HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.01 Staff Report & Exhibits - Part B412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo - ln Missouri Heights - NO
What are the benefits of this project for Garfield County and Eagle County - at this location? I see none for us that live
and own propcrty here.
It concertts nte lhat we ownërs in Missourl Helghts would be stuck paying for additional infrastructure in future years
caused by this project. The traffic alone on our rural roads is a major concern.
Most of us who live in Missouri Heights and have bought property here did not buy with the idea that a major
commercial project such as this would ever come to this rural area. We need to keep this area rural such as we have
now. We need thoughtful rural development to Missouri Heights, not commercial developments that would
considerably change our environment.
Gary Manchester
Owner -Lot26 Stirling Ranch
Resitlent at 507 Kings Row St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
This email has come to you after being scanned by the
Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please email support@thepcwhisperer,net
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-F/o3A1697843451152638496&simpl=msg-fo/o3416978434S1'15... 2t2
4t27t202'l Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EA6LE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecou nty. us>
Tue, Apr 27,2021 at 10:52 AM
Stolg Infortned! Sígrtttp,for the Contmunitg Deuelopnwnt Monthlg -E-À/eruslettet here'
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-4Zt-gsSg
EAGLE COUNTY
community
DeveÌopment
Fon¡varded message
From: Glenn Montgomery <gdmonty32@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 5:28 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Ranch
To: <ghartmann@garfield-county.com>, <sbower@garfield-county.com>, <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>,
<morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
4il,
Please review my letter concerning this out-of-place development proposal.
I have emailed the 3 Garco Commissioners but I can't aftach the letter. Hopefully 1 of you Garco contacts will fonruard
Glenn Montgomery
Missouri Heights
Ë Ascendigo letter to GarGo, etal4-23-21.pdf
210K
https://ma¡l.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/03416982132313'13858201&simpl=msg-f%3416982132313--1t1
April23,202L
To all: Garfield County Commissioners, our elected Eagle County representatives, Garfield Co Planners and Community
Development personnel
Regarding the Ascendigo Ranch development application,
While their mission is admirable, their choice of location is extremely problematic. Missouri Heights is a
sparsely populated residential area - but you all know that. There are limitations to water, there are narrow
single lane roads, there are high, sustained winds, there is a quiet, rural atmosphere that we sustain and
moved/built here for.
Ascendigo's proposal lays out how the program will permanently alter our community in so many ways. The
following will address each topic specifically.
a
a
a
a
Change of Zoning and current land use approvals - First & foremost this should be the basis for denial:o The parcel is currently known as White Cloud Ridge. A previously approved residential parcel with
13 lots for single family homes. The Ascendigo group bought this parcel knowing this approval is
in place. Their desire to go to Garfield County to request a change of use should not constitute an
argument for acceptance by GarCo. There is a process involved in Change of Use and the Missouri
Heights Master Plan does not ¡nclude commercial operations as an acceptable use.
Water:
¡ Western Colorado is in the 20th year of a major drought cricle. When was the last time we had a
day-long rain or even our summer monsoon cycle? Our aquifers are being depleted. Wells are
stressed, water restrictions are imminent. For Ascendigo to propose the size and scale of their
br"rildings, their operations - a commercial kitchen, guest facilities and rentals, ponds, etc, is just so
absolutely insensitive to the realities of our landscape and sustainability. Kitchens use water,
guest facilities need toilets and showers, ponds need filling because they evaporate - especially
with our winds. L00 or 150 overnight guests could use as much water in 1- day as we use
individually for our homes in 1 summer. (Here in Sopris Mesa just north of this development we
are allocated 60,000 gallons from May 1to Oct 1.) Ascendigo's water use will be dramatic.
Fire:
¡ We have lived with "Go boxes" of valuables, fire safes, lists of what to grab, in our hall closet for
over 5 years in the event of a fire. We have lived the past 2 years either on pre-evacuation status
or keeping our eyes on already close-by fires. lt's very stressful. July 4, 2OL8, L1- pm, we activated
our evacuation plan with the Lake Christine Fire blowing up. Our only route out of the Heights
was west on CR 102 (Fender Lane) to Catherine Store Rd. 100 because the fire was about to
consume El Jebel. The amount of traffic on that route was like 170 going into Denver on a ski
weekend. Packed, slow, people lost and terrified, towing stock trailers, congested, disorganized,
no emergency personnel guiding people unsure of where to go. Now put into the mix the L00 -
L50 people staying at Ascendigo needing to get out.
I nfrastructu re:
o Ascendigo is claiming non-profit status. This means they will not pay into current infrastructure to
maintain roads, fire protection districts, police and rescue, schools, etc. Their claim of 450 vehicle
trips per day will significantly stress our already-worn roads, not to mention seriously diminish the
quality of life for those of us who bought into this community. The steep, windlng roads are the
only available access to this community. This doesn't even consider the impacts of the
construction traffic necessary to build-out the camp. See excerpt from Sec 4-203 below regarding
buildout timing.
a Development impacts:
r The footprint of Ascendigo's proposed buildings, ponds, equestrian fields, is enormous
As proposed (their laneuage):
-Bose Camp - the comp heodquorters for registrdtion, reception, medls, ond
education ond training for educøtors and others (up to 6,800 squore Íeet)
-Comper Lodge- steepíng quorters dnd showers Íor up to 24 campers and two on'
duty stalf (up to 8,5(N square feet)
-StøÍf Lodge- sleeping quorters Íor up to 48 stdff members (up to '
8,500 squore feet)
-Activity Born- o trøining and therapy center (74,000 square feet)
-Cøretoker Dwelting- a home for an on-sîte stoff lamily (up to 3,500 squore feet)
and Cøretaker ADIJ- secondory on-site stoff family unit (up to 2,500 square feet)
-Guest Cabin- rentol cobin for Ascendigo participants (up to 7,700 square feet)
-There would also be occessory structures for mointenønce equipment and
$torage, a hdy born, horse and goat borns, on equestian tack/office, and lodfing
sheds.
This is 37,000 sq ft of structures, not counting the last bit of accessory structures,
tbd. How much domestic water with showers, toilets, irrigation would these
facilities consume? We suspect more than the 13 single family homes that the
parcel is already zoned and approved for.
a Traffic:
Their language from their proposal:
The Ascendigo Rdnch is expected to odd six morning peak hour trips Írom CR 702 onto
Harmony Ln. and eight trips in the afternoon peak hour from Harmony Ln. to CR 702.
a
This is simply not true. How does this mesh with their proposed density and Ascendigo
providing/ull-time jobs, commercial kitchens that require food & beverage deliveries,
maintenance crews, emergency services, not to mention the entire buildout toking
several years or more? Their words - see below.
From Sec 4-203 Submittal requirement of the Ascendigo submittal:
J. ...the initial buildings are expected to include equestrian facilities, then the Base
Camp and then the Camper Lodge. Additional phases will be implemented as funds allow. Ihe
entire buildout is expected to toke severøl yeors or more.
The traffic impacts will be endless, horrendous, and dangerous for all the reasons and situations
stated above.
Refer to Section 7-3OL of their proposal which outlines "Compatible Use". Some highlights - their
language:
o ...the Bøsecamp building also lncludes d 7z-seat dining hall, commercial kitchen,
bothrooms, storoge, mechanical/utility spdce, and o 24-seot outdoor dining porch. The
Basecomp will serve as the primøry location for educotion and training when offered
during non-summer periods, The Bdsecdmp may alsa be used during special events.¡ The Comper Lodge includes 24 single-occupancy rooms ond 72 bothrooms, such that 2
compers will share o bothroom, At Íull cøpacity, there will be 24 cømpers sleeping in the
Iodge
o The Stølf Lodge includes 24 double-occupancy rooms with bathroom capacity for up to 48
people. At lull capacity, there would be 48 people sleeping in the lodge during the summer
a Peak summer døv -These ore cdmper drop-off (Sunday) ønd pick-up doys (Friday) which
occur once edch per week. These days dre less active in terms of reÜeational dctivity but
will hove more vehicular troffic ønd total people on- site.
How is this compatiblc to the rural character of Missouri Heights? How much water will
these activities and facilities use and what are the traffic impacts from construction, guest
visits & delivery/rnaintertance schedules. Their traffic tables are just best guesses. Our belief
is that every statistic in their development proposal is understated. That's what developers
do. This will become a small city causing irreparable damage to the current residents of this
peaceful enclave who moved and built here for a piece of the Colorado Lifestyle. When we
built and moved up here in 2002 there was a 200+ herd of elk that would cross the Fender
Ranch every winter. They're gone. Development has already changed the fragile grasslands
of Missouri Heights, and if approved, Ascendigo will do even more damage. Much more-so
than if thirteen homes were built in the area, As mentioned earlier, the light pollution, noise,
and added activity in the area promises to permanently change the landscape and behavior
of wildlife forever. This can't happen.
Our opposition to Ascendigo has nothing to do with Autism or NlMBYism. lt has everything
to do with Missouri Heights being the wrong place for a project like this. There isn't enough
water, our roads are already crumbling, our wildlife is already leaving. Quite simply, this area
cannot sustain a project of this size. lf this proposal were to go through, it would create a
slippery slope where Missouri Heights could be transformed into a commercial area. lt can't
work and it won't work. Hunt Ranch was denied for the same reasons. The water will run
out. The fires will return. And that could mean disaster for not only Ascendigo, but for every
single resident that calls Missouri Heights home.
This project must be denied
Passionately,
Glenn Montgomery
L021Green Meadow Dr.
Sopris Mesa Subdivision
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo proposal
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo proposal
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To : Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@ea glecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 1:26 PM
Stag Infortned! Signup.for the Convnunitg Deuelopntettt Monthlg E-Newsletter here.
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.Zz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡ty
Development
Forwarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Thu, Apr22,2021 al12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo proPosal
To: greg litten <gclitten@gmail.com>, Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Hello Greg,
Thank you for sharing your comments and concerns regarding the Ascendigo proposal. I will be sure they are included
with our referral comments to Garfield county.
Stay well.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v is it www.eag lec o u ntYcov i d.o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
On Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 8:13 AM greg litten <gclitten@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Jeanne Mcqueeney,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. there will make the decision, Eagle
County will cãrtainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697769974877453405&simpl=msg{%3A16977699748'..112
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo proposal
fire and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal seryices will be called upon given the proximity to the: property. It's right on the county l¡nè. from road accidents to fire and health emergeñcies, and even maintenance of
i our road infrastructure, this project brirrgs sigrrificant increased activity ancl vehicles - and there is no revenue
coming with it to mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. It will be
an Eagle County problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more drought every year
We are seeing the effects of climate change. And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and
animals fronl that single road access point shoukl we have another fire. The alternative subdivision of homes would
be developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location.
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
Thanks,
Gregory Litten
0151 Prince dr.
Carbondale Co. 81623
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!!!
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!!!
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:12 PM
Wehsue arr.ew Eagle Countg COWD-tgwebsìte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid'org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Stag Inf,onnecMìgn up.for the ComtnunÍqg Deuel<tptnent Monthly .E-Nerosletter here.
Mot'ganBeryl
Eagle County Govemment
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.Sz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
CommunfN
Developmêñt
Fonruarded message
From: Kathy Ghandler-Henry <kathy.chandlerhenry@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Sun, Feb 28, 2O21 at 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!!!
To: Gwen Carew <gwencarew@comcast.net>, Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Greetings, Gwen. First of all, let me apologize for missing your earlier email. I appreciate your writing, and I certainly
understánd your concerns. I just sent an email to your husband as well - unfortunately we have no jurisdiction over this
development proposal as it's in Garfield County. When this was originally proposed for the Emma area, I know those
neighbors shared many of your thoughts.
We will be responding to Garfield County as a referral agency, but the decision will be made by the Garfield County
Planning Commission and County Commissioners. Please share your concerns with them as well. I've copied Morgan
Beryl, our Community Development Directo¡ in this email so she has your input as she composes our referral response
Thank you so much for taking the time to write.
Sincerely,
Kathy Chandler-Henry
Kathy Ghandler-Henry
Eagle County Commissioner
(970) 390-31 04
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809d5¿y¡s\^/=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1695881614551 586432&simpl=msg-fo/03416958816145.1t3
41612021
wwweaglecounty.us
EACLE COUNÏY
Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!!l
Office ofthe
Comm¡ssioners
ÊtrE¡
CovidQuestions@eaglecounty.us I 970-328-9750
Get the Facfs: One Valley Voice on Facebook or visit ECEmergency.org daily.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 7:41 AM Gwen Carew <gwencarew@conrcast,net> wrote
Hello Kathy,
I've written once before regarding Ascendigo's summer camp facility. I didn't hear back, so not sure that you received
my message.
I am writing to let you know that I am against the proposed development for Ascendigo's Summer Camp along
Harmony Lane. There are several reasons why I am opposed to this development (the land use change, water usage,
etc.), (by the way - I don't believe this will be used as educational - They will market it as a place to send your
child/adult to recreate). The main reason I am against this development is because of the traffic!
As I mentioned, I live on Fender Lane. I live right as you turn onto Fender Lane off of Upper Cattle Creek Road above
El Jebel. I've lived here for 15 T' years. I can tell you first hand that the traffic up here has probably doubled since I
moved up here from down on the valley floor. lt honestly has gotten to the point that I don't feel comfortable bringing
my dogs or my daughter with me to the end of the driveway to check the mail box. There is already a traffic problem on
Fender Lane. I feel that this sort of development will only add to the problem. As you are probably aware, Fender Lane
is going to be the main road used to get to this camp. The amount of traffic on Fender Lane will increase significantly.
Please try to picture it.
I should mention that I have a daughter with severe autism. She is non-verbal and requires assistance in all aspects of
her life. (Feeding, dressing, bathing, meal prep, toileting, etc.) My daughter is 30 years old and still lives with me and
my husband. I know how important it is to get breaks from the caregiving. I know how important it is for this population
to have a safe place to recreate. I just feel that Missouri Heights is not the place for this camp.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341695881614551 586432&simpl=msg-f%3A16958816145... 2tg
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFICII!
I ask that you please take this into consulting with Garfield County about this proposal. Missouri Heights is not the
place. lt has nothing to do with who the camp will be servicing, but how it will impact the people that already live up
here. lt will turn my front yard into a highway!! Thank you for your time.
Gwen Carew
1111 Fender Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-379-5731
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881614551586432&simpl=msg-fo/03416958816145.3/3
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFICI
SAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdcz@caglecou nty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:11 PM
Wehsue onew Eagle Countg COWD-tgwebsíte!
For the most recent information, please uisit wvvw.eaglecountycovid.org
One Vallsy Voice on Facehook
Stay Informed.! Sígnupfor the Comtnunítg Development Monthlg E-Neusletter here.
MorganBeryl
Eagle County Govcrnmcnt
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) 97o-47r-9533
EAGLE COUNTY
CÕmmuniù
Developmeñt
Fonivarded message
From: Gwen Carew <gwencarew@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, Mar 1,2021 at 6:53 AM
Subject: RE: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thank you Morgan
Just one more thought....l know this project will be in Garfield County - but the main roads that will be used to get to
this project are in Eagle County. l'm sure tagle County has alreadythought of this.
lf this project were to pass, I (along with other neighbors) would ask that Eagle County do something about the
traffic. ie: HUGE speed bumps down Fender, a reduced speed limit, and stop signs every 1,000 feet. O
Okay, that's all I wanted to add. No need to respond. I really do appreciate your time. Thank you. Gwen
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881596099186501&simpl=msg-f%3416958815960... 1t3
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!
From: Morgan Beryl Imailto]morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.usl
Sent: Friday, February 26,2021 5:26 PM
To: Gwen Carew
Subject: Re: Ascendigo and TRAFFIC!
Hi Gwen,
Thankyou so much foryourthoughtful letter. We will keep this in mind when reviewing the application as areferral agent
to Garfielcl County. I have also shãred your letter with the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners so they are
aware,
Thankyou,
We høue ø new Eagle County COWD-tg websíte!
For the most recent information, pleqse uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Covid Q uestions@eagl ecounty. us | 97 o3z8-97 5o
Stay Inforrned.! Sìgnupfor the Cotnmunítg DeuelopntentMctttthlg E'Newsletter here.
Mot'ganBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-+zt-gSSg
EAGLE COUNTY
CommuniW
Developmeñt
on Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at6:56 AM Gwen Carew <gwencarew@comcast.net> wrote
Hello Morgan,
My name is Gwen Carew and I live a|1111 Fender Lane, Carbondale, CO (in Missouri Heights). I've never really
wiitten a letter like this before, so I apologize if I don't come across as sounding very professional.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=threadJ%341695881596099'186501&simpl=msg-f%3416958815960 2t3
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo and TRAFFICI
I am writing to let you know that I am against the proposed development for Ascendigo's Summer Camp along
Harmony Lane. There are several reasons why I am opposed to this development (the land use change from -
residential to commercial, water usage, etc.), but the ¡nain reeson I am against this development is becausê of the
trafflc!
As I mentioned, I livc on Fender Lane. I live right as you turn onto Fender Lane off of Upper Cattle Creek Road above
El Jebel. I've lived here for 15 T,years. I can tell you first hand that the traffic up here has probably doubled since II moved up here from down on the valley floor. lt honestly has gotten to the point that I don't feel comfortable bringing
my dogs with me to the end of the driveway to check the mail box. People already fly up Upper Cattle Creek road and
onto Fender Lane. (As in SPEEDING). I feel that this sort of development will only add to the problem. The traffic up
here is already a problem. As you are probably aware, Fender Lane is going to be the main road used to get to this
camp. This is why I am opposed to the Ascendigo Summer Camp. The amount of traffic on Fender Lane will increase
significantly.
I should mention that I have a daughter with severe autism. She is non-verbal and requires assistance in all aspects of
her life. (Feeding, dressing, bathing, meal prep, toileting, etc.) My daughter is 30 years old and still lives with me and
my husband. I know how important it is to get breaks from the caregiving. I know how important it is for this population
to have a safe place to recreate. I just feel that Missouri Heiglrts is not the place for this carnp.
I ask that you please take this into consideration when working with Garfield County on this proposed facility. Missouri
Heights is not the place. lt has nothing to do with who the camp will be servicing, but how it will impact the people that
already live up here. Thank you for your time.
Gwen Carew
1'l'l'l Fender Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-379-5731
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881596099186501&simpl=msg-f%34'1695891S960... 3ts
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Please say NO to Ascendigo
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Please say NO to Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 8:17 AM
Stay Infornted"! Sígnupfor. tlrre Contntuníty Deuelopnwnt Monthly E-Netusletter here.
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-4Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
comm0n¡ry
Developmeht
Fon¡varded message
From: Ben Gerdes <ben.gerdes@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Wed, Apr 21, 2021 al7:10 PM
Subject: Fwd: Please say NO to Ascendigo
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Fonrvarded message
From: Gwen Carew <gwencarew@comcast.net>
Date:Wed, Apr21,2021 at6:44 PM
Subject: Please say NO to Ascendigo
To: <ben. gerdes@eaglecountY. us>
Hi Ben,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. there will make the decision, Eagle
County will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and fire
and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal services will be called upon given the proximity to the property.
It's right on the county line, From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of our road
infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue coming with it to
mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. It will be an Eagle County
problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697750540202937372&simpl=msg-f%3A169775O54O2---112
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Please say NO to Ascendigo
I live on Fender Lane. According to Ascendigo's traffic study (incluclecl with their application to Garfield County) -
their preferred route to Ascendigo Ranch is by way of Upper Cattle Creek Road onto Fender Lane. It even goes as far
as to say they will include a policy for staff with the preferred route. (page 11 of the McDowell Engineering traffic
report). That's a lot of traffic coming up Upper Cattle Creek Road onto Fender, It is not safe. There is always wildlife
on or nearby the road, with bicyclist and pedestrians as well. I can tell you that if this development passes, I will be
the first to ask for speed bumps and stop signs to be installed along Fender.
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more drought every year.
We are seeing the effects of climate change. The alternative subdivision of homes would be developed over time and
would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location.
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reason6.
We all sttpport /¡tt;trrr,li!¡,': work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
Thank you for your time.
Gwen Carew
Thanks, Ben
Benjamin Gerdes, P.E.
County Engineer
Eagle County Government
970.328.3560
ben. gerdes@eaglecounty. us
www.eaglecounty.us
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697750540202937372&simpl=msg-f%3A16977S05402... 2t2
4t16t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
EAGLE COUNTY
IlEllffil
Fonruarded message
From: Holly McLain <rumbleridge@gmail.com>
Date:Wed, Apr 14, 2O21 al4:10 PM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecountY. us>
Dear Eagle County Commissioners.
I live on [tre Eagle-County side of Missouri Heights. I wanted to keep you apprised of the Asendigo application for a large
commercial enterprise in my neighborhood.
Thank you for your time.
Holly McLain
Ð Ascendigo.docx
145K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697144228276389755&simpl=msg-f%3416971442282-212
LDR
t844o'";ffi;;;;þtr
rumbleridge@gmail. com
s70-948-2t51
4/L2/2O2L
To the Garfield County Commissioners:
I am writing you regarding the wisdom of allowing a commercial non-profit
enterprise to conduct a commercial br¡siness on a newly constructcd campus on the
rural Missouri Heights, White Cloud property.
My name is Holly Mclain. I sold Moon Run Ranch, Old Snowmass in Pitkin County,
Colorado after 47 years of ranching in the Roaring Fork Valley and outfitting in the
USFS Maroon/Snowmass Wilderness. In 2014|moved to Missouri Heights to Ruth
Fender's original Homestead property. I chose Missouri Heights because it is a
rural agricultural area, where I can keep my horses, chickens and grow a garden.
Within this area there are at least 6 real working ranches, large properties with
livestock including horses and cattle; and residential properties with long vistas and
larger spaces between homes. Most people grow gardens and have animals like
cattle, sheep, chicken, ducks and geese for their supplemental food source.
I live on the Eagle County side of the Heights and I know that commercial
enterprises are not within the zoning permitted for this area.
I am not against Ascendigo per se, but any large commercial endeavor in a rural
environment is incongruent. Housing 70 campers and then staff to accommodate
those campers would put untold pressure on the road access arteries in our
neighborhood. If the component of horses is removed from the scenario, Ascendigo
becomes a transit operation for camp activities and councilors. Missouri Heights is a
family territory. This residential neighborhood does not require Cysco trucks to
deliver foods to the commercial kitchens that will be built on this campus. Large
Missouri Heights ranches still maintain ownership for agriculture. If Asendigo is
allowed, future sellers and buyers of those existing ranches, which have large
buildings such as riding arenas and hay barns will be asking for similar zoning
changes. This approval will set a preceden! putting pressure on the Garfield and
Eagle bureaucrats to allow new uses similar to Ascendigo.
iVorst oiaìì is the proposeci misuse oiwater. Ascenciigo's water pian of capturing
the B water to fill a pond for clients to float on for their water therapy is counter to
our Colorado water rights drought situation. The B water rights turn on later in the
summer after first cutting of hay. Before and after the water is received, there will
be an empty, unsightly hole, another large arca of undisturbcd land for noxious
weeds to proliferate, Missouri heights is stressed for water. Wells are dropping and
I personally believe there should be a moratorium for any new development. Water
is precious and we are all in the throes of climate change. I am writing my letter to
Garfield County Commissioners today to stop this potential water offense.
When ranching was king, Missouri Heights was flood irrigated, which soaked the
land and recharged the aquifer.Hay, potatoes and grazing cattle utilized our
precious and limited water. Now, there is no recharging of our aquifer. I am against
allowing the depletion of our water by people who may have no idea how their
actions are affecting our water table'
Fire is another climate change reality. The Lake Christine fire burned to my fence'
MHMMR Irrigation Company turned on water so that I and my neighbor, Alex Kim
could flood our lands. We stopped the fire from rampaging across Missouri Heights'
Most residential home owners are unaware of the importance of managing water. In
the West, during the early western frontier days, people fought and died over water.
people are known to go out at night to divert water for their own unpermitted use.
This still occurs.
Ascendigo is a good organization. Currently they use Spring Valley Campus for
housing (already built and functioning); they go to Rifle Gap for water, floating
therapy (plenty of water available to the public); Sidney Horowitz currently runs
Ascendigo equestrian program at Crystal Springs Ranch. WindWalkers and Smiling
Goat offer equestrian therapy (existing programs available in Carbondale); and any
other needed programs can be accommodated locally without building a large
campus complex on Missouri Heights. The Ascendigo Campus will be lit at night to
illuminate roads and buildings. Light pollution is real. Missouri Heights residents
enjoy our starry night skies, which would be forever altered'
I support the ideolog¡r of Ascendigo. I question the wisdom of putting this large
envisioned facility on rural land with the challenges of limited water, wildfire
danger and increased traffic impacts.
From my Missouri Heights neighbor, focelyn Terry -
"l live down an old dirt road, riddled with potholes. The danger for wildfire in my
neighborhood is extremely high, with dry conditions almost year-round and high
winds on a regular basis. Our mesa overlooks the midsection of the Roaring Fork
Valley, with Mount Sopris highlighting the natural beauty to the Southside, Water is
limited here, and we are constantly repairing our aging water systems in order to
keep up with the addition of new single-family homes. We work together as
neighbors to identify fire dangers and traffic concerns. You can wait behind a slow
tractor on a county road or take the time to stop and chat with a neighbor in the
middle of the street, and you will know that you are living on Missouri Heights' We
thrive as a small community in a rural environment'"
Many residents in our rural Missouri Heights neighborhoods want to keep the area
peaceful, verdant and with no additional traffic, light pollution or heightened
activities. Please carefully consider the decision to grant Ascendigo the use rights for
th is com mercia l, a lbeit non-profit enterprise.
Sincerely,
Holly Mclain - Missouri Heights Resident'
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: reject Ascendigo
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris,valdez@eaglecoutrty.us)
Fwd: reject Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 9:54 AM
Stuy Infornted! Sígn up.for the Contmuníty Deu elopntent Monthlg lJ-Newslettet here.
MorganBetgl
Eagle Countv Govenu¡rent
Communþ Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-4Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡e
Developheñt
Fonrarded messagê
From: Janlne gunnl n g <Jänl nê(Ð scênerental. com>
Date: Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 9:51 AM
Subject: reject Ascendigo
To: morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Dear Representative,
Please oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While I recognize this property is in Garfield County, Eagle County will considerably be negatively
impacted. Our traffic, fire and water concerns are nol addressed by representatives and keep getting pushed
further down the road. From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of our road
infrastructure, this project brings signifîcant increased activity and vehicles.
This is NOT a Garfield County matter. It is an Eagle Counfy problem. We are the step-child of Eagle County
and officials consistently turn a blind eye in our area.
The potential drain on our water is of immense concern. Residents encounter water restrictions each summer
yet this conglomerate who will always turn a profit is proposing to build lakes and water resources for a
commercial endeavor.
Our rural area is under attack, and it is your responsibility to use your position and ability to protect
residential zoning and restrictions. This area was zoned residential and should forever stay residential. V/HY
else do we make laws and regulations? This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar
reasons.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697756600763749541&simpl=msg-fo/o3416977S66007... 112
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: reject Ascendigo
I have a child with a disability, and have donated to Ascendigo in the past, yet this proposal to build a
commercial project in this specific location is not appropriate. We do not support them anymore and the
communþ will never let this rest, or support Ascendigo in the future.
Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application'
Slncerely,
Janine Gunning
El Jebel, CO
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fYo341697756600763749541&simpl=msg-f%3416977566007...2t2
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: reject Ascendigo
EAGTE COUNTY Kris V¡ldez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty,us>
Fwd: reject Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdcz@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,202'l at 1:26 PM
Stay lqfornredl Sígrr upfor the Contmunìty Deueloptttettt Monthly E-ÀIerosletter here.
MorgunBergl
Eagle County Governnent
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gzo-+zt-gssg
EA6LE COUNTY
Commun¡ù
Developmeit
Fonrardcd mcssage
Fr-r¡nr: Jeanrre McQueeney <jeanne, mcqueêney@eeglêoounty. us>
Date: Thu, Apr22,2021 al12:40PM
Subject: Re: reject Ascendigo
To: janine gunning <janine@scenerental.com>, Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Hello Janine,
Thank you for sharing your comments and concerns regarding the Ascendigo proposal. I will be sure they are included
with our referral comments to Garfield county. I can understand your feeling that this is an Eagle County Problem and
want to assure you that we are being given the opportunity to comment and will do so soon. Despite its proximity and
impacts to Eagle County this proposal will be heard by the Garfield County commissioners. I am sorry you feel we are
turning a blind eye when in reality we have spent a great amount of time to understand this proposal in order to offer
helpful referral comments. We have also recently reinstated our "Roaring Fork Fridays", with staff and commissioners
spending Friday mornings in El Jebel. I would welcome a longer discussion with you if you would like to arrange a
meeting.
Stay well.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-1| websitel For the most recent information, please
v is it www.eag leco u ntycov Id. o rg
Ane Valley Voice on Facebook
On Thu, Apr 22,2021 al9:51 AM janine gunning <janine@scenerental.com> wrote:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697769986896886766&simpl=msg-f%3416977699868 1t2
4t261202',1
Dear Representative,
Eagle County Govemment Mail - Fwd: reject Ascendigo
Please oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights
While I recognize this property is in Garfield County, Eagle County will considerably be negatively
impacted. Our traffic, fire and water concerns are not addressed by representatives and keep getting pushed
further down the road. From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of our
road infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles'
This is NOT a Garfield County matter. It is an Eagle County problem. We are the step-child of Eagle
County and offîcials consistently turn a blind eye in our area'
The potential drain on our water is of immense concern. Residents encounter water restrictions each
summer yet this conglomerate who will always turn a profit is proposing to build lakes and water resources
for a commercial endeavor.
Our rural area is under attack, and it is your responsibility to use your position and ability to protect
residential zoningand restrictions. This area was zoned residential and should forever stay residential'
WHY else do we make laws and regulations? This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for
similar reasons.
I have a child with a disability, and have donated to Ascendigo in the past, yet this proposal to build a
commercial project in this specifie location is not appropriate. We do not support them anymore and the
community will never let this rest, or support Ascendigo in the firture.
Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application'
Slncerely,
Janine Gunning
El Jebel, CO
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697769986896886766&simpl=msg-f%3416977699868..212
411212021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Affecting Eagle County Roads and Residents
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty,us>EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Affecting Eagle Gounty Roads and Residents
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Mon, Apr 12,2021 at 8:55 AM
Wehaue anew Eagle County COWD-tgwebsíte!
For the most recent information, pleqse uisit www. eaglecou ntycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebaok
Stag In{otmecl! Sìgnupfor the Comntunìty Deueloprnent Monthlg E-Newslettet here,
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Communþ Development Director
(o) gZo.¡z8.8ZSo
(c) 97o-47t-9533
EAGLE COUNTY
Communiw
Developmcñt
Fonruarded message
From: Matt Scherr <matt. scherr@ea glecounty. us>
Date: Mon, Apr 12,202'l al8:55 AM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo Affecting Eagle County Roads and Residents
To: <jenbh4@gmail.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thanks for sending on your comments on the Ascendigo project proposal, Jennifer. Eagle County does expect to be a
Referral Agency on the Garfield County file for this proposal, and your comments are helpful to us as we draft our offlclal
comments for the file.
Thanks again for your email!
Matt Scherr
Chair, Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
97o-376-4449 (m)
www.eaglecounty.us
Fonruarded message
From: Jennifer Bruno <jenbh4@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 9,2021at 12:13 PM
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696846958208634868&simpl=msg-f%3A16968469592..112
4t1Zl2O21 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Affecting Eagle County Roads and Residents
Subject: Ascendigo Affecting Eagle County Roads and Residents
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecounty. us>
Dear Eagle County Commissioners,
Please read th¡s important information about Ascendigo Development affecting EAGLE COUNTY ROADS:
* The Ascendigo Ranch "Trafüc Bomb" will force the closure of Sunset Ln. **.
1. According to Ascendigo's submitted traffic study, Traffic in the Missouri Heights neighborhoods are set to
significantly increase. Page '12, Table 4 shows a 220+Yo increase in daily traffic on Harmony Ln. Fender, Sierra
Vista, Upper Cattle Creek were somehow not included in the study. But can expect to see significant
increases. THESE ROADS ARE lN EAGLE COUNTY.
2. ln line with Ascednigo's continuous misleading of government officials and the public, buried deep inside
the traffic study, page 65, Table 1; You will find a "zero" count for any delivery vehicles to the site. Therefore, it
appears they are not included in the traffic count. There will be delivery vehicle trips of food service to feed
the 100+ people daily, caterers, vendors, rentals, UPS, Fed Express, DHL, Hay deliveryvehicles, etc. None
which have been included in the traffic study.
3. The traffic study however, does include Sunset Ln. Sunset Ln is a private road that is owned and
maintained by the current residents. For years, they have allowed a "shottcut" from Paseo to Harmony to
exist. Ascendigo's traffic study shows, at minimu m, a 50Yo increase in traffic to this private road. ln response
to this egregious, corporate encroachment, the owners of Sunset Ln. intend to close this road to through
access. This will fur.ther increase the traffic impact on the quiet, rural and dirt roads of Missouri Heights. The
"shortcut" may now become Paseo to Sierra Vista to Fender.
*****of important note: The closure of Sunset Ln. will also leave Ascendigo Ranch with a single egress point,
Harmony Ln, in case of a necessary evacuation from a natural disaster or wildfire. Leaving a Camp full of
special needs children and staff with only one evacuation route is borderline criminally negligent. This is an
extremely dangerous public safety violation.
All of this adds to a growing list of why this is not an appropriate location for this scope of commercial
operation. Please help save our rural neighborhood'
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341696846958208634868&simpl=msg-f%3416968469582 2t2
411212021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-o1-21-8826 & PLVA-o..
EAGLE COUNW Kris Vsldez <kris,vsldez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-
01 -21-8826 & P LVA-o 1 -21 -8827
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@ea glecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 8,2021at 8:47 AM
We horue s n.ew Eagle Countg COWD-tg websíte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice onFacebook
Stag Infotmcdl Sígn up.for tIrc Comntuníty Deueloptnent Monthly ß-Newsletter here.
MorganBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-4Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commùnlù
Developñeñt
Fonruarded message
From: Matt Scherr <matt.scherr@eaglecounty. us>
Date: Thu, Apr 8,2021 at 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-01-21-8826 & PLVA-01-21-8A27
To: Jenny Peterson <jennyrsvpeterson@gmail.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thanks very much for your comments on the Ascendigo project proposal. Eagle County does expect to be a
ReferralAgency for the Garfield County file for the project. As we craft our official comments to provide to Garfield County,
we appreciate hearing from our own residents. And we particularly appreciate the specific references to Garfield's land
use code!
Thanks again for your email, Jenny.
Matt Scherr
Chai¡ Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-4449 (m)
www.eaglecounty.us
On Wed, \pr7,2021 at1:44 PM Jenny Peterson <jennyrsvpeterson@gmail.com> wrote:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/Oz¡f=db6sfe0édb&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696484013813854367&simpt=msg-f%3Ai 6964840138. 1t3
4t12t112j Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-0'| -21-8826 & PLVA-O.
RE: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-01-21-8826 & PLVA-01-21-8827
Dear Commissioners Schel r, Chandler-Henry, McQueeney
I am rvriting today to ask each of you to please oppose the land use change in Missouri Heights requested by Ascendigo for the
f-ollowing reasons.
Number one is to protect the rural and ranching character that can cl.range so quickly, if not thoughtfully protected.
Second is water - water is always on oul minds and our neighbors' minds. Winter after winter, the snowpack is less. leaving us
less water for our trees, grasses, and heaven forbid - one day in the future - our drinking water? Considering our already critical
water stresses it is incomprehensible that a neu, developrnent could be on the horizon. Results ofdecreased this decrease in
snowpack bring us our terrifying fire risk. Residents of Missouri Heights have been pre-evacuating and evacuating time and time
again. More development will exacerbate our already existing demand on water and subsequent fire risk.
Another result ofa neu' development is increased traffic. which not only urbanizes the residential neighborhoods and
r.ural/ranching homes, but also negatively affects rvildlif'e and wildlife habitats.
please carefully consider these reasons to oppose further developrnent in Missouri Heights. I have vvitnessed development valley
wide since 1988. I feel a tremendous loss ofcharacter, especiatly up valley. Please do all that you can to preserve and protect the
integrify of our ranching and rural communities' Iesources and unique charactet'.
Most sincerely,
Jeuny and Butch Peterson
l. Faits to meet LUDC 7-103. Compatibility with adjacent land uses and fails to comply with the Garfield Counfy
Comprehensive Plan 2030 Future Land Use Plan which designates this area as Rural single-family "Residential Medium"
The development is a high intensity commercial use and includes a dining room area that seats 75 diners and a deck that
seats an additional 25 diners; lodging, including housing and guest cottages that sleep near a total of I 00 guests and staff.
2. Fails to meet LUDC 7-103. More than 50,000 sq ft of buildings, plus, bams and maintenance buildings are
proposed. The uses, activities and improvements are nowhere close to being compatible with the single family rural
residential neighbors in either size, scale, or use.
3. Fails to meet LUDC 7-104 and Comprehensive Plan. Ascendigo's stated use of water seems to ignore that over
the past three years, neighborhood water supplies have been adversely impacted by low pressure, mud/sand
infiltration into wells, and zero lack of water pressure during the Lake Christine fire. Its stated plans for ponds and a
greater daily population can only negatively affect the available water resources.
Missouri Heights does not have the bountiful water access of the Roaring Fork River, but instead relies upon aquifer
recharge from rain and nearby snow pack. 'Water rvells tap the underlying basalt rock reseruoir. Many nearby water wells
have gone dry in recent years: (source 3/2018 Sopris Sun) https://www.soprissun.coml2018l03l28lwhen-the-well-runs-
dryt-
4. Fails to meet LUDC 7-103 and the Future Land Use Plan. Activities are stated as year-round with proposed high
intensity or heavy use for eleven out of twelve months. The "summer Camp" runs from May I through September
20 and includes 100 campers, counselors, maintenance and kitchen staff, administrative staffand other support staff
on site daily. Camper "Turn over day" will see even higher numbers of people present, and again during its Winter
Camp which runs from January I through March 30. Non-camp months will welcome seminars with guests housed
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696484013813854367&simpl=msg-f%3416964840138...2t3
411212021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; f¡le no. LIPA-01-21-8826 & PLVA-o.
at the lodge and dining facilities open and use for other programs. These high concentrations ofpeople and activities
is not compatible wlth the rural single family residential neighborhood that has a low daily population dispersed
over large homesitcs.
5. Fails to meet LUDC-7-103 and Future Land Use Plan. The resulting enonnous increases in trafüc is not
compatible with the current Rural Residential Medium designation and is not compatible with the single-family
residential neighborhood.
6. Fails to meet LUDC 7-107."Al1roads shall be designed to provide for adequate and safe access". Of serious
concem is thatAscendigo has requested awaiver from the usual Garfield County road standards. The road is, quite
simpl¡ a wreck. Harmony Road is a barely improved farm road with little or no road base. The planned grading of a
section of the road by Ascendigo a few weeks before the site visit represents a mere band aid and was done only to
disguise the completely degraded surface and road base. Their proposed "chip and seal". improvement is not
adequate for the extent ofplanned use.
7. The proposed development site is located in Gallield County's "Vcry High" gusccptibility index for wildfire.
Thc two roads which atc ilre cv¿cual.ion coritlors from the site, CR 102 tq Katherine Store Road and Fender to
Upper Caftle Creek, have blind spots and right angle tums that impede traflic and do not permit any sort of an
efÍciçnt evacuation. The T,ake Christine evacuation was chaotic and witnessed bumper to bumper vehicles and
trailers all in a slow parade out ofthis area in July 2018. Add another 100, plus people concentrated in one area to
this mix and there is only disaster in its wake. Accordingly, it fails to comply with "Comprehensive Plan 2030",
page 52, Policy 5 vi.
8. Does not meet the definition of "Educational Use" under the Land Use Code. "Buildings and uses for
instruction or research activities associated with an academic institution (Emphasis added)..." Ascendigo is not,
and has never claimed to be, an acadçmic institution or associated with one.
9. This development does not comply with'rComprehensive Plan 20300'that strives to preserve rural land and
character and encourage more intense development in towns and already developed commcrcial arcas that have
adequate established infrastructure.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696484013813854367&simpl=msg-fo/03416964940138..3t3
March 18,2021
Glenn Hartmann
Garfîeld County Community Development
RE: Completeness Review Ascendigo Ranch Limited Impact Review for an Educational Facility and
Whitecloud Ridge Subdivision Vacation
(File Nos. LIPA-O 1 -2 1 -8826 & PLVA-0 I-21-8827)
Dear Glenn
Please see below, our responses to your completeness comments. I hope the responses will satisff
staffs information needs. Please contact me with any needed clarification or further response.
Upon determination of completeness, I look forward to identifuing a hearing date with you.
LEGAL TOPICS
1. Please address the following issues from the County Attorney's Office:
. Please include copies of deeds and title work in the hard copy submittals.
Response- see Exhibit I hardcopy. I apologize for not seeing the printing
errors.
Please confirm that the Statement of Authority has been recorded. A recorded
copy needs to be provided.
Response- Electronic copy provided to Glenn and reception number is 951425.
This document is incorporated into Exhibit J.
a
a
a
Please include list of adjacent property owners in the hard copy submittals.
Response- see Exhibit H hardcopY
Please include Title Commitment in the hard copy submittals'
Response- see Exhibit I hardcoPY
EDUCATIONAL FACILITY LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT
2. The hardcopy of the Application and reports needs to be updated with complete copies of
attachments/maps including but not limited to:
Complete copies of slope analysis mapping
Response- see Exhibit F hardcopy
Complete copy of Table I from the traffic reporttables.
Response- see Exhibit K hardcopy
Complete set of CBO Report Attaclunents.
Response- see Exhibit B hardcopy
Complete copy of Appendix J - Basin Delineations from the engineeringreports.
Response- see Exhibit B hardcopy
Complete copy of Wildlife Study Attachments.
Response- see Exhibit G hardcopy
3. Narrative needs to further clari$r accessory type of uses including whether the camp will provide
separate facilities fur said activities/uses such as professional offices, community meetings, public
gatherings, and lodging.
Response- See Narrative operations section 7-301and below
Summer Camp Use
The highest use will occur when Ascendigo hosts its core summer camp between June r and August 3r.
Further definition of dates, times, number of people, etc. is provided in the accompanying table. During
the summer camp, other services are not offered at the site.
Basecamp Building Use
Ascendigo's main administrative offices will continue to be in downtown Carbondale.
The Basecamp building is sited and serves as the welcome center for the site and the primary destination
for most visitors.
The Basecamp building includes camp-specific administration space, including: a reception desk; a r-
room infirmary and dedicated bathroom; 6 workstations for progrãm staff , 4of whom are full-time
employees that will use the offices year-round; one private office; a conference room for staff meetings;
a flex space with small tablc; a waiting room; a restroom; storage closets; and z calming/sensory rooms.
The Basecamp building also includes a 7z-seat dining hall, commercial kitchen, bathrooms,storage,
mechanical/utility space, and a z4-seat outdoor dining porch. The Basecamp will serve as the primary
location for education and training when offered during non-summer periods. The Basecamp may also
be used during special events.
Activity Barn Use
The Activity Barn includes a gym, gear storage and 5 therapy rooms. Therapy rooms will be used for
summer camp activities. During the remainder of the year, therapy and educational sessions for autistic
individuals will be offered. The Activity Bard may also use used in education and training for
professionals, as needed.
a
a
a
a
Camper Lodge Use
The Camper Lodge includes z4 single-occupancy rooms and rz bathrooms, such that z campers will
share a bathroom. At full capacity, there will be z4 campers sleeping in the lodge during the summer
season. We will allow other Ascendigo participants to stay in the Camper Lodge during non-summer
seasons if they are part of an Ascendigo program, and we will limit total capacity during non-summer
seasons per the accompanying table.
Staff Lodge Use
The Staff Lodge includes z4 double-occupancy rooms with bathroom capacity for up to 48 people. At full
capacity, there would be 48 people sleeping in the lodge during the summer season. We will also allow
program participants to stay in the Staff Lodge during non-summer seasons, and we will limit total
capacity during non-summer seasons per the accomPanying table.
Caretaker House Use
Proposed Caretaker House is intended for an Ascendigo staff member and family, if applicable. The
intent is forthis staff memberto be the caretaker of the property. The ADU is also intended for
Ascendigo staff and staff family, if applicable.
Guest Cabin Use
Proposed Guest Cabin will be used by camp families who wish to stay on-site while their camper is in
session. This can be advantageous for campers who cannot be separated from their parents overnight'
During non-summer periods, the cabin may be occupied individuals or families who are visiting for other
Ascendigo programs. Only those participating in Ascendigo programs will be housed there.
4. Accessory uses including meetings, training, conferences, fund raising, short term rental/events
related to Ascendigo'. prog.um should be further clarifîed. The scale and frequency of
activities should be addressed including whether
there will be additional impacts on traffic and hours of operation.
Response- See Narrative operations section 7'3OL and below
The accompanying table defines and quantifies our use in terms of categories listed below:
o Average summer day - This day assumes camp is in-session as described in detail in the
traffic study, Exhibit K. Ascendigo's summer camp currently consists of I weeks per
from mid-June through mid-August. While we do not intend to increase the number of
weekly campers, we are allowing for the possibility to increase the number of weeks in
which camp participants or staff are on site to rz weeks, as listed in the accompanying
table, recognizing that lower demand and reduced staff availability during early and late
summer are limiting factors.
o Peak summer day - These are camper drop-off (Sunday) and pick-up days (Friday)
which occur once each per week. These days are less active in terms of recreational
activity but will have more vehicular traffic and total people on-site. We offer families a
meal on both days for campers, their parents, and staff. lt should be noted that many
campers stay for more than one week, so most pick-up/drop-off days will see less traffic
than the peak.
o Average non-summer day - These days may vary from month to month, but capacity
will be limited per the table. Warmer days may have similar recreational activities to
summer camp. Winter days will involve off-site skiing and limited on-site outdoor
activities such as sledding, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing/hiking or general snow
play. Therapy sessions are expected to occur during the non-summer season. There will
also be several weeks of program breaks for holidays, staff rest, facility repairs and
maintenancc, ctc.
o Peak non-summer day - These days will likely be educational workshops or a drop-off or
pick-up day for a non-summer program.
o Community event - We are limiting these events to no more than 2 per year and they
will likely occur in the Spring or Fall so that they avoid the busy summer season but can
still be held outdoors, possibly with tents. These events include fundraising events or
other community-based functions that relate to Ascendigo. We are allowing for more
people on-site during these events as perthe table and will incorporate a shuttle system
for participants from Aspen and/or our Carbondale office,
ln addition to our summer camp activities, Ascendigo intends to use the property for therapy sessions,
small-group training for staff and other autism professionals, staff meetings, educational workshops,
and education programs (including programs with a residential component), and z community or
fundraising events per yeär. lndoor events will not exceed seating capacity of the Basecamp building (72
at maximum capacity) and it is important to note that we anticipate less than ro 'peak days'for non-
summer use. All activities will be hosted by Ascendigo and Ascendigo commits to not leasing any facility
or component to other organizations. To be clear, part of Ascendigo's mission is to train other
organizations on supporting individuals with autism and therefore other organizations will be invited for
educational or tratntng opportunities, but again, they will be hosted by Ascendigo. Also, Ascendigo does
indeed have a published educationaltraining curriculum.
To quantify the scale and frequency of these additional uses, we have included the accompanying table
for seasonal dates, quiet hours, maximum people on-site. The peak day pertains to any peak activity,
whether it is our peak camp activity (pick-up/drop-off days) or whether it is an alternative use such as an
educational workshop or community event.
Additional Commitments
1. Ascendigo commits to complying with and exceeding Garfield County Sheriff fire restrictions and
following best practice standards as applicable based on conditions. We also recognize the value
in collective effort and consistent policies, and therefore we commit to leading a discussion with
adjacent homeowner associations (HOAs) to consider additional restrictions. Furthermore, we
commit to complying with fire restrictions adopted by all adjacent HOAs.
2. Ascendigo commits to implement traffic-reduction strategies to reduce peak traffic. Examples
include encouraging and/or requiring staff carpooling and incorporating shuttles during peak
times.
3. Ascendigo willadapt its current drug & alcohol policyto Ascendigo Ranch operations and commit
to diligent enforcement.
4. Ascendigo commits to rnainLairr and implement best practice standards with respect to soil
health, weed, domestic animals, and livestock management.
5. Ascendigo commits to working with the Roaring Fork Horse Council to allow limited truck and
horse trailer parking while trails are being used by their members.
Staff
Lodge
max
max
people
on-
site3
end
date days
Quiet
hours
Camper
Lodge
max
start
date
9pm-
8amlJun
31-
Aug 91Summer
7L 24 48 80average daysl
24 48 10020peak daysl
274
7pm-
8am
Camper
Lodge
Ave.
Staff
Lodge
Ave.1--Sep
3L-
May
Non-
summer
222 Lg2 65268average daysl
222 Lg2 1004peak daysl
1_50200
community
eventsl
339average daysl subtotal
26subtotalpeak daysl
TOTAL 365
NOTES
Please refer to accompanying narrative
descriptions.7
During non-summer seasons, this number refers to a seasonal average, not a
maximum.2
Max number of peop le on-site at any given time3
ional ParametersRanch OAscend
5. Narative needs to reflect plans for addressing the status of the Harmony Heights lots and lot lines. The
overall property needs to be merged into one parcel/ownership. The site plan needs to reflect the proposal
to reconfigure the property and references to maintaining 3 parcels should be removed or changed.
Response- The current proposal continues to be to vacate the WhiteCloud Subdivision and have
three parcels upon approval. 'We recognizc thnt thc thrcc parccls will bc ticd togcthcr by thc Land
Use Change Permit/s and that nonc of thc parcels may be sold or further developed without a
future land use approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Ascendigo and County attorneys
have been in discussion on this and we seek direction from the Board of County Commissioners on
the final resolution. We appreciate the good communication with staff on this topic.
6, Â copy of the Harmony Heights Plat nccds to be provided.
Response- Yes, see Exhibit E
7. Existing Whitecloud Ridge Subdivision lots to be vacated should be removed
from the site plan documents.
Response- Yes, see Exhibit C
8. The Application should be edited to reflect that roadway waivers are waivers from standards
pursuant to Section 4-118. The waiver request needs to specifically
address the review criteria in Section 4-l 1 8 (c).
Response- Yes, see Narrative, The correct section is referenced and criteria specifically
addressed.
9. Vicinity Map needs to be provided in an 8 x 11 format for attachment to the public
notice.
Response- I have included two in the application and look for guidance on how to proceed. The
first is based on Garfield County GIS, which allows identification of the specific parcels but does
not include Eagle County. The second is a Google Earth image which shows the entire area but
not the boundary of the property. The first seems compliant with the Code requirement but the
second seems more informative. I will use whichever you prefer for public notice.
Created by: Robert SchultzVicinity MapThree Mile Buffer of Ascendigo Rancht{Å
10. Impact Report needs to address item #5, Groundwater Impacts.
Response- Yes, See Exhibit B, Section 2.4 and below
Groundwater and aquifer recharge areas are located through the Harmony and V/hitecloud parcels in four forms.
Infiltration of stormwater/surface runoff through overland flow, infiltration of irrigatión water, infiltration of
stormwater through an existing detention pond and proposed drywells, and infiltration of treated wastewater using
septic fields. These forms of infiltration are allowed per County code and are being designed to their standards.
There shouldn't be negative impacts to groundwater or local aquifer.
11. A detailed Traflic Study shall be required pursuant to Section 4-203(L)(3) as traffic generation
on County Roads will exceed a20Yo increase. All requirements for a Detailed Study need to be
met including but not limited to the highlighted topics below:
Show all roads
Response- See Updated Exhibit K, Page l Vicinity Map
Updated graphics and key turning intersections
Response- See Exhibit K Pages 6, 10, and 13
Complete Table 1 pages
Response- See hardcopy
Estimate of Road lmpact Fees
Response- See Exhibit B, Appendix S and below
re
Insitutional
Insitutional
Insitr¡tional
Insitutional
Residential
Residential
Residential
ó,800
14,000
8,500
8,500
1,700
3,500
2,500
$1,50s
$1,505
$1,505
$1,50s
$1,988
s2,103
92,703
Total Fee
$10,234
$21,070
$12,793
stue3
$ 1,988
$2,703
$2,703
$64,283
* Residential fee is per dwelling by square feet of finished floor area and non-residential fee is per 1,000 square feet of floor erea
Road Association
Response- A copy of the Road Association agreement is Exhibit P. The Ascendigo property is
included in that Association along with other propert¡es that were required to participate as a
condit¡on of their approval. Ascendigo will be making a significant improvement to Harmony Ln.
Once those improvements are made, then the ongo¡ng ma¡ntenance w¡l! be the respons¡b¡l¡ty
of the Association as per previous approvals. At this time, we are unaware of the level of activity
in the Association but would work w¡th other respons¡ble part¡es to reinvigorate ¡t, if needed.
Road Access Permit
Response- At this time, it appears that only a Driveway Permit will be requ¡red. We would apply
for that Garfield County permit as final engineer¡ng is prepared for submittal of building perm¡ts.
See Narrative Sect¡on 4-203.L
ITE traffic estimate
Response- The traffic eng¡neer did not find an ITE category for a similar use. Given the operating
experience and detailed information provided, they put h¡gher reliance on the custom estimate
using professional standards. tn order to comply with the request, they prepared an estimate
using some ITE categories, which is found in Exhibit K on page 64.
Accessory Uses
Response- The accessory uses are included in the traffic analysis.
l2.p;ngineering Reports need to address the internal road system, estimated traffic counts and compliance
with Section 7 -107 standards
Development îy¡lc SFT of Bull¡l¡ng F¿e: E¡¡t Benelit Arca*
Cereteker
Propored Bulldhg Fee
NOAI}IMPACTFEES
Response- See Exhibit B, Section 2.2
13. lrrigation ditches or pipelines need to be shown on the site plan. Please address code provisions
of Section 7-201(E), regarding irrigation ditches including but not limited description of any
impacts, relocation, plans for mitigation, and contact information ditch owners/operator.
Response- See Exhibit B, Section 3.3 and below
Raw water for the lot comes from two different sources. The sowces are conveyed via thc Whitecloudllevitt Trust
Pipeline to the property and are discharged into a small existing pond. The pipeline conveys 251 Class A Shares
from Cattle Creek, which runs from Spring Runoff to late June/early July depending upon the year. At the beginning
of inigation season, Class A shares deliver t cß to the site. After Class A shares end, Class B shares from Spring
Park Reservoir begin for approximately 16 days. Class B conveys 2.56 cfs to the property. The properfy also owns 3
of the 13 taps from Antonides Well, but does not have a BV/CD Contract to utilize their taps. Multiple options exist
for expanding irrigation water supply, which Ascendigo is currently evaluating. More details on those options are
discussed in the Water Supply Adequacy report in Appendix M.
The project will use the raw water from the tühitecloud/Levitt Trust Pipeline as the source to fill the three proposed
ponds using the existing private lateral on the property. This piped lateral is called the Fender lateral. Since the
irigation lateral is private and only benefits the Ascendigo property an easement is not required. No stormwater is
being directed to the lateral since it is piped and buried and no impacts are proposed.
The owner of the inigation ditch, which feeds the Fender lateral, is the Missouri Heights-Mountain Mcadows
Inigation Company. There are no impacts to the existing ditch. 'lhe registered agent is Craig Corona with a mailing
address of1802 County Road 10, Carbondale, CO81623-9626.
14. Off-street parking analysis needs to include calculations per Section 7-302,based on thc closest
Iit of use types and/or request a determination by the Director for an unlisted use in accordance
with SectionT-302. A table providing a summary of off-street parking would be of assistance
Response- See Exhibit B, Section 2.2 Table 3 and below. A determination of unlisted use is
requested.
Table 3: Off-Street Parking Analysis
þining and Public Facility
Public Facility
Lodging
Lodging
Lodgine
Public Facility
D ^^:,¡^*..:^lÀvù¡ttE,¡¡t¿4¡
Public Facility
15. Intersection clear vision areas nccd to bc documented and addressed on the landscaping plan Section 7-
303.
Response- see Exhibit B, Appendix R. Clear vision âreas are compliant.
33
I
6
22
3
I
4.
8
27
49
13
24
2
I
AI
I
Maintenance Barn
Guest Cabln
Staff
Barn
Base
Proposed No. of
Structure Use
Garfield County
SectÍon 7-3Az
16. Architecture Plans (Ex.D), or Lighting Plans or Section 7-304 responses should include
additional details on lighting code compliance (i.e. sample fixtures).
Response- see Exhibit D for lighting on buildings and ExhibitL2 for landscape lighting locations and
sample fixtures. All lights are downlit.
17. Authori zafion to use past HP Geotech Reports needs to be addressed and the 2020 HP Kumar
report should include clarification that conclusions in past reports are still current and
applicable to the current application.
Response- We are unaware of any edits or redactions to the past geotechnical engineering reports.
The conclusions and recommendations provided should stitl be applicable to the Whitecloud and
Harmony parcels. The most recent geotechnical report indicates previous geologic reports were
reviewed as part of the work and no exclusions were noted.
18. Plat vacation needs to address submittal requirements in Section 5-402(J) and
Associated review criteria.
Response- I believe that the Code section to be addressed is 5-307. Criteria are addressed as such in
that section. lf I am incorrect, please let me know.
19. The Application needs to provide details on how easements will be addressed concurrently with
the plat vacation in accordance with Section 5-307(CX3). Copies of consent or agreements
with easement holders need to be provided if available.
Response- A response from Ascendigo's attorney who is working on this and has been in
communication with the County Attorney's office about this matter is Exhibit Q. We understand
that the County is likely to want a condition of approval requiring completion of the utility
agreements pr¡or to the recordation of the Vacation Plat if it is not complete that before a
hearing is held.
20.Formatting the submittal into a notebook with tabs/folders and three hole
punched is not required but recommended.
Response- Agreed, see hardcoPy
2l.Section 7-1O3, Compatibility needs to address the level of Traffic generated (462
trips per day) with significant increases shown for all three traffic count locations.
Response- The initial 462trip number was the result of miscommunication between the traffic
engineer and Ascendigo that counted other programs during summer camp. Those programs
will not occur during summer camp. Estimated trips are a few less than the single family
residential alternative for the site.
Thanks
Bob Schultz
970-963-3670
Robert Schultz Consulting LLC AICP
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Fw: STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED ASCENDIGO RANCH lN MISSOURI HEIGHTS
E.AGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Fw: STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED ASCENDIGO RANCH lN
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecou nty. us>
Mon, Apr 26,2021 at 9:19 AM
Stag Infartned! Sígnupfar tlte Conununíty Develupnwn! Manthly E-Newsletter here.
Illotgant Bet'yl
Eagì e County Covernment
Community Dcvclopmcnt Dircctor
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-4Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡N
Developmeñt
Fonruarded message
From: Jerry Hjelle <jhjelle@hjelleadvisors.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at12:32PM
SUbJCCI: Fw: STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED ASCENDIGO RANCH IN MISSOURI HEIGHTS
To: morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Jerry Hjelle <jhjelle@hjelleadvisors.com>
Morgan,
I wanted to send to you a copy of out letter to the Garfield County Commissioners--regarding the proposed
Ascendigo Ranch for autistic folks in Missouri Heights. Please don't hesitate to refer to this letter should
this topic come up in your deliberations.
Jerry Hjelle
144 Vega Road
Carbondale CO
From: Jerry Hjelle <jhjelle@hjelleadvisors.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 202L 11:52 AM
To: ghartmann@garfield-county.com <ghartmann@garfield-county.com>
Cc: Jerry Hjelle <jhjelle@hjelleadvisors.com>
SUbJect: STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED ASCENDIGO RANCH IN MISSOURI HEIGHTS
April24,2O27
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341698116796602446726&simpl=msg-f%34169811679660.'U2
4t26t202',1 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Fw: STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED ASCENDIGO RANCH lN MISSOURI HEIGHTS
To: Garfield County Commissioners
I write in strong support of the proposed Ascendigo Ranch site plan. As you know Ascendigo works to
empower and inspire people with autism. Majestic goals, from an organization that has been
headquartered in Carbondale for the last 17 years. By all accounts, Ascendigo is both very well
managed and an upstanding not-for-profit "citizen" in Carbondale. They employ -60 people, making it one
of the town's top employers. More importantly, they have touched the lives of hundreds of autistic people.
Recently I had the opportunity to meet with Ascendigo's Peter Bell and Dan Richardson, on the proposed
Ranch site, to learn more about the development plan, and to, frankly, express some general concerns that I
have regarding Missouri Heights water availability, traffic, noise and fire risks. For context, I have spoken
out previously against a specific nearby commerciol project in Missouri Heights. Peter
and Dan systematically walked me through Ascendigo's plan and impact assessments on each of my
concerns, This was truly eye-opening. After several questions and answers, I concluded that the
assessment was thoughtful, intellectually honest and very valuable. On the topic of wateL their analysis
seems to be supported by Alan Caniglia, a local HOA leader with significant knowledge of the Missouri
Heíghts water situation.
Change is a difficult subject. But many of us who built or bought houses in Missouri Heights, one-by-one,
altered the landscape. The proposed Ascendigo Ranch plan has four main advantages compared against
the most logical alternative case--the gradual, one-by-one development of the -20 properties that comprise
theproposedsite. First,the actualbuilding plansforthefacilityshowa muchlessintrusive development
footprint compared with the alternative of *2O individual houses, roads and related development. Second,
The operotionol plon for the Ranch shows that the traffic, fire risk and water-use impacts are favorable, in
some areas, significontly more favorable, than lhe alternafive. This assessment was done using worst-
cose impacts during the peak summer occupation. Third, the proposal involves Ascendigo, a local
organization with very strong leadership and a proven track record in our community. Fourth, the proposal
involves helping our autistic neighbors meet their goals --- goals as Moiestic as Mt Sopris itself.
But personally, I have a confession to make. Over the last 10 years I have walked my dogs at the White
Cloud development site (i.e., the proposed Ascendigo Ranch site) on literally hundreds of days. On those
trails, I have met many neighbors (and their dogs!) and discussed possible site development options. After
getting more information regardingthe plan and Ascendigo's leadership and purpose, lam now of the
belief that the proposed Ranch site is the better outcome for the community and this beautiful stretch of
land.
Keep Missouri Heights Maiestic.
Respectfully,
Jerry Hjelle
Missouri Heights
https://ma¡l.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341698116796602446726&simpl=msg-f%34169811679660..212
4t26t2021
Date:Thu, \pr22,202'l allO:27 PM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecounty. us>
Eagle County Govemment Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Dear Eagle County Commissioners
I am writing to express my concern and opposition to the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
Whilst it not in your jurisdiction, it falls of the border with Eagle County will impact our Eagle County neighbours in MH
to the same extent it does we GarCo residents. Further, Eagle will not benefit from any additional tax revenue that
would offset the costs of additional road use and fire risk.
Missouri Heights functions as a community because the agricultural and residential interests are kept in equilibrium.
This proposed development would disturb that equilibrium and would significantly increase traffic, fire risk, light and
noise pollution.
The Ascendigo proposal would envision group activities on site of about 100 people and would have a far greater
potential to cause disruption to the peaceful enjoyment of the neighbouring properties.
In the event of an almost certain evacuation order, given the increasingly dry climate, it would also result in a chaotic
and dangerous situation, whatever the preparations. Since access is via single lanc dirt road, thcrc would bc a
situation where fire trucks are trying to access the site as a simultaneous evacuation of a large number of special
needs adults and animals is taking place. I live in a neighbouring property where fire could easily spread and whilst I
take all steps I can to mitigate risÇ the Ascendigo project would materially increase that risk.
I urge you to oppose this proposal.
Your sincerely
Jim Tomlinson
457 SCHOONER LANE
Carbondale
co 81623
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
E.A6LE COUNTY
Fwd
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecou nty. us>
Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 1:19 PM
Støg InJbrrnedl Sígn up for the Conwnunity Deuelopnte¡tt Mottthly .E-Neroslettet' here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Communþ Development Director
(o) qZo.Sz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-qzþgsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Community
Deve¡opment
Fon¡varded message
From: John Ramo <jramo@boulderlearning.com>
Date:Wed, Apr21,2021 at 1:15 PM
Subject:
To: <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: <keepmohrural@gmail.com>
Dear Eagle County officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. there will make the decision, Eagle
County will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and fire
and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal seruices will be called upon given the proximity to the property'
It's right on the county line. From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of our road
infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue coming with it to
mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. It will be an Eagle County
problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more drought every year.
We are seeing the effects of climate change. And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and
animals from that single road access point should we have another fire, The alternative subdivision of homes would be
developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location'
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons'
We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
https:/imail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%341697678940182093965&simpl=msgJ%3416976789401 .. ' 112
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd:
John Ramo
269 Sam Grange Ct.
Carbondale CO 81623
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%341697678940182093965&simpl=msg-f%3A16976789401 2t2
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Autism Services Project
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Autism Services Project
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecou nty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:10 PM
We hcrue a new Eagle Countg COWD-tg websíte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Støg Inf,onned! Signupfor the Cornmunit1g Deueloprnent Monthlg [J-Newsletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Communþ Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-qZvgSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡ty
Development
Fonruarded message
From: Joyce Woltman <jmwoltman@gmail.com>
Date:Tue, Mar 16,2021a|1:59 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Autism Services Project
To: <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Joyce Woltman <jmwoltman@gmail.com>
Mr. Morgan Beryl:
Attached is the letter I am sending to Garfield County Commissioners.
While Eagle County commissioners are not voting on this project, I am
a resident of Eagle County in Missouri heights, and the changes to the
zoning will negatively impact our community. Thank you for reviewing
my letter.
Sincerely,
Joyce Woltman
2 attachments
Golorado Fires,png
244K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881 531433783922&simpl=msg-f%3A16958815314'.. 112
416t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Autism Services Project
Omuotç r¡tËor¡!¡
t ÁbFqlÞ I Modé6ù! l Ssr I Lilrs. ¡ {,¡cfiSd.*)'
t-. : U.¡rJ1.'..¡.',? rì".,." EUtr
@ KMOHR Letter.l MB.docx
16K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f/o3A1695881531433783922&simpl=msg-f%3416958815314... 212
To: Mr. Morgan Beryl, Eagle County Development Director
From: Joyce Woltman, Missouri Heights Homeowner
Re: Ascendigo Autism Services Application
Date: March L5,202L
The Ascendigo Autism Services Project is admirable. My concern is not about the concept of
the project, but the proposed location. There are a number of reasons why this physical
location is the wrong choice, as noted below.
The Proposed Ascendigo Development Plan and Violations: This plan is in violation of
the following items in the Garfield County Land Use Codes 7'tO3,7-LO4'7'LO9,7'206'
The proposal is also in violation of the following items in the "Comprehensive Plan
2O3O": Page 49, Section 7 Water, Section 7.3, Section 7.5, Page 50, Policy f-ii, Page 52,
Policy 5, Policy 5 vi.
a
a F|RE: lf you look at the attached drought map posted by the US Geological Society in
March 2021, Missouri Heights is located in the Exceptional (Dark Red) section. This
indicates increased wildfire threats on the heels of 2020, the biggest season in the
history of Colorado fires. I had to evacuate my home in 201-8 due to the Lake Christina
fire which burned L2,588 acres and several homes directly to the west of this proposed
development. My home was the next street to be evacuated from the 2002 fire in
Missouri Heights, and I was on stand-by to be evacuated with the 2020 fire.
Climate change has increased the threats of out of control wildfires in our area. Due to
our unpredictable and often 40-50 mph winds in Missouri Heights during the spring,
summer and autumn months, if a fire broke out, the only way to stop it would be by
using aircraft, per Fire Chief Rob Goodwin.
The line of traffic evacuating this area during the Lake Christina fire in 20L8 was very
significant, with the Upper Cattle Creek Road closed to traffic due to the fire. Evacuating
110 + staff in an emergency would increase the danger of enabling all residents to get to
a safe location.
ln reviewing Garfield County's current "Comprehensive Plan 2O3O", page 52, Policy 5 vi
"planning for increased probability for drought conditions should include expanded
requirements for wildland fire protect¡on against wildfires.
a WATER: Ascendigo's stated use of water seems to ignore that over the past three years,
neighborhood water supplies have been adversely impacted by low pressure, mud/sand
infiltration into wells, and zero lack of water pressure during the Lake Christina fire.
How will their increased water needs impact the 20-year drought and diminishcd
snowfall western slope Colorado are suffering from rlr¡e to climate change?
Missouri Heights does not have the bountiful access of the Roaring Fork River, but
instead relies upon aquifer recharge from rain and nearby snow pack.
Water wells tap the underlying basalt rock reservoir. Many nearby water wells have
gone dry in recent years: (source 3/2OL8 Sopris Sun)
h++nc'//.^r.^r,^,so ssun ¡a'm l1l't1 lñ? l)Q lt^,þ'on-lha-rrrall-rr r nc-¡.1rrr /
land Use code 7-104 and all of the above mentioned items from the "Comprehensive
Plan 2030" revolve around the need for adequate water. This proposed project will put
increased pressule on an already stressed rural water system.
o Chanpe of Existinp & Land Use:Ascendigo is proposing to change the character
of this portion of Missouri Heights from that of rural residential to commercial. Their
proposal calls for developlng their combined tracts into a non-residential summer and
winter organized camp, which includes activity buildings, residences for full time
employees, guest quarters, staff quarters, activity buildings, commercial kitchen, etc.
This is a large year-round commercial venture, and is not suitable for the rural
residential zoning of tlris are¿. The prupused Ascerrdigo develupment is in violation of
of Land Use Codes 7-LO3.
A while ago, Ascendigo applied for a permit to build a similar "camp" in a residential
neighborhood in Emma. The Pitkin county Planners/Commissioners did not approve
their proposal. This type of land use is inappropriate for Missouri Heights, threatens the
overstressed water supply and sets a precedent for future water-intensive commercial
developments.
Ascendigo is a worthwhile endeavor, but its commercial development is inappropriate in
Missouri He¡ghts' rural residential neighborhood. lt is non-compliant with our existing zoning,
and threatens to overburden the limited water resource. A more suitable location would be within the
commercial confines of the Highway 82 valley floor where zoning would not need to be changed, and
concerns less impactful. Please vote "No" on the proposed Asendigo development ("White Cloud
ridge", G,arfield eounty permit applications Pl-V-A-01-2L-8827 & LIPA-o1-?1-RR?6 I
Respectfu lly su bm itted,
Joyce Woltman, Missouri Heights
$aII!.'f\ .¿Ìr{*l,*ç;iü,rt\F,-ù\Brought intensityAhnonrna[[ydryModeräte fSevÊre IExtreme IExeeptionalII'- t¡$nurre*: LJnit*cJ St{tttr',c ffir*ught MnnitmrETETEI
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Opposition
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdcz <kris,valdcz@caglccounty.us>
Fwd: Ascendigo Opposition
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Thu, Apr 22,2021at 8:02 AM
Stay Infortrredl Sfgtr ttp,fot'the C¡nnmunìty Deuelopntent Manthly E-Nerusletter here.
Mot'ganBergl
Eaßle County Goverrunenl
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-qzþgsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Communlw
Developheñt
Forwarded messagê
From: Judy Shettel <judyshettel@me.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 22,2021 al.7:20 AM
Subject: Ascendigo Opposition
To: <ghartmann@garfield-county.com>, <sbower@garfield-county.com>, <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>,
<morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Dear Eagle County officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. there will make the decision, Eagle
County will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and fire
and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal seruices will be called upon given the proximity to the property.
It's right on the county line. From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of our road
infrastructure, this project brings sigrrificarrt increased activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue coming with it to
mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. It will be an Eagle County
problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this,
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern, We seem to be facing more and more drought every year.
We are seeing the effects of climate change. And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and
animals from that single road access point should we have another fire. The alternative subdivision of homes would be
developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location.
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
https;//mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341697749562338409708&simpl=msg-fo/o3A16977495623... 112
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Opposition
Judy Shettel
90 Vaquero Road
Carbondale, CO 81623
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697749562338409708&simpl=msg-lo/o3A16977495623... 212
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo future on Missouri Heights
E.AGIE COUNTY Kris Valdoz <krie.valdoz@eaglooounty.us>
Fwd: Ascendigo future on M¡ssouri Heights
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Krls Valdez <krls.väldez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021at 5:10 PM
Wehaue anew Eagle Countg COWD-lgwebsìte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Stuy Inf,ortned! Sìgnupfor the Comtnunítg Deueloptnent Monthþ E-Newslettet. here.
MorganBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Direc;tor
(o) gZo.Sz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
coñmun¡ù
Developmeñt
Forwarded message
From: karen Bristol <kbristollS@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, Mar29,2021 at 9:23 PM
Subject: Fwd: Ascendigo future on Missouri Heights
To: <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Sent from my iPhone
Begin fonruarded message
From: karen Bristol <kbristoll 8@yahoo.com>
Date: March 29,2021at 9:17:13 PM MDT
To: jeanne. mcqueenev@eaglecounty. us, morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us
Gc: keepmohrural@gmail.com
9ubject Ascendigo future on Missouri Heights
We have lived on Mountain View Rd in Missouri Heights for 18 years. lt is certainly understandable for this
group to desire such a peaceful, quiet, laid back vista for their home. But for all these reasons they do not
belong in this residential area.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881 520843498621&simpl=msg-f%3416958815208... 1t2
4t612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo future on Missouri Heights
We are all for these folks finding the right special property for all their positive, support¡ve programs. We
believe it would be advantageous to be along HWY 82 for safety, all services and egress in an emergency.
Emergencies have certainly been part of our lives on Missouri Heights. Evacuation during fires, lack of
water, high winds. These uncontrollable environmental changes will continue.
We do not want or deserve a change in character to our area. Allowing this group to proceed would
definitely create a new precedent in our residential rural neighborhood.
Thank you for taking the time to try and understand our very serious concerns. We are asking you folks,
that we voted in ofüce, to HELP Protect Our Propefties and quiet existence.
Karen & Ted Bristol
661 Mountain View Rd
Carbondale CO 81623
Kbristoll S@yahoo.com
Sent from my iPhone
https:/imail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%34169588152084349862'l &simpl=msg-f%3416958815208" ' 212
41',!212021 Eagle County Government Ma¡l - Fwd: Eagle County Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
EAGLË COUNTY Krls Valdez <krls.valdez@eaglecounty.u6>
Fwd: Eagle Gounty Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
Morgan Beryl <morgan,beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Another one foryou.
Tue, Apr 6,2021 at 1:35 PM
We haue crr.eu) Eagle County COWD-tg websÍte!
For the most recent information, plea.se uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Stay Iryformed! Sign upfor tlte Oorntnurúty Deueloptnent )Wonthlg E-Newsletter here.
Morgøn BeryI
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) qZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+zt-gsss
EAGLE COUNTY
CommuniN
DevelopmêÁt
Forwarded message
From: Matt Scherr <matt.scherr@eaglecounty. us>
Date: Tue, Apr 6, 2021 al 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Eagle County Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
To: <kkis1@aol.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>, <sullisooz@gmail.com>
Thanks very much for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Ascendigo project, Karen and Susan (l did see that you had
sent a separate email, Susan, but I thought I'd just reply to you both through Karen's.)
We do indeed expect Eagle County will be a Referral Agency on the land use file for Garfeld County. ln that role we will
comment on the file relative to our own land use codes, community and master plans, and other regulatory or guiding
documents. Those comments will be included in the file and should therefore be part of Garfield's public record for the file
We will monitor the progress of the proposal as well in order to determine what impacts the prolect may have on Eagle
County and our residents.
Thank you both for your emails. The thoughts you've shared are useful as we prepare Eagle County's comments on the
file.
Matt Scherr
Chai¡ Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-4449 (m)
www.eaglecounty.us
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%341696320961372429195&simpl=msg-fo/0341696320961 3... 1t3
4t't2t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Eagle County Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
On Tue, Apr 6,2021 al 12:28 PM Rhea Silverkorn <rhea.silverkorn@eaglecounty.us> wrote:
Hey Matt! Here is 2 oÍ 2 on the Garfield file.
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please visit
www. e ag I e c o u ntyc ov i d. o rg
Rhea Silverkorn
Executive Coordinator
Eagle County Government
970-328-8612
www.eaglecounty.us
EAGLE COUNTY
NEüroI
Fonruarded message
From:'Karen Moculeski' via #www EagleAdmin <eagleadmin@eaglecou nty. us>
Date: Sun, Apr 4,2021 at 4:1 3 PM
Subject: Eagle County Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
To: rhea.silverkorn@eaglecounty.us <rhea.silverkorn@eaglecounty.us>, eagleadmin@eaglecounty.us
<eagleadmin@eaglecountY.us>
Cc: sullisooz@gmail.com <sullisooz@gmail.com>
Ms. Silverkorn,
I am the President of Keep MO Heights Rural, a non-profit organization formed to oppose the Ascendigo Land
Holdings application currently before the Garfield County BOCC. I know that Susan Sullivan wrote to you last week
outlining some of the many reasons why we, as neighboring Eagle County residents, are opposed to this proposed
comme;cial development. We would be more than happy to appear before the Eagle County Board of
Commissioners and make a presentation and answer questions. This development flies in the face of the plain
written language of the Garfield County Land Use Code; provisions of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan
2030 and [rovisions of the Mid Valley Comprehensive Area Plan for Eagle County. I gm not going into detail in this
email as tó all of the reasons that the County Commissioners should take an active role in this matter and I am just
highlighting a few of them:
. Greatly increased traffic that will primarily utilize Eagle County roads, including Upper Cattle Creek, Fender,
paseoand Sunset Lane, a private street. Residents of Sunset Lane have informed the GARCO planning
staff of their intent to close the road at the intersection of Sunset Lane with Harmony Road should this
development be approved.. Because of mutual aid agreements between various Fire Districts, any emergencies occurring on the site or
evacuations that may occur, will necessarily involve those districts located in Eagle County and will place a
greater demand for services on them as compared to single-family residences. Please note that the
Ãscendigo application inaccurately represents thal2l homes is the basis for comparison to their proposed
developmeni. fne correct number of home sites that could be constructed today under GARCO LUDC is 15
homesites.. The large buildings, including lodging, activity center, administrative center and a commercial kitchen that will
serve tñe daily concentration of 100, plus people, three times daily, are not compatible with the rural large lot
single family homesites and scattered population.
. The threat óf evacuation because of wildfires is real and evacuating the concentration of people during the
height of fire season endangers the surrounding neighborhood residents, most of them in Eagle County.
.. There is strong opposition to this proposed development from both Eagle and Garfield Gounty residents. We
do know that numerous letters have been written to both Garfield and Eagle County officials in opposition to
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=al¡&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1696320961372429195&simpl=msg-f%3416963209613... 213
411212021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Eagle County Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
this development. We started a pet¡tion drive just a couple of weeks ago and have over 180 signatures
demonstrating that thêre ls wlde opposltlon in the community.
The Roaring Fork Valley governments have a strong history of working together and requesting input from adjacent
: govêrrlrlìêlìts when new development is proposêd and particularly whên lt ls a dêvelopment, llke this application, that
, literally abuts the adjoining county line, which is Eagle County. I strongly encourage Eagle County to place maximum
: pressure on Garfield County to seek input from the adjoining Eagle County as outlined in the Mid Valley
Comprehensive Area Plan as this proposed development is clearly not in the best interest of neighboring Eagle
County residents. We encourage Eagle County to strongly oppose this development including the submittal of
written comments to Garfield County and an appearance at the hearing which will likely be scñeduled in mid-May.
Please contact me if have any questions or need further information
Karen Moculeski
1140 Sunset Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-963-1 286
314-566-5456
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%341696320961372429195&simpl=msg-f%3416963209613... 3/3
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: NO to Ascendigo
I¡Etrro
Fonruarded message
From: karin bannerot <ksbannerot@gmail.com>
Date:Wed, Apr21,2021 at 10:544M
Subject: NO to Ascendigo
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecounty. us>
To the Eagle County Commissioners
We are Missouri Heights homeowners and residents who VEHEMENTLY OPPOSE the Ascendigo development off
Harmony lane. Please support us by adding your opposition to the Ascendigo application.
( From Karin Bannerot: I have submitted a letter in opposition to you in the past few weeks, so this is a follow up)
The "tours" are being done now (two more coming up April 27 and May 1) with professional PR people paid to spin
their agenda- they DìD NOT field hard questions from those on site who oppose THE LOCATION, not the mission of
Ascenðiog's services. These PR people are actually publishing lies that the citizens in Missouri Heights are ok with
their plan WE ARE NOT.
Here are but a few reasons why this development should not be placed in Missouri Heights:
. This is a drought area and wind-whipped, so a HUGE fire danger to our neighborhood.
. Upwards of 450 extra vehicles willdrive up ElJebelor Catherine's Store Road (County Rd 102) a day...onto a
one-lane, rutted Harmony Lane road.. Ascendigo has applied for tax exemptions under their guise of being an "educational" facility - they are not
educa¡onal when they have fundraising dinners, and rent the location from September to May for anyone
wanting retreat space.. NO TAXES means we have to absorb the cost coming from home taxes ($6,000.00 to Eagle County) for THEIR
use of the road, their need for emergency services, their water use... NO !!!
. The increased construction/service vehicle traffic will be a danger to cyclists, walkers, and even the horses
riders who use this rural area for recreation. Wldlife is already in danger as the deer population increases....it will be Eagle County as well as Garfield
County picking up dead carcesses, and us dodging the remains. NO !!
. lf allowed, this development sets a bad precedent for others to believe "we are open" for
commercial development"...We are NOT !!!. Ascendigo wants to change the Garfield County plan and Land Use Codes under false pretenses and non-
transparent develoPment Plans.
Please, Commissioners, HEAR US. I realize the actual physical plant will be in Garfield County, but we are
literally mere feet away from the Eagle/ Garfield County line, and will be negatively impacted by their development
straddling this government map- line.
There arã MAÑY other safer places for Ascendigo to put their "camp", equestrian center, recreation lake (oh,,,and
apparently water for the lake willjust magically appear...NO!!!), 14,000+ square foot'lodge', out buildings, barn,
and...here's another water need...their crops !!
This is the WRONG LOCATION and as a tax paying citizen of Eagle County who are on the non-visible side to issues
in Vail, Avon, Minturn, etc...Please see us, hear our opposition and support your constituents who elected you to deny
Ascendigo's application. Time is of the essence, and we need to stop the forward motion of this group. Garfield
County Commissioners are all receiving these messages too.
Sincerely,
Karin S. Bannerot
MichaelBallard
Barbara Uboe
Sue Craver
Missouri Heights Homeowners and Residents
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809d5gyis\,=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697677541498462124&simpl=msg-f%3A16976775414.2t3
416t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo
EAGLË COUNW Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:14 PM
We haue s.lnew Eagle Counly COWD-tg websíte!
þ'or the most recent inJ'ormation, pleqse uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voico on Facebook
Støg Informecl! Sìgn upfor the Corntnunìty Deueloprnent Montlrlg ,E-ÀIeurslettet. here.
MorgonBeryl
Eagle County Government
Communþ Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSz,g
EAGLECOUNTY
Cıñmun¡ù
oevelopmeñt
Fonruarded message
From: karin bannerot <ksbannerot@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 31 ,2021 at 10:53 AM
Subject: Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Dear Ms. Beryl,
Please note my strong opposition to the proposed Ascendigo development.
Thank you
Karin Bannerot
Fonruarded message
From: karin bannerot <ksbannerot@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 31 ,2021 at 10:45 AM
Subject: Opposition to Ascendigo
To: Lisa Zimet <lisamaxz@aol.com>, <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, karen.nudell@gmail.com
<karen.nudell@gmail.com>, peter@danceinitiative.org <peter@danceinitiative.org>
Hi Jeanne
Thank you for replying to Lori Brandon's email. I share her sentiments to oppose Ascendigo building their structures,
recreational lake and occupying space in our rural home area.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/o3A'1695881753537640140&simpl=msg-f%34169S881753,5... 1t2
4t6t2111' Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo
Were you aware that commerdal vehicles are strictly prohibited on Katherine Store Road? But unfortunately it seems no
one is really enforcing this consistently.
Well that means all the heavy machinery, construction vehicles and transport haulers will be clogging little Upper Cattle
Creek's 2 Lane (El Jebel road). This is NOT ok...not only for the noise and congestion, but it will destroy the road
surface.
There are many points of opposition that I have contributed to - found at
www.keepmohrural.com website.
Please read the informational flyer there (l will try to attach or send to you)'
I am grateful for your support and ability to share my letter with our Eagle County Commissioners.
Karin Bannerot
Mike Ballard
0045 Sopris Mesa Place
Carbondale 81623.
970-379-5354.
ksbannerot@gmail.com
( Rural section of Carbondale that Dan Richardson has made clear he doesn't govern. ).
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881753537640140&simpl=msg-f%3416958817535... 212
4t26t202'l Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: right project, wrong location
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecourrty.us>
Fwd: right project, wrong location
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To : Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 1:26 PM
Stag Inf,ortned! Sígn up.fot' the Contmunitg Developntent Monthly E-Newsletter here,
MorganBeryl
Eugle County Governmcnt
Comrnunity DevelopnrenL Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gzo-qzrgsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡N
Developmeñt
l-on¡varded mêssage
From: Jcannc McQuccney <jeanne nrc.queeney@eaglecounty. us>
Date: Thu, Apr 22, 2021 al 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: right project, wrong location
To: Katherine Reppa <kreppaO499@sopris.net>, Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Hello Katherine,
Thank you for sharing your comments and concerns regarding the Ascendigo proposal. I will be sure they are included
with our referral comments to Garfield county. You paint a very vivid picture of the fire danger children with autism face
Stay well.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 wehsite! For the most recent information, please
v i s it www. eag I ec o u ntycov i d, o rg
One Valley Vuice o¡t Facebook
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:32 PM Katherine Reppa <kret:paO499@sopris.net> wrote:
\y't/hile Ascendigo Ranch's proposal for a year-round camp is laudable, there couldn't be a more poorly-chosen location.
There are many compelling reasons to deny this proposal (water resources, traffic, limited roads, noise, pollution,
zoning) and I will focus on a crucial one: wildfire threat.
During my time in Missouri Heights, I have been evacuated twice (almost three times) due to encroaching wildfires. As
the Panorama fire approached our neighborhood, the sheriff came to our house and yelled through his bullhorn, "You
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697769932499106450&simpl=msg-lo/o3A'16977699324... 112
4t2612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: right project, wrong location
need to leave NOW. I'm not talking about 15 minutes, but NOW." lt was terrif,ing.
"Those with autism are likely to hide in fire situations: in closets, under beds, behind furniture." adapted from
autismspeaks.org
"lndividuals w1h autism have a particular problem with fire drills: the noise, lights and crowded halls'" adapted from
autismclassroomresources. com
Safely rescuing many children within minutes of an approaching fire (with very few access roads) could be futile and
; tragic.
"The consequences of intense dry periods are severe, including more intense and dangerous wildfires'" from Post
lndependent
"Governor Polis warns that wildfire season is a year-round phenomenon." Post lndependent
WRONG LOCATION.
Katherine Reppa
Missouri Heights
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697769932499106450&simpl=msg-f%3A16977699324.-.2t2
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo opposition
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty,u$>
Fwd: Ascendigo oppos¡t¡on
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fri, Apr 23,2021 at 8:46 AM
Stug Infornted! Sígnupfortll,e Contralrunìtg Deuelopnænt Nlonthlg E-Newsletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Govenrrnent
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.87So
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSS
EACLE COUNTY
CommuniN
Developmêñt
Fonrvardecl mcssege
From: Klmsla Fite <mamafite@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at6:51 PM
Subject: Ascendigo opposition
To: morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Good evening,
Please include my letter as a resident in Missouri Heights that finds Ascendigo's application an attempt to destroy a
residential neighborhood.
Please let me know if I can add any additional support or information to show the damage this would do to our community.
Thank you,
Kimala D Fite
Ð No to Âscenciigo.ciocx
14K
ln response to the Aspen Times letter from the Ascendigo Board of Directors I would like to
assert that they are presenting a false narrative. To say "meetings with neighbors are
productive and positive" is contrary to the opinion of the more than 380 neighbors that have
signed a petition in opposition to this development and the vast majority of property owners
who came to Monday's tour. We came with hope of getting real answers, but yet again the
details changed right before us and is another sign of dishonesty by Ascendigo. Monday's tour
consistedof approximately20-30people,atleast4of whicharepaidAscendigostaff. Allofthe
property owners in attendance were concerned residents and the vast majority were openly in
opposition to this highly commercial like venture that is trying to intrude on our peaceful
residential neighborhood.
My home is directly across the street from where they plan to have their entrance. My family's
first private meeting was in July 2020 conducted by Bob Schultz (planning consultant for
Ascendigo) with 3 other neighbors adjacent to the property under review. We were told that it
was an "8-week summer camp" a quiet and small operation. There would be a camper lodge,
dorm for interns, a pond for agricultural use and a maintenance barn. This is not what we
heard from Dan Richardson and his PR team at Monday's tour. Not only will there be 24
campers and 48 staff (2:1- ratio due to higher needs to support these campers) the building
plans have changed and there is also housekeeping, laundry, medical, caretakers and a guest
lodge. Catering staff would come daily and not reside on premise. And 94 parking spaces!
Presumably to accommodate family dinners on Fridays and Sundays and other non-summer
programs. A smaller capacity camp in May and September is planned and other non-residential
programs in fall and winter. We were suspicious from the beginning in part because the
drawings included a sledding hill- not a summer activ¡ty. I can list dozens of items that have
changed or have been misrepresented by their team from water usage, size, buildings, building
height, days of operation, maximum number of people onsite, type of operation, road
ma¡ntenance, increased traffic, and the frequency of ambulance visits.
Ascendigo is a full time behavioral/therapeutic facility. Bob Schultz stated that the need for
emergency/ambulance service is very high as some clients need more medical attention than
the medical staff can provide. Dan Richardson has contradicted this. Who are we to believe?
And this location poses different challenges than what they are used to. The notorious wind up
on the ridge is one. This program would likely strain our local emergency responders in this
remote area not to mention disturbing long term citizens day and night. Especially those of us
who live very close by. Their vehicle trips described in the operations plan includes multiple
trucks, vans, busses and cars, going back and forth every day in the summer and quite often in
the non-summer periods. And that includes families coming from out of state who may not be
familiar with our windy roads, and wildlife dangers. Dan Richardson clearly stated Monday that
this would be a year-round operation. Ascendigo has applied to Garfield County claiming to be
an "Educational Facility" when they are a behavioral/therapy provider and camp to special
needs clients. My husband and I have been ardent supporters of, and have helped many
people with autistic family members. We appreciate the mission, but are disheartened by the
clearly dishonest approach to placing a large corporate facility in the middle of the tranquil
residential area that lies on the boundary of Eagle and Garfield Counties. The message is clear -
Ascendigo will say whatever is necessary to build their facilities in this neighborhood with clear
disregard for any harm it may cause others.
Please say NO to allowing Ascendigo from placing a large commercial property in the middle of
a residential community.
It is bad for Garfield County
It is bad for Eagle County
It is very bad for Missouri Heights.
Thank you,
Kimala Fite
260 llarmony Lane
Carhondale, Co 81"623
970-3L9-2902
41612021 Eagle county Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch Trafüc and Public safety concerns
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch Traffic and Public Safety Goncerns
2 messages
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>, Ben Gerdes <ben.gerdes@eaglecounty.us>
Mon, Apr 5,2021 at 1:26 PM
Another one for you. Kris, if you haven't already you may want to share all the public comment we got so folks helping
write the referral can read it as well.
Thanks,
Wehøue anew Eagle County COWD-tgwebsìte!
For the most recent information, please uisit wvvw.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Støg Inf,orrned! Sìgnupfor the Contntunítg l)euelopntent Mottthly E'Neusletter here.
Mot'gønBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zr-gSSg
EAGLE COUNTY
Communiw
Developñeñt
Forwarded message
From: Kirk Hartley <kirkhartley@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 5,2A21 at 1:20 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Ranch Traffic and Public Safety Concerns
To: jeanne McQueeney <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Good afternoon,
I'm writing regarding the current land use application on file with Garfield County, in Missouri Heights' RE:
Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-01-21-8826 & PLVA-01-21-8827
Regardless of the numerous land use development codes that Ascendigo is in violation of, just a few
being...
1. Fails to meet IUDC 7-103. Compatibility with adjacent land uses and fails to comply with
the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 Future Land Use Plan which designates
this area as Rural single-family "Residential Medium". The development is a high intensity
https:/imail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696229801887540546&simpl=msg-f%3416962298018' ' '1t3
4161202'l Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch Trafüc and Public Safety Concerns
commercial use and íncludes a dining room area that seats 75 diners and a deck that
seats an additional 25 diners; lodging, including housing and guest cottages that sleep
near a total of 100 guests and staff.
2. Fails to meet LUDC 7-103. More than 50,000 sq ft of buildings, plus, barns and
maintenance buildings are proposed. The uses, activities and improvements are nowhere
close to being compatible with the single family rural residential neighbors in either size,
scale, or use.
3. Fails to meet LUDC 7-104 and Comprehensive Plan. Ascendigo's stated use of water
seems to ¡gnore that over the past three years, neighborhood water supplies have been
adversely impacted by low pressure, mud/sand infiltration into wells, and zero lack of
water pressure during the Lake Christina fire. lts stated plans for ponds and a greater
dally population can only negatively affect the available water resources.
Today, I want to make you aware of the attached traffic study, performed by Mcdowell Engineering on
behalf of Ascendigo. According to Page 12, Table 4: Traffic is expected to increase almost 4O% on the local
roads, daily. ln accordance with Ascendigo's ongoing misleading of government officials, you will
notice Table 1 on page 65 of the traffic study shows a zero count for delivery vehicles and therefor it
appears they are not included in the traffic count. There will be delivery vehicle trips of food service to feed
the 100 people daily, Caterers, UPS, Fed Express, DHL, Hay delivery vehicles, etc. Most of this traffic
increase willtake place-ø-Eagle Countv-roadlwith vehicles and trucks en-route to the propose.d site..
This traffic study also shows a5O% increase in traffic on Sunset ln.(a private road in Fagle County). ln
response to this egregious, corporate encroachment, the owners of Sunset Ln. intend to close this road to
through access. This will further increase traffic impact on the quiet, dirt roads of Eagle County/Missouri
Heights. The closure of Sunset Ln. will also leave Ascendigo Ranch with a single egress point, (Harmony Rd.)
in case a natural disaster or wildfire. Ascendigo is already in violation of GARCO's "Comprehensive Plan
203A", page 52, Policy 5 vi;
The proposed development site is located in Garfield County's "Very High" susceptibility index for
wildfire. The two roads which are the evacuation corridors from the site, CR 102 to; Catherine Store Road
and Fender to Upper Cattle Creek, have blind spots and right angle turns that impede traffic and do not
permit any sort of an efficient evacuation. The Lake Christine evacuation was chaotic, and we witnessed
bumper to bumper vehicles and trailers all in a slow parade out of this area in July 2018. Add another 100+
people concentrated in one area to this mix and there is only disaster in its wake. Accordingly, it fails to
comply with "Comprehensive Plan 2030", page 52, Policy 5 vi.
Does the Roaring Fork Fire & Rescue Authority have any interest in this extreme public safety concern?
Does Eagle County Road and Bridge have anything to say about the 4O% increase (conservative estimate) on
their roads that access the site?
Please use whatever influence you may have to sway Garfield County to say NO to Ascendigo.
Please forward this to the appropriate individuals at Eagle County Road and Bridge department and the
Roaring Fork Fire District.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696229801887540546&simpl=msg-f%3416962298018... 2t3
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch Traflìc and Public Safety Concerns
Thank you,
Kirk Hartley - very concerned Eagle County citizen
fr\uf Exhibit K- Traffic Study Final.pdf
3901 K
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Ben Gerdes <ben.gerdes@eaglecounty.us>
Mon, Apr 5,2021 at 3:25 PM
I'll share the comments with the group. Thanks, Morgan
[Quoted text hidden]
Kris Valdez, Senior Planner, MURP, AICP
Eagle County Planning DePaftment
500 Broadway
P.O. Box 179
Eagle, CO 81631
Phone: 970.328.8752
Fax: 970.328.7L85
Toll-Free: 1,800.225.6136
For the most recent COVID information, please vßit www.eaglecountycovid.org.
One Valley Voice on Facebook
COVID Questions I 97 o3z8-97 5o
Støg I4fortned! Sìgnrylor. tln.e Contntunity l)euelopntent MonthlTl E'Newsletter here.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696229801887540546&simpl=msg-f%3416962298018.. ' 3/3
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascindigo Camp
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez (kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Ascindigo Camp
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:11 PM
Wehaue aneu Eagle County COWD-tg uebsíte!
For the most recent i4formation, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
Qne Valley Vaice an Føcebook
Støy Informed! Sign up.for the Comtnunity Deuelopment Monthly E-Neuslettet here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) qZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+zt-gstt
EAGLE COUNTY
commun¡w
Developmcit
Forwarded message
From: Laena walker <laena48@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 2,2021 at2:52PM
Subject: Ascindigo Camp
To: <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Good Afrernoon,
I realize this camp is being proposed in Garfield county. However I feel it will impact Eagle county as well. Most if not all of
the traffic to serve this camp will come up from El Jebel and down Fender Ln to Harmony. This will cause SO much wear
and tear on this road. Delivery trucks, shuttle vans and buses, laundry service, food service, employees driving to and
from the camp. This is the wrong location for such a huge operation. Many people living in Eagle county will be negatively
affected too. There will be so much noise and light pollution. Below is the letter I sent to Garfield county.
Please support the Eagle County residents who live in and love Missouri Heights! Please let the Garfield County
commissioners know Eagle County does not support this location for the camp.
Thank you!
My letter to GarCo:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881570351208732&simpl=msg-f%3416958815703... 1t2
4t6t217'l Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascindigo Camp
I would like to express my concern over the proposed camp in Missouri Heights. The land they have set their sights on ¡s
the wrong location. This is a quiet residential and rural area. A huge development like this camp is completely out of
character for Missouri Heights. I see they compare their proposed camp to Strang Ranch, the schoolhouse, WindWalkers,
CARE, and CMC. All of thèse other endeavors have direct access to paved county roads. The location on Harmony lane
does not.
With the exception of CMC, all of the above mentioned programs run regular business hours with under 10 staff
members. None of them, (except CMC), have dining, recreation centers or housing for nearly 100 people like this camp
willhave.
There are so many other huge concerns with this location. Noise pollution, light pollution, huge increase in traffic and
strain on the already limited water supply. The area also has high fire danger. lmagine trying to evacuate 100+ people,
some with mental disabilities, quickly in an emergency.
I also believe the camp does NOT meet the definition of and educational facility. They are not associated with any
university or institution. They do not teach scholastic subjects like math or history. Not do they offer vocational training.
Ascindigo is using this loophole as an to try and get approval.
Ascindigo is a wonderful program that does a lot of good for an underserved group. Howeve¡ this is NOT the place for it'
Unfortuñately this camp will decrease the quality of life for all residents of Missouri Heights. A decrease in propefty value
for the area of Missouri Heights near the camp is very likely as well'
Allowing a change of land use would be a HUGE mistake. lt will forever change Missouri Heights for the worse. Please
please please do NOT approve this camp.
Sincerely,
Laena Walker
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881570351208732&simpl=msg-f%3A'16958815703... 212
4t't2t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo Land Holdings application
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo Land Holdings application
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Mon, Apr 12,2021 at 9:01 AM
Wehsue anew Eagle Countg COVlD-tguebsíte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
Qne Valløy Voice on Focchook
Stay In-formed! Sígn up.foî t/l.e Communítg Deuelop¡nent Monthly E-Newslettet here.
MotganBeryI
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSgg
EAGLE COUNTY
CommuniN
Developmeñt
Fonrarded message
From: Matt Scherr < matt. scherr@ea glecounty. us>
Date: Mon, Apr'12,2021 al8:58 AM
Subject: Re: Opposition to Ascendigo Land Holdings application
To: <beezschell22@gmail.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thanks for sending on your comments on the Ascendigo project proposal, Lea Ann. Eagle County does expect to be a
Referral Agency on the Garfield County file for this proposal, and your comments are lrelpful to us as we draft our oflìr.;ial
comments for the file.
Thanks again for your email
Matt Scherr
Chair, Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-4449 (m)
wwweaglecounty.us
Fonruarded message
From: Bz SchEblet <beezschell22@gmail.com>
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341696847292326499366&simpl=msg-f%3416968472929... 1t2
4t12t2o21 Eagle Gounty Government Mail - Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo Land Holdings application
Date: Fri, Apr9,2021at 12:51 PM
Subject: Opposition to Ascendigo Land Holdings application
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecountY. us>
Greetings Eagle County Commissioners;
This is a quick note explaining why we are opposed to the Ascendigo Land Holdings application
currently before the Garfield County BOCC. Please note that our opposition is not about the
populations served by Ascendigo but the proposed location of their future facility. In fact, we are
strong supporters of the Ascendigo work in our communityl Our issue with the development is
focused on our concern for the health and safety of their potential workers and guests for one
primary reason: The high fire danger that exists in this area (highlighted by this week's Red Flag
warnings) and the impending StreSS on our current firefighting resources.
We bought our house in Missouri Heights as the Lake Christine fire blazed just yards from our
house. We feared for our and our neighbors' safety that entire summer. The proposed Ascendigo
location is not easily accessible by fire or emergency personnel let alone the difficulty it would be
to evacuate an additional 100 individuals iflwhen a Lake Christine event happens again.
Such a proposed facility must be located in a space that is easy to access and egress, heavily
resourced to handle emergencies, and zoned for fire mitigation. The location in Missouri Heights
does not have these features and, therefore, the location is unsafe for workers and guests. Why
would we place anyone in this situation when it can be avoided by finding a location that is better
equipped to handle the inevitability of afire?
Thank you for your timel
Sincerely;
Lea Ann Schell & Stephanie Cramblet
232 Caballo Street
Carbondale, CO 81623
"Beez" Lea Ann Schell, PhD
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1696847292326499366&simpl=msg-f%3416968472923.--212
4t12t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Proposed Ascendigo development in Missouri Heights
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@caglecounty.us>E.AGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Proposed Ascendigo development in Missouri Heights
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Tue, Apr 6,2021 at 12:53 PM
Another one for the file.
Thanks,
We hque a new Eagle Countg COWD-tg websíte!
For tlrc ¡nosL recetú irt"fttrmution, please uisit www.eagtecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Stag Infortned! Sìgn up.for tIrc Contmutút1¡ Deuelopntent Monthlg -E-ÀIerusletter here.
Mot ganBeryI
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gzo-qztgsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Developmeñt
Fonruarded message
From: Matt Scherr <matt.scherr@eaglecounty. us>
Date: Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed Ascendigo development in Missouri Heights
To: <curranlisa@yahoo.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thanks very much for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Ascendigo project, Lisa.
We do expect Eagle County will be a Referral Agency on the land use file for Garfield County. ln that role we are able to
comment on the file relative to our own land use codes, community and master plans, and other regulatory or guiding
documents. Those comments will be included in the file and will therefore be part of the public record for the file.
Thank you again for your email, Lisa. Your thoughts are useful as we prepare Eagle County's comments on the file.
Matt Scherr
Chair, Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-44a9 (m)
wwweaglecounty.us
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1 I :1 3 AM <curranlisa@yahoo.com> wrote:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%341696318297681127007&simpl=msg-fþ/o3416963182976 1t2
4t12t2121 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Proposed Ascendigo development in M¡ssouri Heights
Dear Commissioner Scher¡
I am a supporter of Keep Missouri Heights Rural, a non-profit organization formed to oppose the Ascendigo Land
Holdings application currently before the Garfield County BOCC. We, as neighboring Eagle County residents, are
opposãd to ihis proposed commercial development. This development flies in the face of the plain written language
oiifre Oar¡eld iounty Land Use Code; provisions of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 and provisions
of the Mid Valley Comprehensive Area Plan for Eagle County. Following are a few of reasons the County
Commissioners should take an active role in this matter:. GreatlV increased traffic that will primarily utilize Eagle County roads, including Upper Cattle Creek, Fender,
paseo and Sunset Lane, a private street. Residents of Sunset Lane have informed the GARCO planning staff
of their intent to close the road at the intersection of Sunset Lane with Harmony Road should this
development be aPProved.
. Because of mutual aid agreements between various Fire Districts, any emergencies occurring on the site or
evacuations that may ocður will necessarily involve those districts located in Eagle County and will place a
greater demand for services on them as compared to single-family residences. Please note that the
Ãscendigo application inaccurately represents lhat2l homes is the basis for comparison to their proposed
developñreni.'The correct number of home sites that could be constructed today under GARCO LUDC is 15
homesites.
. The large buildings, including lodging, activity center, administrative center and a commercial kitchen that will
serve tñe daily concentration of t OO, plus people, three times daily, are not compatible with the rural large lot
single family homesites and scattered population.
. The threat of evacuation because of wildfires is real and evacuating the concentration of people during the
height of fire season endangers the surrounding neighborhood residents, most of them in Eagle County.
. There is strong opposition to this proposed development from both Eagle and Garfield County residents. We
do know that numerous letters have been written to both Garfield and Eagle County officials in opposition to
this development. We started a petition drive just a couple of weeks ago and have over 180 signatures
demonstrating that there is wide opposition in the community'
The Roaring Fork Valley governments have a strong history of working together and requesting input from adjacent
governmenls when new development is proposed and particularly when it is a development, like this application, that
iiterally abuts the adjoining county line - in this case, Eagle County- I strongly encourage Eagle CountY !o nla99
maximum pressure ôn Garfield County to seek input from the adjoining Eagle County as outlined in the Mid Valley
Comprehehsive Area Plan as this proposed development is clearly not in the best interest of neighboring Eagle
County residents. We encourage Eagle County to strongly oppose this development including the submittal of
written comments to Garfield County and an appearance at the hearing which will likely be scheduled in mid-May.
Sincerely,
Lisa M. Curran
Missouri Heights/Eagle County Resident
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-fo/0341696318297681127007&simpl=msg-fo/034169631 82976... 212
4t26t2D21 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Opposition letter re: proposed Ascendigo development
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@caglccounty. us>EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Opposition letter re: proposed Ascendigo development
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 4:50 PM
Stay Infornredl Súgn upfor lhe Contmunitg Deuelopnrctú Monthlg l9-À/erusletter here.
MorgunBergl
Eagle County Gor¡ernment
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gzo-+zt-gsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Communitu
Developmeát
Forwarded messâge
From: <lioamaxz@aol.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:22 PM
Subject: Opposition letter re: proposed Ascendigo development
To: jeanne.mcqtteeney@eaglecounty.us <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us
<morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Cc: keepmohrural@gmail.com <keepmohrural@gmail.com>
Dear Eagle County Officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
I have lived in Missouri Heights in four different houses since 1992. ln 2004, my husband and I built a house a|2245
Upper Cattle Creek Road (at the 2 mile marker) and have witnessed a significant increase in traffic - cars, trucks,
construction vehicles, cyclists, and more walkers/joggers. ln addition to the increase in vehicles, more and more
people are using Upper Cattle Creek Road for recreational purposes. The thought that the traffic would increase
manr¡fal¿,| ^^l.i^^ i+ ^.,^^ m^,^ ^¡ ^ ¡h^-^.,-L¡--^ ¡a
^----l:--
:- ------.-i :- t-:-L1^-:--rrrqrry¡vrv - ¡rrq^rrrV rt svErI rllulç vl cl LlllJlUuVlllcllË ll ,,-\SUcllulgu lli Appf UVeU - lti lf lgf llef llf lg aflU UAflgglouti.
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the Planning Department there will make the decision,
Eagle County will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution
and fire and water concerns, but the Eagle Gounty municipal services will be called upon given the proximity to the
property. lt's right on the county line. From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of
our road infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue coming
with it to mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. lt will be an Eagle
County problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697692206790203052&simpl=msg-f%3A16976922067 ... 1t2
4t26t2121 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Opposition letter re: proposed Ascendigo development
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more of a drought every
year. We are seeing the effects of climate change. And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and
animals from that single road access point should we have another fire. We were evacuated during the Lake Christine
fire. As Upper Cattle Creek Road was closed south toward ElJebel, we had to drive north over Fende¡ to Catherine
Store Road, to Highway 82, bumper to bumper with cars, trucks, horse trailers, campers, etc. and it was very slow
going. We were also on alert in 2O2O for another potential evacuation due to the Grizzly Lake fire which closed l-70 for
two weeks. The alternative subdivision of homes that was approved for the property in question would be developed
over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the residential location.
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial development. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
Thank you.
Lisa Max Zimet
2245 Upper Cattle Creek Road
Carbondale, CO 81623
Eagle County
cell: 970-379-2136
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/034169769220679O203052&simpl=msg-f%3416976922067 ... 212
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Please register opposition to Ascendigo proposal
Krls Valdez <krls.valdez@eaglecounty.us>ËA6LE COUNTY
Fwd: Please reg¡ster oppos¡t¡on to Ascendigo proposal
2 messages
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:09 PM
Wehaue anew Eagle Countg COVID-tqwebsìte!
For the most recent informøtion, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice o¡t Fucobuuk
Stag¡ I4forrned! Signupfor the Comtnunitg Deaelopment Mçnthlu.E-:\feu:.çletter here,
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-4Zt-gsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Communie
Developme6r
Fonrarded message
From: Lori Brandon <lori@rlbrandon.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 9:30 AM
Subject: RE: Please register opposition to Ascendigo proposal
To: M att Scherr <matt.scherr@eaglecounty. us>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thank you for responding and for copying Morgan Beryl. I was going to write directly to Ms. Beryl loday, but now I see
Morgan, you have seen my submission.
Can you please tell me if Basalt, as a municipality, is also planning to comment?
g*,
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881464016736600&simpl=msg-fo/03A16958814640.1t4
4t612021
914-924-2225
Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Please reg¡ster opposition to Ascendigo proposal
From : Matt Scherr <matt. scherr@eaglecounty. us>
Sent: Thursday, April 1,2021 9:00 AM
To: Lori Brandon <lori@rlbrandon.com>
Gc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Subject: Re: Please register opposition to Ascendigo proposal
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Ascendigo development proposal, Lori. As you mentioned this will be decided
by Garfield County, but we do expect that eagle county will have the opportunity to comment as a referral agency. Your
input will be helpful to us in drafting that comment.
Best,
Matt Scherr
Chair, Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-4449 (m)
www.eaglecounty.us
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:02 PM Lori Brandon <lori@rlbrandon.com> wrote:
Dear Eagle County Commissioners,
I am writing to register my opposition to the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights, where I and my husband reside.
I continue to learn more about this plan and the more I learn the more I am against it...and the more Ascendigo's
arguments and statistics seem to change!
While I understand that this property is in GarJield County and the planning dept. there will have decision making
authority, I hope and encourage Eagle County to carefully consider the impacts this could have on Eagle County
residents as well as Eagle County/ Basalt municipal services. I assume and hope that you will be submitting a formal
position, given the proximity and impact this program has on Eagle County.
Traffic will undoubtedly be coming from Eagle County towards the property which as you know is on the exact
borderline between the two counties. This will impact roads and residents of Eagle County, with extra noise, dust,
pollution, potential accidents, etc. I imagine that should there be emergencies, that neighboring services could be
called upon...from Eagle County. So this is not simply a GaÉield County issue.
Beyond that, I will share just some of my overall concerns that are relevant to Eagle County as well.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881464016736600&simpl=msg-f%3416958814640.
å ñ(a""()
EXHIBIT
2t4
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Please register opposition to Ascendigo proposal
1. Like everyone, I am concerned about the fire safety in terms of fire dange¡ fire mitigation and evacuation. We
have all experienced the stress of evacuatiolt dutirrg Lhe Lake Christine fire antl then seen the threat of last summer's
horrible fires here and elsewhere in CO. This has to be a huge concern, especially with our notorious winds here in
Missouri Heights. lt's very different to evacuate a 100+ facility with campers and staff and animals vs. residents of
homes, not all of which will have been built, some built on double lots, and not all would be full-tlme and occupied.
2. Water is already an extreme issue - rationing and muddy wells are already a reality. We see, again this year,
our moisture is below average. lt's hard to believe that this proposed facility with dorms turning over weekly (laundry/
cleaning) and a commercial kitchen plus equestrian facility, pond, ball fields and ice skating rink would use less water: than 13-15 homes - again not all fully occupied or built yet.
3. And let's be clea¡ the Ascendigo proposal compares their impacts lo 21 or more homes. That is NOT what is
currently approved for these combined properties, so Ascendigo's comparisons are simply not valid.
5. lf we have deer killed on the roads now? Just imagine many 100s of extra cars that are not as familiar with the
area driving here. Our deer are often just by the road's edge and totally camouflaged. We will surely see more
casualties to say nothing of the other wildlife impacts,
I could go on, but will leave it at this. ln summary, I am very concerned about the change in character to our very rural,
quiet neighborhood and believe this would open the door to future commercial endeavors as well as leave the
possibility of expansion on this property with little oversight. And this precedent would also apply to the portion of
Missouri Hcights that is in Eagle County. I believe this was previously attcmpted in another area within Eagle County,
and the negative feedback caused Ascendigo to pull their application, so you know the process and the proposal well.
As everyone who is opposed to this agrees, the mission and program that Ascendigo represents is admirable and
needed, but they should find a location on the valley floor with better access to all services needed that will not bring
significant negative impacts to a rural residential neighborhood.
As an impacted party, I encourage you to register your opposition to this application
Respeutfully subnrilterJ,
Lori Brandon
405 Skipper Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
914-924-2225
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@êäglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:1 5 PM
We haue ø new EøgIe Countg COWD-t9 websíte!
https:/imail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1695881464016736600&simpl=msg-fo/o3A16958814640.314
4t6t2}21 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Please register opposition to Ascendigo proposal
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid'org
One Valley Voice on Fqcebook
Stag Inf,orrned! Sìgnupfor the Co¡nntutúty Deuelop¡nent Monthly E-ÀIeursletter here.
MorganBetyl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-qZt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Community
Development
Fonruarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecounty'us>
Date: Wed, Mar 31 ,2021 al9:29 AM
Subject: Re: Please register opposition to Ascendigo proposal
To: Lori Brandon <lori@rlbrandon.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
HiLori,
Thank you for sharing your comments with us. I will be sure they are included as part of the file for review when we are
asked to submit comments as a referral agency.
Stay well.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have e new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v i s it www, eag I eco u ntYc ov i d. o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
[Quoted text hidden]
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341695881464016736600&simpl=msg-fo/03416958814640...4t4
4ßt2421 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Development - PLVA-01-21-8827
Krls Valdcz <krls.valdez@eaglecotrnty.us>ÉAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Development - PLVA-O1-21-8827
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:12 PM
Wehaue unew Eagle Countg COWD-tgwebsíte!
For the most recent informatíon, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Fnachook
Stay In"formed! Sígnup.for tIæ Comlø"uníty Deueloptnent Mor.thlg ß-Netuslettet. here,
Mot'ganBeryI
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) g7o-47t-g5gg
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡W
0evelopmeñt
Fonrarded message
From: Lynne A <lynne.uhl2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb24,2021 at10:22 AM
Su bject: Ascendigo Development - PLVA-O 1 -2 1 -8827
To: <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
I'm writing you to bring to your attention a proposed water intensive development in eastern Missouri Heights. The Ascendigo
organization has recently proposed a commercial development called "White Cloud Ridge" (Garheld County application PLVA-OI-
2l-8827). Tlteir proposal develops a 125 acre parcel curently zoned for l3 residential homes. What is troubling is that this is an
intense development is surounded by rural residential housing in an area classified as "high desert". This type of land use is
inappropriate for Missouri Heights, threatens our already overstressed water supply and sets a dangerous precedent for future water
intensive commercial developments.
Ascendigo is proposing to change the character of this portion of Missouri Heights from that of rural residential to commercial. They
propose developing their combined tracts into a non-residential summer and winter organized development. Full-time residences in a
hotel-like structure with a commercial kitchen. multiple housing units, administrative buildings and a conference center are proposed
(37,800 square feet of buildings). In addition. plans are for an "activity bam", equestrian centero maintenance ham, hay ham, care
taker's home and guest/rental cabins. 'l'his "Phase I" plan calls for a fwo-acre lake (87,000 square feet), and a playing ficld (20,000
squale feet). While Asccntligtl's wotk is admirable, this location and intensive use of water is not. Ascendigo plans: https:l/sci-
prod-pu bl ic-pdfs. s3-us-west-2. amazonaws. com/mxdYEdCdZUzh guZNlDzzT Mlz{ A.pdf
Missouri Heights does not have the bountiful access of the Roaring Fork River, but instead relies upon aquifer recharge from rain and
nearby snow pack. Water wells tap the underlying basalt rock reservoir. With the last few decades, we have begun to see that the
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?¡k=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881664992098924&simpl=msg-f%3416958816649... 112
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Development - PLVA-O1-21-8827
water supply is not endless. Many nearby water wells have gone dry in the recent years (source 312018 Sopris Sun:
https://www.sopr¡ssun.com l2}18t}3l28lwhenthe-well-runs-dry0. It is very concerning that a concentrated development like
this proposed project will put increased pressure on an already stressed system.
Please help us save our limited waterl If possible, could you register an offrcial opinion with the Garfield County Planning
Department? While this is a worthwhile cause, this development is inappropriate in a rural residential neighborhood, defies existing
land use and, most importantly, will overburden our limited supply of water. The Ascendigo development would be more
appropriately sited in a nonresidential area near a plentiful v/ater source.
Thank you,
Lynne Uhl
970-948-2888 Cell
1455 County Road 102
Carbondale CO 81623
Thanks,
Lynne
Lynne Uhl
970-948-2888 Cell
1455 County Road 102
Carbondale CO 81623
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881664992098924&simpl=msg-f7o3416958816649.2t2
4t6t202',1 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposed Development in Missouri Heights
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglccounty.us>G EAGLT COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Proposed Development in Missouri Heights
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecoun$.us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:11 PM
Wehaue crtew Eagle Counly COWD-tgwebsìte!
For the most recent information, please uísít www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valloy Voice on Facchook
Stag Inf,ormed,! Sígnup.for the Com¡nutútg Deuelopment Monthly E-Newslettet here.
Mot'gonBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gzo-qzvgsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Communit
Developmeñt
Fonrarded message
From: Lynne A <lynne.uhl2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 1,2021 at 1'1:14 AM
Subject: Ascendigo Proposed Development in Missouri Heights
To: <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
3t1t2021
Dear Ms. Beryl,
Since my last correspondence, I have had a chance to read the Garfield County "Land Use Code" and "Comprehensive Plan 2030" documents.
Ïhe proposed Ascendigo development is in violation of Land Use Codes 7-1O3,7-104,7-109 and 7-2O6. The proposal is in violation of the
following items in the "Comprehensive Plan": Page 49, Section 7 Water, Section 7.3, Section 7.5, Page 50, Policy 1-ii, Page 52, Policy 5,
Policy 5 vi. Land Use Code 7-104 and all of the above mentioned items from the "Comprehensive Plan" revolve around the need for adequate
water. This proposed development is 1 .2 miles south of my home. ln 2013 water wells started running dry in this area - particularly south of my
home. This has been documented and is real. The scale of this water-intensive project may deplete an already damaged aquifer. The
Ascendigo organization is top-notch and I truly support their mission, but this development needs to be in an area where there is adequate long-
term water. The following is my updated letter with the information from the County's documents:
Please vote "No" on the proposed Ascendigo development ("\lVhite Cloud Ridge", Garfield County permit applications PLVA-O1-21-8827 & LIPA-
01-21-8826). Ascendigo has a proposed water-intensive development in a rural residential neighborhood of eastern Missouri Heights. Their
proposal develops a 125 acre parcel currently zoned for 13 rural residential homes and two ADUs. \Nhat is troubling is that this is a water-
intensive development surroundcd by rural residential housing in an area where wells have beerr runnirrg dry. Sonre tinre ago, Ascendigrl
applied for a permit to build a similar "camp" in a residential neighborhood in Emma. The Pitkin County Planners/Commissioners did not
approve their proposal. This type of land use is inappropriate for Missouri Heights, threatens the already overstressed water supply and sets a
dangerous precedent for future water-intensive commercial developments.
Ascendigo is proposing to change the character of this portion of Missouri Heights from that of rural res¡dential (Residential Low Density -
"RL"). This is in direct violation of the Garfield Gounty Land Use Code 7-103. The nature, scale, and intensity of the proposed use is NOT
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881587347262494&simpl=msg-f%3A16958815873.1t3
4t6t212,l Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposed Development in Missouri Heights
compatible with adjacent rural residential land uses. Ascendigo proposes developing the combined tracts into a non-residential summer and
wintår organized dêvelopment. Full-time residences in a hotel-like structure with a commercial kitchen, multiple.housing _units, administrative
buildingjand a conference center for fund raisers are proposed (37,800 square feet of buildings). .ln addition, Þþns are for an "activity_ barn",
equesñ¡an center, maintenance barn, hay barn, care taker's home, guesVrental cabins and 80 parking.spaces, This "Phase l".plancalls for a
twb-acre lake (S7;OOO square feet), irrigaied horse pastures, irrigated playing field (20,0Q0 s-gua¡q feet) and irrigation landscaping. The
proposal has morphed irito a full-time, year-round camp. \/\/lrile Ascendigo's goal is_admirable, this.lolation and intensive use of water ¡s not.
Ãsiendigo plans: ' https://sci-prod-public-pdfs.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/mxdYEdCdZUzh9uZrVtDzzTMlz4A.pdf
Most importantly, this proposal is in violation of Garfield County Land Use Code 7-104 which states "all applications for Land Use Change
Permits shall háve an'adåquate, reliable, physical, long- term,'and legal water supply". Eastern Missouri Heighls does.not have the bountiful
access of the Roaring Forli R¡ver, but instêað relies upın aquifer recharge from rain a¡d nea¡by slow pack. Water wells tap the under$ng.
basalt rock reservoif Since 2013, nearby water wells have gone dry (source 3/2018 Sopris Sun: https:iÁruww.soprissun.com l2o18l03l28lwhen'
the-well-runs-dryf . lt is very concerningihat a concentrated development like this proposed projectwill put increased pressure on an already
stressed systeni.
'lt would be better sited in the valley floor where there is e plent¡ful source of water.
The Garfield County "Comprehensive Plan 2030" contains numerous references to preservingwater. On page 49, Section T.Water: ltem
#1: "Water is esseñtial to áll life in the watershed. Potential threats to the water supply include, but are not limited to, climate change and
drought cycles, development pressure including residential and industrial/commercial, and reservoirs" Section 2.3: "Prglggtjry local water
resoürces ¡s essential io tne vitatity of Garfìeld Óounty." Page 49, Section 7.5: "significant þgnefiþ lg_g¡owth where SUFFICIENT WATER
exists". This is the real kicker. ![/lth wells going dry iñ this ãrea, the fact is that there is NOT A SUFFICIENT WATER for this type of high
density development. Page 50, Policy f -ii: "Ñewdevelopment should be ql.ustered around existing wate/'. Locating th_e.Ascendig.o
develópment fàr away from an existing water source (like the Roaring Fork River) is irresponsible-. .Page 52, Policy_5: "Plan for water
conservation and drolght conditions".-\Mth the fact that nearby wells have run dry, the density of the \r'úhite Cloud Ridge residential area should
be REDUCED to no móre than three residences from the current zoning of 13 homes. The Ascendigo proposal goes against all of these above
items in the Comprehensive Plan.
Also in the "Comprehensive PIan" on page 52, Policy 5 vi: "Planning for increased probability.for drought conditions should include
expanded requirements for wildland fire mitigation". Lãnd Use Codes 7-109 and 7-206 both call for adeq_uate fire protection against wildfires.
fn'è Um¡te Clòud Ridge area was under mañdatory evacuation during the 2018 Lake Christine fire. That fire burned 12,588 acres and several
homes directly to the west of this proposed development.
Please help us save our limited water and vote "No" on the Ascendigo proposal! While this is a worthwhile cause, this development is
inappropriåte in a rural residential neighborhood, defies existing land use codes and, most importantly, will overburden the limited supply of
*aidt ine Ascendigo devefopment ñould be more appropriatèly sited near a plentiful source of water in a nonresidential area that is currently
zoned for this type of ¡ntens¡ve development.
Thank you,
Lynne Uhl
1455 County Road 102, Carbondale CO 81623
On a personal note:
We purchased our home in east Missouri Heights in 2013. The Ascendigo proposed_development is. 't.2 miles south of our house. We
cont'racted with Rick Holub of J & M Pump of êlenwood Springs to test our well that f¡rst year. He told us that multiple wells had been running
dry south of our place. ln 2018 an article was published in the Soprls Sun. about wells going dry i1 eagt_el Missouri Heights . .. .
ftítps:/Âvww.soprissun.com/2018/03/28lr¡r¡hen-ihe-well-runs-dryD. We had the water rights to build a 4,500 square foot pond, but didn't because
it would have been irresponsible.
Several years ago, we had an engineer from the NRCS visit our property. He classified this area of eastern Missouri as_"High Desert". The
initial pláns call íoi a two-acre laké (87,000 square feet), irrigated horse pastures, inigated playing field (20,000 square feet) and.irrigation
landsóaping. Much of this water would be lost to evaporation or seepage. This property^has junior.water righ'ts. to an irrig-ation.ditch- The
irrigatioñ diiches typically run with water two months a year (less in drought years when Spring.Park Reservoir is low). When th.e ditch is not
ruñning, water wilíbe pumped from the aquifer to fill the lake and irrigate all of their many facilities. Pouring water onto this land to create a
park-like atmosphere in a desert is efremely irresponsible.
During the 2018 Lake Christine fire, as the fire on Basalt Mountain raged westward toward our neighborhood, we had less than one hour
betwein the voluntary evacuation notice and the mandetory evacuation notice. \Mth over 100 employees and children at the proposed
development, wildflre evacuation should be a concern.
Some time ago, Ascendigo applied for a permit to build a similar "camp" in a _residential neighborh-ood in Emma. The Pitkin County
planners/CoñrmissionerJdid'not apprové their proposal. What is the logic of targeting this type of intensive development in a residential
neighborhood? "lf this doesn't work in Pitkin County, let's try it in Garfield County"?
The scale of this water-intensive project may deplete an already damaged aquifer. The Ascendigo organization. is top-notch and I truly support.
their mission, but this developmeht rieeds td be ìn an area wheie there is adequate long-term water. Please help us save our limited water and
vote "No" on the Ascendigo proposal!
Thanks,
Lynne
Lynne Uhl
970-948-2888 Cell
1455 County Road 102
Carbondale CO 81623
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809d¡gyis\ ,=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1695881587347262494&simpl=msg-f%3416958815873' '. 213
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo Application
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecoullty.us>
Fwd: Opposition to Ascendigo Application
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.bêry|@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@ea glecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:11 PM
Wehaue aneu Eagle Countg COWD-tguebsìte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
Qne Valley Voice on Facebook
Støg Inforrned! Sígnup.for the Co¡ntnunÍty Deuelopment Monthlg E-Newslettet. here.
MorganBeryI
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-+zt-gsss
EAGLE COUNTY
communiw
Developmeñt
Fonrvarded message
From: Mark Gesark <mcstudio@sopris.net>
Date: Mon, Mar 8,2021 at 10:46 AM
Subject: Opposition to Ascendigo Application
To: <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecounty. us>
Cc: <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Mark and Katherine Cesark
2130 CR 102 Carbondale, CO. 01623
9707041 E30
3.8.2021
Dear Eagle County Commissioners,
We are writing as Garfield County residents to express our strong opposition to the proposed Ascendigo development in
Missouri Heights / Harmony Lane / \r'úhite Cloud Ridge subdivision. We have been residents of this area for over 20
years. We raised our family here because of the rural residential setting. We strongly oppose this transition to
commercial / non profit use. ln Ascendigo's application, they sited erea "comps" that are not comparable. We are
concerned that the impact of traffic, excessive water usage, and change to a cornrnercial facility will impact our quiet
quality of life and our property values. lt is unrealistic and irresponsible to build a 2 acre pond on this property. \Mile we
support the mission and vision of Ascendigo, we oppose this change of land use. We hope you will see how this will
negatively impact the residents of the area.
Sincerely,
Mark, Katherine, Niko and Owen Cesark
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/03A1695881551090206495&simpl=msg-f%3416958815510... 1t2
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo/ Wltitecloud
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
E^ACLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo/ Whitecloud
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecou nty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:10 PM
Wehoue onew Eagle Countg COWD-tgwebsìte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Fq.cebook
Støg Infortned.! Sign up.for the Comtnuníty Deuelop¡nent Monthlg ß-Newsletter here.
MorgonBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.Sz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSS
EA6LECOUNTY
commun¡r
Developmeñt
Forwarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecounty. us>
Date: Wed, Mar 31 ,2021 al9:42 AM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo/ \Â/hitecloud
To: Megan Chester <maddY@rof.net>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Hi Megan,
Thank-you for sharing your comments with us. I will be sure they are included as part of the file for review when we are
asked to submit comments as a referral agency.
Stay well.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-í| website! For the most recent information, please
v i s it www.eag lec o u ntyc ov i d. o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881487895628'101&simpl=msg-f%3A16958814878... 112
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo/ \Mritecloud
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 al6:37 PM Megan Chester <maddy@rof.net> wrote:
, Commissioner McQueen,
I'm a resident in Missouri I leights adjacent to the prcrposerJ Ascerrdigo project. I lealize this is in Garfield County but I
ask that you weigh in on this issue. Ëagle County did a lot of work ¡n ¡ts lanO use plan to maintain a rural residential
focus for Missouri Heights. lf this land use ohangê ls approved if will have devastating impacts on the area including
traffic, noise, water issues, fire and wildlife impacts. Please stand up for your constituents rights.
Thank you,
Mary Megan Chester
: Sent from my iPhone
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%34169588'1487895628101&simpl=msg-f%3416958814878... 2t2
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Keep Missouri Heights Rural
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
ÊAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Keep Missouri Heights Rural
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fri, Apr 23,2021 at 1:37 PM
Stag Infortned! Sígnup,for the Conununìtg Deueloptnent Monthlg E-Neusletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Communþ Deveìopment Director
(o) gZo.¡z8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-qZbgSSS
EA6IE COUNTY
Commun¡w
Developmeñt
Forwarded message
From: Rhea Silverkorn <rhea.silverkorn@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2021 al1:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Keep Missouri Heights Rural
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Hey MB! This wasn't addressed to BoCC, so just sending to you :)
Rhea Silverkorn
Executive Coordinator
Eagle County Government
970-328-8612
www.eaglecounty.us
EAGLE COUNTY
BEttffit
Fonruarded message
From: Melinda Fouts <melinda@successstartswithyou'net>
Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2021 al12:52PM
Subject: Keep Missouri Heights Rural
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecountY. us>
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697861264860753869&simpl=msg-f%3416978612648.1t2
4126t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Keep Missouri Heiflhts Rural
I have lived in Missouri Heights for 17 years and am wr¡ting to express my concêrns about the Ascencligo pmject. First of
all, it will have a negative impact on the neighborhood in various ways with the additional traffic of the estimated 450 more
cars a day. The application doee not meet the land usc standards for the change proposed in several areas, the first
being is it violates the preservation of the rural nature and character of this area by being incompatible in the proposed
size and use and a negative impact on what are already scarce water resources. This area is very susceptible to wild
fires and there is limited access to evacuate from the area as experienced July 4, 2018. lf the fire had been moving faster
than it was, many lives would have been lost. We cannot afford an increase in this size for this very reason along with the
water issue.
This proposal is thoughtless in many ways, is narrow sighted, and should not be allowed
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Mefinla
A4 e {ûtcfa f out s, ? ft.D.
97o-274-313o
Executíye coaclihtg tt,itñ att iron-físt itt ayefyet g[ove.
hltp s t/www. I i n ked i n. c o m/ i n/ m e I i n d a -fo u ts/
nel h ula@s uccesssfarfsw lthyou. n et
succEss
i,Jîi,iYOU
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697861264860753869&simpl=msg-fo/o3416978612649... 2t2
4161202'l Eagle County Government Ma¡l - Fwd: Ascendigo proposal
G Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EACLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo proposal
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:10 PM
Wehaue aneta ßogle Countg COWD-tgwebsíte!
For the most recent information, please ußit www.eaglecountycovid'org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Stag Inforrned! Sígnup,for the Co¡ntnunÍtg Deueloptnent Monthlg E'Neuslettel here.
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Communþ Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8zSo
(c) gzo-+zt-gssS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡tv
Oevelopmeilt
Fonrarded message
From: Michelle Bassi <mbbassi.bassi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 10, 2021 al2:49 PM
Subject: Ascendigo proposal
To: <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Hello Morgan Beryl,
I am aresident in Missouri Heights and am writing to express my concern over the proposed Ascendigo
project west of the Garfield-Eagle county line. I am very worried about the impact on our environment and
resources and the increase in wild-fire hazards. Changing and expanding land use in this area is dangerous.
I have ABSOLUTELY NO issue with the potential campers on the autism spectrum. This is not about ASD
in my bacþard - autism is in our home and hearts! We have a daughter on the autism spectrum, and I am a
compassionate educator and have worked with special needs populations. I value Ascendigo's mission to
elevate and empower people on the spectrum.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881540412776517&simpl=msg-f%3416958815404... 112
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo proposal
I am, howcvcr, \trF,RY SCARED about the stressçs ancl the strain that this project will placc or1 our incredibly
dry and flagile environment. This project is vast. Water is a huge issue up here. The fire danger is very real.
I am worried about the firndraising, rentals, larger venues. and future resale as commercial. Do not change
the land use in the rural Missouri Heights area and open the doors to facilities that will further stress our
ecosystem.
The scope of this project lacks proper bounclaries ancl safety measures. This is not a small "educational" or
"agricultural" facility. This project is too large. The plan does not seem to control the flow of traffrc, nor the
number of people included in firndraising/rentals. It is not appropriate up here!
Thank you for your time,
Michelle Bassi
264 Sunrise Lane
Carbondale,CO 8L623
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3416958815404'12776517&simpl=msg-f%341 6958815404... 2t2
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch I LIPA-01-21-8826 | PLVA-O1-21-8827
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE CCIUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch I LIPA-O1 -21-8826 | PLVA-Of '21'8827
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:12 PM
We hcrue a Íteu) EøgIe Countg COWD-tg websíte!
For the most recent informøtion, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Stal¡ l4fonned"! Signup,îor tlæ Comtnunìty Deueloprnent Monthly E'Newslettel here.
Mot'gønBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.S,z8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-+Zt-gSSz
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡w
Developmeñt
Fonruarded message
From: Michelle Ferguson <smichelleferguson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2021 al7:02PM
Subject: Ascendigo Ranch I Ll PA-0 1 -2 I -8826 | PLVA- 01 -21 -8827
To: <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Hi Morgan,
I am a homeowner in Missouri Heights (Eagle County) and directly impacted by the Ascendigo Ranch application within
Garfield County. I wanted to providì my letter of support to you that I have submitted to the Garfield County BOCC and
Planning Commission. Thanli you for taking the time to hear my voice. Please don't hesitate to contact me with
any questions.
Warmly,
Michelle
RE:Ascendigo Ranch I LIPA-01-21-8826 | PLVA-O1-21-8827
I am a full-time homeowner in Missouri Heights. I am reaching out to you regarding the Ascendigo Ranch application.
Although we cannot physically see the educational facility from our home due to the dense trees and brush, this is in our
backyard and directly impacts our property.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881643991661263&simpl=msg-f%3416958816439. '. 112
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Ranch I LIPA-0'| -21-8826 | PLVA-01-21-8827
I have spent countless hours reviewing the application process, zoning, land use code, the subject application,
conrprelretrsive plarr, together with daily u¡¡nversations amongst neighbors.
That said, I am writing to you in support of Ascendigo Ranch to call Missouri Heights home for their educational facility.
Here's why...
Upon learning of the proposed educational facility, I was highly concerned! I would like to share with you that my list of
concerns were promptly addressed by Dan Richardson and Peter Bell by meeting me personally at the site. Walking the
property, having my questions answered and learning more of their "why" and vision was not only informative, but
refreshing coming from what some neighbors are calling the big bad wolf. They have selflessly been available to myself
and all of my neighbors to take phone calls, emails and even meet personally.
I assure you they are far from being the big bad wolf. This meeting prompted my own due diligence and it is my opinion
this educational facility should be approved:
> Children with autism are deserving to have a place that fits their special needs vs a traditional camp. Missouri Heights is
a safe and serene setting for them to thrive.
> This is a meaningful use of the land. The conceptual plan displays low density use and blends well with the character
of our neighborhood. I would much prefer to view a ranch with open space vs 21 homes and potential ADU's that would
likely impact our resources more tlran tlre subject application.
> I feel Ascendigo has gone above and beyond to take our neighborhood and limited resources into consideration.
> ln my opinion, this educational facility is within the land use code and GARCO Comprehensive Plan 2030.
> There are existing non-residential uses in Missouri Heights that our neighborhood enjoys. I feel Ascendigo Ranch will
enrich community spirit and gatherings. Like the other non-residential uses that are already here, Ascendigo Ranch has
taken great care in respecting our natural errvironrlerrt and surroullding neighbors.
> The location for Ascendigo Ranch is ideal for the safety of all. Although some improvements will be required - roads, fire
protection, water, etc. are already in place.
> This is not some big investment group coming into our community to dætroy our rural way of life ln Mlssouri Heights.
Ascendigo has been in Carbondale for over a decade proving their commitmont not only for autistic support, but to our
community as a whole.
I respect the concerns of my neighbors; however, I feel it would be incredibly selfish to not welcome Ascendigo Ranch
with open arms and see their vision become a reality. lnvesting in our youth and community is a WIN for ALL.
With Gratitude,
M ichelle Fer g u s on- C o ok
This transmigsion may contain information which is privileged, confidential, and protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, l8 U.S-C. Section
2510 etseq., and ifyou are notthe addressee, notethat any disclosure, copying, distribution, or useofthe contents ofthis message is shictly prohibited. lf
you have received this transmission in erro¡ please destroy ¡t and notify me immediately at 970-306-6996.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f7o3A1695881643991661263&simpl=msg-f%3416958816439... 2t2
4t12t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Support to Oppose Acendigo
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Support to Oppose Acendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Mon, Apr 12,2021 at 2:56 PM
Wehaue anew Eagle Countg COWD'tgwebsíte!
For the most recent information, pleqse uisit www.eaglecountycovid'org
One Valley Voice on Fqcebook
Støg Inf,or.rnetl! Signup.for tlte Co¡nmutúty Deuelop¡nent Monthlg ß-Newslettet here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Communþ Development Director
(o) gZo.Sz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-qZrgSgS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡ty
Development
Fonrarded message
F rom: Matt Scherr <matt. scherr@ea glecounty. us>
Date: Mon, Apr 12,2021 at2:40 PM
Subject: Re: Support to Oppose Acendigo
To: <michael.armstron9436@comcast. net>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Ascendigo project proposal, Michael. Eagle County is a Referral Agency on
this Garfield County land use file, and your comments are useful to us in drafting the county's input on the file.
Thanks again for your email, Michael.
Matt Scherr
Chai¡ Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
97o-376-4449 (m)
www.eaglecounty.us
Fon¡narded message
From: Mike Armstrong <michael.armstron9436@comcast'net>
Date: Fri, Apr 9,2021 at 4:36 PM
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696869618394419693&simpl=msg-f%3416968696183.1t2
411212021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Support to Oppose Acendigo
Subject: Support to Oppose Acendigo
Tu. eagleadrrrirr@eaglecounty.us <eagleadmin@eaglecounty. us>
We encourage Eagle County to strongly oppose the proposed Ascendigo development, including written comments to
Garfield County and active participation in any hearings. Our concern is that Garfield County will make a decision on
the Ascendigo Land Holdings application which will primarily impact Eagle County. The proposal violates the provisions
of the Mid Valley Comprehensive Area Plan for Eagle County, as will as the Garfield County Land Use Code and
provisions of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030, ln addition, the proposal uses the alternative of 21 home
sites as basis for comparison of impact while the GARCO LUDC allows only 15. This subterfuge in itself raises
concern about the veracity of the entire application.
Following are a few reasons the County Commissioners should take an active role in this issue.
- Greatly increased traffic that will primarily utilize Eagle County roads, including Upper Cattle Creek,
Fender, Paseo (an unpaved residential street) and Sunset Lane (an unpaved private street). While
residents of Sunset Lane have informed the GARCO planning staff of their intent to close the road at the
intersection of Sunset Lane with Harmony Road shor.rld this development be approved, enforcement may
become an Eagle County responsibility and that would be a real burden in this remote corner of the county.
Traffic will be an especially serious problem during construction, which has not been addressed ln the
Ascendigo proposal.
- Emergencies and evacuations occurring on the site will involve districts located in Eagle Cor"rnty and will
place a greater demand for services on them as compared to the alternative single-family residences.
- The large buildings; including lodging, activity center, administrative center and a commercial kitchen that
will serve 100 or more people three times daily; right on the border of Eagle County, are not compatible with
the rural large lot single family home sites and scattered population. The development would also set a
precedent for future commercial development.
- The threat of wildfires is real and a large commercial operation is likely to exacerbate that problem.
Evacuating the large concentration of people would place a hurclen on limiterl evacuation rorúes and hinder
the evacuatiotr of surrounding neighborhood residents, most of them in Eagle County.
This proposed development is clearly not in the best interest of Eagle County residents.
Michael and Elke Armstrong
436 Paseo Road
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1696869618394419ô93&simpl=msg-f%3A16968696183... 2t2
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
G Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Fri, Apr 23,2021 at 4:55 PM
Stay Inf,ornted! Sígnupfor the Convnunìty Developnwnt Monthlg E'Newsletter here.
MorgonBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-4Zt-gSSg
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡ty
Development
Fon¡varded message
From: <laurelia@arise.love>
Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at3:12 PM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Cc: <keepmohrural@gmail.com>
Please find the attached letter,
Have a lovely day,
Nancy DeWind
Ð Ascendigo.docx
20K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341697873708074011529&simpl=msg-f7o3416978737080.1t1
April23,2021
Dear Eagle County officials: Jeanne McQueeney, Eagle County District 3 Commissioner, and
Morgan Beryl, Eagle County Govemment, Community Development Director,
I am writing with strong concerrìs regarding the Ascencligo proposal in Missouri Heights. Please
consider our voice as you formulate your opinion and course of action concerning this.
Phase 1. This is a multiphase project, for which this current proposal only represents the
frrst phase. On their website, Ascendigo only presents a beginning image of a multistage
plan. Will there be a building limit? Will what is approved today be changed tomorrow?
Key factors of potentially grcater impaol. oould occur also in the later planning approvals
that would build upon this one-should it be approved.
I Once major infrastructure for a public service is created, it changes the
landscape forever. It rarely stops there. Sometimes it is gradual, but the
foundation has been changed. Former Eagle County Commissioner Bud Gates
once said," Once the land is gone, it is gone." Will this special use permit
actually function as a re-zoning? If it does, this land use change within a
residential setting proposed by Ascendigo (i.e. a ski park, camps) will
permanently cut away the rural nature of this part of Missouri Heights. Noise
also changes nature of land. Noise and accumulative anthropogenic noise
travels across regions of Misourri Heights. Bud Gates further said, "You onn
never get it back". Thc Asccndigo statcmcnt comparcs thc impacts of this
development vs. the existing approved residential sites does not appear to be
backed by any actual studies. Rather, these comparisons seem to be merely
hased on opinion.
a
a
ô Special Use Permit: lt appears this will need to be a commercial special use.
Many thousands of people dwell here for its beauty and un-suburban aspects.
This land and buildin g area does not represent a new "region" for
development, as Ascendigo also noted on their website. This is an important
point to consider on behalfofthe current residents. It is part ofa larger open
vista and area in an established region, and much care over decades and
decades has been taken by both county land planners, home and land buyers to
preserve and develop this area with care in accordance to its rural character
and nature.
This proposal is beyond a single county issue. Garfield County extends all the way to the
Utah border, and we are in Eagle County, just east of the eastern edge of Garfield. Fringe
areas of counties sometimes struggle to have their voice heard when legislation is made
directly impacting them. This can be true in our area for both Eagle and Garfield
Counties. Impacts of traffic, noise, 24-hour necessitated lighting, fire and water
concerns, and municipal services will affect both Eagle and Garfield County residents.
a
I Traffic and noise (an aggregate issue):
staff and participants travel in groups, often in 12 passenger vans, which
inherently creates less \rffic than single-occupant vehicles. We will travel
offsiÍe less because there will be more actívities to do on-site. lí/e have
committed to a shuttle system for staff and for communiÍy events, which we
have committed to limiting to a maxintum of 2 per year." This response
does not adequately address significant daily traffic for a public service
located in a residential zoned area. Clients, workers, and volunteers need
to travel to the actual site as the place of the program, not as the point of
departure for programs; either way, the logistics of a 12 person filled van
travelling to and from the 126 acre site on a daily basis and throughout the
day as needed does not seem feasible.
trffic engineer will be asked to recommend actions to ensure our guests
and sÍafi'use County Road 102, Fender, and Harmony Lanesfor access."
This response indicates the traffic issue will just shift to these above sited
roads, including the main road, Upper Cattle Creek Road which feeds
Fender on the East access to Missouri Heights. We live adjacent to Upper
Cattle Creek Road, and we can testify to accidents and driving patterns
already occurring. With this increase in traffic, significant noise increases.
t WATER. I know you have received many letters about this! It has always
been a factor of life in Misourri Heights as a precious resource. Historically
potable water had to be brought up this side of Upper Cattle Creek, and people
took to guarding the reservoir. Was news of a potential water ski park for
Ascendigo true?
Lighting. What will the impact of 24hr lighting, even dark lighting be? I feel
concerned for the adjacent property owners on whom this could have a strong and
constant change to their landscape.
Thank you so much for your time and care reading this, and thank you for your chosen path to
best serve the people of Colorado and Eagle County here.
Truly,
Nancy DeWind
1848 Upper Cattle Creek Rd
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
4t26t2021 Eagle County Govornment Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo's Commercerial Development in a Rural Neighborhood
Kris Valdez <kris,valdez@eaglecou nty.us>EA6LE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo's Commercer¡al Development ¡n a Rural Neighborhood
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Mon, Apr 26,2021at 9:22 AM
Stay lrTforrneù! Sígnupfor the Contmunìty Deuelopntent Monthlg E-Newslettet here.
MttrgunBergl
Eagle County Govelnment
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gzo-+zt-gsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Communiù
Developmeit
Fonruarded messãge
From: Matt Scherr <matt.scherr@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Sun, Apr 25, 2021 al l2:38 PM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo's Commercerial Development in a Rural Neighborhood
To: Natasha Soby <natashasoby@gmail.com>
Cc: Rhea Silverkorn <rhea.silverkorn@eaglecounty.us>, Morgan Beryl <morgan,beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Ascendigo project, Natasha. Eagle County is a referral agency and
will be submi,tting comments to Garfield County on the file. Those comments include areas we feel the project conforms
with the Mid-Valley Community Plan and areas we feel are concerning or do not conform to the plan. We will request that
Garfield County consider the Eagle County Mid-Valley Community Plan as it considers the proposal for approval.
Thanks again for your email, Natasha!
Matt Scherr
Chai¡ Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-4aa9 @)
www.eaglecount-rr.us
On Sat, Apr 24,2021 al 12:45 PM Natasha Soby <natashasoby@gmail.com> wrote:
Many of us either grew up in the area and are witnessing massive change/growth, or moved here to become' part of a communit¡r that is very different than where we came from. The people drew us in. Authentic,
compassionate, and neighbors so good that we can live halñnay across the country from family. This
community has created new families for many of us. Many articles have been written about the dangers of
Ascendigo moving into our quiet neighborhood in Missouri Heights, addressing zoning, land use issues,
failures to meet statutes and communityr goals, so I want to discuss the human component. This change in
zoning will completely change the nature of why most of us have made our forever home in Missouri Heights.
Sound travels significantly up here, and we all hear a dog bark at 1000 yards, a simple conversation, etc. We've
sought to escape the clty llghts, traffic, sounds, etc. It's rural, and we appreciate the quiet. This change to our
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341698116993588601909&simpl=msg-f%3A1698116993s8...1t2
4t2612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo's Commercerial Development in a Rural Neighborhood
beloved community will impact traffic, water, impact propefi values, disrupt the wildlife, bikers, etc. All of us
are impacted. So my question to Ascendigo is this, to date -400 people, many of whom live in Missouri
Heights, have signed a petition stating this is not the right location for your proiect. Why not find a |ocation
where there will be no opposition, only happiness for your business? Missouri Heights is not the first location
attempted for Ascendigo's campus. Like their Missouri Heights neighbors, the residents of the other locations
also pointed out stark inappropriateness of a commercial campus in a residential neighborhood and
successfully made their case that these residential areas were not a good fit. lt's clear that the appropriate
location for Ascendigo's campus is an area closer to the emergency services and other amenities that they've
stated will be heavily used, an area designated for commercial or mixed use such as those on the valley floor.
lf we lose the magi6lthat makes our beautiful community so spec¡al, than it won't just be the people in Missouri
Heights that are driven out, This town will be one step closer to the rest of America struggling with how to love
their neighbors like themselves. Please do the right thing. As it's said, the wrong thing is still wrong even if
everybody else is doing it. The right thing is still the right thing, even if nobody else is doing it. The VAST
MAJORITY of your neighbors are telling you that we oppose this. Missouri Heights has come together to say
no (www.keepmohrural.com), Despite the important work that you do, this is the wrong place for this proiect'
Please listen to the protests and please reconsider.
Please help to support this project moving to a more appropriate area! We truly appreciate your support in this
matter!
Warmly,
Natasha Soby
181 Harmony Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341698116993588601909&simpl=msg-f%34169811699358... 212
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Supporting the Ascendigo Ranch
EA6LE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecor¡nty,us>
Fwd: Supporting the Ascendigo Ranch
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:28 PM
Strag Inforttrecl! Sign upfot tlnre Convnunítg Deuelopnrc¡ú NIonthly E-Newsletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Goverruuent
Communþ Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-qZt-gSZZ
EAGLE COUNTY
CommuniN
Developmeñt
Fonruarded messåge
From: n I gol wlllêrton <ni gclwillcrtonq@hotmail. com>
Date: Tue, Apr20, 2021 at2:14PM
Subject: Suppoñing the Ascendigo Ranch
To: morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Dear Ms. Beryl,
Please find attached a letter of support for the Ascendigo Ranch in Missouri Heights in Garfield County
bordering Eagle County
Sincerely,
Nigel & Triny Willerton
¡61 Wilferton Letter in support of the Ascendigo Ranch - April 2021- Eagle Gounty.docx" 14K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697592654308369040&simpl=msg-f%3416975926543... 1t'l
Nigel & Maria Willerton
1-575 Mariposa Avenue
Boulder CO 80302
USA
2}th April2O2I
By email to Morgan Beryl, Community Development Director - Eagle County
morga n.bervl @eaglecountv.us
Dear Ms Beryl,
As the parents of an adult son on the autistic spectrum, I am writing in support of the Ascendigo
Ranch project proposed in the Missouri Heights area of Garfield County that borders Eagle
County.
Ascendigo has brought significant benefits to the quality of our 23-year old son's life with the
residential and educational support services they provide to him in Carbondale. The program has
enabled him find employment in Glenwood Springs, allowing him to make a positive economic
contribution to his local community and growing his confidence and self-esteem.
We discovered Ascendigo through the summer camp outdoor activity programs. A significant
purpose of the ranch is to extend and grow those opportunities, helping more children and young
adults with disabilities similar to Cameron.
I find it hard to believe that the main objections to such a rural ranch project are environmental
concerns, given the alternative is the development of a significant number of new homes which
would have a far greater negative impact. Ascendigo is an educational facility that will develop
the land into the proposed ranch in a far less dense and environmentally friendly manner. Our
knowledge of the Ascendigo management and mission makes me confident that they will be
extremely conscious of conserving wildlife, maximizing open space and minimizing any negative
environmental impact.
Therefore as parents of a young man who benefits from the Ascendigo programs, and as regular
visitors to the Roaring Fork Valley to hike & cycle, and Western Colorado generally, we sincerely
request your support of the Ascendigo limited impact review and the development of the
Ascendigo Ranch project.
Sincerely,
N,4eL Wllt-rtow
Nigel & Maria Willerton
411312021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-O1-21-8826 A PLVA-O.
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valclez <kris,va lclez@eag lecou rrty. us>
Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Ghange in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-
01 -21-8826 & P LVA-o 1 -21 -8827
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Tue, Apr '13,2021 at 9:34 AM
We hsue arr.eu) ßø:gle Countg COVID-tq websíte!
For the most recent i4formation, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Støy hdornred! Sign up-for tlte C¡ttttntutútg Deuelupnrc¡tl Mortlhlg -6-ÀIeroslel|er here.
MorganBeryl
Eaglc County Covcrnmcnt
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) 97o-47r-9533
EAGTE COUNTY
Coñmuniw
Developmeñt
Fon¡varded message
From: Matt Scherr <matt.scherr@eaglecounty. us>
Date: Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-O1-21-8826 & PLVA-01-21-8827
To: <nsmeins@gmail.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thanks very much for sharing your thoughts on the Ascendigo project, Nikki. Eagle County is a Referral Agency on the
Garfield County file for the proposal, and your comments are useful to us as we draft our official input.
And of côt trsê he st trc vnl I nrnvida vôr rr nñmmênf c fn l?arfield lìnr rnfrr narfi¡r rlarlrr ¡e fha nrnia¡f ralrfec fn f hair nrrrn
regulations and community plans.
Best,
Matt Scherr
Chait Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-4449 (m)
wwweaglecounty.us
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696939976553088376&simpl=msg-f%3416969399765... 113
4t13t2021 Eagle County covernment Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-01-21-8826 & PLVA-0..
Fonruarded message
From: Nikki Macleod <nsmeins@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 12,2021 al'l:17 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-01-21-8826 & PLVA-01-21-8827
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecounty. us>
Dear Eagle County Commissioners
I live on Escalante Road which is in the neighborhood next to the proposed development for
Ascendigo . ln 2018 we were evacuated from our home in a fury. I have never been so frightened
running in and out of our house collecting our belongings as the fire roared on the hillside less
than a mile away. We had to leave in the middle of the night and we had to leave fast.
tn the last year we have had our water turned off multiple times due to subdivision issues as well
as Iow water pressure. Residents of MH already run into major issues such as fire risk and water
issues, I can't imagine this being a responsible place to bring at risk children and adults.
Evacuating my family was a challenge, I can't imagine evacuating a large number of people in
the case of a middle of the night wildfire emergency. Add the water issues on top, and that alone
is enough from my personal experience in this neighborhood to realize this is not a good place
for such a large commercial development.
Below are more reasons that the Keep Missouri Heights Rural team have put together. Please
consider all of this in your decision. I have a personal connection to Ascendigo and they do
incredible things, but MH is not the right place for that.
I am a supporter of Keep MO Heights Rural, a non-profit organization formed to oppose the Ascendigo Land
Holdings application currently before the Gadield County BOCC. We, as neighboring Eagle County residents, are
opposed to this proposed commercial development. This development flies in the face of the plain written language
of the Garfield County Land Use Code; provisions of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 and provisions
of the Mid Valley Comprehensive Area Plan for Eagle County. Following are a few of reasons the County
Commissioners should take an active role in this matter.
. Greatly increased traffic that will primarily utilize Eagle County roads, including Upper Cattle Creek, Fender,
Paseo and Sunset Lane, a private street. Residents of Sunset Lane have informed the GARCO planning staff
of their intent to close the road at the intersection of Sunset Lane with Harmony Road should this development
be approved.
. Because of mutual aid agreements between various Fire Districts, any emergencies occurring on the site or
evacuations that may occur, will necessarily involve those districts located in Eagle County and will place a
greater demand for services on them as compared to single-family residences. Please note that the Ascendigo
application inaccurately represents that 21 homes is the basis for comparison to their proposed development.
The correct number of home sites that could be constructed today under GARCO LUDC is 15 homesites.
. The large buildings, including lodging, activity center, administrative center and a commercial kitchen that will
serve the daily concentration of 100, plus people, three times daily, are not compatible with the rural large lot
single family homesites and scattered population.
. The threat of evacuation because of wildfires is real and evacuating the concentration of people during the
height of fire season endangers the surrounding neighborhood residents, most of them in Eagle County.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1696939976553088376&simpl=msg-f%3416969399765... 213
4t13t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Property Holdings Change in Land Use Application; file no. LIPA-o1 -21"8826 & PLVA-o.
. There is strong opposition to this proposed development from both Eagle and Garfield County residents. We
do know that numerous letters have been written to both Garfield and Eagle County off¡cials in opposition to
this development. We started a petition drive just a couple of weeks ago and have over 180 signatures
demonstrating that there is wide opposition in the community.
The Roaring Fork Valley governments have a strong history of working together and requesting input from adjacent
governments when new development is proposed and particularly when it is a development, like this application, that
literally abuts the adjoining county line, which is Eagle County. I strongly encourage Eagle County to place maximum
pressure on Garfield County to seek input from the adjoining Eagle County as outlined in the Mid Valley
, Comprehensive Area Plan as this proposed development is clearly not in the best interest of neighboring Eagle
County residents. We encourage Eagle County to strongly oppose this development including the submittal of
written comments to Garfield County and an appearance at the hearing which will likely be scheduled in mid-May.
Sincerely,
NikkiMacLeod
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341696939976553088376&simpl=msg-f%3416969399765... 3/3
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Ma¡l - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 1:26 PM
Stag¡ Inforrned.! Sígnupfor the Conununity Deuelopntent Monthly E-Neusletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-+zt-gszS
EAGLE COUNTY
commun¡s
DevelÞpmeñt
Fonruarded message
From: <paris@arise.love>
Date: Thu, Apr 22, 2021 al 12:46 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Proposal
To: <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>, <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>
Dear Eagle County officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposition
While I value Ascendigo and believe in their mission, I do not think it appropriate for them to be located in a residential area. I
understand the property is in Garfield County and the planning department there will make the decision, but those of us who are
residents of Eagle County will be strongly affected as well. A few concerns include the unreasonable water usage required for this
operation, increased traffic and travel through neighborhood regions, and the ever-present potential for wildfire, like many of us
experienced with Lake Christine. My main concern, however, ìs preservingthe beautiful, quìet character of our neighborhood and
residential communities and families. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. lt will be an Eagle County problem and those of
us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
On behalf of the Missouri Heights residents, families, ranchers and farmers, I ask you to hear our concern regarding this operation.
I truly hope we can work together to figure out another option that will keep our communities quiet and safe and allow Ascendigo
to fulfill their vision in a more appropriate location.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697769944510978999&simpl=msg-f%3416977699445... 112
4n6D021 Eagle Gounty Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal
Thank you for your time,
Paris DeWind
1848 Upper Cattle Çreek Road
Carbondale, CO 81623
https://m4il.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341697769944510978999&simpl=msg-fo/o3A16977699445... 212
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EA6LE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Wed, Apr 21,2021 al4:52PM
Stag Infonned! Signupfor the Cotnntuní[¡ Deueloptnent Monthly E-Neusletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Govemment
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.Zz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSZS
EA6LE COUNTY
Commun¡ù
Developmeñt
Fonryarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 4:15 PM
Subject: Fwd: Ascendigo
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Another one for the file
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagte County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v is it www. ea g lec o u ntycov i d. o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Forwarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecounty'us>
Date: Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at3:52 PM
Subject: Re:Ascendigo
To: Patrick Henry <pjhenry1 O@yahoo.com>
Hello Patrick,
Thank you for sharing your concerns with me regarding the Ascendigo proposal. I will be sure they are included as part of
the referral comments we make to Garfield County.
Stay well.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697692321754766740&simpl=msg'fo/03A16976923217 '. '1t2
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Jeanlre McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v is it www.eagleco u ntyc ov i d. o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
On Wed, \pr21,2021 al1:10 PM Patrick Henry <pjhenry10@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Eagle County officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. there will make the decision, Eagle
County will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and
fire and water concerns, but the Eagle County munlclpal servlces wlll be called upon glven the proxlmlty to the
propefi, It's right on the county line, From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of
our road infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue
coming with it to mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. It will be
an Eagle County problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seenr to be facirrg more and nrore drought every year.
We are seeing the effects of climate change, And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and
animals from that single road access point should we have another fire, The alternative subdivision of homes would
be developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location.
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
tuture commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
' We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%34169769232'1754766740&simpl=msg-fo/03416976923217 ... 212
4t2612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Kris Valdez <kris,valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@ea glecounty. us>
Wed, Apr 2'1,2021 at 1 :19 PM
Stay Infottned! Signupfor. the Contununitg Deuelopntettt Monthlg E-Newsletter here'
Mot'gønBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.Sz8.87So
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSgS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commun¡ty
Development
Fonruarded message
From: Patrick Henry <pjhenry1 O@yahoo.com>
Date:Wed, Apr21,2021 al1:11 PM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Dear Eagle County officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights'
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. there will make the decision, Eagle
County will cèrtainly be negatively impacted, Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and fire
and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal services will be called upon given the proximity to the propefi'
It's right on the county line. From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of our road
infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue coming with it to
mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. It will be an Eagle County
problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this'
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more drought every year.
We are seeing the effects of climate change. And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and
animals from that single road access point should we have another fire. The alternative subdivision of homes would be
developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location.
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809d5gy¡s\ /=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697678948772562142&simpl=msg-f%3416976789487 ... 112
4t26t2021
Patrick & Velma Henry
99 Fender Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697678948772562142&simpl=msg-f%3416976789487... 2t2
4t6t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo application
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd : Ascendigo application
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@ea glecou nty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:14 PM
Wehsue anew Eøgle Countg COWD-tgwebsíte!
For the most recent informøtion, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Stag InfonnedJ Sìgnup,fot, the Corntnunìtg Deuelopment Monthlg E-Newsletter here.
MorgonBeryl
Eagle County Govemment
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.S,z8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-4Zt-gSSg
EAGLE COUNTY
cÒmmuñiñ
Developmeít
Fonrarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Wed, Mar 31 ,2021 at 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo application
To: Patti Dudley <ppdudley@gmail.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
HiPatti,
Thank you for sharing your comments with us. I will be sure they are included as part of the file for review when we are
asked to submit comments as a referral agency.
Stay well.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v i s it www.eag I ec o u ntyc ov i d.o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881767749666761 &simpl=msg-f%3416958817677 '.. 112
4161202'l Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo application
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 al2:22 PM Patti Dudley <ppdudley@gmail.com> wrote:
Jeanne McQueeney,
l've lived in Mlssouri Heights for 20 years, and want to express my opposition to the proposed Ascendigo project, Wo moved up here to live in a. rural, quiet setting. This development has no place in a residential neighborhood with so many difficult íssues.
Harmony Road is dirt, and has always had issues with maintenance. Adding lots of traffic is only going to make it WAY worse, Lights, traffic,
water, fire danger. lt seems to be a tenible choice for this type of development. lsn't it zoned residential?
Please consider denying this request, and find a more suitable location.
Thank you,
Paul & Patricia Dudley
212 Blue Creek Trail
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881767749666761&simpl=msg-fo/03416958817677 ... 2t2
4t2612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,2021 at 8:1 9 AM
Stay In"fortned! Sígrtttp.for the Canununítg Deuelopntent Mo¡tthlg E'Newslettet here'
MorgønBeryl
Eagìe County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-+zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Community
Development
Fonrarded message
From: Penney Evans-Carruth <Penney.Carruth@aspensnowmasssir.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 5:08 PM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Hi Morgan
I am writing in opposition to the Ascendigo application for development in Garfield County. While I realize
the property is not in Eagle, I know that Missouri Heights will be affected. I live in Missouri Heights.
I support all the opposition points raised by KMOHR ... Keep Missouri Heights Rural, My additional concern
is the ability of the non-profit to maintain and sustain itself in the future, The development is huge,
expensive, and complicated. It will take considerable staff and funding to keep it safe and sustainable. I
am concerned that a good cause has taken on more than it can handle financially and almost any other
way,
If the development was in a commercial zone, the financial viability would not be my concern. But a
commercial development in a residential zone is a concern to me!
If I am not mistaken, Eagle County Commissioners can weigh in, expressing our concerns. I ask you to
do so by opposing the develoPment.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697750667239169986&simpl=msg-Ío/o3A169775O6672 1t2
4t26t2021
Thank you ,,,
Penney Evans Carruth
601 Vista Hi Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-379-9733
Eagle County Government Mail -Fwd: Ascendif,o
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Project
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
E.AGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Project
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecou nty. us>
Thu, Apr 1,2021 at 5:10 PM
We haue a new Eagle Countg COVID-tq websìte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Fs.cebook
Støg Infotmed.! Signupfor the Comtnunìtg Deuelopment Monthlg E'Newsletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSgg
EAGLE COUNTY
Communily
Development
Fon¡varded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>
Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2021 al 12:46 PM
Subject: Fwd: Ascendigo Project
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
For the file
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v is it www.eag I ec o u ntyc ov i d. o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Fonruarded message
From: Peter GilbeÉ <peterl gilbert2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:08 AM
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881498416797749&simpl=msg-f%3416958814984... 112
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Project
Subject: Ascendigo Project
To: <jeanne. mcqueeney@eaglecou nty. us>
Dear Ms. McQueeny,
I am very concerned about the Ascendigo Project and its effect on the rural nature of the western part of Missouri
Heights.
The intense use with 24 residents, 50 plus staff and events with up to 100 guests will dramatically increase traffic and
noise with perheps 450 round trip vehicles per day.
I live off of County Road 100 and have already been subjected to increased traffic over recent years with many vehicles
greatly exceedlng posted speed limits. The intersection of CR 100 and Rt 82 already sees many accidents each year. The
Ascendigo Project will certainly increase the number of safety issues.
There are so meny other reasons to reject this project, including excess water use and its precedent for other commercial
development in this area and loss of tax revenue due to the projects non profit status.
Missouri Heights is the wrong location for this project.
Sincerely,
Peter Gilbert
4480 CR 100
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fl/o341695881498416797749&simpl=msg-fo/o3416958814984... 212
4t12t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Project
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty,us>
EACLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Project
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fri, Apr 9,2021 alll:27 AM
Wehque anew Eagle Countg COWD-tgwebsìte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice onFs.cebook
Stcrg Inf,otrned! Signup.for the Cotntnunítg Deueloprnent Monthlg ß-Newsletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSZ
EAGLE COUNTY
Coñmuniw
Developûeñt
Fonryarded message
From: Brandon, Robert <Robert. Brandon@broadwayacrossamerica'com>
Date: Fri, Apr 9,2Q21 at 10:20 AM
Subject: RE: Ascendigo Project
To: morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Now attached. Apologiesl
From: Brandon, Robert
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 10:17 AM
To:'morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us' <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Subject: Ascendigo Project
Please see the attached letter regarding the Ascendigo Project proposed for Missouri Heights
Thank you.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341696584687322267166&simpl=msg-f%3416965846873..1t2
4t12t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Project
Robert A. Brandon, Esq.
405 Skipper Drive, Carbondale, CO 81623
bobbrandonny@gmail.com
917.421.5497 (direct) I 917.882.1 375 (mobile)
CONFIDENTIAL This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or prior e-mail messages attached to it, may contain
confidential information that is legally privileged. lf you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the
information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly prohibited. lf you have received this transmission in
erro¡ please notiff the sender immediately and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or
saving in any manner.
Ð Ascendigo -- Letter to the Garfield and Eagle Gounty Boards of County Commissioners.docx
17K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/03A1696584687322267166&simpl=msg-fo/03416965846873... 212
ROBERTA. BRANDON
405 SKIPPER DRIVE
CARBONDALE, COLORADO 8L623
(9I7) 882-1375 / bobbra ndon ny@gma i l.com
April9,2027
To the Garfield and Eagle County Boards of County Commissioners:
I am a resident of Missouri Heights who opposes the proposed Ascendigo Camp development based on the
environmental concerns already articulated by many of my neighbors--a drain on an already scarce water supply;
a dramatic increase in traffic on our limited roadways (also, Fender and Catherine Store Rd. are a destination for
many cyclists from miles around, and the estimated 250-450 vehicles on peak days will pose an inherent risk to
our two-wheeled friends); increased fire risks; and significant evacuation challenges that will put campers and
emergency first responders in danger (both in Garfield and Eagle County). Moreover, local real estate agents have
opined that property values in Mo. Heights could decrease by 2O%; once one such a project is permitted, others
while be inclined to develop here, and our uncluttered, quiet way-of-life will be irreparably altered.
Before I am called a NIMBY meanie, note that I fully support the great work that Ascendigo does. Before moving
to Mo. Heights, I lived next door to a family for twenty years that had an autistic child who I watched grow into a
productive and happy young man. I totally support "the cause;" but our rural setting is not the appropriate
location for this business venture.
I am troubled by Ascendigo's ever-changing statistics, e.g., the estimated 450 cars during peak times have been
mysteriously lowered to 250 cars...it's still too many for our limited roads. Many of those vehicles will presumably
crowd in during two hour time periods (e.g., during the weekly "farewell" dinners), posing unavoidable and
unprecedented traffic backups. I also question management's claims that they are "committed" to various
mitigating concessions, implying some promise that, in truth, is not at all binding on Ascendigo. They can and
likely will change their minds when financial realities require them to increase the number of campers, the weeks
operating at full capacity, the dinners for 100+ persons, the number of fundraisers per year and maybe even the
number of physical structures on-site. Absent a binding agreement (perhaps with surrounding HOA's, and with
financial penalties for breaching the empty representations, "anticipations" and expectations currently professed
in Ascendigo's marketing materials), Ascendigo's claims are arguably nothing more than self-serving puffery.
I also question whether my neighbors can sufficiently voice our opposition in a public hearing if it is limited to one
day. Almost 220 neighbors in the immediate vicinity have signed a petition opposing the project; many more are
also expected to sign. A single hearing would fly in the face of the transparency and concern for neighbors that
Ascendigo proudly boasts. Ascendigo: Why don't you urge the Commissioners to revise their plans to
accommodate a more expansive public forum?
It is hard to believe that Ascendigo would spend over $¡ lVl¡llion to acquire land without some kind of advance
assurances that the requisite final approvals would be granted. So are the hearings just for show? Ascendigo's
Chief Operating Officer is also Carbondale's mayor; to the extent the Town will be submitting any position paper
regarding Ascendigo...how can it be impartial? I fully understand that Carbondale has no decisionaljurisdiction
here, but all of us in Mo. Heights patronize Carbondale businesses (and we consider Carbondale "our town"). l'd
like to think the Town would take no position or perhaps oppose the project given its adverse impact on many
hundreds of local residents (and relatively few of the campers will be local). That said, I won't be surprised if the
Town is more politically inclined to support Ascendigo (in light of the mayo/s corporate position there, and
Ascendigo being one of the Town's largest employers).
Garfield and Eagle County Boards of County Commissioners
April9,202L
Page 2
My understanding is that the Ascendigo project cannot legally proceed unless it meets the definition of an
"educational facility" under the County's Land Use Code. The company has therefore recently been stressing that
characterizat¡on in its mater¡als), but their program descriptions primarily focus on outdoor activities, sports and
therapy, with off-season seminars for training professional therapists (not seminars for those struggling with
autism). Ascendigo is not and has never been an educationalfacilitv. The project is to be a therapeutic camp
facility during the summer with other events and business during the rest of the year. One need only look to the
company's own 2019 Form 990 Financial Disclosure to see it's not an educational facility-ORGANIZATION
MISSION: OUTDOOR EXPERIENCES AND CLINICAL THERAPY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH AUTISM
SPECTRUM DISORDERS.
The Commissioners should only consider educational elements if they are the primary purpose of the project,
which is not the case. Ascendigo's recent pointing to "educational" elements is a mere "smokescreen" to detract
from what Ascendigo has always been and would be in Mo. l-leights-an outdoor camp and year-round program
with therapeutic goals. Querie: lf IKEA were to move to Mo. Heights and host a monthly educational seminar
about furniture assembly, would the Commissioncrs dccm IKEA to bc an educational facility? lt's an absurd
hypothetical but my point is that the Code cannot possibly have intended that a mere incidental educational
element justifies permitting an otherwise commercial, camping business to move into a rural community.
The IRS uses the NationalTaxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE) system to classify nonprofit organizations, based
on descriptive data in applications for tax-exempt status. An NTEE code designates a charity by its primary
purpose. Ascendigo files its Forms 990 with Guidestar, a widely recognized resource for informational profiles of
non-profit groups. Ascendigo lists in its own Guidestar profile the following NTEE code-
N20- Organizations that operate facllltles for cooperatlve group llvlng experlences ln the out-of-doors; and
which provide opportunities to learn campcraft, nature lore and conservation, and participate in a wide range
of indoor and outdoor recreational, athletic and group social activities including cookouts. Nowhere in its
Guidestar profile does Ascendigo list any NTEE code assigned to educationalfacilities. lt is not what they do.
I respectfully submit that the Garfield County Commissioners are precluded by the facts and law from permitting
Ascendigo's proposed development from being built. I encourage the Commissioners from both Counties to
oppose the proposed project; it is opposed by the overwhelming majority of persons living in Missouri Heights.
Ascendigo should put this worthwhile project in a more suitable location.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Brandon, Esq.
405 Skipper Drive
Carbondale, CO 8L623
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal in Missouri Heights
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
ËAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal in Missouri Heights
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 1:21 PM
Stay Infot tned! Sígntrpfor. tÈ.e Convnunity Deuelopntent Monthlg lì-Neusletter here.
Mot'ganBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-+zt-gssS
EA6LE COUNTY
CommuniN
Developmeót
Fonruarded message
From: Sarah Kaiman <sarahlwolff@gmail.com>
Date:Wed, Apr21,2021at 1:09 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Proposal in Missouri Heights
To: <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
HiMorgan,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
I live right on the border of Eagle and Garfield counties. The proposed Ascendigo development will also affect both
counties, so I am writing both Garfield and Eagle Co contacts'
First of all, the land is zoned rural-residential. If we can't count on zoning to keep these kinds of things out of our
area/ I have no confidence in government,
Missouri Heights residents will be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and fire and water concerns. The roads and
infrastructure are not designed to support this development. In fact, the roads leading to the proposed site are the
worst in Missouri Heights and currently have very little traffic. I hear that Ascendigo will not bring any revenue to help
with all of this stuff, That is bewildering. Many wells are already running out of water. The Ascendigo water use will
be huge compared to the amount that would be consumed with rural residential use,
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
Thanks,
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permlhid=thread-f%3A'1697679059910983473&simpl=msg-f%3416976790599' '. 112
4t26t2D21 Eagle County Govemment Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal in Missouri Heights
Sarah Kaiman
1253 Kings Row St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
Sarah Kaiman
720-648-7893
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 4:53 PM
Stcry Inforntedl Sígnup.îot the Cotnmunity Deuelopntent Mottthlg E-Neusletter here.
MorgønBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gzo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-+zt-gSgS
EAGLE COUNTY
ComñuniN
Developmeít
Fonryarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>
Date:Wed, Apr21,2021 at4:15 PM
Subject: Fwd: Ascendigo
To: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
ln case you didn't get this one already.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v i s it www.eag I ec o u ntyc ov i d,o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
Fonrarded message
From: Jeanne McQueeney <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>
Date:Wed, Apr21,2021at 3:53 PM
Subject: Re:Ascendigo
To: Sarah Kaiman <sarahlwolff@gmail.com>
Hello Sarah,
Thank you for sharing your concerns with me regarding the Ascendigo proposal. I will be sure they are included as part of
the referral comments we make to Garfield County.
Stay well.
https://ma¡l.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=threadJ%341697692376226031238&simpl=msg-f%341 6976923762' '.1t2
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Jêânne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 yrrebsifeJ For the most recent information, please
v i s it www. eag I eco u ntyc ov i d. o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
On Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 1:01 PM Sarah Kaiman <sarahlwolff@gmail,com> wrote:
Hi Jeanne,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
I live right on the border of Eagle and Garfield counties. The proposed Ascendigo development will also affect both
counties, so I am writing both Garfield and Eagle Co contacts.
First of all, the land is zoned rural-residential. If we can't count on zoning to keep these kinds of things out of our
; ãil'êâr I have no confidence in government.
Missouri Heights residents will be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and fire and water concerns. The roads
and infrastructure are not designed to support this development. In fact, the roads leading to the proposed site are
the worst in Missouri Heights and currently have very little traffic. I hear that Ascendigo will not bring any revenue
to help with all of this stuff. That is bewildering. Many wells are already running out of water. The Ascendigo water
use will be huge compared what would be consumed under rural residential use.
, I am very concerned about the change ln character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar rea6ons.
We all sttpport Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this application.
Thanks,
Sarah Kaiman
1253 Kings Row St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
Sarah Kaiman
72A-648-7893
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697692376226031238&simpl=msg-fo/o3A16976923762... 212
412612021
Date: Thu, Apr22,2021 al 10:26 PM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: <eagleadmin@eaglecou nty. us>
Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
Dear Eagle County Admin
I waited to send this letter until I could gather as much info as possible and also see the site
for myself, as Ascendigo offered us a tour of the campus. I was sceptical but wanted to keep
an open mind. After much review, many conversations and reading all the material available,
I realize that my opinion still stands and has in fact, intensified. As good an idea as it is to set
up a camp of this sort, to build the Ascendigo camp in Missouri Heights is quite simply a
terrible proposal and I am in complete opposition of it being built on Missouri Heights.
We have lived in the neighbourhood lor 17 years, on Missouri Heights lor 11 of them.
We have watched the summers get hotter and hotter, we have exper¡enced a few fires, we
were evacuated for one of them. We have had visits to our home from the fire depaftment to
discuss fire mitigation. In other words, we have an understanding of the neighbourhood and
how it works and what has changed recently on account of climate change.
The idea of putting a camp on that site with a road that is not at all easy to access, when fire
is a real issue up here seems crazy. The traffic that Ascendigo will bring will be significant
and were we to need to evacuate, I cannot imagine getting all these children and all
residents out , not to mention fire trucks in. When we took the tour of Ascdingo last week,
one local brought up the fire risks. The person in charge of the tour said, yes, they had
thought of that and could get the kids out in an hour, and even said something about usually
being given one hour to evacuate. That is an absurd, inaccurate assumption. The night we
were evacuated during the Basalt fire, we were awaiting instructions and told that we could
stand down and go to bed, and then sometime around midnight, we got an alarm to tell us
we had 15 minutes to get out!
Speaking of the tour, it seemed they wanted to give us a tour based on what they thought
were the locals' concerns about design. I don't think anybody is terribly concerned with the
design. lt may look great, but not matter how great it looks and no matter how wonderful an
idea it is to provide these children with this facility, there is absolutely no way it belongs up
here! lt seemed the tour guides actually knew this and ducked out of any serious questions
We also found a lot of inconsistencies in their arguments, basing their traffic findings on
current traffic up here over 3 days but saying it was two days.
The concerns of Missouri Heights residents is about traffic, fire risk, water shortages,
and generally turning a quiet rural community into something commercial.
One more point about fire risk. In a recent conversation with the local fire department, I
happened to say something along the lines of if there's a fire this year' and one of the
firemen interrupted me and said, 'lt's not 'if', it's a matter of 'when'. ln other words, our
firefighters were letting us know what to expect. lf one of those fires happens to be up here
with Ascendigo in place, it puts everybody far more at risk. We urge you to review the roads
and current traffic. Even when homes are built on that land, it will be 15 homes at most and
of course, over time, and of course, some of them will end up being second homes and even
if they weren't, 15 homes would still bring in far fewer residents than Ascendigo will bring.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f8Ogd56yis¡¡y=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697859500609534733&simpl=msg-f%3416978595006... 213
4t2qn021 EaglÊ county Govsrnmânl Mell - Fwd: Ascendlgo
I love the idea of this kind of camp. \Men I was a teenager, I worked for a summer on the
east coast at a camp for children with special needs. lt was one of the most fulfilling
experiences of my life. However, the camp's location on Missouri Heights is so wrong on so
many levels and will bring too many risks.
I am thoroughly against this camp in this place and urge you to hear our wishes to move
it elsewhere. I am in constant contact with neighbours up here and I am hearing the same
cries coming from every home.
Sincerely,
Stacey Kent
457 Schooner Lane, Carbonale.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/0341697859500609534733&simpl=msg-fo/03416978595006... 3/3
Steve Cook
263 Caballo St
Carbondale, CO 81623
(970)366-0307
lovero cks.steve@g ma i l. co m
April 19,2O21
Glenn Hartmann
Garfield County Senior Planner
108 8th St., Suite 101
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
ghartm an ncôgarfie ld-county.co m
Re:Ascendigo Ranch Application
Lt pA-01-21-882 6 i PLVA-01-21-8827
Mr. Hartmann,
I have been a resident of Missouri Heights for 15 years and a small business owner in the
Valley over 3O years. I too have a local non-profit, The Love Rocks Foundation whsre wegift rnusical instruments and lessons to youth and those w¡th special needs. lt ls
rewarding to serve our great community through educatlon and music therapy. I feel
Ascendigo Ranch will also add value ts our lirnited community resources ûor speciol
needs. I am writing to you in support of the ranch.
My neighborhood has a unique opportunity to show comp€ssJqn and to support our
community. The ranch will provide much needed servJces for those with gtrêeial needs
and will be in a safe place, enhancing their personal gr.owth, legrnNng and se-datqk]|lg.
After reading the public information about the ranch, tt's clenrtfte¡¡'
Our resources arent in Jeopardy and tfie archltecture and
with our land. Not to mention, I would rather see ã
versus more single famíly McManslons.
I've been here a long time and I know my
neighbors, but it's my hope speaking up will
standard Valley opposition and greed. Why
important and deserving? Change is the only
It's our
Sincere
nce back and contribute!
416t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez(Deaglecounty,us>
Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 1 ,2021 at 5:1 0 PM
Wehaue rrneut Eagle Countg COVID-tq websíte!
For the most recent information, please uisit www.eaglecountycovid.org
Ona Vallay Voico an Facebook
Stag Informed! Signupfor the Co¡ntnunítg Deueloprnent Monthlg.E-JVeroslettet. here.
MorganBeryI
Eaglc County Government
Communþ Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSZ
EAGLECOUNTY
Communlw
Developheñt
Forwarded message
From : Matt Scherr < matt. sche¡r@eaglecounty. us>
Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2021 al9:39 AM
Subject: Re: Ascendigo Proposal
To: Sue <sue3340@gmail.com>
Cc: Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Ascendigo proposal, Sue.
As you mentioned, the project proposal is in Garfield County, so though Eagle County has no approval authority, we do
expect to be providing comment as a referral agency to Garfield County and your input helps to inform our comment,
when that happens. Be sure to comment directly with Garfield County, of course, as they will be deciding whether to
approve the project.
Thanks again for reaching out, Sue.
Matt Scherr
Chai¡ Eagle County Commissioners
970-328-8625 (o)
970-376-4449 (m)
wwweaglecounty.us
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 al l0:02 PM Sue <sue3340@gmail.com> wrote:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881 511001485659&simpl=msg-f%34169588151100.1t2
41612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Proposal
I am writing you to oppose a land use change application submitted to Garfield County by Ascendigo
Autism Services. The purpose of the application is to allow Ascendigo to operate a year-round camp with
lodging, dining, and indoor/outdoor recreational facilities and includes such uses as fund raising events,
short term rentals and seminar space on 126 acres of land in Missouri Heights. I oppose this project
because the development will mark a drastic change from the rural, agricultural, and residential uses in the
immediate neighborhood of Missouri Heights and will pave the way for other non-residential uses to
infiltrate the area.
ln addition, our natural resources are limited, especially in this severe drought which we are currently experiencing.
Water is already dangerously scarce and becoming worse every year due to climate changes change. Muddy wells and
rationing are already a reality throughout Missouri Heights.
Fire is a constant threat in our area, especially with the notorious winds we have in Missouri Heights. Evacuation was
stressful enough during the Lake Christine fire and more recently from the threat of evacuation from the Grizzly Creek
fire. Evacuating 100+ staff and children from a remote area accessed by dirt roads is not comparable to evacuation
from more easily accessible areas. Everyone agrees that Ascendigo's mission is worthwhile and that their clients
deserve a special facility. But this is simply the wrong location for the reasons provided above, and for many more
which are too numerous to list here. Another rural residential community has rejected a previous proposal. We believe
finding a location on the valley floor with better access to water and emergency services, and with better egress is more
appropriate as well as safer for everyone involved.
i will add that I have also been dismayed at the disingenuousness of the proposers of this development. Please do not
allow this blatantly commercial enterprise to encroach upon the fragile environment that is Missouri Heights
Sue Craver
861 Green Meadow Drive
Missouri Heights
Carbondale
970-963-7036
Sent from my iPad
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341695881511001485659&simpl=msg-f%34169588151100... 212
4t12t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Ascendigo Camp Proposal
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <krls.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Ascendigo Camp Proposal
2 messages
Susan Guseo <scoutqzo@gmail.com> Mon, Apr 12,2021 at 9:57 AM
To: morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us
Cc: morgan.landers@eaglecounty.us, kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us, steve.oconnor@eaglecounty.us
226 Kings Row
Carbondale CO 81623
April5,2021
Dear Community Development Director Morgan Beryl, Planners Morgan Landers, Kris Valdez and Steve O'Connor,
The proposed Ascendigo Camp construction is of great concern to me as a longtime resident of
this immediate area. Reading various opinion pieces that support this proposed commercial development I understand
the camp's value but my opposition is not about opinion or autism itself but facts pertaining to our fragile locale.
Since examining our Garfield County Land Use Codes, I find this Ascendigo proposal to violate General Approval
Ständärds 7-103 rêqulrlng the proposal be compatible with adjacent land uses which this proposal clearly violates.
Adjacent are single family homes and ranches in a rural setting. There are no commercial operations even close to the
scope of the Ascendigo proposal.
The very next Standard ,7-104, describes what is required to demonstrate adequate water supply for the development.
My contention is that there is not an adequate water supply for the buildings and residents let alone their dream of a 2
acre pond. That plan in itself proves the lack of knowledge by the planners. The current residents here would prefer to
have that water to drink and, with ongoing well failures, we visualize that as a very real threat.
And then there is fire suppression! As stated in 7-109, Adequate Fire Protection is required. I have lived in this immediate
neighborhood since 1980 and have been threatened by 4 fires, evacuated twice. And two of those fires we have
experienced in just the last 3 years, 2018 and 2020. With ongoing drought and nätionally lncreaslng wlldflres, "Adequate
Fire Protection" may be an impossibility and that should preclude any intense development with very limited access. And I
refer to 7-20618 which requires the development not to increase potential hazard. Ascendigo's plan clearly does not meet
this requirement.
Also I feel very strongly it is not the right of a new business to develop in a previously commercial-free area and
supersede the rights of established area residents. This proposal is a direct threat to the well-being of your constituents
Very Sincerely,
Susan Cuseo
https://ma¡l.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1696850825974731471&simpl=msg-f%3416968508259.1t2
4t'12t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Eagle County Needs to get behind ¡ts residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
EAGLE COUNTY
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Eagle Gounty Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Not sure if you have this original one yet.
Mon, Apr 12,2021 at 8:56 AM
Wehsue ønew Eagle County COVlD-tgwebsíte!
For the most recent information, please uisít www.eaglecountycovid.org
One Valley Voice on Fqcebook
Ste4S hTformed! Sìgnupfar the Cotnmtuútg Deuelopment Monthly -E-Àtrer¡rsleff er here.
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) qzo-qzt-gssz
EAGLE COUNTY
communi[y
Development
Fonruarded message
From: susan sullivan <sullisooz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Eagle County Needs to get behind its residents and Keep MOHeights Rural!
To: M att Scherr <matt. scherr@eaglecou nty. us>
Cc: Karen Moculeski <kkis1@aol.com>, Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
HiMatt:
I was reading Ascendigo's pre-application today. Eagle County is not listed on the (admittedly non-exhaustive) list of
referral agencies. How do we ensure that Eagle County has a seat at the table?
"c. Referral Agencies: May include but are not limited to:
County Attorney,
County Building Department,
Carbondale Fire Protection District,
CDPHE for Water System,
Division of Water Resources,
Town of Carbondale,
County Road and Bridge,
County Vegetation Manager,
County Environmental Health,
County Consulting Enginee¡
CPW and
BLM''
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1696847019430622862&simpl=msg-f%3416968470194 1t2
4t12t202'l Eagle County Govemment Mail - Fwd: Eagle County Needs to get behind its residônts and Keep MoHeights Rurall
Also I'd like to refer you to üur website ful nrore information on your constituenfs positions.
Thank you,
Susan
lQuoted text h¡dden]
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-foÁ341696847019430622862&simpl=msg-f%3416968470194... 2t2
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Development in Missouri Heights
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Development in Missouri Heights
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To : Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Mon, Apr 26,2021 at 9:18 AM
Stag Infol'tned! Sígnup.fot. the Convnunity Deuelopntent Monthly E-Newsletter here.
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gzo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSz
EAGLE COUNTY
communiw
Developñeñt
Fonruarded message
From: Sylvia Wendrow <sdwjds@yahoo. com>
Date: Fri, Apr23, 2021 at 6:12 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Development in Missouri Heights
To: sbower@garfield-county.com <sbower@garfíeld-county.com>, ghartmann@garfield-county.com
<ghartmann@garfield-county.com>, jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>,
morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Dear Garfield and Eagle County officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
Although this propefi is in Garfìeld County and the planning department there will make the decision, Eagle County
will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents of both counties be affected by traffic, noise, light
pollution and fire and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal services will be called upon given the proximity
to the property. It's right on the county line, From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even
maintenance of our road infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles - and there is no
revenue coming with it to mitigate costs associated with those issues, This is not simply a Garfield County matter but
also an Eagle County problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
The potential drain on our water is of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more drought every year' We
are seeing the effects of climate change, And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and animals
from that single road access point should we have another fire. The alternative subdivision of homes would be
developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location.
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341698116755519182771&simpl=msg-fþ/o34169811675551"' 112
412612021 Eagle County Govemment Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Development in Missouri Heights
I support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this spec¡fic location is not approprlate nor is it safe. I
èncouraEè Garfield County to reject this application.
Sylvia Wendrow
85 Prince Dr.
Carbondale CO 81623
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f/o341698116755519182771&simpl=msg-fþ/o34169811675551 ... 212
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
G Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecou nty. us>
Fri, Apr 23,2021 at 8:41 AM
Stag InfornrecfJ Sign upfor. the Contnunity Developntent Mottthlg E-Newsletter here.
MorgonBeryl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-q21,-gssz
EAGLE COUNW
Community
Developmeñt
Fonruarded message
From: Tanja Duffey <yukonastro@sopris.net>
Date: Thu, Apr22,2021 at 9:31 PM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
Hello Morgan,
Please read attached letter
Thank you.
Tanja and David Duffey
Carbondale, CO 81623
Email: yukonastro@sopris.net
Cell: 970-704-9966
rÐ Ascendigo Morgan Beryl.docx
19K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f8Ogdb&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A'1697842608995294725&simpl=msg-f%3416978426089... 111
Tanja and David Duffey
0220 Sam Grange Ct.
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-704-9966 I 97 0-922-9444
yukonastro@sopris. net
April22,2021
Dear Morgan Beryl,
We are writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While we recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. will make the decision,
Eagle County will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise,
light pollution and fire and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal services will be called upon
given the proximity to thc property. lt's right on the county line. From road accidents to fire and health
emergencies, and even maintenance of our road infrastructure, this project brings significant increased
activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue coming with it to mitigate costs associated with those
issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter. lt will be an Eagle County problem and those of us
who live in Missouri Heights do not want this.
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more drought
every year. We are seeing the effects of climate change. And imagine the evacuation of 100 people;
including children and animals from that single road access point should we have another fire. The
alternative subdivision of homes would be developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is
much morc compatible with the location. Let's keep the visual continuity of homes and the existing
zoning in place.
We are very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open
the door to future commercial endeavors. We met with Jeff Richardson and his co-workers on 4119121, on
location for a tour. Here are our concerns of that day:
1. He claimed that the staff would be encouraged to stay on campus, however, we all know,
especially in the wake of Covid-19 no one wants to be isolated anymore. These college students
(staff) will be going up and down our Eagle County road. They may or may not be typical college
students but we all know what most do especially on the weekends.
2. Harmony road currently is nothing but pot holes, would this facility pay for its improvement and
maintenance? Signage, drainage, asphalt, etc. There is no fast escape on Harmony Rd as it is
now, unless you are willing to damage your vehicle.
3. Delivery trucke such ae "Cisco Food Company'' or "Shamrook Foods" or others are generally
bobtail box trucks which are slow going up and down hills. This will undoubtedly cause traffic
back-ups both up and down the hill from El Jebel, this will be most frustrating to local residents to
get caught behind one of these trucks. This too can be a potential cause for accidents if people
are impatient and pass these trucks around the curves. Then there is winter driving conditions to
consider and the deer that hang out along Upper Cattle Creek Rd.
4. Emergency evacuations: Jeff's response was that their "campers" don't drive so they all get into
vans or buses to leave which is more efficient and fewer vehicles on the road. However,
depending upon the type of autism and everybody reacts differently l'm pretty sure autistic people
like routines and an emergency will not be part of their daily routine. An evacuation can infact be
slowed down because some individuals may become aggressive, disruptive, have a breakdown
etc. and will be more difficult to get them to join the rest of the campers. Some could act out and
scream and cause others normally calm to get upset and raise anxiety.
5. What if Ascendigo's contracts with their clients fall through? They will be scrambling to find any
type of business or event to come in to help make their mortgage payment. I really feel this could
and would open the door to more commercial businesses in Missouri Heights. Lets keep
Missouri Heights Rural and keep the traffic on the valley floor.
We all support Ascendigo's work and their mission, but building it in this specific location is not
appropriate nor is it safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield County to reject this
application.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely
Tanja and David Duffey
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecorrnty,us>
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty. us>
Thu, Apr 22,202'l at 8:17 AM
Stay Inf,ortrred! Sign upfor the Convnunítg Deuelopnwnt Monthly Ë-lVerusletter here.
MorgønBergl
Eaglc County Covcrnmcnt
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSS
EAGLE COUNTY
Commùn¡tu
Dev¡lopm¡Át
Forwarded message
l- rom: Tobias <toby. munk@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 22,202'l at 3:19 AM
Subject: Ascendigo
To: <jeanne.mcqueeney@aaglecounty. u8>, <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Dear Jeanne, dear Morgan,
I have attached a letter to you stating my concern as an Eagle County resident concerning the commercial development
that is before the Garfield County BOCC.
Please intervene to the best of your abilities for the Eagle County residents like me that will be gravely effected by this
non conforming use of land bordering Eagle County. All of this is going down in a residential area.
Thanks you for your efforts,
Tobias Munk
Ë Letter to Eagle Gounty.pdf
1 88K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/o?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/03A1697750500761089945&simpl=msg-f%3416977505007... 111
Save Missouri Heights
Take action r,uith Garfield Count2
Tobias Munk
3BB Sunrise Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623 (Eagle County)
Owner of'
TBD Harmony Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623 (Garfield County)
22. Apríl2021
EAGLE COUNTY COLORADO INTERVENTION
WITH GARFIELD COUNTY COLORADO
Dear Eagle County officials,
I am pleading with you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights
and actively engage with Garfield County to deny the Ascendigo use change
application.
Eagle County will be greatly negatively impacted by this commercial
development.
TRAFIC:
The property in question is currently permitted for 13 residential dwellings. As
there is a high rate of second homeownership this will generate a minimal
amount of traffic compared to the 200+ peak day movements that Ascendigo
has proposed. Also the Ascendigo numbers are just the staft as the propefty
will undergo further development once the cat is out of the bag.
NOISE:
This is a commercial development under the disguise of a land use change as
an "educational facility" The noise levels in a 100o/o agricultural/residential area
will be unlike anything we have now. Delivery traffic on a hourly/daily basis.
Emergency vehicles will be called upon on an almost daily basis according to
Ascendigo.
FIRE SAFETY:
The facility for autistic people will be placed right on the ridge down to the
Highway 82 corridor. This is an area that very frequently experiences high
winds. The past has shown that the fire danger in Missouri Heights is high.
This setting is extremely vulnerable to rapid fires racing up the hillside. Autistic
children have been shown in studies to show a wide spectrum of reactions to
danger, Some of which will go into hiding in the case of fires. Children have
even been repofted to walking back into a burning building and dying. The
location is therefore unsuitable from a safety standpoint as well.
EAGLE COUNTY COLORADO INTERVENTION
WITH GARFIELD COUNTY COLORADO 2
ACCESS:
The propefi has only one access point, Harmony Lane to Fender. Sunset Lane
is a private road and will be closed in the event of this commercial
development getting approval. My lot has granted White Cloud an easement
for residential development. I intend to enforce this easement and Ascendigo
therefore has only one access point for their development and I believe that is
not permissable.
WATER:
The resources are already stressed. This commercial development should also
be denied on the basis of not having adequate water resources and the
commercial activity is likely to consume multiples of residential water use.
SERVICES:
Eagle County municipal services will be called upon given the proximity to the
propefi. All this with no tax revenue to Eagle County nor Gaffield County.
RURAL RESIDENTIAL:
The area in Missouri Heights is exclusively Agricultural and Residential. The
majority of people living here opposed a commercialization of the land use.
Which is what Ascendigo is proposing. It is NOT an educational facility it is a
recreational (not for profit) COMMERCIAL undertaking.
Please weigh in and voice the concerns of Eagle County residents.
Best regards,
Tobias Munk
EAGLE COUNTY COLORADO INTERVENTION
WITH GARFIELD COUNTY COLORADO 3
4t26t2021 Eagle County Goverñment Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Mon, Apr 19,2021 at 4:31 PM
Stag Infornted! Sìgnupfor the Contmunítg Deuelopntent Monthlg E-Neusletter here,
Il[ot'gut Bergl
Englc County Covcrnment
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gzo-+Zt-gSgS
Forwarded message
Frotn: Jeanne McQueeney {jeantte, t r rcqueerrey@eagleL:ounty. u$Þ
Date: Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM
Subject: Re:Ascendigo
To: Lorraine Ferro <lbferro320O@gmail.com>, Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Lorraine,
Thank you for sharing your comments and concerns regarding the Ascendigo proposal. I will be sure they are reviewed
as part of the file when we have the opportunity to provide comments as a referral agency.
Stay well.
Jeanne McQueeney
Commissioner
We have a new Eagle County COVID-19 website! For the most recent information, please
v is it www.eag I eco u ntyc ov i d. o rg
One Valley Voice on Facebook
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 al8:45 AM Lorraine Ferro <lbferro3200@gmail.com> wrote:
Good morning everyone,' As a year round resident of Fox Run in Missouri Heights I would like to voice my concerns regarding the potential
Ascendigo project just a few blocks away. While this may be a facility that will promote a good cause our quiet
residential community is very much the wrong location, The impacts that we will see from a large project like this one is
not something that should be in a residential area. The negative effects that it would bring to our residential community
in traffic, water usage, noise, light pollution, concentrated population and greater chances of wildfire incidents far
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697509789080680658&simpl=msg-fo/03416975097890... 112
G
EAGLECOUNW
Community
Developmeñt
4t26t2021 Eagle County Govemment Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo
outwe¡gh the positives of the proposed project. Mlssouri Heights is a residential community and not a place for
commercial business. I know you are all reviewing this project very closely and I hope you will take our community's
r concerns seriously.
Respectfully,
Tom and Lorraine Ferro
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697509789080680658&simpl=msg-f%3416975097890... 212
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: White Cloud and Harmony Lane Future
EAGLE COUNTY Kris Valdez <krle.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: White Gloud and Harmony Lane Future
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Wed, Apr 21,2021 at2:54 PM
Stc,g Infornred! Sign upfor the ConlrnunÍt1¡ Deuelopntent Monthlg E-Netusletter here.
Morgun Bergl
Dagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.Sz8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-+zt-gsss
EAGLE COUNTY
Community
Dçyçlopmçnt
Fonruarded mêssãgê
From: Pam Lugo <pam_lugo@reyray.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 21,2021 at 8:07 AM
Subject: White Cloud and Harmony Lane Future
To: <ghartmann@garfield-county.com>, <sbower@garfield-county.com>, <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>,
<morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>, <keepmohrural@gmail.com>
Dear Commissioners and decision makers,
I live at 15 White Cloud Road and I am writing to urge you to reject the application Ascendigo has submitted for their
proposed year-round program and summer camp. Overall, this program, although legally a 501c3 non-profit, operates as
a commercial venture much too large for this quiet rural residential neighborhood. I agree strongly that commercial
development will begin in Missouri Heights if Ascendigo is allowed to develop.
I purchased this home with the expectation the residential subdivision would be developed over time as moderate growth
happens typically, and I would have neighbors. I did not expect it would become an area with commercial operation with
larger structures, heavy traffic, over 100 people there regularly. These things would forever change the character of this
area and pose concerns relating to fire and evacuation, wate¡ noise, traffic and more.
I agree that Ascendigo is a worthy cause, and there must be locations on the valley floor that are more attractive with
much easier access to services needed.
Please vote NO to the Ascendigo application.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/o341697684920092905667&simpl=msg-f%3416976849200.112
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: \Mtite Cloud and Harmony Lane Future
Respectfully submitted,
Tommy Barras
TBarras Letterjpg
1107K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/g?ik=db69f809db&v¡ew=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-fo/03A1697684920092905667&simpl=msg-f%3416976849200. '. 212
,, | ,':,,:' i',.'."), ;i/t ,ii/:','l .,"\1...'.t'' I lJIil rr ¡ f rr I lp, I irìier,{1 ¡ ¡ li ¡ ¡ r,r:.rl r,+,t":_ iiir(oìf il::iiìl¡olri[:; ir¡1ôj. ij]rt(,;i:,r:\/i'r:r.l.llllr 'oli OìNlcr¡4ı11'rri--.1::ì:i.l¡-, 1j"trij(1i!ì[rl/^\r lLltolt!(:rf{¡¡1 lolul:r'.Jl[:jìu((ùÉ]\.':ìll]rl.tJ-q(o)1..jt ¿lrì.:{(lli'1, /'l;ii i. ri li )r 'r.Ji:lrr)tl(i;ll¡;¡:' 1;'tl'¡, r .)l ir.ìI r '1,;:l: r^,, II t.. I:til lrlLii¡,tr r¡,,illi.ìLl(0. iil,;{rÌl¿; ÏoÌr:' I l¡r rtil'ì"'¡
4t26t202'l Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Against the Ascendigo proposal
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
EAGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Against the Ascendigo proposal
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
To: Kris Valdez < kris.valdez@ea glecounty. us>
Mon, Apr 26,2021at 9:18 AM
Stag Infortned! Sígnupfor the Ccnnrnunitg Deuelopntent Monthlg -ð-l/erusletter here.
MorganBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) 97o.328.875o
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSg
EAGLE COUNTY
Communiw
Developmeñt
Fon¡varded message
From: Tony Popish <twpopish@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2021 al6:03 PM
Subject: Against the Ascendigo proposal
To: <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>, <keepmohrural@gmail.com>,
<ghartmann@garfield-county.com>, <sbower@garfield-county. com>
Dear Eagle and Garfield County officials,
I am writing to encourage you to oppose the Ascendigo proposal in Missouri Heights.
While I recognize that this property is in Garfield County and the planning dept. there will make the decision, Eagle
CounÇ will certainly be negatively impacted. Not only will residents be affected by traffic, noise, light pollution and fire
and water concerns, but the Eagle County municipal seruices will be called upon given the proximity to the propefi.
It's right on the county line. From road accidents to fire and health emergencies, and even maintenance of our road
infrastructure, this project brings significant increased activity and vehicles - and there is no revenue coming with it to
mitigate costs associated with those issues. This is not simply a Garfield County matter, It will be an Eagle County
problem and those of us who live in Missouri Heights do not want this,
The potential drain on our water is also of great concern. We seem to be facing more and more drought every year.
We are seeing the effects of climate change, And imagine the evacuation of 100 people, including children and
animals from that single road access point should we have another fire. The alternative subdivision of homes would be
developed over time and would bring fewer impacts and is much more compatible with the location,
I am very concerned about the change in character to our rural, quiet area and believe this would open the door to
future commercial endeavors. This was tried once before in Eagle County and rejected for similar reasons.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341698116738520104139&simpl=msg-f7o34169811673852.-- 112
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Against the Ascendigo proposal
We all support Ascendigo's work and'their mission, but building it in this specific location is not appropriate nor is it
safe. Please do what you can to encourage Garfield CÕunty to reject thls application.
As a final note.
I have been through 3 wildfire evacuations in 30+ years of living on Missouri Heights, and feel lucky to have escaped
each time. \Â/ith more and more people up here, l'm not sure if our luck will continue to hold out.
Thank you for your attention,
Tony Popish
l44ElkRange Drive
Mo. Hts.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%34'1698116738520104139&simpl=msg-fþ/o34169811673852...212
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Mctoria Stulgis - Eagle County Resident - Voiced Opposition to Ascendigo
EAGLE COUNTY
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: Victoria Stulgis - Eagle County Resident - Voiced Opposition to Ascendigo
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To : Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@ea glecounty. us>
Fri, Apr 23,2021 at 8:54 AM
Stay Tnfetrrned! Sígnup.for the Contmunity Developntettt Monthly -E--Verosletter here.
MorgønBergl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.¡z8.8ZSo
(c) gzo-qzt-gsss
EAGLE COUNTY
CommuniW
Developmeñt
Fon¡varded message
F rom : Vi ctoria Stul gis <victoria. stul gis@ gmail. com>
Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2021 al8:49 AM
Subject: Victoria Stulgis - Eagle County Resident - Voiced Opposition to Ascendigo
To: <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecou nty.us>, <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Dear Commissioner McQueeney and Director Beryl,
I've lived in Missouri Heights a little over three years. I moved out to Colorado from the East Coast, and I chose to live
here because I love this rural community, its incredible mountain views, the feeling like you could be in the middle of
nowhere, acreage for my dogs to run and for my yaks and donkeys to graze.
Missouri Heights is special in that it sits above the valley floor. As far as the eye can see, there are incredible mountains,
but also rural residential and agricultural ranÖhes. Homes of all shapes and sizes, on lots between 2 - 36 acres. These
are all single family homes. People who have chosen this bucolic rural landscape as their home.
ln my career, I work with institutional property owners (commercial real estate companies) - to install onsite solar across
their portfolios, so I am familiar with commercial development. \Mat Ascendigo is proposing, while they are a
commendable organization with a worthy cause, is commercial development in both the scope and proposed impact of
their operations. They are a tax-exempt non-profit because they engage in activities for both public and private interest
without the pursuit of profit, but having worked for two non-profits, Richard Branson's climate change non-profit, the
Carbon War Room, as well as the Rocky Mountain lnstitute, I am well aware that well-run nonprofits conduct their
activities much the same as a commercial business would.
I attended the first zoom meeting with Ascendigo's consultant. The buildings proposed are beautiful, and the 8-week
summer camp sounded like a welcome alternative to the development of the property into 15 homes (not the 21 that
Ascendigo continues to claim). As the plans have developed, however, I took the time to read the application, and what I
learned was a very different story, and I now strongly oppose this intrusion in our quiet neighborhood. I ask you - does
this sound rural residential, or commercial?
. 12 weeks of intense camp and additional weeks at smaller capacity
https://maif .google.com/mail/u/O?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697843434691547609&simpl=msg-f%3416978434346...1t2
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd:Vìctoria Stulgis - Eagle County Resident - Voiced Opposition to Ascendigo
. 94 parking spots. Multiple buildings that house 24 - 48 residents. A 6,800 sqft building where up to 100 people will eat, and a 14,000 sqft activity barn. Perhaps I was most surprised to learn that in non-summer months, they still plan to have daily commuters for a
variety of therapy and group training programs and workslrops, and many clients coming and going each way. Significant increase in traffic with trucks, vans, buses and cars
No one is against Ascendigo and what they do. Their mission is admirable, their program well reputed and very
worthwhile. But their scope is too large an operation for our neighborhood given its rural residential character, limited to
one dirt road ln and out, challenged acoess to emergèncy servlces, notorlous wlnds up here thât not only make flre rlskler,
but are also not conducive for the outdoor activities they are planning. A program like Ascendigo's should be on the valley
floor, where they have better access to all services, emergency, water, telephone and broadband, and won't bring
unprecedented traffic and noise into a quiet neighborhood.
Best,
Victoria Stulgis
220 Harmony Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
"'ll.s*i,ùÞñå.
Victoria Stulgis
US: +1 617 943 9626
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697843434691547609&simpl=msg-f%3416978434346... 212
412612021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Land Use Change Application
Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us>
E.AGLE COUNTY
Fwd: Ascendigo Land Use Change Application
1 message
Morgan Beryl <morgan. beryl@eaglecounty. us>
To: Kris Valdez <kris.valdez@ea glecou nty. us>
Fri, Apr 23,2021 at 4:56 PM
Stoy Infornredt Sign upfor the Convnunity Deuelopntent Mottthlg E-Newsletter here.
MorganBetgl
Eagle County Government
Community Development Director
(o) gZo.gz8.8ZSo
(c) gZo-+Zt-gSSZ
EAGLECOUNTY
Commun¡N
DevelopmeÁt
Fonryarded message
From: William Niro <billniro@icloud.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2O21 at 2:20 PM
Subject: Ascendigo Land Use Change Application
To: <jeanne.mcqueeney@eaglecounty.us>, <morgan.beryl@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: <ghartmann@garfield-county.com>, <sbower@garfield-county.com>, <keepmohrural@gmail.com>,
<ksbannerot@gmail.com>, Wlliam L. Niro <wniro@agdglaw.com>, CHERYL NIRO <cheryl.niro@mac.com>
Please see the attached letter and exhibits. Your thoughtful consideration is appreciated
William Niro
4 Sunrise Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
708-383-9724
billniro@mac.com
5 attachments
IMG_09l2.jpeg
141K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=db69f809db&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%341697873751733668459&simpl=msg-Í'/o3A16978737517 ... 112
4t26t2021 Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: Ascendigo Land Use Change Application
IMG_09l3jpeg
147K
IMG_0914jpeg
I 56K
Ë Letter to Eagle Co.pdf
71K
Ë 2018 Nonprofit Explorer - ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES ING - Full Filing - ProPublica.pdf
837K
nRln ¡*{li
L
Hü[t
t{0
TT[RU
F
t
ATE.
t,{:rit
t'
.::..,.tI\t+-
F*
- .-l',1
,)
" r'_¡. r..iç .'
t ':.1:;,1 '' ,r ;' .,
', ''i
'..'.',
r
i.;
¡
.J
,-.,..d
:
,l
.5r ,!.:
'',.¡ ,
'l
n l'.
.." {.
'i
.:¡ ,
t
William L. Niro
4 Sunrise Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
April 23,2027
Dear Fellow Eagle County Residents, Public Officials and Employees
I am writing to ask you to formally oppose the Ascendigo Autism Services, Inc.,
Lancl LIse Change application to Garfield County Commissioners for the proposed
Camp in Missouri lleights.
Although this property is located in Garfield County and the Garfield County
Board will make the decision, Eagle County and Eagle County residents will bear
the brunt of the adverse consequences from the proposed use. The property in
question borders on Eagle County at Harmony Lane and Fender Road...essential
ingress and egress tþom the site. Three critical impacts deserve your attention-
traffic, road use and water ( as well as fire risk).
From road use to fire and health ernergenuies, and maintenance of roatl
infrastructure, this project brirrgs signiticant incrcasccl activity ancl vohiclcs. Eagle
County municipal services will be called upon given the proximity to the property
whose main access will be via El Jebel Road, Upper Cattle Creek Road and Fender
Road. The applicant's own traffic report says there will be an increase of 450
motor vehicle movements to and from the site per day. No revenue to mitigate the
costs associated with those uses will be paid to Eagle County. This is not simply a
Garfield County matter. The consequences will be deeply felt in Eagle County and
the residents of Missouri Heights.
To give a perspective, the applicants traffrc study concludes that a 50Yo increase in
traffic will occur on Paseo Drive ( which Eagle County maintains) and Sunset Lane
( a private road ) providing access to Harmony Lane and the applicant site. I have
attached a photo of the entry to Sunset, and two photos takcn 4/23 showing the
impact ofjust this winter's use. (see 3 photos attached)
The potential impact on our well water supply system is obvious and the predicted
drought conditions likely to exacerbate the problem. The current subdivision for
homes ( with are tìrlly provided with utilities) would be developed over time, result
less intense impact, is much more compatible with the location,
While Ascendogo has characterizedthe operation as an "educational enterprise" in
order to achieve "limited impact review" under Garfield County Code, it is in
reality a commercial enterprise, generating $2 million of service revenue with
more recreation than education activities. (see attached Form 990 filing). I was
informed that the applicant attempted a similar proposal in in Eagle County and
was rejected for similar reasons.
While I support Ascendigo's work and their mission, building a year-round
outdoor intensive recreational commercial facility it in this specific location is not
appropriate.
I respectfully ask that you consider the impact on Eagle County and on Eagle
County residents and property and weigh in on this proposal to encourage the
Garfield County Board to reject the application.
Respectfully,
llVilliam Niro/
4 Sunrise Lane
Carbondale/lvlissouri Hts, CO 81623
::-..'.'....ì;:T--_--
:i--
-:f=!=:=-
r!r5-
liraF¡_,lEi
"tÆæ
:,+:
@.tu-_-'-====Ë
-==EEæ:: - :-::=;:
:æ.m
.+-É
:
:_1_ E
'ffiff
:É::- U!
_: k
æ
æ ffim*rr..='...::.l:.ljJHJt+
=........j..].+}Hl*+
'+Fæ
+:=-
-
ll¡lËh
fl-"
I-l#
¡-É t
l= FF-----r----
t:g I
=Ëf-t ]-
t4
¡:æ
.i=Ëæe-df
äii;:-:-r
{.=
æ¡+*-".äJ
_: - ---Èæ:æ
--*:-::
_r-:
!-::,r:: ::
+
_Þ
¡:=.+-ts
tu
-
;Jæj¡r
_____+J_H_
__t---]_+.]_---.'|----+_
ffi
=____l----l-!|---]---_|-
-ffi¡G=;l
--
*MARCH 2O2L OPPOSITION UPDATE* fTom *KEEP M]SSOUR] HE]GHTS RURAL"
www. keepmohrural- . com
ASCENDIGO PROPOSAL _ GREAT PROGRAM - VüRONG LOCATION
MYTHS vs. REALITY
1. Ascendigo uias initial-ly described as a quiet non-profit 8-week
sunìmer camp.
Rather, it has since been described by Ascendigo's COO and in their
proposal as "intense use": as an overnight camp for 24 residents and
50+ staff, running May - Sept, and hol-ding conferences, special
events, fundraisers, weekly drop off dinners with up to 100 guests,
and other activities with future planned winter usage, likely simifar
in nature.
2. Ascendigo has prepared a "limited impact" study based on ít fitting
an "educational" usage for zoni-ng.
In reality Ascendigo does NOT meet the criteria of "educational" usaqe
- it is not affiliated with an academic institution. This is a camp
with lodging that intends to use the facilities for a broad range of
non-educational- uses including offering short-term rentals for
visitors to nearby Aspen.
3. iiüater use has been carefully planned to not exceed usage from 13
approved homesites.
This procfamation appears near impossible given the weekly turnover of
campers, plus water usage for cleaning linens, maintaining a
commercial kitchen, and recreational- needs for ball fields and
equestrian facilities, including a proposed "pond" and ice-skating
rink. l{ater is already dangerously scarce and becoming hlorse every
year from climate change. Muddy wells and rationing are already a
reality throughout MOH.
4. Traffic and Noise and other impacts wil-l be minimal.
Ascendigo has provided traffic figures stating that approx. 450
vehicle trips per day can be expected on peak days. Yikes ! Garbage
trucks, caterers, del-iveries, visitors, staf f , equestrian trail-ers...
that's a fot of noise, dust, light and pollution. That is a far cry
from some 13 homes (built over time - some likely on doubfe fots - and
perhaps not aIl full-time residences), would generate along Fender,
Harmony and Sunset and the other nearby roads. Al-so of concern is the
expected average of 3 emergency vehicles per week.
5. Fire hydrants and fire mitigation plans should quell fire danger
and evacuation concerns.
Ascendigo is proposing a highly concentrated number of people (100+)
to inhabit the site during the most fire-prone season' endangering
both themsel-ves and the community. Evacuation would need to happen in
a short window, including the equestrian trail-ers. Evacuating 100+
staff and chil-dren is not comparable to less densely populated
neighborhood homes. And with the notorious winds we have in Missouri
Heights, fire controf is mostly handled by aircraft. Evacuation was
stressful enough during the Lake Christine fire and from the threat of
evacuation more recently, from the Grizzly Creek fire.
OTHER KEY CONCERNS. Ascendigo, given its non-profit status, has applied for exemption
from property taxes, but private homes would pay taxes. ff an
exemption is granted, this coul-d mean a loss of revenue to Garfield
County of close to or more than $100,000 PER YEAR as compared to the
already approved 13-home neighborhood.
. This deveÌopment would create a permanent long-term change in
character ts this area. Many speculate it wc,uld sígnificantly decrease
real- estate val-ues, Of most concern is that it woul-d create a nev¡
precedent for inviting other commercial, ill-fitting developments to
this residential- rural area. There is a reason and purpose for
established zoning rules and GARCO's Comprehensive PIan. This proposed
development cloes not comply with either nor woulri there be any
oversight once established. They could expand and increase these
already significant impacts. As it is, the facts have loeen changing -
and there has been little consistency or transparency since Ascendigo
purchased this property.
]N SUMMARY, EVERYONE AGREES THAT ASCEND]GO' S MISSION IS VüORTHWH]LE AND
NEEDED AND THAT THEIR CLIENTS DESERVE A SPECIAL FACILITY. BUT THIS IS
S]MPLY THE VIRONG LOCAT]ON FOR THE REASONS PROV]DED ABOVE. ANOTHER
F.URAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY HAS REJECTED A PREVIOUS PROPOSA,L. VIE
RFIT,TF]VE FTND]NC A LOCATION ON THE VALLEY FLOOR VüITH BETTER AÇCESS TO
VüATER AND ALL SERVICESI PROTECTED FROM THE I/{IND, AND WITH BETTER
EGRESS IS MORE APPROPRIATE AS I/üELL AS SAFER FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED.
For more information, visit www.KeepMOHRural-.com and find us on
GIenn Hartmann
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
x
noreply@formstack.com
Monday, September 28,2020 4:19 PM
Glenn Hartmann
lExternall Garfield County website inquiry - Senior Planner
Subject: Ascendigo DeveloPment
Name: Kirk Hartley
Email. kirkhartley@gmail. com
Phone Number. (970) 319-8625
Message: Mr. Hartmann,
I am writing to you today to respectfully state our opposition to the proposed Ascendigo development in
Missouri Héignis. The nature and intensity of the proposed development does not comport with the purpose of
the Ruralzoñed district of our neighborhood. lt is commercial in nature and detracts from the existing large-lot
residential character of the surrounding area. lt is not an "educational use" under the Land Use code. The
existing land uses and development pattern in this part of Garfield County & Eagle County are rural in
characier and consist of large lot single-family residences. The intensive land use of the development is not
compatible with the existing, rural development pattern and land use and the non-residential nature of the
proposed use will result in intense and increased traffic use, noise, light, water, tire hazards, and wastewater
impacts. While we support the general mission of Ascendigo, we believe the proposed development site is not
the correct fit for such a massive commercial undertaking.
Thank you for your consideration