Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1543 C p 1543 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303) 945.8241 Job Address — 4633 County Road 214 Nature of work - BuildinaPermit use at Building. '= Single Fami Residence Owner James & Sharon Yoast Contractor Owner Amount of Permit: $ 213.00 Date: — October a,Iean p.X 4$ Toni I ShPrwned CLERK Building Permit Application • NCO 1410 1 Garfield County, Colo./Li-01 O , 19 0 Owner: EJa. rr/G .S 11 SA a,rel 11 /ri'. s't Contractor or Builder: eJ• Location: 33 : I i .. Purpose for which building is to be used: I/ ✓ 12 �{ S/ q J. f l n.m , Size of Lot: .2 ,. l(,C /f 4 et. cJ J ,� Distance of building from property line at: Front J•3 Rear / S � Left side Right side / Distance from nearest building: Number of stories: / Source of water supply: G i.5 ✓ J, Number of rooms: 9 Type of sewage disposal: .c{,v /;C- Type of foundation: / ' Width of Building: -3:2 r Material in outside walls: • -tan Length of Building: �-7 Exterior Finish: J2e. Height of walls: 7 Type of roof: /u n,- "'- Floor space in sq. ft.: )3 Estimated Cost: $ - 4 � e / Date construction will start:4 0a/ f /) < of completion: Permit Charge: $ /yZ •AEG per 1st $1,000 Valuation. Hog /vi , $ 7/• e"O per each additional $1,000 Valuation. TOTAL $ 213." And I /We hereby agree to build strictly to the terms of the above description, and also to clear the grounds adjacent street or streets of all rubbish and debris caused by the construction of said building. • Respectfully, ✓ L... The County Commissioners hereby grant the above permit as per terms therein stated. This day of �C�" , 191 Building Inspector Clerk Sept. 5, 1980 to; New Castle Building Inspector c/o Mr. James Yoast P. C. Box 907 New Castle, Co. 81647 Reference: 'U' values of concrete block A second review of 'U' values for 8" it wt concrete block indicates the following information. - =? ,� 'U' at the cell portion of the block equals 0.063 over 81% of blk face 'U' at the web portion of the block equals 0.21 over 19% of blk face v using 80# /cf conc. mix �� /4.4 � Se ° // 14. v /f' AVERAGING 'U'VALUES 'U' per square inch of cell is .0004375 x 117 square inch = .05 'U' per square ft. 'U' per square inch of web is .001458 x 27 square inch = .3937 Overall average of wall loss equals 0.089 per sq. ft. 2-,!-4-1 1 Technical data taken from ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals 1972 My understanding of the State Energy Conservation Standards indicates we are well within the requirements. In addition the Stead/ State Heat Loss can be further reduced due to the heat storage capability of the wall mass (see "Technical Notes on Brick Construction" by Brick Institute of America 1977 copy enclosed). Per above reference the mass factor = .95 Ue (equivalent overall) = Uc (calculated steady state) x .95 equals an actual U = 0.084 Figure 1 Uo Walls — Group R Buildings - Type R buildings shall include: A -1. Detached one and two family dwellings A-2. All other residential buildings three stories or less including but not limited to multi - family dwellings, hotels and motels. 0.50 • 1 ' 4_ t ' . • CII f ! ' p.. i ii • + ■Y ■ - � 1 h r 0.400 .•00 ■ .0 {. • ,� •■ r 1.4_ ui•i'•.0 •iii ■ ■ f • • • 1 -7 - 1 - rr{ { �- sit • LL �'■f_•0 ;.QN i � ' • I- � �t rt r t t • - CY 0.30 au •• ••• • •S• ■�•0,■j■0a00• • 1 ... - }—+a— a_w --.—' i 0.20 ' a... w v � i q • • 0 Mi li :irdir ■R • ` 17 � i " — - - 4 =ii •S s i. U 0iuii0.0•u• ■ -,---F-4- ±L MIMS 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 Annual Fahrenheit Heating Degree Days (65 F Base) r (in thousands) I e r REPRINTED FROM 7 GOL04.ADO E1JSRAY G oNsERVA - r( oN I . _STANDARDS , N OV, 11 77 73 1 1 • :� A ~ TABLE 3, cont'd. Conductivities, Conductances and Resistances of Building Sand Insulating Materials- (Design Values)a (Concluded) r R.. Ioncee (R) Specific Density M ean Couduc Conduct- Materiel Description lib per Temp liav once Per inch For flea. l, or thick- Bruper - Cu FI) F 141 ICI i thickness n o alisted IIbllFdepl O /k) I 11 /CI FINISH Carpet and fibrous pad - 1 75 - 0 -48 - 2.08 FLOORING Carpet and rubber pad - 75 - 0.81 - 1.23 0.34 MATERIALS Cork tile 4 in. - 75 - 3.60 - 028 Terrazzo 1 i n. t - 75 - 12.50 - 0.08 • Tile - asphalt, linoleum, vinyl, rubber. - 75 - 20.00 1 - 0.05 0.30 INSULATING Mineral Fiber, fibrous form processed MATERIALS from rock, slag, or glass BLANKET AND BATT approx ° 2 -21 in - 75 - - - 7e 0.18 approx °3 -31 in - 75 - - - Ile 0.18 approx.. 54 - 64 in - 75 - - - 19e . BOARD AND SLAas Cellular glass.. 9 75 0.40 - 1 2.50 - 0. • Glass fiber, organic bonded 4-9 75 0.25 - j 4.00 - 0.19 Expanded rubber (rigid) 4 -5 75 0.22 - 4.55 - Expanded polystyrene extruded, plain 1 1.8 j 75 0.25 - 4.00 1 - 1 0.29 Expanded polystyrene extruded, (It-l2 exp.) I 2.2 II 0.20 - 5.00 - 0.29 Expanded polystyrene extruded, (R -12 j exp.) (Thickness 1 in: and greater) 3.5 75 1 0.19 - 5.26 - 0.29 Expanded polystyrene, molded beads 1.0 75 0.28 . - 3.67 - 0.29 • Expanded polyurethane' (R -11 exp ) 1.5 75 0.16 i. - 6.25 - 1 0.38 (Thickness 1 in. or greater) 2.5 0.38 • Mineral fiber with resin binder 15 j 75 1 0.29 - 3.45 - 0.17 Mineral fiberboard, wet felted Core or roof insulation 16 -17 75 0 -34 - 2.94 Acoustical tile 18 75 0.35 - 2.86 - • Acoustical tile 21 75 0.37 - 2 - 73 - Mineral fiberboard, wet molded Acoustical tiles 23 75 0.42 - j e..38 - Wood or cane fiberboard j Acoustical tiles 4 in. - 75 - 0.80 - 1.25 - 0.30 Acoustical tiles I in. j 75 0.53 1.89 0.30 Interior finish (plank, tile) 15 75 0.35 2.86 0,32 Insulating roof deck Approximately 11 in. - 75 - 0.24 - 4. Approximately 2 in - 75 - 0.18 - 6.66 Approximately shredded (cemented in 3 M. 75 - - 0.12 - : 8.33 Wood preformed slabs) 1 22 75 0.60 - 1.67 - 0.38 - LOOSE FILL Cellulose insulation (milled paper or wood pulp) 2.5 -3 75 0.27 - 3.70 - 0.33 'i Sandust or shavings 0.71-1.5 75 0.45 - 2.22 - 0 -33 Wood fiber, softwoods 2.0 -3.5 1 75 0.30 - 3.33 - 0.33 Perlite, expanded 5.0-8.01 75 0.37 - 2.70 - Mineral fiber (rock, slag or glass) 1 g4 U.1R approx °3 in. - 75 - - - 3s 0.18 • . . approx. ' in - 7 - - - 19° 0.18 approx° 6I 61 in - 75 - - _ app mx° : in 7.5 - - -^ 0.18 Silica aerogel 7.6 ' 75 0.17 - 5.88 V - n' elite ( expanded 1.18.2 75 0.41 - 2.23 1 - .1 1 cJ l 5 0.44. 2.2 Rooe INSULAT ONZ Preformed, for use above deck - 75 - 0 7L - 1.39 Approximately 41n. Approximately 1 in. - 75 - 0.36 - 2 Approximately 11 in. - 75 - 0.24 - 4. Approximately 2 in. - 75 - 0.19 - 5.56 Aoornximately 21 R. - 75 - ' 0.15 - 6.67 Approximately 3 m. 9 ]5 0.40 0.12 2.50 8.33 0.24 - Cellular glass • MASONRY Cement mortar 116 5.0 - 0.20 - MATERIALS Gypsum -fiber concrete 874% gypsum, 51 1.66 - 0 - CONCRETES 121% wood chips Lightweight aggregates Including - 120 5.2 - 0.19 - - panded shale, clay or slate: expanded 1.t 3 -6 - t - /x F j slags; cinders; pumice; vermiculite; i RO 2.5 - 0.40 - l' \ \ q also cellular concretes 60 1.7 0.69 1.15 0.86 I 30 0.90 1.11 1 40 20 0.70 1.43 - APPENDIX- CHARTS AND TABLES A -23 TABLE 3, cont'd. Conductivities, Conductances and Resistances of Building and Insulating Materials - (Design Values)a (Concluded) Resistances (R) Specific Density Mean Concha- Conduct pecl, Material Description lib per Temp tivity n Pet inch For thick Bw Per Cu Ft) F Ik) (C) thickness n e slisled O Bi u deal (1 /kl WC) MASONRY Sand and gravel or stone aggregate MATERIALS (oven dried) 190 9.0 - 0.11 - CONCRETEa Sand and gravel or stone aggregate (Continued) (not dried) 190 12.0 - 0.08 - Stucco 116 5.0 - 0.20 - MASONRY UNITS Briek, commons 120 75 5.0 - 0J0 Brick, face' 130 75 9.0 - 0.11 - Clay tile, ollow: 1 cell deep 3 R. - 75 - 1.25 - 0.80 1 cell deep 4 in. - 75 - 0.90 - 1 .11 2 cells deep 6 in. - 75 - 0.66 - 1.5E 2 cells deep 8 in. - 75 - 0.59 - 1.85 2 cells deep 10 in. - 75 - 0.95 - 2.22 3 cells deep 12 in. - 75 - 0.40 - 2.60 Concrete blocks, three oval core: Sand and gravel aggregate 4 in. - 75 - 1.40 - 0.71 R in. - 75 - 0.90 - 1.11 75 - 0.78 - 1.28 Cinder aggregate 3 in. - 75 - 1.16 - 0.86 4 in. - 75 - 0.90 - 1.11 S in. - 75 - 0.58 - 1.72 _ 12 in. - 75 - 0.53 - 1.89 Lightweight aggregate 1 3 in - ]5 - 0.79 - 1.27 (expanded shale, clay, slate 4 in. - 75 - 0.67 - 1.50 or slag; pumice) 8 in. - 75 - 0.50 - 2.00 12 in. 75 0.49 2.27 Concrete blocks, rectangular core) • Sand and gravel aggregate 2 core, 8 in. 36 lb - 45 - 0.96 - 1.04 Same with filled coresi - 45 - 0.52 - 1.93 Lightweight aggregate (expanded shale, clay, slate or slag, pumice): 3 core, bin. 19lb - 95 - 0.61 - 1.66 Same with filled cores' 45 - 0.33 - 2.99 _ 2 pore, 8 in. 24 Ib.v - 45 - 0 46 - 2.18 Same with lilted cores' - 45 - 0.20 - 6.03 3 core, 12 in. 3816! - 45 - 0.40 - 2.48 Same with filled cores' - 45 0.17 6.8E Stone, lime or sand - 75 12.50 - 0.08 - Gypsum partition tile: 3 X 12 X 30 in. solid - 75 - 0.79 - 1.26 3 X 12 X 30 in. 9 -cell - 75 - 0.74 - 1.35 4 X 12 X 30 in. 3 -cell - 75 - 0.60 - 1.67 METALS (See Chapter 30, Table 3) PLASTERING Cement plaster, sand aggregate.. 116 75 5 -0 - 0.20 - MATERIALS Sand aggregate P in. - 75 - 13.3 - 0.08 Sand ag regate 3 in - 75 - 6.66 - 0.16 Gypsum plaster: Lightweight aggregate din. 95 75 - 3.12 - 0.32 Lightweight aggregate ' in. 45 75 - 2.67 - 0.39 Lightweight agg. on metal lath ; in. - 75 - 2.13 - 0.47 Perlite aggregate 45 75 1.5 - 0.67 - Sand aggregate 105 75 5.6 - 0.18 - Sand aggregate 1 in. 105 75 - 11.10 - 0.09 Sand aggregate 1 in. 105 75 - 9.10 - 0.11 Sand aggregate on metal lath in. - 75 - 7.70 - 0.1 Vermiculite aggregate 45 75 . 1.7 - 0.59 - ROOFING Asbestos-cement shingles 120 75 - 4.76 - 0.21 Asphalt roll roofing 70 75 - 6.50 - 0.15 Asphalt shingles 70 75 - 2.27 - 0.44 Built -up roofing $ in. 70 75 - 3.00 - 0.33 0.35 Slate tin. - 75 - 20 -00 - 0.05 Wood shingles, plain a plastic film faced - - 75 - 1.06 - 0.94 0.31 SIDING Shingles i MATERIALS Asbestos-cement 1 120 75 - 4.76 - 0.21 (ON FLAT SURFACE) Wood, 16 in., 71 exposure 1 - 1 75 j - 1.15 - 0.87 -0.31 A-24 APPENDIX - CHARTS AND TABLES d 2ECEIVED JA, 4 3i� • ., e t7 2 QT( [X . �.:a ®Dts l:✓ VI LJ ©orm Mar]Apr •� Bricklnstitut Ameiica 1750 Old Meadow Road, McLean, Virginia 22101 1977 „ _ THERMAL TRANSMISSION CORRECTIONS FOR DYNAMIC CONDITIONS —M FACTOR INTRODUCTION The slower response of heavyweight, as opposed to ommends that the median of extremes of temp - lightweight, building elements to changes in tempera- erasure be used in load calculations for lightweight lure is a well documented fact. This slower response walls, the 99 percentile temperature values be is due to the heat stored in massive elements, which used for moderate weight walls, and the 971 per - reflect more slowly the ambient temperature changes. centile temperature values be used for massive This property is referred to as: (I) Thermal Storage (heavyweight) walls. (These values are found in Capacity: (2) Thermal Inertia; and (3) Capacity lnsu- Table I of Chapter 33 of the Handbook of Fun - lation, danenml.r.) This recommended procedure for This property is inherent in brick masonry walls be- calculations means that the loads for lightweight cause of their relatively high mass. As a result of this walls are based on temperature differentials that- Lapacity Insulation and the dynamic outside weather are 8 to 12 degrees gre:nei than those for heavy - conditions. brick masonry walls. and other massive weight walla 1 lm exact chilerence will. of eourse, building elements. almost never reach a steady -state depend on the specific location of the building. ( condition. Thus, the actual peak loads in a building of 2. To determine the peak cooling loads (heat gain) , I brick masonry will be reduced, permitting the use of and cooling equipment sizes. the ASHRAE, smaller sized equipment and resulting in more efficient Handhoof of Fundamentals provides tables of operation, and a consequent savings in energy. Total Equivalent Temperature Differentials The superior thermal performance of massive walls (TETD) for use in the calculation procedure. The due to the thermal inertia or.capacity insulation prop- TETD is a modification of the actual temperature erties has long been recognized. This superior perfor- differential that considers geographical location, mance has been reflected in reduced sizes of heating surface color, solar radiation, wall orientation, and cooling equipment, lowered peak loads, and re- time of day. and the mass of the element. duced energy consumption. Each of these two calculation procedures was de- The thermal storage property of massive materials veloped in order to approximate more closely actual was utilized in historical times by the use of large mas- peak - loading, and to predict more accurately the re- sive central fireplaces. 'these were fired during the sponse of the building elements to the cverchanging daytime hours and the stored heat was radiated from ambient exterior conditions, referred to here as dy- the massive fireplace to heal the interior during the namic conditions, as opposed to static (steady - state) night. The Indians of the desert Southwestern United conditions. This permits the designer to size equipment Stales built their homes of massive adobe masonry to more accurately for more efficient operation. take advantage of this superior performance. Their The thermal storage benefits of massive elements homes remained coo) during the hot daytime hours. can be reasonably quantified with the use of computers. Heat stored in the massive walls allowed the inhabit- There are several complex computer programs avail - ants to remain comfortable during the cool night time able for equipment sizing and energy consumption cal - hours. culations. However. since these programs and the ap- The thermal storage benefits of massive materials propriate computers are not always available to the are qualitatively recognized in the recommended average designer. the need existed for a method of ASHRAE calculation procedures for peak loads and calculation which would make the benefits of thermal equipment sizing for both heating and cooling. storage available through the use of hand calculations. e 1. To determine the peak loads and heating equip- This Technical Notes explains what the M Factor ment sizing, the ASHRAE. Handbook of Fun- is and how to use it. It describes how the M Factor dumenrnlc recommends the use of a smaller tem- was developed. and also provides a calculation proce- per amre differential to account for the behavior dure not requiring computers which will take into ac- of mass in building structures. Chapter 21 rev count We henebts of mass - This Technical Notes also illustrates how the Climatic Conditions. The climatic conditions for the • M Factor can he used in heal loss calculations and to study were based upon hourly weather tapes obtained obtain the equivalent and adjusted U and R values for from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin- �_' various weight walls in several geographic locations. istration for ten major cities for a ten year period (1955 - Methods for determining U and R values and steady- 1964). The cities selected had a broad range of climatic state heat losses are discussed in Technical Notes 4 conditions. They are: Chicago, Illinois; Washington, Revised. D.C.; Boston, Massachusetts; Fort Worth, Texas; Los DEVELOPMENT OF THE M FACTOR Angeles, California; Seattle, Washington; Atlanta, General Georgia; Jacksonville, Florida; Minneapolis, Minne- sota; and Denver, Colorado. The Masonry Industry Committee', recognizing the Design Day Selection. It was necessary to establish need for a simplified method to quantify the benefits a design day for each calendar month for each city. of mass for use in heat transfer calculations, commis- Before this could be done, a typical year within the ten sioned the consulting engineering firm of Hankins and year period had to be established by a statistical aver - Anderson, Inc. of. Richmond, Virginia and Boston, aging technique. Once the typical design year was es- Massachusetts to conduct a study to develop and quan- lablished, a design day for each month was determined tify the difference between the dynamic response of by choosing the second highest or second lowest daily walls and the steady- state. It was not the intent of the temperature for each month. The design day was then MIC nor of Hankins and Anderson to create a new used in the study to determine the heat losses or heat design calculation procedure, but only to develop a gains. method to modify the widely used steady -state calcu- Wall Orientations. Because of variations in solar ra- 1 lation procedure to account for the performance of diction for different orientations, it was decided to use massive walls. all 8 orientations. The orientations of the wall in the This study began in January of 1975 and was coat- study were, N, NE, E, SE. S, SW, W, and NW. Heat I pleted in January of 1976. This time included that nec- losses and heat gains were calculated for all walls for 1 essary for the determination of the inputs by the tech- each orientation. -. nical staff of MIC working with Hankins and Ander- ' son, and also the development of the format of the final Results of the Study report. The final report of the study contained over 1200 { _ - The Study pages of text_ and computer print out. The technical The study was performed using a computer program staff of MIC plotted and analyzed the raw data and developed by Hankins and Anderson. The program developed a set of curves that can be used in conjunc- utilized- the "Response Factor Method" contained in lion with the steady -state calculation procedure. The the NBSLD program developed by the National Bu- 460,800 numbers obtained from the study formed the reau of Standards. The NBSLD program is used to basis for the M Factor curves shown in Fig. I. calculate heating and cooling loads and is widely ac- Figure 2 is an example of the raw data plots used to cepted by mechanical systems designers. develop the M Factor curves. It shows the 120 lb /ft' The inputs for the study were 10 wall types with curve from Fig. 1 fitted to the range of correction values various weights and steady -state U values. 10 .sets of obtained for the peak four hours from, 6:00 a.m. to climatic conditions, a statistically selected design day 9:00 a.m. in the six month period from October through of 24 hours for each of 12 months. and 8 orientations. March. A study of the summer month heat gains re- Wall Types. Ten different walls were selected for the vealed that they were sufficiently close to those ob- study. The weights and steady -state U values for each tained using the current TETD calculation procedure type are given in Table 1. The walls and climatic con- that no additional modification of the coo Ing caieula- ditions were the only variables of the study. The walls tion is warranted. included a steel faced sandwich panel, a wood frame The curves shown in Fig. I were developed by uti- wall, and various brick masonry concrete masonry Iizing the heat losses occurring at 8:00 a.m. in the month walls. The thermal properties and densities of concrete of January. The technical staff also investigated the and brick are such that they are interchangeable for all hours of 6:00 a.m., 7:00 a.m., and 9:00 a.m., and the practical purposes in thermal calculations. The study additional months of October, November, December, also included lightweight concrete materials which February. and March. The 8:00 a.m. values of January t have slightly different thermal properties than heavy were found to be most representative and conservative, . weight concrete and brick. The walls were selected as as illustrated by examination of Fig. 2. representative of the types of walls in general use in It can be seen from the curves that in areas where construction. the number of degree days are high the M Factors arc t -- - - - - -- also high. In the colder climates, the ambient condi j me Masonry Industry cnatmiuee i..an,fa,aee of me mn„winx. sots mni- tions more closely approximate a steady -state condi- gar of America: International Masonry Institute: International Union of R Bricklayer. and Allied Craft amen; I .ntrer. International Union of Norm lion. The M Factors from the curves are to be used to , n o. M Ct11111.1% 101. Amociatam 01 Am National Concrete modify only heat loss calculations and should not be n n . : National I e n. ,,t n and r u d <eatem As- used in confine calculations. t d 2 • ANNUAL NELVW HEATING DEGREE OAY51 x81.15 N BASE) 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 vao ■■■■■■ im, .� nn ■■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■■■..■uuI• n... ■ ■. I ■ ■■ ,olc tes rs I ■■ al.. ■ ■ ■■ ■� itl. ■■��■■�p. mom. ■ ■ ■m as MEMO ■/� p =S - i WM ■■ui■ - • ■■■ ■■ imp.Oi a ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Imam SSW ■■ a: ■■■■ r.■■■' ■■ ■■■■■■■■■ - to ANSE Mon -g Mar mmoreimmmummemin Emma m om -AmismAmmom mmoommilmmumms mama smo ■am eo a . _ • � ■N : ■■■.■::■:::■ :V mom \■s_ a. s ■...M■■■■ N■ ■■ ■■■■ • ■I. °. ■■ ■� ■ ■�N Ilimom ■■■■■N ■■�■m■■.■.•. ■■•.•..•••..••. • . = ■.■ t 1 .'SC: 1111 =1.4::1 ■■■■■■■■1■■11■■ _ ■■■■■■■■ MOM ■■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ : C:� : ■ :_::: =:C =::ommomi s a :: : :■ : ■..N■ ■■■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■■■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■.■ • 2000 4000 woo 0000 Iono ANNUAL FAHRENHEIT HEATING DEGREE DAYS (65 ° F BASE) Capacity Insulation Correction Graph FIG. 1 3 • iN 40.41 W H, G 0E01* U57612911 F BASEI ,{ ,00 a" 0 9 000 3000 4000 5000 TABLE 1 1y .. ,fir ~I 1 M Factor Study Walls ES00 � 0 4131 T Wall No. Weight, Ib /ft (kg/m2) U Value • 1 1 42 ( 20.51) 0.088 (0.500) i g 7.3 ( 35.64) 0 -076 (0.432) _ 1� 4 1 I 1 3 44.3 (216.29) 0.173 (0.982) s V 1 1 4 55.0 (268.53) 0.131 (0.744) 11 g , I I 5 45.9 (224.10) 0.072 (0.409) 1 `g I 1 I I 6 62.0 (302.71) 0.273 (1.550) 4 • 70 — 1 7 -- 7 72.7 (354.95) 0.139 (0.789) di E= v w., Q x w1 J e 8 84.3 (41 1.59) 0.161 (0.914) t ° eI 3 1 of - Q 1 0 � . o 9 71.1 (347.14) 0.178 (1.011) 4 el c �1 c is - - 10 116.0 (566.36) 0.131 (0.744) so 6000 _ 0 2000 4000 ANNUAL FAHRENHEIT HEATING DEGREE DAYS (65 °F BASE) M Factor — Adjusted 6 Month Average 4 = Indoor design temperature, degrees F (Kelvin). FIG.2 t = Outdoor design temperature. degrees F (Kel- vin)- USE OF THE M FACTOR General `Modified Steady - State, As previously stated, it was not the intent of the To modify the heat loss calculations for the effects MIC to change the basic formula used for calculating of mass, use the following formula: heat transmission losses, but to develop a modifier to — quantify the benefits of massive walls, that will more • H = AU (t, — t M (2) No - closely approximate actual performance. where: How to Use the M Factor M = The modification factor taken from Fig. I. The M Factor may be used: I. To modify heat losses as determined by the Equivalent U or R steady -state calculation procedure. When a specified U or R value is required by code, 2. To determine the equivalent U and R values for the equivalent U or R value for the element may he massive walls. determined as follows: 3. To determine adjusted U and R values. U (3) In some instances it will be necessary to determine - He = — ryl heat losses in order to comply with energy conservation regulations; in others. because of the governing energy R,. = R,. (M) _ (4) standards. it may be necessary to comply with pre- scribed U values or R values. where: U = Equivalent overall coefficient of thermal trans - Steady - State Heat Losses mission of massive walls or elements, Btu /hour/ Heat losses determined by the steady -state method square foot /degree F temperature difference are calculated by the following formula: (watts /square meter/Kelvin). . U,. = The calculated or required overall steady -state H = AU (t — t (1) coefficient of thermal transmission for the walls or elements under consideration, Btu /hour; where: square foot /degree F temperature difference H = Heat loss transmitted through the walls or other (watts /square meter /Kelvin). elements of the building envelope, Btu /hour R = The equivalent thermal resistance of massive (watts). walls or elements under consideration, Fahren- A = Area of the element under consideration, square heir degrees /Btu /hour /square foot (square feet (square meters). meter Kelvin /watt). • U = Overall coefficient of transmission of the walls R, = The calculated or required steady -state thermal or other elements under consideration. Btu /hour/ resistance for the walls or elements under con - square foot /degree F temperature difference sideration. Fahrenheit degrees /Btu /hour /square (watts /square meter /Kelvin). foot (square meter Kelvin/watt). 4 2. 2,..71; r V ern - • « it yr r • — W I ; CALCULATION FOR WALL . - .( - t r • LINE ( TABLE W -1 WALL AREAS SQ. FT'. C Ai C: ITS I. 'GROSS WALL AREA (A0) . / /39,C,L 2. WINDOW AREA (Ag) - a/,.. d . 3. DOOR AREA (Ad) ca. 7 - 4. OTHER (SPECIFY) TA E W- 5. I OTHER (SPECIFY) _._ - FRAMING AND CAVITY RATIO 6. �, OPAQUE WALL AREA (Aoo) - LINE 1. - SUM 2 THRU 5' 6 5 6;.7 e STUD FRAMING CAVITY 7. FRAMING AREA (Afr) SPACING RATIO RATIO LINE 6. X TABLE W -4 - v° 6, t, , =RUM •22 .78 8. CAVITY AREA (A J. .20 .80 • LINE 6. X TABLE W -4 — ais .15 .85 TABLE W -2 OPAQUE WALL CALCULATIONS FRAMING AND CAVITY SOURCE OF WALL THERMAL _ MATERIALS WINTER HEATING R VALUES RESISTANCE - CAVITY FRAMING OT R 9. OUTSIDE AIR FILM 0./7 O. EXTERIOR FINISH /V'" s /,... ,r. / " --- na . OUTSIDE SHEATHING --- . FRAMING 8 „ cad, c /S /.0 d r / - - \ . CAVITY INSULATION =1.1�� AVIV A R S'ACE nen Le - 15. INTERIOR FINISH , O./ / 16. INSIDE AIR FILM . -.6g 7. OTHER SPECIFY -- -- -.- OTHER SPECIFY -- -- • 9. TOTAL RESISTANCE Rt SUM OrLZNES” 9" TRAIT 19 709 1. Ufr FRAMING - O � 1 /Rt (FRAMING COLUMN) . U� CAVITY 1/R (CAVITY COLUMN) U OTHER ®.� . 1 /Rt (OTHER COLUMN) TABLE W -3 SUMMATION OF TRANSMISSION VALUES FOR WALL SOURCE U -VALUE FROM LINE . ARE FROM LIN U -VALUE X A FRAMING 0.,. / / LINE 0. 8G 6,7 _ 0 d OTHER - W °---- 1.91212111111. OTHER IND•WS -i 9 R /2B= /0 .762 DOORS p� R -s`si'.9 ..9+f- TOTAL ----..1 Ao = p SUM U X A= 292,S/ /¢ SUM OF (U- VALUES X CORRESPONDING AREAS) _ 0 U WALL - GROSS WALL AREA (A0) • • .� Uo CALCULATION FOR ROOF /CEILING - /4-/ LINE TABLE R -1 ROOF /CEILING R S S 1. GROSS ROOF AREA 02. 2. SKYLIGHT AREA R. / , 1. ROOF VFNT AREA - 4. OTHER (SPECIFY) - .--- - - - 5. NET (OPAQUE) ROOF AREA q `� T TABLE R -4 FRAMING AND CAVITY RATIO LINE 1 - SUM 2 THRU 4 /3 ` FRAME FRAMING • CAVITY 6. FRAMING AREA (Af SPACING RATIO - RATIO IMF 5 X TABIF R -4 8 .,(o 4- 12" 0.13 - 0.87 7. CAVITY AREA (AC) 16" 1 TNF 5 X TART F R -4 /3 /✓, -3Lp ✓.24" I 0.10 0.90 0.06 1 0.94 TABLE R -2 OPAQUE ROOF /CEILING CALCULATIONS SOURCE OF ROOF /CEILING HEATING THERMAL MATERIALS WINTER R- VAIIIES RESISTANCE - FRAMING CAVITY 8. OUTSIDE AIR FILM - O o,/ 7 9 . EXTERIOR FINISH -. r »/ .. Ur 0.33 0. 10. OUTSIDE SHEATHING 1" r' 7 1 /r - /.2-.1- 11. FRAMING 2x 69 ;cam. 2+" t.fir 12. INSULATION _ --- , , / 2 13. CAVITY AIR SPACE - '- -- 14. INTERIOR FINISH ./ g le T 6t O,Y$ 6 ,91 1 15. INSIDE AIR FIIM ee,4/ _ o.2a / 16. OTHER (SPECIFY) -- 17. OTHER (SPECIFY) - 18. TOTAL RESISTANCE (Rt) /b/IS` Z 2 SUM OF LINES 8 THRU 17 _ 19. Ufr (FRAMING) qq I R FRAMING • M 8 . t3 `rt 8V ._ 20. UC (CAVITY) o 0 4-44 1 R CAVITY COLUMN _ _ i_ TART F R -3 SIIMMATIIN OF TRANSIM SSTON VAI IIFS OR ROOF /rFTI TNG FRAMING 0 � 0 - = LINE 19. :43 I TNF 6 222/ `L' CAVITY - a.o4 LINE 20. /2. LINE 7. SW, '7G¢ SKYLIGHT 0.5 ' 1/R ea,/ LINE 2. 4. ROOF VENT - 1/R °' LINE 3. i . OTHER 1/R - - -. LINE 4. OTHER - -- 1/R ---- LINE 5. 10IAL .-- .._ AO = I/402, / SUM U X A = 7/, •0 fe- p U ROOF /CEILING = SUM OF (U- VALUES X CORRESPONDING AREAS) = 0,0 6"i/ GROSS ROOF /CEILING AREA (An) - $ 7 /4 /L'- - lock VtiliS /• Gvu // if/ ° 7. l � <-7-x a n x- c.r,g F3' ... P = c ° Z C')(3. /Oa s °" 1 /C I . Y j . m J/ O/7 oC i p '. B _. 1 \ ° ' .' j /O' i C - e-61 ' c e (i. 7%/3) = zt 7 I /00 z 2 = /7/.8I 2 (7 /, g) _ /¢37 1 { 4 -7 f3'K2f3,7) = /7? 4 l lz A 7 - Z(29 -. 2.o7 it 7 074L = a / l , I 1 1 /Z_g3)(,� 7 /S'. a 8 I 3c(--' -' 60/t/Aki /32 ; 5 -11-- _ COUHTY J' � �� _ ____ELD 5-„.,k, °,f (14-3 ,.. • vex+ .lp\ w �� Colorado FF11 ., Q , STATE OF / 1, `:J - O ffice o f eulldlns 011loul *, 1 REOUEST FOR INSPECTION /S �� Da y Permit No. Re e Disldct No._ Tmc 3 i _ P � n Received � � ` �/ 2_d_ — f ___ cality goo Atlanta, Lo o. _ �G. .I eo m r+cto• HEATING Name a -' ELECTRICAL- PLUMBING B HE TI - . BU L n� G PLASTER' Efll ❑ EL Rouptt - -- ❑ Wale' [ w•.e . Fmbn Chimney ._..__- Sc Fetch Gn ... .._.. F r.mtnn Final.- _........ F;,,; >h —_.._ Underground ❑ AM. Footing w ,,,,,n f d ..... Li eM. Weather on ❑ RTAOV FOR INSPECTION Tnu.t.- — Fd.— t un. at on ❑ '� We d. ertip GARFIELD COUNTY - • - STATE OF Colorado f b% �• • Office of Building official R EQUEST FOR INSPECTION 15¢3 Pemma No 1 Date Received st6a No- P ned Di Job Addmn Nameri A _ • —Contractor HEATING Name ! E PLUMBING I•UILUINa PTA ERING v ❑ Bough ❑ Bough _ - - - -- ❑ ras Wiring ❑ Fin ❑ Found n - "' r ❑ Fini h WLin9..❑ Finet ❑ Fiaw•et._..__.❑ Seniors 0 Water Hever.. ❑ F ii a l neY- ....•" 111 flip ❑ Mown. ............ ❑ Cat ❑ Framing ScrmcM1 ❑ flown ce apoot ❑ w tt ea ..,e r p r " Finish ❑ Unuerground ❑ wea ❑ wauoo ...... 0 �.m� ed F.i -_ P ' - I l u atron ❑ READY FOR T . LLf1 c______ impaction M,TC _ - -- ...... fog -- GARFIELD COUNTY v - - STATE OF Colorado Office of Building Official . :EOUEST FOR INSPECTION Per roil No. Dam Time 3 . .M• ' D istrict No Received � / _ Y � • � � Job Addicts Local ly • Owner's ❑ R 6 yr i Contractor Contractor HEATIN Name I - ELECTRICAL PLUMBING BUILDING atio PLASTERING `�"• Bowh 0 Foundation.......❑ W^h- - --".0 Rough i, in0 -❑ Rough /D Final _ _ ❑ Wales Henn_ ❑ inel ..... CnimneY........... ❑ Svach_. _....__❑ Motwe Wiring. Galen ❑, Framing--'-" - ..:...... ❑ BBrown _.. ....._ -0 M°iort Cesspool ... .. ..❑ . eat eatb no ❑ Wallboard i ❑ �- ❑ Underground ❑ Ud 10 pl a prf ❑ E Mo �11 BEADY FOR INSPECTION Tue Wed. hors. rs. Mon. elfi (N Q'J Inspection Mad i r'- r _------------- Inspector ./.. ,