HomeMy WebLinkAbout03391 Ss r r ,
e
' �./ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT Permit N2 3 3 9 1 : ,
109 8th Street Suite 303 Assessor's Parcel No. i '
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 •
, ; . - - - Phone (903) 945-8212 , y
c ,
p _ 4 This does not constitute u
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT a building or use permit. j.
f PROPERTY
is-a-14-4;1E') - C U , ,
cc �� E ,
)
� Owner's NamenLL.JLY�t" E Li zABE7+ Present Address C...Z.r• ■ +.�e`.i?�: � ti.• Phone p py"ZRZ j
y:
System Location an' /r, 0 FNI.�R 41 t !�S c ,l1 L'r�, s
7i ( `
1. r
• Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No.
z
6, SYSTEM DESIGN
k
• • Septic Tapk Capacity (gallon) Other
J Percolation Rate (minutes /inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other)
i
Required Absorption Area - See Attached ,
Special Setback Requirements: /.Cl- F- (l,(r�j • - \ t_ [ ' ? ,
fS •
Date Inspector r
1 • _ FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) '
Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation
• }; 4.j 4
,, System Installer ).,„ u
(t a1
t) Septic Tank Capacity : `
e Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name
f
Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface . `'
Absorption Area
, (
Absorption Area Type and /or Manufacturer or Trade Name
f Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements
a Other .. (�I r r
(, Date 7 �'/' - � \ ` Inspector p ( /— `,� 0 M L RMAX '1 �'dJ-
.
- RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
t, ,' *CONDITIONS:
1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 4 4
25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984.
2. This permit is valid only tor connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- 4 i
nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a S
requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit.
, k 3 . Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material .1 ^
variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine — 6
• months in )ail or both).
e White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT
Liz Stinson
April 24, 2000
Page 4
compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free - draining wall backfill should be
capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce
surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface
runoff around the residence.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation such as sod should
be located at least 5 feet from the building.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on April 12, 2000 to evaluate
the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and
three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes
(nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug from the ground surface and
were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation
holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and consist of
about 1 foot of topsoil overlying weathered to hard siltstone /claystone bedrock to the
backhoe refusal depth of 5 feet. The percolation test results are presented in Table II.
The percolation test results indicate an infiltration rate of 60 minutes per inch. The
tests were conducted in the upper topsoil due to the relatively shallow bedrock. Based
on the shallow bedrock and the percolation test results, the county will likely require
that a civil engineer design the septic disposal system.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in
the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
H - P GEOTECH