HomeMy WebLinkAbout03429 Patch - Vinger Construction, Inc.
September 6, 2000
Page 5
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be
notified at once so re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Rf ci � t,
f I+ O ' IpN A
lk I'A gt610 \ �04
y I- 29717
Jordy Z. Ada son, Jr. i ".E)�
1 -O S ra
1 .t /,7/u ; $ ? Y /
Reviewed by: ��t1; %NAL t.e".
f
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E.
JZA /tI
attachments
cc: Westar, Inc. - Attn: Steve Kessler
H -P GEOTECN
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE II
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 100 675
HOLE N0. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE
(INCHES) INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION
(MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL LEVEL RATE
(INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (MIN. /INCH)
P -1 54 15 9 7 2
7 5% 1'h
5% 4 1%
water added 8 7 1
7 6 1
6 5 1
5 4'/ ' 16
P -2 53 15 9 '/ 7 2 %
7 4' 2'%
4' 3 1%
water added 8'/, 7% 1%
7'/ 6' 1
6'h 5% 1
5% 4% 1 15
P -3 48 15 10 8% 1 '
8'/ 7''A 1
7''A 6'/ 1
6'A 5% '
water added 9 8 1
8 7% °
7A 6'% ° 18
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on August
21, 2000. Percolation tests were conducted on August 22, 2000. The average
percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test.
4
•
•
Moisture Contents 6.3 percent
Dry Density = 93 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
From: Pit 2 at 4 Feet
0
1
Compression
upon
•0 2 wettin
a
0 3
U
4
5
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
100 675 I OE PWORTH ICALAVINC SWELL— CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4
V .
. N 4
: '
A x
.#.s, i b
E ssiA e �
7$ v�r
P 4,65 ! | ; ;
■ 9
1 i (}
,,,,
i7
it�
» °�
§ ` , � t
1 1
Iiii R \/ f
� �
r II ) \ • /7 • :li " .!� +
& \ •
. '
! . i lr
.
44 .9 ' c_
X 4
if
$C 4 f .
. % ..
\i / f. li
;Pi 11
) V :
ƒ :10 .P ;I
\ i1 '| ;I \ . i
a, Z:t70 TOW e'ADw 6Z009e164 :a _G 1_ e»mNO1w :WOW