HomeMy WebLinkAbout4707 •
t N: 047CC
•
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 Bth Street Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 .:
(903) 9454212
JobAddress Lot 3, Teller Springs, Glenwood. Springs
Nature of Work Building Permit
Use of Building Single Family Dwelling Unit
ontractor Ross Jeffrey
• a Chris Overacker
Amount of Permit: $ 869.55
Date April 8, 1993
Permit: 527.00
Plan : 342.55
S. Archuleta
Clerk
White-Trees
Canary- Office
Pink - Applicant
Gold - Duplicate
GARFIELD COUNTY
• APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT 1/707
PERMIT NUMBER 3
�CJ
please print or type DATE /7 - /
Assessor's Parcel #
TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT PLOT PLAN
-- ADDRESS NOTE: Show easements, property line dimensions,
SUBDIVISION », • **k . all other structures, specify north, and street
FILING # I LOT # a BLOCK # name. For odd shaped lots, or if space is
te =a
TAX SCHEDULE # _ too small, provide separate plot plan.
. LEGAL (SEC/TWN/RNG) # OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL 11.
-
USE OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL
NAME � , `� I _
MAILING ADDRESS .,1 P ?a tDTh
0 CITY �.�,1.o.5 HONE G�915- q'"1��i
INANE Ll�= =- - ' -
C ITY
La- Fv-4 , na.
!ADDRESS —_ -
a NAME ±y..05_5 CPS-E'a QJ(
crt'i ` ADDRESS Ow -
C ITY l' kAy5
o I.
I P Ls ONF, _ 7
. 143 _4 33' LICENSE l!
CLASS OF WORK
NEW ALTERATION _ ADDITION
DEMOLISH - REPAIR MOVE
MOBILE HOME (make /model) S.F. S.F. OF BUILDING OF LOT L0,715
# OF FLOORS a. HEIGHT
# OF FAMILY UNITS # OF BED & !!•2 __.__s.
INTENDED USE OF BUILDING _Ikea AQ1�4+4�
GARAGE: SINGLE DBLV CARPORT: SINGLE DBL FRONT PROPERTY LINE
FIREPLACE - dip
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED _ STREET NAME /ROAD NUMBER
- Toth,. WATER SUPPLY oth,.A S '\ b 1��'�� . .k t! ,CHECK IF CORNER LOT
DRIVEWAY PERMIT DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLANNED
SITE PLAN v `at ∎oS E
BUILDING PLANS -
SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCE AT t I hereby acknowledge that I have read this
ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT rive:t_cipEEDD application and the above is correct and I
OTHER DOCUMENTS (specify) agree to comply with all county ordinances
and sta maw regulating building construction
1 •
_78 SIGP. TARE
?BD ° C/�!�'?, • SPar�"e � coo. �.,
_ d Ann , rye f = • t FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
`!'
VALUATION "Z�// ZS 6, � m ® FLOOD HAZARD
PERMIT FEE $jz7,OoPLAN CHECK FEE $,j Z .SS CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVATION
TOTAL FEE $3/ 99,S.S SCHOOL IMPACT FEE $ 464 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Font*: f r-\V -r p
DATE PERMIT ISSUED C� N c V,!t fowl Co i_,N R 1F(- 'G1 "�1""
TONING DISTRICT "lc/ AD PROBLEMS WITH PERMIT
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY R -3
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED
S.F. OF BUILDING 2-971- S.F. OF LOT Fy4C 4
MAX. HEIGHT �.. a.,/ / ROAD CLASS. ��. CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: FRONT '��. OR ENGINEER
REAR RIGHT LEFT
OFF STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
i F ,
APPROVED: _ L /) f. Ai . a �. __�� APPROVED: PLANNI\ fl '- se t", , [. � w~R J � D
;JILDING DE•ART ENT DAT
4 s ot/ R-4 CA- E il
,e5
2(9 3o1
674//291/
c e: - Kre rt./ P7- k-c
so/
G Yt
/We* 41 1
A 0 c *
„p
I C:
f
k C r"
e e
1 ,
4.? ,
/ • , •
„
- • ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS •
(303) 945.1004 SCNMUESER 1001 Grand Avenue, Suile 2E
FAX (303) 945 -5948 GORDON MEYER Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
December 11, 1992
Mrs. C. J. Overacker
P.O. Box 3262
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 -3262
RE: Foundation Design For Lot 3
Teller Sorinas Subdivision
Dear Mrs. Overacker:
As requested, Schmueser Gordon Meyer (SGM) has completed the foundation design for your
proposed residence on Lot 3, Teller Springs Subdivision, County Road 109, Garfield County,
Colorado. The design is based upon the Chen - Northern soils investigation and letter dated
December 4, 1992, Job No. 4 184 93.
The foundation was designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf. However,
for each for of cut below original grade, the allowable bearing pressure Was increased 80 psf.
Therefore, the west foundation wall, which is in approximately 10 feet of cut at footing level,
was designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2300 psf. This method was used to
reduce the size of the footing required. In addition, an equivalent fluid weight of 45 pcf and
soil density of 11.0 pcf were used as design values.
The enclosed sketches show the footing layout and stem wall sections', necessary for your
foundation. The maximum footing width is 3'- 0" and the minimum width is 2'- 6 ". Because
the architect had shown a 10" thick stem wall, we also used this size in our design. Finally,
SGM recommends a foundation drain as described in the Chen - Northern letter although it is
not shown in the wall sections.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. \ " + + p au nrrrnp�
.o` Gis
lo 14. 11 i c y ' .,
Dan Cokley, E.I.T. ,r.`�,'2
� � •
DC:Ic/92210
Enclosures rr
C.. c v r cop ( >� r
rr L L
•
b
12" I 10 "" ! " J
10 " '" '
1 10 C5
i 14 "' I I 10"
J \
3' -0" 3 ► 2' -6 " QS
I
i ..�' p LIJ
1 1 ,
1' - I v
( C2
. I
Z 12" 10"
' 14 "" 10" 10 "'
W
10 "
I rL.)
3' -0" 2' -6" V `
. W
= O
L J
/ / / /, / / : / / / / / / /
L - - -- J
i
0
N
2" COVE" i 2" COVE"
14012" 14012 "
14018" /4018
14" V on 6" /4016" 14" VO" 12" /4 016"
344 CONT.. R 3 -#4 CONT.
N N
lamomsa 3" COVE" I 2' -6" I 3" COVE" I 3' -0" _
-I
NORTH WALL SOUTH /WEST WALL
•
/4018" 14018 ",
14018" /4018" 1
13" 112 " 13" #4076 "" 10" 112 " 10" 14016 1 "
3 -I4 CONT a 3 -14 CONT.. a
N N
3" COVE" I 3'_0" I 3" COVE" I 2' -6"
S TEM WALL EAST WAL L
OVERACKER RESIDENCE WALL SECTIONS
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
• SGM
(303) 945 -1004 SCHMUESER 1001 Grand Avenue, Suite 2E
FAX (303) 945-5948 GORDON MEYER Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
December 16, 1992
Mrs. C. J. Overacker
P.O. Box 3262
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 -3262
RE: Foundation Design For Lot 3
Teller Sorinas Subdivision
Dear Ms. Overacker:
The purpose of this letter is to discuss the changes in foundation design you requested on
Wednesday, December 16, 1992. Per your request, Schmueser Gordon Meyer has reduced
the stem wall thickness from 10" to 8 ". Enclosed are revised wall sections and footing layout
which reflect this change.
Please note the main change is the spacing of vertical reinforcing in the north, south and west
walls. Due to the reduction in wall size, the footing dimensions (not size) have been adjusted
for an 8" wall.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC.
Van—
Dan Dan Cokley, E.I.T.
DC:Ic/92210.1
Enclosure
•
IN
S E - / 1
1 I I I N
8 '" 8 / C
15" ' '\
Q 2' -6"
3'-O" 3 I 0
� K.
j' - 10
L_ _
3
r 7
LIJ m 1 W
e
2 13" ' 11" '
8" - 8"
1 ' 15 : 11" V
1
J' -0" ' 2 ' -6 "
W
= O
0
L _ i
s sssS lriiii J .
2" COVE" 2" COVE -
14010" 14010 "
14 018" 14018"
15 T 14016" 15" in 13 /4 016"
3 -14 CONT. 0 3 -44 CONT.
N �
3" COVE_ r 2' -6 " I 3" COVE"
1 3' -0"
NORTH WALL SOUTH /WEST WALL
•
14 018" 14078"
/4018" 14078"
14" 1 14" 14016" 11" 11 " /4016"
3 -//4 CONT. v 3 - CONT.
3" COVE- 3' -0" 3" COVE'
2'- 6"
STEM WALL EAST WALL
O VERA CKER RESIDENCE WALL SECTIONS
•
I in
ELECT. T. ACCESS. 19. ' . J _
WATER 197E CWT. - _ / L . ti ,
/ J PP 2 : \'
N 89'50'22 W 735.37 "-' S g \
8
'o Ps
o J
f 004W- iDccrnON ' r L ) 11
w S 7., YtA m ii, N 63'00
t 8 LOT 3. Ln :1 t ,,
t o d 6.275 Acres, + / , ",\ IS IAIA .p \ ' y .
NO 1� t :Sq 1 - n 1
. 1
O N 89'50'221W 751.68' - 1 r1 a
4 / CENTERLME Ct 10 Ft Y• TAM STATES 9 •
Z 11104 ONE mat JUEOUPM comPIUIT 11M3101T 1 T• i L�-
1 j? 1 . EOUtsile E mµ _
I l
LOT 4 t : k--•,._ `�
i3 6:304 Acres +/-
/
to rr. TEtbRla a u[cT1sc EAmm7r- 1
4 N \ ,'�i. 1_319
.
It rA 1k.6�'' -
S13'2957 E. 1 N
- lo .244 hi.., . • I2�
I 780.0 .
0'
S 88'55'37" W . 895.47' '' _ _
II
I I L
_ M.CAP /III N 00`11'1 " . W 1 i ' 1
SC�1ARow 6 WALSER C/ - -, 229.16' 1 I >"
Li. 11789 Cr&) V "' _
l7'10 f`� C3 1' '3 N -= '�4 �i� 1 1))Lr7 i . L�
11--L k - ?rI f•i ( ) " = zco' o" (Irx1 cal OEM, ,� I I
IS I I
1 l
• 1
1
4i C 2 ) ( i '
4"` ) /T. ,/ t, ./
1 l 7) r ,
1 I i
r
December 15, 1992
To Whom It May Concern:
Description of Log Construction for proposed residence on Lot 3
of Teller- Springs Subdivision.
Full round logs with saddle notched corners. Nailed with 12"
spikes. Door and window openings solid blocked from floor to
ceiling with #5 rebar driven and laped on 3 logs. Top logs to
be flatened with top plate nailed and leveled. Trusses or
rafters fastened with hurricane metal ties.
e:'
ill
oss D. J
Contractor/ B ilder
C o ' J t .( .. (._. tj
7•11111•11111•111r . la
•
•
December 15, 1992
TO: Mr. & Mr's. Chris Overacker
As required by the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, •
Restrictions and Easements for Teller Springs Subdivision Article
6, Section 6.7 the design review committee has met to review the
proposed plans and specifications for improvements to Lot 3 of
the Teller Springs Subdivision.
After review the committee voted unanimously to approve the plans
. and specifications as proposed.
•
Tha 'ou_ or your cl-- ration.
oss D. Sef.'e ✓
Teller Spring meowners Association Design Requirements
Committee Chairman
Ch en Northern, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Scient
V 5080 Road 154
- Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601
303 945 -7458
303 945 -2363 Facs
December 4, 1992
C.J. Overacker
P.O. Box 3262
Glenwood Springs CO 81602 -3262
Subject: Observation of Excavations for Preliminary Foundation Design, Proposed
Residence, Lot 3, Teller Springs, County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado.
Job No. 4 184 93
Dear Mrs. Overacker:
As requested, Chen - Northern, Inc. observed the rough cut building excavation and two backhoe
pits at the subject site on November 25, 1992 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation
support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the preliminary foundation design
are presented in this report. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for
geotechnical engineering services to you, dated November 25, 1992. Chen - Northern, Inc.
previously conducted a geologic hazards study for the Teller Springs Subdivision, reported under
Job No. 4 338 90, dated June 12, 1990.
Proposed Construction: The residence is proposed on a moderately steep east facing slope,
below the steep to very steep hillside, beginning about 100 to 150 feet to the west. The lot is
in an area of potential debris flow hazard from the upper steep hillside as described in our
geologic haiards study for the subdivision. The building will be a one -story log structure over
a walkout basement level daylighting to the east. The basement floor will be slab -on- grade. We
assume foundation loads will be relatively light to moderate and typical of the proposed type of
construction. The debris fan soils in the area have been identified as being potentially
hydrocompactive.
Site Observations: At the time of our visit to the site, the rough foundation excavation had been
cut in two levels from about 2 to 8 feet below the adjacent ground surface. Some fill had been
placed at the downslope portions of the excavation. A shallow percolation pit and an 8 -foot deep
profile pit were located about 30 and 50 feet, respectively, north of the northeast corner of the
excavation. Two to 3 -feet high berms consisting of the on -site soils had been constructed
upslope of the excavation to the southwest and northwest. The berms are for mitigation of the
debris flow hazard.
The soils exposed in the excavations, below about 1/2 foot of organic topsoil, consisted of
medium dense silty sands and gravels with cobbles and occasional boulders to about 18 inches
in diameter. The soils were brown in color and generally angular, and are debris fan deposits
from the adjacent hillside. The debris fan soils are assumed to extend a considerable depth at
CO T`r Cv?
A member ni lhel Hltll mono nl cmmranies F O 13 P F 1 1- 6
•
C.J. Overacker
December 4, 1992
Page 2
the site and probably possess a potential for settlement if wetted. The results of a gradation
analysis performed on a sample of the silty sands and gravels from the profile pit stockpile
(minus 5 -inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 1. No free water was
observed in the excavation and backhoe pits and the natural soils were slightly moist.
Discussions and Recommendations: Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and
the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf can be used for support of the
proposed residence. There could be differential settlement if the bearing soils become wetted.
The magnitude of the settlement would depend on the depth and extent of the wetting.
Precautions to prevent wetting, such as positive surface drainage and underdrain design
recommendations as discussed below should be followed.
Footings should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns.
Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the
excavation should be removed and the footings extended down to adequate natural bearing
material. The subgrade should then be moistened and compacted prior to the footing
construction. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing
elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and
bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet.
Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth
pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf. A perimeter foundation
drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the walls
and prevent wetting of the lower level. An impervious membrane such as a 20 mil PVC liner
should be placed below the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall
with mastic to help prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Structural fill placed within floor slab
areas can consist of the on -site soils excluding oversized rock compacted to at least 95 % of
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the
structure should consist of the on -site soils, excluding plus 6 -inch size rock, and be compacted
and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building.
The location of the residence on the lot and the shallow berms should help mitigate the debris
flow hazard to the building. We have not conducted a hazard risk assessment but the risk of
debris flows reaching the residence appears to have been significantly reduced by the deflection
berms. Typically, berm heights of at least 4 feet are needed to mitigate a moderate risk. The
constructed berms will not totally mitigate exposure to the lot and some clean -up of the yard area
on the west side of the residence may be needed following a debris flow event.
Limitations: The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the
soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the nearby backhoe pits. Since we did not
conduct subsurface exploration at the residence site, we have assumed the conditions observed
in the excavation represent those within the depth of influence of the residence foundation.
Variations in the subsurface conditions could impact the performance of the foundation. In order
C.J. Overacker
December 4, 1992
Page 3
to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the residence
excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration
could change the recommendations contained in this letter. We should observe the completed
foundation excavations to determine actual bearing conditions prior to the footing concrete
placement. If a debris flow risk assessment is desired, we should be contacted.
If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
CHEN-NORTHERN, INC.
David A. Young 1, 4 .`wa1sTEgF 9,�,
,
; o
DAY /ee 15222 :r5
� 4i 1
1 e" �:
li .re
Rev. By: SLP
1 e• .a ;e
• MA� • 1 ��`. �` •
Attachment *�� - --
Ch en ONorthern, Inc. cunxinmq FI and $dentists
•
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS I U 5 STANDARD SERIES
SIEVE ANALYSIS
CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24 HR 7HR
45 MIN 15 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. '200 '100 '50 '40 '30- '16 1 �'8 '4
100 0
1 —
•
90 1 I i
10
60 i - 1 20
70
30
I
_ 60 40Z
a 1 I
I- 50 4- 1 1 59
z ' ■ 1 Z
a 40 1 1 1 � cr
0. ..p../T � a
30 1 1 1 70
/ f
20 .
4 - 80
1
10 1 1• .. 90
1
0 ■■∎o •••■∎=im••USS •∎ ∎emu non ■mien••••
001 .002 .005 .009 019 .037 .074 149 29] .590 1.19 2.38 4.76 9.52 191 38.1. 76.2 127 200
.42 2.0 152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT I FINE I SAN MEDIUM !COARSE' FINE GR AVE COARSE COBBLES
GRAVEL 48 % SAND 28 % SILT AND CLAY 24 %
% %
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX
SAMPLE OF si l ty sandy gravel FROM Profile pit
with cobbles
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS I SIEVE ANALYSIS
U.S STANDARD SERIES SIEVE
CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24 HR ] HR.
45 MINIS MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. '200 '100 '50 '40 '30 '16 (8 'd
100 1 1 0
90 I 1 ; m
1 1 I 20
1 I
70 30
•
1 1
I 1
z &6 1 w
40
0 c 1 1 I ,
•
0 1 w
_
_50 ■ 50¢
z I I I-
w z
w 40 I ; 1 60 I CC
•
W
I I 1 •-
0 70
20 E 80
10 , 1 90
1
0 IN•111•••••■r=1Mu•1fl•SMo ••••l --ewu— 100
.001 002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 38 4.76 9.52 19.1 38.1 76.2 127 2 0
.42 2.0 152 I
I DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT SAND GRAVEL 1
FINE I MEDIUM ICOARSE' FINE I COARSE GOBBLES
GRAVEL % SAND % SILT AND CLAY %
LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAMPLE OF FROM
4 184 93 ChenoNorthern,Inc. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS •
•
(303) 945-1004 SCNMUESER 1001 Grand Avenue, Suite 2E
FAX (303) 945-5948 GORDON NEVER Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
December 11, 1992
Mrs. C. J. Overacker
P.O. Box 3262 •
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 -3262
RE: Foundation Design For Lot 3
Teller Sorinas Subdivision
Dear Mrs. Overacker:
As requested, Schmueser Gordon Meyer (SGM) has completed the foundation design for your
proposed residence on Lot 3, Teller Springs Subdivision, County Road 109, Garfield County,
Colorado. The design is based upon the Chen - Northern soils investigation and letter dated
December 4, 1992, Job No. 4 184 93.
The foundation was designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf. However,
for each for of cut below original grade, the allowable bearing pressure was increased 80 psf.
Therefore, the west foundation wall, which is in approximately 10 feet of cut at footing level,
was designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2300 psf. This method was used to
reduce the size of the footing required. In addition, an equivalent fluid weight of 45 pcf and
soil density of 11 pcf were used as design values.
The enclosed sketches show the footing layout and stem wall sections necessary for your
foundation. The maximum footing width is 3'- 0" and the minimum width is 2'- 6 ". Because
the architect had shown a 10" thick stem wall, we also used this size in our design. Finally,
SGM recommends a foundation drain as described in the Chen - Northern letter although it is
not shown in the wall sections.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. � uu u
1
Dan Cokley, E.LT.
( t1t r
% ; yY
Nt
o it in
DC:lc /92210
min moo
Enclosures
i zz . -,' -: , : .
r 1
1 - -- o L 1
1 ^ , 1 I ( f)
I 14.1
N
12"
• 1 0" •
�' 1
10" 1 70" 0
14" I / v
10
2 Pi 1 3' -0" --.1
1 ► : 2' - 6 " c3
I ' O
1 1 1
1 1 11 W
J J L - - - — - -- J V
NE
er o I C)
m 1 CO
in
1 W
U I
12" 10" 1
10 10"
14" 10" V
3' -0" i 2' -6"
W
o - C3
///MI/I sna S .
L______ J
o
.
2" COVE [ 2" COVE' f
/4012" /4017
/4018" /4018"
•
14" V 0 " 6 " /4016" 14" VO" 12" /4016"
3 -/4 CONT. , 3 - #4 CONT.
N � N
3" COVE' I 2' -6" I 3" COVE' 3' -0" 1
NORTH WALL SOUTH /WEST WALL
/4018" /4018 "
/4018" 14018 „
13” 113" 13" /4016 " 10" 10 " 10" /4016"
3 -/4 CONT. 3 -/4 CONT.
3 "" COVE^ 3' -0 " I 3" COVE' I 2' -6 " 1
STEM WALL EAST WALL
OVERACKER RESIDENCE WALL SECTIONS
ENGINEERS
•
SURVEYORS •
S
(•303) 945 -1004 SCNMUESER M 1001 Grand Avenue, Suite 2E
FAX (303) 945-5948 GORDON MEYER Glenwood Spring$, CO 81601
December 16, 1992
Mrs. C. J. Overacker
P.O. Box 3262
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 -3262
RE: Foundation Design For Lot 3
Teller Sorinas Subdivision
Dear Ms. Overacker:
The purpose of this letter is to discuss the changes in foundation design you requested on
Wednesday, December 16, 1992. Per your request, Schmueser Gordon Meyer has reduced
the stem wall thickness from 10" to 8 ". Enclosed are revised wall sections and footing layout
which reflect this change.
Please note the main change is the spacing of vertical reinforcing in the north, south and west
walls. Due to the reduction in wall size, the footing dimensions (not size) have been adjusted
for an 8" wall.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC.
C
Dan Cokley, E.I.T.
DC:Ic/92210.1
Enclosure
I
I- - f 1
I I I 0 ILO
13" / 11" ' (/) p i
e s" O
' 75" I ' 11"
J
3 ' -0" . I 2' -6" 0
IC 1
O
' I W
L - -! - _ _1_ _ -- V
r - -- - — 1 7 4 V
EZ ro . I Q
m ;.C? 1
I W
Li I LC
Ca
Z
13" 11"
6" I ' 8" 1
1 15 ' 11 V
3' -0" 2'-6"
W
O
h
i iirairnsssii ,
t ro
2" COVE 2" COVE'
14 010" 14010"
/4018" 14018"
15" 7 14016" 15" : 13" 14 016"
3 —//4 CONT. a 3 - 14 CONT.
N e
3" COVE` 2' -6" 3" COVE -
3' -0"
NORTH WALL SOUTH /WEST WALL
14018" 14018"
14018" 14018"
14 14" /4016" 11 11" 14 016"
3 -14 CONT. = 3 -4 CONT.
N N
3" COVE- 3' —O" 3" COVE'
2' -6"
STEM WALL EAST WALL
OVERACKER RESIDENCE WALL SEC77ONS
(Untitled)
Monday, February 07, 1994
Call Overackers and schedule inspection of drywall
covering of "lite Form" foam insulation at their home at
1855 County Road 109
Page 1
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
7A FIELD COUNT COLORA 1 P ermit No.
Date Issued rPZoned Area .
AGREEMEN'
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with
all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the
proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees That if the above
said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and
construction rf the above described structure, the perm' may then be revoked by notice
m ='
fro -t -: t Bu In. t t I �DIA C 1, 4 NULL AND VOID,
Use 1a'/ � ,Lw�'' `y/
Address Rai Description n � , : �yy +
� � y .. •
owncrl -,/ # 4i .' '• . Contractor i.� - C,.•' '
Setbacks Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From the Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Zoning Roof Covering
Electric -Final (by STATE inspector)
Footing /1.,,z 7_73
Fomrdationt i f A� ✓}
` +"'''r - MASTER PLUMBER LICENSE i _
Plumbing - Underground C 4, r
Gas Piping 16`- 4 < - Heating Ventilationf ?,r /2 _/1;'_93
Frame /G_ / - Insulation. /I-- -
Plumbing -Rough ,� e w Drywall _ lroo'
Electric -Rough
(by STATE inspector) Final o2 0 — 9 y
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING --
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 945 -8212 1119 8th Street, County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs, Colo.
APP OV ED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date B Y M J/
IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVC WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
sy; H a.Y
4
MtXlf its .F F :} :! "i
x` ' + . rt xh, "i' � `w r - A M ., ss �+
O o
4-, ro 0
as F+
H DO O
47 U ., L
t W l" 0
a d
U) rn d 7
a+ " • d .17
u
0
N N - H 3 o . =
U L " y DI G 4.
0 al O Q O Ch O 1. O VA
V O 0 0 3 .. 'uC O
�,� z ° v ro
es ` -0 x ^
`/ N o
I .� a, .--1
NI
D NZ
f N N .7
o q D o '' • u
° CO m H C
L u
�l O 0 Cq • 0 r-. E
O. L.
�l .O 0 ° a
0 • 0
Vila L a d
�` 0
A �c
V
0 ° ' z m ° Ta O ° . °' > O
o . y L
Q X0 0
C.� ..= ° o 0
( 02\111114 101 0 to
NIS CI
•
co
° 5 pp t
f: 4) P t 1 173 1E u
V 0.) is o WA
it = 4 a c,.., u ▪ C 7
Ca) Cal . osise L� s, b4 ° a
N .. \ - L 0
° 1. pi. O H m ar, LI
.
� Ep 0
�� p u o 1 y y- -
Lt. eit
° 3 NI,•,... U � � • ac
C k W O r ' CC C
- v 1 �U to
u�y� a ❑ '�� ���
O 7 N 0 • 0 U .. 0 `\ 4n i
.L' 0 ' CQ ou7
d
RC V) cn 4 _
N a 8 Qo Y v1 N 1 'O 0 0 • a)
NI. 5a ° t bq V) o :c7:
bq , e tc
N � D°o 0 g 4 U ai t 4 ���
- .0 7 u CA �+ 0 0 . -. O N C L
„ES 0 " 0 u
z H J c7 CO U m z'_
400
DESIGN GLASS, INC.
�_ _ =— 9ucc �EZ�E � eadd �4o do 81601
�
3710 Hwy 82, Glenwood Springs, Colora
r a 945.8484 945 -7722
DE SIGN 1_
GL ASS,INC. INVOICE
BILLED TO: JOB LOCATION:
fb( k #sato
INV. NUMBER C.O.D. R.O.A CHARGE CASH CUST. PHONE DATE
010315 IQir.Q 1 `
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL
3 3,y X 16 - C" bYyL.D u iy■ A 1 n - 74 0° / (o oo
Ind)) 10
- 7 O
)',
Accounts due on 10th of the month following date of purchase. A monthly finance charge of 1.5% will
be charged on all past due accounts. Collection fees including attorney's lees shall be added to the
service charge if incurred. If materials are not paid for under the terms of this contract, we reserve the
right to reclaim them.
• -Sr • \ -1/4 1,1 23 9: 10:04 Z 3i3945 8484 EiESIGN GLPSS 01
...
..
; -
• 1
r 7
PHASE ORDER 31741
lo r" 1/ I
44._‘0,3_
• DAII RI ,U1RE .
( Ill' AN ill'
-- , W SHIPPED
;SHIP ft) •
..— .......... _ .
AlEkr SS ,.7 REQ. Na (..)k DEFT
(11Y. SlAr ' c 4
QUANTITY ' i SCRIPTION i 1 [ 1 - ' ' f .. Wn ' UN
1 I ,
2 I 3 -- i 3L-1 Y 7L9
1 r
I r
: .
1 '
r r
51 i 1 t9.-77( • a )dif Lel,h_11.5
. 1 .
! I
- .
7 1
8 1 i
9
10 I
k
1 II
i - I
I 21 1 ,
i 2 1
1 -1. 1 _ I._ .
-------- - ' . ' PI. r mt- 4NTD ' cOPIES of YOUR
1 0E3E12 NUM4ER MUST APPLAIE _
ON ALL INVOICIS. - PACKAGES t IT:. iNvolcf WITH WIC. ' Itia Of.tioviNG. ,
PnAst Ncyffy uf imtviEVATtly f YOU A*L , .,,.,-,
uNApit 10 t9tvirait ORVER Ut OArF "-'"Ai 'n i tit i ll d i
ORIGINAL
•
DESIGN GLASS. INC.
IstJ _ -
9att cS'eavice grass Sop
3710 Hwy 82, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
945-8484 945-7722
•
DESIGN
GLASS, INC. INVOICE
BILLED TO: JOB LOCATION:
rotieko, i 7
I 0 3 3 (.4 :Ka;
PO thox 3 Tr ,T)
_
INV. NUMBER C.O.D. R.O.A. CHARGE CASH CUST. PHONE DATE
010851
OUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT ICE TOTAL
3/0
C " LC ? ?
: 54 V - 1 7 C
C.X i D
9 ) ') ) 12 - 7 no 3 /LI /Yin f-ir
H j ) (- 1 - 0
/ /
'1 53 'I 0 0 I L t
,
A i -5 1 1* x ,1; L_ 3 14.
<-‘ 7/c 0
54' 9 <7) A
66o°°
et,,i) 100 ou
%7
Accounts due on 10th of the month following date of purchase. A monthly finance charge of 1.5% will
be charged on all past due accounts. Collection fees including attorney's fees shall be added to the
service charge if incurred. If materials are not paid for under the terms of this contract, we reserve the
right to reclaim them.
12 23 93 10:05 E 303 945 8484 DESIGN [3LPI35 91
..-
, .
PURCHASE ORDER 316 9
1( , . ,
(.7),. i, ,
1711110(_ WI()
CEP 1 HOW CHIRPED
' ^ 1.1_, i •
- A6iTio - :jlCl&-r—lit)S-2'e-. -111L--- WiT1516.-63-16177-i--
;] La AasLAAA-1:), ]
1
F ' .
. t
1 318
7i -) rei-toLtoc ett)i-rb-i-SE0,_
'7 )
2 1 [ Li CA ‘ik 7(49 " 1 L I
3 \ ! I
Ci
I t !
e s‘
1 ) -- 2 117- 6
/ - A r:12/
-. I\ 1
;
:4 A /-10 1-i x c ,),LpH
) ,
1..:61e, x 0 _ , ,, 1_ t
15 _.11 a , , t
¶J; , ....., 4_i • 1 1 36 A „)., la X 1 ik 1
X
o k i t ‘-‘ N(...
\iii ajzT iti x x 1 .
14
--------RURCHASE ORDE ---"--1— fi NUMBER NALCACPPAR PEE ASE St NO COPIES CR • ' :'
ON ALL INVOICI 5 • PAIE.KACES, ETC INVOICE WITH ORIGIN AI, BRE OF I ADING
PLEASi 1\1i-111Y US INAt■AEDIATED It YOU ARE
PURCHASP c R i ErNt \
LINABLE 10 COMPLETE ORDER V DATE
SPECIFIED A , ilk4A
ORIGINAL