Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1.0 Application
Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek Prepared for: Middle Colorado Watershed Council Prepared by: Scott Schreiber, P.E., C.F.M. Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 181-047.000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 3.0 CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE CODE 2 Section 3-301: Floodplain Overlay Regulations 2 Table 4-102: Common Review Procedures and Required Notice 3 Section 4-109: Development in the 100 -Year Floodplain 3 Table 4-201: Application Submittal Requirements 4 Section 4-203: Description of Submittal Requirements 4 Section 4-203(0): Floodplain Analysis 5 Revegetation 5 4.0 SECTION 404 PERMIT 5 5.0 CONSTRUCION 6 6.0 FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS 6 6.1 Existing floodplain mapping 6 6.2 Survey 6 6.3 Hydrology 7 6.4 Hydraulics 7 6.5 Existing Conditions Model 7 6.6 Proposed Conditions Model 8 6.7 Comparison of Existing conditions to proposed condtions 8 7.0 OWNERSHIP 2 7.1 Ditch Contact 2 8.0 REFERENCES 3 SUBMITTAL REQUIRMENTS / APPENDICES (Follows List Provided in Pre -Application Submittal Requirements) A.1 Application Form A.2 Proof of Ownership A.3 List of Property Owners Within 200 Feet A.4 List of Mineral Right Owners on Subject Property B Vicinity Map C Site Plan D.1 Floodplain Analysis Maps and HEC -RAS Output D.2 Site Photos D.3 StreamStats Output D.4 USACE 404 Permit Documentation Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents information to meet requirements of Garfield County Land Use Code (Code) including the Floodplain Analysis as required by the Code by Wright Water Engineers, Inc. (WWE) to support a No Rise Certification for the construction of the King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design (Project) at the existing King Heatherly Diversion Structure on East Divide Creek in Garfield County, Colorado. To summarize, this analysis indicates that the Project will not cause a rise in the Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) of East Divide Creek outside the proposed Project area and will not impact any structures. The area is highly remote with no structure in the vicinity and overall Project work will reduce impacts from future flooding and provide for more resilient ecosystem if a flood would occur. 2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project is located along East Divide Creek south of Silt, Colorado by 8 miles. The Project is located on a Bureau of Land Management's parcel. The diversion structure is considered a Pre - Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Pre-FLMPA) structure, therefore has reduced permitting required when work is performed in the area. The Project is located off of Highway 313 (East Divide Creek Road). There are no structures in the surrounding area. The closest structure up and downstream from the Project site is approximately 1 mile. Therefore, any effects from the proposed Project will not affect structures. The overall change in topography of the site will take place downstream of the diversion structure and the crest elevation of the diversion structure is not being modified, therefore no changes in the hydraulics will propagate upstream. The proposed Project is located in Section 20, Township 7 South, Range 91 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. See attached Location and Vicinity Map for additional information. The Project provides many environmental, agricultural, structural and safety benefits to the watershed. The Project includes the installation of an 80 -foot rock ramp at a slope of 5% to allow native bluehead sucker fish to navigate an existing 3 foot, vertical, diversion structure. These types of structures are known to have safety concerns associated with low head dams and can cause 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 1 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek underwater eddies. The Project will re-establish floodplain connection through the Project area as well as stabilize eroding banks. The existing diversion structure is severely undercut and has the potential of failing at any time. Therefore, the Project will also stabilize the existing diversion structure to keep it from failing in the future. The Project will provide for a more resilient and sustainable ecosystem. The area will be revegetated after construction to mimic surrounding conditions. The Project is a multi -benefit project being led by the Middle Colorado Watershed Council and is in alignment with the Colorado Water Plan and the Colorado River Roundtable Basin Implementation Plan. A pre -application meeting took place with Glen Hartman from Garfield County as well as Michael Erion of Resource Engineering to discuss the Project and evaluation approach. 3.0 CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE CODE This section outlines the various land use code requirements of Garfield County and addresses them for this Project directly or in subsequent sections. This Project meets the intent of applicable land use codes set forth by Garfield County. Below are overall excerpts and discussion on how the Code is met. Included in this document are more descriptive discussions as well as all the required submittal aspects. Section 3-301: Floodplain Overlay Regulations The Project fits within many of the allowed uses within Floodway and areas outside the Floodway but within the 100 -year floodplain, such as agricultural uses, open space structure not intended for human habitation, dams, irrigation structures, bank restoration and bank stabilization (3-301(A)). The Project meets the general standards for improvements by being adequately designed to prevent floatation, collapse, or lateral movement; will be constructed by methods to minimize flood damage; and with materials resistant to flood damage (3-301(B). It has been demonstrated through hydraulic modeling, in accordance with standard engineering practice, that the proposed Project would not result in an increase of the flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the Base Flood Discharge (3-301 (D)). Drainage is not near structures and will also not adversely impact adjacent properties (3-301(E)). The Project appropriately considered issues of sediment transport, erosion, deposition and channel migration; meets all applicable Federal, State, and local 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 2 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek Floodplain requirements and regulations; and this report constitutes its hydraulic evaluation to show a No -Rise in base flood elevations within the floodway or floodplain (3-301(G)). Table 4-102: Common Review Procedures and Required Notice It is understood that this Project is subject to an Administrative Review and a decision can be made by the Director as shown in Table 4-102 of the Code. Section 4-109: Development in the 100 -Year Floodplain This document is to provide support of the Floodplain Development Permit application prior to any work being performed in the 100 -year floodplain. This document and the Project are in compliance with Section 3-301, Floodplain Overlay Regulations, and upon weighing the relevant factors listed below. Along with the relevant factors, how this project is in conformance with the section is noted. 1. The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; a. There will be no effect on the danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage caused by this project. 2. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; a. There will be no effect on the susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage caused by this project. 3. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; a. There will be no danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others caused by this project. 4. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; a. There will be no effect on the compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development caused by this project. 5. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; a. There will be no effect on the safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 3 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek 6. The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of streets and bridges, and public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems; a. There will be no effect on the costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of streets and bridges, and public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems caused by this project. 7. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site; a. There will be no effect on the expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site caused by this project. 8. The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; a. The proposed `facility' is the enhancement of a diversion structure which must reside at a waterfront location. 9. The availability of alternative locations, not subject to flooding or erosion damage, for the proposed use; and a. The proposed work is taking place at an existing diversion structure therefore there are no alternative locations. 10. The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan for that area. a. The proposed use does not disagree with the Comprehensive Plan. Table 4-201: Application Submittal Requirements This document is to provide the required information as provided in Table 4-201 for development in the 100 -year floodplain. Included in this submittal are general application materials, a vicinity map, a site map, and a floodplain analysis as well as other supporting information required. Section 4-203: Description of Submittal Requirements A licensed Professional Engineer in the state of Colorado, Scott Schreiber PE #: 46577, developed this application and performed the engineering analysis for this Project. Scott practices in the area of water resource engineering and develops fish passage projects across the state. An application form has been developed and is included in this document as an appendix. Included in the 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 4 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek appendices is also an owner authorization letter from the Bureau of Land Management, who owns the land where the Project will take place. Also included in the appendices is information on the adjacent property owners and mineral owners and lessees within 200 -foot radius or mineral estate owners in the Project area. It is our understanding from discussions with the County that since this Project was initially managed by a local non-profit and funded by the Bureau of Reclamation that review fees for the Floodplain Development Permit would be waived. Other items required are included in this submittal in conformance with Section 4-203, which include: project description, vicinity maps, site plans, grading and drainage plans, hydraulic calculations, and revegetation plans. Requirements from Section 4-203(0) were also adhered to for the floodplain analysis. Section 4-203(0): Floodplain Analysis A floodplain analysis was completed which meets the intent of the land use code. The information required of the land use code for this Project is contained within this document. The Project takes place in an unmapped floodplain. There also is not a mapped floodway. The Project takes place on East Divide Creek. There are no insurable structures affected by or part of this Project. Non applicable requirements of 4-203(0) include floodway boundary, since one doesn't exist; elevation of lowest floors, since buildings don't exist in project area; boundaries of impervious surfaces, since none exist in Project area; elevation certificate since one is not needed; Revegetation The area will be revegetated with the use of existing on-site materials including willows. Seed mixes from the BLM or Garfield County will also be used as needed. 4.0 SECTION 404 PERMIT Consultation with the US Army Corps of Engineers has taken place for this Project. It has been determined that Project is considered exempt from 404 permitting due to the fact the work is part of construction or maintenance of irrigation ditches. No mitigation is required of this project, since the inherent nature of the Project is mitigation itself. The documentation of this is provided in the appendices. 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 5 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek 5.0 CONSTRUCION During construction all materials, equipment and refueling will be stored outside of the approximated 100 -year floodplain. The Project is less than one acre of disturbance; therefore, a stormwater management plan is not required. Even though a plan is not required the contractor is responsible for installation and maintenance of stormwater controls for the site. This will limit erosion and sedimentation in downstream waterways. Installation of Best Management Practices will be reviewed by the engineer and modified as required. The project will be constructed with the use of earth moving equipment including but not limited to excavators and hand equipment. 6.0 FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS 6.1 EXISTING FLOODPLAIN MAPPING Currently there is not a mapped floodplain in this area. The most current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Garfield County (080205V001A) was updated on August 2, 2006 (FEMA 2006). The current FIS does not have any documentation on East Divide Creek. The most current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) is Map Number 0802051800B (FEMA 1977) and is noted as "Not Printed" on the FEMA Map Service Center. The proposed Project area is in a very rural and secluded area. There are no known flooding issues at the site. 6.2 SURVEY Surveying for the Project area was performed by WWE. Existing ground topography including the creek and diversion structure was acquired in the summer of 2018. The vertical datum used for this survey was National American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). The horizontal datum utilized was Colorado State Plane Central — US Foot. The ground survey was also supplemented with LiDAR data that were obtained from a 2016 LiDAR survey performed by Merrick and Company in 2016. The LiDAR survey was developed for the Colorado Water Conservation Board. Proposed grading for the Project area was developed by WWE. 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 6 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek 6.3 HYDROLOGY This analysis used hydrology from the StreamStats as well as fish passage criteria developed by Colorado Parks and Wildlife. The 100 -Year peak flow was estimated to be 863 cfs. The output from StreamStats is available in the appendices. 6.4 HYDRAULICS The hydraulic analysis was performed using HEC -RAS version 5.0.5 (Corps 2018) as well as Aquaveos' Surface -water Modeling System version 13.0) (SRH2D 2018). The hydraulics calculated along East Divide Creek were assessed using steady-state conditions and the hydrologic conditions described in this section. A two-dimensional hydraulic model was used to evaluate hydraulics at the site through the main rock ramp to ensure fish passage and associated velocities are understood and then the model was developed with one-dimensional cross sections directly up and downstream of the Project area to show no changes in base flood elevations outside the Project area. These hydrologic conditions are the same in both the Existing Conditions and Proposed Conditions Models. The most critical control elevation of the Project, the crest of the existing diversions, will not be changed as part of this Project. Therefore, work associated with this Project will not cause modifications to the base flood elevations. The following sections provide information on the development of the Existing Conditions and Proposed Conditions Models. 6.5 EXISTING CONDITIONS MODEL The Existing Conditions Model was developed from ground survey data supplemented with LIDAR data (Merrick and Company 2016) at multiple cross sections where the geometry is critical for the hydraulic analysis. Since there is no effective model or existing floodplain mapping cross sections were placed at hydraulically significant locations along the Project reach. The Project area consist of an existing cross -stream diversion structure. The existing diversion structure is approximately 3 feet tall. The structure has a 3 foot scour hole on the downstream side that is currently undercutting the diversion structure. Pictures have been provided in the appendices for your reference. 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 7 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek Bank stations were set based on an evaluation of the cross-section information in the HEC -RAS model and site visits Manning's 'n' was based on a review of aerial imagery and field observation. Roughness coefficients were conservatively chosen to represent the springtime vegetated conditions. Pictures in appendices show the typical roughness. The following Manning's 'n' values were used: • Channel. 0 04 • Willows along the bank: 0.07 These values were kept consistent between the Existing and Proposed Conditions Models. Ineffective flow areas were utilized to account for flow areas with little or no flow conveyance. The upstream boundary of the hydraulic model was extended about 50 feet upstream of the existing diversion structure. The model was extended about 50 feet downstream of the proposed improvements. The downstream hydraulic control for the HEC -RAS model was set based on the normal depth calculation with a channel slope of 3%. Channel and overbank reach lengths were developed based on a review of aerials photographs and surveyed topography. 6.6 PROPOSED CONDITIONS MODEL The Proposed Conditions Model was developed by incorporating the proposed topography and fish passage designs into the Existing Conditions Model. Extents of the Manning's were modified to take into the proposed design elements. Modifications to the overall topography of the Project area only occur downstream of the diversions structure. 6.7 COMPARISON OF EXISTING CONDITIONS TO PROPOSED CONDTIONS The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the potential hydraulic effects of the Project. Overall the Project will not cause rises in base flood elevations outside the Project extents. The overall Project length is less than 100 feet. There are no structures within proximity to the structure that would be affected in any way by this Project. The Project actually reduces concerns from flooding in the area by stabilizing the structure and reduce impacts of scouring on the structure and surrounding banks. 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 8 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek The HEC -RAS output (including tables, profiles and cross sections for the existing and proposed conditions) are available in the appendices. 7.0 OWNERSHIP The land where the Project is proposed is owned by the Bureau of Land Management. The Parcel Number is 239917400954. Attached in the appendices is a property search performed on the Garfield County Assessors page with map print out and property records card. There are no other properties within 200 feet of the Project area. The closest property to the west is Parcel Number 239919200003 and to the east is Parcel Number 239920100121. 7.1 DITCH CONTACT The work taking place as part of this project is at a diversion structure associated with the King Heatherly Ditch. The ditch itself or the functionality of the ditch will not be affected as part of this project since the upstream side of the diversion is not being affected. Contact information for the ditch is Gary Erpestad and can be contacted at 970-379-1564. 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 2 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek 8.0 REFERENCES Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2006. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Garfield County, Colorado and Incorporated Area. FIRM Map Number 080205V001A, FEMA, August 2. Merrick and Company. 2016. Li DAR. Colorado Water Conservation Board. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). 2018. Hydrologic Engineering Center—River Analysis System, HEC -RAS, Version 5.0.5 USACE Hydrologic Engineering Center. June. G:\WWE\181-047\000\Engr\Floodplain Report\East Divide Creek Floodplain Development Report.docx 181-047.000 November 2019 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 3 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek A.1 Application Form 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 1 leGarfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICATION Administrative Review ✓ Development in 100 -Year Floodplain ❑Limited Impact Review 0 Development in 100 -Year Floodplain Variance ❑Major Impact Review 0 Code Text Amendment nAmendments to an Approved LUCP 0 Rezoning ❑LIR ❑MIR SUP Zone District ❑PUD ❑PUD Amendment Minor Temporary Housing Facility ❑Administrative Interpretation ❑Vacation of a County Road/Public ROW ❑Appeal of Administrative Interpretation ❑Location and Extent Review ❑Areas and Activities of State Interest ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑Accommodation Pursuant to Fair Housing Act Pipeline Development ❑Variance Time Extension (also check type of original application) INVOLVED PARTIES Owner/Applicant Name: Bureau of Land Management Phone: ( 970 ) 876-9000 Mailing Address: 2300 River Frontage Rd City: Silt State: CO Zip Code: 81652 E-mail: cmickschl@blm.gov Representative (Authorization Required) Name: Scott Schreiber Phone: ( 970 ) 945-7755 Mailing Address: 818 Colorado Avenue City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 E-mail: sschreiber@wrightwater.com PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION Project Name: King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek Assessor's Parcel Number: Physical/Street Address: 1387-3369 County Road 313 Legal Description: SE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section: 20 Township: 7S Range: 91W 12,263 Zone District: Property Size (acres): PROJECT DESCRIPTION Existing Use: The existing use is an agricultural irrigation water diversion structure that is failing. Proposed Use (From Use Table 3-403): Agriculture Description of Project: The proposed project is rehabilitating a failing diversion and incorporating fish passages into the proposed rehabilitation. The existing structure is severely undercut. The existing cross channel diversion dam causes a large vertical drop that fish cannot make it past. Therefore, the project benefit is environmental and agricultural uses. The project will install an 80' rock ramp, stabilize eroding banks, stabilization of existing diversion structure and re -vegetation after construction. REQUEST FOR WAIVERS Submission Requirements 0 The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4-202. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: Waiver of Standards ❑ The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4-118. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. CHADWICK MICKSCHL Digitally signed by CHADWICK MICKSCHL Date: 2019.08.23 16:48:09 -06'00' 8/23/2019 Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Representative, Title Date OFFICIAL USE ONLY File Number: _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ Fee Paid: $ Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek A.2 Proof of Ownership 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 In Reply Refer to: 7221-CON040 United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Colorado River Valley Field Office 2300 River Frontage Road Silt, Colorado 81652 (970) 876-9000 August 23, 2019 Garfield County Glen Hartmann Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 GIenwood Springs, CO 81601 To Glen, The King Heatherly Diversion Structure on East Divide Creek resides on BLM property within the SE1f4 of the NW1l4 of Section 20, Township 7S, Range 91W. The BLM, with support from the Middle Colorado Watershed Council and the water rights holder, seeks to improve water right delivery and fish passage at the King Heatherly Diversion Structure. Improvements consist of building a fish ramp, bank stabilization features and replacing the headgate. Scott Schreiber of Wright Water Engineers will be providing engineering design and project oversight for the construction of this project. The BLM is in support of Scott Schreiber to submit designs and permit applications associated with this project on behalf of the BLM. Sincerely, Brian Hopkins Assistant Field Manager, Colorado River Valley Field Office Bureau of Land Management 2300 River Frontage Road Silt, CO 81652 In Reply Refer to: 7221-CON040 United States Department of the Interior Garfield County Glen Hartmann Community Development Department 108 8'h Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 To Glen, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Colorado State Office 2850 Youngfield Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7210 January 23, 2020 The King Heatherly Diversion Structure on East Divide Creek resides on BLM property within the SE1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 7S, Range 91W. The BLM, with support from the Middle Colorado Watershed Council and the water rights holder, seeks to improve water right delivery and fish passage at the King Heatherly Diversion Structure. Improvements consist of building a fish ramp, bank stabilization features and replacing the headgate. Scott Schreiber of Wright Water Engineers will be providing engineering design and project oversight for the construction of this project. The BLM is in support of Scott Schreiber to submit designs and permit applications associated with this project on behalf of the BLM. Sincerel Larry Saria1 Field Manager, Colorado River Valley Field Office Bureau of Land Management 2300 River Frontage Road Silt, CO 81652 INTERIOR REGION 7 • UPPER COLORADO BASIN COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, WYOMING gPublic.netGarfield County, CO R230801. 239911,9300092 1,110 ft Account Number R231042 Parcel Number 239917400954 Acres 12,263 Land SgFt 0 Tax Area 023 2019 Mill Levy 64.751 Physical Address 0 Owner Address Date created: 8/13/2019 Last Data Uploaded: 8/13/2019 3:07:45 AM Developed by46.10 Schneider GE OSPAT IAL Overview • Legend Parcels Roads Highways = Limited Access — Highway Major Road Local Road Minor Road Other Road Ramp Ferry Pedestrian Way Parcel/Account Numbers Owner Name Lakes & Rivers 2019 Total Actual Value $73,580 Last 2 Sales NEW CASTLE 81647 Date Price BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT n/a $ 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD n/a $ SILTCO 81652 8/13/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO qPublic.net"' Garfield County, CO Summary Account R231042 Parcel 239917400954 Property , NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Address Legal Section: 17 Township: 7 Range: 91 SEC.3 LOT 4 SWSW SEC.4 LOTS 1-4 Description S2S2 SEC.5 LOTS 1-3 S2SE SEC.6 SESE SEC.7 LOTS 1-4 E2W2,E2 SEC.8, SEC.9, SEC.10 W2,W2E2,SENE,E2SE SEC.11 W2SW SEC.14 W2,W2E2,SENE SEC.15, SEC.16, SEC.17, SEC.18 LOT 1 E2NW,NESW,E2 SEC.19 NE Acres 12262.69 LandSqFt 0 Tax Area 23 Mill Levy 64.751 Subdivision View Map Owner BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT CO 81652 Actual Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Actual $73,580.00 $73,580.00 $73,580.00 Improvement Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Actual $73,580.00 $73,580.00 $73,580.00 Assessed Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Assessed $21,340.00 $21,340.00 $21,340.00 Improvement Assessed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Assessed $21,340.00 $21,340.00 $21,340.00 Tax History Tax Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 Taxes Billed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Garfield County Treasurer's website. No data available for the following modules: Buildings, Transfers, Photos, Sketches. The Garfield County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 8/13/2019,1:07:45 AM Version 2.2.37 Schneider GE OSPAT IAL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PagelD=9447&KeyValue=R231042 1/1 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek A.3 List of Property Owners Within 200 Feet List of Property Owners Within 200 Feet Account Number Parcel Number Name Street Address Town Area Code R023121 2399213000012 Rogers, June Anita & John Stuart 5101 Mountain View Road Hughson, CA 95326 R023376 239919200003 Spring CreekRanch 8020 Forsyth Blvd Saint Louis, MO 63105 R082598 239920100121 Tompid Revocable Trust 3369 County Road 313 New Castle, CO 81647 R084146 239920400001 Rogers Colorado Washington LLC 5101 Mountain View Road Hughson, CA 95326 R230801 2399193000092 Spring Creek Ranch 8020 Forsyth Blvd Saint Louis, MO 63105 R231042 239917400954 Bureau of Land Management 2300 River Frontage Road Silt, CO 81652 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023121 gPublic.net"' Garfield County, CO Summary Account R023121 Parcel 239921300012 Property 3369 313 COUNTY RD, NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Address Legal Quarter: SW SWNW, NWSW, 51/251/2 Section: 20 N1/2NE, SENE, SE Description Section: 28 NE EXCEPT A TR OF LAND CONT 1.837 AC +/- AS DESC IN BNDY LIE ADJ REC #737531 & QCD REC #737528 EXCEPT A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NWSE OF SECTION 20, SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 35.5 Acres 642.663 Land SqFt 0 Tax Area 23 Mill Levy 64.751 Subdivision View Map Owner ROGERS, JUNE ANITA &JOHN STUART, TRUSTE 5101 MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD HUGHSON CA 95326 Land Unit Type SINGLE FAM.RES: LAND- 1112 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Square Feet 0 Buildings Building# 1 Units 1. Building Type SFR Abstract Codes / (Property Type) SINGLE FAM.RES-IMPROVEMTS-1212 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Architectural Style MANUFACTURED -HUD Stories 1 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 1977 Basement Area 0 Finish Basement Area 0 Gross Living Area 1,344 Total Heated SqFt 1,344 Bedrooms 3 Baths 1 Heating Fuel GAS Heating Type FORCED Al R Air Conditioning NONE Roof Type GABLE Roof Cover COMP SHNGL Building# 2 Units 1. Building Type SFR Abstract Codes / (Property Type) SINGLE FAM.RES-IMPROVEMTS-1212 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Architectural Style 1 -STORY Stories 1 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 1965 Basement Area 0 Finish Basement Area 0 Gross Living Area 575 Total Heated SqFt 575 Bedrooms 1 Baths 1 Heating Fuel WOOD Heating Type WOOD STOVE Air Conditioning Roof Type GABLE Roof Cover PRO PANEL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PagelD=9447&Q=1321267988&KeyValue=R023121 1/4 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023121 Actual Values Assessed Year Land Actual Improvement Actual Total Actual Assessed Values Assessed Year Land Assessed Improvement Assessed Total Assessed Tax History Tax Year Taxes Billed 2019 2018 2017 $845,000.00 $37,680.00 $38,150.00 $222,990.00 $148,010.00 $148,010.00 $1,067,990.00 $185,690.00 $186,160.00 2019 2018 2017 $60,420.00 $10,930.00 $11,070.00 $15,940.00 $14,110.00 $14,110.00 $76,360.00 $25,040.00 $25,180.00 2018 2017 2016 2015 $1,621.36 $1,458.64 $1,096.72 $1,003.92 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Garfield County Treasurer's website. Transfers Sale Date Deed Type Reception Number Book - Page Sale Price Grantor Grantee 7/25/2018 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 9/8/2008 EASEMENT View Document 12/5/2007 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT View Document 11/6/2007 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT View Document 11/6/2007 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 11/6/2007 QUITCLAIM DEED View Document 10/31/2007 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 11/12/2004 RIGHT OF WAY View Document 1645-289 3/26/1992 DEED View Document 0827-0063 4/26/1977 WARRANTY DEED View Document 0496-0426 11/1/1976 WARRANTY DEED View Document 0489-0935 Photos Sketches https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppI D=1038&Layer) D=22381 &PageTypel D=4&Pagel D=9447&Q=1321267988&KeyValue=R023121 2/4 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023121 24' FDP 240.0 sf b 24' 56' ONE 1344.0 sf 56' FOP 80.0 sf Co 10' Mimic by Asp. Pfter•-• 25' ONE 350.0 sf 25' 15' ONE ui 225.0 sf Addn, 15' L FOP 70 sf https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&Layer) D=22381 &PageTypelD=4&Pagel D=9447&Q=1321267988&KeyValue=R023121 3/4 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023121 • RESI #2 $ }5 SF RESI #1 L1664 SF EQUIPMENT SHED 854 SF 14X61 BARN W/ LOFT 3200 SF 40X8 The Garfield County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 11/14/2019, 10:25:59AM Version 2.3.21 Developed by (Z) Schneider 6f OSPATIAL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&Layer) D=22381 &PageTypelD=4&Pagel D=9447&Q=1321267988&KeyValue=R023121 4/4 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 ; gPublic.net"' Garfield County, CO Summary Account R023376 Parcel 239919200003 Property 811 313 COUNTY RD, NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Address Legal Section: 19 Township: 7 Range: 91 SEC 18 LOTS 2(47.92A) 3(47.61A) Description 4(47.27A) SESW SEC. 19 LOT 1(48.56A)W1/2NE, SENE, E1/2NW, NESW, N1/2SE. PT OF N1/2SE(75.71A) & NESW(6.6A). EXCEPT A TRACT OF LAND CONTAINING 35.963 AC.+/- KNOWN AS THE RANCH MANAGER PARCEL Acres 597.707 Land SqFt 0 Tax Area 23 Mill Levy 64.751 Subdivision View Map Owner SPRING CREEK RANCH LLC 8020 FORSYTH BLVD SAINT LOUIS MO 63105 Land Unit Type IRRIGATED LAND-AGRICLTRL.-4117(AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square Feet 0 Unit Type GRAZING LAND -AGRICULTURAL - 4147 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Unit Type GRAZING LAND -AGRICULTURAL -4167 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Unit Type LAND NOT INTEGRAL TO AG OPERATION - 1177 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Buildings Building# 1. Units 1 Building Type SFR Abstract Codes / (Property Type) FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE -IMPS -4277 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) IMPROVEMENT NOT INTEGRAL TO AG OPERATION -1277 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Abstract Codes / (Property Type) Architectural Style 1. 1/2 STRY Stories 2 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 1989 Basement Area 2,700 Finish Basement Area 2,295 Gross Living Area 2,880 Total Heated SqFt 5,175 Bedrooms 5 Baths 4.5 Heating Fuel GAS Heating Type FORCED Al R Air Conditioning CENTRAL Roof Type RIDGE FRME Roof Cover COMP SHNGL Building# 4 https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 1/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 Units 1 Building Type SFR Abstract Codes / (Property Type) FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE -IMPS -4277 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) IMPROVEMENT NOT INTEGRAL TO AG OPERATION -1277 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Abstract Codes / (Property Type) Architectural Style 1 -STORY Stories 1 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 1939 Basement Area 0 Finish Basement Area 0 Gross Living Area 743 Total Heated SqFt 743 Bedrooms 1 Baths 1 Heating Fuel WOOD Heating Type WOOD STOVE Air Conditioning NONE Roof Type GABLE Roof Cover COMP SHNGL Building# 3 Units 1 Building Type FARM/RANCH Abstract Codes / (Property Type) FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE -IMPS -4277 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) IMPROVEMENT NOT INTEGRAL TO AG OPERATION -1277 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Abstract Codes / (Property Type) Architectural Style 2 -STORY Stories 2 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 1929 Basement Area 0 Finish Basement Area 0 Gross Living Area 1,527 Total Heated SqFt 1,527 Bedrooms 3 Baths 1 Heating Fuel GAS Heating Type WALL&FLOOR Air Conditioning NONE Roof Type GABLE Roof Cover COMP SHNGL Building# 2 Units 1 Building Type SFR Abstract Codes / (Property Type) FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE -IMPS -4277 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) IMPROVEMENT NOT INTEGRAL TO AG OPERATION -1277 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Abstract Codes / (Property Type) Architectural Style 1 1/2 STRY Stories 2 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 2018 Basement Area 1,188 Finish Basement Area 924 Gross Living Area 1,672 Total Heated SgFt 2,596 Bedrooms 4 Baths 3 Heating Fuel GAS Heating Type FORCED Al R Air Conditioning CENTRAL Roof Type GABLE Roof Cover STANDING METAL SEAM Actual Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Actual $225,210.00 $255,360.00 $101,980.00 Improvement Actual $1,471,740.00 $774,340.00 $605,920.00 Total Actual $1,696,950.00 $1,029,700.00 $707,900.00 Assessed Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Assessed $35,800.00 $46,810.00 $29,580.00 Improvement Assessed $130,840.00 $78,010.00 $46,450.00 Total Assessed $166,640.00 $124,820.00 $76,030.00 https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 2/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 Tax History Tax Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 Taxes Billed $8,082.20 $4,404.28 $3,655.96 $3,346.52 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Garfield County Treasurer's website. Transfers Sale Date Deed Type Reception Number Book - Page Sale Price Grantor Grantee 4/9/2018 Right Of Way Easement View Document 1/18/2018 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED View Document 1/18/2018 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED View Document 11/21/2017 Permit View Document 9/6/2017 EASEMENT View Document 12/22/2016 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED View Document 12/22/2016 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 12/21/2016 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED View Document 2400000 SPECHT, LISA TRUSTEE CHAPMAN, ROBERT H 11/11/2016 POWER OF ATTORNEY View Document 9/16/2011 Plat View Document 8/31/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 6/30/2006 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED View Document 1820-808 6/30/2006 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 1820-805 3/21/2005 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 1676-702 2/22/2005 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 1676-706 3/13/1989 WARRANTY DEED View Document 0750-0545 10/28/1974 DEED View Document 0645-0093 10/28/1974 WARRANTY DEED View Document 0466-0059 Photos Sketches https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 3/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 26' FOG 624 sf FOP —" sr Main House (Ye/low House) 54 FOP/65mT 504 sF OHB 36 sF 6 6' OHB 36 sF OHB 72 sF OHB 72 sF FINISHED HFLF STORY OHB 1186 sF OHB 72 sF OHB 36 sF 2 6' 12' OHB 72 sF OH6 36 sF O P' 6S F1T 504 sF 54' fUNFIN DUE TO ROOFLINE https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 4/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 OH13/LIBM FHS 108 sf Stairs 12' ADU r 10' ` tt r 50sf OHB/FBM FHS 376 sf 10' 5' 11' 0 Open to Below OW13/FMB 498 sf 33' https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 5/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 10' Addition - ONE '1 110 sf Employee Housing (White House w/ Green Trim) 19' Addition Cellar Underneath 7' ONE 289 sf 13' rJ TWO 564 sf FOP 154 sf 22' https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 6/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 Cabin #2023 Openended Shed 90 sf 15' ONE 743 sf FOP 112sf 16' 20' 19' N Prop erky Layout ivf' old 1.ck�.i �• i36;F„'. rn isauiamv 2ctu :�.h4id1Tnt A41101. aMja c ti it's_ CREEK https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 7/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R023376 The Garfield County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 11/14/2019, 10:25:59AM Version 2.3.21 Developed by Schneider GEOSPAT IAL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=1662061102&KeyValue=R023376 8/8 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R082598 gPublic.net"' Garfield County, CO Summary Account R082598 Parcel 239920100121 Property 3369 313 COUNTY RD, NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Address Legal Quarter: NE Section: 20 Township: 7 Range: 91 Subdivision: Description TOMLINSON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION Lot: 1 2ND AMENDED, RECEPTION # 843092. Acres 39.023 LandSqFt 0 Tax Area 23 Mill Levy 64.751 Subdivision TOMLINSON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION View Map Owner TOMPID REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MARCH 7, 20 3369 COUNTY ROAD 313 NEW CASTLE CO 81647-9652 Land Unit Type GRAZING LAND -AGRICULTURAL -4147 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Buildings Building# 1 Units 1 Building Type FARM/RANCH Abstract Codes / (Property Type) FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE -IMPS -4277 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Architectural Style 1-STRY/BSM Stories 1 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 1983 Basement Area 2,336 Finish Basement Area 0 Gross Living Area 2,336 Total Heated SgFt 2,336 Bedrooms 3 Baths 2.5 Heating Fuel ELECTRIC Heating Type ELEC BS BD Air Conditioning NONE Roof Type GABLE Roof Cover CEDAR SHAK Actual Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Actual $930.00 $890.00 $890.00 Improvement Actual $436,510.00 $297,700.00 $297,700.00 Total Actual $437,440.00 $298,590.00 $298,590.00 Assessed Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Assessed $270.00 $260.00 $260.00 Improvement Assessed $31,890.00 $22,070.00 $22,070.00 Total Assessed $32,160.00 $22,330.00 $22,330.00 Tax History Tax Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 Taxes Billed $1,445.88 $1,293.52 $1,096.72 $1,003.92 https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&Layer) D=22381 &PageTypelD=4&Pagel D=9447&Q=2033792511 &KeyValue=R082598 1/3 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R082598 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Garfield County Treasurer's website. Transfers Sale Date Deed Type Reception Number Book - Page Sale Price Grantor Grantee 11/12/2013 Plat View Document 7/30/2008 EASEMENT View Document 6/16/2008 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 6/10/2008 RESOLUTION View Document 2/21/2008 EASEMENT View Document 12/5/2007 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT View Document 11/6/2007 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT View Document 11/6/2007 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 11/6/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 10/31/2007 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 7/30/2007 CORRECTION QUIT CLAIM View Document 1956-698 11/19/2004 RIGHT OF WAY View Document 1645-294 10/10/2001 QUITCLAIM DEED View Document 1298-655 10/10/2001 AFFIDAVIT View Document 1298-654 5/9/2001 AFFIDAVIT View Document 1261-869 5/9/2001 QUITCLAIM DEED View Document 1261-867 4/26/1977 WARRANTY DEED View Document 0496-0426 Photos Sketches https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=2033792511 &KeyValue=R082598 2/3 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R082598 Yrch yeC.aa .6P di. The Garfield County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 11/14/2019, 10:25:59 AM Version 2.3.21 Developed by Schneider GEOSPLTILL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=2033792511 &KeyValue=R082598 3/3 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R084146 ; gPublic.net"' Garfield County, CO Summary Account R084146 Parcel 239920400001 Property 3369 313 COUNTY RD, NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Address Legal Section: 20 Township: 7 Range: 91 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN Description THE NWSE OF SECTION 20, SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 35.5 AC. +/- AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED PER WARRANTY DEED RECEPTION NO. 912303 35.5 ACRES Acres 35.5 Land SgFt 0 Tax Area 151 Mill Levy 64.751 Subdivision View Map Owner ROGERS COLORADO WASHINGTON LLC 5101 MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD HUGHSON CA 95326 Land Unit Type GRAZING LAND -AGRICULTURAL - 4147 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Unit Type GRAZING LAND -AGRICULTURAL - 4147 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Actual Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 Land Actual $940.00 $470.00 Improvement Actual $0.00 $0.00 Total Actual $940.00 $470.00 Assessed Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 Land Assessed $270.00 $140.00 Improvement Assessed $0.00 $0.00 Total Assessed $270.00 $140.00 Tax History Tax Year Taxes Billed Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Garfield County Treasurer's website. 2018 $9.08 https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=70767436&KeyValue=R084146 1/2 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R084146 Transfers Sale Date Deed Type Reception Number Book - Page Sale Price Grantor Grantee 7/25/2018 WARRANTY DEED View Document 7/25/2018 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 7/25/2018 WARRANTY DEED View Document 9/8/2008 EASEMENT View Document 12/5/2007 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT View Document 11/6/2007 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT View Document 11/6/2007 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 11/6/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 10/31/2007 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY View Document 11/12/2004 RIGHT OF WAY View Document 1645-289 3/26/1992 DEED View Document 0827-0063 4/26/1977 WARRANTY DEED View Document 0496-0426 11/1/1976 WARRANTY DEED View Document 0489-0935 No data available for the following modules: Buildings, Photos, Sketches. The Garfield County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 11/14/2019,10:25:59 AM Version 2.3.21 Developed IT Schneider GE OSPAT IAL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PagelD=9447&Q=70767436&KeyValue=R084146 2/2 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R230801 ; gPublic.net"' Garfield County, CO Summary Account R230801 Parcel 239919300092 Property , NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Address Legal Section: 19 Township: 7 Range: 91 LOTS 2(48.75), 3(48.95), 4(49.14), Description SESW, S1/2SE. Section: 30 Township: 7 Range: 91 LOT 1(49.31), NENW, N 1/2N E. Section: 24 Township: 7 Range: 92 S1/2NE, N1/2SE. Section: 25 Township: 7 Range: 92 NENE(NET 37.14AC) EXCEPTT Acres 584.226 Land SgFt 0 Tax Area 23 Mill Levy 64.751 Subdivision View Map Owner SPRING CREEK RANCH LLC 8020 FORSYTH BLVD SAINT LOUIS MO 63105 Land Unit Type GRAZING LAND -AGRICULTURAL - 4167 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Unit Type GRAZING LAND -AGRICULTURAL - 4147 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square 0 Feet Actual Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Actual $12,030.00 $11,420.00 $11,420.00 Improvement Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Actual $12,030.00 $11,420.00 $11,420.00 Assessed Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Assessed $3,490.00 $3,310.00 $3,310.00 Improvement Assessed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Assessed $3,490.00 $3,310.00 $3,310.00 Tax History Tax Year Taxes Billed 2018 2017 2016 2015 $214.32 $191.76 $154.36 $141.32 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Garfield County Treasurer's website. Transfers Reception Book- Sale Sale Date Deed Type Number Page Price Grantor Grantee 1/18/2018 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED View Document 1/18/2018 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED View Document 12/22/2016 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED View Document 12/22/2016 STATEMENT OF View Document AUTHORITY 12/21/2016 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED View Document 1350000 SPECHT, LISA -TRUSTEE CHAPMAN, ROBERT H 11/11/2016 POWER OF ATTORNEY View Document 8/31/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 6/15/2005 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 1700-898 6/15/2005 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED View Document 1700-893 288800 ROGERS, RONALD J & HEIL, MICHAEL ROGERS, RONALD J D 2/22/2002 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 1334-769 https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=2067665196&KeyValue=R230801 1/2 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R230801 Sale Date Deed Type 2/22/2002 WARRANTY DEED Reception Book - Sale Number Page Price Grantor View Document 1334-767 500000 MCCRAY RANCH COMPANY LTD. 6/13/2001 AGREEMENT View Document 1261-469 6/13/2001 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 1261-467 4/11/1986 COURT DECREE View Document 0687-0301 3/24/1983 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED View Document 0625-0545 3/24/1983 DEED IN LIEU OF View Document 0623-0653 FORECLOSU 11/2/1979 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 0541-0712 8/18/1975 QUIT CLAIM DEED View Document 0478-0116 No data available for the following modules: Buildings, Photos, Sketches. Grantee ROGERS, RONALD J & HEIL, MICHAEL D The Garfield County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 11/14/2019, 10:25:59 AM Version 2.3.21 Developed by (ZS Schneider GEOSPATIAL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppI D=1038&Layer) D=22381 &PageTypel D=4&Pagel D=9447&Q=2067665196&KeyValue=R230801 2/2 11/14/2019 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R231042 ; gPublic.net"' Garfield County, CO Summary Account R231042 Parcel 239917400954 Property , NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Address Legal Section: 17 Township: 7 Range: 91 SEC.3 LOT 4 SWSW SEC.4 LOTS 1-4 Description S2S2 SEC.5 LOTS 1-3 S2SE SEC.6 SESE SEC.7 LOTS 1-4 E2W2,E2 SEC.8, SEC.9, SEC.10 W2,W2E2,SENE,E2SE SEC.11 W2SW SEC.14 W2,W2E2,SENE SEC.15, SEC.16, SEC.17, SEC.18 LOT 1 E2NW,NESW,E2 SEC.19 NE Acres 12262.69 Land SciFt 0 Tax Area 23 Mill Levy 64.751 Subdivision View Map Owner BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT CO 81652 Land Unit Type EXEMPT-FEDERAL-LAND-NONRES - 9119 (EXEMPT PROPERTY) Square Feet 0 Actual Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Actual $73,580.00 $73,580.00 $73,580.00 Improvement Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Actual $73,580.00 $73,580.00 $73,580.00 Assessed Values Assessed Year 2019 2018 2017 Land Assessed $21,340.00 $21,340.00 $21,340.00 Improvement Assessed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Assessed $21,340.00 $21,340.00 $21,340.00 Tax History Tax Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 Taxes Billed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Garfield County Treasurer's website. No data available for the following modules: Buildings, Transfers, Photos, Sketches. The Garfield County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 11/14/2019, 10:25:59AM Version 2.3.21 Developed by 46/Schneider GEOSAATIAL https://gpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerlD=22381 &PageTypelD=4&PageID=9447&Q=300067440&KeyValue=R231042 1/1 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek A.4 List of Mineral Right Owners on Subject Property 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 Le Garfield County I CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL OWNER RESEARCH This form is to be completed and submitted with any application for a Land Use Change Permit. Mineral interests may be severed from surface right interests in real property. C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, requires notification to mineral owners when a landowner applies for an application for development from a local government. As such, the landowner must research the current owners of mineral interests for the property. The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code of 2013 ("LUDC") Section 4.101(E)(1)(b)(4) requires written notice to owners of mineral interests in the subject property in accordance with C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, "as such owners can be identified through the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means." This form is proof of applicant's compliance with the Colorado Revised Statutes and the LUDC. The undersigned applicant certifies that mineral owners have been researched for the subject property as required pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, and Section 4-1010E}(1)(b)(4) of the Garfield County Lend Use end Development Code, as emended. As a result of that research, the undersigned applicant certifies the following (Please initial an the blank line next to the statement that accurately reflects the result of research): I own the entire mineral estate relative to the subject property; or X Minerals are owned by the parties listed below The names and addresses of any and all mineral owners identified are provided below (attach additional pages as necessary): Name of Mineral Owner Mailing Address of Mineral Owner James Hofhneister 1437 No Name Lane Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 Cecil Philpott 3038 Milburn Court Grand Junction, Co 81504 I acknowledge 1 reviewed C.R.S. § 24-65.5401, et seq, and I am In compliance with said statue and the LUDC. Applicant's Signature 7 Date 4/27,7 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek B Vicinity Map 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 Project Location (Pre-FLPMA ROW) • r ' 7 ♦ •i rrttrf � `r � i � r • t • •� •.'N.. i• • w • r • . •• dr•P • . , ♦ Path: G:\WWE\181-047\000\GIS\MXD\Location and Vicinity Mapl.mxd WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. GARFIELD COUNTY COLORADO LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP KING HEATHERLY DIVERSION STRUCTURE FISH PASSAGE DESIGN PROJECT NO. 181-047.000 FIGURE 1 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek C Site Plan 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 Plot Date/Time: 05/09/2019, 07:33:43 AM; G:\WWE\181-047\000\CAD\DRAWINGS\COVER.DWG—COVER 810 MIDDL COLORADO A RS D COUNCIL , , Know what's below. Call KING A R Y DIV RSION S RUC UR before you dig. I S PAS SAG D SIGN 60%DESIGN (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) 24 mk, . 0 . TO -7-.4' livilf.- INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION PROJECT CONTACTS m . . - a i i 4:,-•0 1' -s . k a 1 COVER SHEET 2 NOTES, LEGEND AND QUANTITIES 3 HORIZONTAL CONTROL 4 ROCK RAMP PLAN AND PROFILE 5 SECTIONS 6 REVEGETATION PLANS 7 DETAILS • MIDDLE COLORADO WATERSHED COUNCIL- NATHANIEL HIGGINSON, (970) 625-1829 • WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. - SCOTT SCHREIBER, P.E., (970) 945-7755 • BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT - TOM FESQUE, (970) 876-9078 • RANCH MANAGER - PROJ ECT LOCATION • CONTRACTOR - THESE DRAWINGS ARE CONCEPTS ONLY 7. cc `' ,.;, a cr k Rd FOR THE PURPOSES OF COST ESTIMATION BY CONTRACTORS. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED AT THE 60% LEVEL. THERE WILL BE CHANGES IN THE FIELD BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AND AVAILABLE MATERIALS. SOME MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE ON SITE, VICINITY MAP BUT WILL NEED TO BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH OFFSITE MATERIALS. THE INTENT OF THESE DESIGNS IS TO SOLICIT CONTRACTOR SECTION 20, T7S, 91W, COLORADO SIXTH INTEREST TO MOVE DESIGNS FORWARD IN THE FIELD. 1"=5,000' 0 5,000 10,000 PRINCIPLE Feet REVISIONS COMMENTS COMMENTS KING HEATHERLYDIVERSION STRUCTURE JOB NO. N0. BY DATE _ CoDDESIGN SDS 05DATE TE19 PASSAGE DES/GN 181 047.000 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS,INC. � - - -FISH �j� �O� DETAIL SDS 05/10/19 REVISION NO. 818 COLORADO AVE. P.O. BOX 219 sj� ,�O CHECK HAL 05/10/19 X GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 s APPROVAL & 1 (970)945-7755 FAX(970)945-9210 % /�j� SCALE 1" = 5,000' COVER SHEET SHEET NO. , COVER.dwg 1 Plot Date/Time: 05/13/2019, 02:27:36 PM; G:\WWE\181-047\000\CAD\DRAWINGS\NOTES AND LEGEND.DWG—NOTES LEGEND AND QUANTITIES w 0 w GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL (UDFCD) STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, PROJECT CONTRACT AND PROJECT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. 2. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ALL WORK IS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH BY THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (O.S.H.A.). 3. NO FIELD CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 4. SUBMITTALS SHALL BE MADE FOR ALL MATERIALS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT. 5. THE PHYSICAL FEATURES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN SHOWN BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION AT THE TIME OF DESIGN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY EXISTING PHYSICAL FEATURES AND ELEVATIONS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT ALL WORK AND STORAGE AREAS TO THE APPROVED PROJECT SITE, AND EASEMENTS. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN PRE-FLPMA RIGHT OF WAY OR BLM ACCESS ROADS. 7. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO INCLUDE COMPACTION AND FINISH GRADING IN THE RELATED WORK ITEM. 8. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE TO THE LINES, GRADES, SECTIONS, AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 9. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. 10. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED WITHIN 48 HOUR PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THOSE AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND/OR TOES OF SLOPE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ANY DISTURBANCE BEYOND THESE LIMITS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER OWN EXPENSE. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND REROUTE ANY RUNOFF AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT EROSION AND DAMAGE. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLOSELY MONITOR ACCESS FOR HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT THROUGH THE PROJECT. 14. THE PHYSICAL FEATURES REQUIRING REMOVAL OR OBLITERATION WITHIN THE PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING ANY MONUMENT, RANGE POINTS, TIES, BENCHMARKS AND/OR SURVEY CONTROL POINTS WHICH MAY BE DISTRIBUTED OR DESTROYED BY CONSTRUCTION. SUCH POINTS SHALL BE REFERENCED AND REPLACED WITH APPROPRIATE MONUMENT BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A COPY OF ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS ON SITE FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 17. ANY DISCREPANCY WITHIN THESE PLANS SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER AND WORK SHALL STOP UNTIL THE DISCREPANCY IS DISCUSSED AND DECISIONS/AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT ARE PERTINENT TO THIS WORK. 19. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY THE OWNER. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT ANY SUCH MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP THAT DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ONE SIGNED COPY OF THE APPROVED PLANS, ONE COPY OF THE APPROPRIATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND A COPY OF ANY PERMITS NEEDED AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. 21. PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND RECORD NOTES AND PICTURES OF EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE SITE AND ADJACENT PROPERTY DURING PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING. 22. UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES AND USES: THE ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. 23. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY OF ANY FIELD CONDITION NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGES ANY EXISTING SITE OR PUBLIC/PRIVATE AMENITIES (PAVEMENTS, CURBS, CURB AND GUTTER, SOD, GRASS, LANDSCAPING, TREES, FENCES, ETC.) OUTSIDE OR WITHIN THE EASEMENTS OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, THEY SHALL REMOVE AND REPAIR SUCH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS. 25. ITEMS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS. 26. ALL ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BID TAB AND NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONAL PROJECT OR NOTED AS 'INCIDENTAL' IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS OR WILL NOT BE MEASURED AND PAID FOR SEPARATELY BUT ARE INCLUDED IN THE WORK. 27. DIMENSIONS AND NOTATIONS SUPERSEDE SCALE OF THE DRAWINGS. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. PROJECT NOTES 1. THE DESIGNS DEVELOPED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT ARE CONSIDERED 60% DESIGNS. THEREFORE IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT DESIGN CHANGES WILL TAKE PLACE IN THE FIELD TO MEET THE DESIRED INTENT OF THE PROJECT. 2. THE OVERALL GOAL OF THE PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP A NEWBURY RIFFLE (ROCK RAMP) AT A SLOPE OF 5%. THE ROCK RAMP IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PREVENT FLOWS INFILTRATING BELOW THE TOP LAYER OF STREAM SUBSTRATE. VARIATION IN THE SURFACE PROFILE AND HEIGHT OF BOULDERS SHOULD ALLOW FOR RESTING AREAS AND AREA OF REFUGIA. 3. THE GOAL OF THIS DESIGN IS TO PROVIDE BETTER FISH PASSAGE AT AN EXISTING DIVERSION STRUCTURE THAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT ALLOW NATIVE FISH TO MOVE UPSTREAM. THE VERTICAL DROP CURRENTLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE DIVERSION STRUCTURE WILL BE MODIFIED TO INCLUDED A ROCK RAMP WITH LARGER BOULDERS TO PROVIDE REDUCED VELOCITY AND HOLDING AREAS FOR FISH AS THEY PROGRESS UPSTREAM. BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED IN A WAY TO DISSIPATE VELOCITY VECTORS AND PROVIDE INCREASED ROUGHNESS TO REDUCE OVERALL VELOCITY OF FLOWS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE DEIGN INTENT. 4. MANY OF THE MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT ARE LOCATED ON SITE, ON ACCESS ROAD, OR AT A NEARBY RANCH 2 MILES AWAY. THE INTENT OF THE PROJECT IS TO LIMIT IMPORTING OF MATERIALS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING QUANTITIES OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF MATERIALS THAT MUST BE SOURCE FROM OFF SITE. MODIFICATIONS TO THE OVERALL QUANTITIES WILL TAKE PLACE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ONCE ON-SITE MATERIAL VOLUMES HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO WORK WITH THE OWNER IN EVALUATING ON SITE MATERIALS AND SUPPLEMENTING WITH AN OFF SITE SOURCE. 5. MANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED IN THE QUANTITIES ARE TYPICAL UDFCD ITEMS. TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP, TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE, AND TYPE VL RIPRAP CAN BE GENERATED FROM EXISTING ON SITE OR NEARBY MATERIALS. USE OF MATERIALS WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED BY ENGINEER. THE BOULDERS LISTED IN THE QUANTITIES ARE MINIMUM SIZES. BOULDERS CAN BE FOUND ON SITE AND USED TO SUPPLEMENT OFF SITE MATERIALS. 6. BOULDER EDGING IS ALSO SPECIFIED TO REDUCE EXISTING BANK EROSION AND PROVIDE GREATER CHANNEL RESILIENCE IN THE FUTURE. 7. AN EXISTING SEDIMENT SLUICE IS LOCATED ON THE FACE OF THE DIVERSION THAT WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A HEADGATE WILL BE INSTALLED AND CONNECTED TO A PIPE TO ALLOW THE SEDIMENT SLUICE TO DAYLIGHT DOWNSTREAM OF THE DIVERSION STRUCTURE. THE EXISTING DIMENSIONS OF THE OPENING FOR THE SEDIMENT SLUICE SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO ALLOW FOR PROPER ORDERING OF THE HEADGATE AND TIME TO PROCURE. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THE NECESSARY MATERIALS ARE ON SITE IN A TIMELY FASHION TO NOT DELAY CONSTRUCTION. 8. THIS DESIGN IS INTENDED TO BE FIELD ENGINEERED DEPENDING ON THE CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD FIELD CHANGES MIGHT BE REQUIRED. 9. SALVAGEABLE MATERIAL FOUND ON SITE MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. SALVAGEABLE MATERIAL INCLUDES LARGE BOULDERS, WILLOWS AND EXISTING STREAM SUBSTRATE. 10. COORDINATION WITH THE MIDDLE COLORADO WATERSHED COUNCIL, RANCH MANAGER AND BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. 5. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION TO BE PROVIDED BY ENGINEER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. ADEQUATE NOTICE SHALL BE GIVEN TO CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION PERSONNEL AT THE ONSET OF THE PROJECT, DURING MAJOR CONSTRUCTION MILESTONES, SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION, AND FINAL COMPLETION. 6. SURVEY OF EXISTING GRADE PERFORMED BY ENGINEER WITH LIMITED RESOURCES, EXISTING GRADES AND FEATURES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY ELEVATION DISCREPANCIES. 7. THE DESIGN OF THE FISH PASSAGE STRUCTURE WAS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER. THE DESIGN INTENT IS TO PROVIDE A VELOCITY BETWEEN 2 AND 4 FEET PER SECOND FOR A RANGE OF FLOWS FROM 20 TO 100 CUBIC FEET PER SECOND. THE MAXIMUM JUMP HEIGHT OF THE SPECIES OF INTEREST HAS BEEN SET BY THE MIDDLE COLORADO WATERSHED COUNCIL OF 3 INCHES, BUT THE INTENT IS TO PROVIDE NO VERTICAL SEPARATION IN FEATURES AND ALL SHALL BE SLOPED. 8. DEPENDING ON TIME OF YEAR CONSTRUCTION IS PERFORMED DEWATERING MIGHT BE REQUIRED. THE DEWATERING PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER AND OWNER PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. WORK IS ALLOWED IN THE WET, BUT AT CONTRACTORS RISK TO ENSURE BASE BOULDERS ARE ANCHORED IN EXISTING GRADE. 9. ACCESS TO THE SITE IS VIA EAST DIVIDE CREEK ROAD. ACCESS FROM EAST DIVIDE CREEK ROAD AND SITE LOCATION IS VIA DIRT ROAD WITH ONE CREEK CROSSING. 10. ALL WORK MUST BE PERFORMED WITHIN THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT PRE -FEDERAL LAND POLICY AND MANAGEMENT ACT (PRE-FLPMA). SITE CONDITIONS 1. ANY CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS OR MUD TRACKING ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, RESULTING FROM THE PROJECT, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY FIX ANY EXCAVATION, OR PAVEMENT FAILURE CAUSED BY THE PROJECT, AND SHALL PROPERLY BARRICADE THE SITE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDITIONS AT, AND ADJACENT TO, THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRENCH EXCAVATIONS AND SHORING, TRAFFIC CONTROL, SECURITY, AND SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY, AND SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE OWNERS TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SANITARY FACILITY AT THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCEPTANCE, CONVEYANCE, AND CONTROL OF ALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER FLOWS IN AND ENTERING THE AREA AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OPERATIONS OR ANY OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS TO PREVENT POLLUTION OF THE AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY NEEDED DEWATERING OPERATIONS INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED PERMITS FOR DEWATERING OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AND PROVIDE DRAINAGE THROUGH THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION DURATION AND SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR REMEDIATION OF ANY ADVERSE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT WATERWAYS, WETLANDS, ETC., RESULTING FROM WORK DONE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT, MUD, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, OR OTHER POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN DISCHARGED TO OR, ACCUMULATE IN, THE FLOW LINES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAYS AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. SAID REMOVAL SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A TIMELY MANNER. 7. SOILS THAT WILL BE STOCKPILED FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM WIND AND WATER EROSION WITHIN 14 DAYS OF STOCKPILE CONSTRUCTION. IF STOCKPILES ARE LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A DRAINAGEWAY, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS SUCH AS TEMPORARY DIKES OR SILT FENCE SHALL BE REQUIRED. 8. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION WILL NEED TO BE LOCATED BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROTECTION OF ANY UTILITIES AFFECTED BY THE EXECUTION OF THIS CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AND AGENCIES AND FOR THE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK IN THE PROXIMITY OF THE UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THAT ALL UTILITIES MAY NOT APPEAR ON THESE PLANS. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. QUANTITIES lowwwmft below. Call before you dig. BID ITEM NUMBER ITEM UNIT QUANTITY 1 MOBILIZATION' LS 1 2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LS 1 3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 4 WATER CONTROL AND DEWATERING2 LS 1 5 TYPE VL RIPRAP CY 28 6 TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP CY 101 7 TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE CY 53 8 BOULDER EDGING CY 56 9 BOUDLER SILLS CY 45 10 FEATURE BOULDERS CY 13 11 HEAVY WEIGHT NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SY 49 12 HEADGATE5 EA 1 13 18 INCH ADS HP STORM PIPES LF 41 14 R EVEGATATIO N5 LS 1 15 BIORETENTION BLANKET SY 288 *PAYMENT WILL ONLY BE MADE FOR ITEMS LISTED HERE. IF AN ITEM OR PIECE OF WORK IS NOT LISTED IT IS CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL AND INCLUDED IN THE COST OF WORK. LEGEND 6555 EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING DIVERSION STRUCTURE EXISTING DIVERSION PIPE 6555 PROPOSED CONTOURS ■ • gopallopall gimp. II-IIII II-IIII II - III PROPOSED SEDIMENT SLUICE PIPE PROPOSED SOIL RETENTION BLANKET PROPOSED TYPE VL RIPRAP PROPOSED TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP PROPOSED NATIVE STREAM SUBSTRATE PROPOSED PIPE BEDDING PROPOSED WILLOW AND RIPARIAN SEEDING PROPOSED NON WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ODC1 PROPOSED BOULDERS SECTION PAGE NUMBER DETAIL ifr PAGE NUMBER A SECTION CALLOUT DETAIL CALLOUT WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. 818 COLORADO AVE. P.O. BOX 219 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 (970)945-7755 FAX(970)945-9210 REVISIONS COMMENTS NO. BY DATE DESCRIPTION 0 DATE DESIGN SDS DETAIL SDS 05/10/19 05/10/19 KING HEA THERL Y DIVERSION STRUCTURE FISH PASSAGE DESIGN JOB NO. 181-047.000 CHECK HAL 05/10/19 APPROVAL SCALE N/A NOTES AND LEGEND.dwg NOTES, LEGEND, AND QUANTITIES REVISION NO. X SHEET NO. 2 w 0 w -__. 1.11F iv 24 - \\\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \�__- -_ Feet PROPOSED EAST DIVIDE CREEK CENTERLINE y I110 \\ \\ __ -_ •IP :IIIP - - --- \ --_ 41 10 -_ \ �_ 414441. \ illik ail.EXISTING \\ 0+00 OP STA. 0+00.00, 0.00' N:1589944.83 E:2412088.60 - \ �iii,, AO • w6sss • C1 • ®\ .1, �I • y40 ko LO LO . 7 CO \ \ ♦ 1a APN. \\ --_ DIVERSIONP % - - _ _ STRUCTURE \ _ _ - -- - \\ _ -- ---___ \ _____ - ---- or % _ - --., , _.\\\ \\v,, ,.... ..\, --1 � , , \ \ 4 lo• IIIIW 44p ar I\ I Illip.• SS hhCili ' 1 8 L.„ . • is �,It 1 I PO71 a al % 6556 __ \\\k\\\\ O4P ' • i. ) \\\ i ... IR ID i%1 ip �.�- vat ma - 411 mmi 6555 > 13 \71 \\\ .' 0111 S�� S' r-\ \\ _ <� s coco 7) III �J� III6555 �� Os �O 0 65 54 fTl � � cy • ,63 II 0,6.6„ � � s • 553 r- II 1 1 . 1 .,= 1 73 G-5 • // /)\ - • I I...a, X55 ' . \ \ \\ \ ..... .. •••••• all 111P 0+00 two • _Ti) C I -)'• 4655 1+ 0 L3 L4 L5 X 0 FLOW al \ \ \ \ \ We ie L9 \\ \\ III_• _ _ a aill L10-- - L6 _ IN laillta is , \:\b, imalfillIMM 655 5 oilo D 11111 ` _ - _APO L 11 �fr' L 12 L 13 6555 \ ,1 /"\ _ - - - _ _ 000 lit _ _ • \ \ \ \ \ ell 6555-- ,\ STA. 1+52.74, 0.00' N:1589848.76 STAGING AREA AND _ - 14E:2412201.07 ACCESS TO CREEK 655, \,\ • k STA. 0+65.27, 6.31 R STA. 1+31.16, 0.00' 6555 ‘1. C9� N:1589855.58 i \ \ / \ N:1589886.93 E:2412121.27 655 6 PROPOSED SEDIMENT PROPOSED - , E:2412180.61 ® 655 SLUICE PIPE ALIGNMENTif HEADGATE a � •` •. STAGING AREA AND _ PROPOSED EAST DIVIDE CREEK CENTERLINE v ACCESS TO CREEK _ NUMBER RADIUS LENGTH LINE/CHORD DIRECTION START POINT END POINT s ^ \ SITE ACCESS MAP C1 34.00 11.03 S38° 41' 04.37"E 1589944.83, 2412088.60 1589936.25, 2412095.47 \ _ 14MIK , \ \ L1 18.22 S26° 56' 17.86"E 1589936.25, 2412095.47 1589920.01, 2412103.72 - ' 7 i PROTECT EXISTING DIVERSION PIPE IN O* , •. , , �. k , + C2 103.22 43.02 ° S39 26 43.23E 1589920.01, 2412103.72 1589887.03, 2412130.86 , -' , i, PLACE { _ ,: . _ y ,. i..' --- �, •t • -, ,ti EVA!.A f, L2 27.84 ° S56 03' 46.30"E 1589887.03, 2412130.86 1589871.49, 2412153.95 ��� /� / /moi ��- 7� 7 t.. 4, _• ��� ". =..4. . '.. :ry ' .;� t i'lits‘ L3 4.66 S57° 25' 50.30"E 1589871.49, 2412153.95 1589868.98, 2412157.88 = :.. ' ACCESS WORK AREA FROM• • ... r =• L4 0.67 S57° 25' 50.30"E 1589868.98, 2412157.88 1589868.62, 2412158.45 EAST DIVIDE CREEK ROAD L5 10.64 S57° 25' 50.30"E 1589868.62, 2412158.45 1589862.89, 2412167.42 - - _ - • - - ' L6 15.07 S61° 01' 26.72"E 1589862.89, 2412167.42 1589855.58, 2412180.61 PROJECT LOCATION ,;; ACCESS ROAD PRE-FLPMA RIGHT OF WAY ' r illr k PROPOSED SEDIMENT SLUICE PIPE ALIGNMENT - / ` ik t is . NUMBER RADIUS LENGTH LINE/CHORD DIRECTION START POINT END POINT - / _ Fir ' L9 16.94 S51° 13' 05.75"E 1589892.16, 2412114.77 1589881.56, 2412127.98 \ i \\'' L10 16.00 S54° 12' 41.97"E 1589881.56, 2412127.98 1589872.20, 2412140.95 \ \ STAGING/ACCESS - AREAS I L11 16.00 S57° 12' 41.97"E 1589872.20, 2412140.95 1589863.53, 2412154.41 \ \ \ �� L12 5.38 S56° 41' 09.71"E 1589863.53, 2412154.41 1589860.58, 2412158.90 ` NOTES: \ ACCESS TO SITE , / - VIA DIRT ROAD L13 5.38 S56° 41' 09.71"E 1589863.53, 2412154.41 1589860.58, 2412158.90 //•- 1. STATION AND OFFSETS ON PROPOSED \ SEDIMENT SLUICE PIPE BASED ON 0 400 800 REQUIRES ONE L14 22.27 S77° 02' 42.22"E 1589860.58, 2412158.90 1589855.58, 2412180.61 • ALIGNMENT FROM CENTERLINE OF CREEK. Feet CREEK CROSSING 2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED FEATURES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. -, REVISIONS COMMENTS COMMENTS TE DC KING HEATHERLYDIVERSION STRUCTURE JOB NO. N0. BY DATE _ DESIGN SDS 05DATE19 FISH PASSAGE DES/GN 181 047.000 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS INC./ /� - - - 4 �0 DETAIL SDS 05/10/19 REVISION NO. 818 COLORADO AVE. P.O. BOX 219 S), CHECK HAL 05/10/19 X GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ''S'& O,Q APPROVAL HORIZONTAL (970)945-7755 FAX(970)945-9210 '/ SCALE AS SHOWN CONTROL SHEET N0. O,j, BASE.dwg 3 \\ NOTES: 0 12 ---- 24 ---- \ TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP CAN BE REPLACED \ BOULDER VANE \ �, - \ \ \\ HEAVY WEIGHT - BOULDER EDGING WITH EXISTING NATIVE FILL MADE OF ROCK - - Feet - _ \ O+pp 6 - _ _ _ . BURIED BELOW \ \ NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE \ �\ �\ \__- . GRADE \ 0/` \ WITH D50 GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 9 I \ 0 6) 6.56,6 INCHES AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER \\ to.0000��01 Ls • I I �, 000000.1000 s; • s t TYPE L SOIL v `�- - - - - . %%%.....e._••••••••••0•••000•••000.00 v )•i!1 4 •0000000•.�001000000110000000000000� RIPRAP v _ - C - _ �, v a- ro �4 00100000000 00000000.000•••••••••••0•••_•••••••••( ` v v , N. v , v , v , - - ', __ - _ - _ - v v r ,• Al SACC 00000.0000001100000000••00. 000000000 N - _ N , , -, - ,- - ,v v .� ,,,V•41' fp) •, • •' FEATURE 001 . 0000.0000000 OOOO�IOOOr0r000001100000 N v v _ _ - - �,�-°., , ��• �,i0.0• r000O000000000 SOOOOOOOG�00.0000••000 . N ' 7 y 7- _ - - PROPOSED EAST D I V I D E '�4 OI �� . - BOULDERS I0t •0000000000 • 0 IPOS**00••0000000e0 v v i -� ,• ���j •� •v�� v •U . �� I � � � I -� - °c6, \ \ `� Y '.,��n ° - �� ♦ 00 0000000000 • 000000000000 000 001c• �; -L = CREEK E E K AL I G N M E N T \ \ 004�11� • , , ��� 0001A00�t0 �/ 00000.00000�0a 100000000.00 00!'00; \ s� BOULDER EDGING TO PROVIDE ` 000000 i100000sesseet • 000****00000 _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ - , _ --.\,,, � \ �' ���,�• I °. i _ --\ •,� • °,, 000 !1 000000000000i�0 t • Q 0 11000000000000 00 ,- _ _ \ \� \ \\ \ \ ••♦ , Y 000000000000000 _ - \ \ \,\\\ ` •� • 000000000000.0 -- \\ \\ • '•ry -, ' v- , ��'- -4v 1 000 000/x00 �!�I� �, vI 00 •0000000 00000000000 0? O.O= 1 00000000000! 000.000 40===iii*000100.0000 000000000000 �i00000• 0 1•O 0 0 O ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦tel O 0 \ \ DEFINED CHANNEL AND TERRACE �I \ _ _ _ _ \ 6556 - \ \ PROPOSED EAST DIVIDE \ �- - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ /� v \ \ > I \ \\ .. �° r �.�• ► ,, \ II \\ \�` ��i°� •�1� r -v I• ��� \\\\\\\ \ i • s �, �.• II \� , \ • \s ��' . .• •- .,� , III \\ _, �. :, ��. .• ..... _.•� �7� �� -. , • \\ \ �rla ' / v�vvv v,, <I ! i '� % ' ' 0 v "° 0 ' • \ \ \\ �O��O I 1�/ ' r ��•• Y �•0�0000r0�t0 A 00 _��00 �W WNW 0 ... � c . �-� � 41,0 ° ' -v0( !, �/ • r -° . . r �-° ° .• i�co L� � 1i00000000000�tO000r0 __O X0000„00 , ®� • �, OOOO.O.OeO�, 0000110 00 ►000000 *mow • _� • � 1Mma �� moo, .�� �• IOC I° 00 l •° r . �, • �I I� \ 000000000 • 000000000.00000000000,1000100 0000000000000000000.000.000 000000000 �/ �� / 6 UI 555 CREEK CENTERLINE ,\�_ 00010000 �'''�, �,/%do �..� i 1 i �__--- ____---- N---- _ _ - - - _ - _ \ \\ - _ _ _ _ _ -6555 -i \\ ` _ _ - - , - _ _, - -6554- - - r \\ `�i1i/ J° I• I •°��ri ' • • • , -.4 i�•�. 1 l/ \\ �, �r/ moi►` • ► • // Qui=>>�./0 �• 000A000��� lam�� BOULDER SILL•1�d�00 O=�r,�,I� .6 �l'M���� O $Alr \ \ \ \ \ \ / .0.0ea' 6, \ \\ . �• s� I . • ► ° °I • �P �• • • ° °. • s �i���-! °int ' < V 0-4° �s �. -°'% _�� .✓•-°•� ' i�` 1 III/ VJ - _ _ vi ► - r S 553 ► - -° �I• \ 1+5 • ;4?;i??�, . ,1 - _ X56 - - - - - .� moo, • �k� 6553 1 �•IN-° r - -� \ \ \ \ \ \ ;0000/i• 1 000 +pp . �,.I1� f \ ee== / _ •� _ _ �•�°���°� �� ■� /� \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \\\000040000140 �`.1 ' � �� \ \ \ \ \\ \ 00000.0 ► , �/• 4��: .. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - , • 0000.000.00�.��, �� \ \\ \\\ � �� 4r)'3 •. \ \ \\ \ - 0,000i16.0�0�e0t.er• er 00•pR--.- \ \ \ \ \ �C=l00►.. �`00101�0�� • 0000 /000000is���•.�__ _ �_��� - .,��I• r - �- FLOW `��°i, - �� 53 '�� -� - _ - - 65 _ilk./ _ _ ,��..�=�(-__-_-6554' �J\\\ W i.- , 55 - / - r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ i _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \X0000► •.0,••0000000000000_000 •"00•000000•0e, \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\�000000e/='=/,/ 55300='0000000000000000'0000000e00000•i0i00000� 0000000000�•000000000iL0:0'=00�00�,0 \\\\\\\:\\,\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ 0 0000 •0.000000.000••••••00 • 0000000`000000000-�� - - - _'.i .55 , 65 004•imem•w - - , - , - yy,�j � \ � � � ��///\\\\\ \ \ \\\\ NOTES: \\\\\\ ROCK RAMP 000 65 •••i.•000000000•� •• �00000•�••••••••••••441 _ _ _\ \ \\\ \ s i,00•:�!s. \ \ \ 0:000• • s •fit_000001•► ***001.00000 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V�•, �,1'6�1, •••••�Dee00000000•••• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ TYPE E M VOID I D FILLED RIPRAP 6555'' , - - - - - - _ \ \ \ - -- \ \\\\ \ \ \\\\\\\\ / WITH RIVER COBBLE ___,6556-' SEDIMENT SLUICE PIPE' -- \, � � \ \ \ \ \ ,�' ,F551 18 ADS HP STORM �� �� PROPOSED SEDIMENT 0000001000O\ SLUICE PIPE ALIGNMENT / i 0000000000 J / ----� PROPOSED 43 / -- �' HEADGATE /'�� "/ // - - - PROPOSED EAST DIVIDE CREEK CENTERLINE PROFILE 1 /� \ \\ \ \ II i /7 i' 1. INTENT OF DESIGN IS TO LIMIT INFILTRATION OF WATER INTO 67' ►� SUBGRADE. THEREFORE NATIVE CLAY SHOULD BE MIXED WITH TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE AND TYPE VL RIPRAP TO- - N CO °' 4 O M Ln PROVIDE AS IMPERMEABLE SURFACE AS POSSIBLE. 2. TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE CAN BE o o Q `,° Q co II w SUPPLEMENTED WITH NATIVE STREAM SUSBTRATE EXISTING AT THE 6555 ti o 1-w 0) uJ ROCK RAMP w w 6555 SITE AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 3. PROVIDE BOULDERS AT CREST OF DIVERSION TO REDUCE POTENTIAL w N LS_ PROPOSED _�- w'�� �� `���� 2'� 2 FOR SCOUR HOLE FORMING. EXISTING Q J w w GRADE _ �. - I �. - �. �. �. 3lee rall24 /101 �� 40 .��olori r, _- -- --. �--. -- .64-- -_.64_ .- - -- THICK -.-- _ __4r.,� ` EXISTING DIVERSION 4. BOULDER SILLS AND NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO ACT AS BARRIER TO GRADE w' �' �' �' �' �'• �' '-Oh �' i= ' STRUCTURE SUBGRADE FLOWS. NATIVE CLAY TO BE COMPACTED AGAINST BOULDERS AND GEOTEXTILE. =-e--- �-��-��-��-��-��- v -t -A�-� -�- �-� -, -� -��-� -_� �= �` ��� 6550 5. BURY FOOTER BOULDERS 2 DIAMETER INTO EXISTING GRADE WITH 1•IPS�' `�- ,�•e AI' A' S � `44- 00, �• • �"'-" u u �/ �/ �/ �/ \«� \1C1i `r' VL RIPRAP WITH MAX D50 OF 6550 GEOTEXTILE. 2'� - "-"•1�1- '- 2-3' OBOULDERS AS SILL `�'�.0���� � 4' MIN 6" OR APPROVED EQUAL 6. PROVIDE FEATURE BOULDERS AND LARGE ROUGHNESS ELEMENTS am HEAVY WEIGHT - 2' - 3' 0 STACKED MIXED WITH ONSITE CLAYS THROUGHOUT ROCK RAMP. FEATURE BOULDERS TO BE BURIED 0. 2 7. PROFILE OF RAMP TO HAVE SMALL POCKETS OF RESTING AREAS AND ARMORED SCOUR HOLE NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BOULDERS 6546 MINOR VARIATIONS IN SLOPE.. 0+00 NOTES: PROPOSED SEDIMENT SLUICE 6546 1+00 1+25 PIPE ALIGNMENT PROFILE 6560 6560 1. PIPE TO BE BURIED IN BANK AND PROTECTED WITH BOULDERS AND z TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP. ; o STRATEGICALLY PLACE TYPE L RIPRAP TOP PIPE 2. UPSTREAM INVERT OF 18" RCP TO BE SET AT OR BELOW INVERT OF = o rrj SOIL ON OF CAREFULLY TO NOT DAMAGE PIPE o > HEADGATE EXISTING DIVERSION PIPE. 3. EXISTING OPENING IN DIVERSION FOR SEDIMENT SLUICE IS 2.16' a ° 2 `n J w _ u) EXISTING OPENING IN TALL BY 2.16' WIDE AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. _ DIVERSION STRUCTURE 4. GROUT PROPOSED PIPE TO DIVERSION STRUCTURE.6555 -���..1reel -O �0 ���0==OisOaOaymiOa _ ____��� oon -7 EXISTING GRADE 6555 5. PROVIDE SUBMERGED ORIFICE HEADGATE WITH HANDLE ON 0 UPSTREAM SIDE OF DIVERSION. HEADGATE TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER AND INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. PLACE 2'-3' BOULDERS 41 LF OF 18" ADS HP STORM PIPE WITH 3° DEFLECTION AT EACH JOINT 2.16' 6' 6. GRANULAR MATERIAL TO BE COMPACTED AS SUBGRADE FOR PIPE AROUND EXIT TO CONVEY _ _ _ III III III ISI ISI ISI Iii Hi Hi ii iii ��� ��� ����L-, P E R MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. FLOW BACK TOWARDS =III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III= L=1 U I11 7. PROVIDE BOULDERS AT OUTLET AS ENERGY DISSIPATION AND BANK CENTER OF CREEK AND - -W ll 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 11 111 L 6550 PROTECTION. PROTECT BANK - -i u _� 1_11_,, Ill_ = J I EXISTING DIVERSION 6550 -moi__IdL BEDDING STRUCTURE 6547 0+00 0' 0' 0+77 H O RZ 1" = 6' 12' REVISIONS COMMENTS DATE KING HEA THERL YD/VERS/ON STRUCTURE JOB NO. N0. BY DATE DESCRIPTION - 00 DESIGN SDS 05/10/19 FISH PASSAGE DES/GN 181-047.000 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS / INC. - tO DETAIL SDS 05/10/19 REVISION NO. , 818 COLORADO AVE. P.O. BOX 219 <S'i, ,�O CHECK HAL 05/10/19 X GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ,Q APPROVAL (,c>7 (970)945-7755 FAX(970)945-9210 % /Ojj SCALE AS SHOWN PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET N0. , BASE.dwg 4 w 0 w -i--ii-SEC ..5j HORZ 1" = 6' VERT 1" = 3' CROSS SECTIONS ARE LEFT TO RIGHT LOOKING DOWNSTREAM XS STA. 1 +25 XS STA:1 +00 XS STA:0+75 6560 - aactLs) O •�, L Cfl tt in 6560 6560 - n LC C\1.71: OD i 6560 6560 O • CN 6560 SCO ~CO 22 I-cc)�2 ti W 1t ~C4 LU t2 21 It H� W u to f-2 e W W lf) -11149 W co LLw W Ow Ow Lu u_W p-' LiW W W p -I OJ W W U_ LU OJ W LWilj LWiW p w p W w pW 9'- �, �, — 7' // _ 13' _ - 11' r now pri._iiiii, --wi 1 �� . 6555 6555 6555 s 6555 6555\19' 6555 c i .►.A.._144444 • •••••••••• ` �e�•!i��i�'i!i EXISTING GRADE ��, ,� �� — — — — ww`•mAlacdadhir w�w UUUUU t.44 *PH* i• PROPOSED GRADE ...�•�•�•�•�•�� ,� , �,�� , � \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ ff _ � � � ____�_�_ � � �. . . - ••••• •, - •• •�•�•�•�•�•. •� •• •• •• .� v �� TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP ,\/\/\/\/\/\/\/, /\/\/\/\// \� \/ \/ !�_��_��_��_��_�� \/ \/ '-'' \ TO EXISTING GRADE 2' - 3' BOULDERS BURIED � � � _ � � �V/ � �/ \' � F \/ UUUUUUUU>� � � � � � y ---- 6550 - TO HALF DIAMETER 6550 6550 6550 6550 L \/ \/ \/ ir \/ \/ \/ \-/-- 1 Ul CI 1 C VERT1"=3' TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE( CAN BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH EXISTING NATIVE STREAM SUBSTRATE) 18" ADS HP STORM PIPE WITH BEDDING 6545 6545 6545 6545 6545 0 -20 0 -20 XS STA:0+50 XS STA:0+30 n _�n 6545 0' 0� HORZ 1" =\6' 12• 6560 to 6560 6560 o Co a n L0 6560 11 &R tai 11 1)1_,,r) LO H up 11LU 11 u ti CD LU i1 ti 11 10U LU LL> I-> �> LL 9' Ow OLU LL W Li W Li W w Ow LL W O�� OJ JJ u W pJ \ .\� 13' J I I, /I I N. III I I / 1 I • ` ` 0 / � N. � \ �`� � � ��0\�` �� \\ \ \ 1 1�/► I ♦ \ \\ i / N \ \ \ \` \ . \\\\\\\:\ \ /41:11/1//111 / 1 1� �� ' P . t1`♦� / / %%�/III 1 ets F\ \ \ � \ I = �� 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ / / \ ' \\\ \ 6555 6555 6555 6555 I�_ - �'`� / k30 \ ` ��isA / �'Il \\\\ 13'• .y 0 I \ \\\\\\ \\\\ te.t • TYPE L SOIL fjZ I P RAP -�_ •�•� \ - `����/ • s �- .?••;• I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ •Iddii 4::: I io•`�i��i'• neon. 11 / /-6555s* • ., 1,, �� •••••� Oh �•• \ \ \ \ \\ �� I \ 6550 .T �.� W. ,Cor ,C. v -v 6550 6550• •••••, _ 6550 i I w�►` �`� `�� _;':_!=: � ���`�••� ' �•�•�•�•�•�•�•••� . 2'-3'\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I BOULDERS U L D E RS • • • • • �' / a ,o • \ \ \ \ \ ;e s • n� ••• ••••••••,.��•,•••.•� c� I \ \ �' Y_•�' ••• =•=•=•=•`.=•=•=e=• ^ I\\ I \\111,11.00. 111, ��•• • .0410.040 X52 \ ` -. �� •� ♦♦♦♦ •� =X`� r�� '•i•••=••••44 4`1•' -\--Or ••••• �� NATIVE STREAM \ \\\\\ \ • ••••••••••••••'i• •!i•••`�••••• \ •,•�s ♦ ,_`v- SUBSTRATE \ • •�`• • � •••••••••••iat , �?••••••••••••• \ \ ♦•.�••; • • ••• II•C••••• \ \ �•�• co V A •e•�••�� '�:''�:� ••••••LA -m --•••••-•-•••••—m- V A rA ; 56 \`••��••�� •-•=- •-ice ••••••••,• 6545 6545 6545 0 -20 20 0 NOTES; -20 6545 - ,�. fiTt./..rtur.� + f �•• \\ It% ♦ I���1► �• \ o• 5 • .�,� •-_.X.� ,.- ♦• •• r 6 ,.. _•� �!1••••••c••••••••b••••• s'20 0:44444.44444• WV ••••cam CO 00 • ••••••�•• "�c•c• e • �- 655 1 \ �O •• • �`� -014 `�' 1� ••••4C•O�• 1. NATIVE STREAM SUBSTRATE, 2'THICK TO BE USED IN THE MAIN CHANNEL WITH TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT FLOODPLAIN. 655 " y • s_ • • • '4* •_ . _ • • fi • • • 2. TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP CAN BE REPLACED WITH EXISTING ON SITE MATERIAL WITH D50 OF 9 INCH AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. �' \ \\ , * 57 mo• a.� •+ •� cr� ♦� :•,�•c i'�i�i�`?�31� -� 3. NATIVE STREAM SUBSTRATE CAN BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. \ \c•••,c••,• 1�►�♦♦ _�: • .��c�.i fit f \\ /^ 6z, 6\- 4. LIMIT DISTURBANCE ON FLOODPLAIN AS POSSIBLE. 655a�v v s•�c••�,es••,o ,_ �1�� • •� *='� d •N / / ` �' ; o••,•,c••c sem• -� w •• v - 5. FILL BELOW NATIVE STREAM SUBSTRATE TO BE TYPE VL RIPRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL. --\ 6556- _ , ••,••••'r -i==�=�=� ;----.4" ••••• •• /�•• h�`•,� s �••••• (0 �� ="' `♦ �:•=•=•• _to ••••••••• Lo 6. NATIVE STREAM SUBSTRATE AND VL RIPRAP TO BE MIXED WITH ONSITE CLAY AND COMPACTED TO REDUCE INFILTRATION. -6567_ _ \ �.•.•==•=• : ,, •;•• ,66 ss TYPICAL TYPICAL CHANNEL 2% SLOPE 2% SLOPE —� - - - \ \ ••��►s•�►••••s•• h ,\\ y��AWN* \`I ROCK RAMPHROUGH - _ _ h UPSTREAM OF ROCK RAMP \�\ \\ — --_- _-_ �^ \ \ \ ••••�•,!•••• ••••• — -� — — G 1 r • 1 - — — —1 1I i - ,•��� • i ,,\��\-_ -__ __/ •cam••:�•% \f�Y ��, • • • c•�'��c �'` 2% SLOPE TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP, 2'THICK TO 44 0 • 2 /o SLOPE =% . �- - _ - _ J \� _ • \` - - _ _\_ • I ss3_ •• — —� �— •— _ ---/ \ �� - _ _ . , :•==o, - - �� 2' MIN - �� -w���.���wip-���� �I ►�a�a�a�a�a�a�a�•�•`�� • MATCH GRADE BEHIND BOULDERS �����-vp��•,����������-��-��-��, ►� •i 'st"��: �: TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH RIVER-_+5����������������������/ IP Al �: �: �: �: �: �: �: �: ��co - - _ ; - _ / _= I I - _ _ - - \ \ 2' MIN 1 I 1 __ -_-� '---- ���� j 6Sss ....4._ 1441p -'�*�•���*.w*�*.,*.,*....•�*.• ��������������������e�: �_ COBBLE MIXED WITH ONSITE CLAYS BE ••� ••••e.•..•..•..!.r,••or,•0.�•�•' I I \ �_ - - - - - - 1 1 \\ \ -- \ . \- „ „ „ v �/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ (CAN ' SUPPLEMENTED WITH EXISTING NATIVE \/ \/ \,,,',\/ \/ \� \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ ✓ \/ \/ \/ \/ I _ �\ \, I 1 I N N \ "--N---_:-_--.7---_\\\ ,, ` - 6'\/ si , I 1 \ \ \-----__:--_-j---- \ 12' `r 3 9 \T\ \\ N N\ \- - _ _ \ \ \/\/\/\/\/\, ✓\/\/\/\/\/ STREAM SUBSTRATE) / I I \/\/\/\/\/ '\/\/\/\/\/rte I \ \ A\ �.� \�\ \\ \/\/\/\/\/\,12✓\/\/\/\/\/\ I I '\\ \\ ` N N c--- - - - - - 13'-14' - - - - - - �� �\/\/\/\i \i \/\/\/\/\/\/ \/ \/ \ / \ 1 �_ '\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ I I \ \ \\ \\ \\ _ N. ____s ' \/ \/ \/ \ / \ . 1 \ \ X' -6556- _6 554 2 YPICAL SEC ION CROSS SEC ION INSE MAP 5 NTS 1" = 10' REVISIONS COMMENTS_ COMMENTS TE DC KING HEATHERLYDIVERSION STRUCTURE JOB NO. N0. BY DATE DESIGN SDS 05DATE19 F/SHPASSAGEDES/GN 181 047.000 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS,INC. - _ - sO/ �O� DETAIL SDS 05/10/19 REVISION NO. 818 COLORADO AVE. P.O. BOX 219 sj� ,�O CHECK HAL 05/10/19 X GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ,Q APPROVAL & (970)945-7755 FAX(970)945-9210 C>, /�j� SCALE AS SHOWN SECTIONS SHEET NO. , BASE.dwg 5 w 0 w \ 0 12 24 Feet \ \ _ 6 6 0+60 I.-17\ . . ii y ■E■■ ■ME■■1��■■■N�I■��■y 1 WILLOW REVEGETATION, RIPARIAN _ \ \ . y ■�■■ �'■M■■�■���i��,-lA�i y ■�I�■ 6' mss �s� 16's,56PLANTING AND SOIL RETENTION BLANKET \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \■ y ■■r y ■11�1�■il■y 1\■ y ■■rill■iil�■, ■ y ,y TO MIMIC SURROUNDING CONDITIONS \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - 414‘• 11 4 11111111PP! \ \\\ \\.4i \\ \ r y 4 \\ `\ \\ \-- ii ,, t..., .liiiir Lo ... i , , \ ___,__`\ \ \ I \ ,� \ •�' ■■idle■�■■■■:SII\■■■■EINEM ■!�■■[rlr11 - , \ \ ` ... ` \ , \ \\\\\\\._ ss �� ■ y ■Ili■ y ■ El ■ MIME r y ■■i■ y In !�■!� si —�._�4i■ y \ �s` \ \ s�'\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \, ' \ ! r ``EMEll y ■■■��1■il■E ■111■1■ - y -� ai1i�: _ MEIN ■■■ y ■r y SSSS\ \ \ \ \ - �� _ ■ ■PI■ _ fly a w■� ■i■ ■� \ \ \ \ \ ` _PLiEli, ©lam _ �► ♦ ■ �� ■ -V ■■r y ■■■I1■ ■ii y ■I ■■ y ■N1— ■■ y MEIN■■■' y ■•■�11�■■�11 sss \\\ \ \ \ \ ■■ W • ` ■i■ y 1■I I III ■■ iii■III■MEI ■� ril ■lam■■■N■■ y -6556 -V ■■. ` 1�\O \\ \ \ yCO SS hh :16 ' y y — y E'' y y y \ \ \\ \1 ��1��..\� `E . L ��� r MI y1 � ■■w■r■■ �i�ma::II:-, �l�J \ ■■■ y �I�i■ y ■Mil i \\\ �y ,�■r \N maw ► •v. - - =5�■Z■�J - EMI J ��■i�J�ll■\rte y ■■ \ \\ \ \ � ' .\\ w W III olliallimiter-r-MAIWiliNellg ,�■ ■■■�■■■ y y y ■�\ ' \ IMIMM MI AT4p I 111 - — ii �EZ■ --L% �Lk�. 0/ ^\ ^ o%,,�• . se" \ !mom • ` ©-idlogjor 6555 a Ow es. �' S �� - _ -6554- - - inr•63 II .er ts) il / � • '� 1111 ill i ,s -)s\ 4 eit) A+53 0 ,(\ MENEM \ ����■ . AP In 655 4 . \ \ \\\\ v ENEINE, SS• •• . _ . .1111 - �� S / ________ ___ - , _ - °Ail - - 6553 \111 \ \ \ \ -AqNEENE \\ _ 0+004,0' / _. Ql ■■� \ \ , I ( FLOW \ \ \ \ EEE MIIMEN _ /- 1 I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ . � y yEaEE \ � - r_ k ,,_ �6151111)110, a teaAm.'s, ■ �■.li 1 - - - (/- - :b6;4.„,- \ \ \\ \\ \\ \��=.�IE�- ■- y ■�� 0-a���������r m `i% 6555Doo \ \ \ \ - --- / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - M�■■E■e■ y y MUM - y■ y ■-V ■EN■ l■■■N■■40 I -i / / , / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ - `,1NN��IN-6553 i1■il■MI y _ MEM �� ME E■F�■!■ - y MME �� A• / / \ \ \ / \ \ ` y ` , y - - - MEM .�ME M ME y ME IINIFA BM \ i - �� IIMMELIF MIME= - \ \ \ \ \\ ��R \ \ \ \ =sE�-� - �■■IIM'�IIMM■MMEMME MMEMFA=MEI / , , ; / / // ' \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - -� -� \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ - - - \ � — 6555" EMS!■�■■■■■6■■■■■■■■■_ � � — � ._ ��� ■■ii■_! - - %■ - ■■'SO■■ y ii■■='�' / J � , - -' / / / / , , , / / ��, / / / / , \ \ 6556 \7 • / \ , , , -/ ------,---- \ / -- \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ 6 6 _ i i \ �� \\ \\ \\ , — _----- r�`��`O // // /' / / /// / /I� NOTES: \ \ \ WILLOW PLANT REVEGETATION WITHto ,6 to \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ RIPARIAN SEEDING AND SOIL RETENTION `° ‘,\`__ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ BLANKET TO MIMIC SURROUNDING // �� I \' --/ \ \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ / CONDITIONS / \\ ,—' ,, �� ��,; / \\.\\\,\.\.\\\\\ ,,�� // �' \ \\ i/ i � 7 7 \ \ . SEEDED RIPARIAN BENCH / / / // // // /' ' / / / / // // /// / / � / / / / / / / 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED AND COORDINATED WITH ENGINEER.5' LONG WILLOW STAKE 2. AREAS WITHIN THE RIPARIAN AREA BUT OUTSIDE THE ACTIVE CHANNEL WILL BE AT APPROX. 45° REVEGETATED WITH RIPARIAN SEED MIX APPLICABLE TO THIS AREA AND THEN COVERED WITH SOIL RETENTION BLANKET. SEED MIX TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. WATER SURFACE AT BANKFULL CUT TOP OF _ STAKE SQUARE PLACE WILLOW STAKES 3' O.C. (1 PER HOLE) 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WILLOWS SHOULD BE HARVESTED IN AREAS WHERE DISTURBANCES ARE TO TAKE PLACE. MATURE WILLOWS AS WELL AS STAKES CAN BE ��PA HARVESTED FOR LATER USE.2 BOULDER DOUBLE STACKED�\����� � �- , ���� \ \/ / �, ��\ ���� ��I \ � � �� �� �BACKFILL ifr4 WITH A THICK MUD / j WATER SLURRY TO PREVENT 4. IF MATURE WILLOWS ARE TRANSPLANTED, THEY SHOULD BE PLANTED PRIOR TO OR SINGLE 3' BOULDER V / FORMATION OF AIR POCKETS. PLACEMENT OF SOIL RETENTION BLANKET. /� - \\ 3' LONG WILLOW STAKE 1 - ;� 5. ONSITE WILLOW STAKES WILL BE HARVESTED AND PLANTED ONCE SOIL RETENTION TRIM BRANCHES CLOSE - \\ AT APPROX. 45° BLANKET HAS BEEN PLACED. WATER TABLE 6. AREAS OUTSIDE THE RIPARIAN, SUCH AS STAGING AND ACCESS AREAS, TO BE FOOTER BOULDER /— r— c7-0REVEGETATED `�� WITH UPLAND SEED MIX. BACKFILL WITH RIVER..... Alp I ,/ " " - �j/ 4 -12 DIAMETER STAKE PLACED d�% H_= IN HOLE. 1 1_ �// `, BURY - \\\ �� //\\\�j, BOULDER 1/2 DEEP MAKE 45° ANGLED CUT AT I I i - BUTT -END, PLANT BUTT -END 11 II EXISTING STREAM SUBSTRATE I DOWN 1BOULDER EDGING DE AIL 2WILLOW PLAN ING DE AIL 6 NTS \6 NTS REVISIONS COMMENTS COMMENTS TE DL' KING HEATHERLYDIVERSION STRUCTURE JOB NO. N0. BY DATE _ DESIGN SDS 05DATE19 PASSAGE DES/GN 181 047.000 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS,INC.- A - -C)4/FISH �0� DETAIL SDS 05/10/19 REVISION NO. 818 COLORADO AVE. P.O. BOX 219 <S'��Q ,�O CHECK HAL 05/10/19 X GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ,Q APPROVAL �,c (970)945-7755 FAX(970)945-9210 % /Oj/ SCALE AS SHOWN REVEGETATION PLAN SHEET NO. BASE.dwg 6 01 J w 0 01 m z J 0 5 0 0 H 01 W 0 w coL.7.1 0 N 0) w 0 0 O 0 to N O N O E O 0 O w 0 w 0 BOULDER EDGING TO FEATURE BOULDERS THROUGHOUT ROCK TIE PROPOSED BOULDERS INTO EXISTING GRADE RAMP. TO BE COMPOSED OF LARGER PROVIDE DEFINED AT PROPOSED GRADE. REMOVE AS MINIMAL HEAVY WEIGHT NON CHANNELBOULDERS THAT PROTRUDE HIGHER THAN VEGETATION AS POSSIBLE. STORE WILLOWS ON WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SURROUNDING STREAM SUBSTRATE. SITE FOR REVEGETATION. / TYPE M VOID FILLED RIPRAP ••• WITH RIVER COBBLE. ••.•••/1•••/;•••• •••..••••�/•••,�1•••••••• TYPE L SOIL RIPRAP EXISTING DIVERSION SILL BOULDERS TO B E •/1�.••••••••�,•• It•••••••••../�• STRUCTURE • ••' •••DOUBLE STACKED WITH ••• ••••••••••�/...••••• ••1'••'�••••/••••alit FOOTER BOULDER BURIED .�-4 ••••••••••••• ••�"•••••••••�/•1'•• 1111•••1'v S •••••••••• „�•••••••••••/1•• ,•• •.••••2 DIAMETER �, ••••••••••• ••••••��•/1••• ••••,�,••�, NORTH HALF O F DIVERSION TO B E ''•�� �'••••••••••••••• I••••••••••.� �• • 1111 ••/ •• • 1111 1111 v�I �- �•�•• �1••II•...• �° 1 ••••••••• � 1111••• ,� � • • 1.111• 4111.1•••••••••••••• •�� _ ••f/•( '•�•L,• r w 1111•• 1111••',••/ .�, ••1111•• •��� °•OdL� '• 1111 Ii••11111•••••••• �• v 10 • �, • •••••••• is �I°•,•��� ��� ��/ �., W?ssssssssiiVsW..osssssSSS4111 -,� I°•,�lI• !�� ` NO •��°•�• •�°i•� °i • It•••••••••• °� I° I• 1111•I ••• �••• ••••••fit•••%i��� i••••• ��•`r••• •• �•.° ••• •. /TERRACED sisstestalt� �••• ••�� � •1 ••••1111••••1•••'• ••fit•••••/ ette.w./�••••••/�. /• ••••• i / 0•...roe � BURIED 1 ' TO TIE INTO GRADE UPSTREAM AND PROVIDE CHANNEL TIE PROPOSED BOULDER EDGING INTO EXISTING BANK TOP OF BOULDERS TO AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE. , 1 BE 1 ABOVE DIVERSION••••��••,�• • •• -� °r ow 414141pAm0 Q • eV o. •••, mitaltit Ir., A im III 4 • 1 .=•�� 11 re 0 CREST 11/�•••••• 0000000Mo elbui c67)00 �•� �:• � •, � I• • vy �•;0' 0 v,I°�,°Ira" i•%,°•, �• ••• , / �! l , ► � ' Q• .�v • • x �4••,• ••• .2.04, �'� 11100, ) : •• • •,,J ••,� vyPROVIDE •, LOWEST POINT IN ROCK RAMP °i•� i,�_-�• ��, � • �°i•% °���• �• ••�° •��� 1111 �1I �' .2 I � ••••�• it• 1111•• i&O. T =12', 1111•••. • • Apowv� Aria _ °• veer �•�1 ■ •I� 0 �' �• I°••�• I°• ir °stir 4k- 119 Iv AT ALIGNMENT. • BOULDER SILL CREST NOT TO PROTRUDE /1 ,.��� �, • w �• i,� • SURROUNDING TYPE M VOID�jjv "tax. - �, ,,v°••�• RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE. 1ii44.41.6-404,:c' `, • • •, °.• D �� •�, I �.SUBMERGED �r.•• •FILLED •ABOVE ORIFICE HEADGATE INCREASE ELEVATION OF BOULDERS •••1111 �� 1q1_1L. WITH TURN HANDLE. MUST FIT 1 lip Wal- 2'-2" BY 2'-2" OPENING. AWAY FROM CENTER OF CHANNEL. 1�lir l• �i _ _ ••••••••••• 11 EXTEND INTO BANK 10'. 111•••1.1 3risarr_ `. • ',�_- �_�1111• D1111•• 1111 �••••••We� Mae" ••�• 1111•%1111• TIE BOULDERS INTO EXISTING BANK AND :4iteffeeterea.•••• •••••••1/11•••COG SLOPE TOWARDS THE CREEK. DO NOT PROPOSED 18" ADS HP STORM SEDIMENT SLUICE PIPE J••••••STACK BOULDERS VERTICALLY BUT TO BE SET IN NEW BANK AND PROTECTED WITH'•11• GROUT 18" PIPE INTO - STAGGER BY 2 DIAMETER. •••••1•e1• BOULDERS AND TYPE L RIPRAP CAREFULLY PLACED EXISTING OPENING •111•••••1111•• ON TOP OF PIPE WHERE REQUIRED. GROUT CAN BE USED TO STABILIZE BOULDERS AROUND PIPE. 1 FEATURE BOULDERS PROVIDE NATURAL VARIATION IN THROUGHOUT ROCK RAMP. SURFACE TO PROVIDE FOR SMALL PROVIDE BOULDERS TO BE COMPOSED OF POOLS FOR REFUGE. STRATEGICALLY DIRECTLY DOWNSTREAM TIE PROPOSED BOULDER EDGING INTO EXISTINGBANK AND DIVERSION STRUCTURE. BOULDER SIZES: 2'-3' 0 BOULDERS LARGER BOULDERS THAT PLACE FEATURE BOULDERS AND OF CREST TO PREVENT PROTRUDE HIGHER THAN CLUSTERS TO BREAK UP VELOCITY SCOUR SURROUNDING TYPE M VECTORS. VOID FILLED RIPRAP WITH ROCK RAMP: 10%: 1' 0 BOULDERS 80%: 2' TO 3' 0 BOULDERS 10%: 4' 0 BOULDERS AS SILL RIVER COBBLE. FEATURE BOULDERS: 2' TO 4' 0 BOULDERS ME _ III o� � �� o�CD ��o�� •�`� .. • 4.0' BOULDER TO HAVE SPECIFIC GRAVITY GREATER THAN _ „, , �` ►�� •'`►�•a4IL�•� ����•-� MIMI - \/ •� 2.65. SANDSTONE BOULDERS ARE PROHIBITED ISI°.Y °��I• •, �4•%• TYPE M VOID FILLED �/�/�/�/�/�/�/�/�C/ — %�—� Mil • 10' RIPRAP WITH RIVER COBBLE. ANCHOR DIAMETER OF VL RIPRAP OR APPROVED HEAVY WEIGHT NON FOOTER BOULDERS INTO EQUAL MIXED WITH ONSITE WOVEN GEOTEXTILE EXISTING GRADE CLAYS EXISTING DIVERSION STRUCTURE SCOUR POOL A ROCK RAMP PROFILE VIEW 7 1ROCK RAMP DE A L 7yHORZ 1"=5' VERT 1"=5' REVISIONS COMMENTS TE KING HEATHERLYDIVERSION STRUCTURE JOB NO. NO. BY DATE DESCRIPTION _ L' DESIGN SDS 05DDATE19 PASSAGE DES/GN 181 047.000 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS,INC.- A - -°4/FISH �0� DETAIL SDS 05/10/19 REVISION N0. 818 COLORADO AVE. P.O. BOX 219 <S>,. x. CHECK HAL 05/10/19 X GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ,Q APPROVAL �, (970)945-7755 FAX(970)945-9210 �'j, /Oji SCALE N/A DETAI LS SHEET N0. , BASE.dwg 7 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek D.1 Floodplain Analysis Maps and HEC -RAS Output 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 "t; : r',k�, 0-. _ A#• , •- i • ' r Cl Vim' • IL ' _ •-e . • . _ .• : Ji ' a ; •+' . .'r - •-' '.i .0111. .-- - , ,., *• mL • • ad Er F Ir • • 1.-• i .jam• * ;+�. • -- • - •�'ed • I • • r T h ate *i 4 Ilk .+ +•' y -. } } a t .Y -. • • -F- * w• . r -0140,14 E #". 4. *Lin +ti's # + / .a r .i.l :677 ,1M y ;L}' #} +t { f Fr.' s } ' ..~ + { r # ` + ±` ^'' . . _ .. r• -• dm- tom. 701-Z94W At. re- .4- , ` •i •. • .A ":-1-.. it xr ' r- 1, • • , hi% X' n +'4 •� . 4 i • O. - 0 o N w 6565- 6560- 6555- 6550- 6545- 6540 0 EAST DIVIDE CREEK Plan: 1) PR 5/28/2019 2) EX 5/28/2019 EAST DIVIDE CREE EAST DIVIDE CREE Legend WS 863 - PR WS 863 - EX Ground Ground CZ) 0 0 C ch m Ln 100 200 300 400 Main Channel Distance (ft) 6580 6575 6570 c 0 w 6565 6560 6555 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 EAST DIVIDE CREEK Plan: 1) PR 2) EX Legend WS 863 - EX WS 863 - PR Ground - EX • Bank Sta - EX Ground - PR • Bank Sta - PR 6568 6566 6564 6562 .@ 6560 > a> ▪ 6558 6556 6554 6552 Station (ft) EAST DIVIDE CREEK Plan: 1) PR 2) EX 0 20 40 60 80 Station (ft) 100 Legend WS 863 - EX WS 863 - PR Ground - EX • Bank Sta - EX Ground - PR • Bank Sta - PR 120 6563- 6562- 6561- 6560- m 6559- W 6558- 6557- 6556 - EAST DIVIDE CREEK Plan: 1) PR 2) EX Legend WS 863 - EX WS 863 - PR Ground - EX • Bank Sta - EX Ground - PR • Bank Sta - PR 6555 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Station (ft) EAST DIVIDE CREEK Plan: 1) PR 2) EX 6564 6562 6560 • 6558 6556 a> W 6554 6552 6550 6548 0 r Legend WS 863 - EX WS 863 - PR Ground - EX • Bank Sta - EX Ground - PR • Bank Sta - PR 20 40 60 80 100 Station (ft) 0 w 6570- 6565- 6560- 6555- 6550- 6545 565-6560-6555- 6550- 6545 0 EAST DIVIDE CREEK Plan: 1) PR 2) EX 20 40 60 Station (ft) 80 Legend WS 863 - EX WS 863 - PR Ground - EX • Bank Sta - EX Ground - PR • Bank Sta - PR 100 6565- 6560- 6555- 0 taTs w 6550- 6545- 6540 EAST DIVIDE CREEK Plan: 1) PR 2) EX L Legend WS 863 - EX WS 863 - PR Ground - EX • Bank Sta - EX Ground - PR • Bank Sta - PR 0 20 40 60 80 100 Station (ft) HEC -RAS River: EAST DIVIDE CREE Reach: EAST DIVIDE CREE Profile: 863 Reach River Sta Profile Plan Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Fronde # Chl (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/6) (ft/s) (sq ft) (ft) EAST DIVIDE CREE 500 863 PR 863.00 6555.55 6562.60 6563.11 0.002357 6.46 210.17 57.92 0.45 EAST DIVIDE CREE 500 863 EX 863.00 6555.55 6562.60 6563.11 0.002357 6.46 210.17 57.92 0.45 EAST DIVIDE CREE 350 863 PR 863.00 6555.33 6560.44 6560.44 6562.30 0.011502 11.27 90.61 28.12 0.96 EAST DIVIDE CREE 350 863 EX 863.00 6555.33 6560.44 6560.44 6562.30 0.011502 11.27 90.61 28.12 0.96 EAST DIVIDE CREE 300 863 PR 863.00 6554.45 6557.15 6557.15 6558.02 0.015622 7.44 116.11 68.54 1.00 EAST DIVIDE CREE 300 863 EX 863.00 6552.41 6557.21 6557.21 6558.32 0.011094 8.55 114.17 66.59 0.92 EAST DIVIDE CREE 200 863 PR 863.00 6548.39 6552.52 6552.52 6553.88 0.011687 9.47 100.26 43.43 0.95 EAST DIVIDE CREE 200 863 EX 863.00 6548.39 6552.52 6552.52 6553.88 0.011687 9.47 100.26 43.43 0.95 EAST DIVIDE CREE 150 863 PR 863.00 6545.67 6550.70 6550.70 6552.48 0.011676 11.18 94.52 30.12 0.94 EAST DIVIDE CREE 150 863 EX 863.00 6545.67 6550.70 6550.70 6552.48 0.011676 11.18 94.52 30.12 0.94 EAST DIVIDE CREE 100 863 PR 863.00 6544.09 6549.26 6549.26 6550.94 0.010545 10.85 101.41 38.30 0.90 EAST DIVIDE CREE 100 863 EX 863.00 6544.09 6549.26 6549.26 6550.94 0.010545 10.85 101.41 38.30 0.90 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek D.2 Site Photos 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek D.3 StreamStats Output 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 5/16/2018 StreamStats StreamStats Report: King Heatherly Diversion Region ID: CO Workspace ID: CO20180516222902342000 Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 39.43448, -107.58135 Time: 2018-05-16 16:29:19 -0600 Basin Characteristics Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 45.1 square miles PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches EL7500 Percent of area above 7500 ft 85 percent ELEV Mean Basin Elevation 8500 feet BSLDEM10M Mean basin slope computed from 10 m DEM 26.7 percent https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 1/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit CSL1085LFP Change in elevation divided by length between points 10 178.8 feet per and 85 percent of distance along the longest flow path to mi the basin divide, LFP from 2D grid ELEVMAX Maximum basin elevation 10600 feet 124H100Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average 3.07 inches once in 100 years 124H2Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average 1.46 inches once in 2 years - Equivalent to precitation intensity index 16H100Y 6 -hour precipitation that is expected to occur on average 1 .92 inches once in 100 years 16H2Y Maximum 6 -hour precipitation that occurs on average 0.93 once in 2 years LAT_OUT Latitude of Basin Outlet 4368165 degrees LC11 BARE Percentage of barren from NLCD 2011 class 31 0.1 [011 CRPHAY Percentage of cultivated crops and hay, classes 81 and 0.2 percent 82, from NLCD 2011 LC11 DEV Percentage of developed (urban) land from NLCD 2011 0 percent classes 21-24 LC11 FOREST Percentage of forest from NLCD 2011 classes 41-43 83.4 percent LC1 1 GRASS Percent of area covered by grassland/herbaceous using 2.3 2011 NLCD LC11IMP Average percentage of impervious area determined from 1.4 percent NLCD 2011 impervious dataset LC11 SHRUB Percent of area covered by shrubland using 2011 NLCD 7.4 LC11SNOIC Percent snow and ice from NLCD 2011 class 12 0 LC11 WATER Percent of open water, class 11, from NLCD 2011 0.1 LC11 WETLND Percentage of wetlands, classes 90 and 95, from NLCD 0.6 2011 LFPLENGTH Length of longest flow path 16 miles LONG_OUT Longitude of Basin Outlet 277835 degrees MINBELEV Minimum basin elevation 6550 feet OUTLETELEV Elevation of the stream outlet in thousands of feet above 6550 feet NAVD88. https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 2/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit RCN Runoff -curve number as defined by NRCS 75.01 (http://policy.nres.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx? content=17758.wba) RUNCO_CO Soil runoff coefficient as defined by Verdin and Gross 0.49 (2017) SSURGOA Percentage of area of Hydrologic Soil Type A from 1 .99 percent SSURGO SSURGOB Percentage of area of Hydrologic Soil Type B from 1.29 percent SSURGO SSURGOC Percentage of area of Hydrologic Soil Type C from 93.6 percent SSURGO SSURGOD Percentage of area of Hydrologic Soil Type D from 0 percent SSURGO STATSCLAY Percentage of clay soils from STATSGO 31.56 percent STORNHD Percent storage (wetlands and waterbodies) determined 0 percent from 1:24K NHD TOC Time of concentration in hours 4.14 General Disclaimers Upstream regulation was checked for this watershed. Flow -Duration Statistics Parameters [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Flow Duration] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 1060 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 18 47 Flow -Duration Statistics Parameters [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Flow Duration] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 5250 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 8 49 https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 3/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Flow -Duration Statistics Flow Report [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Flow Duration] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp 10 Percent Duration 109 ft"3/s 45 25 Percent Duration 31.7 ft^3/s 55 50 Percent Duration 12.1 ft^3/s 55 75 Percent Duration 6.96 ft^3/s 64 90 Percent Duration 4.53 ft^3/s 85 Flow -Duration Statistics Flow Report [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Flow Duration] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp 10 Percent Duration 60.5 ft"3/s 73 25 Percent Duration 17.7 ft"3/s 77 50 Percent Duration 7.58 ft^3/s 83 75 Percent Duration 4.05 ft^3/s NaN 90 Percent Duration 2.32 ft^3/s 154 Flow -Duration Statistics Flow Report [Area -Averaged] Statistic Value Unit 10 Percent Duration 102 ft"3/s 25 Percent Duration 29.6 ft"3/s 50 Percent Duration 11.4 ft"3/s 75 Percent Duration 6.52 ft^3/s 90 Percent Duration 4.19 ft^3/s Flow -Duration Statistics Citations Capesius, J.P., and Stephens, V. C.,2009, Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5136, 32 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/) https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 4/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Monthly Flow Statistics Parameters [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Mean Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 1060 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 18 47 Monthly Flow Statistics Parameters [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Mean Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 5250 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 8 49 Monthly Flow Statistics Flow Report [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Mean Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp January Mean Flow 8.07 ft^3/s 50 February Mean Flow 7.51 ft^3/s 51 March Mean Flow 8.59 ft^3/s 49 April Mean Flow 20.1 ft^3/s 44 May Mean Flow 108 ft^3/s 46 June Mean Flow 183 ft^3/s 46 July Mean Flow 64.5 ft^3/s 76 August Mean Flow 27.2 ft^3/s 80 September Mean Flow 17.7 ft^3/s 59 October Mean Flow 14.9 ft^3/s 45 November Mean Flow 11.3 ft^3/s 46 December Mean Flow 8.89 ft^3/s 47 Monthly Flow Statistics Flow Report [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Mean Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp January Mean Flow 6.17 ft^3/s 85 February Mean Flow 6.43 ft^3/s 77 https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 5/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Statistic Value Unit March Mean Flow 8.01 ft^3/s April Mean Flow 22.1 ft^3/s May Mean Flow 90.7 ft^3/s June Mean Flow 61.2 ft^3/s July Mean Flow 29.2 ft^3/s August Mean Flow 16.5 ft^3/s September Mean Flow 13.8 ft^3/s October Mean Flow 10.4 ft^3/s November Mean Flow 7.76 ft^3/s December Mean Flow 6.2 ft^3/s Monthly Flow Statistics Flow Report[Area-Averaged] Statistic Value Unit January Mean Flow 7.78 ft"3/s February Mean Flow 7.34 ft"3/s March Mean Flow 8.5 ft^3/s April Mean Flow 20.4 ft^3/s May Mean Flow 106 ft"3/s June Mean Flow 164 ft"3/s July Mean Flow 59.2 ft"3/s August Mean Flow 25.6 ft"3/s September Mean Flow 17.1 ft"3/s October Mean Flow 14.2 ft"3/s November Mean Flow 10.7 ft^3/s December Mean Flow 8.49 ft^3/s Monthly Flow Statistics Citations SEp 68 84 71 80 75 90 104 94 83 79 Capesius, J.P., and Stephens, V. C.,2009, Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5136, 32 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/) https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 6/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Flood -Volume Statistics Parameters [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Max Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 1060 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 18 47 Flood -Volume Statistics Parameters [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Max Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 5 5250 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 8 49 EL7500 Percent above 7500 ft 85 percent 0 99 Flood -Volume Statistics Flow Report [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Max Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp 7 Day 2 Year Maximum 234 ft^3/s 46 7 Day 10 Year Maximum 395 ft^3/s 35 7 Day 50 Year Maximum 541 ft^3/s 31 Flood -Volume Statistics Flow Report [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Max Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp 7 Day 2 Year Maximum 7 Day 10 Year Maximum 7 Day 50 Year Maximum Flood -Volume Statistics Flow Report [Area -Averaged] 135 263 430 ft"3/s ft^3/s ft^3/s Statistic Value Unit 7 Day 2 Year Maximum 219 ft^3/s 7 Day 10 Year Maximum 375 ft^3/s 7 Day 50 Year Maximum 524 ft"3/s 86 59 51 https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 7/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Flood -Volume Statistics Citations Capesius, J.P., and Stephens, V. C.,2009, Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5136, 32 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/) Annual Flow Statistics Parameters [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Mean Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 1060 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 18 47 Annual Flow Statistics Parameters [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Mean Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 5250 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 8 49 Annual Flow Statistics Flow Report [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Mean Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp Mean Annual Flow 41.2 ft"3/s 33 Annual Flow Statistics Flow Report [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Mean Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp Mean Annual Flow Annual Flow Statistics Flow Report [Area -Averaged] Statistic Mean Annual Flow Annual Flow Statistics Citations 24.3 ft^3/s 55 Value Unit 38.6 ft^3/s https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 8/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Capesius, J.P., and Stephens, V. C.,2009, Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5136, 32 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/) Low -Flow Statistics Parameters [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Min Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 1060 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 18 47 ELEV Mean Basin Elevation 8500 feet 8600 12000 Low -Flow Statistics Parameters [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Min Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 5 5250 ELEV Mean Basin Elevation 8500 feet 6880 10480 Low -Flow Statistics Disclaimers [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Min Flow] One or more of the parameters is outside the suggested range. Estimates were extrapolated with unknown errors Low -Flow Statistics Flow Report [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Min Flow] Statistic Value Unit 7 Day 2 Year Low Flow 1.31 ft^3/s 7 Day 10 Year Low Flow 0.583 ft^3/s 7 Day 50 Year Low Flow 1.12 ft^3/s Low -Flow Statistics Flow Report [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Min Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp 7 Day 2 Year Low Flow 1.9 ft^3/s 212 7 Day 10 Year Low Flow 0.964 ft^3/s 280 7 Day 50 Year Low Flow 0.71 ft^3/s 338 https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 9/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Low -Flow Statistics Flow Report [Area -Averaged] Statistic Value Unit 7 Day 2 Year Low Flow 1 .4 ft^3/s 7 Day 10 Year Low Flow 0.641 ft^3/s 7 Day 50 Year Low Flow 1.06 ft^3/s Low -Flow Statistics Citations Capesius, J.P., and Stephens, V. C.,2009, Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5136, 32 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/) Peak -Flow Statistics Parameters [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Peak Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Min Max Value Units Limit Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square 1 1060 miles BSLDEM1OM Mean Basin Slope from 10m 26.7 percent 7.6 60.2 DEM PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 18 47 Peak -Flow Statistics Parameters [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Peak Flow] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 45.1 square miles 1 5250 EL7500 Percent above 7500 ft 85 percent 0 99 PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 27.8 inches 8 49 Peak -Flow Statistics Flow Report [85 Percent (38.3 square miles) Mountain Region Peak Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit 2 Year Peak Flood 328 ft^3/s 49 5 Year Peak Flood 461 ft^3/s 44 10 Year Peak Flood 553 ft^3/s 41 https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ SEp 10/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Statistic Value Unit SEp 25 Year Peak Flood 641 ft^3/s 40 50 Year Peak Flood 763 ft"3/s 39 100 Year Peak Flood 851 ft"3/s 36 200 Year Peak Flood 924 ft"3/s 36 500 Year Peak Flood 1060 ft^3/s 33 Peak -Flow Statistics Flow Report [15 Percent (6.84 square miles) Northwest Region Peak Flow] PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit SEp 2 Year Peak Flood 252 ft^3/s 113 5 Year Peak Flood 408 ft^3/s 88 10 Year Peak Flood 512 ft"3/s 79 25 Year Peak Flood 670 ft"3/s 74 50 Year Peak Flood 789 ft"3/s 74 100 Year Peak Flood 933 ft^3/s 75 200 Year Peak Flood 1040 ft^3/s 76 500 Year Peak Flood 1250 ft^3/s 79 Peak -Flow Statistics Flow Report [area -averaged] Statistic Value Unit 2 Year Peak Flood 316 ft^3/s 5 Year Peak Flood 453 ft^3/s 10 Year Peak Flood 547 ft^3/s 25 Year Peak Flood 646 ft^3/s 50 Year Peak Flood 767 ft^3/s 100 Year Peak Flood 863 ft"3/s 200 Year Peak Flood 941 ft"3/s 500 Year Peak Flood 1090 ft"3/s Peak -Flow Statistics Citations https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 11/12 5/16/2018 StreamStats Capesius, J.P., and Stephens, V. C.,2009, Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5136, 32 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5136/) https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ 12/12 Floodplain Development Report for King Heatherly Diversion Structure Fish Passage Design on East Divide Creek D.4 USACE 404 Permit Documentation 181-047.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. November 2019 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922 February 1, 2019 Regulatory Division (SPK -2019-00036) Middle Colorado Watershed Council Attn: Mr. Nathaniel Higginson 200 Lion's Park Circle Rifle, Colorado 81650 nate(a�midcowatershed.orq Dear Mr. Higginson: This concerns your proposed East Divide Creek Fish Passage project which involves modification of the existing concrete diversion structure, known as the King Heatherly Diversion Dam. The project site is located on East Divide Creek, immediately south of County Road 313, in the SE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 7 South, Range 91 West, 6th P.M., specifically at Latitude 39.434451°, Longitude -107.581470°, approximately 11.5 -miles south of the Town of Silt, in unincorporated Garfield County, Colorado. Based on the information you have provided, we have determined that the proposed work is the type of activity that is included in the Section 404(f) exemption found at 33 C.F.R. Part 323.4(a)(3) for the construction or maintenance of irrigation ditches. Discharges associated with diversion structures and such other facilities as are appurtenant and functionally related to irrigation ditches are included in this exemption. Therefore, a Department of the Army Permit is not required for this work. Measures should be taken to prevent construction materials and/or activities from entering any waters of the United States. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls should be implemented onsite to achieve this end. Our disclaimer of jurisdiction is only for this activity as it pertains to Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act and does not refer to, nor affect jurisdiction over any waters present on site. Other Federal, State, and local laws may apply to your activities. Therefore, in addition to contacting other Federal and local agencies, you should also contact state regulatory authorities to determine whether your activities may require other authorizations or permits. Please refer to identification number SPK -2019-00036 in any correspondence concerning this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Grand Junction Regulatory Office, Colorado West Section, 400 Rood Avenue, Room 224, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, by email at w.travis.morse@usace.army.mil, or telephone at (970) 243-1199 X 1014. For more information regarding our program, please visit our website at www.spk.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx. -2 - We appreciate your feedback. At your earliest convenience, please tell us how we are doing by completing the customer survey on our website under Customer Service Survey. Sincerely, Travis Morse Senior Project Manager Colorado West Section Regulatory Division cc: Mr. Gary Erpestad, Spring Creek Ranch, gerpestad(a�gmail.com Ms. Laurie Rink, Middle Colorado Watershed Council, laurie@midcowatershed.org Mr. Scott Schreiber, Wright Water Engineers, sschreiberwriqhtwater.com Ms. Sheryl Bower, Garfield County, sbower(a�garfield-county.com Ms. Jenn Logan, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, jenn.loqanstate.co.us Mr. Tom Fresques, Bureau of Land Management, tlfresqu@blm.gov