Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of ExcavationK Kun�r &Associates, Inc 5020 County Road 154 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 and Environmental Scientists phone: (970) 945-7988 email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com An fiTltpl W" Owf*d CoMpony Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado October 17, 2025 Jose Salazar P.O. Box 91 Rifle, Colorado 81650 valentinbustillos09(cDhotmail.6om Project No. 24-7-543 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, 239 Village Drive, Rifle, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, a representative of Kumar & Associates, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on October 6, 2025 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated December 31, 2024, Project No. 24-7-543. The proposed residence has been designed to be support by spread footings placed on the natural clay soils and sized for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf with a risk of settlement. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level from about 1 to 3 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of very stiff, slightly porous sandy silty clay. Results of laboratory in -place density testing performed on a sample taken at bearing level were 7.3% moisture and 116 pcf dry density. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and can be used for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf with a risk of settlement. Loose disturbed soils in the footing areas should be moistened to near optimum and compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable, especially those to keep the bearing soils dry, should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, Kumar & Associates, Steven L. Pawlak, P. SLP/kac Cc: Clayton Homes — (karen.gonzaleza-claytonhomes.com)