank LFM Laboratory Fortified Matrix CCV Continuing Calibration Verification standard LFMD Laboratory Fortified Matrix Duplicate DUP Sample Duplicate LRB Laboratory Reagent Blank ICB Initial Calibration Blank MS Matrix Spike ICV Initial Calibration Verification standard MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate ICSAB Inter-element Correction Standard - A plus B solutions PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBW Prep Blank - Water LCSSD Laboratory Control Sample - Soil Duplicate PQV Practical Quantitation Verification standard LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water SDL Serial Dilution QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method or calibration procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Spikes/Fortified Matrix Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. Standard Verifies the validity of the calibration. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) BAnalyte concentration detected at a value between MDL and PQL. The associated value is an estimated quantity. HAnalysis exceeded method hold time. pH is a field test with an immediate hold time. LTarget analyte response was below the laboratory defined negative threshold. UThe material was analyzed for, but was not detected above the level of the associated value. The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit. Method References (1) EPA 600/4-83-020. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1983. (2) EPA 600/R-93-100. Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, August 1993. (3) EPA 600/R-94-111. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples - Supplement I, May 1994. (4) EPA SW-846. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. (5) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Comments (1) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (2)Soil, Sludge, and Plant matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on a dry weight basis. (3) Animal matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on an "as received" basis. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. (5) If the MDL equals the PQL or the MDL column is omitted, the PQL is the reporting limit. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP001.03.15.02 Inorganic Reference Page 5 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM2320B - Titration ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593460 WG593460PBW1 07/19/24 16:48PBW 10.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW3 07/19/24 16:58 98LCSWWC240712-1 802.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 L88841-01DUP 07/19/24 18:00 229DUP 226.4 1mg/L 20 WG593460LCSW6 07/19/24 19:09 100LCSWWC240712-1 816.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW2 07/19/24 19:15PBW 11.9 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW9 07/19/24 20:49 98LCSWWC240712-1 801.1 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW3 07/19/24 20:55PBW 12.8 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW12 07/19/24 22:54 99LCSWWC240712-1 809.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW4 07/19/24 23:00PBW 12.5 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW15 07/20/24 0:49 100LCSWWC240712-1 823.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW5 07/20/24 0:55PBW 15.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW18 07/20/24 1:47 101LCSWWC240712-1 829.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 99ICVII240710-5 1.97 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.15 0.15mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.11 0.11mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .942 85 115mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .931 70 130mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .979 570130mg/L 201.001 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 92ICVMS240613-12 .01838 90 110mg/L.02002 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0012 0.0012mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00088 0.00088mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 103LFBMS240613-7 .01027 85 115mg/L.01 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 104LFMMS240613-7 .01041 70 130mg/L.01 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 103LFMDMS240613-7 .01033 170130mg/L 20.01 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05159 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0015 0.0015mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.0011 0.0011mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .05126 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .01 93LFMMS240613-7 .05679 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .01 93LFMDMS240613-7 .05643 170130mg/L 20.0501 Page 6 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 96ICVII240710-5 1.9278 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.027 0.027mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0198 0.0198mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 91LFMII240608-4 .4542 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 93LFMDII240608-4 .4684 370130mg/L 20.501 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592817 WG592817ICV 07/10/24 18:01 100ICVMS240613-12 .049789 90 110mg/L.05 WG592817ICB 07/10/24 18:02ICB .000111 -0.00024 0.00024mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 18:08LRB U -0.000176 0.000176mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 18:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .051171 85 115mg/L.05005 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.9075 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 92LFBII240608-4 .4613 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 90LFMII240608-4 .4527 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 94LFMDII240608-4 .4687 370130mg/L 20.5005 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 97ICVII240710-5 97.03 95 105mg/L100 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB .1 -0.3 0.3mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 72.17 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 86.8 108ASII240702-3 160.3 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 86.8 100ASDII240702-3 154.4 485115mg/L 2067.93628 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592108 WG592108ICV 06/28/24 10:04 96ICVWI231211-1 38.19 90 110mg/L39.96 WG592108ICB 06/28/24 10:04ICB U mg/L WG592108LFB 06/28/24 10:40 105LFBWI231211-4 21.02 90 110mg/L20.02 L88578-05DUP RA06/28/24 10:52 1.53DUP 1.49 3mg/L 20 L88578-06AS 06/28/24 11:00 U 102ASWI231211-4 20.37 90 110mg/L20.02 Page 7 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 96ICVII240710-5 1.916 95 105mg/L2 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 107LFBII240702-3 .536 85 115mg/L.5005 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 U 110ASII240702-3 .55 85 115mg/L.5005 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 U 107ASDII240702-3 .535 385115mg/L 20.5005 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592697 WG592697LCSW2 07/09/24 16:36 108LCSWPCN6270861520 90 110umhos/cm1409 WG592697LCSW5 07/09/24 19:02 107LCSWPCN6269471502 90 110umhos/cm1408 L88589-04DUP 07/09/24 20:25 1160DUP 1198 3umhos/cm 20 WG592697LCSW8 07/09/24 21:44 108LCSWPCN6269471522 90 110umhos/cm1408 WG592697LCSW11 07/10/24 0:55 108LCSWPCN6269471526 90 110umhos/cm1408 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.92 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .468 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 94LFMII240608-4 .472 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 100LFMDII240608-4 .498 570130mg/L 20.5005 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592565 WG592565ICV 07/08/24 11:39 99ICVWI240626-3 .2961 90 110mg/L.3003 WG592565ICB 07/08/24 11:39ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LRB 07/08/24 11:41LRB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LFB 07/08/24 11:42 90LFBWI240625-2 .1793 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-01LFM M207/08/24 12:14 .251 84LFMWI240625-2 .4193 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-02DUP 07/08/24 12:16 3.67DUP 3.625 1mg/L 20 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593373 WG593373ICV 07/18/24 13:57 99ICVWC240712-2 1.98 90 110mg/L2 WG593373ICB 07/18/24 14:03ICB U -0.3 0.3mg/L WG593373LFB1 07/18/24 14:09 100LFBWC240411-1 5 90 110mg/L5 L88577-01AS 07/18/24 15:25 U 101ASWC240411-1 75.7 90 110mg/L75 L88577-01ASD 07/18/24 15:30 U 100ASDWC240411-1 74.67 190110mg/L 2075 WG593373LFB2 07/18/24 16:24 107LFBWC240411-1 5.35 90 110mg/L5 Page 8 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 1.944 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.18 0.18mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.132 0.132mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 97LFBII240608-4 .968 85 115mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 93LFMII240608-4 .933 70 130mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 96LFMDII240608-4 .966 370130mg/L 201.003 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05118 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB .00015 -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .04917 85 115mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .00024 100LFMMS240613-7 .05047 70 130mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .00024 100LFMDMS240613-7 .05032 070130mg/L 20.05005 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 97ICVII240710-5 97.23 95 105mg/L100 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 53.03 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 42 108ASII240702-3 95.98 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 42 101ASDII240702-3 92.27 485115mg/L 2049.99866 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.91 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .465 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .489 570130mg/L 20.501 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592243 WG592243ICV 07/03/24 15:22 105ICVHG240528-3 .00526 95 105mg/L.005 WG592243ICB 07/03/24 15:23ICB U -0.0002 0.0002mg/L WG592397 WG592397LRB 07/03/24 16:07LRB U -0.00044 0.00044mg/L WG592397LFB 07/03/24 16:08 92LFBHG240619-6 .00184 85 115mg/L.002002 L88717-03LFM 07/03/24 16:31 U 94LFMHG240619-6 .00188 85 115mg/L.002002 L88717-03LFMD 07/03/24 16:31 U 92LFMDHG240619-6 .00184 285115mg/L 20.002002 Page 9 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 98ICVII240710-5 1.957 95 105mg/L2.004 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .4802 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .4713 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .4866 370130mg/L 20.501 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 98ICVWI240403-6 2.366 90 110mg/L2.415 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.02 0.02mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 2.076 90 110mg/L2 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 .155 102ASWI240228-17 2.196 90 110mg/L2 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 .12DUP .119 1mg/L 20 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 100ICVWI240403-6 .61 90 110mg/L.608 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 1.041 90 110mg/L1 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 U 103ASWI240228-17 1.03 90 110mg/L1 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 pH (lab) SM4500H+ B ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592781 WG592781LCSW1 07/10/24 17:00 100LCSWPCN6244495.98 5.9 6.1units6 L88589-01DUP 07/10/24 18:23 8.2DUP 7.9 4units 20 WG592781LCSW4 07/10/24 19:42 100LCSWPCN6244496.01 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW7 07/10/24 22:12 100LCSWPCN6244495.99 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW10 07/11/24 0:48 100LCSWPCN6244496.01 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW13 07/11/24 3:17 100LCSWPCN6244495.98 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW16 07/11/24 4:30 100LCSWPCN6244495.99 5.9 6.1units6 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592482 WG592482ICV 07/05/24 10:43 108ICVWI240603-4 .707 90 110mg/L.65228 WG592482ICB 07/05/24 10:46ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LRB 07/05/24 10:47LRB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LFB 07/05/24 10:48 102LFBWI240625-5 .511 90 110mg/L.5 L88577-01LFM 07/05/24 10:51 .077 101LFM5XPT2.595 90 110mg/L2.5 L88578-01DUP RA07/05/24 10:53 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 Page 10 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 96ICVII240710-5 19.27 95 105mg/L20 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -1.5 1.5mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 105.8 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 5.77 113ASII240702-3 118.3 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 5.77 107ASDII240702-3 112.7 585115mg/L 2099.96008 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592050 WG592050PBW 06/27/24 13:25PBW U -20 20mg/L WG592050LCSW 06/27/24 13:29 96LCSWPCN626715964 80 120mg/L1000 L88580-01DUP 06/27/24 14:18 322DUP 316 2mg/L 10 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591935 WG591935PBW 06/26/24 12:36PBW U -2 2mg/L WG591935LCSW 06/26/24 12:39 82LCSWPCN62671582 80 120mg/L100 L88582-02DUP RA06/26/24 13:59 5DUP 5 0mg/L 10 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592771 WG592771ICV 07/10/24 14:05 104ICVMS240613-12 .0519 90 110mg/L.05 WG592771ICB 07/10/24 14:06ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 14:10LRB U -0.0022 0.0022mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 14:11 94LFBMS240613-7 .047 85 115mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFM 07/10/24 14:34 U 85LFMMS240613-7 .0423 70 130mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFMD 07/10/24 14:36 U 87LFMDMS240613-7 .0433 270130mg/L 20.05005 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 101ICVII240710-5 43.37 95 105mg/L42.8 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 22.7 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 11.2 109ASII240702-3 34.59 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 11.2 100ASDII240702-3 32.66 685115mg/L 2021.42782 Page 11 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 .968 95 105mg/L1 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 87LFBII240608-4 .435 85 115mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 85LFMII240608-4 .426 70 130mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 87LFMDII240608-4 .433 270130mg/L 20.4995 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 98ICVII240710-5 97.53 95 105mg/L100 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 105LFBII240702-3 105.4 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 22.5 111ASII240702-3 133.5 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 22.5 106ASDII240702-3 128.2 485115mg/L 2099.97238 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592103 WG592103ICB 06/28/24 10:34ICB U -2.5 2.5mg/L WG592103ICV 06/28/24 10:34 96ICVWI240628-2 19.3 85 115mg/L20.02 WG592103LFB 06/28/24 11:18 97LFBWI240618-2 9.7 85 115mg/L10 L88477-01AS 06/28/24 11:26 127 106ASSO4TURB5X137.6 85 115mg/L10 L88477-01ASD 06/28/24 11:26 127 105ASDSO4TURB5X137.5 085115mg/L 2010 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05157 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 96LFBMS240613-7 .04817 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 96LFMMS240613-7 .04828 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 97LFMDMS240613-7 .04862 170130mg/L 20.0501 Turbidity EPA 180.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591913 WG591913ICV 06/26/24 11:08 92ICVPCN626099183 90 110NTU200 WG591913ICB 06/26/24 11:10ICB U -0.3 0.3NTU L88577-01DUP 06/26/24 11:43 198DUP 200 1NTU 20 Page 12 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05103 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .0492 85 115mg/L.05 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .0114 102LFMMS240613-7 .06238 70 130mg/L.05 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .0114 101LFMDMS240613-7 .06208 070130mg/L 20.05 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.906 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.044 0.044mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .48 85 115mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .468 70 130mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .484 370130mg/L 20.50045 Page 13 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88577Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM D5 Sample required dilution. Sample matrix causing internal standards to recover outside method limits. EPA 200.8Beryllium, total recoverableWG5928171L88577-01 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011Bicarbonate as CaCO3WG593460 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011Carbonate as CaCO3 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-Cl E-2011ChlorideWG592108 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 4500-Cl E-2011 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2510 B-2011Conductivity @25CWG592697 ZZ Laboratory measured pH and temperature were used in this calculation. Sampler did not report either field pH, field temperature, or both. Calculation (SM 2330)Corrosivity (calc.)RG831070 M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. EPA 335.4Cyanide, totalWG592565 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 335.4 DL Sample required dilution due to high AL and/or FE value.SM 4500-F C-2011FluorideWG593373 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-F C-2011 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011Hydroxide as CaCO3WG593460 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 353.2Nitrate/Nitrite as NWG591986 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2 ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 353.2Nitrite as N RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2 ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-H+ B-2011pHWG592781 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-H+ B-2011pH measured at DD Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor.EPA 365.1Phosphorus, totalWG592206 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 365.1WG592482 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 365.1 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2540 C-2011Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180CWG592050 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2540 D-2011/2015Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105CWG591935 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 2540 D-2011/2015 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.ASTM D516-07/-11/-16SulfateWG592103 HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during the initial analysis. SM 2320 B-2011Total AlkalinityWG593460 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011 DF Sample required dilution due to high sediment.EPA 200.2Total Recoverable Digestion ICP-MSWG592705 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 180.1TurbidityWG591913 REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 14 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Locator: RadioChemistry Analytical Results Gross Alpha & Beta, total EPA 900.0 Prep Method: Parameter Result LLDError(+/-)Units XQMeasure Date Prep Date Analyst Gross Alpha 21 8.5 4.8 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:04 Gross Beta 17 3.6 2.8 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:04 REPRC.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 15 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Error(+/-)Calculated sample specific uncertainty Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. LCL Lower Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) LLD Calculated sample specific Lower Limit of Detection PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Amount of the true value or spike added recovered, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RER Relative Error Ratio, calculation used for Dup. QC taking into account the error factor. RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types UCL Upper Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types DUP Sample Duplicate MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water PBW Prep Blank - Water QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Matrix Spikes Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) H Analysis exceeded method hold time. Method Prefix Reference M EPA methodology, including those under SDWA, CWA, and RCRA SM Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. D ASTM RP DOE ESM DOE/ESM Comments (1) Solid matrices are reported on a dry weight basis. (2) Preparation method: "Method" indicates preparation defined in analytical method. (3) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP003.09.12.01 Radiochemistry Reference Page 16 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Radiochemistry QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alpha EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW .04 1.460.48 0.73 WG592646LCSWA 07/08/24 110LCSWPCN6267237366.67 67 1445.7 0.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 11DUP-RPD 2.6 204.67.6 1512 124 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 11DUP-RER 2.6 24.6 0.957.6 1512 L88597-04MSA 07/08/24 3.6 125MSPCN626723140108.7 67 144214.8 1012 Beta EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW -.43 3.81.8 1.9 WG592646LCSWB 07/08/24 92LCSWRC240513-10 6166.67 82 1224.2 1.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 5DUP-RPD 8.7 2043.4 8.67.7 54 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 5DUP-RER 8.7 240.73.4 8.67.7 L88597-04MSB 07/08/24 1.6 109MSRC240513-10 120108.7 82 1228.13.4 5.99.8 Page 17 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 RadChem Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88577Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross AlphaWG5926461L88577-01 Z1 The NPDWR required detection limit was not satisfied.EPA 900.0 RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross Beta REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 18 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Certification Qualifiers ACZ Project ID:L88577Wright Water Engineers Metals Analysis The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Wet Chemistry The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 REPAD.05.06.05.01 Page 19 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:47 L88577 Date Printed:6/27/2024 Chain of Custody Related Remarks Client Contact Remarks NANOYES X X X X X X 1) Is a foreign soil permit included for applicable samples? 2) Is the Chain of Custody form or other directive shipping papers present? 3) Does this project require special handling procedures such as CLP protocol? 4) Are any samples NRC licensable material? 5) If samples are received past hold time, proceed with requested short hold time analyses? 6) Is the Chain of Custody form complete and accurate? 7) Were any changes made to the Chain of Custody form prior to ACZ receiving the samples? Receipt Verification NANOYES X X X X X X X X8) Are all containers intact and with no leaks? 9) Are all labels on containers and are they intact and legible? 10) Do the sample labels and Chain of Custody form match for Sample ID, Date, and Time? 11) For preserved bottle types, was the pH checked and within limits? 12) Is there sufficient sample volume to perform all requested work? 13) Is the custody seal intact on all containers? 14) Are samples that require zero headspace acceptable? 15) Are all sample containers appropriate for analytical requirements? 16) Is there an Hg-1631 trip blank present? 17) Is there a VOA trip blank present? 18) Were all samples received within hold time? Samples/Containers X X X Shipping Containers Client must contact an ACZ Project Manager if analysis should not proceed for samples received outside of their thermal preservation acceptance criteria. Cooler Id Temp(°C) Temp Rad(µR/Hr) Custody Seal Criteria(°C) Intact? --------- -------- ------------ ---------- ------------ NA42210 9.7 <=6.0 15 Yes X Was ice present in the shipment container(s)? Yes - Wet ice was present in the shipment container(s). 1 NA indicates Not Applicable REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 20 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:47 L88577 Date Printed:6/27/2024 The preservation of the following bottle types is not checked at sample receipt: Orange (oil and grease), Purple (total cyanide), Pink (dissolved cyanide), Brown (arsenic speciation), Sterile (fecal coliform), EDTA (sulfite), HCl preserved vial (organics), Na2S2O3 preserved vial (organics), and HG- 1631 (total/dissolved mercury by method 1631). 1 REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 21 of 22L88577-2407221341 Page 22 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Analytical Report Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ACZ Project ID: L88580 Brianna Trotter July 22, 2024 Project ID: Report to: Suite 307 Brianna Trotter: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) submitted to ACZ Laboratories, Inc. (ACZ) on June 26, 2024. This project has been assigned to ACZ's project number, L88580. Please reference this number in all future inquiries. All analyses were performed according to ACZ's Quality Assurance Plan. The enclosed results relate only to the samples received under L88580. Each section of this report has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate Laboratory Supervisor, or a qualified substitute. Except as noted, the test results for the methods and parameters listed on ACZ's current NELAC certificate letter (#ACZ) meet all requirements of NELAC. This report shall be used or copied only in its entirety. ACZ is not responsible for the consequences arising from the use of a partial report. All samples and sub-samples associated with this project will be disposed of after August 21, 2024. If the samples are determined to be hazardous, additional charges apply for disposal (typically $11/sample). If you would like the samples to be held longer than ACZ's stated policy or to be returned, please contact your Project Manager or Customer Service Representative for further details and associated costs. ACZ retains analytical raw data reports for ten years. If you have any questions or other needs, please contact your Project Manager. Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Brianna Trotter Bill to: Suite 307 Page 1 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Inorganic Prep XQDilution Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 jqr07/05/24 9:50 Lab Filtration (0.45um) & Acidification EPA 200.7/200.8 Filter aps07/01/24 15:40 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 lbt07/01/24 11:46 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP EPA 200.2 aeb/ae h 07/02/24 13:13 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP-MS EPA 200.2 jrj07/09/24 20:57 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 2 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Metals Analysis XQDilution Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.07 mg/L 0.25U msp0.07 07/16/24 14:501 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0004 mg/L 0.002U jrj0.0004 07/03/24 15:171 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00077 mg/L 0.002B jrj0.0005 07/03/24 15:171 Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.0656 mg/L 0.035 aeb/ms p 0.009*07/12/24 13:111 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0001 mg/L 0.00025U aps0.0001 07/10/24 18:121 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.008 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:111 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 70.6 mg/L 0.5 msp0.1 07/11/24 20:181 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 <0.02 mg/L 0.05U msp0.02*07/11/24 20:181 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U msp0.01*07/16/24 14:501 Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.06 mg/L 0.15U aeb/ms p 0.06 07/12/24 13:111 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0001 mg/L 0.0005U jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:171 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 17.0 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/11/24 20:181 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U msp0.01 07/16/24 14:501 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 <0.0002 mg/L 0.001U aeh/ae w 0.0002 07/12/24 13:381 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.008 mg/L 0.04U aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:111 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 3.49 mg/L 1 msp0.5*07/11/24 20:181 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.0045 mg/L 0.005B gjl0.001 07/10/24 14:171 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 21.6 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/11/24 20:181 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.01*07/12/24 13:111 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 14.8 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/11/24 20:181 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0001 mg/L 0.0005U jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:171 Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.0258 mg/L 0.0005 jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:171 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.02 mg/L 0.05U aeb/ms p 0.02 07/12/24 13:111 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 3 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Wet Chemistry XQDilution Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM 2320 B-2011 Bicarbonate as CaCO3 265 mg/L 20H rsc207/19/24 0:001 Carbonate as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc207/19/24 0:001 Hydroxide as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc207/19/24 0:001 Total Alkalinity 265 mg/L 20H rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Cation-Anion Balance Calculation Cation-Anion Balance -8.8 %calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Anions 6.8 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Cations 5.7 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 4.46 mg/L 2 jqr1*06/28/24 11:551 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 438 umhos/cm 10 asn107/09/24 19:511 Corrosivity (calc.)Calculation (SM 2330)0.0 SI Unit calc*07/22/24 0:00 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 <0.003 mg/L 0.01U ems0.003*07/08/24 11:500.5 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 0.43 mg/L 0.35 emk0.15 07/18/24 15:431 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved) Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)246 mg/L 5 calc0.2 07/22/24 0:00 Lab Filtration (0.45um filter) SOPWC050 cdp06/27/24 16:101 Nitrate as N Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.278 mg/L 0.1 calc0.02 07/22/24 0:00 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 0.289 mg/L 0.1 pjb0.02*06/27/24 0:381 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 0.011 mg/L 0.05B pjb0.01*06/27/24 0:171 pH (lab)SM 4500-H+ B-2011 pH 6.7 units 0.1H asn0.1 07/17/24 0:001 pH measured at 21.5 C 0.1 asn0.1 07/17/24 0:001 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U mrd0.01*07/05/24 11:041 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 322 mg/L 40 ptw2006/27/24 14:141 Residue, Non- Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 <5 mg/L 20U cdp5*06/27/24 11:241 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water USGS - I1738-78 0.42 calc07/22/24 0:00 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 62.2 mg/L 25 jqr5*07/01/24 11:045 TDS (calculated)Calculation 362 mg/L calc07/22/24 0:00 TDS (ratio - measured/calculated) Calculation 0.89 calc07/22/24 0:00 Turbidity EPA 180.1 <0.1 NTU 0.5U asn0.1*06/26/24 16:341 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 4 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. Lower Lower Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) MDL Method Detection Limit. Same as Minimum Reporting Limit unless omitted or equal to the PQL (see comment #5). Allows for instrument and annual fluctuations. PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit. Synonymous with the EPA term "minimum level". QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Recovered amount of the true value or spike added, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types Upper Upper Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types AS Analytical Spike (Post Digestion)LCSWD Laboratory Control Sample - Water Duplicate ASD Analytical Spike (Post Digestion) Duplicate LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank CCB Continuing Calibration Blank LFM Laboratory Fortified Matrix CCV Continuing Calibration Verification standard LFMD Laboratory Fortified Matrix Duplicate DUP Sample Duplicate LRB Laboratory Reagent Blank ICB Initial Calibration Blank MS Matrix Spike ICV Initial Calibration Verification standard MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate ICSAB Inter-element Correction Standard - A plus B solutions PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBW Prep Blank - Water LCSSD Laboratory Control Sample - Soil Duplicate PQV Practical Quantitation Verification standard LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water SDL Serial Dilution QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method or calibration procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Spikes/Fortified Matrix Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. Standard Verifies the validity of the calibration. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) BAnalyte concentration detected at a value between MDL and PQL. The associated value is an estimated quantity. HAnalysis exceeded method hold time. pH is a field test with an immediate hold time. LTarget analyte response was below the laboratory defined negative threshold. UThe material was analyzed for, but was not detected above the level of the associated value. The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit. Method References (1) EPA 600/4-83-020. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1983. (2) EPA 600/R-93-100. Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, August 1993. (3) EPA 600/R-94-111. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples - Supplement I, May 1994. (4) EPA SW-846. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. (5) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Comments (1) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (2)Soil, Sludge, and Plant matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on a dry weight basis. (3) Animal matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on an "as received" basis. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. (5) If the MDL equals the PQL or the MDL column is omitted, the PQL is the reporting limit. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP001.03.15.02 Inorganic Reference Page 5 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM2320B - Titration ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593460 WG593460PBW1 07/19/24 16:48PBW 10.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW3 07/19/24 16:58 98LCSWWC240712-1 802.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 L88841-01DUP 07/19/24 18:00 229DUP 226.4 1mg/L 20 WG593460LCSW6 07/19/24 19:09 100LCSWWC240712-1 816.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW2 07/19/24 19:15PBW 11.9 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW9 07/19/24 20:49 98LCSWWC240712-1 801.1 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW3 07/19/24 20:55PBW 12.8 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW12 07/19/24 22:54 99LCSWWC240712-1 809.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW4 07/19/24 23:00PBW 12.5 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW15 07/20/24 0:49 100LCSWWC240712-1 823.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW5 07/20/24 0:55PBW 15.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW18 07/20/24 1:47 101LCSWWC240712-1 829.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 99ICVII240710-5 1.97 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.15 0.15mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.11 0.11mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .942 85 115mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .931 70 130mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .979 570130mg/L 201.001 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 92ICVMS240613-12 .01838 90 110mg/L.02002 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0012 0.0012mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00088 0.00088mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 103LFBMS240613-7 .01027 85 115mg/L.01 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 104LFMMS240613-7 .01041 70 130mg/L.01 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 103LFMDMS240613-7 .01033 170130mg/L 20.01 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05159 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0015 0.0015mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.0011 0.0011mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .05126 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .01 93LFMMS240613-7 .05679 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .01 93LFMDMS240613-7 .05643 170130mg/L 20.0501 Page 6 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 96ICVII240710-5 1.9278 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.027 0.027mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0198 0.0198mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 91LFMII240608-4 .4542 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 93LFMDII240608-4 .4684 370130mg/L 20.501 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592817 WG592817ICV 07/10/24 18:01 100ICVMS240613-12 .049789 90 110mg/L.05 WG592817ICB 07/10/24 18:02ICB .000111 -0.00024 0.00024mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 18:08LRB U -0.000176 0.000176mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 18:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .051171 85 115mg/L.05005 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.9075 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 92LFBII240608-4 .4613 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 90LFMII240608-4 .4527 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 94LFMDII240608-4 .4687 370130mg/L 20.5005 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 99ICVII240710-5 98.8 95 105mg/L100 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.3 0.3mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 102LFBII240702-3 69.6 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 3.78 99ASII240702-3 71 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 3.78 98ASDII240702-3 70.6 185115mg/L 2067.93628 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592119 WG592119ICV 06/28/24 10:04 96ICVWI231211-1 38.19 90 110mg/L39.96 WG592119ICB 06/28/24 10:04ICB U mg/L WG592119LFB1 06/28/24 11:28 101LFBWI231211-4 20.32 90 110mg/L20.02 L88518-01AS 06/28/24 11:29 6.58 98ASWI231211-4 26.12 90 110mg/L20.02 L88518-02DUP RA06/28/24 11:29 6.38DUP 6.36 0mg/L 20 WG592119LFB2 06/28/24 11:47 101LFBWI231211-4 20.29 90 110mg/L20.02 Page 7 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 98ICVII240710-5 1.96 95 105mg/L2 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 100LFBII240702-3 .502 85 115mg/L.5005 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 U 98ASII240702-3 .49 85 115mg/L.5005 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 U 98ASDII240702-3 .491 085115mg/L 20.5005 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592697 WG592697LCSW2 07/09/24 16:36 108LCSWPCN6270861520 90 110umhos/cm1409 WG592697LCSW5 07/09/24 19:02 107LCSWPCN6269471502 90 110umhos/cm1408 L88589-04DUP 07/09/24 20:25 1160DUP 1198 3umhos/cm 20 WG592697LCSW8 07/09/24 21:44 108LCSWPCN6269471522 90 110umhos/cm1408 WG592697LCSW11 07/10/24 0:55 108LCSWPCN6269471526 90 110umhos/cm1408 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.92 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .468 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 94LFMII240608-4 .472 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 100LFMDII240608-4 .498 570130mg/L 20.5005 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592565 WG592565ICV 07/08/24 11:39 99ICVWI240626-3 .2961 90 110mg/L.3003 WG592565ICB 07/08/24 11:39ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LRB 07/08/24 11:41LRB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LFB 07/08/24 11:42 90LFBWI240625-2 .1793 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-01LFM M207/08/24 12:14 .251 84LFMWI240625-2 .4193 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-02DUP 07/08/24 12:16 3.67DUP 3.625 1mg/L 20 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593373 WG593373ICV 07/18/24 13:57 99ICVWC240712-2 1.98 90 110mg/L2 WG593373ICB 07/18/24 14:03ICB U -0.3 0.3mg/L WG593373LFB1 07/18/24 14:09 100LFBWC240411-1 5 90 110mg/L5 L88577-01AS 07/18/24 15:25 U 101ASWC240411-1 75.7 90 110mg/L75 L88577-01ASD 07/18/24 15:30 U 100ASDWC240411-1 74.67 190110mg/L 2075 WG593373LFB2 07/18/24 16:24 107LFBWC240411-1 5.35 90 110mg/L5 Page 8 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 1.944 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.18 0.18mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.132 0.132mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 97LFBII240608-4 .968 85 115mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 93LFMII240608-4 .933 70 130mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 96LFMDII240608-4 .966 370130mg/L 201.003 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05118 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB .00015 -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .04917 85 115mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .00024 100LFMMS240613-7 .05047 70 130mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .00024 100LFMDMS240613-7 .05032 070130mg/L 20.05005 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 99ICVII240710-5 98.9 95 105mg/L100 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 103LFBII240702-3 51.7 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 1.78 101ASII240702-3 52.2 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 1.78 101ASDII240702-3 52.4 085115mg/L 2049.99866 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.91 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .465 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .489 570130mg/L 20.501 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592795 WG592795ICV 07/12/24 11:31 97ICVHG240528-3 .00486 95 105mg/L.005 WG592795ICB 07/12/24 11:32ICB U -0.0002 0.0002mg/L WG592800 WG592800LRB 07/12/24 13:36LRB U -0.00044 0.00044mg/L WG592800LFB 07/12/24 13:37 98LFBHG240619-6 .00196 85 115mg/L.002002 L88606-05LFM 07/12/24 13:48 U 92LFMHG240619-6 .00184 85 115mg/L.002002 L88606-05LFMD 07/12/24 13:49 U 93LFMDHG240619-6 .00186 185115mg/L 20.002002 Page 9 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 98ICVII240710-5 1.957 95 105mg/L2.004 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .4802 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .4713 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .4866 370130mg/L 20.501 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 98ICVWI240403-6 2.366 90 110mg/L2.415 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.02 0.02mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 2.076 90 110mg/L2 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 .155 102ASWI240228-17 2.196 90 110mg/L2 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 .12DUP .119 1mg/L 20 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 100ICVWI240403-6 .61 90 110mg/L.608 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 1.041 90 110mg/L1 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 U 103ASWI240228-17 1.03 90 110mg/L1 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 pH (lab) SM4500H+ B ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593243 WG593243LCSW1 07/17/24 11:20 100LCSWPCN6244496 5.9 6.1units6 L88976-02DUP 07/17/24 12:22 7DUP 7 0units 20 WG593243LCSW4 07/17/24 12:29 100LCSWPCN6244496.01 5.9 6.1units6 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592482 WG592482ICV 07/05/24 10:43 108ICVWI240603-4 .707 90 110mg/L.65228 WG592482ICB 07/05/24 10:46ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LRB 07/05/24 10:47LRB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LFB 07/05/24 10:48 102LFBWI240625-5 .511 90 110mg/L.5 L88577-01LFM 07/05/24 10:51 .077 101LFM5XPT2.595 90 110mg/L2.5 L88578-01DUP RA07/05/24 10:53 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 Page 10 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 100ICVII240710-5 19.9 95 105mg/L20 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -1.5 1.5mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 102LFBII240702-3 102 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 .85 99ASII240702-3 99.4 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 .85 98ASDII240702-3 99.1 085115mg/L 2099.96008 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592050 WG592050PBW 06/27/24 13:25PBW U -20 20mg/L WG592050LCSW 06/27/24 13:29 96LCSWPCN626715964 80 120mg/L1000 L88580-01DUP 06/27/24 14:18 322DUP 316 2mg/L 10 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592030 WG592030PBW 06/27/24 11:11PBW U -5 5mg/L WG592030LCSW 06/27/24 11:13 82LCSWPCN62671582 80 120mg/L100 L88588-03DUP RA06/27/24 11:42 20DUP 20 0mg/L 10 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592771 WG592771ICV 07/10/24 14:05 104ICVMS240613-12 .0519 90 110mg/L.05 WG592771ICB 07/10/24 14:06ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 14:10LRB U -0.0022 0.0022mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 14:11 94LFBMS240613-7 .047 85 115mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFM 07/10/24 14:34 U 85LFMMS240613-7 .0423 70 130mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFMD 07/10/24 14:36 U 87LFMDMS240613-7 .0433 270130mg/L 20.05005 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 100ICVII240710-5 42.7 95 105mg/L42.8 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 98LFBII240702-3 21.1 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 10.3 95ASII240702-3 30.6 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 10.3 94ASDII240702-3 30.5 085115mg/L 2021.42782 Page 11 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 .968 95 105mg/L1 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 87LFBII240608-4 .435 85 115mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 85LFMII240608-4 .426 70 130mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 87LFMDII240608-4 .433 270130mg/L 20.4995 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 99ICVII240710-5 98.8 95 105mg/L100 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 101LFBII240702-3 101 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 2.12 99ASII240702-3 101 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 2.12 99ASDII240702-3 101 085115mg/L 2099.97238 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592200 WG592200ICV 07/01/24 10:25 110ICVWI240624-7 22.1 85 115mg/L20.02 WG592200ICB 07/01/24 10:25ICB 1.4 -2.5 2.5mg/L WG592200LFB 07/01/24 11:10 109LFBWI240618-2 10.9 85 115mg/L10 L88589-01AS M107/01/24 11:12 31.4 121ASSO4TURB5X43.5 85 115mg/L10 L88589-01ASD 07/01/24 11:13 31.4 94ASDSO4TURB5X40.8 685115mg/L 2010 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05157 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 96LFBMS240613-7 .04817 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 96LFMMS240613-7 .04828 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 97LFMDMS240613-7 .04862 170130mg/L 20.0501 Turbidity EPA 180.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591971 WG591971ICV 06/26/24 16:00 98ICVPCN626099195 90 110NTU200 WG591971ICB 06/26/24 16:02ICB U -0.3 0.3NTU L88578-04DUP RA06/26/24 16:19 .55DUP .56 2NTU 20 Page 12 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05103 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .0492 85 115mg/L.05 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .0114 102LFMMS240613-7 .06238 70 130mg/L.05 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .0114 101LFMDMS240613-7 .06208 070130mg/L 20.05 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.906 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.044 0.044mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .48 85 115mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .468 70 130mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .484 370130mg/L 20.50045 Page 13 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88580Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 4500-Cl E-2011ChlorideWG5921191L88580-01 ZZ Laboratory measured pH and temperature were used in this calculation. Sampler did not report either field pH, field temperature, or both. Calculation (SM 2330)Corrosivity (calc.)RG831068 M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. EPA 335.4Cyanide, totalWG592565 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2Nitrate/Nitrite as NWG591986 ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2Nitrite as N ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 365.1Phosphorus, totalWG592482 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 2540 D-2011/2015Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105CWG592030 Z3 Sample volume yielded a residue less than 2.5 mgSM 2540 D-2011/2015 M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. ASTM D516-07/-11/-16SulfateWG592200 HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during the initial analysis. SM 2320 B-2011Total AlkalinityWG593460 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 180.1TurbidityWG591971 REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 14 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Locator: RadioChemistry Analytical Results Gross Alpha & Beta, total EPA 900.0 Prep Method: Parameter Result LLDError(+/-)Units XQMeasure Date Prep Date Analyst Gross Alpha 54 11 3.2 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:05 Gross Beta 8.1 2.9 2.6 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:05 REPRC.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 15 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Error(+/-)Calculated sample specific uncertainty Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. LCL Lower Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) LLD Calculated sample specific Lower Limit of Detection PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Amount of the true value or spike added recovered, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RER Relative Error Ratio, calculation used for Dup. QC taking into account the error factor. RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types UCL Upper Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types DUP Sample Duplicate MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water PBW Prep Blank - Water QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Matrix Spikes Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) H Analysis exceeded method hold time. Method Prefix Reference M EPA methodology, including those under SDWA, CWA, and RCRA SM Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. D ASTM RP DOE ESM DOE/ESM Comments (1) Solid matrices are reported on a dry weight basis. (2) Preparation method: "Method" indicates preparation defined in analytical method. (3) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP003.09.12.01 Radiochemistry Reference Page 16 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Radiochemistry QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alpha EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW .04 1.460.48 0.73 WG592646LCSWA 07/08/24 110LCSWPCN6267237366.67 67 1445.7 0.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 11DUP-RPD 2.6 204.67.6 1512 124 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 11DUP-RER 2.6 24.6 0.957.6 1512 L88597-04MSA 07/08/24 3.6 125MSPCN626723140108.7 67 144214.8 1012 Beta EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW -.43 3.81.8 1.9 WG592646LCSWB 07/08/24 92LCSWRC240513-10 6166.67 82 1224.2 1.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 5DUP-RPD 8.7 2043.4 8.67.7 54 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 5DUP-RER 8.7 240.73.4 8.67.7 L88597-04MSB 07/08/24 1.6 109MSRC240513-10 120108.7 82 1228.13.4 5.99.8 Page 17 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 RadChem Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88580Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross AlphaWG5926461L88580-01 Z1 The NPDWR required detection limit was not satisfied.EPA 900.0 RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross Beta REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 18 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Certification Qualifiers ACZ Project ID:L88580Wright Water Engineers Metals Analysis The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Wet Chemistry The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 REPAD.05.06.05.01 Page 19 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:48 L88580 Date Printed:6/27/2024 Chain of Custody Related Remarks Client Contact Remarks NANOYES X X X X X X 1) Is a foreign soil permit included for applicable samples? 2) Is the Chain of Custody form or other directive shipping papers present? 3) Does this project require special handling procedures such as CLP protocol? 4) Are any samples NRC licensable material? 5) If samples are received past hold time, proceed with requested short hold time analyses? 6) Is the Chain of Custody form complete and accurate? 7) Were any changes made to the Chain of Custody form prior to ACZ receiving the samples? Receipt Verification NANOYES X X X X X X X X8) Are all containers intact and with no leaks? 9) Are all labels on containers and are they intact and legible? 10) Do the sample labels and Chain of Custody form match for Sample ID, Date, and Time? 11) For preserved bottle types, was the pH checked and within limits? 12) Is there sufficient sample volume to perform all requested work? 13) Is the custody seal intact on all containers? 14) Are samples that require zero headspace acceptable? 15) Are all sample containers appropriate for analytical requirements? 16) Is there an Hg-1631 trip blank present? 17) Is there a VOA trip blank present? 18) Were all samples received within hold time? Samples/Containers X X X Shipping Containers Client must contact an ACZ Project Manager if analysis should not proceed for samples received outside of their thermal preservation acceptance criteria. Cooler Id Temp(°C) Temp Rad(µR/Hr) Custody Seal Criteria(°C) Intact? --------- -------- ------------ ---------- ------------ 7195 4.8 <=6.0 15 Yes X Was ice present in the shipment container(s)? Yes - Wet ice was present in the shipment container(s). 1 NA indicates Not Applicable REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 20 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:48 L88580 Date Printed:6/27/2024 The preservation of the following bottle types is not checked at sample receipt: Orange (oil and grease), Purple (total cyanide), Pink (dissolved cyanide), Brown (arsenic speciation), Sterile (fecal coliform), EDTA (sulfite), HCl preserved vial (organics), Na2S2O3 preserved vial (organics), and HG- 1631 (total/dissolved mercury by method 1631). 1 REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 21 of 22L88580-2407221336 Page 22 of 22L88580-2407221336 May 9, 2024 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Canyon Creek Partners LLC c/o Julie and Doug Pratte – The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Email: landstudio2@comcast.net RE: Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), Existing Metal Shop, Lot 2 (Lot 4) of the Gabossi Exemption, 24 County Road 138, Garfield County, Colorado SE Job No. 32000.01 Parcel No: 212335200186, Current Garfield County ISDS Permits: indeterminate Dear Doug and Julie: This letter provides documentation of an initial site investigation performed by Sopris Engineering (SE), on 3-28-24, to inspect visible system components and review applicable permit documents associated with the existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) currently in use, serving the metal shop in operation on the site. A follow up site investigation and tank inspection was performed by SE on 4-23-24, in coordination with Down Valley Septic, who was engaged to pump the existing septic tank. SE observed the tank conditions prior to and after pumping was completed to further evaluate the existing OWTS conditions, functionality, observed components, and identify evidence of an existing soil treatment area (STA). After the site visit, an additional search of the County data base revealed documentation of a 2011 Garfield County Building Permit and a 2002 ISDS Permit associated with the property for a garage and single family home. It appears that a Single family home’s OWTS was permitted and finalized, in 2002, under County ISDS permit No. 3759 to serve a 1-bedroom residential unit plus “GHR” design capacity reported, calling for a 750 gallon septic tank. However, the application dated 11-01-02, indicates a 2-bedroom single family dwelling. The attached permit indicates that the design called for 414 S.F. of leaching chambers (24 units) assumed to be old model standard Infiltrator chambers configured in a trench(s). The permit “final system inspection and approval as installed section” indicates that a 1,250 gallon concrete septic tank, manufactured by Copeland, was installed with Infiltrator trench. This permit was finalized 12-27-02. An application for “Gabossi Subdivision Exemption” document was submitted in 2002 and indicates that the existing residence on Lot 1 has an ISDS in place. A Building permit on record, BLRE-9-10-1742, issued 10/1/2010, to serve a 2,400 SF garage, assumed not to be plumbed as the septic application and building review indicated that a septic permit was not applicable. An existing OWTS does exist that is currently serving the shop. The review of the documents indicate some confusion of what the original intent was to permit either the garage unit or single family unit both being in place on the property at different locations. It is assumed that the single family unit was assigned to the original permit and the garage/shop unit may not have been finalized under a permit. Findings The shop contains a ½ bath. A sanitary sewer cleanout was observed off the south exterior wall approximately 20-ft from the southwest corner of the building. A 750 gallon, 1-compartment, concrete septic tank with an iron ring and cover installed at surface grade, set on a 12-inch concrete access riser on the tank access, is in place approximately 40-ft south of the building at the southerly edge of the gravel drive area. Prior to pumping, SE observed a normal liquid level with a relatively dense 3-inch layer of accumulated scum at the surface and probed an approximate 16- inch layer of settled moderately dense sludge. The tank (6-ft x 4-ft x 5-ft interior dimensions) is equipped with inlet and outlet sanitary tees. The access lid, riser and the tank were observed being in good condition. Page 2 24 County Road 138As Constructed OWTS SE Job No. 32000.01 May 9, 2024 Observation of the liquid level stain in the tank indicates that discharge of effluent to a STA is occurring normally. Observation of the tank interior indicates that the concrete tank, floor, ceiling and walls are in very good condition and that the system is functioning. No surface components typically associated with a newer STA field (was observed (i.e., inspection ports), however evidence of a STA was observed just down gradient from the top of embankment below the tank. These observed features are situated in what appears to be a previously excavated area on the slope characterized by a relatively flat surface area approximately 40-ft by 6-ft within a grade break between some scattered oak brush trees. This small rectangular area has a healthy grass vegetated surface somewhat distinguished from the surrounding terrain. It is strongly assumed that a functioning STA exists that may consist of a single 40-ft long absorptive trench. No evidence of surfacing effluent or compromised system conditions was observed. The usage of the shop appears to be limited to 3-4 people per day. The daily design flow is estimated to be 45 to 60-gpd based on 15-gpd for daily workers usage of a single ½ bath. The single compartment 750-gallon tank and assumed 120-sf STA with native Type 2 silt loam soils in the vicinity, is expected to have adequate capacity to treat the limited sewage treatment requirements. Conclusions Based on the significant accumulation of scum and sludge in the tank, it is recommended that the tank be inspected annually and most likely be pumped every 3-4 years. Based on observation of the tank, sewage influent, tank effluent, assumed STA and site conditions, the system appears to be functioning and is expected to provide for effective treatment of the limited usage in the future. Recommendations for further identification/evaluation of the assumed STA, upgrades to system to be in conformance with current regulatory design criteria may be considered however it is the opinion of SE that no immediate actions or upgrades are warranted at this time or the near future to maintain the system performance to effectively treat the limited usage. Recommendations Future recommendations to consider or that may be required to permit the system include: locating and inspecting the assumed STA by TV probe and minor exploratory excavation; install appropriate inspection ports and perform any other needed upgrades; install a 300 gallon plastic septic tank with outlet effluent filter in series with the existing tank; create a permit/construction drawing with existing conditions and proposed upgrades for permit application and approval; submit record drawing of as-constructed conditions under finalized permit. If a permit and record drawing is requested by the County to support approval of planning or building processes, SE is available to address their concerns and request associated with this existing OWTS. If no significant permitting procedures or system upgrades are required by the County, it may be advisable to just locate the extents of the STA and inspect it by TV probing, field probing, and issue an existing conditions record drawing under a new permit number. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC Paul E. Rutledge Yancy Nichol, PE Design Engineer Principal PAGEBREAKFY2021 , .it 1!61.. A376 i 2;.1 . 20 4. l, 4 i '9 14. ./ '. E.,L F COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT Permit fee Date of transmittal 0.00 06/20/2003 Region/Section/Patrol 03/02/10 CDOT Permit No. 303120 State Highway No/Mp/Side 006D/110.160/L Local Jurisdiction Garfield County The Permittee(s); Randy Withee, Engineer Garfield County 144 E. 3rd Street Rifle, CO 81650 970-625-0973 X4001 Applicant;Ref No. 03-105 Randy Withee, Engineer Garfield County 144 E. 3rd Street Rifle, CO 81650 970-625-0973 X4001 is hereby granted permission to have an access to the state highway at the location noted below. The access shall be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with this permit, including the State Highway Access Code and any attachments, terms, conditions and exhibits. This permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access and its use violate any parts of this permit. The issuing authority, the Department and their duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit. Location: Located on the left side of US Highway 6&24, a distance of 829 feet east of RP 110, also known as County Road 138. Access to Provide Service to: County Road 40 DHV 100.00 % Other terms and conditions: * See Attached Pages 2 and 3 and Other Enclosures for Additional Terms and Conditions. 1&2526272@4, 1 eeG N1.%\ 1 JUK %% 1 j1 ka 1 District lit 01 Traffic Co/ (N, Ok' MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority. Date Title By (X) Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from Initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to 41,an ,i.0,4 .V,119 UWul. The permittee shall notify Brian Gieck with the Colorado Department of Transportation in Rifle at 970-625-2286 at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way. The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access and have full authority to accept the permit and its terms and conditions. t. Permittee X7 ,Date / 00 739 GO -72 «< 15-(03 This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By <-7 _ CP VA-Date (*ique)Title(44» " 22 2 OCR 3 Access Manager Cop*distribution:Required:t>' Make copies as necessary for: 1.Region Local Authority Inspector 2.Applicant MTCE Patrol Traffic Engineer 3.Staff Access Section Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used CDOT Form #101 8/98 .... State Highway Access Permit Form 101, Page 2 The following paragraphs are excerpts of the State Highway Access Code. These are provided for your convenience but do not alleviate compliance with all sections of the Access Code. A copy of the State Highway Access Code is available from your local issuing authority (local government) or the Colorado Department of Transportation (Department). When this permit was issued, the issuing authority made its decision based in part on information submitted by the applicant. on the access category which is assigned to the highway, what alternative access to other public roads and streets is available, and safety and design standards. Changes in use or design not approved by the permit or the issuing authority may cause the revocation or suspension of the permit. APPEALS 1. Should the permittee or applicant object to the denial of a permit application by the Department or object to any of the terms or conditions of a permit placed there by the Department, the applicant and permittee (appellant) have a right to appeal the decision to the [Transportation] Commission [of Coloradol. To appeal a decision, submit a request for administrative hearing to the Transportation Commission of Colorado within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit for signature. Submit the request to the Transportation Commission of Colorado, 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222-3400, The request shall include reasons for the appeal and may include changes, revisions, or conditions that would be acceptable to the permittee or applicant. 2, Any appeal by the applicant or permittee of action by a local issuing authority shall be filed with the local authority and be consistent with the appeal procedures of the local authority 3. In submitting the request for administrative hearing, the appellant has the option of including within the appeal a request for a review by the Department's internal administrative review committee pursuant to [Code] subsection 2.10. When such committee review is requested, processing of the appeal for fornial administrative hearing, 2.9(5) and (6), shall be suspended until the appellant notifies the Commission to proceed with the administrative hearing, or the appellant submits a request to the Commission or the administrative law judge to withdraw the appeal, The two administrative processes, the internal administrative review committee, and the administrative hearing, may not run concurrently. 4. Regardless of any communications, meetings, administrative reviews or negotiations with the Department or the internal administrative review Committee regarding revisions or objections to the permit or a denial, if the permittee or applicant wishes to appeal the Department's decision to the Commission for a hearing, the appeal must be brought to the Commission within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit. PERMIT EXPIRATION 1. A permit shall be considered expired if the access is not under construction within one year of the permit issue date or before the expiration of any authorized extension. When the permittee is unable to commence construction within one year after the permit issue date, the permittee may request a one year extension from the issuing authority. No more than two one-year extensions may be granted under any circumstances. If the access is not under construction within three years from date of issue the permit will be considered expired. Any request for an extension must be in writing and submitted to the issuing authority before the permit expires. The request should state the reasons why the extension is necessary, when construction is anticipated, and include a copy of page 1 (face of permit) of the access permit. Extension approvals shall be in writing. The local issuing authority shall obtain the concurrence of the Department prior to the approval of an extension, and shall notify the Department of all denied extensions within ten days. Any person wishing to reestablish an access perinit that has expired may begin again with the application procedures. An approved Notice to Proceed, automatically renews the access permit for the period of the Notice to Proceed. CONSTRUCTION 1. Construction may not begin until a Notice to Proceed is approved. (Code subsection 2.4] 2. The construction of the access and its appurtenances as required by the terms and conditions of the permit shall be completed at the expense of the permittee except as provided in subsection 2.14. All materials used in the construction of the access within the highway right-of-way or on permanent easements, become public property. Any materials removed from the highway right-of-way will be disposed of only as directed by the Department. All fencing, guard rail, traffic control devices and other equipment and materials removed in the course of access construction shall be given to the Department unless otherwise instructed by the permit or the Department inspector. 3. The permittee shall notify the individual or the office specified on the permit or Notice to Proceed at least two working days prior to any construction within state highway right-of-way. Construction of the access shall not proceed until both the access permit and the Notice to Proceed are issued. The access shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from initiation of construction within the highway right-of-way. A construction time extension not to exceed 30 working days may be requested from the individual or office specified on the permit. 4. The issuing authority and the Department may inspect the access durirg construction and upon completion of the access to ensure that all terms and conditions of the permit are met. Inspectors are authorized to enforce the conditions of the permit during construction and to halt any activities within state right-of-way that do not comply with the provisions of the permit, that conflict with concurrent highway constructior or maintenance work, that endanger highway properly, natural or cultural resources protected by law, or the health and safety of workers or the public. 5. Prior to using the access, the perniittee is required to complete the construction according to the terms and conditions of the permit. Failure by the permittee to abide by all permit terms and conditions shall be sufficient cause for the Department or issuing authority to initiate action to suspend or revoke the permit and close the access. If in the determination of the Department or issuing authority the failure to comply with or complete the construction requirements of the permit create a highway safety hazard, such shall be sufficient cause for the summary suspension of the permit. If the permittee wishes to use the access prior to completion, arrangements must be approved by the issuing authority and Department and Included in the permit. The Department or issuing authority may order a halt to any unauthorized use of the access pursuant to statutory and regulatory powers. Reconstruction or improvement of the access may be required when the permittee has failed to meet required specifications of design or materials. If any construction element fails within two years due to improper construction or material specifications, the permittee shall be responsible for all repairs. Failure to make such repairs may result in suspension of the permit and closure of the access. 6. The permittee shall provide construction traffic control devices at all times during access construction, in conformance with the M.U.T.C.D. as required by section 42-4-104, C.R.S., as amended. 7. A utility permit shall be obtained for any utility work within highway right-of-way. Where necessary to remove, relocate, or repair a traffic control device or public or private utilities for the construction of a permitted access, the relocation, removal or repair shall be accomplished by the permittee without cost to the Department or issuing authority, and at the direction of the Department or utility company. Any damage to the state highway or other public right-of-way beyond that which is allowed in the permit shall be repaired immediately. The permittee is responsible for the repair of any utility damaged in the course of access construction, reconstruction or repair. 8. In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the access shall be securely braced with an approved end post before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence. All posts and wire removed are Department property and shall be turned over to a representative of the Department. 9. The permittee shall ensure that a copy of the permit is available for review at the construction site at all times. The permit may require the contractor to notify the individual or office specified on the permit at any specified phases in construction to allow the field inspector to inspect various aspects of construction such as concrete forms, subbase, base course compaction, and materials specifications. Minor changes and additions may be ordered by the Department or local authority field inspector to meet unanticipated site conditions. 10.Each access shall be constructed in a manner that shall not cause water to enter onto the roadway or shoulder, and shall not interfere with the existing drainage system on the right-of-way or any adopted municipal system and drainage plan.. 11.By accepting the permit, permittee agrees to save, indemnify, and hold harmless to the extent allowed by law, the issuing authority, the Department, its officers, and employees from suits, actions, claims of any type or character brought because of injuries or damage sustained by any person resulting from the permittee's use of the access permit during the construction of the access. CHANGES IN ACCESS USE AND PERMIT VIOLATIONS 1. It is the responsibility of the property owner and permittee to ensure that the use of the access to the property is not in violation of the Code, permit terms and conditions or the Act. The terms and conditions of any permit are binding upon all assigns, successors-in-interest, heirs and occupants. If any significant changes are made or will be made in the use of the property which will affect access operation, traffic volume and or vehicle type, the permittee or property owner shall contact the local issuing authority or the Department to determine if a new access permit and modifications to the access are required. 2. When an access is constructed or used in violation of the Code, section 43-2-147(5)(c), C.R.S., of the Act applies, The Department or issuing authority may summarily suspend an access permit and immediately order closure of the access when its continued use presents an immediate threat to public health, welfare or safety. Summary suspension shall comply with article 4 of title 24, C.R.S. MAINTENANCE 1. The permittee, his or her heirs, successors-in-interest, assigns, and occupants of the property serviced by the access shall be responsible for meeting the terms and conditions of the permit, the repair and maintenance of the access beyond the edge of the roadway including any cattle guard and gate, and the removal or clearance of snow or ice upon the access even though deposited on the access in the course of Depadment snow removal operations. Within unincorporated areas the Department will keep access culverts clean as part of maintenance of the highway drainage system. However, the permittee is responsible for the repair and replacement of any access-related culverts within the right-of-way. Within incorporated areas, drainage responsibilities for municipalities are determined by statute and local ordinance. The Department will maintain the roadway including auxiliary lanes and shoulders, except in those cases where the access installation has failed due to improper access construction and/or failure to follow permit requirements and specifications in which case the permittee shall be responsible for such repair. Any significant repairs such as culvert replacement, resurfacing. or changes in design or specifications, requires authorization from the Department. State Highway Access Permit Form 101, Page 2 The following paragraphs are excerpts of the State Highway Access Code. These are provided for your convenience but do not alleviate compliance with all sections of the Access Code. A copy of the State Highway Access Code is available from your local issuing authority (local government) or the Colorado Department of Transportation (Department). When this permit was issued, the issuing authority made its decision based in part on information submitted by the applicant, on the access category which is assigned to the highway, what alternative access to other public roads and streets is available, and safety and design standards. Changes in use or design not approved by the permit or the issuing authority may cause the revocation or suspension of the permit. APPEALS 1 Should the permittee or applicant object to the denial of a permit application by the Department or object to any of the terms or conditions of a permit placed there by the Department, the anplicant and permittee (appellant) have a right to appeal the decision to the [Transportation] Commission [of Coloradol. To appeal a decision. submit a request for administrative hearing to the Transportation Commission of Colorado within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit for signature Submit the request to the Transportation Commission of Colorado, 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222-3400 The request shall include reasons for the appeal and may include changes, revisions, or conditions that would be acceptable to the permittee or applicant. 2. Any appeal by the applicant or permittee of action by a local issuing authority shall be filed with the local authority and be consistent with the appeal procedures of the local authority 3, In submitting the request for administrative hearing, the appellant has the option of including within the appeal a request for a review by the Department's internal administrative review committee pursuant to [Code] subsection 2.10. When such committee review is requested. processing of the appeal for formal administrative hearing, 2.9(5) and (6), shall be suspended until the appellant notifies the Commission to proceed with the administrative hearing, or the appellant submits a request to the Commission or the administrative law judge to withdraw the appeal. The two administrative processes, the internal administrative review committee, and the administrative hearing, may not run concurrently. 4 Regardless of any communications, meetings, administrative reviews or negotiations with the Department or the internal administrative review Committee regarding revisions or objections to the permit or a denial, if the permittee or applicant wishes to appeal the Department's decision to the Commission for a hearing, the appeal must be brought to the Commission within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit. PERMIT EXPIRATION 1. A permit shall be considered expired if the access is not under construction within one year of the permit issue date or before the expiration of any authorized extension. When the permittee is unable to commence construction within one year after the permit issue date, the permittee may request a one year extension from the issuing authority. No more than two one-year extensions may be granted under any circumstances. If the access is not under construction within three years from date of issue the permit will be considered expired. Any request for an extension must be in writing and submitted to the issuing authority before the permit expires. The request should state the reasons why the extension is necessary, when construction is anticipated, and include a copy of page 1 (face of permit) of the access permit Extension approvals shall be in writing. The local issuing authority shall obtain the concurrence of the Department prior to the approval of an extension, and shall notify the Department of all denied extensions within ten days. Any person wishing to reestablish an access permit that has expired may begin again with the application procedures An approved Notice to Proceed, automatically renews the access permit for the period of the Notice to Proceed. CONSTRUCTION 1, Construction may not begin until a Notice to Proceed is approved, (Code subsection 2.4] 2. The construction of the access and its appurtenances as required by the terms and conditions of the permit shall be completed at the expense of the permittee except as provided in subsection 2.14. All materials used in the construction of the access within the highway right-of-way or on permanent easements, become public property. Any materials removed from the highway right-of-way will be disposed of only as directed by the Department. All fencing, guard rail, traffic control devices and other equipment and materials removed in the course of access construction shall be given to the Department unless otherwise instructed by the permit or the Department inspector. 3 The permittee shall notify the individual or the office specified on the permit or Notice to Proceed at least two working days prior to any construction within state highway right-of-way. Construction of the access shall not proceed until both the access permit and the Notice to Proceed are issued. The access shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from initiation of construction within the highway right-of-way. A construction time extension not to exceed 30 working days may be requested from the individual or office specified on the permit. 4 The issuing authority and the Department may inspect the access durirg construction and upon completion of the access to ensure that all terms and conditions of the permit are met. Inspectors are authorized to enforce the conditions of the permit during construction and to halt any activities within state right-of-way thal do not comply with the provisions of the permit, that conflict with concurrent highway construction or maintenance work, that endanger highway properly, natural or cultural resources protected by law, or the health and safety of workers or the public. 5 Prior to using the access, the permittee is required to complete the construction according to the terms and conditions of the permit. Failure by the permittee to abide by all permit terms and conditions shall be sufficient cause for the Department or issuing authority to initiate action to suspend or revoke the permit and close the access If in the determination of the Department or issuing authority the failure to comply with or complete the construction requirements of the permit create a highway safety hazard, such shall be sufficient cause for the summary suspension of the permit. If the permittee wishes to use the access prior to completion. arrangements must te approved by the issuing authority and Department and included in the permit The Department or issuing authority may order a halt to any unauthorized use of the access pursuant to statutory and regulatory powers. Reconstruction or improvement of the access may be required when the permittee has failed to meet required specifications of design or materials. If any construction element fails within two years due to improper construction or material specifications, the permittee shall be responsible for all repairs. Failure to make such repairs may result in suspension of the permit and closure of the access. 6 The permittee shall provide construction traffic control devices at all times during access construction, in conformance with the M.U.T.C.D. as required by section 42-4-104. C.R.S., as amended. 7. A utility permit shall be obtained for any utility work within highway right-of-way. Where necessary to remove, relocate, or repair a traffic control device or public or private utilities for the construction of a permitted access, the relocation. removal or repair shall be accomplished by the permittee without cost to the Department or issuing authority, and at the direction of the Department or utility company. Any damage to the state highway or other public right-of-way beyond that which is allowed in the permit shall be repaired immediately. The permittee is responsible for the repair of any utility damaged in the course of access construction, reconstruction or repair. 8. In the event It becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the access shall be securely braced with an approved end post before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence. All posts and wire removed are Department property and shall be turned over to a representative of the Department. 9 The permittee shall ensure that a copy of the permit is available for review at the construction site at all times The permit may require the contractor to notify the individual or office specified on the permit at any specified phases in construction 10 allow the field inspector to inspect various aspects of construction such as concrete forms, subbase, base course compaction, and materials specifications Minor changes and additions may be ordered by the Department or local authority field inspector to meet unanticipated site conditions. 10.Each access shall be constructed in a manner that shall not cause water to enter onto the roadway or shoulder, and shall not interfere with the existing drainage system on the right-of-way or any adopted municipal system and drainage plan, 11 By accepting the permit. permittee agrees to save, indemnify, and hold harmless to the extent allowed by law, the issuing authority, the Department, its officers, and employees from suits, actions. claims of any type or character brought because of injuries or damage sustained by any person resulting from the permittee's use of the access permit during the construction of the access. CHANGES IN ACCESS USE AND PERMIT VIOLATIONS 1 It is the responsibility of the property owner and permittee to ensure that the use of the access to the property is not in violation of the Code. permit terms and conditions or the Act. The terms and conditions of any permit are binding upon all assigns, successors-in-interest, heirs and occupants. If any significant changes are made or will be made in the use of the property which will affect access operation, traffic volume and or vehicle type, the permittee or properly owner shall contact the local issuing authority or the Department to determine if a new access permit and modifications to the access are required. 2. When an access is constructed or used in violation of the Code, section 43-2-147(5)(c) C.R.S., of the Act applies. The Department or issuing authority may summarily suspend an access permit and immediately order closure of the access when its continued use presents an immediate threat to public health, welfare or safety, Summary suspension shall comply with article 4 of title 24, C.R S. MAINTENANCE 1. The permittee, his or her heirs, successors-in-interest, assigns, and occupants of the property serviced by the access shall be responsible for meeting the terms and conditions of the permit, the repair and maintenance of the access beyond the edge of the roadway including any cattle guard and gate, and the removal or clearance of snow or ice upon the access even though deposited on the access in the course of Department snow removal operations. Within unincorporated areas the Department will keep access culverts clean as part of maintenance of the highway drainage system. However, the permittee is resi onsible for the repair and replacement of any access-related culverts within the right-of-way. Within incorporated areas, drainage responsibilities for municipalities are determined by statute and local ordinance, The Department will maintain the roadway including auxiliary lanes and shoulders, except in those cases where the access installation has failed due to improper access construction and/or failure to follow permit requirements and specifications in which case the permittee shall be responsible for such repair. Any significant repairs such as culvert replacement, resurfacing, or changes in design or specifications, requires authorization from the Department STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16,2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Permittee and Applicant are responsible for fully reading and understanding the attached terms and conditions of this permit. Failure to comply with anv of these terms and conditions may result in the suspension of this permit. When an access is constructed or used in violation of the , J Code, section 43-2-147(5)(c), C.R.S., of the Act applies. The Department or issuing authority may summarily suspend an access permit and immediately order closure of the access when its continued use presents an immediate , threat to public health, welfare or safety. Summarysuspension shall comply with article 4 of title 24, C.R.S. If there are any questions or concerns regarding these terms and conditions, IMMEADIATLY contact the Access 0 Manager. 1. This permit replaces any and all additional access permits that may be in existence. All other access to the property shall be removed. 2. This permitted access is only for the use and purpose stated in the Application and Permit. This Permit is issued in accordance with the Access Code (2 CCR 601-1), and is based in part upon the information submitted by the Permittee. Any changes in traffic volumes or type, drainage, or other operational aspects may render this permit void, requiring a new permit to be applied for based upon existing and anticipated future conditions Any subsequent relocation, reconstruction, or modifications to the access or changes in the traffic volume or traffic nature using the access shall be requested for by means of a new application. 3. The traffic limitations listed on the face of this permit shall be adhered to. The traffic volumes are listed in Design Hourly Volume (DHV) trips or Average Daily Trips (ADT) where entering the site and returning counts as two trips. Vehicle counts using the access shall be adjusted for vehicles longer than 20 feet in accordance with Section 2.3(4)(e). 4. A Notice to Proceed is required prior to beginning construction. The following items are required before a Notice to Proceed will be issued: (1) Certificate of Insurance Liability as per Section 2.3(11)(i) of the State Highway Access Code. (2) Traffic Control Plan in accordance with Section 2.4(6) of the Access Code. (3) Three copies of Construction Plans Stamped (11"x 17" with a minimum scale of 1" = 509 by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer in full compliance with the State Highway Access Code. 5. The access shall be constructed 25-feet wide with radii to accommodate the minimum turning radius of the largest vehicle or 25-foot, whichever is greater. OR curb, gutter, and radii to the requirements of the local jurisdiction. 6. The access shall be constructed perpendicular to the travel lanes of the State Highway for a minimum distance of 40 feet from the edge of roadway or the right-of-way line. whichever is greater, and shall slope down and away from the adjacent pavement edge at a rate of 2% grade for a minimum o f 20 feet. If curb and gutter are present, the slope shall be calculated from pan line to pan line. Any revisions to -1- STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16, 2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) this requirement shall be subject to Department review and approval prior to commencement of any work within the highway right-of-way. Slopes shall be at a 6:1 ratio on the roadway and a 6:1 ratio on the approach. The access shall be surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code immediately upon completion of earthwork construction and prior to use. This access shall be hard surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code a minimum distance of 350 feet from the traveled way. Where the hard surface is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be saw cut and removed a minimum of one foot back from the existing edge for bituminous, or until an acceptable existing cross slope is achieved. Surfacing shall meet the Department's specifications with minimum surfacing to be equal to or greater than existing highway conditions. 9. The Permittee shall install a culvert a minimum of 24-inch in diameter and have protective end treatments or as otherwise authorized by the Access Manager. 10. Water, sanitary, sewer, gas, electrical, communication, landscaping, and telephone installations will require individual additional permits. 11. The Permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary additional federal, state and/or City/County permits or clearances required for construction of the access. Approval of this access permit does not constitute verification of this action by the Permittee. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to verify the location of the existing utilities and notify all utility owners or operators of any work that might involve utilities within the State Highway right-of- way. Any work necessary to protect existing permitted utilities, such as an encasement will be the responsibility of the Permittee. Any damage or disruption to any utilities during the construction shall be the Permittee's responsibility and shall be repaired or replaced at no cost to the Department. 13. A fully executed complete copy of this permit must be on the job site with the contractor at all times during the construction. Failure to comply with this or any other construction requirement may result in the immediate suspension of work by order of the department inspector or the issuing authority. 14. Traffic control shall be provided on site during the duration of construction of access and highway improvements in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and a Traffic Control Plan prepared by a American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or Colorado Contractors Association certified Traffic Control Supervisor in accordance with the MUTCD and Colorado Supplements. 15. All work that requires traffic control shall be supervised by a registered professional traffic engineer or by a traffic control supervisor certified by the American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or the Colorado Contractors Association (CCA). When flagging personnel are required, the contractor in accordance with the Department standards shall certify them. 16. Any incomplete construction activity on the State Highway that must be left overnight shall be barricaded and signed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and other applicable standards. 17. Open cuts, which are 6 inches in depth, within 30 feet of the edge of the State Highway traveled way, will not be left open at night, on weekends, or on holidays. 18. No more than 6 feet of trench areas shall be opened at any one time. Open trenches and other excavations within the State Highway right-of-way shall be backfilled and/or paved before 3:30 P.M. of each working day or be protected in accordance with the M.U.T.C.D. -2- STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16,2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) this requirement shall be subject to Department review and approval prior to commencement of any work within the highway right-of-way. 7. Slopes shall be at a 6:1 ratio on the roadway and a 6:1 ratio on the approach. 8. The access shall be surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code immediately upon completion of earthwork construction and prior to use. This access shall be hard surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 ofthe Access Code a minimum distance of 350 feet from the traveled way. Where the hard surface is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be saw cut and removed a minimum of one foot back from the existing edge for bituminous, or until an acceptable existing cross slope is achieved. Surfacing shall meet the Department's specifications with minimum surfacing to be equal to or greater than existing highway conditions. 9. The Permittee shall install a culvert a minimum of 24-inch in diameter and have protective end treatments or as otherwise authorized by the Access Manager. 10. Water, sanitary, sewer, gas, electrical, communication, landscaping, and telephone installations will require individual additional permits. 11. The Permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary additional federal, state and/or City/County permits or clearances required for construction of the access. Approval of this access permit does not constitute verification of this action by the Permittee. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to verify the location of the existing utilities and notify all utility owners or operators of any work that might involve utilities within the State Highway right-of- way. Any work necessary to protect existing permitted utilities, such as an encasement will be the responsibility of the Permittee. Any damage or disruption to any utilities during the construction shall be the Permittee's responsibility and shall be repaired or replaced at no cost to the Department. 13. A fully executed complete copy of this permit must be on the job site with the contractor at all times during the construction. Failure to comply with this or any other construction requirement may result in the immediate suspension of work by order of the department inspector or the issuing authority. 14. Traffic control shall be provided on site during the duration of construction of access and highway improvements in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and a Traffic Control Plan prepared by a American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or Colorado Contractors Association certified Traffic Control Supervisor in accordance with the MUTCD and Colorado Supplements. 15. All work that requires traffic control shall be supervised by a registered professional traffic engineer or by a traffic control supervisor certified by the American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or the Colorado Contractors Association (CCA). When flagging personnel are required, the contractor in accordance with the Department standards shall certify them. 16. Any incomplete construction activity on the State Highway that must be left overnight shall be barricaded and signed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and other applicable standards. 17. Open cuts, which are 6 inches in depth, within 30 feet of the edge of the State Highway traveled way, will not be left open at night, on weekends, or on holidays. 18. No more than 6 feet of trench areas shall be opened at any one time. Open trenches and other excavations within the State Highway right-of-way shall be backfilled and/or paved before 3:30 P.M. of each working day or be protected in accordance with the M.U.T.C.D. -2- STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16,2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) 19. Any work within State Highway right-of-way shall begin after 8:30 A.M. and all work and equipment shall be offthe highway BEFORE 3:30 P.M. each day. 20. Two-way traffic shall be maintained at all times on the highway in accordance with the MUTCD and Colorado Supplements or as otherwise approved. 21. No work will be allowed at night, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays without prior authorization from the Department. The Department may also restrict work within the State Highway right-of-way during adverse weather conditions. 22. Construction traffic control devices, when not in use, shall be removed or turned away from traffic. 23. When it is necessary to remove any highway right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the access entrance shall be securely braced with approved end posts and in conformance with the Department's M-607-1 standard, before the fence is cut, to prevent slacking of the remaining fence. All materials removed shall be reiumed to the Department. 24. Landscaping shall not obstruct sight distance at any State Highway access point. In the event the landscaping becomes unsightly or considered to be a traffic hazard, The Department may require that it be removed promptly by the Permittee and at no cost to the Department. 25. On-premise and off-premise signing shall comply with the current Colorado Outdoor Advertising Act, sections 43-1-401 to 421, C.R.S., and all rules and regulations pertaining to outdoor advertising. Please contact (advertising inspector name and number) for any questions regarding advertising devices. 26. Upon completion of the access, the applicant shall notify the Access Manager by certified mail within 10 days at: Colorado Department of Transportation Region 3 - Access Manager 222 South 6th Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 -2- COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY Issuing authority APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIl date application acceptance Instructions: - contact the Department of Highways or your local government to determine your issuing authority. - contacttheissuingauthoritytodetermine whatplansandotherdocumentsare requiredtobesubmitted withyour 4 application. A - completethis form(somequestionsmaynotapplytoyou) &attach allnecessarydocumentsandsubmitittothe 0/ issuing authority. Submit an application for each access requested. - if you have any questions contact the issuing authority.Please print or type 1) roperty owner (Permittee)2) Applicant AESKILE\.b CDot)Tl --AVel UIT WEE/, El,4,AE,t- GMZFIEL-b COONT'I -Rh,tt:Y \11331#EE fi,L; 41 2- street address, city street address, city, / 19 4 E. 1-8 STWEEr }tH E. 3·e-0 Sr 2-*- state & zip Phone # %1,\00 l state & zip Phone #REPLE 81 l50 190- LQ 5-0913 2.:ug LE 1 SIU 6 910-£95-0993A 4001 3) Adr of property to be served by permit (if known) 4).. Legal description of property: county subdivision block . lot township rangeGAE.ea-13 1 N/A 1 0/A 11>NE.EL. C 1 section/2 c 1 5 jaunt i cio W op Lmt. RM 5) What state highway are you requesting access from?6) What side of the highway? . / DYN OS O EOWEATE ALL#,JM[ 64-94 7) How many feet is the proposed access from the nearest mile post or cross street? 9/1 +circk 0 1 J - feet (NS €)W) from 8) Check here if you are requesting a Il new access O temporary access improvement to existing access O change in access use 9) What is the approximate date you intend to begin construction?AJAf> 10) Do you have knowledge of any State Highway access permits serving this property, of foradjacent properties in which you have a property interest. 0 yes o If "yes" - what are the permit number(s)?and/or, permit date 11) Does the property t3.ner own or have any interests in any adjacent property? 0 yes dp'Zo If "yes" - please describe: 12) Are there existing or dedicated public streets, roads, highways or access easements bordering or within the property? hi /A 0 yes 0 no If "yes" - list them on your plans and indicate the proposed and existing access points. 13) I f you are requesting commercial orindustrial access please indicate the types and numberof businesses and provide the floorarea square footage of each?0,24- V I business square footage businei square footage NIA ff I f; 4" 1 i 04 ,{* 4441 1 01 9 1r.Uistri*' ,f014) If you are requesting agricultural field a - how many acres will the access serve? 44 A 1 15) If you are requesting residential development access, - what is the type (single family, apartment, townhouse) and number 01 units? \422£8 02:toj,9,50/ type numberof units type -numberof units N M 1 1 1 1 16) Provide the following vehicle count estimates for vehicles that will use the access. Leaving property then returning istwocounts. Indicate if your counts are peak hour volumes O or average daily volumes 0. # of passengers cars and light trucks # of multi unit trucks kl- #ofothervehicles N/A- # of single unit vehicles in excess of 30 ft #of farm vehicles (field equipmA Total Count of All Vehicles 0/A. 17) Check with the issuing authority tocletermine which of the following documents are required to complete the review of your application. OlA (plans should be no larger than 24" x 36") a) Highway and driveway plan and profile. b) Drainage plan showing impact to the highway right-of-way. c) Map and letters detailing utility locations before and after development in and along the right-of-way. d) Subdivision, zoning, or development plan. e) Property map indicating other access, bordering roads and streets. f) Proposed access design. g) Parcel and ownership maps including easements. h) Signing and striping plans. i) Traffic control plan j) Proof of liability insurance I If an access permit is issued to you it will state the terms and conditions for its use. Any changes in the use of the permitted access not consistent with theterms and conditions listed on the permit may be considered a violation of the permit. LIC E--ECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, AND ANY OTHER \BLE FATEOR FEDERAL LAWS, THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM AND ouw,kliTED FACIJF|VIEITARE TO THE BEST OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE TRUE AND COMPLETE. Applicant sigr;hturr i'n..... Jl J¥ 8 1, r·,1 1 1 -r C»9« 1 1-alle 4 -2- 63 I f theapplic,Misno Ajwnerofthproperty,werequirethisapplicationalsotobesigned6ytheproperty owneror their legall author 1Nrepresentative (or other acceptable written evidence). This signature shall constitute agreement/with this *lication bfall owners-of-interest unless stated in writing. If a permit is authorized, the property okner will lisNd as t® permittee. tth, ize ;a b Property owner sidaeture Date Previous editions may be used until supplies are exhausted CDOH Form #137 \IHE Al AN T 0 0 U H 8 LO 11 BEDDING OF CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. EXISTING GRADE - MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION STA: 2+71.49 ELEV: 5004.53 12 --1.............VITYQ)2<3<23:2*- END OF IMPROVEMENTS STA 3+65.41 , -0.49% - 2.00 4" MIN. - 12" MIN.5000 PROPOSED GRADE TYP. ON SIDES 1 -EXISTING EDGE OF HWY 6&24 STA: 1 + 5 ELEV: 5004.20 r-- PROPOSED GRADE DATUM ELEV EXISTING GRADE - / 4990.00 SCALE: VERTICAL 1"=10 HORIZONTAL 1"=50' CULVERT CROSSING DETAIL /2 - END OF IMPROVEMENTS STA: 3+65.41 ELEV: 5( Uf ) 28 5% Le 52 9 * 10 Ul * 4 9-4 4 4 :8 De 00 00 /0 &;} 00 00 8 8 ) to B tO 1010 1.0 If) 4 1+00 - 2+00 3+00 COUNTY ROAD 138 PROFILE 48 L.F. 24" ADS N-12 INV=5001.14' INV=5000.59' LEGEND:CONTRACTOR TO REGRADE BORROW DITCH FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, MATCHING NEW - %*3 -NEW ASPHALT (8" GRAVEL UNDER 3" ASPHALT)CULVET ELEVATIONS. 142-25-/ 1 -- [7-771 N.T.S. )04.51 0 0 DE CATE T - 5 R L rpazz= *41-1403 =NEW ASPHALT ( 3" ASPHALT OVER EXISTING COUNTY ROAD) -4400 ' 10119115 #SS 23-33tFripiltz/253-7*-1- »u L SANCUT AND MATCH EXISTING . VARIES VARIES EDGE OF ASPHALT 0 0 0 0 0 STA: 1+15.07 OFFSET: O.00 R 9 \ CONTRACTOR TO REGRADE BORROW DITCH-- FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, MATCHING NEW CULVET ELEVATIONS 2%COUNTY ROAD 138 IMPROVEMNTS 6 6 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO - PLAN, PROFILE AND DETAILS f COUNTY ROAD 138 SCALE: 1"=6' SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS SCALE: 1"=50'502 MAIN STREET. SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO.SHEET 1 98010 5/20/03 98010SITE.DWG CARBONDALE, CO 81623 SJO DATE 10/24/03 98010 OF 1 (970) 704-0311 DR. .. It fI COUNTY ROAD 138 V \2 /4/ /0/1 , 0 1 >AL lllllllllll 1/Uumm771 STA: 7+39.43 . OFFSET: O.00 G . 4 I 1=.22-7 »--6+04 1 i : _. r---L- i -A - 44 Or)-Al/.,·'/</7* Ell D /\/ - - 6+00 /-00\ Jr, I.r#.'./ t.- 1'' ,1 1 3 r.z- - - V ,CD --ill ---- -1 7=mut.-- f- Ees=NG Cor,09£72 .\0AND GUARORAIL U , fb- - -9 & 1:-04 O 4 52 V 17,u EZE e, 15-4.n,T , -E-'Ent04139 VEHICLE ENTERING HWY 6&24 UNE OF SIGHT ELEVATION= 5004.29'+3.5'=5007.79'----0- Ull N / I 13+00 1Ati 4 981-- 1 1.0. L- 51@MT PISTANCE WEST=#39.43' . ELEVATION AT ROAD=5001.04' ELEVAnON OF ONCOMING EASTBOUND VEHICLE=5001.04'+4.25'=4991.77' 61*MT PISTANDE EAST=796.75' J ELEVATION AT ROAD=4987.52' ELEVATION OF ONCOMING WESTBOUND VEHICLE=4987.52'+4.25'=4991.77' PLAN VIEW OF SIGHT DISTANCE EXITING COUNTY ROAD 138 VEHICLE ENTERING STATE HWY 6&24 SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE WEST OF ENTRANCE= 639.43 FT THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE FOR PASSENGER CARS AND PICKUP TRUCKS (REFER TO TABLE BELOW). -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE EAST OF ENTRANCE= 796.75 FT THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE FOR PASSENGER CARS AND PICKUP TRUCKS (REFER TO TABLE BELOW). HICLE SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIRED -2)(*TABLE 4-2) ADJUSTMENT FACTOR DOWNGRADE (*TABLE 4-4) ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE EAST REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE WEST 550'1.20 660'550' 715'1.20 858'715' 935'1.20 1122'935' VEHICLE APPROACHING COUNTY RD 138 SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE OF VEHICLE TRAVELING WEST ON STATE HWY 6&24 (EAST OF ENTRANCE)=796.75 FT. THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE OF 495 FT. (REFER TO TABLE BELOW) -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE OF VEHICLE TRAVELING EAST ON STATE HWY 6&24 (WEST OF ENTRANCE)= 639.43 FT. THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE OF 550 FT. (REFER TO TABLE BELOW) SCALE: 1"=100' COUNTY ROAD 138 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIRED (*TABLE 4-1) 550' ADJUSTED REQUIRED ADJUSTMENT FACTOR SIGHT DISTANCE UPGRADE (*TABLE 4-4)VEHICLE TRAVELING WEST 0.9 495' 98010 5/20/03 98010SITE.DWG ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE VEHICLE TRAVELING EAST CJOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. 550'CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREEL SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 ENTRANCE SIGHT DISTANCE ENTERING HWY 6&24 FROM CR 138 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO.SHEET 1 DR. SJO DATE 5/20/03 98010 OF 2 fl 1 07 CL OF LANE AT DRIVER'S LINE OF SIGHT . ELEVATON OF LINE OF SIGHT OF ENTERING VEHICLE STA: 7+39.43 ELEV: 5007.79 ELEVATION OF EASTBOUND VEHICLE STA: 1+00 ELEV: 5005.29 5010 5000 4990 4980 UNE Q[ SlgtIT_ WESI-639.fly_ _ - ELEVA DON OF WESTBOUND VEH/CLE CNE OF SIGHT r STA: 15-1--36.18 ELEV: 4591.77 EXISTING GROUND EXISTIN 3 ELEVATION STA: 7+39.43 ELEV: 5004.29 - - EXISTING POAD ELEVATION STA: 1+OC ELEV: 5001.04 1 *A // EXISTING ROAD ELEVATION STA: ' 5+36.18 ELEV: 4987.52 -- EXISTING GROUND SCALE I \ERTICAL. 1"=10' DATUM ELEV FORIZONTAL: 1 "=100' 4975.00 Al ro O t.0 0 M *NO(\100)-0 LO 0 (0 4 4 0 0 * A 4 03 16 88823vi 4 4 4-5 43 d US id co 45 tri 4 d ch 06 <CS Lri 14 4 Mi oF K K co K 0888888 80 0 0 8 0 032 323300*00 00 CO 0 0 0 0 0 03 03 0-j· LO 10 10 1.0 t.0 4-) (.0 LO LO LO Ul tO 1.0 1.0 * r ****W Wr * f 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 ENTRANCE SIGHT DISTANCE PROFILE STATE HWY 6 & 24 NOTES: ENTERING VEHICLE SIGHT DISTANCE NOTES: 1) ELEVATION AT ENTRANCE VEHICLE 1) MAXIMUM SLOPE OF STATE HWY 6&24 WEST OF THE ENTRANCE IS 27. LINE OF SIGHT= ROAD ELEVATION+3.5' 2)2) ELEVATION OF ONCOMING VEHICLE AT CL OF LANE WEST AND EAST= ROAD ELEVATION+4.25' MAXIMUM SLOPE OF STATE HWY 6&24 EAST OF THE ENTRANCE IS -3%. *ADJUST REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE DOWNGRADE BY A 3) SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENTERING VEHICLES:FACTOR OF 1.2. (STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS CODE, AUGUST 31, 1998 TABLE 4-4) ROADWAY POSTED AT 55 M.P.H WEST AND EAST OF ENTRANCE, THEREFORE REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE PER STATE - HIGHWAY ACCESS CODE , AUGUST 31, 1998, TABLE 4-2 IS: COUNTY ROAD 138 -550'* FOR PASSENGER CARS AND PICKUP TRUCKS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO -715'* FOR SINGLE UNIT TRUCKS OVER 10,000 LB GVW ENTERING SIGHT DISTANCE -935'* FOR MULTI-UNIT TRUCKS SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC.PROFILE CIVIL CONSULTANTS 98010 5/20/03 98010SITE. DWG 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO.SHEET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 DR. SJO DATE 5/20/03 98010 OF . te 20 Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change – Comment Response December 13, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 1 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Canyon Creek Partners LLC c/o Julie and Doug Pratte – The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Email: juliepratte@thelandstudio.com, dougpratte@thelandstudio.com RE: Land Use Change Application, Garfield County Comment Response (SE Job #32000.01) Dear Julie and Doug, Sopris Engineering (SE) has prepared the following letter in response to the Garfield County Hogback View Estates Administrative Review letter dated November 25, 2024. Please see below for SE’s response to the comment on the access easement. County Comment #3 - "Access of the easement to the south to the county road does not line up with the map. You must address the compliance of the easement and access." SE has reviewed the easement in question along with associated plats and title work. After review, SE's opinion is that the road and the access easements on and through Lot 4 are in compliance. Although the road as it exists today falls outside of the platted easement boundary in a few areas (middle and upper end of the easement), SE believes the intent of the easement to provide access from the County Road to the subdivided Lot 2 constitutes that the access and easement are in compliance. In previous review and correspondence with the County, only a 30-ft access easement was considered at the lower end of the road access. However, after further review of the plat, there is a second access easement that is 40-ft wide of which the road providing access to Lot 2 falls within at the County Road intersection. See a snapshot of the plat below with the two easements highlighted. The plat has also been attached to this letter. Canyon Creek Partners – Land Use Change – Comment Response December 13, 2024 Job #: 32000.01 Page 2 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let our team know. Sincerely, Kyle Sanderson, PE Project Manager Sara M. Dunn Direct Dial (970) 928-3467 sarad@balcombgreen.com Andie Hall Direct Dial (970) 928-3462 ahall@balcombgreen.com SERVING COLORADO SINCE 1953 818 Colorado Avenue | Post Office Box 790 | Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 | 970.945.6546 | BalcombGreen.com October 16, 2024 Via Email: Jullie Pratte The Land Studio, Inc. juliepratte@thelandstudio.com RE: LEGAL WATER SUPPLY FOR METAL SHOP AT 24 COUNTY ROAD 138, NEW CASTLE, CO Dear Julie: The Metal Fabrication Shop located at 24 County Road 138 New Castle, Colorado (“Metal Shop”), owned by Canyon Creek Partners, LLC, is currently served by a well operating pursuant to Well Permit No. 335230, a copy of which is attached. Pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-602(1), this commercial exempt well permit allows the well to be used for drinking and sanitary facilities in a commercial business where (1) pumping is limited to 15 g.p.m.; (2) uses are limited to drinking and sanitary facilities inside a single commercial business; and the demand will be less than 1/3 of an acre foot per year. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. By: Sara M. Dunn Andie Hall ASPEN | BUENA VISTA | GLENWOOD SPRINGS | LAMAR Post Office Box 790 | Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 | 970.945.6546 | BalcombGreen.com Sara M. Dunn Receptionist (970) 945-6546 Direct (970) 928-3467 sarad@balcombgreen.com August 4, 2023 John Leybourne, Planner III Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Application for Hogback View Estates Sketch Plan – Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Dear Mr. Leybourne: We are writing this letter in response to your letter dated July 13, 2023. Our office conducted the mineral owner research for Assessor’s Parcel Number 212335200186 and also known as Lot 2, Gabossi Subdivision Exemption (the “Property”). The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (“GCLUDC”) require an Applicant to provide notice to mineral owners in accordance with C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq., “as such owners can be identified through records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means.” GCLUDC 4-101(E)(4). Section 24-65.5-101 requires that an applicant notify a mineral estate owner who either (1) is identified as such by the county tax assessor’s records; or (2) has filed in the Clerk and Recorder a request for notification. If such records do not identify any mineral estate owners, including their addresses of record, “the applicant shall be deemed to have acted in good faith and shall not be subject to further obligations….” By this letter, the Applicant certifies that mineral owners have been researched for the Property as required pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5- 101, et seq, and Section 4-101 (E)(1)(b)(4) of the GCLUDC, as amended. On August 9, 2023 we conducted the following tasks: 1. We reviewed the current vesting deed for the Property. 2. We reviewed the owner’s title insurance policy. 3. We researched the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder’s index of mineral owner requests for notification per C.R.S. § 24-65.5-103(a)(I)(B) and confirmed that no mineral owner for the Property has filed a request for notification; and 4. We also confirmed that the Assessor’s records for Section 35, Township 5 South, Range 90 West, do not list any active or inactive mineral owners. John Leybourne Mineral Owner Research August 11, 2023 Page 2 ASPEN | BUENA VISTA | GLENWOOD SPRINGS | LAMAR Post Office Box 790 | Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 | 970.945.6546 | BalcombGreen.com Applicant acknowledges that it has reviewed C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, and it is in compliance with said statute and the GCLUDC. This satisfies the Applicant’s obligations under Colorado law and the County’s Code. Sincerely, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. By: Sara M. Dunn Cc: Canyon Creek Partners, LLC The Land Studio, Inc. Douglas Pratte CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL OWNER RESEARCH This form is to be completed and submitted with any application for a Land Use Change Permit. Mineral interests may be severed from surface right interests in real property. C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, requires notification to mineral owners when a landowner applies for an application for development from a local government. As such, the landowner must research the current owners of mineral interests for the property. The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code of 2013 (“LUDC”) Section 4-101(E)(1)(b)(4) requires written notice to owners of mineral interests in the subject property in accordance with C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, “as such owners can be identified through the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means.” This form is proof of applicant’s compliance with the Colorado Revised Statutes and the LUDC. The undersigned applicant certifies that mineral owners have been researched for the subject property as required pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, and Section 4-101 (E)(1)(b)(4) of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended. As a result of that research, the undersigned applicant certifies the following (Please initial on the blank line next to the statement that accurately reflects the result of research): I own the entire mineral estate relative to the subject property; or Minerals are owned by the parties listed below The names and addresses of any and all mineral owners identified are provided below (attach additional pages as necessary): Name of Mineral Owner Mailing Address of Mineral Owner I acknowledge I reviewed C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, and I am in compliance with said statue and the LUDC. _____________________________________________ _________________________________ Applicant’s Signature Date X No mineral owners were found 12/12/24CCP LLC.