HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.00 ApplicationAspen Glen Eagle Nest Buffer Zone
Removal Application
Submitted by: Western Slope Consulting LLC
PO Box 411
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
970-618-4708
Davis@coloradoplanning.com
2 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Page
Application Submittal Letter 4
Applicant & Consultant Information 5
Land Use Change Permit & Application Form 6
Agreement to Pay Form 8
Pre-Application Conference Summary 9
Proof of Ownership – Title Commitments 18
Statement of Authority 26
Letter of Authorization 27
Vicinity Map 28
Project Narrative 29
Status of Eagle Nest & Basis for Removing Buffer Zone 31
Compliance with Buffer Zone Conditions 38
Future Development of Subject Parcels 40
Infrastructure Capacity to Serve Subject Parcels 41
General Conformity with Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 47
Amendment Justification Report 54
Impact Analysis – Limited to Section 1 55
Mineral Owners - Names & Mailing Addresses 63
Names and Addresses of All Property Owners within 200 Ft. 65
Names and Addresses of All Property Owners in Aspen Glen PUD 67
EXHIBITS – Exhibits A through K are submitted under separate cover
with this application.
81
EXHIBIT A - Aspen Glen PUD Approval Resolution 92-059
(Including Original PUD Plan Guide)
EXHIBIT B - Original Aspen Glen PUD Plan
3 | P a g e
EXHIBIT C - Original DOW Correspondence and Assessments Re:
Eagle Buffer Zone
EXHIBIT D – First Amendment to Aspen Glen PUD Plan
EXHIBIT E – Plats of Parcels within Buffer Zone
EXHIBIT F - Bald Eagle Nest & Roost Sites
EXHIBIT G - Site Plan Showing Key Locations, & Relationship to
Overlay and Affected Parcels
EXHIBIT H - Cokley Signal Warrant Study
EXHIBIT I - Aspen Glen 1993 Preliminary Plan
EXHIBIT J - Aspen Glen Preliminary Plan Approval Resolution 93-
121
EXHIBIT K - October 30, 2020 Letter from Garfield & Hecht, PC
4 | P a g e
Application Submittal Letter
March 24, 2021
Mr. Glenn Hartman
Garfield County Community Development Department
Planning Manager
108 8th St # 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Mr. Hartman:
Western Slope Consulting, LLC is pleased to submit herewith the Aspen Glen Eagle Nest Buffer Zone
Removal Application (the “Application”) on behalf of Aspen Glen Golf Company (“Applicant”). The
Aspen Glen PUD approval in 1992 established an Eagle Nest Buffer Zone (the “Buffer Zone” or “Buffer”)
that restricted certain activities within that zone. The Buffer was created because of the existence of a bald
eagle nest along the river near the 10th hole of the Aspen Glen Golf Course and related bald eagle activity.
However, the eagles abandoned that nest as of December 1, 2016, and relocated to a new nest approximately
one mile upstream. Then, in early June 2018, a windstorm broke off the nesting tree approximately 15 feet
above ground and destroyed the nest.
Garfield County Resolution No. 92-056 (the “PUD Resolution”) approved by the Garfield County
Commissioners on June 29, 1992, includes language providing for removal of the Buffer Zone if a change
in conditions eliminated the need for the Buffer. Specifically, Condition 16 of the PUD Resolution states as
follows:
“At such time as the Division of Wildlife allows removal of the Eagle Nest Buffer Zone,
the applicant may request the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD. If
approved by the Commissioners, the amendment only removes the Overlying zoning
(Buffer Zone), and the approved underlying zoning will become effective.”
This request is therefore made because the tree and nest are no longer viable. Support and justification for
elimination of the Buffer Zone is detailed in the Application. This Application conforms to the requirements
of the applicable sections of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (“LUDC”) and is in
general conformance with the 2030 Garfield County Comprehensive Plan.
Our team looks forward to discussing this application with the County. After the submittal has been deemed
complete, please schedule it for review by the Planning Commission and subsequently by the Board of
County Commissioners. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 618-4708
or Davis@coloradoplanning.com.
Sincerely,
5 | P a g e
Applicant & Consultant Information
Property Owner
Aspen Glen Golf Company
c/o Balcomb & Green - Chad Lee
818 Colorado Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945-6546 - Telephone
Applicant, Planner & Authorized Representative
Davis Farrar - Western Slope Consulting LLC
0165 Basalt Mountain Drive
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
970-618-4708 - Telephone
E-mail: davis@coloradoplanning.com
Project Attorney& Authorized Representative
Haley Carmer - Garfield & Hecht, P.C
901 Grand Ave., Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
970-947-1936 - Telephone
E-mail: hcarmer@garfieldhecht.com
Project Wildlife Specialist
Steve Dahmer - Environmental Solutions, Inc.
600 County Rd. 216
Rifle, CO 81650
970-618-6841 - Telephone
E-mail: steve.dahmer@esinc.biz
6 | P a g e
Land Use Change Permit Application Form
7 | P a g e
8 | P a g e
Agreement to Pay Form
9 | P a g e
Pre-Application Summary
10 | P a g e
11 | P a g e
12 | P a g e
13 | P a g e
14 | P a g e
15 | P a g e
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
18 | P a g e
Property Ownership – Title Commitment
Parcel 390
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
Parcel 245
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e
Parcel 246
24 | P a g e
25 | P a g e
26 | P a g e
Statement of Authority
27 | P a g e
Letter of Authorization
28 | P a g e
Vicinity Map
Subject Properties
Inset Map
29 | P a g e
Project Narrative
The purpose of the Applicant is to request that the Aspen Glen PUD be amended to remove the Buffer Zone
that was originally established by Conditions 6 through 16 of the PUD Resolution, which is attached to this
Application as Exhibit A. The terms of the Buffer Zone were later modified when the preliminary plan for
the entire Aspen Glen PUD was approved in 1993. Those amendments are reflected in Garfield County
Resolution No. 1993-121 (the “1993 Resolution”) and the correspondence referenced in that resolution. See
Exhibits C and J. If the Buffer Zone is eliminated, Conditions 6, 9-13, 15, & 16 of the PUD Resolution, as
modified by the 1993 Resolution, will be of no further force or effect.
The PUD Resolution conditions that establish the terms of the Buffer Zone include specific language
providing for removal of the Buffer if allowed by the Division of Wildlife—now called the Colorado
Parks and Wildlife Division (“CPW”)—and with the approval of the Garfield County Commissioners.
Specifically, Condition 16 of the PUD Resolution states “At such time as the Division of Wildlife allows
removal of the Eagle Nest buffer zone, the applicant may request the Board of County Commissioners to
amend the PUD. If approved by the Commissioners, the amendment only removes the overlying zoning
(Buffer Zone), and the approved underlying zoning will become effective.” As explained below, removal
of the Buffer Zone is now warranted because the reason for and function and purpose of the Buffer Zone
no longer exist.
The only parcels that are have ever been encumbered by the Buffer Zone are those owned by Applicant
and hole 10 of the Aspen Glen Golf Course, which is owned by Aspen Glen Owner, LLC. The boundary
of the Buffer Zone is shown below. While the parcel on which hole 10 is located is not technically part of
this Application, Aspen Glen Golf Club Management Company, the operator of the Aspen Glen Golf
Club, has submitted a letter of support for this Application that is included with this submission.
Eagle Nest Buffer Zone Boundary (in red)
30 | P a g e
Each of the residential parcels within the Buffer Zone was assigned an underlying zone district by the
Aspen Glen PUD Plan that contemplates residential development. Specifically, Parcel 2393-202-00-390
(“Parcel 390”) is zoned Club Villas Residential, Parcel 2393-202-00-245 (“Parcel 245”) is zoned ¼ Acre
Residential, and Parcel 2393-202-00-246 (“Parcel 246”) is zoned ¾ Acre Residential. Parcels 390, 245,
and 246 will be referred to throughout the Application materials as the “Subject Parcels.” A site plan
showing the Subject Parcels is attached as Exhibit G.
While the location of the Buffer Zone is part of the PUD Plan Map (see Exhibit B), its restrictions were
not incorporated into the Aspen Glen PUD Plan Guide that was attached at the end of the PUD Resolution
or added to the PUD Plan Guide by later amendments. As such, the PUD Plan Guide does not need to be
changed to reflect the removal of the Buffer Zone should the Application be approved. Instead, the lifting
of the Buffer Zone will be accomplished by the terms of the Application approval resolution itself.
Accordingly, Applicant requests that the resolution approving the Application eliminate Conditions 6, 8-
13, and 15-16 of the PUD Resolution and find that Conditions 7 and 141 have been satisfied. An
Amended PUD Plan Map including only the Subject Parcels and Hole 10 is also included with this
Application for approval by the BOCC. See Exhibit D. The amended map simply shows the Subject
Parcels with their underlying zoning designations that were approved as part of the PUD Resolution.
As explained in more detail later in this Application, removal of the Buffer will have no appreciable short
or long-term effects on the eagle nest or the bald eagles that moved from the site to a location upstream
even before the original nest was destroyed. Indeed, several of the Buffer Zone restrictions no longer apply
even though the Buffer has not been removed. For example, the restriction on construction activities
provides that construction within the Buffer zone may begin prior to June 1 if there is nest failure and
abandonment. Similarly, Hole 10 may be played prior to April 1st if there is nest abandonment. That means
now, even with the Buffer in place, construction and golf course play can occur at any time beca use the
nest has been abandoned since as early as December 1, 2016. Amending the PUD to remove the Buffer
Zone will not take away designated open space or destroy essential eagle habitat. Instead, it will simply
allow the Subject Parcels to be developed in a manner consistent with the requirements of the PUD and in
conformance with adjacent properties to preserve and enhance the overall character of the Aspen Glen
PUD.
1 Condition 14 of the PUD Resolution required that the Aspen Glen covenants include a provision limiting owners to
one dog per lot. That provision is included in the Amended Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
for Aspen Glen. Nothing in this Application is intended to eliminate that provision from the Covenants, render it
ineffective, or require that the Covenants be amended to remove the provision.
31 | P a g e
Status of Eagle Nest & Basis for Removing Buffer Zone
Original and New Eagle Nest Locations
The Buffer Zone was originally established to protect an existing nest and a pair of juvenile eagles that
eventually became a mating pair. The Buffer was created for that purpose and was not intended to be used
or designated for other purposes. As of December 1, 2016, the eagles that occupied the original nest had
abandoned it and relocated approximately 1 mile upstream to a new nest within approximately 60 feet of
already constructed and occupied homes within an area of Aspen Glen where there is no nest protection
zone. A map showing the original and relocated nest sites is included above. Then in early June 2018, the
tree that housed the historic nest blew over in a windstorm, destroying the nest and all but the bottom 15
feet of the tree itself. It is Applicant’s understanding that there has been no bald eagle nest, active or
otherwise, located within the Buffer Zone since June 2018. Applicant has received three emails from
CPW that confirm the foregoing events. Those emails dated June 12, 2018, June 13, 2019, and February
15, 2021, are incorporated below.
32 | P a g e
33 | P a g e
Considering Mr. Groves’ June 12, 2018 e-mail, it appears that the statement in his 2021 e-mail regarding
the date the tree and nest were destroyed was likely an inadvertent error. In any event, the trio of CPW
emails confirms that the historic nest and tree have been destroyed and that the Buffer Zone is no longer
warranted. Applicant has also received a report from an independent wildlife biologist, Mr. Steve Dahmer
of Environmental Solutions, Inc., that comes to the same conclusion. That report is reproduced below.
34 | P a g e
35 | P a g e
36 | P a g e
37 | P a g e
38 | P a g e
Compliance with Buffer Zone Conditions
Listed below is each condition from the PUD Resolution that concerns the Buffer Zone, along with a
response from Applicant regarding its knowledge of how each condition has been complied with since the
PUD was approved.
Condition 6: An Eagle Nest Buffer Zone, as indicated on Exhibit F-16 submitted at the public hearing,
will be established around the nest where there will be no construction of dwelling units or human
activities, except as established herein. The area of the Zone is described per a letter dated April 26, 1992
from Kevin Wright of the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Any changes or modifications to the Zone will
require approval from the Division of Wildlife.
Response: No dwelling units have been constructed in the Buffer Zone since the PUD Resolution was
enacted, and human activity, to the best of Applicant’s actual knowledge, has been consistent with what is
allowed under the PUD Resolution.
Condition 7: Prior to submittal of a Preliminary Plan, the applicant will submit building envelopes,
approved by the Division of Wildlife, for the nine ¾-acre lots adjacent to the Buffer Zone east of the
Roaring Fork River.
Response: A preliminary plan was approved for Parcels 245 and 246 in 1993. At that time, building
envelopes for the ¾-acre lots were reviewed and approved by DOW. A preliminary plan has not yet been
submitted for Parcel 390 as the Club Villas portion of the PUD was not part of the preliminary plan that
was approved in 1993.
Condition 8: Prior to submittal of a Preliminary Plan, the applicant will submit landscaping plans,
approved by the Division of Wildlife, for the vegetative screening along both sides of the entry road and
the downstream side of the bridge and along the east (riverside) boundary of Club Villas, Clubhouse
District, per Kevin Wright's April 26, 1992 letter. The screening will be planted immediately upon
construction of the entrance road and the bridge crossing the Roaring Fork River.
Response: The landscaping plans required by Condition 8, as later modified with the DOW’s consent,
were reviewed and approved by the DOW. Vegetation was thereafter installed in accordance with the
approved plans.
Condition 9: A timing restriction will be placed on the 10th hole of the golf course. If Bald Eagles have
abandoned the nest and no eagles are present, the hole may be played from April 1st to December 31. If
eagles are present, the hole may be played July 1st to December 31st. It may be played earlier, if there is
nest abandonment and young have fledged. Any alternative plans for the reconfiguration of the 10th hole
to allow earlier play must be approved by the Division of Wildlife.
Response: From the time the golf course opened until the nest tree was destroyed in 2018, the Aspen
Glen Golf Club restricted play on the 10th hole as required by Condition 9. In years when the nest was
abandoned early, the Golf Club manager would advise DOW/CPW of the abandonment to confirm that
play could occur earlier than July 1st. During the 2019 and 2020 golf seasons, play on the 10th hole
commenced as early as April 1st because the nest was gone and no eagles were present.
Condition 10: There will be no construction or activity within the Buffer Zone, hole #10, entry road and
bridge, or facilities/units north of hole #18 from January 1st to June 1st if the nest is active. Construction
may begin earlier if there is nest failure and abandonment.
Response: As is evident by the fact that the Subject Parcels are vacant, no construction has occurred at
any time on those parcels. Upon information and belief, construction of the entry road and bridge
occurred in compliance with this restriction. Applicant has not conducted or contracted for any
construction of facilities or units north of Hole 18. Applicant has no knowledge of whether third-parties
conducting construction in this area have complied with this restriction.
39 | P a g e
Condition 11: There will be no human entry within 100 yards of the nest except for nest management
activities, activities related to the use of Hole #10, or normal ground and ditch maintenance activities.
Response: Applicant understands that CPW may have conducted monitoring activities in and near the
original nest. Normal ground and ditch maintenance activities have occurred over the years, and golf play
on Hole #10 has occurred at the allowed times. Applicant has no actual knowledge of other unauthorized
human entry within 100 yards of the nest. If such entry did occur, it was not authorized by Applicant.
Condition 12: No human entry will be allowed within 200 yards of the nest from January 1st to June 30th
if eagles are present, except as allowed in condition #11.
Response: See response to Condition 11
Condition 13: There will be a seasonal closure of the Roaring Fork River to public fishing/hiking access
and Open Space River Park Districts within 200 yards of the nesting site from January 1st to May 15th
except for float-through river traffic. Signs will be posted and maintained by the Applicant alerting
residents and the general public to this restriction.
Response: The required signs were originally installed by Applicant. Applicant is unaware of whether
the Aspen Glen HOA, Garfield County, or another entity or public authority have regularly taken steps to
close the Roaring Fork River as required by Condition 13.
Condition 14: The Homeowner’s Covenants will be amended to restrict all dwelling units to one dog per
dwelling unit.
Response: The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for Aspen Glen were revised to include this
restriction. This Covenant restriction will not be modified or removed by approval of this Application.
Condition 15: Coordination will occur on an annual basis between the applicant and the Colorado
Division of Wildlife concerning the monitoring of nesting activities occurring within the Buffer Zone.
Response: As mentioned above, the Aspen Glen Golf Course manager has been in regular contact with
DOW/CPW regarding eagle activity as a result of the Hole #10 play restriction. Applicant also helped
conduct monitoring activities in the late 1990s and advised DOW/CPW of eagle activity in the area as it
became aware of the same.
Condition 16: At such time as the Division of Wildlife allows removal of the Eagle Nest Buffer Zone,
the applicant may request the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD. If approved by the
commissioners, the amendment only removes the overlying zoning (Buffer Zone), and the approved
underlying zoning will become effective.
Response: As noted in this Application, CPW has acknowledged that the original nest that prompted the
creation of the Buffer Zone was destroyed of natural causes and there are no eagles currently nesting in
the Buffer Zone, meaning the Buffer Zone is no longer warranted. Applicant has therefore submitted this
Application to remove the same to allow development of the Subject Parcels consistent with their
underlying zoning.
40 | P a g e
Future Development of Subject Parcels
As noted above, the Aspen Glen PUD was approved in June 1992 by the PUD Resolution. As part of the
approval process, the BOCC required the developers to subsequently submit a preliminary plan for the
entire PUD. A Preliminary Plan for all of the Aspen Glen PUD, except for the areas zoned Club Villas,
was approved in 1993 by the 1993 Resolution. See Exhibits I and J. That preliminary plan included
Parcels 245 and 246 but did not include Parcel 390, as it was (and currently is) zoned Club Villas. See
Exhibit I. Under the preliminary plan, sixteen ¼-acre lots were approved for Parcel 245, and nine, ¾-acre
lots were approved for Parcel 246. A final plat for Parcels 245 and 246 has not been presented or
approved, so they, along with Parcel 390, are considered unplatted future development parcels. That said
the existing boundaries for Parcels 245 and 246 are generally defined by the Aspen Glen Filing 1 final
plat and the Second Amended Plat, Golf Course Parcel 5, Aspen Glen Filing 1. Those plats and current
surveys of Parcels 245 and 246 are provided with this Application. See Exhibit E.
Parcel 390 was created by the final plat titled “Second Amended Plat Golf Clubhouse Parcel, Aspen Glen,
Filing No.1,”, which was signed by BOCC Chair Marian Smith on November 24, 1997. See Exhibit E.
Parcel 390 is the 1.225-acre parcel shown on the plat as “Riverfront Club Villas Tract B.” Per a plat note
on the Golf Clubhouse Parcel plat, “All Club Villas Tracts Shall Be Subject to a Preliminary Plat Review
Prior to Resubdivision.” A similar requirement is reflected in Condition 17 of the 1993 Resolution.
Riverfront Club Villas Tract A was further subdivided following preliminary plan and final plat approval
as shown on the Aspen Glen Filing 5 final plat (see Ex. E), leaving Parcel 390 to be further subdivided on
its own at a later date if desired. Note that notwithstanding the density allowed for the parcel under the
Club Villas zone district, Parcel 390 is subject to a restrictive covenant limiting maximum development to
two residential units.
While dwellings on the Subject Parcels cannot be constructed until the Buffer Zone is removed, the data
summary on the Aspen Glen PUD zoning map includes the Parcel 245 and 246 units in the total number
of approved dwelling units for the PUD. It also accounts for the Club Villas units.
41 | P a g e
If this Application is ultimately approved and Applicant or a successor proceeds to develop the Parcel 245
or 246, the developer must go through the final plan/plat approval process set forth in Section 5-302(D),
unless the developer desires to make changes to the previously-approved preliminary plan. In that event,
the developer would be required to amend the preliminary plan before proceeding with the final plan/plat
as provided in Section 5-304 of the LUDC.
Applicant is currently under contract to sell Parcel 390. If this Application is approved, the potential buyers
intend to construct a single-family dwelling on Parcel 390, which is a permitted use in the Club Villas zone
district. No subdivision approvals from the County will be required to proceed with that proposal, but the
potential buyer will need to obtain a building permit from the County and project approval from the Aspen
Glen Design Review Committee.
Infrastructure Capacity to Serve Subject Parcels
As part of the preliminary plan review, infrastructure designs and capacity requirements were submitted
for the entire Aspen Glen development. Infrastructure design included water, sewer, roads, dry utilities,
and other improvements necessary to serve the full development. Indeed, all the engineering studies and
analyses submitted with the preliminary plan application – the traffic study, the Highway 82 access
permit, water and sewer studies, all other utilities – considered the full buildout of Aspen Glen including
the density approved for the Subject Parcels. Moreover, all the main infrastructure needed to
accommodate development of the Subject Parcels–e.g., the internal roads, water and sewer lines, shallow
utility lines – has already been constructed. The only additional infrastructure needed to develop the
Subject Parcels is the following: (i) construction of Eagle Run Road as shown on the Filing 5 plat; (ii)
extending Leonis Lane to Parcel 245; and (iii) extending and installing the water and sewer lines
described in the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District letter included below.
The following letters from David Kotz of SGM, Inc., the engineering firm that designed Aspen Glen’s
infrastructure, and Scott Grosscup of Balcomb & Green on behalf of the Roaring Fork Water and
Sanitation District, explain that the water, sewer, roadway infrastructure currently installed in Aspen Glen
has capacity to serve the project at full buildout. This capacity includes the Subject Parcels. Mr.
Grosscup’s letter states that they are willing and able to serve the Subject Parcels with potable water and
wastewater service. In addition, Dan Coakley from SGM prepared a Signal Warrant Study in October
2018 which addresses the issue of signalization at the intersection of State Highway 82 and Diamond A
Ranch Road (the Aspen Glen entrance to state Highway 82). See Exhibit H. This report was prepared at
the request of the Garfield County Commissioners in response to public comment about the need for
traffic signalization at that intersection. This report is in addition to similar studies for the intersection
completed by SGM associated with internal development of the subdivision in the early 2000’s. The
analysis concluded that signalization of that intersection is not warranted now or in the future. Mr.
Coakley’s report concludes with the following summary.
“Signal Warrants are NOT met for this intersection based upon high SH 82 volumes and a Diamond A
Ranch Road volume that does not meet warrant thresholds based upon a high speed (> 40mph) isolated
(rural) intersection.
The existing pedestrian crossing is utilized solely for a RFTA NB (down valley) bus stop on the north
side of SH 82. This crossing could be underutilized compared to a signalized intersection. Pedestrian
volumes do not currently meet warrant thresholds. Although both injury accidents and a fatal accident
have occurred at the intersection, the accident history warrant does not meet the requirement of 5
accidents in the preceding 12 months. Although of 6 accidents in 5 years, 3 have occurred within the 9
months analyzed.
The subdivision was planned for 643 single-family residences, currently there are approximately 100
unbuilt or unplatted lots. Based upon current traffic volume rates, the addition of those units will most
likely not change the results of this study.”
42 | P a g e
43 | P a g e
44 | P a g e
45 | P a g e
46 | P a g e
47 | P a g e
General Conformity with Garfield County Comprehensive Plan
When the Aspen Glen PUD was approved in 1992, the BOCC found the PUD to be in general
conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan in effect at that time. The Comprehensive
Plan designation for the property in 1992 was described as an area for high density residential
development, which allowed for a density greater than one (1) dwelling unit/two (2) acres. This
designation was based on the availability of central water and sewer to the project area. Notably, the
BOCC found the Aspen Glen PUD to be in conformance with the then-applicable comprehensive plan
even with the potential that the Buffer Zone may be removed one day.
Garfield County recently updated its Comprehensive Plan by adopting the Comprehensive Plan 2030 (the
“Plan”) on November 10, 2020. “In Garfield County, the Comprehensive Plan establishes the broad land
uses and the density of development (number of units/acre) and the Garfield County Land Use and
Development Code (LUDC) establishes the detailed standards such as specific uses, minimum lot size,
and setbacks. The LUDC requires that land use decisions be in general conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.” Amending the PUD as the Applicant requests is a land use decision that, for the
reasons explained below, is in general conformance with the applicable sections of the Plan.
I. FUTURE LAND USE AND MAJOR THEMES
The Plan’s “major themes” attempt to chart how best to accommodate future growth and development
(ex. housing, commercial development, industrial development, etc.) in the County. At the same time, the
Plan addresses transportation and mobility, open lands, infrastructure and other future needs of the
County through policies that aim to guide future growth. Ultimately, the intent of the Plan’s Future Land
Use Map is to preserve the “livability” of Garfield County over the coming years. A “livable” County
means different things to different people. For some, it means retaining open space, for others, planning
for a range of development densities and for still others, it means allowing flexibility to accommodate
economic development in the County. The Plan reinforces a major direction of the County’s previous
plan: Most new growth should occur in areas that have, or can easily be served by, urban services, which
is the case here. The Plan therefore seeks to achieve a broad range of “livability” in a balanced manner.
Aspen Glen PUD is identified on the Plan’s future land use map as “Res MH (2 to 6 acres/DU)” as shown
on the map below.
48 | P a g e
This designation is based upon the approved PUD and reflects the land-use and densities representative of
the project in place. The characteristics of a residential medium high (RM H) designation in the Plan
include the following:
Amending the PUD to remove the Buffer Zone will activate the underlying zoning of the Subject Parcels.
Those underlying zone districts allow for residential development only, albeit at densities greater than 1
unit per 2 to 6 acres. More density is allowed on the Subject Parcels—and within the PUD as a whole—
than contemplated in the Plan because the clustering of development in certain parts of the PUD created
additional open space in other parts of the PUD and because the PUD Resolution prohibits transferring
density from one part of the PUD to another to maintain the original development pattern approved by the
BOCC.
The Plan articulates five major themes for future land use in the County that are also embodied in the
Future Land Use Map. Those major themes are:
1. Growth in Urban Growth Areas (UGA) & 3-Mile Areas of Influence
2. Growth in Unincorporated Communities
3. Growth in Designated Centers, including:
• Town Centers
• Village Centers
• Rural Employment Centers
• Rural Regional Employment Centers
• New or Expanded Centers
4. Growth of New Major Residential Subdivisions
5. Change in Residential Development Densities
Amending the PUD to remove the Buffer Zone would allow future development only within the existing
boundaries of the Aspen Glen PUD. Aspen Glen is an unincorporated community with concentrated
development and a mix of land uses. The Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District provides water and
sewer services within the PUD. Removing the Buffer Zone will modify an overlay district in the project,
but it will not change overall development density, mix of land uses, or otherwise change demand for
infrastructure in the project. Instead, it will simply allow the use of properties identified in the original
49 | P a g e
PUD approval and subsequent County approvals for residential land uses. Thus, the proposed amendment
would allow development that is consistent with the Plan’s “Growth in Unincorporated Communities,”
which “acknowledges the existence of several unincorporated communities that have concentrated
development, a mix of land uses and services provided by special districts.”
II. NATURAL RESOURCES, HABITAT AND WILDLIFE
As is relevant to the Application, Section 8 of the Plan aims to, among other things, ensure that natural,
scenic, ecological, and critical wildlife habitat resources are protected and impacts mitigated and that
incompatible development is directed away from ecologically sensitive areas. That vision is to be
achieved through the three policies and related strategies set forth in Section 8 of the Plan. Each of the
Policies and relevant strategies are addressed below.
BACKGROUND & KEY ISSUES
1. Nature-based tourism is an integral component of the county’s economy. Therefore, it is important to
respect the natural environment that brings residents and visitors to the Garfield County.
2. Many high-priority wildlife habitat areas and migration corridors exist in Garfield County. Over the
coming years, the county will continue to grow, resulting in greater potential for conflict between these
important habitat areas and areas targeted for development. In addition, an increase in people participating
in outdoor recreation activities will result in greater pressures on these high priority habitat areas.
3. Many of the natural resources in the county are also under the jurisdiction of other agencies and extend
beyond county boundaries. Therefore, a coordinated approach between all involved agencies is required.
4. The continuity of wildlife corridors, preservation of riparian and other wildlife habitat, protection of
native fish species and water quality and quantity are all important to watershed health. Threats include
development pressure in sensitive areas from industry, land use and roads.
Response – With the loss of the historic nest and tree where it was located, no high-priority wildlife
habitat areas exist within the Buffer Zone. The Subject Parcels currently encumbered by the Buffer Zone
is private land slated for residential development. The golf course parcel that is also within the Buffer
Zone is part of a private club that is not open to the public. Lifting the Buffer Zone to allow the land
within it to be used to its full potential therefore will not affect nature-based tourism or put added pressure
on high-priority habitat areas. The Applicant has been in communication with CPW about the former nest
site as indicated by CPW comments that are included as part of the Application. Those comments reflect
CPW’s acknowledgement of the destruction of the tree and nest and support for elimination of the Buffer
Zone because it no longer serves its original intended purpose. Mr. Dahmer, an independent wildlife
biologist, has also provided a professional opinion letter to that effect. As with the creation of the Buffer
Zone, its elimination will be the result of a coordinated objective scienced based effort among the
Applicant, the County, independent professionals, and necessary agencies such as CPW.
POLICIES & STRATEGIES
Policy 1: Encourage the protection and preservation of critical wildlife habitat.
Strategies:
i. Protect critical wildlife habitat from conflicts with development by requiring appropriate
buffers between proposed development and habitat area.
ii. Encourage higher intensity development away from critical wildlife habitat areas and
migration corridors as identified by Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s High Priority Habitat
mapping layers, along with the Colorado National Heritage Program’s report “Survey of
Critical Biological Resources - Garfield County, Colorado, Volume I”. Direct
development to infill areas, incorporated areas of Garfield County and within urban
service boundaries and areas serviced by water and sewer.
50 | P a g e
iii. Through the county GIS Department, regularly update wildlife habitat maps and make
wildlife data available to county residents and visitors.
iv. Support Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) habitat protection efforts and continue
efforts to coordinate/cooperate with CPW on all wildlife/habitat matters.
v. Work collaboratively with land trusts, conservation organizations and governmental
entities to support their efforts in preserving critical wildlife habitat.
Response – In the original PUD approval, the Aspen Glen developer worked collaboratively with the
Colorado Division of Wildlife (now CPW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Garfield County to
establish the terms of the Buffer Zone that were ultimately incorporated into the PUD Resolution to
protect and preserve a then-existing nest and tree frequented by a pair of bald eagles. To account for the
fact that wildlife patterns and habitat change over time, some flexibility was incorporated into the PUD
Resolution’s Buffer Zone restrictions. Namely, the golf course play, construction, and human activity
restrictions all allow for such activities to occur earlier if eagles are not present in the nest or if the nest
has failed or been abandoned. Most important, the PUD Resolution expressly contemplates the removal of
the Buffer Zone altogether once CPW approves the removal. We have now reached that point.
As acknowledged by CPW and as explained in Mr. Dahmer’s report, the nest and tree that were the
impetus for the Buffer Zone are gone. The tree housing the nest fell over in 2018 due to weather,
destroying the nest. Even before the historic nest was destroyed, the eagles that frequented that nest built
a new one about a mile upstream in November 2016 and have used that nest since to raise their young.
Without the historic nest, the land within the Buffer Zone does not include any critical or essential
wildlife habitat and does not offer any unique habitat that is not otherwise available along the rest of the
Aspen Glen reach or the river corridor upstream or downstream from the PUD. And there are no mapped
or CPW-identified migration corridors through the area encumbered by the Buffer Zone. Seeing as the
Buffer Zone no longer serves its intended purpose, CPW has indicated that the Buffer Zone is no longer
warranted.
As explained in the memorandum from Mr. Dahmer reproduced below, the guidelines used to establish
the Buffer Zone conditions in the first place (see Exhibit C) are outdated and not in keeping with the
current status of bald eagles and our understanding regarding their biology, habitat needs, and range and
variability among individuals and habitat selection. Indeed, the guidelines relied on in 1992 have been
supplanted by the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines published by the US Fish and Wildlife
Service in 2007. Mr. Dahmer’s conclusions regarding removal of the Buffer Zone are based on those
guidelines, not the antiquated ones. That said, even the original guidelines acknowledge that when a tree
containing an eagle nest has blown down and no longer supports a nest, all buffer zone restrictions should
be removed.
51 | P a g e
52 | P a g e
It is also worth noting that the Aspen Glen PUD includes an Open Space/River Park Zone District along
the Roaring Fork River corridor. Among the purposes of this PUD zone district are the buffering of the
riparian corridor from the adjacent residential uses, protect that area from development impacts, and
reducing conflicts with wildlife and habitat in the buffer areas. The proposed PUD amendment will have
no impact on the OpenSpace/River Park Zone District, leaving its buffering and habitat protection
functions intact.
Amending the PUD to remove the Buffer Zone does not conflict with the Plan’s policy of protecting
critical habitat because, as acknowledged by CPW and another wildlife biologist, the critical habitat the
Buffer Zone was created to preserve is no longer present and there is no other unique habitat within the
Buffer to protect. Additionally, other wildlife habitat areas within the PUD are not affected by the
Application. While new development will be possible if the Buffer Zone is eliminated, it will be infill
development in previously approved portions of the Aspen Glen PUD that lie within an existing water
and sewer service area that the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District has capacity to serve.
Policy 2: Avoid disturbance to wildlife habitat; where disturbance cannot be avoided, require
development to fully address and mitigate potential negative impacts.
Strategies:
i. Continue to integrate an environmental review process for the approval of Land Use Change
Permits and evaluate the LUDC’s overall effectiveness in this review process.
ii. Coordinate and communicate with applicable federal and state agencies to ensure that
appropriate reclamation measures occur after extraction operations through adherence to
reclamation plans and bond release requirements.
iii. Require detailed impact analyses for developments proposed within or adjacent to critical
wildlife habitats or migration routes.
iv. Evaluate how to make the Conservation Subdivision option (a major subdivision option that
allows reduced lot sizes and provides density bonuses in exchange for the preservation of
rural lands) more attractive to developers through additional incentives and improved
awareness of the option for developers.
v. Evaluate various types of incentives to encourage clustered development in areas that present
potential impacts to wildlife habitat and discourage densities greater than the underlying
future land use designation if the proposed development would adversely affect wildlife
habitat.
Response – As explained above and in the correspondence from CPW and Mr. Dahmer, the land
currently within the Buffer Zone does not offer any critical or unique wildlife habitat without the historic
nest and tree. The bald eagle habitat maps included with the Application similarly show that the Subject
Parcels are not within any CPW Active Nest or Roost Site buffer zones. See Exhibit F2. As noted in Mr.
Dahmer’s letter, the fact that eagles have now nested immediately adjacent to occupied homes in Aspen
Glen suggests that the eagles in the Aspen Glen area are not disturbed by residential development or
human presence and activity. Indeed, the eagles themselves are the best indicator of what habitat
conditions are acceptable and appropriate. Accordingly, allowing development of the Subject Parcels by
lifting the Buffer Zone will not disturb wildlife habitat, especially because the Open Space/River Park
2 Exhibit F reflects a nestsite area described as “Unknown.” This designation comes from CPW, and, according to
the CPW’s ArcGIS website, an unknown nestsite is one that does not have a recorded monitoring record in over 5
years. It is unclear how, if at all, CPW addresses or protects “unknown” nestsites. In any event, the Buffer Zone was
added only because there was a known, active, viable nest in place at the time the PUD was approved. To keep the
Buffer in effect now because of an unknown and unverified site is neither in keeping with the basis for the Buffer
Zone in the first instance nor with current guidelines regarding eagle habitat.
53 | P a g e
Zone District along the Roaring Fork River corridor which serves to protect and preserve critical wildlife
habitat is not implicated by the Application. Moreover, future development will occur in the areas
previously approved for clustered development by the PUD Resolution with densities that are consistent
with or less than that approved as part of Aspen Glen PUD.
Policy 3: Work cooperatively with involved agencies to ensure natural resources are protected and
preserved.
Strategies:
i. Work collaboratively with appropriate community resources such as the Middle Colorado
Watershed Council, Colorado River District and Roaring Fork Conservancy in their efforts to
protect and enhance the health of watersheds in the county; consider adding the agencies to
list of referral agencies for Land Use Change Permit applications.
ii. Continue to refer all Land Use Change applications to Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW)
for input on wildlife habitat concerns.
iii. Discourage development in areas of high or extreme wildfire hazards.
iv. Continue to monitor air quality issues within the county and respond, if necessary, if negative
trends are detected.
Response – As contemplated in the PUD Resolution, Applicant is submitting its Application following
consultation with CPW that the Buffer Zone is no longer warranted. CPW (formerly the Division of
Wildlife) was primarily responsible for setting the parameters of the Buffer Zone and has therefore been
consulted in advance of submission of the Application regarding the proposed PUD change. As a Garfield
County referral agency, CPW will also receive this Application so that the agency may provide any
additional comments it may have on the proposed removal of the Buffer Zone. Finally, if the Application
is approved, CPW and other agencies will review the specific layout and intensity of development
proposed for each of the Subject Parcels once a land use application is submitted to development of the
parcels. In that way, future developers, Garfield County, CPW, and other referral agencies will work
together to ensure that natural resources with the Subject Parcels are protected and preserved.
54 | P a g e
Amendment Justification Report
In accordance with LUDC Section 6-302(B) and as requested by Staff, the following is provided as
Applicant’s Amendment Justification Report:
1. General description of the amendment and any supporting information such as the proposed
amendments to the PUD General Description, PUD Technical Descriptions, PUD Plan Map, and/or
PUD Plan Guide.
Response - As explained above, the amendment proposed in this Application is removal of the Buffer
Zone established in the PUD Resolution upon recommendations from the Colorado Division of Wildlife,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the BLM. See Exhibit C. Specifically, the Applicant is requesting
that the PUD Plan Map be amended as necessary to eliminate the Buffer Zone and that the County
eliminate those Conditions in the PUD Resolution regarding the Buffer Zone that restrict development
and activities on the land within the Buffer and have not been satisfied to date, namely, Conditions 6, 9-
13, 15, & 16. As a result of lifting the Buffer, the previously approved underlying zoning designations for
the subject parcels would govern future use and development of those parcels.
Bald eagles abandoned the original nest as of December 1, 2016, and the eagle nest tree and the eagle nest
were destroyed by a weather event in June 2018. The CPW correspondence included in this Application
confirm the same. Mr. Dahmer’s letter presents a scientific basis and adequate support for his conclusion
that “given the preponderance of evidence in this case, it is my professional opinion that the continuation
of the ENBZ in question is no longer warranted.” Similarly, the June 13, 2019 CPW email includes the
following statement. “As I stated in our conversation, since the eagle nest and tree no longer exist, the
Eagle Protection Zone at Aspen Glen is no longer warranted. This was an agreement between Garfield
County, CPW and the USFWS. CPW is a recommending agency only, and all land-use restrictions are
enforced by Garfield County. You may use this correspondence as CPW’s acknowledgment that the
Eagle Protection Zone can be lifted as you move forward with Garfield County.” Removing the Buffer
Zone is therefore warranted.
2. Evaluation of how the PUD either complies with the criteria in Section 6-203C for a Minor
Modification or how it does not comply with the criteria.
Response – Applicant’s analysis of how the PUD amendment complies with the criteria set forth in
Section 6-203(C) is described in the letter from Garfield & Hecht, P.C. dated October 30, 2020, provided
with the Application as Exhibit K. The letter was submitted to Garfield County Planning Director Sheryl
Bower as part of Applicant’s request that the Application be considered a Minor Modification of the
Aspen Glen PUD. Director Bower opted to forward the request, as provided for in the LUDC, to the
Board of County Commissioners for a determination about whether the application should be a Minor or
Substantial PUD Amendment. On November 23, 2020, the Board of County Commissioners decided that
the application would be a substantial PUD amendment. This application is submitted in conformance
with the County Commissioner’s decision and the requirements of the Garfield County LUDC.
55 | P a g e
Impact Analysis – Limited to Section 1
Impact Analysis.
According to Section 4-203(G) of the LUDC, an Impact Analysis is required when a proposed
development will impact specific features of the site. In the Impact Analysis, the applicant is to describe
both the existing conditions and the potential changes created by the project. While no development is
proposed as part of Applicant’s Application, Applicant’s requested amendment of the Aspen Glen PUD—
removal of the Buffer Zone—will have the effect of allowing development on the residential parcels
within the Buffer in the future. Accordingly, Staff has requested that Applicant respond to the Adjacent
Land Use, Site Features, and Environmental Impact portions of the Impact Analysis. Those sections are
addressed below.
1. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1,500-foot
radius.
Response - The existing use of adjacent property within the PUD and within the 1,500-foot radius
consists predominantly of suburban single-family residential uses and recreational amenities including a
golf club, swimming facilities, tennis courts, driving range, putting green, and similar activities. The #10
golf hole lies at the center of the Buffer. Other golf holes lie wholly within or partially inside the 1,500-
foot radius. Uses outside the PUD consist of large lot rural residential single-family dwellings, vacant
land, BLM public lands, and agricultural uses. The north/south Roaring Fork River corridor bisects the
1,500-foot radius through the center of PUD and areas north and south. A portion of State Highway 82 is
located within 1,500 feet of the subject properties.
Map Showing 1,500-foot Buffer from Subject Properties
56 | P a g e
2. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high
ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the
evaluation of the proposed development.
The area affected by the Buffer includes the following four primary topographic areas with associated
flora and fauna.
1) Upper River Terrace area includes the #10 golf hole and Parcels 245 and 246. The predominant
vegetation on the undeveloped lots includes various grasses including smooth brome, crested
wheatgrass, quack-grass and several weed species such as scotch thistle, kochia, plumeless thistle,
hounds-tongue, giant ragweed and tumble mustard. The #10 golf hole has been planted with golf
course grasses utilized for fairways and golf greens. Other portions of this location have been
vegetated with imported evergreen and deciduous trees as part of the Aspen Glen landscaping
plan and recommendations from DOW for eagle nest screening purposes. These terraces are
relatively flat and gently slope toward the river.
2) River Terrace Slopes are the steeper areas which transition between the upper terrace and the
river bottom. The river terrace slopes are vegetated with cottonwood trees, ponderosa pine,
willows, service berries, red-osier dogwood and other native plant species.
57 | P a g e
3) Lower River Terrace area is elevated above the 100-year floodplain and lies on the west side of
the Roaring Fork River. This area is characterized by developed residential lots with non-native
landscaping that includes deciduous and evergreen trees, lawn grasses, bushes/shrubs. The
undeveloped portions of the lower river terrace area—including Parcel 390—include various
native grass species willows, service berries, red-osier dogwood and other native plant species.
4) River Bottom area includes the roaring Fork River channel, adjacent floodplain and vegetated areas.
Vegetation types in this location include juniper, coyote willow, narrowleaf cottonwood, Russian olive
trees, and red-osier dogwood.
58 | P a g e
6. Environmental Impacts. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be
developed and the effects of development on those conditions, including:
Response:
a. Determination of the long-term and short-term effect on flora and fauna;
Fauna in the Buffer includes mule deer, elk, raccoon, skunk, fox, coyote, small mammals, domestic dogs,
domestic cats and humans. There are a variety of birds found in the area that travel along Roaring Fork
59 | P a g e
River corridor and utilize the area as habitat. These birds include Bald Eagle, Red Tail Hawk, Blue
Heron, Osprey as well as a variety of other smaller birds.
The Aspen Glen PUD includes an Open Space/River Parks Zone District which encompasses the river
corridor through the development. This PUD zone district separates the residential uses from the river
corridor and provides a level of buffering to the riparian environment. None of the parcels within the
Buffer are part of the Open Space/River Parks Zone District. There will be no change in this distri ct if the
Buffer is removed. The Open Space/River Park Zone District allows the following uses.
Open Space/River Parks Zone District.
a) Permitted Uses: Passive and active recreational activities; park facilities; clubhouse with snack bar;
fishing tackle sales; equestrian facilities; tack services; reservation services; water treatment
facility; water storage tanks; and wastewater treatment facility.
b) Maximum Building Height: 25 feet provided that water storage tanks may exceed such height
limitation.
c) Building Setback from Residential Property Line or Road ROW: 25 feet.
The Buffer was originally established to protect an existing nest and a pair of juvenile eagles that
eventually became a mating pair. The Buffer was created for this purpose and was not intended to be used
or designated for other purposes. It is important to note that the Buffer included specific language
providing for its removal if allowed by the Division of Wildlife and with the approval of the Garfield
County Commissioners. Condition 16 of the PUD Resolution states “At such time as the Division of
Wildlife allows removal of the Eagle Nest buffer zone, the applicant may request the Board of County
Commissioners to amend the PUD. If approved by the Commissioners, the amendment only removes the
overlying zoning (Buffer Zone), and the approved underlying zoning will become effective.”
Removal of the Buffer will have no appreciable short or long-term effect on the eagle nest or the bald
eagles that moved from the original nest site to a location upstream approximately 1 mile even before the
tree and nest were destroyed. The function of the Buffer no longer serves the intended purpose as
indicated in Mr. Dahmer’s report and the June 13, 2019 email from CPW officer John Groves, so there is
no reason to keep the Buffer Zone restrictions in place.
Elimination of the Buffer will remove the restriction on golf course use between January and the end of
March. Doing so will clarify that the 10th hole of the Golf Course may be played at all times that
the remainder of the Course is open. The restriction on construction activities between January 1 and
June 1 if the nest is active, would also be removed. Presently and under the current restrictions,
“construction may begin earlier if there is nest failure and abandonment.” This is the current situation as
previously noted. The restriction on “no human entry” within 200 yards of the nest from January 1 to June
30 if the eagles are present “except for nest management activities, activities related to the use of hole
#10, or normal ground and ditch maintenance activities” would be eliminated too. Finally, the “seasonal
closure of the Roaring Fork River to public fishing/hiking access and Open Space River Park Districts
within 200 yards of the nesting site between January 1 and May 15” would be eliminated.
Elimination of the Buffer in the short-term would allow more human use of the area by permitting golf
use and fishing/hiking. In the long-term, construction activity will occur on Parcels 245, 246, and 390, all
of which were originally approved for future development and have underlying zoning designations that
will apply once construction and development is allowed. The impacts of these activities would be
identical to that which has occurred and will occur in the Aspen Glen PUD, including on the lots
immediately adjacent to the Buffer parcels. Elimination of the Buffer will have no greater impact on flora
and fauna than the prior development of the rest of the Aspen Glen PUD as a suburban golf course
development.
60 | P a g e
b. Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including critical wildlife
habitat;
Response - No adverse effect is anticipated on designated environmental resources including critical
wildlife habitat with the elimination of the Buffer. Elimination of the Buffer would not create adverse
impacts to the eagles that have vacated the buffer zone as a nesting area or other impacts beyond what
currently exists in the Aspen Glen PUD. Ongoing impacts in the Aspen Glen PUD include but are not
limited to vehicles on roadways, human activity, dogs, golfing, pedestrians, construction activity,
facility/infrastructure maintenance, fishing, hiking, river running, and other activities that are common in
the suburban environment.
The letter dated January 19, 2021 from Steve Dahmer of Environmental Solutions, Inc. and the 6/13/2019
e-mail from Colorado Parks and Wildlife officer John Groves to Mike Elkins clearly state that the Buffer
is no longer warranted because both the tree and the nest the Buffer was created to protect were destroyed
in June 2018. A subsequent 2/15/2021 email from John Groves to Davis Farrar also confirms that the tree
and eagle nest were destroyed. The eagles have moved to a new location upstream.
The three privately owned parcels that are slated for residential development were previously evaluated
and approved in conformance with the Garfield County land use regulations for development as part of
the Aspen Glen PUD, and the impacts of such development was accounted for at the time the PUD was
approved. Future development of these properties must comply with the Aspen Glen PUD zoning,
architectural design requirements and other applicable provisions of the Aspen Glen PUD and Garfield
County regulations, which further ensures that any site-specific impacts from development will be flagged
and mitigated through the development process.
c. Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of
existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns, or other disruptions; and
Response - The Buffer zone was specifically created and was intended to protect an existing tree, bald
eagle nest, and nesting birds. The tree and nest are destroyed. The eagles have moved approximately 1
mile upstream to a new location adjacent to residential structures and outside of any eagle protection area.
No additional impacts on wildlife or domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions,
alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns or other disruptions are
expected. There are no mapped wildlife migration routes through this portion of the PUD. Except for the
river bottom and adjacent riparian areas, most of the original vegetation has been modified by human
activity and development of the PUD. To a great extent, wildlife use patterns have adjusted to these
changes over the nearly thirty years since the Aspen Glen PUD was approved. Infill development of the
Subject Parcels will not disrupt or alter those patterns. Domestic livestock no longer occupies the
property. The number of dogs per household have been restricted to one based upon recommendations of
the Colorado Division of Wildlife as reflected Aspen Glen’s restrictive covenants which encumber the
subject parcels. There may be situations where hazardous attractions are created because of residential
development through landscaping, household trash, grills/birdfeeders, petfood and other attractants to
wildlife. However, the Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife has readily available information about
living with wildlife that is intended to reduce these conflicts. Moreover, those attractions are the same as
the ones posed by all the surrounding lots that have been developed with residential structures.
d. Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by the State or
County Health Departments.
Response - There are no State or County identified radiation hazards on the site. This was evaluated
during the original and ongoing PUD approvals through Garfield County.
61 | P a g e
Additional Comments Regarding Impact of Buffer Zone Removal:
This Application does not propose a change to the underlying PUD zoning of the Subject Parcels, so there
will be no change from the permitted residential use to any other use. The proposed amendment will not
alter the PUD densities allowed on each Subject Parcel, and it will not add additional lots or dwelling
units to the PUD. While the Subject Parcels are currently undeveloped and removing the Buffer Zone will
open the door for development of those parcels, the impacts of such development have already been
analyzed, approved, and planned for.
It is important to recognize these properties are not identified as open space; to the contrary, the County
zoned and platted them for development. The Subject Parcels are and always have been intended for
residential use. It is inaccurate for anyone to construe this land as open space. Amending the PUD by
removing the Buffer Zone permits future development of the Subject Parcels without impacting the
acreage of approved Open Space within the PUD. Removing the Buffer Zone will also eliminate the
restriction on golf course use, which is consistent with prior CPW approval for early play during the
golfing season after the nest was destroyed and the eagles left. The Aspen Glen Golf Club Management
Company supports removal of the Buffer Zone as evidenced in the following January 28, 2021 letter.
62 | P a g e
Removal of the Buffer Zone to allow development of the Subject Parcels will not affect the enjoyment of
land outside the PUD. Parcel 246 is in the interior of the PUD and does not abut any non-PUD lands. The
PUD amendment will not allow any of the three parcels to be more intensively developed or developed in
a different manner than what is already allowed in the underlying PUD zone districts applicable to the
Subject Parcels. Additionally, the public interest will not be impacted by the proposed amendment
because (a) all the Subject Parcels are private property that adjacent property owners and members of the
public have no right to enter upon or use, and (b) the amendment is warranted because CPW has
determined that the original nest which justified the Buffer Zone is gone, and the Buffer Zone is no longer
necessary to protect a nonexistent tree or eagle nest. Eagles continue to nest, breed, hunt, and roost within
the entire reach of the Roaring Fork River within Aspen Glen where there are no eagle nest protections or
restrictions. Residents in Aspen Glen as well as those in the surrounding area can still enjoy the benefits
associated with these birds of prey as they travel the river corridor, play the golf course, and utilize the
designated open space areas within Aspen Glen.
Amending the PUD by removing the Buffer Zone will not confer a special benefit upon any one person. It
will simply allow the current or future owner of any Subject Parcel or portion thereof to develop its
property in conformity with the approved underlying PUD zoning districts and approved preliminary plan
just like all other Aspen Glen property owners are able to do. It will also clarify that Aspen Glen Golf
Course players may play the entire course for the entire golf season without restriction as well as allow
fishermen and river users to enjoy the riparian area within the Buffer Zone year-round.
The PUD Resolution acknowledges the likelihood that the eagles may move in the future and therefore
gives the BOCC flexibility to remove the Buffer Zone with CPW’s agreement. That resolution language,
approved by the BOCC, recognizes that when there is no need for the Buffer Zone it can be removed
without adversely impacting the PUD. The fact that the BOCC approved underlying PUD zoning for the
Subject Parcels in the beginning and later approved the sizing and installation of utilities, road capacity,
and other required PUD infrastructure to accommodate development of the entire PUD, including the
Subject Parcels, further indicates that the County anticipated removal of the Buffer Zone at some point in
the future. Finally, the 2019 and 2021 emails from CPW and Mr. Dahmer’s report provide independent
support for the conclusion that the Buffer Zone is no longer necessary and that removal is appropriate. To
conclude, removing the Buffer Zone will not approve or authorize any development that has not already
been considered and approved by Garfield County under the PUD Resolution and 1993 Resolution and
will not adversely impact those within or outside the Aspen Glen PUD.
It is clear from the foregoing materials and the enclosed exhibits that this Application conforms to the
LUDC and complies with the requirements contained therein. In addition, this Application is in general
conformity with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030. Further, the Application includes or
otherwise addresses all of the submission requirements set forth in the pre-application summary that was
issued on December 23, 2020, including information about the existing Aspen Glen PUD infrastructure
and its capacity to support future development on the Subject Parcels. The Applicant believes that this
Application and the supporting documentation justifies removing the Buffer Zone within the Aspen Glen
PUD and therefore asks that the BOCC adopt a resolution that accomplishes that requested amendment.
63 | P a g e
Mineral Owners - Names & Mailing Addresses
The records of the Garfield County Assessor and County Clerk and Recorder were searched
February 2021 for mineral owners of record for the subject property.
64 | P a g e
List of Mineral Owners
1. Sandra McCabe
772 Castle Drive
Palisade, CO 81526
2. Deborah Chuc
1612 Grand Avenue
Silt, CO 81652
3. Telinde Family Trust
994 Brush Creek Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
4. United States (BLM) P.O. Box 1009
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
5. Esta Arlene Estes and Cora Lea
Gentry
PO Box K
Meeker CO 81641
6. Estate of Caesar J. Chuc (address
unknown)
7. Ella Chase (address unknown)
The list of mineral owners was determined by identifying the mineral owners listed on the Aspen
Glen Filing 1 plat recorded February 16, 1995, at Reception No. 476330, and searching said
owners forward in the grantor/grantee index of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder. The Clerk
& Recorder records did not show any further conveyance of the minerals held by Caesar Chuc or
Ella Chase, and no contact information could be located for those owners. Note that only owners
1 – 4, above, own a portion of the minerals underlying the Subject Properties.
65 | P a g e
Names and Addresses of All Property Owners within 200 Ft. of the Subject
Parcels
Information Obtained from Garfield County Assessor's Records January 2021
Aspen Glen Golf Company Land Use Change Permit Application Form Mailing List -
January 2021 - Property Owners within 200 ft. of Parcel 239320200245
Property Owners Account Number(s)
Chris Wirkler & Wirkler Living Trust
P.O. Box 1030
9663 82 Hwy
Carbondale, CO 81623
R011074
Bureau of Land Management
2300 River Frontage Rd
Silt, CO 81652
R082660
Ruby Ann Richardson
9177 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
R111469
Aspen Glen Owner, LLC
9 West 57th Street 40th Floor
New York, NY 10019
R830192
Aspen Glen Golf Company Land Use Change Permit Application Form Mailing List -
January 2021 - Property Owners within 200 ft. of Parcel 239320200246
Property Owners Account Number(s)
Kaiser Family Trust
256 Bald Eagle Way
Carbondale, CO 81623
R083597
Bonnie K and Roland M Mclean
68 Bald Eagle Way
Carbondale, CO 81623
R830165
Yun Suk Scott
140 Osprey Circle
Carbondale, CO 81623
R830166
Elena & Phil Motuzko
98 Sweet Grass #B
Carbondale, CO 81623
R830167
Paula F. Walbert
Walbert Family Trust
170 Osprey Circle
Carbondale, CO 81623
R830168
Diane E. Sherman Living Trust
214 Bald Eagle Way
Carbondale, CO 81623
R830169
Camp Carbondale, LLC
16 Bardon Street
Madison, NJ 07940
R830179
John Miernicki
851 Latigo Loop
Carbondale, CO 81623
R830173
John Bailey, Trustee
Lavender Hill Properties, LLLP
R830174
R830175
66 | P a g e
1570 Linda Vista Drive
San Marcos, CA 92078-3808
John W. Thackson & Marcia F. Hall
18 Leonis Ln
Carbondale, CO 81623
R830176
Kevin L & Lisa Anne Reimer
2009 S. Broadway
Grand Junction, CO 81503
R830177
Aspen Glen Golf Company Land Use Change Permit Application Form Mailing List -
January 2021 - Property Owners within 200 ft. of Parcel 239320200390
Property Owners Account Number(s)
Homeowners Association at Aspen Glen
0080 Bald Eagle Way
Carbondale, CO 81623
R820066
Christopher & Nicole Hilgert
734 Camelot Lane
Houston, TX 77024
R820128
Fraser Family 2008 Revocable Trust
2069 Boundary Drive
Santa Barbara, CA 93108-2251
R820129
Donneil Hecker
Gayle F. Hecker Revocable Living Trust
139 River Glen
Carbondale, CO 81623
R820130
R820131
MN Carbondale, LLC
2531 Del Lago Drive
For Lauderdale, FL 33316
R820132
Olden C. & Carol S. Lee
2555 N. Pearl Street Apt, 602
Dallas, TX 75201
R820133
R820134
Roy M. Spence, Jr. & Mary Couri
403 Lake Cliff Trail
Austin, TX 78746
R820135
Andy Kwitowski
134 River Glen Rd
Carbondale, CO 81623
R820136
ML2, LLC
96 River Glen
Carbondale, CO 81623
R820137
McNearney McPherson Revocable Trust
78 Riverglen
Carbondale, CO 81623
R820138
67 | P a g e
Names and Addresses of All Property Owners in Aspen Glen PUD
Property Owners in Aspen Glen PUD
Information Obtained from Garfield County Assessor's Records February 2021
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239319100396 ASPEN GLEN OWNER
LLC
9 W 57TH ST # 40TH NEW YORK NY 10019
239319101001 RICHARD STAFFORD 4914 BROOKVIEW
DR
DALLAS TX 75220
239319101002 THE MARY JANE
STENEMAN
REVOCABLE TRUST &
THE ROBERT J
STENEMAN
REVOCABLE TRUST
PO BOX 1044 ASPEN CO 81612
239319101011 VITALE, ANDREA F
VITALE LAND TRUST
823 N SOANGETAHA
RD
GALESBURG IL 61401
239319101012 CRYSTAL RIVER
LAND COMPANY LLC
918 BROOKIE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319101013 SHAY & DEBORAH
ONEILL
24 GOLDEN STONE
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319101014 JAMES PIZZO 26852 MCLAUGHLIN
BLVD
BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134
239319101020 FORSMAN FAMILY
TRUST
74 ANGLER CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319101028 DONNA HUSON &
DONNA J HUSON
LIVING TRUST
36 GOLDEN STONE
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319101029 JOSEPH & MELINDA
DUWAN
352 GOLDEN STONE
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319101031 LEONE ROSSO LLC 431 E BAYAUD AVE
APT 306
DENVER CO 80209
239319101032 PENSCO TRUST
COMPANY & SUSAN
GOLDSTEIN
23 ROYAL
COACHMAN
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319101061 HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION AT
ASPEN GLEN
80 BALD EAGLE
WAY
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319101064 STEVEN & JERRI
PEDRO
6800 DESERT
HIGHLANDS DR
FORT WORTH TX 76132
239319102003 JOHN MCKAY &
LESLIEANN
GALLAGHER
54 INDIAN PAINT
BRUSH
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102004 CLIFTON & HEATHER
KLING
8780 SW 64TH CT PINECREST FL 33156
239319102005 FRED STANDEFER &
FRED W STANDEFER
1982 REVOCABLE
TRUST
94 INDIAN PAINT
BRUSH
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102006 DAVID & LAURA
SHUKOVSKY
3684 FESCUE LN SARASOTA FL 34232
68 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239319102007 ROBERT & CAROL
JENKINS AND PAUL
BROWN AND
LEIGHANNE JENKINS
PO BOX 14 WOODY CREEK CO 81656
239319102008 VICTOR FASCIANI 83 INDIAN PAINT
BRUSH
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102009 THE DANIEL M
KEENAN TRUST &
THE SUSAN R
KENNAN TRUST
1716 SEVERN
FOREST DRIVE
ANNAPOLIS MD 21401
239319102010 DAVID & DORA LEE 13 INDIAN PAINT
BRUSH
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102011 ERIN FERGUSSON 220 COLUMBINE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102012 SWARTZENDRUBER
PROPERTIES LLC
1435 N 24TH ST GRAND
JUNCTION
CO 81501
239319102013 HARVEY & JANET
GOLDBERG
252 COLUMBINE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102014 PUDER FAMILY LTD
PARTNERSHIP NO1
LTD
3930 MAX PL BOYNTON
BEACH
FL 33436
239319102016 RAYMOND &
MONDEEN SNYDER
12609 SAGAMORE
RD
LEAWOOD KS 66209
239319102018 KEISTER 2012 LONG
TERM TRUST &
WALTER T
WEATHERS JR
406 MENKING CT HOUSTON TX 77024
239319102020 GEOFF & VICKI
HASLEY
221 WILDFLOWER
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102021 MARK HARRIS &
CLAUDIA LAUER
195 WILDFLOWER
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102022 AARJAVE SHAH &
MEGAN HAYES
171 WILDFLOWER
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102023 ALEXANDER &
DOROTHEA
THOMSON
127 WILDFLOWER
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102024 RICHARD & LEANN
KATCHUK
12 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102025 THOMAS RITZEL 36 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102026 RICHARD & PAMELA
STRASSBERG
3400 SW 27TH AVE
APT 1202
COCONUT
GROVE
FL 33133
239319102027 DOUGLAS YORK 602 CLIFFGATE LN CASTLE ROCK CO 80108
239319102028 FFRP LLC 1621 CENTRAL AVE CHEYENNE WY 82001
239319102030 KENNETH &
DEBORAH ROBERTS
12 MARIPOSA CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102031 AGV8 LLC 37 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102032 WILLIAM & FRANCES
HOGAN
54 MARIPOSA CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102033 JAMES & CYNTHIA
NOWERY
63 MARIPOSA CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319102034 KEISTER FAMILY 2012
LONG TERM TRUST
3101 S OCEAN DR
APT 3708
HOLLYWOOD FL 33019
69 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239319102038 JON & CONNIE
WARNICK
28 INDIAN PAINT
BRUSH
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319103001 VIEWPOINT
PROPERTIES LIMITED
PO BOX 1657 BASALT CO 81621
239319103002 THOMAS & TAMELA
KENNING
42 MIDLAND LOOP
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319103005 REBECCA TILL 94 MIDLAND LOOP
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319103006 ROBERT & MARTHA
BISPLINGHOFF
12707 DEACONS PL LAKEWOOD
RANCH
FL 34202
239319103010 SLM HILL FAMILY LP 5240 114TH ST APT
2502
LUBBOCK TX 79424
239319103011 VIRGINIA & WILLIAM
WEATHERS
198 MIDLAND LOOP
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319103012 JAMES J & MARJORIE
MOYNIHAN
30 CAMDEN RD NE ATLANTA GA 30309
239319103021 DONN WILLINS &
EEDA YAJKO
115 MIDLAND LOOP
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319103023 DAVID & ALBERTA
LEACH
PO BOX 3707 VAIL CO 81658
239319103024 HF MANAGEMENT
COS, LTD
311 UNIVERSITY DR
# 101
FORT WORTH TX 76107
239319103025 JACKSON & GIAL
MCCOY
9261 SW 103RD ST MIAMI FL 33176
239319104001 CHRISTOPHER &
NICHOLE HILGERT
734 CAMELOT LN HOUSTON TX 77024
239319104002 FRASER FAMILY 2008
REVOCABLE TRUST
2069 BOUNDARY DR SANTA
BARBARA
CA 93108
239319104003 REVANA,
ALEXANDRA
RACHELE REVANA
TRUST UAD
3433 WESTHEIMER
RD APT 806
HOUSTON TX 77027
239319104004 GAYLE HECKER 139 RIVER GLEN RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319104005 MN CARBONDALE
LLC
2531 DEL LAGO DR FORT
LAUDERDALE
FL 33316
239319104006 OLDEN & CAROL LEE 4720 ROYAL LN DALLAS TX 75229
239319104009 ANDY KWITOWSKI 134 RIVER GLEN RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319104010 ML2 LLC 96 RIVER GLN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319104011 MCNEARNEY
MCPHERSON
REVOCABLE TRUST
78 RIVER GLN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109001 MARGARET &
GEORGE CHERNY
47 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109002 MICHAEL EASTERLY
& ANNE DEELEY
1085 BROOKHAVEN
SQ NE
BROOKHAVEN GA 30319
239319109003 QUCK MART LLC PO BOX 6832 SNOWMASS
VILLAGE
CO 81615
239319109004 PAUL BUSHONG 27 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109005 BRUCE & BONNIE
LIEBMANN
1495 GATEWAY RD SNOWMASS CO 81654
70 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239319109006 GOODNOUGH, WILDA
ERNESTINE
REVOCABLE TRUST
31 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109007 NANCY & GARY
PETERSON
14 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109009 JOHN MCGARY 18 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109010 ROGER & SANDRA
YOST
64 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109011 JENNIFER RANDLE 219 PARK
LAUREATE DR
HOUSTON TX 77024
239319109012 BRUCE & BONNIE
LIEBMANN
68 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109013 GINN, ARLEEN KUHN
TRUST
55 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319109014 KASPAREK FAMILY
PROPERTIES LLC
105 BROAD COVE
DR
MONTGOMERY TX 77356
239319109015 GARDNER & DIANE
LEAVER
1788 W FM 1885 WEATHERFORD TX 76088
239319109016 PEAKS AT ASPEN
GLEN HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
215 S MONARCH ST
STE 104
ASPEN CO 81611
239319111001 GEORGE & LORAINE
DUNCAN
71 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319111002 ALLEN & SANDRA
HENRY
3950 N RIVERSIDE
DR
INDIALANTIC FL 32903
239319111004 BARTON & NANCY
LEVIN
340 RIVERS BND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319111005 BRUCE & MARGARET
LYNTON
PO BOX 9158 ASPEN CO 81612
239319111007 QUINN & MICHELLE
WILLIAMS
9731 N 56TH ST PARADISE
VALLEY
AZ 85253
239319111008 DAG ASPEN LLC 629 SADDLEBACK
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319111009 DARRELL &
DEBORAH KIRCH
9621 BEMAN WOODS
WAY
POTOMAC MD 20854
239319111010 HARVEY FEDERMAN
& CAROL WELLS
FEDERMAN
117 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319111011 LISA DEPAULO &
PATRICIA ROSS
1499 BLAKE ST APT
7K
DENVER CO 80202
239319111012 SUSAN & ROBERT
HESS
106 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD UNIT B
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319112001 RAYBOURN SMISER 6637 CRESTWAY CT DALLAS TX 75230
239319112017 PRASADA HOLDINGS
LLC
PO BOX 1437 CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319112018 CJB LLC PO BOX 1132 CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319112019 RANDY & AMI DIERS PO BOX 3294 GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81602
239319113001 WILLIAM & WILLOW
BANKS
290 SUNSET WAY MUIR BEACH CA 94965
239319113002 KEITH & JENNIFER
EICKELMAN
38 COTTAGE DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
71 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239319113003 EDWARD & JANE
BLEKA
6 RIVA RDG LEMONT IL 60439
239319113005 GEOFFREY SPICE &
JACQUELYN BAILEY
74 COTTAGE DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319113006 WILLIAM BAGBY 241 CHIMNEY ROCK
RD
HOUSTON TX 77024
239319113007 ALAN & MAY
STOREY
98 COTTAGE DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319113008 MARY MURPHY 106 COTTAGE DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319114001 ROBERT & CAROLE
SLOSKY
2777 S ELMIRA ST
APT 2
DENVER CO 80231
239319114002 PHILIP & LYDIA CLAY 804 TURKEY OAK
LN
NAPLES FL 34108
239319114003 THOMAS COOPER 321 VINE ST ASPEN CO 81611
239319114004 STEPHEN BELLOTTI PO BOX 8238 ASPEN CO 81612
239319114005 JOHN & LINDA NEIL PO BOX 237 GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81602
239319114006 CYNTHIA & DONALD
BUTTERFIELD
110 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319114007 MATHEW
ZUCKERMAN
99 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319114008 JAMES VIDAKOVICH 5027 GREENBUSH
AVE
SHERMAN OAKS CA 91423
239319114009 KIM STANEK 95 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319114010 ROBERT DUANE JR &
LAURIE
OSTERMILLER
275 MEADOW WOOD
RD
GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239319114011 KIRK & CELIA
FEUERBACH
5601 TURTLE BAY
DR APT 1804
NAPLES FL 34108
239319114013 SUNSHINE
ENTERPRISES LIVING
TRUST
71 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319114014 GRACE S OLIPHANT
REVOCABLE TRUST
69 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319114015 BARGER, H CARTER
TRUST
67 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319173003 JOAN LEVIN &
CHARLES LOHRFINK
14 UPLAND LN ARMONK NY 10504
239319173008 CLUBLODGE
OWNERS
ASSOCIATION
PO BOX 21307 HILTON HEAD
ISLAND
SC 29925
239319173012 RAVEN STATION LLC 335 CLAYTON ST DENVER CO 80206
239319173013 CHARLES & ANNE
GOYER
4707 WILDWOOD RD DALLAS TX 75209
239319173014 FRANK & CATHERINE
TOMENY
9191 SIEGEN LN
BLDG 7
BATON ROUGE LA 70810
239319173015 HAYLEY KILLAM PO BOX 8262 ASPEN CO 81612
239319203013 SCOTT & ERICA
MYERS
1214 10TH AVE W SEATTLE WA 98119
239319203014 DAHR HOLDING, LP 6905 NW GRAND
BLVD
OKLAHOMA
CITY
OK 73116
72 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239319203026 BRIAN & PATRICIA
BERKOWITZ
6911 NW 66TH WAY PARKLAND FL 33067
239319205019 PATTISON, DOUGLAS
J TRUST
26 PULLMAN CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319205022 DAVID & FRAN
ALBALA
120 BUCHMANS
CLOSE CIR
FAYETTEVILLE NY 13066
239319205023 SHANNON MURPHY 231 MIDLAND AVE
STE 206
BASALT CO 81621
239319205024 NO BUX LLC PO BOX 459 GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81602
239319205025 JAMES & ANN
KENNEY
323 MIDLAND LOOP
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319208001 BENJAMIN LOUGHRY 4455 CAMP BOWIE
BLVD STE 114
FORT WORTH TX 76107
239319208004 TOMEK &
MALGORZATA
PEGIEL
722 VINE ST ASPEN CO 81611
239319208005 KEVIN EVERSON 715 HORIZON DR GRAND
JUNCTION
CO 81506
239319208007 JAMES & VIRGINIA
LOGAN
283 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319208008 ASPEN WIT LLC PO BOX 3518 ASPEN CO 81612
239319208017 DAVID & LISA
WEIMER
353 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319208018 DAN DEATON 328 SUNDANCE TRL CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319208019 PENSCO TRUST CO &
ROBERT ASA JONES
IRA
PO BOX 173859 DENVER CO 80217
239319208020 CRAIG FIX &
THERESA SIMPSON
117 FOXGATE CT MILLERSVILLE PA 17551
239319208021 SJG ASPEN GLEN, LTD 1101 S DOWNING ST DENVER CO 80210
239319208022 HENKE PROPERTY,
LLC
215 S MONARCH ST
STE 101
ASPEN CO 81611
239319208023 JOSE ORELLANA
VILLATA & SANDRA
RODRIGUEZ
208 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319208024 DAVID SOSNOWSKI 7340 ISLAND GREEN
DR
BOULDER CO 80301
239319208025 RKS FAMILY LLLP PO BOX 500 CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319212008 CRAIG BUSHONG &
MARY BONDLOW
1108 BALD EAGLE
WAY
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319212011 GEORGE & JOAN
GREENWALD
89 SUNDANCE TRL CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319212022 ROBERTA GOODRICH
& MARTIN HOFFMAN
6906 E ARCHER PL DENVER CO 80230
239319401004 MYERS RESIDENCE
TRUST
396 BROOKIE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319401005 EDWARD POLEN &
EDWARD J POLEN
REVOCABLE TRUST
2780 RIDGE RD HIGHLAND PARK IL 60035
239319401009 FRANCESCA &
WILLIAM FENDER
625 BROOKIE CARBONDALE CO 81623
73 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239319401010 BB PARTNERS LLC 5030 COUNTY ROAD
154
GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239319401015 JAMES & MICHELLE
MORRIS
396 GOLDEN STONE
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319401016 POLICARE TRUST 255 GREEN DRAKE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319401017 RONALD & LAURA
PICKMAN
161 GREEN DRAKE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319401018 GOODWILL
HOLDINGS LLC
PO BOX 381 WRIGHTSVILLE
BEACH
NC 28480
239319401037 BRADLEY & TERRIE
GEDDES
19 ROYAL
COACHMAN
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319401042 MICHAEL & RACHEL
KEELING
11 CADDIS CT CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319401043 THOMAS & CELESTE
COX
207 W SHORE RD HUNTINGTON NY 11743
239319401045 DANIEL & DONNA
MILLER
2539 S SAINT PAUL
ST
DENVER CO 80210
239319401047 DAVID SCHUSLER PO BOX 935 PAOLI PA 19301
239319401049 JOHN & MARY ELLIS 201 NW 130TH AVE PLANTATION FL 33325
239319401050 MICHAEL MURRAY 1848 NORWOOD PLZ
STE 212
HURST TX 76054
239319401051 SMOLIK INTERESTS
LP
7 RIVERWAY UNIT
2210
HOUSTON TX 77056
239319401052 SMOLIK INTERESTS
LP
2505 DEL MONTE DR HOUSTON TX 77019
239319401053 GERALD & BEVERLY
BURK
608 W HARVARD DR GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239319401054 GEREN, CHANDRA
EDWARDS LIVING
TRUST
4900 WESTRIDGE
AVE VILLA # 4
FORT WORTH TX 76116
239319401055 JOHN & RITA
MADDEN
2121 KIRBY DR UNIT
11
HOUSTON TX 77019
239319401060 PICARD, SCOTT,
TRUSTEE OF SCOTT
PICARD FAMILY
TRUST UTD OCTOBER
22, 2002
442 LARKSPUR DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239319401063 ENIS & KAREN
ALLDREDGE
281 GOLDEN STONE
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320206001 JOHN MIERNICKI 851 LATIGO LOOP CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320206002 JOHN A OR
SUCCESSOR THE
JOHN A BAILEY
REVOCABLE BAILEY
& TRUST DATE 2/19/93
1570 LINDA VISTA
DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
239320206005 KEVIN & LISA
REIMER
2009 S BROADWAY GRAND
JUNCTION
CO 81507
239320301001 BELL REVOCABLE
TRUST
516 DOVE CT GRAND
JUNCTION
CO 81507
239320301002 PAULA BARCLAY & E
KELLING
PO BOX 2600 BASALT CO 81621
74 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239320301007 MARK SCHNURR 6828 NORTHSTAR
CIR
CASTLE ROCK CO 80108
239320301008 JOHN WALKER PO BOX 11538 ASPEN CO 81612
239320301009 ANDREW MODELL 76 PUMA CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301010 TERRY BUTLER 305 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611
239320301011 CARTER COLORADO
REVOCABLE TRUST
678 PRIMROSE LN FRIDAY HARBOR WA 98250
239320301012 LEYLI 37 LLC 110 SPUR DR GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239320301013 LEO & CO LLC 253 HAYSTACK LN SNOWMASS CO 81654
239320301014 HEFNER LIPKE
REBECCA 2015
LEGACY TRUST
6 BELLEVIEW TER PRINCETON NJ 08540
239320301015 SUSAN ESVAL BUSS
FAMILY TRUST
3025 HANOVER ST DALLAS TX 75225
239320301016 SYBIL HILL &
MICHAEL CARTER
42 BUFFALO CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301017 JASON & RENEE
CAREY
PO BOX 2123 GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81602
239320301018 KATHRYN BROOKS 78 BUFFALO CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301019 JOSEPH & MIRIAM
LEAVITT
83 BUFFALO CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301020 RANDY & AMI DIERS 75 BUFFALO CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301021 JAY & KIMBERLY
ABRAHAMOVICH
63 BUFFALO CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301022 DAVID HARDIN 118 HURON DR CHATHAM NJ 07928
239320301023 PAUL & BONNIE
HOFFMANN
255 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301029 DIANE & NOAH
BAULDRIDGE
101 FOX PROWL CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301030 BD DEVELOPMENT
LLC
210 ASPEN AIRPORT
BUSINESS CTR STE
MM
ASPEN CO 81611
239320301031 KENNETH WILLIAMS
& JANELLE WEAVER
63 FOX PROWL CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301032 ROBERT WILLIAMS &
PAMELA ZENTMYER
PO BOX 23 CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301033 DAVID & YING WALL 678 SURREY RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301035 WILLIAM FOX 96 LOTHROP RD GROSSE POINTE
FARMS
MI 48236
239320301036 MICHAEL EDINGER 108 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301037 SCHENK, BRENT J
LIVING TRUST U/A
132 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301038 KENNETH & JODY
BLACKBURN
PO BOX 5390 FRISCO CO 80443
239320301040 PARK & METZ LLP 329 MAIN ST CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301041 DEBORAH B ISGRIG
REVOCABLE TRUST
193 MOUNTAIN
MEADOWS CIR # 15
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301043 DAVID BAXTER PO BOX 1112 CRESTED BUTTE CO 81224
75 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239320301044 ROBERT GALLAGHER
JR & NANCY
GALLAGHER
314 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301045 E M Y PARTNERS,
LTD
22617 E IDA AVE AURORA CO 80015
239320301046 KENNETH &
KIMBERLY HICKMAN
237 BLUE HERON LN ROCKWALL TX 75032
239320301047 MARINA KLEIN 2627 S BAYSHORE
DR APT 2103
MIAMI FL 33133
239320301048 ROBERT SIMONS JR &
SALLY SIMONS
31 KINGFISHER CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301049 THOR & CHRISTIE
JENSEN
123 KINGFISHER CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301050 RONALD & MARCIA
FROH
7000 BAHIA BEACH
BLVD
RIO GRANDE PR 00745
239320301051 SECTOR 3
DEVELOPMENT LLC
170 OSPREY CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301052 KEVIN & KATHLEEN
SCHNEIDER
54 KINGFISHER CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301054 WILLIAM CHANDLER 1014 MISSION DR SOUTHLAKE TX 76092
239320301090 MOGLI & DAVID
COOPER
109 FOX PROWL CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320301100 JAMES DALLMAN &
KATHLEEN SCHIAVI
534 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320302002 YOUNG, J ROBERT
LLC
PO BOX 10000 GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81602
239320302003 ASHTON & SUSAN
LEE
473 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320302005 LESTER & CYNTHIA
PRICE
413 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320302006 BRITTON JR WHITE &
SHERRY ODENTHAL
397 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320302007 EDWARD & JUDY
BROWN
22 PHEASANT CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320303010 ROCKY HOLDINGS
540 LLC
13400 MARSH LNDG WEST PALM
BEACH
FL 33418
239320303011 THOMAS & CLAIR
AMONETT
3900 ESSEX LN STE
400
HOUSTON TX 77027
239320304035 D-35, LLC 1818 RIDGECREST
WAY
HIGHLANDS
RANCH
CO 80129
239320304036 HANNELORE
DAWSON & THE
HANNELORE P
DAWSON 2004 TRUST
13602 JADESTONE
WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
239320304039 SJN LLC 2402 GRAND AVE GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239320304044 MKS INVESTMENTS
LLC
5010 HILLSBORO
AVE N
NEW HOPE MN 55428
239320304045 DAVID BROWN PO BOX 91 ASPEN CO 81612
239320304096 JEFFERY & CARRIE
CLOUGH
158 SEEBNRG CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304104 GEOFFREY & JILL
TASKER
106 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
76 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239320304105 BARBARA & JAY
SPORT
106B DIAMOND A
RANCH ROAD EAST
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304106 POLLACK, CINTRA
REVOCABLE TRUST
PO BOX 22066 DENVER CO 80222
239320304110 RICHARD & KAREN
KRUSE
139 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304111 HOWARD & JANICE
COWAN
137 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304114 EWALT, NORRIS D
TRUST & EWALT,
SUSAN M TRUST
12 SEEBERG CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304115 DOUGLAS & CHERYL
POLSON
210 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304116 NEIL ROSS 18 UPLAND UNIT A CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304118 TRACY FORRISTALL
& TIMOTHY KRUSE
180 A SEEBURG CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320304119 CATHEY & PAUL
MASSEY
180 B SEEBURG CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305003 LYNDA & E STOKES 25655 MARSH
LANDING PKWY
PONTE VEDRA
BEACH
FL 32082
239320305004 STANISLAW &
ALEKSANDRA
BARTLOMIEJCZUK
162 W 6TH ST GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239320305005 JAY CRONK 101 RIVER PARK RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305006 F6, LLC 106 B DIAMOND A
RANCH RD E
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305008 ROBERT
WESTERLUND
88 RIVER PARK RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305009 JASON KILLEBREW 62 RIVER PARK RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305011 EDWIN & TRACY
STREULI
408 PECAN
MEADOW DR
BATON ROUGE LA 70810
239320305012 DEBORAH ISGRIG &
THE DEBORAH B
ISGRIG REVOCABLE
TRUST
193 MOUNTAIN
MEADOWS CIR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305013 THE DR SISO LIVING
TRUST
PO BOX 2625 CAREFREE AZ 85377
239320305014 MARGOT
HAMPLEMAN
PO BOX 2779 BASALT CO 81621
239320305015 177 MOUNTAIN
MEADOWS LLC
310 MARKET ST BASALT CO 81621
239320305016 GEORGE SHAVER 1836 MIDLAND AVE GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239320305017 A&M VENTURES LLC 4431 W CASPIAN CIR LITTLETON CO 80128
239320305018 GERALD & KIRSTEN
MCDANIEL
87 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305020 BONNIE & RONALD
MCLEAN
68 BALD EAGLE
WAY
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305021 YUN SCOTT 140 OSPREY CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305022 ELENA & PHIL
MOTUZKO
98 SWEET GRASS RD
# E
CARBONDALE CO 81623
77 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239320305024 SHERMAN, DIANE E
LIVING TRUST
214 BALD EAGLE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320305025 CAMP CARBONDALE
LLC
16 BARDON ST MADISON NJ 07940
239320305028 WEBER LIVING
TRUST
9683 E MARIOLA
WAY
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85262
239320305029 KAISER FAMILY
TRUST
256 BALD EAGLE CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320306004 JOHN THACKSTON &
MARCIA HALL
18 LEONIS LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320401004 STEVE & MARY NAST 463 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320401005 JOHN & BRENDA
BELL
403 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320403001 STEVEN & NANCY
BECKWITH
446 DIAMOND A
RANCH RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320403002 BRENDAN & ABIGAIL
MATTHIAS
56 THUNDERSTORM
CIR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320403003 DREAM MASTERS,
LLC LIABILITY
670 FRYING PAN RD BASALT CO 81621
239320403004 MARK & SALLY
BALDWIN
3 AMBERTON LN HOUSTON TX 77024
239320403005 MICHAEL & LINDA
MOORE
18 BUFFALO CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320403008 ROBERT & LAURA
EAGLE
PO BOX 3095 ABILENE TX 79604
239320403009 G & JUDITH
SHOTWELL
3377 MILL VISTA RD HIGHLANDS
RANCH
CO 80129
239320403010 MARTHA PICKETT &
EDGELL PYLES
PO BOX 503 SNOWMASS CO 81654
239320404009 DEAN BRAMLET &
JANE KIENLE
2027
BRIGHTWATERS
BLVD NE
SAINT
PETERSBURG
FL 33704
239320404010 THOMAS & CAROL
CARNISH
245 SNOWCAP CIR
UNIT B
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404012 KENNETH & MARTHA
ROBINSON
255 SNOWCAP CIR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404014 TIMOTHY & DIANE
PARKS
PO BOX 1790 VAIL CO 81658
239320404015 ALAN KIDNEY &
JEANNIE STELDT
7727 14TH AVE NW SEATTLE WA 98117
239320404017 EXLINE FAMILY
TRUST, LLC
6135 S NETHERLAND
CIR
CENTENNIAL CO 80016
239320404020 DIEGO ORMEDILLA &
CAROLINA
CANCELLERI
94 PRIMROSE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404022 DAVID & DIANA
KEIM
63 SWEET GRASS DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404025 WISDOM MATURITY
REVOCABLE TRUST
PO BOX 5793 DENVER CO 80217
239320404028 GRETCHEN
GREENWOOD
210 S GALENA ST
STE 30
ASPEN CO 81611
78 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239320404031 B GLEN 31 LLC 5404 WISCONSIN
AVE STE 800
CHEVY CHASE MD 20815
239320404034 KURAJIAN, GEORGE
M JR TRUST
17 BLUEBILL AVE
APT 706
NAPLES FL 34108
239320404099 98 B SWEETGRASS
LLC
6706 GATERIDGE DR DALLAS TX 75254
239320404108 ROBERT CHATMAS 39 SWEET GRASS DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404109 0041 SWEET GRASS,
LLC
533 E HOPKINS AVE
FL 3RD
ASPEN CO 81611
239320404112 CURTIS HENDERSON
REVOCABLE TRUST &
DEANNA
HENDERSON
REVOCABLE TRUST
10 CASTLE PINES DR
N
CASTLE ROCK CO 80108
239320404113 DAVID &
CHARMAINE BOOTH
14405 W COLFAX
AVE
LAKEWOOD CO 80401
239320404114 THOMAS & LORI
JOINER
78 UPLAND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404115 CHRISTOPHER BAKER 76 UPLAND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404116 BLACK HORSE LLC PO BOX 4010 BASALT CO 81621
239320404117 BLB PARTNERSHIP
LLC
299 B SWEETGRASS
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404118 STEVEN & SHAY
PENTON
40 HIGH CT CHAGRIN FALLS OH 44022
239320404119 SPENCER SCHIFFER &
NANCY LAWRENCE
28 SWEET GRASS DR CARBONDALE CO 81623
239320404120 BRIAN L
MCEACHRON LIVING
TRUST
12 RIVERS BND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329101001 STAN KORNASIEWICZ 284 RIVERS BND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329101002 MORGAN 1999
REVOCABLE TRUST
222 WEST AVE UNIT
1401
AUSTIN TX 78701
239329101003 CHARLES BRINDELL
JR & REBECCA
OLMSTEAD
3535 GILLESPIE ST DALLAS TX 75219
239329101004 HARLEE 425 LLC 1449 SE 13TH ST FORT
LAUDERDALE
FL 33316
239329101010 ALLAN & CHERYL
BOMERSBACK
PO BOX 310 CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329101011 T & ELIZABETH ROOS 263 RIVERS BND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329101013 GLEASON, NANCY J
APPOINTIVE GST
EXEMPT TRUST
503 MARINA DR PORT ARANSAS TX 78373
239329101014 JOHN & PAMELA
MCDERMOTT
141 HITCHING POST
RD
BOZEMAN MT 59715
239329101018 MJC HOLDINGS LLC 17 WHISPERING
WATER CIR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329101019 KYLE & TARAH WOLF 237 BENTGRASS DR GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239329101020 MARK & LAKEO
LEWIS
823 25 RD GRAND
JUNCTION
CO 81505
79 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239329101022 JOHN & CONNIE
THORSEN
5787B NW 151ST ST MIAMI LAKES FL 33014
239329101023 JOHN & MOLLY
MORTON
PO BOX 3315 BASALT CO 81621
239329104001 ROBINSON FAMILY
TRUST
369 SWEET GRASS
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329104002 GUTTI & NALINI RAO 361 SWEET GRASS
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329104004 DOLORES BOWERS 7930 SW 155TH ST PALMETTO BAY FL 33157
239329104006 EARL AUSTIN JR &
SANETTE AUSTIN
11120 S COUNTRY
SQUIRE ST
HOUSTON TX 77024
239329104009 THOMAS & KAREN
THOMPSON
1113 ROCKY RIVER
RD
HOUSTON TX 77056
239329104100 MARK ROSMAN &
JACQUELINE
CORCORAN
4328 37TH RD N ARLINGTON VA 22207
239329104101 WELLING FRUEHAUF 1324 VIA
PORTOFINO
NAPLES FL 34108
239329201006 KEITH & MICHELLE
MARLOW
372 RIVERS BND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329201007 JERRY & LESLIE
BEINSTEIN
404 RIVERS BND CARBONDALE CO 81623
239329201091 ELIZABETH HOLTZE 330 N GILPIN ST DENVER CO 80218
239329201092 ASPEN GLEN A-8 LLC 20 SUNSET DR STE 1 BASALT CO 81621
239513405003 CHESTER & NANCY
CYNOSKI
55 SPIRE RIDGE
WAY
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513405005 SS LIANA, LLC PO BOX 6513 SNOWMASS
VILLAGE
CO 81615
239513405006 GRISEL PADILLA 550 AVE DE LA
CONSTITUCTION
APT 807
SAN JUAN
00901
239513405008 R & PAMELA SMITH 93 SADDLEBACK RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513405014 NANCY CARLSON 2780 COUNTY ROAD
113
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513405015 LAWRENCE DENTON 567 BALDWIN CT BIRMINGHAM MI 48009
239513405017 CYPRESS POINT
LAND HOLDINGS,
LLC
5335 SPRING
VALLEY RD
DALLAS TX 75254
239513405018 FRANK & BARBARA
QUIGG
152 SADDLEBACK
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513406011 THOMAS E JR & AMY
GUEM
205 SADDLEBACK
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513406012 RICHARD & JANICE
VIERKE
PO BOX 772930 STEAMBOAT
SPRINGS
CO 80477
239513406013 WILLIAM YOUNG &
WILLIAM AND
FELICIA YOUNG LIVI
245 SADDLEBACK
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513406015 VITALI LIVING TRUST 285 SADDLEBACK
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513406016 RICHARD PERKINS III
& NATALIE
BARTLETT
125 UPLAND RD CONCORD MA 01742
80 | P a g e
Parcel # Owner Name Mailing Address City St ZIP
239513406017 W SCOTT LIVESAY 405 LONDONDERRY
DR STE 203
WACO TX 76712
239513406018 FRANK MCGUIRK III
& LINDA HUNTSMAN
35 HORSESHOE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513406020 FLOYD & CYNTHIA
MCADOW
PO BOX 129 GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81602
239513406021 EDWARD & SIBYL
DAVIS
PO BOX 1010 ASPEN CO 81612
239513406022 JUSTIN & TARA ADIS 62 HORSESHOE LN CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513406024 PAULA ROTH &
DOMINIC DEZZUTTI
4804 WALDENWOOD
DR
HIGHLANDS
RANCH
CO 80130
239513406025 GIESZL FAMILY
NEVADA LLC
PO BOX 6535 SNOWMASS
VILLAGE
CO 81615
239513406026 MIKE BODROGI 998 HUEBINGER DR GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239513406027 KOENIG, RAYMOND P
REVOCABLE TRUST
AGREEMENT
26 SADDLEHORN CT CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513406030 JOHN & MARIANNE
VIRGILI
406 HYLAND PARK
DR STE A
GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239513406031 AMERICAN NEVADA
CO LLC
2360 CORPORATE
CIR STE 330
HENDERSON NV 89074
239513406035 RICHARD & LOUANN
CRAMER
871 GRANDVIEW DR PALMYRA PA 17078
239513407001 GOETZ, THE PHILIP &
ARLENE 2003 TRUST
6629 E EVENING
GLOW DR
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85266
239513407002 WILLIAM & WANDA
GARVEY
4303 CAT
MOUNTAIN DR
AUSTIN TX 78731
239513407006 KENT & DAWN DORR 14350 MARIPOSA ST WESTMINSTER CO 80023
239513407008 DAVID LEVINE 2801 GLENDALE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28209
239513407009 JAKE & IVA
DEWOLFE
PO BOX 1805 CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513407010 STEVE FIZGERALD 333 LIONS RIDGE RD CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513407011 G & L ENTERPRISES
LLC
PO BOX 61 CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513407012 BETTY & SCOTT
BOWIE
1260 COUNTY ROAD
112
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513407013 DAVID & PATRICIA
ARGO
121 HIDEAWAY LN GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239513407014 PETER HARRIMAN &
MELISSA AMATO
602 SADDLEBACK
RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513407015 JODY & RICHARD
WILSON
11 EASY ST CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513408009 DAVID BAXTER &
SHIRLEY AIN
85 BUNKHOUSE PL EAGLE CO 81631
239513408010 ROBIN & MARCUS
HOWELL
351 GOLDEN BEAR
DR
CARBONDALE CO 81623
239513408011 CHARLES COURTNEY 738 MINTER AVE GLENWOOD
SPRINGS
CO 81601
239513408012 GSS PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 3377 BASALT CO 81621
239513408013 LARRY & PATRICIA
MAY
1125 S MILWAUKEE
ST
DENVER CO 80210
81 | P a g e
EXHIBITS
Exhibits A through K are submitted under separate cover with this application.