HomeMy WebLinkAbout03010 I) %
: Y C '
` t 0 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATI DEPARTMENT Permit N_ 3 0 1 n *.)
ti 109 8th S treet Suite 303
+ Assessor's Parcel No.
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 t
, , Phone (303) 945 -8212 1
1
f, T his does not constitute k
( ' !
i INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT a building or use permit.
r } )
;.! PROPERTY
d t k
C o le 141 Res ag 3 ).1 V Owner's Name 5 � D�q sent Address CJ �� Phone
! i System Location t l 1'Z 1 1 (-, iC`A"vo°8 SQRI j a r b I ( O O 1
. k{
I Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. a
1. o C bC L E At oi- fc 1 E L 0 /2_ 0 °/d -----.-7° S 7c
r SYSTEM DESIGN Z) E ACAi L ' k A M t Q = SO P EIS p R
ei ) Iy
1 1 11 TA, Eke'Cel 42_ 11 7 � a 7 A ii, ,
t (' �� Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other ,,
y '`'-` -' 1 17 MtAM Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) )•
A'. t 4
e Required Absorption Area - See Attached
;t r Special Setback Requirements: ( l
t
• ,, Date - Inspector i r
• y
l , FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed)
L. + , Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation t
f I D id Al C` � 4
f 1 • System Installer ii, y Septic Tank Capacity / S 0 r7 d....e_ 'A '
• ,y
S eptic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name v 0 \ �'+�, {
l '` •
} Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface
Absorption Area W t I t F lc 7 - h 4 70E f (A � (n FY,r t^ l - -/ c�
,v
I tit F ( c 7 K /a 7v
A bsorption Aree Type and /or Manufacturer or Trade Neme ;
Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements t
i ll
, Other
1 ,..-c s 9 A r 7.
t ` Date ` ' Inspecto y - +
t '
t RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
a
a
a,
* CONDITIONS: 'i
„ 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter t, ,
25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984.
' ° 2. This permit Is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- !'i
nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a
requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit.
, 1 3. Any person w h o constructs, alters, or installs an i ndividual sewage disposal system In a manner which involves a knowing and material `,;
• y variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine -6 ■
months In )all or both). y
r i
? W hite - APPLICANT Yelkav - DEPARTMENT C
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION
OWNER cg IA Co(rf t
ADDRESS SC h'S' p7 g'J PHONE V. 8' 3.
CONTRACTOR &ro'4 IN-
ADDRESS 'y. 2 G '/ / / 7 Iz 6 CI 'S PHONE , 9h 4 t/2.7
PERMIT REQUEST FOR (4 NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area,
habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4).
LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACTIJTY.
Near what City of Town 6—le . /t (F S Size of Lot 'YO '9 -
Legal Description or Address .410 / 1 7 — R �I
WASTES TYPE: Y' DWELLING ( ) TRANSIENT USE
( ) COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ( ) NON - DOMESTIC WASTES
( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: ci cr.c P
Number of Bedrooms 3 Number of Persons 7'
Garbage Grinder ()d) Automatic Washer ()Q Dishwasher
501 JRCF AND TYPE OF WATER SI JPPI ,Y: ( ) WELL ( ) SPRING ( ) STREAM OR CREEK
If supplied by Community Water, give name of supplier:
DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM:
Was an effort made to connect to the Community System?
A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the following MINIMUJM distances:
Leach Field to Well: 100 feet
Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet
Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet
Septic System to Property Lines: 10 feet
YOUR INDIVIDUJAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILIL NOT RE ISSUED
WITHOUT A SITE PLAN,
GRO1 JND CONDITIONS:
Depth to first Ground Water Table
Percent Ground Slope
2
TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED:
M SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANT ( ) VAULT
( ) VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, POTABLE USE
( ) PIT PRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, OTHER USE
( ) CHEMICAL TOILET ( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
FINAL DISPOSAL BY:
ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
( ) UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER
( ) ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND
( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE?
pERCOLATION TEST REST ILTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does
the Percolation Test)
Minutes per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes per inch in hole NO. 3
Minutes per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes per inch in hole NO. _
Name, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests:
Name, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system:
Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and
additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the
applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the
permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations
made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be
represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the
local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further
understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any
permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law.
/ l
Signed /i Date g /� -fr
PLEASE DRAW AN ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY!!
3
tv GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945- 8212/(970) 285 -7972
PROCEDURE REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE GARFIELD COUNTY SEWAGE DISPOSAL
REGULATIONS.
,Step 1: Application
A. Obtain a standard "Individual Sewage Disposal System" application from the Building and Sanitation
Department, 109 8th Street, Suite 303, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601, 970 - 945 -8212 or 625-
5571.
B. Return completed application, map to property, site plan and diagram of site to the Building and
Sanitation Department (Pages 2 and 3) and building plans. INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL
SYSTEM PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT AN APPROVED BUILDING
PERMIT.
C. Make check or money order payable to "Garfield County Treasurer" (The cost for the permit fee and
percolation test is $150.00 or if a Registered Professional Engineer does the percolation test, the cost
is $50.00 permit fee). FEES ARE NOT REFUNDABLE.
D. Your Individual Sewage Disposal Permit will be issued along with your building permit provided no
prohibitive problems are encountered.
Step II: Percolation Tests -SEE DETAILED INSTRI ICTIONS ON PAGE 6
A Prepare three (3) percolation holes 4 feet deep, 8 to 12 inches in diameter, and 20 feet apart in the
area of the proposed leach field area (Instructions for post hole or back hoe holes are on page 4).
B. Fill percolation holes with water once for the required eight (8) hour soaking period.
C. Request percolation test by Sanitarian. (To avoid construction delay, we suggest arrangements for
percolation test be made at least 24 hours prior to the end of the soaking period). Please have at
least five (5) gallons of water for each hole available at the site for the percolation test.
!!!!IMPORTANT!!!! Please be advised that if the Sanitarian's initial field visit to your property reveals any unusual
difficulties such as high water table, excessive percolation rates, bedrock, etc., the services of
a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and/or Board of Health approval will be
required.
Step III: Final Inspection
A. When all components are in place, connected and ready to cover, request a final inspection by the
Sanitarian.
B. DO NOT backfill any part of the system prior to the inspection.
C. The initial fee covers the percolation test and one inspection before cover up. Any additional
percolation tests will be charged at $100.00 each and additional inspections will be charges at $42.00
each.
D. Upon final approval, carefully cover the entire system.
1
%
w'
r z , d
i g
1
CD
n P::- o
o co 0
N N
o
a r
0
S-
c
I \
CD
t o M N N Ve-
0. Er z
‘..
w
c B n '
C
g 2: ,
5); N C.
h 4.
Logi ba d p,=
o' ^IO Fr .o
7 C N "` co p ' O
•
C•O P e ` y
CD w N m ti
W r
H A � n
1 ra S 10. 0 2 G 8 S y
a E G <
w`< w / \
o
5' c
o
O
0 0 3
w
Z o
R.2
as
CD -
CA N
HepriarthPawlak Geotech TEL:970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:02 No.002 P.02
HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5040 Road 154
• Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax 970 945.8454
June 24, 1998 Phone 970 945-7958
Russ Coletti
0011 Deer Valley Drive
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Job No. 198 345
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence, Four Mile Road, One Mile Past Black Diamond Curve,
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Coletti:
As requested, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services
to you dated May 19, 1998. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the
proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are beyond the scope
of this study.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a one story wood frame
structure over a walkout basement level. Basement floor is proposed to be slab -on-
grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 6 feet. Foundation
• loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of
the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located
downhill to the southwest of the proposed residence.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re- evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site was vacant at the time of our field work. An access
driveway and a relatively level building area had been constructed prior to our site visit.
The natural ground surface in the building area slopes moderately steep to steep down
to the west. A cut up to about 15 feet high was used along the eastern side of the pad.
Up to about 10 feet of fill exists on the western portion of the pad. Vegetation outside
the building pad consists of scruboak, sagebrush, grass and weeds.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic
disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are
presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, consist of generally stiff to very stiff
sandy silty clay with scattered gravel and cobbles. About 5'h feet of soft fill materials
• from building pad grading was encountered above the natural clays in Pit 2. Results of
swell - consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the clay,
HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL:970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:02 No.002 P.03
•
Russ Coletti
v June 24, 1998
Page 2
presented on Fig. 3, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of
loading and wetting. One sample showed a moderately high expansion potential when
wetted under a constant light surcharge with an expansion pressure of about 8,000 psf.
The testing is summarized on Table I. No free water was observed in the pits at the
time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist.
Preliminary Foundation Recommendations: The natural clay soils encountered at the
site show an expansion potential when wetted. Shallow foundation placed on soils with
relatively high expansion potential can experience movement causing structural distress
if the clay is subjected to changes in moisture content. A drilled pier foundation may be
feasible at the site to penetrate the expansive materials and place the bottom of the piers
in a zone of relatively stable moisture conditions. Using a pier foundation, each column
is supported on a single drilled pier and the building walls are founded on grade beams
supported on a series of piers. The subsoil profile to below the possible pier hole
length should be detennined.by drilling an.exploratory boring in the building area. The
additional information should be adequate to provide drilled pier foundation design
recommendations.
Another possible foundation to resist potential heave from expansive soils is a structural
slab (mat) foundation. This type foundation could also help limit potential heave and
cracking of lightly loaded slabs -on- grade. A structural slab placed on the pier
foundation could also be used to prevent floor slab heave and distress.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on May 28, 1998 to evaluate the
feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three
percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12
inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits
and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the
percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and
consist of 3 feet of topsoil overlying medium stiff to stiff silty sandy clay with scattered
gravel and cobbles. The percolation test results are presented in Table I1. The
percolation test results indicate a rcolation rate between about 30 and 72 minutes per
inch with an average ram of ab til " ,„ 010112Basecl on the subsurface
conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable
for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
r , in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
H -P GEOTECH
HeploorthPawlak Geotech TEL :970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:03 No.002 P.04
•
Russ Coletti
June 24, 1998
Page 3
locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in
the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits. Variations in the subsurface conditions
below the pit depths could change the findings of this study. We recommend additional
subsurface exploration to evaluate the feasibility of a drilled pier or structural slab
foundation to support the residence.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTI•I - PAWLAK GEOTECHN1CAL, INC.
Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr. P.E.
Reviewed By:
Steven L. Pawlak, P.G.
JZA /ksm/kmk
attachments
H - P GEOTECH
HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL :970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:03 No.002 P.05
1
I
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED
C
POLE
BARN
V /NT PROPOSED
GARAGE
/\ • PIT 1
N
P3
A
P 2 PIT 2 \
A PROFILE. PIT
•
/ � PROPOSE[)
P 1 RESIDENCE
FENCE
7
POWERUNE
I 198 345 I GEOTECHNICAI_A INC. I AND A PERCOLATION OTESTOHOLES PITS I Fig. 1
HeptiorthPawlak Geotech TEL:970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:04 No.002 P.06
a
PIT 1 PIT 2 PROFILE PIT
— 0 0 „..„,
/ rt/
—
-- *0~16.7 `� / — i.
� -20o /
6s ♦ / 5 l
5 S 11,46 1..i WC' w
/ 3
$- '— DD= 10.5 — O
O 00.108 0 W0 =16.2 /
-200=69 DD -111
— — 1
10 0
LEGEND:
FILL; sandy silty cloy. organics, soft. moist, brown.
• i
TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organics, roots, medium stiff, moist, dnrk brown.
—; CLAY (CL): silty, sandy, scottered grovel and cobbles. generally stiff to very stiff, slightly
moist to moist, browns, angular to subongular fragments of siltstone /sandstone,
/ medium plastic.
1 61 2" Diameter hood driven liner somple.
`
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on Moy 21, 1996 with o bockhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by posing from features on tho site
plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of explorotory pits are drown to depth.
4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree
Implied by the method used.
5. The linos between materials shown on the explorotory pit logs represent the approximate
boundaries between material types and transitions may bo gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the plts of the time of excavoting.
Fluctuations In water level may occur with timo.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC Ix Water Content ( X )
DD — Dry Density ( pcf )
—200 — Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL t Liquid Limit ( % )
PI a Plasticity Index ( % )
198 345 I GEOTECF NIGAL, INC. I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig. 2
HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL :970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:04 No.002 P.07
I _ �w Moisture Content ¢ 10.5 percent
Dry Density = 106 pcf
V Sample of: Sandy Cloy
From: Pit 1 at 6 Feet
0
K 1 --rte Cweom pression
2 •
wetting
0 3 — —
1
0.1 ... �. 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
Moisture Content = 16.2 percent
Dry Density - 111 pcf
K 2 Somplo of: Sandy Clay
5 From: Pit 2 at 7 Feat
F 1
c
0
n .
x
W
i
Expansion
wean
woltln
2 0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
1 198 345 I EGYOWTCEI
NICALAWLA SWELL — CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I Fig. 3
HepluorthPawiak Geotech TEL :970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:05 No.002 P.08
5 _
, .
m
O w
... z 8
o5 os co
U U U
G
0 0 co
U
Z N
J J
Mi
Q D
N
Z a di? N
x I
U w
E. c
J H cc - .
■"• . ec
q gpg l A w in 0)
7g 1 co co
a u.
CC a
a w
X 1
N. ce ry
a g ''
6 i # en co n
i
. _
k , N
HepterthPawlak Geotech TEL :970- 945 -8454 Sep 30 98 10:05 No.002 P.09
• HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE II
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 346
HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE
(INCHES) INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION
(MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL LEVEL RATE
(INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (MIN. /INCH)
P -1 44 15 7% 6% '
634 6'% %
6% 5'% Y.
51 5%. Y.
5`/ 4'% Y
4% 4Y. Y. 30
P•2 56 16 6 5% Y.
5'% 6 '4
6 4% '4
4K 4% Y.
4% 3% %
3% 3% % 45
P.3 60 15 6% 5% '/.
6% 5 Y.
5 4% Y.
I
4% 4'k Y.
4/ 4% Y.
4% 41/2 `A 72
NOTE: Percolation test holes were hand dug In the bottom of beckhoe pits and soaked on May 27, 1998. Percolation tests
were performed on May 26, 1998. Ilia porcoletion roto was based on the last three readings of the test.
3 0
ii C
7a
r2 - drat. =/ `"°10