HomeMy WebLinkAbout03007 ! 3007 )
I
I GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT Permit N°- i i
4 109 8th Street Suite 303 Assessor's Parcel No. Y
R i Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801
r Phone (303) 945 -8212
N
f } This does not constitute I
t 1 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT a building or use permit. f e
%j PROPERTY
Co 8l� a D� t I
k Owner's Name 10tOn GALL Present Address R 0 • i4ol vk honb-
f
.S /S/ Cou Road 3 �6 5; (-f G aft5 9qs -y9v
) � System Location j
'
4 /
� Q A c
t Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. W! C2 ` tafgl,S EXfi✓f ft) fir\ ; i.
rf
SYSTEM DESIGN
! 4 .
O I
�, _Se ptic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other '
i i
1 ; n u
t / fig Percolation Rate (minutes /inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) i '
11
i t Required Absorption Area - See Attached
1
- 6 -f-- p Special Setback Requirements: t 2
�s
I, Date 74 _ Inspector 440 ` - . Q� oolY, 7344.14-4- F. ,, I
I (. FINAL SYSTEMIINSPECTI AND APPROVAL (as Installed) r 3
- .2r: ' t Call for Inspection (24 hou notice) Before Covering Installation .
t System Installer
Septic Tank Capacity - / *etr \ i
i �' n - /
Septic Tank Manufacturer or Tra Name 4 ;
Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface
/QS
39 X50 2e,KJ F/4-4 J ,� 5 D ,
e A bsor ption Area 4 '
t ,
0 I 0 ,,e,g 1 ' e. '
Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name ;
\/ a ,
f
Adequate compliance with County and State regulations /requirements / r t
k ^ /
Other 1
r
f b Date_ r ear— 9T 57 ..
•s
I ; RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
1 '
f .
• *CONDITIONS: i'
i 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 3 r
25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984.
7 2. This permit is valid only for connection I to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- k
nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a i
' , requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. .. f
) n 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or stalls an individual sewage disposal system Ina manner which involves a knowing and material f
I) variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class 1, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine — 8 ?
,s
A t months In Jail or both). ; 1
White - APPLICANT Yelbw- DEPARTMENT ,
S e ,gti"v - ( 00 0
PeA-C rl./r¢C = ( S2 M(f )
or- a CDrto
( ) (1.0 etc._ L &L.c K- r r c c p --_ 9 0 9
0 LEAC 4- C At .4"-et e S - Q C` e + P( &c . ? Sc(S
L CAck - &me 44-er (2 1 ) l 1`i
ill' _ �� 1 6
14 C. q Picea;
5) a
c YI 02/K3 = (2SO CAL. 3coorrc 7
1) 1 e
ek) £' pit cc
3) 47 lc
•
W
• 11 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION
OWNER (2-PRY / // 7
ADDRESS 7. . 2ox /80/ (get,woob . * /as PHONE 9n -- -yyva.
CONTRACTOR R',WPt
ADDRESS PHONE
PERMIT REQUEST FOR PQ NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area,
habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4).
LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY;
Near what City of Town 9 /kr Size of Lot .2 Ae1 S
Legal Description or Address ,4)7 .2 8oe C x F'm7 )7 49AI
WASTES TYPE: GX) DWELLING ( ) TRANSIENT USE
( ) COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ( ) NON - DOMESTIC WASTES
( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: ...c /.ul -,c£ tAvi7/1 Res, B Fti c �
Number of Bedrooms 7ZJo 62) 7FM�Rt QR(4) Number of Persons S
( ) Garbage Grinder (x) Automatic Washer (1C) Dishwasher
SOURCE ND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: fx) WELL ( ) SPRING ( ) STREAM OR CREEK
If supplied by Community Water, give name of supplier:
DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: fliat 7o& / /Jl /st£
Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? AA>
A site plan k required to be submitted that indicates the following MINIMUM distances:
Leach Field to Well: 100 feet
Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet
Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet
Septic System to Property Lines: 10 feet
YOIJR INDIVIDUAL, SEWAGE DISPOSAL, SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED
WITHOUT A SITE PLAN,
GROI ND CONDITIONS:
Depth to first Ground Water Table / 4" Far , E 2 61
Percent Ground Slope APPA-ox 3
2
TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED:
SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANT ( ) VAULT
( ) VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, POTABLE USE
( ) PIT PRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, OTHER USE
( ) CHEMICAL TOILET ( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
FINAL DISPOSAL BY:
Q Q ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
( ) UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER
( ) ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND
( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? 410
PERCOLATION TEST RRSI TITS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does
the Percolation Test) facer Arne seta
Minutes la per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes N8 per inch in hole NO. 3
Minutes Z O per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes per inch in hole NO. _
Name, address and telephonegQf RPE who made soil absorption tests: . "fl's,o.Qm' - &2A.t l Se7P&NM Ave
Soars _nAA AqV (r crrvwe O CP/ vG 5- et) (von) Pvs 29.75
Name, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system:
Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and
additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the
applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the
permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations
made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be
represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the
local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further
understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any
permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law.
Signed r Date / 3 ,4?
PLEASE DRAW AN ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY!!
3
, • •
.
r /e . • :....; •
.. \
..e 1 - 1-. .•.. 4
?„...::•,..)," \ 1 h ,I t -. . fi
- . i IA
\ ... 1 ....... 1 \\ j- A •^" • c / • -11 scH • L ge
.• -
• -4 Z.., -.. ...... ....
1 0 ,1M tiir I j 1 r a ndr alb s ' Ili V : - \ 1 I -b--.." 4
. 1( • ‘"""-
. ',..' ..
r. .. m t• ) - 4i ''' .„
yl 3 ,.
1 f‘.1 ' i 5 - -.S‘. 6 \ tit4
* s ireS , I. 3 (44,.__ S e'. \ 1 Ki . .
‘,„,•1'4-$ 4 •-i-L: -.. yik• _. . / i, :akir- '-
a teel l
* Iv
I r."-;....
" k - ' 'Or 1 -- ,c -
rS • /N116 , a i.
tie
4
ta, /
toy) , error a 1
sk ,,
'asfi w ar
IIIIM::.■ 1. tr :S Igi 1 .. S ..
N k , .
:.:. ,,,... I •
re A: i i ii 'ea ''''.. 1 ;2■ •• -
Im0 .' c . . Ar ri I R i tl 1 ‘t .. b4' ‘ - i 'tic/ r .,fr• • •
........ . , f r, 1, i
4 0 i c al lif 1 — ' VT; ..... "' sin' ; il
II I l a
1 .
A c • ••• (4,- A cr-7/1, ...• 1 .
..,_ ••. a / 7 ,; . -4 • ,:i
..; • ;
--'N-----/- .... i- ic j i .i:•/
• /
--; \. ( (3 I 'let1; . i .
` .4,-; i .., v ..e.,,..1 (
)1 -A
• 1
1 . . .
I I — * --(1 .‘\ \ . ca .1
., . )A‘ :, r ps ‘..\\ .. r
—?, • \ ii ) , , 1 \
--. • .. .---- 1 • .a k i. , , -
. . a
. ri' ire
/ )011,i
,•,._;
,,,,77. . /Al
7. \ yir
, „a.... \ , ......... ; , 7
! -1 0 11 1
a :
gc --. .9 .0 I . ,,
) *, ,
r 1. I
L2 1
1
• .. i I
‘4\ \A1 7
„ •
v•
1111-2, 1 .
s
1 'Mitt )1111.1" i 1 - %
lin " :
as , s7 s af Th,),„ 9 ,
ai , sorikr:Art, 1
A.. r•Nri '. -411 16., 4. -.• Ai
. • •\-: ....
, c i , 1 . 441rti ,•,,,,,--.,.;;,, :
A--="trw<' • . \ • ,,-/
v4 \\ ...iiTilkk
i dswtycmg4 ,,,
. ... vv.
t 1.1 111,5 ir
C kli i ? + :: 1 Nt -fg A ZAP )1 2 4
1 ..... I
. 1 i '1• X . ... \ - ( .t,,,,t;7-4-,J,5piicit
i y ,.
_ ., . . - 0?_ • 1 lie.A ...- • 4%
• i / \ c
Nit 121111111Witi ' :P a l ' ' s '•
, O
C?
N t
0 r
1 i I A <
I 1 I
I
C
I I I o � - o > L -1
I fn
I 3 $ d
1 o I� ' 1i G0 m t r -A
, 1 1 0 (D Z O z ii3
ig . I t. a a IV
•
I 0 ' ; : i " X ;lc))
i V" 2 CD cn co m
" III
si :4 ; 1 % l e Z t, n .
. 1 v 0 - V) CD
^i
i A
ti
1 t , 0
I m ° OI '+
1 +"
D r
1
! 1
1 e
1
1
1 w
1 / t - 2 .,
1
1) . . I,-
I
1
1 v
a
r lD
in
N O
g CA
HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
July 20, 1998 Fax 970 945 -8454
Phone 970 945 -7988
Gary Tillotson
P.O. Box 1801
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Job No. 198 451
Subject: Percolation Test and Bearing Soil Conditions, Proposed Residence, Lot
2, Burris Exemption, 346 Road, 1 Mile East of Mamm Creek Road,
Garfield County, Colorado.
Dear Gary:
As requested, a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. conducted
percolation testing at the subject site for septic disposal system design and evaluated the
exposed soils for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations
for the septic system and foundation designs are presented in this report.
The residence will be a modular structure above a full basement and located in the
uphill, southern part of the property. The septic disposal system will be located in the
west - central part of the property.
Bearing Conditions: We initially observed the site on June 27, 1998. An 8 foot deep
profile pit and 3 percolation pits had been dug with a backhoe. The septic tank had
been installed just uphill to the south of the pits. The soils exposed in the excavations
consisted of sandy clay with scattered gravel. Results of swell- consolidation testing
performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on Fig. 1, indicate the soils are
slightly compressible under natural low moisture content and light loading and
moderately to highly compressible when wetted and loaded. The laboratory test results
area summarized in Table I. No free water was observed in the excavations and the
soils were slightly moist.
Considering the conditions exposed in the pit excavations and the nature of the proposed
construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an
allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf should be adequate for support of the
proposed residence. The soils appear to compress when wetted and there could be some
post - construction settlement of the foundation if the bearing soils become wet. Footings
should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns.
Loose and disturbed soils exposed in the excavation should be removed and the bearing
level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be
provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection.
Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local
anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation
walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure
based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on -site soil as backfill. A
perimeter foundation drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of
hydrostatic pressure behind the basement walls and prevent wetting of the lower level.
Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on -site soils compacted to
Gary Tillotson
July 20, 1998
Page 2
at least 95% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill
placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent
ponding within at least 10 feet of the building.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on July 17, 1998 to evaluate the
feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three
percolation holes had been dug in the proposed disposal area. The test holes (nominal
12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) had been hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe
pits and soaked with water the day prior to our testing. The percolation test results are
presented in Table II. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the
percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration
septic disposal system. An average percolation rate of 50 minutes per inch can be used
for design of the infiltration septic disposal system. We recommend the infiltration area
be oversized due to the relatively slow percolation rates.
Limitations: The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our
observation of the soils exposed within the pit excavations and do not include
subsurface exploration to below the loaded depth of the building foundation influence.
This study is based on the assumption that soils beneath the footings in the building area
have equal or better support than those exposed in the pit excavations. Variations in the
subsurface conditions could increase the risk of foundation movement. In order to
reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the
building excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by
subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter.
If there are any questions or we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - P • .,-" •r ica• :., ECHNICAL, INC.
�....
i ' 4 kF.
.7} S
1522 •
•
Steven L. Pa , �.E. / ' :
:?0 7 Ct s`': l
v
SLP /ro , Jj•• �s ioea� � i■c
OF Gd
attachments
H - GEOTECH
•
Moisture Content = 8.5 percent
Dry Density Weight = 110 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Clay
From: Bottom of Perc Pit, 6/27/98
0
1 Compression
upon
wetting
2 -
te
c
4 3
N
L
a.
4
0
C N \
U
5
6 \b.
7
8
1.0 10 100
0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
198 451 I H - LAWLA I SWELL- CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I Fig. 1
•
•
\ 0§
§ f 15 (
- O e
-o -o
) a
) ; §
O §( \
\ §
k o w
t
e
w / §
o CC <°`
\\
\/j E■!« 0
-J §
4 0
/ �
{ \
o
a. & ! •_
_ §
4 1 /
|§_
|| ` w a
AO
$ C 2 2
( —
$ coo
a.
•
• HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE II
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 451
HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE
(INCHES) INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION
(MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL LEVEL RATE
(INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (MIN. /INCH)
P-1 46 30 12 10% 1'/
(north) 10y 9%. 1 /•
9% 8'h %
8% 8 % 48
P -2 48 30 9% 8'% 1'%
(south) 83/4 7'/. '%
7'% 7'A h
6% y 60
P.3 54 30 133/4 11 2%
(west) 11 10'% '/•
10'% 9'/. %
9 9 34 48
Note: Percolation holes were hand dug in bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on July 16, 1998.
Percolation tests were conducted on July 17, 1998.