HomeMy WebLinkAbout4934 N: 04934
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 Blh Street Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801
(303) 945 -8212
Job Address 45855 Highway 6 5 24, Lot 6, Canyon Creek Estates, Glenwood Springs
Nature of Work Building Permit
Use of Building Single Family Dwelling Unit Ia Garage
Owner Steve D. Donna N. Jensen
Cr 'tractor Dave Coddington
Amount of Permit: $ 1,143.04 Date: October 19, 1994
Permit: 692.75
Plan : 450.2.9
S. Archuleta
Clerk
White - Treas.
Canary - Office
Pink - Applicant
Gold - Duplicate
GAR'FIELD COUNTY
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT 9 PERMIT NUMBER s/ •
r please print: or type DATE / / / / �/ / q3 /.cCM3
Assessor s Parcel 1! II (((
TO BE FILLED OW' BY AF1'LICAN'1' _
_ _ G P1.,0'T PLAN
ADDRESS '�f S. SS i W y 0 # • 4' R O � OTE: Sho eas - me nu, property line dimension:
SUBDIVISION ' 'a/yOnl C.EI EC cE2 .97 all other structures, specify north, and street
7 FILING 11 LOT 11 6 BLOCK 11 name. For, odd shaped lots, or if space is
W TAX SCHEDULE 11 too small, provide separate plot plan.
LEGAL (SEC /TWN /RNG) 11 OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL
tL NAME 6 it t Qp, /�4 ,CzVSCTJ' USE 07 BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL
MAILING ADDRESS. S / 5ile9&4/4S4 - --
o CITY X /PLc, d o _ PHONE aRg -gsaq
% a NAME 4.frl, f1. Qa,.1/ /C
i w ADDRESS y3Oy C. G(1 Tp C7 g ij , , OR
oe NAME 4 //!CE&7K
H
u ADDRESS ��� (cJ, 144,^/
x CITY Najd Gs. - CO _
ii PHONE 984€ -302 / -/ / LICENSE 1.1
CLASS OF WORK
VEW ,k ALTERATION ADDITION
DEMOLISI! REPAIR MOVE •
^]/BILE HOME (make /model)
S.P. OP BUILDING v0.0en S.E. OF LOT
A 07 FLOORS . HEIGHT a 7'
N OF FAMILY UNITS I! 07 BEDROOMS ,3p
INTENDED USE OF BUILDING f%nv) Qy /&S_/dG,w
GARAGE: SINGLE DDI, XCAIU'ORI': SINGLE' UDh
FRONT PROPERTY LINE
FIREPLACE ON Ac4vuBarlrirc�a,. - �c- 4c-d
_ DOCUMENTS ATTACHED STREET NAME/ROAD ,NUMBER
WATER SUPPLY COrg ii; l rVS _ CHECK 17 CORNER LOT
DRIVEWAY PERMIT DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLANNED�i -jweLy
SITE PLAN 2{ c+ /r, /nl!%, elfin --
BUILDING PLANS )r / �
SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCE prylrn /ry I hereby acknow e..- that 1 have read this
ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT /Vial 1 .aup1 ' in t Li on an the .'hove is correct and I
OTHER DOCUMENTS (specify) agre -Lo comp. /. with all county ordinances
79rroc/1rsr 1 ' 7- ' T'U pram ir and/ t .e nws :e. lating building constructic
fiendenr.oM izt q7 tq
rngPcir , 4- 040, - ROJtS nsvr= 0 Few 0 rSIGNATURE
a FOR FFICE USE ONLY
VALUAT /, ION / 7 3Z FLOOD 11 ZARD
PERMIT FEE $ b / /2„ y /PLAN CHECK FEE $ 45 _ CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVATION
TOTAL FEE $ SCHOOL IMPACT FEE $ _ SPECIAL CONDITIONS
DATE PERMIT ISSUED _
ZONING DISTRICT PROBLEMS WITH PERMIT
TYPE 07 OCCUPANCY g- 3 . r1 -/
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ' -/J ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED
S.7., 07 BUILDING 2.csy S. 7. 0E LOT .
MAX.. 11EIG11T ROAD CLASS. _ CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURVEY/]
SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: FRONT g -23 ' OR ENGINEER.
REAR 50' W RIGHT / 20 t LEFT 5 -- / 4" -- -
077 STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRE - , QQ
Ar a Ty
APPROVED: _. i � / / J / /1, „ - /1 23 3
D1 LDING DD'PAll1' EN2' DATE PLANN.' 0 DEPARTMENT DA 1F
R,e GARFIELD COUNTY
1A; — 199 Si ! i APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT 2
� 1. PERMIT NUMBER i/9J
As {�nl al=la tiag lY please print or type DATE q __
TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT PLOT PLAN
- ADDRESS' - .177a �'J�-
c y �v � 2 0 �p . i
¢" " 4'.rg ezniii�7b y t )emen ts, property line dimensioi
.a ,SUBDIVISION OM/yew CRc -cx ST/FTES' a1I other str ctures, specify north, and stre
S FILING 11 LOT N BLOCK N name. For odd shaped lots, or if space is
,--1 TAX SCHEDULE it too small, provide separate plot plan.
LEGAL (SEC /TW,V /RNG) u OF IIIILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL
r 4 NAME L VC 4 • T' 1 i /1 n . / cr/ USE OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL
T MAILING ADDRESS f /RU /,m T ' / ��)
3 CITY �� i PRONE GAS 4 c / IN �j a / �O /OJ,
;" x NAME (�[,/N f.P /7'irLe,f (® "� �` —
a R ADD:2ESS, A / CITY
-4 41 o NAME .A 'VE -d6fN/ wall
u ADDRESS C3/4407 rnetnrr9' £Mc* a.SO
g CITY SfLT cO
ei PHONE $7G Plto LICENSE (+ Fed /D $Y e/08:09/ V
CLASS OF 11ORIC
'JEW X - ALTERATION ADDITION
DEMOLISH REPAIR MOVE
MOBILE HOME (make /model)
S.F. OF BUILDING 2/5 1 2- -- S.F. OF LOT
11 OF FLOORS a t4'ASFinc-*/ - 7 HE. e 2 / '(' "
11 OF FAMILY UNITS / ld OF BEDROOMS 2
INTENDED USE OF BUILDING QJ.r/Aey OES,6C�JC'
GARAGE: SINGLE DDL X CARPORT: SINGLE DBL.
_
FIREPLACE — FRONT PROPERTY LINE
DOCUMENTS A'rT.ACIIED _ STREET NAME /ROAD NUMBER
WA TER SUPPLY a444t te Vjry' SYSTC- CHECK IF CORNER LOT _ G NNN
DRIVEWAY PERMIT 7 D � ESCRIPTION OF / WORK PLANNED J / 'Y 14
SITE PLAN X , I JIV e di . 4.1q_, ` M 14 .
BUILDING PLANS K a
SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCE 62n24 /I I hereby acknowled•e that I have read this
ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT J(/`') •.11 on and he - ove is correct and I
(1TIIER DOCUMENTS (specify) agree o comply ith 11 county ordinances
end :t e law re! ating building constructi(
..
SIGNATURE
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
VALUATION 1 12 , 9� FLOOD HAZARD
PERMIT FEE $ 6Q' .75 - PLAN CHECK FEE $ '/50.,2.7 CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVATION
TOTAL FEE $ j/+ 0`f SCHOOL IMPACT PEE $ / 0. '" SPECIAL CONDITIONS Uri JUI3 &tv �vISED
DATE PERMIT ISSUED g'(I-4 Of 9 I. PR. TO 'F'1' rr (NSP L.
ZONING DISTRICT _ PROBLEMS WITH PERMIT
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY a-3 /1 -1
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION J
N ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED
S.F. OF BUILDING '3 ,300 S.F. OF LOT
MAX. HEIGHT /' -4 ROAD CLASS. CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURVEYO]
SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: PRONTO 9,/' - 6" SCgc< OR ENGINEER
REAR W G2'" C ., RIGHT S 19'6 LEFT pi 30'
OFF STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRE+ Ais
i ' ` ■ I I J
APPROVED: �� ` A PPROVED: \ - A l' • �� f 6 --n -cA
DUILDI NG DEP!' MEN7' DATE I' DEPAR7'MEPIT DATE
r 7�i Inc. Chen T 1orthern, Consulting Engineers and Scientists
5080 Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
303 945 -7458
303 945 -2363 Facsimile
August 3, 1993
Steve and Donna Jensen
530 Fairway
Rifle, CO 81650
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 6, Canyon Creek
Estates, Garfield County, Colorado
Job No. 4 478 93 •
Dear Steve and Donna:
As requested, Chen- Northern, Inc., performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the
subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical
engineering services to you, dated July 7, 1992. The data obtained and our recommendations
based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed building will be one and two story wood frame structure
with a partial basement located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. The basement level will daylight
to the west. Porch and roof support foundations will be placed on the moderately steep slope
on the west side of the building beyond the basement level. Ground floors will be a combination
of slab -on -grade and structural over crawl space. Cut depths of about 3 to 8 feet are assumed.
Some fill will probably be placed on the moderately steep slope. Foundation loadings for this
type of residential construction are assumed to be relatively light.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described
above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report.
Site Conditions: The site is a vacant lot in the southwest portion of the Canyon Creek Estate
Subdivision. The ground surface is relatively flat in the eastern portion of the lot transitioning
to a moderately steep slope down to the west in the western portion. Slope grades are about 2%
to 3% on the flatter portion and 20% to 35% on the moderately steep slope. The approximate
slope transition is shown on Fig. 1. The slope shows no apparent signs of instability.
Bedrock of the Maroon Formation outcrops above the site to the northeast. The outcrops are
apparently the source of the subsoil deposits at the site.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two
exploratory pits at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2.
The subsoils encountered, below about 3 to 6 inches of organic topsoil, consist of stiff sandy •
Steve and Donna Jensen
August 3, 1993
Page 2
silty clays with little or no gravel extending to the pit depths of 7 to 8 feet. Results of swell -
consolidation tests performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the clays presented on Fig.
3 indicate low compressibility under light to moderate surcharge and a no expansion potential
when wetted under constant light surcharge. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I.
No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the subsoils were slightly
moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoils encountered in the exploratory pits and
the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the
undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf for support
of the proposed building. Isolated pad footings located on the moderately steep slope should
bear at least 3 feet below the natural ground surface for stability. Footings should be a
minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed
soils and any existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation
should be removed and the footings extended down to stiff natural clay bearing material.
Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost
protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used
in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and bottom to span local
anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls
acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on
an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site soils excluding
vegetation and topsoil.
Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to
moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential
movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion
joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to
reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab
use. A minimum 4 -inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level
slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 -inch aggregate with less than
50% passing the No. 4 sieve and Less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at Least 95% of maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the
on -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Uhderdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has
been our experience in mountainous areas and where clay soils are present that local perched
groundwater may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground
(i hen eNo there, 11 }C. Consulting Engineersand 9aentisls
Steve and Donna Jensen
August 3, 1993
Page 3
during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below grade
construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and
hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. A perimeter drain around crawl space
areas does not appear needed with proper foundation wall backfill and adequate surface drainage.
The underdrain should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded
above the invert level with free - draining granular material. The drain should be placed at least
1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity
outlet. Free- draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than
2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size
of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1' feet deep.
Surface Drainage: Surface drainage is an important aspect of the project. The following
drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after
the building has been completed:
1) Excessive wetting of the foundation and underslab soils areas should be avoided during
construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least
95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least
90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain
away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of
12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the
first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas.
4) Surface water should not be allowed to discharge uncontrolled down the moderately steep
slope in the area of the residence. Discharge of water down unprotected slopes could
cause erosion and possible slope instability. Surface water should either drain away from
the slope or be collected and discharged in drainage channels.
5) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill.
Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and
foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The
conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from
the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and the proposed type of
construction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not become
evident until further excavation is performed. If during construction, fill, soil, rock or water
conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at
Ch en @Northern, Inc. ConsWling Engineers and Soentisis
Steve and Donna Jensen
August 3, 1993
Page 4
once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on -site observation
of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of
the soil engineer.
Sincerely,
C N- NORTHERN, INC.
David A. • ng ov1U11111llytlq;��,
P ,9 e F
Reviewed By:?�� ps L. �
28301 _-
• L� -:-d
Thomas L. Allen, P.E. �
� SS io NI1w\'\'''
DAY /rh
Attachments
•
Ch en @Northern, Inc. consulling Egg neers and Scienllsts
Approximate Locatio
of Moderately Steep
Slope D ow n
PIT I
•
LOT 5 PROPOSED
RESIDENCE 1- I
1
1
1
LOT 7
LOT 6
•
PIT 2
,
1 _LOT
BOUNDARIES
r 1
ACCESS
EASEMENT ' APPROXIMATE SCALE
I" = 20'
4 478 93 Chenallorthern,[nc. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig.
PIT 1 PIT 2
ELEVATION - 98' ELEVATION - 100' Approximate Main
Floor Elevation 100
---
— WC =6
_ ram DD =109 w
w w
—
" ` WC =12
95
DD =103
95 z
o a WC =8 - 200 =61
_
F= DD =97
— - 200 =65 Approximate Basement Floor
W w
J
LLJ
— WC =14
90 DD =103 90
LEGEND:
,// Topsoil; organic silty clay, firm to soft, dark brown, slightly moist.
Clay (CL); low plasticity, silty, sandy, trace gravel /cobble, stiff, slightly
moist, brown to red brown.
I SJ Hand driven liner sample.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on July 13, 1993 with a backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from
features shown on the site plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by instrument level survey and
refer to Pit 1 as Bench Mark = 100'.
4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only
to the degree implied by the method used. -
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of digging.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC =Water Content ( %)
DD =Dry Density (pcf)
- 200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
4 478 93 CherlONOrtherrl,InC. Logs of Exploratory Pits and Fig. 2
Legend and Notes
• Moisture Content = 14 percent
Dry Unit Weight = 103 pcf
Sarnpie of: Sandy silty clay
•
From: Pit 1 @ 7 Feet
0
•
•
c 1 Additional compression
° • under constant pressure
N due to wetting
•
L 2
rz
E
0
3
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
Moisture Content = 6 percent
Dry Unit Weight = 109 pcf
Sampieof: Sandy silty clay
From: pit 2 @ 1 Foot
J
0
•
•
1
4:
o •
ti
v 2 •
L
d
v 3
No movement upon wetting
0.1 1.0 10 too
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
4 478 93 Chen0Northern,Inc. SWELL- CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIg. 3
% /
�/ .. b \ \
k } } \
_
• •
0 a.z
§ 0
j
( - t-
B
\
9
0
\ al / \ ( :
Q )
0
§ B ) 6 22;
\ / §§)
& A
w ■
\ 0 � . . .
\ 0
/ \/
(§ 2 § - -
/[ §£ 74 _
z
> f [ / 2 - 2
2] -, . 4, . . _
CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
' • Chen - Northern, Inc.
' ASTM Designation: D 2487 - 83
(Based on Unified Soil Classification System)
Soil Classification
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests' Group
Symbol Name'
Coarse - Grained Soils Gravels Clean Gravels Cua4 and 1 5,CcS3' GW Well graded gravel'
More than 50% retained on More than 50% coarse Less than 5% fines'
No. 200 sieve fraction retained on Cu<4 and /or 1>Cc>3' GP Poorly graded gravel`
No. 4 sieve
Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel' °"
More than 12% fines'
Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel`'"
Sands Clean Sands CW_6 and 15CcS3' SW Well- graded sand'
50% or more of coarse Less than 5 % fines°
fraction passes No. Cu<6 and /or 1>Cc>3' SP Poorly graded sand'
4 sieve
Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand` "'
More than 12% fines°
•
Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand" '
Fine- Grained Soils Sills and Clays inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above C, Lean clay' "
50% or more passes the Liquid limit less than 50 "A" line'
No. 200 sieve •
• PI<4 or plots below "A" ML Sill' L"
Tine'
organic Liquid limit - oven dried <0.75 ' "
OL Organic clay"
Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt" "°
Silts and Clays inorganic PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clay` `"
Liquid limit 50 or more
PI plots below "A" line MN Elastic silt' L"
organic Liquid limit - oven dried <0.75 OH Organic clay " '
Liquid limit - not dried
Organic sill'' u °
Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat
'based on the material passing the 3-in. (75 -mml sieve. 'Cu = O r0, -= PA' 11 Atterberg limits plot in hatched area. soil is a CL -ML.
91 field sample contained cobbles or boulders. or both, 0, • Dan silly clay.
add 'with cobbles or bookers, or both" to group name. '11 soil contains 1510 29 %plus No. 200. add "with sand" or
'Gravels with 510 12% lines require dual symbols: 'II soil contains .?:15% sand. add with sand" lo groyp - with gravel ", whichever is predominant.
GW -GM well - graded gravel with silt name. 91 soil contains 030% plus No 200. predominantly sand.
GW -GC well- graded gravel with clay 11 lines classify as CL -ML use dual symbol GC -GM. or add "sandy" to group name.
GP-OM poorly graded gravel with call SC -SM. 11 soli contains ?30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel.
GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay 11 fines are organic, add "with organic liner to group add - gravelly" to group name.
°Sands with 510 12% lines require dual symbols: name. "PI24 and plots on or above - A - line.
SW -SM well- graded sand with sill 'If soil contains ?..15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group °PI <4 or plots below "A" line.
SW -SC well- graded sand with Gay name. 'PI plots on or above "A line.
SP-SM poorly graded sand with sin °PI plots below "A" line.
SP -SC Roomy graded sand with clay
SIEVE ANALYSIS 60 /
1 SCREEN - IN I SIEVE NO. I For classification of ane-grelned etas and /
3 21 %1 % % 4 10 20 40 60 140 200 enl9reined freseon of coarse-grained /
100 s1II ■• ■ ■■■•I ° 50 _ soh / /
II■I•I,•1I•I„I■I = Equation or - A - -line 4.
Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 25.5, y�2 #". 8° 111111••••1111111M1 20 d AU then PI= 073(11.20) )/ �� Fy''
" 60 111I ' p°0_15mm ■ Q Equation
al at LL to PI // �X
111111111111111.1....11 ? men PI = 0.9 (LL-6) /
111111011.1....1 r 30 - / /
<, '° 1111! \\ D r' umm I � tu Q /
Ir p 11111111111111111111 N p / ' 0..- —
1I1I.�..�raI o,° =0.075 3 / / CI
MH OH
a 1111nt��il�I / •
I 1111 1 10-
50 10 5 L00.5 0.10 7
PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 4 - T h a , . / / /�� ML i OL
0 I b 110
O = 15 = IOyP I2.5)= 0 10 16 20 30 a0 50 60 70 60 g
0 - a 13, 0.075 300 c 0. 10,,, 00175 • 15 5.6 LIQUID LIMIT (LL)
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issued) .1 .. _.Z oned Area
1 Permit No..
ddd AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with
all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the
proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above
said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and
construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice
from the u y llding 1' ector and IMME E Y B EC E U A D VOID,
iA
Use �. ttr L �rA (^ r, /� ��y
Addr or Legal Description 9 / / ' �V L el - 1
l� S Y
P a ado - Z r e.A.MINJ Conic aclore),d/ E+' Le �(k+' °�P 0. /�ryp
Setbacks Front Side Side Rear /
This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From the Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Zoning Roof Covering
,, Electric -Final (by STATE inspector)
Footing / / o _ 57 c e *i ' /9Sg 9 s y II z G - 9' - r 3,
Foundation L2_5_ 9T coit
Plumbing - Underground
Gas Piping /ci , Heating Ventilation
��� / :.,r / - 7 /2 - -,1,;/ 1 Insulation 3/7ak
Frame c ,•�.
Plumbing -Rough Drywall
Electric -Rough Rt- ~ �
7 _r 7 - 9/� ,7 / Cf)a.,,
(by STATE inspector) 5 z 3 - Li FinaYL/,.2 �.. ?you !V ali nu H/4 (
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING —
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 945 -8212 109 8th Street, County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs, Colo.
APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date ) / By 1 /h a i 44 "'
/ I tQ E r fri EW4 'i _
IF '
-- — - - - -- EDOT� SI E -CO VE W FH CLE PLASTIC
�
- m CD N
R 1 u C G
•
•
v x o 0
4, of ai s. s.,
qq N m
0 i o m • o
c 0 0
a� U o 0 0
U a a o 0
W U d d
a o 0 0
O >
_` � cu G 6 a o C
V II c. 'd b N ro y
3
. U W O d d
fil 4 44
+r
O � 0
0 O • ai o d
O F O o> cl
z U 0
av °� >
4,4 C CU
V c,
YY I. O S b 0 ) °' 0. 0
Jai H
O A w " o e o r O o °O ,y o a) ,n S
n Y [d q U 3 + 0 + 7
I.
`� , I4 O P+ 3 a) Q ti c PA
• a) O q - O U u' n
• CJ ^ � E bA r l w C d � in ij M
N a9 C g
A - O a coned
a) cd O • h — , V
• ` mil o a) `° M H a m y . �
o
E
0� 0 0 v 0 x �1� c y4 ti
o U P. m a • � w co b0 c a
. .
Ii! in 111 ., • O 4 N ° 0 !1.7... m ti 4 t U a) • L •
n A' e T U 0° `'S z pa b 8 9 • c V en I m 0 2 bA ,� • O U d.
N �9y v. U a O b \1 [ � — ro • Z 00 o [ t . C7 0 W 0 (Y1 4 Na 0
i i rif ot - '
. •
. . . ,
•