HomeMy WebLinkAbout4547 `
•
*
+wa 4"
N oa5
•
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8th Street Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
��( (303)
_/
v g
Job Address = e. 2 A, Tract 44, Secw20,(Secs. 20 & 21, T3S R87W)
Nature of Work til ]in- "ernat
Use of Building Single Fati3., welling Unit
Owner Liward J. Carson
Contractor "saner " 3 "
Amount of Permit: $ �'�'�' +. "� Date: Au • ��laPA • •
Permit : 657.00
an . 477.05
S Feta
.
White - Treas. -
Canary - Office
Pink - Applicaht
Gold - Duplicate
A
•
,,. GARFIELD COUNTY
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
PERMIT NUMBER i53 7
please print or type DATE g'/p7 —f 2 -
4: 9
firs, tared *1(1(3 2-/Z. 0 o oe.
TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT PLOT PLAN
'ADDRESS PA /ZCE/ C'41 TCAC NOTE: Show easements, property line dimensions,
(SUBDIVISION GAPCFJELb Cairn / co( wpm all other structures, specify north, and street
c ' # LOT # BLOCK # __ name. For odd shaped lots, or if space is
a 'TAX SCHEDULE # _ _ too small, provide separate plot plan.
LEGAL (S,FC /TWN /RNG)S' 1t4z / gS f?87 W' # OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL 4/04/E
USE OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL /VI94 -
W NAME rt.)1' i b _., c A :T »J, .D ,
.MAILING ADDRES * / / 2/2 13oG7V, A/2 / s1►
o (CITY -
„. : :7 3 7l. /7'( X 7 31I(PHONE . ,� /
; • a NAME Q;)(nN d ASe3rarL T ,42CN m;
a w ADDRESS 1390 ?. DOVGLA$ 'CITY (�A 12L4c`,T CO' o(-:-
a
-- NAME - 7 - S110 —
0
c ADDRESS
d CITY
` o PHONE LICENSE #
u
CLASS OF WORK
NEW k/ ALTERATION ADDITION
DEMOLISH REPAIR MOVE
MOBILE' HOME (make /model) n/
S.F. OF BUILDING S.F. OF LOT -1 S M ‘.
# OF FLOORS / HEIGHT
OF FAMILY UNITS /' # OF BEDR /OOMS. 'j
INTENDED USE OF BUILDING /= -e : of v1_yt_
GARAGE: SINGLE DBL CARPORT: SINGLE DBL FRONT PROPERTY LINE
FIREPLACE L— - — k � �
DOCU TITS ATTACHED ti STREET NAME /ROAD NUMBER eal.. /-'..:4) > Y / U , /5/
WATER SUPPLY Weil } CHECK IF CORNER LOT _
DRIVEWAY PERMIT DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLANNEI
SITE PLAN ✓ V
\ ` L. -,sit �r UC - � L
BUILDING PLANS
SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCE /r%{. ,� / 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this
ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT r% o[ic- Cfec application and the above is correct and I
OTHER DOCUMENTS (specify) A lt A -agree to comply with all county ordinances
`k , ands ate iaia building construction.
\ , k j
��--rr�I e ,yam
,/4 ,�/,1
-25 l /Y�' /� " i ,e, ACC ; yf /6.
+� • ‘ FOR OF'ICE USE ONLY
b ALUAZFON ' /1 /1�. :' FLOOD HAZARD _
PERMIT 2 FEE $ p PLAN HECK 'EE $4-Z7, (r CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVATION
TOTAL FEE $/ o8 OS'SCBON,L IE1'ACT FEE $ .. 2oo,0 SPECIAL CONDITIONS
DATE PERMIT ISSUED
ZONING DISTRICT /-I- Z PROBLEMS WITH PERMIT
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY — 3
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (/ - e st ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED
S.F. OF BUILDING 2. 3"3 S.F. OF LOT - "5Selc. _
MAX. HEIGHT ,, 74. ' ROAD CLASS. CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: FRONT S4 Pc OR ENGINEER
REAR RIGHT LEFT
OFF STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
— �/ p
APPROVED: -, � /1 1 z8 I_ APPROVED: ��''� \ � / R "v „'�. 7 -r C_
: c, G DEPARTMENT - DAT PLANNING EPARTMENT DATE
Bi ¢ 6-5/- 7
, ,
• CARSON CHIROPRACTIC t { 0
1212 S. Am DEPOT - CONTINENTAL SQUARE - SUITE 33 • {eir
MIDWEST CITY, OK 73110 7 /Lt ! ii ,,,
(405) 737-7100
0 C,, o `?
November 24, 1992 I ' NOV 3 0 1992 1 1 ?
GARFijw CQU:Ni yy
Mr. Jim McMurrey
Regulatory Offices & Building Inspector -
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO
Dear Jim:
From what I hear, your having your share of snow a little early
this year. Hope you and yours had an enjoyable Thanksgiving.
I'm happy to say I've got my well drilling permit squared away
and Holycross Electric has the power route layed out and ready
to go by Spring.
I do have one problem that may require my changing our ATans
on the type of vacation home structure. The cost factors Tor
the Earth Bermed type home in your area are much higher than
anticipated. I am therefore considering a log home such as
those produced by Satterwhite in Gypsum. Could you possibly
send me some guidelines or advice on what to look for so that
it would qualify for a building permit at my site in Sweetwater
on County Road 151?
Thank .u
y
--ma D.C.
EJC /jr
•
* Chen @Northern, Inc. Cons4lnn9 Engineers and Coen! sla
_ - 5080 d 1
Glenwood Roa Spr nigs. Colorado 8 601
303945 7158
303 945 -2363 Fars i Ws
May 29, 1992
Edward Carson
1212 South Air Depot
Continental Square, Suite 33
Midwest City, OK 73110
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Near 7W Guest
Ranch, National Forest Access Road 151, Garfield County, Colorado
Job No. 4 310 92
Dear Mr. Carson:
As requested, Chen - Northern, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at
the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for
geotechnical engineering services to you, dated May 11, 1992. The data obtaine 1 and our
recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions
encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be single story wood frame and
masonry structure located on the site as shown on Fig. 2. Ground floor will IN slab -on-
grade. Cut depths of about 4 to 8 feet are assumed. Foundation loadings for ill s type of
construction are assumed to be relatively light.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described
above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report.
Site Conditions: The building site is located at the edge of a small knoll on a north facing
slope, north of Road 151. A site vicinity map is shown on Fig. 1 and the building site is
shown on Fig. 2. The site is currently vacant and vegetation consists of sagebrush and
weeds. Boulders and cobbles are visible on the ground surface. The topography at the site
is flat to gently rolling with moderate to steep slopes north, east and west of the building
site. Shallow soil slumping has occurred near the toe of the steep slope east of the site.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating
one exploratory pit at the location shown on Fig. 2. The log of the pit is presented on
Fig. 3. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of topsoil, consist of a mixture of
rov nrTY CupY
19 R' 8 P FIL—c
A n v mbu ul Ihr I$IU)groupof coulponios
Edward Carson
May 29, 1992
Page 2
gravel and clay containing cobbles and boulders. At a depth of 4 feet, relatively dense
clayey gravel with sand and cobbles and boulders was encountered to the full depth of
exploration, 11 feet. Results of swell - consolidation tests performed on relatively undisturbed
samples of sandy clay from the 2.5 foot depthmdicate moderate compressibility under light
to moderate surcharge. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of clayey
gravel (minus 5 -inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 6. No free water
was observed in the pit at the time of excavation.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoils encountered in the exploratory pit
and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the
lower undisturbed clayey gravel soil below all topsoil and the upper sandy clay designed for
an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf for support of the proposed residence. The
proposed residence will be located near the top of a steep slope which shows signs of
shallow surface slumping. Footings located near the top of the steep slope should be placed
at sufficient depth to reduce the risk of loss of bearing capacity caused by erosion of the
slope. We recommend placing footinss below an imaginary line drawn at an aVe of 1 1/2
horizontal to 1 vertical from the toe of the slope. '1 a required depth Of the footings should
be verified during excavation. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for
continuous wads and 2 for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the
foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footings extended
down to adequate natural bearing material. Exterior footings should be provided with
adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings
at least 48 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous
foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by
assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining
structures should be designed to resist' a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid
unit weight of 45 pcf.
Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to
moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential
movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with
expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints
should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint
spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience
and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 -inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed
beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus
2 -inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the
No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum
CheneNorthern,Inc.
' Edward Carson
May 29, 1992
Page 3
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of
the on -site gravels devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has
been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater may develop
during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff
can create a perched condition. We recommend below grade construction, such as retaining
walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by
an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded
above the invert level with free - draining granular material. The drain should be placed at
each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped
at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free - draining granular material used in the
underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50%
passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill
should be at least 2 feet deep.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided
during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at
least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in walkway and slab areas and
to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -
draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded
soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to
drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recom en minimum slope
of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inc es
in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill.
Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and
foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The
conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained
from the exploratory pit excavated at the location indicated on Fig. 2 and the proposed type
Ch en @Northern,Inc. , „, Itry; Lilo ,,,r, In( S ,,Mt'r.,
Edward Carson
May 29, 1992
Page 4
of construction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not
become evident until further excavation is performed. If during construction, fill, soil, rock
or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should
be advised at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend
on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill
by a representative of the soil engineer.
Sincerely,
CHEN - NORTHERN, INC.
2 � - 7 ._
Thomas L. Allen
` o�u11UnIIUB:
*O p00 RECi'%,y
Reviewed By `� \E� E. h4 p •
• 244!3 r
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. •• "?` ,^
TLA /lr y „ �nNeuei� unn•
Attachments
cc: Ernest Delto
Chen Northern,lnc. C.c „ st,II SI 'EP CI.
t -- TO SWEETWATER
G LAKE
• . @ Pd11Dh
a'eQnt1� \
- 151 ROAD
1 .• 150 ROAD
GD QT
2AN[.N 4 .
SJ1eETW.ar.R LIZEEk��
leg
6OL020.o Q21V
f ide
U - R. 61,14 , 2, 1
•A To. \
— "DEEP :1
..1111111 LILL
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
ly ri LuE o 70f Q!' •
4 310 92 ChenQNorthern,Inc. VICINITY MAP Fig.
NOT TO SCALE
(
I
NATIONAL FOREST
ACCESS ROAD 151
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
I
1
• PIT I
/ TOP OF STEEP SLOPE
I
4 310 92 Chen0Northern,lnc. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PIT Fig. 2
Pit 1
0 0 —
WC =20
'.!O 0 . DD =95 —
5 '
•' - WC =6
� . 6 _ -J +4 =53
�" - 200 =20
10 jg.1.£ 10 0
w
15 15
Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 4.
4 310 92 Chen0Northern,lnc. Log of Exploratory Pit FIg. 3
Legend:
f Topsoil; sandy clay, stiff, moist, dark brown, organic, cobbles, small
�'1 boulders.
Mg Gravel and clay (GC -CL); sandy, with cobbles and small boulders, very stiff
to dense, moist, dark brown,
d Gravel (GL).; clayey, sandy, with cobbles and boulders, dense, moist,
L •.. d light brown;
Band driven liner sample.
Disturbed bulk sample.
•
Notes:
1. An exploratory pit was excavated on Hay 15, 1992 with a backhoe.
2. Location of the exploratory pit was measured approximately by pacing from
features shown on the site plan provided.
3. Elevation of the exploratory pit was not measured and the log of the
exploratory pit is drawn to depth.
4. The exploratory pit location and elevation should be considered accurate
only to the degree implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit log represent the
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pit at the time of excavation.
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( %)
DD = Dry Density (pcf)
+4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
4 310 92 Chen0Northern,Inc. Legend and Notes Flg. 4
Moisture Content = 20 , percent
Dry Unit Weight = 95 pct
Sample of: sandy clay
•
From: Pit 1 @ 2.5
•
0
•
.° 1
tn
a •
2
'3
No mov omen :
• upon wotti
4
5
•
6
•
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
4 310 92 Chen 0 Northern, Inc. SWELL- CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5
1 .HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I
'11 TIME READINGS I U 5 STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SOUARE OPENINGS 1
24 HR. 7HR •
' 45 MIN 15 MIN. 60 MIN, 19 MINA MIN. 1 MIN. '200 '100 '50 '40 '30 '16 1 �'8
100 - 0
90 T 10
00 1 ' 1 20
1
I I
70 , 30
t I t 0
z 60 1 w
1 1 40
If/ 1 , / 0
w
Lt H � 1 � ' SOP
z 1 I 1 z ILI
0 40 r ' 60 Q
-.. 1
I
30 1 I 70
20 I f 6e
t ,
10 t 1 90
I
0 a=i.•wa1.■■■• =man u ■iimp i■i■ 4.■• a x4111 __.I.u•_— Inlio -.•o4' 100
001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 119 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 38.1. 76.2 127 200
.42 2.0 152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS 1
CLAY TO SILT FINE j SAN MEDIUM (COARSE( FINE GRAVEL COARSE (COBBLES
GRAVEL 53 % SAND 27 % SILT AND CLAY 20 %
LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAMPLE OF Clayey gravel with sand FROM Pit 1 @ 6' through 7'
I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS 1 SIEVE ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS I 0 5 STANDARD SERIES I
10 CLEAR SOUARE OPENINGS
24 Hq 7 HR.
45 MIN.I5 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MINA MIN. 1 MIN. '200 '0 '50 '40 '30 '16 1 8 '4
103 0
90 i 1 10
1 1
1 I I
1 , 20
0
70 1 1 30
1 0 0
z 60 0 4 i w
1 1 z
N
Q
a 2 W
50 4 1 f 50¢
U 1 W
w
40 1 0 600
A 1 w
A
30 1 I 1 70
I 1
M 1 60
1 I
10 1 93
1 1 1
0 •014r � 141411n
1 115anem 94�.m1. 2 100"
.001 002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 74 .149 .149 . 297 r .297 . . 4�441 1� �
.590 1.19 .38 476 76 952 19.1 38.1 76.2 2 • 127 4
20 152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT FINE I SAND MEDIUM 'COARSE( FINE GRAVEL 1 COARSE !COBBLES
GRAVEL % SAND % SILT AND CLAY %
LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAMPLE OF FROM
4 310 92 CheneNorther n,Inc. 1 GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 6
I N
N f4
O w
r-1 a '-1
M ¢= N .
V ox T al y� 0 H
0 ti lot
w U
z m >.
9. N
o g m
h cd rl .
Inc
1—
J
D w
2V1-
w0
Z QWg
W /C 0 0 6
LL L z8
1-
V! F 8 Of '
W f ?
J J
Li E- g .
C w 0 ti
a.
C CC
L O •
W 1-- i o w
-. J Liz
L Q OW - 0
O m W Q�w N
2 Q CC as
I F
0
CO
Z- N
Q v < - N
V —I 6
a -
L a
T, 2 M
O
>-•
CC <g
Q A L m
M
D wI-
< ¢cw_ O LO
0 y NT
1;8
N
= c/1 0
2 w = • 1a
4 O —
`U N
O %0
w
6
2
A ,-,
s
' 07-15-1992, t::.....r DZ Ii' .: ook 1 %.1 n L. 'he rED
11:56:40 TAUS JOIST MacMILLAN Page 1 of )
ANDY FARR (M5018) (5 A1O01}
Project Name: QUINN & ASSOCIATES, KELLY Page Title: ROOF JOISTS
TJSizingTN 3.30 Building Coda UDC Type of Sale Dlr
1192033009
Roof (snow load) Live Total w s
Stress Level 11S% 1."- De`l Oaf!. Member S n /ft ,,,, JOIST .0
*Live Load(psf) a0.0 R oo f S op i ft),. , 4.000
S pan 1 L, 240 ✓ Li3E0 ✓
Dead Load(psf),......,. 10.0 ,A —Roof Slope(.Nft).... 4,000
Floor
Partition Load( psf)., 0.0 Glued tiveH ,,,,,,,,6 NN
Deflection Criteria MR Repetitive Member Use Y
Reinforced Overhangs.,,,, N
16" TSI(R )/550F JOIST 62 1,2,0" o/c
" 30'- 0.00' "
IMPORTANT! The analysis presented below is output from software developed by Trus Joist MacMillan, Allowable
product values shown are in accordance with current Trus Joist MacMillan materials and code accepted design values.
The specific product application, input design loads and stated dimensions have been provided by others, have not been
checked for conformance with the design drawings of the building, and have not been reviewed by Trus Joist MacMillan
Engineering,
Design assumes adequate continuous support of the joist compression flange, 4 Ste enk t . at 9
Maximum Design Allowable Control
Shear(1b) 1356 1356 ( 1610 . 119% LEFT end Span 1 under 115% stress TOTAL toad
Moment(ft-lb) 10186 10186 ( 15320 150% MID Span 1 under 115% stress TOTAL Load
#Live Defi.(in) • 1,404 i 1,581 ' L/270 MID Span 1 under Live Load criteria
*Total Defl.(in) 1.589 ( 2,148 L/239 MID Span 1 under Total Load criteria
" Span 1 "
Max. Reaction Total(lb) 1358 1358
Live(lb) 1200 1200
Assured Erg. Length(in) 1.75 1.75
Max. Unbraced Length(in) 68
Copyright (4) 1992 by Trus Joist MacMillan, a limited partnership, Boise, Idaho.
TJI(e) is a registered trademark of True Joist MacMillan.
TJSizingrw is a trademark of Trus Joist MacMillan.
Q) July 21, 1992
Garfield County Building Inspection Department
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Q ATTN: Mr. Jim McMurrey
RE: Building Permit Application
Dear Mr. McMurrey,
Enclosed are two copies of a Garfield Country "Application for Building Permit" which we
are filing in behalf of the owner, Dr. Edward J. Carson, 1212 South Air Depot, Midwest
City, Oklahoma 73110.
0 The name of the contractor is missing because that is not yet known. I am asking Dr.
W Carson to provide the information under "Legal" on the form. He will forward the Filing
Number, Lot Number and Block Number, the tax schedule and legal description. Dr.
Carson will provide additional information to you on water supply, driveway permit and
on -site sewer disposal permit.
Enclosed are copies of a Subsoil Study for Foundation Design made by Chen Northern,
Inc., Consulting Engineers and Scientists. Also enclosed is Size Analysis information for
the roof joists.
r n See the attached "Exhibit A" for the legal description of the parcel. A copy of the parcel
vJ in Tract 44, prepared by Jim Stevens, is enclosed.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
r` , Very truly yours,
0
• QUI N & ASSOCIATES
' 0 / •
W • . •ui
FPQ /dmm
Oa Enclosures
cc: E. Carson
c File
McMurrey.ltr -6
Cr i 1390 s. douglas blvd., midwest city, oklahoma 73130 telephone (405) 732 -0343 member american institute of architects
r
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building and Planning
6 -10 -97
Edward J. Carson, D.C.
1212 South Air Depot, Suite 33
Midwest City, OK. 73110
Dear Dr. Carson,
Today this office paid a visit to your new home at 3726 County Road 151 in Sweet water.
This is to confirm our letter to you of September 19, 1996 stating that your building permit has
expired and a renewal will have to be done before work can recommence on the house.
It looks as though drywall, interior trim, exterior steps and landings and electrical work remains to
be completed before a final inspection can be done. You will also need a permit and inspections
from the Colorado State Electrical inspector completed before we can do a final inspection. We
look forward to hearing from you in the immediate future about completing this job.
Sincerely,
L
Steve Hack t
Codes Enforcement
CC: Don Owens, Chief Building Official
f it
109 8th Street, Suite 303 945 - 8212/285 -7972 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
•
IS rAI �� ' {Y R !'� _. COUNT
•
Buiiciing and .Pla; -aping •
September 19, 1996
Edward Carson
1212 S. Air Depot
Oklahoma City, OK 73110
Re: Building Permit #4787 Issued 3/12/92
Dear Mr. Carson:
Upon reviewing our files, it was noted that there has been no activity on your building permit for more
than 180 days. Per code section 106.4.4 of the 1994 U.B.C. (Volume 1) your permit has become invalid.
Since your permit has now become invalid if you wish to resume work on your building you will have to
resubmit for a new building permit.
You should be aware that no use or occupancy of a structure is allowed until it has passed a final
inspection by Garfield County. The State of Colorado also requires a final inspection of any electric wiring
installed in any structure before use.
P1eaae_call_ lisifyou have any questions -at- (970)945 -8212. - - -- - - - -- - - - --
Garfield County
Building
•
109 8th Street, Suite 303 945- 3372/285 -797 Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601
•
1
GARFIELD COUNTY
•
Building and Planning
May 9, 1996
Fdward I. Carson & Sons
1212 South Air Depot #33
Midwest City, OK 73110
Dear Mr. Carson:
The Garfield County Building Department received an application for a garage /storage building
located at 3726 CR 151, Gypsum. The building permit was approved but never issued. This
office needs to know if you are still going to do the work, you need to pick up your permit,
otherwise we will return all information submitted to us to you. If you decide at another time to
do the work, you will need to apply for and.receive a building permit.
Also the Single family dwelling permitted under permit #4787 has not had a final inspection and
has not been issued a Certificate of Occupancy. I need to remind you that you need a Certificate
of Occupancy before you can occupy the home at any time. To do so means you are doing it
illegally and may be subject to fines and /or a cease to occupy the home. We would like for you to
contact this office, so we may make a final inspection.
We would appreciate hearing from you within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. If we do
not hear from you within thirty days, we will consider the approved permit null and void and will
destroy all information submitted to us.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office.
Sincerely,
nN1 I C C,x.2
ev
Don Owens
Chief Building Official
DO /sa
109 8th Street, Suite 303 945- 82 12/285 - 7972 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
CARSON CHIROPRACTIC
1212 S. AIR DEPOT - CONTINENTAL SQUARE - SUITE 33 a �/
MIDWEST CITY, OK 73110
(405) 737 -7100 %! ;�i'd
t
a Y2319'%
May 21, 1996
j
Garfield County
Building and Planning Dept.
109 8th St., Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attn: Mr. Don Owens, Chief Building Official
Dear Mr. Owens:
Thank you for your letter of May 9, 1996, regarding the building
permit for a garage /storage building. Would it cause any
inconvenience to your office to delay a decision on starting
this project until my son returns to the Sweetwater area this
summer?
Concerning the final inspection and issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy. My son will be using a trailer on site when he
returns to Sweetwater this summer. But we do want to obtain
a Certificate of Occupancy as soon as possible. Please advise
on what is required for the final inspection.
Than ou,
r ;
am /
Edward J. Car I9 D.C.
EJC /jr
9- 3 5
— C p
Cgs 04 . C A74so�
I} , Ewit. c. C4cc ars- Rocro\ ti
LTOliN J002k SZ }!l ?•3s-
To fivekie Fro-t. New
pc4ni r No cf/9nc-
Pt'tneT /Z€4iy TO
i . ______.__________-CSH:'
Cro, c
v .
„ ..„..t
I ,
_ . . - 1
Ciftlso A.) ... 7%...a/2 2--
tV- ci" , -.7-;) 7*
2— ' ( 77 sr ) 4 8 #(7 3
e 44 e/
_EP .1 *b_. - 77, 1 0 7 7/ 4,-, 0 0
-
C r 7 i o 6 GovlarrAuser70-ev
72 giercilla sr i
c p g.3
(t
t, -T 4 -7 ,0 (#
- 7
P:ii es 1 -- 1
.•••• :: ................. 4 „.
4
( C° N °ffe--
,! ... r co
‘>: / r'i
0 r 7- ----'---
4y_5 0 • 0
/
) F it
.
,...-- 0
, 7--/